THE CONFERENCE - Biblical Patriarchy - Session 4 - Eric Conn ｜ Blueprints for Christendom 2.0 2024
Episode Stats
Harmful content
Misogyny
65
sentences flagged
Toxicity
11
sentences flagged
Hate speech
73
sentences flagged
Summary
Pastor Dusty Devers is a man of courage. He was brave enough to stand up for biblical patriarchy and speak against it in a speech at the Evangelical Theological Society of America in 2000. In this episode, Pastor Devers shares the story of a woman who sent her husband to work as a promise keeper so that her husband could reconnect with other men his age.
Transcript
00:00:00.180
Thank you, Pastor Joel. I appreciate the height of this podium.
00:00:05.720
We have some pastors at our church who are about 6'5", and normally I'm reaching and leaning in so that I can get to the microphone.
00:00:13.940
But they made this one short. Joel actually has to lean down, which is also quite interesting.
00:00:20.860
As we look at everything that's going on in our culture, it's an encouragement to me.
00:00:24.960
You know, we've heard Dusty speak, we've heard Joel, we've heard Pastor Brian.
00:00:29.240
And what an encouragement that God has not left his church in the dark without teachers or alone.
00:00:39.220
I want to pray for us and then we'll get started on today's talk,
00:00:41.760
which will be recovering a vision for biblical patriarchy.
00:00:48.840
Father, we thank you so much for the souls gathered here.
00:00:51.700
We thank you that you are faithful to your bride, to the church.
00:00:56.160
God, we ask that you would continue to build her up in faithfulness.
00:01:00.800
Lord, we thank you, especially for the men gathered here, that you have made them bold.
00:01:06.440
We thank you for Dusty Devers, for his faith that he's willing to put into action.
00:01:12.760
God, would you give them courage as they are fighting literally demonic powers?
00:01:17.060
Would you put your arms and your angels around them?
00:01:22.420
Father, would you also inspire other men to be raised up, that they too may be courageous,
00:01:27.680
that they may fight the good fight of the faith.
00:01:30.700
Lord, and help us to see that our generations are brought to you.
00:01:35.560
God, we ask all these things in the high name of Jesus Christ, our King.
00:01:41.860
Well, I want to begin this talk again on biblical patriarchy, everybody's favorite doctrine.
00:01:46.760
particularly if you're a feminist on Twitter you you probably hate me you might know who I am
00:01:52.980
maybe you blocked me that's okay but I want to start this talk with actually a talk that comes
00:01:59.460
from the year 2000 or rather in the 2000s this talk is what I think is fantastically good one
00:02:08.920
theologian stood at the Evangelical Theological Society to deliver a scathing indictment of the
00:02:14.840
American church. And a feminist followed him, so you know how brave he was actually being in this
0.77
00:02:21.240
situation. And he specifically addressed the failure of complementarianism to make much of a
00:02:26.880
dent in the orthodoxy or the orthopraxy of the church, right? The complementarian doctrines,
00:02:33.060
which had been around since the early 90s, 1989 and following, had made little impact, both on
00:02:38.500
the teaching of the church, but worse, on the practice of the church. Complementarianism had
00:02:44.880
become, he said, a weak compromise with feminist teachings. As such, it had resulted in a church
0.73
00:02:50.880
that was softly patriarchal, he said on paper, but fundamentally egalitarian in practice.
00:02:57.720
Wasn't that what we find in the church so much today? We use words like headship,
00:03:02.080
but they mean nothing, right? For all intents and purposes, he said, the conservative
00:03:07.380
and the complementarian wing of the church was pragmatically egalitarian.
0.79
00:03:13.180
Now, among other signs of demise, the speaker noted how many wives are encouraged to work outside the home
00:03:19.400
and how child care is relegated to daycares and public schools.
0.72
00:03:25.100
You know how excited people get when you talk about women working outside the home,
00:03:33.300
Now, this brave speaker told the story of one complementarian wife who sent her husband to promise keepers.
00:03:42.920
Thank you for laughing because that is ridiculous.
0.72
00:03:47.460
She told this to a sociologist so that her husband could, quote, reconnect with other men his age.
00:03:54.280
Of this incident, the speaker said this, and I find this fitting.
00:03:58.200
He said, this complementarian woman does not seem to recognize that she is sending her husband off to be with one his own age as though she were a mother sending her grade school son off to summer youth camp.
0.85
00:04:11.660
How often does this sort of thing happen in the church today?
00:04:17.740
Likewise, our speaker said, because the church had blindly adopted psychotherapeutic practices, which he said, and he's right,
00:04:26.120
They're inherently Marxist and anti-hierarchical.
00:04:32.200
Because of this, evangelicals had neutered headship of any meaningful authority.
00:04:37.800
Instead, the church had foolishly adopted a servant-leader model.
00:04:41.820
This comes largely out of the Promise Keeper's movement.
00:04:48.100
And what it did was empty the concept of virtually all its authoritative character of actual biblical headship.
00:04:56.120
So the speaker, also being brave, he said, what should we do about this?
00:05:00.880
And this is actually when I think it gets really good.
00:05:03.960
We had a simple and clear solution for the church moving forward.
00:05:07.940
It was not appeasement, as you see from so many people today.
00:05:12.340
No, but he said that the church needed to recover biblical patriarchy.
00:05:18.960
He said, quote, unless evangelical churches are willing to be countercultural
00:05:23.880
against not just the secular culture, and here's the thing I want to underline, not just against
00:05:30.020
the secular culture, but also against the evangelical establishment itself. That's what
00:05:37.000
we're facing. He said, unless we do that, the future of complementarian Christianity is in fact
00:05:43.140
bleak. He went on to say, more patriarchal complementarianism will resonate among a
00:05:49.560
generation seeking stability in a family-fractured Western culture in ways that soft-bellied, big-tent
00:05:56.500
complementarianism never can. So he's advocating we need to be bold. We need to oppose all the
00:06:03.760
sexual craziness that's going on in our culture and specifically in our churches. Well, he rightly
00:06:09.540
pointed out that patriarchy is not a secondary issue within Christian theology. It's a matter
00:06:15.520
of vital importance. Many of you, rightly so, would ask the question, as you come to a conference
00:06:21.100
like this, okay, covenant succession, I get that one, that's important. Post-millennialism, I get
00:06:26.300
that, that's important, but really patriarchy. Why is that in this series of talks for building
00:06:33.920
Christendom 2.0? Well, C.S. Lewis was wise to this, and our speaker pointed it out. In fact, C.S. Lewis
00:06:41.760
included male headship as part of his book, Mere Christianity. Well, why did he do that?
00:06:48.700
The speaker says this, male headship has been asserted and assumed by the Christian church
00:06:54.660
with virtual unanimity from the first century until the rise of contemporary feminism.
00:07:01.500
That's a bold statement in the church today. Patriarchy has been the baseline for 2,000 years,
00:07:07.760
and only recently have we abandoned it. He went on to say this, if we are to reclaim the debate,
00:07:14.840
we must not fear making a claim that is disturbingly counter-cultural, and yet,
00:07:20.940
he said, strikingly biblical, patriarchy. Patriarchy is a claim that the less than
00:07:27.360
evangelical feminists understand increasingly. Indeed, he said Christianity is undergirded by
0.98
00:07:33.860
a vision of patriarchy. Now, finally, our speaker concluded by saying this, patriarchy for the
00:07:41.420
Christian is essential. Egalitarians are winning the evangelical gender debate, not because their
00:07:47.900
arguments are stronger, but because in some sense, we are all egalitarian now. That's the reality we
00:07:55.660
have to face in the church. Practically speaking, most people are egalitarian or feminist. He went
0.98
00:08:02.620
on to say this, our response must be more than simply a reaction. It must instead present an
00:08:09.800
alternative vision, a vision that sums up the burden of male headship under the cosmic rubric
00:08:15.600
of the gospel of Christ and the restoration of all things in him. It must produce churches that
00:08:20.820
are not embarrassed. We cannot be embarrassed that when we say our father, we mean that we
00:08:27.040
are patriarchs of the oldest kind. Amen indeed. What a great speech, right? It's phenomenally
00:08:35.780
accurate. The majority of Christians today really are functionally egalitarian. Headship has been
00:08:42.800
robbed of its authority. Why? Because we have ignored scripture for too long. We have ignored
00:08:48.560
the faith of our fathers on this issue of biblical sexuality, and we've let the woke sociologists do
00:08:55.280
are theologizing for us. Now, despite having greater power and influence than ever, think
00:09:00.680
about this. How many churches are on every street corner in the South? How much money does the
00:09:07.060
gospel coalition have in these major conference circuits? How much money is represented? And yet
00:09:13.440
for all that, the church is being more shaped by the world than it is shaping the world. Why is this?
00:09:20.300
why is it that evangelical leadership has in mass betrayed us on the issue of biblical sexuality
00:09:28.220
well this failure of church leadership is i think typified most by the speaker himself
00:09:35.720
well who was this brave speaker oh it was none other than dr russell moore
00:09:41.080
right russell moore the now leftist editor-in-chief at christianity yesterday
00:09:47.300
right his speech if you try to find this has been scrubbed from almost every major publication
00:09:54.880
in which it was linked denny burke cbmw ets it's all gone you can't find it
00:10:01.480
and in 2023 russell moore said this in an article for christianity today he said i put more trust
00:10:10.800
in Beth Moore today, that is the Anglican lady priestrics, right? I put more trust in Beth Moore
00:10:19.300
today than Russell Moore when I delivered that speech. This is where we are as evangelical
00:10:25.640
leadership has left us, right? The patriarchy he once defended was, he said in the article,
00:10:32.620
more John Wayne than Jesus, right? An obvious nod to the evangelical left and Kristen Kobaz Dumas.
00:10:40.800
Now, why do I bring this up in this talk? I want to illustrate by this example just how far the
00:10:48.440
church has fallen in just 20 years. I mean, think about this today. If you talk about patriarchy
00:10:54.800
at all, who gets mad on Twitter? It's the conservative Christians. A dark cloud, so it
00:11:02.360
seems, looms over the church, which seems to have all but abandoned these historic doctrines
00:11:07.620
of patriarchy. And so I think we are in a desperate lurch. Again, I think as you look at
00:11:15.160
leaders like Russell Moore, what you see is something like in The Lord of Rings, Saruman.
00:11:20.880
You exchange the truth for a lie, and what do you get in return? Money, power, power among the
00:11:27.780
leftist elites especially. But I think as Moore said 20 years ago, our task remains the same.
00:11:34.680
It's not simply to fight a feminist culture, but to oppose the evangelical establishment itself.
00:11:45.680
It's encouraging to see everybody here, but I wonder if you've ever thought about the fact that maybe there's 800 of us here.
00:12:00.280
and a lot of times people ask me, Eric, do you actually think, do you actually believe
00:12:05.580
that patriarchy could be recovered? Absolutely. That's my answer as well. Yes, absolutely it can
00:12:13.600
be recovered. But the more important question is, what is true? As we look at the scriptures,
00:12:19.640
are we convicted about the clarity of God's word on this issue? So many people have not even looked
00:12:25.320
at the historic commentaries, the confessions, or the church fathers on these issues.
00:12:32.100
We listen more to sociologists and psychologists. But there's encouragement for us as well, and I
00:12:38.540
want to give that to you today. This is not the first time the church has been badly on the ropes.
00:12:47.160
I love this quote from G.K. Chesterton. Someone asked him about the church, and again, in his time,
00:12:54.320
there's been lots of times where the church seems to be doing poorly. He said this,
00:12:59.080
on five occasions in church history, the church has gone to the dogs, but on every occasion it
00:13:05.280
was the dog that died. This is the church of the Lord Jesus Christ. He conquered the grave. He is
00:13:12.740
the risen Lord. And so for us, as we seek out his word, and we want to do that today and ask the
00:13:18.700
question, what is biblical patriarchy? We do so fundamentally from a position of hope.
00:13:25.300
So if we look at this question, how is patriarchy to be recovered?
00:13:33.580
Well, I love what Dr. Joe Boot, who's here with Ezra Institute,
00:13:39.800
Every revival, every reformation is fundamentally looking back to the law of God
00:13:44.260
and to our fathers and doing the deep work of repentance.
00:13:49.440
I also love what Dr. Martin Lloyd-Jones said about this
00:13:57.140
You'll remember in that passage, Isaac had departed to Gerar,
00:14:07.280
Well, the Philistines had stopped the wells of Abraham, Isaac's father.
00:14:11.660
And so he realized Isaac did his desperate situation.
00:14:16.300
He realized that his people's survival depended upon him,
00:14:28.420
He didn't send for the technocratic experts of his day.
00:14:34.160
No, he went back to his father's wisdom and he said,
00:14:36.600
if I know anything about my father, it's that he knows where the water is.
00:14:45.880
This is what Lloyd-Jones says about that passage in his sermon.
00:14:51.780
the man who experiments in the midst of a crisis is a fool. There is great value in the readings
0.99
00:14:58.120
of church history and the study of the past, and nothing surely is more important for us
00:15:03.420
at this present time than to read the history of the past and to discover its message afresh.
00:15:11.300
The issue today, he said, is that we think that our problems are new and that we think that they
00:15:17.220
are unique. And the church and the world have never been confronted by such problems before.
00:15:23.880
But Lloyd-Jones said, and I find this quite helpful, every time you get one of these great
00:15:28.380
and glorious and mighty periods of true revival, you will find that in every instance it seems to
00:15:34.100
be a returning to something that had been obtained before. Every time the church is thus revived,
00:15:40.220
she seems to be doing what Isaac did. She is going back to something that had happened before,
00:15:45.300
rediscovering it and finding that ancient supply and so there is nothing that I know of Lloyd
00:15:50.960
Jones writes that is more striking in the history of the church than just this principle
00:15:56.240
all right so as we discuss patriarchy we'll lay out some points general principles and points for
00:16:02.840
what is biblical patriarchy we have to face the fact that our need is not something novel or new
00:16:08.640
or faddish, right? How many times do we have to read a new sociological study or read from a
00:16:15.480
professor at the University of Oklahoma or wherever else? Sorry, Oklahoma, right? We have to read from
00:16:22.920
these professors that we now know that the word effeminacy doesn't mean effeminacy because
00:16:28.020
somebody in 2024 found out that the church fathers and everybody else for 2,000 years was
00:16:33.760
quite simply wrong, right? That is, of course, nonsense. We don't need a new definition from
00:16:40.620
Rachel Hollis about motherhood or womanhood. We don't need a new defense of lady pastors
0.99
00:16:46.900
from an up-and-coming lady pastorics in training at a reform denomination. And we're all going to
00:16:54.460
pretend, by the way, along the way that she won't ever become a preacher, even though that's what
00:16:59.300
keeps happening, right? Our starting point, most of all, cannot be appeasement of our culture.
00:17:07.180
I appreciate so much what Dusty Devers had to say because I think that is the heart of the issue.
0.58
00:17:12.280
When you look at biblical sexuality in the church today, I think what you should notice
00:17:16.480
is that our theology is developed more from cowardice than from the Word of God.
00:17:22.140
We are simply embarrassed about what Scripture teaches. It was interesting to me that when
00:17:28.140
Russell Moore in 2023 completely flip-flopped on his position, it wasn't because he came up with a
00:17:33.920
new interpretation of the text. And so what do we need to do in this moment and in this time is to
00:17:40.920
go back to our fathers, to Genesis and Abraham, to the patriarchs, to the Puritans, to the reformers.
00:17:49.060
All right, these are the men who built the first Christendom. And what we need to do is re-dig
00:17:54.040
their wells and go back and study what our fathers said, right? I think it's fitting that as we go
00:18:01.760
back and we study them, that we should truly learn what it means to rule well as a king and as a
00:18:08.260
father. Fundamentally, what we have to do is we have to put the ancient landmark back where it
00:18:14.580
was moved. And this means that we have to go back and we have to read the old dead guys. Because the
00:18:21.160
one thing about it is they had problems, but they're not our problems. They weren't enmeshed
00:18:26.320
in 1960s liberation sexual theology. They had problems, but not those. So what I want to do
00:18:34.900
now is give just a brief defense of biblical patriarchy. And as we jump into this, I want to
00:18:41.980
make a couple baseline recommendations. A talk like this is bound to bring many questions.
00:18:47.640
and so as you have questions it's good to talk to your husbands it's good to talk to pastors
00:18:53.540
but it's also good to read so i want to recommend to you a book that has been most helpful to me on
00:18:59.240
this issue which is masculine christianity by mr zach garris he's actually a pca pastor
00:19:05.320
and he's done a phenomenal job outlining the biblical historical doctrine of patriarchy
00:19:12.820
This book, by the way, you can get it in hard copy, also Canon, the Canon app.
00:19:18.440
If you already have the app, you can listen to it there.
00:19:22.860
The other book I want to recommend is also by Zach Garris.
