00:00:21.860We need this content for the glory of God to reach more people's ears.
00:00:30.680Merry January 6th, everyone. Welcome back to Right Response Ministries. Today is January 6th, and it marks the fourth year since the horrific, for those who are just listening, I've got quotation marks there, attack on our sacred democracy.
00:00:45.920And while most of you watching probably agree that the pearl clutching and drama from the
00:00:52.260mainstream media regarding January 6th is a little over the top, I have a few questions.
00:00:58.620Three, to be precise. Number one, would you be willing to go so far as to say that the majority
00:01:04.060of protesters who gathered there that day were heroes protesting genuine grievances?
00:01:10.440Number two, would you be willing to say that January 6th should be an informal national holiday held in their honor?
00:01:18.580And could you, number three, in good conscience, advocate not just for the release of all remaining January 6th prisoners,
00:01:26.720but restitution and even reprisal against the corrupt justice system that imprisoned them in the first place?
00:01:34.080Now, we will argue today that all Christians should be able to say a hearty yes and amen
00:16:20.320Fines ranging in the hundreds of thousands of dollars.
00:16:22.900So we're talking about a tenth as many actual convictions.
00:16:26.30020 to 25 times more convictions for january 6 so it not even a tenth it'd be like five percent
00:16:33.120four percent a hundredth of the damage much fewer participants and again the point is not like oh
00:16:38.780look if the shoe was on the other foot it's friend enemy yeah it's politics it's leveraging
00:16:44.280optics that's all that's what's being done the left knows how to play politics uh real quick
00:16:49.540this is not um for this is not the subject for today but uh knocked loose in the live stream
00:16:55.620i'm not going to comment on it but uh not your most recent comment but your second
00:16:59.880most recent comment um that is correct can confirm all right let's keep going um yeah so just
00:17:08.600absolutely wild what time is it we want to make sure that we get hey we've got 10 minutes on the
00:17:12.560clock 10 minutes on the clock um yeah but when you think about it the reason why i wanted to
00:17:16.780share that tweet is um the way that he laid it out one it was just fantastic you know superb
00:17:21.180professional trolling and i always steven wolf level trolling yeah it really was uh but beyond
00:17:25.660that beyond just uh the the comedic you know um element um it also for me it helped it just was
00:17:32.880succinct it was concise it was clear and it helped me understand this is what was going through
00:17:37.600people's minds they were trying to make a difference and and they were trying to do so
00:17:41.920peacefully um they weren't trying to it wasn't it wasn't to you know forcefully you know uh take
00:17:47.760take the capitol or take the white house you know with a bunch of a bunch of guns they didn't they
00:17:52.480didn't storm it with guns no um they they stormed it with signs they stormed it peacefully but it
00:17:58.500was to get a message across and and they had no other avenue of of dealing with their grievances
00:18:04.680and and the whole point was saying look we think that there was some serious funny business in this
00:18:10.200election and honestly um especially after our most recent 2020 uh 2024 presidential election
00:18:17.780yeah i i feel like a lot of that if anything has only been further confirmed i you know i was
00:18:23.040talking to um over the christmas holidays i was talking to my brother i don't see him very often
00:18:27.880love him dearly um but we strongly we have strong disagreements my brother is um is
00:18:35.280on good days a marxist and bad days a communist and i on good days am um christian nationalist
00:18:45.620and on my bad days you know christo-fascist you know so that you know the two of us are about as
00:18:49.940far apart as you could possibly get you know in our worldview and certainly our view of politics
00:18:54.900and all that ultimately is you know we have different uh different views of the scripture
00:18:59.200that's where you know everybody ultimately that's where your worldview is contrived um but we were
00:19:04.300talking about it and he was saying you know well you just see that uh you know the dims put forward
00:19:09.120a terrible candidate and uh there was no turnout turnout for because you know she's just a laughing
00:19:13.800stock i was like well you know we couldn't agree more on that i'm with you uh but i said but that's
00:19:19.140that's i mean 90 quadrillion billion gazillion uh you know votes for joe biden 81 million
00:19:27.740it was 90 trump trump uh had like close to 80 and 76 biden biden had 81 yep 81 million i thought
00:19:36.060it was 90 76 okay so 81 in 2020 it was still the most of any election but it was like wasn't it
00:19:42.160like 10 20 higher than obama got yes yeah in 2012 higher than hillary higher than anybody ever and
00:19:49.160then what you see if you look at like yeah every presidential election for every four years on the
00:19:53.540dim side and then it's like spikes in 2020 for joe biden and then it comes right back down in line
00:19:59.500with with 2000 you know in 8 2012 2016 and um and i was just saying look i at minimum even if you
00:20:08.600don't want to say that uh that you have to at least be able to say that it was rigged even if
00:20:12.700it wasn't stolen even if it wasn't illegal um at least rigged with ballot harvesting and these
00:20:17.360kinds of things and and um it's it's not just that oh you know people weren't motivated to uh to vote
00:20:22.760for kamala but but they really love uncle joe um and so my point is just uh anybody with two eyes
00:20:29.520in their head was looking at what was going on and saying this is absolutely absurd i i refuse
00:20:34.880to believe this many people came out um and voted for uncle joe who has been on the wrong side of
00:20:42.480every issue for 5 000 years as long as he's been you know in politics from the womb you know and
00:20:49.520he's and he's currently like 170 years old i i refuse to believe it and and i understand that
00:20:54.380nobody voted for joe biden it was votes for trump and votes against trump yep but even with that it
00:20:59.360just it was it was insane it was hard to believe so what do you do if you feel like you're being
00:21:05.060lied to um the january sixers did the only thing they knew to do they they tried to get the message
00:21:11.540across there was no avenue for them to go to there's no court that was going to take that case
00:21:16.300there was like all of their ones their elected representatives ignored them right and when they
00:21:21.000came in we have some concerns they hid fled instead of facing them right so so they're trying as
00:21:27.660patriots to say we think something's wrong we think something's wrong and we're trying to make
00:21:33.420our voices hurt and again as we've already established the only person who died at the
00:21:38.580protest on january 6th was a protester yep and so yeah this this myth has to be debunked and if
00:21:48.220it's not my fear our concern is that it will be enshrined eventually it won't be the same level
00:21:55.320the same status but but at a national level for america it will be like what what happened with
00:22:01.100the post-war consensus world war ii adolf hitler third reich germany the whole nine yards is now
00:22:06.480Now, anytime somebody says, you know, Steve Wolf mentions the Christian prince and people say, well, the last guy, you know, who is a strong authoritarian leader on the right, which I'm not even, I think that you can poke holes in that, whether or not, you know, Hitler was truly on the right.
00:22:20.780But the point is, well, the last time somebody, you know, somebody on the right, somebody who was a nationalist, you know, rose to power and had strong, you know, dogma and opinions and this, that, and the other, it was Adolf Hitler, the worst person, you know, in all of human history, worse than Mao, worse than, you know, anybody else, you know, the devil incarnate.
00:22:41.300And I'm concerned that the same thing is going to happen.
00:22:44.340And so it's something that we just need to break the, we need to be able to freely and
00:22:48.240public publicly talk about January six and say, yeah, there can be some reasonable measure
00:22:53.420of criticisms, but, um, on the whole good on those people, well, they were patriotic.
00:22:59.460Those who put them in prison, they need to go to prison.
00:29:21.020And I really think it should be Patriots Day.
00:29:22.960But it's a distraction from the substance of it.
00:29:26.180And I think the substance is extremely important.
00:29:29.460And because no one likes to talk about the substance, because no one wants to talk about
00:29:34.000these things, it's like no one really wants to talk about the gulag and the Soviet Union
00:29:37.980or the mistreatment of the Romanian communists of people in the 1950s, which to be sure is
00:29:43.820the treatment in the gulag by the Romanian communists is worse than the treatment of
00:29:50.000the heroes of January 6th, but only by degree, not in terms of its actual quality.
00:29:55.560And as I'm fond of pointing out, and this is undoubtedly true, late communist Soviet Union or late communist East Germany held a lot fewer political prisoners than America does at this very moment.
00:30:07.900And in fact, most of the relatively few political prisoners in those places were actual spies, as in people they had caught spying for money and they were being held.
00:30:18.380And it's not really a political prisoner, though, is counted in that bucket.
00:30:22.060So certainly, I mean, I think we should be a national holiday. And I mean, we can really talk about any aspect of it that interests you. I mean, I tend to follow different threads because I used to be a lawyer. I tend to focus a lot on kind of the distortions and corruptions of the justice system that have been engendered by the regime's response to January 6th.
00:30:46.060you can also of course focus on the human interest stories and what have you but because you know i'm
00:30:50.700a sociopath i don't focus so much on the human interest as as important as that is the lives
00:30:55.700destroyed and and what have you uh and then of course we can there's lots to talk about what's
00:31:01.120going to be done about it if anything right the new trump administration yeah so i mean whatever
00:31:05.960you want to talk about let's well let's talk about uh let's do this what do you think should
00:31:09.920be done and then number two what do you think will be done i'd like to hear predictions as well as
00:31:14.000prescriptions well my predictions have been running about 50 percent so take them for what
00:31:18.320they're worth right you know my i i got it somehow i got into the prediction game and then people like
00:31:24.100you gratuitously encouraged me to predict more getting me i'm not sure so i mean what should be
00:31:32.640done is quite clear um i mean the parameters can be decided but like if you if i were king
00:31:38.420first of all the country would be a lot better off if i were king but second i'll net more narrowly
00:31:43.420on this question, the kind of day one thing is that Trump should obviously harden 100%.
00:31:52.240There's 100% of the people connected in any way, their persecution connected in any way
00:31:59.840to January 6th, whether that includes, I mean, there's people who are in jail for a couple of
00:32:03.840decades for so-called seditious conspiracy, a crime that literally never been charged in American
00:32:08.640history before for a law that had been on the books for 200 years or 200 plus years,
00:32:14.440something like that. So obviously, he should issue pardons and he should issue
00:32:17.980significant compensation to everybody who was either imprisoned or persecuted or investigated.
00:32:24.000I mean, very significant compensation, millions of dollars, maybe tens of million dollars for
00:32:27.620some people. And then, of course, you know, medals, rewards, commendations. I mean,
00:32:32.180the kind of things that are not kind of quantifiable, but indicate the desire of the
00:32:38.900people in charge to applaud rather than to persecute behavior. So I don't think we should
00:32:44.840underrate things like commendations in favor of just, well, here's a pardon, now let's forget
00:32:53.440about it. And then, of course, the second half of this is punishing of everyone involved in the
00:32:58.400persecution of these people. And that punishment has to be many times the seriousness and gravity
00:33:04.280of the persecution, or else it doesn't serve its game theory purpose of deterring such things
00:33:10.040in the future. That's a much harder thing to do because it can't be done by executive action.
00:33:16.260And even some of the first group could only be done by congressional action. I mean,
00:33:20.120Trump doesn't have a bunch of money he can just hand out as the president to people. That's
00:33:24.560something that the left confines. Only the left-wing presidents have the ability to hand0.99
00:33:29.500out money. Right-wing presidents are called on the carpet if they do that. So how you go about
00:33:34.780punishing these people, legally or extra-legally? By extra-legally, I mean kind of Nuremberg-style
00:33:40.740things, saying, yes, you did this under the guise of legality, but you're going to be punished
00:33:45.780anyway because it was not, in fact, just or legal in the broader sense. I don't really know how
00:33:52.340you'd go about that. It can be difficult because the entire system is designed to prevent that
00:33:58.100kind of thing, that kind of punishment of anybody who's on the left side of the spectrum. So I don't
00:34:03.960have a great idea how to do that. You could, for example, enable private rights of action,
00:34:08.640but there's various legal devices. So like, for example, there's a judge created, entirely judge
00:34:15.900created legal doctrine called immunity, that if you are in the justice system as a police officer
00:34:22.500or a judge, you are completely immune from lawsuits against you. This is nowhere in the law. The
00:34:28.220judges just created it in order to protect themselves and the people that they wanted to
00:34:32.420protect. You could have Congress pass a law stripping people of immunity. You can override
00:34:37.580the judges. Congress isn't likely to do that in its current incarnation, but there'll be one avenue
00:35:08.420you don't you can't just not you can't just try to recompense people for injustices done to them
00:35:17.840without punishing the people who created those injustices so that's a very important part of
00:35:25.480the equation right because the restitution in order for it to actually be just the restitution
00:35:30.020actually needs to to come from those who committed the wrong um like so even from just a biblical
00:35:34.920standard of justice um if if the restitution only comes from the taxpayer you know the government
00:35:40.260is just giving money because you know these people were you know rotting in jail um unfairly and
00:35:45.560unjustly for four years but the the money is ultimately coming from us and not from those
00:35:50.000who actually you know committed the crime and put them there unjustly uh then you know there's
00:35:54.720difficult problems in terms of justice but then also in terms of political you know and shifting
00:35:59.620categories uh politically that the message just isn't strong enough um because ultimately what
00:36:04.360you're telling your enemies who your enemies um your enemies don't just need to be hamstrung they
