The NXR Podcast - Off Limits News - The Charts Explaining Why Young People Are Miserable

00:00:00.000 America will either have Christ or it will have chaos.

00:00:05.680 For years, conservatives believed that Trump could reverse America's decline.

00:00:10.440 But after Trump, the right is now fractured, exhausted, and losing ground.

00:00:16.520 Endless infighting and electoral losses have exposed a deeper problem that politics alone cannot solve.

00:00:24.680 A nation that rejects Christ cannot be restored by mere personalities, grandstanding, or Christless

00:00:33.380 conservatism. So NXR Studio's first annual conference, America After Trump, brings together

00:00:41.180 pastors, politicians, commentators, and Christians that are committed to strength, cooperation,

00:00:48.100 and a durable future for the American right.

00:00:52.080 Complaining is not a strategy

00:00:53.960 and despair cannot be an option.

00:00:57.480 Christ is King.

00:00:58.880 Let's live like it.

00:01:00.820 Save 50% off your ticket

00:01:02.660 only by registering before May 31st

00:01:06.260 at newchristianright.com forward slash conference.

00:01:10.900 That's newchristianright.com forward slash conference.

00:01:18.100 you are now entering restricted broadcast territory they were planning to use the term

00:01:25.480 fake news to drive a censorship program some members of the media some members of the media

00:01:30.200 they were always going to intend to crush

00:01:33.940 i say it's like a like a fractal image right you the more you zoom in the more you see it

00:01:41.980 it's like you can

00:01:42.500 This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.

00:01:50.760 Welcome to Off Limits News. I'm your host, Harrison Smith.

00:01:54.500 Now, normally, Off Limits News is a weekly news roundup where we show you the top stories and maybe some of the most missed stories over the week.

00:02:02.960 We're going to do something a little bit different today.

00:02:05.040 There are going to be some weeks where we're not able to make an episode.

00:02:08.820 And so we wanted to have something we call evergreen episodes that we can bank and show to y'all that are less about what's happening this week and more about covering a certain topic or a certain angle and dedicating an entire show to that.

00:02:23.940 And so what we're going to do today is a special episode.

00:02:27.180 It's called The Charts.

00:02:27.960 I call it The Charts.

00:02:28.740 We're going to The Charts today because what happens is as I do my news gathering and just daily I'm looking at headlines and information and I get a lot of it from X.

00:02:38.020 And what I do is if I see a chart or a graph or something, some data set that I think is interesting, I just sort of put it off to the side and I save it in its own folder.

00:02:46.640 And now on days like this where we weren't able to do a weekly update episode, then we go into the vault.

00:02:53.020 We go into the archives, the chart archives, and we find the most interesting data sets available to us.

00:02:58.620 And so this is, you know, it has elements of the news since all of these are going to be about where our world is now, where we're going, the trajectory of America, and really the world at large.

00:03:10.060 And see if we can't come to some conclusions from this.

00:03:13.360 Now, my biggest problem with this, the biggest struggle I'm going to have today, is not making this episode the biggest black pill on the planet.

00:03:23.100 If you're not familiar with that phrase, basically, it's bad news.

00:03:27.520 There's a lot of bad news, and when you look at just the statistical reality of the world today, it's hard to paint a very rosy picture, but that's not my goal.

00:03:38.900 My goal is not sit here and look at a bunch of charts and tell you, look how bad everything is.

00:03:43.440 Everything's getting worse, and oh my god, the world is ending.

00:03:46.560 That's absolutely not my goal here, and that's not what I'm going for.

00:03:50.660 What we need to do is understand the world.

00:03:52.440 What we need to do is understand the direction that we're going so that we can alter it, so that we can change it, because obviously the first step of changing the situation that we're in is simply recognizing the situation that we're in and finding the underlying causes that are driving the trajectory of the modern world.

00:04:11.540 And so actually, it was funny, as I was compiling the data sets for today's episode, I was getting a little black-pilled myself.

00:04:19.020 I was getting a little overwhelmed with some of the information I was finding, and I was thinking, how am I going to present this?

00:04:24.500 Should I even do this? I don't want to just depress people.

00:04:26.500 I don't just want to throw a bunch of stuff that really makes you think things are hopeless.

00:04:31.220 That's not my goal.

00:04:32.080 And as I'm looking through, I happen to see a chart, a graph, that doesn't actually represent any real data, but does represent sort of what I'm attempting here.

00:04:43.160 So this is chart number 25.

00:04:45.580 We can throw it up, this graph.

00:04:47.380 It simply is a, the y-axis is functional system, the x-axis, or I guess the, whatever, the up and down axis is the functional system.

00:04:56.180 The left and right is a dysfunctional system over time.

00:04:59.560 I'm sorry, so functional system at the top

00:05:01.840 dysfunctional at the bottom over time

00:05:03.580 and what you find is that if you lie

00:05:05.660 you might have a kind lie, you might

00:05:07.540 be able to soothe somebody's

00:05:09.520 you know, concern momentarily

00:05:12.080 but then things get worse and you

00:05:13.760 find yourselves having to lie more about

00:05:15.720 what's going on and then more and then more

00:05:17.640 and eventually you get a thoroughly

00:05:19.620 dysfunctional system, whereas what we're

00:05:21.600 trying to do here is present you with perhaps

00:05:23.840 what could be perceived as unkind

00:05:25.780 truths, but unkind

00:05:27.880 truths that if you accept them and understand them and integrate them into your understanding

00:05:32.160 of the world will lead to better and more functional systems in the future.

00:05:36.380 So this is my goal.

00:05:37.280 This is what we're going for here.

00:05:39.460 Whether it works or not, I guess we'll have to wait and see.

00:05:43.500 But obviously, this is a phenomenon, a pattern that you see everywhere in daily life.

00:05:47.940 I think we're seeing it right now with the Trump administration in a very big way.

00:05:52.620 And a lot of people point to what's happening with Trump and the way that he's surrounding

00:05:55.900 himself with people, and they point to, you know, King Lear, Mad King Lear. They'll point to things

00:06:01.560 in fiction that show, you know, tyrants becoming mad, but that's not an aspect of fiction. That's

00:06:09.020 real life. If you go back and look at real-life leaders that surround themselves with people who

00:06:13.860 yes-men, for lack of a better word, sycophants, this is the process that they get into. They lie,

00:06:19.440 things get worse, but then nobody wants to tell them that it's getting worse, so they lie to them

00:06:23.520 about that. So then they're making decisions on the basis of the lies that were told to make them

00:06:27.860 feel good about their past decisions. And it's a feedback loop. It's a spiral. It's a downward

00:06:32.920 spiral that will always end in destruction. So what we're trying to do here is just lay out the

00:06:38.280 facts and just understand the world as it is so that we can correct the problems that we're facing.

00:06:44.860 And so I also, but to be fair, I don't think there's such a thing as an unkind truth. The

00:06:50.440 truth is just the truth. It's not kind. It's not mean. It's just the truth. And that's something

00:06:54.340 that I may have to reiterate a few times during the show today, because some of these things

00:07:00.140 are not going to make people happy, that's for sure. They're not going to appreciate what's

00:07:05.000 being said, but it is the truth, and we have to face the truth, regardless of how we feel about it.

00:07:10.360 And so I think we can begin our real dive into the charts, into the understanding.

00:07:18.940 And this is sort of a dual chart, although the bottom one is the real one that we're paying attention to, which is 33.

00:07:28.200 If we can bring up 33 here, the top chart I consider sort of the real stock market.

00:07:35.480 This is the real stock market.

00:07:37.280 What it is is the estimated percent of 30-year-olds who are both married and homeowners, and the time is from 1950 to 2025.

00:07:46.660 And you can see a distinct and unbroken decline to the point now that, well, it's basically just unrecognizable. The construct of our world is completely broken, and a society that once was able to provide for a family with a single uneducated job, a manual labor job, could afford a house with a stay-at-home wife and kids and two cars, now is not enough to even own a house.

00:08:14.880 And now the bottom chart is the cumulative total foreign-born white-collar workers in the U.S. by year.

00:08:22.500 So this would be your H-1B visas, your not field workers, but rather sort of executives or corporate hires from foreign states.

00:08:33.400 And you can see a distinct correlation.

00:08:35.920 Now, that's not necessarily causation, but I'm going to present a lot of charts today that make the causation pretty much undeniable.

00:08:44.880 And so, again, I consider this top chart sort of the actual stock market.

00:08:48.120 Our stock market is constantly reaching new highs.

00:08:50.500 It's constantly better than ever.

00:08:52.580 If all you judged America by was the stock market, you'd think we were doing amazing.

00:08:57.620 But you look at the actual data of how people are actually doing, and it's cratering.

00:09:01.800 It's collapsing.

00:09:02.320 So we've gone from 50% or more of 30-year-olds, both married and homeowners, in 1950, which I would consider a benchmark for a successful society.

00:09:10.280 And you see it basically collapse, increasing around 1990 to where we are now, where less than 15% of people are married and own homes by the age of 30.

00:09:23.260 Now, I would consider this like red siren alarm bells if you were, you know, playing SimCity or something.

00:09:31.380 If you were playing some video game where you were trying to manage a city or a nation, you know, one of these map games, this would be like a fail condition.

00:09:40.280 right this would be you have utterly failed the game you have absolutely not achieved any of the

00:09:47.040 goals that you should have set out for yourself because this is what actually matters are people

00:09:50.800 able to build wealth are they able to become prosperous are they able to support themselves

00:09:55.200 without working themselves to the bone because this isn't a capitalistic argument you know i'm

00:10:00.680 not saying that you know the wealth of a nation is entirely dependent on the gdp it's kind of the

00:10:06.440 opposite. But it's a measure of success. It's a measure of happiness. It's a measure of stability

00:10:11.740 that people are able to own property, that they're able to work and be paid a fair wage

00:10:17.960 for their labor. And ideally, we'd go back to the 1950s where you could. And it wasn't a rare

00:10:24.440 story. I could point to somebody like my grandfather who worked for Shell Oil Company as

00:10:30.160 was a chemist. They experienced a downturn at one point and had to lay a bunch of people off. And so

00:10:35.500 he essentially got to retire at like 55 with a great pension and spent you know 40 years of his

00:10:41.440 life flying a little plane around and uh you know building his own home in the mountains it's like

00:10:47.220 that's what the world used to be like it was possible and most people had a story like that

00:10:53.360 you went to university you got a good job you were in that job for 20 years or so you retired

00:11:01.000 you got a gold watch and a vacation home, and life was good. It's a little different now. It's

00:11:06.820 actually kind of unrecognizable now. And the real thing to understand as we go through these charts

00:11:12.380 is that this is deliberate. The thing you need to understand is that as we see everything collapse,

00:11:17.140 that as you look at the data percentage over time, and you see everything is getting worse

00:11:23.180 in every possible quadrant, you have to understand it's on purpose. It's by design. It's a choice

00:11:28.380 being made it's not because we don't know what the hell to do and we're just trying our best and

00:11:33.360 everything's going badly it we figured out how to do things we actually figured out the best way to

00:11:38.600 run a society the 1950s in america was probably the peak of like human development as we know it

00:11:44.880 and it's only by going away from those traditions that built that society that we see everything

00:11:50.140 collapse and again it's very obvious and this is one of the things that you realize looking at the

00:11:55.500 news and charts like this all the time, is that all of this is kind of obvious when you really

00:12:00.680 get right down to it. Warning, this product contains nicotine. Nicotine is an addictive

00:12:05.220 chemical. All right, guys, you know the drill. This is our favorite sponsor. Knickknack,

00:12:09.160 Poliwack, Give a Dog a Bone. These are knickknacks, and they're America first, 0.95

00:12:13.680 manufacturing the product in America. They're Christ is King Maxine. You've got the foot of

00:12:17.380 our Lord and Savior crushing the head of the serpent right there on the can. They're Christians. 0.57

00:12:21.400 We know the guys.

00:12:22.500 They support us.

00:12:23.420 We need you to support them.

00:12:24.880 If you don't use nicotine, you can just skip this commercial.

00:12:27.880 If you do use nicotine, I'm not asking you to start a new habit.

00:12:31.300 You can spend money on the thing you're already buying, but actually spend less,

00:12:35.480 because I'm going to give you a deep discount here in just a second,

00:12:37.780 and you'll be supporting an America First Christian company

00:12:40.800 that also supports us over here at NXR Studios.

00:12:44.420 So you can buy it online.

00:12:45.620 You go to nicknack.com.

00:12:47.340 Use our promo code, all caps, J-O-E-L, 20 exclamation point.

00:12:52.440 That's Joel, 20 exclamation point.

00:12:54.680 And you're going to get 20% off.

00:12:56.480 That's if you buy it online, knickknack.com.

00:12:58.740 But now you can also buy Knickknack in the store.

00:13:01.920 If you go in the store and use our code, the link in the description below,

00:13:07.140 then you'll actually get paid to try out their product.

00:13:09.580 You'll get $3 back when you buy your first can.

00:13:12.240 Then you'll get $1 back when you buy can number two, three, and four.

00:13:15.840 and then another $3 back when you buy your fifth can.

00:13:19.040 It's pretty simple.

00:13:19.960 You just upload your receipt, and they'll send you the cash back.

00:13:23.500 So go to knickknack.com if you want to buy it online,

00:13:26.520 Joel 20 exclamation point,

00:13:28.280 or use our code in the description below if you're buying it in the store.

00:13:32.520 A few weeks ago, I covered Saga Metals,

00:13:35.460 trading as SAGMF in the U.S. and Saga in Canada.

00:13:40.920 It's a company that we've featured many times on this channel.

00:13:44.120 We're revisiting the story much sooner than expected to share a few major developments that are currently unfolding.

00:13:51.660 Less than 48 hours ago, they achieved a 100% drill success rate in all 57 drill holes all ahead of schedule.

00:14:00.920 The company also added $10 million to its bank account from a successful financing round dedicated entirely to drilling,

00:14:09.360 adding serious fuel to an already accelerating program.

00:14:13.420 As the U.S. and its allies move to secure the future, Saga Metals is positioning itself directly where the money, the mandates, and the momentum are flowing.

00:14:24.800 In the past six months, Saga Metals scooped another titanium project from under Rio Tinto, a company roughly 3,500 times larger by market value.

00:14:36.040 That takes execution.

00:14:37.920 It's pretty easy to see where this train is headed.

00:14:40.600 Look at the numbers.

00:14:41.640 You do the math.

00:14:42.460 Now, if you want to learn more about this critical mineral story, then check out the link in the description below.

00:14:48.960 A special thanks to Saga Metals for making today's video possible.

00:14:53.940 But of course, and one of the things I sort of had trouble with when organizing these charts is I've got charts about immigration.

00:15:02.460 I've got charts about the economy and I've got charts about how immigration affects the economy.

00:15:06.800 How do we go from one to the next?

00:15:08.760 So we can see from the last chart just how badly things have gone in terms of just building a life for yourself at a young age so you can actually build on top of a solid foundation. 0.51

00:15:20.480 Nobody owns a home or is married by the time they're 30, and that has a lot to do with immigration.

00:15:26.000 That has more than you even think just from seeing the two side-by-side charts there. 0.93

00:15:32.880 let's look at my god we there's so many amazing amazing places to go that are all terrible let's

00:15:42.100 go to 27 here and we'll go 27 through 31 and we'll just go one by one so this is per capita

00:15:47.540 gdp productivity and immigration and you'll see it sort of makes a almost looks like an infinity

00:15:53.820 right so on the left of the chart was 1996 now uh that green line is the immigration rate the blue

00:16:02.520 line is the real GDP per capita, and the red line is labor productivity. So you can see the labor

00:16:08.160 and productivity sort of matches the real GDP fairly closely, and it is in basically direct

00:16:15.840 opposition to the immigration rate. As the immigration rate is lowered, the productivity

00:16:20.780 and the GDP goes up. As the immigration rate increases, the GDP and productivity decreases

00:16:28.080 at an appropriate rate. There's a direct correlation. We can just go through these. 0.98

00:16:33.680 Let's go to the next one here. This one is for Canada, and you see something similar,

00:16:40.080 maybe a little bit more chaotic, but you can still see the trend matches. We go to the next one.

00:16:44.740 You can see this is United Kingdom, where once again, you have the blue line being the GDP per

00:16:52.000 capita and the red line being net immigration. And as you see the increase starting at around

00:16:56.940 year 2000, you see the corresponding decrease, although the decrease is much more significant

00:17:01.940 and dramatic than the increase is because there's sort of an outsized influence when

00:17:07.020 it comes to migration.

00:17:07.740 Because not only are they less productive on a per capita basis, but their welfare use 0.99

00:17:12.960 is significantly higher than native born. 0.99

00:17:14.520 And we'll get to that in just a second.

00:17:15.740 So we can go to the next one here.

00:17:17.380 So that was the Canada United Kingdom.

00:17:19.060 This is Italy.

00:17:20.000 Once again, you almost see it's dancing with itself, right? 0.64

00:17:23.380 productivity skyrockets as immigration goes down. Productivity goes down as immigration skyrockets.

00:17:29.780 I mean, it is pretty much a one-to-one kind of operation here. And I think we have one more of 1.00

00:17:35.340 these, if I'm correct. Australia. Australia also, you see this correlation, which I would argue

00:17:41.400 is evidence of a causation. I believe that's the last one we have of those. But there's like an

00:17:46.620 infinite number of these. And I could show you so many aspects of this. So this is pure

00:17:53.120 productivity, which, if you know anything about the migration program, you know it's all based

00:17:59.360 off of insane lies from the get-go, but the only argument that has ever been made about why it

00:18:06.360 would benefit the country receiving migrants is that they would receive an economic boost. Now,

00:18:10.580 that's a lie. That's just an obvious lie, and we can go through some of the numbers of household

00:18:15.480 welfare rate, but just think about how ridiculous this is and how designed and purposeful it is.

00:18:23.120 The pension systems in Europe and America are set up to be deliberate Ponzi schemes, meaning that they pay out more than a person puts in, meaning that you constantly have to have a greater number of new contributors to pay for – robbing Peter to pay Paul.

00:18:39.440 You've got to have more people coming in so you can pay out the people that you promised who paid in before.

00:18:45.620 That requires infinite growth.

00:18:48.160 It requires a constant state of growth in population and productive capacity.

00:18:52.260 And then they both wielded psychological operations and chemical operations to massively lower our birth rate.

00:19:02.640 So whether that's because of the introduction of the birth control pill, the introduction of no-fault divorce, like there are lots of contributing factors.

00:19:09.740 Obviously, women in the workforce, meaning women have to go to school, meaning they're putting off having children for decades in some cases, meaning that they're able to have less children.

00:19:18.980 There have been so many contributing factors to the lowering of the birth rate, but they're all deliberate, but they're all by design and as part of a concerted effort that the people who do it talk about.

00:19:31.260 They publish documents, the limits to growth from the Club of Rome where they say we have limited resources, so the number of people has to be limited.

00:19:40.200 Now, that only applies to first world people, but then you run into the problem of the pension system. 0.63

00:19:45.760 So they're crushing the first world that is white European population, lowering it as much as possible, birth rates below replacement, which means the pensions are insolvent. 0.87

00:19:58.140 So now you have to make up for that low birth rate that you caused. 0.99

00:20:01.040 And so you bring in immigrants to fill the birth rate, but then they all immediately go on welfare. 1.00

00:20:06.480 And so actually instead of contributing to the budget and the pension system, they detract from it. 0.98

00:20:13.020 And so instead of the workers that you brought in paying for the pension system of the retirees, countries all throughout Europe and America are raising their retirement age by up to like 10 years. 0.99

00:20:23.740 So instead of retiring at 63, you're retiring at 73 because you have to pay for all the migrants they brought in to pay for your pensions. 0.96

00:20:30.660 Are you starting to understand yet? 1.00

00:20:32.340 Like this is absurd. 0.98

00:20:33.880 This is nonsense. 0.50

00:20:34.680 And it goes on and on and on.

00:20:35.900 And I have evidence for everything that I've just laid out for you, including things.

00:20:40.160 We can go to chart number one here.

00:20:42.020 Chart number one is the welfare use rates in Minnesota by household, and it's everywhere.

00:20:46.880 And these numbers are very similar in Europe.

00:20:48.900 They're very similar all over the United States.

00:20:51.000 What you see here is three bars.

00:20:54.420 The yellow, gold, brown bar is native households.

00:20:57.480 The black bar is Somali immigrant households.

00:20:59.840 And the gray bar is Somali immigrant households who have been here for over 10 years in the United States.

00:21:06.460 And what you see is that for any welfare at all, only 21 percent of native households receive it, while 81 percent of Somali households receive it. After 10 years in the United States, that number drops only 3 percent to 78 percent still on welfare after 10 years in this country.

00:21:25.360 Medicaid is not quite as dramatic, very dramatic still, 18 for native households, 73 for Somali.

00:21:31.660 Food stamps, only 7% of native households, 54% of Somalis.

00:21:36.280 Cash welfare is received by 6% of American households, native American households, and 27% of Somali households.

00:21:44.740 So again, this is a sort of constant trend, and the question is, why would we accept this?

00:21:49.720 Why would we do this?

00:21:50.600 Why is this a function of our government at all? 1.00

00:21:54.120 Now, it's one thing if the immigrants to a country are bringing wealth to a country, are bringing prosperity to a country.

00:22:01.280 I can actually understand that.

00:22:02.900 I can actually at least hear the argument and follow the logic.

00:22:07.780 You know, places like Qatar are talked about quite a bit these days, but not a lot of people understand the immigration situation in Qatar.

00:22:16.780 It's actually, by sheer numbers, way worse than a place like Ireland and England.

00:22:22.160 Ireland and England, while they are being overwhelmed by Muslims in certain areas, like to the degree that you don't even see the natives there anymore, there are people running for office in the UK right now that do not speak English. 0.93

00:22:35.320 So it's getting really bad there, yet it's like 10% of the population, maybe more.

00:22:41.240 I don't have the exact numbers for that.

00:22:43.140 I probably do somewhere in my charts, but it's not an overwhelming degree.

00:22:47.440 Meanwhile, in Qatar, it's like only 10% of the people in Qatar are actual Qataris. 90% of them are immigrants. So why is Qatar not being overwhelmed by these immigrants? Why are they not suffering like the European states are even though they have a higher percentage of their population foreign-born immigrants?

00:23:06.840 It's because you don't become an immigrant to Qatar if you don't bring them something in return.

00:23:12.000 If you're not benefiting them, then you're not going to Qatar. 0.68

00:23:14.640 And you can go to Qatar and you can work and you can build prosperity there, but you will never be a citizen there. 0.92

00:23:19.600 You will always have to go home at the end of it or you can stay forever and your family can stay there, but you'll never be Qataris. 0.99

00:23:26.300 You just never will. That's just how it is. That's just what they've decided. 1.00

00:23:28.700 Now, all of our countries could also decide that, and we probably should because it's not even really about sheer number of immigrants or even percentage of immigrants in terms of total population. 0.99

00:23:40.660 What it's about is are those immigrants guests in your country that are there on the condition that they benefit you, or are you welcoming them in to be nothing but societal drains and, frankly, parasites to the economic system? 0.97

00:23:54.560 One way doesn't make a hell of a lot of sense. 1.00

00:23:56.980 The other way does. 0.98

00:23:57.540 The other way, the Qatari way, would actually be fine and beneficial. And hell, if you want to bring your family over but you're coming over with $10 million and you're going to build a school and you're going to be contributing to the community in some ways, then you can make that deal. You can make that argument. You can at least present it to the people of the country as if it's something good. 0.95

00:24:19.900 What's happening now is people are coming over, and they are just drains on the system.

00:24:24.180 They do not contribute anything.

00:24:25.940 And the question is, why would we operate like this?

00:24:28.420 Why is this the function of our government? 1.00

00:24:31.080 Especially when it comes to the Somalis and the Somali daycare and the fraud. 1.00

00:24:34.440 The fraud is unimaginable.

00:24:36.300 There's been a lot of talk about fraud in Minnesota.

00:24:38.300 The fraud in California dwarfs it by a country mile.

00:24:41.840 We can go to chart number two here.

00:24:44.260 Take a look at these. 0.76

00:24:45.460 Speaking of Qatar, the California fraud. 0.89

00:24:48.640 that's already been discovered. $280 billion. That is more than the total GDP of Qatar or the

00:25:00.920 country of the Ukraine. There is more California fraud by the tune of $60 to $70 billion more

00:25:10.540 than the entire GDP of the country of Qatar, one of the wealthiest countries. When you think about

00:25:17.480 you know these people run around spending hundreds of millions of dollars on whatever the hell they

00:25:22.060 want in ukraine just think about the country with all their tens of millions of people

00:25:27.240 working all day every day you know producing stuff building things all of it all year 0.65

00:25:34.060 all does not even amount even come up to the amount of fraud that is being committed in

00:25:40.960 california and the massive majority of that going to illegal immigrants or illegal welfare programs

00:25:48.580 like this is the thing when they say somali fraud what does that even mean how is it not fraud

00:25:53.600 already the idea that somalis are coming here and then american tax dollars are paying somalis to

00:26:01.300 take care of other somalis in a somali enclave what why would we do that why is this the thing

00:26:07.340 that we do why are we doing this we pay Somalis take care of other Somalis and then you go to the 0.79

00:26:14.140 daycare and there's not even anybody in there it's all just fraud but even if it was totally legit

00:26:18.900 even if they really were even if every daycare was jam-packed with kids and every you know hospice

00:26:24.180 was full of dying patients which none of them are but even if it was all legit it would still be

00:26:30.100 in my opinion totally fraudulent totally theft why why do we allow this why do we have a system

00:26:37.800 like this it just doesn't make any sense and it's only getting worse and we can go to

00:26:42.960 number seven here there's a couple ways of of seeing this image

00:26:47.200 uh actually so so this is the chart that sort of shows you you know what's going on exactly we can

00:26:55.160 go to number uh nine first there's some number nine and then and then 24 so this is h1b visas

00:27:01.940 soar as u.s tech tech workers face mass layoffs and so in the red you see h1b visa approval in

00:27:08.600 the thousands whereas in the blue on the blue bar you see u.s tech layoffs in the thousands

00:27:13.460 so starting in around 2021 you had a couple thousand layoffs but you had hundreds of thousands

00:27:19.640 of h1b approvals uh to 2022 you have 150 000 u.s tech layoffs so you have 350 000 h1b hires and

00:27:30.760 of course the uh number of layoffs gets even higher in 2023 as does the number of h1b visa

00:27:36.500 approvals so what's happening here is that you can fire one american hire three indians and pay them

00:27:43.940 basically the equivalent amount which is again goes to what we showed at the beginning of the 0.58

00:27:49.620 show the lack of the ability to purchase a home or get married, get your feet under you, get a good

00:27:55.840 job, get something that is in line with the university degree that you achieved. It's not

00:28:02.920 a coincidence. They are closely and deeply intertwined. And the latest headline as the

00:28:09.320 making this video, was that since COVID, the jobs in America have gone 90% to non-American

00:28:19.140 workers, to foreign-born workers.

00:28:21.700 I don't have a chart showing that, but I think you can imagine.

00:28:24.880 I think you can imagine what that's like.

00:28:26.940 And I think 24 here is a display that shows.

00:28:30.300 So U.S. employment breakdown by nativity, CPS household survey, 90% of net gains to

00:28:36.460 foreign-born workers since pre-COVID peak. And so, of course, you can see on the left,

00:28:42.720 February 2020, on the right, March 2026, native-born, this is total employment levels.

00:28:48.840 So you see they're fairly consistent, 130 million native-born, 130 million from February 2020 to

00:28:58.540 March 2026, whereas the foreign-born went from 26 million to nearly 32 million, meaning that the

00:29:06.040 net job gains by nativity since 2020, native born people have only gained 0.471 million jobs. So

00:29:15.060 less than half a million jobs have been gained by the native born while the foreign born have seen

00:29:20.280 their net job gain up 4.27 million. Okay. So nearly 10 times the amount, 90% of all new jobs 0.74

00:29:28.200 created since 2020 have gone to foreign born workers. So, you know, this isn't, this isn't a 0.57

00:29:33.580 racial thing. This is a national thing. This is a nationalistic thing. This is American workers of

00:29:39.200 every race, color, and creed being discriminated against by industries, companies that are hiring

00:29:47.400 and preferring foreign-born workers who are either willing to work for less, are more pressured to

00:29:56.600 accept abuse on the work site because if you get fired, then you're going to be sent back home,

00:30:01.940 So they're more incentivized to put up with bad working conditions.

00:30:04.820 I mean there are lots of reasons, and on top of all that, there's simply the ethnic mafia aspect of the whole thing where groups of people will get into positions of power and then benefit their ethnic group by giving jobs to people who are like them.

00:30:18.660 This is a very, very common scheme being run that nations are getting in on now.

00:30:24.860 Like India is now treating its diaspora like a foreign policy block, saying we can now shape American policy because we have so many people in America who are actually Indian, who are working on behalf of India's interest, and we can now manipulate America because of the overwhelming numbers we have in some of their cities.

00:30:46.020 This is what the Indian government says.

00:30:49.180 The Syrian government was asked to take back something like 700,000 Syrian, quote-unquote, refugees who, quote-unquote, fled Syria because of the mean Bashir al-Assad regime.

00:30:58.980 Well, they can go back now.

00:31:00.440 Bashir al-Assad is not in Syria.

00:31:02.040 Syria's civil war is over.

00:31:03.640 They should all go back. 1.00

00:31:04.680 But Syria won't accept them because they find them useful. 0.56

00:31:07.940 The money they bring in that they siphon out of Germany, the influence they have on the German government, it's very useful to Syria, the government, the people in Syria.

00:31:16.020 to utilize their diaspora as a political bloc.

00:31:19.880 Once again, I ask you, why would we put up with this?

00:31:22.360 Why is this okay? 1.00

00:31:23.640 Why are we allowing foreign nations, 1.00

00:31:25.520 and we, I mean, Europe and America and Canada and Australia,

00:31:29.200 I mean, anywhere the European diaspora lands,

00:31:31.620 you have diasporas from other countries

00:31:33.740 making their way into white European countries

00:31:37.240 and manipulating their politics 0.63

00:31:39.800 for the benefit of their home country.

00:31:41.620 Why? Why do we allow this?

00:31:42.760 Why would we allow this?

00:31:44.440 Why have we gotten to this point?

00:31:46.020 It's all been manipulation. We'll get to why we're at this point and how all of these things

00:31:50.380 correspond, intersect, intertwine, relate to one another. In case you need another

00:31:56.740 visualization of what it looks like, how you can understand the lack of new jobs following COVID,

00:32:04.160 we can go back to number seven here. You can see the obvious drop-off there where those red lines

00:32:11.500 are and you can see where the native born dropped off completely the foreign born dropped off 0.88

00:32:15.780 completely and then they start to build back up well that yellow line the native born line

00:32:19.880 never actually reached like it basically reaches where it was before but certainly never exceeds 0.57

00:32:25.120 it and then it goes back down whereas the foreign born you can see yes their jobs dropped the same 0.96

00:32:31.040 that the native born did but when they started getting jobs back it just kept going and they're 0.78

00:32:36.360 getting into more jobs so they've recovered and gained some whereas the native born lost a bunch

00:32:41.120 of jobs and merely recovered and did not exceed any more than they had previously had. So that's 0.99

00:32:47.440 sort of a visualization of it. It's even worse if you take the longer view to go to graphic number

00:32:52.200 six is the same data, but an even longer where the red line on top is the employment level of

00:32:59.280 foreign born and the blue is the employment level of native born. And the employment level is lower

00:33:05.040 since it's a index of thousands of persons rather than the total number. It's a per capita reading.

00:33:11.700 So you can see per capita, the foreign born are more employed than the native born. And the

00:33:18.300 recovery again was significantly less for the native than it was for the foreign. And of course 1.00

00:33:26.900 this was on purpose and combined with the drive, the anti-white genocidal drive inspired in part 0.63

00:33:37.220 by Black Lives Matter, but mostly by just general anti-white sentiment being widely accepted. We can 0.98

00:33:43.640 go to graphic number four here. This is a very famous one, probably like one of, if not the

00:33:50.080 most important images in our modern age. Corporate America pledged to hire more people of color. It

00:33:56.000 actually did. And so basically because of the lie of Black Lives Matter and the horrible racist 0.96

00:34:02.880 abuse of cops, I guess, they decided, hey, let's all discriminate openly against white people 0.88

00:34:08.620 on purpose and celebrate this achievement. So white people only got 6% of the jobs added to 0.57

00:34:17.560 the S&P 100 companies. The industries in the S&P 100 added more than 300,000 jobs. 94% of those

00:34:25.860 jobs went to people of color now are people of color that much more deserving than white people 0.55

00:34:32.020 after all white people are still the majority in america so i mean this is beyond you know a lack

00:34:37.700 of representation this is a total inversion of what it would look like if the decisions were

00:34:42.760 being made in an unbiased and unmanipulated manner so no people of color are not you know 0.77

00:34:50.080 10 times more capable than white people. This was clear, blatant, open discrimination. I mean,

00:34:56.260 they say in this chart, the year after Black Lives Matter protests, they hired 94% people of

00:35:01.320 color. Now, the other thing to understand, this is a top-down decision. This was imposed by

00:35:06.280 corporations like BlackRock, big private equity firms that said, we are now implanting DEI, ESG.

00:35:14.260 This gets talked about a lot. The source of it is the banks. The banks decided that they would

00:35:19.280 have these arbitrary metrics that they would force corporations to abide by in order to get

00:35:23.440 investment so it completely upended and inverted the incentive structure of the capitalistic system

00:35:29.580 that we have to where you could do something as a corporation that would get you less customers

00:35:35.900 now typically in a capitalistic system you would avoid anything that would lower your customer

00:35:40.520 base or that would mean you were selling less products but you'd get more investment so sure 0.88

00:35:45.540 You might lose $20 million of merchandise sales you would have gotten otherwise by having a transgender children display in your store like Target or one of these corporations. 0.95

00:35:57.220 You're probably not going to sell as many – I don't want to talk about what they're selling – the bathing suits for children. 0.99

00:36:06.880 I think you know what I'm talking about, and we don't need to go any farther than that.

00:36:09.540 You're not going to sell that many of those things, but by doing that, your ESG score goes up. 0.96

00:36:13.760 Oh, you're showing that you are societally responsible because you're pushing transgenderism on children, and I'm a giant New York bank that thinks that that's valuable. 0.99

00:36:21.680 So we're going to force that on you, and in exchange, then we're going to up your investment portfolio status, which means you're going to get hundreds of millions of dollars of new investment, cash money injected into your company. 0.99

00:36:34.480 So do the thing that makes you less money, but because it comports with the societal construct of the people in power, they reward you with more money.

00:36:42.780 So you're actually incentivized to do things that are not good for the business because you get these cash injections.

00:36:49.880 I honestly don't understand how they got away with implementing this.

00:36:53.400 Like technically it should be illegal, and I don't even necessarily agree with the law.

00:36:56.980 The law is Dodge versus Ford, and basically Ford back in the day wanted to pay its people really well and wanted to prioritize sort of money back into the company to make the workers happy, to build the company out more.

00:37:10.120 And they were sued by Dodge, I think it was Dodge, because Dodge prioritized returning money to the investors. Basically, the decision of this Supreme Court case, Dodge v. Ford, was that companies have to prioritize the monetary return of the investors.

00:37:28.660 Again, I don't necessarily agree with that law, but that is the law.

00:37:31.300 And so the question becomes what happens when the investment companies are just abandoning their fiduciary duty, making decisions that they know we're going to make less money because they've decided to use the power they have as the money changers to force societal changes on an unwilling populace.

00:37:49.540 They just decided we're going to do this, and of course Larry Fink, the head of BlackRock, said we're going to use capital to change behaviors.

00:37:55.760 what why why were they allowed to do this and this is one of those things where you talk to 0.96

00:38:01.560 investment bankers you're like so what's the deal with esg and they're like oh yeah it's just a

00:38:04.780 that's another you know um metric by which uh we judge things and it's like yeah but it's it's

00:38:10.640 totally got an inverse relationship to productivity like diversity is in an inverse relationship to

00:38:16.160 productivity we will show you the charts we got a lot more to show you that too why would you

00:38:20.160 have a incentive to do something that lowered productivity and the investment banker will just

00:38:24.960 go, I don't know. That's just, it's just a new thing that's happening. So we just take it into

00:38:28.920 account. It's just great. They just accept it. They just go, okay, we're judging companies on

00:38:33.540 what percentage of their board are black lesbian women? What? Why? Why would that be the, why would 0.98

00:38:40.820 that be the metric you judge by? Oh, because you hate straight white people? Got it. Like, 0.99

00:38:45.660 what else could it be? What else could it possibly be? So when you look at the graph of,

00:38:52.240 30-year-olds not being able to afford houses. It's got reasons. There are reasons behind it.

00:38:59.640 It's because foreigners are being brought in to work for less, to accept things that the American 0.99

00:39:06.300 workers would never accept. People in America, the majority of which are white people, are being 0.75

00:39:12.480 deliberately discriminated against in high-paying corporate jobs. These things have reasons. They

00:39:16.860 have explanations it's not a mystery it's a design it's it's on purpose you know if the 1.00

00:39:25.100 reason you're bringing in migrants is to build up the pension system the minute you realize 0.97

00:39:30.540 they're not contributing to the pension system wouldn't you reverse the flow when you go okay 1.00

00:39:34.700 wait this is being this is the effect of this is contrary to our desire let's undo this but they

00:39:42.580 don't. They actually make it illegal to talk about in Europe. Actually, if you want to present the

00:39:47.840 evidence for why immigration is a failed policy, you'll go to jail. So they aren't interested in 0.98

00:39:54.160 actually doing the thing they say they're doing. They're just hijacking your virtue to use against

00:39:59.800 you because European people, highly empathetic, highly caring and charitable, when they're told

00:40:04.960 there's this population that's fleeing from war, they're desperate, they need help, they're refugees,

00:40:09.880 European people are inclined to believe that and to open their doors and to accept them, and that's a good thing because they're good people because they want to help their neighbors in times of stress. 0.84

00:40:19.100 Only their neighbors are deceitful scum in many cases and know that European empathy can be used against them, and so they take advantage of it. 1.00

00:40:27.420 So they present themselves as desperate refugees when really they're rapacious criminals. 1.00

00:40:33.820 It's really not that complicated, and everybody knows this is going on, so it's going on on purpose. 1.00

00:40:38.580 The purpose of a system is what it does. If the system continually delivers to you welfare-dependent migrants that are criminal, then that's why they're doing it. It's not an accident, and they could reverse it at any time. 0.99

00:40:51.440 They're so desperate to keep it going that they'll throw children in prison or beat their heads with sticks like they're doing in Ireland and the Netherlands right now if they dare to express discontent at the obvious deliberate deconstruction of their entire nation.

00:41:05.960 It's all very sick but also obvious.

00:41:08.740 All right, so just to round off, just to sort of finalize what I'm talking about with the economic impacts, we can go to 15 here, graph 15.

00:41:18.220 This is, again, buying a home, 1985 versus 2022. 0.86

00:41:22.040 This is for the baby boomers out there that say, 0.99

00:41:23.900 just pull yourself up by your bootstraps. 0.98

00:41:25.740 I did it, you can too.

00:41:27.080 And for baby boomers, buying a house in 1985 versus 2022.

00:41:31.700 So in 1985, baby boomers were making a medium household income

00:41:35.280 of $23,620, whereas the medium home price was $83,200.

00:41:41.840 So about four times the median household income.

00:41:44.560 For millennials, a medium household income is $74,580, whereas the average house price is nearly half a million dollars, so significantly more, okay?

00:41:57.160 This, again, by design and a consequence of all of the other horrible economic decisions that have been made in the recent past.

00:42:04.900 And we can go, again, in understanding sort of where this goes and what really is happening here, we can go to number 12. This, again, I think is a very important graph in understanding how the world is the way it is.

00:42:24.600 So this is per capita lifetime budgetary impacts of whites, blacks, and Hispanics. 0.66

00:42:29.460 So this is less about immigration and it's more about race. 0.61

00:42:31.800 But you see the average white individual over their lifetime contributes to the governmental budget.

00:42:39.460 The tax amount that they contribute over their lifetime is around $220,805. 0.59

00:42:47.400 So over their lifetime, white people contribute about a quarter million dollars more to the general welfare than they receive in taxes and services, whereas for Hispanic people, it's a negative 588,000 contribution, negative detriment, whereas for black people, it is negative 751,000. 0.63

00:43:14.500 Now, this is only sustainable because there are so many more white people right now than there are Hispanic or black people. What happens when white people are a minority and you only have a small number of people contributing and a huge number of people receiving? 0.56

00:43:33.140 Some people think that that would cause just a sort of a chain reaction, total collapse scenario, which is true, but not in the way a lot of people perceive a collapse scenario. 0.84

00:43:43.560 It'll be more like South Africa.

00:43:44.920 South Africa, I mean, the numbers are insane, and these aren't totally accurate, but just off the top of my head, it's like, go look up the numbers for South Africa.

00:43:54.760 Look up how many people in South Africa are totally dependent on government welfare.

00:43:59.660 I believe it's something like 80%.

00:44:01.540 And then look up how many people in South Africa even pay taxes. What you'll find is that it turns out if you incrementally increase the amount that you're taxing people, incrementally increase the amount that you're giving out to nonproductive citizens, you can end up with a situation where like 5% of the population is funding the other 95%.

00:44:23.000 And in South Africa, A, there are still leftists.

00:44:26.660 They still exist, even though they're living in the ruins of a greater country, even though they are seeing with their own eyes the way that their own ideas have led to the absolute degradation and destruction of everything that they thought they were upholding.

00:44:41.540 And yet they still have leftists in South Africa.

00:44:44.620 They still have an illegal immigration problem in South Africa, folks. 0.94

00:44:48.440 south africa the number one like rape capital of the world a place where you know people are

00:44:53.360 i think they only have the electricity on half of the day because people are constantly stealing

00:44:58.040 the copper out of the power lines that can't even maintain the nuclear arsenal they once had 1.00

00:45:04.080 they still have an immigration problem because everywhere else around them is that much worse so 0.99

00:45:08.840 things can get a hell of a lot worse than they are now if we allow things to continue this way 0.92

00:45:13.920 again i think people have this idea of like eventually it'll get to a point where it can't

00:45:17.380 be sustained, and we'll have to flip the table and reset things. That doesn't happen. No, it's

00:45:22.360 just slow degradation forever. That's totally possible. I mean, look at the Soviet Union. The

00:45:28.120 Soviet Union lasted 80 years, and it was – theoretically, and you can debate how real our 0.96

00:45:33.420 opposition was, but it was opposed at every pass by a giant, powerful, monolithic, hegemonic, 0.78

00:45:40.460 capitalist structure that was, you know, at war with it quietly all over the world constantly.

00:45:46.740 What happens if America goes communist? Is there another America out there

00:45:50.500 to defend against it, to, you know, fight against the push of communism? If it lasted for 80 years,

00:45:57.940 sort of endless degradation, endless collapse for 80 years straight, you know, how long can it last

00:46:04.140 if there was no opposition? It could last forever. So again, there's this idea that like, well,

00:46:08.520 eventually you know it'll become overborn and we'll have to reset there's no guarantee that

00:46:13.840 that would ever happen and so we can look at like where this goes and you know what it's causing

00:46:22.120 let's go to 44 here because this is where we get to the sort of black pilling part of this is where

00:46:28.700 you get to the the values part that corresponds to all of this so this is percentage who say

00:46:34.760 these values are quote very important to them patriotism religion having children or community

00:46:40.280 involvement and you can see that you know and it's it's going from 1998 to 2023 and there is a

00:46:48.000 distinct drop is not even the right word total collapse might be more accurate where patriotism

00:46:55.480 religion having children and community involvement have all cratered in the number of people who say

00:47:01.540 that these values are very important to them.

00:47:03.840 Patriotism, not important. Religion, not 0.98

00:47:05.500 important. Having children, not important. Community involvement, 1.00

00:47:07.960 not important. Money, however,

00:47:10.760 seems to have gained.

00:47:11.700 It seems to be the only one on the rise.

00:47:13.720 It seems like in 1998, people

00:47:15.300 tended to value money and

00:47:17.500 consider money very important

00:47:18.960 at a lower rate than they do now,

00:47:21.560 which, again, is not an accident

00:47:23.660 because what's happening is that

00:47:25.640 in America and really all over

00:47:27.720 the world, we are replacing genuine

00:47:29.860 values genuine you know family and friends and community with money with material with

00:47:38.140 digital approximations it's very sad but it's having a devastating impact

00:47:46.080 let me go to 45 here this is i'll try i'll try to tile this in together but it should be fairly

00:47:54.560 obvious from the charts we're seeing so this is a pew 2020 poll has a doctor or health care

00:47:59.400 provider ever told you that you have a mental health condition? This is the percentage of

00:48:03.320 people saying yes. And you have women and men. So women is the green line, men is the blue line.

00:48:09.380 For conservatives, you have, it looks like about 25% of young conservative women have been, well,

00:48:15.780 about 20% of 18 to 29-year-old conservative women have been told by a healthcare provider that they

00:48:20.860 have a mental health condition. For men, it's around 12, 13%, and it goes down the older that

00:48:26.240 they get. So same thing with moderates, although women is a little bit higher. Still, about 30%

00:48:32.080 of 30 to 49-year-old moderate women have been told they have a mental health condition.

00:48:37.700 Now, when liberals, when you get to the liberal section, the difference is obvious, and it's stark.

00:48:41.420 And young liberal women are far and away the most likely to have ever been told they have a mental

00:48:48.020 health condition, with over 50% of liberal women, 18 to 29, having been diagnosed at one point with

00:48:55.900 a mental health condition. Now, obviously, there's some contributing factors to that. You could say,

00:49:00.360 well, isn't it more likely that young liberal women are the demographic that would go see a 0.97

00:49:05.720 psychiatrist, that would go see a mental health professional? And to me, that's sort of a chicken 0.56

00:49:09.660 and the egg kind of thing. I mean, yes, they are the more likely to go see the psychiatrist, but

00:49:15.160 is that not sort of a symptom of their condition, that they are looking for meaning, that they are

00:49:21.820 lost and desperate for some corrective measure, and so they go seeking out mental health care

00:49:28.020 because that's the sort of secular approved method of bettering your life. They don't have

00:49:35.300 church to go to. They don't really have family to confide in, so they pay a medical professional

00:49:39.700 to diagnose them and put them on pills. It's very sad. Let's go to 46 here, and we'll go 46 through

00:49:45.320 49. These are all sort of part of the same collection. Is the digital world out-competing

00:49:49.700 a real-world commitment. Average agreement with different descriptions of self, five equals

00:49:54.620 strongly agree, one equals strongly disagree. And so this is people rating themselves, basically,

00:49:59.240 and they're asked, are you good at this? Are you bad at this? So people asking, are you good at

00:50:05.440 making plans and following through? Well, for age 60 plus, they say, yeah, yeah, we're pretty

00:50:11.300 strongly agree. I'm good at making plans and following through. Of course, 40 to 59, a little

00:50:17.880 bit lower, but the really low one and the ever cratering one from 2016 to 2024 is that lowest

00:50:24.080 cohort, 16 to 39. From 2016 to 2024, they went from upper fours or the mid fours. In other words,

00:50:33.880 most people strongly agreeing that they can make plans and following through to 3.8. So just a

00:50:39.480 collapse in their ability to just like have the will to live and do things. Perseveres until

00:50:45.740 finished they don't persevere anymore they don't persevere they don't stick to it they got no

00:50:49.900 gumption i guess you could say is easily distracted most of them say yeah i'm i'm very easily

00:50:56.320 distracted can be careless and again you've got the older cohorts the older age groups saying no

00:51:03.680 i'm not i'm not very careless all the time and the younger cohort saying yeah yeah i'm pretty

00:51:07.620 careless out there and this this goes to you know we can let's see we we go to the other charts from

00:51:16.960 this but there's an important one up at the top i believe i'll find it here there you go number five

00:51:26.020 number five is sort of the the all-in-one chart that relates to the other charts that we're going

00:51:31.680 through right here. This is self-derogation for 12th graders in the U.S. So that's basically

00:51:37.860 talking badly about yourself, feeling badly about yourself, feeling like degrading yourself or

00:51:43.880 feeling degraded. And you can see that from 2009, you see a distinct uptick in the number of USA

00:51:52.800 12th graders, seniors in high school, who basically don't like themselves or think badly about

00:51:58.000 themselves it is a crisis of confidence that people are experiencing and the people experiencing

00:52:03.420 it the most are liberal girls followed by liberal boys then far down below them are conservative

00:52:09.380 girls and then conservative boys and this is the thing that you'll notice and we'll go to 39 here

00:52:14.920 the correlation is unavoidable it's not sort of a scatter plot where you have you you know there's

00:52:22.920 some correlation sure you can draw a line but it's not exact no no it is a step by step it is a

00:52:27.980 direct causal link. Whereas on the left, this is percentage of younger people diagnosed with a

00:52:34.740 mental health problem. On the left, you have strong Democrat. On the right, you have strong

00:52:38.380 Republican. And from left to right, it is a almost incremental step down from 56% of strong

00:52:45.980 Democrats having a mental health issue to 41% weak Democrats, all the way to only 15%

00:52:52.620 for strong Republicans. So there is a direct correlation between your political outlook

00:52:58.900 and your mental health condition. And it is really unavoidable and goes to explain a lot

00:53:06.600 about these results that we're seeing. We can go to 38 here. This is like a chart that sort

00:53:12.460 of explains the numbers that you're seeing. This is an NBC News poll for Generation Z.

00:53:18.160 these are percentage of people who say

00:53:20.800 it's important for your definition of success

00:53:22.860 so men who voted for Trump

00:53:24.420 their number one thing

00:53:26.740 they consider important for their personal

00:53:28.700 definition for success is having children

00:53:30.420 it's their number one priority 0.99

00:53:32.060 for women who voted for Harris

00:53:34.080 it's the lowest

00:53:36.580 so again not

00:53:38.220 oh they're both somewhere in the middle or one's a little higher

00:53:40.640 than the other, no no, for men who voted for Trump

00:53:42.820 number one is having children

00:53:44.180 for women who voted for Harris it's the last

00:53:46.800 So this is a total deliberate inversion of priorities, of concerns. And of course, one of the most famous charts out there right now is number 11. This is called the concern heat map.

00:54:03.120 and what it is you're seeing two they almost look like targets right with bullseyes

00:54:08.380 and the closer towards the center you are is the closer towards you as an individual and so that

00:54:15.540 center circle is you the circle just outside of that is your immediate family circle outside of

00:54:20.060 that is your extended family circle outside of that is your immediate community to eventually

00:54:24.100 you're getting out to those outside circles which are things like rocks you know so what they do is

00:54:29.140 they ask conservatives, you know, what do you value more? And conservatives, the closer the

00:54:34.820 thing is to themselves, they basically give more concern and care towards it. So they value their

00:54:40.960 own family more than they value the family of foreigners. For liberals, it's the exact opposite.

00:54:45.320 For liberals, their greatest concern is reserved for the people and things farthest away from

00:54:52.140 themselves so they tend to and they consider this you know empathetic and um you know charitable i

00:55:00.060 guess but it's really not it's it's inverted it's unnatural it's it's bizarre and implanted it's not

00:55:06.200 something that arises in a healthy healthy functioning system this is an outside force

00:55:11.240 manipulating people and basically confusing and distorting their you know virtuous

00:55:19.700 world construct to be completely inverted so liberal people literally value are concerned

00:55:26.060 about and care more about things that are less like them and i'm not kidding that heat chart

00:55:31.580 shows that liberals will genuinely care more about an amoeba on a different planet than they

00:55:39.820 care about their own children and it sounds crazy but is it really out of whack with the uh stuff

00:55:45.720 that we're seeing with the information that I'm presenting to you right now, like we go to

00:55:50.480 number 10, chart number 10. This is, has a doctor or healthcare provider ever told you you have a

00:55:56.800 mental health condition? Once again, we see not only are liberal people significantly more likely

00:56:01.960 to say yes, white people are significantly more likely to say yes, especially white liberals. So

00:56:08.280 white liberals, they say 38% in this poll have said yes, whereas only 19% of non-white

00:56:15.420 people who say they're very liberal have also been diagnosed with this so again this is about 0.89

00:56:21.120 sort of the deliberate brainwashing of specifically white liberal women white liberal women have been 0.96

00:56:29.980 convinced to value things that are unnatural that are at odds with their natural inclinations that 0.78

00:56:36.520 are just, I guess unnatural is sort of the only word to say for it. They're trying to like force

00:56:45.760 themselves into a shape that they don't naturally come in, right? Naturally and without outside

00:56:52.100 influence, women will always value their children, their husband, their immediate family. It's only 1.00

00:57:00.400 by continuous brainwashing, all of society manipulation focused on these particular

00:57:07.360 populations that are having this incredible effect. So we can go to chart number 14 here.

00:57:14.660 This is the suicide rate percentage change since 2023. And again, you see female teens 0.92

00:57:22.180 are the far and away standout breakaway tragedy in this so the suicide rate for men has actually

00:57:31.040 gone down some but for women it's gone up in their 20s and 30s it's gone up significantly but

00:57:37.820 for teens so the younger you are if you're female the more likely you are to want to commit suicide

00:57:44.340 and this is in 17 different countries so again it's not just america where this is happening

00:57:49.840 And this is directly correspondent to and in line with their political radicalization.

00:57:57.600 We can go to 19 here, one of many charts that you can find if you go out and look for them, which shows the ideology gap opening between young men and young women, where young men are mostly actually kind of to the left.

00:58:11.960 It shows them breaking a little bit to the right, but this is South Korea, the U.S., Germany, and the U.K., and you see in all cases women have become significantly more liberal, and the gap between women and men has widened massively.

00:58:25.300 So it used to be that, sure, women would be a little bit more liberal than men, but not much.

00:58:29.660 Now, men became a little bit more conservative, but it's women who have become radically more liberal over that time. 0.66

00:58:35.140 So they've become radically more liberal, and they've become radically less happy.

00:58:38.940 We can go to 26 as well, another version of this where, once again, liberal women are most likely to feel alone, and they're most likely to be unsatisfied with life. 0.74

00:58:51.260 Not a coincidence by any means.

00:58:54.240 So just to sort of get through some of the rest of these, we don't have too much time, and I've got some good charts to show you at the very end.

00:59:02.300 We'll try to put a bow on this.

00:59:04.500 Let's go to chart 47 here.

00:59:05.920 This is extroversion and trust, also in decline.

00:59:08.580 So again, the red is the youth. And you can see people who rate themselves. They're asked, are you outgoing? Are you helpful to others? Are you trusting? Or do you start arguments? And in all cases, the youth are significantly less well-adjusted than their older counterparts.

00:59:25.900 48 here. This is young adults' personalities changing with conscientiousness in freefall.

00:59:32.340 So this is a very disturbing chart, but essentially they say this is the relative

00:59:37.760 change in strength of different personality traits from 2014, or they're taking 2014 as the

00:59:43.820 average, and it does go from 2014 to 2024, and you see conscientiousness collapses, neuroticism

00:59:50.080 increases, agreeableness collapses, and extroversion collapses. Now, obviously, this has a lot to do

00:59:55.480 with electronics and things like that. We can go to the last one here, 49. This is birth rates,

01:00:03.140 right? So birth rates falling, but they're falling for progressives a lot more than

01:00:07.160 conservatives. So a lot of these are sort of a chicken and the egg thing. Okay, are conservatives

01:00:12.460 having more babies because they're happier? Are they happier because they're having more babies?

01:00:18.340 The answer is yes. The answer is yes, either way, you need to have more babies.

01:00:22.020 35 here explains this and shows this and this is sort of the point of what i'm talking about here 0.51

01:00:28.800 young married moms are the happiest this is percentage of women age 22 to 35 who are very

01:00:34.080 happy married moms 41 say they're very happy if they're married but don't have children it's 38

01:00:40.960 if they're unmarried only 18 of unmarried women unmarried mothers say that they're happy whereas

01:00:46.920 unmarried and childless is 14 so again a direct step down one to the next so in other words i can 0.95

01:00:52.560 say with the data the best possible thing to be is a married mother the next best would be a mother

01:00:59.500 even if you're not married and only below that so i mean it's or rather married even if you're not

01:01:06.560 even if you don't have children so it's not a question you know there's this idea that it's like

01:01:12.400 the way things were before is because of superstition or tradition people just didn't

01:01:17.340 know better that's why they were stay-at-home moms because they were forced to by their mean

01:01:21.360 husbands no that was actually the correct way to be if you were to actually put it to a scientific

01:01:26.660 test and say what is the best way to make a population that is happy healthy and productive

01:01:31.180 it would be to get married young and to have children and to uphold frankly biblical concepts

01:01:37.580 of morality. Once you do that, happiness simply comes. What we have instead is people chasing

01:01:43.200 happiness, trying to reach out for some facsimile or illusion of happiness, and we find that they're 1.00

01:01:50.880 depressed and hopeless and broke and being replaced by foreigners because they've been 1.00

01:01:55.940 convinced to support liberalism, which is systematically destroying all of the things 1.00

01:02:01.740 that make our society strong and functional in the first place. So again, we don't have to

01:02:06.440 ask about this. We don't have to wonder about this. It's not really even a question. It's

01:02:11.400 an obvious fact. Sadness, unhappiness, misery is directly correlated to liberal ideas. And that's

01:02:21.620 just the data. It's just the facts. Don't come at me. Don't shoot the messenger here. You don't

01:02:25.900 like it. Take it up with the universe. Have an argument with God because this is the way that

01:02:31.120 he made things, and it's up to us to comport ourselves with his will, not try to impose ours

01:02:36.220 on him. And this is one, it's, you know, out of all the charts I have that all show population

01:02:41.800 collapse and racial strife and all this stuff, this one is just, it's just lovely. It's chart

01:02:47.480 number 16. This will be our last chart for today. And this is the effect of naming cows on milk

01:02:54.320 yield. And so you see here, cows that are uncared for, cows that are not named, that are treated

01:03:01.580 like, you know, a piece of meat, a machine rather than a living being, they only produce around

01:03:06.900 7.68 liters of milk. Whereas if a cow is named and it's loved and it's treated like a member of

01:03:12.700 the family, their milk yield goes up almost double. It's pretty wild, or maybe not almost

01:03:19.340 double i'm looking at the chart as if it goes zero to 82 but a massive increase in the number of in

01:03:25.720 the amount of milk produced so again what does this mean is this really the most profound chart

01:03:30.600 i think it is i really think it is and you know you see stuff like this all over the place there

01:03:34.840 are some amazing studies that like you can do yourself where like mold will not grow on you

01:03:41.460 know people do it with rice the wet rice you leave it out mold grows on the one that you you know 1.00

01:03:46.460 send bad vibes to you, you go and you've talked to the rice, you say, I hate you rice, you suck 1.00

01:03:50.720 rice. It'll grow mold. Whereas if you talk to the rice on the other side and say, we love you rice, 1.00

01:03:55.620 you're amazing. And it doesn't grow mold. Literally there's stuff like this that it seems

01:03:59.060 unbelievable, but it's rapid, it's, it's repeatable. You can actually do these studies over and over

01:04:04.060 and get the same results over and over. There's something about our mindset. There's something

01:04:07.900 about, uh, you know, the connections that we have to other living things, plants, animals,

01:04:13.700 or even just the universe around us that has a tangible effect.

01:04:16.860 And so while it might be kind of a funny thing to bring up,

01:04:20.340 naming dairy cows as being some profound thing,

01:04:23.880 I really think it is.

01:04:24.800 I think there's something there that sort of goes to everything else

01:04:28.540 that we're talking about.

01:04:29.120 There's something about the human connection,

01:04:31.740 the human appreciation to those things that are most important to you

01:04:35.760 that confers some intangible metaphysical benefit upon them.

01:04:41.420 And you can see just almost extrapolate that out to a wider view, and that's what we're experiencing right now where people have been convinced to hate their neighbors. 0.91

01:04:50.920 People have been convinced to hate their own family, to value these foreign criminals over their innocent victims.

01:04:58.280 There's something deeply troubling about all of this, and in a universe designed by God that is conscious and responds to our will and our energy that we put out, it's having a detrimental and ever-increasing effect.

01:05:12.240 And so when we look at the charts showing the collapse of achieving milestones – in fact, we'll go to one more chart just to bum you out one more time before we go.

01:05:21.800 34 here, adult milestones.

01:05:24.240 So beyond being able to own a home, beyond getting married, it's whether you're living on your own, if you've ever been married, if you have a child that you live with or own a home.

01:05:33.660 All of these things have collapsed in the last 40 years to the point that they're a tiny minority of people who are achieving what used to be sort of just standard life milestones, things that everybody was expected to have achieved by the time they were 30 are now out of reach for a huge number of people.

01:05:57.200 And while that can be depressing and you see the trajectory and you see it's all downward, there's hardly anywhere where there is an uptick, it's important to understand that there's a reason that that's happening and that it's not just a force of unconquerable nature that we have to deal with.

01:06:11.700 It's the decisions being made on the basis of the morality being pushed.

01:06:15.740 If we can change the morality, change the decisions that we're making, we can reverse this.

01:06:20.320 We can reclaim our sovereignty.

01:06:23.040 We can reclaim our prosperity.

01:06:24.720 We can create a world once again that works and is functional and happy and prosperous and productive. 0.98

01:06:30.760 We just have to actually look at what brings those conditions about, not pursue some ridiculous manipulation fed to us by a gigantic society-wide cabal of scumbags that have deliberately destroyed the minds of especially our young women since they're the easiest to manipulate. 0.88

01:06:51.040 So I hope that's a lesson for people out there, especially young women who I feel for you. 0.91

01:06:58.680 If you are on antidepressants and sad about the way the world is going, just know that you can break out of it, but it's about understanding and truly valuing the things that are worthy of being valued, which are your family and your people and your nation and your God and not TikTok, I guess you could say.

01:07:19.160 Not to boil it down to something that sort of childish, but at the end of the day, that really is the choice people are making.

01:07:26.580 They're choosing to spend their time and dedicate their life to video games and social media and approval from strangers than actually building a life out for themselves.

01:07:37.120 And you just have to go to the charts.

01:07:39.000 You just have to look at the numbers to see what a ridiculously bad decision that truly is.

01:07:43.940 I hope you've learned something.

01:07:45.060 We've only been through about half of the charts I have,

01:07:47.060 so we'll have to do another episode of this later.

01:07:49.400 In the meantime, I hope you enjoyed it.

01:07:52.820 I hope you were enlightened and entertained at the very least.

01:07:55.900 I hope you subscribe to NXR Studios on Rumble,

01:08:00.100 NXR Studios on YouTube, as well as X.

01:08:03.260 However you can find us, please do share this content.

01:08:06.520 Share the links, follow us, subscribe.

01:08:08.960 You can follow me on X.

01:08:09.880 I'm at Harrison H. Smith.

01:08:11.360 And until next time, this has been Off Limits News with Harrison Smith.

01:08:14.960 We'll be right back.

The NXR Podcast - May 22, 2026

Off Limits News - The Charts Explaining Why Young People Are Miserable

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript