The NXR Podcast - December 05, 2025


THE LIVESTREAM - Answering Kevin De Young’s Questions About Christian Nationalism


Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 29 minutes

Words per minute

173.48

Word count

15,452

Sentence count

528

Harmful content

Misogyny

8

sentences flagged

Toxicity

35

sentences flagged

Hate speech

92

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode, we tackle the question asked by PCA Moderator Kevin DeYoung, Are you a Christian nationalist? What does that mean, and why does it matter? And what does it have to do with Christmas?

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Leave us a five-star review on your favorite podcast platform.
00:00:03.960 I get it.
00:00:04.620 It's annoying.
00:00:05.380 Everybody asks, but I'm going to tell you why.
00:00:07.660 When you give us a positive review, what that does is it triggers the algorithm so that
00:00:12.440 our podcast shows up on more people's news feeds.
00:00:16.280 You and I both know that this ministry is willing to talk about things that most ministries
00:00:20.820 aren't.
00:00:21.860 We need this content for the glory of God to reach more people's ears.
00:00:30.000 So, just a few days ago, Kevin DeYoung, who is currently the presiding moderator over the PCA,
00:00:39.500 wrote an article explaining why he is not a Christian nationalist, and he specified six
00:00:44.980 particular questions that he would need answers to in order to perhaps be persuaded. That's what
00:00:51.640 we're going to be addressing today in this episode. We are Christian nationalists. We make
00:00:55.800 no apology for it. It is, we believe, the position of America historically and many European nations
00:01:02.180 and the absence of Christian nationalism has led to our sacred democracy, a raw democracy, 0.89
00:01:09.440 where a republic is nowhere to be found, radical globalism, an invasion of immigration from the
00:01:17.220 third world, and ultimately the destruction of these United States. We need to change. We need
00:01:23.700 serious change. We need to make this change quickly, and Christian nationalism is clearly 1.00
00:01:29.000 the way to go. We're going to be addressing all six of Kevin DeYoung's questions in this episode, 1.00
00:01:34.740 preparing you for the inevitable moments when you go home for the Christmas holidays and are asked
00:01:40.580 by your sweet grandmother, are you a Christian nationalist? What does that mean? Does that mean
00:01:45.300 that you hate certain people? Are you a racist? Are you anti-Semitic? There are good answers to
00:01:50.680 these questions and we'll provide them to the best of our ability in this episode today.
00:01:55.960 Tune in now.
00:02:05.900 GA.
00:02:06.820 We're back.
00:02:07.440 We are so back.
00:02:08.520 Happy Friday.
00:02:09.360 Happy Friday.
00:02:11.380 I've got a lot going on over here.
00:02:13.280 We've got Tree, who has joined us on the show, a major contributor.
00:02:18.780 When Antonio and I were doing the show without you,
00:02:21.460 when you were gone on your six-month leave for Thanksgiving,
00:02:24.280 as a true patriot, it was six months, but it was six days.
00:02:28.280 We didn't see that, right?
00:02:29.160 It was quite the trip.
00:02:30.820 We replaced you with tree, is how we refer to him.
00:02:35.420 I think it's a him.
00:02:36.460 I think so.
00:02:36.960 Christmas tree just felt too formal, right?
00:02:40.000 We were calling it Christmas tree,
00:02:41.320 and you could almost hear the tree responding saying,
00:02:43.120 hey, my dad was Christmas tree.
00:02:45.560 I'm just tree.
00:02:46.620 Call me tree.
00:02:47.120 but tree has contributed a lot uh some of the charts that you'll be seeing west likes to take
00:02:51.500 credit but uh i know tree knows we know who's cooking behind the scenes tree is tree is putting
00:02:56.700 up some numbers a charts so uh today we're going to be addressing the topic that i just spoke of
00:03:03.520 in the cold open well that's not everything going on in the set i i feel like this kind of needs a
00:03:07.380 little bit of an explanation yeah so we got tree we've got a little bit of garland here some lights
00:03:12.160 going on uh but yeah so we uh decided to make steak for lunch we were cooking quite literally
00:03:19.100 and figuratively and uh so we decided we didn't have time to go out we were just going to make
00:03:23.920 some steak and we did um if this was all that i was going to be eating and i'm going to use it
00:03:29.280 you know my bare hands to do it uh look at that i don't know if you can see that but that's red
00:03:33.360 i don't think we can cook that steak you did and you did a great job fantastic uh this is a a rare
00:03:39.680 steak and uh it's a filet mignon and i just want to say if you think that this is all i'll be eating
00:03:47.020 during the episode yeah that's true uh but this is this is like the hobbits you know we've had
00:03:53.040 breakfast have we had second breakfast i already ate a whole steak this is the second portion if
00:03:57.940 this was all i was having then people would start calling me william wolf tiny steak man uh but we
00:04:03.860 can't have that so we've got that going on we've got some delicious drinks we're ready for the show
00:04:08.060 all right well this term christian nationalism really has had some staying power and what i
00:04:12.420 love about it there's lots of different terms you're gonna do it i need you to lean into the
00:04:15.800 microphone as you chew nice and slow no just kidding um one of the reasons i think christian
00:04:21.140 nationalism has had some staying power there's lots of movements i'm trying here to be serious
00:04:26.400 go ahead this is a very christian nationalist thing to do oh absolutely red meat um 0.69
00:04:31.120 nathan literally just ruining all of our fun nathan just yelled from the sound booth please 0.94
00:04:38.320 don't eat in the mic we've got no you can you can see the chat everyone's going to agree with him
00:04:42.700 i'm going to push the mic away with each bite go ahead west feel free to make your thoughts along
00:04:47.880 um the reason christian nationalism i think has some staying power is because it's a great blend
00:04:52.740 of nationalism which is awesome but a natural category the nation exists for the nation's
00:04:58.780 benefit. The nation is not a tax farm. It's not GDP must go up. Nationalism, the nation for itself,
00:05:04.740 but it marries it to what man has inside of him, which is religion. So it's not just,
00:05:10.080 and man exists to have children and to work on a farm and to make money. And that's it. That's
00:05:15.400 what the nation does. I like how Stephen Wolf says, the nation helps secure man earthly and
00:05:20.160 heavenly good. And Christianity comes in and it does that in Christ. That it says, here's the
00:05:25.140 nation, and that's awesome. And also grace elevates nature. So you don't just have a nation
00:05:29.600 where like, well, it's safe and people make money, but it's also a brutal place to live. It's also a
00:05:35.620 place where people are executed in the town square for pickpocketing. No, nationalism that's 0.66
00:05:40.460 Christian, it makes it a place that people want to live. And so I would say for the last two,
00:05:44.840 three years, we've seen again and again, this one won't seem to go away. There's movements and
00:05:49.460 ideas and terms that won't seem to go away. People keep coming back to, they use as an insult
00:05:54.840 But what we've been doing, and like you said, we're unapologetic about it,
00:05:58.240 I actually think Christian nationalism is a great way to describe what we're doing.
00:06:01.820 New Christian right, that's another great way of talking about it.
00:06:04.400 But you've got both parts in there.
00:06:05.720 It's not just Christianity that levels, flattens nature.
00:06:09.080 It comes in and elevates and perfects nature. 0.98
00:06:12.060 Well said.
00:06:12.580 Yeah, you know Christian nationalism is not going away.
00:06:14.920 And yes, I am eating a steak on the show if you're tuning in just now.
00:06:17.940 It's like, why would he do that? 0.98
00:06:18.900 That's ridiculous. 0.98
00:06:19.620 We had steak for lunch. 0.98
00:06:20.920 There was some left over.
00:06:21.900 I'm feeling a little bit peckish.
00:06:23.760 little bit that's my question uh no cold steak's good um so i'm feeling a little peckish and if
00:06:29.140 you're like but is he holding it with his hand yes i am a brutal american i don't know what to tell
00:06:34.620 you it's christmas uh yeah so everything you just said is uh very well said in terms of christian
00:06:40.100 nationalism having staying power i think that's a good point that you made uh you know that
00:06:44.620 christian nationalism is here to stay uh because number one it's our history but then number two
00:06:50.640 all the usual suspects are coming out of the woodwork in order to say that it's somehow already
00:06:55.920 failed. So when you have Neil Shinvey, for instance, writing, saying, I'm going to work
00:06:59.920 on a project that's going to be called the rise and fall of Christian nationalism, when he should
00:07:03.660 be working on a project that's called the rise and fall of BLM and wokeness and all the things
00:07:10.720 that his pastor, J.D. Greer, supported, that would make a lot more sense. But you have guys trying
00:07:15.960 to say, hey, look, it's not really lasting. The fad is already ending. But the people who are
00:07:20.100 saying that are the people who have been betting the house on it ending. They need it to end.
00:07:26.920 And so Christian nationalism is here to stay. And I think that Kevin DeYoung raised pretty much, 0.94
00:07:32.700 none of them seemed, did any of the questions he raised seem unique to you? I feel like these are
00:07:37.380 the usual questions that we've received several times. I think a lot of guys have done a good
00:07:42.320 job answering them, but I think it's worth answering once more. None of them seem necessarily
00:07:47.700 unique or even really particularly insightful. If you read the whole longer article, it's on
00:07:53.280 Clearly Reformed. He gets into some of the more history. For example, Dabney was a Southern
00:07:58.040 theologian. He argued against the Establishment Clause, and he gets into some of the back and
00:08:02.040 forth there. So Kevin is a serious reader. He's well-read. He's well-informed. He's asking questions
00:08:07.640 with historical context to them. But the questions in and of themselves, I would say, these are
00:08:11.720 questions some of that we've answered two years ago. We've answered many times on the show. It's
00:08:16.660 funny relating to staying power just yesterday the guardian published uh a hit piece on men
00:08:21.820 trying to take away women's right to vote uh men advocating for the repeal of the 19th amendment
00:08:26.820 and who which men who would do that who who would they cite in that article that's trying to take
00:08:33.700 away who would be the first one that they cite in the article first one let me see i gotta find your
00:08:37.720 description a pastor and youtube personality who has been at the forefront of this brand
00:08:42.460 of misogynistic christian reaction who is this man can i meet him he sounds like a brutal american 0.60
00:08:49.440 he sounds like the kind of guy who would eat steak who would have a filet mignon in his cheek 0.77
00:08:53.580 sticking out protruding as he's talking on the podcast incredible that's what it sounds like but
00:08:57.560 the point is the guardians writing articles about christian nationalists and how they think the
00:09:01.720 country should be well christian nationalism is dead christian nationalism is this uh well all
00:09:06.580 the focus all the fire all the attention of the left is currently not all and not everyone in
00:09:11.860 this vein would literally call themselves Christian nationalists, but it is against nationalists who
00:09:16.400 are Christian. They can't stop talking about them. They can't stop retweeting. They can't 0.93
00:09:20.280 stop sharing their videos. Very much so. You think this is going away. You think, well,
00:09:24.880 we had the rise and now it's time to the fall. My friend, you are sorely mistaken. And in that vein,
