#103 - Looking back on the first 99 episodes: Strong Convictions, Loosely Held
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 17 minutes
Words per Minute
187.69156
Summary
In this episode, we celebrate our 100th episode by doing a retrospective on the first 99 episodes of The Dr. Phil Show. In episode 100, we talk about why it's important to be malleable, and what it means to have strong convictions loosely held.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Hey everyone, welcome to the drive podcast. I'm your host, Peter Atiyah. This podcast,
00:00:15.480
my website and my weekly newsletter all focus on the goal of translating the science of longevity
00:00:19.800
into something accessible for everyone. Our goal is to provide the best content in health
00:00:24.600
and wellness full stop. And we've assembled a great team of analysts to make this happen.
00:00:28.880
If you enjoy this podcast, we've created a membership program that brings you far more
00:00:33.280
in-depth content. If you want to take your knowledge of the space to the next level at
00:00:37.320
the end of this episode, I'll explain what those benefits are. Or if you want to learn more now,
00:00:41.720
head over to peteratiyahmd.com forward slash subscribe. Now, without further delay,
00:00:47.740
here's today's episode. Welcome to a special episode of the drive to celebrate our 100th
00:00:56.020
anniversary. We have decided to try something a little different. The title of this episode is
00:01:03.420
strong convictions loosely held. And what that basically comes down to is Bob asking me questions
00:01:12.080
about things that I've kind of changed my mind on over the past year and a half. So we definitely go
00:01:19.240
into a lot of areas where I had a strong point of view or a reasonable point of view on something.
00:01:25.740
And then after either preparing for a podcast or going through a discussion, I sort of came away
00:01:32.500
with a different point of view and it's, you know, usually changed my behavior for the better.
00:01:37.540
So we thought this would be kind of an interesting and maybe even clever way to go about doing a
00:01:42.560
retrospective on the first 99 episodes. And of course, we also do take a moment to sort of
00:01:48.760
talk about some of the things, highlights, things that I've maybe enjoyed the most or that Bob's
00:01:53.280
enjoyed the most. If you like the style of this episode, by the way, please let us know because
00:01:57.940
I'd be open to doing it again. I actually found it quite fun to reminisce. So again, if you find this
00:02:04.600
interesting, please let us know. I'd be happy to repeat this every 50 episodes or so. And I guess
00:02:09.840
without any further delay, I hope you enjoy episode 100 of The Drive.
00:02:19.700
So for episode 100, as I alluded to in the introduction, we're going to do something a
00:02:25.540
little bit different and I can't take any credit for this idea. So if you like it, Bob gets all the
00:02:32.440
credit. If you dislike it, well, hopefully you won't dislike it. But many of you know Bob Kaplan,
00:02:39.840
the guy behind the guy behind the guy. And one of the things that Bob has had the luxury of doing,
00:02:46.240
if you can think of it as a luxury, is sort of helping me get ready for many of the past 99
00:02:52.500
episodes of podcasts. And there's a lot that goes into making this sausage known as the podcast.
00:02:59.460
Once in a while, I just get up there and wing it. But I think more often than not,
00:03:03.640
a lot of thought has to go into who do we want to interview? What do we want to talk about?
00:03:08.560
What do I need to know in order to have this discussion in sort of a thoughtful way?
00:03:13.820
And throughout that process, my opinion on things can change. And sometimes not necessarily through
00:03:19.720
the podcast per se, but just through the evolution of learning and what it means to sort of scour
00:03:26.540
information and test a hypothesis and see data that conflict with your preexisting way of thinking
00:03:34.020
about things. I mean, all of these things have led to an enormous evolution over a period of time
00:03:40.380
in the way I think about things and do a lot of things. And I think, I know that on some levels that
00:03:46.140
might sound like a real cop-out to think that one can change their mind on how things work. But
00:03:51.540
I think that when I've written this before, I think in politics, that may be a cop-out,
00:03:56.140
but I don't think in science or in medicine that should be viewed as a cop-out. I think
00:03:59.580
one should always be malleable and willing to sort of lean into new information. And in fact,
00:04:05.960
the title of this podcast, Strong Convictions Loosely Held, is a phrase that exists in various
00:04:11.980
different forms. So sometimes it's strong opinions loosely held, strong opinions weakly held,
00:04:17.620
strong convictions weakly held. I've seen many different versions of it. But in particular,
00:04:21.540
this version of it, Strong Convictions Loosely Held, is something that I remember one of my
00:04:25.840
patients telling me a couple of years ago in reference to one of his mentors in the investment
00:04:32.540
space. So this patient of mine is himself an investor, and he came out of a very successful
00:04:39.580
hedge fund. And he spoke very affectionately about how he was mentored there. And he said that that was
00:04:46.100
sort of one of the things that allowed them to be so successful was they had very strong convictions,
00:04:50.800
and they would make bold investments based on those things. But they were very loosely held
00:04:55.020
convictions, and they were always looking for ways to change their information. So in that spirit,
00:05:00.940
I am joined today by Bob Kaplan. And I think Bob has, along with maybe two or three other people
00:05:10.180
around me clinically, as good an insight into some of the various things I've changed my mind on.
00:05:16.840
And so, Bob, how do you want to do this? Do you want to just ask me about things I've changed my
00:05:21.380
mind on or point them out to me or call me on what you want to do?
00:05:23.740
Yeah, I think that works. Call you out on things you've changed your mind. But again,
00:05:27.560
I think it's really important. That's a feature, not a bug. One of the quotes that I heard or
00:05:32.060
somebody talking about this idea of the Strong Opinions Weekly Held is, it was on a blog actually,
00:05:39.420
and it's Richard Feynman, just to confuse everyone, Richard Feynman, the other,
00:05:42.180
the SUNY biochemist, who said that a colleague at NIH said...
00:05:51.440
Just to really confuse people now. It's not the Shia Richard Feynman. It's, yeah, forget it.
00:05:59.260
Yes. So he had a colleague, at least he wrote this in his blog, and he said,
00:06:03.640
what you do in science is you make a hypothesis, and then you try to shoot yourself down. And I think
00:06:08.480
that that's really succinct. And the podcast for over the 100 episodes, Peter has a lot of
00:06:15.160
hypotheses, which is great for me because I think I share a lot of those and I get to dig into them
00:06:19.180
as an analyst. And so I think from a selfish perspective, what I see in podcasts and the
00:06:25.180
episodes and why Peter's so successful, other than his rugged good looks, is that he has a lot
00:06:31.420
of hypotheses. He has a lot of ideas and he's not afraid to just say whatever he thinks and try to
00:06:39.300
find the people who are the absolute experts or even just somebody who disagrees with him and his
00:06:44.480
take on something. Try to dig into it further to see, basically, to see if he can shoot it down,
00:06:48.380
because I think the more hypotheses you can shoot down, actually, things get a little bit simpler,
00:06:52.820
even as much as we're waiting in a lot of this uncertainty.
00:06:56.440
But a lot of that actually occurs behind the scenes. I mean, I hear what you're saying,
00:07:01.540
but I think most of the shooting down is not actually done in the podcast. It's actually done
00:07:07.880
in the preparation for it and some of the analyses that come after the fact. So I also could imagine
00:07:14.740
somebody listening to this saying, well, your podcasts aren't really that contentious. It's not
00:07:18.460
like you're getting into rip-roaring fights. It's not like our podcast is sort of an environment where
00:07:24.760
we're always just trying to come up with a contrarian point of view or an antagonistic
00:07:29.760
point of view. I think a lot of the places where my minds have been changed has been in getting
00:07:36.040
ready to do it. And sometimes, frankly, it just doesn't have to do with the podcast, but I do
00:07:40.300
think this is a great excuse, as any, to be 100 episodes into this thing and say, hey, two years
00:07:45.240
ago, what did I do or what did I think or how did I behave in a way that was different from today?
00:07:50.160
So yeah, hopefully we've got some interesting ones to talk about. I've seen that you and Nick have
00:07:53.880
been comparing notes. We have. I've got a good mixture here of hard topics and maybe a little
00:07:59.780
softer. So we'll see if we can sprinkle them in. This might be on the harder side. Metformin.
00:08:06.960
So maybe think about, I guess in the context of the episodes, it was probably, it was a summer of,
00:08:12.720
was it 2018 or so you started the podcast. Since then, how have your strong convictions,
00:08:18.980
if you had them changed at all since then? Well, in the summer of 2018, I was taking metformin. I had
00:08:25.660
been taking it for about seven years. I think I started in 2011 and that was based on a lot of
00:08:33.100
research that I had seen and read and a white paper we had written internally that looked at the
00:08:41.060
benefits of metformin in people with type 2 diabetes and in people without type 2 diabetes,
00:08:46.700
but with obesity, which was probably just a proxy for hyperinsulinemia, but it's not entirely clear.
00:08:53.140
But the benefits were not subtle. In particular, the benefits were around a reduction in cancer
00:09:00.180
mortality and survival with cancer as well. So both a reduction in the incidence of cancer and an
00:09:07.200
increase in the survival of cancer. And we certainly weren't the only people to figure this out in 2011.
00:09:13.320
There were people who figured this out long before us, but we were sort of, I think, a little bit
00:09:17.520
early on the cusp of viewing metformin as a drug that might have a benefit for people who were not
00:09:24.620
type 2 diabetic, but looking for sort of a boost in longevity. And truthfully, not a lot of our
00:09:31.320
patients in the practice were taking metformin. One, because my convictions, I guess, weren't that
00:09:36.900
strong. They were strong enough that I was willing to take it because I could also kind of monitor a bunch
00:09:41.960
of things in the background, but not strong enough that I felt like it should be dispensed like you
00:09:46.000
would dispense chiclets or Tic Tacs to people. I don't know why I said chiclets are...
00:09:50.580
Because you dispense them like candy anywhere you go. We know you're the chiclets and Tic Tacs guy.
00:09:56.660
Whenever I don't know the last time I had a chiclet or a Tic Tac. Do they even make chiclets anymore?
00:10:02.900
I don't even remember seeing these things in a grocery store.
00:10:06.540
I've seen Tic Tacs, but I don't think I've seen a chiclet in a long time. I miss chiclets.
00:10:10.540
So that said, a lot of patients over time would say, hey, I've heard about this drug called
00:10:16.240
metformin. Kind of interested in it. What's your take on it? And sort of share our white paper with
00:10:20.560
them. And in the end, we ended up prescribing it for a number of patients. I would say off-label,
00:10:25.720
meaning these aren't patients that were hyperinsulinemic or diabetic.
00:10:30.160
Perfect. So fast forward. Well, actually we had an interview with Nir Barzilai, who is certainly
00:10:36.780
one of the world's experts on this topic. That was a very interesting podcast. I learned a few
00:10:42.780
things there that I didn't even know before, which again, given that I'd been spending so much time
00:10:47.160
thinking about metformin, I think that really speaks to Nir's depth of knowledge on that front.
00:10:51.940
But somewhere along the way, something changed. And the first clue was December of 2018. So in
00:11:01.600
December of 2018, which was when I first became interested in zone two training, it was the first
00:11:08.960
time I'd ever been checking my lactate levels under low levels of exertion. And it was the first time
00:11:15.940
I'd been just checking lactate levels in a while, since I hadn't been doing much lactate testing since
00:11:21.520
I stopped competing in sports where that mattered. And I was kind of surprised at how high my lactate
00:11:28.140
levels were, especially my fasting lactate, just baseline, like not exercising lactate levels.
00:11:35.080
And that got me poking and poking and poking and coming to the obvious conclusion that metformin is
00:11:42.360
a weak mitochondrial toxin. And as such, it probably shouldn't be surprising that you'd have a higher level
00:11:49.200
of lactate. In medical school, every student learns that one of the potential rare complications of
00:11:56.900
metformin is lactic acidosis. I'm sure somebody in an ER somewhere has even seen it. So again,
00:12:03.320
it's not a huge stretch that you would see elevated levels of lactate. But it did get me thinking,
00:12:08.500
which is, wait a minute, what if the benefits of metformin are only going to be most pronounced
00:12:15.200
in people who have otherwise quite defective mitochondria to begin with and or people who
00:12:21.020
can tolerate a slight hit in the sort of mitochondrial performance because of all the
00:12:27.480
other benefits they're getting? And what if that doesn't hold true for someone who's otherwise quite
00:12:31.920
healthy and looking to really maximize mitochondrial health and throughput? And basically since that time,
00:12:40.740
I would say that more and more literature have probably emerged suggesting that we might want
00:12:47.260
to think about metformin different in people who are quote unquote sick versus healthy. I hate using a
00:12:54.540
stupid division like that, sick versus healthy, but I mean, I could sort of explain what I mean in a bit
00:12:59.560
more detail, but I think people get the gist of it. What if this is a drug that still offers
00:13:04.860
a sizable benefit to people who are metabolically ill, but that benefit sort of evaporates in people
00:13:13.080
who are not? And so I would say that my position today, so I've stopped taking metformin after
00:13:18.880
making this observation in December of 2018, I then spent the next six months, maybe not that long,
00:13:24.780
maybe the next four months experimenting a lot with it. So only dosing it in the evening,
00:13:31.420
but not in the morning, reducing the dose, like making a whole bunch of changes to see if I noticed
00:13:37.060
any difference before ultimately stopping it and then stopping it altogether. And then realizing a
00:13:42.440
couple of things. One, yeah, my lactate levels went down and my zone two efficiency as measured by
00:13:48.120
lactate went up, but also my glucose levels are a bit higher. There's no question it was suppressing
00:13:53.380
glucose levels and that was probably a good thing. So I have no way of knowing if the net benefit of
00:13:59.720
stopping metformin has been positive or negative, but I now would say I reserve metformin prescriptions
00:14:07.280
for patients who obviously are in need of it from the standpoint of glucose and insulin regulation,
00:14:13.820
but I don't view it really as a pro longevity agent yet. Again, very likely we'll be having a
00:14:20.780
discussion in two years, Bob, and I'll have changed my view again. There will be some new data that will
00:14:25.880
have emerged that will have told me that yes, despite the elevated levels of lactate,
00:14:31.240
it's still a net positive, even in someone who's metabolically healthy. And we've obviously looked
00:14:36.520
at a bunch of other papers that look at the impact of metformin on muscle mass and training effects,
00:14:42.280
though a lot of those studies seem suboptimal because they don't include some of the more
00:14:46.440
functional analyses of the muscle that you'd want to see. So I don't think this is not an open and
00:14:51.520
shut case. We have a lot to continue to learn, but as of today, I have a really different point
00:14:56.560
of view than for the previous decade. And I don't think the jury's necessarily out that in the next
00:15:02.160
900 episodes that you do going forward, you'll probably have a few that are on metformin and
00:15:07.360
you may change your thinking on it down the road, I imagine.
00:15:10.880
Yeah. I mean, I think one big thing that's going to be interesting is to see if TAME,
00:15:14.660
which is the study that Nir Barzilai spoke about on our podcast, does TAME actually get funded?
00:15:18.800
Because again, if TAME is done correctly, it's really not going to be weighted towards people
00:15:24.980
with diabetes. It's going to be looking at people without diabetes and asking the question,
00:15:28.940
can this extend life indirectly via mitigating the onset of chronic disease? So in the end,
00:15:35.380
nothing matters more than that is health span and lifespan. All of these other things that we're
00:15:39.820
looking at, such as lactate levels and zone two efficiency or muscle mass, those are proxies for that.
00:15:45.980
So in a large enough study, if we could actually go after the thing that matters,
00:15:52.320
Okay. So I'm going to bring in a little social media into this. On Instagram, I think it's pretty
00:15:57.360
clear that anybody who follows you, that you recently got a dog. You're snuggling up with that
00:16:01.940
pup. And along the same lines, have you changed your mind on having a dog? Because I believe in some
00:16:07.280
of the podcasts, maybe we've talked about in the AMAs and other times about the reluctance to get a dog
00:16:12.060
and maybe you caving at some point down the road. Yes. We do have a puppy. Four weeks ago,
00:16:19.820
we got her, little Molly. And you are absolutely correct that, remember that scene in Planes,
00:16:26.900
Trains, and Automobiles when, I think it was John Candy's character who says something to the effect
00:16:31.660
of, if I'd woken up with my head sewn in the carpet, I would have been less surprised. Remember
00:16:35.840
that line? I think I thought the day that we were going to get a dog was never. I just thought it'll
00:16:43.720
never happen because I don't have the bandwidth to absorb any additional work. My wife is already
00:16:51.720
functioning at the level of three wives. And it's just like, why would we do that to ourselves?
