00:04:34.180where they, where they reach their, you know, final form where, I mean, even, even transgenderism
00:04:38.860probably isn't the final form. It's not the final form, yeah. No, it's close to it, but it's not,
00:04:42.780you know, it could get worse. And, and so we, we have to go back further and further and further
00:04:50.920to see, okay, when is it this tiny little, and not just transgenderism, but feminism as well,
00:04:57.040when is it just this tiny little thing in the ground where I can just easily pluck it out and
00:05:01.080right throat to the wind um yeah well and that's i think what we should talk about i think
00:05:04.940transgenderism is one of the and not maybe not the final fruit like you just said but it's one
00:05:09.840of the final fruits are getting close of the root of feminism so i think there's a straight line
00:05:14.740from feminism to transgenderism because i think egalitarianism for it to be successful ultimately
00:05:20.960um equality uh when we speak of equality in those kinds of terms what it demands is androgyny yeah
00:05:28.620So people think, well, transgenderism, you know, like you own the libs, you know, and say like, oh, isn't this funny that, you know, Leah Thomas, you know, is beating all the, you know, all the chicks and swimming, you know, that kind of stuff.
00:05:42.620So on one hand, you know, I think the neocon individual, you know, who red pill three years ago and thinks that the world was fine until then, that person, you know, is owning the libs by saying, you're, you know, you're the real anti-feminist, you know, like you're the real, you know, blah, blah, blah.
00:05:57.200but we just want to save title nine and it's like right and so what they're saying is that
00:06:01.660right so they're saying transgenderism is an irony of feminism uh whereas i would say no
00:06:08.760transgenderism is actually the logical end yeah it's not an irony yeah it's not an irony it's not
00:06:14.300uh it's not opposing feminism uh it's actually the logical end of what feminism would always
00:06:19.900was always destined to produce and i think the reason why is because again um i think in order
00:06:25.260to have um the perfect egalitarian you know equal world uh you need um in order to have perfect
00:06:32.540equality as the marxist thinks about equality uh you have to have sameness you have to have
00:06:37.700androgyny so uh you know like i i've always told my church i said you know the goal is not uh to
00:06:43.220have 5 000 different genders right it's you know two genders then it's three then it's 87 then it's
00:06:48.340126 134 whatever number we're on now but the goal is uh not to get to 5 000 it's to get to one
00:06:54.820yeah so the goal is how do we get from two genders to one and the easiest way to do it is not two to
00:07:01.020one that's that's a that's a hard pill to swallow that probably won't work on the public so what
00:07:05.600you do is is you go up first and then you go up so far to where just all is just a a mess and just
00:07:12.460blends together and it becomes one but the goal is androgyny i think feminism has always uh served
00:07:18.660towards that end and so you know even though it seems like an irony like oh feminism is no longer
00:07:23.940of the thing now it's transgenderism which flies in the face of feminism i would say no
00:07:27.860transgenderism is the child of the mother of feminism well yeah the irony too is that i mean
00:07:33.700you see it a lot online that the the really radical feminists or many of them uh are like
00:07:40.920anti-trans for the for the same reason where they're like no no this is the no feminism didn't
00:07:46.220cause transgenderism this is this is attacking us you know they could they're called like turfs
00:07:50.240right yeah yeah dave chapelle famously said i'm team turf yeah trans exclusion exclusionary uh
00:07:56.700radical feminist you know that's a harry potter woman uh yeah yeah she's she yeah she is a turf
00:08:03.060um and and so it it's and they're broken into these two camps whereas other feminists are like
00:08:08.380no you you're a woman too and we're gonna fight to make sure that you all your rights are protected
00:08:13.980and things like that and so there's this divide within within that world uh but i i think it is
00:08:19.840it's obvious there's this this seamless process where if you if you break down all of the social
00:08:25.820distinctions between men and women that already exist um you know where you have anti-discrimination
00:08:34.480laws that uh force women into male-only spaces and um where you have you know by by law and then
00:08:43.880later by custom um everyone just assuming that well we we won't ever have any distinctions
00:08:49.540between men and women we'll have men and women together in every single thing you know um we'll
