The NXR Podcast - The Next Crusade - The Enemy's Greatest Tool Is Feminism

00:00:00.000 I do not seek glory.

00:00:03.000 I do not fight for honor.

00:00:05.000 I fight because it must be done.

00:00:08.000 This is not a war for trophies or banners.

00:00:12.000 This is a war for the soul of mankind.

00:00:15.000 Because even should I fall,

00:00:18.000 even should the blood stop flowing

00:00:21.000 and my breath fade,

00:00:23.000 even in death,

00:00:25.000 I crusade.

00:00:30.000 Hello and welcome to The Next Crusade with me, Fr. Calvin Robinson, here on NXR Studios.

00:00:54.280 This, of course, is the show where we address current events from a Christian perspective. 1.00

00:00:58.820 we'll talk about the most important topics the mainstream media does not want to touch with a

00:01:03.120 10-foot barge pole coming up on today's show we've got don keith from urban scoop we've got john

00:01:09.260 henry weston from life site news and we're going to be addressing the sspx situation will the sspx

00:01:16.740 consecrate bishops will that result in an excommunication from the catholic church

00:01:21.260 why does the catholic church look to excommunicate orthodox traditionalist catholics

00:01:26.000 when it doesn't seem to want to do the same with people in China and or Anglicans in England.

00:01:32.240 We're going to address very shortly the meeting between the Pope and Dame Sarah Mullally. We'll

00:01:36.180 get to that very shortly. But before we do, we've got the kill switches situation too.

00:01:41.100 The US government, thanks to Democrats and Republicans working together, has now dictated

00:01:46.940 that going forward, all new cars will have to have kill switches installed, which means the

00:01:52.020 government can have control over your car and your car can have control over you. That should concern

00:01:57.240 anyone who believes in civil liberties. We'll get to those stories very soon but before we do

00:02:01.900 let's have a look at what's been going on with Dame Sarah Mullally. Now those of you who do not

00:02:07.520 know I have a history with Dame Sarah. She and I were friends back in London. She is the woman and

00:02:13.500 the reason that I am not a member of the Church of England. It just so happens that she was the 0.99

00:02:19.040 Bishop of London when I was in seminary at the University of Oxford. And at the end of my time

00:02:25.440 in Oxford, I was going to be sent back to London, not under the Bishop of London, because I've never

00:02:30.200 believed in women's orders, but under the Bishop of Fulham, who is the traditionalist bishop in 0.65

00:02:34.840 London. However, within the Church of England, she is still the highest ranking member of the

00:02:40.060 clergy in London. And in fact, she was at the time the third highest ranking member of the clergy in

00:02:45.100 the country. And so she still had a say on what happens within her diocese, even if we are not

00:02:50.740 under her jurisdiction directly, because the Church of England is a broken communion, as you may or

00:02:55.480 may not know. And so my bishop, the Bishop of Fulham, said to me, there's something going on,

00:03:00.980 Calvin. I'm going to have your back, though. Don't worry. And so I said, okay, thank you,

00:03:05.380 Your Grace. I trust you. And little did I know that he didn't exactly mean what he said. And

00:03:11.360 the Bishop of London made it clear to both of us that someone like me would not serve in London 0.91

00:03:16.460 unless we capitulated to wokeness. There's a whole conversation about this recorded online

00:03:22.740 on my YouTube channel already, which is at Common Sense Crusade. But essentially, she said to me,

00:03:27.900 look, the church is institutionally racist, and you will have to affirm that if you're going to

00:03:33.760 become a priest in my diocese. And I said, the church is not racist. The church cannot be racist.

00:03:38.220 people can be racist and racism is a sin that people must repent of but the moment that you say

00:03:43.400 that it's the institution that's racist you take that opportunity for repentance away from the

00:03:47.560 individual you pass it onto the corporate body and that is neglect that is spiritual neglect

00:03:51.780 and i said look i don't feel like as a mixed race person i have been oppressed uh under the church

00:03:58.240 in fact i feel like i've been thriving so far up until this point uh what i didn't say is this is

00:04:03.700 the only point that my race has ever been an issue with you and she said to me as she put her hand

00:04:08.400 on my knee I can tell you Calvin as a white woman the church is racist what I didn't realize at the

00:04:13.960 time was that was clearly an admission of guilt and she is probably the racist because the then

00:04:19.180 Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby stood up in General Synod and said the church is systematically

00:04:25.100 racist and we must repent the Church of London's the Bishop of London in the Church of England

00:04:31.080 affirmed that teaching. And so we had two open heretics preaching on DEI and critical race

00:04:38.920 theory. And so I was waking up to the fact that just because I'd come from an Anglo-Catholic

00:04:43.680 bubble in North London doesn't mean that that was what the rest of the church looked like.

00:04:49.180 And it became clear to me that I was not going to be serving in London. But the rest, as they say,

00:04:53.860 is history. What I want to talk about now is Bishop Dame Sarah Mullally herself and this meeting

00:04:59.060 with the Holy Father. Because after recently being installed as the new Archbishop of Canterbury,

00:05:06.020 which should be a problem to any Catholic-minded individual anyway, because a woman cannot become 0.65

00:05:11.500 a deacon, priest, or bishop, and certainly not an archbishop, and people will make arguments back.

00:05:17.680 I can already see the comments coming saying, but what about deaconesses in the Bible? A deaconess

00:05:22.800 is a lay ministry it is not in the threefold order of bishop priest and deacon which are 0.66

00:05:30.220 ontological changes a deaconess is not it's a different different role entirely because men

00:05:35.000 and women have different roles and a woman cannot become a deacon priest or bishop any more than a

00:05:40.200 man can become a mother these are biological and ontological facts anyway the the bishop of london

00:05:46.380 was promoted to the archbishop of canterbury within the church of england structure because

00:05:51.380 of DEI because they wanted a woman in that position to show how progressive they are

00:05:55.620 now the church should not try to be progressive the church should try to be true beautiful and

00:06:00.800 good the church should try to be transcendental church should try to adhere to the sacred

00:06:05.500 tradition of the church and not try to adhere to the new tradition of the world and so when

00:06:11.600 they installed her we knew it was going to be a problem not just for the people in the church of 0.51

00:06:15.940 England because some of them believe in women's orders some of them don't and what are they going

00:06:19.700 to do if they're in a church that is broken communion, but also for the rest of Christians

00:06:23.360 around the world, because the Church of England does have an impact on Christianity in a wider

00:06:27.740 field than just within the realm of England. And so when she meets with the Pope as the

00:06:33.900 representative of the people, the Christian people of England, that's going to be an interest for all

00:06:39.060 of us. And what happened was, if you can see by this tweet here, Pope Leo XIV meets with the

00:06:46.960 Archbishop of Canterbury and the quote is, when Archbishop Michael Ramsey and St. Pope Paul VI

00:06:53.240 announced the first theological dialogue between Anglicans and Catholics in 1966, they spoke of

00:07:00.360 seeking the restoration of complete communion in faith and sacramental life. Certainly this

00:07:07.220 ecumenical journey has been complex. And now what this is saying is quite clearly that there was a

00:07:13.500 conversation, an ongoing conversation, with the Pope and the Church of England, with the broken

00:07:19.180 Church, because of course, a very brief history, the Church of England was of course part of the

00:07:24.060 one true Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church before the English Reformation. And there's been dialogue

00:07:30.800 in recent years with recent Popes and recent Archbishops. And it seemed, when Michael Ramsey

00:07:36.640 was the Archbishop and Pope Paul VI was the Pope, that there may be a chance of reunion.

00:07:45.300 No one knows how that would look. Would that mean that Anglicans suddenly fall under the

00:07:51.260 jurisdiction of the Bishop of Rome? Would it mean that they have their own kind of ordinariate?

00:07:56.040 What would it look like? We don't know, but the conversations were serious through Archic,

00:08:00.500 and they were getting very close. And now it's my theory that the enemy hated that,

00:08:05.300 because the enemy wants a divided church and the enemy wants christians fighting each other rather

00:08:10.260 than fighting together against him and his armies and so what happened was the church this is around

00:08:15.860 the same time the church of england decided that it had the authority the unilateral authority

00:08:20.540 to change church teaching up until this point it had been the teaching of the church of england

00:08:24.540 that the church of england has no doctrine of her own and that it was still professing to be

00:08:29.680 catholic however having no pope within the church of england having no magisterium within the church

00:08:35.280 of England, the Synod of the Church of England, voted in favor of women's orders.

00:08:41.040 And from that point on, there can be no argument of validity of Anglican orders, because there

00:08:47.000 had been an argument prior to that.

00:08:49.140 And you may or may not know that there was a papal declaration, Apostolicae Curae, which

00:08:57.400 issued that Anglican orders are absolutely null and utterly void.

00:09:01.940 and this was in a papal bull so it was official church teaching and this was due to a defect of

00:09:07.380 form and intention now since that bull there has been lots of ongoing conversations and it seemed

00:09:13.040 that some anglican orders may be valid while some may not so it was on a case-by-case basis there

00:09:18.120 have been anglican priests who have been who have entered the catholic church and they have done the

00:09:22.700 research into their orders and the church has looked into their orders and given given them

00:09:26.500 a conditional ordination rather than reordaining them, which clearly says that they have been

00:09:31.840 ordained, but they're just covering their tracks. So on a case-by-case basis, because of the Dutch 0.89

00:09:39.200 touch, some people in the Church of England received old Catholic orders at some point.

00:09:44.080 However, you can't have that argument anymore. You can't go on a case-by-case basis anymore.

00:09:48.320 You can't have the conversation of, well, actually, what this papal bull was referring to was the

00:09:54.400 missal at the time and the missal language has been altered since and it now is a sacrificial

00:09:59.620 sacramental language we can't have any of that because now going forward the church of england

00:10:04.240 has a woman in the highest position in the church of england and so there is no question about it

00:10:09.640 there is no legitimacy there because women cannot become deacons priests and bishops and so what

00:10:16.180 that's meant is that the conversation is no longer progressive or progressing it's going nowhere so

00:10:22.920 we have to ask the question, at what point should this dialogue end? Why is the Pope still meeting

00:10:28.900 with the Archbishop of Canterbury? Because it's dangerous to do so. And let's talk about why it

00:10:34.820 may be dangerous. Because as you can see from this tweet, the Archbishop of Canterbury came

00:10:41.660 away from that meeting and said, this was a meeting of two pastors. That is heresy. She is

00:10:48.980 not a pastor. He is a pastor. He does not recognize her as a pastor. Now, the Pope may have been

00:10:53.940 playing nice and polite. He may have been being friendly towards Dame Sarah Mullally, but he would

00:11:00.560 not have recognized her as a priest or a deacon or a bishop or an archbishop. That is an impossibility

00:11:05.740 for him. But just meeting gives the argument legitimacy. It almost affirms her in her error.

00:11:13.620 Just as when you meet someone who is trans and you call them by their preferred pronouns, 0.95

00:11:18.340 You are affirming them in their error. The loving thing is actually to say, no, I recognize that you 0.97

00:11:22.840 are a man. I recognize that you are a woman, and I cannot lie. I will not lie. That is not loving.

