The NXR Podcast - THE LIVESTREAM - Werry’s Law： No Such Thing As Public Conservative Women

00:00:00 Leave us a five-star review on your favorite podcast platform.

00:00:03 I get it.

00:00:04 It's annoying.

00:00:05 Everybody asks, but I'm going to tell you why.

00:00:07 When you give us a positive review, what that does is it triggers the algorithm so that

00:00:12 our podcast shows up on more people's news feeds.

00:00:16 You and I both know that this ministry is willing to talk about things that most ministries

00:00:20 aren't.

00:00:21 We need this content for the glory of God to reach more people's ears.

00:00:30 As surely as the sun will rise each morning in the east, there is a universal law, a law

00:00:38 of nature, a law of the scripture that is never proven to be false a single time in

00:00:44 all of human history.

00:00:46 That law is known as Wary's Law.

00:00:49 Now, this is something that has been observed by many for quite a while, but Wary, a friend

00:00:55 of mine put it into concise and clear language a while back. He posted an infamous tweet that I'm

00:01:03 going to show for all of you and read, for those of you who are listening, that I think will bring

00:01:08 a lot of clarity. Here it is. Wary said, there are two elements of Wary's law. Number one,

00:01:16 an evangelical man will only speak out on a controversial cultural issue, or political we

00:01:23 might say, if he can do so by citing a woman who has already done it. Number two, every conservative

00:01:32 woman, and this is what we're going to focus on, every conservative woman with a public platform 0.99

00:01:38 is on a trajectory toward liberalism. Let me say that one more time. The second component of 1.00

00:01:45 Wary's law, proven beyond a shadow of a doubt to always be true in every instance, is this.

00:01:51 every conservative woman with a public platform is on a trajectory toward liberalism and there

00:02:00 you go there you have it that is wary's law and it has proven to be true again and again and again

00:02:08 because if there is a woman who is truly conservative and conservative i understand

00:02:14 it's not the best word why is it not the best word because well you could be conserving something

00:02:19 that is biblical and traditional, old, tried, true, or you can say, I'm a conservative. What

00:02:24 are you conserving? Well, I'm conserving, you know, the politics of, of 2015, you know, I'm

00:02:30 conserving the 1990s. And so in that sense, yeah, there are plenty of feminist conservative women 1.00

00:02:37 that are in the technical sense, actually conservative. If you're conservative, you know, 1.00

00:02:43 seeking to conserve something that's fairly recent. But if we say conservative, and what we

00:02:49 mean by that is a woman who is biblically conservative. She's trying to conserve the 0.97

00:02:55 timeless Christian principles of Scripture. She's biblical, she's traditional. If we're speaking of 0.63

00:03:03 a conservative woman in that regard, then a conservative woman who is speaking and teaching 0.99

00:03:10 and leading and directing people publicly from some public platform is an oxymoron. Jumbo shrimp, 1.00

00:03:20 right? Intelligent liberal, right? There's all kinds of oxymorons, and this would be one of

00:03:25 them. Public conservative woman. There's no such thing. A truly conservative woman, again, 1.00

00:03:34 using the word conservative, not conserving the 1990s, but biblically conservative. That woman

00:03:41 is a domestic woman. She is a homebody. She is a lady of the hearth. That is a woman who is 1.00

00:03:50 out of sight. I don't mean that she never goes into public. I'm not saying that she can't go

00:03:55 to the grocery store. I'm not saying that she can't take the children to the park,

00:03:59 But I'm talking about public platforms. Speaking, leading, influencing from a public platform is not what a truly conservative woman does. And I've seen this go both ways. To be fair to Wary's Law here, one scenario is that a conservative woman with a public platform is on a trajectory towards liberalism or she's on a trajectory off of that public platform. 1.00

00:04:28 and by God's grace, and it's a wonderful—you love to see it. You love to see it. It's a wonderful

00:04:33 thing that God, in his compassion and kindness towards that particular woman, has done many

00:04:39 times. Many times there is a woman who is biblical in her convictions for the most part. She's not,

00:04:48 obviously, she's not entirely consistent, which is why we're seeing her publicly talking about it,

00:04:52 influencing, seeking to lead, seeking to grow her influence. But over time, her convictions

00:04:58 actually don't lessen, but they get stronger. She becomes more convicted by the scriptures.

00:05:04 She wants to be more pleasing to the Lord. Maybe she's a young single woman at first,

00:05:10 but then she gets married and she has her first child and then a second and then a third.

00:05:15 And little by little, you wake up one day and five years have gone by and you're like,

00:05:20 hey i never hear from so-and-so anymore i wonder what happened to to this woman you know she had

00:05:26 some some decent takes online you know i used to follow her her x account you know or she had a

00:05:32 podcast for a while that that had some good things you know that she was saying and and i never hear

00:05:37 from her anymore uh what happened well what happened is that uh she started listening to

00:05:44 her own podcast. What happened is that she influenced and led herself right into biblical

00:05:52 womanhood. And leading herself into biblical womanhood necessarily means leading herself

00:05:59 out of the public sphere. And again, not saying that women aren't literally in public sometimes,

00:06:06 but public leadership, public platform, publicly seeking to speak to and lead and teach others. 0.99

00:06:15 That is an oxymoron. That is not feminine. It's not domestic, right? I think of 1 Peter 3 that 0.89

00:06:22 says that the characteristics of a woman who has inward beauty, imperishable beauty of the heart

00:06:29 that is pleasing in the sight of God is that she is a quiet woman with a gentle spirit.

00:06:38 Those are the two characteristics, the only two characteristics that are mentioned

00:06:41 in this particular passage in 1 Peter 3, quiet and gentle spirit. Those two characteristics make

00:06:49 up imperishable internal beauty of the heart that God finds to be pleasing. It is not feminine, 1.00

00:06:57 not in any biblical sense, to be online in the public sphere and battling with men in the public

00:07:05 sphere. Even if those men are wrong, even if those men are progressives and leftists and liberals,

00:07:11 then that's something that a man should be doing. Now, back to the first point of where he's law,

00:07:17 and then we'll jump into the episode. The first point is that when it comes not just to generally

00:07:22 conservative men in the realm of politics and culture, but particularly evangelical men,

00:07:28 Christian men in the evangelical world, church world. His first point is this. An evangelical

00:07:36 man will only speak out on a controversial cultural issue if he can do so by citing a

00:07:43 woman who already has, I personally would add to that, and say a woman who has already spoken out

00:07:48 or a black man. I think either one would be fair, a white woman or a male who is non-white, 0.68

00:07:57 a non-white male or a white woman, right? It's like, man, there's this big issue going on in 0.61

00:08:02 politics right now, going on, you know, in the culture war. Has a white woman talked about it

00:08:08 publicly yet? Has a black or Hispanic man talked about it publicly yet? Oh, phew, okay. Then I can