00:08:54.740we won't have you know boys boys sports and girls sports with girl sports or uh or even before that
00:09:01.840sports were just for boys right like we talked about title nine right we'll have um um now every
00:09:09.040every boy sport you have you have to have a girl sports that accompanies it and and um we're gonna
00:09:14.540of mandate this by law right all all sorts of things like that is it um it didn't happen like
00:09:22.520overnight or out of nowhere like it's this long drawn-out process over the course of of decades
00:09:28.660and even centuries and uh you remove all of these distinctions in your culture between men and women
00:09:34.220and then all of a sudden it's like well if men and women are entirely the same other than
00:09:41.320biologically then well why don't we change them biologically right why don't we make them
00:09:48.880physically look like one or the other and and that's what that's what happened especially once
00:09:53.580you um once you know sexual perversion in general begins to be normalized tolerated then normalized
00:10:02.140and then uh positively exalted uh then that other you know perversion um becomes thinkable
00:10:11.040as well or at least something you could you know bring out into the public and demand that people
00:10:15.980accept this now because that's the next thing after after we after we made homosexuality um
00:10:22.060a a laudable thing that you you by law you have to praise um then it's the very next step is all
00:10:31.140right now these men who look like women uh dress like women i don't really look like women they
00:10:35.880act like women yeah now they're going to look like and look like them and women that want to
00:10:40.480look like you know teenage boys um now now you have to treat them as though they are those things
00:10:47.120right right or you are in trouble right so let's talk about let's talk about the church let's talk
00:10:53.340about um the origins of some of these ideas but how the church in many ways hook line and sinker
00:10:59.320you know took the bait that uh and i'm thinking about you know specifically american church
00:11:05.380history and like i think it would be helpful to you know you discuss this in your book
00:11:08.920but to talk about the second great awakening yeah the second great awakening was nothing like
00:11:14.500the first this isn't you know this isn't george whitfield um you know wesley brothers but that
00:11:20.400you know charles finney and his conception of revival his conception of christianity
00:11:25.240his systematic uh that's heretical that he came up with you know these kinds of things
00:11:30.040and in a lot of ways you know yes we could argue that it was there before you know in a previous
00:11:34.380episode we talked about how you know in the rome uh roman church and roman catholicism that these
00:11:39.500things were there very early on with their mariology uh was a big part of it but i think
00:11:44.880within protestantism uh especially here in america the great awakening seems to be uh seems to be
00:11:51.600the root of a lot of feminization that that affected the culture but began actually in the
00:11:57.240house of god yeah i think the the big thing about the second great awakening just as a you know as
00:12:04.140the the fundamental religious moment in american history uh it is that it uh democratized american
00:12:13.520religion where whereas and american protestant protestantism in particular it um before that
00:12:21.560you would you had the various forms of of protestant denominations that all had a very rigid
00:12:29.440hierarchy right um even even congregationalism still had pastors that were set apart and things
00:12:35.820like that so uh people maybe would be like oh well there was still congregationalism in in
00:12:40.520America. Yeah, there was. But even there, it was fairly rigid. You still had families and
00:12:47.480households where the fathers represented the household. They're the ones that voted in most
00:12:52.080of the Congregationalist churches and so forth. But then you have Finney and you have the
00:12:58.280revivalism in Western New York and throughout the frontier during the early part of the 19th
00:13:05.000century where now it's just individuals and it isn't even really churches it's just these big
00:13:10.560tent revivals and um all of it's reduced down to individual conversions and there is no there is
00:13:19.500no discipleship there's no church um it's all just individual people becoming christians and that's
00:13:25.080that's it pretty straight line from charles finney to billy graham would you say um yeah i i think
00:13:32.280Well, yes and no. In terms of the methodology, yeah, definitely. I think you have a few different things happen to Protestantism throughout the 19th century in America where you still have your mainline Protestant denominations and the seminaries and big churches that existed.
00:21:46.000And so the household would be like a molecule.
00:21:49.140But, but what shifted theologically with the great awakening is, is it started to focus
00:21:53.900less on the molecule, more on the atom, less on water and more on hydrogen or oxygen, less
00:21:59.120on the family, the household, and more on the individual.
00:22:02.360And then that ultimately, absolutely, there's a straight line from that theological transition to a political and cultural way of thinking that now it's, you know, so even with the 19th Amendment and women's suffrage, it was this idea of like, well, you know, for women to have rights, then they must have this inalienable, you know, they're somehow not even a whole person or don't have value and intrinsic value unless they have the right to vote.
00:22:31.720whereas before we would have said well women are voting the this is the household vote and and when
00:22:38.000you look at like splitting the household vote with men and women uh there seems to be a direct
00:22:42.820correlation between that and down the line a little bit further you know getting to no fault
00:22:47.540divorce yeah you know and all that so all these things are connected so when we talk about feminism
00:22:52.440today and and it's and it's you know most extreme form currently and not to say it can't get worse
00:22:58.280But when we think of feminism today and transgenderism, I think we do need to think about the Great Awakening, going from the household to the individual, decisionism versus God's sovereignty and salvation, the idea of women's suffrage, the household vote being viewed as oppressive, misogyny, rather than men lovingly representing their families.
00:23:20.180all these things are connected and one last piece that i think that's worth fleshing out is
00:23:24.960um it just doesn't seem like a coincidence to me uh that the same group that's fighting for
00:23:30.220women's suffrage uh is the same group that's uh fighting to shut down all the bars yeah you know
00:23:35.640so like can we talk about that a little bit you know the temperance movement and why why was why
00:23:41.100was the temperance movement was not led by men that's not to say none of them were involved but
00:23:45.400by and large right this was a female project before before we get into that let me just say
00:23:49.560this so it sounds like to me what you're saying is that maybe maybe baptists didn't cause transing
00:23:56.820kids but charles finney did yeah maybe yeah who technically was a presbyterian yeah yeah but he
00:24:06.060was a bad presbyterian his spiritual children are mostly baptists now so yeah we might even we might
00:24:13.820even title yeah i told you guys offline but we might even title this episode uh maybe baptists
00:24:19.300no we may not go that route but here's but here's the deal with that i you know i i do want to say
00:24:26.840that um if you are shocked and appalled by the idea that the theology of the church would influence
00:24:33.700the beliefs of the culture then then you've got another thing coming you need to you need to
00:24:39.060rethink what the church believes good theology has good effects and on the culture even outside
00:24:46.380of the church, and bad theology has bad effects, and we're not relativists. Somebody's right,
00:24:51.300somebody's wrong. So, you know, for me, I'm going to say, well, I think credo-baptism is right.
00:24:56.120However, the notion that a wrong take on baptism could have ripple effects on the culture that
00:25:05.020are incredibly negative, I'm not offended by that concept at all. Of course that's true.
00:25:10.780Of course that's true. What are we doing? If we don't think that our theology of the triune God
00:25:16.360and what we believe about the world that he made
00:48:39.220i did say that marvel's fake and gay that's right so you're working on it okay i'm working on it
00:48:46.760But the point is this, the point is that some of the medieval types are not, it's not just effeminacy, you know, the women who are both sexist kind of thing.
00:48:55.760Some of these guys really are like, by God's grace, they really are masculine.
00:48:59.640So their problem is not that they're the school marm.
00:49:02.560Well, actually they are, but it's not.
00:49:05.800So they're like, they are masculine in many ways, in many areas, but they have like, they've chopped off a little bit here and maybe changed it a little, you know what I mean?