00:09:30.960 I think it's time to get into the questions. These are some of the questions you should be
00:09:34.400 able to answer if you want to describe yourself as a Christian nationalist at Christmas. And I
00:09:38.300 questions that are worth pondering on so i'm going to read all six of them real quick cosmic
00:09:42.620 treason said repealing the 19th is not misogynistic it's something that you have to do
00:09:47.220 if you truly love women so true king yep so true all right here's all six questions i'm going to
00:09:52.580 read them quickly we'll jump to the first one so kevin de young he said you know i could be
00:09:56.320 convinced to be a christian nationalist here's some questions i have question one do you unequivocally
00:10:01.320 so this would be two christian nationalists unequivocally renounce anti-semitism racism
00:10:05.820 and nazism question two when and how does the nation act as a corporate moral person question
00:10:11.840 three what is the purpose of civil government question four what does it mean for the civil
00:10:15.540 magistrate to promote true religion question five was the first amendment a mistake question six
00:10:21.280 what is the historical example of the political order you would like to see in america so question
00:10:26.780 one do you unequivocally denounce anti-semitism racism and nazism um in 95 percent of cases
00:10:35.660 no because of who's asking the question and the person who's asking the question is the person
00:10:42.640 who sets the frame they're the ones who are either explicitly or implicitly defining the terms of
00:10:49.960 what it means to be racist what it means to be anti-semitic and so forth and so because those
00:10:56.760 questions tend to come the vast majority of the time from people who are either absolutely you
00:11:03.920 know marxist communist progressives or conservative and if you're just listening on apple or spotify
00:11:10.600 i'm giving some quotation marks air quotes here uh conservative but still exist within a 20th
00:11:16.740 century liberalist liberalism framework uh so when the question is coming from from that place
00:11:24.000 then yeah really just it doesn't mean anything and i'm not going to sit there and bend over
00:11:30.100 backwards and cry and apologize and say oh no no no mister please please i'm not one of them i'm
00:11:36.040 not one of the bad guys i swear yeah so um if the question is saying do you genuinely uh genuinely
00:11:43.860 hate um without any biblical justification whole groups of people universally not allowing for any
00:11:53.260 exception so you you hate an entire people group based on them solely belonging to that people
00:11:59.480 group with an unwillingness to see any exceptions to that general rule, but rather viewing it as
00:12:05.380 an ironclad universal rule, and you truly hate them without biblical justification, have malice
00:12:12.180 in your heart, and a desire, if you could, to harm them without fair trial, without being able to
00:12:20.300 establish evidence and true individual guilt. If that's the question, do you have that going on
00:12:28.440 inside of your heart, then the answer is a resounding no. No, I don't have that for any
00:12:33.340 people group in the world. But if you're saying that anti-Semitism is simply noticing certain
00:12:41.760 historical and even present day patterns as generalities, again, not universal, not each and
00:12:48.560 every individual person, but in general, that historically this is what has happened from a
00:12:54.680 particular group of people and still in present day this tends to still take place these things
00:13:01.960 and there's a disproportionate presence that is responsible for it and simply noticing that
00:13:08.760 and speaking to that makes you anti-semitic if that's your definition then sure right isn't it
00:13:16.880 profound we did an episode and if you haven't watched it yet you need to it was on uh the uh
00:13:22.000 event in World War II. We'll just put it that way. And we titled that video, New Saints,
00:13:26.780 New Devils, and a New Religion. And it is kind of incredible here that you have a Presbyterian
00:13:30.800 minister talking about a church kind of movement, a movement that calls itself Christian. The first
00:13:36.860 question out of his mouth about it, it's not about church establishment, it's not about the role of
00:13:40.760 government. His first question is, do you renounce racism and anti-Semitism and Nazism? It's like,
00:13:46.860 it's almost like the only thing that these people can think about. We gave the example again of
00:13:51.080 another reformed minister, John Piper, and the things that he wrote. It's so fascinating how
00:13:55.860 these reformed ministers, this seems to be the only moral category in some ways that they can
00:14:01.260 think of. And you can see it right here. The first question off his mind is, do you denounce X, Y,
00:14:07.420 and Z? And for the record, we have this idea of a struggle session, for example. Well, somebody got
00:14:12.700 struggle sessioned, or do you denounce? This was actually a tool. It's been used in many places at
00:14:17.460 different times. One of the most recent and widespread usages would have been in communist
00:14:21.700 China. So in communist China, if you were sensed or someone detected that you weren't quite
00:14:26.440 revolutionary enough, that you, you know, you were in favor of communism and the people and
00:14:31.480 the revolution, but your heart wasn't really in it. Well, you could be dragged up in front of the
00:14:35.680 town and subjected to a struggle session, in which case you could be beaten in front of the town
00:14:39.740 and you'd have to show your enthusiasm for revolution. You weren't just getting up there
00:14:44.940 to say, no, I agree with it. You were getting up there to be berated for the people to mock you
00:14:49.640 and for you to attempt to prove to them, no, no, no, no, no, no. I'm revolutionary enough. And you
00:14:55.700 kind of get a sense for that here. Grown men don't talk. Do you denounce? Do you denounce? Do you
00:15:00.700 decry? Grown men don't talk like that. Do you know who does? Communists who detect that you
00:15:05.740 are not revolutionary enough for their liking. Now, I'm not calling Kevin DeYoung a communist
00:15:10.280 in this sense but that is how radical revolutionary leftist movements have worked do you denounce do
00:15:17.600 you decry are you on board comrade that is how they've always attempted to frame the discussion
00:15:22.300 and when you have something like this hey here's three bad words do you want to distance yourself
00:15:26.320 from them that is a tool and a framing of the left to lock you down to say get in step these are the
00:15:32.940 views you're allowed to have and these are the views you are not do you affirm the good thing
00:15:37.480 and denounce the bad thing to which the only answer is i'm not going to play your game right
00:15:42.520 i'm not going to give you the answer that you want i can't do it right yep well said um i think
00:15:48.760 you know for most people who would side with kevin de young on this particular question
00:15:55.880 they would define racism as uh merely the belief that races exist yeah um and that there are
00:16:04.740 distinctions among races. That would actually make you racist, I think, in the mind of many who
00:16:11.800 are championing this recent article from Kevin DeYoung. And I think that that would probably
00:16:16.940 be true of Kevin DeYoung himself. Just the mere acknowledgement that all human beings
00:16:24.500 descended from Adam and that all human beings are made in the image of God, but that all human
00:16:30.740 beings through their ancestry and by way of God's providence and his good design
00:16:36.600 have formed over the centuries distinct races with differences and different strengths and
00:16:46.300 different weaknesses. I think that that would probably be enough to label you a racist. So
00:16:54.600 that that's why you you can't really answer these questions um because what it requires you to do is
00:17:02.260 just jump through hoop after hoop after hoop and and the denouncement purity test uh it once you
00:17:09.900 begin to play um it never stops there's there's another purity test there's another you know
00:17:16.320 purity test after that and after that and after that there's someone else that you have to denounce
00:17:21.000 something else that you have to denounce. And so at a certain point, you just have to be willing to
00:17:26.280 say, I'm just not going to play anymore. And you define your own terms. And as you seek to do that,
00:17:32.160 you try to use biblical definitions. So no, we do not unjustly and universally hate any one group
00:17:41.020 of people solely on the basis of their group identity belonging to a particular group that's
00:17:48.360 different than us um no uh we we don't have uh that kind of what we would call sinful hatred
00:17:56.300 sinful hatred it's unjustified um it's universal right so it's uh hating people who are not
00:18:03.100 actually even guilty um and it's on the basis of simply their birth um i don't know i don't know
00:18:10.240 anybody in our neck of the woods who holds that position i do know plenty of people myself
00:18:16.380 included, who would say, I recognize that by way of providence, through God's sovereignty,
00:18:22.680 he's created not just distinct people, individuals, but distinct peoples, groups of people that are
00:18:30.380 nations or ethnicities or races, and that these people are distinct. They're not interchangeable.
00:18:39.920 You can't just import Haitians and expect that they're going to be the same as heritage
00:18:45.860 Americans. So these people are different and there are actually particular besetting sins 1.00
00:18:55.260 belonging in general to particular peoples. Just as the Apostle Paul said, all Cretans 1.00
00:19:02.060 are lazy beasts, gluttons, liars. He was not saying that universally because he left Titus 0.99
00:19:11.240 in Crete to appoint some Cretan elders and he seems implied that he thought that some Cretans
00:19:16.560 would be up for this noble task. So he's not saying universally each and every single Cretan
00:19:22.600 who is currently alive on the planet but he is quoting a prophet of their own and agreeing with
00:19:27.220 it and saying this is true that in a general sense the Cretan people were a distinct people
00:19:32.260 they had distinct strengths and some distinct weaknesses and those weaknesses were specific
00:19:38.980 and he lists some of them. And we believe that still to this day, there are distinct peoples
00:19:44.260 with distinct strengths and distinct weaknesses, and that noticing, recognizing that, or saying
00:19:51.260 that out loud does not inherently place you into a sinful category, but it places you,
00:19:58.280 if you're able to do it, with character and maturity and without hatred, harboring unjustifiable
00:20:03.580 hatred in your heart, it puts you in the same category as the Apostle Paul, which is not a
00:20:08.460 bad category to be in yep and uh unlike christian nationalism those terms it's not grandma asks you
00:20:15.080 aren't you guys christian nationalism i've heard that's associated with racists the answer is not
00:20:19.140 to come back and say not only do i not denounce racism i am a racist i am anti-semitic i am a
00:20:25.160 nazi don't do that say yeah that's not the best way to frame those terms here's what i prefer to
00:20:29.720 say the for example exactly you just gave that's the best way to answer that question yeah that's
00:20:35.020 super helpful just like at a pastoral level um you're going home you're talking to extend family
00:20:40.880 members for the holidays don't don't just play the heel don't lean in don't lean in and play the
00:20:47.200 because if you're asked that question well aren't christian nationalists racist are you one of those
00:20:52.080 um yeah i sure am um yeah well what your grandma means by racist probably isn't actually a sin 0.58
00:21:01.660 she's been programmed and you really should have some compassion for the boomer generation they're 0.62
00:21:06.520 the most propagandized generation in arguably all of human history yeah um so so have have some 0.81
00:21:12.660 compassion and show some respect some honor towards grandma and uh grandma's when she says
00:21:18.220 so are you a racist what she means by racist um because she has been propagandized is um is
00:21:24.960 probably not actually a sin. But you don't need to lean in knowing that and say, well, I am racist
00:21:32.540 and you know what you mean. You mean like, yeah, I have the same view of the peoples of the earth
00:21:38.340 that the apostle Paul had. Okay. You might know that. Grandma doesn't know that. Love your
00:21:44.740 grandma. So don't say, no, I would never deter from the civil rights act. I would never,
00:21:53.460 i would never deter from the adl don't do that so don't just oh i denounce i denounce i denounce
00:22:00.020 don't do that but also don't play the heel and lean in and say our sharam grandma um take take
00:22:06.960 two minutes with grandma and say well what do you mean by racist grandma i i don't think that um i
00:22:15.060 have any views towards other peoples uh that the bible would condemn as sinful um but what do you
00:22:21.560 me and let her answer and then you explain your answer and maybe you agree to disagree but that's
00:22:27.060 a good way to honor her well said all right question number two from kevin de young when
00:22:32.400 and how does the nation act as a corporate moral person and some of what he's getting here is
00:22:37.480 there's a way of looking at it and saying well all right a nation should honor the lord i think
00:22:42.340 of actually the psalms blessed is the nation whose god is the lord who fears him uh you could say
00:22:47.060 well, technically, actually, nations are made up of individuals, and so when we're speaking of that,
00:22:52.780 all that we're speaking of is the individuals within the nation, that each individual has this
00:22:57.340 duty, and when we speak corporately, all that we're kind of doing is saying all of these individuals
00:23:01.880 that corporately make up the nation have an actual duty, but there'd be no way to speak of them as a
00:23:06.620 collective of having certain duties, having certain responsibilities. So when and how does a nation
00:23:11.440 act as a corporate moral person i have thoughts joel what do you think yeah um i i just i i feel
00:23:19.960 like out of all these questions that one to me seems the least important yeah um but yeah i i
00:23:26.520 think that um that god treats nations and views nations uh in that frame and so i think it's
00:23:33.960 appropriate for us to do the same i think of you know the nation of nineveh repenting um i think
00:23:40.100 of even you know like um like what you said you quoted you know the nation that fears the lord
00:23:46.020 um you know god exalts that nation that fears the lord i think of the great commission you and i
00:23:51.400 were talking you know offline before we were uh came uh came onto the live stream uh you know
00:23:56.700 the great commission is not just making disciples of individual people out of nations but it's
00:24:01.900 actually discipling the nations um so i do believe that the nation itself as a body politic as a
00:24:08.540 corporate group um can be christian and that it cannot be christian and someone like kevin de
00:24:14.720 young knowing that he's you know a covenant theologian and presbyterian he perfectly well
00:24:20.000 understands this concept um at least conceptually as it pertains to the family he's perfectly
00:24:25.920 comfortable with having a family knowing that there are individual family members that are not
00:24:30.920 yet regenerate are not yet in the true sense christian and yet uh you know maybe it's an
00:24:35.820 infant or maybe it's a wayward child and yet still referring to the family as Christian
00:24:40.940 has set apart wholly because the scripture uses that kind of language.
00:24:47.500 You know, the apostle Paul, as he's writing to the Corinthians, talking about the children,
00:24:51.960 that even if just one of their parents and that the particular context that Paul is speaking
00:24:57.500 of, it could even be the mother who's not even the head of the household.
00:25:00.940 And yet even if their mother is a Christian, truly a disciple of Jesus, then the children would be considered set apart, holy, sanctified before the children are converted.
00:25:13.700 And even with the conversion of the husband being absent.
00:25:18.320 And so we're able to understand what a Christian family is.
00:25:22.500 We're able to understand a Christian school.
00:25:25.200 We have Christian schools.
00:25:26.420 We have seminaries, and not just seminaries, but you also have, I'm not doing so hot right now, but like Baylor University or whatever it may be.
00:25:35.720 None of us would sit here and say what makes a Christian university Christian is it every single faculty member, every single student, and all the way down to the janitor, that they're all born-again regenerate Christians.
00:25:50.380 no we just say as an entity in a in a general and overall corporate sense um it's christian
00:25:58.520 it's values it's beliefs um it's what it publicizes is christian and so yeah so i just i feel like we
00:26:06.680 we have a framework for that and uh and a guy like kevin de young is perfectly willing to apply that
00:26:14.800 label a corporate christian label to a number of other entities and so my question i i feel i guess
00:26:22.120 what i'm saying is i feel like um the burden of proof is actually on him because he's perfectly
00:26:27.600 willing in principle to to call things christian or not christian wholesale collectively without
00:26:35.780 each individual member actually being regenerate um but yet he's he's actually being inconsistent
00:26:42.700 and not being willing to apply that same principle to nations.
00:26:47.240 And so I would want to know why.
00:26:49.120 Yeah.
00:26:49.560 I like what Stephen Wolf, the way he was defining some terms in his book,
00:26:52.400 he said, the totality of national action.
00:26:55.140 So like Baylor University.
00:26:56.520 Well, technically, it's a bunch of buildings.
00:26:58.420 Buildings are just, they're physical.
00:27:01.280 They're structures.
00:27:02.160 It's structures.
00:27:03.100 It's individuals that then collectively gather together.
00:27:06.160 You could do the same thing with that and pick it apart.
00:27:08.100 But what is the totality of that action?
00:27:10.060 Oh, people are educated.
00:27:11.460 Degrees are conferred.
00:27:12.700 sports are played. All of those things come together to actually form something like a
00:27:17.240 movement. There's not a certain point where you can say, well, when it tips over this number of
00:27:20.760 faculty or adds this number of buildings, it's an entity, calls itself, distinguishes itself by a
00:27:26.580 certain name, and together the individual efforts come together in their sum to make up a body that
00:27:32.540 does certain actions. It's the same way with the nation. It's flags, it's government, it's people
00:27:36.900 all within them. Sure, you can take the individual person and say, well, this is just him doing his
00:27:41.300 responsibility and him doing this here and him doing this here. But all of that adds up to the
00:27:45.520 total of, are you elevating true religion or denigrating it? Are you protecting the church
00:27:50.780 of God, the people of God, your borders, or are you doing that terribly? Are you punishing the
00:27:55.320 evildoer? It is the sum of individual choices, but we're not going to put murderers to death
00:28:00.040 anymore, for instance. Yes, that may be an individual's choice within that larger framework,
00:28:05.060 but in totality, when we zoom out, okay, the nation as a whole is now no longer punishing
00:28:10.060 the evildoer, according as it's supposed to do to Romans 13. And so the sum of those individual
00:28:14.780 actions still add up to an entire body politic that commissions actions. And the Bible clearly
00:28:20.980 in many places speaks of those nations being blessed because of the totality of that action.
00:28:25.900 It fears the Lord. It repents of its sin. It looks to God, blessed or cursed. It's full of
00:28:32.060 individuals that are wicked, individuals that are sinners, individuals. I mean, I even think of
00:28:37.340 israel of course we know not every single israelite rejected the messiah but by and by and large on
00:28:42.820 the whole 60 70 80 90 percent of them did and as a whole together they were judged corporately now
00:28:49.260 every individual of course is accountable for their sin but those individuals summed up together
00:28:54.400 on the whole they were judged the bible knows how to speak about that we know how to speak about
00:28:58.940 that this question is a little bit being obtuse yep i agree question number three last one for
00:29:04.400 the segment, what is the purpose of civil government? What is the purpose of civil
00:29:11.100 government? It's to punish the evildoer, as per Romans 13, as it clearly says, which is,
00:29:19.540 you know, the typical conservative with a libertarian bent would say, well, yeah, so that's,
00:29:25.020 you know, crime, you know, but the question is, where can evil be committed? Is there evil in the
00:29:33.140 realm of economics yeah there is so uh just perfect limitlessly free markets um with no um
00:29:43.760 no state uh governing principles whatsoever uh is to essentially assume that no evil can
00:29:52.060 be committed in the realm of trade right um or or buying or uh there's no such thing as financial
00:29:58.480 evil is usury evil exorbitant forms of usury interest that people can never get out of that
00:30:05.880 are specifically designed to take captive and enslave the poorest of the poor yeah it's evil
00:30:11.520 so well then the government needs to be able to have some kind of mechanism for punishing those
00:30:16.500 who charge interest so one the purpose of government is to punish the evil doer but
00:30:24.000 Romans 13 also says, uh, to, to praise, to praise the one who does good. And so I do think that
00:30:31.680 there's a twofold, uh, there's a twofold purpose of government praising the good and punishing
00:30:37.840 the evil. And so based off of that, I would agree with guys like Stephen Wolf, who have said that,
00:30:44.040 uh, government should be Christian and they should promote true religion, the highest good
00:30:51.380 ordering civil life temporal life for heavenly good right kevin de young as he's extrapolating
00:31:00.040 expanding on this question in his article he explicitly disagrees with that he says quote i
00:31:05.200 do not want government to direct its citizens to the highest heavenly good or to order society
00:31:09.700 around true religion because i do not trust the government to determine true religion from false
00:31:14.260 religion and because i do not trust human beings to wield this kind of authority well or wisely
00:31:19.820 I hold these convictions not in avoidance of Calvinist theology, but precisely because I am
00:31:24.700 a Calvinist. A reformed understanding of human nature should lead one to grant the civil magistrate
00:31:28.860 less power in matters of religion, not more. Yeah, and I think that's, I just think that's
00:31:34.520 silly. I think that's what we have talked about over and over again, is, okay, well, power corrupts,
00:31:41.000 absolute power corrupts, absolutely. We're aware. Checks and balances, I think, are a good thing
00:31:46.920 for me preferably I would like to have a republic or even if there is a monarchy I would I would
00:31:53.920 like to have some aspects of a republic that are involved in that or an aristocracy to where it's
00:31:59.160 not just a singular individual but but he's held in check just like a king would have been held
00:32:04.500 in check by the feudal lords they could actually rival him you know and and press some measure of
00:32:11.680 accountability so I'm aware of the need for checks and balances accountability because of
00:32:16.840 doctrine of total depravity perfectly aware but here's the deal about total depravity um total
00:32:23.780 depravity affects democracies too um if it can affect the state well then it'll also affect the
00:32:29.900 citizens of a given state and i feel like what we're seeing and what we have been seeing for
00:32:35.760 decades now is um the people uh collectively voting in wickedness uh wholesale and so to say
00:32:47.060 that um that a powerful government is the only way to usher in national compromise
00:32:53.920 i think is a bit naive yeah he says here like i do not trust the government to determine true
00:32:59.980 religion from false religion the problem is the government is going to at some level push some
00:33:05.020 type of religion on the people. So it's not as though, well, the government could push religion,
00:33:09.240 and if they do so, well, they might get it wrong. They might promote the false religion instead of
00:33:13.700 the true, and so categorically, instead of pushing religion, the government should stay completely
00:33:18.120 out of this. But if anything we've learned, especially from the last five years, but most
00:33:22.660 certainly the last 25 years, the last couple decades, the government is very much so going
00:33:27.240 to have a hand in, and this is some of what the next question gets at, the government is very much
00:33:31.280 so going to have a hand in shaping the religious conception and experience of its citizens.
00:33:37.240 That's why it's this powerful institution that has biblical instruction around it.
00:33:42.480 It's why we have Numbers and Deuteronomy and Leviticus, why we have laws and case studies
00:33:47.160 and examples, because it's very powerful.
00:33:49.380 And the question is not, well, it could promote true religion or no religion.
00:33:54.100 You know, religion, no religion, true religion, false religion. 0.64
00:33:57.100 It's going to promote one of those two.
00:33:58.800 you saw during covid 2021 through 2024 when joe biden was president you saw the religion of
00:34:05.360 transgenderism welcome to the white house lawn and broadcasted to millions the religion celebrated
00:34:10.620 yeah the religion of george floyd yes so like what was permissible in a pandemic uh what was
00:34:17.720 permissible to stand outside and protest with thousands and thousands of people right next
00:34:23.160 to each other but it was not permissible to go to church to even go to church in some states you
00:34:29.900 couldn't go to church even in an outdoor service for for at least a couple months and so certain
00:34:37.660 things were still permissible and not just permissible but commendable and then other
00:34:42.780 things were ultimately um renounced as as being harmful or dangerous and so yeah government it's
00:34:51.240 it's not you know it's the old rush duny adage it's not whether but which so um the government
00:34:56.640 is going to promote some kind of ideology some kind of higher truth and uh and so you'd like it
00:35:03.780 to be the christian one yep and uh i remember uh kathy hockle uh she's now the governor of new york
00:35:10.060 it was early on during covid but she was literally went to a church and she said i need you to be my
00:35:15.740 apostles for the vaccine yeah that's going to happen it's not as though government there will
00:35:20.340 simply to be this vacuum of religion, and government will say, I'm content to stay out of it.
00:35:24.240 They're going to push something. And so Kevin kind of needs to look at reality as it is and say,
00:35:29.500 they're going to promote something. And all else being equal, we've got to be honest, he's right,
00:35:33.920 it is the government. I will completely recognize the government is probably never, no place,
00:35:38.820 no time, going to be up there promoting the most pure, unadulterated gospel, perfect doctrine on
00:35:44.360 every single point that is just objectively true. It is the government. But even in, this is some
00:35:49.660 of our point, even in doing it somewhat wrong, even in being a little cheesy, even if being 1.00
00:35:55.500 off track a little bit, that is way better than transgender individuals on the lawn of the White 0.98
00:36:02.700 House celebrating and enjoying their perversion. So it's like, okay, you have a president. Think, 1.00
00:36:10.040 for example, of Jimmy Carter back in the day. Well, even here, this is more illustrative.
00:36:14.040 All the presidents, I think, in United States history have had to claim Christianity as their
00:36:18.820 religion. They may not be practicing, they may not be attending church, but practically speaking,
00:36:23.740 we have never had a non-Christian president, and that matters. I don't think you can separate 0.93
00:36:28.260 how much Christianity shaped this nation, such that every president has had to claim to be a
00:36:32.500 Christian, and being also the greatest nation the world has ever seen, that has produced more,
00:36:36.620 that has won more, that has been as prosperous as us. They're not separated. It matters that even
00:36:42.480 in name only, we still have to say we are a Christian nation, that our leaders to be elected
00:36:47.640 can't be from another religion.
00:36:49.660 Those things matter.
00:36:51.280 And so you're going to have the government promoting religion,
00:36:53.760 and then at that point you just have to simply say,
00:36:55.660 well, they're going to do it.
00:36:56.920 And because it's the government, it might be a little bit cheesy. 0.97
00:36:59.860 It might be silly. 0.89
00:37:00.640 In some cases, downright wrong.
00:37:02.360 But it's better for them to get up and say,
00:37:04.260 it's Christmas, it's time to think about Jesus and his birth,
00:37:07.560 which Trump has done.
00:37:08.800 It is better that than, let's crack open the Bhagavad Gita to swear in.
00:37:13.160 Well, of these two, if I'm going to have one of these two options,
00:37:16.520 it's pretty clear which one we should have.
00:37:19.080 So you need to grow up and live in reality and say,
00:37:21.540 yeah, they're going to do a religion one way or the other. 0.58
00:37:23.600 Let's make it the Christian one, and I'm not ashamed of it.
00:37:25.420 Right. Yeah, I think part of the concern from someone like Kevin DeYoung
00:37:29.720 and others have expressed it as well,
00:37:32.620 but I think part of the concern is,
00:37:35.320 and it tends to come from your Reformed Protestant types,
00:37:40.120 of which we are as well,
00:37:42.100 uh but guys who are place a heavy emphasis on um doctrinal specificity yeah um and and we're not
00:37:52.200 saying that doctrine doesn't matter because it does um immensely and doctrinal purity matters
00:37:57.920 but i think part of the reason guys like kevin de young are concerned about the government
00:38:01.780 promoting true religion is because they're they're thinking well we we can't possibly expect
00:38:07.140 um the civil magistrates to be aware of you know x y and z and all these you know secondary and
00:38:14.960 tertiary um very specific doctrinal tenets that we hold to in our tribe and our you know reformed
00:38:24.400 protestant wing of christianity right but that's not really what we're advocating for um we we have
00:38:31.720 said from the beginning, two, three years ago, I've publicly said that, you know, what would it
00:38:37.560 look like practically? It would look like adopting perhaps the Apostles' Creed as a preamble to the
00:38:44.560 Constitution, so that the Lord Jesus Christ is specifically named, and the major tenets of
00:38:50.880 primary doctrine are affirmed and esteemed. The Trinity, the Incarnation, the Crucifixion,
00:38:59.400 resurrection uh these these kinds of things um and and so that's that's what i would be looking
00:39:06.040 at i wouldn't be looking at uh the civil magistrate to parse out um for the entire country
00:39:13.660 including ministers the differences between super lapsarianism you know and infra lapsarianism
00:39:19.620 i would be looking for him to hold the hold the uh the the far-reaching boundaries of simply
00:39:27.780 creedal not confessional but creedal christianity so i would want him to be able to discern the
00:39:34.300 difference not between an anglican and a presbyterian i want him to be able to discern
00:39:40.300 the difference and act accordingly between a christian and a muslim a christian and a jew
00:39:46.960 christian and a hindu a christian and an atheist i would want him to be able to see the difference
00:39:52.020 between those and promote true religion and i think that's that is part of the problem is guys
00:39:58.140 like kevin de young and i've had this temptation you know myself uh but when we say promote true
00:40:03.140 religion i think the subliminal uh message that some of us actually mean by that whether we're
00:40:09.380 aware of it or not is um we we think of the government promoting our particular denominational
00:40:16.320 allegiance that religion that that very particular expression of the christian religion and because
00:40:23.880 we're not confident and for good reason uh that the government would do that then we don't want
00:40:29.100 the government to do it at all um and i think that that is a a massive um a massive error like
00:40:36.800 as i think about it more more clearly um i realize if the government promotes true religion
00:40:45.480 and uh and it ends up being uh more of a particular denominational vein of christianity
00:40:54.220 that i'm not actually a part of that i have differences with that would still be infinitely
00:40:59.840 better uh than promoting secularism transgenderism marxism islam judaism xyz so i i'm actually
00:41:10.760 perfectly comfortable with the government promoting a a broad creedal christianity that
00:41:18.280 knowing that it would encompass other people that i disagree with but it would not be encompassing
00:41:24.880 people who are much much further that i have much deeper profound disagreements with such as 0.97
00:41:30.500 false religions like islam um you know and those kinds of things absolutely all right we've got
00:41:37.280 three more questions to handle we're going to head to our first commercial break be right back 0.99
00:41:40.240 talking about the First Amendment, true religion, and has Christian nationalism been achieved
00:41:45.000 before? When it comes to your financial future, are you planning forward or backwards from your
00:41:51.380 desired results? What type of financial culture do you want to create for your family and for
00:41:57.920 your children's children? We are not called to be wise as doves. Therefore, simpleton planning
00:42:04.840 simply won't cut it. Joe Garracy helps families develop and implement a long-term culture of
00:42:11.900 excellent financial management. He starts with your goals, your tithing plan, your retirement,
00:42:18.680 and the legacy that you want to build for your generations. And then he works backwards to build
00:42:24.780 a real actionable plan to get your family on track. Now, many of my personal friends have
00:42:31.580 benefited from the financial wisdom of Joe Gerasi that he shared for their specific situations.
00:42:38.500 Do you want to work with someone who strives for alpha with your investing, hates taxes,
00:42:44.320 and brokers insurance? Start planning smart. Call Joe Gerasi at 615-767-2555. Again, that's
00:42:57.160 615-767-2555. Or you can find him by going to backwardsplanningfinancial.inm.com. Again,
00:43:11.460 that's backwardsplanningfinancial.in, as in Nancy, m, as in ministries, dot com.
00:43:19.880 The silver is mine and the gold is mine, declares the Lord of hosts.
00:43:26.500 Yet your retirement dollars keep shrinking daily as Washington prints money out of thin air.
00:43:34.040 Genesis Gold Group aligns financial guidance with godly principles when others serve only profit.
00:43:40.740 Their faith-centered approach to gold IRAs stands apart in an industry that has forgotten what true stewardship actually means.
00:43:50.860 Why gamble your family's future on Wall Street's paper promises?
00:43:55.820 Your 401k and IRA deserve better protection.
00:44:00.740 Genesis Gold Group transforms your vulnerable retirement accounts into physical gold,
00:44:06.420 something real, something tangible, something that God created with inherent value. Their
00:44:13.680 faith-driven experts walk you through every step, helping you shield your life's work from the
00:44:19.260 financial storms up ahead. No high-pressure tactics, no hidden fees, just guidance rooted
00:44:26.160 in timeless principles of sound stewardship. So the decision is simple. Watch your retirement
00:44:32.900 evaporate through inflation or secure it in God's precious metal. Take action now. Go and visit
