00:09:57.700But when we start to see any sort of economic shakeout, really what it comes down to is people used to have a general sense of discomfort when they see Bitcoin dropping.
00:10:10.300How much further is it going to go down?
00:10:12.060Where you see, obviously, that happens to some degree with any asset, with gold as well and silver.
00:10:15.680But it happens a lot less because people, you know, understand, A, that there's utility involved in this, that, you know, all things aside, silver is still going to be in demand, right?
00:10:26.620So for silver, for instance, we're in the fifth consecutive year with a deficit in terms of production versus usage.
00:10:33.960It was just added to the 2026 strategic minerals reserve list.
00:10:37.500You've got all these different things.
00:10:38.620That's going to buoy the value of silver, you know, and gold has that too with semiconductors and whatnot.
00:10:44.380But that's going to buoy it. And then you've got, with gold in particular, the really long track record. So there's always going to be some of that. And again, maybe over time, you see Bitcoin have some of these less drastic moves. It's not uncommon to just look up and Bitcoin is down 5% or 6% or up 5% or 6% in a given day. That would be huge news in gold and silver any given day if gold's up 6%.
00:11:09.180So not to say that these things can't happen. It's just, you know, that speaks to kind of that general piece. As far as the economy as a whole, I think there is just a lot of uncertainty is the word I would use, because you've got things like, you know, just the general AI.
00:11:26.600You know, some people think it's a bubble. Some people think it's justified. And it's really tough. I mean, no one has a crystal ball. No one knows in 20 years when we look back and say, wow, you know, we were undervaluing everything. Or do we say 20 years later, wow, that was a massive bubble. How did we not see this coming?
00:11:42.320And because of that, there's a lot of people that are kind of anxious.
00:11:46.560And you see that playing out across the world stage.
00:11:49.380That's one of the reasons that gold has done so well is that institutions, central banks,
00:11:55.300et cetera, are saying, we just really don't feel confident.
00:12:03.120It speaks a little bit also to just the general sense of the dollar and distrust in the dollar
00:12:07.560and other countries wanting to buy metals, wanting to separate from the dollar.
00:12:11.140We're now under 50 percent of the world's reserve currency that the countries hold, you know, in terms of non-native currency.
00:12:19.400It's under 50 percent. So it used to be, you know, 70, 80 percent.
00:12:22.700So countries are moving away from the dollar.
00:12:25.160So there's just all in all, I would just paint it as a lot of uncertainty and fear is kind of ruling right now,
00:12:31.760because no one really knows what that's going to look like,
00:12:34.380especially when you've got all of the valuation in the market is really plugged into about seven companies, the Mag7.
00:12:41.140well said a couple things from the chat real quick um one based homemaker asked did they
00:12:47.160replace wes with a christmas tree and the answer of course is yes and it was a major upgrade it
00:12:53.060cannot be understated um how much of an improvement uh we were given a choice it was a hard choice you
00:12:58.860know we uh it was we were sad to see him go uh he's done a lot of good and we love him immensely
00:13:03.580but um we were given a choice wes or christmas tree and uh and the answer was clear you know
00:13:10.220and i think we made the right choice you know as much as west contributed i feel like the tree
00:13:15.620contributes more and uh and so i'm grateful with that choice um no we miss west uh he should be
00:13:21.540back on wednesday so uh no we didn't trade west he'll be back on wednesday um go up a little bit
00:13:26.720in the comments uh tech crew if you will go up a little bit striker striker is very very upset with
00:13:33.080me just so frustrated with me he said uh you were asking a gold bug and a theologian i'm just saying
00:13:39.820they might have great general wisdom, but they may not have great insight in specifics. I know
00:13:45.760what he's getting at. This is what Stryker's getting at some of his previous comments.
00:13:49.640Stryker loves him some Bitcoin. It is quite obvious from the chat. And so perhaps I just
00:13:55.540let off, you know, started on the wrong foot and was not clear. So let me be clear. I'll go out on
00:14:02.120a limb. I love predictions because I'm perfectly comfortable coming out after the fact and saying,
00:14:06.180you know what? I was wrong. All right. So some people don't like predictions because the phrase
00:14:10.620I was wrong is something that they physically cannot utter. Right. And I'm, I'm looking at
00:14:15.840you pastors. There are, there are a lot of people in this world. Many of them happen to be ministers
00:14:20.360that can never, ever, ever, ever admit that they were wrong. By the grace of God, I'm perfectly
00:14:26.140comfortable doing so. I've been wrong many times and I can be wrong again. But because I'm comfortable
00:14:31.260admitting that I'm wrong, I'm also comfortable making predictions. So here's a prediction.
00:14:34.660I think that Bitcoin will be a million dollars. And I think relatively soon, I don't think in a
00:14:41.380couple months, but I think 2030, 2031, I think that it's possible. And I think that in my lifetime,
00:14:49.360barring some kind of, you know, extreme tragedy, assuming that I live for another, you know, 30,
00:14:53.68040 years, I think that we'll see a $10 million Bitcoin. So I'm not bearish on Bitcoin, just
00:14:59.720to be abundantly clear. I think that Bitcoin is phenomenal. And I think that Bitcoin can do a lot
00:15:08.160of good. I'm friends with some of the OG Bitcoiners, some of the guys who wrote the book,
00:15:13.240thank God for Bitcoin. And I agree with their basic premise. I despise fiat currency.
00:15:21.080I despise having the Fed holding a lever that can just make money cheap or make money expensive
00:15:27.980at will, turning on a printer. I like that Bitcoin is finite. I like that Bitcoin will only be 21
00:15:35.640million ever. So I'm aware of the concept. I am pro the concept. All I'm saying is that in terms
00:15:41.360of the four-year cycle, it could be over. I personally don't think that even this cycle is
00:15:48.420over. I think that we will still see Bitcoin crossing the $100,000 threshold, maybe even
00:15:54.620getting a new all-time high, $130,000, $140,000, maybe as high as $150,000. But some of the
00:16:00.180original projections that I saw in 2024 and early 2025, guys like Tom Lee saying that Bitcoin is
00:16:06.580going to moon to $250,000 in this cycle by the end of this year. I think, I mean, guys,
00:16:14.480Stryker, you tell me if I'm wrong, but am I being crazy by saying I don't think that Bitcoin hits
00:16:21.320a quarter million in the year of our lord 2025 with 31 days left to go on the clock that's that's
00:16:28.060all i'm saying so i'm not against bitcoin i'm not against crypto some crypto i'm against because
00:16:32.640it's just retarded but bitcoin i think is a great asset i think ethereum also is a good asset i i
00:16:39.420prefer some of the cryptocurrencies that actually have functionality um you know blockchain
00:16:45.080technology or this that and the other um you know something that that you know has some sort of
00:16:50.500utility in and of itself. I think Bitcoin is the best. And I think that Bitcoin will be a long
00:16:54.740standing, powerful asset. But all I'm saying is that in the short run, in the next couple of
00:17:00.640months, Bitcoin feels a little shaky. This current cycle could be at an end, at least for a little
00:17:09.020while. And then the bigger thing that I was trying to say at the beginning is that the four year
00:17:13.320cycle that we're used to with Bitcoin could just be forever altered as we know it. Not meaning that
00:17:20.360there's you know that there's not you know everything has bear cycles and bull cycles but
00:17:24.320it may not follow the trajectory that it used to where you could just every four years you could
00:17:29.280count on bitcoin is going to go up you know some extreme percentage um i think the more that states
00:17:35.040nations and institutions get involved you're going to see less of the traditional cycle that you've
00:17:42.560seen with bitcoin in the past another thing i wanted to comment on uh michael burry um i think
00:17:49.400he has some good insights. I watched The Big Short with Steve Carell like everybody else. I'm aware
00:17:54.920of Michael Burry. I'd like to think I'm a Michael Burry expert. I saw three tweets from him, read
00:18:01.580one Substack article and watched The Big Short. I think that makes me an expert. But this is what
00:18:06.160I would say about Michael Burry and other people have said it as well. It's not just me. But Michael
00:18:11.000Burry has called 15 of the last two market crashes. Michael Burry has been betting on the market to
00:18:18.460crash with everything all the time for a couple decades. So he could be right. He could be right.