00:36:09.860need to be crushed it's not just that your enemies need to get the message that uh your worst attempts
00:36:14.940enemies um will ultimately be undone four years later that's not a very strong message the message
00:36:21.800needs to be no your worst attempts as soon as we get power again um tenfold will come back down on
00:36:28.460your head don't try it that's the only way only way to have an equilibrium i mean that leaves
00:36:32.700inside the broader question of can we live with these people at all? I mean, can you have a
00:36:36.780society? But if you're going to have a society, you have to restore the equilibrium. And I, of
00:36:42.240course, I'm not privy to anything inside the administration. But you hear rumors that Trump
00:36:46.560is only going to commute sentences, that is, end sentences. I mean, that would be a complete
00:36:51.480disaster and a betrayal of the reason a lot of people voted for Trump. So to the extent Trump
00:36:57.880has people in his ear that say, well, you know, there was some violence and there was no relevant
00:37:02.360violence by the heroes of January 6th. There was some pushing and shoving occasioned by the violence
00:37:09.000initiated by the by the Capitol Police. But there wasn't any actual violence, certainly to speak of
00:37:17.600certainly relative to the violence, a tiny fraction of any violence. The left continuously
00:37:22.320meted out in the summer of 2020. But Trump may be listening to people say, well, you know,
00:37:27.260there is some people got out of control and, you know, there were some people who did some bad
00:37:31.200I think it doesn't mean if you dug deep enough, there are probably some people who who pushed and shoved people a bit more aggressively than might be desired.
00:37:38.540That doesn't matter. I mean, they should be rewarded and commended in the same way that someone who who did nothing at all should be rewarded and commended because they were participating in a heroic action.
00:37:49.920You know, but Trump may listen to evil counselors. So we'll see.
00:39:14.520I don't actually have any legal schemes.
00:39:16.260I did have illegal schemes and some guy was giving me kickbacks.
00:39:19.580You know, he may be my friend, but I don't have a you can't say you need to.
00:39:24.700your actions need to be, as a kind of premise, moral. If God is unhappy with the things that
00:39:33.480you are doing, maybe you should step back. But the fact is, God is not unhappy at a bunch of
00:39:38.140people pushing and shoving inside the Capitol or outside the Capitol, rather, in order to
00:39:43.040demonstrate in a supposed democracy that the people are unhappy with their elected representatives.
00:39:49.600So I think the – when you talk about friend-enemy, you're bringing in Carl Schmitt kind of stuff.
00:39:57.060Schmitt was – I'm a huge Schmitt fan, and Schmitt was a – he wasn't an indifferent Christian, but let's just say he had a tortured relationship with the Catholic Church and a disordered personal life.
00:40:10.140So a lot of – if you talk about friend-enemy, it's easy to forget the moral frame.
00:40:14.020So on the premise that the frame is moral, and you also have the moral question on the other side in terms of like what punishments you should hand out and what have you.
00:40:25.900But I think the friend-enemy distinction is, as you say, the crucial distinction here.
00:40:31.880And people on the right for decades have completely failed to execute on this distinction while it's all that people on the left have executed.
00:40:42.180I mean, this is, of course, not a point original to me, but I grew up, I'm older than all of you,
00:40:48.440but I remember I grew up in the 1980s reading National Review when it was actually, I mean,
00:40:53.780now, of course, it's just a pile of steaming horse manure. But back then, it was a flagship
00:41:00.360publication, the only publication really other than, say, Chronicles, which was much smaller
00:41:04.420on on the right and all of it was more principles you know it was all you're looking back it was all
00:41:11.960in i'm always down correctly on william f buckley but there was never any distance any mention of
00:41:18.260justice or the rewarding friends and punishing enemies it was all about more principles which
00:41:24.980of course were ended up in the right for decades and hopefully now we're turning the corner on that
00:41:31.260fighting the long defeat. And if you don't approach all politics, all crucial politics,
00:41:40.460I mean, if you're arguing on the local level about whether you should fund a sidewalk,
00:41:43.900you probably don't need to view it as a friend-enemy distinction. But I mean, all politics
00:41:50.080that is crucial has to be viewed as a friend-enemy distinction. The issue that I think
00:41:55.880that brings up in our society is that politics is far too ingrained in all of society. That is,
00:42:05.400in a well-run society, the average person has essentially no connection or interest in
00:42:10.520national politics and doesn't really have much to say about it, and so therefore doesn't have to
00:42:17.500ponder everything through the prism of friend and enemy. But since the left has politicized
00:42:21.800everything for a century and made America into political bedlam, the result is that you have a
00:42:29.320very corrosive approach to society, even though that approach is necessary, that of friend and
00:42:35.260enemy. I don't have a solution for that, but it's kind of, it's a bad harbinger of the future,
00:42:40.480because unless we can back off everything being politicized, then everything will be viewed by
00:42:45.760both sides through friend-enemy distinction, and it's simply not a recipe for social comity.
00:49:31.380That Trump and the people around Trump, I mean, Trump is in some ways just a condensed
00:49:37.060symbol that he is obviously the most important guy. He can do things that are necessary in order
00:49:42.120to restore our nation and to restore justice and balance and, frankly, to put the fear of God into
00:49:48.120our enemies so that in the future we can move forward together. That's a long shot, admittedly,
00:49:54.660even if Trump does all those things. The divisions are very deep and so on. But certainly the last
00:49:59.720peaceful possibility. And if Trump had not been elected, there would be no possibility and we
00:50:06.140be headed towards some form of violent conflict, whether low level or high level, I don't know.
00:50:11.140But the good news is we have a potential escape hatch only if we use that not to restore the
00:50:18.200status quo ante of 2019 or 2008, but the actual, not to restore any status quo ante, because
00:50:30.040going back to the past is a waste of everyone's time. I've written against nostalgia. But for
00:50:35.380example, one of the things that Trump has to do, whether the right has to do in order to renew
00:50:41.040America, totally aside from things, this narrow question we're talking about, the electoral
00:50:45.700justice protest, we have to move towards restoring freedom of association because America is run in
00:50:52.380a way that is completely incompatible with any social comity where basically one group of people
00:50:58.600is by law, white people, white men specifically, is basically deprioritized and persecuted
00:51:05.600and officially allowed to be oppressed.0.50
00:51:08.320And that's the most productive group in the nation.
00:51:10.900And if you can't reverse the so-called Civil Rights Act and all its associated progeny,
00:51:16.700we're not going to get social comment.0.71
00:51:18.840And no one's even talking about that except kind of fringes on the right.
00:51:21.860On the other hand, you know, there's a lot of things that are being talked about now.
00:51:25.720Six months ago, we're only talked about the fringes of the right.
00:51:28.260so it's amazing the overton is is shifting at uh incredible speeds michael do you have something
00:51:34.640to add i have a i have a question kind of about narrative and um the article that you wrote about
00:51:43.820this was it was almost four years ago now right it was 2021 um and we were talking before the show
00:51:50.740about the idea or maybe you mentioned it during the show just now joel that uh within about four
00:51:56.800years, that's kind of some people have observed that that is the amount of time that it takes to
00:52:01.480build and establish something. So my question for you, Mr. Haywood, is in relation to January 6th
00:52:08.980and the larger narrative, because Wes brought up the idea before we brought you on, that even in
00:52:15.680Christian circles, evangelical circles, January 6th is pointed to as this is why we cannot have
00:52:22.240something like Christian nationalism, because then we'll get riots all over the place.
00:52:25.380My question is, as far as narratives go, is this narrative about January 6th being evil and the death of democracy and attack on sacred democracy, is that set if Trump does not pardon some of the January 6th or all of the January 6th people, does that lock the narrative in into history?
00:52:51.920Like, this was an attack on democracy, and that's going to be what settled.
00:52:57.840And how big of a factor in kind of the culture war is the January 6th narrative overall?
00:53:06.340Is this a big deal because we need some modern heroes?
00:53:09.600Is this a smaller deal given Trump is tackling other things?
00:53:12.800Where do you think we rank the narrative and mythology coming out of January 6th?
00:53:17.540And how much does it relate to kind of some of the other goals that the dissident right has right now overall?
00:53:26.880It's kind of like the apocryphal episode where the Chinese Communist Party premier Zhao Enlai, Nixon asked him what he thought of the French Revolution.
00:53:38.920Now, that story actually is true, but it's a good story, right?
00:53:42.480It's too early to tell because it's tied to the Overton window.
