#124 - AMA #15: Real-world case studies—metabolic dysregulation, low testosterone, menopause, and more
Episode Stats
Words per minute
182.02287
Harmful content
Hate speech
1
sentences flagged
Summary
In this episode of the Ask Me Anything (AMA) podcast, Dr. Peter Atiyah and his co-host Dr. Kelly discuss the role of lab tests in assessing blood glucose, insulin resistance, testosterone replacement therapy, and other metabolic biomarkers.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Hey everyone, welcome to a sneak peek, ask me anything or AMA episode of the drive podcast.
00:00:16.500
I'm your host, Peter Atiyah. At the end of this short episode, I'll explain how you can
00:00:20.460
access the AMA episodes in full, along with a ton of other membership benefits we've created,
00:00:25.440
or you can learn more now by going to peteratiyahmd.com forward slash subscribe.
00:00:31.140
So without further delay, here's today's sneak peek of the ask me anything episode.
00:00:39.340
Everyone, welcome to ask me anything or AMA episode number 15. Now in May, we released the
00:00:46.620
first part of our AMA focusing on my framework for analyzing labs. But in that episode, it took me a
00:00:52.840
little longer to get to some of the actual labs and we weren't able to cover as much as I wanted.
00:00:56.880
So this is a follow-up to that greatly appreciated episode. People had a lot of really kind things
00:01:02.020
to say about it. They really wanted more. And so it was a pretty easy decision to follow up and go
00:01:07.600
a lot deeper because in that episode, we really only got to cardiovascular labs. In this episode,
00:01:12.100
we kick it off with some of the stuff around insulin sensitivity, getting into some oral
00:01:17.120
glucose tolerance tests. We get into testosterone replacement. We talk about menopause and female
00:01:24.680
sex hormones, thyroid hormone, other metabolic stuff that can be gleaned from labs. Overall,
00:01:31.340
I found this to be a really fun episode and I'm really glad we did it. And also there were a couple
00:01:35.560
other pretty cool nuggets that Kaplan threw in here based on some questions from the previous one.
00:01:40.500
So before we start, of course, I need to remind everyone through the obligatory legal disclaimer
00:01:45.900
that this podcast is for general informational purposes only. It does not constitute the
00:01:50.800
practice of medicine, including the giving of medical advice. The use of this information and
00:01:55.900
the materials linked to the podcast is at the user's own risk. The content of this podcast is
00:02:01.300
not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Users should
00:02:07.320
not disregard or delay in obtaining medical advice for any medical condition they have. And with all
00:02:13.420
of that said, and without further delay, I hope you enjoy AMA number 15.
00:02:22.520
Welcome back to another AMA. We may consider this one a part two. I think it was back in May,
00:02:29.320
we had, let's call it part one, where a lot of questions came in about what lab tests should I be
00:02:34.960
getting? And I think that turned into, well, it depends. And actually it's more of how does Peter think
00:02:41.000
about labs. And we got into some really interesting case studies or patient cases on cardiovascular.
00:02:47.760
And I think that we wanted to get into more cases and didn't have enough time. So we're going to come
00:02:53.200
back and discuss a few more patient cases. But first we had some feedback from the first part one AMA,
00:03:00.460
where we got a couple of really interesting questions that I think we should address up top.
00:03:04.240
And so the first question that I have for you, Peter, is this one. When a patient is going in
00:03:09.620
for their labs, how long before the lab should they cease taking any supplements if they're taking
00:03:14.180
any? And should they stop taking supplements for labs at all? So, I mean, I think it really depends
00:03:20.160
on what the supplement is and what's the purpose of the test. But almost without exception in our
00:03:25.100
practice, it's the opposite. We'll check in with patients a month before a scheduled test to be sure
00:03:30.240
that they are on their supplements. And if they are not, we'll postpone the lab test until they
00:03:35.480
resume them. For most supplements, there's some biomarker that we would track. For example, if
00:03:41.680
we care about a person's homocysteine level as the metric we're tracking, then that's why we might be
00:03:48.720
giving them methylated B vitamins. So if we find out, hey, I ran out a month ago and I forgot to refill
00:03:53.420
it, it wouldn't make a lot of sense to repeat the information we already know, which is, hey,
00:03:58.600
when you're not taking a methylated B vitamin, lo and behold, your homocysteine is high. I'm trying
00:04:03.320
to think of an example of when I want someone to stop a supplement or a medication outside of when
00:04:09.200
I want to actually know how they look without it. But I think the more important point here
00:04:15.140
is you need to know how long it takes to see the effect of the intervention. And so, for example,
00:04:22.960
one of the longer tail things is looking at, for example, the omega quant test that we use to measure
00:04:30.880
EPA and DHA index. So this is a test that looks at the red blood cell membranes and measures the
00:04:40.100
amount of EPA and DHA, which are omega-3 fatty acids. We spoke about this on a podcast with Bill
00:04:45.840
Harris some time ago. That's a test that you use to assess either how much fish a person is getting
00:04:51.640
through their diet, like how much fish oil is coming in naturally, or in the case of most people
00:04:56.240
through supplementation. But you have to know that it could take up to three months to fully
00:05:01.680
assimilate the change you make to see that. So if you gave somebody that supplement and then tested
00:05:07.400
them a month later, you could be misled into thinking you're not giving them enough. Whereas
00:05:13.120
other things work very quickly. For example, a drug like Repatha, probably within two doses,
00:05:18.480
which is given over the course of two weeks would be sufficient to know if the drug is working or
00:05:24.340
not. So whether we're talking about drugs or supplements, the real question is knowing what
00:05:29.680
the period of time is it takes to see an effect and making sure that you're being thoughtful about
00:05:35.060
that. And again, I think the bigger issue is making sure that the patient didn't run out or didn't
00:05:40.200
forget to take it so that you're not scratching your head. And this happens to us still, despite all our
00:05:45.680
checks and balances, this still happens to us where we get labs back and we think, oh, this can't make
00:05:49.980
any sense. And then we talk to the patient and like, oh yeah, I ran out of that thing. Sorry, I forgot
00:05:54.760
to tell you guys. So that's our take on that. Okay. The next question is, you mentioned asking your
00:06:01.140
patients about their family history and how important that is. I know we got into that about
00:06:05.360
how important it is, how much you can learn from getting a family history. And this person asked,
00:06:10.420
what questions or information do you ask new patients on family history?
00:06:14.900
Oh, I'm glad somebody asked that question because it's something I feel so strongly about.
00:06:18.920
A lot of times patients will come in and they'll say, I have my 23andMe data. Is that all you need?
00:06:23.820
And I was like, actually, that pretty much tells me nothing. We'll take it. Thank you very much. And
00:06:28.680
we will scour the hell out of it. And we'll find out if you have a TOM40 SNP and that'll increase
00:06:34.580
your risk of Alzheimer's disease. And maybe you got a certain FOXO3 SNP and there's some
00:06:39.600
interesting stuff here and there. Obviously the genes that we think really matter, we're measuring
00:06:43.900
on our own, such as the MTHFR genes and of course the APOE. But what I say to them is, look,
00:06:50.540
this stuff doesn't mean jack compared to your family history. Once in a while, you'll see a patient
00:06:55.280
who's been adopted or has been estranged from some part of their family for which that's simply
00:07:00.420
impossible to know. And that is what it is. But for somebody who's not in that situation,
00:07:05.060
we actually give our patients a template to be filled out in advance of our first meeting.
00:07:10.440
And the template goes through the following. So for mother, father, both sets of grandparents,
00:07:16.900
and all aunts and uncles and siblings, we actually want to know everything that is knowable. So our
00:07:23.820
template is really painful for the patients. I will acknowledge that upfront. So starting with
00:07:28.360
cardiovascular disease, does anybody have a history of cardiovascular disease? Did they take
00:07:32.660
any medication for blood pressure, cholesterol? Did they ever have a stroke, chest pain, heart attack,
00:07:37.160
all of these kinds of things. We go through the same type of questions around dementia and then
00:07:43.100
cancer and then metabolic disease. Did they have diabetes? And then when we're talking about this,
00:07:48.760
because the reality of it is virtually nobody can show up with that level of granularity. So then
00:07:53.100
these become the questions we prod. And I think it's important to give patients that information
00:07:59.400
long before you see them. Nobody can show up to a first meeting with their doc and know that.
00:08:06.460
You'd have to be a freak of nature to have that information at hand. And it usually requires lots of
00:08:12.160
phone calls. And sometimes you're asking about relatives that have been long dead and or for whom
00:08:17.620
you've never met. So the more you know these things, the better. And it's also important to understand
00:08:22.720
context. You'll get some family histories that are full of cancer, but then you ask that second
00:08:29.020
order question and find out, oh, well, that person also smoked three packs a day. If you didn't know
00:08:34.260
that detail, you might be inclined to think, well, this person's family history of cancer is crazy.
00:08:39.740
But in reality, every one of the people who died of cancer was also a three pack a day smoker. So you
00:08:44.920
have to take that with a grain of salt. Similarly, the person who has a family member that died of
00:08:49.820
a heart attack at 50, well, it's really important to know a lot about that person. Is this a case of
00:08:54.740
LP little a, which can easily present in myocardial death at 50? Or was this somebody who was an
00:09:02.360
alcoholic and or a very heavy smoker and or had some other risk factor? So I don't have a simple
00:09:08.260
formula or template from this other than the more time you spend on it, the richer it is. And the more
00:09:14.400
you can potentially glean about what's really at the root of the genetic template that your
00:09:20.140
patients inherited. It may sound silly, but it's almost like doing a book report when you're young
00:09:25.240
and you're doing it on your dad or somebody like that, and then just extending it out. And then
00:09:29.020
you may learn some things that are really surprising. Like you're talking about your dad's
00:09:34.360
brother died of a heart attack at age 50, and then you found out they have more siblings and they had
00:09:39.140
cardiovascular disease. And it seems a little bit younger and realize like, if you haven't looked at it
00:09:43.720
before, that you can start to connect some dots there, just looking at family history rather than
00:09:48.160
looking at labs. I think it's a really important thing. I didn't even do my own until somewhat
00:09:54.440
recently in the level of detail that I would expect of a patient. And that was kind of humbling first to
00:09:59.600
realize, A, I hadn't done it, but two, to actually learn the information about the true mortality of all
00:10:06.480
the aunts and uncles. And even now, by the way, I can't really provide a single shred of insight
00:10:13.200
about how my paternal grandparents died because they died before my dad was even married. My dad
00:10:21.140
is potentially the world's single worst historian. So asking him anything about how his mom and dad
00:10:27.740
died, I might as well use a Ouija board. He just keeps rambling off things that make absolutely no sense.
00:10:33.840
So I can absolutely relate to my patients who come in and complain of the same thing,
00:10:39.340
which is I asked my dad how his parents died or asked my mom how her parents died. And
00:10:43.240
they just said they make up something that sounds completely nonsensical. So I truly have no clue
00:10:48.720
how his parents died. And frankly, I probably have no clue about a bunch of things in my family history.
00:10:54.120
So it's tough, but you do the best you can. And that information usually pays off quite a bit.
00:10:59.680
And you're looking for patterns. This is where a lot of the times you'll see that signature of
00:11:06.060
cancer. You'll see that signature of dementia, cardiovascular disease. And it also really helps
00:11:12.760
with understanding what to make of the findings you have in front of you. One in 10 people roughly
00:11:19.280
show up with an elevated LP little a, but the number by itself doesn't tell you how bad of a problem
00:11:24.900
it is. I mean, we know LP little a is bad, but is this a big problem or just a medium problem?
00:11:30.680
But the family history can often elucidate that. And the people who have a lot of sub 60 year old
0.99
00:11:37.660
cardiovascular events and elevated LP little a, boy, like you need to be acting on that in the most
00:11:44.040
aggressive manner. And then in the families where the LP little a is very elevated, but nobody's having
00:11:48.960
any events into their eighties. Maybe you don't need to be as aggressive.
00:11:53.780
I think that's a nice segue. When you talk about your dad, not being the best historian that
00:11:57.780
you may have talked about this in the previous podcast about a lot of this stuff when you're
00:12:01.980
talking about labs, but really you're trying to put a puzzle together where you have some pieces and
00:12:06.840
it's, it's like an investigation or you're a detective trying to figure out what are the things that we
00:12:11.880
should be looking for? And I think these patient cases are great examples of, you get this question
00:12:17.040
so often, Peter, what are like the top five lab tests that I should be looking at? And maybe you
00:12:21.200
have your five, put a gun to your head. You've got your five, but based off what those labs tell you,
00:12:25.700
you have 10 more questions that you want answered and they're not going to be answered within those
00:12:28.900
five labs that you just got. It might take you down a path. And so I think what we want to get to
00:12:35.440
here is we've got a couple, I think at least, yeah, we've got a few cases of OGTT or oral glucose
00:12:42.320
tolerance tests that I think that you do with most, if not every one of your patients.
00:12:45.940
And what information can that yield beyond a lot of people just use fasting blood glucose or even a,
00:12:51.680
even an oral glucose tolerance test with looking specifically at glucose and not looking at other
00:12:55.460
things like insulin. So are there any cases in particular that you would want to get into that
00:13:00.400
can help elucidate some of this stuff with OGTT? Yeah, Bob, as you said, the OGTT is a really
00:13:07.220
cumbersome test and there's a reason that it's not a test that is done commonly, certainly not with
00:13:13.460
frequent sampling and looking at glucose and insulin. In fact, when we began working with
00:13:19.140
our current lab, which is called Boston Heart Labs, they didn't even have a protocol for it and they
00:13:26.320
refused to do it initially. And it took us six months of arm twisting to even get them to agree to do the
00:13:34.260
test such that we could do it all under one rec form and have the information reported. That's
00:13:41.220
how cumbersome it was. So obviously I believe in this test or I wouldn't jump through the hoops to
00:13:47.800
do it. So what is the test? Thank you for listening to today's sneak peek AMA episode of The Drive.
00:13:54.000
If you're interested in hearing the complete version of this AMA, you'll want to become a member.
00:13:58.420
We created the membership program to bring you more in-depth exclusive content without relying
00:14:03.980
on paid ads. Membership benefits are many and beyond the complete episodes of the AMA each month,
00:14:10.400
they include the following. Ridiculously comprehensive podcast show notes that detail
00:14:15.120
every topic, paper, person, and thing we discuss on each episode of The Drive. Access to our private
00:14:21.560
podcast feed. The Qualies, which were a super short podcast, typically less than five minutes,
00:14:26.920
released every Tuesday through Friday, which highlight the best questions, topics, and tactics
00:14:31.740
discussed on previous episodes of The Drive. This is particularly important for those of you who
00:14:37.240
haven't heard all of the back episodes. It becomes a great way to go back and filter and decide which
00:14:42.440
ones you want to listen to in detail. Really steep discount codes for products I use and believe in,
00:14:47.720
but for which I don't get paid to endorse. And benefits that we continue to add over time.
00:14:52.880
If you want to learn more and access these member-only benefits, head over to
00:14:56.740
peteratiamd.com forward slash subscribe. Lastly, if you're already a member, but you're hearing this,
00:15:03.700
it means you haven't downloaded our member-only podcast feed where you can get the full access
00:15:07.900
to the AMA and you don't have to listen to this. You can download that at peteratiamd.com
00:15:14.040
forward slash members. You can find me on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, all with the ID,
00:15:20.740
peteratiamd. You can also leave us a review on Apple podcasts or whatever podcast player you listen
00:15:26.940
on. This podcast is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute the
00:15:31.820
practice of medicine, nursing, or other professional healthcare services, including the giving of medical
00:15:37.540
advice. No doctor-patient relationship is formed. The use of this information and the materials
00:15:43.180
linked to this podcast is at the user's own risk. The content on this podcast is not intended to be
00:15:49.320
a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Users should not disregard
00:15:55.480
or delay in obtaining medical advice from any medical condition they have, and they should seek the
00:16:01.640
assistance of their healthcare professionals for any such conditions. Finally, I take conflicts of
00:16:07.360
interest very seriously. For all of my disclosures and the companies I invest in or advise,
00:16:12.640
please visit peteratiamd.com forward slash about where I keep an up-to-date and active list of such