The Peter Attia Drive - November 11, 2024


#325 ‒ Peter's key takeaways on bone health, calorie restriction and energy balance, dopamine and addiction, gene editing, and testosterone therapy safety with a prostate cancer diagnosis | Quarterly Podcast Summary #3


Episode Stats

Length

24 minutes

Words per Minute

188.56227

Word Count

4,704

Sentence Count

256

Misogynist Sentences

7

Hate Speech Sentences

3


Summary

In this episode, Dr. Peter Atiyah reviews interviews with Dr. Anna Lembke, Feng Zhang, Belinda Beck, Eric Ravison, and Ted Schaefer. They discuss topics such as dopamine, addictions, CRISPR, gene editing, bone health, the importance of exercise at any age, the role of caloric restriction, and much more.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hey everyone, welcome to a sneak peek, ask me anything or AMA episode of the drive podcast.
00:00:15.820 I'm your host, Peter Atiyah. At the end of this short episode, I'll explain how you can access
00:00:20.280 the AMA episodes in full, along with a ton of other membership benefits we've created,
00:00:24.900 or you can learn more now by going to peteratiyahmd.com forward slash subscribe.
00:00:30.600 So without further delay, here's today's sneak peek of the ask me anything episode.
00:00:38.980 Welcome to another AMA episode of the drive. Today's episode will be the third of what we're
00:00:44.040 calling the quarterly podcast summary. The feedback again has been very positive on these. So we're
00:00:49.480 going to continue to do these. And in these conversations, what I do take the interviews
00:00:54.540 that I've done over the preceding quarter and note the most important insights that I've gained
00:01:00.280 personally from these interviews, along with any changes that have resulted in my practices
00:01:05.280 from these insights. So with all that said, these shouldn't be seen really as a replacement for
00:01:10.440 listening to these, but I hope they serve as both a primer if you've listened to them, or maybe they
00:01:15.820 direct you to go back and listen to something that you missed. In today's episode, I'm going to cover
00:01:20.540 interviews that I did with Anna Lembke, Feng Zhang, Belinda Beck, Eric Ravison, and Ted Schaefer.
00:01:27.820 In this discussion, we speak about topics such as dopamine, addictions, CRISPR, gene editing,
00:01:34.080 bone health, the importance of exercise at any age, energy balance, caloric restriction,
00:01:40.040 prostate cancer, testosterone, and much more. If you're a subscriber and you want to watch the full
00:01:45.720 video of this podcast, you can find it on the show notes page. If you're not a subscriber,
00:01:50.280 you can watch a sneak peek of the video on our YouTube page. So without further delay,
00:01:54.660 I hope you enjoy this special quarterly podcast summary AMA of The Drive.
00:02:04.900 Peter, welcome to another quarterly podcast summary AMA, which is a mouthful. How are you doing?
00:02:11.820 Good. Do we have an abbreviation for that?
00:02:13.360 I think it's QPS 1, 2, 3. This is 3.
00:02:18.820 QPS 3 AMA 60 something.
00:02:22.480 Yeah. We're just going to keep throwing numbers at it until it sticks.
00:02:25.220 That's definitely not confusing to the listener.
00:02:27.760 Well, thank you for coming to Austin to do this one in person.
00:02:30.580 Yeah. It's honestly weird to not look at you through a screen for one of these.
00:02:35.140 I feel the same way.
00:02:36.100 Yeah. I can't hide what I usually do behind the screen in this one. So this is a much more serious
00:02:40.960 episode. So for this one, as a reminder for people, because it's still relatively new,
00:02:46.520 what we're doing with these quarterly podcast summaries is we're taking previous episodes
00:02:51.140 and just going through them with your thoughts. And this came about because you take an insane
00:02:56.340 amount of notes through the podcast you have in front of you there. And so we would internally
00:03:01.040 kind of go through these and we did a few of these and people really liked them. And so
00:03:05.000 what we're going to do is we'll go through, we won't necessarily summarize them as much
00:03:09.380 as you will talk about your big takeaways. And then we'll kind of have a conversation
00:03:13.200 on how that's affected either your behavior, how you deal with patients, anything of that
00:03:18.760 nature. And so for today's episode, we're going to talk about dopamine through Anna's
00:03:23.740 podcast. We have CRISPR, which is super interesting through Fung's podcast, bone mineral
00:03:29.680 density, lifting and females, especially as you age with Belinda calorie restriction with
00:03:35.440 Eric, which is always of interest. And then prostate cancer, which was kind of a special
00:03:40.400 shorter episode we did with Ted. So I think it's really good, kind of a huge variety of things
00:03:47.960 that we'll cover. But with that said, anything you want to say before we roll?
00:03:52.700 No, just to reiterate, I'm sure I'll have said this already in the intro, which I obviously
00:03:56.480 haven't recorded yet, that this is not a substitute for going back and listening to the podcast
00:04:00.280 because I'm not even attempting to provide the full context of everything. What I'm really
00:04:04.960 trying to do is capture what I'm taking away in real time as I'm having these discussions
00:04:10.320 with people. What am I making notes on? That's effectively the filter here is what is Peter
00:04:15.960 pulling out of this as the most interesting stuff? And sometimes that comes with an assumption
00:04:22.260 that other content is understood and heard. So the hope is that you're listening to
00:04:26.300 this after you've heard these podcasts or that you listen to these and maybe go back
00:04:30.640 and listen to a podcast that you skipped because the insight is particularly interesting.
00:04:35.300 Yeah, definitely. Let's start with Anna's episode, which covered dopamine, great book,
00:04:42.040 super interesting episodes. So do you want to kind of start with what your main takeaways
00:04:46.020 were from that episode?
00:04:47.980 Yeah. So I read Anna Lemka's book, obviously before interviewing her, enjoyed it a lot and was
00:04:53.600 kind of looking forward to talking about this and had a lot of questions about what really
00:04:58.440 constitutes addiction. Because I think the book is really about addiction more than it is about
00:05:03.500 dopamine, right? Dopamine is kind of a heuristic. Everybody's heard the term dopamine. Everybody
00:05:07.500 understands what dopamine is. It's a neurotransmitter. It's one of the most important
00:05:11.980 neurotransmitters in the reward system and therefore in the addiction system, but it's not the only one.
00:05:16.540 And so I think my interest was maybe even personally a little bit less in the nuts and bolts of dopamine
00:05:21.600 and more around the science of addiction. We started with defining the traditional aspects
00:05:27.260 of what defines addiction. So the sort of out of control compulsive use, the cravings, the continued
00:05:33.320 use despite consequences, and then the tolerance to the stimulus and then ultimately withdrawal when
00:05:39.760 it's removed. So again, if you view that through the traditional lens of how people think of an
00:05:43.720 addiction like alcohol, all of those things clearly check, check, check, check, check. But of course,
00:05:47.960 there are behavioral things that show up here as well. Everything from gambling to sex to workaholism,
00:05:54.040 many of these things can constitute an addiction. Now, one of the things I took away from this that
00:05:58.640 I found interesting was the idea of what are the factors that influence this. In particular,
00:06:02.320 I wanted to really understand how heritable addiction was, meaning how much is this written
00:06:06.520 into the genetic code? Turned out quite a bit according to the heritability data. Now, again,
00:06:11.640 you'll often hear us talk about these. This came up in the podcast with Carl Deseroth, where we talked
00:06:17.560 about eating disorders, depression, schizophrenia. The typical way that these conjoint twin studies
00:06:23.380 are done is they look at the prevalence of a certain condition in identical twins that were
00:06:29.900 raised apart. That's really the best tool we have to understand how much of a role do genes play.
00:06:36.480 You take two people with identical genes raised in a completely different environment. And based on
00:06:41.440 that, Anna said that addiction is about 50 to 60% heritable. That's a huge amount, obviously,
00:06:48.840 but it's a big enough amount that it can't be ignored, but it's not so big an amount that the
00:06:53.180 die is cast. Meaning just because you come from a line of people who have an addiction to one thing or
00:06:59.580 another doesn't mean that your fate is sealed. So what are the other two things that play a role in
00:07:04.800 this? And she described them as nature, nurture, neighborhood, nature, genes, nurture, how you're
00:07:11.900 raised and neighborhood, meaning the environment you're in. Now she wasn't able to provide, or at
00:07:17.540 least if she was, I missed it, what the percent is for nurture versus neighborhood. But again, if
00:07:24.320 heritability is 50 to 60%, we're going to say 40 to 50% comes from how you were raised. And I don't
00:07:30.660 just mean like the obvious things, but I also mean the subtle things. So are you raised around people
00:07:36.140 that are engaging in a certain behavior? Do you have experiences in life, for example, trauma that
00:07:40.180 might predispose you to certain addictive behaviors? This idea of neighborhood is very important. And I
00:07:45.540 think it really has a lot to do with anybody who's ever considered trying to break a bad habit. So if
00:07:50.540 you struggle with gambling, it's really hard to break a gambling habit. If all your friends are
00:07:55.520 gamblers, you either have to get a bunch of new friends or somehow just decide you're going to hang
00:08:00.640 out with a bunch of people who gamble, but not do it yourself. Very difficult. Another topic that I
00:08:05.580 just found incredibly fascinating, and I don't think we know the answer is the takeaway is why do some
00:08:12.100 people have a certain lock and key configuration for certain addictions? So why is it, I use myself as
00:08:19.640 an example, I think in the podcast, I really enjoy alcohol. Like it's not like I'm repulsed by the
00:08:24.880 taste of alcohol. I quite enjoy it. Like literally enjoy the taste. I just don't think I could be an
00:08:29.720 alcoholic if I tried. In other words, if you surrounded me with alcoholics, it would never
00:08:34.000 appeal to me to drink in the morning or to drink in a manner that would lead to excessive use. So
00:08:39.980 why is that? It's clearly not moral superiority. That's not what I'm trying to say. It's that there
00:08:45.120 is something in my brain that doesn't get enough of that cycle from alcohol that it just doesn't work
00:08:51.120 for me that way. The same is true with gambling. I was in Vegas, remember giving a talk a little
00:08:55.320 while ago, had to walk through a casino like 25 times to and from where I was going. And again, I don't
00:09:00.960 say this to be disparaging of the people that are in casinos at seven in the morning, but I just
00:09:05.360 couldn't imagine, like if you said to me, Peter, we have a job for you. You just have to sit in the
00:09:09.480 casino and play blackjack and we'll pay you a million dollars a month to do this and cover all your
00:09:14.040 losses and you can keep all the winnings. I couldn't do it. I couldn't imagine something less
00:09:18.720 appealing. And yet there are obviously people who can ruin their lives doing this. Why?
00:09:22.960 And by the way, there are things that I'm addicted to that most people would look at and say,
00:09:26.360 who could do that? This why question, I don't think we have an answer to yet.
00:09:30.800 And yet it totally fascinates me. To me, that's the most interesting question in this space.
00:09:35.720 How does Anna work with clients? She's a psychiatrist. One of the first steps that she
00:09:39.640 thinks about, and I think this is valuable for any of us that are trying to cope with our own
00:09:43.280 addictions is she does a four week dopamine fast, which means a four week total abstinence from the
00:09:51.980 behavior that one is trying to rid themselves of. She said that 80% of her clients, her patients will
00:09:59.120 feel better after the four week fast. Now she also noted some of those people need medications to help
00:10:06.540 them through that. So for example, if a person is trying to do a dopamine fast around alcohol,
00:10:12.580 they may actually require benzodiazepines medically to help with that transition. Of course,
00:10:18.320 that's not always the case. She also talked, I think, I can't remember if this was in her book
00:10:21.840 or we talked about it, but I think we also discussed a woman that was basically smoking pot 24 seven
00:10:27.460 and was doing it because of her anxiety. But of course, turned out she was having all the anxiety
00:10:32.760 because she was smoking all the pot, but this wasn't realized until she was able to sort of abstain
00:10:36.580 from it. Okay. Another thing that I found just interesting sort of nuance was around pain and
00:10:42.880 pleasure. One of the examples we used was that of cold plunging. So people have heard me talk a lot
00:10:48.340 about cold plunging. I'm a huge fan of it, although I still firmly maintain it has no longevity benefit.
00:10:54.320 There's no gyro protective benefit of cold plunging. So to all the biohackers out there, I'm sorry,
00:11:00.000 but I don't think this is going to make you live longer. But I do think there are two distinct
00:11:04.260 benefits. I think one is a reduction in inflammation and muscle soreness. And I think the other for
00:11:10.520 select people is an improvement in mood. Anna talked about how she's tried cold plunging many times
00:11:16.180 and has never experienced an improvement in mood. And I was like, oh, that's super interesting.
00:11:20.400 I've heard many people say that, but I've heard just as many people share my experience, which is
00:11:25.800 no matter what mood I'm in, no matter how foul it is, if I get into a 40 degree bathtub, bury myself to
00:11:33.640 my neck for 10 minutes, I feel insanely good after that. And again, it's not unlike the issue we
00:11:42.020 discussed earlier of why do some people have the key go in the lock for alcohol and it's like both
00:11:48.820 thumbs up, other people don't have it. What it really comes down to is endogenous dopamine production
00:11:54.520 from pain. So Anna talked about how we live in a state of homeostasis. This is obviously a factor
