#328 - AMA #66： Optimizing nutrition for health and longevity： myth of a ＂best＂ diet, complexities of nutrition science, and practical steps for building a sustainable diet
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
164.94304
Summary
In today's episode, we cover a topic that is generally one of the most talked about topics and also one that comes with a lot of confusion, and that is nutrition. In this episode we speak about nutrition and weight loss and weight maintenance, how nutrition compares to exercise, the complexities of nutrition research, and how to think about choosing the right diet for oneself.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Hey everyone, welcome to a sneak peek, ask me anything or AMA episode of the drive podcast.
00:00:15.820
I'm your host, Peter Atiyah. At the end of this short episode, I'll explain how you can access
00:00:20.280
the AMA episodes in full, along with a ton of other membership benefits we've created,
00:00:24.900
or you can learn more now by going to peteratiyahmd.com forward slash subscribe.
00:00:30.600
So without further delay, here's today's sneak peek of the ask me anything episode.
00:00:38.880
Welcome to ask me anything AMA episode 66. I'm once again joined by my co-host Nick Stenson.
00:00:46.220
In today's episode, we cover a topic that is generally one of the most talked about topics
00:00:51.120
and also one that comes with a lot of confusion, and that is nutrition. Given this, we wanted to
00:00:57.500
do a special episode to answer any and all questions that routinely come in on this topic.
00:01:04.600
So in this conversation, we speak about nutrition and weight loss and weight maintenance and how
00:01:08.920
nutrition compares to exercise, the complexities of nutrition research, what, if any, is the so-called
00:01:15.440
best diet and how to think about choosing the right diet for oneself. We talk about protein,
00:01:21.360
we talk about processed foods, and much more. We discuss what questions you as an individual
00:01:27.120
can ask yourself to try to identify the best diet for you. If you're a subscriber and want to watch the
00:01:33.340
full video of this podcast, you can find it on the show notes page. If you are not a subscriber,
00:01:38.600
you can watch a sneak peek of the video on our YouTube page. So without further delay,
00:01:51.760
Peter, welcome to another AMA. How are you doing?
00:01:56.720
I haven't talked to you yet today. So what kind of mood would you say you're in today?
00:02:01.040
Oh, well, given the subject matter, surprisingly good mood and, you know, I've taken a couple beta
00:02:07.620
blockers before. So I'm riding the cool wave, man.
00:02:12.660
That's good. I was curious if we were going to get diplomatic Peter or spicy Peter on this episode.
00:02:24.320
Perfect. So for today, we are covering a topic that, as you hinted at, is not one of your favorite,
00:02:31.680
but we probably get asked the most amount of questions on in some form or another.
00:02:37.620
It's a massive topic. It's nutrition. And we've done a ton of podcasts on this,
00:02:42.120
ton of newsletters on this. And so we're not going to be able to cover everything as it relates
00:02:48.000
to nutrition. But what we did is we pulled the most common questions, themes that we get asked,
00:02:54.260
and we pulled them together for this episode. So we are going to talk about nutrition,
00:02:59.500
its relationship in weight loss and weight management, how you think about it compared to
00:03:04.580
exercise, the complexities of nutrition research, which is why often when we send emails tearing
00:03:11.120
apart studies, they are typically on nutrition. What you think of as, quote unquote, the best diet,
00:03:17.480
if we can even answer that, how that's different from a healthy person to someone who's trying to
00:03:22.180
manage chronic disease, how people can think about choosing the best diet for themselves.
00:03:28.600
Obviously, we can't do nutrition without protein, which is one thing you do genuinely like to talk
00:03:35.060
about. And we'll also hit some other hot button issues, such as processed food. So with all that
00:03:41.100
said, anything you want to add before we get rolling? No, let's jump into it. Perfect. Starting
00:03:47.960
off nutrition. Why do you hate talking about it? Well, look, it wasn't always this way. There was a day
00:03:54.000
when I really enjoyed talking about nutrition and writing about nutrition. In fact, you could argue I cut
00:03:58.940
my teeth on that. That was my very first foray into doing anything publicly back in 2011 was blogging,
00:04:06.360
and it was blogging mostly about nutrition. But I would say there are a handful of reasons that my
00:04:12.360
interest in continuing to obsessively talk about it has sort of diminished. So you've alluded to some
00:04:19.040
already. So the problem with nutrition research is that it doesn't really lend itself to having
00:04:26.260
rigorous discussions on the topic. I read a really interesting and timely article the other day on
00:04:32.240
LinkedIn, and it was titled something to the effect of food can't be medicine until we can research it
00:04:38.900
like medicine. In fact, we should link to that article in the show notes. I mean, it was so spot on.
00:04:43.580
It's like everyone loves to probably misquote Hippocrates with the let food be thy medicine
00:04:49.920
line. And yeah, it makes sense in a way. They're molecules. You put the molecules in,
00:04:56.280
they clearly have an effect on your body. The problem is there's no relationship whatsoever
00:05:02.940
between food and medicine. The nature of which we can do controlled studies with medicine
00:05:07.180
is completely different. The homogeneity of medicine, right? If we're going to study a medication,
00:05:13.140
you're getting the same molecule every time. And that's the one molecule that you're studying,
00:05:18.080
right? I mean, there are a few exceptions to that. If you're taking, for example, desiccated thyroid
00:05:21.660
hormone, where you have kind of a hodgepodge of pig thyroid gland mixed up, you're getting some T3,
00:05:28.260
some T4, some T2, etc. But for the most part, when you take a drug, you're taking a single molecule.
00:05:33.680
That's obviously not the case with food. So all of that notwithstanding, the real issue I have,
00:05:39.260
because that's just, I think, a function of food. What rubs me the wrong way is that the ratio of
00:05:45.560
certainty, with which people speak about this subject matter, to the quality of data. So take
00:05:51.480
that as a ratio. So on the top, you have certainty. On the bottom, you have quality of data. That is
00:05:58.080
really, really high. That's a really big number, meaning people have tons of certainty despite a
00:06:03.440
paucity of data or quality of data. You don't have a paucity of data. You have a paucity of quality
00:06:08.220
data. There's nothing that compares to this. There is no discipline of science or engineering
00:06:13.760
for which our magnitude of certainty is so high relative to such poor quality data.
00:06:20.440
And then I think the final point I would make of many, but I don't want to spend the whole time
00:06:25.040
on this, is that the zealous extremes and the cultish religious buffoonery that goes on in this
00:06:33.500
space is just very off-putting to me. Whether we're talking about one end of the spectrum of
00:06:38.540
carnivore to vegan, when people speak about their diet as the one true diet, I find it very off-putting,
00:06:45.140
which is not to say that a person who's vegan is off-putting. I mean, I've met many people who say,
00:06:49.480
look, this is kind of the thing that works for me, or this is my belief system. I just can't bring
00:06:53.620
myself to eat animals. I'm not saying there's anything wrong with that. What I'm talking about is sort of
00:06:58.160
the really cultish people who will tell you with absolute certainty that if you are eating anything
00:07:04.000
other than this diet, and this diet can be any diet, you're going to go to hell, basically. There's a
00:07:09.660
warm place in Hades that's waiting for you. And of course, they're not saying that, but the point is
00:07:13.880
they're speaking with such conviction about something for which such conviction is impossible.
00:07:19.620
What do you think caused you to make a switch on nutrition? So you cut your teeth on this subject.
00:07:25.620
When we met 12 or so years ago, you were deep in this subject. Was it a slow progression or do you
00:07:33.360
think it was like more of a quick switch? No, I think it was pretty gradual. There's not a moment
00:07:38.340
I'll point to that says when that happened, or when I read that one study or meta-analysis or article,
00:07:44.320
I had a change. I think it was in part maybe as my clinical experience grew and I saw more and more
00:07:51.600
patients and realized more and more the complexity of nutrition and the heterogeneity of people's
00:07:59.860
response to different nutrition. In other words, how 10 people could respond in six different ways
00:08:06.720
to given nutritional inputs that you start to realize, well, a couple of things are true.