00:18:26.880He also could be wrong. I want to do something a little bit different and then we'll go back to
00:18:30.680Bill. But I want to handle some of the super chats so early. So Nathan, if you can pull up
00:18:35.960some of the super chats to kind of round out this segment, because I wanted to address a couple of
00:18:40.080them, give it back to Bill, then go to our first commercial break and then we can take another
00:18:43.620round of super chats you know later on uh but this was from giraffe neck uh he said he gave us
00:18:51.520a ten dollar super chat we appreciate that thank you very much he said what is the likelihood that
00:18:55.500big ai stocks like nvidia can continue to grow is it just an ai bubble christmas tree looks good
00:19:02.740and joel's beer game is strong west can't compete so true king um poor west west needs to be here
00:19:08.080or he's going to get roasted um so the the big ai stocks this is my opinion and i'd like to hear
00:19:13.440you know bill and antonio see what they think um i i think nvidia will continue to grow
00:19:18.740that said um once a company gets to a a certain level you're not going to see you know the the
00:19:26.840percentage jumps in in a matter of weeks or months uh that you see early on right like amazon is
00:19:35.120still growing um but it's not like you know if you bought amazon in the 90s um that's you know
00:19:42.300that's very different so like i'm expecting you a thousand percent return in one year you know or
00:19:47.86018 months i think that that's probably in in the rearview mirror for companies like nvidia
00:19:54.720but i i think if i'm looking at ai you know the question is it just a bubble and these kinds of
00:20:01.020things i think it will prove to be a bubble in some aspect not entirely in some aspect
00:20:06.580um meaning that that there's a lot of you know just like the dot-com bubble i think that ai is
00:20:12.540different than the dot-com bubble uh but with the dot-com bubble it was like every company you know
00:20:17.740every mom and pop you know business that you could think of is like we have a website oh my goodness
00:20:22.980you know trillion dollar evaluation you know and like we have a website www.com and uh and the
00:20:30.720reality is that yes, having a website improved business. It made it more searchable. Um, you
00:20:36.640know, those kinds of things, maybe you could even order online. Uh, but, but then every business
00:20:40.980started doing it and the competition still exists. And, and so, you know, so it proved to be a bubble
00:20:47.220of sorts. Um, AI, I don't, I, I'm going to go out on a limb, another prediction here. I don't think
00:20:53.460it's a bubble, not, not like the.com bubble or not like the housing crash of 2000, you know,
00:20:58.080six, seven, and eight. I think that it's real. I think there's real legitimacy. That said,
00:21:04.200I think like most things, when they become popular, when it's the talk of the town,
00:21:09.640everybody's going to hop on board. I think that there are some companies that are doing something
00:21:14.120real with AI that will prove to be incredibly valuable, bearing out more value than we've
00:21:21.300ever seen multiple trillion dollar, you know, evaluation companies in the years to come. But I
00:21:28.040do think that those companies will be ultimately few and far between. It's not going to be every
00:21:33.060single company that claims to have, you know, some kind of AI function, right? I mean, like,
00:21:38.060honestly, we could IPO with RightResponse and say, RightResponse has an AI function. It's like,
00:21:44.020oh, really, what is that function? Well, we occasionally use MidJourney to use AI to make
00:21:49.760our thumbnails oh okay like okay so you're not an ai company so i think i think there'll be some
00:21:56.400aspect of that people saying we're an ai company or we have an ai you know wing of our company
00:22:01.320and a lot of that will prove to just be talk but uh the companies that are really behind it um
00:22:07.760you know in making something real i think that there will continue to be real value that said
00:22:12.140nvidia i think will probably grow slowly i think it will grow but grow slowly i think it's big
00:22:18.500jumps are behind it. And I think over the next few years, what you're really going to see
00:22:22.700is going to be physical AI. I think that's where the value will lie. And that's the question that's
00:22:28.480still kind of yet to be answered. I lean towards yes, that it is possible and that it will be
00:22:33.560achieved. But it's going to, I think, be companies that actually take the chips and all these kinds
00:22:40.340of things. And they're not just doing virtual AI, digital AI, visual AI, but physical AI that they
00:22:46.160actually like to you know to be abundantly clear i'm talking like robots i think companies that
00:22:52.640are able to actually uh from fsd you know self-driving cars that would be one level of
00:22:58.580the physical utility to the ai but the big one would be things like optimus things like robots
00:23:04.720um i think any any company that's able to achieve that and and i do think it's a matter of time i
00:23:10.340don't think it's if i think it's when um now the question is is that right around the corner within
00:23:15.460the next two to five years or are we still 20 years away so i think if there is a pop a burst
00:23:21.360to the ai bubble um it's not the same as the dot-com bubble it would simply be institutional
00:23:27.400money wall street waking up and realizing that these things will happen but they're going to
00:23:32.260happen 20 years from now instead of two years from now and everything you know all the the you
00:23:37.500know the the pe ratios of like palantir being you know 300 times you know um it's it's actual
00:23:44.300evaluation, those things will plummet. But that doesn't mean that AI is not real. That doesn't
00:23:50.220mean that we won't actually have real, tangible, physical AI robots and value. I think that that's
00:23:55.040going to happen. I think it's just a matter of when. Antonio, Bill, what do you guys think?
00:23:58.720Yeah, I think I agree with a large swath of that. When we talk about a bubble, I find the most
00:24:04.720helpful way to think about it is a bubble is essentially the pricing in of future earnings.
00:24:10.660A bubble occurs when we basically say, hey, I expect this company to make, you know, a million dollars in five years. And so I'm going to pay a price with that expectation in mind. And so the question becomes in terms of, is it a bubble? Is it not a bubble? Time will tell. Time will tell whether or not the company actually generates the million dollars in economic productivity over that five-year period.
00:24:36.080And with respect to AI, I think that the jury's just still out. I, you know, NVIDIA specifically, you're totally right. Valuation is at a point. Once the mailman knows about, knows what NVIDIA is, there's probably not a lot of upside there.
00:24:51.540And so NVIDIA, though, you can think about them as like kind of the backbone of a lot of the things you were talking about when it comes to robotics, manufacturing AI, those sorts of things.
00:25:02.240You imagine an Amazon warehouse with completely end-to-end robotics, right?
00:25:07.100There's virtually no person there because AI can move the box.
00:25:10.700It can do all of these like deft, agile activities with robotics.
00:25:16.520And AI is the backbone of those things.
00:25:18.520There's going to be an NVIDIA chip and each one of those different, you know, robots.
00:25:22.900And so NVIDIA is really upstream from things that have to occur to prove its value, which
00:25:28.540is to say, are these AI companies that are functioning in robotics and manufacturing,
00:25:33.420are they going to be able to use the NVIDIA chip to do something that is economically
00:25:42.000So like the AI, the hardware, you know, the GPUs and CPUs and, you know, the guts.
00:25:48.520of ai the chips um that's that's been you can liken it to like kind of creating the railroad
00:25:54.900before the steam engine is ever invented and so the question is is the steam engine going to exist
00:25:59.960because if it doesn't and you're nvidia and you just laid railroad a railroad from the east coast
00:26:05.000to the west coast and there's no engine to run on it then you're worthless and so that's kind of
00:26:10.040like where nvidia is at and and and uh and that we just i think something that's just abundantly
00:26:15.860clear is these large language models, these OpenAIs, ChatGPTs, they don't make money. Like
00:26:20.880even OpenAI is, they see their natural evolution for their company into wearables and devices
00:26:26.840because it, you know, these ChatGPT prompts, they aren't making money. They're losing billions and
00:26:32.260billions of dollars a year because to your point, there's no real world application for those
00:26:37.160things. It doesn't translate into moving something, into building something. And we've
00:26:44.220seen a little this a little bit of this in self-driving cars right um and in terms of like
00:26:49.400a vehicle being able to or way more vehicle that's why i mentioned it yeah fsd i think is
00:26:54.400the clearest current case study of you know ai having a physical value a physical function
00:27:00.880um aside from that it's like okay well now instead of a cat meme you know that's a still shot
00:27:07.340now you can you know animate it as a cat meme video you know so like incredible you know but
00:27:13.500that's you know so like that's a lot you know so it's got to be more than that for it to prove to
00:27:18.360ultimately be valuable but i think that's why you know it's the ai appliers right now that's why
00:27:22.960tesla you know elon musk um is kind of you know constantly you know what people are talking about
00:27:30.460and you know in the news is like his pay package you know being approved um you know so tesla has
00:27:37.600now secured him uh but the question is can he do it you know elon has promised many things and some
00:27:43.080of those things he's achieved and some of them he hasn't but the question is you know can tesla
00:27:47.680actually take all these chips and these you know the the guts of ai and actually create a physical
00:27:54.020you know application uh that's immensely valuable because if company whether it's serve robotics or
00:28:00.460whether it's tesla or you know these different companies if they can't do it then then it yeah
00:28:06.620it doesn't just hurt them the company that's attempting to apply it but but the manufacturers
00:28:11.300of the ai chips themselves like nvidia and then i've also read recently that um it seems like
00:28:16.400there may be a shift like nvidia has certainly been the front runner um but it seems like google
00:28:21.820might uh i mean you even have you know um what what is it jp morgan um who um what's his name
00:28:30.560the super super old investor he just retired recently warren buffett yeah like uh they just
00:28:35.920put a ton of investment into Google, and they were sitting on just piles of cash. Apple has
00:28:43.920always been his favorite stock, and he exited a ton of his Apple position in the last year or so
00:28:49.460and sat on cash for a very, very long time. And you would think he would get in after the tariff
00:28:55.980scare in April. He didn't. He just sat on cash, sat on cash. V-shaped recovery happened. Warren
00:29:01.400buffett's still sitting on cash google hits all-time highs and warren buffett's like all in
00:29:06.960you know like when it's like what and you know at the end of the day it's because he's not a
00:29:12.100short-term investor so he's thinking in 20 years it doesn't matter um doesn't matter if i got you
00:29:17.080know the dippity dip dip dip you know um trying to catch the the falling knife or whether i did
00:29:22.540it at all-time highs you know today but they're going to be you know not even close to all-time
00:29:28.080highs 20 years from now but still that shift to google um not nvidia although they have some
00:29:35.640nvidia position to be sure but a massive position staked now in google there's a lot of guys who
00:29:42.620are saying that even with the chips and the hardware of ai uh that google has some things
00:29:48.120in the works that may actually prove to be a formidable competitor to nvidia yeah and you can
00:29:54.520fact check me but i believe that google is either a partial owner or an entire owner of waymo as
00:29:59.160well so you talk about fsd and and devices and hardware and those that's the thing is google's
00:30:04.060prolific so if google if they can pull it off they they have everything they have the search engines
00:30:10.760they have you know the uh cloud you know they have you know data centers they had like at every
00:30:16.540single level google you know has carved out a position for itself with everything with self
00:30:22.420driving cars so if they can get the tech and for it to be as good or even better than nvidia's or
00:30:28.740tesla or something like that um then they already have the market carved out in every sector right
00:30:35.280and they would just better economics they were just running the world and i think warren buffett
00:30:39.980you know is looking at that and saying i think uh long term i think they win um so i i think that
00:30:45.960you know even i say that to say that even some behemoth companies like google i don't think
00:30:52.220that they're going to go a thousand percent uh raise in their stock price you know in 18 months
00:30:56.540but google could could potentially 10x a thousand percent over 20 years um that that actually is
00:31:03.360possible but those are long-term investments bill what do you think yeah i mean i would start you
00:31:10.600know just going back to nvidia like the reason that they perform so well is is because they're
00:31:15.480beating guidance right so it's not like they are there's guidance put out on expectations and then
00:31:21.800they exceed expectations. They, you know, continue to do that over and over and over again, even as
00:31:25.880guidance is revised. So, you know, just kind of keep that in mind that it's not like, you know,
00:31:30.380this is all speculation. There's, there is actual profits being generated, which is one of the big
00:31:34.320differences from a 2000. The other thing I just want to do is reshape a little bit. When we talk
00:31:39.520about bubble, even with the.com, it's not like the thing about how our world has changed is sent,
00:31:45.980you know, through the advent of the internet and.com and whatnot. So it's not like nothing
00:31:51.060came out of that. It's just that at the time, it was really hard to evaluate how companies were
00:31:56.940going to compete, market share online, and what that was going to shake out to be. And you
00:32:00.780understood, people understood that if they were correct, if they were right on the Amazons of
00:32:06.280the world and what they eventually became, that they would do incredibly, incredibly, tremendously
00:32:10.420well. And so there was this sort of mad dash to find companies that maybe didn't have to be online
00:32:17.720or weren't going to have the space there, didn't win the competition.
00:32:21.340And eventually, obviously, the winners shook out of that.
00:32:23.880And I think it's not dissimilar to, in that way, what we're seeing with AI.
00:32:28.840Again, not that AI is not going to be productive or anything like that,
00:32:32.020but that it's really hard to tell who shakes out of this, how it shakes out, in what places.
00:32:38.640Obviously, FSD is a great example of somewhere that we're pretty, basically 100% sure
00:32:42.440that will continue to develop and we're going to use that.
00:32:45.240But there's other applications, many applications that, you know, we're not sure how important that will be or what the market share on that will look like, you know, 10 years, 20 years down the road.
00:32:55.580And so everyone wants to be the company that has it.
00:32:59.000The question is, is there market share there?
00:33:02.320So it's not so much when people talk about, you know, is this a bubble?
00:33:06.400I mean, I would say I think that there is definitely bloat.
00:33:10.060I don't think that we're talking, you know, 50 percent drop or something like that.
00:33:13.720But yeah, I would say absolutely there's bloat. And I think all of these companies have made tremendous bets on AI. And another important distinction is the bets they've made, the infrastructure, we were talking about this a little bit before the show, is that over 90% of GDP comes from AI-related CapEx, so capital expenditures from companies in creating data centers and things of that nature.
00:33:36.360So there's, I mean, basically the entirety of the GDP this year is just, okay, how do we add AI into our companies? How do we grow, you know, server farms, et cetera, which is not bad. But the expectation, the guidance on these is, you know, two to four years to start seeing turnaround and, you know, growth.
00:33:53.520And that's why some of these jobs, people are being laid off is they're trying to repurpose
00:33:57.680a lot of those jobs that can be done by AI to AI.
00:34:00.340But if we get two years into these processes and they're not seeing the ability to sort
00:34:07.900of transfer workload into AI in the way that they want to, even if it's not that quick,
00:34:12.700then you're going to see, okay, then companies start slowing down the purchasing of chips.
00:34:17.160They slow down the growth in these AI-related capex.
00:34:21.180And then that's where you would see somewhere like NVIDIA, as you guys mentioned, kind of being downstream from that.
00:34:27.640If guidance is we expect Google to buy this many chips and then all of a sudden Google says, you know what, we're not seeing quite the return out of this we wanted or we're not able to develop this in the way we wanted necessarily.
00:34:38.420Then, of course, you know, OK, we're going to cut some amount of this or some portion of the order.
00:34:45.060But again, that some part of that goes.
00:34:47.340And then NVIDIA being kind of upstream from that feels that effect.
00:34:50.700And then their guidance has to be revised down. And so I don't think it's a bubble in the sense that no one's going to be using AI. It's not going to be productive, anything like that. I think the bubble talk is more in this is such an unheard of technology space that it's impossible to really predict with any any good sense what this is going to look like 10 years, 20 years, 30 years.
00:35:13.140And I know that you guys were talking a little bit about, you know, just again, when do we see that payoff? And right now, the general guidance is companies expect to see that in, you know, two, four years. And who knows, maybe it's there, maybe it's not. And if it's not, they scale back and then you see this kind of shrink. And then maybe over 20 years, it goes back up.
00:35:31.180So I think it's more, it's not, I wouldn't shape it as this massive bubble, it's about to pop and people are going to lose everything. I would shape it more as going back to kind of what I was saying earlier, more into uncertainty. And, you know, it really depends for anyone, what are your goals? I mean, if your goals are, you know, is a 30 year hold, then I think we can all agree that AI has, you know, will continue to develop and be productive and be helpful over 30 years.
00:35:56.280but if you're you know in a more conservative approach you may say you know i really don't
00:36:00.620know that i feel as comfortable you know in four years with ai in two years these ai bets pay off
00:36:05.180so i i would just say it's kind of investment horizons and things of that nature when people
00:36:09.900talk about this yeah well said uh let's go ahead and round out the super chats the ones that we
00:36:15.520have so far and then we'll go to our first commercial break we'll come back and talk some
00:36:18.720more uh this is from dapper dan he gave us ten dollars we appreciate that dan thank you he said
00:36:24.160i am currently in the military and putting a percentage of my earnings into a roth tsp
00:36:30.960i am leaning towards moving it in uh into uh the s&p 500 um anything else that i should consider
00:36:40.160s&p is usually a pretty safe bet um we are kind of nearing all-time highs uh just about a week
00:36:49.120and a half ago you know when we were it came off of what what was it it was like a five percent
00:36:53.860correction pretty much i think uh s&p or at least the spy spy was at like 688 was all-time high and
00:37:02.220then it got as low as i mean it did 650s i think yeah 650s uh-huh uh somewhat not quite as severe
00:37:09.640is the april tariff scare but somewhat significant um but has certainly recovered and bounced back
00:37:16.160off of that i think today we closed out around 679 although i have been reliably informed that
00:37:24.500jerome powell is supposed to speak uh at 8 p.m central uh or eastern time and uh he is a crusher
00:37:32.120of all dreams throw a wrench in there so uh if if if you're betting short term on uh the market
00:37:38.740going down today's a great day uh because you've got jerome powell crusher of markets crusher of
00:37:44.420dreams uh just out of sheer spite to trump he will literally he'll be like uh ruin the entire
00:37:49.940american economy just to spite trump worth it he'll do it yeah so anyways i i i mean yeah the
00:37:57.520s&p 500 you can you can never go wrong with the s&p if it's long term yeah and over a long term
00:38:02.260and obviously the the typical advice is when you're younger you can afford to be more aggressive
00:38:06.960in your allocations and you think about like the typical sort of allocations being and now we've
00:38:11.180got crypto in there but stocks and bonds and you say hey bonds are less aggressive stocks are more
00:38:16.260aggressive and then within stocks you have the most aggressive being the nasdaq and these tech
00:38:21.260companies high growth uh very sensitive to interest rates very sensitive to um the you know
00:38:26.900long-term implications of public policy and those sorts of things and so you can think about hey if
00:38:32.180i'm young if i'm 25 years 30 years out from investment i can afford to be more aggressive
00:38:36.880And so I'm going to allocate money, you know, accordingly, maybe I'm 80% equities, I'm 20%,
00:38:42.340you know, or 15% yield, you know, bonds, and then I'm 5% crypto or something like that,
00:42:45.100The only thing I'll add, because I pretty much agree with what you guys have said there,
00:42:49.220is whatever you do, I would say you almost think of I would think of it almost like you're picking
00:42:55.500a wife, right? You're not picking it for a year or six months or you're picking it for a long time
00:42:59.980here. And so because I think where a lot of people get hung up on is they try to look at these in
00:43:05.260these really small time scales, you know, OK, what's the last six months, last three months,
00:43:09.560you know, whatever that might be. And I mean, you're thinking about you guys are right to say
00:43:13.140you're thinking about 30 plus years probably of what you want your money to do. And this is how
00:43:17.480Warren Buffett approaches it as well, is it doesn't really matter if he's buying it at an
00:43:21.220all-time high or on a dip or this or that, because the scale of the growth over that 20 or 30 years
00:43:28.440really is going to minimize that entry point dramatically. So whatever you're doing, I would
00:43:33.620be confident and committed to it for the long-term there, as opposed to sort of jumping ship at every
00:43:40.380pretty girl you see, so to speak, as it walks by. You really want to say sort of committed.
00:43:45.000And so whether that's, you know, if that's precious metals, great. If that's, you know, Bitcoin, great. If that's the S&P, great. But I think where a lot of people get themselves into trouble is, you know, one thing to keep in mind, think of like 2008 when the market was crashing, you know, people were running into gold.
00:44:01.880and and yeah obviously you know gold did great there but if you hope if you hold that you know
00:44:05.700another four years you make that back and then then you have a tremendous run after that from
00:44:09.860like 2011 to 2015 2016 so i think it's you just don't want to play that game where you're constantly
00:44:15.600you know it starts selling when it's going lower and buy when it's going higher uh so i would just
00:44:21.460that that's the the one tidbit i'd add in there yep well said all right just to uh finish off the
00:44:26.800super chats giraffe neck he gave us one more super chat he said the christmas tree might be prettier
00:44:30.800than west that's certainly true but it can't produce any charts that is also true uh wes's
00:44:36.720chart game is off the charts but it is okay and then we've got uh one last super chat from zach
00:44:43.280kohlberg he wrote in and said i'm a local pastor that aligns with christian nationalism and
00:44:47.680biblical patriarchy god bless if anyone is looking for a local church in northern colorado let me
00:44:55.040know so zach do us a favor before we end this broadcast so that we can read it live on the air
00:45:00.480Send us one more super chat, just a dollar, whatever, just so that it registers so that
00:45:05.660we see it because we get lots and lots of comments and give us an email because otherwise
00:45:10.280I'm afraid that those who are listening who are in Northern Colorado won't be able to
01:04:19.420It makes it really, really impossible to compete
01:04:22.300because there is someone who is willing to do a job for far less because they're sending that
01:04:27.540money across to India or whatever it might be. And so you're competing against that. You can't
01:04:32.260live on the same amount that they can provide for their family across an ocean for. So what do you
01:04:37.360do? You pick the same job, get paid nothing. So the competition that's been created is objectively
01:04:44.100bad for the average person. Right. It's almost like you can't win in late-stage capitalism.
01:04:50.820Either one, you have a company who's so big that the wages have just completely stagnated or you have historical capitalism, which was good, which is a race to the bottom.
01:05:01.040How can I make something cheaper? How can I make it more affordable and get it into more people's hands?
01:05:06.200You think of the Ford Model T. It was like, let's create an assembly line, make this really cheap, fast, sort of, you know, compartmentalized and widgets.
01:05:14.900And then we can get it to everyone for cheap. And even in that version of capitalism, which has historically made this country great, what that's resulted in is exactly what you said. It's outsourcing jobs overseas and making things super cheap for the American worker.
01:05:30.860but also their wages aren't going to go up and they're not going to be able to to develop any
01:05:36.200new skills or develop professionally or grow up you know grow in in the company and so it's it's
01:05:42.720almost like either way you go either way you take capitalism where we're at today with our current
01:05:47.580public policy you're not going to win yeah i would even add ai being sort of a continuing this trend
01:05:56.100And, you know, as we've talked about, this is kind of my bigger fear with AI is this
01:06:01.700continued trend of pushing, you know, of taking jobs.
01:06:05.240I mean, you know, think of how much you talk about manual AI.
01:06:08.200So think we can actually do things, you know, that takes another huge chunk.
01:06:11.680I mean, there's so much there that that can eat, you know, if you really think about it
01:06:14.940into just the productive space that people operate in any given day.
01:06:21.460So what does that look like after that?
01:06:22.940And I think that we all know the companies here, obviously, they don't have our best interest at heart, you know, nor should they necessarily.
01:06:30.060It's not their job. You know, they're they're companies.
01:06:32.540But I think that we reach a point where what is good for them is actively bad for the American people.
01:06:39.180And that is, I think, the point that we've reached as a country is when most companies end goal is necessarily is bad for the average American.
01:06:49.900And so there's this this competing sort of, you know, you know, they want more profits and we want better lives.
01:06:57.600And those don't exactly are even cheaper things doesn't necessarily being able to pay a little less for Netflix isn't making my life better.
01:07:04.200I can go without Netflix, but I you know, but I can't go without, you know, feeding my family, owning a home, et cetera.
01:07:09.280So, you know, there's obviously we live in a world where we have access to a lot more things.
01:07:13.980And that's a good thing. I mean, you know, we like that we have access to all our, you know, our toys and whatnot.
01:07:18.940But at the same time, the minimum here to survive is becoming out of reach for most people.