00:00:00.000Here at the New Christian Right, we produce daily content, and now there's an app for it.
00:00:06.940Introducing NXR Plus, available now on both Apple and Android.
00:00:13.460Get every daily show completely ad-free.
00:00:17.300You can close the app and still listen along while you drive, work, or walk.
00:00:21.580There's exclusive interviews with early access for all our subscribers,
00:00:26.620and every Substack article will be available and hosted here
00:00:31.200and a growing library of audiobooks that you won't find anywhere else.
00:00:37.260We have the exclusive audiobooks for Hyphenated Heresy and Silent Jihad
00:00:42.960alongside many banned, censored and hard-to-find works
00:00:47.440that almost no other platform is willing to host
00:00:51.180such as Martin Luther's On the Jews and Their Lives.
00:00:55.340This isn't just a streaming app. It's a digital library for the new Christian right.0.71
00:01:02.200So go and download NXR Plus, content that conquers.0.97
00:01:25.340Hello and welcome to the next crusade, only here on the New Christian Right, NXR Studios,0.81
00:01:40.920newchristianright.com. This is the show where we look at current events from a Christian
00:01:45.020perspective. We look at the headlines, the topics, the rest of the mainstream media and the legacy
00:01:48.760media does not want to touch with a 10-foot barge pole. Coming up on today's show, we've got some
00:01:53.340fantastic guests. We've got Lauren Chen and the Reverend Brett Murphy. We'll be looking at the
00:01:58.780black problem and is there a British-Anglican revival. But before we do, I want to have just0.99
00:02:05.740a brief chat about the state of free speech in my homeland. Now, as this airs, I may or may not
00:02:14.240have just given an address at the Oxford Union, and it may or may not have been one of the most
00:02:19.760historic debates in the Oxford Union in recent history, with myself, Lawrence Fox, and Tommy
00:02:24.780Robinson against Jacob Rees-Mogg and a number of Mohammedans on the question of, should Britain
00:02:31.100be suspicious of Islam? And it's important that this topic be had in our country. And one of the
00:02:37.460best places to have this kind of conversation is, of course, the Oxford Union, founded in 1823,
00:02:43.020when at the time in Oxford, at the oldest university in the world, some would say the
00:02:48.340best university in the world, you weren't able to have debates on politics or religion. Bearing in
00:02:54.520mind that Oxford was founded as a Christian institution, at the time that sort of
00:02:59.260conversation wasn't allowed. And so the union was set up to have a safe space for open debate,
00:03:05.700for free speech. And since then, for over 200 years now, it has been that until relatively
00:03:13.280recently. My good friend Carl Benjamin from the Lotus Eaters was disinvited or his event was
00:03:19.880cancelled recently. I spoke there a couple of years ago and before we even began the president
00:03:26.320of the union started by saying I've had a lot of complaints from people saying that I shouldn't
00:03:30.960invite Father Robinson here, oh I think it was Deacon Robinson at the time, but we believe in
00:03:34.480free speech and so we're going to have this conversation. That was of course a debate on
00:03:38.180whether the church should have same-sex marriage within the Christian church which of course is
00:03:42.680an impossibility. Then I was against three bishops from the Church of England, which is a very sad
00:03:47.180state of affairs. But the debate went ahead. And I'm glad that it did, because that conversation
00:03:51.260needed to be had. Fast forward to today, we're having a similar problem. And Tommy Robinson
00:03:58.200is seen as far right. And Lawrence Fox is seen as a provocateur. And I am seen as a bigot. And so
00:04:05.940we are three people that people don't want to be seen in public. So I'm kind of questioning,
00:04:12.040what's the point of a debate society where you're not allowed to debate controversial subjects if
00:04:15.940you're only debating things that everyone agrees on then it's not a debate regardless of that the
00:04:21.220Oxford County Council and the Thames Valley Police have been putting pressure on the Oxford Union to
00:04:27.400cancel the event all different types of pressure first they tried to say look it will cost £80,000
00:04:32.740in security to which Lawrence said well we'll pay for our own security then and then they tried to
00:04:38.920say well it's an inconvenience and we don't want to you know we wouldn't want the Oxford Union to
00:04:44.240ruin its relationship with with the police in the county by having to divert traffic and stuff and
00:04:48.620then the Oxford Union is like but it's your job to police and like if we are hosting these events
00:04:53.400then we're informing you so that you can police and then Thames Valley and the the commissioner
00:04:59.860put together a statement for the Oxford Union on behalf of the Oxford Union gave it over to them
00:05:05.080said publish this saying that they're going to cancel the event that it's no one's fault uh but
00:05:10.360they have the full they fully support thames valley and to which the oxford union said no
00:05:14.660we're not going to do that that's those aren't our words and you are the one saying that we should
00:05:18.400cancel the event if you are saying that we'll think about it and it almost did get cancelled
00:05:22.320i don't know if it has or hasn't yet because as i'm recording i haven't done the debate yet but