00:19:26.840
And this is titled Honor Thy Fathers, Recovering the Anti-Feminist Theology of the Reformers.
00:19:33.520
And this will be released this summer, Lord willing, from New Christendom Press.
00:19:38.640
He essentially goes through Calvin, Vermigley, Luther.
00:19:42.740
He says, what do they have to say about women, biblical sexuality, pertaining to what is now feminism?
00:19:49.920
The final recommendation I want to give to you, particularly if you're a pastor,
0.73
00:19:54.180
but anyone studying God's word, is that you rely on the older guys.
00:20:00.240
So when you're going through commentaries, it was very common, at least for me,
00:20:03.540
in seminary that we're reading new commentaries.
00:20:05.820
commentaries. You read R.T. France on the Gospels, and guess what? He has a very egalitarian view
00:20:11.800
when you get to sexuality. And an older and a wiser pastor told me, he said, really what you
00:20:17.760
ought to do is your bedrock for sermon preparation should be John Calvin. It should be Matthew Henry.
00:20:24.380
It should be John Gill. It should be William Gouge. And as I started making that transition in pulpit
00:20:29.840
ministry, what I started to notice was how backwards we actually are today. I said, wait a
00:20:36.040
minute, these guys would get canceled on Twitter if they put these things on there. So then I
00:20:40.600
thought to myself, what if I did it for them? And that's actually one of the most interesting
00:20:47.140
things. I often get charged with this, but people say, you're just trying to be a shock jock, Eric.
00:20:52.980
And I say, actually, I was reading William Gouge on the fifth commandment and he's got some burners.
00:20:58.860
And so here they are for everybody's enjoyment.
00:21:03.000
So now as we turn to this question of biblical patriarchy, I want to lay this out in nine
00:21:09.900
And again, I want to just emphasize this, the question, so often you'll see this among
00:21:14.820
reformed pastors even, but people will say things like, well, yeah, that's a cool principle
00:21:19.700
And I think it's true, but I just don't think today that's practical, right?
00:21:23.320
I don't, I just, in my experience, I don't know if that could actually happen.
00:21:26.460
the fundamental question that you ought to be asking again particularly for pastors
00:21:31.300
but fathers and husbands the question is not is this popular the question is not is this going
00:21:38.200
to be practical are the feminists going to like it is taylor swift going to like it that's not
00:21:42.940
what we're asking right again we're saying is this true and so we begin with clarity
00:21:49.460
about what the scripture teaches and from clarity we move to courage and then courage means that
00:21:56.920
somewhere along the lines we're actually going to have to assert these principles we're actually
00:22:01.860
going to have to live them we're actually going to have to say to a transgender family member
0.56
00:22:06.520
i'm not going to that wedding and the reason i'm not going is because this is a public
00:22:11.920
statement and i know that because i've read william gooch
00:22:14.800
right so in this talk we're tying together confessionalism post-millennial vision and
00:22:22.160
all the rest hopefully as we go about it the the final thing i'll say as we jump in now and i
00:22:28.920
promise we're going to jump in right these are general principles and i don't know if you've
00:22:34.920
ever noticed this pastors probably have definitely when you give general principles in today's
00:22:40.320
culture, people's minds like short circuit, right? Well, what about the exceptions? I'm going to give
00:22:47.320
you a general rule that is good for women to be mothers. This is the glory of women, right, is to
1.00
00:22:53.980
be mothers. And people will say, what about my triple amputee? Well, yeah, that's an exception.
0.75
00:23:02.000
But we don't make the rules based off the exceptions.
00:23:04.640
so it's a good practice that as you hear these again if you have questions by all means talk
00:23:11.640
to your husbands talk to your pastors talk to your friends point number one what is biblical
00:23:19.180
patriarchy first of all patriarchy simply means father rule right patriarchy means father rule
00:23:26.140
in our culture patriarchy is obviously a dirty word it's supposedly responsible for every evil
00:23:33.440
that has ever happened, right? The patriarchy has actually been smashed, so they tell us,
00:23:40.800
and yet the women who are in charge are killing more babies than ever, if that's in fact what's
0.99
00:23:45.360
happening, right? Feminists run the day, and yet they tell us it's still the patriarchy's fault,
1.00
00:23:52.640
right? It's thought that before 1960, pretty much all women were treated like dirt,
1.00
00:23:58.940
right but again patriarchy means father rule it comes from the greek word patriarches
00:24:04.020
and is a combination of the words potter for father and arco for rule as zach garris says
00:24:10.500
in his book it describes the practice of men providing for and protecting women and children
00:24:15.800
as well as men leading in church and in society right in its simplest form patriarchy means that
00:24:23.360
father's rule in home church and in society. Now, it's also interesting that Peter and Paul both
00:24:30.960
use this word, patriarches, and it's always positive. So Acts 2.29, for example, Peter refers
00:24:37.980
to David the patriarch. They don't seem to be embarrassed about this language. And so if you
00:24:43.240
ask the question, well, why are we going to use that word? Number one, because it's a lot easier
00:24:47.800
to say than complementarianism. But number two, I think it is the biblical word that's used to
00:24:54.180
describe the interplay between the sexes and particularly men leading in these three spheres.