00:16:58.260
And even though our daughter was the one begging, it's not like she can take care of a dog when she's
00:17:04.280
at school or whatever. So I was just like, no, this is never going to happen. And then I don't know
00:17:08.860
what, I mean, I just don't know what happened for lack of a better way of describing it. Somewhere in
00:17:14.300
there, the resistance just weakened. And I was in Australia and I must admit prior to that Australia
00:17:24.060
trip, we had gone and looked at a couple of puppies in a dog shelter nearby. And I must admit there were
00:17:31.900
some cute little puppies in there, but I still kind of came away from that experience thinking
00:17:35.880
we just need a couple more years. We just need the two guys to be a little bit older and
00:17:41.760
a little less dependent on us. And then somehow they just went to the dog shelter. When I was in
00:17:49.580
Australia, they FaceTimed me from there and said, there's this little girl, little puppy, Molly,
00:17:55.920
she's perfect. And they gave me all the reasons why she was perfect. And I actually went out to
00:18:04.340
social media to seek an opinion. This was like one of the few times social media was actually helpful
00:18:08.660
because this puppy was the runt of her litter and she was visually impaired. And I really wanted to
00:18:17.920
know if we were biting off more than we could chew. And so I asked that question broadly and the
00:18:21.920
feedback was overwhelming actually, both on Twitter and Instagram. And people said, she's going to make
00:18:26.560
an awesome puppy. And I will say this a month in, it's way more work than I expected. And not so much
00:18:32.700
for me, but certainly for my wife and for my daughter and for me too, but I'm taking on 10% of the additional
00:18:39.400
work. But I think people were right that a dog that doesn't see perfectly, perhaps coupled with some
00:18:46.980
other characteristics of just being a rescue dog. She's amazingly gentle and sweet and kind. And
00:18:55.340
I don't know. So I don't regret it, even though it's harder than I thought it would be. And there
00:19:01.580
have been a number of accidents that have required significant cleaning, but I think I'm getting the
00:19:09.360
point that people had been trying to make for years when I had been saying, why would anybody get a
00:19:16.460
dog? Which is, I think there are these intangible benefits that come from a dog that you don't
00:19:21.320
appreciate. If you try to just think about it with your logical brain, you guys have a dog, right?
00:19:25.880
We do. The dog has passed. We're going to get another one. But yeah, I mean, I definitely share
00:19:30.820
your feelings about it. It's funny. It sounds a lot like having a kid where you think you get older.
00:19:37.980
I think if you don't pop one out when you're younger and you're older, you're trying to think of like,
00:19:41.640
when's the right time? We need to line up all these things. It's just like, there's never the right time.
00:19:46.460
Although probably any time is probably the right time if you don't have a kid and then you raise
00:19:50.920
that child. And there are probably accidents along the way as well, whether it's a dog or a person.
00:19:56.300
This is completely inappropriate, but I thought of it when you were talking about loving a dog.
00:20:00.380
This is a joke. This is not my joke. It says, want to know who loves you more? Put your spouse and
00:20:05.500
your dog in the trunk of a car and drive around for an hour. When you open the trunk, who's happy to see
00:20:10.880
you? I honestly, I think like that joke, I don't know. I'd heard it recently, but I would always be
00:20:20.380
amazed that you just think of like dogs and you come home every single day. And it's like,
00:20:24.100
you went to Afghanistan, a tour of duty for three years and you came back and you get that kind of
00:20:29.280
reaction every single day. And it's pretty amazing. I'm a big fan. So I have a...
00:20:37.900
Yeah, I'm in the club. It was interesting too. I caught one thing, which is great is that
00:20:41.940
when people ask you, where does Peter Atiyah get his second opinions, you can say Twitter and Instagram,
00:20:53.440
We're going to go back to the pharmaceuticals. We've got rapamycin.
00:21:00.340
Well, this is sort of been another area of real interest of mine for many years, not quite as far
00:21:09.480
back as the sort of Metformin interest, which started, I think around 2010, 2011 for me, but
00:21:15.720
probably by about 2012 and certainly by about 2014 when the first, that sort of really interesting
00:21:25.560
Everolimus paper was published by Joan Manick, Lloyd Clickstein and others in December of 2014.
00:21:34.480
That was a real, real peak to my curiosity. That was a paper that showed that the strength of
00:21:42.820
vaccination in healthy subjects who were, I believe about age 65 could be augmented by basically a
00:21:51.980
rapamycin analog, which again is counterintuitive, right? That's the adaptive immune system getting
00:21:58.420
better with rapamycin. Very counterintuitive because of course, rapamycin's on label use
00:22:05.700
is specifically to suppress the adaptive immune system. And that's what makes it such a efficacious
00:22:13.800
tool for mitigating organ rejection. But of course, what that study would show was a couple of things,
00:22:20.680
which is there are different ways that you can dose it. Two of the three treatment arms in that
00:22:26.660
study were only being given rapamycin once a week, one at five milligrams, one at 20 milligrams,
00:22:31.980
by the way, I said rapamycin. I almost use Everolimus and rapamycin interchangeably, but it was not
00:22:38.200
rapamycin. And that study was sort of the turning point for me. And what it really led to was the next
00:22:49.140
four years, just a deeper and deeper look into all of the literature. We've had, I think, two podcasts
00:22:59.360
that have been dedicated to rapamycin and mTOR, one with David Sabatini, one with Matt Caberline. I feel
00:23:05.080
like we're overdue for another one, by the way, because I know those were very early.
00:23:08.540
Yeah. A little inside baseball, but those interviews were, I think, like in 2017.
00:23:15.240
That was at Sabatini and it was the summer. We went over there, you gave a talk.
00:23:21.380
Yep. August of 17. So we're way overdue to go back and revisit that. But basically just more and
00:23:28.460
more data, both in animals and in humans, really got me to a point where I felt really comfortable
00:23:36.880
that one, I was taking enough, because you've probably heard me talk about this before, that
00:23:41.780
you always think of two risks when you're taking a medication that you don't have an immediate
00:23:47.560
biomarker for. So if you're talking about taking a statin or taking a PCSK9 inhibitor, well, you have
00:23:55.420
a very clear biomarker that at least tells you if the drug is working. And similarly, you have either
00:24:02.340
clinical signs or biomarkers that tell you if things are going awry. Clinical signs might be, you know,
00:24:07.960
muscle aches and you might see outside of complete breakdown of muscle, you might still see
00:24:13.980
significant elevations of CK or significant elevations of liver function tests or things
00:24:19.000
like that. You have some sort of bearing on either symptoms that would cause you to revisit your
00:24:25.160
decision to use the medication or lack of efficacy or other signs that tell you, hey, this isn't a good
00:24:31.520
idea. But with rapamycin, you don't have any of that. I mean, on the symptom side, obviously,
00:24:37.540
if you take too much, you're going to start to see some of the symptoms like mouth sores and things
00:24:41.460
like that. But you don't really know if you're taking enough and you don't know if you're taking
00:24:46.400
too much beyond some of those symptoms. And so you really have to be able to triangulate on what the
00:24:52.360
right dose is. And so that's what basically took me about four years. Once I sort of felt like,
00:24:58.980
I think this makes sense, there was still, I couldn't quite get to the point where I could
00:25:04.820
understand what to do, how to do it. And I think that was sort of the big switch that flipped in,
00:25:10.740
well, probably about 18 months ago, kind of in the fall of 2018. And I would still say that here I am
00:25:15.960
a year and a half later, I'm still really eager to figure out ways that we can have biomarkers that
00:25:23.700
can lend some insight into this. Probably more so on the efficacy side, there's still a lot of
00:25:31.000
questions I have on the use of rapamycin, even though I'm using it. I sort of cycle it a little
00:25:36.900
bit. I think there's lots to be asked there. Is it the right cycling? Is it the right period? Is
00:25:43.200
the right on versus off? All of those things are, we don't have enough answers yet, but my convictions
00:25:48.660
are now high enough on the side of something that looks like what I'm doing right now is probably
00:25:53.960
beneficial. One thing interesting too, just about the metformin and rapamycin is, I think you might've
00:26:00.520
talked about this with Nir. That was like January of last year. So about a year ago is him and a few
00:26:08.420
other colleagues. I think Steve Ostad was one of them. They were talking about what is the trial
00:26:12.700
that we want to do? And I think there was a lot of debate and healthy conversation around whether
00:26:17.640
they should use metformin or rapamycin. And I wish that there was enough resources in the world to try
00:26:24.060
both, but it sounded like they had to do one. Then it was metformin. Yeah. I remember actually
00:26:30.160
having that discussion with Steve Ostad over dinner about four years ago at the time before TAME had
00:26:36.300
been fully formulated and saying, if you're only going to get one bite at this apple, rapamycin might
00:26:41.880
be the more interesting agent to study. I think their concern was the monitoring was going to be more
00:26:47.340
complicated. Just the economics of trying to understand how the immune system was potentially
00:26:54.780
changing was going to make that sort of cost prohibitive study, unfortunately.
00:26:59.080
On the subject of apples, I don't know why this is apples. I think of archery and shooting an apple
00:27:03.960
on someone's head, but are you still practicing archery?
00:27:07.760
I am. I practice a lot. I think archery and driving are the two things that I really sort of
00:27:14.940
just try to carve out time for every single day that I'm not traveling.
00:27:19.160
Luckily, I travel a lot less than I used to, so that means more practice.
00:27:22.980
How do you think that goes? I was just thinking that in terms of getting better,
00:27:25.580
the more you practice it, is it just, do the gains become more and more incremental,
00:27:29.220
or do you always feel like you're learning something each session, so to speak? And I mean,
00:27:33.860
just in terms of archery, I think it's more objective where maybe you can take your score and say,
00:27:39.020
on average, I'm improving over time with those things.
00:27:41.380
Yeah. I mean, I think they're both so different and yet so similar. I think that with archery,
00:27:48.140
it's so hard to explain how addictive it is if you've never done it. But I think anybody who's
00:27:52.740
fired a compound bow, I think most people are like, oh, wow, I can see why this is really something
00:27:58.780
else. First of all, there's no ceiling to how much one can improve. That's the beauty of something
00:28:04.820
like this is you have so much ability to measure how you're doing that you can never say, I've kind
00:28:12.400
of plateaued, you know, I've kind of hit my limit. Like there's just always a place to go up. And
00:28:18.400
really it's many different sports in one. There's sort of, there's the indoor target, you're shooting
00:28:23.820
at 20 yards and at 20 yards, you're expected to be able to hit something the size of a quarter.
00:28:28.980
So if you think about that, something 60 feet away, you have to be able to hit a quarter 60
00:28:33.540
feet away. And in a perfect round, you would take 60 shots and do that 60 times. How many times do
00:28:41.720
you think I've done that so far, Bob? A hundred. Zero. See what I did there? Very nice. Very nice.
00:28:49.020
Yes. The hundredth episode. No. So I have yet to score a perfect 300 round, like a perfect 360 round,
00:28:56.580
which is what that would be. So anyway, it's meaning all 60 were in the tiny little X. And to
00:29:02.720
be clear, there are days when I find that fact infuriating. Like there's times when I get so
00:29:07.620
close and then I blow it at the end. And then there's times I just blow it in the first shot
00:29:11.900
and I'm like frustrated and I don't even want to finish. But you also realize that archery is kind
00:29:17.920
of a great metaphor for life and you can't focus just too much on your target. You really have to
00:29:24.400
focus on the process or you're not going to get better. So one of the things we do a lot in
00:29:28.120
archery is called blank bailing, which is taking a shot at a huge target. Like there are these big
00:29:34.140
bales without actually looking at a target, like literally not having a target there. So there's
00:29:40.540
nothing for you to fixate onto so that you can just go through the sequence. And when I'm traveling,
00:29:46.040
I take this thing called a shot trainer with me, which is like a little string attached to
00:29:52.220
something that sits in your hand that sort of mimics the feeling of the riser.
00:29:56.640
And I'll take maybe 20 to 40 shots a day in my room, hotel room or whatever, that are obviously
00:30:04.220
not aimed at a target or not doing anything, but just going through the muscle memory of where are
00:30:09.260
my feet? Where is the pressure on my hands? How am I feeling the contraction of my rhomboid? All those
00:30:15.300
sorts of things. Again, if you're listening to this and you're thinking, oh my God, how did that guy
00:30:20.600
just manage to waste the last three minutes of my life telling me that? Again, I don't think you have
00:30:26.000
to like archery to appreciate the notion of mastery. And I do think that as people, we sort of crave
00:30:35.440
getting better at something. And that can be lots of things. It doesn't just have to be sort of a
00:30:41.240
physical domain. It can be an intellectual domain. It can be an emotional domain or a relational domain.
00:30:46.000
But anyway, for me, this habit with archery, this curiosity started three years ago.
00:30:52.360
And now it's something I can't imagine. If a day goes by that I don't do it, I feel like I'm missing
00:30:58.020
something. I think there's something to that process. I mean, I think about my childhood,
00:31:02.820
the intellectual pursuit. I just always, I had these things uncoupled that I just wasn't very good.
00:31:08.160
I was not a very good student. 1.44 grade point average in high school.
00:31:15.380
That's actually really hard to graduate with that kind of GPA.
00:31:17.960
It's not just hard to graduate. How do you even get a grade point average of 1.44?
00:31:21.600
The secret is not showing up. That's how you do that.
00:31:27.660
Having fun. At least what I thought was having fun at the time. But I was also,
00:31:31.900
I guess, to the larger point here, not get into my childhood too much.
00:31:36.380
Wait a minute. You can't throw out the 1.44 without explaining it, but okay.
00:31:39.860
Yeah. I was also playing hockey and that's a totally different sport, but I excelled at it.
00:31:46.940
And I went through the, like, you don't automatically excel at a sport like that.
00:31:50.620
I probably, particularly in Massachusetts, like you got to really work at it.
00:31:53.860
And it instilled a lot of stuff in me. And I never made the connection until later in my life
00:31:57.880
that intellectual pursuits and educating yourself and things like that, it's not very much different.
00:32:03.580
It's like, in order to be good at blank, you are going to suck at blank.
00:32:07.660
Like, if you have a few of these victories, Peter, you have so many of these things.
00:32:12.260
I think you're, in a way, obsessed with mastery and you have so many different things that you've
00:32:16.200
pursued excellence in that you realize, even if you have no idea what this thing is,
00:32:21.480
if you put the time and the effort in, that you can get better at it.
00:32:25.160
And so I would just, I would put a plug in for anybody at a younger age.
00:32:28.240
Maybe it's like, I never thought about musical instruments that way, but maybe it is.
00:32:31.580
It's like, I know Olivia plays the drums and that's something you first start and you're
00:32:35.500
just like, you can't keep a, can't keep a beat and then check in a few months later and
00:32:41.280
you can see that progress and you just know that work and work and effort and time.
00:32:45.920
I mean, it sounds like grit, those kinds of things, but they apply to so many different
00:32:50.180
And just with this podcast is, I mean, I think there's a parallel there with all the episodes
00:32:54.200
and all the, all the information that goes into the prep with the guests.
00:32:57.980
And I think that you have a predilection to guests who have a healthy obsession, let's
00:33:03.420
call it healthy, a healthy obsession with these topics as well.
00:33:06.120
And they just, they know a lot about these things, probably through similar practice with
00:33:11.940
It's funny you bring that up, by the way, I actually had this discussion with Olivia two
00:33:15.800
days ago and I don't know why, oh, I know how it came up.
00:33:18.980
We were sitting there at dinner and I was just sort of complimenting her on how
00:33:23.460
impressed I was with how hard she's been studying this year, which was a real switch
00:33:30.900
And it's like, you don't have to ask her to do her homework.
00:33:35.520
And she makes cue cards and is always like just going out of her way to really try to
00:33:40.560
learn stuff in a way that I just didn't see her doing before.
00:33:44.120
And so I was just saying, hey, that's so great, blah, blah, blah.
00:33:46.020
And then she sort of asked me, she's like, well, when you were my age, how much did you
00:34:02.060
And really what it was, was I wasn't interested in what was happening.
00:34:07.140
But the point I made to her is exactly the point that you made, which was the reason that
00:34:12.460
I was ultimately able to do well in school was fortunately I had spent all of that time
00:34:19.920
And it was that sort of pursuit of that that became transferable.
00:34:26.700
I just think I do pity the person who's never found it interesting to try to get better at
00:34:36.280
I don't consider archery for me to be the greatest form of recreation because I am very internally
00:34:43.600
competitive and I'm sometimes too focused on the result and not the process.
00:34:54.000
So there are days when archery is like meditation to me, just being out there just feels so amazing
00:35:00.140
and the sun is shining and the wind is blowing and I can sort of disregard the outcome, but
00:35:08.800
And so I, when you think about the podcast with Ryan Holiday, where we talk about stillness,
00:35:12.840
I would say that archery for me does not constitute stillness because stillness can't really have
00:35:20.820
And I think for me, archery carries with it too much of an objective.
00:35:25.140
So I still think that one has to have those other things in there.
00:35:31.140
I didn't even think of it this way, but I think this is one thing I've noticed about having
00:35:38.440
It is kind of a form of stillness for me, like taking her out and walking her and picking
00:35:44.480
There's nothing else to be doing and there's no outcome associated with it.
00:35:49.460
It's literally just a forced reason to be outside and to be observing the completely
00:36:00.780
So yeah, I think it's funny, even though we didn't pose it this way.
00:36:06.080
If you want to ask me about another really big change in the way I think about things
00:36:11.680
over the past couple of years, it's a huge appreciation for how essential it is to have
00:36:18.260
something that is not object-oriented, outcome-based in your life.
00:36:24.060
Like not everything in your life can be outcome-based.
00:36:29.180
This might be a good segue to another topic, but it's funny when you were talking about
00:36:33.460
stillness and how some of these little things that you don't even realize are stillness or
00:36:37.920
I was going to use the example of washing dishes and then I realized you've got the
00:36:45.640
Even though a lot of people just wash the dishes and it's like, it's therapeutic for
00:36:52.380
But things that were once like, you know, I was saying a second ago, I mean, even swimming
00:36:55.060
for me now is something that is really a form of stillness.
00:36:58.280
So I just started swimming again a couple months ago and I go like once a week and I don't keep
00:37:09.900
I'm in the water maybe 45 minutes to an hour and all I'm doing is swimming.
00:37:21.860
I literally just get in the water with no agenda other than to get wet and hear the sound
00:37:29.460
Probably I'm not even swimming hard enough to get into zone two, truthfully.
00:37:38.820
If you think about it, you can talk about it, but I think that's one of the things is
00:37:42.940
like a governor putting a rate limiter on your performance when you do zone two, that it's
00:37:50.040
For me, doing this reminds me kind of of stillness, although I might read on the bike or things
00:37:55.720
But can you talk about zone two importance and how your thinking has changed on that?
00:37:59.400
Yeah, when I stopped riding a bike with a purpose, which was for me a time trial, so that would
00:38:06.000
have been late 2014, early 2015, I kind of really just stopped doing any low intensity
00:38:15.680
So anyone who does ride a bike or swims a lot has plenty of that activity in them.
00:38:21.540
So even if you're training for the 200 meter individual medley, which is a race that's very
00:38:27.840
short, very quick, and very painful, you still put in hours and hours a week of aerobic-based
00:38:33.660
Similarly, if you're training for a one-hour all-out time trial, you still put in hours
00:38:43.300
But when I stopped doing that, I was like, well, I don't need to do this anymore.
00:38:52.120
And I was sort of obsessed with just being as efficient as possible.
00:38:59.360
I mean, if I was running, it was going to be a six-minute mile.
00:39:04.340
I think especially through the interactions that I had with Inigo, who I met about a year
00:39:12.220
before I had him on the podcast, which was just recently, it was sort of meeting him and
00:39:17.900
kind of going back through the literature on that type of training and the benefits that
00:39:25.600
it could have, both from the standpoint of metabolic benefits such as glucose, insulin-dependent
00:39:31.160
and insulin-dependent glucose-mediated disposal, looking at just sort of mitochondrial function,
00:39:37.700
mitochondrial health density, and then looking at sort of the sort of neurotropic factors,
00:39:42.460
the BDNF secretion that can come from this type of activity.
00:39:45.060
All of these things were just pointing towards this was a glaring hole in my training that
00:39:55.060
And like you said, I mean, one of the things about Zone 2 that I really enjoy is it's just
00:40:01.680
You know, like frankly, sometimes it's just nice to get on the bike and I probably spend
00:40:08.220
And that is my time to listen to podcasts and audiobooks.
00:40:14.480
As sort of boring as it seems to be sitting on a stationary bike for that long, there's
00:40:19.480
never been a day when I've been like, I don't feel like doing this.
00:40:23.200
And I think in large part, it's because I also get to combine it with learning, which
00:40:28.300
you wouldn't be doing if you're out there crushing intervals.
00:40:30.720
And not that there's something wrong with that.
00:40:32.280
I think each of these things has this time and a place, but I think that we can do Zone 2
00:40:37.060
our entire lives, we can do it safely and it just yields enormous dividends.
00:40:43.840
What's nice about that too, for I think a lot of your training is you've got the smart
00:40:47.120
erg, so you can tie yourself to the mast that the output, whether you pedal faster, it's
00:40:52.600
going to give you the output that you pre-desired.
00:40:54.860
So you can't start cheating, which is what I find myself doing when I don't have it on
00:40:59.200
smart, just the erg that I find myself pedaling faster, just unconsciously, just wanting to
00:41:11.220
So you can set it to either smart or set it at a certain level.
00:41:20.040
Did you ever have a CompuTrainer back in the day?
00:41:24.360
I had it on an old Windows computer, I remember that.
00:41:26.620
I had the little CompuTrainer and then it's connected to the bike trainer.
00:41:31.000
I tried simulating the Tour de France one year, just in terms of the time.
00:41:35.620
So I talk about the time over summer, I had a bucket.
00:41:38.880
My wife now, I can't believe she's my wife now.
00:41:41.120
I was living in Las Vegas and it was the middle of our, I would sit in our apartment with a
00:41:44.580
bike trainer and had a bucket with ice of water bottles and things like that and eggs.
00:41:51.880
So I was eating eggs at the time, but I don't know if that was stillness.
00:41:58.300
So on this topic, moving along, the importance of deadlifts as an adult, how has your thinking
00:42:07.460
So maybe even take it back to in school when you were doing powerlifting before it might
00:42:14.420
Long before it was in vogue, one of my best friends in high school who was also involved
00:42:19.820
in boxing and martial arts, we would go to the Scarborough campus of the University of
00:42:27.100
And it was, it's still one of the fondest memories I have of what a gym could be like.
00:42:33.220
It would certainly be the, it was certainly not the sunny, warm golds in Venice, but it
00:42:40.240
had some of those features, which was old school, lots of iron, nothing fancy.
00:42:46.380
Of course, unlike a nice gym, this was like two stories below ground.
00:42:58.780
You felt like you were getting frostbitten by touching the iron.
00:43:02.440
And aside from me and my friend, there were no kids there.
00:43:08.240
And it was this group of men who to this day, I think back and like, can't believe how strong
00:43:18.580
And so that sort of got us interested in powerlifting.
00:43:21.080
And that's how we sort of started putzing around with it.
00:43:23.780
And as most people know who are listening, or I guess people might know who are listening,
00:43:28.420
powerlifting is different from Olympic lifting.
00:43:30.800
Powerlifting is three lifts, the deadlift, the squat and the bench press.
00:43:34.840
And so yeah, make a long story short, grew up doing a lot of deadlifting, a lot of squatting,
00:43:40.820
Was always very horrible at bench press, much better at squatting and deadlifting.
00:43:45.720
Fast forward to, I don't know, a few years ago, maybe three years ago, I had an injury
00:43:53.240
where I kind of tore or partially tore one of my obliques.
00:44:09.720
But everything went kind of sideways after that.
00:44:12.720
And I really was never able to fully deadlift again without some discomfort.
00:44:19.440
And so again, this is now take it back to maybe 2016.
00:44:24.380
I sort of decided, you know what, maybe the deadlift has reached its point of futility and
00:44:33.580
maybe I've extracted all I'm going to out of that.
00:44:36.840
And there's no denying what a wonderful movement it is in terms of being a total hip hinge compound
00:44:43.360
But I was like, look, I could probably get most of the benefits of a deadlift doing things
00:44:50.880
And also, again, in the spirit of thinking about longevity, I thought, why does one need
00:44:55.180
to subject themselves to twice their body weight or more in an axial load?
00:45:01.680
And then I think all that kind of changed when I started DNS, Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization,
00:45:09.540
And we're going to have a podcast on this topic because it's just, there's so much I
00:45:16.080
And so actually, I think today we got an email about how we're trying to make some time for
00:45:21.140
So we'll definitely, if you're listening to this and you don't know what DNS is, Dynamic
00:45:24.440
Neuromuscular Stabilization, by all means, you should go read about it.
00:45:27.440
But we're going to have at least one solid podcast on this.
00:45:30.800
But it was through that process that I realized, actually, the deadlift for me was going to be
00:45:37.500
beneficial, not because of the metabolic benefits.
00:45:41.280
I was not going to be doing Tabata deadlifts like I used to, or even by trying to set records
00:45:47.140
for how much I could lift or anything like that, but rather because it becomes a beautiful
00:46:01.260
Like I deadlift at least twice a week, often three times a week, both straight bar and trap
00:46:09.740
I don't know the last time, maybe I've had 400 pounds on one of those on the trap bar in
00:46:15.180
the past year, but I usually sort of stop at about 350 to 375 on the straight bar.
00:46:29.020
I film every single rep of every single set and I study it and I send it to Beth Lewis,
00:46:40.120
And we do so much around making this deadlift perfect.
00:46:46.440
And I'd rather take a lightweight and deadlift it perfectly several times a week.
00:46:55.140
Like, I mean, it's today was four sets of 10, five sets of 10, maybe.
00:47:02.420
So again, I can push myself harder doing other things, but what I could get out of doing that
00:47:07.620
deadlift perfectly is do I have just the right amount of thoracic extension?
00:47:13.820
Do I have just the right curvature in the lumbar spine?
00:47:26.820
Like all of this little stuff translates biomechanically to the activities of daily living that matter
00:47:33.440
to me, like getting up off the floor, picking up one of my kids, lifting a piece of luggage
00:47:40.800
And so if I can do the deadlift and it feels right, then I know I'm ready to do everything
00:47:47.060
And when I'm deadlifting and I feel like, hey, this isn't correct, this doesn't feel right.
00:47:51.600
Well, first of all, now I've really learned what that feeling is.
00:47:54.200
And secondly, I've now learned the steps that I can go back and reconstruct what needs to
00:48:01.000
And so one of the things I definitely want to do at some point in the next year is actually
00:48:04.580
put together kind of a video on deadlift and deadlift preparation.
00:48:08.560
Because I think that there are probably 10 exercises that I do as a way to get ready to deadlift.
00:48:16.760
Like this, my deadlift checklist is like 10 to 15 minutes.
00:48:21.960
It's almost like ketosis the way we were talking about it in the past, right?
00:48:25.480
Which is, it's not even clear if it's the ketones themselves that can sometimes be the
00:48:30.740
benefit versus the metabolic conditions that allow you to make them, right?
00:48:35.280
In other words, I'm not even sure how much of the benefit is the actual deadlift versus
00:48:40.480
all of the things you have to do to do the deadlift correctly.
00:48:43.080
And one of the most exciting things just on this, the last thing I say on this is it never
00:48:49.060
occurred to me up until a year and a half ago that you could actually deadlift in a way
00:48:57.560
You would think that anytime you're lifting under an axial load, your spine is under compression.
00:49:02.320
But it turns out when you learn the right positioning and you understand how to create
00:49:07.840
intra-abdominal pressure and you know how to elongate your spine, you can actually deadlift
00:49:16.640
And that's why deadlifting is the most important thing I do before I get on an airplane.
00:49:22.320
Because when you're on an airplane and you're sitting there for five or six hours, what you
00:49:26.160
really want to do is not let your spine be compressed.
00:49:29.120
And the deadlift primes me to then go and sort of maintain that activated form of traction.
00:49:37.480
It's a significant investment, but I would say it's worth it that you'll bring your hex
00:49:41.180
bar to the gate before your flight and pump yourself up and bang out a few sets.
00:49:47.140
I mean, I don't know what it is about the TSA guys.
00:49:49.200
They get so wigged out when you have your hex bar there at the gate.
00:50:07.020
I am about a third of the way through Andrew Solomon's Far From the Tree.
00:50:20.220
But I've actually thought it would be probably really interesting to have Andrew on the podcast.
00:50:25.340
He's obviously just one of those guys that when you're in the process of writing a book,
00:50:29.960
you probably shouldn't be reading their books because they just make you not want to write
00:50:39.420
You know, it's just one of these people who are just so, so exceptional in their ability
00:50:48.120
So prior to that, I reread Stillness is the Key for the third time.
00:50:55.800
That is a book that has just spoken to me probably more than anything else Ryan has written.
00:51:00.120
And he's written some really great books in that series.
00:51:02.860
And just overall, the other two books in that series, Ego is the Enemy, which I'm also a huge
00:51:11.020
But Stillness is really the one that kind of captivates me.
00:51:13.700
And that's why I've just finished it for a third time.
00:51:16.040
I've also gifted that book probably half a dozen times.
00:51:19.260
And so, yeah, I suspect there'll be at least a fourth reading of that book in my future.
00:51:25.700
So I was thinking in the context of the podcast, and there's so many books, I guess it's not
00:51:30.780
recently, but for the guests, just reading a lot of their books is, it's great.
00:51:35.880
I actually think of Gary Taubes and how you read Why We Get Fat, and you had a list of questions,
00:51:41.240
And there's a version of that where I get to read these books, and I have a list of
00:51:45.200
questions, and I'll ask you to ask the questions or ping them off of you.
00:51:50.100
So actually, what I'm reading right now, it's not out yet, but it's really interesting, which
00:51:54.860
is Vinay Prasad, who probably be right around the time of this episode, I guess, or no, we
00:52:02.060
And he has a book called Malignant, which is really interesting.
00:52:11.920
He's now like the, I would say Einstein or Lincoln, but you attribute all these kind of
00:52:20.120
Is it better to read five books or to read one book five times?
00:52:26.320
Azra Raza is another guest on the podcast, hasn't come up yet.
00:52:36.600
When you had Sid Mukherjee on too, he talked about a PBS that they're going to do another,
00:52:42.700
But for that podcast, I went back and I read The Gene and The Emperor of All Maladies and
00:52:47.660
The Three Laws, which is like a, I guess it's a TED book.
00:52:56.860
My thing is I usually go in the sauna about an hour a day and I either print out a stack of
00:53:02.280
papers that I want to read for research or just read a book in there.
00:53:07.080
So I should probably just write all these, put these down in a spreadsheet and see what
00:53:13.480
But a bunch of it has been on the podcast prep.
00:53:17.160
I also read that Stillness is the Key, which I found that's definitely worth reading again.
00:53:24.740
So baby aspirin and the use for prevention of blood clots or thrombosis during a flight.
00:53:33.560
So I used to be of the mindset that anybody who was on a flight, on a long enough flight,
00:53:39.620
should be taking a baby aspirin for prevention of deep vein thromboses.
00:53:45.020
And I just sort of assumed that that was the case.
00:53:47.960
I mean, it's widely understood that baby aspirin or aspirin in general inhibits platelets and
00:53:54.380
platelets, of course, are one of the cellular matters in blood that's responsible for clotting.
00:54:01.920
And then, I don't know, again, maybe about a year, year and a half ago, kind of did a little
00:54:07.300
digging into this and found that there really wasn't much evidence that aspirin or baby aspirin
00:54:13.720
had any efficacy in mitigation of deep vein thromboses, especially on an airplane.
00:54:19.620
And in digging around, we sort of found that, well, the gold standard would, of course, be
00:54:24.140
heparin, which could either be fractionated or ultra low molecular weight heparin.
00:54:31.120
I mean, intravenous heparin is obviously not something you're going to do before a flight.
00:54:34.820
And even the low molecular weight heparins have to be injected.
00:54:49.960
I haven't looked in a while to see if it's still there.
00:54:51.660
But it was a pretty potent agent that actually had pretty remarkable evidence that it prevented
00:54:59.100
And then the other is something that is also pretty easy to get over the counter called
00:55:07.480
I think it actually kind of, it's like sort of a sort of stinky odor is sort of the types
00:55:12.300
of foods that it occurs in naturally or certain types of mushrooms or, you know, cheeses or
00:55:16.700
But these are things that actually turned out to have far more evidence.
00:55:20.860
And they were both things I'd never heard of until we sort of really dug into this question.
00:55:26.380
So that was a bit of a humbling experience because you think, well, look, on first principles,
00:55:35.180
And then you realize, well, wait a minute, when you, even something as simple as that,
00:55:38.860
when you actually really antagonize the literature, it turned out not to be the case.
00:55:43.680
And the things that did seem to have some efficacy are things I'd never even heard of.
00:55:47.740
So it's a little scary because it makes you wonder how many times is that happening
00:55:52.940
Yeah, this sounds apropos in terms of strong convictions held loosely.
00:56:04.040
What do you think prior to that and some of the stuff that you were seeing in, I guess,
00:56:08.140
the clinic or at least some of your patients and taking generics?
00:56:11.680
Yeah, I mean, Catherine's podcast is, I mean, it would be hard to say that that hasn't been
00:56:15.880
one of the 10 most important podcasts that we've done in this first hundred.
00:56:19.860
If you haven't listened to that, I suggest you just hit pause on this now and go back
00:56:25.980
You can search Eban, E-B-A-N in your podcast player and it'll show up.
00:56:29.640
But I think prior to that, my view had always been generics are great.
00:56:33.460
They're the exact same as branded, except they're a fraction of the cost and branded drugs are
00:56:39.100
That was sort of my default thinking all through medical school.
00:56:42.000
I'd say in the last couple of years, I began to wonder if maybe there were a couple generics
00:56:49.480
that weren't great because in the case of certain drugs where you do have a very clear
00:56:56.480
biomarker for use, such as a statin, you put a patient on Crestor, but of course they
00:57:04.380
And you look at their blood level two months later and there's no change in anything that
00:57:13.220
And when you query them, they tell you they've taken it every day and you believe them because
00:57:23.520
And you see a couple of those things and you start to wonder if maybe not all generics are
00:57:28.900
But then of course, in the discussion with Catherine, I came away thinking, oh boy, this
00:57:34.240
And it's frankly, it's completely changed the way we do things in the practice now.
00:57:37.800
So we work primarily with one pharmacy that will either at our insistence or the patient's
00:57:45.140
insistence only issue branded drugs, sometimes even when it is a little bit costly.
00:57:50.280
And when we do generics, we do it through the lens of looking at the companies specifically
00:57:57.240
that make them and at least taking a first order pass at cross-referencing that with sort
00:58:06.420
So I don't think that has completely mitigated the problem, but I think it's probably taking
00:58:14.840
Another one, this one is a omega-3 fatty acids.
00:58:20.280
Your thoughts on that, and obviously Bill Harris is somebody who came on the podcast
00:58:25.240
So Catherine Eban was number 71, that was in September of last year.
00:58:30.240
And Bill Harris was in December of last year, and he came on and talked about omega-3 fatty
00:58:37.240
So what's your take on omega-3 and how has it changed?
00:58:40.820
I think I'm still sort of in my evolution on this.
00:58:42.840
I mean, I think I've longly held the, for a long time held the view, longly, is that
00:58:51.960
I have for a long time held the view that EPA and DHA are beneficial.
00:58:57.620
Obviously had some questions as to, again, how much of it was the other things that you
00:59:03.880
got when you ate things that were high in EPA and DHA versus just the supplemental thing.
00:59:09.020
I would say that my thinking has evolved to the point where EPA and DHA by themselves
00:59:13.340
are quite potent drugs, and we really ought to think of them in that way.
00:59:17.360
So that, in fact, you look at a drug like Visepa, which is just pharmaceutical grade
00:59:25.100
I mean, that is as potent as any anti-cardiovascular disease drug that we have.
00:59:31.860
So clearly EPA has a benefit to it, especially in patients that are at risk for cardiovascular
00:59:40.520
I think with DHA, the clinical trials data are still not clear.
00:59:48.160
There's a pretty interesting setback on a clinical trial in the fall that was looking at a combination
00:59:53.700
of EPA, DHA, and it was a trial that was stopped for futility.
00:59:56.960
So there was no harm from it, but there wasn't the big bang benefit that we frankly expected
01:00:02.420
to see based on the earlier trial with Visepa, which was just EPA.
01:00:06.600
I think the discussion with Bill Harris certainly increased my level of confidence in the necessity
01:00:14.180
of EPA and DHA, and also probably drove me to a point of thinking about it being a higher
01:00:20.660
We used to generally look at an RBC or red blood cell membrane level of about 8% to 10%,
01:00:29.140
but I think I came away from the discussion with Bill Harris thinking we could really push
01:00:33.360
that up to 12%, 14% without undesirable side effects, and also getting more value or more
01:00:40.940
I think one area that Bill had a very strong conviction on that I've also, I've kind of
01:00:47.340
had the opposite conviction too, so I think I'm still in the space of wanting to learn this.
01:00:51.660
So I think my strong conviction had generally been that excessive amounts of omega-6 polyunsaturated
01:00:58.640
fatty acids or PUFAs were generally not a good thing, and the associative data there is
01:01:05.600
But again, the problem with the associative data is things that are full of omega-6 PUFAs
01:01:13.560
So it's easy to see an association with high omega-6 polyunsaturated fat and disease, chronic
01:01:20.760
But Bill's point was that the omega-6 polyunsaturated fats aren't harmful, it's just that diets that
01:01:28.980
are rich in them tend to be void in EPA and DHA.
01:01:31.580
So his real takeaway was, don't think about omega-6 polyunsaturated fats, you just need
01:01:39.160
And so I think you and I have been talking about this actually over the past couple of
01:01:42.820
weeks, but I think I'd really like to go back and do a podcast that looks specifically
01:01:46.540
at the omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acid discussion and really kind of dive into the whole PUFA
01:01:54.720
Because again, this is a very polarizing topic.
01:01:59.420
Both sides, I think, have people that I think are quite bright.
01:02:04.120
And for me, it's not really a huge issue personally because I just don't gravitate towards those
01:02:10.400
Like I find them to be kind of gross and I don't know why you'd want to consume.
01:02:15.180
It wouldn't occur to me to put canola oil on a salad when I could put olive oil on or
01:02:21.400
So on a personal level, I think the point is somewhat moot because N6 PUFA don't make
01:02:28.360
But I do think it has huge implications for public health.
01:02:32.300
And I think it has implications for our patients when we think about people who are potentially
01:02:40.840
One theme in recent episodes, not overly related to medicine.
01:02:46.640
I think of Jason Freed, Rick Elias, actually probably Jason Freed twice have talked about
01:02:53.820
this thing and how you viewed this sort of in the past and now today, this idea of saying
01:03:00.200
no, how good you are at it, when you think it's applicable, and if you've improved on this.
01:03:05.600
I've definitely improved on it in the sense that there was a day when I couldn't say no
01:03:11.460
The pendulum was pretty far off on one side where I was basically on a treadmill of sort
01:03:17.340
of saying yes to anything and everything that was asked of me.
01:03:21.340
Began to realize that I just couldn't do that anymore.
01:03:28.520
And I don't think I'm doing it at a level that's unhealthy either.
01:03:32.480
I mean, you can obviously take these things to far extremes on both sides and you could
01:03:37.000
sort of say no to everything and become sort of dysfunctional in that way.
01:03:45.140
And I remember there was a podcast that there was someone that Tim Ferriss had on his podcast.
01:03:53.560
I forget the name of the person, but hopefully we'll find it for the show notes.
01:04:00.140
And I remember that was actually the first time I started really contemplating it.
01:04:04.140
And I remember shortly after listening to it, I had someone who I really liked, respected,
01:04:09.000
called me and said, hey, I really like you to be on the board of such and such.
01:04:13.000
And I mean, deep down, I knew it was going to be a pain in the ass.
01:04:21.340
And even just the travel of getting to the board meetings was like, wasn't in a place
01:04:25.760
where there was easy access and all these other things.
01:04:28.140
And I remember like thinking, I just, I just got to do this.
01:04:32.340
And I remembered one of the lessons in that podcast was don't answer, just say, can I get
01:04:39.840
So I pulled the, can I get back to you on this?
01:04:42.660
And then with the benefit of a little bit of distance, I realized, Peter, you're crazy.
01:04:48.800
You already lament the time you don't get to spend at home.
01:04:53.220
So then the next day I just called him back and said, hey, I can't do this.
01:04:57.660
And just like this person in the podcast with Tim said, the guy understood.
01:05:02.160
It wasn't like I'd committed some grievous, heinous crime in declining this.
01:05:07.840
So I think that's just an important thing to remember.
01:05:10.220
And yeah, I continue to look forward to refining my no saying skills.
01:05:16.400
I think it's always hard for ourselves to do it.
01:05:19.140
But then when you think in the context of how you work and operate with other people
01:05:25.660
If it's whether it's like having more patience in the practice, if it's not going to benefit
01:05:29.060
what you have going on, then you're usually very matter of fact.
01:05:32.780
But I think it's almost like a, it might be like the ego getting in the way or something
01:05:39.240
I mean, I think it's, this is probably a little cathartic, but it's getting into some of this
01:05:42.940
research where you'll have to tell me no, as far as the deep dives and the rabbit holes
01:05:47.200
that I want to go down or say like, we're just, we're on a mission.
01:05:50.540
I don't want to give the milk analogy, but for a lot of these episodes and a lot of the
01:05:54.440
guests, a little bit of the deep diving can help.
01:05:56.800
But oftentimes it's really about the stuff that you say no to helps shape the things that
01:06:02.220
you actually are focusing on day to day that matter.
01:06:05.500
That's the insight that I think Jason Freed brought to his episode really well, which
01:06:10.500
was when you're saying yes to something, you're actually saying no to something else.
01:06:14.740
You just don't know what that something else is yet.
01:06:19.440
And again, I would, anybody who struggles with saying no, I think would, would benefit greatly
01:06:29.300
I think of Tim Ferriss just himself talking about saying no and his evolution.
01:06:33.320
He's probably done his own podcast talking about that.
01:06:35.820
And I always think of a, I do a lot of reading on Charlie Munger and Warren Buffett, but if
01:06:39.860
you look at their schedules, they're like practically empty.
01:06:42.660
I think Munger refers to himself as like a book with legs that all he does is he just reads
01:06:52.880
You would look at the schedule and you'd say, oh, it's wide open.
01:06:55.220
It looks like, you know, if you're the secretary and say, yeah, it looks like his schedule's
01:06:59.280
It's more about saying no and what that schedule can be open to if you have all those
01:07:06.620
And I, I hope to one day get to that point where my calendar doesn't look like it does
01:07:10.660
And it's much more last minute things that are being scheduled where you can actually
01:07:15.920
say like, Hey, do I want to have this meeting tomorrow?
01:07:18.600
As opposed to, do I want to have this meeting in three months?
01:07:21.060
So I think maybe one more question, if you want to take it, I know this one is difficult
01:07:26.540
It's like asking you like, which of your children is your favorite.
01:07:29.740
But as far as the episodes go, do any of them stand out in your mind?
01:07:34.000
Maybe even just like the style or the way it's happened or separate question as far as
01:07:39.140
just doing a podcast, hosting a podcast and interviewing people and having conversations.
01:07:43.460
Are there things like going into this that you thought, I mean, part of it was like you
01:07:48.580
And now I think that you might have a different opinion about that.
01:07:51.040
So how about that strong opinion, maybe a little more loosely held today as far as doing
01:07:58.840
I mean, I think the first time the idea of a podcast was floated to me was about 2014.
01:08:04.760
And I mean, it was the worst idea I ever heard.
01:08:09.760
And it was mostly due to a fear of the amount of work that would go into it.
01:08:15.240
Because at the time I knew a few people who were doing podcasts and it was sort of the
01:08:24.140
I just don't have the time to do something where it's the only thing I'm doing.
01:08:31.000
And I sort of kind of kept that point of view, frankly, until about two years ago when we,
01:08:38.500
or maybe a little less than two years ago, actually, when we decided to give it a try.
01:08:41.140
So yeah, that was a very strongly held or strong conviction, fortunately loosely enough held
01:08:47.780
that I was able to sort of get out of my own way on that.
01:08:51.060
And yeah, I really can say that I have enjoyed it a lot.
01:08:58.060
It is a little more work than I thought, but also we have such a big team that works on
01:09:04.800
it that I have it easier than probably a lot of people who do a podcast in that I have a
01:09:12.540
We have two people that work exclusively on the podcast and Travis and Nick.
01:09:17.620
So all the heavy lifting of making show notes and things like that, none of that falls on
01:09:22.720
So all I really have to think about is having discussions with people and, and trying to
01:09:28.020
think of topics that I want to meet people who can speak to those topics.
01:09:33.640
And it's hard to believe we're at a hundred because you sort of realize there's not that
01:09:37.760
many podcasts that sort of get into the territory of multiple hundreds of episodes.
01:09:42.700
And I mean, barring some unforeseen thing, we're going to one day be that podcast that's
01:09:49.160
Now to your first question, honestly, I just, I've thought about this a lot and I do, I
01:09:53.980
get asked this question a lot, Bob, which is what is my favorite episode?
01:09:57.960
And I just, it's so hard because they are so different.
01:10:02.520
There are some that are, I've really enjoyed from a technical standpoint.
01:10:06.360
I think the Rick Johnson podcast and the Keith Flaherty podcast really stand out to me as
01:10:15.220
podcasts that I have gone back and listened to several times because of the technical content
01:10:22.380
So there are probably half a dozen that are like that for me, where they're just, just
01:10:27.700
so much interesting information that I can't wait to go back and listen to them again, which
01:10:33.740
I think on the other side of the coin, there are experiences for me, like interviewing Damon
01:10:41.540
And just to have him be so open and so just available to talk through his own difficulties
01:10:50.160
and obviously everything that went into his career and beforehand, that was a really special
01:10:55.280
episode for me as just a fan of his and such a fan of F1 and obviously a fan of Senna, who
01:11:02.300
I thought the Rick Elias podcast really, even though I knew Rick really well and there was
01:11:07.640
nothing we talked about that I didn't know, but I just, as it was unfolding and we were
01:11:11.800
having the discussion, I remember thinking, you know what, I think a lot of people are
01:11:19.060
And then we've already touched on some, but you look at the Catherine Eban podcast, which
01:11:23.560
is just an unbelievable opportunity to, I think, help people with information, which
01:11:30.100
is also kind of part of the itch that we're trying to scratch here.
01:11:33.200
So the irony of it is if I sat here long enough, Bob, I could tell you something special about
01:11:37.800
all 99 that came before this with the exception of the AMAs.
01:11:41.180
I could probably rattle off something special about 80 of these podcasts through the lens
01:11:51.560
I mean, it's probably a record as far as how long I've waited.
01:11:55.340
I think he's often asked the question, what's his favorite Superbowl ring?
01:12:01.400
So I think maybe you think about that with the episodes.
01:12:08.200
I like reflecting on these episodes, but the research that goes into these guests.
01:12:12.260
And I think we just have a lot of similarities as far as our interests.
01:12:15.600
So for me, for me, for you to be creating the podcast that you would want to listen to,
01:12:21.580
having ZDogg, who's your buddy, Stanford, from ZDogg to Marty.
01:12:30.400
To Marc Messier to say like, why hasn't somebody sat down for a multiple hour podcast with
01:12:37.700
One of the greatest teams, if not, I'm sure you would say maybe the greatest team ever
01:12:48.160
It's, I could talk about each one of them and how great they are, but I'm hopefully looking
01:12:55.780
I think we're, I just, I know we're getting better at this.
01:12:58.800
And I remember having, I think I may have even mentioned this once before on a podcast,
01:13:03.780
whether it was ours or someone else's, that I had this little tiny fear when we started
01:13:07.980
that we were going to run out of things to talk about and run out of people to interview.
01:13:11.180
And I was sort of reluctant to start this thing and then realize, well, after 50 episodes,
01:13:18.060
And I think you can attest to the fact that our list of people we want to have on is growing
01:13:27.420
Like we can't interview people quick enough at the rate that we want to learn stuff.
01:13:33.340
So I have a feeling we're going to be able to do this for a very long time.
01:13:41.220
I do try to listen to some of the podcasts to learn from them.
01:13:44.860
And I've, I've certainly picked up a number of things I could be doing better.
01:13:48.440
And as I think I talked about on Tim's podcast, I enjoy listening to other really good podcasts
01:13:53.840
for, for some insight into how to do this thing better.
01:13:57.140
But anyway, I'm excited about it and it's hard to imagine what the next hundred have to
01:14:05.000
I think maybe we cheers, have some champagne or you can wrestle a centenarian to commemorate
01:14:10.460
I'm sure that's what you probably have that on your schedule anyway.
01:14:14.100
I've got a little bit of centenarian boxing this afternoon.
01:14:21.740
I don't know if it was your idea or Nick's idea, but maybe both of you guys deserve credit
01:14:25.480
But I think this was a fun way to commemorate a hundred kind of looking back and looking
01:14:32.200
Thank you for listening to this week's episode of The Drive.
01:14:34.800
If you're interested in diving deeper into any topics we discuss, we've created a membership
01:14:39.060
program that allows us to bring you more in-depth exclusive content without relying on paid ads.
01:14:44.580
It's our goal to ensure members get back much more than the price of the subscription.
01:14:48.840
Now to that end, membership benefits include a bunch of things.
01:14:52.120
One, totally kick-ass comprehensive podcast show notes that detail every topic, paper, person,
01:14:59.860
The word on the street is nobody's show notes rival these.
01:15:03.500
Monthly AMA episodes or ask me anything episodes, hearing these episodes completely.
01:15:07.960
Access to our private podcast feed that allows you to hear everything without having to listen
01:15:15.340
The Qualies, which are a super short podcast, typically less than five minutes that we release
01:15:20.160
every Tuesday through Friday, highlighting the best questions, topics, and tactics discussed
01:15:26.420
This is a great way to catch up on previous episodes without having to go back and necessarily
01:15:32.680
Steep discounts on products that I believe in, but for which I'm not getting paid to endorse.
01:15:37.420
And a whole bunch of other benefits that we continue to trickle in as time goes on.
01:15:42.100
If you want to learn more and access these member-only benefits, you can head over to
01:15:49.340
You can find me on Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook, all with the ID Peter Atia MD.
01:15:55.180
You can also leave us a review on Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast player you listen on.
01:16:00.260
This podcast is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute the practice
01:16:05.020
of medicine, nursing, or other professional healthcare services, including the giving of
01:16:13.840
The use of this information and the materials linked to this podcast is at the user's own
01:16:19.140
The content on this podcast is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice,
01:16:26.220
Users should not disregard or delay in obtaining medical advice from any medical condition they
01:16:33.000
have, and they should seek the assistance of their healthcare professionals for any such
01:16:39.000
Finally, I take conflicts of interest very seriously.
01:16:41.780
For all of my disclosures and the companies I invest in or advise, please visit peteratiamd.com
01:16:48.740
forward slash about where I keep an up-to-date and active list of such companies.