00:08:17 come in behind them and simply echo what they've already said. Without that cover fire, without a

00:08:26 white woman or a non-white male leading the way, then you can expect an evangelical man, 0.65

00:08:33 evangelical pastor, to not take the risk, to not exercise the courage. And so I say that just to 0.60

00:08:43 temper what I've already said, I do have sympathy. I do have sympathy because I do think that there

00:08:50 are many women who are conservative and not just conserving the 1990s, but in the biblical

00:08:54 traditional sense, who would love to see men, godly, courageous men into the fray. But sadly,

00:09:04 often they don't. They don't. And so eventually, I think some of these women speak out. And then

00:09:12 once they speak out, then you have the cover fire and these men feel as though they have permission

00:09:16 to follow up behind and echo the sentiments. Now they feel like they can speak out. And this is

00:09:22 just this vicious cycle that keeps going round and round and round. We've been watching it for

00:09:27 decades at this point, but it's been especially prevalent over the last few years between

00:09:34 podcasting and social media and all these kinds of things. And at a certain point,

00:09:38 oh, I think John MacArthur, you know, will honor him. He just recently passed away and is now

00:09:44 in glory with the Lord. And he famously said, when someone asked him once, you know, what do

00:09:50 you think? It was Todd Friel. What do you think about Beth Moore? Two words. What would you say?

00:09:54 He said, go home. Wonderful. I love it. Go home. Be feminine. Be domestic. Be a lady of the hearth.

00:10:06 exercise and model a quiet and gentle spirit. But we don't have a whole lot of that. And so

00:10:16 what we're left with instead is conservative women saying things that sound good for a while, 0.76

00:10:22 and then lo and behold, shocker, they come out a little bit later saying things that are not

00:10:29 conservative at all and all i'm saying is can we please as a society and especially christians in

00:10:37 america come to a place where we're no longer surprised by this where we realize that that you

00:10:42 know the um the purpose of a system is what it does right the purpose of a system is what it

00:10:48 does oh my goodness i can't believe that this this woman who i followed for the last you know

00:10:53 two and a half years she was so conservative and said so many good things and now she's saying

00:10:57 some things that aren't conservative. But was she so conservative? I mean, she's literally

00:11:04 in the public sphere speaking to men and women alike, telling them what to do, wearing a three 0.77

00:11:12 piece, you know, boss babe pantsuit. No, it's not that she switched. That's what I'm trying to get

00:11:19 across. It's not that all these conservative women keep becoming liberals. No, they weren't 0.99

00:11:25 conservative women in the first place. How do you know? Because if they were truly conservative,

00:11:29 I would have never heard their name. That's how I know. So this episode is brought to you by our

00:11:35 premier sponsors, Armored Republic and Reese Fund. Also by our Patreon members. You can join our

00:11:40 Patreon by going over to patreon.com forward slash right response ministries. And also this episode

00:11:46 is brought to you by our generous donors. You can make a donation today by simply going to

00:11:50 rightresponseministries.com forward slash donate. Again, that's rightresponseministries.com

00:11:58 forward slash donate. Let's tune in now. All right. We're so back. Happy Wednesday.

00:12:11 Happy Wednesday. Here we are. So it's just you and I, Wesley Todd and Joel Webin today. Antonio

00:12:17 is out of the studio and we'll also be out on friday but we'll be back with us next week we'll

00:12:23 make good use of the time one way or another yeah one way or the other uh i think jumping into this

00:12:28 one of the big themes i feel like we've been talking about a lot this year especially the

00:12:31 last three months conservative liberal progressive republican democrat a lot of what we're talking

00:12:37 about is kind of two sides of the same coin and if you keep up that paradigm well you're going to

00:12:42 end up with the same result that you've always gotten so we've talked before about getting women 0.95

00:12:46 out of politics. We talked about Governor Kristi Noem and even in pro-life. So Kristen Hawkins, 1.00

00:12:50 I remember a feminist was assaulting her or just confronting her. And she said, well, hang on, 0.98

00:12:56 you're over here advocating for children for pro-life. Where are your children at home? Who's

00:13:01 caring for them? Oh, somebody else. And so we've made this point a lot of a lot. And what we're

00:13:06 really bringing where he's law to bear in here is to illustrate that until we get over this obstacle,

00:13:10 until you get over and you stop making women be the first champions for your position well as a

00:13:16 woman said it as a woman said it has someone come out and support we're never going to get over some

00:13:20 of the hurdles that i think we would all love to see go away in the texas house there's a bill to

00:13:25 abolish abortion filed this session and uh one of the state reps there's a bill to abolish women

00:13:30 yeah we both voted abortion yep and uh one of the state reps he said well why isn't this being

00:13:36 carried by a woman as in children are being killed alive in texas in the womb through abortion pills

00:13:43 this is i mean who else to take this on but the men men of character men in political office

00:13:48 and the first question was well have you had a woman go and tackle that like who's supposed to

00:13:54 save people in a society it is the men that's right let's go ahead and illustrate this with

00:13:59 the unfortunate case joel this happened i think yesterday yeah i saw with pro-life activist lila

00:14:05 Grace Rose. She's been around for a number of years. She did some undercover work at Planned

00:14:10 Parenthood back in the 2000s, worked with James O'Keefe as well, exposing just Planned Parenthood.

00:14:15 She went in as a 15-year-old and said, hey, I want to get an abortion. Don't tell my parents. 0.61

00:14:20 They had no problems with it. So she's been around and been a pro-life, whatever that means,

00:14:23 activist for a long time. But listen to what she said. And this is a relation, again,

00:14:27 she's commenting very publicly. This had over half a million views, last I checked,

00:14:31 commenting very publicly on the execution that Tennessee just carried out of an inmate.

00:14:35 So the article, maybe you might be able to read the headline, maybe not, from the New York Post.

00:14:40 It says, Tennessee death row inmate cries out in pain during lethal injection after state refuses to deactivate the fibrillator implant.

00:14:48 So you had an inmate, and in the picture...

00:14:51 What did he do? What's the crime?

00:14:52 Well, in the picture, he brutally murdered a mother and her two children.

00:14:56 So the man is on the right.

00:14:57 So we're saying that a man who murdered a mother and her two children, looks like they're both daughters,

00:15:03 murdered three women two of them little girls that he experienced some pain as a consequence

00:15:10 and this is a problem i i regret to inform you does hanging hurt unfortunately yes yeah uh we

00:15:19 we have we have exercised capital punishment for capital crimes such as murder uh in virtually

00:15:26 every God-fearing society

00:15:28 for centuries,

00:15:30 what's the problem?

00:15:33 Sir, you're based 0.96

00:15:34 Roman Catholic, woman in politics,

00:15:36 woman in the public. She had

00:15:38 some thoughts. She said,

00:15:39 no civilized nation 0.94

00:15:41 needs the death penalty. 1.00

00:15:44 Lila Rose. She's a Catholic? 1.00

00:15:46 She was raised evangelical Protestant.