00:08:11.760
One is that the body is remarkably adept at dampening the effects of nutrition.
00:08:18.480
So it's like, if you think of an engineering system, there are some systems where when you
00:08:22.920
put a signal in to the box, the box amplifies the signal. So you put something in that's a two out
00:08:29.800
of 10 and it amplifies it to like an eight out of 10. And sometimes you want that. Sometimes you need
00:08:34.500
a signal amplifier, but then you have the opposite is true where you put something in and it dampens the
00:08:39.820
signal. So you put something in that's like a blinking eight out of 10 and the thing gets attenuated.
00:08:44.320
It gets dampened. It comes out at a two out of 10. And in many ways, the body is that way with
00:08:48.760
nutrition. And so a lot of the things that people pontificate about on the margins end up being really
00:08:53.980
not that important. And I've talked about this a bunch and maybe we'll even speak about it a little
00:08:58.920
later today. But once you get beyond total energy consumption, our total energy content of the food,
00:09:03.800
total calories, protein content, and the essentials within minerals and nutrients,
00:09:11.760
most of the rest doesn't matter that much. The body's pretty resilient. You have to hit certain
00:09:16.820
minimums on fat to avoid severe malnutrition and problems that occur there. Carbohydrate tolerance
00:09:23.040
is staggeringly variable. You can get away without eating any carbs and still function. And you can
00:09:29.300
get away with eating a ton of carbs and still function. So that's actually kind of amazing is our
00:09:34.100
variability on that one particular macronutrient. But beyond those big principles, there's very little
00:09:40.420
that can be said with high certainty. And one might even ask the question, how much really,
00:09:45.600
really matters. I mean, we're now talking about fourth and fifth order terms on a polynomial here.
00:09:50.140
And those don't tend to really sway the outcome because the first, second, and third order terms
00:09:55.780
are really clearly set. And so I think the next follow-up question would be what measures of health,
00:10:02.820
if any, that relate to nutrition can an individual monitor on their own to kind of understand where
00:10:13.240
Well, I think there are many. Obviously, nutrition plays a huge role in anthropometric data. So using a
00:10:21.300
DEXA scan, which will tell you how much lean mass you have, how much body fat you have, and if the scan
00:10:27.580
is calibrated correctly at least give you a good estimate of how much visceral fat you have, that's a
00:10:32.780
great readout of nutrition. You could go even detailed in that and actually do scans of the liver
00:10:38.940
specifically to look for liver fat. Also, a fantastic readout of nutrition quite specifically. You could
00:10:45.540
look at biomarkers that pertain to metabolic health and specifically to glucose regulation or glucose
00:10:53.800
homeostasis. So if you look at either impaired or enhanced glucose disposal and other markers of
00:11:01.680
metabolic health, this is everything that would range from how your CGM performs, your hemoglobin
00:11:05.960
A1C, things like uric acid, things like liver function tests, your oral glucose tolerance tests,
00:11:12.040
all of those things are going to be very important readout states of nutrition. Now, of course, those markers
00:11:17.720
are also readout states of other things. They reflect your sleep and exercise quite a bit as well,
00:11:22.200
but there's no doubt that those are reflections of your nutritional status. In some cases, we would
00:11:27.620
say otherwise unexplained inflammation could probably be driven by nutrition. We certainly see that outside
00:11:33.940
of very extreme examples, for example, celiac disease is a pretty extreme and specific case, but even
00:11:39.840
absent something like celiac disease, there's clearly an intolerance to wheat on the part of many people,
00:11:45.460
and it only shows up in a biochemical assay that surveys for inflammation, such as a C-reactive
00:11:52.600
protein or a slight change in the white blood cell count or things of that nature. And we know this
00:11:57.060
because when we do empirical elimination, selective elimination and reintroduction of these things,
00:12:02.880
we'll see those inflammatory markers move. So there's no question that food plays a role in that as well.
00:12:08.400
And then obviously, we can measure certain deficiencies and or excesses in the blood most
00:12:14.920
commonly, but also in the urine or even in the hair. So in other words, you could give you an
00:12:18.560
example, right? You could see a person who is B12 deficient. That's a very common finding in people
00:12:23.340
who don't eat meat. And similarly, you can see an excess of mercury, which would be considered quite
00:12:28.040
toxic if it gets to a high enough level for someone who, for example, is eating a lot of seafood and
00:12:33.000
especially seafood that is coming from really large fish who are high enough on the food chain that
00:12:37.380
they're eating a lot of other fish and accumulating mercury themselves. So I would say probably those
00:12:41.540
would be the big four categories of things where nutrition is easy to read out in testing.
00:12:48.220
One of the questions we see come through a lot is kind of the relationship or the difference between
00:12:53.100
nutrition and exercise as it relates to weight loss, weight maintenance, or gaining weight. What do we
00:13:01.500
know about kind of those two things, nutrition and exercise, as it relates to weight?
00:13:07.380
Thank you for listening to today's sneak peek AMA episode of the drive. If you're interested
00:13:12.200
in hearing the complete version of this AMA, you'll want to become a premium member. It's extremely
00:13:18.000
important to me to provide all of this content without relying on paid ads to do this. Our work
00:13:23.060
is made entirely possible by our members. And in return, we offer exclusive member only content
00:13:28.820
and benefits above and beyond what is available for free. So if you want to take your knowledge of this
00:13:34.060
space to the next level, it's our goal to ensure members get back much more than the price of the
00:13:38.800
subscription. Premium membership includes several benefits. First, comprehensive podcast show notes
00:13:45.180
that detail every topic, paper, person, and thing that we discuss in each episode. And the word on the
00:13:51.400
street is nobody's show notes rival ours. Second, monthly ask me anything or AMA episodes. These
00:13:59.000
episodes are comprised of detailed responses to subscriber questions, typically focused on a
00:14:03.760
single topic and are designed to offer a great deal of clarity and detail on topics of special
00:14:09.100
interest to our members. You'll also get access to the show notes for these episodes. Of course,
00:14:14.000
third delivery of our premium newsletter, which is put together by our dedicated team of research
00:14:19.580
analysts. This newsletter covers a wide range of topics related to longevity and provides much more
00:14:25.500
detail than our free weekly newsletter. Fourth, access to our private podcast feed that provides
00:14:32.660
you with access to every episode, including AMA's sans the spiel you're listening to now and in your
00:14:38.760
regular podcast feed. Fifth, the qualies, an additional member only podcast we put together that serves as a
00:14:46.200
highlight reel featuring the best excerpts from previous episodes of the drive. This is a great way to
00:14:51.680
catch up on previous episodes without having to go back and listen to each one of them. And finally,
00:14:56.760
other benefits that are added along the way. If you want to learn more and access these member only
00:15:01.980
benefits, you can head over to peteratiamd.com forward slash subscribe. You can also find me on
00:15:08.740
YouTube, Instagram, and Twitter, all with the handle peteratiamd. You can also leave us a review on
00:15:14.820
Apple podcasts or whatever podcast player you use. This podcast is for general informational purposes only,
00:15:21.400
and does not constitute the practice of medicine, nursing, or other professional healthcare
00:15:25.640
services, including the giving of medical advice. No doctor patient relationship is formed. The use of
00:15:32.100
this information and the materials linked to this podcast is at the user's own risk. The content on
00:15:38.200
this podcast is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.
00:15:43.640
Users should not disregard or delay in obtaining medical advice from any medical condition they have,
00:15:48.740
and they should seek the assistance of their healthcare professionals for any such conditions.
00:15:53.880
Finally, I take all conflicts of interest very seriously. For all of my disclosures and the
00:15:58.960
companies I invest in or advise, please visit peteratiamd.com forward slash about where I keep an up-to-date