00:12:02.180 spread across all of biology. So when it comes to maintaining regular glucose levels, when it comes
00:12:07.620 to maintaining a regular pH, body temperature, all of the core things that allow us to live
00:12:13.200 require homeostasis. And the body has remarkable tools for adjusting up and down to keep us in that
00:12:20.000 window. And dopamine is no exception. And so when we do something that is difficult, that induces pain,
00:12:27.880 and the two examples that she gave were cold immersion and exercise, the body has to offset
00:12:34.640 that pain somehow. And it does so by increasing the endogenous production of dopamine. What's
00:12:40.940 different about this is one, it's not a huge rush of dopamine that you get for free. It's this dopamine
00:12:46.720 that you kind of had to work for to offset something you're doing that's actually causing pain. So when you
00:12:52.780 remove the pain, your painful stimulus, i.e. when you get out of the cold plunger, when you stop the
00:12:56.980 workout, you have this lingering effect of that heightened dopamine. But again, it's a physiologic
00:13:02.720 level, and it hasn't been sort of a hijacked level. There was a line in Anna's book that she credits to
00:13:09.720 the person who said it, and I can't remember who that was, but I loved it. Our brains are like
00:13:15.300 cactuses that now reside in rainforests. So we evolved in an environment where stimulation was
00:13:24.460 relatively modest, and our brains had normal tools for coping with the up and down swings of dopamine.
00:13:31.360 And now we live in the most stimulating environment imaginable. And obviously, we just didn't have
00:13:37.000 enough time to adapt. Anybody can sort of follow the logic there. And so I think that makes a lot of
00:13:43.640 sense. And it probably speaks to kind of what I think of as the big takeaways from this. So the
00:13:49.320 big takeaways here, especially if you're a parent, is to sort of ask the question, what are we doing
00:13:55.340 to prevent our kids' brains from being hijacked by this? So even the world you and I grew up in,
00:14:02.000 more than 10 years older than you, but whether you grew up in the 70s or the 80s, we still grew up in a
00:14:06.880 relatively stimulation-free world. I mean, the most stimulating thing in my life was a cheap cathode
00:14:13.160 ray tube TV watching reruns of happy days. Like that was the pinnacle of stimulation in my life.
00:14:20.560 And today, forget about it. Kids wouldn't even know what that is if they saw it. So everything
00:14:26.380 is in technicolor. And two things she said really probably stand out. One is social media. The other
00:14:33.040 is pornography. Again, I think I brought up the example of when I was a kid, pornography was a
00:14:38.240 Playboy magazine. Today, it's VR, literally. All of this stuff, there's just no way around it.
00:14:46.160 As a parent, I think you just have to be the one that's in charge of saying,
00:14:49.080 we're going to absolutely minimize, avoid these things to the best of our ability.
00:14:54.300 I don't think there's much I would add here because so much of this is advice I think everybody
00:14:58.080 already kind of knows about how much you limit smartphones, social media, all of those things.
00:15:02.880 Those are the big takeaways from this podcast. A few follow-up questions there. First is on the
00:15:08.600 hair ability piece. So about 50 to 60%, which is large. And I know we've talked in other podcasts
00:15:13.660 about the importance of like family history and taking a detailed family history, typically as it
00:15:18.520 relates to diseases, cardiovascular disease, Alzheimer's, things of that nature, cancer. So when
00:15:24.520 you're having patients and new patients do family histories, are you now having them also include
00:15:30.680 addictions in there? Have you always done that? Yeah, it's a good question. So we don't have
00:15:35.680 dedicated questions around it, but usually we almost always come up with it just through the
00:15:41.360 detailed questioning around everything else. And the reason is it's very difficult for a person to
00:15:47.040 struggle with an addiction to alcohol or drugs and not have it creep into their health. So it's very
00:15:53.840 common that we hear uncle Jimmy, he died of heart disease when he was 60, but truth be told,
00:16:00.180 he had a real drinking problem and da, da, da, da. So yeah, we usually emerge from the family history
00:16:04.960 knowing full well, but I actually think it's a good point. I think we could be more deliberate
00:16:08.280 about it. And we obviously pay just a lot of attention to this when it comes to mental health
00:16:12.420 as well, because when you go through the family history and you see a number of family members
00:16:17.700 with mental illness, you just realize that there's a greater susceptibility as well.
00:16:21.940 Yeah. Let's talk a little bit more about cold therapy. So you do that, you mentioned for you in
00:16:25.840 particular for mood, you said that's not the case for everyone, but there is a good amount of people
00:16:30.380 who get that benefit. And so do you find for yourself, it's more of a, if you routinely do
00:16:38.460 cold plunges, it's kind of like a consistent benefit or do you ever have days where you're like,
00:16:44.220 I'm in a terrible mood. Like I need to just step away from the computer, jump in. Do you kind of
00:16:49.420 use it both ways or how do you think about that? I occasionally do use it as the total reset.
00:16:56.020 And by the way, I don't know that that even needs to be done in the most extreme version of a cold
00:17:00.740 plunge. Like I really think that having your face dipped in a bowl of cold water, I've talked about
00:17:06.240 this in the past, can stimulate the mammalian dive reflex. So you have a big enough bowl, you put your
00:17:11.820 head into it, just even just covering your face. That can, in theory, I suppose, at least trigger an
00:17:17.900 autonomic response that upregulates the parasympathetic system via the vagus nerve and
00:17:23.520 that can tone down the sympathetic system. Actually, this is a great example of coming back to
00:17:28.440 a previous podcast. So the one with Joel Jamison, where we talked about HRV, I think he did a very
00:17:32.820 good job in that podcast explaining that you don't want to think about one system being on,
00:17:38.400 one system being off between parasympathetic and sympathetic. You just really want to think about
00:17:41.760 them always both being on. And it's just a question of the balance. Are you revving one up more than the
00:17:47.720 other? You mentioned that in addition to cold therapy, Anna talked about exercise can also
00:17:53.560 be a mood stabilizer for people. Do you see that for you? Yeah, yeah, yeah. I mean, if you deprive
00:17:58.320 me from exercise, it's noticeable within a day. When you work with patients, how do you think,
00:18:04.420 because there's obviously a huge spectrum of this. Some of it can be as simple as, I'm just not going
00:18:09.420 to look at my phone an hour before bed. Other can be deep addictions. And so how do you think in
00:18:15.060 your work with patients of when you're starting to recommend, hey, let's just try these behaviors
00:18:20.600 versus let's go see a specialist to work on this in a more nuanced, detailed manner?
00:18:27.900 I think for the most part, we like to see people try to solve this on their own using neighborhood
00:18:33.960 as the tool. So what do I mean by that? If I'm sitting around holding my phone,
00:18:40.480 I'm looking at it frequently. There's no two ways about it. And by the way, I can be very good
00:18:47.080 about not looking at social media, but it's also because I don't really like social media.
00:18:52.640 But the truth of it is, if I'm sitting around and my phone is on my lap or it's in my pocket,
00:18:58.760 I'm going to be checking email. I'm going to be checking texts. I'm going to be reading
00:19:03.260 news quite often. So if I want to avoid that, I have to come up with an alternative. And that's
00:19:11.240 where my bat phone is a good alternative, right? If I'm going somewhere where I need a phone to make
00:19:16.800 phone calls, but I don't want to have anything to do, I just bring my second phone, my bat phone,
00:19:22.860 which doesn't have email on it. I don't even know the phone number. Nobody knows the phone number.
00:19:26.940 So it never gets a text message. It's basically just a device that makes calls and has podcasts
00:19:32.800 on it if I want to listen to a podcast. So that's something that I'm just going to look at less
00:19:37.300 because I fixed the neighborhood in a sense. And so I think that's sort of generally what I try to
00:19:41.960 get patients to think about is, yeah, like how do you not have your phone in your room? How do you not
00:19:46.560 have your phone with you for an hour before bed? Not because you're white knuckling it, but because
00:19:52.280 you've come up with another thing in your routine that wouldn't have a phone with you. So if you go
00:19:58.200 and do a sauna cold plunge before bed, it's easy to displace the phone. But if I say, I want you to
00:20:04.300 sit there and stare at the wall, but not have your phone, that's a tougher ask. You do archery every
00:20:09.680 now and then you go hunting. And when you do, it's basically like being off the grid. So you're
00:20:13.700 hiking, you're deep in the woods. It's not like you're kind of sitting around your house. There's no TVs.
00:20:18.800 So during those periods of time, those handful of days, do you find that not being on your phone,
00:20:24.620 not having technology, when you come back to the world, do you use it less? Is that kind of like a
00:20:30.360 natural dopamine fast or no? I wouldn't say so because I don't think it's long enough.
00:20:36.080 I do enjoy that. I just came back from a trip a little while ago where we were bow hunting in a
00:20:41.900 very, very remote area. So there was no wifi. There's no cell service. My phone didn't work once except
00:20:48.580 for the one place where one guy had one of those little Starlink things. Once or twice a day,
00:20:53.760 you could make a phone call or something. Yeah. Everything about that is cool, which you don't
00:20:57.540 have to be hunting to do it, that you could just be camping in the right spot. But everything about
00:21:01.240 waking up super, super early, going to bed once the sun goes down and not being inundated with
00:21:07.800 anything was great. And so I don't think that would constitute a fast because at least in my case,
00:21:13.340 it's not nearly long enough, but it's enjoyable nonetheless. It also probably maybe made me feel
00:21:18.700 a bit better in knowing that I guess I don't have an addiction to that at least because I also didn't
00:21:22.980 experience withdrawal. I was like quite happy to not have the device. Awesome. Let's move on to the
00:21:29.460 next one, which is Fung's podcast, heavily on CRISPR gene editing, really interesting episode,
00:21:37.000 pretty technical at times, but also it's a topic I feel it's talked about so much. You hear CRISPR,
00:21:42.680 you hear gene editing. We've written about PCSK9, gene editing, and how that can have an impact on
00:21:48.320 cardiovascular disease. So do you want to talk about your biggest takeaways, insights you learned
00:21:53.500 from that? Thank you for listening to today's sneak peek AMA episode of The Drive. If you're
00:21:59.460 interested in hearing the complete version of this AMA, you'll want to become a premium member.
00:22:04.920 It's extremely important to me to provide all of this content without relying on paid ads.
00:22:09.360 To do this, our work is made entirely possible by our members. And in return, we offer exclusive
00:22:15.140 member-only content and benefits above and beyond what is available for free. So if you want to take
00:22:20.920 your knowledge of this space to the next level, it's our goal to ensure members get back much more than
00:22:25.860 the price of the subscription. Premium membership includes several benefits. First, comprehensive
00:22:31.680 podcast show notes that detail every topic, paper, person, and thing that we discuss in each episode.
00:22:37.920 And the word on the street is, nobody's show notes rival ours. Second, monthly Ask Me Anything or AMA
00:22:45.500 episodes. These episodes are comprised of detailed responses to subscriber questions typically focused
00:22:51.060 on a single topic and are designed to offer a great deal of clarity and detail on topics of special
00:22:56.740 interest to our members. You'll also get access to the show notes for these episodes, of course.
00:23:01.740 Third, delivery of our premium newsletter, which is put together by our dedicated team of research
00:23:07.220 analysts. This newsletter covers a wide range of topics related to longevity and provides much
00:23:12.920 more detail than our free weekly newsletter. Fourth, access to our private podcast feed that provides
00:23:20.300 you with access to every episode, including AMA's sans the spiel you're listening to now and in your
00:23:26.400 regular podcast feed. Fifth, the Qualies, an additional member-only podcast we put together that serves as a
00:23:33.840 highlight reel featuring the best excerpts from previous episodes of The Drive. This is a great
00:23:39.040 way to catch up on previous episodes without having to go back and listen to each one of them.
00:23:43.660 And finally, other benefits that are added along the way. If you want to learn more and access these
00:23:49.060 member-only benefits, you can head over to peteratiamd.com forward slash subscribe. You can also find me on
00:23:56.380 YouTube, Instagram, and Twitter, all with the handle peteratiamd. You can also leave us a review on Apple
00:24:02.760 podcasts or whatever podcast player you use. This podcast is for general informational purposes only
00:24:09.040 and does not constitute the practice of medicine, nursing, or other professional healthcare services,
00:24:13.760 including the giving of medical advice. No doctor-patient relationship is formed. The use of
00:24:19.740 this information and the materials linked to this podcast is at the user's own risk. The content
00:24:25.480 on this podcast is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or
00:24:30.500 treatment. Users should not disregard or delay in obtaining medical advice from any medical condition
00:24:35.900 they have, and they should seek the assistance of their healthcare professionals for any such
00:24:40.520 conditions. Finally, I take all conflicts of interest very seriously. For all of my disclosures and the
00:24:46.600 companies I invest in or advise, please visit peteratiamd.com forward slash about where I keep an up-to-date
00:24:54.560 and active list of all disclosures.