00:44:40.560 rightresponsebiblegold.com. You can visit today for your free book, The Bible and Gold, and join
00:44:49.180 the thousands of believers who sleep soundly knowing their future is anchored in something
00:44:54.740 unshakable. Again, that's rightresponsebiblegold.com, safeguarding your legacy with God's
00:45:03.640 timeless treasure. All right, jumping right back in, question number four that Kevin DeYoung has
00:45:12.000 for Christian Nationalists. He says, what does it mean for the civil magistrate to promote true
00:45:16.240 religion? Joel, you've mentioned one of the functions of civil government is the promotion
00:45:20.180 of true religion. And I want to read from him from this article to get a sense for the things
00:45:25.300 he feels kind of icky about civil governments doing. So he starts off with this. He says,
00:45:29.860 I suspect that promote, in quotes, is meant to entail more than this. But what? Because what
00:45:35.360 does promote mean from Christian nationalists? Calling for days of prayer and fasting? Giving
00:45:39.360 fireside chats at Christmas that speak about the good news of Christ's birth? Defending the rights 0.99
00:45:43.780 of conscience and religious liberty? Establishing a military chaplain corps? Tax breaks for churches
00:45:48.340 and clergy i like all of that or and this is his kind of contrast or does promote mean supporting
00:45:55.180 churches and ministers from tax revenue making religious tests of office reforming the church
00:46:00.840 that its worship discipline and doctrine are in line with god's word shutting down churches and
00:46:05.220 religious assemblies that are false and idolatrous these are bad ideas in my estimation i might agree
00:46:11.200 with promote but the devil is in the details and so he's okay with some level yeah hey it's 0.96
00:46:15.880 christmas time tell everybody in the nation christmas is when we celebrate christ's birth
00:46:19.620 when it gets down to brass tacks though you mentioned shutting down false and idolatrous
00:46:23.600 worship he says it this is actually a bad idea in my mind right and we we would disagree so pull up
00:46:28.960 that second quote again just so that we can see it on the screen as we're addressing it uh where
00:46:33.720 it says or does um so or does promote mean uh go ahead and throw it on the screen or does promote
00:46:40.980 means supporting uh churches and ministers from tax revenue i think that that is fine uh making
00:46:47.560 religious tests of office i think that that is uh permissible um i think that it's more than it's
00:46:55.520 certainly permissible i think that it would be advantageous uh reforming the church so that its
00:46:59.800 worship discipline and doctrine are in line with god's word i'll come back to that one to me that's
00:47:05.440 the only one that's questionable and then lastly shutting down churches and religious assemblies
00:47:10.600 that are false and idolatrous um both the one right before that reforming the church and that
00:47:16.980 last one shutting down certain churches that are idolatrous and false i'm actually fine with both
00:47:22.460 of those if we're assuming what i said previously um in terms of what are we setting as the land
00:47:29.380 markers right the the uh the furthest extending boundaries of how we're defining christian
00:47:35.660 so if we're saying christian christianity is the one true religion and that the government of a
00:47:41.840 christian nation should be christian itself and promote that one true religion then the question
00:47:47.160 is okay what constitutes as being christian and i would advocate for a a pan creedal conception
00:47:56.560 of christianity and when i say creedal i mean not particular confessions belgic right or or 1689 or
00:48:04.080 westminster uh but creedal so the historic christian creeds like uh the apostles creed
00:48:11.340 the nicene creed so if you take that understanding and you say shutting down churches and religious
00:48:18.000 assemblies that are false and idolatrous um but you're using creedal christianity as your metric
00:48:26.700 for determining what's true and therefore what is false and idolatrous then um then i think that
00:48:33.260 that is permissible because the kinds of churches that you would be shutting down at that point 0.90
00:48:38.540 would be to be frank uh the clearest and easy it would be um it would be mosque synagogues right so
00:48:47.500 judaism islam hinduism uh beyond that probably the closest that you would get within is i'm not
00:48:55.180 saying this is true christianity these would be examples of of christian heresies that would be
00:49:00.120 shut down um you would you would shut down uh mormon temples yep um jehovah's witness would
00:49:07.600 be shut down because there's actually a denial of creeds uh within them there's a denial um like
00:49:14.780 like a mormon cannot affirm the nicene creed they're not going to be able to agree that uh
00:49:21.660 that jesus is very god right that he is um that he is of the same substance not just similar but
00:49:29.760 same substance as the Father. You know, so certain Christian heresies are going to say, well, Jesus
00:49:36.900 is the first created being, right? So he's special, he's cool, but he's still a creature. He's the
00:49:44.060 best of the creatures and the first of the creatures, but he's still a creature. He's the
00:49:49.580 Archangel, you know, Michael, or the brother of the Archangel Michael. Yeah, so that would be
00:49:55.220 a Christian heresy. Now, I'm aware that there are many other things that for myself and for 0.97
00:50:02.300 you, Wes, as Reformed Protestants, we would also consider to be erroneous doctrine and then some
00:50:09.760 to be even heretical doctrine that would be found in churches besides just Mormons or Jehovah's
00:50:18.320 witness. But you've got to decide who's in, who's out, how wide are we going to draw this circle?
00:50:29.180 And I would draw it at the historic creeds, because I think you have historic precedents,
00:50:35.400 you have a great degree of clarity, and you also have an ecumenical element that I think
00:50:44.780 politically is super helpful. I'm not saying that being ecumenical in a church service
00:50:51.900 is helpful. I don't think that it is. But for a national body politic, I think that that's
00:50:58.540 incredibly helpful to draw that circle as wide as you possibly can. So the idea of government,
00:51:06.040 a Christian government for a Christian nation, the Christian America that I would like to see, 0.73
00:51:10.080 it would not be rounding up catholics and it would not be rounding up uh eastern orthodox
00:51:15.580 and it would not be rounding up pentecostals or episcopalians or baptist or presbyterians
00:51:22.320 um and i i acknowledge right because i want to be honest about it i could just let it go and
00:51:28.240 and escape you know some some criticism uh but i acknowledge that within this scheme
00:51:33.660 um making it creedal nicene creed apostles creed uh that there would you know there would be an
00:51:39.840 allowance uh for some churches that i i personally would say are heretical um i'm thinking of like um
00:51:49.740 like a joel osteen type church right um a church that you know that teaches the health wealth and
00:51:56.200 prosperity gospel a word of faith um that that would be um not not penalized under a creedal
00:52:05.700 christian nation however there would be some like oneness pentecostals that actually um delve into
00:52:12.960 full-blown heresy in terms of denying the trinity and so then that would be punished so you'd have
00:52:17.920 a oneness pentecostal punished um and yet even i as a protestant i'm able to recognize that a
00:52:24.960 catholic wouldn't so a catholic would be in keeping with the apostles creed the nicenean creed in a
00:52:30.280 way that a oneness Pentecostal would not. Um, but that is a broad tent. And I think that that's
00:52:36.280 what would be necessary so that we don't, um, become too meticulous and overly zealous in
00:52:42.760 persecuting, um, you know, half of the Christians in our nation or more. Um, so, so that's what we 0.83
00:52:51.320 imagine. You tell me if you have any differences there, but that's what I imagine when I think of
00:52:55.960 christian nation and promoting true religion true religion being the christian religion okay but who
00:53:02.100 gets to define christian well i would say the historic christian creeds yeah i um you go as
00:53:10.420 erroneous as possible we've used this example before i got in trouble for it actually think
00:53:14.720 of the mainline denominations that promote publicly the image a lot of them have churches
00:53:18.660 that are downtown whether it be philadelphia or new york and they fly pride flags out front of
00:53:23.520 them. And they teach the millions of people that see them every single year. They project this
00:53:28.240 image that Christianity is okay with this. Christianity is loving. Christianity is accepting.
00:53:32.920 Christianity doesn't judge. And these denominations, the mainline ones, some of the big ones,
00:53:37.620 they're sitting on millions and millions of dollars and some of the best property in the
00:53:41.120 United States because they were here early. So the only way you're going to have those churches
00:53:45.380 stop promoting the false religion that they are publicly every single day to millions and millions
00:53:50.520 of people is at some level, the state coming in and saying, we're not trying to be meticulous.
00:53:56.180 We're not trying to get in and like, how many points of Calvinism do you hold to? But the state
00:54:00.620 says, you are flying a pride flag out front. You have signs. This is a church in our town
00:54:06.920 that's in downtown Georgetown. It's a Unitarian Universalist church. No human being is illegal.
00:54:12.940 Abortion is healthcare. You are flying this publicly. It is blasphemous. It is wicked.
00:54:18.060 It sends a wrong message about Christianity. 0.51
00:54:20.220 And to be honest with these churches,
00:54:22.140 the reason I said they're sitting on millions of dollars
00:54:23.980 in all this land, they could do it forever,
00:54:25.960 even if nobody attends them.
00:54:27.480 They could sit on that land.
00:54:28.680 They could fly that flag for the next 200 years.
00:54:31.180 They don't pay property taxes.
00:54:32.100 They don't pay property taxes.
00:54:33.380 They have trust that the land has already been paid for.
00:54:35.480 They rent a portion of the church property,
00:54:39.660 the parish to a school or something like that.
00:54:42.760 They literally can have three members 1.00
00:54:44.880 and a female blue-haired lesbian priest 0.85
00:54:48.080 and just put propaganda physically 1.00
00:54:50.980 in a downtown real estate location
00:54:55.060 and wave pride flags for everyone in the town
00:54:58.840 passing by to see for children's...
00:55:00.740 For hundreds of years.
00:55:01.300 Forever, forever.
00:55:02.660 They can financially afford to keep it up forever.
00:55:05.380 And so then the question is,
00:55:06.940 what's going to stop that?
00:55:08.700 Well, if we just preach Christ,
00:55:10.720 then that'll...
00:55:11.720 No. 0.90
00:55:12.240 That'll empty their trust coffers.
00:55:14.100 No, it actually won't.
00:55:14.700 it actually won't um that doesn't actually uh preaching christ will not seize their accounts
00:55:20.300 and seize their land um if you preach christ and by his grace there's great revival and everyone
00:55:26.300 leaves their churches to go to christian churches that won't change it either because right now
00:55:30.940 everyone has already left their church not to go to faithful churches necessarily but to just not
00:55:35.420 go to church at all their churches this is what you have to realize those mainline protestant 0.68
00:55:39.340 churches with heretical gay affirming doctrine they're already empty they are and they're still 0.98
00:55:45.900 going with no end in sight because that's the way that that money works when when you have uh when 0.91
00:55:52.460 it's labeled legally it's legally filed as a church it doesn't pay taxes doesn't pay property
00:55:58.440 taxes has uh trust funds accumulating interest they they can afford to pay a livable wage to a
00:56:06.020 blue-haired lesbian priest forever and when she dies for the next one and the next one and the 1.00
00:56:12.600 next one with three congregants or zero congregants and then have that real estate right in the 1.00
00:56:17.760 downtown square of your town waving transgender flags for your children to see when they want to
00:56:24.000 go play in the park right um and and revival um and even if all the hearts in town are regenerate
00:56:32.180 but not the person who controls the trust fund
00:56:35.040 of that mainline Protestant denomination,
00:56:37.660 then they still get to waive transgender flag. 1.00
00:56:40.140 No, it's public, just like public indecency. 0.99
00:56:44.140 You can't run around naked in the town square
00:56:46.540 without having a church preach to you repentance.
00:56:50.620 Yeah, you should probably have that too,
00:56:52.460 but also without having the civil magistrate
00:56:54.440 inflict some kind of penalty.
00:56:56.080 And it should be the same 0.99
00:56:57.580 for these gay-affirming Protestant churches.
00:57:01.080 and if it's not then then there's actually no solution there is only a state solution there
00:57:07.600 is only a legal legislative solution uh real quick this is a side point but um uh for our
00:57:14.220 our tech team there was uh somebody in the chat that had an israeli flag and uh and it also had
00:57:22.360 the username was genocide enjoyer uh make sure to ban them immediately uh never want to see them
00:57:29.400 again genocide enjoyer with an israeli flag i do appreciate that both the profile picture and the
00:57:36.460 name match up right there was consistency there israeli flag genocide enjoyer uh but we don't
00:57:42.180 want them in our chat um speaking of things that we won't tolerate um and using levers of power
00:57:47.480 to uh to promote righteousness there's there's a little example so i espouse the principle and
00:57:52.940 then got to give you a case study go ahead i was gonna say king josiah he came in and reformed
00:57:58.100 worship. There was all this idol worship that was going on. There were idolatrous priests.
00:58:02.400 He took care of them. The king came in and reformed worship. Now, and Stephen Wolf makes
00:58:07.260 a great distinction, that doesn't mean he comes in and he says, well, we're going to actually have
00:58:10.460 the table for the Lord's Supper. We're going to put this one off to the left, and the minister
00:58:14.400 isn't going to preach. He doesn't administer over those things. But he can drive by a church and say,
00:58:19.360 that's a pride flag out there. I think it's time we pay them a visit. There's a huge distinction
00:58:23.900 between and this will be the ingredients of the bread for the lord's supper this is the hymns
00:58:28.300 no not at all what we're saying uh we're not there's a woman on stage to their liturgy we're
00:58:32.640 not speaking to their order of worship we're not speaking to any of those things and notice that
00:58:36.520 that's why like i mean it kills me a little bit inside but i'm trying to to because here's a
00:58:41.100 problem i like i sympathize with kevin de young and part of the problem is a lot of christian
00:58:47.040 nationalists are intentionally ambiguous and vague they don't they will not give you clear
00:58:52.840 detailed explanations so we're trying to do that so um should the government be christian and does
00:58:59.500 that mean uh does that include promoting uh true religion the christian religion we're saying yes
00:59:04.340 but we know that that's that's sticky that's complicated so christian defined as what and so
00:59:11.600 we're saying creedal christianity um okay then what does the government actually have authority
00:59:16.760 over and that's why i gave the example like there are certain churches that um that i think are
00:59:24.200 absolutely destructive that would be allowed to continue um with with 18 minute ted talk sermons
00:59:32.020 and um and you know uh little wafers and grape juice once a quarter if they i was about to say
00:59:40.080 once a quarter for the lord's supper and uh even an israeli flag flying in the sanctuary
00:59:46.740 right um and and yet they would be able to continue i'll say it like this greg lock
00:59:52.240 i think he's terrible yeah um his church would be able to continue yep it would um mormon church
01:00:02.280 no jehovah's witness church no um pride flags in the public square on the outside of the no
01:00:08.580 right um but but there would be other things that would be permissible so yep all right question
01:00:14.280 number five this is a good one was the first amendment a mistake congress shall not pass any
01:00:19.120 law uh restricting the free expression there's five categories of it uh one of them being the
01:00:23.580 free expression of religion was the first amendment a mistake i'll say in this time no
01:00:31.160 today it needs some updating yep i think that's the best way to say it's been 250 years guys
01:00:36.860 yeah it's like oh you you are you hating on the founders no they were our new grill needs a
01:00:43.120 firmware update like every 30 minutes you go to do the grill it's like well you need software
01:00:46.900 update 14.6.8.1 uh if a grill needs an update every uh 20 minutes i think a nation 250 years
01:00:53.840 in with vastly different demographics that's a big one that first started with can say hey when
01:01:00.020 we started uh coming out of a european context the persecution of the puritans coming out of
01:01:05.560 that context we said hey and i it pains me to admit but they really did mean freedom of religion
01:01:10.940 like there is some sense in which they meant freedom of religion within the christian religion
01:01:15.060 right but you read jefferson and others and and for sure the majority they they really truly meant
01:01:19.220 like jew mohammedan christian free religion they actually meant that and so that would be a rare
01:01:24.280 founders l um but an understandable uh rare founders l because they weren't their big concern
01:01:30.640 was not hedging against, you know, 0.0001%.
01:01:34.040 In a 95% Christian country. 0.85
01:01:35.740 Exactly. 1.00
01:01:36.080 They could not, even Jefferson,
01:01:39.160 who was, Jefferson was a deist and a Unitarian.
01:01:43.380 Is that right?
01:01:43.660 Close to a universalist.
01:01:45.000 Close to, yeah. 1.00
01:01:45.140 I mean, he was a heretic. 0.99
01:01:46.520 We'll just say that. 0.63
01:01:47.280 Jefferson was a heretic and certainly not, 0.99
01:01:50.700 one of my least favorite of the founding fathers.
01:01:52.740 Not our guy.
01:01:53.600 Yeah, Jackson would be good.
01:01:55.020 Adams would be good.
01:01:56.060 Washington would be good.
01:01:57.020 Jefferson's not our guy.
01:01:58.040 But even Jefferson, if he was alive today, 1.00
01:02:00.060 he'd be like what the heck is going on in the world you have how many muslims here in the united 1.00
01:02:05.700 states you're like uh yeah freedom of religion my bad i need a mulligan um yeah so so yeah so 1.00
01:02:14.160 it's just uh the constitution is like well you guys hate the constitution i i love the constitution
01:02:18.220 i i still with all my reforms and she's still love the constitution but the people that the
01:02:23.980 constitution was fit for that's those that's not the people of our country anymore we don't have
01:02:29.540 those people we don't have them racially religiously um ethnically at any level we don't 0.96
01:02:35.600 have those people the country was predominantly european and christian and now um we have a ton
01:02:43.960 of different religions ton of different nationalities um we have ilhan omar now we have um
01:02:50.280 we have uh zon zon whatever the mayor of new york what's pronounced zoran mondani zoran mondani
01:02:57.620 uh mondani i don't even want to i don't even want to learn to pronounce his name correctly but
01:03:02.220 um in that kind of nation yeah you you need a couple updates yeah yeah because all politics
01:03:07.580 is contextual there is no abstract perfect political theory that oh it works in every
01:03:11.620 time and every place politics is adapted to its time so in that time the protecting the free
01:03:16.600 expression of religion that i'm not going to count that as an l we were 95 christian country
01:03:21.080 we had an identity uh today that's been eroded and we need to say yeah all this eastern nonsense
01:03:25.660 it needs to go uh doesn't have a place here is not christian is not western it doesn't have a
01:03:31.780 spot that's today that wasn't 250 years ago again getting back kind of to question one
01:03:36.280 you feel like some of these constitutional elements right the bill of rights the 19th
01:03:40.400 amendment we saw owen strand crash out about that they treat these things like they're religious
01:03:44.360 precepts okay so if the first amendment like goes away or someone doesn't want it i'm not
01:03:48.960 personally advocating for that but say someone does okay that is in the realm of politics yeah
01:03:53.960 that's not a christian the first amendment is not the gospel no and you know it's funny
01:03:58.480 neither is the 19th right um but it's funny like somebody like owen strand who'd be like this is
01:04:03.260 terrible what are you doing um even the guys that he would respect like john macarthur god rest his
01:04:09.440 soul john macarthur said religious freedom uh religious freedom is the freedom of idolatry
01:04:15.880 right he literally said that that's not righteous there's nothing righteous about religious freedom
01:04:20.960 giving people freedom of idolatry. So that's even like John MacArthur, dispensationalist,
01:04:26.420 Baptist, and even he recognized like, no, this is not a Christian principle, and it's silly to
01:04:32.500 pretend that it is. Yeah. Kevin DeYoung said in his article, just to show we're not taking him 0.65
01:04:37.120 out of context, we're not attributing to him a view he does not hold, he said at the end of his
01:04:41.420 article, he said, I suggest, however, as an American, so as opposed to the suppression of
01:04:46.160 false worship as an american and as a christian that the better way is to pray preach and
01:04:51.100 proselytize for the conversion of these religious groups jews hindus muslims etc while also defending 0.96
01:04:57.180 their right to exercise their false religion during this temporal order which is insane put
01:05:02.220 put that quote up uh we want people to see it so this is from kevin de young um let's put it up on
01:05:07.620 the screen uh starting there it's about halfway down or so i suggest yeah third line i suggest
01:05:14.300 however so this is what he's saying would be better than christian nationalism i suggest as
01:05:19.900 an american and as a christian that the better way is to pray that's good preach that's good
01:05:26.220 proselytize do the work of an evangelist that's good for the conversion of these religious groups
01:05:32.660 right so he's thinking of false religious groups for muslims jews hindus etc so praying and seeking 0.59
01:05:40.680 to evangelize and preaching to these religious groups, false religions, while also defending 0.72
01:05:46.700 their right to exercise their false religion during this temporal order. That's insane 0.73
01:05:57.500 that I'm going to preach to you that your soul might be saved and that you wouldn't go to hell
01:06:04.780 and then also go and fight wars and be willing to die to defend the right for 90-foot-tall
01:06:12.260 statues in Houston, Islamic statues, to be raised. No, I'm not going to fight to defend 0.97
01:06:20.920 idolatry, public, visible, expressed idolatry that brings about God's judgment on the land.
01:06:29.920 I'm not going to do that. And just for the record, that's still distinct, okay? There's a difference
01:06:34.500 between sins and crimes,
01:06:36.900 public blasphemy,
01:06:38.480 public idolatry is not
01:06:40.420 only, it is a sin, but it's not only
01:06:42.460 a sin, it is a crime.
01:06:43.960 We are not advocating for 1.00
01:06:45.820 the Muslim police 0.94
01:06:47.440 to go and round up Muslims 1.00
01:06:50.260 who are privately worshipping 0.67
01:06:52.420 in their homes, but we are
01:06:54.460 saying that 94... I'm monitoring bacon shipments
01:06:56.620 like, it's been three weeks, I don't know.
01:06:57.980 It's been three weeks, no bacon, 1.00
01:06:59.620 we might have some Jews here. 1.00
01:07:01.800 Check under the floorboards. 1.00
01:07:03.240 eat the bacon cheeseburger what's going on here bacon cheeseburger to prove that you're a christian
01:07:07.900 uh no we're not saying that um we're saying uh but 90 foot tall statue uh just a blasphemous
01:07:16.440 eyesore outside of a major american city in houston that that should be torn down yep um and
01:07:22.540 that the state has a right to do that now in terms of rounding people up right if we're talking about
01:07:27.480 ice and we're talking about people rounding them up not not strictly because they're muslim 0.99
01:07:31.860 religiously but because they're not american nationally they they don't belong here well
01:07:37.060 that's that's a separate issue based yeah that's that's great uh question number six this is the
01:07:42.940 last one we'll get to super chats here just in a minute after our second commercial break
01:07:46.600 but his last question what is the historical example of the political order you would like
01:07:51.620 to see in america unfortunately we have to go back a very very long time hundreds thousands of years
01:07:57.100 since we've ever seen a Christian nation like Rome.
01:08:00.140 Actually, no, just 125 years.
01:08:02.280 What historical time?
01:08:03.660 When did we have this?
01:08:04.680 America, 1900. 0.99
01:08:06.100 We had blasphemy laws. 1.00
01:08:07.840 We had sodomy laws.
01:08:09.220 And people were prosecuted 1921 in Maryland.
01:08:11.840 A man was prosecuted for blaspheming God.
01:08:14.240 We had blasphemy laws on the books.
01:08:16.660 Sodomy laws, all 50 states. 0.87
01:08:18.620 Harsh prison sentence for perversion.
01:08:21.320 Again, people were not being interrogated in their homes, right?
01:08:23.780 The police are going down the street, knocking on the door. 0.95
01:08:26.000 we need proof blah blah blah no but if it was publicly known you were a homosexual you were a 0.98
01:08:31.420 sodomite that carried strict laws if convicted we had usury laws capped interest rates at something 0.62
01:08:36.840 like six percent most people we talked about this in another episode uh they didn't have to get
01:08:41.380 loans for their homes they bought them because they typically were a couple years wages they
01:08:46.040 saved they bought homes we were considered a christian nation they weren't financing burritos
01:08:50.500 god yep and then also pornography blue laws explicit sabbath laws yep sabbath laws these
01:08:55.660 things are all illegal. America was, it depends on the source. Obviously, it's not an exact science.
01:09:00.760 America was 90 to 95, 97% Christian in 1900. And correct me if I'm wrong, but about 90%
01:09:08.560 white European. Yep, exactly. It was a mix. Mostly, I think two-thirds Protestant are kind 0.97
01:09:14.240 of resident third Catholic. Two-thirds Protestant, probably close to 97% white, 95% Christian. We had
01:09:21.760 that here in this nation 125 years ago. And honestly, it produced, I think, of the Roaring
01:09:27.760 20s. It had its faults, for sure. I think of the prohibition and all of the crime that that brought
01:09:32.640 with it. That is not to say everybody was moral, there was nobody that was degenerate, but publicly
01:09:37.620 speaking, the nation itself oriented people again and again towards Christianity in its habits,
01:09:45.260 in its action, in its memorials, in its celebration, in its songs, in its memories,
01:09:49.900 and all that it did in its public schools.
01:09:52.200 It oriented people to the true religion.
01:09:54.640 It used the law as a curb against evil.
01:09:58.320 No, you can't do that
01:09:59.360 because you'll go to jail for 20 years 0.99
01:10:01.040 if you're a homosexual. 0.98
01:10:02.280 You can't blaspheme the Lord Jesus Christ 0.97
01:10:03.920 because he's holy, living, and God.
01:10:06.420 You can't exploit your neighbor
01:10:07.700 and charge him 25% interest.
01:10:10.300 We had it.
01:10:11.140 We had it here in this land 125 years ago.
01:10:14.960 Well said.
01:10:15.320 Let's go to our last commercial break
01:10:16.680 and then we're going to come back
01:10:17.580 and deal with the super chats.
01:10:19.900 Hey friends, Gray Toad Tallow is a family business making skin care the way that it should be,
01:10:25.960 simple and clean. The company began as a personal mission to find healthier, more affordable
01:10:31.740 solutions to common skin problems without the chemicals that are found in most products today.
01:10:38.380 Now that search led to crafting balms from grass-fed, grass-finished animals that were
01:10:44.000 naturally rich in vitamins and healthy fats, which is exactly what your skin craves. These balms
01:10:51.560 fight dryness, they calm eczema, and psoriasis, along with other stubborn skin issues,
01:10:59.740 without containing all the nasty toxins. Gray Toad Tallow offers everyday soaps, balms,
01:11:06.820 and beard balm for men. To experience some of their products, grab a balm sample pack.
01:11:13.400 Each batch is made with care in their home and shipped directly to their customers.
01:11:20.240 For skincare, the way that God designed, natural, clean, and effective, visit greytoedtallow.com.
01:11:29.120 Use code WRITE15 for 15% off your order today.
01:11:35.100 Again, that's greytoedtallow.com.
01:11:39.180 And if you want 15% off, then add the promo code WRITE15 today.
01:11:45.820 The danger of centralized power is often represented by the word king.
01:11:50.800 As Americans, we hate the word king.
01:11:54.480 Civilian ownership of body armor is about helping people to have increased power to resist tyrants and criminals.
01:12:01.260 And so, Armored Republic is about helping you to preserve your God-given rights to the
01:12:07.860 honor of the Lord Jesus Christ, because he is the King of kings, and he governs kings
01:12:12.720 and he will judge them.
01:12:15.140 This is Armored Republic, and in a republic, there is no king but Christ.
01:12:21.120 We are free craftsmen, and we are honored to be your Armorsmith choice.
01:12:31.260 all right we're back let's uh do the super chats first one of the day that we have is from
01:12:44.700 austin gondor he gave us 50 we appreciate that thank you very much he said ga kings
01:12:50.440 have you ever heard of dr byron brian brian artist artist it's it's hard to read it's very
01:12:58.560 small print i promise i know how to read dr brian you have glasses this should be easy to see he
01:13:03.300 has it's still it's small he has done um a lot of good research on uh the health benefits of
01:13:09.660 nicotine god bless him and i think that it would be awesome if you did another episode on nicotine
01:13:15.300 and had him on the show to talk about it i'm open to that i think i've seen a video from him he's
01:13:20.260 made he would say that there's effects that it has on cancer parasites and all of that and i think he
01:13:24.860 advocates for uh using a nicotine patch so he's not saying here's what you need to do for your
01:13:29.000 health go out and smoke a pack of marvalo reds a day that's not what he's saying he's saying
01:13:32.580 hey nicotine taken in some form whether it be some type of pouch or a patch because pouches
01:13:38.540 and cigarettes and all that can be disruptive a type of patch has a lot of great health benefits
01:13:43.140 i just felt like i had to add more to that because it was a very generous super chat i've seen him
01:13:47.080 before and uh people have to have him on the show sometime cool uh all right 10th generation
01:13:51.940 generation american sons of the american revolution sent in a super chat and said tgc doubled down
01:13:58.220 bringing out joe carter today so joe carter wrote an article i think it was uh what wicca has to
01:14:03.840 teach us about christian nationalism so what witches i i couldn't even bring myself to open
01:14:09.280 the article there's no way i was gonna like open it up read it uh hurt myself with it uh yeah
01:14:15.640 absolutely terrible gospel coalition has become a rag and uh and you see it the readership is
01:14:20.840 a tenth of what it was
01:14:23.260 from like 2015, 16, 17
01:14:25.360 the big reformed resurgence. People
01:14:27.200 are done with them. And it's
01:14:28.920 it didn't have to be this way
01:14:30.560 but it is. Yep, it is.
01:14:33.700 Next one. 10th Generation
01:14:35.080 sent one more chat. He said, beautiful
01:14:37.080 steak. Now we need an ugly sweater episode. 1.00
01:14:39.560 Yeah, we do. I have one.
01:14:41.820 You do? If you could believe I have an ugly 0.98
01:14:43.160 sweater in my closet. You do. Somewhere in there.
01:14:45.120 I've got one. Okay, we can do that.
01:14:47.000 Maybe next Friday. Next one, Kenton Little.
01:14:49.400 Oh my goodness. Uh-oh.
01:14:50.840 Uh-oh, this is going to be rough.
01:14:52.740 All right, no, we like Kenton.
01:14:54.180 He's great.
01:14:55.400 Wait, doesn't Kenton hate eggnog?
01:14:58.280 Have you read the comment yet?
01:14:59.960 Oh, no.
01:15:01.040 Is that what it's going to be about?
01:15:02.740 $5 from Kenton, little.
01:15:06.220 GA Gents, eggnog is awful.
01:15:09.220 Hey, Nathan, while I'm reading this,
01:15:12.380 go grab me the eggnog out of the fridge, please.
01:15:15.100 Boy, for boy.
01:15:16.780 Eggnog is awful.
01:15:17.600 What are we doing?
01:15:18.220 one of mankind's worst inventions this is insane uh it deserves to not rot in the back of grandma's
01:15:28.320 fridge real cheer comes from wassail okay i do like wassail um i i've been making wassail since
01:15:35.700 i don't know since i was like 14 years old i've got a banger recipe came all the way from grandma
01:15:40.800 so i i know about the wassum and it is good uh but eggnog is good too uh hook it up
01:15:47.880 and uh i think it's i think it's worth uh kenton a little just uh watching me
01:15:55.300 get a little bit right here just a good sip
01:15:58.320 i had steak i had a coffee now i'm having eggnog this is actually homemade
01:16:08.660 um it's homemade by one of my best friends his wife made it for us as a gift and it is absolutely
01:16:16.360 delicious yeah watch this jar carefully i'll keep it on screen because if we get to the bottom of it
01:16:23.380 uh then i'm going to have to resign because we are going to be kicked off of youtube this bad boy
01:16:29.400 uh she put a lot of uh a lot of generous there's even some eggnog alongside the whiskey in that
01:16:35.360 barely any eggnog yeah this thing is spiked okay you take the next all right austin gondor sent 0.91
01:16:40.300 in a super chat thank you sir he said west that starbucks drink you are drinking is kind of gay 0.90
01:16:45.180 and my wife says that's not very christian nationalist of you and uh yeah i can't believe 0.77
01:16:49.360 you would do that if you're listening you drank that it's a glass frappuccino now here's the deal
01:16:53.680 you drank that don't say somebody don't say it somebody don't went to costco today don't
01:16:59.340 this is this is why christian nationalism matters i wouldn't drink this slop normally somebody went
01:17:06.140 to costco and bought a whole pack of them and they're in the fridge and i have a headache
01:17:11.520 and i grabbed one of them i feel a lot better they're full of sugar they're terrible for you
01:17:15.480 but i needed someone to say you can't have that in the house and nobody did no authority came in
01:17:20.600 and said you can't have these in the house they're bad for you and they're full of sugar so i'm the
01:17:25.060 victim here not sure somebody should have stopped me from making this purchase but i will say if
01:17:29.220 we're on the subject of costco and christian nationalism there are some other christian
01:17:33.600 nationalist you know policies that need to be employed at costco and i'm talking about like
01:17:39.600 90 of the clientele i'm talking dress code ushered into ice vans and immediately deported every time
01:17:48.120 i go to costco it's just like billions have to go back i go to costco and i'm like we're not
01:17:51.980 can i ever have our country back yeah it's like legitimately no seriously it's done yeah when i
01:17:56.880 go to costco i'm like this is not america it's really sad okay uh next one is who cody legal
01:18:03.200 here okay here we go uh sent in a 20 super chat thanks cody very generous he said have a merry
01:18:08.360 christmas god bless christian nationalism sticking with it amen amen all right next one general blurbs
01:18:14.700 he gave us five bucks we appreciate that he said if 400 years in america makes uh blacks okay so
01:18:21.760 he's talking about the black population part of the american nation then shouldn't 430 years
01:18:27.560 in egypt have made the israelites egyptian um well i would say that in the case of egypt there's a lot
01:18:35.140 of things that could be said but one would be in the case of egypt um they absolutely did not ever
01:18:41.500 let the israelites um actually become a part of egypt they held them in slavery right they kept
01:18:48.360 them distinct. They lived in different portions, like geographic portions. And, you know, so like
01:18:54.560 they remained very, very distinct. And I would also say that's on the Egyptian side of the equation.
01:18:59.480 On the Israelite side of the equation, the goal was always to leave. They were crying out and 0.98
01:19:04.680 praying for God to deliver them. They didn't want to stay in Egypt. They knew that they had a promise
01:19:10.420 that God would eventually, he would eventually deliver them, redeem them and take them out 0.76
01:19:16.500 of Egypt. Even so, there were, you know, there was some blending, you can see, and a lot of it 0.51
01:19:25.080 was negative, that, you know, the Israelites, when they got out of Egypt, they still needed to get
01:19:29.440 Egypt out of the Israelites. And that took some time, an entire generation wandering and eventually
01:19:35.000 perishing in the wilderness before they were able to cross the Jordan River. So I understand your
01:19:40.700 point. I personally disagree with the point. I think that there are some dynamic differences
01:19:46.300 between the two. Again, Israel remained enslaved for the full 400, you know, give or take years
01:19:55.180 that they were actually in Egypt. They had a distinct promise from God to eventually be
01:19:59.520 delivered from Egypt. That wasn't their final resting place. That's not what God had intended
01:20:03.320 for them. So it's just, I think it's different. But I am aware of people who hold your position.
01:20:09.680 thank you for the super chat i appreciate it all right the edger whistle sent two dollars he said
01:20:15.460 changing name to aid joel's steak glazed eyes 10th gen am all right thanks for the super chat
01:20:24.660 all right cousin re sent five dollars why does it seem like today's church is unwilling to take
01:20:30.160 principles from old testament israel also west and the tree in the same room must not be the same
01:20:36.480 no i'm actually antonio joel you're doing the show with antonio today can't you see it's clearly me
01:20:41.100 yeah definitely just yeah just like monday same guy right here in the chair um you're about i would
01:20:48.000 say you're about i'm decently tan actually you're about 60 of antonio right isn't it is antonio is
01:20:56.220 it 60 57 yeah 57 we're about like 57 the same yeah 57 antonio uh which i just got to go on record
01:21:05.060 and say, I miss my boy. I know. Yeah. He's almost done. He is almost done with the day job. He did
01:21:11.300 400 years of slavery in Egypt, just like the Israelites did. Yeah. He has been doing some 1.00
01:21:16.200 serious slavery on the corporate plantation, but we'll be with us soon. Yep. Okay. And with us
01:21:21.300 permanently. Yeah. We're excited about that. Yeah. So then the actual question, why does it
01:21:25.480 seem like today's church is unwilling to take principles from Old Testament Israel? Yeah. They
01:21:29.220 Just Andy Stanley style, right? 0.93
01:21:32.020 Just unhitching from the Old Testament.
01:21:34.200 What is it, Marcionism, right?
01:21:36.600 The idea that basically the New Testament trumps the Old Testament,
01:21:40.880 which is, I mean, honestly, here's the irony. 0.99
01:21:42.740 That's a really Islamic way of reading the scripture. 0.88
01:21:46.320 It's an Islamic hermeneutic. 0.92
01:21:49.100 It's also a Jewish hermeneutic. 0.91
01:21:51.400 Both Judaism and Islam picks and chooses certain texts to trump other texts, 0.91
01:21:58.780 and they have to have that hermeneutic way of reading their sacred texts because it's so 0.96
01:22:04.960 blatantly contradicting. But that's the beauty of the Christian faith is that there's actually
01:22:08.940 no contradiction. You can esteem every single jot and tittle of the Word of God as, in fact,
01:22:15.960 the Word of God, infallible from Genesis all the way to Revelation without having to choose one
01:22:20.780 text over the other because no two texts ever directly contradict. There are apparent
01:22:26.640 different contradictions that need to be carefully studied and reconciled, but there is no true
01:22:32.300 contradiction. Wherever there appears to be a contradiction, the contradiction lies in the
01:22:36.560 heart of man and not in the text of God's word. So why do Christians, and obviously the guy who 0.95
01:22:43.480 wrote in the super chat, he seems to understand this. So why do Christians think otherwise? Well,
01:22:48.540 I think it's because Christians have adopted a very foreign, and I might add novel, hermeneutic 0.99
01:22:56.360 that they're not reading the scripture as historic Christianity always has. It's very novel, 0.98
01:23:02.380 and it's either Islamic in some sense, right? Isn't it the latter text? The further you get 0.66
01:23:08.840 the Quran, the more authoritative it is. So if you read something early on, and then you read
01:23:14.020 something later, and they contradict blatantly with one another, the later passage would trump
01:23:19.560 the former passage. So there's an Islamic hermeneutic, but we've got to be fair, right?
01:23:24.960 equal offenders here it's not just islamic uh that's that's also jewish right is it was it in 0.91
01:23:30.140 the jerusalem you know talmud or the babylonian like yeah well this one actually carries more
01:23:34.320 weight than this other one and these latter texts you know actually uh override the former text
01:23:38.960 um judaism uh modern judaism and uh islam have a very similar hermeneutic right they do and uh
01:23:49.180 and i'll be honest we've got a lot of muslims in this country but that's a pretty recent development
01:23:53.980 wouldn't you say i think that's fairly recent and there still are very small proportion like jews
01:23:58.660 are as well three percent or so muslims are probably under a little bit of that but they're 1.00
01:24:02.980 just so annoying i guess my point is that jews have been here longer oh yeah the the muslim 1.00
01:24:07.700 you know um addition to these united states of america is more of a novel um addition 0.87
01:24:14.420 whereas the jewish influence has has been here for quite a while and uh and so my point is um
01:24:22.480 to answer the question, why do we have all these Christian pastors who are reading the Bible with
01:24:27.900 an Islamic or Jewish hermeneutic? I would say because a lot of these Christian pastors have
01:24:34.060 actually been influenced by Islam or Judaism. And I would argue probably 90% of the time,
01:24:40.820 it's more so Judaism than it is Islam. I think it's because of Judeo-Christianity. I think it's 0.85
01:24:45.900 because of the influence of Zionism on American churches,
01:24:51.260 particularly evangelical Protestant churches.
01:24:54.040 And so they have, you know, you see evangelical pastors
01:24:57.480 even inviting Jewish rabbis to come and speak on the Lord's Day
01:25:01.900 behind the pulpit during the church to preach a sermon.
01:25:05.680 People who don't even believe that Jesus is the Son of God,
01:25:09.120 they reject Christ and they're preaching at church.
01:25:12.400 Talk about blasphemy. 0.73
01:25:13.920 I mean, that's absolutely insane.
01:25:15.660 but they've allowed these individuals to have an immense amount of outsized influence on their
01:25:22.200 doctrine, their theology, their metrics, their pragmatism, all the way down. And so the fact
01:25:28.540 that you now have Christian ministers and Christian churches treating the Bible, New 0.82
01:25:33.460 Testament, trumping the Old Testament, Marcion, well, I would say that's kind of a Jewish thing 0.81
01:25:39.140 to do. And, oh, well, look, you've opened the door wide to a bunch of Jewish influence. This 0.96
01:25:44.240 makes sense that's that's one of the ways i would account for it yeah i think it's easy to to come
01:25:49.780 across as nice kind tolerant and just honest for one the new testament is shorter uh paul had
01:25:55.700 written more there'd probably be more that he would have said but if you kind of take the new
01:25:59.000 testament in isolation you take the ethics of jesus for example the sermon on the mount
01:26:02.520 you kind of just isolate them and hold them in and of themselves you can kind of come across as
01:26:06.780 really tolerant nice and affirming and inclusive and that is our modern religion we talked about
01:26:12.320 that in our episode about the big event from world war ii the new religion is niceness and
01:26:16.060 inclusion right at any cost and so the old testament with josiah taking wicked priests
01:26:21.120 and putting them to death it's a little bit hard to square but pull a portion and a verse and a
01:26:26.880 passage from the new testament kind of cobble them together you can be nice you can adhere to
01:26:31.020 the modern religion and uh get to kind of have your cake and eat it too and so the old testament's
01:26:35.260 like it's a little icky it's a little violent there's a lot of blood i would prefer my misreading
01:26:39.920 of Jesus and misreading of Paul to actually really just kind of affirm what I wanted to do
01:26:43.720 anyway. Well said. All right. Last super chat of the day. This is from Cousin Ree. He gave us
01:26:49.740 two bucks. We appreciate that. He said, Joel just said, por favor, and I'm not sure how I feel.
01:26:57.880 It's fair. It's harsh, but fair. It's true. Yep. All right. Well, thanks for tuning in. That is
01:27:03.000 the broadcast for today, and it is Friday. So those of you who are new to the channel,
01:27:07.720 make sure to subscribe and click the bell on youtube you can just search right response
01:27:13.000 ministries on youtube subscribe and click the bell and then on x our handle is at right response
01:27:19.400 m the letter m as in ministries there wasn't enough room to put the whole thing so it's just
01:27:24.080 right response m at right response m on x same thing uh give us a follow click the bell our
01:27:30.460 broadcasting schedule is as follows we do every monday wednesday and friday at 3 p.m central time
01:27:37.100 So three live streams every week, Monday, Wednesday, and Friday at 3 p.m. Central Time.
01:27:42.480 It's Friday, so Lord willing, we will see you again on Monday.
01:27:46.260 And we only have a couple weeks left at this point.
01:27:48.940 It's December 5th.
01:27:50.380 We're going to do next week.
01:27:51.780 We're probably going to continue through the following.
01:27:55.440 And then we're going to take about a week, week and a half off for the holidays.
01:27:59.940 And then we've got some big things that will be unveiled in the new year.
01:28:04.500 Very excited about that.
01:28:05.840 Thank you guys so much for, is this a last minute?
01:28:09.200 Last minute?
01:28:10.400 It is.
01:28:11.220 All right.
01:28:11.640 Heath, Cliff, and Fagan.
01:28:14.120 Okay.
01:28:14.440 He said, have you over at Right Response Ministries considered making religious slash political films, documentaries, or informative videos to generally capture a modern Christian nationalist thesis?
01:28:27.080 Go for the big screen.
01:28:29.080 I think that's great.
01:28:30.020 Great idea.
01:28:30.500 And we actually do have some film-like project in the works to be released next year that would
01:28:41.860 not just be a regular podcast, but would be highly produced and a lot of different B-roll
01:28:49.420 and footage and citations and all these different things, more of a documentary film style. And
01:28:55.900 you'll have to stay tuned. We'll announce more in the new year, but that's a great idea. We
01:28:59.680 appreciate it. God bless you guys. Thanks for tuning in and we will see you Lord willing on Monday.