00:25:00.560
It's a biblical word. We should use the biblical word. I don't really care what the feminists
00:25:04.160
think about it. So that's number one. Number two, patriarchy is about a multi-generational
1.00
00:25:10.320
covenantal vision, right? This is what separates Andrew Tate masculinity from what we're talking
00:25:17.820
about here. Yes, men should be strong, but for what, right? They have to have what Brian just
00:25:23.360
talked about with a vision for generations and legacy. I don't have strength so that I can spend
00:25:30.740
it on myself doing the sort of buy a Bugatti and have 30 women in your harem thing that Andrew Tate
00:25:37.480
does, right? This is a man who has no vision. That's the fundamental problem, among many other
00:25:43.800
problems. So patriarchy has to be about this multi-generational and covenantal vision that
00:25:51.460
husbands and fathers have for their families. The Lord is known, by the way, in the Old Testament
00:25:57.940
as the God of your fathers, right? God meant to impart this vision upon his people and in their
00:26:03.600
hearts. And when he visited Abraham in Genesis 15, what did he do? Well, he told him to look at the
00:26:10.080
stars and envision his sons, both numerous and ruling the cosmos, right? This is what Dusty was
00:26:17.040
talking about. What we want to fill our men with is this hope. Look at your life. Someone did this
00:26:24.260
with Jonathan Edwards, by the way, and they looked at like 200 years after his life, and it's like
00:26:30.520
dozens and dozens of his sons are lawyers and senators, probably back when senators were a
00:26:35.980
better thing, right? They impacted their society. All these people came from him.
00:26:42.900
This is actually a similar thing, what we find in Virgil's Aeneid. Aeneas descends into the grave,
00:26:49.060
and what does he do? He meets his father, and before him is paraded all the future generations
00:26:54.240
of his sons. That's the sort of vision that gives you hope. And God told Abraham, this is what is
00:27:02.220
going to happen, ultimately to bring Christ from your loins. This God-given and patriarchal vision
0.81
00:27:10.740
calls each of us to look down through the generations and by faith start building because
00:27:15.660
we believe God's promises. Number three, the scriptures themselves are patriarchal.
00:27:22.600
and somewhere a feminist brain just like short-circuited again she had a meltdown
00:27:28.200
right but all of us i mean even when i first started looking into this i said i don't know
00:27:33.660
are the scriptures really patriarchal this is like 10 years ago well let's look at it even
00:27:38.620
elizabeth caddy stanton you remember her she was the first wave feminist she is the one that said
00:27:45.520
that christianity i'm quoting christianity is inherently patriarchal and that's why i hate it
00:27:50.640
when the feminists say it's patriarchal and then you read the scripture and you say
1.00
00:27:55.700
she's she's right not that she hated it obviously so what did she do she published her woman's bible
0.81
00:28:03.300
which deleted all references to patriarchal rule right this is what the scripture teaches
00:28:10.480
biblical patriarchy scripture is actually quite clear on this issue in the scriptures for example
00:28:17.400
we learn things like this. Adam was created before Eve, and she was made to be his helper on his
00:28:22.760
mission. Genesis 2.15. God named mankind after the man, not the woman. Genesis 5.1-2. Adam was the
00:28:31.560
one who, as ruler, named his wife Eve, mother of all living. Even though Eve sinned first, what did
00:28:37.860
God do? He called Adam to, first and foremost, to be accountable. And this makes sense when you
00:28:43.380
consider that Adam ruled and had authority over his wife, and thus he was responsible. He was the
00:28:49.600
responsible agent for Eve's sin. In fact, Adam was responsible covenantally for all humanity.
00:28:57.040
This is what patriarchy means. Later, we learn that Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob would be referred
00:29:03.680
to as the patriarchs. Why? Because they ruled their families. Abraham was promised land and
00:29:09.140
offspring and given the covenant of circumcision, which applied to who? Male offspring. These
0.95
00:29:15.080
promises were inherited by his descendants, but specifically by his sons. And the Apostle Paul
00:29:21.100
includes Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob as patriarchs in Romans 15.8 when he says, Christ became a
00:29:28.260
servant to Jews. Why? To confirm the promises given to the patriarchs. So the New Testament
00:29:35.600
doesn't seem to have a problem with patriarchy. In the Old Testament, we think about the civil
00:29:41.180
structures. Well, elders, prophets, judges, priests, kings, all men. We do have the one case of
00:29:47.500
Athalia being the queen, but she is a usurper. Judgment falls upon her head. The heads of
1.00
00:29:54.540
families, men, were chosen for civil government, Exodus 4.29. Of the old covenant structure,
00:30:01.180
Herman Boving says this, quote, the entire organization of the nation was along patriarchal
00:30:07.760
lines. You see, what's important to read the old guys, right? It's along patriarchal lines in clans,
1.00
00:30:15.500
families, and households. Each group had a head or representative or prince, a man. All these heads
00:30:21.400
or princes together formed the members of the assembly. When they gathered, the congregation
00:30:25.820
of Israel was thus gathered, end quote. Well, what about Jesus? This is one that I get a lot
00:30:33.680
on Twitter, social media, but also in email. Wasn't Jesus like a modern-day hippie? Didn't
00:30:40.520
he have like really long hair and flip-flops? Hung out at coffee shops in Boulder, Colorado?
00:30:48.760
Well, that's not actually what we find from the biblical record. Jesus not only had shorter hair
00:30:53.400
like the Jewish men of his day, but he exercised manly authority. What did he do? He applauded John
0.57
00:31:00.100
the Baptist because he wasn't soft. And this is from Matthew 11. The Greek word that's used there
00:31:07.000
is malikos, which means effeminacy. He's applauding John for not being effeminate.
00:31:13.520
God sent Christ in the flesh as a man. That seems obvious, but again, as previous speakers have said,
00:31:20.080
we're not even sure what men are anymore. Christ came as a man. He was resurrected with a male
00:31:26.720
body. He taught with authority, and he overturned the tables in the temple. God's people, in fact,
00:31:33.400
expected a male Messiah because the prophecies were about a man, and God's leaders had always
00:31:38.820
been men. Point number four, gender rules are rooted in creation. Gender rules are rooted
0.97
00:31:46.860
in creation. Now modern feminists like to claim that gender rules are just cultural, right? These
1.00
00:31:53.300
are things that we made up because of John Wayne, not Genesis 1 through 3, which is in fact where
00:31:58.680
they come from, right? The New Testament authors, including Jesus, root these teachings continually
00:32:04.160
in creation. So for example, when Jesus is asked about marriage in Matthew 19, what does he do?
00:32:11.660
He makes a beeline for Genesis and for the creation account.
00:32:16.500
When Paul says in 1 Timothy 2 that he does not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man,
00:32:21.920
he ties it specifically to the creation account.
00:32:25.920
Adam was created first, therefore Adam is to rule.
00:32:31.780
While he was created second, it is Adam's helper.
00:32:39.420
This was one that I had the most enjoyment over on Twitter
00:32:42.680
because I quoted Paul without telling people where it was from,
00:32:46.680
and they said, you're twisting the word of God.
00:32:49.520
I said, no, this is literally word for word what the text says.
00:32:55.340
Here's the point in talking about our natures being rooted in creation and in God's design.
0.82
00:33:01.720
If God made a woman a certain way, everywhere she goes, every sphere,
00:33:09.140
It's not just that she's easily deceived when we're talking about the church, but not the family.
00:33:15.240
And then the sphere that nobody likes to talk about because it's so controversial is society, the public sphere.
00:33:23.020
God did not arbitrarily assign tasks to men and women apart from the sexual nature that he gave them.
00:33:33.120
Contrary to modern thought, these physical and biological differences affect a person's entire being.
00:33:39.200
Men and women have different bodies, different minds, different personalities, and different dispositions.
00:33:46.880
I read an article recently in a newspaper, and this is how you know it's a good newspaper.
00:33:51.820
They said there's a new sociological study, and it proves a fundamental reality.
1.00
00:33:59.740
Like, I did not need this article to know that that was true.
00:34:03.420
right that's how crazy our society is and that's how far even the church has fallen
00:34:09.820
so this means that when we talk of roles that men and women occupy they're not arbitrary
00:34:17.280
this is why God gave women certain physical components right they have breasts and womb
00:34:25.900
men have more muscle mass on average than women right there's a reason for this and it's related
00:34:32.180
to their purpose. This is also why, if you understand nature rooted in creation, this is
0.96
00:34:39.440
why it's a problem when a woman says, I could preach a better sermon than most men. No, in fact,
1.00
00:34:45.580
you could not. That's as equally absurd as if I said, I could give birth better than most women.
0.99
00:34:53.040
You cannot do the thing. It is not rooted in your nature. No matter how many crazy articles
1.00
00:35:22.140
Number five, women are made for motherhood.
1.00
00:35:26.240
One of the primary aims of the feminist movement,
1.00
00:35:28.560
they're outspoken about this, is to push women into the workforce.
0.83
00:35:34.140
Frederick Engels wrote about this before and after the Communist Manifesto.
0.95
00:35:39.600
They said, what we want to do is destroy the middle class of working people.
00:35:43.120
If we do that, then we can push our communist aims.
00:35:46.340
The only way we can do that is by destroying patriarchy.
0.96
00:35:50.720
There's a reason that Betty Friedan was a Marxist.
0.70
00:35:55.000
She fabricated her study about how miserable women were in the 1950s.
00:36:03.160
We moderns have a hard time fathoming that it's been atypical across history
0.95
00:36:08.900
to have women so prominent in the workforce as today.
00:36:13.920
But you look at 1950 and before, it simply wasn't happening.
00:36:18.420
Not in American history, but in world history.
1.00
00:36:21.880
For thousands of years, women were seen as naturally caretakers in the home.
0.98
00:36:31.380
Creation tells us that women are made to help the man.
0.97
00:36:34.880
She does this, get this, she makes immortal souls in her womb.
0.95
00:36:40.040
And you're trying to tell me that spreadsheets are better.
1.00
00:36:44.700
She makes immortal souls in her womb, and the home is her proper sphere.
0.98
00:36:51.240
the church fathers said this for thousands of years a woman can put on pantsuits she can occupy
1.00
00:36:58.180
a corner office she can sterilize her body for decades via the pill but all the while her
0.98
00:37:03.320
biology screams out she is made to be a mother her menstrual cycle her breasts her womb they sing
00:37:11.900
the song of her creation her glory is motherhood it was chesterton i think who so aptly put it this
00:37:19.720
way. He said, feminism is the muddled idea that women are free when they serve their employers,
1.00
00:37:25.740
but slaves when they help their husbands. You have to understand that's what our women are
0.86
00:37:31.660
being inundated with. All the feminists and the crypto feminists on Twitter, you know who they
1.00
00:37:38.020
attack the most? Moms who stay home. And as men, we have to be the protectors to say, no,
1.00
00:37:46.760
my wife is not going to take that because I'm going to stand in the gap
00:37:52.660
point number six men are made to be courageous warriors and workers if you ask me why is
00:38:00.940
patriarchy so important for this project of rebuilding christendom it's for this reason
00:38:05.980
christendom simply cannot be recovered without recovering biblical masculinity when you look
0.89
00:38:12.260
at the first Christendom. Men like Charlemagne and Alfred the Great and Jan Sobieski. Well newsflash
0.78
00:38:19.740
they were not pietistic effeminate versions of men that we have today. They saddled up their horses
00:38:25.700
and they defeated an enemy that outnumbered them 200 to 1. This is what we need if we're going to
00:38:33.620
defend the perimeter. Genesis 2 15 says that man was put in the garden to work and to keep. Why?
00:38:40.760
Because man was designed for vocational work, right?
0.73
00:39:00.660
The man who doesn't provide for his family is worse than an unbeliever.
1.00
00:39:05.440
Men are made to be warriors for the sake of their people, right?
1.00
00:39:13.320
A man who has not bled, a man who has not suffered, a man without scars, is no man at all.
1.00
00:39:21.600
Women will bleed in childbirth and menstruation.
0.88
00:39:29.640
Among other things, this means that a man must have a capacity for violence, for the good of his people.
00:39:36.820
He has to be meek in the sense that he knows how to restrain it,
00:39:44.120
So when Paul says in 1 Corinthians 16, act like men,
00:39:49.520
it's clear he means that men must be physically courageous.
00:39:59.820
The church tends to over-spiritualize this element of masculinity
00:40:02.820
as though Paul were merely calling for spiritual strength.
00:40:06.720
They think when Paul says act like man, they mean have a really good quiet time.
00:40:14.540
Quiet times are important, but you have to do far more than that if you're going to be competent and capable as a man.
00:40:23.720
God gave men chests and muscles and deep voices so that they would learn how to command respect and act with gravitas and auctoritas or manly authority.
00:40:34.380
so we must reject the false effeminate version of manhood that is so often pushed on us by the
00:40:40.400
church today one of the things that draws the most ire perhaps in the realm of fathers and
00:40:47.960
sons protecting is the issue of modesty right this is uh if you talk about yoga pants people
1.00
00:40:54.800
get really mad i don't know if you know this right there's a coveted thing among feminists
1.00
00:41:01.100
that has been just embedded in the culture that women think they're free when they take all their
1.00
00:41:06.220
clothes off in public. And brothers and fathers and husbands ought not to allow this. Why? Because
1.00
00:41:13.320
they love their daughters. And when daughters are intoxicated and drinking during a Mardi Gras parade
00:41:18.940
and doing all sorts of lewd gyrations, the question we ought to ask is where are the men?
00:41:30.420
Men are to protect their women and particularly their sexual purity.
0.88
00:41:36.460
Number seven, women are not made for military or combat.
00:41:41.380
This is incredibly unpopular, and I would say law enforcement is included.
00:41:45.500
Deuteronomy 22.5 tells us, this is actually very clear.
0.99
00:41:48.500
A woman shall not wear a man's garment, nor shall a man put on a woman's cloak.
0.53
00:41:52.960
for whoever does these things is an abomination to the Lord your God. Read that again. Whoever
00:41:58.360
does these things is what? An abomination to the Lord your God. That's some pretty weighty
00:42:05.360
language. Not only does this prohibit cross-dressing, but the text refers specifically
00:42:11.440
to a woman who puts on military garb, right? Women are not to serve in the military or combat roles
1.00
00:42:18.000
because it is a violation of their nature, right?
1.00
00:42:22.720
Women are not designed to give or to take punches.
1.00
00:42:25.560
They're not made to enter the arena or the agon.
1.00
00:42:31.160
We continue to push them into these areas, right?
1.00
00:42:35.040
Women in the UFC, I think it's against a woman's nature.
1.00
00:42:39.020
It's disgusting to see women cave each other's faces in, right?
1.00
00:42:48.640
But other sports, women in full-contact sports, you see this with the NFL.
0.96
00:42:53.320
They're continually trying to push women into playing.
0.96
00:42:59.560
Women have leagues, and you know what they found out?
1.00
00:43:02.160
Cutting sports are notoriously destructive of a woman's ACL, her knee joint, right?
1.00
00:43:08.180
They have such catastrophic rates of knee failure in women that doctors have said,
1.00
00:43:12.640
we need to stop putting women in full-contact sports.
1.00
00:43:15.880
Again, to which we could say, yeah, no kidding.
1.00
00:43:20.920
The other area where we've connected it in Ogden is women and cultural pugilism.
1.00
00:43:26.980
Part of the problem is we have women in politics as well.
1.00
00:43:30.460
We have women all over the place doing things that normally men should be doing.
1.00
00:43:35.800
And while we admit that the world is messed up and there's going to be some imperfect situations,
1.00
00:43:39.560
we also have to stand by the principle that women do not need to be out front even in the culture
00:43:45.420
war fighting for us the thing we should ask ourselves if there are no men to do it why is that
1.00
00:43:52.140
then maybe we should raise some up maybe we should train them but again the woman's role
00:43:59.400
is primarily the home i think i'm crazy on this john gill who served 100 years i believe before
00:44:06.100
Spurgeon in the same church, he applies this principle on Deuteronomy 22.5, and he says this,
0.94
00:44:13.000
it is very unseemly and impudent and contrary to the modesty of her, that is the woman's sex,
00:44:19.340
or there shall not be upon her any instrument of a man, any utensil of which he makes use of in his
1.00
00:44:25.740
trade or in his business. So he's not just saying military, he's also saying trade tools.
00:44:31.360
John Gill says as if she was employed in it that is the trade her business was not to do the work
00:44:37.880
of men but to take care of her house and her family and the apostle Paul says the exact same
00:44:45.160
thing we just don't like it number eight men are made to rule in family in church and in society
00:44:54.580
fathers are called to rule in the family this much is clear of all the controversial things to say
00:45:00.860
this is probably the least, but yet it still doesn't happen. Paul is clear in Ephesians 5.25,
00:45:07.240
for example, that the husband is head of the wife. They are not joint heads of the household.
00:45:13.640
As my friend Pastor Rich Lusk often says, anything with two heads is called a monster.
00:45:20.580
There is one head, which is the husband. He has both authority and responsibility to rule his
00:45:27.440
household. Well, this is the failure of servant leader model. Well, he has the responsibility to
00:45:32.420
serve his wife's every need, but he has no real authority. But that's never leadership. You have
00:45:38.840
to have both, authority and responsibility. And the man is to love his wife as Christ loves the
00:45:44.720
church. She, in turn, is to submit, and here's the part that you all love, she is to submit as one
00:45:52.220
inferior in rank. Let me say that again, as one inferior in rank, right? They're both equally
00:46:01.780
valuable before God, but they have a different hierarchical ranking. Our society hates this.
00:46:09.440
I think this is one reason, this is the language, by the way, of the Westminster Confession,
00:46:14.000
but this is one reason why the complementarians in 1989, when they formulated their statements,
00:46:19.680
This is why they said we're anti-hierarchalist.
00:46:31.700
The necessary subjection of the wife is to that degree of subordination where God has placed all subordinates
0.92
00:46:38.180
and how he has subjected them to their superiors and set them in a lower rank.
1.00
00:46:47.540
All that means in hierarchy, it's very, very simple.
1.00
00:46:55.160
And the church fathers taught it for millennia.
0.97
00:47:05.780
Christ has appointed men to lead in his church.
00:47:08.500
And again, 1 Timothy 2 and elsewhere, Paul affirms this.
00:47:12.180
We need to recognize that preaching and pastoral ministry
00:47:15.640
is a form of spiritual combat and spiritual warfare.
1.00
00:47:20.760
And this is one reason why a woman's nature
1.00
00:47:26.280
Finally, we'll conclude with this as we wrap things up.
00:47:43.380
right thomas watson on the fifth commandment taught that the civil sphere just as the church
00:47:50.540
is an extension of the family starts with the family flows outward as such it's clear in this
00:47:57.560
structure and in westminster that only men may rule we see this principle in exodus 3 where the
00:48:04.300
fathers are appointed to rule in the civil sphere but again this is controversial today but actually
00:48:09.360
biblically quite clear. If a woman cannot lawfully rule in her home, which scripture says she cannot,
0.99
00:48:16.560
and in the church, how then is she going to rule other households and churches?
0.94
00:48:21.900
This makes no sense. She is not fitted in her nature for this task. And again, if you think
00:48:28.120
I'm crazy, here's R.L. Dabney. He says this, does not the apostle here assign the home as the proper
00:48:35.280
sphere of the Christian woman. That is her kingdom, and neither the secular nor the ecclesiastical
00:48:42.540
commonwealth. Her duties in her home are to detain her away from the public functions. A wise God,
00:48:49.720
and here's the point, this is in God's wisdom and his goodness and his mercy to us, right? These
00:48:55.280
structures are good. A wise God designs no clashing between his domestic, his political,
00:49:09.780
but it's patriarchy in this order that God has set,
00:49:15.980
because it is a good thing for us and for our families
00:49:25.200
Number nine, patriarchy must be marked by contagious joy.
0.92
00:49:30.820
Everybody thinks, especially on the feminist side, that we're in Ogden and we're just really angry.
00:49:38.720
We're actually a bunch of friends in a really old church basement that probably has mold.
00:49:45.060
And the week before we got here, all Brian did was sing the same songs.
00:49:56.400
As Pastor Doug has led the way on so many of these issues for so many years,
00:50:02.500
You can't fight a culture war without a culture.
00:50:10.560
We are establishing hardy cultures that are worth defending.
00:50:15.240
We are building cultures that are filled with psalm singing and feasting and robust worship
00:50:20.960
and the study of God's Word and Christian education.
00:50:32.380
Only when we have this great culture are we prepared to fight,
00:50:39.880
So as we embark on the battle to defend God's design for human sexuality,
00:50:48.200
The true soldier fights not because he hates what is in front of him,
00:50:55.460
It is not a hatred for feminism or a sexual perversion,
00:51:04.300
It's our love for the purity of Christ's church.
00:51:10.200
talking about King Loon from C.S. Lewis and the Horse and His Boy.
00:51:15.260
It's this principle that we talk about often in Ogden.
00:51:21.380
Right? Quoting from C.S. Lewis, I'll share this with you. He says this,
00:51:26.460
This is what it means to be a king, to be first in every desperate attack, to be last in every
00:51:31.860
desperate retreat, and when there's hunger in the land, as must be now and then in bad years,
00:51:37.280
to wear finer clothes and to laugh louder over a scantier meal than any man in your land.
00:51:44.000
This is a vision, a joyful vision for patriarchy.
00:51:48.500
i want to charge you finally as we close particularly the men dusty spoke at length
00:51:54.860
about this i love what he said i want you to think about your grandsons especially again
00:52:01.980
what will disappoint them is not that you died in the fight and you gave it your all
00:52:10.080
what will disappoint them in you is that you were a coward and that you didn't fight this fight
00:52:16.000
evangelicals have said this for the last many years this is not a hill to die on
0.94
00:52:22.900
brothers and sisters biblical sexuality and patriarchy is a hill to die on we have to be
00:52:30.340
willing to plant our flag here and we do so because we know what our father's taught
00:52:37.160
we have the confession behind us it may be depressing as you look about we are badly
00:52:44.960
outnumbered by the feminist hordes and the culture and yes even our church institutions
00:52:49.200
to which I say to you what a time to win glory. We have been chosen to stand in the gap as did
00:52:56.320
the 300 Spartans at Thermopylae and we fight not for ourselves but for our progeny not because it
00:53:03.980
is easy but because we look with faith to the future generations of our sons and we come full
00:53:10.600
circle with patriarchy. When we die, let us die spent in the fight for Christendom. Then we may
00:53:17.560
say, as Théoden did on the Pelennor fields, as he lay dying, I go now to my father's, in whose
00:53:24.640
mighty company I shall not now be so ashamed. Amen? Let's pray. Father, we thank you so much
00:53:33.340
for your grace. We thank you for your word. We ask that you would revive and reform and build
00:53:39.440
up your church in such a manner that we crush the gates of hell. Father, build up your kingdom
00:53:45.660
for the sake of your son, Jesus, in whose name we pray. Amen. Amen.