00:49:14.780right what i'm saying is and they have to repress it they're the yeah actively what i'm saying is
00:49:18.340they're the slave owners they actually are masculine but they want to take everyone else
00:49:23.420who's masculine and treat them like a slave so like so only a few men so there's a lot of men
00:49:29.000right so so going back to the ancient world lots of men let's say 50 women 50 men but it's not 50
00:49:35.360heads of households only a few of those men can actually be heads of households yeah the other
00:49:40.580men um are allowed to be masculine in some capacity but they're not allowed to to be self-ruled men
00:49:47.760they're not allowed to have their own household they're not and so i and i think that's how mid
00:49:51.760eva so big eva is let's just get rid of men all together and let's just have women with both sexes
00:49:56.220uh everything that is feminine is a virtue everything that's masculine is a vice that's
00:50:00.440how i think of big eva russell moore types but within mid eva uh they would actually be able
00:50:06.060authentically it's not hypocrisy authentically they would be able to write a book about how
00:50:10.280masculinities under attack and and and i and and it wouldn't just be a weak book either i'd be able
00:50:16.140to read it and say yeah i said that on a podcast uh yesterday that same thing good on you yeah
00:50:21.080but here's the one problem the one problem is that when i said on a podcast you blocked me
00:50:26.060and and and you and you actually you shared it to your legions of female followers to say look
00:50:31.820at this patriarch and i like and i almost i almost uh just said exactly verbatim what you said yeah
00:50:39.860but so so there's an element of like okay you you can't be masculine but there's also an element i
00:50:45.960think in the church world today which is uh you can be masculine but only a few of us the rest
00:50:51.660of you are slaves because you didn't pay your dues you're not good company men you didn't go
00:50:56.560to the right seminary you haven't served in you know in this pastoral internship you didn't kiss
00:51:01.160the ring whatever the reasons might be you know but but but yeah the rest of the bottom line is
00:51:05.620right so you're a plat you're just platform building it's like well everybody has a platform
00:51:09.340it was built by that's just stupid yeah john mccarthur built a platform it's like well no he
00:51:13.880didn't he was just that talented somebody recorded those sermons yeah right and and he at some point
00:51:19.640gave someone permission to turn on a camera yeah right so like there you go so everybody builds a
00:51:25.040platform uh it's not that you guys are grifters and building platforms and it's nefarious and
00:51:29.860it's sinister. It's like, no, well, you built a platform too. It's what you're doing. It's
00:51:35.200gatekeeping. It's just only some people are allowed to write a book about masculinity.
00:51:38.920There's a lot going on psychologically with that behavior. I don't really know all the details,
00:51:42.580but it's definitely gatekeeping for sure. Oh, yeah. So all that being said, my point is just
00:51:46.960to say that we need masculinity. We don't need the school marm. We don't need the temperance,
00:51:52.880you know, suffrage. We don't need the feminization of the church, the feminization of culture.
00:51:59.860But we also, I think if you're going to have masculinity,
00:52:26.520but but they're they actually have a a right biblical conception of masculinity the problem
00:52:31.560is that they don't actually allow all men to achieve it you're you're not allowed to be
00:52:37.320masculine unless you've jumped through these hoops and done this thing you can't say that why because
00:52:42.100it was harsh well but dude you said the exact same thing last week last week so it can't be that this
00:52:48.960is objectively uh harsh and in tone it like it's it's got to be uh it's got to be at some level
00:52:55.300You don't want every man to be a strong masculine head of his own household, building institutions to the glory of God and doing this.
00:53:06.100No, you only want a few men able to do that.
00:53:08.760Well, I think part of the reason why is for that phenomenon is if you have men who are masculine, are bold and assertive and say what they think, you're going to have guys that are not going to agree with you from time to time.
01:08:19.940And once you have young women that are like your wife or like my wife, where they want to live in the good and wholesome world that God created, not trash world, well, we have to raise up daughters like that for all these young men.