00:05:26.400as you're watching this it will have either happened or not happened this is the the magic
00:05:30.360of television right or pre-recorded podcasts but the problem is that the outside pressure
00:05:36.020was massive and these are just students like the people running the Oxford Union are literary
00:05:41.160students and so they're they're wondering about their future career prospects they're wondering
00:05:45.480about pressure from from politicians and and commissioners and police forces they don't want
00:05:50.860to rock the boat too much they just want to have a free speech debate society it should not be that
00:05:55.120way. In any university, you should be able to debate any topic. But in an Oxford Union or
00:06:00.320Cambridge Union, in a debate society, you should especially be able to debate any topic. And I find
00:06:06.200it problematic that this censorious environment exists. And of course, part of it is because the
00:06:12.240topic is Islam. Islam is the one topic that nobody in Britain wants to discuss, partly because they're1.00
00:06:18.360afraid of being called racist, and partly because, what I think is the case here, they're afraid of0.99
00:06:23.220what will happen they are genuinely afraid that me lawrence or tommy could get killed by a raving0.98
00:06:29.540mad wild mohammedan because they do not accept criticism of their ideology as you're watching0.99
00:06:35.180this i may have i may well have been martyred at this point i may not be alive anymore that's how1.00
00:06:40.300bad islam is in our country which is exactly why we need to fight against it and part of the fighting1.00
00:06:45.480against it is addressing the problems of it and that's what i intend to do so hopefully by this1.00
00:06:50.840point we could put a clip up of the event and saying it was a success if not then please pray
00:06:56.560for my soul that i make it through purgatory to heaven now moving on i had i took a lot of
00:07:01.640criticism recently for using the word pastor about a protestant woman doesn't matter who it
00:07:08.260was i won't go to the to the who's or how's but um i'm taking that feedback on board because i
00:07:14.640think actually some of the criticism was right because let's have a look at what it means to
00:07:19.040be a pastor right so from the bible we have a few different words we've got diakonos which is the
00:07:24.620word for deacon which is a servant minister we've got presbytros which is the word for presbyter
00:07:30.580which we these days we call priest i'll come back to that which is an ordained teacher who presides
00:07:36.040over the sacraments and we've got episkopos which is bishops the episcopacy and these are still
00:07:41.900these are the greek words that we still use and the bishop has oversight they are the overseer
00:07:47.560another biblical word and they have the fullness of holy orders and so this is this is a translation
00:07:53.380to what we practice today in the priests we call them vicars in england because they operate
00:07:57.740vicariously for the bishop on behalf of the bishop the bishop has that threefold ministry of deacon
00:08:02.980priest and bishop whereas priests we are deacon and priest and deacons are deacons but a bishop
00:08:09.680has all three and is all three and so sometimes in the bible you may hear those words used
00:08:15.080interchangeably in the early days but then they did settle so i think there's an element of a the
00:08:19.940language was being uh formulated but b there's also that recognition that uh bishops are all three
00:08:25.520bishops are still priests who are still deacons forever but a pastor in the protestant sense is
00:08:33.400somewhere between a presbytos and episkopos uh so somewhere between a presbyter and a bishop or
00:08:39.220or a priest or bishop so it's co-opting the title of shepherd but they're not ordained into holy
00:08:45.560orders and so they don't have they're not ordained as a teacher they can't preside over the sacraments
00:08:49.900so there's no eucharist there and they don't have apostolic succession which means they don't have
00:08:54.240the fullness of the deposit of faith i'm not saying they don't have any of the deposit of
00:08:57.420faith but they don't have the fullness of it because it's passed down from christ to the
00:09:00.780apostles from the apostles to their disciples on and on and on and on that unbroken line of
00:09:05.740apostolic succession is important for those gifts of the holy spirit for that ontological change
00:09:10.840that happens to the human man in ordination your soul is permanently marked so therefore
00:09:18.040christians uh under the catholic or orthodox tradition cannot uh refer to a protestant as
00:09:25.840pastor in terms of recognizing their authority or submitting unto them that now there has been
00:09:31.440expectation from the church of respectful dialogue and so we quite often say pastor such and such
00:09:36.540pastor such and such you know i went to moscow i recorded some content with pastor doug wilson
00:09:41.660now i don't recognize him as a priest or a bishop he isn't he has no absolute succession he has
00:09:47.340doesn't have the fullness of the deposit of faith but i'm record i'm using his title in a form of
00:09:51.620respect but i'm taking the feedback on board that i've had um and i think was mostly from protestants
00:09:56.600suchly because you're right in that if i don't recognize their authority i shouldn't use a word
00:10:02.640and it is and it is all one way when i was in moscow i was referring to pastor doug wilson as
00:10:07.380pastor but they weren't referring to me as father calvin robinson and it's like i wrote it in a lot
00:10:11.860of protestant circles but i've never taken offense when people don't call me father because i
00:10:15.620understand their theology although i would say it's clearly wrong doesn't recognize me as a
00:10:20.320spiritual father because they've got a misunderstanding of that part of the bible
00:10:24.880which I can get to as well if it's helpful, but I have always done the opposite and I've always0.95
00:10:30.940tried to be respectful of, but I'm going to take the respect out of it and actually stick to the
00:10:35.740theological truth. So going forward, I will never refer, or I'll try not to refer to Protestants as
00:10:40.580pastor. The next time I see Doug Wilson, he'll just be Mr. Wilson. I'll still try to be respectful0.95
00:10:46.660Mr. Wilson. I was always taught to refer to my elders, but I won't pretend that he has any
00:10:53.220spiritual authority but all men all fathers and husbands are priests of a sort within their own
00:11:01.020home there is a spiritual authority of the father in the household that is important and we do
00:11:07.300believe all of us in that uh royal priesthood of all believers to give it a quote a phrase in that
00:11:13.720we're all part of a priesthood and christ himself is the high priest however we do recognize a
00:11:20.100sacerdotal ministry a ministerial priesthood where we we consecrate bread and wine and we
00:11:26.900and it becomes the body and blood of christ that happens at the altar because christ died for us
00:11:32.900on the cross at calvary that one once for all sacrifice on the cross is a perpetual sacrifice
00:11:39.940which we partake in at the eucharist and so no we're not killing christ over again to people
00:11:45.020who will try and strawman me what i'm saying is we we outside of time a piece of heaven comes to
00:11:50.580earth and a piece of the congregation goes rises to heaven our hearts are lifted up and we are in
00:11:55.960that moment of that perpetual sacrifice and the priest is standing there in the person of christ
00:12:00.260for the congregation offering up we as we offer ourselves up to be a living sacrifice but also
00:12:05.820offering christ up to the father in that perpetuation for our sins and so yes the the mass
00:12:11.800is sacrificial but only priests and bishops can partake in that because it's an ordination process
00:12:17.780that we are set apart for it is a vocation a calling and so protestant pastors do not do that
00:12:24.460cannot do that and it's important we we are clear on that and so i'm taking that i've taken that
00:12:30.480criticism and i'm working on that so thank you for that those of you i think they were unhappy
00:12:34.500that i was referring to a woman as pastor but my point is that she is no more pastor than any of
00:12:38.940the other protestants who go around calling themselves pastors and so we should look to all
00:12:43.320be in line with apostolic succession and we should all look to have the fullness of the deposit of
00:12:47.540faith and that is something we should all pray and discern over um and just to finally wrap up
00:12:53.440on that piece priest uh is of course an old testament word when we use the word priest in
00:13:00.220as christians in the new covenant what we're it's a colloquialism for presbyter so we're referring
00:13:06.520to the presbyter which is the proper title and this is not a anglican thing catholics use this
00:13:12.400too presbyter is the biblical word for the priest so we have the deacon we have the priest or the
00:13:18.940presbyter and we have the bishop that is the threefold order of threefold ministry of holy
00:13:23.520orders i hope that cleared things up a little thank you for raising that though i appreciate it
00:13:27.020right now a lot of families are trying to eat healthier i know that my family is trying to do
00:13:32.160this as well. But when you look at the prices of truly grass-fed pasture-raised meat, it feels
00:13:38.860impossible. That's why I want to tell you about our sponsor, Wild Pastures. Wild Pastures works
00:13:44.480with over 100 American family farms to deliver 100% grass-fed beef, truly pasture-raised chicken
00:13:52.740and pork, and wild-caught seafood directly to your front door. And unlike a lot of these big
00:13:58.780meat delivery companies, their beef is raised right here in the good old U.S. of A. No imported
00:14:05.100beef from overseas. Their animals are rotationally grazed, non-GMO, raised without antibiotics or
00:14:12.800hormones. And the farms focus on regenerative agriculture that actually restores the land
00:14:19.800instead of destroying it. And here's the best part. They've made this actually affordable. In many
00:14:26.220cases, their products are 25 to 40% less than what you'd expect to pay for this kind of quality.
00:14:33.560So if you want cleaner meat, better sourcing, and you want to support America's farmers,
00:14:38.640then go and check out Wild Pastures. You can go to wildpastures.com forward slash NXR. Again,
00:14:46.000wildpastures.com forward slash NXR. Try it for yourself. Get 20% off of your first box plus an
00:14:54.840extra $15 off when you use our link in the description below. I'm very pleased to announce
00:15:00.860my next guest is the one and only Lauren Chen. Lauren, thank you for joining us.
00:15:05.660Thank you so much for having me. I've been listening to you since you were on the Lotus
00:15:09.620Eaters podcast. I'm a big fan, so really cool to be here. That's very kind of you. Thank you.
00:15:13.860You've just relaunched your show. How's that going? It's a little bit of a struggle. I mean,
00:15:19.360it's a lot of fun but i've i've for the longest time was a youtuber so that's short form kind of
00:15:25.320content that's edited pre-recorded now i'm doing live streaming like the young people do and it's
00:15:31.200it's a whole different ball game i'm encountering different technical difficulties having to learn
00:15:36.720the new lingo keep up with the chat but it's it's honestly a lot of fun and i'm having a great time
00:15:42.220doing it so if hey if anyone watching is on twitch or kick or i'm still on rumble and x uh would be
00:15:48.060happy to have you it's been it's been yeah a lot of new things but it's it's a good it's a good
00:15:54.060journey we're on good I'm glad to hear it what I like about your content Lauren is you just say
00:15:58.200things you just say it as it is like you don't mince your words you don't tread on eggshells
00:16:02.280and we live in an age where people are afraid to speak so it's always refreshing to hear someone
00:16:06.200just say something right and actually I think I almost had a bit of a reset so last year I spent
00:16:13.240six months in Asia, which is where I grew up, but I hadn't spent a huge amount of time there,
00:16:18.220you know, more than a month since I basically went into college. And so it's, it was really
00:16:24.680interesting, almost going back to factory settings for me, because, you know, in the West, we're so
00:16:29.540used to mincing our words, being politically correct. And I mean, frankly, in Asia, they just0.99
00:16:33.620don't play that game. You can call a spade a spade. If you're, if you're looking at a problem,1.00
00:16:37.820like, wow, there's a lot of black crime. You could just say that. It's not controversial.1.00
00:16:43.240As I think people in the West are learning with the automatic translate function on X,
00:16:47.320we're starting to see more, I guess, more of what political discourse looks like in other
00:16:52.140countries. And so that's kind of the mentality I've come back with. Not only am I kind of like
00:16:57.800more attuned into a not necessarily Western filter, but also I've basically been canceled
00:17:04.940by everyone who could possibly want to cancel me at this point. So for better or worse,
00:17:09.480it's not as if I have any, you know, bridges left to be burned, so to speak. So I'm really free to
00:17:15.480just shoot from the hip in that regard. Well, that is liberating, isn't it? And I do want to
00:17:19.700get to the black problem. We'll get to that later. But you mentioned that political correctness. And1.00
00:17:24.080of course, that came from the Soviets. It came from the commies that, yes, this is actually0.81
00:17:28.540correct, but it's not politically correct. And that was the indoctrination that you had to say
00:17:32.280what the state wanted you to say. You had to think what the state wanted you to think.
00:17:36.240And I think we're reaching that point again in the West, particularly in Europe, especially in my homeland in Great Britain. It seems there is a correct thing, there's a truth, but you can't speak the truth because you'll get in trouble. You'll get arrested for social media posts or retweets or comments. But you can say what the government wants you to say. That's what they want you to think.
00:17:52.960right and it's funny because i i watched tucker carlson and pierce morgan debate free speech and
00:17:59.800whether the uk had free speech and the argument that pierce morgan was putting forward well i
00:18:04.380can criticize keir stommer of course the uk has free speech how could you say otherwise i mean
00:18:09.400you could criticize keir stommer in north korea as well no problem there uh it's strange to think
00:18:14.820that the litmus for free speech is whether you can criticize keir stommer i think a better metric is
00:18:19.720whether you can criticize the people in charge. And for the uninitiated, you might think that
00:18:23.940that refers to Keir Stalmer. But as we've seen, people have been arrested for social media posts
00:18:29.140criticizing the LGBT community, mass migration, kind of this globalist trend. So I think in the
00:18:35.280UK, objectively speaking, no, you cannot criticize the people in charge. But some people might
00:18:40.580wrongly think that the people in charge just refers to the politicians. Yeah. And also people
00:18:46.340don't tend to mind people being cancelled if they're being cancelled for something that they
00:18:49.480agree with or disagree with. For example, if you speak out against mass migration, you can get
00:18:54.080arrested. Lucy Conley is an example. There have been people arrested for speaking out against
00:18:58.760mass migration. If you speak out against Islam, you can be arrested. It's Islamophobia. It's
00:19:03.400pretty much a blasphemy law we've got in our country now. You're absolutely right. It's the1.00
00:19:06.640people in power, but it's also the people aligned with the people in power. That censorship is
00:19:12.800growing all across the continent. I've seen you push back against Europeans who seem to say that
00:19:17.280Europe has more free speech than America, which cannot be the case because America has
00:19:21.280a constitution that is codified that explicitly outlines free speech.
00:19:26.100In your travels back to Asia and back to America, have you seen a difference?
00:19:30.360Do you think America still does have free speech?
00:19:33.640Well, honestly, I think that's a topic up for debate. I don't think it's controversial to say
00:19:39.400that compared to all other countries, the US does have free speech, at least relatively. Now,
00:19:44.700whether the U.S. has absolute free speech. Well, there are some cases that I think put that into
00:19:49.980into question. We have seen pro pro-life activists arrested and prosecuted by the Biden DOJ.
00:19:56.120I think my whole issue with the, you know, the tenant media scandal, I think that arguably is
00:20:00.980a question of, you know, First Amendment and free speech protections as well. When you're going
00:20:04.860around, you know, accusing people with YouTube channels of being foreign assets and propagandists
00:20:10.540when there's absolutely no like no evidence pointing to whether you're being fed lions or
00:20:15.020anything like that uh we also have uh there was recently a mayor in in california who was charged
00:20:21.220by the doj under i think similar something a foreign agent act uh because she was putting out
00:20:27.820uh you know i think i think it was like op-eds that had ties to the chinese communist party
00:20:34.580whether you agree with that or not i think arguable like if you have free speech then
00:20:39.660you shouldn't be going after any type of speech prosecutions, period. So I think we are entering
00:20:45.380an era in the United States where it's becoming more and more of a gray area, less black and white.
00:20:51.360Of course, you can say that you have free speech. Oh, not to mention, we have the case of Chud the0.99
00:20:54.880Builder. He's someone, I don't know if your audience might be familiar with this, but he's
00:20:58.740a streamer. I think it's fair to say he's a provocateur who goes around being a little bit
00:21:03.700liberal with the naughty no-no gamer word towards black people not advisable under you know any0.80
00:21:09.300circumstance now he's actually being charged with attempted murder because he claims he acted in0.57
00:21:15.700self-defense other people are saying no this word in and of itself is provocation I think there's
00:21:19.860also a case to be made that that is a free speech issue uh it's violence if it's even if it's
00:21:25.600unflattering so yeah like I'll repeat again is America the place where you have the most free
00:21:31.760speech rights, 100% absolutely. Is the First Amendment as robust as perhaps the founding
00:21:36.840fathers would have imagined? Not so sure about that. Yeah, indeed. And again, where you can't
00:21:42.360speak on Islam in Britain, you can't speak on Israel in America. It's very controversial.
00:21:46.340Yes. People could take $7,000 from the Israeli government to promote Israel all day, every day,
00:21:51.920as you point out, take it from China or Qatar, then it's a problem. So there's a two-tiered system.
00:21:55.900Yeah. No, 100%. I'm actually, I'm glad you bring that up because that's another issue where the
00:22:01.560free speech tests of the United States are maybe starting to fail a little bit more because you
00:22:06.180also have, I think, individual states as well that might have their own specific, I guess,
00:22:11.540regulations as to what qualifies as hate speech going further than just saying, oh, these calls
00:22:15.900to action, they're fighting words. Now they're also starting to include things like anti-Semitism.
00:22:20.100And, you know, in which case, regardless of how you feel about that, you know, saying that the
00:22:24.560government should have a role in prosecuting hate speech, that is an anti-free speech stance.
00:22:28.660Absolutely. I hope the Americans push back against that. But you mentioned Chud the Builder. I want to get to this Chud guy because part of it is a free speech issue, but part of it is a provocateur issue. So I think if the word nigger can be said by anyone, it can be said by everyone. I don't believe in certain words that only certain people can say. I think that's bizarre. I don't know how we've fallen into that trap. But at the same time, that will probably be beeped out. So I'll probably be censoring myself or my team will be censoring me because you can't say these words on YouTube.
00:22:58.660as you very well know um but the point is i'm not afraid to say them these are just words
00:23:03.100but to go out there and purposefully say words not in any context of a conversation just just
00:23:09.900to annoy people to get a reaction out of people well sometimes that reaction is going to be violent
00:23:14.680surely so to some extent i think chud is actually provoking chimping out by chimping out himself
00:23:21.040right and that that's kind of you know when i first covered the story and i i wasn't someone
00:23:27.060who is familiar with chud beforehand this was actually the first time i was exposed to his
00:23:31.840content i've all i very firmly believe that you know saying the n-word is not in and of itself
00:23:37.100provocation to violence because it's not a threat it's not violence in and of itself so if you're
00:23:41.660committing violence you are the one who's escalating things there but i also you know
00:23:46.320went out of my way to say this is not the type of content or conduct that we should be aspiring to0.98
00:23:52.140But I think it's, you know, if there were a black person going around saying, cracker, cracker, or to me, chink, chink, I mean, we would all agree that this is obnoxious behavior.1.00
00:24:01.400We shouldn't be condoning it. It's disrespectful. It's crass. It's rude. It's low class.
