00:01:42.500This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
00:01:50.760Welcome to Off Limits News. I'm your host, Harrison Smith.
00:01:54.500Now, normally, Off Limits News is a weekly news roundup where we show you the top stories and maybe some of the most missed stories over the week.
00:02:02.960We're going to do something a little bit different today.
00:02:05.040There are going to be some weeks where we're not able to make an episode.
00:02:08.820And so we wanted to have something we call evergreen episodes that we can bank and show to y'all that are less about what's happening this week and more about covering a certain topic or a certain angle and dedicating an entire show to that.
00:02:23.940And so what we're going to do today is a special episode.
00:02:28.740We're going to The Charts today because what happens is as I do my news gathering and just daily I'm looking at headlines and information and I get a lot of it from X.
00:02:38.020And what I do is if I see a chart or a graph or something, some data set that I think is interesting, I just sort of put it off to the side and I save it in its own folder.
00:02:46.640And now on days like this where we weren't able to do a weekly update episode, then we go into the vault.
00:02:53.020We go into the archives, the chart archives, and we find the most interesting data sets available to us.
00:02:58.620And so this is, you know, it has elements of the news since all of these are going to be about where our world is now, where we're going, the trajectory of America, and really the world at large.
00:03:10.060And see if we can't come to some conclusions from this.
00:03:13.360Now, my biggest problem with this, the biggest struggle I'm going to have today, is not making this episode the biggest black pill on the planet.
00:03:23.100If you're not familiar with that phrase, basically, it's bad news.
00:03:27.520There's a lot of bad news, and when you look at just the statistical reality of the world today, it's hard to paint a very rosy picture, but that's not my goal.
00:03:38.900My goal is not sit here and look at a bunch of charts and tell you, look how bad everything is.
00:03:43.440Everything's getting worse, and oh my god, the world is ending.
00:03:46.560That's absolutely not my goal here, and that's not what I'm going for.
00:03:50.660What we need to do is understand the world.
00:03:52.440What we need to do is understand the direction that we're going so that we can alter it, so that we can change it, because obviously the first step of changing the situation that we're in is simply recognizing the situation that we're in and finding the underlying causes that are driving the trajectory of the modern world.
00:04:11.540And so actually, it was funny, as I was compiling the data sets for today's episode, I was getting a little black-pilled myself.
00:04:19.020I was getting a little overwhelmed with some of the information I was finding, and I was thinking, how am I going to present this?
00:04:24.500Should I even do this? I don't want to just depress people.
00:04:26.500I don't just want to throw a bunch of stuff that really makes you think things are hopeless.
00:04:32.080And as I'm looking through, I happen to see a chart, a graph, that doesn't actually represent any real data, but does represent sort of what I'm attempting here.
00:07:37.280What it is is the estimated percent of 30-year-olds who are both married and homeowners, and the time is from 1950 to 2025.
00:07:46.660And you can see a distinct and unbroken decline to the point now that, well, it's basically just unrecognizable. The construct of our world is completely broken, and a society that once was able to provide for a family with a single uneducated job, a manual labor job, could afford a house with a stay-at-home wife and kids and two cars, now is not enough to even own a house.
00:08:14.880And now the bottom chart is the cumulative total foreign-born white-collar workers in the U.S. by year.
00:08:22.500So this would be your H-1B visas, your not field workers, but rather sort of executives or corporate hires from foreign states.
00:08:33.400And you can see a distinct correlation.
00:08:35.920Now, that's not necessarily causation, but I'm going to present a lot of charts today that make the causation pretty much undeniable.
00:08:44.880And so, again, I consider this top chart sort of the actual stock market.
00:08:48.120Our stock market is constantly reaching new highs.
00:09:02.320So we've gone from 50% or more of 30-year-olds, both married and homeowners, in 1950, which I would consider a benchmark for a successful society.
00:09:10.280And you see it basically collapse, increasing around 1990 to where we are now, where less than 15% of people are married and own homes by the age of 30.
00:09:23.260Now, I would consider this like red siren alarm bells if you were, you know, playing SimCity or something.
00:09:31.380If you were playing some video game where you were trying to manage a city or a nation, you know, one of these map games, this would be like a fail condition.
00:09:40.280right this would be you have utterly failed the game you have absolutely not achieved any of the
00:09:47.040goals that you should have set out for yourself because this is what actually matters are people
00:09:50.800able to build wealth are they able to become prosperous are they able to support themselves
00:09:55.200without working themselves to the bone because this isn't a capitalistic argument you know i'm
00:10:00.680not saying that you know the wealth of a nation is entirely dependent on the gdp it's kind of the
00:10:06.440opposite. But it's a measure of success. It's a measure of happiness. It's a measure of stability
00:10:11.740that people are able to own property, that they're able to work and be paid a fair wage
00:10:17.960for their labor. And ideally, we'd go back to the 1950s where you could. And it wasn't a rare
00:10:24.440story. I could point to somebody like my grandfather who worked for Shell Oil Company as
00:10:30.160was a chemist. They experienced a downturn at one point and had to lay a bunch of people off. And so
00:10:35.500he essentially got to retire at like 55 with a great pension and spent you know 40 years of his
00:10:41.440life flying a little plane around and uh you know building his own home in the mountains it's like
00:10:47.220that's what the world used to be like it was possible and most people had a story like that
00:10:53.360you went to university you got a good job you were in that job for 20 years or so you retired
00:11:01.000you got a gold watch and a vacation home, and life was good. It's a little different now. It's
00:11:06.820actually kind of unrecognizable now. And the real thing to understand as we go through these charts
00:11:12.380is that this is deliberate. The thing you need to understand is that as we see everything collapse,
00:11:17.140that as you look at the data percentage over time, and you see everything is getting worse
00:11:23.180in every possible quadrant, you have to understand it's on purpose. It's by design. It's a choice
00:11:28.380being made it's not because we don't know what the hell to do and we're just trying our best and
00:11:33.360everything's going badly it we figured out how to do things we actually figured out the best way to
00:11:38.600run a society the 1950s in america was probably the peak of like human development as we know it
00:11:44.880and it's only by going away from those traditions that built that society that we see everything
00:11:50.140collapse and again it's very obvious and this is one of the things that you realize looking at the
00:11:55.500news and charts like this all the time, is that all of this is kind of obvious when you really
00:12:00.680get right down to it. Warning, this product contains nicotine. Nicotine is an addictive
00:12:05.220chemical. All right, guys, you know the drill. This is our favorite sponsor. Knickknack,
00:12:09.160Poliwack, Give a Dog a Bone. These are knickknacks, and they're America first,0.95
00:12:13.680manufacturing the product in America. They're Christ is King Maxine. You've got the foot of
00:12:17.380our Lord and Savior crushing the head of the serpent right there on the can. They're Christians.0.57
00:13:28.280or use our code in the description below if you're buying it in the store.
00:13:32.520A few weeks ago, I covered Saga Metals,
00:13:35.460trading as SAGMF in the U.S. and Saga in Canada.
00:13:40.920It's a company that we've featured many times on this channel.
00:13:44.120We're revisiting the story much sooner than expected to share a few major developments that are currently unfolding.
00:13:51.660Less than 48 hours ago, they achieved a 100% drill success rate in all 57 drill holes all ahead of schedule.
00:14:00.920The company also added $10 million to its bank account from a successful financing round dedicated entirely to drilling,
00:14:09.360adding serious fuel to an already accelerating program.
00:14:13.420As the U.S. and its allies move to secure the future, Saga Metals is positioning itself directly where the money, the mandates, and the momentum are flowing.
00:14:24.800In the past six months, Saga Metals scooped another titanium project from under Rio Tinto, a company roughly 3,500 times larger by market value.
00:15:08.760So we can see from the last chart just how badly things have gone in terms of just building a life for yourself at a young age so you can actually build on top of a solid foundation.0.51
00:15:20.480Nobody owns a home or is married by the time they're 30, and that has a lot to do with immigration.
00:15:26.000That has more than you even think just from seeing the two side-by-side charts there.0.93
00:15:32.880let's look at my god we there's so many amazing amazing places to go that are all terrible let's
00:15:42.100go to 27 here and we'll go 27 through 31 and we'll just go one by one so this is per capita
00:15:47.540gdp productivity and immigration and you'll see it sort of makes a almost looks like an infinity
00:15:53.820right so on the left of the chart was 1996 now uh that green line is the immigration rate the blue
00:16:02.520line is the real GDP per capita, and the red line is labor productivity. So you can see the labor
00:16:08.160and productivity sort of matches the real GDP fairly closely, and it is in basically direct
00:16:15.840opposition to the immigration rate. As the immigration rate is lowered, the productivity
00:16:20.780and the GDP goes up. As the immigration rate increases, the GDP and productivity decreases
00:16:28.080at an appropriate rate. There's a direct correlation. We can just go through these.0.98
00:16:33.680Let's go to the next one here. This one is for Canada, and you see something similar,
00:16:40.080maybe a little bit more chaotic, but you can still see the trend matches. We go to the next one.
00:16:44.740You can see this is United Kingdom, where once again, you have the blue line being the GDP per
00:16:52.000capita and the red line being net immigration. And as you see the increase starting at around
00:16:56.940year 2000, you see the corresponding decrease, although the decrease is much more significant
00:17:01.940and dramatic than the increase is because there's sort of an outsized influence when
00:17:20.000Once again, you almost see it's dancing with itself, right?0.64
00:17:23.380productivity skyrockets as immigration goes down. Productivity goes down as immigration skyrockets.
00:17:29.780I mean, it is pretty much a one-to-one kind of operation here. And I think we have one more of1.00
00:17:35.340these, if I'm correct. Australia. Australia also, you see this correlation, which I would argue
00:17:41.400is evidence of a causation. I believe that's the last one we have of those. But there's like an
00:17:46.620infinite number of these. And I could show you so many aspects of this. So this is pure
00:17:53.120productivity, which, if you know anything about the migration program, you know it's all based
00:17:59.360off of insane lies from the get-go, but the only argument that has ever been made about why it
00:18:06.360would benefit the country receiving migrants is that they would receive an economic boost. Now,
00:18:10.580that's a lie. That's just an obvious lie, and we can go through some of the numbers of household
00:18:15.480welfare rate, but just think about how ridiculous this is and how designed and purposeful it is.
00:18:23.120The pension systems in Europe and America are set up to be deliberate Ponzi schemes, meaning that they pay out more than a person puts in, meaning that you constantly have to have a greater number of new contributors to pay for – robbing Peter to pay Paul.
00:18:39.440You've got to have more people coming in so you can pay out the people that you promised who paid in before.
00:18:48.160It requires a constant state of growth in population and productive capacity.
00:18:52.260And then they both wielded psychological operations and chemical operations to massively lower our birth rate.
00:19:02.640So whether that's because of the introduction of the birth control pill, the introduction of no-fault divorce, like there are lots of contributing factors.
00:19:09.740Obviously, women in the workforce, meaning women have to go to school, meaning they're putting off having children for decades in some cases, meaning that they're able to have less children.
00:19:18.980There have been so many contributing factors to the lowering of the birth rate, but they're all deliberate, but they're all by design and as part of a concerted effort that the people who do it talk about.
00:19:31.260They publish documents, the limits to growth from the Club of Rome where they say we have limited resources, so the number of people has to be limited.
00:19:40.200Now, that only applies to first world people, but then you run into the problem of the pension system.0.63
00:19:45.760So they're crushing the first world that is white European population, lowering it as much as possible, birth rates below replacement, which means the pensions are insolvent.0.87
00:19:58.140So now you have to make up for that low birth rate that you caused.0.99
00:20:01.040And so you bring in immigrants to fill the birth rate, but then they all immediately go on welfare.1.00
00:20:06.480And so actually instead of contributing to the budget and the pension system, they detract from it.0.98
00:20:13.020And so instead of the workers that you brought in paying for the pension system of the retirees, countries all throughout Europe and America are raising their retirement age by up to like 10 years.0.99
00:20:23.740So instead of retiring at 63, you're retiring at 73 because you have to pay for all the migrants they brought in to pay for your pensions.0.96
00:20:30.660Are you starting to understand yet?1.00
00:20:54.420The yellow, gold, brown bar is native households.
00:20:57.480The black bar is Somali immigrant households.
00:20:59.840And the gray bar is Somali immigrant households who have been here for over 10 years in the United States.
00:21:06.460And what you see is that for any welfare at all, only 21 percent of native households receive it, while 81 percent of Somali households receive it. After 10 years in the United States, that number drops only 3 percent to 78 percent still on welfare after 10 years in this country.
00:21:25.360Medicaid is not quite as dramatic, very dramatic still, 18 for native households, 73 for Somali.
00:21:31.660Food stamps, only 7% of native households, 54% of Somalis.
00:21:36.280Cash welfare is received by 6% of American households, native American households, and 27% of Somali households.
00:21:44.740So again, this is a sort of constant trend, and the question is, why would we accept this?
00:22:02.900I can actually at least hear the argument and follow the logic.
00:22:07.780You know, places like Qatar are talked about quite a bit these days, but not a lot of people understand the immigration situation in Qatar.
00:22:16.780It's actually, by sheer numbers, way worse than a place like Ireland and England.
00:22:22.160Ireland and England, while they are being overwhelmed by Muslims in certain areas, like to the degree that you don't even see the natives there anymore, there are people running for office in the UK right now that do not speak English.0.93
00:22:35.320So it's getting really bad there, yet it's like 10% of the population, maybe more.
00:22:41.240I don't have the exact numbers for that.
00:22:43.140I probably do somewhere in my charts, but it's not an overwhelming degree.
00:22:47.440Meanwhile, in Qatar, it's like only 10% of the people in Qatar are actual Qataris. 90% of them are immigrants. So why is Qatar not being overwhelmed by these immigrants? Why are they not suffering like the European states are even though they have a higher percentage of their population foreign-born immigrants?
00:23:06.840It's because you don't become an immigrant to Qatar if you don't bring them something in return.
00:23:12.000If you're not benefiting them, then you're not going to Qatar.0.68
00:23:14.640And you can go to Qatar and you can work and you can build prosperity there, but you will never be a citizen there.0.92
00:23:19.600You will always have to go home at the end of it or you can stay forever and your family can stay there, but you'll never be Qataris.0.99
00:23:26.300You just never will. That's just how it is. That's just what they've decided.1.00
00:23:28.700Now, all of our countries could also decide that, and we probably should because it's not even really about sheer number of immigrants or even percentage of immigrants in terms of total population.0.99
00:23:40.660What it's about is are those immigrants guests in your country that are there on the condition that they benefit you, or are you welcoming them in to be nothing but societal drains and, frankly, parasites to the economic system?0.97
00:23:54.560One way doesn't make a hell of a lot of sense.1.00
00:23:57.540The other way, the Qatari way, would actually be fine and beneficial. And hell, if you want to bring your family over but you're coming over with $10 million and you're going to build a school and you're going to be contributing to the community in some ways, then you can make that deal. You can make that argument. You can at least present it to the people of the country as if it's something good.0.95
00:24:19.900What's happening now is people are coming over, and they are just drains on the system.
00:28:21.700I don't have a chart showing that, but I think you can imagine.
00:28:24.880I think you can imagine what that's like.
00:28:26.940And I think 24 here is a display that shows.
00:28:30.300So U.S. employment breakdown by nativity, CPS household survey, 90% of net gains to
00:28:36.460foreign-born workers since pre-COVID peak. And so, of course, you can see on the left,
00:28:42.720February 2020, on the right, March 2026, native-born, this is total employment levels.
00:28:48.840So you see they're fairly consistent, 130 million native-born, 130 million from February 2020 to
00:28:58.540March 2026, whereas the foreign-born went from 26 million to nearly 32 million, meaning that the
00:29:06.040net job gains by nativity since 2020, native born people have only gained 0.471 million jobs. So
00:29:15.060less than half a million jobs have been gained by the native born while the foreign born have seen
00:29:20.280their net job gain up 4.27 million. Okay. So nearly 10 times the amount, 90% of all new jobs0.74
00:29:28.200created since 2020 have gone to foreign born workers. So, you know, this isn't, this isn't a0.57
00:29:33.580racial thing. This is a national thing. This is a nationalistic thing. This is American workers of
00:29:39.200every race, color, and creed being discriminated against by industries, companies that are hiring
00:29:47.400and preferring foreign-born workers who are either willing to work for less, are more pressured to
00:29:56.600accept abuse on the work site because if you get fired, then you're going to be sent back home,
00:30:01.940So they're more incentivized to put up with bad working conditions.
00:30:04.820I mean there are lots of reasons, and on top of all that, there's simply the ethnic mafia aspect of the whole thing where groups of people will get into positions of power and then benefit their ethnic group by giving jobs to people who are like them.
00:30:18.660This is a very, very common scheme being run that nations are getting in on now.
00:30:24.860Like India is now treating its diaspora like a foreign policy block, saying we can now shape American policy because we have so many people in America who are actually Indian, who are working on behalf of India's interest, and we can now manipulate America because of the overwhelming numbers we have in some of their cities.
00:30:46.020This is what the Indian government says.
00:30:49.180The Syrian government was asked to take back something like 700,000 Syrian, quote-unquote, refugees who, quote-unquote, fled Syria because of the mean Bashir al-Assad regime.
00:31:04.680But Syria won't accept them because they find them useful.0.56
00:31:07.940The money they bring in that they siphon out of Germany, the influence they have on the German government, it's very useful to Syria, the government, the people in Syria.
00:31:16.020to utilize their diaspora as a political bloc.
00:31:19.880Once again, I ask you, why would we put up with this?
00:31:46.020It's all been manipulation. We'll get to why we're at this point and how all of these things
00:31:50.380correspond, intersect, intertwine, relate to one another. In case you need another
00:31:56.740visualization of what it looks like, how you can understand the lack of new jobs following COVID,
00:32:04.160we can go back to number seven here. You can see the obvious drop-off there where those red lines
00:32:11.500are and you can see where the native born dropped off completely the foreign born dropped off0.88
00:32:15.780completely and then they start to build back up well that yellow line the native born line
00:32:19.880never actually reached like it basically reaches where it was before but certainly never exceeds0.57
00:32:25.120it and then it goes back down whereas the foreign born you can see yes their jobs dropped the same0.96
00:32:31.040that the native born did but when they started getting jobs back it just kept going and they're0.78
00:32:36.360getting into more jobs so they've recovered and gained some whereas the native born lost a bunch
00:32:41.120of jobs and merely recovered and did not exceed any more than they had previously had. So that's0.99
00:32:47.440sort of a visualization of it. It's even worse if you take the longer view to go to graphic number
00:32:52.200six is the same data, but an even longer where the red line on top is the employment level of
00:32:59.280foreign born and the blue is the employment level of native born. And the employment level is lower
00:33:05.040since it's a index of thousands of persons rather than the total number. It's a per capita reading.
00:33:11.700So you can see per capita, the foreign born are more employed than the native born. And the
00:33:18.300recovery again was significantly less for the native than it was for the foreign. And of course1.00
00:33:26.900this was on purpose and combined with the drive, the anti-white genocidal drive inspired in part0.63
00:33:37.220by Black Lives Matter, but mostly by just general anti-white sentiment being widely accepted. We can0.98
00:33:43.640go to graphic number four here. This is a very famous one, probably like one of, if not the
00:33:50.080most important images in our modern age. Corporate America pledged to hire more people of color. It
00:33:56.000actually did. And so basically because of the lie of Black Lives Matter and the horrible racist0.96
00:34:02.880abuse of cops, I guess, they decided, hey, let's all discriminate openly against white people0.88
00:34:08.620on purpose and celebrate this achievement. So white people only got 6% of the jobs added to0.57
00:34:17.560the S&P 100 companies. The industries in the S&P 100 added more than 300,000 jobs. 94% of those
00:34:25.860jobs went to people of color now are people of color that much more deserving than white people0.55
00:34:32.020after all white people are still the majority in america so i mean this is beyond you know a lack
00:34:37.700of representation this is a total inversion of what it would look like if the decisions were
00:34:42.760being made in an unbiased and unmanipulated manner so no people of color are not you know0.77
00:34:50.08010 times more capable than white people. This was clear, blatant, open discrimination. I mean,
00:34:56.260they say in this chart, the year after Black Lives Matter protests, they hired 94% people of
00:35:01.320color. Now, the other thing to understand, this is a top-down decision. This was imposed by
00:35:06.280corporations like BlackRock, big private equity firms that said, we are now implanting DEI, ESG.
00:35:14.260This gets talked about a lot. The source of it is the banks. The banks decided that they would
00:35:19.280have these arbitrary metrics that they would force corporations to abide by in order to get
00:35:23.440investment so it completely upended and inverted the incentive structure of the capitalistic system
00:35:29.580that we have to where you could do something as a corporation that would get you less customers
00:35:35.900now typically in a capitalistic system you would avoid anything that would lower your customer
00:35:40.520base or that would mean you were selling less products but you'd get more investment so sure0.88
00:35:45.540You might lose $20 million of merchandise sales you would have gotten otherwise by having a transgender children display in your store like Target or one of these corporations.0.95
00:35:57.220You're probably not going to sell as many – I don't want to talk about what they're selling – the bathing suits for children.0.99
00:36:06.880I think you know what I'm talking about, and we don't need to go any farther than that.
00:36:09.540You're not going to sell that many of those things, but by doing that, your ESG score goes up.0.96
00:36:13.760Oh, you're showing that you are societally responsible because you're pushing transgenderism on children, and I'm a giant New York bank that thinks that that's valuable.0.99
00:36:21.680So we're going to force that on you, and in exchange, then we're going to up your investment portfolio status, which means you're going to get hundreds of millions of dollars of new investment, cash money injected into your company.0.99
00:36:34.480So do the thing that makes you less money, but because it comports with the societal construct of the people in power, they reward you with more money.
00:36:42.780So you're actually incentivized to do things that are not good for the business because you get these cash injections.
00:36:49.880I honestly don't understand how they got away with implementing this.
00:36:53.400Like technically it should be illegal, and I don't even necessarily agree with the law.
00:36:56.980The law is Dodge versus Ford, and basically Ford back in the day wanted to pay its people really well and wanted to prioritize sort of money back into the company to make the workers happy, to build the company out more.
00:37:10.120And they were sued by Dodge, I think it was Dodge, because Dodge prioritized returning money to the investors. Basically, the decision of this Supreme Court case, Dodge v. Ford, was that companies have to prioritize the monetary return of the investors.
00:37:28.660Again, I don't necessarily agree with that law, but that is the law.
00:37:31.300And so the question becomes what happens when the investment companies are just abandoning their fiduciary duty, making decisions that they know we're going to make less money because they've decided to use the power they have as the money changers to force societal changes on an unwilling populace.
00:37:49.540They just decided we're going to do this, and of course Larry Fink, the head of BlackRock, said we're going to use capital to change behaviors.
00:37:55.760what why why were they allowed to do this and this is one of those things where you talk to0.96
00:38:01.560investment bankers you're like so what's the deal with esg and they're like oh yeah it's just a
00:38:04.780that's another you know um metric by which uh we judge things and it's like yeah but it's it's
00:38:10.640totally got an inverse relationship to productivity like diversity is in an inverse relationship to
00:38:16.160productivity we will show you the charts we got a lot more to show you that too why would you
00:38:20.160have a incentive to do something that lowered productivity and the investment banker will just
00:38:24.960go, I don't know. That's just, it's just a new thing that's happening. So we just take it into
00:38:28.920account. It's just great. They just accept it. They just go, okay, we're judging companies on
00:38:33.540what percentage of their board are black lesbian women? What? Why? Why would that be the, why would0.98
00:38:40.820that be the metric you judge by? Oh, because you hate straight white people? Got it. Like,0.99
00:38:45.660what else could it be? What else could it possibly be? So when you look at the graph of,
00:38:52.24030-year-olds not being able to afford houses. It's got reasons. There are reasons behind it.
00:38:59.640It's because foreigners are being brought in to work for less, to accept things that the American0.99
00:39:06.300workers would never accept. People in America, the majority of which are white people, are being0.75
00:39:12.480deliberately discriminated against in high-paying corporate jobs. These things have reasons. They
00:39:16.860have explanations it's not a mystery it's a design it's it's on purpose you know if the1.00
00:39:25.100reason you're bringing in migrants is to build up the pension system the minute you realize0.97
00:39:30.540they're not contributing to the pension system wouldn't you reverse the flow when you go okay1.00
00:39:34.700wait this is being this is the effect of this is contrary to our desire let's undo this but they
00:39:42.580don't. They actually make it illegal to talk about in Europe. Actually, if you want to present the
00:39:47.840evidence for why immigration is a failed policy, you'll go to jail. So they aren't interested in0.98
00:39:54.160actually doing the thing they say they're doing. They're just hijacking your virtue to use against
00:39:59.800you because European people, highly empathetic, highly caring and charitable, when they're told
00:40:04.960there's this population that's fleeing from war, they're desperate, they need help, they're refugees,
00:40:09.880European people are inclined to believe that and to open their doors and to accept them, and that's a good thing because they're good people because they want to help their neighbors in times of stress.0.84
00:40:19.100Only their neighbors are deceitful scum in many cases and know that European empathy can be used against them, and so they take advantage of it.1.00
00:40:27.420So they present themselves as desperate refugees when really they're rapacious criminals.1.00
00:40:33.820It's really not that complicated, and everybody knows this is going on, so it's going on on purpose.1.00
00:40:38.580The purpose of a system is what it does. If the system continually delivers to you welfare-dependent migrants that are criminal, then that's why they're doing it. It's not an accident, and they could reverse it at any time.0.99
00:40:51.440They're so desperate to keep it going that they'll throw children in prison or beat their heads with sticks like they're doing in Ireland and the Netherlands right now if they dare to express discontent at the obvious deliberate deconstruction of their entire nation.
00:41:08.740All right, so just to round off, just to sort of finalize what I'm talking about with the economic impacts, we can go to 15 here, graph 15.
00:41:18.220This is, again, buying a home, 1985 versus 2022.0.86
00:41:22.040This is for the baby boomers out there that say,0.99
00:41:23.900just pull yourself up by your bootstraps.0.98
00:41:27.080And for baby boomers, buying a house in 1985 versus 2022.
00:41:31.700So in 1985, baby boomers were making a medium household income
00:41:35.280of $23,620, whereas the medium home price was $83,200.
00:41:41.840So about four times the median household income.
00:41:44.560For millennials, a medium household income is $74,580, whereas the average house price is nearly half a million dollars, so significantly more, okay?
00:41:57.160This, again, by design and a consequence of all of the other horrible economic decisions that have been made in the recent past.
00:42:04.900And we can go, again, in understanding sort of where this goes and what really is happening here, we can go to number 12. This, again, I think is a very important graph in understanding how the world is the way it is.
00:42:24.600So this is per capita lifetime budgetary impacts of whites, blacks, and Hispanics.0.66
00:42:29.460So this is less about immigration and it's more about race.0.61
00:42:31.800But you see the average white individual over their lifetime contributes to the governmental budget.
00:42:39.460The tax amount that they contribute over their lifetime is around $220,805.0.59
00:42:47.400So over their lifetime, white people contribute about a quarter million dollars more to the general welfare than they receive in taxes and services, whereas for Hispanic people, it's a negative 588,000 contribution, negative detriment, whereas for black people, it is negative 751,000.0.63
00:43:14.500Now, this is only sustainable because there are so many more white people right now than there are Hispanic or black people. What happens when white people are a minority and you only have a small number of people contributing and a huge number of people receiving?0.56
00:43:33.140Some people think that that would cause just a sort of a chain reaction, total collapse scenario, which is true, but not in the way a lot of people perceive a collapse scenario.0.84
00:43:44.920South Africa, I mean, the numbers are insane, and these aren't totally accurate, but just off the top of my head, it's like, go look up the numbers for South Africa.
00:43:54.760Look up how many people in South Africa are totally dependent on government welfare.
00:44:01.540And then look up how many people in South Africa even pay taxes. What you'll find is that it turns out if you incrementally increase the amount that you're taxing people, incrementally increase the amount that you're giving out to nonproductive citizens, you can end up with a situation where like 5% of the population is funding the other 95%.
00:44:23.000And in South Africa, A, there are still leftists.
00:44:26.660They still exist, even though they're living in the ruins of a greater country, even though they are seeing with their own eyes the way that their own ideas have led to the absolute degradation and destruction of everything that they thought they were upholding.
00:44:41.540And yet they still have leftists in South Africa.
00:44:44.620They still have an illegal immigration problem in South Africa, folks.0.94
00:44:48.440south africa the number one like rape capital of the world a place where you know people are
00:44:53.360i think they only have the electricity on half of the day because people are constantly stealing
00:44:58.040the copper out of the power lines that can't even maintain the nuclear arsenal they once had1.00
00:45:04.080they still have an immigration problem because everywhere else around them is that much worse so0.99
00:45:08.840things can get a hell of a lot worse than they are now if we allow things to continue this way0.92
00:45:13.920again i think people have this idea of like eventually it'll get to a point where it can't
00:45:17.380be sustained, and we'll have to flip the table and reset things. That doesn't happen. No, it's
00:45:22.360just slow degradation forever. That's totally possible. I mean, look at the Soviet Union. The
00:45:28.120Soviet Union lasted 80 years, and it was – theoretically, and you can debate how real our0.96
00:45:33.420opposition was, but it was opposed at every pass by a giant, powerful, monolithic, hegemonic,0.78
00:45:40.460capitalist structure that was, you know, at war with it quietly all over the world constantly.
00:45:46.740What happens if America goes communist? Is there another America out there
00:45:50.500to defend against it, to, you know, fight against the push of communism? If it lasted for 80 years,
00:45:57.940sort of endless degradation, endless collapse for 80 years straight, you know, how long can it last
00:46:04.140if there was no opposition? It could last forever. So again, there's this idea that like, well,
00:46:08.520eventually you know it'll become overborn and we'll have to reset there's no guarantee that
00:46:13.840that would ever happen and so we can look at like where this goes and you know what it's causing
00:46:22.120let's go to 44 here because this is where we get to the sort of black pilling part of this is where
00:46:28.700you get to the the values part that corresponds to all of this so this is percentage who say
00:46:34.760these values are quote very important to them patriotism religion having children or community
00:46:40.280involvement and you can see that you know and it's it's going from 1998 to 2023 and there is a
00:46:48.000distinct drop is not even the right word total collapse might be more accurate where patriotism
00:46:55.480religion having children and community involvement have all cratered in the number of people who say
00:47:01.540that these values are very important to them.
00:47:03.840Patriotism, not important. Religion, not0.98
00:47:05.500important. Having children, not important. Community involvement,1.00
00:53:44.180for women who voted for Harris it's the last
00:53:46.800So this is a total deliberate inversion of priorities, of concerns. And of course, one of the most famous charts out there right now is number 11. This is called the concern heat map.
00:54:03.120and what it is you're seeing two they almost look like targets right with bullseyes
00:54:08.380and the closer towards the center you are is the closer towards you as an individual and so that
00:54:15.540center circle is you the circle just outside of that is your immediate family circle outside of
00:54:20.060that is your extended family circle outside of that is your immediate community to eventually
00:54:24.100you're getting out to those outside circles which are things like rocks you know so what they do is
00:54:29.140they ask conservatives, you know, what do you value more? And conservatives, the closer the
00:54:34.820thing is to themselves, they basically give more concern and care towards it. So they value their
00:54:40.960own family more than they value the family of foreigners. For liberals, it's the exact opposite.
00:54:45.320For liberals, their greatest concern is reserved for the people and things farthest away from
00:54:52.140themselves so they tend to and they consider this you know empathetic and um you know charitable i
00:55:00.060guess but it's really not it's it's inverted it's unnatural it's it's bizarre and implanted it's not
00:55:06.200something that arises in a healthy healthy functioning system this is an outside force
00:55:11.240manipulating people and basically confusing and distorting their you know virtuous
00:55:19.700world construct to be completely inverted so liberal people literally value are concerned
00:55:26.060about and care more about things that are less like them and i'm not kidding that heat chart
00:55:31.580shows that liberals will genuinely care more about an amoeba on a different planet than they
00:55:39.820care about their own children and it sounds crazy but is it really out of whack with the uh stuff
00:55:45.720that we're seeing with the information that I'm presenting to you right now, like we go to
00:55:50.480number 10, chart number 10. This is, has a doctor or healthcare provider ever told you you have a
00:55:56.800mental health condition? Once again, we see not only are liberal people significantly more likely
00:56:01.960to say yes, white people are significantly more likely to say yes, especially white liberals. So
00:56:08.280white liberals, they say 38% in this poll have said yes, whereas only 19% of non-white
00:56:15.420people who say they're very liberal have also been diagnosed with this so again this is about0.89
00:56:21.120sort of the deliberate brainwashing of specifically white liberal women white liberal women have been0.96
00:56:29.980convinced to value things that are unnatural that are at odds with their natural inclinations that0.78
00:56:36.520are just, I guess unnatural is sort of the only word to say for it. They're trying to like force
00:56:45.760themselves into a shape that they don't naturally come in, right? Naturally and without outside
00:56:52.100influence, women will always value their children, their husband, their immediate family. It's only1.00
00:57:00.400by continuous brainwashing, all of society manipulation focused on these particular
00:57:07.360populations that are having this incredible effect. So we can go to chart number 14 here.
00:57:14.660This is the suicide rate percentage change since 2023. And again, you see female teens0.92
00:57:22.180are the far and away standout breakaway tragedy in this so the suicide rate for men has actually
00:57:31.040gone down some but for women it's gone up in their 20s and 30s it's gone up significantly but
00:57:37.820for teens so the younger you are if you're female the more likely you are to want to commit suicide
00:57:44.340and this is in 17 different countries so again it's not just america where this is happening
00:57:49.840And this is directly correspondent to and in line with their political radicalization.
00:57:57.600We can go to 19 here, one of many charts that you can find if you go out and look for them, which shows the ideology gap opening between young men and young women, where young men are mostly actually kind of to the left.
00:58:11.960It shows them breaking a little bit to the right, but this is South Korea, the U.S., Germany, and the U.K., and you see in all cases women have become significantly more liberal, and the gap between women and men has widened massively.
00:58:25.300So it used to be that, sure, women would be a little bit more liberal than men, but not much.
00:58:29.660Now, men became a little bit more conservative, but it's women who have become radically more liberal over that time.0.66
00:58:35.140So they've become radically more liberal, and they've become radically less happy.
00:58:38.940We can go to 26 as well, another version of this where, once again, liberal women are most likely to feel alone, and they're most likely to be unsatisfied with life.0.74
00:58:54.240So just to sort of get through some of the rest of these, we don't have too much time, and I've got some good charts to show you at the very end.
00:59:05.920This is extroversion and trust, also in decline.
00:59:08.580So again, the red is the youth. And you can see people who rate themselves. They're asked, are you outgoing? Are you helpful to others? Are you trusting? Or do you start arguments? And in all cases, the youth are significantly less well-adjusted than their older counterparts.
00:59:25.90048 here. This is young adults' personalities changing with conscientiousness in freefall.
00:59:32.340So this is a very disturbing chart, but essentially they say this is the relative
00:59:37.760change in strength of different personality traits from 2014, or they're taking 2014 as the
00:59:43.820average, and it does go from 2014 to 2024, and you see conscientiousness collapses, neuroticism
00:59:50.080increases, agreeableness collapses, and extroversion collapses. Now, obviously, this has a lot to do
00:59:55.480with electronics and things like that. We can go to the last one here, 49. This is birth rates,
01:00:03.140right? So birth rates falling, but they're falling for progressives a lot more than
01:00:07.160conservatives. So a lot of these are sort of a chicken and the egg thing. Okay, are conservatives
01:00:12.460having more babies because they're happier? Are they happier because they're having more babies?
01:00:18.340The answer is yes. The answer is yes, either way, you need to have more babies.
01:00:22.02035 here explains this and shows this and this is sort of the point of what i'm talking about here0.51
01:00:28.800young married moms are the happiest this is percentage of women age 22 to 35 who are very
01:00:34.080happy married moms 41 say they're very happy if they're married but don't have children it's 38
01:00:40.960if they're unmarried only 18 of unmarried women unmarried mothers say that they're happy whereas
01:00:46.920unmarried and childless is 14 so again a direct step down one to the next so in other words i can0.95
01:00:52.560say with the data the best possible thing to be is a married mother the next best would be a mother
01:00:59.500even if you're not married and only below that so i mean it's or rather married even if you're not
01:01:06.560even if you don't have children so it's not a question you know there's this idea that it's like
01:01:12.400the way things were before is because of superstition or tradition people just didn't
01:01:17.340know better that's why they were stay-at-home moms because they were forced to by their mean
01:01:21.360husbands no that was actually the correct way to be if you were to actually put it to a scientific
01:01:26.660test and say what is the best way to make a population that is happy healthy and productive
01:01:31.180it would be to get married young and to have children and to uphold frankly biblical concepts
01:01:37.580of morality. Once you do that, happiness simply comes. What we have instead is people chasing
01:01:43.200happiness, trying to reach out for some facsimile or illusion of happiness, and we find that they're1.00
01:01:50.880depressed and hopeless and broke and being replaced by foreigners because they've been1.00
01:01:55.940convinced to support liberalism, which is systematically destroying all of the things1.00
01:02:01.740that make our society strong and functional in the first place. So again, we don't have to
01:02:06.440ask about this. We don't have to wonder about this. It's not really even a question. It's
01:02:11.400an obvious fact. Sadness, unhappiness, misery is directly correlated to liberal ideas. And that's
01:02:21.620just the data. It's just the facts. Don't come at me. Don't shoot the messenger here. You don't
01:02:25.900like it. Take it up with the universe. Have an argument with God because this is the way that
01:02:31.120he made things, and it's up to us to comport ourselves with his will, not try to impose ours
01:02:36.220on him. And this is one, it's, you know, out of all the charts I have that all show population
01:02:41.800collapse and racial strife and all this stuff, this one is just, it's just lovely. It's chart
01:02:47.480number 16. This will be our last chart for today. And this is the effect of naming cows on milk
01:02:54.320yield. And so you see here, cows that are uncared for, cows that are not named, that are treated
01:03:01.580like, you know, a piece of meat, a machine rather than a living being, they only produce around
01:03:06.9007.68 liters of milk. Whereas if a cow is named and it's loved and it's treated like a member of
01:03:12.700the family, their milk yield goes up almost double. It's pretty wild, or maybe not almost
01:03:19.340double i'm looking at the chart as if it goes zero to 82 but a massive increase in the number of in
01:03:25.720the amount of milk produced so again what does this mean is this really the most profound chart
01:03:30.600i think it is i really think it is and you know you see stuff like this all over the place there
01:03:34.840are some amazing studies that like you can do yourself where like mold will not grow on you
01:03:41.460know people do it with rice the wet rice you leave it out mold grows on the one that you you know1.00
01:03:46.460send bad vibes to you, you go and you've talked to the rice, you say, I hate you rice, you suck1.00
01:03:50.720rice. It'll grow mold. Whereas if you talk to the rice on the other side and say, we love you rice,1.00
01:03:55.620you're amazing. And it doesn't grow mold. Literally there's stuff like this that it seems
01:03:59.060unbelievable, but it's rapid, it's, it's repeatable. You can actually do these studies over and over
01:04:04.060and get the same results over and over. There's something about our mindset. There's something
01:04:07.900about, uh, you know, the connections that we have to other living things, plants, animals,
01:04:13.700or even just the universe around us that has a tangible effect.
01:04:16.860And so while it might be kind of a funny thing to bring up,
01:04:20.340naming dairy cows as being some profound thing,
01:04:29.120There's something about the human connection,
01:04:31.740the human appreciation to those things that are most important to you
01:04:35.760that confers some intangible metaphysical benefit upon them.
01:04:41.420And you can see just almost extrapolate that out to a wider view, and that's what we're experiencing right now where people have been convinced to hate their neighbors.0.91
01:04:50.920People have been convinced to hate their own family, to value these foreign criminals over their innocent victims.
01:04:58.280There's something deeply troubling about all of this, and in a universe designed by God that is conscious and responds to our will and our energy that we put out, it's having a detrimental and ever-increasing effect.
01:05:12.240And so when we look at the charts showing the collapse of achieving milestones – in fact, we'll go to one more chart just to bum you out one more time before we go.
01:05:24.240So beyond being able to own a home, beyond getting married, it's whether you're living on your own, if you've ever been married, if you have a child that you live with or own a home.
01:05:33.660All of these things have collapsed in the last 40 years to the point that they're a tiny minority of people who are achieving what used to be sort of just standard life milestones, things that everybody was expected to have achieved by the time they were 30 are now out of reach for a huge number of people.
01:05:57.200And while that can be depressing and you see the trajectory and you see it's all downward, there's hardly anywhere where there is an uptick, it's important to understand that there's a reason that that's happening and that it's not just a force of unconquerable nature that we have to deal with.
01:06:11.700It's the decisions being made on the basis of the morality being pushed.
01:06:15.740If we can change the morality, change the decisions that we're making, we can reverse this.
01:06:24.720We can create a world once again that works and is functional and happy and prosperous and productive.0.98
01:06:30.760We just have to actually look at what brings those conditions about, not pursue some ridiculous manipulation fed to us by a gigantic society-wide cabal of scumbags that have deliberately destroyed the minds of especially our young women since they're the easiest to manipulate.0.88
01:06:51.040So I hope that's a lesson for people out there, especially young women who I feel for you.0.91
01:06:58.680If you are on antidepressants and sad about the way the world is going, just know that you can break out of it, but it's about understanding and truly valuing the things that are worthy of being valued, which are your family and your people and your nation and your God and not TikTok, I guess you could say.
01:07:19.160Not to boil it down to something that sort of childish, but at the end of the day, that really is the choice people are making.
01:07:26.580They're choosing to spend their time and dedicate their life to video games and social media and approval from strangers than actually building a life out for themselves.
01:07:37.120And you just have to go to the charts.
01:07:39.000You just have to look at the numbers to see what a ridiculously bad decision that truly is.