00:15:48 She's now Roman Catholic.

00:15:49 Again, very active in pro-life. She's written a book.

00:15:52 No civilized nation needs the death

00:15:54 penalty his death doesn't bring these innocents back to life life in prison is enough i love that

00:15:59 use of my tax dollars for the record right well and here real quick for me to play the devil's

00:16:04 advocate that i know all the different rhetoric this is what they so they'll say well it actually

00:16:08 costs more taxpayer dollars to put someone to death um than it does to put them in prison for

00:16:16 life okay number one uh first start with what's true start with what god says so first um before

00:16:24 we get into the the fiscal responsibility of how we carry out punishment for crimes the first thing

00:16:30 is does the bible allow us to treat people like pets here's the irony it's like well this is so

00:16:35 inhumane you're putting someone to death giving them the death penalty for you know a capital

00:16:39 crime because they murdered three people um yeah treating someone like a dog three meals a day

00:16:45 a little bit of outside time you know maybe we put a leash yeah if you behave you know then you

00:16:50 can go out in the dog run you know for a little bit you know and play with you know everybody

00:16:54 the other dogs and yap at each other and blah blah blah and then you can come back into your

00:16:58 kennel at night um and no that's that's inhumane you're treating people like cattle you're treating

00:17:05 people like like animals uh the bible does not have any category for uh life in prison uh somebody

00:17:12 could be arrested and as they're awaiting trial right they could be they could be captive as

00:17:18 they're awaiting a fair trial but then once the fair trial happens then there's a punishment it's

00:17:22 either a fine right it's it's double restitution if they stole or it's uh or it's the death penalty

00:17:28 if they committed a capital crime or if it's assault or something like that then they're

00:17:32 publicly beaten by rods right oh my goodness that's so i did he just say that out loud yes

00:17:37 i'll say it again publicly beaten by rods this is actually far more humane far more humane and

00:17:44 instead think about what we do we put someone uh that we put the worst people in society around

00:17:49 the worst people in society right there's no reform there's there's no uh prison is is the

00:17:56 purpose of the system is what it does if somebody um wasn't a bad guy when they went into prison

00:18:03 they come out a bad guy if they're somehow innocent they somehow wouldn't be when they

00:18:06 got out that yes and so you are literally um putting people into a system that's uh that's

00:18:13 one it's not just according to god's law and then secondly um there's there's no behavioral reform

00:18:18 that's taking place if anything it's it's what corinthians says bad company corrupting good

00:18:23 morals making the person worse and worse and worse um and then now to talk about the fiscal

00:18:28 side of things uh yes i have seen those statistics that uh would actually cost more money uh to to

00:18:34 give someone, you know, the death penalty than it does to sustain them with three meals a day

00:18:39 and air conditioning, you know, and room and board for, you know, 40, 50 years until they die of old

00:18:45 age. If that is the case, it's not because it literally costs too much money to give someone

00:18:53 lethal injection. It's because of all the court fees. It's because of all the legality, because

00:19:00 we have made it as a society virtually impossible to punish someone justly and because we've made

00:19:08 it virtually impossible to give anyone a just punishment i mean people who like this man who

00:19:13 murdered three women and you have a catholic conservative woman from her public her public

00:19:19 platform again it's an it's an oxymoron coming out and saying this is inhumane this is terrible

00:19:25 you know we shouldn't have capital punishment um well it's because of all the lila roses of the

00:19:31 world and that feminine sentiment right that is a feminine sentiment the masculine sentiment is

00:19:37 he killed how many people okay tall tree short rope right we have it on video he's got a jury

00:19:43 okay all right we're done it's actually really really cheap to put someone to death believe it

00:19:48 or not what makes it so expensive is that before you put them to death and after you put them to

00:19:53 death, you have to placate and satisfy all the women in society who think that it's bad. That's

00:20:00 why it's expensive. It's because of all the legal loops and hoops that you have to jump through

00:20:06 that have been determined primarily by a feminine sentiment. So no, I reject the notion that it

00:20:14 will cost more to put someone to death than it does to sustain them for 50 years in prison.

00:20:18 that's not true it only costs more to put them to death because we have so many people fighting

00:20:24 against it that's right and the point is when you have this type of rhetoric and thousands of people

00:20:28 liked it like i said this was a post that got a lot of traction that type of rhetoric runs cover

00:20:33 fire and there's a lot of people so women and women adjacent men who kind of see that and they

00:20:38 say yeah that kind of makes sense well we can't get the innocent people back and so i mean capital 0.99

00:20:43 punishment like this poor guy was crying out in pain and that's the dangerous effect of women with 1.00

00:20:48 public platforms they take those sentiments they take them and run with them and they run cover 0.99

00:20:53 fire for weaker individuals like those that don't have the stomach for statecraft uh i'd commented

00:20:59 actually on this post like statecraft you know how we got the society we have now where it's safe

00:21:04 for you to go pretty much anywhere uh we had a long history hundreds and hundreds of years of

00:21:09 christendom uh being really hard on criminals those that were not fit to participate in society

00:21:14 the violent those without the temperance those that couldn't abide by laws again and again for

00:21:20 hundreds of years men who ran things said you're not fit to participate in society and the way you

00:21:26 lose it is you give into the sensibilities that prevent you from maintaining it and so as long

00:21:32 as you have women leading the movement women using their voice to do that you're going to

00:21:36 have an environment where it's very difficult to push back and say no the measures we have to take 0.99

00:21:40 they're not fun and they're not pleasant but you don't understand because the alternative to this

00:21:45 that you're not considering she's not considering the alternative the alternative to this is

00:21:50 something much worse and you can't imagine it you're not thinking of it you haven't studied

00:21:54 the history you don't have in the back of your mind but we do we know what life was like prior

00:22:00 to high trust prior to having strong rule of law it was not great but then someone would come along

00:22:06 and say, well, sentimentally, the vibes, I don't know.

00:22:10 That seems pretty inhumane, capital punishment.

00:22:13 And that's the bigger problem with this.

00:22:15 Yep.

00:22:16 Real quick, I noticed in the chat somebody was asking where Michael Belch is.

00:22:19 So for those of you who are new to the channel,

00:22:21 we've done this with three hosts, myself, Wesley, Todd, and Michael Belch.

00:22:25 And Michael Belch will be actually preaching this Sunday at our church.

00:22:30 So excited to sit under the preaching of the word by Michael.

00:22:34 He is an elder in the church.

00:22:36 he's going to be preaching this sunday and uh he left right response because he is doing other

00:22:41 things and we talked about that we didn't talk about that he talked about it so his final episode

00:22:46 we had him on i can't remember what episode that was but the supreme court back when that's right

00:22:51 so this was uh probably three weeks ago something like that but if you go back and you look in it

00:22:57 and it has katanji brown jackson in the thumbnail so you can go back and you can watch that video

00:23:01 and it's the final segment the third segment that we have uh michael belch you know explain to the

00:23:06 listeners because everybody loves him we love him and uh explain why he's leaving uh some of the

00:23:11 projects that he's actually going to be working on and so how people can follow his work and see

00:23:15 what he is up to and uh in terms of will he or or wesley for that matter or nathan over there back

00:23:23 working the tech um will they always be working with me with right response ministries until the

00:23:31 day that they die, guess what? I don't know. I don't know. Will we part ways? Will Michael be

00:23:38 in the church, buried in the church, in the back cemetery? I don't know. Maybe God calls his family

00:23:47 to go somewhere else one day. Maybe God calls you to go somewhere else. Maybe I end up moving and

00:23:53 doing something else one day. But the speculation of like, there must be something really, really

00:23:57 going on um that's just a bad faith speculation and uh and you know it the listener knows it

00:24:04 we know it and uh so try not to do that but uh if that's kind of your aim if you like to tune

00:24:09 into the live stream you know because you know you just hate this ministry and hate us well then

00:24:15 you know haters gonna hate uh speaking of that uh not you know it's one thing to uh to hate watch

00:24:20 a video online uh but it is uh i mean at some level you just gotta you know give uh give honor

00:24:26 where honors do. It is impressive to not just hate watch a video online, but to hate attend

00:24:33 a church on the Lord's day, right? Like, especially when you're local, say I'm actually

00:24:38 belong to another church here in town, and I'm going to skip church to go to this other church

00:24:46 that I hate so that I can listen to a pastor that I hate so that I can then publicly post

00:24:52 slander, like an outright lie about his sermon when the sermon is publicly posted online and

00:24:59 anybody can listen for themselves. But here's the thing. It doesn't really require, you don't

00:25:05 actually have to have the facts and evidence because there is a certain point where you can

00:25:11 just say enough people don't like someone that the narrative has already been woven and you

00:25:17 actually don't have to source anything. You actually don't have to prove your point. You can

00:25:21 just say it, and there's enough people who are just, they're itching for it. They're just like,

00:25:25 yes. I didn't say it. I declared it. Yeah, I didn't say bankruptcy. I declared it.

00:25:32 And so, you know, but that happened just this last week. That's just, that's where we are.

00:25:36 We are on the front lines. We're doing things that we feel the Lord has called us to do and

00:25:40 trying to exercise courage where it is desperately needed in our society and in the church today and

00:25:45 in our nation. And because of that, there are many individuals who hate us and absolutely

00:25:53 oppose us. And some of them will just dig and dig and dig into your past to try to find things from

00:26:01 12, 13 years ago, or some of them will show up to our church on a Sunday and then try to write

00:26:08 some kind of tweet or an article or whatever about it. And there are many people who are

00:26:13 trying to do that with Michael. All right. So that's why I brought it up. I saw it in the chat,

00:26:17 you know, where's Michael, you know, and there must be something sinister going on. Well, if

00:26:21 you'd like to see more of Michael, feel free to watch the sermon from this Sunday from our church

00:26:26 where Michael will be preaching. All right. So let's go to our first commercial break and we

00:26:29 will be right back. Hello, brothers in Christ. Let me ask you something real. Are you truly

00:26:35 protecting and providing for your wife and children, not just in this life, but the one to

00:26:40 come. Here's a reality check. Only 45% of adults in America have life insurance, and of those,

00:26:47 nearly two-thirds are underinsured. That's not good stewardship. And as Christian husbands and

00:26:54 fathers, we're called to do better. But what if you could protect your family's future and wisely

00:27:00 grow your wealth right now? That's where private family banking comes in. It's a proven strategy

00:27:06 that allows you to leverage your existing cash flow,

00:27:09 build tax-free legacy wealth,

00:27:12 and give your family lasting security,

00:27:14 all while aligning with your biblical call

00:27:17 to provide and protect.

00:27:20 This is what it looks like to turn post-mill talk

00:27:23 into post-mill action.

00:27:25 Tap the link in the show notes

00:27:27 to book your free discovery call

00:27:29 and take your next step toward financial discipleship

00:27:32 and multi-generational impact.

00:27:36 heaven's harvest takes pride in providing you with the best freeze-dried emergency survival

00:27:46 food kits on the market their kits stand out because they prioritize serving sizes

00:27:51 and calories that will sustain you for the long haul no gimmicks no fillers just a diverse array

00:27:59 of nutritious options that will pleasantly surprise you but they're more than just emergency

00:28:04 food. They're advocates for sustainable preparedness. Their heirloom seed kits include

00:28:11 heirloom, non-GMO, non-hybrid, open pollinated seeds, ensuring that your garden produces the

00:28:18 same quality and variety year after year. Packaged in high-grade Mylar foil, their seeds have a 10

00:28:26 year shelf life. So get 10% off your Heaven's Harvest order by using our special discount code

00:28:34 RRM at checkout or by clicking the link in the description below. Made in the USA and free

00:28:42 shipping on orders above $99 for the US only. All right. So I made the comment just in this

00:28:50 earlier segment that when it comes to conservative women and liberalism, liberal women, you're often

00:28:55 in many ways, practically, functionally, you're talking about two sides of the same coin. And to 0.86

00:29:00 back this up i'm going to quote extensively from a wall street journal article this article just

00:29:04 came out and it's called the conservative women who are having it all because there's always this

00:29:10 dichotomy put out if you watch candace owens for example on jubilee there's a kind of a dichotomy

00:29:14 of there's a lot of women and they're advocating for traditional roles so they say women should

00:29:19 be at home women should be taking care of their children women should be married but then also at

00:29:23 the same time i think a lot of people then they put the pieces together and they say but hang on

00:29:28 I'm hearing this rhetoric from the right.

00:29:30 I'm hearing this from conservatives.

00:29:31 But I'm looking at Donald Trump's press secretary.

00:29:34 I'm looking at his chief of staff.

00:29:36 I'm looking at these women involved in pro-life.

00:29:39 And these women, in many ways, seem to be doing the same thing that I want to do.

00:29:43 And this article, it's funny, it's titled, like,

00:29:44 These are the conservative women, and in having it all,

00:29:47 what it's referring to is that they're conservatives, 0.53

00:29:50 they have all the things that come with it.

00:29:51 They're pro-family, pro-children, and I think many of them genuinely are.