00:53:47.140but the Overton window is a narrow political question. Basically, what at this moment is
00:53:52.120the acceptable range of political discourse? The question of how history will view something
00:53:56.820is both hard to say, particularly in a fragmenting polity such as ours, and it's hard to say over
00:54:02.860time. I mean, you're no doubt familiar with a couple of months ago, Daryl Cooper got in trouble
00:54:06.980because on Tucker, he questioned the post-war consensus about who's a hero in World War II
00:54:12.340and other matters related to World War II.
00:54:15.440But that's a sign that he's – the fact that that was done
00:54:23.100and that it got a lot of traction suggests that the history
00:54:31.300that we've kind of all been forced down our throats for the past 30 or 40 years,
00:54:35.660which is different than the kind of immediately post-World War II history,
00:54:39.560it's hard to say what it's going to be.
00:54:41.320And since the certainly of the left were to emerge triumphant in America, the narrative of January 6th would kind of over the next decades be set as the kind of risible narrative that they've tried to put together over the past four years.
00:54:56.620But as you say, it's been four years, and it's pretty obvious that narrative has not gained traction.
00:55:06.180It's complete within a certain epistemically closed set of people, the people on the left.
00:55:14.040But by the same token, there's large numbers of people who just reject that narrative.
00:55:17.940In order for a narrative to kind of have common currency, that is to be accepted by essentially everybody in the society, that's a historical process that depends on a variety of things, including the people writing the history having control over the history.
00:55:33.380And one of the things we see with technology is that that's increasingly impossible.
00:55:39.460Or rather, it's increasingly impossible to have lies be established in the narrative.
00:55:44.400I mean, you can you can have a narrative about the statistics related to copper mining from 1950 to 2020.
00:55:52.340I mean, that's not going to be changed by the by the Internet.
00:55:56.120But it's very difficult now to not for the truth not to come out.
00:56:01.620And of course, at the same time, that also means that there's more fragmentation.
00:56:05.200It also means that people who are like legitimately crazy, the reptiles are ruling us kind of thing, also are able to get more of a voice.
00:56:12.560But again, back to the 1980s. I find myself as I've entered my 50s now, I sound like that old guy now, but I'm like back in the 80s. But back in the 80s, if you were not regarded as pure enough or there was something wrong with you with National Review and you worked for National Review, Buckley destroyed you.
00:56:32.400But if you just didn't appear in the pages of National Review, you had no platform to talk to other people about right-wing things other than mimeographing, if anybody remembers what a mimeograph is, mimeographing your biweekly newsletter and mailing it to people who had somehow heard about you.
00:56:51.940And that made it possible to create completely lying narratives. And everybody knows that or can feel in his bones that huge segments of what we've been told our whole lives as history is partial or complete lies.
00:57:08.400some of that has been exposed, some of it hasn't. But I think in the future, it's going to be very
00:57:13.660difficult to maintain that level of control over what the narrative about a historical event is.
00:57:19.860So paradoxically, though, I generally would be happier if the internet were turned off.
00:57:24.040I think it's a net negative. The one thing that the internet does in associated technological
00:57:28.960things is it makes it extremely difficult to control this narrative. Yes, it's true this
00:57:35.300seems particularly spectacular right now because Elon Musk has opened up X and Justin Trudeau is
00:57:40.640getting canned and Keir Starmer is like fleeing for his life because people, his association with
00:57:45.880rape gangs has been exposed for the whole world. But even without that platform, people would still
00:57:51.040be able to get much more access to the truth than they could in the past. So and given that right
00:57:57.100wing is basically correlated nearly 100 percent with reality based, I would expect to answer your
00:58:03.600question in kind of a long and roundabout way, that the history of the future will be written
00:58:07.980in a right-wing friendly way, not because the right wing is controlling the narrative,
00:58:12.620but simply because it reflects reality. That's good. All right, we're going to go to our last
00:58:19.380commercial break for the day, and then we'll come back with some concluding thoughts.
00:58:24.240Hello, this is Chuck from Private Family Banking. Thanks for joining us today. We help you make one
00:58:29.940money move in your cash flow, and it'll implicate itself in a multi-generational wealth building
00:58:35.240starting the first day. We help you avoid taxation. We grow compound interest to your
00:58:41.060money. If you're a high net worth individual, you have over $10 million in net worth, we can even do
00:58:46.280more with you. W-2 workers, contract workers, business owners, it's all about cash flow and
00:58:52.120making tax deferred gains on all of your money for the rest of your life. Don't avoid this. It's
00:58:59.940Click the link, get on my calendar, and we'll go over your background and what you want to accomplish,
00:59:04.920and we're going to model a program that exactly fits your needs.
00:59:08.480Chuck at PrivateFamilyBanking.com is my email, but click the link below.
01:01:32.880I want to, Mr. Haywood, sorry to interrupt.
01:01:34.540Just with your legal background, there was one particular thing that the three of us can't really speculate on.
01:01:40.780And so maybe if you know, as you as you answer Joel's question, have there been any legal precedents that are now being built on some of the imprisonments and mock fake trials that have happened with some of the January 6th protesters in the same way that in the past legal precedent was built on some of the civil rights action?
01:02:00.160Have any actual legal precedents been started to be erected around this sort of situation with January 6th?
01:02:08.640No, because the the issue with the persecution of the January 6th protesters is primarily that existing systems and existing laws are being used in new ways, which doesn't necessarily establish a precedent, except in kind of a tactical sense.
01:02:26.760So almost all and maybe all of the statutes that are used to prosecute, the claimed violation of which are used to prosecute these people have never been used in that way before, which is a function of federal criminal law being unbelievably voluminous and unbelievably vague.
01:02:46.820And historically, people have relied on people, meaning the American people have relied on the kind of neutrality and discretion of prosecutors to properly use those laws to charge people who are have engaged in actual criminal wrongdoing.
01:03:05.160And that they, of course, have upended this to do the exact opposite.
01:03:08.700And it's no different than 1930s show trials.
01:03:11.380I mean, the communists, the constitution of the Soviet Union and the laws of the Soviet
01:03:15.640Union offered all sorts of hugely important protections for people in all sorts of ways,
01:06:00.080And you've said this, I've said this, Stephen Wolfe has said this in the epilogue of his book, The Case for Christian Nationalism.1.00
01:06:07.220But we are a country that is female-led.0.95
01:06:11.080Everybody is either a woman in power or somebody who is woman-adjacent.1.00
01:06:15.860But that's the only kind of leadership that we currently have.0.98
01:06:18.100child worst childless women in most cases correct you know that's even i mean i mean0.71
01:06:23.580jenny vance said it well childless cat lady yeah right exactly and didn't back down his credit so
01:06:29.580right yeah good on him so but as long as that's the case um then a lot of a lot of what you're
01:06:35.160going to have is the worst of the worst the most vile of the population uh that is willing to be
01:06:41.320crafty and deceitful and do their, their deeds of wickedness in darkness, but paint on a smile
01:06:48.460and use flowery kinds of language. Like I think I'll just, I'll just, you know, everybody knows
01:06:54.400I'm, I'm patriarchal and not a fan of women in leadership. So, you know, but I'll say it like1.00
01:06:59.420this, the false teachers in the first century and the, you know, the early first century, you know,0.68
01:07:05.020Christian church, the Bible is explicit. The primary audience that they were winning0.95
01:07:10.220were women. The Bible says that these false, they creep into weak-willed women's homes1.00
01:07:19.280and lead them astray. And they do so. The false teacher, this is the, it's so ironic. I mean,0.99
01:07:25.860anybody with an open Bible should be able to get this. But the false teachers, you know,
01:07:29.400people are like, you're being divisive, you're being divisive, you're harsh, or you're a reviler,
01:07:35.360or you're this or you're that um but but when you look at the new testament the bad guys are almost
01:07:42.080always described as the ones who have the flowery language the soft smooth speech and their primary
01:07:50.680target audience is the wives the women um because they fall for it this is definitely true but it's
01:08:00.220exacerbated as well by uh and this is something that was true throughout the 20th century
01:08:05.300For some reason, many of the worst, most sadistic exercises in the 20th century, both in Nazi Germany and in the Soviet Union or in the Soviet satellites at various death and torture camps, while there were not a high percentage of women involved as torturers and guards there, the women who were were always regarded as among the worst.
01:08:27.840And you see this, for example, like the the prosecution of Douglas Mackey, the guy who who was prosecuted for memes.0.93
01:08:35.320the, I don't know, I can't remember the specifics, but basically that was cooked up by a lesbian
01:08:40.780assistant U.S. attorney who may or may not have been the lover of the U.S. attorney0.96
01:08:45.460as something, you know, cooked up and held in readiness for the moment Biden became
01:08:52.200president and they get the green light from the Justice Department to engage in this nakedly
01:08:59.000political persecution. I mean, these are extremely bad people who in a different,