BONUS EPISODE - Jen Wilkin, The Gospel Coalition, & Public School “Debate”
Episode Stats
Harmful content
Misogyny
10
sentences flagged
Toxicity
10
sentences flagged
Hate speech
88
sentences flagged
Summary
The Gospel Coalition released a Good Faith Debate between Jen Wilkin, Pennington, and another Christian on whether or not Christian parents should allow their kids to attend public schools. What does that mean and how does it affect our understanding of baptism and the New Covenant?
Transcript
00:00:00.000
All right, listen, guys. I get it. Many of you are unable to financially support this ministry
00:00:04.680
because you're spending your cash and your lives on raising young children in the fear and admonition
00:00:09.940
of the Lord. Praise God for you and that endeavor. However, algorithms are a thing. Shadow banning,
00:00:17.100
sadly, is a thing. And one major way that you can help to expand the reach and effectiveness of
00:00:23.460
this ministry that doesn't cost you a dime is by spending just a few moments leaving us
00:00:28.960
a five-star review. Also, perhaps even more effective than that, you can share our podcast
00:00:35.280
with a friend. We hope you'll take the time to do so. Thank you so much. God bless.
00:00:40.640
Hi, this is Pastor Joel Webin with Right Response Ministries, and I'm doing a quick
00:00:44.700
live video right now. It's Tuesday. I typically don't go live and do videos like this on just a
00:00:51.440
random day of the week, but I couldn't let this one slide. Yesterday, the Gospel Coalition released
00:00:56.720
a good faith debate between Jen Wilkin and Jonathan Pennington, Jen Wilkin and Jonathan
00:01:04.520
Pennington over the topic of whether or not Christian parents should utilize public schools
00:01:10.460
for their children, whether or not Christian parents should send their kids to public state-run
00:01:17.480
schools. And the first thing that I want to say, I'm going to play a couple clips from the debate,
00:01:21.720
Just two very brief clips, both coming from Jen Wilkin and her position, her arguments.
00:01:28.040
It's not really an argument, but her position that she conveys.
00:01:33.080
I'm going to break them down and give you my thoughts.
00:01:34.720
But before, I just want to address this concept of a good faith debate.
00:01:39.200
I'm not saying that it's fallacious or it's ridiculous on every account, but I do think
00:01:43.720
that it is not the proper phrase to be used in this context.
00:01:48.640
Let me give you an example of a good faith debate.
00:01:51.200
good faith debate, what that means, what they're trying to communicate with that phrasing of a
00:01:57.760
good faith debate is saying essentially that the debate is going to be charitable in nature.
00:02:02.640
Its tone is going to be charitable, both sides towards one another. And what makes it good faith
00:02:07.180
is not just a charitable or humble or winsome is probably what the Gospel Coalition would use to
00:02:14.120
describe it, a winsome tone, a winsome manner towards one another. But the good faith phrasing,
00:02:20.040
what that also conveys is that a Christian could take either side of the debate, that both options
00:02:27.240
are viable options according to the scripture, according to the word of God. Now, for instance,
00:02:35.220
let me give you an example of an actual good faith debate. A.D. Robles and I could have a good faith
00:02:40.040
debate about baptism. And that's not because, just for the record, that's not because we're
00:02:43.960
theological relativists. So we're not saying that both positions are biblically faithful positions.
00:02:53.800
I think somebody's right in this particular instance.
00:02:56.040
We could both be wrong, or one of us could be wrong,
00:03:10.680
Your understanding of the covenants, the new covenant,
00:03:18.980
what's the door into the new covenant? I believe as somebody who is a Baptist, barely, most of my
00:03:25.580
friends these days tend to be Presbyterians and I've kind of have my given by them. I've been
00:03:30.060
given, you know, my honorary Presbyterian card, but in regards to baptism, I do hold to a credo
00:03:37.120
Baptist position. I believe that the door is faith. The door into the new covenant is faith. And yes,
00:03:43.920
I do see for the record, the continuity between the old covenant with Israel, the nation state
00:03:48.760
of israel and circumcision and the continuity between circumcision under the old covenant and
00:03:54.120
baptism for the new however i think that what matters is the timing that timing is important so
00:04:00.780
baptism for belonging in the new covenant likened to circumcision for belonging in the old covenant
00:04:06.400
yes and amen i'm right there with you but what gains you entrance right there are different
00:04:11.340
modes yes ruth could could become a part of the old covenant and join israel your people will be
00:04:16.100
my people. Your God will be my God, even though she wasn't Israel by natural birth. So there are
00:04:21.160
other ways in, but the predominant way into the old covenant was birth, physical birth. So after
00:04:27.540
physical birth, the Hebrew male on the eighth day would be circumcised because they've been entered
1.00
00:04:32.560
in. They've gained entrance into the old covenant by virtue of their natural birth. Well, in the
00:04:38.020
same way, when it comes to the new covenant, the way in is new birth. And so we apply the signs and
00:04:43.920
seals of baptism of the Lord's Supper right after entrance into the new covenant, which comes by
00:04:49.140
new birth or spiritual birth rather than old birth, physical birth. So that is continuity,
00:04:54.440
and yet we disagree in regards to the timing. Now, that could be a good faith debate.
00:04:59.380
That could be a good faith debate. Good faith not meaning that we could both be right,
00:05:03.780
but meaning that there's a legitimate biblical argument to be made on both sides of the issue.
00:05:10.960
there are legitimate paedo-baptist theologians throughout the ages for centuries now and there
00:05:19.340
are legitimate and i know the presbyterians are going to disagree but there are legitimate
00:05:23.500
credo-baptist arguments and theologians who have made those arguments for centuries now the 1689
00:05:30.980
is is not a trifle it's a legitimate reformed confession it is historical nehemiah cox is not
00:05:39.920
someone to scoff at. Benjamin Keech is not someone to scoff at. John Gill. There are legitimate
00:05:46.180
people and legitimate arguments made from the scripture to back up this position. Modern guys
00:05:52.100
who are living today, James White. On the other side of the debate, you've got guys like R.C.
00:05:57.920
Sproul. You've got guys like Doug Wilson. In the same way, the 1646, the Westminster Confession of
00:06:04.320
Faith is not a trifle. It is not something to be mocked. There are faithful guys on both positions.
00:06:09.220
that doesn't mean both are right because we're not relativists. These positions contradict one
00:06:13.380
another. They cannot be simultaneously true. Either they're both wrong or one position is
00:06:18.460
wrong, but they both can't be right. And yet we can have a good faith debate on that particular
00:06:24.220
topic because there is a reasonable argument to be made from what we understand about the
00:06:29.860
scripture. When it comes to Christians putting their children in public schools today in America,
00:06:36.340
right? Because you got to give a little bit of context with this debate. Jen Wilkin and the
00:06:40.120
position that she's arguing for is not public schools somewhere else on the other side of the
0.74
00:06:45.460
world. And it's not public schools in a different period of time, public schools in America 50 years
00:06:50.920
ago. She's talking about putting her kids in public school, which she did. And she says that
00:06:56.600
in this debate. And she says that given the option that she would do it again today in 2023 in
00:07:04.420
America she would put her children in the public school system today and what this is doing right
00:07:09.780
it makes me think of the Hegelian dialect right this well it's a typical gospel coalition third
00:07:16.320
wayism kind of thing that that ultimately really really what I think that accomplishes and I think
00:07:21.120
this is maybe not for everybody but I think some of the people with the gospel coalition this is
00:07:25.040
actually the intent I won't say for everyone some people could be just ignorance but I think some
00:07:30.480
people, there actually is a malicious intent. What they're trying to accomplish with this third
00:07:34.900
way argumentation is compromise. Because not in every instance, but with this instance about
00:07:42.840
public school and Christians utilizing public schools for their children, you're talking about
0.70
00:07:46.980
one position that's correct and another position that's wrong. The position that's correct is that
1.00
00:07:52.420
the children of Christians should not be in public schools. That is right. They should not.
1.00
00:07:56.500
The position that is incorrect is the position that Jen Wilkin is arguing for, that Christian
0.98
00:08:01.960
parents can send their kids to public school today in America in 2023.
00:08:09.480
So a third-way position somewhere in between is simply compromise.
00:08:14.900
It's one thing's right, one thing's wrong.
1.00
00:08:17.600
In a best-case scenario, you're assuaging the consciences of Christians to adopt a position
0.79
00:08:25.520
maybe they land somewhere in between so it's just some compromise it's just some unfaithfulness
00:08:30.880
worst case scenario is is that you go all the way to jen wilkins position and you're assuaging the
00:08:37.080
consciences of christian fathers and christian mothers um to to put their kids in public school
00:08:44.080
40 hours a week from kindergarten all the way through 12th grade um which is a massive amount
00:08:50.260
of compromise that is a massive amount of what i believe according to the scripture is unfaithful
00:08:55.260
So just even the framing, that's my first point, the framing of this debate, calling
00:09:00.140
it a good faith debate, what that implies or really outright expresses is that a legitimate,
00:09:08.300
reasonable argument from the scripture, from a Christian worldview could be made to support
00:09:20.500
Doug Wilson would agree with my position and say that, yes, there is not a valid, reasonable
0.78
00:09:28.060
biblical argument to be made for Christians utilizing public schools with their children.
0.97
00:09:33.640
Votie Bauckham would be another example. Votie Bauckham has said for decades now that if you
00:09:39.020
send your kids to Caesar, you cannot pretend to be surprised when they come back as Romans.
00:09:45.360
And so I would argue that this is a position that should not be framed as a good faith
0.71
00:09:51.040
position, a position that a Christian could take within the realm of faithfulness.
00:09:56.360
No, it is not somehow faithful or a different shade of faithfulness.
0.98
00:10:09.620
This is Ephesians chapter 6, verses 1 through 4.
00:10:11.920
It says, children, obey your parents in the Lord, for this is right.
00:10:16.860
This is the first commandment with a promise that it may go well with you and that you
00:10:23.160
Fathers, do not provoke your children to anger, but rather bring them up in the discipline
00:10:32.120
Fathers have a moral obligation under God to raise their children in the discipline
00:10:41.920
It means the instruction, the tutelage, the teaching, the curriculum, that God has a
00:10:50.300
There is a Christian curriculum for children that they must be trained up in.
00:10:58.240
And I'm starting with this text to make this argument, and I'm going to show a couple
00:11:03.720
The argument that I'm making is that the moral imperative for Christian parents in not sending
0.63
00:11:08.940
their kids to public schools is not merely that Christians have an obligation to protect
0.76
00:11:14.700
their children from falsehoods, to protect their children from perversion, right?
00:11:21.420
It's not just that a Christian father and mother, but the father primarily as head of
00:11:26.240
the household, it's not only that he has a moral obligation under God as a Christian
00:11:30.740
father to see to it that his children avoid pagan indoctrination, to see to it that his
00:11:38.040
children are guarded and protected from critical race theory, from LGBT jihad agenda. It's not only
0.76
00:11:46.140
that he has to ensure that his children don't receive pagan education, but it's also that he
00:11:52.320
has a moral imperative placed upon him as the head of the household by God himself to ensure that his
0.87
00:11:58.600
children, not just that they avoid this bad thing, but that they are properly and thoroughly trained
00:12:04.240
up in, immersed in this good thing. What is the good thing? It's God's curriculum. It is the
00:12:09.780
Christian curriculum. It is the biblical worldview. And the point is this, if you are going to fulfill
00:12:17.280
the commandment that is given to fathers in scripture by God himself, not to provoke your
00:12:23.560
children to anger, but to bring them up, to raise them up, train them up, immerse them in the
00:12:28.660
discipline and instruction of the Lord to enlist them, enroll them in the paideia, the Christian
00:12:34.900
curriculum that God has given to us in his holy word that fathers must raise their children up in.
00:12:41.040
If you're going to do that, one practical requirement is time. Fathers, listen to me,
00:12:47.020
Christian fathers, you are not going to be able to raise your children up in the fear and admonition
0.87
00:12:53.240
of the Lord, the paideia of the Lord, with your 15-minute-a-day family worship in the evenings.
0.97
00:12:59.520
After your children get home from their eight hours a day, five days a week for 13 years,
00:13:06.800
kindergarten through 12th grade, you're not going to be able to enlist your children in 15,000 hours.
00:13:14.840
That's how much it amounts to. You're not going to be able to enlist your children, enroll them in
00:13:19.180
15,000 hours of pagan indoctrination, and then with 15 minutes in the evening, and then an hour
0.96
00:13:27.460
and a half on the Lord's day, be able to sufficiently and thoroughly and biblically
0.68
00:13:32.040
raise your children up in the Christian paideia. So it's twofold. One, you do have an obligation.
00:13:39.940
Fathers are to provide and protect. Those are the two primary categories of a fatherly duty as head
00:13:45.860
of the household when it comes to your wife and when it comes to your children you must provide
00:13:49.580
for them spiritually provide from for them physically practically put food on the table
00:13:54.380
put a roof over their head clothe them right a father has an obligation to work out of outside
00:14:00.160
the home in such a way that he's able to protect his children and provide for his children physically
00:14:05.080
and spiritually and when it comes to spiritual protection one thing that a father has to do
00:14:14.300
to a biblically faithful, orthodox, robust church
00:14:22.840
seeker-friendly, watered-down megachurch, right?
00:14:31.680
Well, in the same way that a father has an obligation
0.85
00:14:33.580
not to lead his family to a heretical church,
0.90
00:14:40.320
for any christian father who says i would never take and see this is the compromise this is the
00:14:47.160
blatant hypocrisy for any christian father who cares about sound doctrine who would say i would
00:14:53.060
never take my children and my wife and and enroll our family as members in a in a heretical um of
00:15:01.540
false doctrine false teaching word of faith prosperity gospel seeker friendly megachurch
00:15:07.480
for an hour and 15 minutes once a week on sunday but i will put them in a public school for 40
00:15:15.540
hours a week monday through friday that is a contradiction so the point is this it's twofold
00:15:21.380
not only do fathers have an obligation to provide and protect on the protection side to protect
00:15:26.780
their children to ensure that their children avoid pagan indoctrination fathers also have
00:15:33.080
an obligation not just to make sure that their children are protected from getting something
00:15:37.240
that's bad but to instill in their children something that is good not just protect but
00:15:43.140
provide they must provide a christian education and if your children for the very brief window
00:15:50.200
of time that you have them in your home with you approximately give or take 18 years during those
00:15:57.220
18 years when your children father christian father are under your roof that they're under
0.74
00:16:02.320
your roof, they're in your home, you cannot afford, you simply cannot afford 15,000 hours
0.97
00:16:08.900
for them to be in a public school and expect with any reasonable expectation that you're
00:16:16.560
going to sufficiently and thoroughly be able to train them up in the fear and abomination
0.98
00:16:21.340
of the Lord, the discipline and instruction of the Lord, the Christian curriculum, because
0.52
00:16:25.900
a Christian curriculum, if it is to be thorough, if it is to be faithful, it requires far more
00:16:32.300
than your 15 minutes a day of family worship in the evening it is a a full-time endeavor right
0.62
00:16:39.180
so that's the first thing um so i don't i think i think that the framing is at best ignorant and
00:16:45.720
at worst downright deceptive of calling this a good faith debate because what that implies
00:16:51.960
or outright conveys is that a christian can reasonably and permissibly take both sides
00:16:59.060
both positions in this debate? And the answer is no. There is not, biblically speaking,
00:17:09.080
in America in 2023, there is not a biblical argument to be made for Christians utilizing
00:17:16.940
public schools. And back in the day, just for the record, public schools, the reason why there
0.96
00:17:22.100
were Catholic schools early on in America and not a bunch of Protestant schools is because
00:17:26.800
essentially, this doesn't mean that there weren't problems back then, but there was a dynamic
00:17:30.720
difference between then and now. Primarily, the public schools were the Protestant schools.
00:17:36.720
Not only was there prayer in public schools, not only was there Bible in public schools,
00:17:41.240
there were catechisms in public schools in America. There were catechisms. That is long gone.
00:17:49.400
Long gone. So the argument that I'm making is that parents today, and I would say for really
00:17:55.320
for a few decades now, but especially in 2023, in the United States of America, a Christian parent
0.76
00:18:01.060
does not have a biblical leg to stand on when it comes to sending their kids to 15,000 hours
0.62
00:18:09.220
of public school curriculum. That's just simply not a good faith position that a Christian
0.99
00:18:15.920
can take today. Last disclaimer, and then I'll show the clip. Last disclaimer I want to make
0.99
00:18:20.600
real quick is a part of the the good faith debate uh they get into the the concept of well what
00:18:26.340
about uh christians um on staff at public schools christian adults who are a teacher in a public
00:18:32.280
school or um they're you know an administrator in a public school or or a principal you know
00:18:38.020
or on the school board or these kinds of things that's entirely different uh different that's
00:18:42.300
distinct from a parent sending their children to a public school for their formation for being
00:18:47.720
shaped, for being trained. There's a difference in an adult Christian going behind enemy lines
00:18:54.840
to make a difference versus an adult Christian sending their six-year-old child behind enemy
00:19:01.520
lines for training. Let me say that again. There is a dynamic difference between an adult Christian
0.80
00:19:07.680
going behind enemy lines to fight, to wage warfare, versus a Christian parent sending their
00:19:15.040
six-year-old child behind enemy lines to be shaped and formed and trained. That's dynamically
0.73
00:19:21.080
different. Doug Wilson has said it like this even recently in one of his blogs. He said,
00:19:25.260
can a Christian adult be a teacher at a public school? He said, yes, you just have to do so
1.00
00:19:29.840
faithfully. So you can't get up there and say evolution is true. We all evolved out of this
00:19:35.900
primordial soup and fish became lizards and lizards became whatever, apes and apes became
00:19:42.980
man. You can't do that. It's not faithful. You can't lie to children. Christians, right? I mean,
00:19:48.940
that's ultimately the question that we're asking. Can Christians, is it a viable Christian position
0.72
00:19:53.040
to say that Christian adults can lie to children? No, of course not. So Doug Wilson, his position
00:19:58.540
was saying, yes, a Christian can be in a public school as a teacher, a Christian adult, but they
00:20:03.420
have to do so Christianly. They have to do so as a Christian. And he said, so you can work in a
00:20:08.680
public school for approximately two to three weeks. Because if you do so faithfully, you'll
00:20:13.920
probably get fired. So it's not that a Christian can't do it, but a Christian has to do it faithfully.
0.75
00:20:19.040
So there's a difference between a Christian adult and the question of whether or not they can be
00:20:22.380
on staff at a public school versus a Christian parent sending their child to be trained
00:20:27.540
by a public school. And if you can be faithful at your public school as a Christian adult on staff
00:20:33.120
as a teacher, and by the grace of God in that particular public school, you're able to last
00:20:38.400
more than two or three weeks, maybe you can last two or three years, then fine. This video,
00:20:44.100
I'm not addressing you. That's not what we're addressing. So I'm not saying that that's wrong,
00:20:47.420
but I am saying that Christian parents can't send their kids there. Okay. That being said,
1.00
00:20:51.320
let's go ahead and roll the first clip. These are two short clips. Here's the first.
00:20:56.800
I'll hear a lot from parents who will say, well, it's a public school, but all the teachers are
00:21:00.920
Christians. And I'm like, well, I want my children to be exposed to all different kinds of teachers.
00:21:07.920
and then I can parent them through whatever those are.
00:21:13.720
I want you guys to catch this. This is important.
00:21:15.420
We're going to play the clip one more time. Here we go.
00:21:19.980
well, it's a public school, but all the teachers are Christians.
00:21:22.900
And I'm like, well, I want my children to be exposed
00:21:28.840
and then I can parent them through whatever those are.
00:21:33.620
She's basically, she's acknowledging one of the fallacious arguments that Christians often make
0.93
00:21:40.060
in order to defend their position of sending their kids to a public school. One of those
0.99
00:21:45.060
fallacious arguments is this, well, my public school is different. My public school, you know,
00:21:50.580
all the teachers there are Christians. Number one, statistically, that is highly unlikely,
1.00
00:21:56.320
if not just downright impossible. But let's just humor that for a second and say maybe,
00:22:01.420
okay you have the one public school in america where all the teachers are christian there would
00:22:05.500
still be problems with that one because okay they may be christian teachers but but it's not just
00:22:12.960
we don't just want christians in education for our children we want them to receive a christian
00:22:19.540
education not just christians giving a pagan education there's a difference between a christian
00:22:25.360
teacher giving a non-christian education versus a christian teacher giving a christian education
00:22:32.060
a christian education meaning that the basis for all truth and everything that our children are
00:22:37.920
being taught is that jesus is lord that for him and through him and by him all things were created
00:22:45.680
and are being held together right they're not just receiving a a education from a christian but
00:22:52.460
they're receiving a Christian education from a Christian. So that's one of the arguments against
00:22:56.640
that. Votie Bauckham has dealt with that. So one, every teacher in your school is not a Christian.
00:23:02.480
That is highly unlikely, if not downright impossible. Number two, even if they were,
0.99
00:23:07.500
do you have Christians, right? Christian teachers, but are they giving a Christian education? Or is
00:23:12.520
it Christian teachers giving a non-Christian education? Well, Jen Wilkin doesn't even deal
1.00
00:23:16.300
with this. What she's doing, making it seem, right? It makes it appear as though she has
1.00
00:23:21.680
more of a viable argument. She's saying, well, I recognize that that, you know, that, that argument
00:23:25.980
that Christians who utilize public schools for their children, like I do, like I did when my
00:23:30.800
children were in school, I realized that one of the arguments they use is they say, well, our
00:23:34.220
school's different or all the teachers are Christians. And I recognize that that's a
1.00
00:23:37.280
fallacious argument. I would never dream of making such an argument. Okay. Well then,
00:23:43.000
then what is your argument? And so she actually argues the opposite. She actually says,
00:23:47.280
i actually see it as a virtue i see it as something positive something good um i want
00:23:53.020
my kids right that's the language notice that's the language that she uses she said i don't want
00:23:57.560
my kids to only have christian teachers i want them to have all kinds of teachers but all kinds
00:24:03.020
of teachers in this particular i want my kids to have a lot of different types of teachers
00:24:06.640
right i want my kids to have a teacher who specializes in science a teacher who specializes
00:24:11.540
in history teacher that specializes in literature um but but that's not what she's saying she's not
00:24:16.340
saying literature and science and, and, you know, I want them also to get some practical training
00:24:21.220
and welding. No, she's saying different kinds of teachers, meaning there's Christian kinds. And
00:24:26.880
then I want the non-Christian kinds also. No, I don't want that. I don't want that for my kids.
1.00
00:24:33.400
I don't want Christian teachers for my kids and then non-Christian teachers for my kids,
1.00
00:24:37.740
but Jen Wilkin does. She does. And that's, that's the argument she makes. And then right there at
1.00
00:24:43.380
the end what she ties on on the end is she says and then i'll parent them through it let's play
00:24:47.860
the clip one more time i want you to hear that here we go i'll hear a lot um from parents who
00:24:53.400
will say well it's a public school but all the teachers are christians and i'm like well i i
00:24:58.760
want my children to be exposed to all different kinds of teachers and then i can parent them
00:25:03.900
through whatever those are so let me give you an illustration here that hopefully will be helpful
00:25:09.840
the illustration is this um if i was going to enroll my children in mma fighting which i won't
00:25:23.340
just for the record that's a video for another day um but let's say i'm going to enroll my
00:25:29.460
children in mma fighting classes to be trained um i do want my my kids to be trained in self-defense
00:25:35.800
and all those kinds of things but i think there's a difference in teaching them self-defense
00:25:39.500
versus encouraging them to mar the image of God,
00:25:50.120
That being said, if I was going to enroll my children
00:25:59.000
jujitsu, boxing, kickboxing, Muay Thai, whatever,
00:26:08.080
right at this point you know people send their kids to preschool in the public school system
00:26:12.320
but let's just say kindergarten five years old kindergarten i would not enroll my child in mma
00:26:19.120
training as a five-year-old and drop them off at the gym right because remember jen jen wilkins
0.64
00:26:25.980
she's not sitting in class with her kids she's dropping them off i wouldn't drop my five-year-old
00:26:31.200
daughter off at MMA fighting training and knowing that part of the training is not just that my
00:26:38.520
five-year-old boy son or daughter is going to be sparring with other five-year-olds
00:26:43.800
but but that part of the training is that that my five-year-old is going to get in the ring
00:26:49.720
with a full-grown adult and they're going to fight them that full-grown adult is going to
00:26:58.020
start wailing on my child. They're going to be up against the ropes. And a 29-year-old
00:27:05.200
feminist is going to be wailing on my five-year-old daughter. And I'm at work
1.00
00:27:12.720
somewhere. I'm not even there. But when they get home, I'm going to parent them through it.
00:27:17.880
Right? So when my child gets home and they're battered and bruised and bleeding,
00:27:21.760
hopefully still alive but battered and bruised and bleeding then i'll i'll parent them through it
00:27:28.900
that's that's the equivalent no no that's that's not how christian parents parent
00:27:35.160
no that's no you're not you're going to parent them through it but but what are you parenting
00:27:40.340
them through you don't know what just happened you weren't there you weren't there you're going
00:27:46.520
to parent them through your five-year-old's recollection of what happened. But that teacher
00:27:54.020
with you out of the room, with you out not even being present, that pagan teacher who hates
00:27:58.600
God, if they're not a Christian. And again, I'm using her argument because her argument is she
00:28:02.800
wants different kinds of teachers. She wants non-Christian teachers. So she wants pagan
0.79
00:28:07.220
Christian or pagan teachers. And according to the word of God, there is no neutrality. There's no
00:28:12.060
indifference, right? Romans chapter eight says the mind of the sinful man is hostile, not just
00:28:17.260
neutral, not just indifferent, not uninterested, but hostile at enmity toward God and his law.
00:28:23.440
He does not submit to God's law, nor can he. He's unwilling to submit to the truth of God,
00:28:28.960
God's law, the way that God made the world. The pagan mind is unwilling to submit to God's law
1.00
00:28:34.140
and unable. He does not, he cannot. And so what you're advocating for right now is you're saying
0.99
00:28:41.080
that you actually don't want your children to be trained and formed and shaped and taught
0.78
00:28:47.260
in a Christian paideia by Christian teachers. But you actually see it as not just something
00:28:53.520
that we stomach, not just something that we put up with, but as a virtue, as a positive aspect of
00:29:00.000
your children's formation, that they be trained by God-hating pagans with you not there. So you
00:29:08.500
got a God-hating pagan giving a God-hating worldview that essentially right now, and
0.96
00:29:14.120
not just for 15 minutes, but for eight hours.
0.84
00:29:17.440
And while you're gone for eight hours, you have a God-hating teacher providing a God-hating
00:29:24.000
curriculum, God-hating worldview with your five-year-old.
00:29:28.100
So they're in the ring, and this grown adult is wailing on them, but you're going to parent
00:29:35.060
you're going to somehow salvage this um after the fact uh based off of working from your five-year-old
00:29:41.980
your six-year-old your seven-year-old's recollection of of the fight that they just had
00:29:47.580
and how they got pummeled and and one you're counting on your five-year-old to be able to
00:29:52.860
to call this to memory um and and hopefully they were conscious even for this fight they were
00:29:59.380
getting destroyed they were getting pummeled um but you're gonna you're gonna work them through
00:30:04.380
you're going to parent them through it um no you're not you're not um no this is a bad idea
00:30:12.480
this is not a good faith position that christians can take it's not it's not we don't subject our
00:30:19.780
children your child is not a missionary and see that's part of the argument right so jim wilkin
00:30:25.300
she she's aware of some of the arguments that have failed that have been thoroughly dismantled
00:30:32.480
And so she doesn't even attempt to make them, right?
00:30:34.960
She tries to make these new arguments, right?
0.81
00:30:37.520
The Christian parents, one of her arguments
0.94
00:30:59.120
and so i i mean i i can't i can't put my children you know in front of a table that has food i can't
00:31:05.880
you know i none like if every christian you know part at one point in the good faith debate she
00:31:11.680
says if every christian took uh their children out of the public school all all at the same time
00:31:16.360
um imagine the the collapse and the the calamity and and and how harmful it would be for all these
00:31:23.840
kids who are left behind. And I would respond to that and say, praise God. Praise God. Not praise
00:31:31.080
God in the sense of it's good that this would have negative impact on these other children.
00:31:35.460
I would actually argue that I don't think that would be the result. I think the result would be
00:31:39.220
if every faithful Christian, everybody who professes the name of Christ and claims to be
0.97
00:31:45.160
a Christian started behaving in a faithful manner and took their kids out of the public school
00:31:48.800
system, even in the state of California, you have 10 million, 42 million is the population,
00:31:54.260
give or take, 10 million of those residents profess to be Christians. If 10 million, a quarter,
00:32:00.720
25, and that's California, right? So if you take the nation as a whole, it would be over a quarter
00:32:05.480
of the population takes their kids out of the public school system, well, the public school
00:32:09.820
system would collapse. It would be done. It would implode. And we would be forced to come up with
00:32:16.600
other options. And I do believe that the vast majority of these alternative options would be
00:32:23.200
better than the current situation, better than the state-run atheistic schools that we currently
00:32:29.000
have. So the idea of making the argument saying, well, of course, we can't say that the children
00:32:36.560
of Christians are missionaries, right? Of course not. We can't make that argument. The reason she's
00:32:41.460
not making that argument for the record is because that argument was made by Christians to support
00:32:46.340
sending kids to public schools, that argument was made ad nauseum for decades. And it has been
00:32:52.900
proven and dismantled so thoroughly by this point that Jen Wilkin just doesn't even have
00:32:59.060
the gall to even make the argument because it's been so thoroughly disproven. Your children are
00:33:06.200
not to be treated as missionaries. They're training. I mean, even when it comes to 18,
00:33:12.160
19, 20-year-old young adults who enlist in the military, they go to boot camp. And boot camp
00:33:21.920
is thousands of miles away from actual warfare that's taking place. And yes, it's rigorous,
00:33:28.040
and yes, it's difficult, but it's controlled, and it's protected, and it's defended. We don't even
00:33:35.480
send someone into who's a young adult. We don't send them into battle without first being
00:33:41.760
trained and the training doesn't happen on the battlefield, it's too late. The training doesn't
00:33:47.900
happen at war. The training happens in preparation in the controlled environment before war. The
00:33:55.320
imperative for Christian parents is not to treat their children as missionaries, as spiritual
1.00
00:34:03.280
soldiers in the war, but rather to train them so that when they're ready, they would be shot out
0.95
00:34:09.480
like arrows. But those arrows need to be formed first. They need to be sharpened. They need to
00:34:14.020
be straightened. We need those arrows to be prepared before we shoot them out at the enemy.
00:34:19.640
Okay, so let's go ahead and play the next clip. I don't want to covertly take over the public
00:34:26.960
schools and make them Christian schools, although I value the ethics that that would involve being
00:34:33.460
in place in the public schools. But I think that because they're public schools,
0.56
00:34:38.700
they need to serve a general population in a way that a Christian school doesn't.
0.98
00:34:45.080
No. Okay. First, I do want to take over public schools. Now I agree. I don't want to covertly
0.96
00:34:52.140
take over public schools. I want to overtly take over public schools. I want the public school and
00:34:57.940
I want the United States of America, I want the general public to be fully aware of what the
00:35:03.960
Christian's intention is. And that intention is that, yes, we want to take over public schools.
0.90
00:35:10.080
We want to see them shut down. We want to see them shut down. I believe that the public school
00:35:15.040
system in America is past the point of being redeemed, that it needs to be shut down. We
00:35:21.620
talk about some institutions. You can go inside and try to recapture some institutions. And other
00:35:27.360
institutions like high places in Israel. They need to be burned to the ground, and a temple to the
1.00
00:35:34.140
Lord needs to be built right on top of the ashes. I think the public school system in America today
00:35:38.520
in 2023 would be an example of an institution that needs to be abandoned, and it ultimately
00:35:44.120
needs to be overcome. It needs to be conquered. It needs to be conquered. So, well, she's saying,
00:35:50.800
know, well, I don't want to take over the public school system. Well, I do. I do. And I want to do
00:35:57.800
it from the outside. Or from the inside, I want to see faithful Christian adults at the school
00:36:04.120
board meeting. I want to see faithful Christian adults, but not from the inside by sending in
0.89
00:36:08.660
our secret agent, six-year-old. Now, your six-year-old child is not meant to be sent in
0.97
00:36:17.080
by Christian parents as the TKO weapon to take down the public school. So I do want to overtake
1.00
00:36:26.140
the public school system. I don't want to covertly do it. I don't want to do it deceptively. I want
00:36:30.620
to do it overtly and say, yeah, this is wrong. And by God's grace, if he would be so gracious,
00:36:36.460
he's going to empower us by his spirit through both law and gospel to take this down and to set
00:36:42.760
up better Christian alternatives. But the last thing that she said in that clip, I want to play
0.70
00:36:47.120
it for you guys one more time, but the last thing she said in that clip is not just, I don't want
00:36:50.820
to take them down, but basically saying, I don't want to take them down because the general public
00:36:55.220
needs them. There are non-Christians and these non-Christians need this non-Christian education
1.00
00:37:01.300
because it's good for the general public. It's good for society. Play the clip again.
1.00
00:37:07.440
I don't want to covertly take over the public schools and make them Christian schools.
0.64
00:37:12.160
schools, although I value, you know, the ethics that that would involve being in place in
00:37:19.220
But I think that because they're public schools, they need to serve a general population in
1.00
00:37:28.820
Because they're public schools, they need to serve a general population, right?
0.56
00:37:32.180
She's essentially saying because it's a public school, it needs to serve the general public
0.98
00:37:39.160
is um that is a pivotal fallacy no a christian school if it's truly christian it serves the
00:37:47.940
general public better than a public school than an atheistic pagan school period the point that
00:37:56.920
i'm making is this a christian school is not just better for um christian children or the children
00:38:02.620
of christian parents it's better for everyone the law of god is good holy and right it's not just
00:38:11.220
the morally right thing it's the good thing triple braided cord truth goodness and beauty if it's
00:38:17.440
true it is beautiful if it's true it is beneficial it is good the right thing is the good thing and
00:38:25.720
the thing that is truly good for society for human flourishing is also that which aligns with the
00:38:31.680
law of God and is morally right. Christian schools, hear me, Christian schools are not just
00:38:38.540
a necessity for the children of Christian parents. Christian schools are a practical,
00:38:45.940
not just spiritual, it's that, certainly, but also a practical benefit to everyone.
00:38:54.040
Everyone. Salt and light benefits everyone. The gospel of Jesus Christ benefits everyone.
00:39:01.680
It is better to be an atheist living in a Christian society with Christian principles
0.87
00:39:07.920
and Christian law and Christian civil magistrates.
0.90
00:39:11.560
Better to be a non-Christian in a Christian society than to be not only a Christian in
0.86
00:39:18.160
a non-Christian society, but even a non-Christian in a non-Christian society.
0.91
00:39:34.960
This Christian ethic that she mentions in passing, she says, well, while I see that
00:39:39.160
a Christian ethic would be good, the implication that she gives in that clip is she's saying,
00:39:44.480
she's subtly implying that a Christian ethic, a Christian education, Christian school would
00:39:49.580
teach a Christian ethic and that would be good.
00:39:51.560
But what she's implying is that it would be good for Christians, that it would be exclusively
00:39:57.180
But we live in a society where, you know, not everybody's Christian.
00:40:01.460
there there's a general public and and there are people who are not christian so they need
00:40:05.760
non-christians need non-christian schools for their good no the gospel is good for everyone
00:40:11.560
the law of god is good for everyone the christian paideia is good for every child
00:40:18.920
every child a child of unbelievers or child of believers both will benefit by being trained up
00:40:27.780
in the fear and admonition of the Lord. What is true is that which is good. And I mean universally
00:40:35.200
good. Universally good. That which is true, aligning with God's word and what God says is true,
00:40:42.080
is going to be that which is good. And not just good for some people. It's not if we cling to the
00:40:47.840
truth, it'll benefit the church. No, if we cling to the truth, it benefits the church. It will
00:40:53.880
uniquely benefit the people of God. That's true. But the truth of God, his ways, his law, his
00:41:00.360
principles, his gospel, it doesn't just uniquely benefit the church, but it also universally
00:41:06.520
benefits all image bearers. All people benefit. One of the most loving things that we can do,
00:41:14.340
not just for our own children, not just for Christian children or children of Christian
00:41:18.560
households, but benefit all children. One of the best ways that you can love your neighbor
00:41:25.040
is by not just obeying the law of God, but ensuring in the public square that the law of
00:41:31.620
God is adhered to by the civil public, the civil square. When a Christian votes for certain laws,
00:41:38.900
right? So as an abolitionist, when it comes to the issue of abortion, I want to work towards
0.87
00:41:47.120
penalties for abortion. And not just penalties for the abortion doctor, but penalties for the mother
0.74
00:41:53.480
who goes to have her unborn child murdered and consents to that murder, is complicit in that
00:42:00.640
murder, and the father, if he consents to that. I want penalties for him too. I don't want just
00:42:05.600
abortion to be unavailable. I don't want abortion just to be illegal. I want abortion to be
00:42:12.480
criminalized. I want there to be penalties, equal penalties, not just some penalties,
0.99
00:42:17.760
but whatever the penalty would be for a mother taking her three-year-old child to a back alley
0.96
00:42:22.900
with a hitman and paying him to shoot that child in the head and murder them in cold blood. I want
1.00
00:42:28.580
that, whatever that penalty is, I want that same penalty for a mother who goes to an abortion
0.99
00:42:34.120
doctor and drags her baby by virtue of it being in her womb and pays him in order to kill her
0.99
00:42:40.360
unborn child. I want the same penalty, equal penalties. Equal penalties, here's the argument,
0.97
00:42:45.420
real short. Equal penalties ensures equal protection. You cannot say that it's equal
00:42:50.320
protection if it's not an equal penalty. So equal penalties is equal protection, and equal
00:42:55.240
protection is necessary in order to actually back up the argument of equal dignity, equal sanctity,
00:43:02.160
equal value. If you're going to say that the child in the womb really is a child, that they really
00:43:07.480
are a human being that they really are an image bearer not half of an image bearer but a whole
00:43:12.080
image bearer a whole human if you're going to attribute to the unborn child um 100 personhood
00:43:18.700
as an image bearer the living god created in the image of god with the full sanctity of life
00:43:24.020
if you're going to say equal value for the unborn then then to back that statement up to say we
00:43:29.200
value the unborn just as much as those who are born then you have to say equal value means then
00:43:34.300
we ensure equal protections. And if it's going to be equal protections, it has to be equal penalties.
00:43:40.500
Now, if I vote for a law like that, or I give my vote for a political candidate who's given a
00:43:47.960
promise to ensure and put down bills on the table to try to pass laws like that, that benefits
00:43:54.760
everyone. I'm not just doing that because I think it's good for Christians. No, I'm doing that for
00:44:00.960
children in the womb who very well may be born and grow up and live their entire lives from birth
00:44:08.200
to death and never receive the Lord Jesus Christ as Savior through faith. And yet it's still in
00:44:15.600
their benefit. They're temporal, physical. In this life, it is to their good. It is to their benefit.
00:44:21.580
And so I'm going to support laws in the civil sphere, in the public square, when it comes to
00:44:27.340
education public education when it comes to legislation and laws i am going to support that
00:44:33.340
which aligns with the moral transcendent universal law of god because it's right it's true and
00:44:40.160
therefore it is also good and practically beneficial not just for christian people
00:44:44.760
or christian children but for all people and all children the christian ethic no my argument is
00:44:51.460
jen wilkin is wrong my argument is not that well there there are christians and they can have their
00:44:56.360
christian schools but there are non-christians and so they need non-christian schools no the
00:44:59.880
christian ethic that should come from a faithful christian school benefits everyone whether they're
00:45:04.880
christian or not because it's right and it's true so this good faith debate was not helpful
00:45:12.600
again at best it muddies the water and confuses christian parents and at worst it assuages the
0.99
00:45:20.900
consciences of Christian mothers and fathers to the point that it would allow them to enlist
00:45:26.620
their children in 15,000 hours of pagan indoctrination. And that is a sin. Thanks for
0.92
00:45:33.360
tuning in. Can I be frank with you for just a second right here at the end? Look, some of you
00:45:38.400
guys, you're financially supporting this ministry. And from the bottom of my heart, I say thank you.
00:45:43.960
I cannot thank you enough. However, some of you, you just, you can't afford it. In fact,
00:45:51.080
some of you, you shouldn't afford it. Let's be honest. I mean, we're living in Joe Biden's
00:45:56.660
ridiculous economy. Our nation and our totalitarian political elites lost their minds over the last
0.97
00:46:05.680
three years due to COVID. We have written checks that we simply cannot cash. It doesn't matter if
00:46:13.080
people change the definition of a recession, we are living in a recession right now regardless.
00:46:20.260
Some of you are struggling to afford a carton of eggs at the grocery store. You cannot support
00:46:26.560
financially this ministry at this time, nor should you, but you could still help us tremendously.
00:46:33.820
I am asking you, please, if you're willing to do so, take one minute of your time. Leave us a
00:46:40.480
five-star review on your favorite podcast platform, iTunes, Spotify, whatever that might be.
00:46:47.100
This is the way the system works. We want to be innocent as doves but shrewd as vipers. We need
00:46:53.960
to be strategic. You leave us a five-star review and our podcast shows up for more people. And the
00:47:00.600
word of God and courageous theology applied in practical ways to every realm of life gets out
00:47:08.400
there. Help us get it out there. Thanks for tuning in.