00:24:07.180However, the reason why I think the issue of Chud is worth talking about, and, you know, obviously this is an ongoing court case.0.96
00:24:14.220We don't actually have footage that's been released to the public of what happened that fateful day.
00:24:19.980So there are conflicting reports. But there is a narrative going on that it seems to align fairly well with what the state has currently put out in regard to Chud's charges, that the person who Chud got into a fight with, Chud hadn't actually used the N-word toward him on that day.
00:24:39.820This was someone who was simply familiar with Chud's other content and went to either seek him out specifically that day or happened to be in the area and saw him.
00:24:51.100And because he saw previous live streams where he did use the N-word, that is what inspired the, I guess, initial confrontation.
00:24:58.740So now we're not just talking about whether in the moment using the N-word against someone is the equivalent of starting a fight and provoking someone.
00:25:05.600Now the question is, is using the N-word at a previous time, in a previous place, does
00:25:12.400that put a target on your back for the rest of your life, where now it's fair game for
00:25:16.640anyone to go and chimp out at you because previously you have said that word?
00:25:20.920And I'm surprised at the number of people online who I'm seeing saying, yes, that absolutely1.00
00:25:32.360obviously when Charlie Kirk was assassinated the wicked left were celebrating saying he had it
00:25:37.280coming because he said things we didn't like to hear of course no one should ever receive violence
00:25:41.120or violent threats because they're saying things that people don't like to hear but I think it's
00:25:45.120very different because the context of Charlie's conversations were always this is a problem or
00:25:48.760this is a good thing it wasn't I want to provoke you whereas with Charlie he actively knows the
00:25:53.740response he's going to get and I don't think that people should be violent towards him but
00:25:56.920at the same time I know that that's kind of what he's seeking because that's what his content is0.88
00:26:01.160well and i'll push back a little bit there because like i said i've i've not been a um a chud fan
00:26:08.320i haven't seen a lot of his content but i initially took the same stance that you have
00:26:13.280toward him but in response to that people who do follow his content they've shown clips
00:26:18.060kind of showing that you know if if he is speaking to a black person and there's respect both ways
00:26:23.940then he actually is quite amicable it's really only when the i mean at least this is what they're
00:26:30.000saying and i want to kind of be fair to his content especially as someone who's not super
00:26:34.580familiar with it um the you know the idea is that he he he is a mirror of whoever he's talking to if
00:26:41.780they want to kind of chimp out then he raises to the same level but on the other hand if if they
00:26:46.700do kind of show him respect then he is happy to to return that even if he's talking to a black person0.61
00:26:51.680i haven't seen enough of his content to make a full determination myself but you know just
00:26:57.100for fairness sake i thought i'd throw that out there yeah that is fair and i have seen his
00:27:01.180content does pop up on my instagram feed i don't know why my algorithm is a mess but i have seen
00:27:05.640him uh be respectful towards black people but he does start the whole conversation off by throwing
00:27:10.460the m-bomb out there so you know yeah that is that is quite a conversation starter let's not
00:27:16.220be violent towards people but also let's try and have civil conversations where we can uh but some
00:27:20.600people right and i think that is the you know the the christian thing to do the polite thing to do
00:27:24.900And I kind of, what I've said to my audience is I don't say the N-word because I try not to swear, period. I don't think swearing is, it's not that I, you know, I have some cancel culture attitude to it, but I try to, you know, conduct myself in a certain way. Saying slurs to people doesn't fit into that. And I think, you know, that's very different than I'm not going to say it because I'm worried I'm going to be cancelled and because I think saying it might justify violence against someone.
00:27:49.300I completely agree and respect that view. But there's also the problem there that there are certain demographics that don't necessarily have the capacity to engage in a civilized manner, or it seems they don't. I don't know whether this is, you know, shortened prefrontal cortexes or if this is entirely cultural.
00:28:06.720But within the African-American demographic, there is certainly a problem with hyper-violence.
00:28:14.460We saw very recently that McDonald's are changing their policy on the drinks fountains due to changing consumer habits.
00:31:21.620that we know it's whoever's store that is they're probably scared to say anything for fear that they
00:31:27.660might be attacked or even killed perhaps and you know oftentimes police departments in areas where
00:31:33.260this type of things happen happening they're overwhelmed there are actual bigger crimes
00:31:37.140because like you know it's kind of like a scale you might say like oh well this isn't as bad as
00:31:43.340something like murder or bigger theft but these behaviors all often go hand in hand and that's
00:31:47.740what people need to realize. We saw Mayor Mamdani, he, you know, just to kind of look at this on the
00:31:52.800macro scale, he was very much against things like enforcing fair rules in the subway and, you know,
00:31:58.040making sure that people paid because he was saying, you know, we're criminalizing just petty
00:32:01.700behaviors. This doesn't really matter. This isn't something we should be focusing on. But then now
00:32:06.300what we see is that crime and including like murders on the subway are up, I think, 300 percent
00:32:11.760since he took office because it's actually like it's a it's a ripple effect. If you don't enforce
00:32:16.820the little things then that means that the big things kind of won't be enforced either and people
00:32:21.140who might have gone gone on to do bigger crimes but they started with the smaller crimes well
00:32:25.400they're not being stopped at that earlier intervention so they can go on to you know
00:32:30.260perhaps become violent or commit robberies that are a lot more substantial words of wisdom before
00:32:37.000this i used to be an assistant principal and my policy was sweat the small stuff then you don't
00:32:41.460get to the big stuff if we are absolute fascists about you school uniform say no your socks aren't
00:32:46.440high enough you know to tuck your shirt in like just get everything down to being pristine the
00:32:51.220kids don't understand it of course they don't but they do want discipline because they want to be in
00:32:55.040an environment where they can learn and if you sweat that small stuff you don't get to the kids
00:32:58.560picking up chairs to hit each other over the head with which does happen in some state schools yes
00:33:03.460but it's this false idea of compassion this soft parenting style oh it's a form of communication
00:33:09.040in fact during my teacher training one of the lecturers one of the professors said if a child
00:33:13.620is misbehaving it's a form of communication it's like no it's not children are just sometimes
00:33:17.540being bad sometimes being naughty and if we let it happen as child as children it can happen in
00:33:23.000adulthood too here's a video of just a typical american restaurant
00:33:43.620people shouldn't have to live like this that is not normal and no it's not it's not normal and
00:33:50.900it's not acceptable and i cover these types of stories a lot on my show and i often hear people
00:33:55.660say like oh you just you hate america why are you always complaining about america scenes like this
00:33:59.760don't represent america to be clear especially if you have uh european audiences watching there are
00:34:05.320plenty of idyllic almost utopian suburbs and rural areas in america the problem is however that
00:34:11.220increasingly, this does represent American cities. And, you know, it's because disproportionately
00:34:16.680in American cities, you also have certain demographics. You've said, you've referred
00:34:20.580to this as the Black problem. Your words, not mine. So we're clear. You have a certain, I think,0.97
00:34:25.540maybe understanding with using that phrase that I probably wouldn't be given. But this is not
00:34:30.520acceptable. And the people who don't want to address this for fear that they don't want to
00:34:34.420offend the Black community, they don't realize that the biggest victims of this behavior are,0.96
00:34:38.700in fact, the black community. Because, you know, people who are wealthier, disproportionately0.95
00:34:43.020whiter, they could go to different neighborhoods, right? They can kind of buy their way out of this
00:34:47.840problem, keep the riffraff out with higher prices. But if you're a normal black person,1.00
00:34:52.520but who perhaps is a little bit lower on the financial rung, it's not fair for you to have
00:34:57.600to live like this. It's honestly not. You know, the term right is thrown around a lot nowadays.
00:35:03.400Everything's a right. You have a right to this and that. I do think right to safety is paramount.
00:35:07.740And I think you have the right to be safe, regardless of what your color is, what your income level is. And like, ultimately, it is like lower income communities who are harmed by this behavior, and we're not doing them any favors by being permissive about it.
00:35:20.680Then homogenous societies tend to be high trust societies. And that's not me being a white supremacist. You are obviously Asian. I'm obviously half Afro-Caribbean, half English. Neither of us are heritage Americans. But we can at least observe there's a growing problem with the African American community in that they are not assimilating and integrating in the same way that you and I do with this wonderful country and this great culture. That is a problem.
00:35:41.800Right. And I actually think there's an interesting distinction to be drawn with the African diaspora and African-Americans because I've gotten into, you know, online confrontations with the African-American community, Black Americans, quite a bit because I talk about these issues.0.79
00:36:01.260They're very quick to throw out racial slurs, even though I would never do such a thing.
00:36:05.320there are death threats, threats of violence. This is all very common when you criticize
00:36:10.140anything about the Black community. However, I had a post go pretty viral where I was talking
00:36:15.720about the effects of colonialism on Africa, basically saying, no, Africa is not poor because
00:36:19.520of the Europeans. That's cope. And a lot of Africans, as you can imagine, were not very
00:36:24.780sympathetic to my viewpoint. However, what was really interesting is I noticed that there was
00:36:29.600a huge difference in the level of discourse that i received like critical discourse from the african
00:36:35.680community and the black community uh i to my recollection was not met with any threats of
00:36:42.160rape or violence or slurs i received thoughtful responses i received several uh podcast interview
00:36:49.360requests i was forwarded several articles and i just thought it was such an interesting difference
00:36:56.240between like the the behavior that we see when you criticize the black community versus the
00:37:02.080african immune community and i was honestly very impressed and you know i i did end up changing my
00:37:08.080own opinion a little bit because i was you know shown some things like you know there are african
00:37:12.080countries that have seen great development good for them i want all countries to be safe and
00:37:16.240prosperous and i think it just goes to show that we don't need to accept this behavior from the1.00
00:37:22.320the black community. There's nothing intrinsic about, oh, I'm black, this is just how we do1.00
00:37:26.080things. No, you can conduct yourself to a higher standard of behaviour, and you should conduct
00:37:30.000yourself to a higher standard of behaviour. It's such an important point because it's
00:37:33.840a specific African-American community or black American community problem, and it wasn't always
00:37:38.320the case. Black Americans used to be more integrated into American culture, just as
00:37:42.240Caribbean black people in Britain, they're mostly Caribbean at least, are more integrated into
00:37:46.960British culture. That has started to shift as Americanisation is coming over, and they're
00:37:50.720They're adopting the hip-hop culture of America.0.71
00:37:52.720But you're right to point out that most African countries0.80
00:37:54.900look at African-Americans and think,0.68
00:39:25.220I used to be more so than I am now. I mean, now like with two little kids, unfortunately,
00:39:29.880it's been quite a while since I've done anything like that. But my thing now is that I don't know
00:39:35.340if you've ever watched gaming playthroughs, but you can watch those. You're watching someone else
00:39:39.500play the games i used to be in the games industry a long time ago yeah so baldur's gate is the most
00:39:45.100recent playthrough that i've started watching how old are your kids are they too young to game
00:39:48.720oh yeah well i mean one's four and one is one so i mean the the games that we play are like you
00:39:55.680know if if she's been good she'll get to like play the game where you kind of match the letters on
00:40:00.900the tablet and things like that i'm introducing my nieces to mario kart at the moment so oh very
00:40:06.600but i am excited for when we're going to be able to play stuff like that or even games when i was
00:40:11.160younger carmen san diego i i played a lot of like there are educational games but still really fun
00:40:16.200and so i'm trying to i'm actually trying to find versions online of 90s games that i can
00:40:20.680install on computers now for when she gets older love it lauren chan thank you very much god bless
00:40:25.720you you as well thank you oh my next guest is an old friend of mine it's canon brett murphy father
00:40:33.560Brett, thank you for coming on. How are you? I'm well. Thank you for having me, Father
00:40:37.100Calvin. It's like old times. It is like old times. It's been too long. I thought we'd
00:40:41.240got to get Red Brett on here. People who don't know, you have a YouTube channel where you
00:40:46.440basically lambast all things gay. You are an Orthodox Anglican. You push for men to0.56
00:40:53.760become men again and just Christians to become Christians again. You take a lot of stick
00:40:57.720for it because people don't like that anymore. Yeah, I do. I take a lot of hits, but it's
00:41:03.560And I've pretty much reached the wonderful point in my ministry where anyone who's a bit of a scumbag has weeded themselves out, which is awesome.0.83
00:41:10.320And yeah, the channel's grown well, and we've sort of gotten to this phase of, I wouldn't say pushing, but I guess promoting muscular Christianity, which is awesome.0.79
00:41:19.900Well, let's start with that, because you've started a new program called No Man Left Inside, where you're promoting masculinity within the church.
00:41:28.020you're helping men become men again and you're teaching that we don't all have to be nice and
00:41:32.660wet and lukewarm we can just be straightforward strong leaders and that's a good thing yes nice
00:41:39.720is a vice kindness is a virtue amen you taught me that many years ago so no man left inside was
00:41:45.020started by my friend james uh it's a really i think it's a visionary ideal to it started around
00:41:52.920the idea of preventing male suicide so he's a veteran and he was touched by this horrendous
00:41:57.980statistic that the number one killer of men in the uk now is taking their own lives which
00:42:02.820i think should be like an alarm bell a wake-up call to anyone in our culture that something's
00:42:07.380gone terribly wrong so um he thought that the best thing to do is to get men outside get them
00:42:13.740in the company of other men because that's very frowned upon so it's great to be with brothers
00:42:18.060and to do not just exercise and a bit of grappling,
00:42:22.980a little bit of boxing, some physical stuff,
00:42:24.660but also to bond together, which is brilliant.
00:42:27.040And it's forming a kind of fraternity.
00:42:29.840So it's based on Christian principles,