The Peter Attia Drive - November 08, 2021


#183 - James Clear: Building & changing habits


Episode Stats

Length

2 hours and 19 minutes

Words per Minute

209.18274

Word Count

29,087

Sentence Count

1,595

Misogynist Sentences

13

Hate Speech Sentences

4


Summary

James Clear is an author, entrepreneur, and photographer. He is the author of the New York Times Bestseller, Atomic Habits, an easy and proven way to build good habits and break bad ones. In this episode, we talk about his background, why this is an interesting topic to him, but mostly we just dive really deep into the 4 components of what goes into forming behavioral habits, and how can you unlearn or learn de novo new habits?


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hey, everyone. Welcome to The Drive Podcast. I'm your host, Peter Atiyah. This podcast,
00:00:15.480 my website, and my weekly newsletter all focus on the goal of translating the science of longevity
00:00:19.800 into something accessible for everyone. Our goal is to provide the best content in health
00:00:24.600 and wellness, full stop, and we've assembled a great team of analysts to make this happen.
00:00:28.880 If you enjoy this podcast, we've created a membership program that brings you far more
00:00:33.280 in-depth content. If you want to take your knowledge of this space to the next level,
00:00:36.840 at the end of this episode, I'll explain what those benefits are. Or if you want to learn more now,
00:00:41.720 head over to peteratiyahmd.com forward slash subscribe. Now, without further delay, here's
00:00:48.080 today's episode. My guest this week is James Clear. James is an author, entrepreneur, and photographer.
00:00:55.280 He is the author of the New York Times bestseller, Atomic Habits, an easy and proven way to build
00:01:01.660 good habits and break bad ones. I wanted to interview James after reading his book for the
00:01:06.240 second time, at which point I picked up even more from it the first time. And I realized
00:01:10.260 this is such an important part of what we try to do in our practice. And of course, what most of us
00:01:16.520 try to do in our lives, which is change behaviors and behaviors can really be distilled into habits.
00:01:21.780 In this episode, we talk about his background, why this is an interesting topic to him, but mostly
00:01:26.520 we just dive really deep into the four components of what goes into forming behavioral habits.
00:01:33.200 And then of course, breaking those apart, how can you unlearn or learn de novo new habits?
00:01:40.000 So I think you'll enjoy this episode if you've ever wanted to change a behavior or create a behavior.
00:01:43.820 So without further delay, please enjoy my conversation with James Clear.
00:01:47.720 Hey James, thanks so much for making time to sit down today. It's been a while I've wanted to sit
00:01:57.780 down and chat with you. Yeah, of course. Thank you so much for thinking of me. I'm excited to talk
00:02:01.560 more. I'm trying to think when I first read your book, because I read it twice and like all good
00:02:06.440 books, you get more out of it. I think the second time in part, because I think the deeper you get
00:02:12.140 down the rabbit hole of trying to create habits, whether it's in yourself or helping others form
00:02:17.780 habits, the more you realize how challenging it can be. But maybe for folks who haven't read it,
00:02:23.700 because I suspect there's going to be a bunch of people listening to this who have read it,
00:02:26.660 and I want to be able to go deeper for them and think there's going to be some people who haven't
00:02:29.800 read it. Give us a bit of the history as to why this even appealed to you.
00:02:33.780 Well, first, thank you for saying that. I feel like that's the ultimate measure of whether a book is
00:02:37.280 good or not. Is it worth rereading? That's a high bar. There are many books I've reread. But yeah,
00:02:42.440 I really appreciate you taking the time to do it twice. So what excited me about habits? I think
00:02:47.580 there are a few things. The first is you're building habits all the time, whether you're thinking about
00:02:52.640 them or not. So depending on which study you look at, somewhere between 40 and 50% of our behaviors
00:02:59.520 seem to be automatic and habitual. But most of the time, those studies are looking at things that are
00:03:06.280 like more or less automatic, brushing your teeth, tying your shoes, unplugging the toaster after each
00:03:11.320 use. But I think the true influence of your habits is even greater than that, because a lot of the
00:03:17.120 time, the behaviors that you're taking are shaped or influenced by the habits that preceded them. So
00:03:23.500 you can imagine standing in line at the grocery store or having three or four minutes free in your
00:03:29.300 kitchen, and you habitually pull your phone out of your pocket. The next five or 10 minutes might be
00:03:35.760 spent thinking carefully about what email you're responding to or the video game you're playing
00:03:40.800 or scrolling social media. But that conscious, maybe non habitual behavior was shaped or set by
00:03:49.560 the habit of pulling your phone out. So the reach of our habits is very wide, and it's influencing our
00:03:55.300 behavior all the time. So that's one reason why it's important. And I think that if you're going to be
00:04:00.460 building habits anyway, you might as well understand what they are and how they work and
00:04:06.400 how to shape them, so that you can be the architect of your habits and not the victim of them. A lot of
00:04:13.040 people feel like their habits are happening to them, like they don't get a whole lot of influence on it.
00:04:17.460 And partially, I think it's just because, you know, it's this process your brain is going through all
00:04:20.960 the time to try to automate and make behaviors more efficient. But if you don't really know what's
00:04:26.200 happening or where to adjust it, then it kind of feels like it's happening to you rather than
00:04:29.900 happening for you. And then I would say the second thing that kind of really got me diving in deeper
00:04:35.660 and thinking about it more carefully is just the realization that most of us in life want some kind
00:04:41.460 of results. We want to get better at a skill or we want to lose weight or to make more money or reduce
00:04:48.220 stress and gain peace of mind. And whatever the results are that you're looking for, most of the time,
00:04:54.940 your results are a lagging measure of the habits that preceded them. So your bank account is a
00:05:01.200 lagging measure of your financial habits. Your weight is a lagging measure of your nutrition and
00:05:06.680 training habits. Your knowledge is a lagging measure of your reading and learning habits.
00:05:12.800 Even like the clutter on your desk at work or in your garage is a lagging measure of your cleaning
00:05:17.920 habits. And so habits are not the only thing that influence outcomes in life. You have luck and
00:05:24.200 randomness. You've got misfortune. But by definition, randomness is not under your control.
00:05:30.780 And I think the only reasonable approach is to focus on what's in your control. And over long time
00:05:37.300 horizons, your results tend to bend in the direction of your habits. So I think because your brain is
00:05:44.400 building habits all the time anyway, and because your results are heavily influenced by the habits that
00:05:50.620 you repeat, those are two primary reasons that I feel like got me interested in the topic, but also
00:05:56.540 just good reasons for anybody to be fascinated with habits. I'm guessing there's a lot of probably
00:06:01.720 evolutionary rationale for why we're creatures of habit. Presumably the less energy we had to devote to
00:06:10.580 things that would help us survive and procreate, the better. And obviously that's why we have an
00:06:16.600 autonomic nervous system that allows us to function, you know, things like breathing and having your
00:06:21.540 heart go from beating fast or beating slow to be completely out of your voluntary control. I'm curious
00:06:27.860 as to whether or not we have a sense of ancestrally, what types of habits were people ever trying to
00:06:36.840 deliberately change? Maybe it's not an answerable question, but I don't know if you ever contemplated
00:06:40.940 that. When did this idea of being proactive in either breaking a habit or creating a new habit,
00:06:49.460 do you get the sense that that is a recent luxury of our species? So I don't know the answer to the
00:06:53.980 question, but I do have some thoughts on it. And I feel like it probably does skew somewhat recent
00:06:59.220 for one particular reason, which is generally speaking, our ancestors lived in what was primarily
00:07:07.180 an immediate return environment. The majority of the decisions that you would make that meaningfully
00:07:12.980 impacted your survival were ones that were relatively immediate in nature. So taking shelter
00:07:18.520 from a storm or avoiding a lion on the Savannah or foraging for the next meal in a berry bush. These
00:07:24.040 are things that like had a pretty quick payoff in your life. If you fast forward to modern society
00:07:29.980 though, and we could define that however you want, but probably say the last 500 years or something
00:07:34.300 like that, certainly the last hundred years, modern society seems to have created quite a few
00:07:40.360 structures that favor not an immediate return environment, but a delayed return environment. So
00:07:45.800 you go to work today so that you can get a paycheck in two weeks, or you study at school today so that you
00:07:53.540 can graduate in four years, save for retirement today so that you can not have to work a couple decades
00:08:00.260 from now. And there are a lot of structures that are like that in modern society that, that tend to
00:08:05.360 reward delayed gratification. So I think in a sense, we're kind of walking through this modern society
00:08:11.660 that rewards ourselves for patience. And we still have this like paleolithic hardware where we
00:08:17.840 prioritize instant gratification and immediate returns in a lot of ways, in some kind of evolutionary
00:08:22.460 sense. And you can see how there's a little bit of a mismatch there. I wonder if it's that
00:08:28.160 modern mismatch that has led to the desire to change our behavior and to adjust habits. And perhaps it
00:08:36.440 wasn't something that we thought about as carefully or cared about as much a thousand years ago or
00:08:40.640 5,000 years ago or longer. It is interesting though, to say that some aspects of modern society are
00:08:46.940 mismatched with that ancestral wiring, but some of them are not. Why do we care about delaying
00:08:53.920 gratification to get a PhD or delaying gratification to save more money? Primarily because it affords
00:09:00.280 some form of status, which is very hierarchical and very, we think, evolutionarily wired in. So
00:09:06.780 there's still connections there. It's just that not all of it is aligned. Yeah. It seems that the
00:09:12.200 vehicles that we would have used to attain status earlier were much quote unquote simpler. And today
00:09:18.600 we're looking at other ways to do it. Hearing you talk about habits that way makes me compare two
00:09:24.040 activities I like very much and contrast the challenges of learning each of them. So one is
00:09:30.280 riding a bike and the other is learning to swim. So if you took a 20 year old who had never done both,
00:09:35.840 and admittedly, it's easy to find a 20 year old that's never swum. It's probably hard to find a
00:09:39.480 20 year old that's never ridden a bike, but I would posit that it's really easy to teach a 20 year old
00:09:44.020 to ride a bike if they haven't done it. And let's assume for a moment, this isn't someone who
00:09:48.640 had never been able to do it before, but found somebody who'd never ridden a bike at 20.
00:09:53.220 And the reason I would argue that is in a bike, the object is balance. It's really about balance
00:09:59.200 and you get your feedback immediately. So, you know, the second you're out of balance on a bike
00:10:05.040 because you're in the environment of the air and the air has a density such that it's not forgiving.
00:10:11.400 You basically are out of balance. You're going to fall. Conversely, although most people don't
00:10:15.600 think of it this way, swimming is also about balance in the water. You're trying to balance
00:10:19.640 yourself this way versus this way. Most people would naturally sink feet first and you're trying
00:10:25.000 to balance yourself this way so that you can breathe. And those things are not easy to do
00:10:30.060 because the feedback loop is very long and it's very hard to make the connection that you're out of
00:10:35.080 balance. It also doesn't hurt as much when you fail. So when you fall off your bike,
00:10:39.020 it's very uncomfortable, but when you're out of balance and swimming, you just have to work harder,
00:10:43.240 but you don't realize why you're working harder. Anyway, that's why I think it's very hard to learn
00:10:47.840 how to swim and it's not very hard to learn how to ride a bike. And therefore it requires much more
00:10:52.900 deliberate practice to learn to swim than it does to ride a bike, at least at some basic level.
00:10:58.920 I'll kind of give a roundabout answer here, but I'll come back to your question. So
00:11:02.080 what is it that determines whether a habit is good or bad? You know, we use these phrases a lot of the
00:11:07.680 time and conversation. We say, Oh, it's a bad habits, good habit. And sometimes people will
00:11:11.900 ask me like, well, why do I repeat this habit? If it's bad for me, you know, if it's so terrible,
00:11:15.460 then how come I keep coming back to it? And I think we can divide in a sense, if you want to get
00:11:21.820 really pedantic about it or really academic about it, some researchers don't even like to use the
00:11:25.660 word good or bad because they're habits and they all serve you in some way. So we could just say
00:11:29.760 basically adaptive or maladaptive. Right? Yeah. I think we could make a meaningful division
00:11:35.420 in the sense of how we use it in most conversation and say that pretty much all behaviors produce
00:11:41.840 multiple outcomes across time. Broadly speaking, we could lump it into an immediate bucket,
00:11:48.040 an immediate outcome and an ultimate outcome. And what you find is that for most bad habits,
00:11:54.680 the immediate outcome is actually pretty favorable. The classic example is smoking a cigarette. But if
00:11:59.320 you smoke a cigarette outside the office at 10 a.m. with a friend, well then immediately you get
00:12:03.700 some socialization. Maybe it curbs your nicotine craving or just lets you like de-stress for a
00:12:08.860 couple minutes or get a break from work. There are all kinds of things that you might be benefiting
00:12:12.440 from. It's only two or five or 10 years later that the ultimate outcome is negative. With the
00:12:19.080 good habits, especially the first time you perform them, it's often the reverse. The first week of
00:12:24.600 training in the gym, your body looks the same in the mirror. You're sore. You don't really have much
00:12:29.680 a show for the effort that you're putting in. You feel kind of stupid in there. You're wondering if
00:12:33.740 people judge you or if you're doing it the wrong way. There are a lot of upfront costs and it's only
00:12:38.960 two or five or 10 years later that you get the outcome that you're looking for. In a sense, the cost
00:12:44.800 of your good habits is in the present. The cost of your bad habits is in the future. And that
00:12:50.160 misalignment between when you feel rewarded and when you feel punished helps to explain why we tend to
00:12:57.320 fall pretty easily into a lot of things that we would categorize as bad, like eating donuts or
00:13:02.200 smoking a cigarette or whatever, and fall less easily into things that we would categorize as good
00:13:08.040 or feels like I have to force myself to write or whatever. Now, that's very similar to what you
00:13:13.180 just mentioned about the immediacy of the feedback. Bad habits are giving you pretty immediate feedback,
00:13:17.840 kind of like riding a bike. Good habits are giving you pretty delayed feedback, maybe a little bit
00:13:22.120 analogous to swimming. I think that example of the medium that you're in, air versus water,
00:13:27.260 is fascinating to think about water as being a feedback dampener. But there is another element
00:13:33.320 to it, which you also mentioned, which is the strength of the feedback. Falling on the ground
00:13:38.020 off a bike and skinning your knee is pretty painful. You learn quite quickly. Technically,
00:13:42.420 making a bad stroke in the water, you don't really pay too much of a cost if you're being sloppy
00:13:46.620 with your form. It's unlikely that you rectify that quickly. And this is a phenomenon that I think
00:13:53.120 is so critical or so important to behavior change. I called it the cardinal rule of behavior change
00:13:57.980 in atomic habits, which is behaviors that get immediately rewarded get repeated. Behaviors that
00:14:03.980 get immediately punished get avoided. And it's really about the speed and the intensity of that
00:14:09.020 feedback. And generally speaking, the quicker you can get feedback, too intense is maybe a bit much,
00:14:14.460 but you know, at some point it needs to be high enough to move the needle. Can't be so low that
00:14:18.320 doesn't register. So you need both meaningful feedback and quick feedback if you want behavior
00:14:23.660 to change. Actually, I want to come back to that topic because I think therein lies one of the themes
00:14:30.280 of your book, right? Which is that willpower is not a great long-term strategy. But before I get to
00:14:35.840 that, I want to kind of talk a little bit about you personally, at least before you came to these
00:14:40.240 realizations. I know you were an athlete. In your book, you write about this horrible accident you
00:14:45.160 had when you were playing baseball. I believe that was high school or was it in college?
00:14:49.220 Yep. Sophomore year of high school.
00:14:50.820 During that period of your life, were you someone that others and your peers would have looked at
00:14:55.280 you and said, oh God, that James, that guy is so disciplined. I mean, he just has what it takes to
00:15:01.520 always get the job done and he never indulges in the wrong things and always does the right things.
00:15:06.860 Were you one of those guys that was just a beacon of quote unquote discipline or were you a normal
00:15:10.820 guy or were you someone who had a hard time doing what was right? Well, I wasn't someone who had a
00:15:15.540 hard time, but it depends on the context. Keep it simple, like homework, sports, those things.
00:15:22.180 So with school, definitely. I always liked school. I was like the nerdy kid on the sports teams I was on.
00:15:29.200 But in the science lab or something, I was like the jock, which is kind of funny how you change
00:15:34.400 based on the room that you're in. And so I always felt like I kind of played that middle ground
00:15:38.600 between those two. I think it helped me learn how to get along with both groups and, you know,
00:15:42.660 was helpful socially and all that. But earlier in my life, I think I thrived more in school than I
00:15:49.040 did in sports. I barely got to play in high school. That's one of the punchlines of that early story
00:15:53.820 in the book is I've ended up playing a total of 11 innings in high school. Now I kind of blossomed
00:15:59.260 once I got to college and ended up being an academic All-American by the time I graduated,
00:16:03.700 but that came much later. So it really sort of depended on the context. But generally speaking,
00:16:09.420 I would say, yeah, people probably thought that I was disciplined, but I do think it depended on
00:16:14.260 where we were. If it was just looking at school, then I think people would say that if you're looking
00:16:18.960 somewhere else, then maybe not. Was there an area that you struggled with from a behavior standpoint?
00:16:24.060 To be honest, there were areas that I avoided because I thought I would struggle. So I think
00:16:30.020 it was more about me being fearful and avoiding anything I thought I would be bad at than it was
00:16:36.900 about watching him and being like, oh, look at him floundering around. I think I had to overcome
00:16:41.660 that wiring over the course of a decade or two. It took me a long time to start to take more risks
00:16:46.540 and take on things that I didn't think I would be good at rather than just trying to like stack the
00:16:51.620 deck and just do what I thought I would do well. I don't know how much you've paid attention to
00:16:55.860 the discussion debate around free will. I have always assumed we have free will. This is one
00:17:03.200 of those things that is kind of an anthema to me to imagine a world under which I'm not completely
00:17:08.960 under control of my own will and my behavior. But my good friend, Sam Harris, who I don't know if
00:17:15.500 you were familiar with Sam's work. Yeah, I did an episode on his podcast as well.
00:17:18.880 You're familiar with the fact that he's written extensively and spoken extensively about the idea
00:17:22.720 that we actually don't have free will, that this is an illusion. There are examples that I can conjure
00:17:27.720 up to make that case. For example, he uses a very clever thought experiment, which is if I tell you
00:17:34.100 to think of a movie, the first movie that pops into your head, you have no control over what that's
00:17:40.580 going to be. Conversely, there's a part of me that thinks, okay, but there were lots of things I
00:17:45.500 have free will over, my ability to go and do something, take an action, go and exercise or
00:17:50.220 something like that. But the deeper I get into this thinking, the more I start to realize, well,
00:17:54.860 wait a minute, that may still be innate. This ability that I have, using myself as an example,
00:18:00.980 to really have an easy time exercising, it requires virtually no effort to exercise. In fact, it usually
00:18:08.720 requires a lot of effort to sometimes not exercise, but requiring a lot of effort to mind what I eat.
00:18:15.600 And I know people for whom that's not the case, right? I know people for whom they just have an
00:18:18.860 easy time eating what's healthy, but maybe they don't like to exercise that much. Before I go any
00:18:24.040 deeper into my question, let me just pause and ask you for your reaction to that overall line of inquiry
00:18:29.660 and how do you think about free will as it pertains to what we're going to talk about today?
00:18:34.300 Well, first, I think I'm probably similar to you in the sense like exercise has always been
00:18:38.760 on the easier side for me. Nutrition has always been on the harder side, which is kind of interesting
00:18:42.500 there. I don't know exactly what that reveals, but it's just interesting to think about where you have
00:18:45.980 certain inclinations and maybe not others. With respect to free will, I understand the argument.
00:18:52.980 Once you start to walk through, it's like, okay, yeah, there's this very long chain of atoms that are
00:18:56.780 essentially colliding and leading us inevitably to the next action or the next thought or whatever. And if we
00:19:01.700 could map them all out, then perhaps we could just predict everything that's about to happen.
00:19:07.280 I get that as a thought experiment. I tend to, when I'm living my daily life, fall in the same space
00:19:13.560 that sounds like you fall in, which is, well, I'm going to continue to act as if I have free will.
00:19:18.680 And ultimately, the more that I think about it, I usually come down on that side where it's like,
00:19:22.640 listen, the truth is nobody knows the answer one way or another. We have good arguments perhaps for
00:19:27.460 each, but nobody knows for sure. If it is all predetermined, then it kind of doesn't really
00:19:33.180 matter. I'm going to do this anyway. And if it isn't predetermined, I might as well choose the
00:19:38.820 thing that I think best serves me. So whether I'm making that choice that best serves me or whether
00:19:45.240 it was predetermined that I'm going to make the good choice, it kind of doesn't really matter to
00:19:49.580 me. Like I might as well choose to act that way. So I don't know. I would be very curious to hear
00:19:54.240 what Sam's thought on that is, but I, from a practical standpoint, I don't see a reason to
00:20:00.040 not choose the best option that you can in the event that you do have free will. You'll be glad
00:20:05.560 that you chose it in the event that you don't have free will. You didn't get a say anyway. So who cares?
00:20:10.460 I guess I would add to that is it might be that free will or the absence of free will is what
00:20:16.280 determines a person's maybe call it genetic propensity to change habits or form habits. There may be some
00:20:23.460 people for whom that is easier than others, but that's probably a spectrum. And it doesn't imply
00:20:29.540 that a person who struggles with a given behavior can't learn to master it. Again, using an example,
00:20:36.480 I'll never be a Michael Phelps ever. There was no scenario under which I was going to be as good
00:20:42.080 a swimmer as Michael Phelps. So even if he hadn't started swimming till he was 15 and my parents threw
00:20:48.520 me in the water at two, I was never going to be that good, but it doesn't mean I couldn't learn
00:20:53.660 to swim. And similarly, had he never been thrown in the pool, we would never have heard his name.
00:20:59.560 So I guess that's how I kind of rationalize it, which is there are going to be people for whom it
00:21:04.540 is easier to go through the exercises that we're going to talk about. And there are people for whom
00:21:10.320 that's just going to be more difficult and you can't change that part of it. That's the part,
00:21:14.600 I guess, that is set. Yeah. A couple of thoughts to add onto that. I thought of this when you first
00:21:19.940 brought this up a few minutes ago. I don't know if you're familiar with David Epstein,
00:21:22.820 his work on sports gene and range and so on. David's great and a good friend of mine,
00:21:27.160 a really nice guy and just very thoughtful with the way he puts arguments together,
00:21:32.040 which I always appreciate. And I was having a conversation with him about some of this stuff.
00:21:36.120 And he said, one of the things that surprised him when he was researching the sports gene is that
00:21:41.160 characteristics that he thought would be mostly genetic strength and speed and things like that
00:21:47.020 turned out to be heavily influenced by training and choice and a lot of other stuff and qualities
00:21:52.260 that he thought would be a choice like grit and perseverance and desire to train turned out to
00:21:59.520 have a much higher genetic component than he realized. I always love the example. There's,
00:22:04.160 I think this is in sports gene. He talks about Steffi Graf just happened to be in a tennis study when she
00:22:09.360 was young. She was like 14 or something. And she was part of this cohort of young Germans that were
00:22:13.920 being studied. And she not only tested the highest for physical abilities like strength and speed and
00:22:20.280 quickness and so on, but also tested the highest for competitiveness and desire to train and all
00:22:25.320 these other things. I just love when combinations like that come together. Like think about how pointless
00:22:29.720 this is to compete against her. Not only is she better than you, she also wants it more.
00:22:34.160 So I do think that there's a heavy genetic component to some of the mental characteristics
00:22:39.500 that would make you more likely to train some of these aspects or more interested in some things
00:22:45.280 than others. To your point about Phelps, whether he had ever been dropped in the pool or not,
00:22:50.560 on the surface, it seems like something that would make you less motivated. You would say,
00:22:54.500 oh, well, why even try? I'm never going to be Michael Phelps. Or if genes play such a large role,
00:22:59.000 what's the point? But I actually think that's the wrong lesson to take away. The primary lesson,
00:23:04.700 I think, is that genes don't tell you not to work hard. They tell you where to work hard. Or they
00:23:10.660 don't tell you not to have a strategy. They just inform your strategy. This is another line that
00:23:15.940 David told me in a conversation once where he said, a lot of people talk about grit and perseverance
00:23:19.840 and discipline. But what if that is just your natural propensity based on the thing that you're
00:23:26.220 working on? What if I just happen to look kind of gritty in my terms of weight training or working
00:23:32.320 at writing a book compared to the average person? But I just look that way because I happen to like
00:23:37.680 those things. And he said, yeah, there's this whole line of thinking that like grit is fit.
00:23:42.780 And so actually the way to increase your perseverance and discipline is to find areas
00:23:48.000 or categories or skills where you're highly interested in them. It's very hard to beat the person who's
00:23:52.960 having fun because they're going to want to keep working longer than the person who's suffering.
00:23:58.100 So grit is fit. I think is one way in which you can maybe try to stack the deck or stack the odds
00:24:03.720 in your favor and get your genes aligned with the things that you're working on. And then there are
00:24:09.260 going to be things like Michael Phelps in a pool where you're like, listen, this body was just designed
00:24:14.980 to do this thing. It's very hard to find somebody who's more optimally designed to move through the
00:24:20.160 water than him. Not all of us are going to have the good fortune of discovering whatever that thing
00:24:26.500 is for us in our lives at age four or six or whatever. I don't think that that means you
00:24:32.000 should stop searching. This is one of the benefits of trial and error. The person who is curious and
00:24:36.660 willing to explore a lot of things is more likely to come across an area where they are fascinated or
00:24:42.580 they are interested. And it also is a really good fit for their natural abilities or propensities.
00:24:47.620 That's kind of the primary lesson that I take away from the genetic side of things is similar to what
00:24:53.000 you said. Anybody can improve. Doesn't mean anybody can be Michael Phelps, but you can always improve
00:24:57.200 your ability. And let's try to find that thing that I'm fascinated with, that I'm interested in.
00:25:02.620 So where it doesn't feel like I'm suffering in the same way that other people are when they're
00:25:07.180 trying this thing. You often be surprised how far you can go, how willing you are to build habits
00:25:12.360 and improve skills if you find some of those things that you're truly fascinated by.
00:25:15.700 Two comments I'd add to that. One completely trite, but amusing, which is not only does Phelps have
00:25:22.040 the perfect chassis and engine for what he does, but just as you described Steffi Graf, I've seen
00:25:28.480 Phelps race at meets that meant nothing. So total throwaway meets. He's not shaved. He's not tapered.
00:25:36.000 He couldn't care less to be there. He's swimming like a 200 IM. It doesn't look like he's going to win
00:25:41.680 at all. And yet somehow in the last 15 meters, he out touches everybody. I've seen this on enough
00:25:47.900 occasions that I just think like, this is a guy who hates losing. So even though he's not necessarily
00:25:52.740 in shape at this moment, even though this meet means nothing for him, he's training through it
00:25:57.280 and half the people he's competing against, this is their pinnacle. He hates losing so much. So it is,
00:26:03.420 it's really the perfect combination. I have that same takeaway watching the last dance. There was that
00:26:07.960 one summer where he was recording space jam and they set up like a tent for him outside the movie
00:26:12.560 studio and all the NBA players came in like each night to play pickup games, just got done filming
00:26:17.580 like 12 hours a day, but he just could not handle losing a pickup game. It would just bother him so
00:26:22.320 much to not get it right, to not win. I got to think that that is maybe not exclusively, but at least
00:26:29.120 largely just, he can't turn it off. He doesn't know any other way to be personality or genes or whatever
00:26:34.440 you want to call it. It's just, that's just how he's wired. And I actually love it. When I see
00:26:38.900 that characteristic in any domain, Maggie Rogers, who's a musician, she had this post she put on
00:26:44.800 Instagram. It was all of her notes on a particular song that they were working on. And like, you know,
00:26:49.500 Hey, I think we need to bring the symbol in second earlier here and a bunch of other stuff. And then
00:26:54.260 she shared a little clip of her listening to it with her producer and so on. And you could just tell
00:26:59.440 that she cared so much about the details. It would bother her if the song was not as good as it could
00:27:05.980 possibly be. And maybe that's the musician's version of hates to lose. I love it. When I see
00:27:11.780 that characteristic, it kind of lights me up and makes me want to be that way about whatever thing
00:27:16.060 I'm working on. If you can find that area where it would bother you for it to not be right. I got to
00:27:22.180 think you're going to get much better results there than most people, because most people get bored or move
00:27:26.440 on or get tired or frustrated. And the person who just will not stop unless it's right, is going to end up
00:27:32.900 with better results. It sounds simple to say the way to have great results is to not lower your standards.
00:27:38.980 But in a lot of ways, it turns out to be more true than you would expect.
00:27:44.400 I love watching this in the best of the best. Formula One is one of my favorite sports. And historically,
00:27:50.920 my hero is this guy named Mayartan Senna. And to hear him speak-
00:27:54.440 When I watched Senna, that documentary, I'd never heard of him. I know very little about Formula One.
00:27:58.340 It was awesome. After watching that, I was completely hooked. It was a fascinating sport.
00:28:03.300 And you gather from that documentary, I mean, he was a perfectionist, even amongst his peers. He took
00:28:08.680 it to a level that exceeded that. It actually cost him his life. I don't think the documentary fully
00:28:13.420 explains how much that need to win killed him, because the day he died, he was trying to do something
00:28:18.960 in a car that shouldn't have been done at a time when it shouldn't have been done.
00:28:22.580 But it's amazing when in a sport like that, where the stakes are so high for trying to do something
00:28:28.960 at the expense of maybe a mechanical limit or a limit of the car, but yet all drivers will tell
00:28:34.840 you they're going to go for it. If there's a gap, they're going to go for the gap. And there was a
00:28:39.640 debate in the nineties in Formula One. So Senna's death changed the sport forever because that's really
00:28:44.560 what changed the imposed safety in the sport. But the debate prior to that was, look, we'll just tell the
00:28:51.520 drivers to drive slower. They don't have to drive this fast. They can choose to drive 10% slower,
00:28:57.400 which of course was nonsense. The head of the FIA at the time, who has just recently passed away,
00:29:02.660 made a point, which was that that's the dumbest thing you could ever say. They will all choose
00:29:07.480 to have a less safe car if it goes faster, because you're talking about the 20 most competitive
00:29:15.220 drivers on the planet. Now, there was another point I was going to make that was for most of us,
00:29:21.300 we will never know what it's like to be the top thousand in the world of anything. If I think
00:29:26.520 about all the things that I love, driving a race car, shooting my bow and arrow, you know, exercising,
00:29:30.500 I mean, I'm multiple orders of magnitude beneath even the most lowly ranked professional of those
00:29:40.980 things. And this gets into something else, which is for me, at least the joy is not in the absolute
00:29:48.820 comparison of myself to others, but the relative comparison of where I was before. Do you think
00:29:55.120 that's a universal thing? Is it universal that people are mostly engaged by how much they are making
00:30:02.180 progress relative to their own performance? Or do you think that there are some people who are
00:30:07.240 only capable of finding pleasure when being compared to others in an absolute basis?
00:30:13.380 The second half of that question, I'm not sure of. Generally, I think both of those things are
00:30:17.300 universal. I think one, it's universal that one of the most motivating feelings to the human mind is
00:30:23.060 the feeling of progress. And I think it's fairly universal that progress feels good. In a sense,
00:30:28.860 at the most base level, we are goal-directed organisms in the sense that we have a goal to get food or
00:30:34.860 water or to procreate or to be safe. And we want to move toward those things and resolve the tension,
00:30:42.120 the gap between that goal and our current state as much as possible. Now, with our complex brains in
00:30:48.880 modern society, we come up with many other goals that are outside of just our basic needs like food
00:30:53.480 and water. We have goals like getting a promotion at work or losing 10 pounds or whatever it is.
00:30:58.540 But that same tension between where you are currently and where you want to be, we want to
00:31:03.940 have that resolved. The more progress that you feel like you're making toward one of those things,
00:31:09.180 I think that generally feels good. I feel like that's pretty universal. I also do think it seems
00:31:14.580 to be fairly universal that we have some bias toward status, some bias toward prestige and rank and
00:31:20.820 hierarchy. And it feels good for pretty much anybody to win the game or to have the best score on the
00:31:26.720 scoreboard or to climb the leaderboard. And the more that you see yourself occupying a higher rung
00:31:32.800 relative to those around you, whether it's with wealth or money or fame, the better that feels too.
00:31:39.180 And it probably is a spectrum or maybe each of those is a spectrum. And some people have the dial
00:31:44.720 turned up real high on the status part and maybe lower on the internal measures and other people have it
00:31:51.180 the reverse. But I generally think we all have them to some degree. And you probably will find
00:31:57.060 yourself feeling good if you happen to succeed on either of those metrics. And how much of it do you
00:32:02.160 think is, for lack of a better term, journey versus destination focused? Because if you talk about
00:32:07.900 your example of weight loss, that is generally a very destination based metric. I want to lose 10
00:32:13.900 pounds. I'm not going to be happy until I lose 10 pounds. The process of how I go about doing it,
00:32:19.200 changing the way I'm eating, changing my exercise, accepting the fact that you're not going to lose
00:32:24.060 10 pounds linearly. It's going to look like this. Those are details that I'm willing to tolerate,
00:32:29.240 but I want to lose those 10 pounds or I want to fit into this piece of clothing that I used to fit
00:32:33.460 into. Contrast that with, I want to learn to speak Italian. I'm enjoying this process of learning
00:32:40.460 a few new words every day and learning how the structure of this grammar works relative to my native
00:32:45.920 tongue. And I'm never going to be perfectly fluent in Italian, but I know that in some point I'm going
00:32:52.060 to be completely functional. This journey of learning this new language or learning how to play
00:32:56.900 this instrument, that's what's giving me the pleasure. And I don't know if that distinction
00:33:00.300 makes sense. First, I should say this is coming from someone who's been very goal oriented for most of
00:33:05.120 their life. I would set goals for the grades I wanted to get in school, for the weight I wanted to lift in
00:33:10.920 the gym, for the numbers I wanted my business to hit. And at some point I actually found this sheet
00:33:17.820 that I made my sophomore year of college for the goals that I wanted to hit by the time I graduated.
00:33:22.680 It was funny looking back on it like 10 or 11 years later, because about half of them I hit the
00:33:27.960 other half I didn't. And I was like, obviously setting the goal was not the thing that made the
00:33:32.680 difference. If it did, I would have hit them all. So something else is going on here. It was like a
00:33:37.960 little remedial training session for myself or something realizing that goals are not the primary
00:33:44.220 thing that drives results. And in fact, if you look at the performance in most domains, the winners
00:33:51.560 and the losers have the same goal. Presumably every Formula One driver has the goal of winning the race
00:33:56.800 when they take off from the starting line. If you have a job opening and 100 candidates apply for the
00:34:01.900 job, presumably every candidate has the goal of getting the job. The goal is not the thing that makes
00:34:07.460 the difference in the performance. And if the winners and the losers have the same goal,
00:34:11.900 it cannot be the distinguishing factor. Maybe it's necessary. Perhaps there's an argument it's
00:34:16.320 necessary for success, but it's not sufficient for it. So that got me thinking more like, well,
00:34:21.180 what is it then that drives it? And I, in the book, the way that I described is the difference between
00:34:25.840 systems and goals. Your goal is your desired outcome, your target, the thing you're shooting for.
00:34:30.840 Your system is the collection of daily habits that you follow. All these little gears in this
00:34:36.040 overall machine. And if there's ever a gap between your desired outcome and your daily habits,
00:34:42.380 if there's ever a gap between your goal and your system, your daily habits will always win.
00:34:47.260 Almost by definition, your current habits are perfectly designed for your current results.
00:34:53.440 So whatever system you've been running for the last six months or year or whatever,
00:34:58.420 you talked about shooting a bow and arrow, presumably whatever system of movements you have going on
00:35:02.540 there, pre-shot routine, how you draw it back, everything. It kind of is inevitably carrying
00:35:08.460 you toward the result of where the arrow ends up. The irony of all of this is we also badly want
00:35:14.040 better results in life. You know, we also badly want to make more money or to reduce stress or lose
00:35:19.920 weight or whatever, but the results are not actually the thing that needs to change. It's kind of like
00:35:26.060 fix the inputs and the outputs will fix themselves. There are some areas like shooting a bow where that
00:35:30.880 is the connection is quite obvious, but there are other areas where for whatever reason we,
00:35:36.080 we don't see it as clearly, but I think the pattern is still there, which is let's adjust the habits.
00:35:41.340 Let's get this machine running in a more fluid fashion. And you'll find that the results kind of
00:35:47.460 come naturally. I think just appreciating that helped rewire mindset a little bit. I was so focused
00:35:53.780 on outcomes and goals for a long time. And now realizing that actually the way this is driven
00:35:58.400 is with the system that helped me shift from what I would say now is like goals are for people who
00:36:04.620 care about winning one time. You set a goal to run a half marathon and you train for three months and
00:36:10.580 you do it and you complete the race, but then maybe you stop training after that. But systems are for
00:36:16.320 people who care about winning again and again. And if you care about sustaining that success, then
00:36:20.980 you're like, I'm a runner. I care about the system that I'm building for how I train and how many miles
00:36:25.280 I'm getting in and all kinds of other stuff. And whether I have a half marathon three months in
00:36:29.920 the distance or not, it doesn't really matter because I'm going to be running my system either
00:36:34.520 way. Making that mental shift, I think can be useful for sustaining results. So let's talk about
00:36:41.900 habits now, because I think that's the thing that, as you said, basically shapes the nature of what we're
00:36:48.340 going to do. There's a saying that many people have said, and I won't even try to paraphrase it
00:36:53.180 because at the moment it's escaping me, but the gist of it is like, you don't rise to level of
00:36:56.500 your training. You fall to the level or you fall to level of your training. And the original quote,
00:37:01.040 I think it's from Archelokas, I believe a Greek philosopher and said, you don't rise to the level
00:37:06.860 of your expectations. You fall to the level of your training. And in atomic habits, I tweaked that or
00:37:13.020 adjusted that to say, you don't rise to the level of your goals. You fall to the level of your
00:37:17.240 systems. And so it's actually your habits that kind of create that baseline.
00:37:20.800 Why is it called atomic habits? I remember when I first saw the title, my assumption was atomic
00:37:26.880 must be huge explosion, like big habits, which of course is exactly not what it means. So
00:37:32.440 it's interesting which meanings people pull out when they see it. So I chose the phrase atomic
00:37:37.820 habits for three reasons. The first meaning of the word atomic is tiny or small like an atom. And I do
00:37:44.560 think habits should be small and fairly easy to do, especially in the beginning. The second meaning
00:37:50.300 of the word atomic is the fundamental unit in a larger system. And that's the one that people
00:37:55.300 often overlook. Atoms build into molecules, molecules build into compounds and so on. And
00:38:00.340 your habits are kind of like that. Each little habit is like a atom in the overall routine of your
00:38:05.160 day. You put them all together and you end up with your lifestyle or your daily routine.
00:38:09.260 And then the third and final meaning is the one that you mentioned, the source of immense energy or
00:38:13.560 power. And I think if you put all three meanings together, you sort of understand the narrative arc of the
00:38:20.300 which is make changes that are small and easy to do, layer them on top of each other like units in a larger
00:38:27.180 system or atoms in a molecule. Collectively, you can get some really powerful or remarkable results. And so I feel
00:38:33.760 like the phrase atomic habits not only encapsulates that kind of small change in the system that you're looking
00:38:39.680 to build, but also the powerful results that can emanate from that.
00:38:43.380 So you talk about three different types of change, outcome change, the process change. We've touched on a
00:38:48.420 little bit of those, but the one we haven't really touched on is this identity change. That was something
00:38:53.600 that when I read your book really resonated because it provided, I think, a very decent explanation,
00:39:01.460 at least for why exercise comes naturally to me, which is it's so hardwired into my identity and why
00:39:10.300 maybe certain other habits I've tried to create over time don't come easily to me because I haven't
00:39:18.240 fully identified with them yet. So expand on that, but also how you came to realize that.
00:39:23.760 Two things before I unpack the idea a little more fully. First is of all the ideas in the book,
00:39:28.680 this is probably the least scientific. There are actually some studies, which I cite in that
00:39:34.160 chapter, and it's not like there's no science behind it, but the majority of the book, I try to
00:39:38.060 be very robust in the way that I was thinking about how do we build habits and what actually gets in
00:39:43.200 the stick. And there also are just a bazillion social psychology and cognitive psychology studies
00:39:47.980 that illustrate a lot of the examples that I talk about. But this is more of a mindset, I would say,
00:39:54.040 air of philosophy on how behavior change works. Second thing is it's maybe the only unique idea
00:40:00.440 that I have. Pretty much everything else that I share is stuff that's been widely covered by other
00:40:04.540 people or, you know, things that we've known for hundreds, if not thousands of years. But I felt
00:40:09.320 like this was something that maybe I could contribute to the conversation. Part of the reason I started
00:40:14.020 thinking about it is I started asking, why do habits really matter? We seem to care about them a lot
00:40:20.280 as a society. It's something a lot of books get written about, something we talk about a lot.
00:40:24.980 There's clearly some kind of deeper importance to them. So what is it? The surface level answer
00:40:30.680 is that we care about habits because they get us these external things that make us more productive
00:40:35.860 and more fit and so on. Habits can help you do all that stuff, which is great. But I think the real
00:40:42.560 reason, the deeper reason that habits matter is that they are a signal internally to ourselves about who we
00:40:49.560 are and what we care about. And they're kind of a signal of like the story that we're telling
00:40:53.960 ourselves. So in a sense, every time that you perform a habit, you are embodying a particular
00:41:01.500 identity. When you make your bed, you embody the identity of someone who is clean and organized.
00:41:06.900 When you shoot a basketball for 30 minutes, you embody the identity of someone who is a basketball
00:41:12.260 player. You do those things once or twice. It doesn't radically transform the story you have about
00:41:17.520 yourself. But if you keep showing up and shooting a basketball every day for six months or two years,
00:41:22.860 or at some point you cross this sort of invisible threshold where you're like, yeah, being a
00:41:27.500 basketball player is like part of who I am, some aspect of my identity. And so your habits provide
00:41:32.820 evidence. They provide proof of the story that you're telling yourself. And that I think is a very
00:41:38.300 powerful thing, a very deep personal thing that habits can provide and perhaps the real reason why
00:41:43.740 they matter. So to come back to your question about process versus outcome versus identity,
00:41:49.980 where how we change, usually when people set out to make some kind of change, they start by thinking
00:41:55.880 about the results or the outcome that they want. So they say, I want to lose 40 pounds in the next six
00:42:00.720 months. And then from that outcome, they back into a process or a plan. So they say, all right,
00:42:07.300 if I want to lose 40 pounds, then I need to follow this nutrition plan. I'm going to need to work out
00:42:11.700 four days a week. And maybe there are details to those plans and everything, but that's usually
00:42:16.440 kind of roughly where it stops. And then the assumption is if I do those things and I lose
00:42:22.580 that weight, then I'll be the kind of person that I want to be. The argument that I try to unpack in
00:42:27.620 that chapter is what if we worked backwards from this? What if instead we said, who is the type of
00:42:33.080 person I wish to be? What is the identity that I'd like to have? And in fact, we could even ask the
00:42:39.040 person who has that identity, what kind of habits would they have? And then we use that identity
00:42:45.420 to inform the process, the habits, and we let the outcomes come naturally. There are a variety of
00:42:52.060 examples of this. I, one reader of mine, she lost a bunch of weight. I think it was 110 pounds in total,
00:42:58.020 and she's kept it off for over a decade. And the question that she sort of carried around with her
00:43:03.540 as she was starting her weight loss journey is what would a healthy person do? And that's very
00:43:07.740 much aligned or oriented with that identity piece. It's like, okay, would a healthy person
00:43:12.480 take a cab or would they walk four blocks the next meeting? Would they order a salad and chicken
00:43:17.760 at lunch or would they have a hamburger and fries? And she could just kind of carry that question
00:43:22.040 around with her to every context she was in and make a choice that she felt like aligned with the
00:43:27.520 identity that she wanted to have rather than worrying necessarily about something specific,
00:43:32.580 like the number of macros she's getting or, you know, whatever. Now I should say, I think it can
00:43:37.360 work both ways. Like I count my macros and it works really well for me, but I think that's partially
00:43:42.260 because it aligns with the identity that I already have. And if you don't have that shift in internal
00:43:47.920 story yet, it's hard for the behavior to follow suit. Imagine you went up to two people, you said,
00:43:53.880 Hey, would you like a cigarette? And the first person says, Oh no, thanks. I'm trying to quit.
00:43:57.920 And the second person says, Oh no, thanks. I'm not a smoker. Technically they've done the same
00:44:03.320 thing. They both turned down the cigarette, but the second person kind of has signaled a shift in
00:44:08.760 identity change. The first person is trying to be something they're not. No, thanks. I'm trying to
00:44:13.340 quit. And the second person is saying, I'm not a smoker. Uh, it's just not something that I do.
00:44:18.900 I think once you get to that stage, that shift in identity, you're in a much more powerful place
00:44:24.740 from a behavior change standpoint, because you're not even really trying to change anymore.
00:44:29.540 You're just acting in alignment with the type of person you see yourself to be.
00:44:33.420 So we can talk about ways to do that, but that's kind of the quick version on identity versus outcome.
00:44:39.340 Tell me what you think the difference is in identity between the woman you gave the example of
00:44:44.100 and say yourself. So you're both striving to the same objective, which is a healthy weight,
00:44:49.780 but she accomplished it by focusing on what would a healthy person do in this situation.
00:44:56.900 You accomplish it again, just pertaining to nutrition at the moment, presumably by saying,
00:45:01.960 I don't know what your macro goals are, but these are the aspirations that I have. And I'm going to
00:45:06.160 stick to these. So tell me a little bit about the difference between those approaches and how can a
00:45:10.460 person know which will be better for them outside of just empirically trying them both?
00:45:14.440 Well, I think in this particular case, the primary difference is I had an internal story
00:45:20.400 or have an internal story that I am a healthy person already. And so just doing things that
00:45:26.120 are aligned with that, like counting macros feels totally fine. Whereas for her at that early stage,
00:45:31.280 she did not feel that way and did not genuinely believe that about herself. It's possible to have
00:45:37.500 an epiphany and to change cold turkey or to just flip a switch and suddenly start acting in a different
00:45:42.820 way. I do think it's possible. I think sometimes people have experiences like that. Ironically,
00:45:47.320 I think it rarely happens from some kind of bolts of lightning inside. I think one of the most common
00:45:51.980 ways that happens is by reading books. I think people will sometimes read a book that really
00:45:56.360 changes their worldview and they start to do things completely differently after that. You can imagine a
00:46:01.160 bunch of nutrition examples, like somebody reads a book that convinces them that carbs are the devil
00:46:06.440 and the grain is terrible. All of a sudden the next day, like they want to throw out all the bread in the
00:46:10.980 house and it's very quick switch has been flipped. So I do think it's possible. However, I don't think
00:46:18.520 that changing through an epiphany is a very reliable way to change. And I don't know that it's something
00:46:24.260 you can bank on or can plan around or strategize for. It might happen to you a couple of times in
00:46:29.580 your life. I don't think that it's an efficient way to try to build a new habit. So if you can't change
00:46:35.620 or hope to change through an epiphany, then what are your options if you want to change your identity?
00:46:41.320 And I think the best avenue that you have is to cast votes with your actions. So in a sense,
00:46:48.380 every action you take is like a vote for the type of person you wish to become. So no, doing one
00:46:54.700 pushup does not radically transform your body, but it does cast a vote for I'm the type of person who
00:47:00.300 doesn't miss workouts. And no, writing one sentence may not finish the novel, but it does cast a vote
00:47:06.640 for I'm a writer. I think this is like a meaningful difference between my approach or what I recommend
00:47:12.680 and what you often hear. Like you often hear something like fake it till you make it. I don't
00:47:18.260 necessarily have anything wrong with fake it till you make it. It's asking you to believe something
00:47:22.660 positive about yourself, but it's asking you to believe something positive without having evidence for it.
00:47:29.340 And we have a word for beliefs that don't have evidence. We call that delusion. Like at some
00:47:34.720 point, your brain doesn't like this mismatch between what you're saying and what you're actually
00:47:39.060 doing. And so to bring it back to your question about my friend who lost all this weight, I think
00:47:44.600 you have to genuinely believe that story about yourself in order for the actions to start to feel
00:47:50.200 aligned. And what do you do if you don't genuinely believe you're a healthy person or don't genuinely
00:47:55.360 believe that I'm the kind of person who would track my macros or whatever? Well, I think you have
00:47:59.300 to start with these very small habits. You have to start by proving it to yourself in some little
00:48:03.220 way. Maybe it's just that you did walk the three blocks to the meeting and didn't take the taxi,
00:48:08.240 or maybe it's just that you did order a salad for lunch and not a burger and fries. And none of those
00:48:13.740 things individually are going to change your body or even the story right away. But if you keep casting
00:48:20.800 votes for that behavior and keep casting votes for that identity, then eventually you get to the
00:48:26.720 point where it's like the basketball example. You kind of have to admit that you're a basketball
00:48:30.460 player because you've been shooting hoops for the last two years. And like, this is just part of who
00:48:34.320 you are now. So I think that that's the primary difference between the two of us is that I already
00:48:39.180 kind of had that story and early on she didn't now she does. So who knows, maybe now she could just
00:48:43.800 track her macros just as easily or even easier than I can. I don't know. But I think that that shift
00:48:49.300 there. Yeah. I was kind of curious to ask about that because I wonder how that process changes in
00:48:56.600 this person after 10 years. I mean, most people understand that losing weight is actually not that
00:49:02.160 hard, but keeping weight off is exceptionally hard. So what your friend did, yes, losing 110 pounds is
00:49:08.080 remarkable, but the fact that she's kept it off for a decade is actually what's remarkable. And I'm
00:49:13.080 curious as to what the temporal sequence of events is where, you know, Hey, for the first year, it was
00:49:21.180 a daily struggle of what would the healthy person do? What would the healthy person do? What would
00:49:25.920 the healthy person do? And at some point that transitions into I'm a healthy person. This is
00:49:30.840 what I do. I'm a healthy person. This is what I do. And then it becomes so autonomic that you can slip
00:49:35.800 up for a day and it feels wrong. Like, Oh God, that cotton candy is horrible. Like I don't ever want to
00:49:41.120 eat that again. Yeah. Well, you said something similar to that a few minutes ago about how, like
00:49:45.860 it bothers you to not work out sometimes near a y'all who also has written about habits has kind of a
00:49:51.640 little measure for that where he's like his measure for whether it's a habit or not is, does it bother
00:49:55.640 you when you don't do it? I think that's a signal that it's kind of aligned with your identity. It's
00:49:59.840 like, Oh, I kind of feel like I'm not being me. If I don't do this to your point about it taking a long
00:50:04.740 time, it can take much longer than you would think. I mean, my friend told me she had to lose 60
00:50:09.260 pounds before the first person noticed before she ever heard anything from somebody else.
00:50:13.680 That's a lot of weight and a long time to be working in essentially what feels like a vacuum
00:50:17.620 feels like you're just doing it for yourself. No external feedback from the world. So this comes
00:50:22.360 back to a lot of the things we've already talked about, about process and falling in love with the
00:50:25.740 system and a lot of things that go into it, but it definitely is an internal journey and it
00:50:30.600 definitely will take longer than you would imagine. A lot of cases. One of the most common examples
00:50:35.700 that I hear of in my practice for the epiphany behavior change that sticks is the person who
00:50:43.820 quits smoking the day their child is born. And I've always found this interesting, right? Because
00:50:48.360 the day before their child is born, they clearly know how bad smoking is. There's nobody who's
00:50:54.620 smoking who doesn't understand the risks of it. And by the same token, who doesn't, as you pointed out
00:51:01.060 earlier, enjoy the benefits of it in the short run. Very rewarding in the short run. Very damaging
00:51:06.100 in the long run. That's completely understood intellectually. On day X, they have a child and
00:51:11.120 they decide, I'm done with this. I'm not going to have smoke in my household because I also know the
00:51:16.380 benefits of secondhand smoke or the harm rather of secondhand smoke. And I'm not going to expose my
00:51:20.500 child to this. And yet amazingly, I mean, over and over and over again, I hear these stories from
00:51:25.140 patients saying, yep, I grew up in a household where my parents were incredible smokers. And the second
00:51:30.920 I was born, they stopped, they stopped. And that was 40 years ago. And they've never had a cigarette
00:51:34.140 since. Is there a transference process here where because it involves the life of another person,
00:51:39.580 it's easier to make this change stick? Possibly. I mean, I'm sure there are a lot of variables that
00:51:44.280 go into it, but it does align with, there's like this whole category of behaviors that I feel like
00:51:49.020 if you wanted to hack a radical change in your life, you want to figure out a way to get,
00:51:54.440 like you said, this epiphany to stick. Massive environment changes or lifestyle changes are a good
00:52:00.480 way to do that. Perhaps one of the strongest ways to do that. So having a kid, getting married,
00:52:06.520 changing jobs, moving to a different city, even something small, like getting a dog can lead to
00:52:12.760 rapid behavior change. And I think one of the things that is really crucial about it is that
00:52:19.020 most of those decisions tend to be irreversible or at least very hard to reverse. I had one that I
00:52:25.940 struggled with for a long time. Sometimes people ask me, you know, what habits have you struggled
00:52:28.940 with or whatever. And I tend to be pretty good about getting enough sleep. I almost always get
00:52:34.340 eight hours or even nine if I'm training hard, but I would fall into this pattern where it'd be like
00:52:39.960 nine or 10 o'clock at night and I would kind of get a second wind and they'd be like, well, maybe I'll
00:52:43.360 just send a few emails or something. And of course it's never just a few, you turn around and it's
00:52:47.340 midnight or one and you're like, okay, am I going to sleep for eight hours? Cause if so, that means I'm
00:52:51.260 not getting up till nine. And I know that I prefer to get up early. I know that I feel better
00:52:56.740 throughout the rest of the next day. 10 PM. James is kind of ruining things for tomorrow. James
00:53:01.380 by staying up late. And I tried a bunch of different things. There's a little device called
00:53:06.900 an outlet timer. You can buy it for like 10 bucks on Amazon. You plug it into an outlet and you can
00:53:11.520 set the time for when it kills the power from that outlet. And so like, if you plug your internet
00:53:17.140 into it, then like the internet shuts off at 10 PM or, you know, whatever you set it for. So I tried
00:53:21.800 different things like that, but then you could just pick your phone up and get around it. But the thing
00:53:25.980 that finally made it stick was getting a dog because the dog is going to get up at 7 AM.
00:53:30.780 Whenever I go to sleep, it doesn't matter. And I need to go take it for a walk. And you can only
00:53:34.700 do that for a few days before you're like, all right, I'm not going to play this game anymore.
00:53:37.760 I'm going to bed at 10. It's because it was fairly hard to reverse. They got it to stick. And I think,
00:53:44.440 you know, in the case of having a kid, they're going to be there every day now. Maybe you could
00:53:48.880 rationalize it a bunch of times before that, but that's not going to change. They're going to be around.
00:53:53.120 And weirdly, because presumably this person's wife was pregnant. So they obviously saw that
00:53:58.580 throughout the whole pregnancy, but that didn't get them to change. But once the child is there,
00:54:03.880 man, it's really immediate. You're taking a puff and you have those little eyes looking back at you.
00:54:08.600 The feedback loop is even tighter than before. So I would imagine both of those things probably play
00:54:13.600 a role, but more generally speaking, those kinds of irreversible or hard to reverse lifestyle
00:54:18.800 changes also tend to be big drivers of quick behavior change. I can only think of one dramatic
00:54:25.880 habit I changed that has stuck. And it is the silliest thing, but I always bit my nails growing
00:54:33.260 up, bite them nonstop. Invariably what happens is you'd get a little infection because you bite too
00:54:39.280 close. And it was like, my mom was always like, God, that is such a disgusting habit. Like it just
00:54:43.800 looked horrible. The day I decided to change it was the day I got my first interview for med school.
00:54:50.600 You apply to medical school and then all of a sudden the envelopes start coming in and you got
00:54:55.000 these interviews. Just as I got that first envelope and I realized, oh, I'm actually going to go and be
00:55:00.540 interviewing. At least for me, I didn't interview to go to college. This was the first time I had to do
00:55:04.660 an interview. And I don't know, just something came over me. I was like, wait a second, dude, you can't
00:55:09.240 be the guy that's showing up to an interview with these horrible looking nails. You have to cut
00:55:13.920 this out. You are going to get a nail clipper and you are going to start clipping your nails like a
00:55:19.140 civilized human being. And that was, I don't know, 25 years ago. And today, like when my nails get long,
00:55:25.920 I'm a guy who likes short nails. So I'm always sort of trimming them. I can't imagine that I once bit
00:55:31.140 them. It just seems so strange to me. It's a silly example. I don't think it is actually.
00:55:37.120 We all have habits that are like that.
00:55:39.240 There's two things that made me think. The first is it connects to our conversation about
00:55:42.520 identity from a few minutes ago, which is you started to take pride in it. You cared about
00:55:47.520 how you presented. And the more that we take pride in certain elements of our identity or
00:55:53.380 aspects of who we are, certain parts of our story, the more strongly that behavior starts
00:55:58.400 to stick. You can imagine a woman who takes pride in how her hair looks. She probably has
00:56:03.660 all kinds of hair care habits and products and things that she does. And she probably doesn't
00:56:08.420 have to convince herself to do them the same way that we talk about convincing ourselves with a
00:56:13.400 lot of other habits. Oh, I wish I could write, or I wish I would work out or whatever. It's just an
00:56:17.760 element of her identity. She takes pride in and shows she does it like fairly consistently,
00:56:21.560 or the guy who gets complimented on the size of his biceps. And so he just never skips arm day in
00:56:27.200 the gym because it's an aspect of his identity that he takes pride in. What I'm kind of getting at is
00:56:31.960 like, what parts of your story do you take pride in? And once you start to take pride in it, man,
00:56:36.680 you'll fight for it pretty hard to keep it. And in many cases, you'll find yourself doing it
00:56:41.380 somewhat naturally, or at least internally motivated to continue doing it. So that was the first piece.
00:56:47.120 The second piece, and this is something that since atomic habits has come out, I think is even more
00:56:53.360 important than I realized when I was writing the book, which is the influence of the social environment
00:56:59.400 on your habits. So in your case, the med school interviews, it was actually the image in your
00:57:05.700 mind, the expectation about what other people might think and how you would present in that interview
00:57:11.000 and so on the judgment of others, essentially that helped drive that change. And if you look at
00:57:18.880 behaviors that really stick, the ones that tend to stick for 10 or 20 or 30 years, a long time,
00:57:24.520 there's often a strong social component involved. So for example, we are all part of multiple tribes.
00:57:32.660 Some of those tribes are large, like what it means to be American, or some of those tribes are small,
00:57:37.940 like being a member of your CrossFit gym or being a neighbor on your street. Take the neighborhood
00:57:43.320 example. You might walk outside and see your neighbor mowing their grass on Wednesday night or
00:57:49.160 something and think, Oh, I need to cut my lawn. And you'll stick with that habit of mowing your
00:57:54.500 grass for 20 or 30 years or however long you live in that house. Like we wish we had that level of
00:57:59.300 consistency with most of our other habits. And why do you do it? Partially you do it because it feels
00:58:05.760 good to have a clean lawn, but mostly you do it because you don't want to be judged by the other
00:58:11.020 people in the neighborhood for being the sloppy one. And so it's actually that social norm, that
00:58:16.460 expectation for what it means to be part of this neighborhood and how you act in this group or this tribe
00:58:21.520 that helps get the habit to stick. I think the practical takeaway there, if you really want to
00:58:27.300 behavior change to last is to join groups where your desired behavior is the normal behavior,
00:58:33.320 because if it's normal in that group, it's going to seem much more normal and typical for you to do
00:58:39.780 it. I mean, Peter, I'm sure you're part of multiple groups that do what most people would determine are
00:58:44.280 like weird habits. Like I'm sure there's a group of friends who are really into driving cars and there's
00:58:49.020 probably another group who's like really into bow hunting and archery. And there are all kinds of
00:58:53.140 habits that these little tribes do. And it might seem strange to the normal person, but it's probably
00:58:59.420 very casual or typical or easy relatively for you to stick to those habits, especially when you're
00:59:05.320 part of those groups or talking with those guys, because it's just part of something that it's part of
00:59:09.840 what they do. And I think maybe the deeper lesson here is that we don't just do habits because of the
00:59:17.580 results they get us. We also take behaviors because they are a signal to the people around us that,
00:59:24.740 Hey, I get it. I fit in. I understand how to act in this group. Most people, if they have to choose
00:59:31.080 between having the habits they want to have, but they kind of go against the grain of the group,
00:59:36.940 they like don't really fit in well, they get ostracized or having habits that they don't really
00:59:42.840 love, but they get to go along with the crowd. They fit in, they get praised for being part of
00:59:48.200 the group. Most people will choose belonging over loneliness. Like the desire to belong will
00:59:54.860 overpower the desire to improve. And so you want to make sure you get those two things aligned to
01:00:00.640 join groups where your desired behavior is the normal behavior. I wonder if part of the cue for me
01:00:06.240 was buying a suit and it was the first suit I had. That was sort of a, wait a minute,
01:00:13.680 you're wearing a suit. Think of the trouble you're going to, to get this thing. And then this tie that
01:00:19.720 you're going to wear and blah, blah, blah, all this sort of stuff. But it's interesting. And then
01:00:23.920 clearly it just became a part of my identity, which is I'm a person who has nice fingernails.
01:00:29.240 I present well from the fingernail standpoint, at least hasn't translated to all of my habits,
01:00:35.020 but let's talk about the four laws. Cause these four laws are kind of the central tenets to what
01:00:41.560 we speak about and they can be inverted as well, which I think is important as we think about
01:00:45.880 creating, call it adaptive habits versus breaking maladaptive habits. So what's the first law
01:00:51.600 real quick, before we get into these four, I just want to explain the framework a little bit
01:00:56.080 in particular for this episode or this show, because I feel like your audience will appreciate
01:01:00.980 it more than most audiences. So I like to divide a habit into four stages. And as you said, those
01:01:07.120 four stages kind of have what I call the four laws of behavior change that come out of it.
01:01:11.180 But when I was working on atomic habits and researching this framework and trying to understand
01:01:15.600 why do behaviors happen and how do they happen? How do habits form? I had a couple questions that I
01:01:21.160 felt like previous frameworks did not answer that well. While researching the book, I was able to
01:01:27.280 find 40 different models of human behavior that biologists and neuroscientists and psychologists,
01:01:33.200 bunch of different industries had come up with over the last, say about 150 years. Broadly speaking,
01:01:39.440 those models of human behavior tended to fall into one of two categories. The first category are what I
01:01:45.460 would call like motivation models. So they explain things like internal drives and motivations and
01:01:51.940 cravings and kind of like what compels us to act. And then the second category were what I would call
01:01:58.220 reinforcement models. And so they described the rewards that we get from behaviors and how those
01:02:03.980 things kind of reinforce our behavior and essentially what happens like after an action. And what I wanted
01:02:09.860 to do was try to come up with a model that I felt like accurately described both the motivation that may come
01:02:14.980 before and the reinforcement that may come after and how those things influence the actions that we
01:02:20.420 take. And there were a variety of what I thought were fairly simple questions about human behavior that
01:02:27.540 weren't totally answered by the previous models. So things like what causes somebody to try to have it in the
01:02:33.460 first place? You haven't experienced the reward at that point. So why would you take the first bite of a
01:02:38.560 pancake or the first smoke of a cigarette? What would motivate you to do that? Started with BF Skinner,
01:02:43.900 stimulus, stimulus, response, reward. Charles Duhigg and power of habit kind of popularized his cue,
01:02:48.840 routine, reward. But we say, okay, habits are a cue and then there's the action and there's some kind of
01:02:53.380 outcome. Well, how come two people respond differently to the same thing? Like why would one person see a
01:02:59.080 cigarette and feel like, oh, I have to smoke and another person's like, I've never smoked a day in my life. I'm not
01:03:03.580 interested at all. Because if it's just the cue that leads to the action, you would think they would do the
01:03:07.960 same thing. Why would the same person respond differently to the same cue? How come when I
01:03:13.220 walk in my kitchen at 7am, I see a loaf of bread and I think, oh, I'm going to make some toast for
01:03:17.940 breakfast. But then I walk in at 4pm and I see that same cue and I don't think anything of it. I just
01:03:23.360 move on. So to summarize all of this, I think one of the meaningful distinctions about the four stages
01:03:29.720 that I put together and why I feel like it accurately describes human behavior and sort of the insight
01:03:35.600 that I came across as I was researching. A neuroscientist named Lisa Feldman Barrett. She
01:03:40.640 has a bunch of studies and a couple books on this topic. One book in particular that was useful for
01:03:46.300 me while I was researching is called How Emotions Are Made. The key insight is that we often think that
01:03:51.820 human behavior is reactive in the sense that somebody does something and I respond or somebody
01:03:56.520 says something and I feel a certain way. But in fact, human behavior is mostly predictive. You are kind
01:04:03.100 of endlessly going through your experience in life predicting about what to do next. It's actually
01:04:09.080 this prediction that I think was the key thing that was missing from a lot of the previous models
01:04:13.560 of habits and behavior. So with that as a primer. Before we do that, I think you wrote about this in
01:04:18.880 the book, which was that the dopaminergic surge comes more from the anticipation of the reward than the
01:04:26.680 actual behavior that gives the reward. Did I remember that correctly? There's a bazillion studies on
01:04:32.460 dopamine, of course. Also, I should say like, I think if you only talk about dopamine, it's not
01:04:37.620 the full story about habits. Like there's many neurochemicals that are involved in the process
01:04:41.500 and dopamine is just one part of the overall picture, but it does play a very important role.
01:04:46.320 For a long time, we thought it was about reward and satisfaction and enjoyment. But in fact, it seems
01:04:52.060 that the crucial role dopamine plays is about prediction and anticipation. And so the first time that you
01:04:58.420 take a bite of a pancake, you don't know what to expect. And so you take that bite and then afterwards
01:05:03.700 you get a surge of dopamine, almost as if to like mark the experience or to teach you, hey, that was
01:05:10.100 favorable. You should do that again next time. Like if you happen to see a pancake again, that was a
01:05:14.320 really great outcome. So then the next time around, you know what to expect. And in fact, what we find is
01:05:20.520 that dopamine tends to spike before you take a bite, not after. And there are a bunch of studies that show
01:05:25.880 this. Gamblers get a spike before they roll the dice, not after. Drug addicts get a spike before
01:05:31.360 they take a hit of cocaine, not after. Dopamine, I think probably the more accurate way to describe
01:05:36.660 it in this context is it's a teaching molecule. It's a learning molecule and it helps you mark
01:05:42.740 experiences that are favorable so that you'll remember them next time. And then when you come
01:05:47.420 across a similar situation, it spikes in anticipation. So after you see the cue, you get this craving
01:05:53.880 and it's actually that craving or anticipation or prediction that motivates you to act, drives the
01:06:00.020 response, and then there's an outcome. Presumably, again, using your example, there are lots of
01:06:04.980 diversity between individuals, right? So you take 10 people who have never smoked a cigarette.
01:06:09.960 Let's just, to make the math easy, say, well, seven of them have no desire to. So they walk away.
01:06:15.300 Three of them are like, yeah, I'll give it a try. They take a puff. One of them starts hacking and says,
01:06:19.400 that is the most disgusting thing I've ever done. I never want to do that again. And they never do.
01:06:22.440 One of them says, you know, I kind of like that. I'm going to do this socially. Anytime I'm going
01:06:27.160 to have a drink, I'm going to have a cigarette. And one of them goes on to become a chain smoker.
01:06:31.220 Now, what explains that distinction? How much of that is neurochemical?
01:06:35.140 There are examples like that for alcohol and drugs and all kinds of things.
01:06:39.680 And I'm not an expert on addiction and I didn't write the book about addiction. So I don't want to
01:06:44.020 speak out of turn or step out of my lane or anything, but I don't know that I have a good answer to
01:06:48.400 it. But from what I understand and from what I've seen as I was researching the book, it does seem to
01:06:53.960 have a strong, basically genetic or neurochemical component. It seems like in a sense, drugs kind
01:07:00.140 of hack the system. This is, I think, one way to define an addiction, which is the process of
01:07:05.840 learning is actually broken. Addicts know that the behavior does not benefit their lives in a lot of
01:07:11.540 ways, but they still can't get themselves to stop doing it, even though they know it doesn't benefit
01:07:15.560 them. And I think part of the reason that happens, or perhaps the primary reason, is the
01:07:20.880 drug kind of hacks the system. It gives you this spike of dopamine, even though you shouldn't be
01:07:24.960 getting it. Usually your brain would not be doing that. It would not be trying to teach you to repeat
01:07:29.240 that, but you're artificially spiking it by taking the substance. And so then process of learning breaks.
01:07:35.360 I also find it interesting that different people will get that pleasure from different things.
01:07:42.020 When I'm not in a good place, when I'm unhappy about something, it's never my tendency to have a
01:07:49.120 drink. So alcohol would only be associated with something I want to do when I feel good to begin
01:07:54.400 with. I would never want to have a drink when I don't feel good. But when I don't feel good,
01:07:59.280 I would happily binge on junk food. That would be the thing that provides comfort. And of course,
01:08:04.720 there are people, when they're unhappy, they would never want to eat even, let alone have junk food.
01:08:08.320 I find it interesting to at least contemplate how much of that is genetic, how much of that is
01:08:12.660 learned, and what else is going on in sort of understanding that. Because that does sort of
01:08:16.840 factor into falling to the level of our habits. Because we fall to these levels when things are
01:08:22.260 not going well, typically. I do think there's a genetic component. Some people are more sensitive
01:08:26.580 to certain substances than others, or at least it appears to be so. However, it does strike me as
01:08:32.460 very possible that a good chunk of it is learned, and that now you have a story that junk food is the
01:08:37.980 way that I cope, or the way that I soothe myself when I need that. And in a sense, your habits are
01:08:44.160 these solutions to recurring problems that you face. So say you have somebody who comes home from
01:08:50.060 work and they feel exhausted. And one person, that's a recurring problem that they feel often.
01:08:55.920 And so one person comes home and they play video games for 30 minutes. And another person comes home
01:09:00.260 and they go for a run. And a third person smokes a cigarette. And all of them are solving the same
01:09:06.180 underlying recurring problem. But they're choosing different methods through which to do that.
01:09:11.560 And I wonder about how the grooves kind of get formed. Once we learn that a certain method is
01:09:17.900 effective in solving that problem, we tend to default to it, even if it's not the only way
01:09:22.560 to solve that. Even if, yeah, going for a run would make me feel better, but I'm just used to
01:09:26.880 smoking cigarettes now. Then we start to develop a story around it. It starts to become a little bit
01:09:31.340 of our identity. We start to use it as a crutch. I do think there's definitely a learned component
01:09:35.900 to that as well. All right. I interrupted you before you were just about to launch into the
01:09:39.860 four laws. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. So the four stages are Q, craving, response, and reward. The Q is
01:09:47.700 something that you notice. So for example, you see a plate of cookies on the counter. That's a visual Q
01:09:52.660 starts the habit of eating a cookie. The craving is the prediction or the meaning that you assign to that
01:09:59.080 cue often happens relatively automatically or quickly. So you see the plate of cookies and you
01:10:05.220 think, Oh, that'll be sweet, sugary, tasty, enjoyable. It's that favorable meaning that leads
01:10:10.600 to that dopamine spike that we talked about that motivates you to take the third step, which is the
01:10:16.440 response. You walk over, you pick the cookie up, you take a bite. And then finally there's the reward.
01:10:22.040 Oh, it is in fact, sweet, sugary, tasty, satisfying. Now, not every behavior in life is rewarding.
01:10:29.220 Sometimes things have a cost or a consequence. Sometimes they're just kind of neutral and don't
01:10:33.900 really mean a whole lot. If a behavior is not rewarding, then it's unlikely to become a habit
01:10:40.020 because you don't have any reason to repeat it again in the future. You need some kind of positive
01:10:43.840 emotional signal associated with the behavior for you to stick with it. At least as we've already
01:10:49.540 talked about an immediate signal that says, Hey, that was enjoyable. Is there some evidence to
01:10:54.860 suggest if I remember back to like my psych one-on-one class, which is obviously pretty
01:10:59.860 elementary that some of the most addictive behaviors are variably reinforcing? I sort of
01:11:06.040 remember this example of why slot machines are particularly addictive because the pattern
01:11:11.700 with which they produce a win is actually random. And therefore you really don't know when it's
01:11:18.200 going to come. You know, it's going to come. You have to have belief that you'll see other
01:11:21.260 people win and you've won in the past, but that's somehow even more addictive. Whereas
01:11:25.780 the cookie in theory is not variably reinforcing. It's pretty much reinforcing the same way every
01:11:30.720 time. I mean, presumably only subject to the tastiness of the cookie.
01:11:34.640 It's even more, there've been tons of studies done on variable rewards. The basic answer is
01:11:39.160 yes, you're right. Variable rewards tend to accelerate or intensify behavior. It can get even
01:11:44.340 more twisted than that in the slot machines example, because what they have found is that the sweet
01:11:49.200 spot tends to be right around 50, 50. You can imagine getting a reward at very different
01:11:53.740 schedules. Like you could get it 95% of the time, or you could get it 5% of the time.
01:11:58.300 Well, if you only get it 5% of the time, then you learn pretty quickly, like, Hey, this isn't a very
01:12:02.940 fruitful action. Maybe I should stop doing this. But if you get it around 50, 50 tends to work out for
01:12:08.320 you a lot, but not every time. And it still is coming at it like a roughly a random pattern. Even if you
01:12:12.760 know, over 10,000 trials, it works out to be about 50% of the time, man, you will just keep
01:12:17.920 pressing that slot machine button over and over and over again. There've been studies done on mice
01:12:22.140 where they would get a squirt of sugar water when they poke their nose in a box. And if they did it
01:12:28.160 at a variable reward schedule, they would do it. I can't remember the exact number. I want to say it
01:12:32.320 was like 6,000 times in an hour, many, many times. We laugh at it thinking about mice, but we're not
01:12:38.180 that different. The average slot machine player will press the button like 800 times in an hour. And so
01:12:42.780 we're just basically doing the same thing, getting the reward, but not knowing exactly when it's going
01:12:48.060 to happen. It gets you to do it more frequently. And you can think about examples like this in
01:12:52.720 everyday life. Imagine a remote control where the battery's dying and you press the power button,
01:12:58.140 but it doesn't turn on right away. And you're like, God, did that work? And then you press it
01:13:00.940 again a little harder. And then maybe you press it again a third time. Now, if you do it eight or nine
01:13:04.460 or 10 times, you're like, okay, the batteries are dead. But if on the second try, it turns on
01:13:09.040 the variable reward got you to do it again or got you to try the behavior more.
01:13:13.380 So that variable reward schedule is definitely something that can intensify behavior.
01:13:17.640 You remember Anchorman? Yeah. I assume you've seen. Yeah. This might actually mean that there
01:13:22.220 is truth to the statement that 50% of the time it works every time.
01:13:27.280 Incredible reference. Yes. Fantastic. Little did we know that Will Ferrell was a
01:13:32.040 cognitive psychology fan. Wait, I think that was Paul Rudd's line, wasn't it?
01:13:35.760 Was it? Yeah. When he used Black Panther, the cologne.
01:13:38.580 Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Amazing.
01:13:40.740 50% of the time it works every time.
01:13:43.320 I'm going to be honest with you. That smells like pure gasoline.
01:13:46.900 It's got bits of real Panther in it. Oh, it's made by Odeon.
01:13:52.360 So those are the four stages. What I like to do and what I consider to be the hallmark of
01:13:57.080 my work, I'm just interpreting the research, like pretending to be an academic. I'm not actually
01:14:01.680 an academic. I think the value that I try to provide is to make these ideas actionable and to
01:14:08.180 turn them into something that we can operationalize or apply to daily life. And the four laws of
01:14:13.320 behavior change are how I have attempted to do that. So if we understand that a habit has those
01:14:19.020 four steps and how do we actually change our behaviors? We can follow these four laws and
01:14:23.940 there's one for each stage. The first law of behavior change is to make it obvious. You want
01:14:28.660 the cues of your good habits to be obvious, available, visible, easy to see. The easier it
01:14:34.400 is to see or get your attention, the easier it is to notice, the more likely you are to act on it.
01:14:39.860 The second law is to make it attractive. So the more attractive or appealing or exciting a habit is,
01:14:46.000 the more likely you are to feel motivated to do it. So again, this is about anticipating it or
01:14:50.420 something you anticipate more, feel more motivated. The third law is to make it easy. The more easy,
01:14:56.400 convenient, frictionless, simple a habit is, the more likely behavior is to be performed. And then
01:15:03.280 the fourth and final law is to make it satisfying. The more satisfying or enjoyable, pleasurable a
01:15:09.220 habit is, the more likely you are to repeat it in the future. So those four laws give you like a high
01:15:14.580 level overview of how to build a good habit. So make it obvious, make it attractive, make it easy,
01:15:20.580 make it satisfying. You don't need all four every single time, but the more that you have those
01:15:26.540 four things working for you, I think the more likely it is that the good behavior will stick
01:15:30.920 or that you'll find a way to start on it. If you want to break a bad habit, then you just invert
01:15:35.940 those four. So rather than making it obvious, you want to make the cue invisible, unsubscribe from
01:15:42.120 emails, reduce exposure to the cue. If you're trying to be on a diet, don't follow food bloggers on
01:15:47.360 Instagram, reducing exposure to the thing that starts the process. Rather than making it attractive,
01:15:52.840 make it unattractive. Rather than making it easy, make it difficult. So increase friction,
01:15:58.640 put more steps between you and the behavior. And rather than making it satisfying, make it
01:16:03.640 unsatisfying, layer on some kind of immediate consequence or a cost to the behavior. Those four
01:16:08.900 make it invisible, make it unattractive, make it difficult, make it unsatisfying, give you a high
01:16:15.100 level framework for how to break a bad habit. Now, how often is a certain behavior, the combination
01:16:21.420 of breaking a habit and creating a habit? Again, it seems like a lot of the ones we default into
01:16:26.380 talking about are the hard ones like nutrition. We all eat. We're all going to eat all the time.
01:16:32.260 It's not something you can opt out of or into. We all eat. So presumably if a person says, again,
01:16:38.320 I hate coming back to weight because it's such a stupid example relative to say overall health,
01:16:42.720 but let's say health actually. I want to be a much healthier person. So I need to change the
01:16:48.240 way I eat. That's two things, right? You have to start eating better and stop eating poorer.
01:16:54.620 It is two things, but I view them as two sides of the same coin. In many cases, you know, we can come
01:17:00.060 up with edge cases or examples where the behaviors start to get more specific. But generally speaking,
01:17:05.300 I think there are three ways to break a bad habit. You can eliminate it entirely. So you can just go
01:17:10.060 cold turkey, cut it out, never do it again. You could curtail the behavior to the desired degree
01:17:15.880 so you can reduce it a little bit. You still do it sometimes. Instead of drinking a beer at dinner
01:17:20.120 every night, you just have it maybe once a week. You could also replace it. So rather than drinking
01:17:25.700 a beer, you replace it with water. When I'm thinking about myself personally, when I actually am changing
01:17:31.000 behavior, I don't usually think about breaking bad habits that often. In fact, most of the time I'm
01:17:36.800 focused on building or establishing new good behaviors. Which necessarily displace the old
01:17:43.560 ones. For example, with eating, it is a bit of a zero sum game. I mean, not entirely. I guess you
01:17:49.340 could just keep eating more and more and more. But generally, if you say I'm going to eat more good
01:17:53.940 things, it kind of drives down the bad things. Is that the way it normally works then? I think a lot
01:18:00.340 of the time it does. And that's why I tend to focus on that for my personal life is that it's kind of
01:18:04.920 like two plants. One plant, if it grows a little bit more and spreads its leaves a little further,
01:18:10.100 it starts to crowd out the other plant. Just soaks up more energy and resources and sunlight.
01:18:15.320 And your good habits are kind of like that. I mean, we all, in some sense, it is zero sum
01:18:19.440 in the sense that we only have 24 hours in each day. And so if you have somebody who says, even if
01:18:24.980 they're unrelated habits, they say, hey, I want to start doing something healthy. I'd like to start
01:18:29.060 working out for an hour each day. And I also want to watch less TV. I just feel like I watch Netflix
01:18:34.400 too much. Well, if you usually watch Netflix for three hours each evening and you decide to insert
01:18:39.780 your workout from six to 7 p.m., by definition, you're not watching Netflix while you're doing
01:18:45.500 that. You start to crowd out the bad behavior just by focusing on building a workout habit,
01:18:50.580 even if you don't think about the TV thing at all. So my sort of general approach is, look,
01:18:56.260 I'm trying to spend my 24 hours in the highest leverage way possible, the best way possible,
01:19:01.820 the way that is moving me toward whatever I'm optimizing for. Let me just try to continually
01:19:06.980 think about how to upgrade those behaviors. I also like that mindset more than the breaking
01:19:11.940 the bad habits one, because it gives me a reason to improve even once I have good habits.
01:19:16.960 I'm continually looking for the higher leverage action. Even if what I'm doing is already good,
01:19:21.200 okay, fine. How can I make it great now? I tend to focus on that style rather than thinking about
01:19:26.480 breaking bad ones, but they definitely are related to answer your question.
01:19:29.960 The example that we come back to is smoking, because smoking doesn't really take that much
01:19:34.400 time. So it's hard to say, I'm just going to introduce a new habit that will force smoking
01:19:38.500 out. Are there other examples though of habits where you really do focus on how to break the bad
01:19:44.380 one? Yeah. So to take the smoking example, I think it's helpful to divide it into the specific
01:19:51.740 instances in which it happens. So we kind of lump smoking into a single habit, but the truth is it
01:19:58.240 actually might be a collection of like a dozen habits throughout the day. It might be that you
01:20:02.740 have a habit of smoking when you get in your car for the morning commute. And then you also have a
01:20:06.900 habit of smoking around 1030 when you take a break with your coworker. And then you also have a habit of
01:20:11.720 smoking after dinner on your porch. And all three of those are going to have their own cue, craving,
01:20:18.660 response, and reward. In a sense, you kind of have to intervene in like 12 different places
01:20:22.940 to try to come up with a solution for each one of those. So you might find that like for the morning
01:20:28.320 commute, maybe instead of having a cigarette, you come up with something else that you can do
01:20:33.180 on the morning commute that fulfills that desire. Maybe even just a cup of coffee is what wakes you
01:20:37.960 up instead of a cigarette. That may not work for the 1030 session with your friend. Maybe there you
01:20:43.520 actually need like an e-cigarette to start. I want to have the socialization of feeling like you're
01:20:48.500 smoking with a friend. You may need to like take it in different stages and break it down
01:20:52.820 degree where it's easier to have a line of attack. The environment seems to be so potent. You know,
01:20:59.620 again, David Foster Wallace writes about in his commencement speech, this is water. He talks about
01:21:03.840 the ubiquity of water and also the fact that you don't even realize it's there. And that's what makes
01:21:08.660 it so profound, right? Is the heat referring to certain thoughts. But I think the same is true of
01:21:13.500 these cues. For most of us, we're not actually that aware of what it is. It can be pointed out
01:21:18.440 to you and you can say, oh yeah, I come to think of it. I am a fish swimming in water or yeah,
01:21:23.460 I come to think of it every time I get in the car, it's the act of getting in the car and driving to
01:21:28.580 work that signals a change in where I'm going. And that's what forces me to light up. But the example
01:21:35.200 of having the cigarette at 1030 with your coworker is a very powerful one because of the connection in
01:21:41.960 the environment. I remember in my residency, when people would come into the hospital with
01:21:48.180 abscesses from IV drug use. So very Baltimore, which is right at my residency, there was just
01:21:53.160 rampant IV drug use. You'd be amazed at how much that habit and that addiction could cause a person
01:21:59.880 to do something that at the surface doesn't seem that logical. Use dirty needles and needles would
01:22:05.020 break in their abscesses. And you'd be down there and you'd be sort of draining a huge baseball size
01:22:10.400 pus filled abscess that's got broken needles in it. And this person is very sick. I mean,
01:22:15.460 this is a person who's now risking their life due to this. And they would be back in a month with the
01:22:20.600 same thing in a month and a month later, the same thing over and over again. And tragically,
01:22:24.020 eventually a lot of these people would die. But I remember at some point saying to these folks,
01:22:27.700 this was the best advice I could offer, which was not very helpful, was I don't think you can go
01:22:32.860 back to the same place you live. I think you need new friends. Now that's not a very helpful thing to
01:22:38.480 offer somebody who probably doesn't have many choices. But the point was like, how could you
01:22:43.120 expect this person to go back to the same place that they were living in the same environment
01:22:47.500 with all of the same people doing the same things and say, well, you just got to resist it. It
01:22:53.300 doesn't make sense. Presumably someone who decides they want to stop drinking alcohol
01:22:57.800 really ought not go into a bar that much anymore. Environment is like a form of gravity pulls on you and
01:23:04.800 you can resist it for a little bit, but maybe a day or week or a month. But at some point,
01:23:10.080 it just starts to drain on you, sucks you back in. And to your point about going back to the
01:23:16.140 environment that prompted the behavior in the first place. I mean, this is one of the stories I share in
01:23:20.320 Atomic Habits, but it was the surprise that we saw from the Vietnam War, which is so many soldiers
01:23:25.260 were getting addicted to heroin and drugs when they were over there. And then they came back and we were
01:23:30.220 like, what are we going to do with all these addicted soldiers? And it turns out that 90% of
01:23:35.180 them or more ended up being fine because they didn't go back to the place where they got addicted.
01:23:39.680 They went home to their friends and family and they didn't have all the same signals that were
01:23:44.540 prompting them to pick up the habit. And so they were able to drop it much more easily than we thought
01:23:49.160 they would. And compare that to the typical drug addict who does the reverse. They go into rehab
01:23:54.620 and that's where they leave all of their cues and influences behind. And then once they get clean
01:24:01.660 and they detox, we send them back to the same place where they got addicted before. That is a much,
01:24:06.440 much harder uphill battle. So environment, I think it's kind of like the invisible hand that
01:24:12.040 drives our behavior. As you said, it's kind of like water, you know, fish in water. We don't realize it,
01:24:17.020 but we all have these things that we say are important to us. Oh, I would like to lose weight,
01:24:21.580 or I'd like to build a business, or I want to finish a book. But then you look around the spaces
01:24:26.340 where we live and work. The cues of those habits are not a big part of the environment. We all are
01:24:32.740 busy, strapped for time, minimal energy. We have kids to take care of, or parents to do chores for,
01:24:40.000 or friends to see. And whenever we have limited capacity or limited time, or we're low on energy or
01:24:46.500 exhausted, what choice do we make? We often choose the thing that is most obvious in the environment.
01:24:52.080 We choose the thing that is the easy choice or the path of least resistance. And so if I'm
01:24:57.540 recommending a place to start for changing behavior, it's usually either the first law or
01:25:02.660 the third law. It's making it obvious and making it easy. Because we can talk about making it easy,
01:25:07.440 but scaling habits down obviously makes it more likely that you're able to complete the task.
01:25:11.620 And making it obvious essentially creates an environment where the good choices are right
01:25:17.320 in front of you, where they're the path of least resistance. Individually, I think it's easy to
01:25:22.280 overlook the importance of this because individually, one change to the environment does not usually
01:25:28.140 meaningfully move the needle or change your behavior. But collectively, making a dozen or two
01:25:33.940 dozen or 50 little choices to how your office is laid out and how your living room is laid out and how
01:25:38.980 your kitchen is laid out. Yeah. Now all of a sudden you're working and thriving in a space that is
01:25:43.780 stacking the odds in your favor. That's making it more likely that you will just choose the good
01:25:48.700 thing because the healthy food is on the counter and the TV is behind a wall unit and a cabinet where
01:25:53.840 you're less likely to see it. And the remote control is inside a drawer and there's a book in
01:25:58.160 its place. And you have a couple of books that are scattered around in your desk waiting for you to
01:26:02.680 pick them up and open them. You can do it with digital spaces too. When I wanted to start reading
01:26:07.600 more, I took audible for audio books and I moved it to the home screen on my phone and took all the
01:26:13.120 other apps and move them to the second screen. That's a very small thing and it doesn't guarantee
01:26:18.000 the behavior, but it's another way to stack the odds in my favor that whenever I open up my phone,
01:26:23.320 I'm reminded to listen to an audio book for a few minutes rather than browse Instagram. And the more
01:26:28.880 that you do those kinds of things, the more likely good behaviors are to arise. So one thing I want to park
01:26:34.420 for later once we get through the laws is a very specific question around the challenges that some
01:26:42.500 people face and that they don't control their environment. And again, I come back to food because
01:26:45.820 I think for most of my patients and for myself, food is such a struggle because again, it's always
01:26:51.740 around us. You have to do it. It's not a behavior you can just opt out of. And I think those of us that
01:26:57.320 have kids, not to throw our kids under the bus, but I haven't met too many people whose eating habits
01:27:02.160 get better once they have kids. If they're generally inclined to be healthy people, because
01:27:06.380 at some point you sort of start losing the battle of how much non crap you can have in the house
01:27:12.400 due to time constraints and the other constraints, which is look, kids are going to eat things that
01:27:18.240 are probably not so bad for them, but I shouldn't be eating wheat thins. My kids love wheat thins.
01:27:24.180 I love wheat thins. I think the difference is they can get away with eating a lot more wheat
01:27:28.480 thins than I can. So I've lost the wheat thin battle. We have a pantry that is full of wheat
01:27:34.100 thins and I'm never, at least for the foreseeable future, going to get those wheat thins out of
01:27:37.980 there. So now every time I walk in the pantry, I'm staring down the barrel of wheat thins and I
01:27:43.040 would love to get those wheat thins in the trash. But every time I do, my wife says, understandably,
01:27:47.540 Hey, if you want to be in charge of feeding the kids every meal, knock yourself out chef. But if you're
01:27:53.680 not, let me handle food and our kids eat well, but they're going to eat wheat thins and a few other
01:27:57.980 things that you'd want to eat. Isn't it kind of fascinating? Like you're someone that I think
01:28:01.600 most people have described as disciplined and high performing and talented and skilled. And you
01:28:06.340 like, look at yourself with that. And you're like, wheat thins beat me every time I think about myself.
01:28:10.140 I was doing an interview with somebody else a couple of weeks ago, and he was joking about how
01:28:14.360 the number of cookies he can eat is either zero or 30, because if they're there, then he's going to
01:28:21.020 eat them all. And I'm exactly that way. One of the best hacks that we've come up with is I love
01:28:26.760 chocolate chip cookies and my wife will make them, but she'll make the balls of dough and then freeze
01:28:32.460 them and put them in the freezer. And at night after dinner, we'll take them out and just take
01:28:37.240 out two and put them on the pan and warm up the oven and put them in. And it's actually a better
01:28:42.400 experience because you get to eat like fresh baked, warm chocolate chip cookies, but you'll only eat two
01:28:47.920 because all the rest of them are frozen. It's just enough friction to know that this is going to take
01:28:52.640 another 15 minutes. If I want to take two more out and heat them up, I don't actually need another
01:28:56.660 cookie. Like I just want to eat it. What limits you from putting five on the tray?
01:29:00.980 We just haven't gotten in the habit of doing that. So hopefully that question won't wreck my psyche.
01:29:05.400 And now we'll be doing that every night. Is part of that the accountability though, between you
01:29:09.300 that probably you say I want five, at least she's going to say, she'd be like, come on. Yeah, for sure.
01:29:14.720 It's interesting the ways in which there's a whole discussion we can have about habits and marriage
01:29:18.700 and relationships and how that influences things. Cause you soak up, each person soaks up a little
01:29:23.420 bit of the other partner, but we've seen it work in a very positive way for training, which is there
01:29:28.720 are going to be some days where I just like, don't feel like working out after a full day at work,
01:29:32.460 but she's like, all right, we're going to go to the gym. And then I'm like, okay, I'll change.
01:29:36.920 And then other days I'm like, okay, I'm ready. And she's like, all right. You know,
01:29:40.480 and she didn't feel like it. That's really helpful for the long-term consistency. But I've talked to
01:29:45.620 other couples who've said my nutrition habits actually got worse. Cause like one day I won't
01:29:50.480 feel like cooking and I'll be like, Hey, can we just order out? And she'll be like, okay, fine.
01:29:53.820 And then the other day she won't feel like cooking. Like, Hey, why don't we pick up something from,
01:29:57.420 and you're like, okay, fine. And so you can see how it goes in both directions. And I don't
01:30:02.100 have a good way to describe these upward and downward spirals that we often get into where the momentum,
01:30:09.300 once it's moving in that direction, you just kind of like, it becomes your default behavior and you just
01:30:13.540 sort of keep rolling with it. But there's something very powerful about that in life that if you get
01:30:18.640 on a nice trajectory and you got a good spiral working for you, then that momentum just kind
01:30:23.060 of carries you. If you start to get in a downward spiral, you really got to find a way to just
01:30:28.260 reverse course and gain a foothold. Even if it's a really small thing, just to get the momentum
01:30:33.100 moving in the other direction. But anyway, there are a lot of potentials there.
01:30:37.140 And that's actually something I feel like I've also noticed with my patients and myself,
01:30:41.360 which is, it seems that the people who are able to be more self-forgiving when they slip up and get
01:30:50.780 back on course, have an easier time than people who approach it through a very perfectionistic lens.
01:30:58.580 And once they make a mistake, they get into the cycle of self-judgment and beating themselves up.
01:31:06.080 And I say them, like, it's me too, right? We all do this. And all of a sudden, a blown meal turns
01:31:13.520 into, well, forget it, the day's over. I mean, I've screwed this day up, so I'm just going to eat
01:31:18.100 whatever I want. And then you wake up the next day and you probably feel like crap, both physically
01:31:22.640 and emotionally. And that reduces your drive to continue to do what you set out to do and give
01:31:30.560 the spirals. And you make a point about that in the book, which is if you're going to miss a workout,
01:31:34.000 miss a workout, but don't miss two. Yeah. Never miss twice is the idea that I try to,
01:31:38.040 the little mantra I try to tell myself. Stuck to the diet for nine days, binge ate a pizza on the
01:31:43.580 10th day. Well, I wish I hadn't happened, but never miss twice. So let's make sure the next meal is a
01:31:49.300 healthy one. And I think we all know this implicitly from going through life, but it's easy to forget in
01:31:55.780 the moment, which is, it's rarely the first mistake that ruins you. It's like usually the spiral of
01:32:01.040 repeated mistakes that follows. That's the real problem. It's like letting slipping up
01:32:04.760 become a new habit. That's the real issue. And if you can cut that off of the source,
01:32:09.820 if you can never miss twice, get to the end of the year. And those mistakes are just like a little
01:32:14.580 blip on the radar. It's really about getting back on track quickly. I think actually you see this with
01:32:19.980 top performers in many different industries. Like, you know, think about any athlete. I mean,
01:32:24.200 this is something that like Nick Saban's teams at Alabama pride themselves on.
01:32:27.360 The screw up a play or have a bad drive, throw an interception for a touchdown or something,
01:32:32.160 but the focus is on the very next play. And I'm making sure that you don't let that mistake
01:32:38.180 become another mistake. And the teams and the athletes that are really good at doing that and
01:32:43.060 having a short memory and getting right back on track, they end up having really successful
01:32:47.720 careers and you can scale that down to your own life. Gretchen Rubin actually has this, I thought
01:32:53.240 it was a clever little idea, which is divide the day into four quarters. So you got like morning,
01:32:58.320 afternoon, dinner and night or evening and night. If you make a mistake, keep it contained to that
01:33:03.560 quarter. So you don't lose the day, you just lose the quarter. And then the next one, you get back on
01:33:08.160 track. If you can keep your failure small like that, if you can contain the damage, then I just think
01:33:15.380 it's easier to get back on track quickly and to maintain the momentum, build consistency, all the other
01:33:19.780 positive benefits that we've talked about. And to your point about judging yourself or feeling guilty
01:33:24.240 or turning this into like a, some kind of self berating session, playing the victim never makes
01:33:29.720 it better. It doesn't make any of it easier. I think generally in life, we all have things that
01:33:34.760 happen to us. Some of them are terrible things and you can be the victim, but I don't know that it ever
01:33:40.960 benefits you to play the victim, to accept that role. Bad things can happen to you, but that doesn't
01:33:46.300 mean you have to start to identify as someone who is worthy of them or someone who is, you know,
01:33:50.840 it's inevitable for that to be part of your story. And so the more that you can like cut the judgment
01:33:56.580 out of it, cut the guilt out of it, the story, the narrative piece, and take that away and just
01:34:01.860 accept the event for what it is and move on to the next instance, I think probably the better off
01:34:07.260 you'll be. Yeah. This is probably an area where a habit that is probably desirable for many people
01:34:12.340 also becomes a tool to help. And that's mindfulness meditation, which I think is one of the more
01:34:17.560 powerful tools to help people observe the judgment without judging it, which sounds odd to someone who
01:34:24.340 hasn't practiced that, but that becomes very powerful, made a difference as I've kind of released
01:34:29.740 the need to be perfect. It's really a continuum. And there's a spectrum of efficacy here, which is
01:34:36.080 like on Monday, we traveled the whole day. We got back and I really wanted to work out. I just hate
01:34:41.600 ever missing a workout. But the reality is once we got home and the kids were exhausted and
01:34:46.980 my wife was tired and it just felt like sort of a schmucky thing to do to go and work out and leave
01:34:52.260 her with decompensating kids and a whole bunch of stuff that needed to be unpacked. Actually, part of
01:34:57.480 the judgment was letting go of that, letting go of the fact that I wasn't going to work out that day.
01:35:01.080 And that was okay. Now you can do that on anything. I think if you can come to be flexible
01:35:05.820 and say, you're stuck in the airport with your kids, the food sucks. It is what it is today.
01:35:11.600 And you're not horrible because of it. But I think this idea of get back on the horse as quickly
01:35:16.920 as possible is really powerful. Again, anecdotally, I always bring everything back to driving a race
01:35:22.040 car. It is so rare that you make a mistake and crash in a car because of what you did at that
01:35:28.280 moment and not because of what happened earlier. If you spin at corner four, the mistake usually
01:35:35.540 started at corner two. And sometimes you don't realize it. And sometimes you do realize it, but you
01:35:40.620 arrogantly think that you don't have to make any adjustment going forward because of it. At least
01:35:45.720 for me, that's been an incredibly humbling experience with how mistakes compound.
01:35:52.340 Rapid course correction is probably a deeply applicable lesson for many areas of life. The world
01:35:57.940 is complex and situations evolve. Life is dynamic. It's not static. Your preferences also evolve.
01:36:04.120 What you optimize for or want is different today than it was 10 years ago and probably will be
01:36:09.140 different five years from now or 10 years from now. And given that many changing dynamics, it's not
01:36:15.120 possible for someone to predict the optimal course of action. And even if you could, it is very unlikely
01:36:21.700 that it will remain the optimal course of action. Given that things are going to be changing, you're going
01:36:27.100 to be off course at some point. And the ability to correct for that and to correct for that
01:36:32.120 quickly. I mean, it might be one of the all optimal life skills, the ability to assess where you are in
01:36:38.680 the moment, see what the next step is going to be. Keep in mind where you ultimately want to go
01:36:43.580 and then correct as needed is possibly the path to like living a great life. I heard recently this,
01:36:50.680 I thought it was a great little framework, which is ABZ came from Sean Peary. He's a entrepreneur
01:36:56.680 and basically said, you need to know your ABZs. A is where you are right now. It's like the truth
01:37:02.920 of the situation. The reality B is your next step. And Z is where you want to go. Ultimately it's
01:37:09.340 where you want to end up. And I think the key, this is me talking now, not him. For me, the key is
01:37:14.240 working backwards. It's knowing Z first, knowing what you're optimizing for, and then jumping back to
01:37:20.800 A and being honest about the situation. What is the truth of the situation? What are the resources I
01:37:25.440 have? The skills I have? What are my strengths? What are my weaknesses? What's reality say? And
01:37:30.700 then knowing that I want to head towards Z and knowing honestly where I am today, what's the next
01:37:35.920 step? I actually don't need to know C through Y right now. I don't need to have the whole thing
01:37:40.600 planned out perfectly, but I do need to make sure that my next step is directionally correct.
01:37:45.260 If it is, then you can just keep running that ABZ process over and over again until you finally get
01:37:50.000 there. Yeah. Annie Duke talks about this in a slightly different way. And she refers to it as
01:37:54.360 backcasting. And I find it to be an incredibly powerful tool, again, to be contrasted with
01:37:59.800 forecasting, right? Forecasting is I'm just going to stand here and I'm going to tell you I got to do
01:38:03.740 B and then C and then as opposed to saying, no, this is where I am. That's the desired outcome.
01:38:09.220 Let's start working the steps backwards. What you've described is slightly different, but I think it
01:38:13.440 preserves this idea of taking stock of where you are and most importantly, understanding where you need to be
01:38:18.280 and not trying to do what I think stochastically is really hard, but predict every step going forward.
01:38:24.420 The only thing I'll add to that, which I like Annie's framework and I think working backwards is
01:38:28.800 it's a really powerful thing, particularly if you can not be your own bottleneck in the process.
01:38:35.560 The phrase I like is work backwards from magic. What would the magical outcome be? What would the
01:38:40.380 ideal outcome be? And then let me work backwards from that. And a lot of people have trouble with that
01:38:45.040 brainstorming part of the process because they think, well, if it's unrealistic, why would I even
01:38:49.440 try? And the point is like, listen, it's way too early for that. Most people become their own
01:38:54.020 bottleneck long before reality prevents them from doing it, which is kind of this great irony.
01:38:59.080 We're like, Oh, you know, why would I attempt this like super impossible thing? And it's like, well,
01:39:02.660 the world hasn't even told you it's impossible yet. You have, I think work backwards from the magical
01:39:07.260 outcome. But my key is I want to be very clear about where I'm going, but very flexible about how I get
01:39:13.440 there. I don't need it to happen. If I work backwards, I don't need it to happen only through
01:39:18.340 that chain of that potential path, because if you can only have one way to get there, you're
01:39:23.180 actually kind of brittle. You become hostage to things working exactly in that way. But if I know
01:39:28.680 where I want to get to with a very clear vision, I'm flexible on how I get there. Well, now I can
01:39:32.140 start to spring on opportunities as they arise and just take whatever the most fruitful path seems to
01:39:36.520 be. But I do think that that whole process starts with working backwards. So it's, I think a more
01:39:42.360 fruitful way to think about where you want to go than just trying to predict. Before we leave the
01:39:46.280 first law, what advice do you offer for people if they aren't quite clear what the cues are? Again,
01:39:54.960 in the spirit of trying to even displace a habit that's maladaptive and create new ones. Again,
01:40:00.400 is this something that's just empirical or is it, I hate to use the word, but other tricks for
01:40:04.900 identifying what the cues are? I think there are exercises or strategies you can use. So
01:40:09.500 you sort of hinted at this a few minutes ago and I meant to say it, but I forgot, which is
01:40:14.960 the process of behavior change, strategically changing your behavior. We need to make a
01:40:20.620 separation here, a distinction between the types of behavior change because people change their
01:40:25.540 behavior all the time. We're always responding to the situation we're in or the circumstance or the
01:40:30.160 conversation we're having. This is like one of the great myths about behavior change, which is
01:40:34.260 behavior change is hard. Actually, it's one of the easiest things that you do. Like your brain is
01:40:38.540 designed to change your behavior, to match the situation that you're in. So you're making
01:40:42.920 adjustments all the time. The question is, can you reliably change your behavior? Can you design
01:40:48.820 your behavior in a fashion that you want? And if you want to design it, if you want to be in control
01:40:53.820 of it more, I think it almost always starts with the process of self-awareness. And that's kind of what
01:40:58.400 this question is getting at. I don't even know what the cues are. I don't even know what my habits are.
01:41:02.160 So the two exercises I recommend, the first one I call the habit scorecard, and you just go through
01:41:08.180 your day and you list out every habit that you already do and try to get as detailed as possible.
01:41:13.080 So usually there's a big lump in the beginning. Like I wake up, I take a shower, I step on the scale,
01:41:18.160 I brush my teeth, I go to the bathroom, I get dressed. Like there's all this stuff that you do
01:41:22.180 to start your day. And then there's things for breakfast and starting your work day and on and on and
01:41:26.920 on. And the more that you have that list, again, the goal is not to judge yourself. It's almost like
01:41:33.080 you're at the zoo looking at animals and you're one of the animals. It's like, oh, how interesting
01:41:37.440 that they would do that. You're just trying to get a lay of the land and see how do I actually
01:41:41.020 spend my time? What habits am I actually doing if I'm being honest about it? So that's just to
01:41:45.540 understand what habits you have. To figure out what the cue is, basically you're just asking like
01:41:50.040 five questions. Who, what, when, where, why. You're essentially just trying to get a lay of what's
01:41:55.280 going on. So let's say that you're like, man, I eat a lot of candy bars, but I don't know why I do
01:41:59.860 it. I don't know what the cue is. Well, each time that you find yourself eating a candy bar,
01:42:04.580 just pull up a note on your phone or have an index card or a notebook or whatever, somewhere to record
01:42:09.080 it, write down, what time is it? Where are you at right now? What's the context? What's the
01:42:13.540 environment? Who are you around? Are you near the, do you eat these by the same kind of people?
01:42:17.820 What were you doing just before this? Was it a break from writing emails or doing something else?
01:42:22.740 And the more that you start to answer those questions about the context, the better you'll
01:42:27.780 start to understand, Hey, maybe that was the cue. And I bet if you do that exercise for whatever the
01:42:32.540 particular habit is that you're working on, just do that for, you may not even need to do it for a
01:42:36.700 week, but if you do it for five days or seven days or something, you're going to start to develop a
01:42:40.620 good sense for what it is that's prompting the behavior. Yeah, that's a great exercise. Is there any
01:42:46.340 concern that when a person does that, the Hawthorne effect kicks in and they basically start
01:42:50.660 deviating from the natural behavior because of the observation? In other words, is the act of
01:42:56.800 going through this exercise potentially making it harder for them to transparently see what's
01:43:01.940 happening? Maybe I'm not going to say it's not a risk. I'm sure it's a possible risk, but I think
01:43:07.280 what's more likely to happen is rather than not being able to see what's going on, assuming you're
01:43:12.460 being honest with yourself, it can be hard to honestly observe your own behavior. You have a lot of
01:43:17.620 biases and stories for why we do what we do. So assume you're doing that to the best degree
01:43:21.780 possible. I think you're probably still going to get a good idea of what the cue is. What I think
01:43:27.020 is more likely to happen if there is some influence on your behavior is you may find yourself changing
01:43:32.120 the behavior anyway, just because you're tracking it. And there are quite a few studies that show
01:43:36.900 this, like with nutrition, for example, there are some studies about food journaling, people who just
01:43:41.620 keep a food journal. They're not even trying to stick to a certain calorie level or a certain macro
01:43:46.300 profile or anything. They just are tracking what they're eating, tend to change their eating habits
01:43:52.060 and eat less just because they're tracking it, even if they don't have a specific program they're
01:43:56.040 trying to follow. So the mere act of observing something or measuring something often changes
01:44:01.780 the behavior associated with it. You may find that to be the case here. You're like, well, I keep right
01:44:06.020 now when I have candy bars, so I'm like, maybe I'll skip this one. I think that's probably the more
01:44:09.840 likely outcome, but who knows? There could be other biases as well. These devices here, these continuous
01:44:14.820 glucose monitors, they are a remarkable tool for both insight. When you first put them on,
01:44:20.020 you're sort of learning, oh my God, like I didn't realize eating that thing would have this response
01:44:23.520 in my glucose. But once you sort of saturate the insight part of that equation, it can be three
01:44:28.880 months, six months, depending on the complexity of your life. It becomes forever a behavioral tool.
01:44:36.140 You don't want to eat a certain thing if it's going to raise your glucose because you've at least
01:44:40.140 bought into the thesis that you don't want to have your glucose skyrocket the way it does when you eat
01:44:44.340 M&Ms. So it's interesting. It becomes kind of an accountability partner. And I find some of the
01:44:49.960 most interesting and sticky devices do that. The wearables that offer an insight that's not obvious,
01:44:56.220 but is objective tend to be the things that we really like coming back to. Whereas the ones that
01:45:02.580 are kind of obvious, like how many steps you take, that's not very sticky because we sort of have an
01:45:07.100 intuitive sense for what that is. Like once they've spent enough time walking 10,000 steps a day,
01:45:11.220 they don't really need a device to tell them that anymore. It becomes easier to do on their own.
01:45:15.640 This is a side comment, but I have this like theory about technology and innovation and that
01:45:20.960 the technologies that most radically change the world or change our behavior are all just kind of
01:45:25.540 different forms of vision. You have obvious examples like x-rays, which, you know, allow you to see
01:45:30.360 the broken bone or MRIs or whatever that allow you to see some tissue in a way that you couldn't see
01:45:35.760 before. And so that gives you information that then you can act on and make a diagnosis and,
01:45:39.860 you know, make some kind of change. But the glucose monitor is like another example. It's
01:45:44.220 just like, now you can see the spike and because you can see it, you change your behavior. Even
01:45:49.080 stuff like the number of email subscribers to my website, because my email platform tracks that and
01:45:54.800 I can see how many people are signing up each day. I make a change to the form and, you know,
01:45:59.780 conversion and so on. And I do think there's some deeper lesson there about behavior change and about
01:46:05.520 what drives human behavior, which is if you can visualize your progress in some way, maybe it's
01:46:12.160 a chart on a screen, maybe it's, you know, an actual printout, maybe it's something that you
01:46:16.460 actually see looking through lenses or something. But if you can actually visualize it, then the
01:46:21.640 behavior often follows suit. And that's why even simple strategies like a habit tracker, where you
01:46:26.740 just put an X on each day, seems very rudimentary, very basic, but it can still be meaningful because
01:46:33.520 it gives you a way of visualizing your progress. So anyway, the glucose monitor is an interesting
01:46:37.640 one. Yeah. This idea of what gets measured, gets managed is a great tool. About six months ago,
01:46:43.060 I started going to the water meter of our house every Tuesday and recording it. And then I've got
01:46:48.640 a little spreadsheet that says, okay, this is how many gallons we've used this week. This is what it
01:46:53.960 would project to for a monthly usage, et cetera, et cetera. And you just can't believe how much our water
01:46:59.140 usage has come down in six months because in Texas, water is not that expensive actually compared to
01:47:04.580 California, but just, it became something I was obsessed with, which is like, we're not going to
01:47:08.080 waste any water. I just don't want to waste any water. It's now become a game for me. It drives my
01:47:12.520 family nuts, but it is a game. Like we are going to have the lowest water bill ever in Austin. No one
01:47:19.760 is going to use less water than us. I'm obsessed with that spreadsheet. It's kind of like an adult version
01:47:25.780 of I spy walk in. You're like, I spy the red thing. And then all the red stuff in the room lights up
01:47:30.260 right now. You're like, I spy water and everywhere I go, that's what I see. And you find opportunities
01:47:35.300 and you find ways to change it. Oh yeah. When I'm giving my kids a shower, like once I'm lathering
01:47:40.260 them up the water, I got to turn the water off. And they're like, daddy, why are you turning the water
01:47:43.280 off? I'm like, because we're just putting soap on right now. You don't need the water. It drives
01:47:47.140 everybody nuts. Okay. So let's talk about the second law. Yeah. So the second law is making it
01:47:53.120 attractive. And I think there's a simple example I could give here, which is let's imagine that you
01:47:58.600 wake up tomorrow and you're like, all right, I listened to this guy talk about habits all day
01:48:02.940 today. So tomorrow's going to be the day I'm going to wake up and I'm going to go for a run.
01:48:07.120 So you set your alarm for 6am and 6am rolls around, but your bed is warm and it's cold outside. And
01:48:14.960 you're like, well, I'll just press snooze and sleep in. Like maybe I'll do it tomorrow.
01:48:18.180 But if you rewind the clock and come back to today and you text a friend and you say, Hey,
01:48:23.880 you want to meet at the park at 615 and go for a run? Well, now 6am rolls around. Your bed is still
01:48:29.940 warm and still cold outside. But if you don't get up and go for a run, you're a jerk because you leave
01:48:34.360 your friend at the park all alone. And so you've kind of simultaneously made it more attractive to
01:48:40.940 get up and go for a run and less attractive to press snooze and sleep in. Now you haven't made the
01:48:46.740 run itself any easier. That's still going to be as difficult as it was before. So the habit,
01:48:50.880 the difficulty is kind of the same, but you have changed the calculus that's going on in your mind
01:48:55.180 about like whether you should do this or not, or how attractive it seems. So there are a bunch of
01:48:59.940 examples, strategies like that and stuff that I talk about in the book and that you could use to
01:49:03.900 kind of make habits seem more attractive than they otherwise are. But that's sort of what it comes
01:49:08.380 down to on a short-term basis for making habits attractive on a long-term basis. I think it's about
01:49:13.760 what we've already discussed about the social environment and being part of a tribe where
01:49:17.520 your desired behavior is the normal behavior, because those behaviors become very attractive
01:49:22.240 even a year or two or five from now, if they help signal that you're part of the tribe.
01:49:27.960 Yeah. You brought up CrossFit earlier, but I always thought that CrossFit was one of the best
01:49:31.500 examples of this. I never did CrossFit myself. You know, there's lots of criticisms of it,
01:49:36.220 et cetera. But the reality of it is it was certainly, it was and is something that really creates a
01:49:42.120 community of people who have a certain belief about who they are and what they do. For all the
01:49:47.780 people who knock CrossFit, I've seen it take a lot of very inactive people and turn them into some
01:49:52.320 pretty impressive people. Yeah. I think the social side, the community side of it is the strongest
01:49:57.200 piece of the whole thing. It's the part that's hardest for any other exercise program to replicate.
01:50:02.220 That's for sure. It does. It gets people to stick to it. I mean, it becomes, it sounds extreme to
01:50:06.720 call it a form of a religion, but it becomes kind of like that for them. I mean, the box is like
01:50:10.860 their church in a lot of ways. You know, they go six days a week instead of one day a week.
01:50:14.600 There are a lot of strong community elements there. You also see CrossFitters pick up a bunch
01:50:19.060 of habits they didn't even expect. Like they thought they were going to start working out,
01:50:22.800 but then six months later, they all are buying the same brand of knee sleeves and they have a
01:50:27.400 certain type of weightlifting shoe and they're all eating paleo. And it was like, we didn't even plan
01:50:32.240 on doing that stuff. I just was going to go to a gym to work out. But all of those are behaviors
01:50:37.500 that signal what it means to be part of that group. And again, once you start to build friends
01:50:42.440 in that group and start to, you know, become ingrained in that society or in that tribe,
01:50:47.360 you start to soak up some of those other behaviors as well.
01:50:50.500 It's really a great example. I guess we'll go to the third and fourth law, but I want to take a step
01:50:54.460 back and ask you where you put nudging into this. So Richard Thaler's book, Nudge, which was probably
01:51:00.120 the first book I ever read on this subject matter. I mean, it seems so obvious, which is what makes it so
01:51:06.180 interesting and insightful, right? Sometimes the most brilliant things in retrospect seem so
01:51:10.660 entirely obvious, but it was, I think reading Richard's book circa, I don't know, call it maybe
01:51:16.080 2012, it's probably nearly 10 years ago. This idea of the default food environment sort of came to me.
01:51:21.720 And I use that term with our patients as the more you can control your default food environment,
01:51:27.020 the more healthy you can be. So if your default food environment sucks, you're going to be relying
01:51:32.100 on willpower a lot. And that's really, really hard. If your default food environment is one extreme end
01:51:37.700 of the spectrum, you can have a perfect default food environment. You can be the healthiest person
01:51:41.080 in the world, even if it's not enjoyable. If you were locked in a room and all you had were the best
01:51:45.660 foods to eat, you're going to end up being healthy. And you're going to be kind of like,
01:51:48.800 oh, if I eat one more macadamia nut and have one more avocado and salad. But nudging obviously refers
01:51:54.360 to a cue, but it also refers to this environmental change. It doesn't seem to really capture the idea of
01:52:00.080 making it attractive or does it? I think it's more about making it obvious. I would lump it more in
01:52:05.540 the first law. Design the environment to make the good habit the obvious one, to make the good habit
01:52:11.820 the path of least resistance. Some other nudges that are very popular people talk about is like
01:52:16.800 default choices on forms. The very famous example being the organ donor study. Default opting in every
01:52:24.140 employee to a 401k and making them opt out is a nudge. I think that's also another example of making
01:52:29.700 obvious or we could also say making it easy. Nothing's easier than letting it ride. All of those are
01:52:35.200 examples. To your point about default food environment, Daria Rose, who writes a nutrition blog, she's got a
01:52:41.760 great concept. I just like it. It's kind of sticky. Home court habits and away court habits. The argument
01:52:46.880 is like, try to optimize your home court habits first. What's the environment where it's your kitchen,
01:52:52.200 it's your apartment, you get to set the tone. And let's just try to prime all of that. Whatever happens at a
01:52:57.680 restaurant or when you're at a hotel traveling or whatever, let's don't worry about that as much right now. Let's
01:53:02.480 just optimize the home court. I like that. If you can build a home court advantage for yourself, then you get
01:53:07.620 in a good situation, you start to build some momentum, you handle the thing that you're probably going to be
01:53:12.300 doing 70% of the time or 80% of the time. And then after that, you can move on to the away court stuff.
01:53:18.760 So one of the other things you talk about is the idea of accountability. It's come up now several times. And I think
01:53:25.080 everybody would agree that the moment you have somebody else in this thing with you, the better
01:53:30.180 it gets. Is there any evidence about the type of accountability partner? So an example you gave
01:53:36.760 was your wife, great accountability partner for you guys to work out. Would that be more or less
01:53:41.680 effective than if you were matched with a person who you didn't know, but who had similar aspirations
01:53:49.460 conversations where you'd be less comfortable and perhaps more inclined to hold yourself to a higher
01:53:56.140 standard? Again, it kind of comes back to this idea of how we're wired to be seeking the approval of others and
01:54:03.120 all those sorts of other things. Is there any research to support this idea?
01:54:06.460 I don't know of any studies that like distinguish clearly between those two. It's quite possible. There are plenty out
01:54:12.420 there. I just may not know of them, but I can see it working well on both sides. And I also see complexities on both
01:54:18.480 sides. So a lot of the time when people talk about accountability partners, they join a Facebook
01:54:23.880 group or they join a course or a program or something, and they get matched up the way that
01:54:27.760 you described. But I can actually see that form of accountability kind of falling apart fairly quickly
01:54:33.520 for a simple reason, which is it's a stranger and you don't really bear much cost for them thinking you
01:54:40.300 did a bad job, or you may not really value or care that much about their opinion. Compare that to the
01:54:46.860 example I gave earlier, which is you walk outside and your neighbor sees that your lawn is very sloppy
01:54:52.620 and you haven't mowed the grass in three weeks. That actually you may care pretty deeply about
01:54:57.000 because you don't want to be judged by the other people in the neighborhood and you don't want to
01:55:00.140 have friction with your neighbor and so on. And so there's much more of a cost there. And that form
01:55:05.160 of accountability is a lot stronger because there's some reason why you really want to fall through on
01:55:11.180 it. Now you could say that that same thing is true for, you know, for example, a marriage or
01:55:16.200 relationship. I don't want to let my partner down. I don't want them to think poorly of me and so on.
01:55:21.620 But you have to remember in that particular case, you're so close that there are actually a lot of
01:55:27.560 additional complexities there. Like you want to be fairly forgiving of your partner because you're
01:55:32.500 living with them all the time. Or even if it's not someone you're married to, say it's your brother
01:55:37.180 or your parents or whoever. There's just a lot going on in those relationships. And so is the
01:55:42.980 other person really going to become like an enemy just over you skipping your workout routine on
01:55:49.240 Tuesday? Because you guys got to get dinner together on Wednesday night and you have to babysit their
01:55:54.340 kids over the weekend. And there's a lot of other stuff that's involved there. And so in those cases,
01:56:00.320 I think the relationships are so tight or so complex that that person may not actually want to be a
01:56:06.800 strict accountability partner because of the other costs may need to bear. You're kind of in this
01:56:11.400 weird situation where you don't want there to be other things on the line that would influence their
01:56:17.120 ability to hold you accountable. But you do actually want to care about their opinion and to bear some
01:56:23.640 cost if you don't follow through. Perhaps this is the reason why having like a coach is a good example,
01:56:29.560 because that's somebody that presumably you want to do a good job because you're going to see them
01:56:33.880 repeatedly. Even if it's not as dicey as the neighbor situation where like you do bear some
01:56:39.580 social cost for it, you probably bear a financial cost because you may be paying your nutrition
01:56:44.520 coats $500 or $1,000 or whatever. And the more that there's some kind of painful cost associated with
01:56:52.020 it, probably the more that you're going to be willing to follow through on that accountability.
01:56:56.480 And speaking of a coach, just more broadly, how does a coach or how did the best coaches,
01:57:02.540 if you have insight into this thread the needle of creating accountability,
01:57:07.620 but also creating encouragement when you fall short?
01:57:10.740 Boy, that's a big question. I'm not a coach. I've been fortunate to have some good ones.
01:57:16.180 And I've also had a bunch of mediocre ones too. And thinking about the difference between them,
01:57:21.240 we could have a whole conversation about coaching and about the art of that because there is a really
01:57:26.440 fine balance there. And I think there also is a big difference in the, I'm going to use athlete,
01:57:33.180 but of course you can have a coach for many things, but there's a big difference also in the intensity
01:57:37.440 that the athlete might have. You can imagine I was into Olympic weightlifting for a time and it was
01:57:43.080 kind of the main way I was training. I had the fortune of training with a really great team. I was
01:57:47.440 very average, but Holly Mangold was on that team and she competed at the Olympic games in London in 2012.
01:57:52.640 Just watching the interactions between the coaches and her and what was required for her to make it
01:57:58.960 to the Olympics was interesting to see. There is every element of a tight relationship there. I mean,
01:58:04.740 there's tough love and there's actual love. And there are some days where you have to be really
01:58:09.260 harsh and some days where you have to be really soft. And there's all the dynamics of the athlete's
01:58:14.860 internal mindset. There are days when you go out and you feel like you're a world killer and like
01:58:20.060 nobody can touch you. And then there are other days where you just feel completely broken. And
01:58:24.260 you're like, can I keep this training up for another six months? The more intense the objective
01:58:29.020 is that you're trying to achieve. I think the more detailed and balanced and nuanced all of that
01:58:33.720 becomes. And then you have just your standard CrossFit coach who's coaching a 35 year old dad of
01:58:38.620 two who just wants to get in better shape. And that I think may be totally different relationship.
01:58:43.760 I don't know that I have a good answer there, but I do think it's a really important thing.
01:58:46.840 Great coaches are incredibly valuable. They're rare by definition. That's why they're great.
01:58:52.740 It's probably much more complicated than a lot of us realize.
01:58:55.500 So you said rule number one and rule number three were probably the most important. Rule number three
01:58:59.960 is now make it easy. Yeah. So if I could only recommend one thing, if you forced me to say,
01:59:06.000 hey, where's the one place I would start? I would say, start with this, start with me.
01:59:09.220 Do you hate being asked that question, by the way? If you could just do one thing.
01:59:13.380 You know how it is. You know, like if somebody said, what was the one thing I would do to get
01:59:16.200 healthy, you'd be like, okay, come on. This is like a very big picture. There's a lot of stuff
01:59:19.440 here. Same story here. I do think this is a good place to start though. And so if I had to pick,
01:59:24.480 I would say, follow the two minute rule, which says, take whatever habit you're trying to build
01:59:28.900 and scale it down to something that takes two minutes or less to do. So read 30 books a year
01:59:34.420 becomes read one page or do yoga four days a week becomes take out my yoga mat. And sometimes people
01:59:40.720 hate that because they're like, okay, buddy, I know I'm not actually just trying to take my yoga mat out.
01:59:45.640 I know I'm actually trying to do the workout. So if this is some kind of mental trick and I know
01:59:49.860 it's a trick, then like, why would I fall for it basically? And I get where people are coming from,
01:59:54.120 but I have this reader, his name's Mitch. And I mentioned him in Atomic Habits. He lost a ton
01:59:59.040 of weight. Another guy, I think he lost definitely over 80 pounds. I think it was probably over a hundred
02:00:02.620 kept it off for a long time. He had this interesting rule for himself though. When he went to the gym
02:00:08.260 for the first six weeks, they started working out. He wasn't allowed to stay for longer than five minutes.
02:00:13.220 So he'd get in the car, drive to the gym, get out, do half an exercise, get back in the car,
02:00:18.280 drive home. And it sounds ridiculous. It sounds silly. You're like, obviously this is not going
02:00:22.820 to get the guy the results that he wants. But if you take a step back, what you realize is that he
02:00:28.320 was mastering the art of showing up. He was becoming the type of person that went to the gym
02:00:32.760 four days a week, even if it was only for five minutes. And I think this is like a deep truth about
02:00:38.900 habits. Something that we often overlook, which is a habit must be established before it can be
02:00:44.220 improved. It has to become the standard in your life before you can optimize and scale it up into
02:00:49.060 something more. If you want, you can come up with a better theory. Like you could come up with a
02:00:53.860 perfect plan, but unless you're acting on it, it doesn't do you any good. It's just a really good
02:00:58.760 idea. For whatever reason we get like really all or nothing about our habits. We tend to have this
02:01:04.600 tendency to be like, well, if I can't do the full marathon training program, then why go for a run
02:01:09.040 at all? Or if I can't follow through on the perfect lean startup business framework, then like why
02:01:14.120 bother starting a company? The two minute rule kind of helps you get over that tendency of
02:01:18.420 perfectionism and just start to master the art of showing up, find a small way to establish the
02:01:23.760 habit, make it part of your new normal. And then you can gain a little foothold and start to scale up
02:01:28.560 and expand from there. There's that great quote from Ed Latimore, where he says the heaviest weight at the gym
02:01:33.520 as the front door. That's true for a lot of things in life. The hardest part is getting started. So
02:01:38.120 let's master that and make it part of your lifestyle. And then once you're the kind of
02:01:42.360 person who's showing up consistently, we have all kinds of options for how we can improve and optimize
02:01:46.520 and so on. I think meditation is another great place where that two minute rule really helps.
02:01:52.680 I think it can be really daunting the first time you decide for the first time, let's say you buy the
02:01:57.400 idea that, Hey, you know what? There's probably real value in this. I'd be better served to go on a
02:02:01.440 silent retreat for seven days or meditate 40 minutes every day. It's like, that's a real big
02:02:05.820 step for someone who's never done it. How about two minutes every single day you meditate and maybe
02:02:12.160 in a few weeks it's three minutes a day, but yeah, you have to sort of lay down that track to say,
02:02:17.820 Hey, I'm a person who meditates and B this is the actual muscle memory of what it looks like to sit
02:02:22.360 down. It's also surprising how few people actually have two minutes in their day where they stop and do
02:02:28.920 nothing except breathe. That alone would deliver more value than you might expect. And there are
02:02:33.700 a whole host of other behaviors that go along with this. You think meditating for two minutes
02:02:38.900 sounds very small, but if you start to back out of it, you realize you got to pick a space. Where
02:02:44.320 is it going to happen? What time of day is it going to occur? Is this something that you're going to do
02:02:48.200 before work or after work? Do you do it on your lunch break? Try to do it with somebody to, so you have a
02:02:53.340 little bit of social accountability, or is this just like a private thing that you're going to do in the
02:02:56.460 corner? Do you need a pillow to sit on or are you fine to sit on the floor? Like what's your
02:03:00.460 flexibility? Like, are you going to get interrupted by your kids? If you do this at 7am, it might be
02:03:04.960 nice to get it done in the morning, but is that when you're getting them ready for school and getting
02:03:08.320 them dressed? A lot of little questions like that, that people don't think about. And so finding a very
02:03:14.360 small version of the habit allows you to get all of that other stuff kind of handled, figure out the
02:03:19.640 logistics of it and just to do it for a minute or two. And then once you get all that stuff
02:03:24.900 handled and you don't have to decide anymore, you have a little bit more mental capacity and energy
02:03:29.280 to actually focus into, okay, let me scale this up a bit and do it maybe in the way that I was
02:03:33.800 hoping I would. So how do you make them satisfying? Cause that's the fourth law. Yeah. So this is the
02:03:39.640 final piece. It's really about just making a habit that's pleasurable enough that you want to return
02:03:43.860 to it, giving you some reason, some emotional signal that, Hey, this is worth it. And there are a bunch
02:03:49.220 of different ways you can do this. Some of them are short-term. Some of them are long-term.
02:03:52.620 The short-term stuff is mostly about reinforcement. So classic examples are things like, Oh, you can
02:03:59.120 reward yourself with a bubble bath or with ice cream or buying a, you know, something that you
02:04:04.040 wanted or whatever. I think the key with those short-term reinforcements is you want to make
02:04:09.540 sure that the reinforcement also aligns with the long-term identity that you're trying to build.
02:04:15.960 Right. Ice cream wouldn't be a great reward for getting in better shape.
02:04:19.940 You go to the gym and you do a workout and then you eat a bowl of ice cream. It's like,
02:04:23.040 okay, you're casting boats for two different identities. Or let's say that you're trying
02:04:26.980 to get your finances in order. And so you're like, okay, I want to budget consistently and
02:04:30.880 save money for retirement. Well, if you reward yourself with that, buying a leather jacket,
02:04:35.520 then it's kind of like, okay, on the one hand, you're trying to be a saver. On the other hand,
02:04:38.560 you're being a spender. So I like to pick things that we feel like are aligned. So like in the
02:04:43.520 fitness example, you could say, well, if I don't miss any workouts this week,
02:04:46.800 then I'm going to reward myself with a bubble bath and kind of like an hour alone of peace
02:04:50.720 and quiet on the weekend. And that's like a vote for taking care of your body. That seems pretty
02:04:55.320 aligned. Or if I save consistently for retirement this month and I make a contribution each week,
02:05:01.020 then at the end of the month, I'm going to reward myself with a hike in the woods. And that's like
02:05:05.420 another example of a lifestyle of freedom and of controlling your time. So anything that's aligned
02:05:12.100 or reinforces that story you're trying to build, I think that can make a great immediate
02:05:15.960 reinforcement. In the long run, the way to feel rewarded, the kind of ideal form of making it
02:05:22.280 satisfying is when the behavior starts to feel like it reinforces your desired identity. So if
02:05:28.780 you're the kind of person who feels like, yeah, I'm the type of person who doesn't miss workouts,
02:05:31.960 then in the middle of doing a set of squats, you can feel satisfied because you're being the kind
02:05:37.540 of person you want to be. And so this comes back to kind of the point you made a little bit ago about,
02:05:41.940 I just don't want to miss a workout. Like I kind of feel off. I feel like I'm not being myself if I
02:05:46.500 miss. And so just getting the reps in, that alone is satisfying in the moment. And that's sort of the
02:05:51.980 ultimate version of making it satisfying because you don't even need to wait for the reward. It's
02:05:56.680 just happening as you're in the middle of performing the behavior. Make it obvious, make it attractive,
02:06:01.800 make it easy, make it satisfying. Those four laws and the various ways to intervene and do that
02:06:07.160 increase the odds that you're going to fall through on a good habit.
02:06:09.540 Let's take a step back from all of this. When someone picks up your book, presumably there's
02:06:15.720 a selection bias that exists, which is this is a person who either through luck or through some
02:06:22.400 recommendation or friend or whatever has made a decision that they at least want to examine the
02:06:27.420 habits in their lives and or potentially change them. What do we know or what can we extract from
02:06:32.200 this about a scenario that's different, which is, I'll use my example. You have a patient
02:06:38.520 who you're trying to help and helping that patient requires some intervention. They're going to have
02:06:45.320 to make a change. Now that change can be at one level, really simple. I think the simplest change
02:06:50.460 medicine has to offer is take a pill. There's a time and a place for pills. I think it's a bit silly
02:06:54.860 when people assume that everything modern medicine has to offer is bad. Pills are bad. Obviously that's
02:06:59.760 not the case. Taking your medicine for your blood pressure, your cholesterol, all these things,
02:07:03.280 if it's warranted, that's a really important thing to do. And we also know, by the way, that
02:07:06.800 even something as quote unquote simple as taking your medicine is actually really hard for a lot
02:07:10.640 of people. Most people are, I think studies demonstrate, you know, sort of in the neighborhood
02:07:14.000 is 60 to 70% compliant with something as simple as take a pill, but it only gets harder from there.
02:07:20.020 Getting someone who's not sleeping well to sleep well. That's a real big set of behavior changes.
02:07:25.640 Getting someone who's not eating well to eat well. Getting someone who's not exercising to exercise.
02:07:30.100 Getting someone who's not taking care of their mental health to take care of their mental health.
02:07:33.280 All of these things require enormous change. If a person says on the surface, yes, I want to be
02:07:39.960 better. I accept that I want this outcome of being healthier, but they haven't specifically
02:07:47.480 had the need or desire to change the way they eat or exercise or sleep or whatever. It adds a layer of
02:07:55.200 challenge or friction to this process. What advice would you offer to me in a situation like that
02:08:01.720 for trying to implement your insights into that scenario to a person who hasn't fully selected
02:08:08.320 into wanting to change habits? The point about people self-selecting by picking up the book is
02:08:14.180 interesting. Sometimes it's like you're sort of only helping the people who already want to be helped
02:08:20.060 in that sense. It's interesting to think that most of the time, the people who most need to read
02:08:25.800 the book are not the people who pick it up to read it. The people who read about habits are usually the
02:08:30.360 ones who have fairly decent habits and are pretty interested in it. The people who need it the most,
02:08:34.200 they've never read a book on habits and they don't want to read it. They're not interested.
02:08:37.300 Something interesting about that. But I think the points you bring up are very true and challenging.
02:08:43.640 Changing your own behavior is hard enough. Changing other people's behavior is like a whole
02:08:47.640 another level of difficulty, a whole another order of magnitude of difficulty. I'll offer maybe three
02:08:53.580 ideas that could apply. The first one, and we've already talked about this in various ways, but I do
02:08:58.400 think you have to make it really small. So you said taking a pill is the smallest version, but it doesn't
02:09:03.260 always have to be that. It could be, you know, if you're trying to get them to exercise, it could
02:09:07.440 literally be doing one pushup, walking around the block one time or something. And this is that version
02:09:12.680 of like, can I just go to the gym for five minutes sort of thing? Let's just scale it down, make it super
02:09:17.120 simple. Along with that is very hard for it to be simple. If people are being pulled in multiple
02:09:22.780 directions. And so I think if you're giving people a plan that has five things on there for them to do,
02:09:28.540 can we eliminate four of those for now? Stay at phase two. And can we just do one right now?
02:09:33.860 Let's take one thing and scale it down and stay focused and just try to get a little bit of momentum
02:09:38.740 going on that. And then once we've established that and started to gain a foothold there and get a
02:09:44.240 little bit more consistency with that one thing, we can take that momentum and transfer it into the
02:09:49.380 next one. So yeah, ideally, probably a lot of patients will be doing these five things or these
02:09:54.780 15 things, but it doesn't mean you need to do all of them right now. Let's pick one and stay focused.
02:09:59.960 So that's the first thing is try to keep it as simple as possible. Pretty obvious answer,
02:10:04.240 but I still think a useful one. The second thing, again, fairly obvious, and we've talked about it a
02:10:09.560 bit, but still, I think useful is the environment design piece. Even the laziest person, even the
02:10:16.000 person who has zero interest naturally in these topics is a product of the environment that they're
02:10:21.160 in. Imagine this lab experiment where you're locked in a room that only has healthy food options.
02:10:26.720 Even the laziest person is going to eat healthy there. They have no other choice. And that doesn't
02:10:31.900 mean that they need to change everything in their home so that it's that control lab experiment feel.
02:10:37.080 But look, there's a lot of low hanging fruit that can be done here that you don't actually need
02:10:43.120 someone. And this, I think is one of the reasons why I like environment changes. You don't actually
02:10:48.120 need someone to be motivated every day to do this. You really just need them to be motivated for like
02:10:53.280 one afternoon so that they change the environment a bit. And that can actually serve them. In some
02:10:58.820 cases it can serve them for months, but in most cases, even food related cases, it could serve them
02:11:03.700 for the next three days or five days or seven days just by getting junk food out of the house that
02:11:08.200 serves them for the next couple of days. You only need little pockets of motivation. And if you can
02:11:13.700 direct that pocket of motivation toward a high leverage action, like redesigning the environment,
02:11:19.100 then it can continue to serve even a lazy person for a good chunk of time. So that's probably the
02:11:24.900 second same thing. So make it small, optimize the environment. And then the third thing,
02:11:29.640 and this is maybe more of like a coaching thing as someone who deals with patients or has clients
02:11:34.480 or whatever. The general strategy is easy to say, but very hard to follow, which is praise the good,
02:11:41.560 ignore the bad. It goes against the grain of what we want to do because they're like, you're telling me
02:11:46.300 I just want to ignore the mistakes that they're making. And certainly there's a place for rectifying
02:11:51.880 mistakes. And I don't mean that every problem should just go unresolved, but especially early on,
02:11:57.100 the thing that you really want to build is momentum and you want to reinforce the good
02:12:01.900 behaviors. And as we talked about a good plant crowding out another, a way to encourage that
02:12:07.700 is by praising the good and ignoring the bad. There was a hilarious op-ed that was written,
02:12:12.720 I think it was in the New York times, this wife who her husband would never throw his dirty clothes
02:12:17.480 in the laundry hamper and it was driving her nuts. Occasionally he would do it, but it was like
02:12:22.460 pulling teeth all the time to get him to do this consistently. She tried nagging him. She tried
02:12:26.760 annoying, you know, whatever, just all kinds of different, put the laundry hamper in a different
02:12:29.620 place. Don't even have it in the closet, just have it out on the floor in the bedroom. And he still
02:12:33.380 wouldn't do it. Sometimes he'd throw the clothes next to the hamper. She's like, you're already
02:12:36.560 throwing it over there. Just put it in. Eventually what she settled on doing was that every time that
02:12:41.860 he happened to put it in the hamper, she would make a huge deal about it. She'd run over, give him a
02:12:46.280 kiss, give him a hug, say, thank you. Be like, Oh, you're making my life so much easier. Thank you so much.
02:12:50.620 Over the course of about a year, she effectively trained him to always put the clothes in the
02:12:56.060 hamper because every time that happened, something good happened. He got praised. It felt good.
02:13:01.160 Almost like training a dog in a sense, which is all kinds of organisms, dogs and humans love feeling
02:13:08.720 praised. We like feeling good. We like being rewarded. And so if you praise the good actions and ignore the
02:13:14.020 bad actions, it's again, almost like a form of gravity. People naturally gravitate toward the things that
02:13:20.120 they get rewarded for the things they get praised for. And you'd be surprised how often people don't
02:13:25.840 do something like this, or in fact, do the opposite. You can imagine the quiet kid in the household who
02:13:31.820 comes down for dinner with the rest of the family. And it's like, Oh, look who showed up. They decide
02:13:36.000 to share something about their day. And it's like, Oh, a fact about your life. And you can imagine a
02:13:40.920 parent or somebody saying something sarcastic like that. And all of a sudden you're punishing the very
02:13:45.420 behavior that you wanted to see. So praise the good, ignore the bad. I think it applies in a lot
02:13:50.940 of situations and can be more powerful than you realized. The tricky part is it requires a lot of
02:13:56.080 patience. You got to do it for six months or a year or three years. It's hard to stick with that in the
02:14:01.360 long run. Last example of this is a weightlifting one. I was at the gym on a Friday night one time,
02:14:07.180 and I was there with a friend and we were doing a quick workout. It's probably like 20, 25 minutes.
02:14:12.260 We got done and we're putting our shoes on. And this guy who's just kind of a jerk went over and
02:14:18.220 was talking to her. It was like quick workout for a Friday night. She just kind of moved on,
02:14:22.720 but that's like exactly the opposite of the type of feedback you want to be getting.
02:14:27.220 Especially if you're someone who's like new coming into the gym or feeling kind of uncomfortable
02:14:30.840 there. What people should be saying is, Oh, it's great that you got in here, even though it's the
02:14:34.880 weekend. And a little cutting comment like that is all that people need to not show up again the next
02:14:40.940 day. The more that you can be lavish with praise is maybe stating it even too strongly, but it
02:14:47.980 doesn't really cost you very much to be kind. And you may not even remember it, but it's the kind of
02:14:53.020 thing that might be enough to get that person to show up again the next time. So in the long run,
02:14:57.440 praising the good and ignoring the bad can count for a lot. So James, you're working on another book,
02:15:01.460 right? I am. Yeah. And working is the correct term. Currently kind of slogging and battling
02:15:06.760 against the manuscript. I seem to find whatever way requires the most suffering to write books.
02:15:13.160 Atomic Habits, the first draft was like 720 pages. And then I cut it down to 250 eventually,
02:15:18.940 which for the finished version, this manuscript is like 600 and something right now. So I'm in the
02:15:23.840 trimming phase. What's this book about? It's a book about strategy and choices and decision-making
02:15:31.060 and how we direct our attention. I'm still kind of finding it and discovering it in a lot of ways,
02:15:35.680 but one question that you could have after finishing Atomic Habits is, okay, that's great.
02:15:41.260 I know how to build better habits, but which habits should I be focusing on? What's the high leverage
02:15:45.900 action? How do I figure out where to direct my energy and attention? And so those are a lot of the
02:15:50.540 questions that I'm exploring now. Well, I can't wait to have you back to discuss that after I read it
02:15:55.100 twice, which I will do, I'm sure. Thanks very much, James. This has been great to sit down with
02:16:00.620 you. And this is almost like reading the book a third time. And I picked up a lot of things that
02:16:04.520 I hope readers or listeners have also, and I look forward to implementing it both personally and
02:16:09.060 professionally. That's great. Thanks, Peter. I appreciate the opportunity.
02:16:12.720 Thank you for listening to this week's episode of The Drive. If you're interested in diving deeper
02:16:16.840 into any topics we discuss, we've created a membership program that allows us to bring you more
02:16:21.600 in-depth exclusive content without relying on paid ads. It's our goal to ensure members get back
02:16:27.020 much more than the price of the subscription. Now to that end, membership benefits include a bunch
02:16:32.260 of things. One, totally kick-ass comprehensive podcast show notes that detail every topic, paper,
02:16:38.080 person, thing we discuss on each episode. The word on the street is nobody's show notes rival these.
02:16:44.120 Monthly AMA episodes or Ask Me Anything episodes, hearing these episodes completely.
02:16:48.460 Access to our private podcast feed that allows you to hear everything without having to listen
02:16:54.240 to spiels like this. The Qualies, which are a super short podcast that we release every Tuesday
02:16:59.740 through Friday, highlighting the best questions, topics, and tactics discussed on previous episodes
02:17:04.480 of The Drive. This is a great way to catch up on previous episodes without having to go back and
02:17:09.540 necessarily listen to everyone. Steep discounts on products that I believe in, but for which I'm not
02:17:15.280 getting paid to endorse, and a whole bunch of other benefits that we continue to trickle in
02:17:19.780 as time goes on. If you want to learn more and access these member-only benefits, you can head
02:17:24.100 over to peteratiamd.com forward slash subscribe. You can find me on Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook,
02:17:31.440 all with the ID peteratiamd. You can also leave us a review on Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast player
02:17:38.260 you listen on. This podcast is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute the practice
02:17:44.000 of medicine, nursing, or other professional healthcare services, including the giving of
02:17:48.980 medical advice. No doctor-patient relationship is formed. The use of this information and the
02:17:54.700 materials linked to this podcast is at the user's own risk. The content on this podcast is not intended
02:18:00.900 to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Users should not disregard
02:18:07.360 or delay in obtaining medical advice from any medical condition they have, and they should seek
02:18:13.360 the assistance of their healthcare professionals for any such conditions. Finally, I take conflicts
02:18:19.060 of interest very seriously. For all of my disclosures and the companies I invest in or advise, please
02:18:25.100 visit peteratiamd.com forward slash about where I keep an up-to-date and active list of such companies.
02:18:43.360 Thank you.