Why do we hate great men? Is it because they were great in their day, or because they weren't great in our day? What is the difference between great men today and great men in our past, and why do we love them?
00:00:00.000Leave us a five-star review on your favorite podcast platform.
00:00:03.800I get it. It's annoying. Everybody asks, but I'm going to tell you why.
00:00:07.540When you give us a positive review, what that does is it triggers the algorithm
00:00:12.040so that our podcast shows up on more people's newsfeeds.
00:00:16.280You and I both know that this ministry is willing to talk about things that most ministries aren't.
00:00:21.860We need this content for the glory of God to reach more people's ears.
00:00:26.800well thank you for for being here i i didn't know there'd be so many people here for to listen to a
00:00:34.560guy who believes in natural law so uh it's a rare thing but uh hopefully you know david and i can
00:00:40.720have a good discussion and hopefully you'll you'll you know come to the conclusion that we're not
00:00:45.260actually so far apart but um so thank you to joel for this and the invitation uh this is a really
00:00:50.520great conference and it's an honor it's definitely an honor to be here um among great men
00:00:56.300and women. So I'm talking about the prince and or the prince as great men.
00:01:05.040So our world hates great men. Why do they hate great men? They hate great men because such men
00:01:14.580transcend the rules and the moralistic norms of the age. And by force of vision and by personality,
00:01:24.480they gain a devoted and loyal and inspired following.
00:01:30.560And that great man leads them into hardship for the good of themselves and their posterity.
00:01:37.940But why do liberals, why do liberals fawn over the ice cream devouring Joe Biden?
00:01:45.760Why did Obama, Mr. Smooth and Mild, cause young women and men of the aspiring class0.90
00:01:53.200to swoon at his rallies. Do you guys remember that? Literally people would collapse in his
00:01:58.380presence. That's, that's power. I'll give them that. But, uh, but what, why is that? Because at
00:02:03.960heart, the liberal has a weak soul is animated by bureaucratic sameness and management. Everything
00:02:13.340is a process of fairness, fairness through, uh, through procedure, through box checking and
00:02:20.500oftentimes cooked evaluations. For them, power is diffused. It's implicit. It is soft. That is,
00:02:29.000it is long housed. The great man in such an order is obsolete, so they think. To them,
00:02:36.440he is destructive to the system. Now, the conservatives, for their part, in our day,
00:02:43.780seemed to love some great men. They loved Lincoln, Churchill, and Ronald Reagan. But notice that the
00:02:51.220conservative loved such great men for their universal ideas. Lincoln completed the aspirations
00:02:58.280of the founding by enacting universal natural rights, and Churchill defeated a threat to
00:03:06.120universal democracy while losing his empire, and Reagan led a liberal world to triumph over the
00:03:15.480evils of communism. So all these men, all these men in their own way, made the world safe for
00:03:22.860democracy. So in the early 2000s, the conservatives looked up, took up this theme, took up this theme
00:03:31.500of universality and they had a bust of Churchill staring at them in the Oval Office. And what did
00:03:37.580they do? They invaded the sovereign nation of Iraq. And to do what? They did it to spread0.63
00:03:43.520democracy. Universal democracy is in the heart of every single man is a liberal Democrat waiting
00:03:50.440to come out. So each of these men, and certainly you can admire these men, but for the conservative,
00:03:56.520they're cherished for their contribution to humanity. Just listen to example to Reagan's
00:04:03.520celebrated farewell address, which I recommend you do, as he cast the pilgrims of Plymouth Rock
00:04:09.980as freedom lovers, just freedom lovers seeking freedom, and he renders the American as simply
00:04:16.360any human who wants to work hard. He renders him into the universal economic man. Now the new right
00:04:24.180today, the new riot of which we're a part, likes to question whether we actually won World War II.
00:04:31.300But that's not because of some love for the Third Reich or Hitler or anyone like that,
00:04:35.440but because the aftermath of our victory led to the lifting up of humanity to the degradation0.87
00:04:42.720of the victors' own historical peoples. That is why we question whether we actually won World War
00:04:50.640too. And the conservatives since then, the conservatives and the liberals, have been
00:04:55.060united on this general program, which is to invade the world and to invite the world.
00:05:02.260Why did the old guard conservatives hate the slogan, Make America Great Again? It's because
00:05:08.860it spoke of American greatness, not aspirations for international liberalism. So the liberal and
00:05:17.600the conservative in our day, for related reasons, despised the idea of the great man, one whose
00:05:23.540vision is for national greatness, driven by concerns for a particular people. And thus,
00:05:31.040David and Solomon were for the Israelites, and Solon was for the Athenians. Lycurgus was for0.98
00:05:37.880the Spartans. Cincinnatus for the Romans. Alfred the Great for the Anglo-Saxons. William the
00:05:43.540silent for the Dutch, Edmund Burke for the British, George Washington for the Americans,
00:05:48.980Napoleon for the French, and Robert E. Lee for the American South.
00:05:59.020So great men, great men are not bound by the chattering commentary class, nor the literati,0.93
00:06:06.740those who in our day are so ideologically bound by procedural norms that they prefer a slow,
00:06:13.120decline to necessary action. They have endless words and few deeds. They fear presence, gravitas,
00:06:21.940vitality. They fear the yearn for life, the yearning that distracts the average man from
00:06:28.420expending his life force on meaningless labor and consumption. The nation for such people is not a
00:06:35.880collective entity with a collective purpose, a way of life, shared loves, but a huddled mass
00:06:42.600of disparate individuals contributing to GDP and an internationalist ideology.
00:06:50.140The great man rejects such people. He transcends the moral pieties of the age, which bound men
00:06:56.080to weakness, to being slaves, or at best, lovers of warmth and small comforts. He crosses the
00:07:04.660Rubicon. He awakens men from slumber and sloth, just as Xenophon aroused the 10,000 to action
00:07:12.820and adventure, as Themistocles, as Athens burned, united the Greeks to defeat the Persians at0.80
00:07:20.200Salamis, as the exiled El Cid led his followers against Muslim-held Spain, and as Washington
00:07:27.380rallied the Continental Army at Valley Forge. These were great men who, in conditions of crisis,
00:07:34.660inspired their fellow men to embrace hardship and to strive with united purpose.
00:07:42.700So one thing that distinguishes the political right from the political left is its conception of power.
00:07:50.900For the right, power is preferably open, it is explicit, and is more personal.
00:07:57.220It typically has its figurehead, a true identifiable object of praise or blame.
00:08:04.020Think, for example, about the old paintings of kings who are wearing swords.
00:08:09.560So I'm not speaking about absolute power.
00:08:12.080This power should be constitutionally curtailed and limited and directed,
00:08:17.220nor does this require a centralization of power.
00:08:20.800But power for the right should be identifiable and personified.
00:08:26.940That is, in some way, embodied in a person.
00:08:29.620but today in our time can we identify who specifically is responsible for say the spread
00:08:37.900of transgender ideology well maybe some of you can but i won't go there so but in our in our time
00:08:47.060in our time power is diffused through a network composed of professional associations such as
00:08:54.640the American Medical Association, the media, academia, foundations, and government agencies.
00:09:00.760Power in liberalism, especially in modern liberalism, is implicit. With a few exceptions,
00:09:08.360no one mandates by law what you must think or care about. And yet, all of a sudden,
00:09:14.300the new current thing is presented to us, and we, by a strange social pressure,
00:09:21.220feel compelled to have an opinion, to talk about it.
00:09:25.860They tell us which person or country we must stop and hate for a couple of minutes.
00:09:31.740There are many things that we could stop and think about,
00:09:35.620but our mind is captured by this thing presented to us.
00:09:38.900The nation is repeatedly swept up in unthinking thought.
00:09:44.700So as Christians are being slaughtered,
00:09:46.900been slaughtered in Africa, in Syria, and other places, as freedom of speech is crushed even in
00:09:52.920places in the West, what are we talking about instead? We're talking about Israel and Ukraine.0.63
00:09:59.720But again, power in liberalism is unidentifiable, or at least it is irreducible.
00:10:05.420As Biden was incapacitated for four years, who was running the federal government?
00:10:11.920Who was making the decisions? Again, some of you guys might know, but who was making the decisions?
00:10:16.900As for radical social change, its source is often indiscernible and is easy for them to simply dismiss any theory as conspiratorial, outlandish, or evil, or due to, you know, ethnic jealousy or something.
00:10:34.700But change just simply happens suddenly.
00:10:38.040It is like the wind, you know, not where it comes from, nor where it is going.
00:10:41.380It is that the secular spirit moves, and suddenly we must celebrate the man in a dress.
00:10:49.100Now, perhaps this is due to liberal managerialism, where individuals bounce between governments,
00:10:55.580corporations, NGOs, foundations, media, academic jobs, everyone moving up the academic ladder,
00:11:01.860playing the same game, operating according to the same rules of this brand network.
00:11:06.640And each organization has its talking head, all of them saying the same exact thing.
00:11:11.380And so the devilish spirit moves and the aspiring class conforms. But of course, this is mere theory
00:11:18.500and it's me trying to discern a diffused implicit power. Now, everything conforms to this very
00:11:25.560implicit power, the sort of thing that tugs at our hearts and gets us at the psychological level.
00:11:32.760And thus, even rhetoric itself has become passive-aggressive. The HR lady with a smile
00:11:38.580one day says you're fired without cause. Threats to your livelihood are concealed under language of
00:11:46.520concern. That should sound familiar. We've experienced a lot of concern from fellow
00:11:53.020Christians, and this is what I call wolf's law. So I made my own law. Thank you. Some of you know it,1.00
00:12:00.720but among Christians, the more they talk about loving your enemies, the more willing they are1.00
00:12:07.700to wield the left-wing mob to get you fired, to render you a social outcast, and to see you0.54
00:12:14.360financially ruined. So now you can remember Wolf's Law now. But the moral rhetoric, especially among
00:12:20.660Christians, is a veiled threat. But the right still holds on to this ideal, that our rhetoric0.72
00:12:28.980should be assertive and direct, and that power should be open and it should be explicit. Now
00:12:35.400Donald Trump, for all his fault, more than anyone in my lifetime has embodied this ideal. It's kind
00:12:40.940of, I call him the most ironic great man of history. He embodies, you know, he's embodied
00:12:47.420this ideal imperfectly. That is, and one reason why he's so hated, he's shown that you can just
00:12:52.680do things, that you can just say it, that all those promises of the Republican Party that I
00:12:58.080heard for decades, you can, they can just happen. You can actually achieve it when there is a will
00:13:04.460to do it. So it is for these reasons that I think people are so angsty about the title
00:13:11.060Christian Prince, which is a term, by the way, that is nearly ubiquitous in the Christian
00:13:18.160tradition. So it's kind of bizarre. But it suggests a title of a man who does not ask
00:13:25.580the ladies for permission. It is a man whose ethics is good and evil, not safe and scary.
00:13:32.520so the christian prince as i described him in the case for christian nationalism is a great
00:13:38.960man he is no surprises here a prince he is a distinguished man of his particular people
00:13:46.420excelling in virtue the christian qualifier does not make him a man of humanity nor a man of all
00:13:54.600christians he is a christian prince for his particular christian people so some people
00:14:01.880have suggested that this prince of mine is a man of absolute power, unhindered in action. But this
00:14:09.200is really what I'd call a universalist projection, stated by those who lack any conception of a
00:14:15.840particular people with their own political tradition and constitution. The prince is a man
00:14:22.140of a people for those people. He is bound by a way of life. So I'm not calling for a return to
00:14:31.160monarchy, nor to some ancient conception of dictatorship, nor to a 16th century Geneva.
00:14:39.220I know some of you might want some of that, but that's not what I'm saying. So every people has
00:14:43.820a constitution. Every people has a constitution. It's either written or it's unwritten. And that
00:14:49.560is, it is a political architecture that limits and directs absolute power or abstract power,
00:14:56.780excuse me. It limits and directs power in the abstract. So in ordinary circumstances,
00:15:01.680this prince that I've described is bound by his way of life, or I should say the people bind him
00:15:09.820to it. See, the point of the prince, among other things, is that political rule must return to
00:15:16.420great men who lead their people to greatness, who can inspire a sense of we across generations
00:15:25.460who remind the living of their ancestors and of those yet to be born.
00:15:32.260That is, they are temporal leaders of what Edmund Burke called the eternal society,
00:15:36.760as he said in his own words, that it is a partnership between those who are living,
00:15:42.380those who are dead, and those who are to be born.
00:15:46.440So the prince is a man in whatever capacity or whatever title we want to give him in our political system
00:15:51.680who reminds us that we live in a society gifted to us from the dead, and we labor now for our
00:15:59.820progeny. We work with and we work for an inheritance. Every generation is both the
00:16:08.980given and the givers of a way of life. So, of course, there are different types of civil
00:16:14.800leaders. 16th, 17th centuries, we hear of kings and princes, civil magistrates, governors.
00:16:20.940Today we have presidents, congressmen, prime ministers, members of parliament, all those.
00:16:25.740And, of course, many countries today have a separation of powers
00:16:29.320so that the legislative, executive, judicial powers are in different branches of government.
00:16:35.200That's not always how it's been in the history.
00:16:39.000So, but Prince, I do not refer to any specific type of ruler.
00:16:42.100It's more of a ruler in general, emphasizing the personal nature of leadership,