00:11:28.340 And it's the same in this situation too. In a way, the Archbishop of Canterbury is trans. 0.94

00:11:32.780 She is playing the role of a man. She is wearing men's clothing, which the Bible teaches us against, 0.99

00:11:37.200 and she is fulfilling a male role, which also the Bible teaches us against. So that is heresy, 0.96

00:11:42.280 and she's dragging the Church of England into apostasy. But the problem isn't just the Church

00:11:45.820 of England. It's how the Catholic Church interacts with the Church of England. And so my point is

00:11:51.300 that women's orders reinforce and compound the problem that arose in Apostolicae Curiae. And so 0.88

00:11:57.620 the situation now is worse than it was in 1896, not better, unfortunately. And if we look at how

00:12:05.280 this came about, how did it actually happen? Because as with anything liberal and progressive

00:12:10.720 and fake and gay. It doesn't happen overnight. It doesn't happen all at once. It's the boiling of 1.00

00:12:15.960 the frog in the ever-heated-up water. In this case, they boiled the frog in the water of heresy

00:12:22.780 and apostasy. So prior to 1987, in the Church of England, women could become deaconesses. 0.83

00:12:30.580 And as we've discussed, deaconesses are lay ministers. They are not ordained deacons. It's

00:12:36.880 not a feminine word of the same role of deacon. So a deacon is a deacon, and a deaconess is

00:12:42.780 something entirely different. So prior to 1987, women could fulfill that role. So there was a 0.98

00:12:48.200 role for women in the Church of England. There was also the role of nun. So the Church of England

00:12:53.800 does have sisters. There are religious orders in the Church of England for men and women. And so

00:12:58.960 there are active roles for women in the Church. But we must always remember, when we're asking

00:13:03.700 the question what role is there for women in the church that the church isn't just a clerical

00:13:08.580 position is the church is the great body of christ and so we are all through our baptism

00:13:14.100 members of the church and that means that the greatest role for women in the church is

00:13:18.840 motherhood right it's becoming a wife becoming a mother becoming a homekeeper and becoming a 0.54

00:13:25.020 caregiver they are the great roles for women they don't need to be seen within the sanctuary that's

00:13:29.480 not the sanctuary isn't a place of authority and power the sanctuary is a place of worship

00:13:34.160 and Christ has outlined how we should worship and that men have a role in the sanctuary

00:13:40.160 standing in the place of Christ and that women have a role in providing recreation not recreation

00:13:47.180 procreation for our very existence and so that's in 1987 prior to that women could become deaconessers

00:13:54.360 so when did it start to go wrong a couple of years prior 1985 so 40 years ago the general

00:14:02.800 synod voted to allow women to become deacons so for anyone that argues that deacons and deaconesses

00:14:09.400 are the same thing the church of england clearly didn't think so because they passed legislation

00:14:14.560 in the synod that said that women could now become deacons but they could already become

00:14:19.320 deaconesses so why would they need that if they're the same role they explicitly stated 0.79

00:14:23.640 at this time that they wouldn't become priests and they wouldn't become bishops, but they could

00:14:29.400 become deacons. You're seeing where I'm going with this slippery slide, right? In 1992, they voted to

00:14:36.720 allow women to become priests. It didn't stay at just deacons. They also went on to become priests.

00:14:43.400 The slippery slope continues. In 2014, legislation was passed to allow women to become bishops, 0.63

00:14:50.480 one step further and then of course in 2026 they elected their first female archbishop

00:14:57.320 and so one thing leads to another leads to another you know almost a decade later each time

00:15:02.140 and so because if from day one in 1985 they said look we want women to become archbishops everyone

00:15:07.060 would be like no that's preposterous we can't serve under a lady bishop when we don't recognize 1.00

00:15:11.940 women's orders etc and so they had to do it piece by piece well what does it matter if some women 1.00

00:15:17.180 are deacons. There won't be a deacon in my parish, etc., etc. That's where it starts. Then it ends 1.00

00:15:21.880 with, okay, your boss is now a woman. What are you going to do about that? There's nothing you can do. 1.00

00:15:26.600 And part of the reason is because the Church of England has a general synod. Synods are dangerous.

00:15:32.320 And so people who are looking on the synod of synodality should be looking at it with suspicion

00:15:37.160 because synods are not the way the church runs. The church runs in a clear hierarchy

00:15:41.260 and this modern idea of synods is post-concilia and not good for the church.

00:15:47.180 and where does it all come from where does any of this come from one of the enemy's greatest 1.00

00:15:52.660 tools is feminism feminism is one of those heresies that most christians take on board i

00:16:00.580 would say i would honestly gather a guess that most christians most conservatives most people 0.84

00:16:05.460 who think they are sound or based would be feminists really and truly if you push them 1.00

00:16:10.320 hard enough on the relevant questions because most people take on board an element of egalitarianism 0.99

00:16:15.700 that came about only in the last hundred years really and truly and is a tool of satan because 0.85

00:16:20.700 egalitarianism is fake and gay heaven has a hierarchy the principalities the powers the 0.94

00:16:26.100 dominions um this creation has a hierarchy human beings are to steward creation and animals are 0.97

00:16:33.160 there for us for our benefit and so everything good has a hierarchy god himself is our patriarch

00:16:39.720 he is the ultimate father figure and so he teaches us not just through his being but through the

00:16:46.100 scriptures of how to organize and order our families in the male headship the man is the

00:16:51.880 as the husband and the father is the leader of the household the woman submits to the to the 0.98

00:16:56.880 husband and the father the children submit to the mother and wife and this is this is good order 0.86

00:17:01.620 but egalitarianism says no no no no they're both equal and that's that's a twist of the enemy

00:17:06.720 because yes they're both equal we're all equal in the eyes of god in terms of dignity and worth

00:17:11.140 but we're not equal in our roles and that changes from minute to minute from hour to hour in whatever 0.83

00:17:16.920 we're doing and it can be the most stupid small thing in the world like i was just i just came 0.91

00:17:22.620 from the supermarket there was no equality there when i could reach the things on the top shelf 0.87

00:17:26.480 the person next to me couldn't right there are many ways in which our immutable characteristics

00:17:31.040 affect us as we go through life and the left have tried to turn it into language of privilege as if

00:17:36.240 like your skin color gives you a certain privilege or other immutable characteristics give you a

00:17:40.580 certain privilege where they may do in certain circumstances but it's not universal but the

00:17:45.060 point being that neither is egalitarianism we are none of us equal really and truly on a day-to-day

00:17:50.880 level but that's the life of the enemy that wants us all to be evil because he wants us to be equal

00:17:54.640 with god and from the first moment of history in the garden of eden he's convincing us that we can

00:18:00.140 also be equal with god we can have that knowledge of good and evil we can eat from the tree of the

00:18:05.340 fruit. We can eat the fruit from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. That is a lie of Satan

00:18:09.380 from the beginning, and we're still hearing it today, and it is feminism. It was feminism in 1.00

00:18:13.800 the Garden of Eden, and it's feminism today. The idea that woman and man can be interchangeable. 0.99

00:18:20.100 When the Bible tells us very clearly that God made man from the dirt, from creation,

00:18:26.080 and he made woman from man to be his helper, his helpmate. Now that language is offensive,

00:18:32.880 not just to most feminists but to most people who consider themselves christians and conservatives 1.00

00:18:37.260 and if it's offensive to you that's because you fall on foul of feminism a woman is to be

00:18:42.060 a man's helper his help mate and that is good and ordered it's not even complimentary it is just

00:18:48.880 hierarchical it is that the man leads the household or the woman supports him now that's not to say

00:18:53.960 he lords it over her that's not to say he is a tyrant he is to love and serve her and christ

00:18:59.340 teaches us this too, that to be a good leader is to be a servant. To be a servant leader is the

00:19:04.900 appropriate way to lead anybody, including your wife and your children. And again, that's not to

00:19:09.660 say you should become subservient to them, which is a different thing. There is a nuance in this

00:19:13.700 that the feminists don't like to use, because nuance rids them of their binary argument. 0.99

00:19:19.420 But the point here is that reunification was genuinely possible at one point, and actually,

00:19:25.460 I would say considered probable between Catholics and Anglicans but the enemy didn't like it and the

00:19:31.200 enemy infiltrates it as he does with most things and he asked the question of General Synod

00:19:36.000 did God really say which is the same question the enemy asked in the Garden of Eden did God really

00:19:42.400 say you cannot eat of the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil did God really say

00:19:47.220 that women cannot become priests deacons and bishops the answer is yes yes he did and he makes

00:19:53.120 these things very clear to us so the priesthood is a role for men just as motherhood is a role

00:19:57.960 for women they're not the only roles not all women are blessed with child the gift of childbirth but

00:20:03.260 all women are called to be a caregiver of some in some way shape or form just as all men are called

00:20:08.000 to be fathers in some way shape or form not all men may be gifted with children but he is to become

00:20:13.740 a father to his community or to his parish just as a woman is to become a mother to her community

00:20:19.140 or her parish these are good things this is good order for our lives and so we need to learn these

00:20:26.300 lessons because there is nothing new under the sun and again that is scriptural but this became

00:20:32.080 ambiguous when the pope gifted the archbishop an episcopal ring many decades ago now and so people

00:20:41.820 just assumed that was a sign of authority and a lot of this comes from the second vatican council

00:20:46.780 and people would be saying, no, the Second Vatican Council is very sound, how can you say that?

00:20:51.280 Lots of the writings are sound, some of them aren't.

00:20:54.820 But it's the spirit that came about from Vatican II,

00:20:57.360 it's how Vatican II was followed that has led to the problem of this false ecumenism,

00:21:01.580 which looks to the outside world like pluralism,

00:21:06.200 like there are multiple ways of being true, multiple truths.

00:21:09.580 When the Catholic Church is always taught there is one truth, one universal truth,

00:21:12.860 he has a name, it's Jesus Christ,

00:21:14.200 but also it's a faith not just of the book and people you know mohammedans use that word we're

00:21:20.280 a book of the faith faith of the book and and jews often use that word but christians aren't a faith

00:21:24.540 of the book we're a faith with a book but we're a faith of sacred scripture and sacred tradition

00:21:29.460 and it's important that we don't take one without the other because sacred scripture came from

00:21:33.900 sacred tradition and without it it doesn't make sense because it comes down to each individual's

00:21:38.180 interpretation the sacred scriptures should be looked at through the lens of sacred tradition

00:21:42.740 And sacred tradition dictates that men can become priests, deacons, or bishops. 1.00

00:21:47.500 Women cannot. 1.00

00:21:49.180 Elders, presbyters in the Bible are men. 0.99

00:21:53.260 And so this was a problem, and we've seen this week that it's been made worse. 0.97

00:21:57.600 Unfortunately, over those last couple of weeks, it's been made worse.

00:22:00.700 But I put a post out about this on social media, as I often do,

00:22:05.320 and a fairly decent woman in the Church of England by the name of Angela Tilby 0.98

00:22:10.080 commented, Calvin, this is pure misogyny.

00:22:12.740 and she's she goes on to say about the case i just mentioned archbishop michael ramsey was

00:22:17.700 given an episcopal ring by paul vi how dare you distort history and the true relationship between

00:22:24.680 anglicans and catholics that you see what they did that's very clever isn't it it's always that 0.99

00:22:29.300 very emotive language first and foremost which is probably one of the reasons that women are not 1.00

00:22:32.460 supposed to become leaders but also secondly it's pure misogyny like it's an ad hominem you're doing

00:22:38.040 a bad thing you're a bad person not i disagree with you based on this scripture but no you are

00:22:42.540 wrong. You are wrong because you're bad, right? There's nothing misogynistic about it. Men and

00:22:47.600 women are equal in dignity and worth. Women should be treasured, absolutely. But women cannot lead

00:22:54.000 men in this regard. And that's 2,000 years of church teaching. And the Church of England has 0.99

00:22:59.600 always said it has no authority of its own to change church teaching. And therefore, the Church

00:23:04.060 of England is in error and should be called to rebuke because this is apostasy. And it's not good

00:23:11.540 for the people in the Church of England, because they will be led astray. And so I think the Pope

00:23:16.200 is at fault here, and I'm not trying to be too harsh, but I think he's at fault here for affirming

00:23:22.280 this lady in her heresy and in her potential apostasy. And so I would hope that the next 1.00

00:23:30.460 meeting between the Pope and the Archbishop of Canterbury, if there is to be another one, 0.50

00:23:33.920 he would call her to repentance and tell her to become a Catholic, which is what every Catholic 0.84

00:23:39.220 should be doing to everyone that is not yet catholic trust me if you see my comments some 0.99

00:23:44.720 of them do and that is a good thing we should always if we believe there's one universal

00:23:49.460 objective truth we should be convincing everyone of that truth that's what we're called to do

00:23:54.160 love god first and foremost and then love your neighbor as yourself if you truly love your

00:23:58.440 neighbor you want your neighbor to go to heaven if you want your neighbor to go to heaven you

00:24:01.680 want them to be repentant repenting of their sins and baptized in in the spirit in water in the

00:24:07.740 spirit and that means becoming a christian and to have the fullness of that is to become a catholic

00:24:13.480 and have the access to the sacraments now that's the mess of the papacy and the archbishop of

00:24:20.380 canterbury but before we get on to our guests today i'd like to take a brief look at the mess

00:24:25.680 that's been happening over here with the southern poverty law center before we do let's take a

00:24:31.180 prayer break in the name of the father and of the son and of the holy spirit amen hail mary full of

00:24:36.560 grace the lord is with thee blessed art thou amongst women and blessed is the fruit of thy

00:24:40.820 womb jesus holy mary mother of god pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our death amen

00:24:45.640 in the name of the father and of the son and the holy spirit amen now you may have heard of the

00:24:51.160 spLC the southern poverty law center but you may not have heard that they're being charged with

00:24:57.520 funding white supremacy which is kind of ironic because they set themselves up as these social

00:25:04.760 justice warriors who are going to challenge all the far right and bring down the racists and the

00:25:11.480 neo-nazis and it turns out they've been funding the neo-nazis interesting isn't it how that works

00:25:17.320 the spLC has been charged with six counts of wire fraud four counts of bank fraud and one count of

00:25:24.440 conspiracy to commit money laundering and of course these are all what they're being charged with

00:25:29.420 and so we have to be careful we don't want to say they are guilty yet but the indictment from the

00:25:34.440 Department of Justice alleges that the SPLC paid millions of dollars to people associated with

00:25:40.880 neo-nazi groups and the Ku Klux Klan. The SPLC is funding neo-nazis and the KKK.

00:25:49.440 Make it make sense. So what it seems that they were doing is they were trying to be their own

00:25:55.860 kind of FBI, right? They wanted to be feds and have informants. So they were paying people

00:26:00.800 who were members of the KKK and groups like them, excuse me, they were paying members of the KKK

00:26:09.580 and groups like them and essentially sending members into meetings and encouraging them to

00:26:15.780 report back. But what that means in practice is that their money went to membership fees and their

00:26:22.200 money went to sponsorships, their money went to these groups. And so in trying to look into these

00:26:29.440 groups they ended up funding them but i think it's deeper than that i think it's darker than

00:26:32.520 that i think it's the fact that these hard left groups you know these radical extremist leftists

00:26:38.580 cannot exist unless there's a far right to fight against and they can call me and you far right

00:26:43.920 all day every day but we're not we're just right so far we are not the genuine far right we are

00:26:49.180 just conservatives from five five minutes ago we are traditionalists we're christians and catholics

00:26:53.620 we are not far right. The idea is ludicrous. But they want an actual enemy to fight against. 0.95

00:26:59.920 They need an enemy to fight against because they are raising a lot of money. And they cannot

00:27:03.440 continue to raise that money if there's nothing to fight against. And so to some degree they need

00:27:08.080 an enemy to exist. And so they're funding their enemy for the purposes of funding themselves.

00:27:13.520 They cannot continue to take millions of dollars of donations if there's nothing for them to do.

00:27:18.640 and that that that is for every kind of non-profit institution anyone that sets up an organization

00:27:25.520 to change something you should be suspicious of the fact of what are they fighting against

00:27:30.000 will it always exist so look at the civil rights movement look at black lives matter right black 0.61

00:27:35.780 lives matter the the another instance of money laundering the group that was set up to fight

00:27:40.920 so-called white supremacy like what is their exit criteria when have they won the same with the

00:27:45.800 feminists, the first wave, the second wave, the third wave, the fourth wave, are we in the fifth 1.00

00:27:49.600 now? I'm not even sure anymore. When have they won? When have they won their equality? There is

00:27:55.180 no longer a pay gap. There are no differences between men and women under the law. Women can

00:28:00.280 do everything men can do in the eyes of the law, not in the eyes of God, but in the secular law, 0.86

00:28:05.360 they can do. And so what are they fighting for anymore? Who knows? The same with gay rights.

00:28:10.560 The gays have the right to get married, for goodness sake, which makes no sense because 0.99

00:28:13.940 marriage is a word and words mean something and marriage is a lifelong indissoluble union 1.00

00:28:18.000 between one man and one woman blessed under the eyes of God but even regardless of that they have

00:28:22.900 the rights to everything no one can discriminate against you because you're gay anymore whether

00:28:27.840 you whether you should be able to or not is a different argument entirely but my point is that

00:28:31.820 these civil rights movements and these leftist organizations don't have any terms of success

00:28:39.280 so they never meet that success which means they continue to crowdfund to continue to raise money

00:28:44.040 and therefore they have to perpetually perpetuate an enemy they have to make something up they

00:28:50.380 invent a boogeyman or they fund a boogeyman i genuinely didn't know the kkk still existed

00:28:55.460 i'm i'm quite surprised that it does but i'm not surprised by the fact that the splc

00:29:00.160 is funding them and they're getting money from four left organizations that should tell you

00:29:04.620 everything you need to know about them never fund four left organizations never fund four

00:29:08.600 right organizations either you know fund christian organizations solely now as a reminder coming up

00:29:14.800 in the rest of the show we've got a conversation with don keith from urban scoop and john henry

00:29:20.580 weston from life site news on the kill switches which are becoming mandatory in cars going forward

00:29:27.080 from this year and the sspx consecrations which may result in the first excommunication the first

00:29:33.380 schism in the catholic church since the avignon papacy which is of course something that the

00:29:39.900 president brought up recently well not the president but the the president's administration

00:29:43.680 brought up recently when there was this veiled threat against the vatican and a reminder that

00:29:48.380 at one time uh the power of the vatican was under threat and the pope uh his seat was essentially

00:29:55.460 taken in a coup to france to avenue and uh took many many years to fight back for rome to become

00:30:04.080 the center of the church again and there was that veil threat from the u.s administration when they

00:30:07.660 said look we are the most powerful military in the world you should do what we say you should

00:30:11.280 want to be on our side when the church's response i hope was we don't care about worldly power we

00:30:16.680 are on the side of the ultimate power which is our lord and savior jesus christ and who sits

00:30:21.460 on the throne. However, we'll get to those topics very shortly. Before we do, let's have a prayer

00:30:27.240 break. The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God, and the fellowship of the Holy Ghost

00:30:34.420 be with us all evermore. Amen. Before we begin, I want to point you to something important.

00:30:41.320 NXR has launched its store, and one of its pieces available is this Diversity for Israel shirt.

00:30:48.220 it's obviously not overly serious it's just a bit of well-placed humor in the middle of an

00:30:53.920 otherwise serious conversation if you want to wear something that actually means something

00:30:58.760 head on over to shop.newchristianright.com you'll find the link below and i'd also like to encourage 0.88

00:31:08.000 you to pre-order my new book the silent jihad this book exposes the growing influence of islamic

00:31:14.900 immigration in the West, something many are hesitant to discuss, but something we need

00:31:20.020 to understand clearly. You can pre-order your copy today at newchristianright.com forward slash

00:31:26.940 jihad. That's newchristianright.com forward slash jihad. We've all just accepted this idea that basic

00:31:35.500 hygiene has to come from a lab. If it's going to make my body clean, then it has to be synthetic,

00:31:40.840 It has to be artificial. It needs to be constructed in a lab with guys in white coats and goggles and test tubes.

00:31:48.700 But that's not true. See, most oral care products are built on that premise.

00:31:53.500 But Van Man, our sponsor, does something different.

00:31:56.480 They're using real mineral source from grass fed cattle, which means this.

00:32:01.060 It's going to carry the full mineral profile that your body actually recognizes and can use to clean your teeth and support tooth structure.

00:32:09.760 and really that's the big idea there's a lot of health companies that are selling to the crunchy

00:32:14.840 right or the hippie tree hugging left saying our product is the superior product why because

00:32:20.680 it's it's not bad for you you'll live and die at 85 years old instead of dying at 83 years old but

00:32:26.900 here's a question for the 50 years in between now and death when i'm playing on the floor with my

00:32:33.320 kids are they going to look at me and say daddy your teeth stink right i use organic you know

00:32:38.160 perfectly natural deodorant yeah i know bro you stink so the question is not just is it healthy

00:32:44.640 the question is is it a good product if you're selling toothpaste does it clean your teeth i can

00:32:50.060 tell you from personal experience this product does so go to vanman.shop forward slash nxr use

00:32:56.320 our code nxr for 15 off of your first purchase again it's vanman.shop forward slash nxr use nxr

00:33:04.440 for 15% off. Van Man, real ingredients, no exceptions. Joining me right now is my good

00:33:11.360 friend Don Keith, who is the host of The Real Beef with Don Keith. And he's also a contributor

00:33:16.960 to Urban Scoop. So a bit of US politics, a bit of UK politics, dabbling in both ends of the

00:33:23.220 big pool. Keith, what's going on with your country at the moment and the lack of civil liberties?

00:33:28.540 What is going on with this idea of putting a switch, a kill switch in every single car?

00:33:33.440 Well, you know, that created quite a stir. You know, we Americans, we like our individual liberty. Unfortunately, the Democrats don't agree with us all the time. So you always get something like this that comes along and tries to control us a little bit more.

00:33:47.260 But what they're calling a kill switch, it doesn't it doesn't actually say kill switch in the language of the law.

00:33:53.420 Now, what this is a section 24220, I believe, which comes from the larger bipartisan infrastructure and investment and jobs act that was passed in 2020, 2021.

00:34:04.420 And it was passed overwhelmingly by Democrats, but it was bipartisan in that about 19 Republican senators voted with the Democrats.

00:34:12.600 and I think it was about 13 House Republicans voted for this bill.

00:34:17.900 And what it basically is, it's a section in the law that would require what they call the National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration here,

00:34:28.640 which is kind of in charge of the official administration in charge of highway safety here in the United States.

00:34:34.940 And what they did was that the Congress directed them to require all new passenger motor vehicles to be equipped with what they call an advanced drunk and impaired driving prevention technology.

00:34:48.740 Now, it sounds really good on its face.

00:34:51.260 You know, like everything the Democrats do or the liberals do when they present it to us, it always seems like, you know, this amazing thing that's going to be great for humanity.

00:34:59.960 And on its face, it is. And if I could guarantee that this thing was just going to simply be able to detect drunk driving from here to eternity, I would be fine with it.

00:35:10.340 But we know from history, if we look at things like, you know, if you give Democrats an inch, they take them off.

00:35:16.520 You look at anything they've done in the past where we've sort of given them a little bit of leeway.

00:35:20.600 If you look at gay marriage or affirmative action, you see what they want to do with the central bank digital currency now or digital IDs, gun control, FISA courts.

00:35:31.460 They always take that little inch and they use it for power and control and try to manipulate and terrorize conservatives in our country who believe in individual liberty.

00:35:41.440 So my fear of this mechanism is that it would be implemented under the guise of good and years from now or another administration that's more tyrannical, say like Biden on steroids, years from now would take that and say, hey, you know, we've already got this technology in our vehicles.

00:36:04.420 Why don't we tweak it a little bit to say, okay, this guy, he's already driven his allotted mileage for the week.

00:36:11.440 I think we need to shut his vehicle down.

00:36:13.560 Right, for net zero emissions.

00:36:16.100 Exactly.

00:36:16.840 If you want to pursue that green agenda, we can just use this, what was created to shut the vehicles down for impaired drivers.

00:36:24.280 We'll now do it to make sure our green agenda is just like we want.

00:36:28.120 We'll shut them down if they drive too far.

00:36:30.120 If we don't like something they said on social media, maybe we shut them down.

00:36:34.060 You just never know the direction of the country, how tyrannical things can be.

00:36:37.720 If we lose our Supreme Court advantage, if we lose Congress to the Democrats, we lose the presidency, I could see this being implemented by a Democratic-controlled government in the future.

00:36:50.680 That's why I'm a no on it.

00:36:52.320 Like I said, if it were created just for the reasons they say, I would be for it because

00:36:57.020 it does seem like a good thing.

00:36:58.360 But I can just see the Democrats running with this and using it for evil, basically.

00:37:03.940 It's interesting to me that a number of Republicans have voted for this against the House in favor

00:37:09.320 of the Democrats.

00:37:10.300 That's problematic because which party is supposed to be looking after the freedoms

00:37:13.660 and the civil liberties of the people?

00:37:15.620 There is one Republican, though, who always seems to stand up on these issues.

00:37:19.560 That's Republican Thomas Massey.

00:37:21.340 let's have a look at what he had to say but there is a law that states that every vehicle

00:37:25.160 manufactured is going to have to have a kill switch in it the car itself will monitor your

00:37:31.180 driving and if the car thinks that you're not doing a good job driving it will disable itself

00:37:38.180 so the car dashboard becomes your judge your jury and your execution

00:37:43.320 now the words that stood out to me there were if the car thinks i don't want my car to think

00:37:51.900 i don't want my car to have an opinion on my driving exactly exactly and the other thing

00:37:56.560 there is what if you have a uh a health condition or a medical emergency that mimics the signs of

00:38:03.020 impairment and you need to get someone in an emergent situation and your car says no i think

00:38:07.240 he's drunk i'm going to shut it down you just can't depend on technology all the time there's

00:38:11.680 you know even they're designing i think that's a key point because i'm reading the information

00:38:16.920 here apparently it monitors a driver's performance to identify impairment of the driver it passively

00:38:22.200 detects a blood alcohol level equal to or exceeding 0.08 blood alcohol content and detects

00:38:29.540 impairment and prevents or limits vehicle operation those three clauses are problematic for the

00:38:34.520 reasons you've laid out but what if you're the reason that you are your performance is seen as

00:38:40.160 impaired by the car isn't actually because you're impaired what if it's something else

00:38:43.700 i don't know if you had a chance to see this parody clip i forgot the woman's name but she

00:38:47.060 does so many um social media parodies these days she's hilarious have a little look at this 1.00

00:38:52.780 granny we gotta go you think 1.00

00:38:59.080 Let's go 0.95

00:39:05.820 Come on, come on, come on

00:39:07.560 Due to elevated heart rate, high stress levels

00:39:10.480 And panic indicators

00:39:11.760 You're not fit to operate this vehicle

00:39:13.800 What? There's this tornado

00:39:15.420 Have you tried calming down?

00:39:17.440 Daryl, it's getting bigger

00:39:18.820 Start the truck

00:39:19.880 Let's begin a breathing exercise

00:39:21.540 Inhale, exhale

00:39:23.680 I'm not breathing right now

00:39:25.440 Daryl, do something

00:39:28.340 i'm trying analyzing driver condition i've determined i know what you've determined but

00:39:32.960 you're wrong i am never wrong whose right idea was this your governments

00:39:38.320 granny i have a feeling we're not in america anymore you can pause that there 0.89

00:39:44.900 i mean first of all i love this woman she pops up on my instagram all the time 1.00

00:39:49.500 but basically she's straight to the point make sense comment again is what her shirt says that's

00:39:53.760 what we need like who is dictating that this happens well your government your government

00:39:57.720 is surely there to safeguard you in the very minimal way, to get out of your way, to let you

00:40:02.800 live your free life. I am not a fan of giving the government more control than they need, and this

00:40:07.760 is far more control than any government needs. I don't even think China has this kind of control

00:40:11.980 over their citizens' vehicles. If I'm going to buy a car, I want to buy that to get from A to B,

00:40:17.220 and I don't want anyone knowing where A or B is. I don't want them monitoring where I'm going. I

00:40:21.800 don't want them knowing how fast I'm going, how slow I'm going, if I'm swerving, if I'm driving

00:40:26.340 perfectly straight. That's on me. I want an element of trust from the rest of my fellow

00:40:31.280 citizens and from my government. I don't want to have to report back to anybody. Now, is that too

00:40:36.140 much to ask? No, I agree with you there. I've never seen this woman before. That's pretty

00:40:41.800 funny. I might have to look her up because that was good. But yeah, that just goes to show you 0.98

00:40:45.520 what I was talking about, either a situation like that or an emergency health situation where you

00:40:50.140 have something that mimics impairment. Now, imagine what else they can detect if they can

00:40:57.480 come up with sensors for air cabin pressure in your vehicle. What other technology are they going

00:41:02.660 to try to foist upon us to control us down the road? So, you know, I want the basics. I want to

00:41:08.240 get from A to B. I'd like to have my radio, my talk radio I can listen to, my air conditioning,

00:41:13.980 and, you know, I like the power windows and door locks, but I don't want Uncle Sam driving my

00:41:19.320 vehicle for me and controlling you know what i mean yeah there's a fine line isn't there i tend

00:41:23.360 to buy secondhand video vehicles and i don't want something that's got a great big ipad screen with

00:41:28.320 too much i don't want too much tech i want the bare minimum tech so i can have good quality

00:41:32.340 cool or hot air depending on the weather you know as you say windows that you don't have to manually

00:41:37.460 wind down but apart from that and maybe a radio but apart from that i don't want too much tech

00:41:42.340 in my vehicle because um you know the vehicles that we drive in for example in greece if there's

00:41:47.540 an EMP, the vehicles are going to last forever. If there's a VMP here right now, most vehicles

00:41:53.220 are going to be gone. We're going to be stuck. Yeah, that reminds me of the movie, was it,

00:41:57.700 World of Worlds with Tom Cruise, when the EMP went over the globe and shut all the cars down.

00:42:02.440 He had the one with the carburetor, and he had the only car that would run. I think maybe in

00:42:06.800 the future that we may want to think of these electronic controlled vehicles and go back to

00:42:12.560 carburetors. I absolutely agree with that. I've got one more video to show you, Don. This is what

00:42:16.840 you've been talking about of the consequences, the potential consequences of the actions of this

00:42:20.180 policy. You've got to understand the unintended consequences of this paragraph could be severe.

00:42:27.620 It was sold to the public or to Congress as a drunk driver initiative. But look, what about a

00:42:33.660 woman fleeing an attacker or stalker? Her pupils are going to be dilated. She's going to be breathing 0.99

00:42:39.180 hard. She's going to be alert. What if it says, no, you're impaired. You can't drive your car

00:42:44.380 to escape from an attacker.

00:42:46.180 This could be unintended consequences that we...

00:42:48.860 Now, what concerns me about this is the unintended consequences.

00:42:53.860 So you've obviously heard about the 15-minute cities

00:42:56.080 that are coming to play in Oxford, in the United Kingdom,

00:42:58.900 and want to design a way that you can't leave your direct vicinity.

00:43:03.780 Like, you have to stay within your 15-minute block.

00:43:06.300 And if you go outside of it, then there'll be consequences.

00:43:08.680 That's all published around the idea of climate crisis

00:43:11.920 and net zero and all of that.

00:43:13.140 But of course, it's tyrannous, it's dictatorial.

00:43:15.760 And so what if they paired this up with your kill switch?

00:43:18.620 What if they said, look, if you drive 15 minutes away, more than five times a week, your car

00:43:24.180 will not function.

00:43:25.360 You know, if you drive to certain places where we know they're selling red meat, your car 0.88

00:43:29.640 will not function.

00:43:30.700 They can dictate whatever they want.

00:43:32.160 Once this is in play, there's not much we can do about it.

00:43:35.760 Well, that's exactly right.

00:43:36.680 And then you pair all of those things with the central banking digital currency or the

00:43:40.300 digital ID and the other.

00:43:41.800 What you're giving the government is multiple upon multiple ways to track you and control you and do your bidding and submit to their will.

00:43:49.700 And, you know, it's very Orwell-y.

00:43:52.200 And I know people always talk about 1984 and Orwell, but if you've read that book, that's the way the Democrats want to go.

00:43:58.960 And, you know, really reality has mimicked that fiction for some time now under liberal governments really across the globe who've tried to implement these things like 15-minute cities and things like that with their hoaxy, fake, green agenda.

00:44:15.860 It's all based on lies, and it's all about power and control and money.

00:44:21.320 If you look at the billions that have been made from these companies that were spawned by this entire green energy movement and how many billions of dollars these companies are worth and this industry is worth, you can see exactly why the ruse is afoot because it's all power play and it's all about money.

00:44:37.980 So I want to keep my liberty.

00:44:39.940 I want to keep my country free, and I don't want to submit to any of this government overreach in my devices, my vehicles, my identity, my 15-minute cities.

00:44:50.020 I don't want any part of any of it.

00:44:52.120 I'm into that.

00:44:52.820 Don Keith, where can people find you?

00:44:55.000 At Real Don Keith on X and Instagram.

00:44:58.920 The Real Beef with Don Keith on YouTube.

00:45:02.120 Do you have that saying in America then?

00:45:03.420 I thought that was just a British thing, the beef.

00:45:06.140 Yeah, yeah. 1.00

00:45:06.800 Like I have a beef with, I hope my show started

00:45:09.100 because I like had a beef with the government.

00:45:12.340 So every episode was like, man,

00:45:14.220 I've got a real beef with this thing.

00:45:15.700 So the show was called The Real Beef.

00:45:17.660 Plus it rhymes with Don Keith.

00:45:19.200 So that's why it became The Real Beef with Don Keith.

00:45:22.520 Well, I love it.

00:45:23.380 Keep up the good work. 0.98

00:45:24.200 Send my love to Judy. 1.00

00:45:25.140 God bless you.

00:45:25.660 I will.

00:45:26.020 Thank you for having me on.

00:45:26.900 Great to see you, man.

00:45:27.900 Take care.

00:45:29.920 Warning, this product contains nicotine.

00:45:31.860 Nicotine is an addictive chemical.

00:45:34.060 All right, guys, you know the drill.

00:45:35.260 This is our favorite sponsor, Knick-Knack, Poliwack, Give a Dog a Bone.

00:45:38.340 These are Knick-Knacks, and they're America first, manufacturing the products in America.

00:45:43.320 They're Christ is King Maxine.

00:45:44.660 You've got the foot of our Lord and Savior crushing the head of the serpent right there

00:45:48.000 on the can. 0.57

00:45:48.500 They're Christians. We know the guys. They support us. We need you to support them. If you don't use

00:45:53.480 nicotine, you can just skip this commercial. If you do use nicotine, I'm not asking you to start

00:45:58.240 a new habit. You can spend money on the thing you're already buying, but actually spend less

00:46:03.360 because I'm going to give you a deep discount here in just a second, and you'll be supporting

00:46:06.920 an America First Christian company that also supports us over here at NXR Studios. So you

00:46:12.760 can buy it online. You go to knickknack.com. Use our promo code, all caps, J-O-E-L, 20 exclamation

00:46:19.940 point. That's Joel, 20 exclamation point. And you're going to get 20% off. That's if you buy

00:46:25.020 it online, knickknack.com. But now you can also buy Knick Knack in the store. If you go in the

00:46:30.500 store and use our code, the link in the description below, then you'll actually get paid to try out

00:46:36.860 their product. You'll get $3 back when you buy your first can. Then you'll get a dollar back

00:46:41.560 when you buy can number two, three, and four,

00:46:43.940 and then another $3 back when you buy your fifth can.

00:46:47.000 It's pretty simple.

00:46:47.920 You just upload your receipt

00:46:49.220 and they'll send you the cash back.

00:46:51.460 So go to knickknack.com if you want to buy it online,

00:46:54.500 Joel 20 exclamation point,

00:46:56.240 or use our code in the description below

00:46:59.080 if you're buying it in the store.

00:47:01.780 I am now pleased to be joined by my friend,

00:47:04.460 John Henry Weston, the founder and CEO

00:47:06.680 and top dog over at LifeSite News.

00:47:09.360 John Henry, thanks for joining us.

00:47:10.560 good to be here calvin thank you so very much for having me not at all that the church is a mess and

00:47:15.500 i thought who can i get to talk to me about this and talk to my audience through this

00:47:18.960 it seems like the church may be about to enter schism or produce a schism for the first time

00:47:25.940 since the avignon mess now this is this is foundational for people who don't know the

00:47:31.000 situation what is going to happen with the sspx in june so in on july 1st um the sspx

00:47:39.680 which is the priestly society of St. Pius X. And basically, they are sort of the guardians,

00:47:45.560 if you will, of the traditional Latin mass. And they are going to make new bishops. They're going

00:47:51.000 to do bishop consecrations or ordinations, if you will, because they are a Latin mass society that

00:47:58.680 serves hundreds of thousands of faithful around the world. And as you know, to do confirmations,

00:48:03.620 you need bishops. A bishop has to do a confirmation, especially in the traditional right.

00:48:07.560 and there's only two of them so they need to ordain more bishops or consecrate more bishops

00:48:13.780 and of course the relations with rome are really rough when you have modernist popes as we've had

00:48:20.560 now for 14 years first francis and then leo um it's going to create a situation that's going to

00:48:27.500 be next to impossible francis had a very clear agenda to eliminate the traditional latin mass

00:48:33.320 that became very, very clear, because at first it was thought, oh, we just, we want it to be part of,

00:48:40.580 but not the exclusive part of, and we want to make sure that there's still, no, no, no, no. It became

00:48:45.140 really clear. The head of the congregation that deals with worship made it absolutely clear that

00:48:52.300 the process, this is a process for elimination. And that's never going to happen, because that

00:48:57.960 is the Mass of Ages. That's the Mass handed down by our Lord to his apostles. And it's never going

00:49:04.060 to change. And so we're in a kind of a pickle, a battle, if you will. And the society basically

00:49:13.000 says, okay, well, in order to obey Rome, we're going to do that by refusing to listen to what

00:49:20.480 Leo Francis etc have told us because if we obey what they're saying we are then going to harm the

00:49:28.480 faith and harm the faithful and in fact harm these men who are claiming to be the representative of

00:49:35.180 the Catholic Church because it would be a massive harm to the church if we basically folded up shop

00:49:41.440 and we're no longer able to provide the traditional mass the traditional sacraments for the faithful

00:49:48.560 hundreds of thousands of whom attend SSPX churches and masses all around the world.

00:49:54.180 So that's what's going on.

00:49:56.480 On the other side of the equation, the Rome has threatened excommunication.

00:50:01.840 I don't know if you want me to go into the past.

00:50:03.800 Well, let's get to that because there are two bishops, you say, within the SSPX.

00:50:08.600 And as you rightly point out, you need a bishop in order to confirm somebody,

00:50:12.760 to receive the full gifts of the Holy Spirit and fully become a member of the church.

00:50:16.500 and so there's a necessity for more bishops. Now people may not know that in order to consecrate

00:50:21.500 new bishops, and these bishops within the SSPX have full apostolic succession, they have full

00:50:26.660 authority from Christ passed down through the apostles, they are bishops in the church. However

00:50:32.440 in order to consecrate a new bishop you need something called a papal mandate which is

00:50:36.720 essentially permission from the Vatican to say you can consecrate new bishops. Now correct me if

00:50:41.740 I'm wrong but my understanding is they have not received a papal mandate and they're going to go

00:50:45.300 ahead with a consecration anyway, which would probably mean they're de facto excommunicating

00:50:50.940 themselves, but it seems that Rome may issue an excommunication, and they've explicitly said

00:50:55.840 they may do so. Is that right? So what the Pope grants is jurisdiction. And the bishops there are

00:51:03.700 not going to be claiming jurisdiction at all. In other words, what they're doing is they're

00:51:08.220 saying they're consecrating bishops in order to do the sacraments for the faithful and they're not

00:51:15.340 giving themselves jurisdiction so when the so just just to clarify that they won't have a diocese

00:51:20.380 they'll be kind of like auxiliary bishops that's right and so they will be bishops because what it

00:51:26.300 takes if you will to make a bishop is as we know from the scriptures it's the laying on of hands

00:51:32.540 And if you go back to the original days in the church, there was no permission from Peter to, let's say, Timothy, to go and obtain another mission because the situation was there.

00:51:47.180 So historically, we don't have that stable mandate in India.

00:51:50.900 It's developed at the time, rightfully so, not saying that that's wrong.

00:51:54.680 But the whole point is the SSPX are not claiming to do that.

00:52:00.140 They're not claiming a mandate per se.

00:52:01.620 So they think, I believe they've developed a pathway where they don't feel they are transgressing

00:52:09.800 the law such that they'd be automatically excommunicated. Rome, however, is saying

00:52:14.640 they're going to do this. And it's interesting to me because this is, so this is part two,

00:52:19.700 if you will, of this move. What happened first with Second Vatican Council, and then after the

00:52:27.280 Council, the obliteration of the Latin Mass. And that's where Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, one of

00:52:33.260 the fathers of the Council, wanted to say, whoa, whoa, whoa, we need to preserve the Mass of Ages.

00:52:39.240 This traditional Mass has been with us since time immemorial. In fact, the Church had forbade any

00:52:44.500 other Mass other than ones that were already over 200 years old, back at the time in the 1500s.

00:52:50.840 Um, and, and so you have this perennial mass forever that Lefebvre said, we have to preserve.

00:52:59.340 We have to, we have to just do this.

00:53:01.060 So they were doing that and it got to a point in 1988 where those four bishops said, uh,

00:53:10.280 there's not, there's not, well, actually it was him saying, I have to make new bishops

00:53:14.900 because if I die, then what?

00:53:16.700 so he wanted to make bishops and john paul ii actually agreed to let him make one and there

00:53:23.480 was a kerfuffle back and forth and he said look i've got to make four interestingly the cardinal

00:53:28.800 from the vatican who visited lefebvre at the time was a cardinal gagnon and his one of his disciples

00:53:36.200 was a good friend of mine father charles murr who many of you viewers might know from his he

00:53:42.960 appears on Faith and Reason with me every week. He's also a prolific author, one of his most

00:53:47.300 famous works, Murder in the 33rd Degree. Anyway, he, being a disciple of, or, you know, one of the

00:53:54.420 students of Cardinal Gagnon, is interesting. He's able to relate what happened. When Gagnon went to

00:54:00.260 visit Lefebvre, and Lefebvre told him, yeah, I know, the Holy Father said, one, we got to do four.

00:54:06.580 why? Well, frankly, because I don't trust Rome. Gagnon's response,

00:54:12.360 I agree with you. And so it's like, whoa. So you're getting, even at that time in Rome,

00:54:19.360 because in 1988, it's John Paul II, and everybody thinks, oh, wow, awesome, St. John Paul II.

00:54:23.980 It is true, but he was surrounded by vipers. To give you an example, Cardinal Walter Casper,

00:54:32.260 the same guy we know now as the guy who basically gave us Amoris Laetitia, this heretical thing which

00:54:38.860 allows for Holy Communion for divorce and remarried Catholics. He at the time was the head of John

00:54:44.800 Paul II's outreach to interreligious outreach. And he said famously, we shouldn't try and convert the 0.83

00:54:52.240 Jews, which anybody who knows anything about the faith will tell you. And I like to quote Mother 0.62

00:54:58.720 Miriam, who is a former Jew, who then became a Catholic and now a nun, she basically said,

00:55:03.880 the worst form of anti-Semitism is keeping Jesus from the Jews. And that's exactly what Walter

00:55:09.180 Casper, and he was there advising John Paul in a top position. So he was surrounded by snakes,

00:55:15.800 the same snakes who, by the way, wouldn't let him make the consecration of Russia back in 84.

00:55:19.660 But nonetheless, that's where this came from. So Lefebvre does this in 88, and he's excommunicated

00:55:28.040 with the other bishops who he consecrated. And then what happens? Fast forward in history to

00:55:38.740 Benedict. Benedict lifts the excommunications, but interestingly, without the SSPX ever recanting

00:55:49.240 or saying we did wrong or repenting. No, nothing. So that's very interesting. So normally when

00:55:55.680 you're excommunicated, you have to come back and ask for reinstatement. Well, if you're reinstated

00:56:04.440 without repenting, in fact, with continuing in the same vein, it's the authority acknowledging,

00:56:12.200 yeah, something went wrong over there, and we're undoing this. Okay, so it's undone. And there was

00:56:17.780 this amazing flowering of latin mass under benedict he did something uh giving a document for

00:56:25.700 the whole church telling because he knew he knew that there's these leftist bishops who really hate

00:56:31.560 the latin mass and so he said to the priests of the world look this is the mass of the ages and

00:56:37.200 you're allowed to celebrate it and your bishop actually can't forbid you that's been the teaching

00:56:41.620 of the church forever and so benedict's not even changing anything he's acknowledging something

00:56:47.180 that's been there um for centuries already and so that's what it was and there was this huge

00:56:55.020 flowering of latin mass you had these massive latin mass communities churches packed with young

00:57:02.220 people young families and this started to freak out many of these baby boomer bishops for them

00:57:12.700 I think, and it's a postulation of mine, it's a hypothesis of mine, their stamp, their contribution,

00:57:20.380 if you might say, to the church was exactly eliminating the Latin Mass to making it new.

00:57:25.580 That's what they, that was going to be their signature move.

00:57:28.220 There's multi-layers to this, and I do want to get to the Latin Mass part of it,

00:57:32.140 but I'm stuck on the excommunication side just for a moment, because it seems almost

00:57:36.700 pharisaical to me. Maybe you can help me out with this, because the whole point of Christianity,

00:57:41.660 as opposed to Judaism, is that we're supposed to follow the spirit of the law, not just the letter

00:57:45.740 of the law. And as I understand it, pontifical mandates have only been necessary since 1917,

00:57:52.060 but there has been a practice of it further back than that. But the point is that for the first

00:57:57.260 11 centuries, bishops just consecrated new bishops. The reason they brought in this idea

00:58:03.260 of checking in with the pope first was because they wanted to avoid secular interference. And

00:58:08.620 And of course, throughout much of Christendom, which was most of Europe at the time,

00:58:11.740 kings were having a say on who bishops consecrated.

00:58:14.180 And so there were political interferences that they wanted to avoid within the church.

00:58:19.640 So it's the separation of church and state, essentially, in the true sense.

00:58:22.820 And so the church said, before we consecrate new bishops, we're going to check in with the top bishop first.

00:58:27.500 But that was the point of that law.

00:58:29.140 So it wasn't about stopping other bishops consecrating other bishops

00:58:32.560 if you don't like the form of liturgy that they celebrate or that they're too traditional.

00:58:35.680 It seems to me that we're not following the spirit of this law, which is, again, a very new kind of law from 1917, and it seems we're leaning on the letter of the law instead. Is that not pharisaical?

00:58:45.420 well it's pharisaical especially in this sense so unfortunately there's so much politics in the

00:58:53.900 church today uh and i don't mean proper politics i mean crass bending over to not only the secular

00:59:02.640 to the enemies of the church the biggest case in point is what we're doing with china china is of 0.74

00:59:10.100 course run by the communist party and they have a patriotic catholic association which is a fake

00:59:15.240 church set up by the Chinese Communist government, whose stated goal is the elimination of Catholicism.

00:59:21.240 So, Rome allows them, the Chinese Communist Party, to name their own bishops, and without

00:59:32.040 papal mandate. Now, they're supposed to have it, but they do it anyways without it. And Rome signs

00:59:36.600 off and smiles, even when they do it, without their permission. So, under both Francis and Leo,

00:59:41.640 oh, Rome has faced the,

00:59:45.480 basically they've named their own bishops

00:59:47.260 without consulting with Rome.

00:59:48.940 And Rome goes, oh, okay, then you shouldn't have done that.

00:59:51.900 But yeah, yeah, it's fine.

00:59:53.280 It's all good.

00:59:54.200 They've got the mandate now after the fact, it's all good.

00:59:57.260 So that is where we will see

01:00:01.040 what's going to happen with the SSPX.

01:00:04.460 If Rome allows for bishops to be named,

01:00:08.360 no excommunications to the chinese communist party which hates the church stated goal is to 0.88

01:00:15.380 get rid of catholicism and it treats them with not only kid gloves but actually is now encouraging

01:00:23.400 the faithful there the underground church to come out there was just a report by human rights watch

01:00:29.640 of all places a leftist outfit saying that hey uh rome you've done a really bad thing here because

01:00:37.200 you're faithful in china are now persecuted more thanks to your agreement with china than ever

01:00:42.980 before and so it's sick but if rome's now going to turn around and say to the sspx whose stated goal 0.62

01:00:51.560 is to further the church who loves the church who's willing to sacrifice themselves for the 0.95

01:00:58.420 church if they're going to go ahead and tell those folks you're excommunicated while the chinese are 0.88

01:01:04.280 not for doing the same thing, that really will speak volumes to the world. So I actually made 1.00

01:01:09.840 a guess that Leo was going to ignore it because I thought there's no way he's going to act.

01:01:17.200 What he'll do is he'll be vague and ambiguous like the church often is these days and kind of

01:01:20.700 people won't know. So people who don't like the SSPX will think they're excommunicated

01:01:24.460 de facto and people that do like them will think they're not. But no, he seems to be coming down.

01:01:28.980 But you've pointed out that there's a two-tiered system here. Now, legal systems should be equal.

01:01:33.740 People are equal in terms of dignity and worth in the eyes of God, but we should have equality

01:01:38.040 under the law too. If China's been treated one way and the SSP another, that's an issue.

01:01:42.940 But it's not just within China. We've seen over the last few days, actually, that there's been

01:01:47.800 a different treatment of, well, not just schismatics, but apostates. We saw the new

01:01:52.420 so-called Archbishop of Canterbury being greeted by the Holy Father. We saw her praying in front

01:01:59.500 of cardinals who are banging their heads and crossing themselves as if they're being blessed

01:02:03.860 by her which is an impossibility and so there's kind of that problem but also we've seen catholic

01:02:10.900 bishops co-consecrate not co-consecrating um co-facilitating in uh in what looks like some

01:02:18.020 kind of sacramental service yeah yeah the the uh ordination or whatever of a anglican bishop

01:02:27.340 with the participation of an actual bishop, a Catholic bishop.

01:02:33.080 And these things are so sad because it actually gets worse

01:02:37.640 than the welcome of Sarah Mulally.

01:02:40.860 You know, she's a female lay person who's not in the church.

01:02:46.240 She's an Anglican.

01:02:48.980 And, you know, she's, by the way, she's pro-abortion, 0.97

01:02:52.240 she's pro-lesbian, pro-homosexual. 0.89

01:02:54.720 She's not even a Christian by that right, 0.97

01:02:57.340 because she rejects the teachings of Christ.

01:02:59.820 But she claims to be a priest and a bishop,

01:03:05.040 dresses up in liturgical garb, as Ed Penton said.

01:03:10.540 And Ed, God bless him, he's such a mild-mannered guy.

01:03:13.360 He has been a Vatican reporter for decades and is one of the best.

01:03:18.320 He even said Rome is confirming her in her trans-ecclesial identity.

01:03:24.100 I thought that was great.

01:03:25.420 She spoke afterwards.

01:03:26.380 she said it was like a meeting of two pastors so she clearly wasn't rebuked and she needed to be

01:03:31.020 in love rebuked no in fact got even worse she was asked if she spoke to the pope about female

01:03:39.180 ordinations female priests and she said well i'm not a politician but then she said but

01:03:45.980 i sometimes will have to say some things when they're a matter of justice and i thought oh my

01:03:50.140 that seems like a pretty clear hint that she spoke to him about the issue. And I thought,

01:03:55.860 my goodness. But the visuals of it were so striking that I think that really cut deep for a lot of

01:04:02.800 Catholics who've been trying to avoid the issue of Leo being heterodox, you know, just burying

01:04:08.780 their heads in the sand, looking the other way. This one was too visually striking. Just to allow 0.97

01:04:16.280 women to masquerade as priests is just a nightmare. And yet, here's the real rub. 1.00

01:04:24.820 While he met with Sarah Mullally, he refused to meet with Archbishop Viganot,

01:04:31.000 excommunicated unjustly by Francis. He refused to meet with the leaders of the Society of Pius X.

01:04:38.100 And so he will meet with rock stars and known heretics in the church, like Father James Martin, but he won't meet with actual Catholic bishops and those whom they're pretending they're all concerned about, i.e. the SSPX.

01:04:56.360 Well, let's get to the meat and veg of this, because this is what it all comes down to in essence, isn't it?

01:05:01.040 there is a kind of a spiritual schism already within the church between the Old Mass and the

01:05:06.660 New Mass. There's a problem here in that we have the Mass of the Ages, which has been celebrated

01:05:11.580 at least going back to the third century, standardized during the Council of Trent,

01:05:16.780 and we have evidence of it throughout the whole of church history. So it's called the Mass of

01:05:20.460 the Ages for a reason. It's the Mass that has been prayed throughout the ages. And so we pray it not

01:05:24.920 just in unity with Christ, but we pray in unity with all of the saints in heaven. And then there's

01:05:29.760 the new mass which came out of Vatican II which you know people can argue whether it's valid or

01:05:34.120 not that's not the point of this conversation but the point here is that the church clearly

01:05:36.960 wants to go in that direction and it's trying to not just offer two forms like an ordinary form and

01:05:42.520 an extraordinary form as was the promise but it's actually trying to cut off tradition cut off the

01:05:48.060 mass of the ages and force people down this new track is that not what all of this is really about

01:05:53.060 it's not about the SSPX not about the bishops not about Sarah Mullally or China it's all about

01:05:57.480 the mass of the ages being cut off really isn't it yeah i mean it does seem to be that in terms

01:06:03.500 of validity you had lefebvre even say insist that the new mass was valid but the the difficulty

01:06:10.460 here is it moves further and further away from the truth which is the mass the way handed down

01:06:19.380 as i said from christ to his apostles and this is how we get to the third century mass if you will

01:06:26.060 it comes from those apostolic prayers in fact if you look at an old missal and compare it to a new

01:06:31.800 one and you look at some of the prayers that are already eliminated in the novus ordo as a new

01:06:37.200 right to the mass the the the novus ordo mass you'll see some of the prayers removed when you

01:06:42.160 look at the date it says from apostolic times i.e from the apostles and so that's just totally

01:06:48.420 bizarre how can they do that god only knows but this is it as we move further and further away

01:06:54.320 there's a lot of postulation in rome that they are moving toward a mass which eliminates the

01:07:01.100 words of institution in other words the very words that are necessary to say in order to

01:07:08.520 confect or to to make the bread and wine into the body blood soul and divinity of our lord jesus

01:07:15.020 christ they and those words of course very very simple this is my body this is my blood there's

01:07:22.640 already a move to try and do a more ecumenical mass that talks about that but doesn't actually

01:07:30.020 use those words and that would actually eliminate the mass itself and that is the trajectory we've

01:07:38.400 already seen that with covid the shutdown of the mass never before in history that was a sign like

01:07:45.860 never before of the end times if you will and that has to be the trajectory of a lot of these people

01:07:52.280 And I'm sorry to say, there's a lot of evil involved in this.

01:07:55.500 We know from Malachi Martin, from even Fulton J. Sheen, it's very interesting he's being

01:08:02.780 beatified this year, because Fulton J. Sheen was very clear that there is a false church

01:08:09.040 coming, that it will be the ape of the church, it will be like the mystical body of Antichrist.

01:08:14.500 And this is where we're headed.

01:08:16.600 And it's actually in effect right now.

01:08:19.140 you can see it because this thing that we're experiencing have been for the last 14 years or so

01:08:24.120 is not where we were before even 14 years ago it was bad since the 60s sure but this thing is wholly

01:08:31.240 new in that we have official papal documents that are absolutely heretical that terrifies me because

01:08:37.400 those words hot est enim corpus meum have been prayed not from the apostles but from christ

01:08:42.860 himself so the idea of removing them is terrifying to me but this is part of the broader picture and

01:08:49.120 that it already moves the mass away from a sacrifice into something lesser than. It feels

01:08:54.880 quite Protestant, actually, as does much of the things that came out of Vatican II, because you

01:08:59.540 look at the offertory prayers, and they were changed from, again, from the prayers of the

01:09:03.860 apostles to something that is taken from Jewish liturgy, a prayer over a meal. And so instead of

01:09:09.560 praying over a sacrifice, the perpetual sacrifice of Christ, we're praying over the Lord's Supper.

01:09:16.060 that sounds very anglican to me and so that i have i have many problems with the new mass

01:09:20.580 and it's not about the language but what gets put forth in the public conversations is that people

01:09:25.500 think it's about the language they say well you pray the new mass in latin there you go you've

01:09:28.640 got your latin mass it's about what has been handed down to us it's a treasure of the church

01:09:33.240 it's the sacred tradition which makes up the church and is older than the bible itself and

01:09:37.780 is that not why it matters well indeed so benedict for his part he actually made some changes

01:09:44.120 to the mass, to the English version,

01:09:47.920 or the secular versions,

01:09:50.420 excuse me, vernacular versions of the mass

01:09:52.560 to correct some errors

01:09:54.540 that have been going around for decades.

01:09:56.980 So one of the, I'll make the most serious one,

01:10:00.240 was where the priest during consecration would say,

01:10:04.960 my blood was shed for,

01:10:08.000 in the Bible, in the true version,

01:10:10.220 it's shed for many.

01:10:11.380 but it was always used at least in english for for you and for all but that can't be because a

01:10:20.360 our lord didn't say that but b that wants to give credence to the false teaching that no one's in

01:10:29.080 hell this is universalism this is what we're hearing that hell hell is empty that's right

01:10:33.260 and that's been going on again since well it's been going on there's a lot of people who thought

01:10:37.860 that forever but that's always been a heresy i heard this over easter i heard one of the bishops

01:10:43.260 in the church saying that hell is empty fortunately because of um certain theologians

01:10:49.760 you have even modern bishops who are pretty good like bishop baron suggesting that yes we can have

01:10:57.400 a hope that hell is empty that uh no one's there even even judas and if it's all nonsense you make 0.98

01:11:04.420 our Lord a liar. Remember, it's our Lord who says, narrow is the road that leads to life. Few

01:11:10.980 there are that find it. Broad is the road that leads to destruction. Many there are that go

01:11:14.940 therein. You can't say hell is empty. You have to acknowledge, painful as it is, our Lord's own

01:11:23.420 teaching, that the majority go to hell. And that makes us, should make us, as St. Paul said,

01:11:30.300 work out our salvation in fear and trembling i'll mentor that i think that sums it up pretty

01:11:36.540 well thank you for that uh for people who want to find out more where can they follow you where

01:11:40.520 can they watch your shows life site news.com is the original source so l-i-f-e-s-i-t-e-n-e-w-s.com

01:11:47.860 we of course are after being canceled twice are still on youtube at lsn tv we have all of our

01:11:54.360 social media channels, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, everywhere you can reach us at

01:11:59.740 J.H. Weston or at LifeSite News.

01:12:03.920 And we hope to see you there.

01:12:05.420 Also, we've just launched a new venture, like a Catholic-only page, at signofthecrossmedia.com.

01:12:12.780 Fantastic.

01:12:13.400 John Henry Weston from LifeSite News.

01:12:15.040 Thank you very much.

01:12:16.320 Thank you so much, Kevin.

01:12:17.100 God bless you.

01:12:17.960 Now, let's take a look at the comments from last week's episode.

01:12:21.440 I'd like to have real engagement with you guys, the viewers.

01:12:23.840 so do drop your replies your comments whether you're watching on x youtube facebook substack

01:12:29.360 whatever wherever you are let me know in the comments looking at the clip that joel put up on

01:12:35.020 x when preaching becomes a crime christian replied and that's at underscore god's lonely man or

01:12:42.180 saying i'm watching dale's american grit on youtube and now this one with calvin amazing times

01:12:48.300 glad you're excited about the show christian thank you for watching we've got filmer's ghost here who

01:12:54.020 says we need more government surveillance not less we need to know who every foreigner is 1.00

01:13:00.140 so we can identify and deport that's creepy and scary right first and foremost if you have a 0.93

01:13:07.560 problem with the number of foreigners in your country prevent the number of foreigners from 0.97

01:13:10.740 coming into your country that's so prevention is better than reaction but secondly this is just a

01:13:17.260 short-sighted approach filmers goes because if you allow your government to have a lot of surveillance

01:13:22.460 because you think they'll help you on a particular policy you're not thinking ahead because eventually

01:13:27.140 they may and probably will use it against you on another policy you the smaller the government

01:13:32.280 the freer the people we don't want our governments to have a big brother state where they can see

01:13:36.920 us everywhere monitor everything we do from everywhere we go to everything we spend that's 0.98

01:13:41.540 communist china you know that's that's north korea that's great britain we don't want that 0.91

01:13:47.040 in america at least i don't want that in america carrow says when praying becomes a crime and 0.55

01:13:52.740 prayer emoji absolutely it's shocking what's happening and we'll have more in that story as

01:13:57.120 it progresses dark chicago says but will you help us take back constantinople i would love to help

01:14:05.440 you take back constantinople let me know when the crusade begins over there now on the clip of

01:14:10.640 my friend isabel vaughan spruce being arrested for silent prayer in her own head justin harris

01:14:16.440 fonseca quotes from the scriptures and it was given unto him to make war with the saints and

01:14:22.540 to overcome them and power was given him over all kindreds and tongues and nations revelation 13 7

01:14:29.380 king james version he says it's time to defeat the beast take over the surveillance systems to take

01:14:34.780 down the criminals absolutely i'm with you that on that level um in great britain there are these

01:14:40.140 people who call themselves the blade runners from the movie and they go around chopping down these

01:14:45.920 cameras that have been put up I would say very immorally if not illegally that capture us all

01:14:51.620 around particularly in the capital but all around the place and so that's that's an activist method

01:14:57.280 that's been taken up but also over here in America these flock cameras are popping up everywhere

01:15:01.660 without seeming any consensus from the population and hackers have put together these little flock

01:15:08.860 zappers that you can get that uh essentially flood the flocks with false information i think they

01:15:15.020 could probably go a step further and disable the flocks um i as as a former computer scientist and

01:15:21.060 a penetration tester i uh someone who's interested in cyber security and used to teach it i i'm more

01:15:28.980 in favor of disabling these immoral and illegal devices than chopping them down as the blade

01:15:34.000 runners are doing in britain but i think it's it's good that activists are looking at ways of doing

01:15:37.940 things and again I'm not advocating for any illegal activities a friend of mine is alleged

01:15:43.040 to have promoted the Blade Runners and is in a long court case about it because the state has

01:15:50.020 taken him to court so I'm not advocating for any illegal activities but I'm saying what the state

01:15:53.880 is doing is wrong and it's good that people are standing up against it. Julia Lee said people

01:15:58.560 don't realize that smart TVs and other devices are watching and listening to conversations in

01:16:03.380 people's homes absolutely and these things too these things are always on right now you can't

01:16:08.600 see it on the on the camera that we have but there are infrared bursts coming out of these phone

01:16:13.760 cameras all the time particularly from the front camera to check to see if your face is in front

01:16:19.400 of it well that's the reason they give but essentially the microphones are always on

01:16:23.020 you know we we often say things and then a couple of hours later we are advertised something in line

01:16:28.380 with what we said we are being monitored at all times in all places you know if you use

01:16:32.540 most people around the world now use gmail for example google have access to everything big

01:16:38.660 tech is scary and we should be uh suspicious of these big companies and big governments that have

01:16:45.100 too much information on us because they know more about us than we know about ourselves the

01:16:49.340 algorithms that they have can predict things that we may not even suspect about ourselves

01:16:54.200 on the uh the next crusade clip on x we've got a number of comments here rachel so sapphire sun

01:17:02.640 seven um good commenter she's always around supportive says that callum is a bundle of joy

01:17:08.100 literally lights up the world with his smile i'm sure callum smiles would love to hear that

01:17:12.420 they don't call him smiles for nothing on the uh britain's king skipping easter post we've got some

01:17:18.860 we've got quite a few comments on there i'll pick just a handful um theoria neosis says hi father

01:17:27.120 robinson do you currently have a jurisdictional home i wish to connect with whatever church gives

01:17:32.280 you a home i love that i love that sentiment thank you uh theoria but what i would say is look

01:17:37.500 i am in an irregular situation and i don't advocate irregular situations to anyone i think

01:17:44.600 everyone should go to the nearest catholic church and they are all around the world um if you are

01:17:49.720 if you are in a place where there isn't a catholic church then look up the nearest high church

01:17:55.100 whether it's anglo-catholic or old catholic church in your in your area or if your local catholic

01:18:00.820 church is is captured by homosexuality or liberalism then look elsewhere but otherwise

01:18:06.800 generally speaking you should be sticking to your local catholic church especially if you're

01:18:11.040 baptized and confirmed Catholic. I don't recommend anyone who's baptized and confirmed and taken 1.00

01:18:15.220 first Holy Communion leave the Catholic Church because that is becoming apostate. My situation 0.90

01:18:19.960 is kind of unique. I submit to my bishop. My bishop is not in full communion with Rome at present,

01:18:26.420 but that's not an ideal situation. All Catholics should aim to be in communion with the Bishop of

01:18:32.760 Rome. But I appreciate you saying someone that would take me on is a good sign, and it is. My

01:18:38.100 bishop is bishop jaden haygood good man but but the old catholic church that i belong to or

01:18:42.600 jurisdiction that i belong to doesn't have churches everywhere and that's just the situation that we

01:18:47.600 are in right now i hope that the whole church is reunited at some point and if east and west

01:18:52.880 manages to do it then everyone else should be able to do it too uh laura says that worried me

01:19:00.540 this is about the king not making an easter speech but celebrating ramadan and not having

01:19:05.260 being a fan of his but loved his mother I did find his trip to see Trump was refreshing and

01:19:10.280 hopeful yeah I'm with you on that I'm not the biggest King Charles fan I loved Queen Elizabeth

01:19:15.180 II God rest her soul and I also think his visit to America was quite good actually for someone 0.92

01:19:21.500 who's been a massive critic of his for a while the wandering shrew said JQ I have addressed the JQ

01:19:28.680 I will address the JQ not relevant to this particular topic I don't think but other than 0.54

01:19:33.640 And Queen Elizabeth II did not like Israelis visiting Buckingham Palace.

01:19:37.860 She considered them all to be terrorists.

01:19:40.100 A little tidbit of knowledge for you there.

01:19:42.180 What else have we got here?

01:19:43.880 Darren said, not my king.

01:19:45.080 Unfortunately, he is.

01:19:46.020 If you live in Great Britain and all the Commonwealth of Nations,

01:19:49.500 he is your king.

01:19:50.220 He is my king.

01:19:50.760 I don't like him, but he is our king.

01:19:52.280 We don't get to just say not our king.

01:19:53.940 That's what the leftists do with the president.

01:19:56.140 And, you know, in a democracy, whether it's a constitutional republic or whatever,

01:20:00.200 it doesn't matter that the person who's elected president on the popular vote is the president of

01:20:04.960 the united states uh whether you like him or not uh julia lee said he is not our king the monarchy

01:20:10.600 needs to be abolished don't want someone who has turned their back on our faith i don't want someone

01:20:14.900 who's turned their back their back on our faith either but again he is our king um we can argue

01:20:19.720 for the the uh abolition of the monarchy we can get into that conversation and then we'd have to

01:20:26.160 wonder about what kind of system we'd like i would prefer an absolute monarchy actually

01:20:31.080 i just prefer an absolute christian monarchy cranges says we all know why i think he's

01:20:37.220 alluding to the to the idea that uh the king may have converted to mohammedanism

01:20:41.560 orion 77 said ramadan is great britain's future no i hope not heaven forbid

01:20:47.700 moses pointing up said the people need to elect a new king if only we could but the point of a

01:20:53.660 king is he can't be elected he is above the democratic system even in the constitutional

01:20:57.380 monarchy what we need is a good king a benevolent king

01:21:01.000 micah cherry said britain cooked time for time to take back christendom it is time to take back

01:21:09.000 christendom and that's why this crusade is the starting point we have a spiritual crusade and

01:21:13.840 hopefully that will amount to something now on the other x post just before we move on to youtube

01:21:19.700 i had a post world by wolf has gone missing by the way on x he's been a great account for a long

01:21:27.200 time usually very sound he's been a bit of a negative nancy recently i don't know why but i

01:21:32.860 hope he's okay but his account is down anyway he clipped a bit a bit from last week's show

01:21:37.500 where i was just having a conversation with callum about the unite the kingdom events and

01:21:43.540 i think tommy got a bit upset by it and some of his uh bootlickers got upset by it but i have

01:21:48.240 nothing against Tommy Robinson. I say the same thing I always say. I like Tommy Robinson actually.

01:21:53.460 I get on quite well with him in person. We disagree on one particular issue which is Israel

01:21:57.980 and Zionism but I don't expect to get on, get to have the same opinion as everyone I get on with.

01:22:03.860 I don't expect to agree 100% with everyone that I'm friends with and you know most of my friends 0.54

01:22:09.620 I have disagreements with on some level about some issue. I think it would be very strange if

01:22:14.040 I agreed with everyone absolutely and so again I have no issue with Tommy Robinson whatsoever

01:22:17.720 but i was just having a conversation about a factual situation a turn of events and some

01:22:25.740 people have taken issue with it but let's see what the comments were cammy osieglowski says

01:22:32.160 britain needs catholicism again absolutely that's the only way to save the country returning to god

01:22:37.380 returning to his church agf said it used to be a pagan country uh i don't know why people always

01:22:43.740 come up with this stuff it used to be a pagan country no england's never been a pagan country

01:22:48.920 england was founded in 927 ad by rex anglorum the first king of england uniting wessex and

01:22:55.120 the other counties around which all had their own um lower kings they all came under one high king

01:23:00.760 and it was founded as a christian nation from the very beginning so over a thousand years it's been

01:23:06.420 a christian nation explicitly so in all of its constitutions and so to suggest that it was pagan

01:23:12.680 is just poor history but of course we had pagans in our land of course we did yeah we you know

01:23:17.620 people who who built stonehenge and stuff like that um but it was never a majority pagan country

01:23:23.360 and even before england was founded as a country the british owls had christians on there

01:23:29.000 in fact it was one of the first places to have christians in the world

01:23:32.440 so i don't know why people pipe up with this unless they think it's some like passive aggressive

01:23:36.960 attack it means nothing uh rachel said england first not israel first i'm with you on that one

01:23:43.120 christ first england first absolutely planet walker said you muppet the judeo is reflective

01:23:50.240 of the old testament clueless as usual i mean if anyone's a muppet planet walker it is you because

01:23:56.100 christian christianity and christian those two words have meant something for 2 000 years now

01:24:02.100 people understand that the christian bible has an old testament and a new testament always has done

01:24:06.680 and no one until the last few years has needed to say oh judeo before christian in order to 0.96

01:24:13.360 understand that it's reflective of the old testament that's just stupid in fact actually 0.69

01:24:17.960 the word judeo-christian originally meant that the jews who converted to christianity sometimes 0.90

01:24:23.480 people call them messianic jews but i mean all jews should follow the jewish messiah the christ

01:24:29.480 and become Christian as the first Christians were Jews but to suggest that the term Judeo-Christian 0.99

01:24:37.100 somehow means that we're reflecting on the Old Testament is inaccurate untrue and stupid and we 1.00

01:24:44.020 need to you know face down these stupid suggestions because what it does is it undermines the Christian 1.00

01:24:49.400 faith we don't need to put anything before Christ or before Christian Christ should come first in 0.99

01:24:53.400 all things and so we know that the Old Testament is pointing towards Christ all the way through it

01:24:58.780 it's prophesying him and we know that the new testament fulfills the old testament and together

01:25:04.060 they make up the canon of the christian bible which is a good thing christian bible not judeo

01:25:10.640 christian bible yes the modern day jews have parts of our old testament not all of it because

01:25:15.400 they took out the bits that prophesied the coming of christ or many of them but that doesn't mean

01:25:19.400 we somehow have to recognize that no we don't we don't recognize any false religions any other

01:25:23.620 religions we recognize christianity we recognize jesus christ anything else is a lie you sir

01:25:28.680 are clueless onto the next comment um spero petria said a positive christian country yes

01:25:36.960 that's what we need he said raw christians who follow jesus's original uncorrupt ideals before

01:25:42.700 the jew paul distorted them what what is this heresy they know jesus could not have been jewish

01:25:50.120 as the jews would never have handed them handed one of their own over to roman goy courts for

01:25:56.700 punishment well okay let's break this down a little bit because this is interesting thank you

01:25:59.960 for this comment spiro um jesus was jewish in terms of he was from judea right he wasn't jewish

01:26:06.880 in terms of the what we understand to be the jewish faith in 2026 no not at all um however

01:26:14.300 paul at saul saul was a jew and saul persecuted christians because he was a jew but he converted

01:26:24.300 on the road to Damascus very famous passage in this book you should check it out but when Paul

01:26:29.980 converted he became one of the most ardent followers of Christ and his teachings have been

01:26:36.420 in our canon from the beginning passed down first through word and then secondly through the Bible

01:26:41.940 once it was put together Saint Paul is one of the most important Christians of all time and this is

01:26:47.260 why the Bible teaches and the Bible is God-breathed by the way it's inerrant there are no errors in

01:26:51.160 the Bible the Bible teaches us that we should mirror Paul as Paul mirrors Christ and so no

01:26:58.740 the Bible is not corrupted Christianity is not corrupted I don't know what it means to follow

01:27:02.600 raw Christianity that following the the Christian faith of both sacrament and tradition sacred

01:27:11.720 scripture and sacred tradition is what we call the Catholic faith and we learn about it through

01:27:16.660 the tradition handed down to us through the apostles but also through the bible

01:27:19.660 um so that's a very interesting ticket i've never heard that one before

01:27:23.100 and just a couple more from this clip england so this is stop the world i want to get off

01:27:30.480 aptly named england isn't a christian country it's a country with christians in it no england

01:27:35.060 is still a christian country uh and i want it to stay that way forever i want it to become more

01:27:39.980 christian but our laws are christian our judiciary is christian our legislative is christian our

01:27:44.240 monarchy is christian our houses of parliament are christian uh the very culture is christian

01:27:49.900 our morality is christian everything about our country is explicitly and or implicitly christian

01:27:54.620 and we want to strengthen that not weaken it and i think we'll leave that one there

01:28:01.100 gary mack posted that excellent meme of just to clarify christian and judeo where christian is

01:28:06.860 christ on the cross and judeo is the people standing around yelling crucify him yes

01:28:11.620 we'll leave that one there let's go to over to the comments on youtube that's on nxr studios

01:28:18.420 lots of lots of lovely positive comments here thank you for these this encouragement um from

01:28:24.380 david saying great premiere angela love father calvin love you too thank you angela miss phoenix

01:28:30.100 excellent show uh joseph i am a big fan of calvin blessing to america thank you bless you too

01:28:36.740 goldfish said not nearly enough people are actively watching this content don't be afraid

01:28:42.380 to share this stuff with your friends guys yes be evangelists um helen said love nxr everyone

01:28:49.780 great job yes great team at nxr sean said jesus is king yes he is indeed sarah said sharing with

01:28:57.340 everyone love you guys keep going thank you for sharing please do like comment subscribe share

01:29:02.680 all of that stuff dylan said let's go yes exactly right chick oh right chicken wing said

01:29:09.680 surveillance and facial recognition is wrong makes me wonder if the blade runners will add

01:29:14.700 the cameras to their to-do list like you les makes me wonder too right chicken wing

01:29:20.200 and zach said this is incredible this show is prayers answered i wish that things hadn't gotten

01:29:27.160 this bad uk is in such a horrible place it must become british and christian again i am with you

01:29:35.120 100 zach thank you for that thank you for honestly i could scroll all day lots and lots of wonderful

01:29:40.400 comments from you very kind people uh oh johnny dork said does calvin have an afro maybe he's

01:29:47.940 just listening i'm not watching i don't know but the neo puritan replied yes it's pretty epic thank

01:29:52.580 queue it's not as epic as it was it used to be about here but we'll see how far how big it grows

01:29:57.320 this time around um i'm going to leave that there for this week please leave your replies and

01:30:02.700 comments and i'll get back to more next week love engaging with you guys even when we have these

01:30:06.600 little debates these little tit for tats it's great to have a bit of challenge and it's great

01:30:10.780 to have some encouragement too we do this for you guys and so as long as you like it we'll keep

01:30:15.920 doing it that is it for this week thank you for watching another next crusade only here on nxr

01:30:22.580 studios today of course is the solemnity of the ascension of the lord which is his ascension into

01:30:28.960 heaven 40 days after easter so let us pray the collect of the day in the name of the father and

01:30:34.960 of the son and of the holy spirit amen grant we pray thee almighty god that as we believe your

01:30:41.900 only begotten son our lord jesus christ to have ascended into heaven so we may also in heart and

01:30:48.940 mind there ascend and with him continually dwell who lives and reigns with you and the holy spirit

01:30:55.820 one god forever and ever amen in the name of the father and of the son and of the holy spirit

01:31:01.600 amen that's been another great episode with great guests thank you for tuning in

01:31:07.100 leave your comments down below and I will have a read of them next week. We have an announcement

01:31:12.360 this week in that the book is live. You can purchase the book. Go to newchristianright.com

01:31:18.240 and click on the shop or go to shop.newchristianright.com. And that is my book, The Silent

01:31:25.680 Jihad, where I outline the mess of Islam and its invasion of Christendom and what we should be 1.00

01:31:31.440 doing about it as Christians. You can catch us at the same time, same place next week, 1.00

01:31:36.380 which is thursdays at 5 p.m eastern for the next crusade on nxr studios you can also watch our

01:31:42.540 live show as well of wednesdays at 2 p.m eastern time that's the common sense crusade over at

01:31:47.540 calvinrobinson.com and look out for fox and father during the week that's sundays on reclaim the

01:31:54.220 media at 7 p.m british time 2 p.m or 3 p.m eastern standard time you can follow me on social media

01:32:02.040 if you'd like i'm at calvin robinson on all the usuals x instagram facebook you name it and my

01:32:09.120 youtube channel is at common common sense crusade my sub stack is calvin robinson.com

01:32:15.640 thank you very much god bless you bye

01:32:32.040 We'll be right back.

The NXR Podcast - May 14, 2026

The Next Crusade - The Enemy's Greatest Tool Is Feminism

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript