00:11:44.860And so that's even R.C. Sproul in a children's book saying,
00:11:49.020I'm not going to have an image of Jesus.
00:11:52.620And the reason why, I'll kind of land the plane with this.
00:11:55.640the reason why is because Jesus is the God-man. Jesus, he is God in the flesh, right? John chapter
00:12:05.480one, verse one, in the beginning was the word, the word was with God and the word was God. And then
00:12:10.280verse 14, it says, and the word took on flesh and tabernacled, dwelled among us. So this word,
00:12:18.820this eternal Logos, the Word who is God, the second member of the Trinity, and was with God
00:12:26.040from the beginning without beginning. He is the eternal second member of the Trinity, the Son of
00:12:30.180God. This God did in fact take on flesh. But when Jesus took on flesh, he did not rid himself of his
00:12:37.840divinity. So who Jesus currently is at the right hand of the Father, the majesty on high, is the
00:12:45.280God-man. He is fully man, but he is also fully God. And a picture, a physical image of Jesus
00:12:53.420would only be able to capture, as it were, the man, but not the God-man. It could capture his
00:13:02.160flesh, his humanity. It could not capture his divinity. In other words, it's not Jesus,
00:13:08.440because Jesus is not merely a man. He is the God man. He is the God man. So any depiction
00:13:16.820of Jesus, physical depiction of Jesus in his flesh is depicting for us someone other than
00:13:23.800Jesus. It is depicting the flesh of Jesus apart from the divinity of Jesus, which ultimately
00:13:29.880misses the whole person of Jesus. The person of Jesus is fully God and fully man. Now to actually
00:13:38.900witness Jesus, to see Jesus as the disciples did, and as we will, 1 John says, when we see him,
00:13:44.640we will be like him. So to stand before him on that final day, we will be witnessing,
00:13:49.260we will be observing, physically seeing Jesus, both his divinity and his humanity. We will be
00:13:55.960seen the whole God-man, not half of Jesus, but all of Jesus. When we see him, we will be like him,
00:14:03.780for we will see him as he is, 1 John goes on to say. We're not going to see half of him or part
00:14:09.440of him. We're going to see all of him. For now, we see, you know, Paul writes to the Corinthians,
00:14:15.140we see dimly as in a mirror, but soon we will see fully, you know, we will fully know, even as we
00:14:19.860are fully known. And so that's the problem with depicting Jesus. So certainly we shouldn't have
00:14:25.420images of God the Father, because God the Father is not visible. The Bible is clear that he is the
00:14:32.280invisible God. He is a most pure spirit without body, parts, and passions, as it pertains to the
00:14:38.400third member of the Trinity. The Holy Spirit is, of course, a most pure spirit without body, parts,
00:14:43.220and passions, and he proceeds from the Father and the Son. So, both the Father and the Spirit
00:14:48.760our spirit, without body, without parts, without passions. Jesus has a body, but for it to be
00:14:56.700truly the person of Jesus, the second person of the Trinity, it has to be his whole person.
00:15:03.180So Jesus has a body, but Jesus does not only have a body. He is not just man, he is the God-man.
00:15:10.400It is full divinity and full humanity, and there is no way to depict Jesus as he is, a true depiction of Jesus, without literally standing before him and actually seeing him in the flesh.
00:15:25.500any illustration of Jesus, a statue or an image or a painting, any image of Jesus would only convey
00:15:34.900his humanity and not his deity, which means, all that to say, which means it's not an accurate
00:15:43.440image of Jesus. And so the reason why we would ban, we would have a prohibition against images
00:15:49.940of God, even the second member of the Trinity who does have a body, we would ban images of even
00:15:55.800Christ is because we're banning inaccurate images. Let me say that again because I think that's what
00:16:01.840people miss. What we're banning is inaccurate images of God, including inaccurate images of
00:16:08.980Jesus. And any physical image of Jesus is inaccurate because it is incomplete. It is only
00:16:16.580half, as it were, of Jesus. It is his humanity, but not his divinity. So yes, I would agree with
00:16:24.640J.I. Packer. I would agree with R.C. Sproul. I would agree with the Westminster Confession,
00:16:29.840the 1689 London Baptist Confession, and certainly would agree with the church fathers going back.
00:16:35.420This was never really an issue until more so recently. And when I say recently, I mean a few
00:16:41.900hundred years or so, I would not advocate for images of Christ. And then in general, to your
00:16:48.120question, Catherine, what about things that don't have an image of Christ, but it's still a Bible
00:16:52.680story, an Old Testament Bible story about Moses or something like that. I'm not horribly against
00:16:59.120it, but again, I just, in the same way, this is what I would say, in the same way that you should
00:17:04.340be discerning and selective about what theological books you read and what YouTube channel you watch,
00:17:12.980you know, what podcasts you listen to. I think those same measurements, whatever you're using
00:17:20.400to select what content you consume about God, theology, theological content, you should have
00:17:27.940those same measurements in place for videos about the Bible. And so for me, I don't know a lot of
00:17:36.600sources that make videos about the Bible, about biblical things that have good doctrine. That's
00:17:45.600what I mean. I don't listen to every podcast that claims to be Christian. I don't listen to every
00:17:50.400preacher that claims to be Christian. I don't read every book that's written by someone who claims
00:17:54.860to be Christian. I'm very selective in what sources I deem as credible. I will listen to
00:18:01.960this guy's podcast because he's proven himself to be sound in the faith, sound in doctrine.
00:18:08.180I will read this guy's book. I will go to this person's conference. You know, in the same way
00:18:14.080that we're really selective, and I'm sure you are, Catherine, and most of our listeners are probably
00:18:18.840very selective about who they listen to. I just would say that if it's about the Bible,