Every conservative woman with a public platform is on a trajectory toward liberalism, according to Wary's Law. Is there such a thing as a truly conservative woman? Is there a woman who is truly conservative in her convictions? What does it mean to be a conservative woman in the eyes of God?
00:00:49.400Now, this is something that has been observed by many for quite a while, but Wary, a friend
00:00:55.760of mine put it into concise and clear language a while back. He posted an infamous tweet that I'm
00:01:03.580going to show for all of you and read, for those of you who are listening, that I think will bring
00:01:08.540a lot of clarity. Here it is. Wary said, there are two elements of Wary's law. Number one,
00:01:16.600an evangelical man will only speak out on a controversial cultural issue, or political we
00:01:23.880might say, if he can do so by citing a woman who has already done it. Number two, every conservative
00:01:32.060woman, and this is what we're going to focus on, every conservative woman with a public platform0.99
00:01:38.140is on a trajectory toward liberalism. Let me say that one more time. The second component of1.00
00:01:45.120Wary's law, proven beyond a shadow of a doubt to always be true in every instance, is this.
00:01:51.940every conservative woman with a public platform is on a trajectory toward liberalism and there
00:02:00.640you go there you have it that is wary's law and it has proven to be true again and again and again
00:02:08.200because if there is a woman who is truly conservative and conservative i understand
00:02:14.660it's not the best word why is it not the best word because well you could be conserving something
00:02:19.580that is biblical and traditional, old, tried, true, or you can say, I'm a conservative. What
00:02:24.880are you conserving? Well, I'm conserving, you know, the politics of, of 2015, you know, I'm
00:02:30.580conserving the 1990s. And so in that sense, yeah, there are plenty of feminist conservative women1.00
00:02:37.520that are in the technical sense, actually conservative. If you're conservative, you know,1.00
00:02:43.640seeking to conserve something that's fairly recent. But if we say conservative, and what we
00:02:49.940mean by that is a woman who is biblically conservative. She's trying to conserve the0.97
00:02:55.700timeless Christian principles of Scripture. She's biblical, she's traditional. If we're speaking of0.63
00:03:03.780a conservative woman in that regard, then a conservative woman who is speaking and teaching0.99
00:03:10.300and leading and directing people publicly from some public platform is an oxymoron. Jumbo shrimp,1.00
00:03:20.760right? Intelligent liberal, right? There's all kinds of oxymorons, and this would be one of
00:03:25.840them. Public conservative woman. There's no such thing. A truly conservative woman, again,1.00
00:03:34.660using the word conservative, not conserving the 1990s, but biblically conservative. That woman
00:03:41.000is a domestic woman. She is a homebody. She is a lady of the hearth. That is a woman who is1.00
00:03:50.400out of sight. I don't mean that she never goes into public. I'm not saying that she can't go
00:03:55.440to the grocery store. I'm not saying that she can't take the children to the park,
00:03:59.640But I'm talking about public platforms. Speaking, leading, influencing from a public platform is not what a truly conservative woman does. And I've seen this go both ways. To be fair to Wary's Law here, one scenario is that a conservative woman with a public platform is on a trajectory towards liberalism or she's on a trajectory off of that public platform.1.00
00:04:28.020and by God's grace, and it's a wonderful—you love to see it. You love to see it. It's a wonderful
00:04:33.620thing that God, in his compassion and kindness towards that particular woman, has done many
00:04:39.500times. Many times there is a woman who is biblical in her convictions for the most part. She's not,
00:04:48.000obviously, she's not entirely consistent, which is why we're seeing her publicly talking about it,
00:04:52.720influencing, seeking to lead, seeking to grow her influence. But over time, her convictions
00:04:58.820actually don't lessen, but they get stronger. She becomes more convicted by the scriptures.
00:05:04.760She wants to be more pleasing to the Lord. Maybe she's a young single woman at first,
00:05:10.220but then she gets married and she has her first child and then a second and then a third.
00:05:15.140And little by little, you wake up one day and five years have gone by and you're like,
00:05:20.040hey i never hear from so-and-so anymore i wonder what happened to to this woman you know she had
00:05:26.100some some decent takes online you know i used to follow her her x account you know or she had a
00:05:32.420podcast for a while that that had some good things you know that she was saying and and i never hear
00:05:37.980from her anymore uh what happened well what happened is that uh she started listening to
00:05:44.280her own podcast. What happened is that she influenced and led herself right into biblical
00:05:52.800womanhood. And leading herself into biblical womanhood necessarily means leading herself
00:05:59.160out of the public sphere. And again, not saying that women aren't literally in public sometimes,
00:06:06.060but public leadership, public platform, publicly seeking to speak to and lead and teach others.0.99
00:06:15.260That is an oxymoron. That is not feminine. It's not domestic, right? I think of 1 Peter 3 that0.89
00:06:22.500says that the characteristics of a woman who has inward beauty, imperishable beauty of the heart
00:06:29.940that is pleasing in the sight of God is that she is a quiet woman with a gentle spirit.
00:06:38.380Those are the two characteristics, the only two characteristics that are mentioned
00:06:41.680in this particular passage in 1 Peter 3, quiet and gentle spirit. Those two characteristics make
00:06:49.460up imperishable internal beauty of the heart that God finds to be pleasing. It is not feminine,1.00
00:06:57.060not in any biblical sense, to be online in the public sphere and battling with men in the public
00:07:05.980sphere. Even if those men are wrong, even if those men are progressives and leftists and liberals,
00:07:11.960then that's something that a man should be doing. Now, back to the first point of where he's law,
00:07:17.260and then we'll jump into the episode. The first point is that when it comes not just to generally
00:07:22.700conservative men in the realm of politics and culture, but particularly evangelical men,
00:07:28.920Christian men in the evangelical world, church world. His first point is this. An evangelical
00:07:36.380man will only speak out on a controversial cultural issue if he can do so by citing a
00:07:43.100woman who already has, I personally would add to that, and say a woman who has already spoken out
00:07:48.460or a black man. I think either one would be fair, a white woman or a male who is non-white,0.68
00:07:57.360a non-white male or a white woman, right? It's like, man, there's this big issue going on in0.61
00:08:02.580politics right now, going on, you know, in the culture war. Has a white woman talked about it
00:08:08.840publicly yet? Has a black or Hispanic man talked about it publicly yet? Oh, phew, okay. Then I can
00:08:17.600come in behind them and simply echo what they've already said. Without that cover fire, without a
00:08:26.000white woman or a non-white male leading the way, then you can expect an evangelical man,0.65
00:08:33.880evangelical pastor, to not take the risk, to not exercise the courage. And so I say that just to0.60
00:08:43.120temper what I've already said, I do have sympathy. I do have sympathy because I do think that there
00:08:50.240are many women who are conservative and not just conserving the 1990s, but in the biblical
00:08:54.940traditional sense, who would love to see men, godly, courageous men into the fray. But sadly,
00:09:04.140often they don't. They don't. And so eventually, I think some of these women speak out. And then
00:09:12.140once they speak out, then you have the cover fire and these men feel as though they have permission
00:09:16.480to follow up behind and echo the sentiments. Now they feel like they can speak out. And this is
00:09:22.560just this vicious cycle that keeps going round and round and round. We've been watching it for
00:09:27.560decades at this point, but it's been especially prevalent over the last few years between
00:09:34.300podcasting and social media and all these kinds of things. And at a certain point,
00:09:38.860oh, I think John MacArthur, you know, will honor him. He just recently passed away and is now
00:09:44.380in glory with the Lord. And he famously said, when someone asked him once, you know, what do
00:09:50.280you think? It was Todd Friel. What do you think about Beth Moore? Two words. What would you say?
00:09:54.880He said, go home. Wonderful. I love it. Go home. Be feminine. Be domestic. Be a lady of the hearth.
00:10:06.580exercise and model a quiet and gentle spirit. But we don't have a whole lot of that. And so
00:10:16.260what we're left with instead is conservative women saying things that sound good for a while,0.76
00:10:22.660and then lo and behold, shocker, they come out a little bit later saying things that are not
00:10:29.260conservative at all and all i'm saying is can we please as a society and especially christians in
00:10:37.360america come to a place where we're no longer surprised by this where we realize that that you
00:10:42.580know the um the purpose of a system is what it does right the purpose of a system is what it
00:10:48.340does oh my goodness i can't believe that this this woman who i followed for the last you know
00:10:53.020two and a half years she was so conservative and said so many good things and now she's saying
00:10:57.320some things that aren't conservative. But was she so conservative? I mean, she's literally
00:11:04.340in the public sphere speaking to men and women alike, telling them what to do, wearing a three0.77
00:11:12.700piece, you know, boss babe pantsuit. No, it's not that she switched. That's what I'm trying to get
00:11:19.840across. It's not that all these conservative women keep becoming liberals. No, they weren't0.99
00:11:25.140conservative women in the first place. How do you know? Because if they were truly conservative,
00:11:29.120I would have never heard their name. That's how I know. So this episode is brought to you by our
00:11:35.240premier sponsors, Armored Republic and Reese Fund. Also by our Patreon members. You can join our
00:11:40.480Patreon by going over to patreon.com forward slash right response ministries. And also this episode
00:11:46.580is brought to you by our generous donors. You can make a donation today by simply going to
00:52:00.860and generates a report that is sent to an accountability partner.
00:52:05.560Covenant Eyes is offering our listeners 30 days free when you sign up using our promo code.
00:52:12.160Whether you're concerned about online safety for yourself, your kids, or even your workplace,
00:52:19.240Covenant Eyes has your back with its powerful screen accountability and filtering services.
00:52:25.680Covenant Eyes provides peace of mind by monitoring and reporting digital activity in a way that's both effective and respectful of privacy.
00:52:36.920Plus, the Victory app offers free resources to guide your understanding of why people get stuck in pornography and what you can do to help them.
00:52:47.840Try it out for an entire month absolutely free using our code.
00:52:52.760so don't wait take advantage of this exclusive offer and start protecting yourself your family
00:52:59.220and the people around you today visit the link in the show notes and use promo code rrm for 30 days
00:53:08.520free all right we're going to go ahead and deal with the chat uh we've got three super chats which
00:53:15.480we appreciate uh god's doomer he gave us ten dollars no comment just giving us a super chat
00:53:22.260just trying to help out we appreciate that a lot thank you god's doomer but no dooming but no do
00:53:27.100me no black that's right uh and then we have blood based he gave us five dollars 4.99 blood
00:53:32.940based again no comment no question uh and then he gave us another 4.99 so we've got 10 bucks from
00:53:38.100god's doomer we got uh 10 bucks from blood base we appreciate both you guys thank you uh for your
00:53:42.840generosity and then we've got a question from ninja 51 50 uh ninja 51 50 he asked this do you
00:53:49.860think that all this is happening because there are not enough strong men um i don't think so
00:53:57.780oh it's a she all right nathan's saying it's a she so uh she asks do you think that this is
00:54:03.040happening because there are not enough strong men no um i think that these things started
00:54:08.180because there were uh weak men absolutely right the old adage of you know um hard men make good
00:54:14.680times good times make soft men soft men make bad times bad times create you know hard men
00:54:19.400so I think that you know there was a there was a time where where yeah we did not have enough
00:54:25.480strong men I think that Christendom had done its work because of many faithful generations of both
00:54:31.440men and women in the past and created a society that that was healthy that was strong and many
00:54:38.220men chose to be apathetic and lulled to sleep and feminism began to creep up on their watch
00:54:44.800but I don't think that it's the case now right the question of you know is this because we
00:54:49.380don't have enough strong men well you can never have too many strong men so i i do think that yes
00:54:53.380we do need more courageous men but i think my position is that as it stands today um that there
00:55:00.020are actually several courageous men um who have been completely ostracized and silenced and passed
00:55:06.260over um so i actually think that yes i'd like to see us have even more courageous men uh but first
00:55:11.780i'd like to see us actually use the courageous men we currently have i i think that there are
00:55:16.240men right now who are willing to be courageous uh willing to be strong who are courageous who are
00:55:21.420strong and who are both qualified and willing to to fill the gap but they are being passed over
00:55:28.340um so no i don't think it's just oh this is just deborah you know because uh all the men are you
00:55:34.060know trembling and shaking in their boots and choosing to stay back at home um no i think um
00:55:39.080there's a lot of qualified men who would go out to the fight they would run to the battle um but
00:55:45.120uh deborah has been chosen over them yeah men also too so a a courageous man uh it's funny i was
00:55:52.260sharing earlier this week some studies just men with higher testosterone they're more less willing
00:55:57.000to just behave in ways that are socially acceptable so it's men that are high t that say0.97
00:56:02.360the mask is stupid i'm not wearing it they're the ones that are more likely to speak out but by that0.98
00:56:06.900men that are courageous they're more likely to speak out they don't acquiescence well to kind0.99
00:56:11.380of these existing structures that we've put in place that are very feminine coded, so they won't
00:56:15.740ascend through the ranks in a company or in a political party. Like in the Republican Party1.00
00:56:20.020of Texas, it's like, well, why don't we have any great councilmen or great board members? Well,
00:56:25.780because they got there for 10 to 15 years, and the way they got there was by being very non-offensive.
00:56:31.260They didn't speak out. They didn't stand out. They didn't mess with the status quo. So those
00:56:36.460type of men were the softer men. They were, and certainly many of them, women. They all acquiesced
00:56:42.400into the very feminine coded structure that was there. And then the good men, there are many of
00:56:46.720them, hundreds of them out there, but they would never survive the process. People wouldn't be
00:56:50.620willing to work with them. People wouldn't be willing to put them forward. People wouldn't be
00:56:54.220willing to be friends with them because again, the structure itself is coded for maintain the status
00:56:58.840quo, not be offensive. And so that's why when you look around, you're like, man, state representatives,
00:57:04.760state senators the republican party for us the rpt republican party of texas man there's no great
00:57:10.040guys in here and to be honest there are still some but many of them have had to deal very much
00:57:14.460so with the fallout of standing up speaking out and nearly losing their job right yep um any other
00:57:22.020questions nathan that's the only one i saw okay uh we're gonna just go ahead and leave it let this
00:57:27.760episode be a little bit shorter this uh for today uh today's what wednesday yes okay so we have
00:57:33.220friday uh that'll be the last live stream of this week and then we have the friday special with dr
00:57:38.180stephen wolf that's friday at 8 p.m central so if you're new to the channel our our regiment is as
00:57:44.140follows we do the live stream three times a week monday wednesday and friday at 3 p.m central time
00:57:48.860and then we have the friday special which is pre-recorded and it's a deep dive multiple part
00:57:53.440series uh the topic is all things christian nationalism uh with dr stephen wolf that's at
00:57:59.5808 p.m. on Friday evening. So we'll have one more live stream with Wes and I while Antonio is out
00:58:05.800at 3 p.m. this Friday. Then we'll have the Friday special at 8 p.m. on Friday with myself and Dr.
00:58:10.960Stephen Wolfe. And then we will come back on Monday, Lord willing, me and Wes and Antonio,
00:58:17.360all three of us back in the studio. So we hope this episode has been helpful for you,
00:58:20.620that you've been blessed by it. And we will see you on Friday, Lord willing, at 3 p.m. Central.