In this episode, Pastor Andrew Isker and I discuss why it's time to "wind the clock" back to the time of Calvinism, and why we should all be running out of time to hold the line that Scripture commands.
00:00:28.200We've got several hundred reviews so far, but we'd like to reach a thousand reviews by the end of this year, the year of our Lord, 2024.
00:00:36.960If you haven't left a review yet, take a moment and help us achieve our goal.
00:00:41.740Last week, the Gospel Coalition was very concerned that Reformed and Evangelical churches are not integrating men and women together like they should.
00:00:51.560Where are all the women teaching Sunday school with a mixed group of both men and women being present?
00:00:56.700Why don't we have more women discipling men and acting as church mothers?0.60
00:01:01.980But we've seen these ideas before, and in time, without exception, they all lead to0.74
00:04:25.880all right good to be back with you guys it looked like i got the call last week but i'm just out
00:04:35.380sick. Nobody gave the ring. Shut it down. Good to be back with you guys. We're going to be talking
00:04:41.320about the Gospel Coalition. I want to rewind the clock just a little bit because if I had a dollar
00:04:47.780for every day that someone got on a podcast and said something silly, well, I would never have
00:04:51.600to work again. So why this topic, why these individuals that we're about to spend this
00:04:55.700episode reviewing and these ideas that we talked about. To rewind the clock a little bit, if you
00:04:59.940became a Calvinist, say, 2010 to 2020 and onward, one of the biggest organizations, one of the
00:05:05.700biggest, they're parachurch, so not a denomination, not a church, but parachurch, so kind of spanning
00:05:11.280across these denominational lines, was the Gospel Coalition. They brought together on their board
00:05:15.200individuals like Matt Chandler and John Piper and D.A. Carson, some of the most influential men in
00:05:20.420American evangelicalism, and they put out material that millions upon millions of people at some
00:05:25.580point consumed. So if you became a Calvinist 15 years ago, 10 years ago, 5 years ago, you know
00:05:31.380who these people are, and they still hold a lot of legacy influence. This is not just someone that
00:05:36.220fired up their webcam in their basement, just took a whole new reading of scripture. We're not
00:05:40.920talking about that at all. We're talking about a massive organization. Even still, it's fallen off
00:05:45.720in recent years to a significant degree. I would say even its readership, its attendance to its
00:05:49.720conferences. But this is still, by and large, within evangelicalism, these are the resources
00:05:55.200is that a lot of pastors, a lot of lay leaders, a lot of just individuals, they're consuming.
00:06:00.800This is who they're listening to. These are the articles they're reading. They want advice on
00:06:04.960politics in the election. The Gospel Coalition for years has been kind of the staple of reformed
00:06:10.940evangelical thought. And so for Gospel Coalition to come out and say some of these things that
00:06:15.160we're about to review is incredible. And you'll notice, so we titled this, The Gospel Coalition
00:06:20.760embraces egalitarianism. If you can think about maybe hierarchy, you would have hierarchy on one
00:06:26.500end. Egalitarianism is the flattening of all hierarchy. It's a removal of hierarchy of status,
00:06:31.940of superiority, of anything of that. So you have hierarchy and you have egalitarianism.
00:06:36.160And we titled it Gospel Coalition Embraces Egalitarianism. Now, is the Gospel Coalition
00:06:41.760openly advocating for women filling the pulpit? Well, no, not yet. But here's the deal. Ideas
00:06:47.280grow up. If you read Karl Marx in the Communist Manifesto, it is surprisingly absent of any
00:06:52.160references to starving millions and millions of peasants, of destroying the workers, of hating
00:06:57.600them. Well, why is that? Because that happened by the millions in China and in Russia. Well,
00:07:03.020ideas, when they mature, when they come to fruition, that's when you actually begin to
00:07:07.660realize what they're all about. And make no mistake, the ideas that are presented here,
00:07:12.180that you're going to hear espoused, when they grow up, when the tree finally bears its fruit,
00:07:17.280You will have a plethora, a plethora of women preachers, women teaching Sunday school.
00:07:23.500You will have functional egalitarianism across the board.0.72
00:07:27.720Just for the record, you won't just have that.0.60
00:07:29.520You're not just going to have an epidemic of, you know, female Sunday school teachers in mixed groups.1.00
00:07:35.500Even as bad as that is, what is far more heartbreaking is you're going to have an epidemic of 40-year-old, 50-year-old, 60-year-old single women who are childless.0.98
00:07:48.000And you're basically, you're functionally going to have,
00:07:51.820the church is going to have functionally an epidemic of widows.
00:07:56.080You're going to have all these widows who actually were never married0.95
00:07:59.840because they were told to use their gifts for the church.
00:08:03.220And so they forewent childbearing, they forewent marriage,
00:10:11.200The four people on this, Colin Hansen and Michael J. Kruger are the two men that are on this.
00:10:16.680Colin Hansen is editor-in-chief at Gospel Coalition.
00:10:19.380Michael J. Kruger, my goodness, he should know better.
00:10:21.860He is one of the preeminent, I would say preeminent, Protestant scholars on the canon of Scripture.
00:10:26.060That is to say, how did we arrive at the 66 books that we deem to be the inspired Word of God?
00:10:30.860So he's the preeminent Protestant theologian on these and the president of Reformed Theological Seminary, Charlotte.
00:10:38.360So if you're in the PCA or the OPC, it's very likely that men, elders in your presbytery, so your surrounding area, were taught by either Michael Kruger himself, most certainly influenced.
00:10:49.040And these ideas are what they're getting at seminary.
00:10:51.800He's going to talk about how they run seminary to make sure that they're preparing women and men to do this type of egalitarian, this functionally egalitarian ministry.
00:10:59.860ministry. So these are very influential men. I purposely, there's two women on this,
00:11:04.460Jen Wilkin and Corey Porter. I didn't take, besides like a 20-second snippet, anything from
00:11:09.020them, any clips, anything of what they're saying. Because I'll be honest with you, I don't know that
00:11:13.920they know better. I don't know their husbands. I don't know their church. I don't know their
00:11:17.460pastor. As Paul says in the scriptures, women are more easily deceived. And so I don't even think
00:11:22.500it's fair for us to sit here and to critique Jen Wilkin as if she's an equal. We're going to deal
00:11:27.440with the opinions, the thoughts, the takes, and they're bad, of the qualified men in this
00:11:32.320conversation. And I think that's what I want to get back to chivalry. Men deal with men when we
00:11:37.500have arguments and disputes. That's iron sharpening iron. This maybe would be closer to iron and a
00:11:43.140Twinkie cake, but men should be having this, qualified men, not men versus women or women
00:11:48.640versus men. That's good. All right, real quick, before we show the clip, help us out for the
00:11:52.940algo for the algorithm go ahead and like this video right now i'm just going to say it a couple
00:11:57.520times i'm looking at the screen right now i can see the thumbs up i know that it lags so it'll
00:12:01.860be like a minute maybe 45 seconds before my voice starts to trigger we need you guys to get this out
00:12:07.240uh help us out go ahead and when i say give us a thumbs up i said this like last week or the week
00:12:12.000before and everybody started putting thumbs ups in in the chat which that helps too so so leave
00:12:17.140a comment for the algorithm um you can put a thumbs up you know in the chat like and that's
00:12:21.860fine as a comment, but when I say a thumbs up, what I mean is actually like the video. Like the
00:12:26.180video, like the video, like the video. You do that, it gets it out to more people, and more people
00:12:31.800are confronted with biblical truth so that they stop listening to things like the Gospel Coalition.
00:12:38.320So, all right. So there are many things that we all share in common. There are ways that we would
00:12:46.240be different from each other as well, but one of the areas that we share in common within the
00:12:51.120Gospel Coalition is sharing a broad complementarian perspective that the office of pastor and elder
00:12:56.760is reserved for qualified, qualified men. And at the same time, we all agree that the body of Christ
00:13:04.380functions best when all of its members are valued and encouraged to use their gift. You know,
00:13:11.740often these conversations are about what women can't do. Many of the denominational debates
00:13:17.580that we see are often focused on the things that women cannot do. And those can be important
00:13:23.760discussions, but we also want to continually affirm all the many, many things that God has
00:13:28.940called women to do in the church and alongside men. So I just want to start with the basic
00:13:35.340question of how would you make the case that the church needs the ministry of women? And I thought,
00:13:40.760Mike, that we begin with you and just look at a historical perspective. One of the things that you
00:13:44.620teaching or an expert in is the early church. Talk about that. Maybe even just bridge from
00:13:49.660the Bible. Some of the biblical examples are a little bit more well-known, but bridge from that
00:13:54.360into the early church. Yeah. I mean, I'm excited about this conversation because even in a few
00:13:59.140hours from now, I'll be doing a whole talk on why we need women in ministry and actually deals with
00:14:04.260a lot of the same issues here. And that whole talk is designed to be an encouragement along
00:14:07.400the same lines we're discussing here, which is that men and women need each other. And that is
00:14:11.960what complementarianism is about, right? So some people take complementarianism as a way of saying,
00:14:16.480let's separate men and women from each other in ministry. They don't really interact. I'm like,
00:14:20.800well, no, it's the opposite. We fit together. We need each other. And that's true from the very
00:14:24.820beginning. And it's true in the early church. As you noted, I've done a good bit of work on
00:14:30.180particularly second century Christianity. And I was rather shocked in the academic space. You're
00:14:34.720not shocked by many things, but I actually was, I thought I knew what was going on there. And I was
00:14:38.800shocked by just how many women were popping up in the historical sources all over the place.0.95
00:14:42.940And in my talk this afternoon, I'll mention a bunch of them. But one example, you know,0.99
00:14:47.660in very early second century, as Christianity is spreading, some pagan governors, plenty of
00:14:52.280the younger is really upset about Christianity spreading. He's looking to find a couple of0.52
00:14:55.600Christians to torture and find out what's really going on in these secret meetings. And we're told0.96
00:14:59.380in the historical record that it's two women he finds. It's just very fascinating that the two
00:15:03.680people he picks to get more information about Christianity are women, because women were
00:15:07.040flocking to it in great numbers. So I'll add something to that if I can, because I think
00:15:10.700the familial analogy is such a great illustration of what we're talking about here. You mentioned,
00:15:15.420Jen, you got a sort of a very prominent father and an absentee mother as an analogy of the church.
00:15:19.920I would say there's another analogy you could use here is that we wouldn't want sort of normal
00:15:23.440families to have two fathers and no mothers or two mothers and no fathers. In fact, we've been
00:15:28.960seeing this in our society for years and we're like, no, no, families need both the father and
00:15:32.920a mother to have the right balance and perspective. Well, that's also true in the church, right?
00:15:37.120Because we're a big family. So whether it's a father that's prominent and a mother that's
00:15:42.780absent, but also you don't want a church that's only fathers because you end up with another
00:15:47.180imbalance there. So I think that familial analogy is key. We found this problem at the
00:15:51.160seminary level at RTS. We realized that because seminary is mostly men, when we have a women's0.71
00:15:57.740only ministry at the seminary, it can sometimes even exacerbate the problem because they feel
00:16:01.860even more isolated. So what we tried to do is do both. Allow them to have their opportunity to be
00:16:06.720together for obvious reasons, but also make sure we're working really hard to bring the male and
00:16:11.080female students together in spaces where they can interact with each other. And truthfully,
00:16:15.020when you're training pastors, they need to know how to interact with women in their churches. If
00:16:19.080you have a seminary environment that's supposed to train them and they're only interacting with
00:16:21.940their other guys, that actually isn't a very good training ground for what the real world's going to
00:16:25.940be when they get in their churches um jen you can come back late well let's talk about that right
00:16:31.860now of what of cory's point of how do we go from how do we raise up and encourage other women
00:16:39.360teachers and leaders so that alongside they're doing their jen wilkin studies they're also
00:16:45.920learning themselves to teach and i know this is your heart hey real quick so wes is going to take
00:16:52.020you've got some great thoughts um i you know i i have probably less great thoughts but i gotta
00:16:57.020just say this for that though that was three clips strung together and for those clips i gotta say i
00:17:03.160really appreciated it uh the quietness the quiet and gentle spirit that first peter talks about
00:17:08.540yeah um the two men were talking uh their talking was terrible so i'm not really pleased with the
00:17:13.740men but uh i didn't hear a word there were two women they were sitting there learning with all
00:17:18.680submission learning the wrong things but they were quiet so my favorite thing i just want to0.76
00:17:22.280come out out of the gate my favorite thing about those three clips that were strung together1.00
00:17:25.220is um is not hearing jen wilkins speak i love that okay go ahead she does this vocal fry to1.00
00:17:32.400make her sound more masculine you may notice it if you listen to her on other things she literally1.00
00:17:36.140manipulates her voice to try to sound more authoritative because a woman's voice is1.00
00:17:40.920naturally not it doesn't have a gravitas to it does she speak real quick does she speak in the0.99
00:17:45.920next string of clips that we're going to show a little bit a little bit so you'll you'll probably
00:17:49.040okay so then we yeah let's see we can maybe you know if you want to talk about that let's let's
00:17:52.460do it once she's actually spoken um go ahead so didn't have time to obviously couldn't take the
00:17:57.220whole 40 minutes to watch the full thing but here's the idea they're getting across and mike
00:18:00.460i want to go to you too for some of this historical stuff that michael kruger talks about
00:18:03.860they take this idea of the church as a family which it is which we can talk about in a second
00:18:08.260they take this idea of the church's family and say there's a neglected category we have and
00:18:12.320that's the category of the church mother. So the church has fathers. We would call them elders. We
00:18:17.180would call them deacons that they teach and they labor, they protect, and they have responsibility.
00:18:21.260But the argument that they're making there is if you have a family and it has a father that's doing
00:18:25.680all these things, but it doesn't have a mother, then you're deficient. So Michael Jacob Reed talks
00:18:30.700about this family analogy that we wouldn't want to have just two fathers, three fathers in a normal
00:18:35.600family. That wouldn't be a normal family at all. We wouldn't want just fathers. We wouldn't want
00:18:39.140just mothers, but we need these two together. The analogy, we are never given in scripture.
00:18:45.080So God has instituted three spheres would be a way to talk about this. This would be Abraham
00:18:48.340Kuyper, the home and the church and the state. And he's given fathers to each one of them. And
00:18:52.700in each of those spheres, the father actually carries a sword. So he's symbolic of in the
00:18:57.920state with the sword to avenge evildoers. He's symbolic of justice, of rigidity, of being
00:19:03.480impartial. Same thing in the spiritual realm. The sword, which is the word of God, pierces,
00:19:08.300it divides, it lays bare. So the father in all three spheres, he's given a sword. Now in the
00:19:14.320home, we do have the role of the mother. Children obey, not just your father, obey your parents in
00:19:19.300the Lord, your mother and your father that are given. But we never see, now there is some language
00:19:23.480of the church's mother, which Michael can get to in a minute, but we never see in anywhere in
00:19:28.000scripture, the idea of the role of mother given to either the state, so not in the state and not in
00:19:34.320the church either. It's only in the home that we see that. And I think the reason for it is that
00:19:38.880if a woman were to be put in the state and to take the role of mother, it would be a rigid and a cold0.99
00:19:43.520and a judicial role. It wouldn't be warm and affectionate the way the woman is inclined to be,1.00
00:19:48.160but it would be a role of executing justice. That's when we see when women are on the Supreme1.00
00:19:51.960Court or even other court positions that they tend towards leniency because God has made women to be1.00
00:19:57.560compassionate, to be forgiving, to be merciful. So those traits, they're good. It's good to be
00:20:03.700compassionate and merciful and loving, but they're not suited for dealing out justice to a pedophile.
00:20:08.920They're not suited for making law. They're suited for the home and the same way in the church.
00:20:14.320Now, Paul does say, I can actually pull up a couple of verses here that are helpful.
00:20:18.480Paul does speak highly of women in the church, but does he say they're mothers? Does he say
00:20:23.540they're leaders? Romans 16 verses one, verse one, I commend to you our sister Phoebe, a servant
00:42:02.280When a woman is fearful because part of the curse is that their pains have been greatly
00:42:06.580increased in childbearing, or when she's hemorrhaging blood, like a woman in our church was just
00:42:12.780this last week, and we're as a church gathering around and not physically, we're giving some
00:42:17.920space, but we are spiritually gathering around and sounding the alarm, church, it's time
00:42:22.320to pray, you know, and asking the husband, is there anything we can do? And like bringing them
00:42:25.640dinner and these kinds of things. She is being encouraged by other women in our church to not
00:42:31.720just love your children, but love your children and love the Lord and be fearless in this moment.
00:42:38.060You will be saved through childbearing. If you continue with faithful, childbearing was a
00:42:43.480horrifying, terrifying thing, especially for the first century and most of the world until very0.99
00:42:49.680modern times many children died in childbearing many women died in childbearing and or also like
00:42:56.880first peter i believe it's uh chapter three where um he says you know that that uh sarah called her
00:43:03.340husband lord lowercase l lord not the lord but a lord sire sir a sign of respect and that this is
00:43:12.120commended she's not made fun of by this she's commended and you likewise are her daughters
00:43:17.720If you follow her example, and it goes on, it says, and are not frightened, fearful of anything.
00:43:24.620One of the constant commands, so not being afraid of childbearing, but rather trusting with faith that you'll be saved through childbearing.
00:43:34.020Or in 1 Peter 3, not fear anything that is frightening.
00:43:37.540Well, one of the things that's frightening is being called by God in Titus chapter 2 to be obedient to a fallible man who is a sinner in a fallen world where things go wrong.0.72
00:43:48.600And so as older women are teaching women to obey their husbands and to be lovers of children, when those children are at times difficult,0.71
00:43:57.660is they're teaching them to do these things and they're teaching them as they are commanded to
00:44:03.840do these things to rely upon all the promises of scripture in the gospel it's theology applied
00:44:09.580it's the whole podcast but here's the deal theology does not apply in a generic one one
00:44:17.420size fits all across the board for everyone that's not the way theology works theology is the same
00:44:22.720book, the same 66 Holy Spirit-inspired books of the Bible. That's the theology. That's the source
00:44:28.520of our doctrine. But that theology then applies in different ways, given our, in God's providence,
00:44:35.380our station in life. And that includes our gender. That includes our age. Are you children? Well,
00:44:41.680theology for you applies, all these promises in Scripture apply to you, to obey your parents.
00:44:46.800Are you fathers? Well, it's going to apply a different way for you. Are you mothers? It
00:44:50.800applies a different way. Are you officers in the church? Are you members in the church? Are you
00:44:55.020civil magistrates in Romans 13? Are you citizens? At every single level, are you masters? Are you
00:45:02.080slaves? That's Ephesians 6. Read Ephesians 6. The whole thing is basically saying, okay, so up until
00:45:08.380this point, we've had five chapters and I've taught you all these principles, and now I'm going to give
00:45:12.640some very specific practical application. And guess what? The practical application varies.
00:45:19.640given your station of life. Fathers this way, mothers that way, parents this way, children that
00:45:25.440way, masters this way, slaves that way. What they're trying to do in this video, and we'll see
00:45:31.040even more in the next clip, and Wes has some great things to say about it, but what they're trying to
00:45:34.560do is steamroll and completely flatten out God's good design. They're trying to take something
00:45:40.480that's varied, it's multifaceted, and that God calls exceedingly good and beautiful and hate it
00:45:48.700and say what you have designed and called good and beautiful, we hate and we're going to destroy.
00:45:54.320We're going to steamroll it in to a one-size-fits-all, no more distinctions, no more hierarchy, no more variance, no more beauty.
01:02:50.820Are you going on camp outs with a 23-year-old?
01:02:53.480Well, I mean, I would be on a men's retreat, and I would get a chance on a men's retreat to have focused time that I wouldn't have.
01:03:01.820I don't have a lot of focused time in general with your average 23-year-old male, but I would have something like that in a men's ministry context where I could do that.
01:03:11.020So that's why I'm wondering, what does it look like otherwise to do that?
01:03:14.760actually that's one of the key things i think is missing in the whole conversation is that when
01:03:18.380lots of times when pastors think about disciplining a woman in their church and they're like i don't
01:03:21.820know if i should do that part of the reason they make that is because they assume that the topic
01:03:25.860has to be about womanhood or about female stuff or about things like that and this is one of the
01:03:30.480things i that i don't get that paradigm problem yeah why wouldn't you just talk to them about
01:03:34.360jesus and the gospel and the word and biblical theology and sound doctrine and basic discipleship
01:03:39.600categories so it seems like there's there's a sense in which when a pastor pastors a male he
01:03:44.120thinks in theological categories when he moves over to passionate female he thinks oh and now
01:03:48.540it's relational categories and I don't I'm not equipped for that so I just do the males and I
01:03:52.840don't do the women I think that's itself the problem is that why would we assume that women
01:03:55.940don't need those same categories and I think that's exactly maybe what you were describing
01:04:00.060is that you got the benefit of someone who just wanted to talk to you about the gospel
01:04:03.020you know which is like wow how about that I mean that seems like an obvious thing I think Mike it's
01:04:07.120also because we're professors meaning that there are certain people gravitate toward us and I think
01:04:13.860if the local church can't reclaim the beauty of male-female interaction along appropriate lines,
01:04:19.080what hope does the culture have? And we also cannot turn a blind eye to the fact that two0.92
01:04:25.980men meeting alone can be every bit as inappropriate as a man and a woman meeting alone. We should say0.82
01:04:32.100that. I don't think women should have to carry this burden around all the time that we're a0.91
01:04:37.460particular risk category when it comes to relationship forming. That's a good clip right1.00
01:04:43.560There. And there are all sorts of other ways where it can go wrong, not just with an older man, with a younger woman, all sorts of different.
01:04:50.240People are crazy as well. Yeah. Well, because they're people. Right. Not because they're men and women. Right. Because they're people.0.98
01:04:58.420He nailed it. He said, that's a good clip right there. And it is. It's a fantastic clip for us to torch to the glory of God and out of love for both men and women.
01:05:08.220um jen wilkins said you know that basically she said something along the lines of like
01:05:12.440um they they act as though women are uh just um a risk category a risk category yes did we not0.98
01:05:20.620just watch steve lawson fall the timing of this is not just um foolish it's disgusting yeah it is0.96
01:05:28.720brazen um it is audacious the timing of this we've seen uh an epidemic of ministers failing0.97
01:05:37.580and falling and abuses i would say too not in steve lawson's case but genuine like criminal
01:05:43.780abuse a lot of this year has come out yes this very year and with steve lawson within our camp
01:05:50.200the broader reformed camp these people these four people know steve lawson that just happened
01:05:55.520like 15 minutes ago and uh and then jen wilkin has the audacity to talk about women being a risk
01:06:01.960category yes yes yeah you you are you are a risk category we love you um but but no notice the
01:06:10.720whole thing that they're talking about and that string of clips right there is um they're not
01:06:15.140talking about women uh getting to belong in the church on the lord's day or being members in the
01:06:19.620church or co-heirs and grace or all these kind of of course those things are being loved by their
01:06:24.480husbands as christ loved the church yes and amen a thousand times husbands are commanded to love
01:06:29.160their wives as christ loved the church be willing to give themselves up for their life uh their life
01:06:33.700up for their wives just as christ did for the church all these things are a no-brainer nobody
01:06:38.580is denying that um but that's not what they're asking for they're asking for um they're basically
01:06:45.300they didn't say it they didn't outright say it but they're basically um doing the same thing
01:06:50.080that blue blue-haired lesbian feminist progressives they don't even claim the name of christ do when0.60
01:06:56.300they mock relentlessly mock um the billy graham rule or mocked for four years mike pence and get0.96
01:07:03.540don't don't mishear me mike pence needed to be mocked and still does uh so anybody who's committed
01:07:09.280to mocking mike pence you have my full support but he does not need to be mocked for his uh
01:07:14.840application of the billy graham rule and his discipline to never be alone in a room with a
01:07:20.880woman who's not his wife that is a good discipline of course it's and they are literally paving the
01:07:27.080way this whole thing that we just watched they are paving the way for pastors to be um meeting
01:07:33.540alone with young women um and to regularly be discipling women not from the pulpit as you
01:07:40.440disciple the whole church at large on the lord's day by the expositional preaching of his word but
01:07:46.080they're begging the question. They are implying and almost explicitly outright saying and even
01:07:54.480commanding or condemning, if you even thought anything otherwise, that there need to be all
01:08:00.640of these midweek touch points where an elder, I mean, they're saying that a pastor basically
01:08:06.020should be treating a young 23-year-old woman in the way that he engages her and disciples her,
01:08:12.220And they mean by discipleship outside of the Lord's Day, midweek personal discipleship, that there should be virtually zero distinction or difference in the way that he would disciple a young 23-year-old man.
01:08:25.080They were begging for more Steve Lawsons.
01:08:28.600They were saying, could we please have more sexual immorality in the church?
01:08:30.980And you know when that happens, it's going to be the guy's fault.
01:08:39.600And even more so, perhaps the most responsible loser on the planet, never met him, don't even know his name, but whoever Jen Wilkins' husband is, that guy, I would not want to be him.0.88
01:21:44.060Why is it, I've said it before, I'll say it again, even when it comes to just strategic thinking, why is it that it's not just like, well, you know, the fastest female swimmer can't beat the top 100 fastest male swimmers.
01:21:58.500Or the fastest female runner can't beat the top 100 fastest, you know, male runners.
01:22:03.420well how come um the best female chess player right that doesn't require physical strength at
01:22:09.280all right at all um how come the the best female chess player can't beat um the top 100 chess
01:22:17.940player what why why is why is there still a distinction now we've moved away from physical
01:22:22.280feats of strength and we still find a distinction because we're different all the way down yep all
01:22:28.080the way down mentally different and that doesn't mean that men are smarter across the board on
01:22:33.180everything. I'm not saying that. There are instincts that my wife has, motherly instincts0.78
01:22:39.200that I do not. And she is often right. And if I did not listen, if she did not have the ear of
01:22:44.980her husband, I do listen to my wife. I hear I at the end of the day make the decision, but I take
01:22:50.660her counsel that she offers respectfully and humbly always into account, always. And she has
01:22:56.980instincts and thoughts and ideas that i don't have that are great sometimes they're bad but
01:23:03.820sometimes they're really good but in other arenas in the civil polis and in the ecclesiastical
01:23:11.300realm and these things men are not just physically stronger but they are psychologically mentally
01:23:17.780spiritually at every single level they are superior for those realms right because that's
01:23:24.780God's design. God is not capricious. Why do I defend this? Because the good of a natural order
01:23:33.080where everyone is healthier, everyone is happier, because it's for the good of men, the good of
01:23:38.340women, the good of children, but also it's a defense of God. I make this point again and again,
01:23:43.040we make this point because we love God. And I'm sick of what things like this with the
01:23:47.900gospel coalition what they're actually doing it is it's a subtle a constant subtle and and often
01:23:53.820not so subtle indictment and accusation a slander levied to god not just to men not just to women
01:24:01.880but to god himself they're they are condemning god as arbitrary random capricious cruel they're
01:24:09.460basically saying um that this is basically the gospel coalition's position of men and women in
01:24:14.220a nutshell the women are jen wilkin is singing anything you can do i can do better i can do
01:24:18.580anything better than you but i won't well actually i will 99 of it but i won't on a couple things
01:24:25.720um not because i can't not because i'm designed it differently i could not only could i do it
01:24:31.620i could do it better than you better than you but i won't because i'm a soft soft soft soft soft
01:24:39.540soft, narrow, narrow, narrow, complimentary. And when you hold that position, what you're
01:24:46.020essentially saying is that God designed, in God's design, he made Jen Wilkin to be extraordinarily
01:24:53.300gifted to do something. Like Eric Little, you know, why do you run? Well, God made me and he
01:24:59.440made me fast. And when I run, I feel his pleasure. Good line. I like it. For Wilkin, this would be
01:25:05.640her view god made me and he made me um theologically astute and and in terms of oration articulate and
01:25:13.200dynamic and inspiring uh inspiring um and god did that intentionally in his design and he did it for
01:25:20.600the sole purpose by design of of of making me into this person and then intentionally withholding
01:25:28.000right any avenue or opportunity for those gifts just to crush me just to disappoint me just to
01:25:34.120be capricious or here's that that's that's ultimately the view you have to adopt or here's
01:25:40.180the other view you're not a good preacher you never were it's always been a joke yeah that's
01:25:46.320the actually loving charitable view for jen wilkin for her husband for her pastors and certainly as
01:25:52.280a defense of god um god did not make you a great preacher and not allow you to do it right he made
01:25:57.540you a great woman which you've forsaken and you've never been a good preacher it's not just that
01:26:03.160you're not allowed to preach, you can't preach. You can't. Let's get to our second set of
01:26:08.420commercials. I would say, throw some comments in. I see one already. Maybe we can hit on.
01:26:13.380So if you have any comments, leave them in the chat and we'll get to them. And we'll see you
01:26:17.520in a minute. You have heard it said that cash is king. Well, our sponsor, Private Family Banking,
01:26:23.180wants you to know that cash flow is the key to building wealth. The partners at Private Family
01:26:28.340banking are experts at teaching you how to implement a new way of thinking about money
01:26:34.060this powerful and innovative approach provides a fail-safe method for redirecting the cash flow
01:26:40.520you already have into a privatized banking system that you now own and control this new system
01:26:47.180places you and your family on the wealth curve for continuously compounding tax protected gains
01:29:06.100We've got some questions already in the chat, so we'll jump right into them.
01:29:08.720so this is type type in questions if you got one yep so we'll go with the one we got first
01:29:13.520timeline wise this is from rose kind of off topic kind of is on topic what is your opinion
01:29:18.480on a christian woman marrying an atheist man or agnostic man and it would be no the word of god
01:29:23.560says no second corinthians 6 paul talks about the joining of believers with prostitutes so he said
01:29:29.060what fellowship is christ with belio and in first second corinthians 6 14 he says this be not
01:29:34.820unequally yoked together with unbelievers, for what fellowship hath righteousness with
01:29:38.840unrighteousness, and what communion hath light with darkness. Now some will take that and they'll
01:29:43.360say, well, a Christian should never even do business with an unbeliever. There is maybe1.00
01:29:48.540even some validity there, but if there's some validity there, how much more so is the relationship
01:29:53.000of man and woman, of husband and wife, the closest relationship possible? Scripture would categorically
01:29:58.860say, no, if faced with the choice to marry an atheist or agnostic, a Christian woman should not
01:30:04.460should a christian man marry an atheist woman if you are already in that relationship though
01:30:09.260god has god does say through paul that you should stay in it as long as possible for the sake of
01:30:14.340your children if your spouse will have you if your spouse will have you if they leave you are not
01:30:17.840required to follow them to the ends of the earth to beg outside their door but if they'll have you
01:30:22.100you are to stay in it but insofar as you are already a christian and you're faced with the
01:30:25.920opportunity the proposition for marriage from an atheist and agnostic even a shallow believer if
01:30:31.580you are a a mature believer and it's someone who you believe is a believer but they're young and
01:30:36.540they're immature and they have much growing even that pairing uh could cause some real difficult
01:30:41.120dynamics especially when it's the woman that knows much more of the faith than the man so
01:30:45.060scripture categorically rose says no uh you are not allowed to not you i don't know if you were
01:30:50.740considering it but a christian woman is not allowed to marry an atheist or agnostic right and if and
01:30:55.120if a christian woman already is married um to an atheist you know and and vice versa a christian
01:31:00.540man married to an atheist agnostic any you know it's beyond agnostic and atheist it's just
01:31:05.240non-christian so buddhist hindu whatever uh as long as it's not a christian if a man a christian
01:31:10.740man is married to a non-christian woman um then uh the bible is clear that he should seek to remain
01:31:15.740with her right and to strive to be at peace um assuming that she's willing to be at peace and
01:31:20.900remain with him right but if she uh refuses to remain with him if his faith ultimately ends up
01:31:27.080driving her away because she hates Christ and doesn't convert, and therefore grows to eventually
01:31:32.460begin to despise and hate her husband, who now loves Christ, if that eventually drives her away,
01:31:39.020then the scripture does say, again, 1 Corinthians 6 and 7, that there is actually a permissibility
01:31:45.200for him to allow her to go, and vice versa, if she's the Christian and her unbelieving husband.
01:31:50.660But if the unbelieving spouse chooses to remain in the marriage, then the believing spouse,
01:31:55.300The Christian spouse is called to remain in that marriage, to do the work faithfully as an evangelist with their unbelieving spouse, and to simply continue the marriage in a peaceable manner.0.86
01:32:07.900But for those who are single and not already married, not married yet, you have no right given by God to seek a spouse from among unbelievers of any kind.0.90
01:32:22.620And this is really something to consider seriously, because young women, if you come under the0.95
01:32:29.100headship of a man who is not a Christian, biblically speaking, he still has the authority
01:32:46.420Young men also, if you marry a woman who's not a Christian, and then you try and do family
01:32:51.100worship she's kicking against the goads right she's resenting the fact that your children
01:32:55.940are memorizing scripture catechisms or whatever it is that it is really i mean there's many many
01:33:03.160reasons but just that one practical issue it is not a good idea like do not even consider it it'll
01:33:09.560bring a lot of sorrow yeah all right grady kelm this is a question from x how do you deal with
01:33:14.920relationships that have egalitarian influences on their side? And I would assume this is talking
01:33:22.120mostly in-laws, so probably a husband-in-laws or friends or maybe her mom would pastor or something
01:33:27.640like that. That's a good question. I would say with in-laws and family relationships, ones that
01:33:35.600you'll have, like if you marry a woman, you are bound to her family for the rest of your lives0.78
01:33:40.800together. Like that your father-in-law will be your father-in-law, even if you have a falling out0.80
01:33:44.780And so when you have a relationship that's going to last because it's family or it's someone that you've become family by marriage, charity and overlooking offenses is, I think, the name of the game, often for the sake of the relationship.
01:33:58.560Now, that doesn't mean compromises on your theology, compromises that affect your children.
01:34:02.920But insofar as possible, you're going to have 40, 50, 60 years with your in-laws.
01:34:07.160and um and there comes a point in time to say you know mom dad father-in-law mother-in-law
01:34:12.920i respect you but this is a line or we need to be clear we won't be coming to this church that
01:34:18.080you guys attend that has this woman pastor but insofar as it's possible to live peaceably to
01:34:23.720not make a big deal about it um i was just back this summer with uh with my in-laws and they love
01:34:28.360them some israel great family wonderful family but uh they love them some israel and i didn't
01:34:33.760say a word about. I have views, and I'm very convicted of them, and I know a lot of history,
01:34:38.900but I win nothing. Even on a topic where I believe by God's grace, I have the right view,
01:34:43.800I win nothing by arguing with my mother-in-law about that. And so, insofar as it's possible,
01:34:48.820again, you're not compromising on your own views, you're not taking your children. I would not take
01:34:53.300my children to church where there would be a woman pastor. There won't be a church. You can't do that,1.00
01:34:57.740but insofar as it's possible to let some of the other things go, I think there's a grace in that,