In the United States, Reformed Christians make up a very small percentage of Protestant congregations and congregants. That means that publishing houses that are much bigger than Reformation heritage books and personalities with a bigger reach than R.C. Sproul exerts significant influence over a much broader swath of American evangelicals than merely small Reformed Outfits. One such influential publisher is Zondervan Publishers, a media company and printer founded almost a hundred years ago that is the publisher of the popular NIV Bible translation, which has sold over 450 million copies annually.
00:07:01.800Zondervan has been, to put it charitably, trying to figure out what to do about gender
00:07:09.620ideology and language for a little while.
00:07:12.100And so there have actually been several versions of the New International Version Bible, or
00:07:17.760several editions, I should say, of that version over the last couple of decades.
00:07:21.780And it's interesting how the emphasis on gender-neutral pronouns or plural pronouns instead of he has been actually creeping into the Christian world for a long time.
00:09:19.480The study committee said, the gender-neutral pronoun they, or them and theirs, is by far
00:09:24.560the most common way that English language speakers and writers today refer back to singular
00:09:29.820antecedents such as whoever, anyone, somebody, a person, no one, and the like.0.51
00:09:34.480Now, the fact is, this actually in our time is true.
00:09:38.060This is true in our culture, and it is true that English language has come to use these non-equal pronouns.
00:09:48.840So you use a plural pronoun them to talk about he or her.
00:09:52.720And just as a side note, I've been a fan for a long time that we need to start using the masculine he again when we refer to just an unknown single person in society.
00:10:01.280Like that ought to be, in many ways, what comes to our mind when we think about the lawyer or the soldier or the politician.
00:10:10.000But there's another interesting point here, because when we think about the English language in particular, the two things that kind of universalized and gave convention to the English language were Shakespeare and the King James Bible.
00:10:27.120And so it's interesting to see that Zondervan is now saying, well, we are trying to adjust
00:10:32.080our version of the Bible to match social convention, whereas before, it was the King
00:10:38.740James Bible and Shakespeare that shaped the social convention. And I think it's an interesting
00:10:43.460just thing to notice about where we are versus where we used to be in history.
00:10:49.460You'll see this in your ESV, the battle over Doulos, which would be slave. The ESV, I have
00:10:54.180one right in front of me they'll make that bond servant right which is kind of redundant bond
00:10:58.700servant and because that term slay oh we don't really like it and uh it takes a adelphi which
00:11:04.980would be brothers the esv does a good job and that typically doesn't try to throw in their
00:11:08.460ancestors right paul is generally saying greet the brothers brothers i write to you he's not
00:11:12.540writing brothers and sisters preach the word be faithful he's writing brothers but the esv does
00:11:17.580go out of its way typically in most versions of it with the publisher right to add to the bottom
00:11:21.640well, this could mean brothers and sisters.
00:12:16.540The daughters would not receive the inheritance.
00:12:19.880And so when we speak of, you know, the doctrine of adoption, you know, the ministry of the Holy Spirit and justification, the doctrine of justification being declared righteous and then being grafted into the family of God, you know, where the branches and Jesus is the vine, John 15, were grafted in.
00:12:37.000And when that takes place, you know, we go from being children of God's wrath to being, you know, beloved adoptive children, but particularly sons and not daughters, because we're co-heirs with Christ.
00:12:51.420we actually share in the son, capital S, in his inheritance. And that becomes ours. And it's the
00:12:58.280son that carries on the name of the father that is the rightful heir to his entire estate. And so,
00:13:07.520no, there are no daughters of the kingdom in the technical sense. And in the ministry of adoption,
00:13:14.940we are adopted as sons. And that would include, you know, women who are born again by grace alone
00:13:21.200through faith alone and Christ alone, they too are co-heirs in grace and they're receiving that
00:13:27.340spiritual eternal inheritance that is theirs rightfully by virtue of having faith in Christ.