00:29:54 And also they've managed to just squeeze on top of it

00:29:57 just a little career that's, you know, it's just 60 hours a week, have to fly home to Houston on

00:30:03 the weekends, and so they're able to kind of have it all. Let me read this first quote. This is

00:30:08 from, this is referring to Deputy Chief of Staff May Mailman. So this is a 37-year-old woman that 0.99

00:30:14 works now for Donald Trump in his cabin in D.C., and this is kind of her schedule. So first of all,

00:30:22 she flies home to Houston every weekend. She's pregnant. So imagine your pregnant wife. You have 1.00

00:30:27 three kids at home uh your wife she's gone in dc till friday and then work finishes up late she

00:30:34 goes ahead catches the first flight back during the week this is from the article may mailman's

00:30:38 nanny and her husband david who owns a tree moving company so he's home he's running his business too

00:30:43 gets the kid kids out of bed changes their diapers bathe and feed them and put them to bed while 0.77

00:30:47 making sure to run the dishwasher yes mailman is missing missing out on much of her kids early

00:30:53 years but she doesn't second guess or feel guilty about her choices so this is quoting her now

00:30:58 she feels lucky quote i don't have a victimhood mentality she said you have to exert a certain

00:31:04 locus of control and focus on the things you can handle without obsessing over what you can't and

00:31:10 the obsessing over what you can't the context there is motherhood the deformative years of my

00:31:17 children yeah as in well my kids won't really know me and lord knows in her career it's not as

00:31:23 though like guys i got six months more months then i'll be home for good it's going to continue 1.00

00:31:28 hey who's going to obsess over the things they can't control this conservative woman says 1.00

00:31:32 the thing she can't control is literally being present not even the same house not even the 1.00

00:31:38 same town literally being present in the same state as her children five out of seven days of

00:31:43 the week right yeah it's crazy let me continue reading uh so again this is from a wall street 1.00

00:31:49 journal article the conservative women who are having it all conservative just as heavy as uh 0.95

00:31:54 as quotes there as you could put conservative women just tend to see their lives in a different 1.00

00:31:59 light in interviews with over a dozen high profile dozen high-powered conservative women 0.99

00:32:04 they said the trad life lifestyle trad wife lifestyle was never a choice they seriously

00:32:10 considered for themselves all said that they always knew they wanted children and that they

00:32:16 also wanted a meaningful career as for what makes this juggle work for them they credited a

00:32:21 combination of grit religious faith familial and community support and a laser-like focus on

00:32:27 planning and priorities in other words many again this is across the board uh donald trump's press

00:32:36 secretary her name is katherine levitt i think that would be the way that i pronounce it she

00:32:40 went back on back to work four days after having i believe her first child this was around when he

00:32:45 was assassinated she said hey i just had my baby i feel a calling to be on this four days after she

00:32:52 had her first kid and it's interesting because they say they're very pro-family all of these

00:32:56 different things but notice then it's like well would you consider that life for yourself would

00:33:01 you be a trad wife would you be a keeper at home like the bible says would you be home to raise 1.00

00:33:06 your kid and almost all of them have said and it's the same i mean this was the arc of feminism

00:33:11 well no i'm gonna have a career too yeah what discernible difference is right the number of

00:33:17 kids i'll grant you maybe some of them have probably one to two more children than the average

00:33:22 liberal woman that also has a family but i mean we are practically functionally speaking there

00:33:27 really is no difference it's the same picture it's a it's a revolt against the traditional way

00:33:32 of life it's a revolt against how societies have been ordered and then practically you look at uh

00:33:38 you look at uh anxiety you look at happiness you look at all these different metrics man why are

00:33:43 women so stressed out why do they have so many mental health issues uh why why is divorce so

00:33:47 common do you know what would be a i'm just trying to think here what could drive divorce i i don't

00:33:52 know maybe not seeing your spouse five out of seven days of the week not being present with

00:33:57 especially if your spouse is raising children with the nanny i mean in the mind that's never

00:34:03 gone wrong has it yeah in the mind of those children it's like okay there's daddy and there's

00:34:08 mommy no no nanny mommy right i mean that's that's how a one-year-old child is going to

00:34:16 there's there's a male there's a female they're the ones who give me baths they're the ones who

00:34:21 wake me up they're the ones who make breakfast they're the ones who help me get dressed they're

00:34:24 like mom and dad oh that's actually not your mom right well then where's mom and she's doing more

00:34:31 important things yeah and that's definitely never introduced affairs or infidelity in the home

00:34:35 either that you're just gone most of the week let me even again illustrate this we've talked about 0.98

00:34:40 this before let's take a governor christy gnome i mean she is miss conservative christian family

00:34:46 values governor christy gnome this is a headline from vanity fair a couple years ago god-fearing

00:34:51 family woman and Corey Lewandowski, Trump creep, reportedly had years-long affair. It's pretty

00:34:57 well substantiated that Governor Kristi Noem, I believe South Dakota, and she was a big like get 0.99

00:35:02 men out of women's sports, all of that. And what was she doing as governor? Oh, having a years-long 1.00

00:35:08 affair with someone besides her husband. Same thing over here, you have Representative Lauren 1.00

00:35:13 Boebert. Again, this is your Miss, I'm pro-Second Amendment, I'm pro-family, God and country.

00:35:19 It's another headline. 0.96

00:35:20 Lauren Boebert and her ex-husbands have a series of public spats,

00:35:23 timeline of the relationship.

00:35:24 She has the three kids in there.

00:35:26 The family disintegrated, gone, split between the two of them,

00:35:30 sharing time, themselves publicly feuding.

00:35:33 Imagine seeing that publicly, your mom and your dad fighting with each other

00:35:37 as do you split up and you're caught in the middle. 1.00

00:35:40 These women are destroying their families. 1.00

00:35:43 And again, all in search of, what, a career? 1.00

00:35:47 Who's ever 60 and 70?

00:35:48 and it's like, oh man, I just provided so much shareholder value.

00:35:52 Like, it's kind of ridiculous, and you have to see. 0.56

00:35:55 Like, oh, well, she's a conservative, she's this, she's a God-fearing woman. 0.97

00:35:58 No.

00:35:59 The people that love Jesus obey him.

00:36:02 And one of Jesus' commands to women, it's not the same as men.

00:36:05 They're different commands.

00:36:07 Men's responsibilities, women's responsibilities. 1.00

00:36:09 His command to women is to be keepers at home. 0.99

00:36:12 And the description of the wayward woman is, she's never at home. 0.96

00:36:15 In the Proverbs, it's Proverbs 7.

00:36:17 her feet she's always going other places right so it's like i love jesus have you taken the first

00:36:23 steps in obeying him right oh you haven't right uh another point i wanted to raise is you know a

00:36:29 lot of people will uh try to counter what we're saying here by saying well it's it's the men the

00:36:36 men aren't willing to step up and there are a lot of apathetic cowardly men certainly i talked about

00:36:42 that in the cold open to this episode um but at the same time it's it's not just that you know

00:36:49 well every single male in the entire country refuses uh to lead no that's that's not the

00:36:56 case there actually are a lot of men who are being who could lead and could lead well but

00:37:01 who are displaced because they're intentionally whether it's the gop or whether whatever it may

00:37:07 be are intentionally seeking out women particularly young blonde attractive women it's it's actually

00:37:17 their goal they're you know whether it's fox news or whatever it may be they're they're um it's not

00:37:22 well you know we had to turn to women right like like because this is what christians say over and

00:37:27 over they're like well this is a deborah situation you know um uh you know what if what if she's just 0.77

00:37:33 a modern day deborah you know and she's rising through the ranks because all the men are cowardly 0.85

00:37:38 and refuse to i talk to men every day they're not all cowardly there are a lot of cowardly men

00:37:44 but there are good competent gifted qualified courageous men to lead they are being passed over

00:37:54 by women the the way that this affects not just society and politics but even the economic

00:38:02 repercussions of this there are men who would be able to hold these vocations these positions and 0.54

00:38:09 provide for wife and children and have a single income family where mom can stay at home and

00:38:16 that's not happening in part because men have been literally displaced by women women are it's not

00:38:24 just women are filling the void left by men. No, weak men are seeking out women and intentionally

00:38:34 taking them over qualified men who are able and willing to fill that role, but are being skipped

00:38:42 and avoided and forgotten because they know that, well, having a woman will work better. 0.73

00:38:49 And if we were to go a little bit deeper, another level, why would you do that? Let's just 0.92

00:38:54 say, in the realm of politics, right? Why would the GOP, why would political entities be thinking,

00:39:00 all right, there are men actually who want this position and who are qualified for this position, 0.93

00:39:07 perhaps even more qualified for this position, but we're intentionally going to seek out a woman. 0.68

00:39:13 Why would they do that? Well, they do that because they think that it will play better 0.99

00:39:18 to their constituents they think that having a woman in said position will garner more 0.82

00:39:24 more likability more sympathy more whatever uh well but who cares who cares if it's uh more

00:39:33 more people like it well i'll tell you what makes you care what forces you to care a democracy with

00:39:39 universal suffrage why are we appointing women as politicians because we gave women the vote

00:39:44 that's why all that is is actually downstream of the 19th amendment why why does the gop

00:39:52 you know allegedly conservative sit there and say yeah we've got uh we actually have like 500 guys

00:39:59 who have been busting their tails for years and years and years trying to work their way up the

00:40:05 rank and they're going to be passed over for this position even though they're willing eager right 1.00

00:40:11 and and more than qualified but we have to get this little blonde chick to do it instead why 1.00

00:40:17 because we have to win an election and we can't win an election when it comes down strictly to 1.00

00:40:23 the merits in principle we have to win an election by uh getting enough votes from the peanut gallery

00:40:29 and who is the peanut gallery every single person in the country over the age of 18 every single

00:40:37 one of them. You mean, no, no, no, you just need to have the support of the people in the country

00:40:42 who actually lead the country, right? The heads of households, you know, those who own land,

00:40:47 those who pay taxes, those who have been here for generations, who are actually founding American

00:40:52 stock. Nope. Anyone, male, female, right? On welfare or paying taxes, living in project-free

00:41:01 housing or owning a home in their family for 30 years. They've been here for one year. They've

00:41:07 been here for 10 generations no doesn't matter they each get the same say in the direction of

00:41:14 our country they each get a vote universal suffrage is one of the most surefire ways to end

00:41:21 a civilization because it requires that the politicians no longer care about what is good

00:41:27 but rather simply try to please the masses and if you're trying to please the masses and 51

00:41:33 percent of those masses are women then what are you going to do you're going to pass over men

00:41:39 to put forward women that's a major part of all this and what you're saying too with universal

00:41:45 suffrage is not all forms of voting are terrible and immoral but a type of voting where like you

00:41:50 said everybody participates in a republic citizenship is very closely tied to the virtue

00:41:56 and character and the stock of a man so it's men it's men that are productive it's men that own

00:42:00 property even aristotle he tended towards men that are specifically civilly engaged so men who know

00:42:06 politics men who have the training and it's those men that it's like all right so here on one hand

00:42:11 this was a real state this was a real race here in texas you had a man who had run he was a fifth

00:42:16 generation texan father to five children had run a very successful title company he was a lawyer

00:42:23 i mean the type of man christian character godly family vocation and he had to run a neck and neck

00:42:30 race knock down drag out versus a woman who i could only tell her only real accomplishment was

00:42:36 shaking hands and kissing babies now if you're voting block not her babies no not even hers 1.00

00:42:41 maybe she had one or two she would probably leave her babies right kiss other people's babies yep

00:42:46 and literally like a man qualified in every single metric and it's like i have to spend months

00:42:50 knocking on people's doors uh trying to outdo all these posters that are painting as a terrible

00:42:57 person just to make sure that 50 of the women the voting bloc being women don't pick my opponent

00:43:04 again just because she's a woman but in a restricted republic the men who are making

00:43:09 decisions go well yeah of course no duh he's the most qualified man to go up and to represent us

00:43:15 but like those are real dynamics and guys lose those races then you have katie brit as a senator

00:43:21 you have women like it's it's tough to think this way but like women going through menopause

00:43:26 working as, like Pam Bondi, working as the Attorney General for the United States. 0.96

00:43:31 That sounds miserable.

00:43:32 Like, just as a practical, at a practical human level.

00:43:35 That sounds terrible. 0.95

00:43:36 That's not something I want to put my wife through. 1.00

00:43:38 Hey, going through menopause, that's great. 1.00

00:43:40 Would you enjoy 70 hours a week working in the United States Capitol?

00:43:43 Very high-stress situation.

00:43:45 Oh, millions of people will hate you, too, for the way that you handled the Epstein files.

00:43:48 Have no fear of that.

00:43:49 You go out there and you get it, babe.

00:43:52 Sounds awful. 0.56

00:43:52 Sounds like a terrible husband. 0.58

00:43:54 and even people surrounding people that picked her Donald Trump even those guys what are we doing

00:44:00 right right yeah and we we've got to fix um we're not a republic where I know we're supposed to be

00:44:09 I like republics as much as the next guy but we just don't have one right it's like well we're

00:44:14 not we're not a democracy we're a constitutional republic no we're not no we're not uh number one 0.71

00:44:20 the civil rights act trumps the constitution in all and for all intents and purposes in terms of

00:44:26 its function effectively um and and then in terms of being a republic um no a republic would have

00:44:34 some form of of um it's it's not a free-for-all it's it's not every single person um is coming

00:44:41 and voting that's you know i've quoted before but that um that little video where the guy says you 0.88

00:44:47 know democracy is for the people by the people of the people but the people are retarded so democracy 0.97

00:44:52 is you know for the retarded by the retarded and of the retarded and that's absolutely where we are 0.99

00:44:58 today not everybody should be able to vote not everybody should be able to dictate the direction 0.98

00:45:05 of the country if you don't have a stake in the country's past you shouldn't have a say in the

00:45:10 country's future um if if you're not married and and don't have children or don't intend to have

00:45:16 children then why why does it matter why should you be able to uh to make decisions that could

00:45:22 direct the course of the nation for the next 250 years when you don't have anyone you're gonna

00:45:28 you're gonna be dead and you don't even have any posterity to to stay you know your your living

00:45:35 memory continued by them you should have a stake in the past and a stake in the future stake in

00:45:39 the past you should be at least third generation on both sides of the family you need to be a

00:45:44 heritage american stake in the future you need to be married with the intent of children you also

00:45:50 need to be contributing you need to be land-owning paying taxes if you're taking welfare you should

00:45:55 get negative votes you are a fiscal drag on the society right you are taking why in the world

00:46:03 would you get a say? You are freeloading off of the taxpayers. You should have zero say. So you

00:46:10 should be landowning. You should be paying taxes. You should be a heritage American. You should be

00:46:15 married. You should be male heads of households. Part of what's happened with all this is we 0.95

00:46:21 no longer believe the family is the basic building block of society. Instead, we've made it the

00:46:28 individual and we when we moved away from families to individuals we became further fractured atomized

00:46:35 um and we set up this this this perpetual feud between this battle of the sexes part of the

00:46:42 battle of the sexes is because of the 19th amendment um it is women versus men men versus

00:46:49 women and say well but women should have a voice they always had a voice every wife every sister 0.58

00:46:54 every daughter, every mother had a voice. They had a voice through the avenue of a man who loved

00:47:01 them and cared for them, their brother, their uncle, their father, their husband. That husband

00:47:06 was going into the voting booth thinking about his children, thinking about his wife, thinking

00:47:11 about the family unit, casting one vote with a married father who owns land, who has been in the

00:47:19 country generations back and plans to have his posterity as a vital part of the country generations

00:47:25 forward. That makes sense. That's what healthy societies are built on. But when you get rid of

00:47:30 that, anybody can show up in America in a matter of months, years, at the longest, they can not

00:47:38 only vote, but they can actually be one of our civil officers. And expressly, they're not even

00:47:44 trying to hide the quiet part anymore. They're saying it out loud. I am first and foremost a

00:47:49 Somalian. But I am here in America serving as a civil officer in America for the good of Somalia.

00:48:00 So not only do we allow them to vote at this point, but we allow them to rule. And then we're

00:48:05 like, man, the country's really going downhill. I wonder what the problem is. How did this occur?

00:48:09 And to bring it full circle, that impulse for inclusion. So you say, hey, only men that have

00:48:14 duty, only men that have jobs, men that have a stake in the future, they can vote. Your biggest

00:48:18 opposition to that is going to be most certainly liberal women. It's also going to be conservative 1.00

00:48:22 women, and that's because of the feminine impulse for inclusivity. Women, by nature of caring for 1.00

00:48:28 children, as they always have, they have a very inclusive nature. A good woman will not want to 1.00

00:48:33 see one of her children left out, right? She has four children. Three of them are having a great

00:48:36 time. One of the wonderful things about women is they're going to notice, hey, he's over there in

00:48:40 the corner, and he's sad about something, and I want to bring him in and make sure, hey, you should 0.71

00:48:45 include so-and-so that's a wonderful quality except when you're trying to have a functioning

00:48:51 nation when you get to that point hey we should include everyone well he's a felon well come on

00:48:57 he should have a voice and they should have a voice and well they just got here well but i mean

00:49:01 like this nation has to be safe for them too it is directly the feminine sensibility towards

00:49:07 inclusion that got us to expand voting rights as big as they are right now and it will be pushing

00:49:13 back against that feminine sensibility. Practically, we probably don't go from everyone voting to a 1.00

00:49:18 half of people voting, aka men. We probably go from everyone voting to nobody voting, aka monarchy.

00:49:24 But if we were to go back, it would have to be, hey, I know as women, you want to include, 0.99

00:49:29 you want to make sure everyone has a fair say. That doesn't work at scale for 350 million people. 1.00

00:49:34 There are millions of people who should not have a say. They have no duty. They don't pay taxes.

00:49:38 they don't contribute they offer nothing to society and at the very least we can relieve

00:49:43 them of the burden of going to the voting booth every two years yeah and relieve us of the burden 0.99

00:49:48 of their stupidity of leaving of living with your choices yeah next time cast yourself into the when 1.00

00:49:53 i go to walmart and rid us of your stupidity when i go to walmart i'm just i'm always relieved 1.00

00:49:59 these people are voting yeah they've got my future in their hands absolutely crazy all right let's go 0.99

00:50:04 to our last commercial break and we'll be right back if you want to uh send in a super chat uh

00:50:10 we're gonna deal with whatever questions you guys might have so we'll deal with some of the uh the

00:50:14 questions and uh we'll prioritize the super chats first also make sure to subscribe uh on youtube

00:50:20 and click the bell so that you'll be notified as we post content and then make sure to follow us

00:50:25 over on x uh our handle is at right response m as in ministries at right response m you can follow

00:50:32 us on X. And if you are watching on X right now, do us a favor and retweet or repost the video

00:50:37 so that it has legs, a little bit of staying power, and is seen by more people. We'll go to

00:50:42 our last commercial break, then we'll come back. We'll start dealing with questions and super chats

00:50:46 first. The danger of centralized power is often represented by the word king. As Americans, we

00:50:53 hate the word king. Civilian ownership of body armor is about helping people to have increased

00:51:00 power to resist tyrants and criminals.

00:51:04 And so Armored Republic is about helping you to preserve your God-given rights to the honor

00:51:09 of the Lord Jesus Christ because he is the King of Kings, and he governs kings and he

00:51:14 will judge them.

00:51:17 This is Armored Republic, and in a republic there is no king but Christ.

00:51:23 We are free craftsmen, and we are honored to be your Armorsmith choice.

00:51:30 We'll see you next time.

00:52:00 and generates a report that is sent to an accountability partner.

00:52:05 Covenant Eyes is offering our listeners 30 days free when you sign up using our promo code.

00:52:12 Whether you're concerned about online safety for yourself, your kids, or even your workplace,

00:52:19 Covenant Eyes has your back with its powerful screen accountability and filtering services.

00:52:25 Covenant Eyes provides peace of mind by monitoring and reporting digital activity in a way that's both effective and respectful of privacy.

00:52:36 Plus, the Victory app offers free resources to guide your understanding of why people get stuck in pornography and what you can do to help them.

00:52:47 Try it out for an entire month absolutely free using our code.

00:52:52 so don't wait take advantage of this exclusive offer and start protecting yourself your family

00:52:59 and the people around you today visit the link in the show notes and use promo code rrm for 30 days

00:53:08 free all right we're going to go ahead and deal with the chat uh we've got three super chats which

00:53:15 we appreciate uh god's doomer he gave us ten dollars no comment just giving us a super chat

00:53:22 just trying to help out we appreciate that a lot thank you god's doomer but no dooming but no do

00:53:27 me no black that's right uh and then we have blood based he gave us five dollars 4.99 blood

00:53:32 based again no comment no question uh and then he gave us another 4.99 so we've got 10 bucks from

00:53:38 god's doomer we got uh 10 bucks from blood base we appreciate both you guys thank you uh for your

00:53:42 generosity and then we've got a question from ninja 51 50 uh ninja 51 50 he asked this do you

00:53:49 think that all this is happening because there are not enough strong men um i don't think so

00:53:57 oh it's a she all right nathan's saying it's a she so uh she asks do you think that this is

00:54:03 happening because there are not enough strong men no um i think that these things started

00:54:08 because there were uh weak men absolutely right the old adage of you know um hard men make good

00:54:14 times good times make soft men soft men make bad times bad times create you know hard men

00:54:19 so I think that you know there was a there was a time where where yeah we did not have enough

00:54:25 strong men I think that Christendom had done its work because of many faithful generations of both

00:54:31 men and women in the past and created a society that that was healthy that was strong and many

00:54:38 men chose to be apathetic and lulled to sleep and feminism began to creep up on their watch

00:54:44 but I don't think that it's the case now right the question of you know is this because we

00:54:49 don't have enough strong men well you can never have too many strong men so i i do think that yes

00:54:53 we do need more courageous men but i think my position is that as it stands today um that there

00:55:00 are actually several courageous men um who have been completely ostracized and silenced and passed

00:55:06 over um so i actually think that yes i'd like to see us have even more courageous men uh but first

00:55:11 i'd like to see us actually use the courageous men we currently have i i think that there are

00:55:16 men right now who are willing to be courageous uh willing to be strong who are courageous who are

00:55:21 strong and who are both qualified and willing to to fill the gap but they are being passed over

00:55:28 um so no i don't think it's just oh this is just deborah you know because uh all the men are you

00:55:34 know trembling and shaking in their boots and choosing to stay back at home um no i think um

00:55:39 there's a lot of qualified men who would go out to the fight they would run to the battle um but

00:55:45 uh deborah has been chosen over them yeah men also too so a a courageous man uh it's funny i was

00:55:52 sharing earlier this week some studies just men with higher testosterone they're more less willing

00:55:57 to just behave in ways that are socially acceptable so it's men that are high t that say 0.97

00:56:02 the mask is stupid i'm not wearing it they're the ones that are more likely to speak out but by that 0.98

00:56:06 men that are courageous they're more likely to speak out they don't acquiescence well to kind 0.99

00:56:11 of these existing structures that we've put in place that are very feminine coded, so they won't

00:56:15 ascend through the ranks in a company or in a political party. Like in the Republican Party 1.00

00:56:20 of Texas, it's like, well, why don't we have any great councilmen or great board members? Well,

00:56:25 because they got there for 10 to 15 years, and the way they got there was by being very non-offensive.

00:56:31 They didn't speak out. They didn't stand out. They didn't mess with the status quo. So those

00:56:36 type of men were the softer men. They were, and certainly many of them, women. They all acquiesced

00:56:42 into the very feminine coded structure that was there. And then the good men, there are many of

00:56:46 them, hundreds of them out there, but they would never survive the process. People wouldn't be

00:56:50 willing to work with them. People wouldn't be willing to put them forward. People wouldn't be

00:56:54 willing to be friends with them because again, the structure itself is coded for maintain the status

00:56:58 quo, not be offensive. And so that's why when you look around, you're like, man, state representatives,

00:57:04 state senators the republican party for us the rpt republican party of texas man there's no great

00:57:10 guys in here and to be honest there are still some but many of them have had to deal very much

00:57:14 so with the fallout of standing up speaking out and nearly losing their job right yep um any other

00:57:22 questions nathan that's the only one i saw okay uh we're gonna just go ahead and leave it let this

00:57:27 episode be a little bit shorter this uh for today uh today's what wednesday yes okay so we have

00:57:33 friday uh that'll be the last live stream of this week and then we have the friday special with dr

00:57:38 stephen wolf that's friday at 8 p.m central so if you're new to the channel our our regiment is as

00:57:44 follows we do the live stream three times a week monday wednesday and friday at 3 p.m central time

00:57:48 and then we have the friday special which is pre-recorded and it's a deep dive multiple part

00:57:53 series uh the topic is all things christian nationalism uh with dr stephen wolf that's at

00:57:59 8 p.m. on Friday evening. So we'll have one more live stream with Wes and I while Antonio is out

00:58:05 at 3 p.m. this Friday. Then we'll have the Friday special at 8 p.m. on Friday with myself and Dr.

00:58:10 Stephen Wolfe. And then we will come back on Monday, Lord willing, me and Wes and Antonio,

00:58:17 all three of us back in the studio. So we hope this episode has been helpful for you,

00:58:20 that you've been blessed by it. And we will see you on Friday, Lord willing, at 3 p.m. Central.

00:58:25 God bless.

00:58:29 We'll be right back.

`witch hunt`	Both words, anywhere in the episode.
`"witch hunt"`	The exact phrase.
`witch OR hunt`	Either word.
`"alpha male" -"high value"`	The first phrase, but not the second.
`(feminist OR feminism) AND (marriage OR divorce)`	Parentheses group alternatives.
`"decline civilization"~5`	Both words within 5 words of each other.

`misogyn*`	Any word starting with "misogyn": misogyny, misogynist, misogynistic…
`feminizm~1`	Words one letter off: catches typos and transcription errors.

`person:"Andrew Tate"`	Episodes where they host, guest, or are mentioned.
`host:"Glenn Beck"`	Episodes they host.
`guest:"Jordan Peterson"`	Episodes they appear on as a guest.
`mentioned:"Andrew Tate" -host:"Andrew Tate"`	Talked about on other people's shows.
`show:"Bannon's War Room"`	Episodes from one show.

`topics:abortion`	Episodes tagged with a topic (see the Topics page).
`summary:"Andrew Tate"`	Words in the episode summary. Summaries are machine-written and can be wrong.

`"great replacement" AND episode_date:[NOW-1YEAR TO NOW]`	From the past 12 months.
`lockdown AND episode_date:[2020-01-01T00:00:00Z TO 2020-12-31T23:59:59Z]`	From one year. Dates need the full time, as shown.
`"high value" AND misogyny_count:[100 TO *]`	Episodes with 100 or more sentences flagged as misogynistic. Also: hate_speech_count, toxicity_count, word_count.

The NXR Podcast - August 06, 2025

THE LIVESTREAM - Werry’s Law： No Such Thing As Public Conservative Women

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript