The NXR Podcast - August 18, 2022


QUESTIONS - How Should Christians Vote?


Episode Stats


Length

16 minutes

Words per minute

180.26143

Word count

2,965

Sentence count

207

Harmful content

Toxicity

5

sentences flagged

Hate speech

23

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In Ephesians 5:5-6, Paul says that we should mutually submit to one another under Christ, in love for Christ, and in unity with Christ. What does that mean? What does it mean to be a Christian? And how does this apply to husbands and wives?

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Hey guys, real quick, before we get started, I have a small request.
00:00:03.360 If you've been blessed by our content and you like this show,
00:00:06.420 would you take just a brief moment and leave us a five-star review?
00:00:09.740 This is quite possibly the most effective thing that you can do
00:00:12.860 to ensure that this content gets out to as many people as possible. Thanks.
00:00:21.240 Oh, Sir Ian, he's back. All right, I remember you.
00:00:24.420 Should Christians vote on laws based on God's law? Yes. Next question.
00:00:27.980 are there limitations on using Americans' system to enforce God's law? 0.62
00:00:37.240 Yeah, that's a good question.
00:00:38.280 Okay, I'll give you my thoughts.
00:00:39.480 So you got two questions.
00:00:40.940 Put it back up for a second.
00:00:41.900 Let's leave it up for a second,
00:00:42.940 because I need to be able to go back and forth and reference.
00:00:44.840 The first question, should Christians vote on laws based on God's law?
00:00:49.340 That's a clear yes. 1.00
00:00:51.840 Yeah, Christians with, so that gets into those lesser identities, right? 1.00
00:00:56.260 primary identity, spiritual, eternal identity, you're either in Adam or in Christ. You're either 0.99
00:01:00.720 spiritually dead or spiritually alive. You have Adam as your federal head, your representative
00:01:04.960 as your father, or you have Christ as your father, right? And it's like, well, Christ is the son. We
00:01:09.480 have God, the father. Well, the Bible actually says of Christ, one of his names is eternal father.
00:01:14.940 So yes, he is our older brother and he is the son of God, the father, the first member of the
00:01:18.800 Trinity, Christ being the second. And I don't mean by that a hierarchy, but just the second person
00:01:24.240 of the Trinity, of equal divinity and equal worth and all those things. But Christ is referred to
00:01:30.140 in Isaiah as eternal father, wonderful counselor. And so with that, you're either going to have
00:01:36.680 Christ as your spiritual head, federal representative, father, or Adam. That's our
00:01:42.260 primary identity, right? But we have these lesser identities of the Bible to speak to. And so one
00:01:49.520 of them would be, are you a man? And if so, are you a husband? Are you a father? Are you a son?
00:01:54.160 Are you a brother? And the Bible has something to say about that, right? So Ephesians five and six
00:01:59.080 are really helpful with this. So because Ephesians five and six, it starts off at the end of chapter
00:02:05.200 five. The apostle Paul starts off by basically saying that we should be mutually submitted to
00:02:10.420 one another under Christ, in love for Christ, in unity with Christ. So there's this mutual
00:02:16.100 submission to one another. But then Paul begins to specify. He begins to get specific. And he
00:02:22.140 says, and this is what that mutual submission looks like for a husband and a wife. But he
00:02:27.540 doesn't just deal with that. Those are those secondary identities. So primary identity,
00:02:31.060 Christian or not, in Adam or in Christ. But secondary identities being, are you a husband
00:02:37.260 or are you a wife? And Paul says, what it looks like to obey Christ differs based off of whether
00:02:44.660 or not you're a husband or whether you're a wife. There's one set of commands to husbands,
00:02:49.400 one set of commands to wives. And then Paul just takes that same principle and just goes to other
00:02:54.000 human relationships dealing with secondary identities, right? So husbands and wives,
00:02:59.320 Ephesians 5. But then Ephesians 6, he talks about employers and employees, masters-slave
00:03:05.640 relationship. There's one thing that masters need to do in obedience and one thing that slaves need
00:03:10.620 to do in obedience. And both are obedience to Christ, but they're both different based off of
00:03:15.180 your station, your secondary identity. He also talks about children and parents, right? So the
00:03:19.840 dynamic with husbands and wives, employers, employees, children, and parents, and it doesn't
00:03:24.480 look the same, right? And the egalitarian is going to come in here and take Ephesians 5 and say,
00:03:28.680 well, but the headline of the story is mutually submit to one another. And that's why the husband's
00:03:33.320 not really the head of the home. Paul doesn't really mean that. He means something else. Let's
00:03:37.040 defying head? Does that really mean leader? Does that really mean, you know, is that really
00:03:41.280 authoritative? You know, the headline of the story is mutual submission to Christ. Okay,
00:03:45.400 apply that, right? That egalitarian argument that you're taking with husbands and wives,
00:03:50.440 if you're going to be consistent in your hermeneutics, then go ahead and apply that
00:03:54.380 in Ephesians 6 with children and parents. You don't do that. You're a hypocrite.
00:04:01.260 You're a liar, egalitarian Christian. You are. You're a liar. You know that, right? You're not 1.00
00:04:06.660 going to, you don't do that. If you claim to be a Christian, but you're egalitarian in your views
00:04:12.980 between husbands and wives, and that husbands aren't the head of the home, and God gives to
00:04:17.080 you children, you don't apply that same hermeneutic in your parenting. You don't say, okay, but, and
00:04:21.500 when it comes to our children, we're going to do the same thing we do with husbands and wives.
00:04:25.000 You know, I'm not really, I don't really have authority over my children. It's a mutual
00:04:28.220 submission between me and my two-year-old toddler. They give their point of view. I give my point of
00:04:33.840 you. Whenever me and my two-year-old have a disagreement, you know, we take it to the elders
00:04:38.080 of the church to provide counsel and we kind of decide together and we often compromise. That's
00:04:43.160 dumb. Don't be an egalitarian. That's so dumb. All right. So apart from being dumb, the point is 1.00
00:04:48.460 there are secondary identities. Well, another one, husbands, wives, all this kind of stuff, 0.99
00:04:51.840 children, parents, employers, employees, also citizen. All right. Long thing to get to this
00:04:57.880 point. Citizen, the Bible talks about nations and the Bible affirms the goodness of boundaries.
00:05:07.680 Boundaries, borders are not some mean, white, colonizing, oppressive thing. No, the Bible
00:05:16.380 affirms the goodness of nations, distinct nations, not just this new global order. That's from the
00:05:24.220 pit of hell. So it's not a global order. It's individual sovereign nations that have the right
00:05:30.160 biblically to have borders and police their borders. And there is such a thing as legal
00:05:35.680 immigration and illegal immigration. And it is not only permissible, but good and right 0.98
00:05:40.460 and biblically affirmed for a nation to properly and justly exercise its civil authority to expel 1.00
00:05:48.600 illegal immigrants. So there is such a thing as nations, and therefore there is such a thing 0.99
00:05:54.680 as national citizenship. So I wouldn't put that on par with husband, wife, child, parent,
00:06:00.760 but that is an identity. Primary identity in Adam or Christ, right? But then there's male and female
00:06:07.480 and husband or wife, father, mother, parent or children, employer or employee. And there are
00:06:16.420 distinctions of obedience. What does it look like to faithfully and practically obey Christ
00:06:22.240 based off of your, these secondary and tertiary identities? Am I a husband or am I a wife? Am I
00:06:28.340 a citizen of America or am I, that's biblical. And so should Christians vote on laws based on
00:06:35.200 God's law? Yes. Every nation should obey Christ. And that means legislating God's law. All 0.75
00:06:41.060 legislation, all laws are legislated and all legislation is moral. Every law is moral. It's
00:06:46.960 not whether but which. It's going to be a moral law and it's either going to be God's morality
00:06:52.020 or man's morality. So nations have to legislate. They have to have laws. By default, every nation
00:06:57.000 has laws. Even a lawless nation has, it's not that they have no law. A lawless nation is simply a
00:07:03.220 nation that has bad laws, immoral laws. And what makes a law right or wrong, bad or good, does it
00:07:10.060 align with God's law. So nations must legislate laws. Legislation is moral neutrality. Moral
00:07:16.960 neutrality is a myth. Neutrality does not exist. You're either in allegiance to Christ or you are
00:07:22.660 against him. You're either for me or against me. Jesus says that pertains to individuals. It also
00:07:27.400 pertains in the civil realm to nations corporately. So they should be in line with Christ in submission
00:07:32.880 to his law. Therefore, they are legislating morality, which is what laws are, that align
00:07:39.140 with God's law and our duty with our secondary identity, not primary, but one of our secondary
00:07:45.220 identities as citizens, national citizens, is to hold our civil leaders accountable. Yes, let's
00:07:51.520 pray for them. And yes, in biblical cases, let's submit to them. And I don't have time to talk
00:07:56.600 about that, what constitutes biblical submission and when should we resist. But I do hold to the
00:08:01.840 Scottish reform tradition of Protestant resistance theory. John Knox, it said, resistance to tyranny
00:08:07.400 is obedience to God. I would be in that line. So I'm not of the Todd Friel persuasion that,
00:08:13.240 well, if the government says, put pinwheels on the side of your head, then go ahead and put
00:08:17.180 pinwheels on the side of your head, as long as they're not telling you to do something that
00:08:21.320 explicitly rebels against God's law. No, no. Governments, their authority is, and the
00:08:29.400 jurisdictions, the boundaries of their authority is set by God. For instance, here's something
00:08:34.860 is always taken out of context. People say, well, even Jesus said, render to Caesar what is Caesar's
00:08:40.500 and give to God what is God's. Okay, well, here's the question you should ask, Christian, 0.89
00:08:45.560 when somebody says that. You're being too political or you're not being submissive. You're
00:08:49.820 not being humble. You're being rebellious towards a civil magistrate. Even Jesus said, render to
00:08:55.160 Caesar what is Caesar's. Here's the question. And who gets to decide what is Caesar's? Because what
00:09:01.260 Christians are assuming these squishy, winsome Christians that want to winsomely walk off to 0.99
00:09:06.660 the gulags and damn our children to concentration camps. These Christians, you know who I'm talking 1.00
00:09:13.800 about, Tim Keller, David French, these kind of whatever. What they're doing is they're actually 1.00
00:09:19.360 eisegeting into the text. It's not biblical exegesis. What they're doing is they're saying
00:09:23.300 this. They're saying, render unto Caesar what is Caesar's, and they are then inserting,
00:09:28.200 an eisegeting, an extra statement that Jesus never said. This is what they're assuming. They're
00:09:33.700 saying, Jesus said, render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. And Jesus also said, Caesar gets to
00:09:38.960 decide what belongs to Caesar. Jesus does say, render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. But the
00:09:46.100 implication is that there is something that belongs to Caesar, and there are other things
00:09:51.180 that don't belong to Caesar.
00:09:53.300 And then the final question is, and who decides?
00:09:58.520 Jesus, the implication of Jesus' statement,
00:10:00.800 render unto Caesar what belongs to Caesar
00:10:02.280 and render unto God what belongs to God.
00:10:04.100 Jesus is saying there's a bifurcation.
00:10:05.800 There are things that belong to Caesar
00:10:06.860 and there are things that don't.
00:10:08.960 So Jesus, even in that statement,
00:10:10.680 is implicitly saying not everything is Caesar's.
00:10:13.740 Caesar does not get to require whatever he wants.
00:10:16.720 Not everything belongs to Caesar. 1.00
00:10:18.360 But then the squishy gospel coalition folk 0.78
00:10:20.560 are going to come out and they're going to implicitly eisegete in the reading of that text
00:10:24.300 that, okay, well, maybe not everything belongs to Caesar, but Caesar gets to decide what belongs
00:10:29.340 to Caesar. No, no, no human being. I don't care if you're the Pope. I don't care if you're
00:10:33.940 the emperor. It doesn't matter who you are. Nowhere in scripture does it say that there is
00:10:38.680 any office, any human office, any, any man who gets to decide, gets to outline and define his
00:10:46.580 role, his jurisdiction, and what belongs to him. No, God decides that for everyone, for the peasant 0.96
00:10:51.520 all the way up to the prince. God determines what rightfully belongs to them and what doesn't.
00:10:57.900 Okay? So all that being said, should Christians vote on laws based on God's law? Yes. Christians 0.87
00:11:03.800 should hold, we have a civil duty within our secondary identity as citizens to hold civil
00:11:10.040 authorities accountable. And one of the ways that we do that in our constitutional republic,
00:11:15.780 we're not a true democracy. Democrats always, oh, democracy, oh, January 6th, an assault on
00:11:21.760 our sacred democracy. No, we're not a democracy. No, we are not a true democracy because a true
00:11:28.340 democracy isn't biblical. And our founders knew that. A true democracy is mob rule, right? A
00:11:34.960 complete democracy would be mob rule. It means that the 50% plus one can completely abuse and
00:11:42.440 press, the 50% minus one, right? The 50% plus one determine, well, they, you know, they have a lot 0.82
00:11:52.400 of stuff and we want their stuff. And so we're going to legislate laws and vote for politicians
00:11:55.880 that'll give us their stuff. No, we are a representative government. And that kind of
00:12:00.920 gets to the second part of your question. Are there limitations on using American system?
00:12:04.580 Yeah, there are. But America, I do think has one of the best systems. And I do believe that this
00:12:09.180 comes from the scripture. Number one, checks and balances of three branches of government
00:12:13.360 and term limits, right? For governors and for presidents and all these, all that speaks to
00:12:20.920 an affirmation of the doctrine of total depravity, right? That we recognize that people aren't
00:12:27.740 perfect and that people with power certainly aren't perfect, right? And so there are checks
00:12:33.880 and balances. We are a representative government. We are a covenantal. We have a covenantal polity
00:12:40.800 here in America because it was founded by the covenanters. Makes sense, right? People want to 0.88
00:12:46.960 say, well, they were all deists. They weren't Christians. Well, some of them were deists.
00:12:50.900 You got guys like John Adams, who seems to be a deist, but then you got guys like George Washington 0.64
00:12:57.040 that people want to make a deist, but I think he was probably a Christian. It seems from the 0.93
00:13:02.340 original sources that he was a Christian. And then you got Jefferson, who is a Unitarian.
00:13:07.100 But the point is America was forged in a Christian ethos, a Christian worldview. That doesn't mean
00:13:12.040 every single one of the founders was a regenerate Christian themselves, but the American origin
00:13:18.260 story, it is a Christian story. And I would argue when people, so are you saying we're a Christian
00:13:22.920 nation? No, but I think we were. I would say, I would agree with guys like Doug Wilson that I
00:13:28.280 think we are currently a Christian nation in a state of apostasy that needs to be called to 0.92
00:13:34.680 repentance and is incurring God's judgment because of our walking away, our rebellion and our 0.84
00:13:39.680 apostasy. So are there limitations on using America's system? I don't think it's a perfect
00:13:43.860 system, but I think it's one of the best. And I think that it does in many ways, largely align
00:13:48.480 with the scripture, even our case law system that we inherited from King Alfred, right?
00:13:54.280 That comes from the Old Testament and civil law and civil code and case law.
00:13:59.000 And then with that, the fact that we have to have witnesses, right?
00:14:02.580 There have to be eyewitnesses, two or three witnesses, and it can't just be hearsay, you
00:14:06.780 know, or that's going to be cast out as non-evidence.
00:14:10.840 Our court system, our justice system, these kinds of things, they model the scripture.
00:14:16.180 So I think America's system, it needs to be reformed.
00:14:18.840 There are things that are not in line with scripture, but there are plenty of things
00:14:21.900 that are.
00:14:22.940 And so I think there are limitations in the sense that America's system, polity, system
00:14:28.580 of policy, polity, governance is not perfect.
00:14:31.920 But because I think it's one of the better systems, one of the closer to being biblical
00:14:36.460 systems in comparison with other nations in the world, I think there are therefore less
00:14:41.460 limitations because America's government, its polity is closer to being biblical.
00:14:48.640 Therefore, it has less limitations.
00:14:51.420 And so the rights and privileges that we have as citizens in this country, if you're an
00:14:57.020 American, those should be used.
00:15:00.420 It's not just a right, but with that right, the other side of the coin is, on one side
00:15:04.320 of the coin, it's a right, a privilege.
00:15:06.000 On the other side of the coin, it's a duty, an obligation, a responsibility.
00:15:09.580 Because I have that right, I have an obligation within this secondary identity.
00:15:13.980 My first identity is I'm in Christ.
00:15:16.200 And then I have lesser identity.
00:15:17.300 But from these identities come rights and privileges, but also duties and responsibilities.
00:15:22.580 It is a privilege to be a husband and to be married to my wife, Megan.
00:15:26.300 But I also have responsibilities because of that office.
00:15:29.180 It's a privilege to be a pastor, but it's also an obligation.
00:15:32.780 And I have responsibilities and duties.
00:15:35.380 And likewise, it's a privilege to be an American, even with our country currently in a state
00:15:40.320 of apostasy.
00:15:41.140 It's less of a privilege than it was back in the day, but it's still a privilege to
00:15:45.220 be an American.
00:15:46.280 I am proud to be an American, but it's not just a privilege.
00:15:50.600 It's also a responsibility and a duty.
00:15:53.360 And yes, we should hold leaders.
00:15:55.900 We should do it respectfully.
00:15:56.900 We should pray for them.
00:15:57.680 All those things that the Bible says, but we don't just, when Caesar says jump, we don't
00:16:02.400 just say how high.
00:16:04.260 Todd Freel and his doctrine on this matter, that's how people wind up in the gulags.
00:16:08.720 And no, I don't think that's biblical.
00:16:10.480 Thanks so much for listening.
00:16:11.360 But real quick, before you go, do us a small favor, take a moment, and leave us a five-star review if you enjoyed the show.
00:16:18.840 This is undoubtedly the best way that you can help us get this biblically faithful content to as many people as possible.
00:16:26.240 Thanks so much.