00:13:33.700But they're receiving that as sons in terms of a legal status, not that women in the afterlife
00:13:41.660will become male, but in the legal judicial status. My wife is a co-heir in grace along
00:13:49.120with me and she's receiving the inheritance that would be given to a son. And so in that sense,
00:13:55.200it matters. And so when we're looking at scripture, you know, that talks about,
00:13:58.800you know, that we're sons of the living God, you know, he's adopted us as sons.
00:14:03.480We don't need to say sons and daughters. It's understood theologically that God adopts
00:14:09.680by virtue of conversion, that he adopts, he saves both men and women. We know that.
00:14:16.200we know that that's that's obvious from other portions of scripture but when we're speaking
00:14:20.900of adoption and all the judicial corresponding you know legal rights and inheritance that
00:14:26.440corresponds with that then we should say what the bible says sons and we don't have to bend
00:14:32.540over backwards to constantly be trying to make everything as inclusive as possible because in
00:14:39.180that case you know it's a bit ironic but the irony is that by virtue of including you know sons and
00:14:44.380daughters you're actually um you're actually downgrading um all female christians status and
00:14:51.280inheritance you're saying so god actually adopts both he adopts sons and daughters and what that
00:14:55.520would imply is that god saves both men and women but he saves them in a different way or at least
00:15:00.620saves them unto a different status that men are saved unto one status of a full inheritance and
00:15:07.600women you know i don't know maybe they get a dowry or something you know like a lighter status
00:15:12.280and that's not true so yep hebrews talks about too that i will tell if he's quoting psalm 22
00:15:17.300i will tell my brothers in the midst of the congregation like that's what he didn't say
00:15:21.120like i'll be there and i'll talk of my brothers and sisters all right so we're going to dig into
00:15:25.580this upside down kingdom bible we're going to play the the actual video that's used to
00:15:30.280advertise this why you should why you should purchase your copy of zondervan before we do
00:15:35.720real quick i you know we just went on a trip and visited the guys in ogden my family and also
00:15:40.700Nathan's family and another family from Georgetown. So we took three families up there and spent time
00:15:46.320with Brian and Eric and Dan, Ben and those guys. And I'm reminded because we were just on a plane
00:15:52.680with a lot of little kids and they were, you know, digging through the pockets and finding, you know,
00:15:56.240like the menu and the little instruction, you know, thing that shows you how to put on the mask
00:16:01.220and, you know, use the flotation device under your seat. And they also, of course, naturally,
00:16:06.100as small children tend to do they found the vomit bag and so as we're going into this video right
00:16:12.100i would strongly strongly um prescribe um finding you know whether it's a trash can or you know some
00:16:18.900something that you can throw up into you know other than merely throwing up into your lap
00:16:23.940um because i think uh anything from preston sprinkle you're gonna need it how did he get0.81
00:16:28.580that last name like you don't even choose them and god was just like i'm gonna give the gayest0.66
00:16:34.180well here's the deal that's what i was gonna say is god is we forget this and i mean this seriously0.68
00:16:38.500i'm not i'm not just being facetious god is exceedingly kind seriously and like pilgrim's
00:16:44.960progress you know sometimes like some of the critiques was you know it's allegorical and
00:16:48.460sometimes people are like ah bunyan you know like it's just it's too on the nose right i mean you've
00:16:53.500got like a judge over here in a courtroom in vanity fair called you know mr hate good you
00:16:59.560know like like couldn't you be like a little bit more subtle give a little more mystery i mean the
00:17:03.880dude's name is mr hate good it's like obvious this is a bad guy you know like let the reader
00:17:09.780guess a little bit right like his character can slowly come out through the narrative you know
00:17:14.640you don't have to just label it right up front hey this is a bad guy and this is a good guy you
00:17:19.140know the lead protagonist christian you know and uh one of the bad guys mr hate good but sometimes
00:17:24.920god does that in the same way that john bunyan did because um god loves clarity and he wants to
00:17:30.120be merciful and kind and um in god's providence he gave preston sprinkle the last name sprinkle
00:17:35.300so we would know this dude's gay all right all right let's play this video it's been said that
00:17:41.020the christian faith is personal but not private our faith is political but it's not partisan0.57
00:17:46.400christianity in other words is not about some private little jesus that we keep tucked away
00:17:50.800in our hearts rather the lordship of king jesus should determine how we think about all areas of
00:17:55.860life. Economics, immigration, the death penalty, abortion, war, violence, power, justice, sexuality
00:18:02.680and what it means to follow the Creator's design for human flourishing. This is why I'm so excited
00:18:08.420about the Upside Down Kingdom Study Bible. This study Bible seeks to unleash the counter-cultural1.00
00:18:14.360upside-down nature of the Christian faith. Our hope and goal is that the Upside Down Kingdom1.00
00:18:20.040Study Bible will provide you with a fresh and exciting encounter with God's Word so that you
00:18:25.580you may be challenged to think more deeply
00:34:49.000I don't know if you were watching on standby as we were kind of outlining this episode,
00:34:52.540but we played one of the clips from Preston Sprinkle where he's plugging, you know,
00:34:57.520and promoting the Upside Down Kingdom Bible and talking about how it's countercultural.
00:35:03.440And I said, yeah, like counterculture to the high watermark of Christendom in England in the 1700s, perhaps it would have been countercultural.
00:35:12.000But I think it's actually, he should just say, there's nothing counter to it.
00:35:18.080It's just right along with the culture.
00:35:20.420And are we experiencing some winds of change right now?
00:38:33.940it says for this was the sin of sodom i'm i'm familiar i'm a pastor i've preached through the
00:38:39.240bible um and then it talks about like basically withholding charity and generosity and then also
00:38:44.780pride pride is also um so it's arrogance and a lack of charity that's true um but ezekiel never
00:38:52.200says and that's the definition of sodomy so there's there's it's just multivariant there's
00:38:57.620you know sodom had sodomy going on well how do you know um it's a descriptive text uh-huh but
00:39:03.160in the description, all the men of the city are saying, Hey, could you, could you send those male1.00
00:39:09.520angels outside of your house so that we can have sex with them? Right. So not, not just so that we1.00
00:39:14.580can withhold our alms and offerings and charitable gifts from them, or so that we can, you know,
00:39:20.000make snobbish remarks and, and be arrogant towards them. No, it's, um, you've got angels in your
00:39:25.440house. They're pretty good looking. They're also male. We'd like to, uh, we'd like to lie down
00:39:31.160with them. So Sodom was marked by sodomy. Was it also marked by pride and a lack of charity?0.81
00:39:40.660Yeah, because birds of a feather flock together, sins, there's a progression to sin. And I think
00:39:45.760there's a pretty safe biblical theology that could be molded and saying, the tree, if the roots are
00:39:53.140bad, the fruits are bad, and you can't just designate, we have one branch that'll have bad
00:39:57.920fruit and all the rest will be really healthy. Yeah. People who have embraced high degrees of
00:40:03.460sexual perversion also are probably not very charitable and probably not very humble. We see
00:40:10.300that today all the time, right? All the time. You see all the different political lobbying groups
00:40:15.800for LGBT rights. And also turns out that the least sodomite friendly, you know, state in the0.93
00:40:24.460whole union, those backwoods, you know, traditional Bible thumpers of Oklahoma and Kansas would be0.99
00:40:30.660another example, are literally statistically the most generous, you know, giving to nonprofits,0.94
00:40:35.880501c3s, churches. So both are true. Ezekiel's right. Sodom was not a very generous place or
00:40:43.120a humble place. Well, the badge of Sodom now is pride. Exactly, pride. Yeah, so it wasn't a0.57
00:40:48.760generous place. It wasn't a humble place. It also was a sexually perverse place. All of that is
00:40:54.440true back to you jared what do you think yeah that that's 100 right um it's interesting the
00:41:01.060very next verse in ezekiel so it says that god condemned him for an abomination as well so even
00:41:09.540in ezekiel he mentions that sodom was condemned for an abomination it's the same word used for
00:41:16.260men lying with men um and then jude is explicit as well for the strange flesh that they went0.63
00:41:24.040after um that it is it was a homosexual sin a perversion um and it's interesting because
00:41:32.580sprinkle sprinkle is not logically or biblically consistent in anything he writes so in this study
00:41:41.340um he'll talk about how um he'll talk about for example in the song of solomon he talks about how
00:41:52.640The Song of Solomon, according to ancient Near Eastern genre, the particular genre that it is, everybody would understand that it's talking about the relationship between a husband and a wife.
00:42:05.060And he says that, and then later on, as the man describes the woman, he goes from her head, describing her eyes and her facial features, her hair, and then he describes her neck.
00:42:17.840he gets down he talks about her breasts and then sprinkle argues that a single man looking at you
00:42:26.560know being enamored by a woman's beauty and after talking about her breasts that that that's not sin
00:42:36.260and um he does this numerously like he when he's talking about Romans 1 when he's talking about
00:42:43.460um when he's talking about sodom he he explicitly says god's not condemning same-sex attraction here
00:42:51.700and so what he's doing is it's just a sleight of hand a turn of phrase he he's created this
00:42:58.000category and this is the whole so-called gay christian movement they create a category that
00:43:03.580isn't does not exist in church history it does not exist in the bible but it's this pre-lust
00:43:11.560inclination or desire or orientation that is either neutral or not sin and that's essentially
00:43:21.320what pelagians argued um you can go back and read augustine writing to um julian the pelagian
00:43:29.180and he he's pointing this out like if something is luring and enticing you from within
00:43:35.420and if it would be a sin to act on it then it is already sin like it's it can't produce
00:43:43.960something contrary to its nature if you argue that it's neutral
00:43:47.320then how does it all of a sudden produce sin right like right so well it just doesn't accord
00:43:57.000with the book of james that desire eventually you know gives birth conceives and gives birth
00:44:03.300to sin and then sin when fully grown brings forth death there's a there is a progression to sin
00:44:08.180uh nobody just wakes up in the morning with a perfect you know pure spotless record and decides
00:44:13.960to become a serial killer right that there is a progression to sin all sin um lying um you start
00:44:21.920with small uh discrepancies and exaggerations and flattery and gossip that eventually you know
00:44:30.140snowballs into slander and becomes larger deceptions and these so at every level whether
00:44:35.960it's sins of the tongue or whether it's sins of the flesh especially sins of the flesh there is
00:44:43.020a progression i'll never forget i'm gonna if you're a parent go ahead and uh and maybe if
00:44:49.640you're with uh your children go ahead and log off for just a second or or take the volume down but
00:44:54.560i think it's worth sharing because it just it marked me as a young man i remember uh serving
00:44:59.580tables when i was in college and you know i i think it was a law of every restaurant in the
00:45:06.500world that at least half of the wait staff has to be you know gay and um if they speak english0.67
00:45:11.520only the english if they speak yeah that's right half has to be mexican the other half has to be0.95
00:45:15.360gay which i i appreciate the mexican half um you know much more than the the gay white half but um0.86
00:45:21.560i i remember talking to one of the servers and um and they were just constantly making crude0.96
00:45:27.960homosexual jokes with each other. And they would always try to do it around me and try to involve0.53
00:45:32.480me in their course joking. And I remember asking him one time, I said, like, how did you become
00:45:41.860gay? And this is back in the day. So this is before the rhetoric had really become universal0.55
00:45:46.800of like, well, you don't become gay. It's not a choice. I was born this way. This is back before
00:45:51.160they knew that they needed to hedge that bet. This is back when you got the gays being honest,1.00
00:45:57.580which I, you know, I appreciate it. And, and so he just shot me straight. He was like, oh no,
00:46:01.500I wasn't born like this. I wasn't born, you know, it's not like I was, you know, I was just as a
00:46:05.160young boy, I was, you know, wearing dresses and more interested in dolls than I was with, you
00:46:09.960know, bows and arrows. And, um, none of that, not that, that rhetoric hadn't seeped in yet. He said,
00:46:14.840um, he just looked at me plainly. He said, I've had sex with over a thousand women. And at a0.92
00:46:21.180certain point, um, it just doesn't do it anymore. Nobody knows how to please a man like a man.0.89
00:46:27.580and i was like oh right it's just you're you're perverse it was a progression of perversion they0.95
00:46:34.240got worse and worse and worse and worse with sin unchecked that's sodomy that's how you get there0.64
00:46:40.740and that made a lot of sense it would grossed me out you know but it made a lot of a lot of sense0.85
00:46:46.820and um yeah so i with all these things sin i think catholics are actually you correct me if i'm wrong
00:46:54.280jared but catholics are pretty good on the doctrine of concupiscence that sin begins it has
00:46:59.320a beginning it has an in vitro stage in the heart before it's ever even brought out in speech or
00:47:06.120actions isn't that is that right they they are good in that sense that they believe in concupiscence
00:47:13.800um where they are bad is that they believe that it so so church history always argued that
00:47:21.240that original sin is morally culpable sin, and its motions are morally culpable sin.
00:47:26.960The Roman Catholics argued that you had to be baptized to take that guilt away,
00:47:32.080and they argued this ex operae operato, which just means to the thing conferred.
00:47:39.400So they, in other words, you know, you read the Council of Trent in the 1500s,
00:47:43.960and they believed that the priestly order could essentially give you grace.
00:47:47.080It didn't matter if you had faith or not.
00:47:49.660And so by them baptizing a baby, they were actually taking, the priestly order was taking that guilt away.
00:47:56.040And so that baby no longer had the guilt of concupiscence.
00:47:59.580Now, when that concupiscence moved and they submitted to it, then they began to sin again.
00:48:06.520But what Preston Sprinkle was arguing is that, no, you don't need Jesus to die for your concupiscence,
00:48:14.800or let's just say for same-sex attraction, because it's not sin.
00:48:20.640So he's arguing he's to the left of Rome.
00:56:14.820I think the command is to love God and your neighbor and you love God first.
00:56:21.380You know, and Preston sounds like he's worried about offending people and and not it's the thing is, it's not about needlessly offending people.
00:56:30.220It's about whether or not God made the person male or female.
00:56:36.580Preston says he believes that, but then he's going to say the opposite of that.0.98
01:02:11.140But if you started saying, well, the inclination towards racism, that's not sin.
01:02:15.620Or if you start saying, well, the inclination towards children is not sin.
01:02:20.100Well, then people start getting alarmed and say, of course it's sin.0.99
01:02:23.620Well, then why not the inclination toward the same sex, right?1.00
01:02:29.420or the trans stuff, or it's all morally culpable sin, and Christ is the only remedy. And that's0.98
01:02:37.300what's so sinister about what Sprinkle is doing. He is sending people running to the mirror to
01:02:43.140self-justify instead of running to Christ. He's also leaving Christians ensnared in their sin,0.92
01:02:50.200teaching them that they will never. He's teaching that there's male, female, and then there are0.97
01:02:56.960homosexuals and then there are trans people like like there's four different sexes is what he's
01:03:03.460teaching it's an ontological reality that these people are um you know and that these people are
01:03:11.740something other than just male or female because otherwise if they're just male or female then they
01:03:16.880can repent and christ can transform them according to how he has designed them that's not what he
01:03:22.120teaches. He teaches his hearers that if they're gay, they're going to be gay. And so they need0.99
01:03:29.320to make the best of it. And how do you make the best of it? Well, you need to take the good
01:03:33.220elements, like what that Jesus and John desire, you need to take those good elements and sanctify
01:03:38.600those. And the sexual desire, well, it's not sin, but just don't act on it. And he argues,
01:03:45.320He's so Pelagian that he argues this about, you know, if I was enamored at another woman, even her breasts, and I'm married, and let's say she's married, that that would not be sin.
01:04:27.760I mean, Paul picks this up in 1 Timothy 5.2 and says that we're to view older women as mothers and younger women as sisters in all purity.
01:04:36.460And so if we would take responsibility for that from the root, you wouldn't have any ministers failing morally.
01:04:43.280You wouldn't have, you know, we have to redeem.
01:04:48.700We've got to return back to what the church has always taught concerning these things, because there's a lot of men ensnared in sexual sin.
01:04:56.660I saw Dusty Devers. He is trying to ban pornography. That's wonderful. That would be awesome.
01:05:03.580Like we need to ban it because it's wrecked marriages, wrecked men and women and young people.0.83
01:05:10.500We've sold future generations down the road, messed them up sexually because of how they've been exposed to that stuff so early on.
01:05:20.060But but anyways, I'm kind of rambling.
01:05:22.060But but what what Preston is lacking is the definition of sin and the fact that Jesus Christ can actually transform people.
01:05:50.720Even that language, that rhetoric is baloney.
01:05:54.700You're male or female, and entailed in God's design of you is the pursuit of opposite-sex marriage unless you have the gift of singleness.
01:06:02.100But if you're running around talking about your sexual orientation all the time, you're not you don't have the gift of singleness.0.91
01:06:11.080Well said. All right. We've got a couple of questions in the chat. I'm going to throw them out there for you, Jared.0.93
01:06:15.980Here's one that I thought was helpful. This is from Statistics Man 24.
01:06:22.180Since no marriage or children since there's no marriage or children in heaven, what do you think will be different between men and women in the eternal state?
01:06:32.100like roles etc that's a good question i think i think the roles will stay the same
01:06:38.580um i think it'll look like helpmate and spouse i just think that there won't be
01:06:44.820a sexual relationship um i think there will be kings you know and there there may be queens
01:06:54.260but there won't be marriage um and there'll be a hierarchy i mean it'll be very much similar to
01:07:01.620this earth it'll be very much similar to what the garden would have been um but uh you know
01:07:08.540in answering the question there one there is marriage in heaven it's just everybody's married
01:07:12.960to jesus marriage is fulfilled what's not fulfilled in heaven is singleness there is no
01:07:18.740end to go for singleness as a matter of fact that singleness i would argue in paul's mind is that
01:07:25.040he's married to christ um that he's already he's already living that out while he's on earth
01:07:31.640is why he's rejecting the physical marriage um he doesn't have that desire so he wants to
01:07:37.560i mean the language is devoted to the lord right and uh that's what we need to emphasize because
01:07:43.380you you a lot of people like christian sprinkle they in the gospel coalition they they have
01:07:48.140exalted singleness to this grandiose state they make the argument well jesus in the end we're all
01:07:54.120single, and that's just not true. No, we're all married to Christ. So the language in the
01:08:01.980Septuagint concerning Eve being taken from Adam, from his side, it's rib in the Hebrew, but when
01:08:10.240the Septuagint translated, it translated side, and the Apostle John picks that language up when he's
01:08:15.660describing Jesus' side being pierced with the spear, and the blood and the water flow out,
01:08:21.060which are two essential elements of life and the picture is that of the church being born from
01:08:27.100Jesus's bloody son similar to Eve being from as a bride yeah I like that I think another interesting
01:08:35.420angle and this is a little bit speculative but marriage was given partially for the the roles0.75
01:08:44.280where a woman would be a help meet to a man but even preceding that it was the command to be
01:08:49.520fruitful and multiply. And so we've talked a lot on the podcast about how God's original desire
01:08:56.760was for structure and order and tending and caretaking and stewardship of the earth and
01:09:03.240producing out of it. Well, in heaven, there's seemingly no need to be fruitful and multiply
01:09:09.100anymore. That's the missing ingredient. It's not the need to still, you know, in the new earth,