The Peter Attia Drive - January 06, 2025


#330 – Autism, ADHD, and Anxiety: Understanding the rise in autism and a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and treatment of each condition in children | Trenna Sutcliffe, M.D.


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 57 minutes

Words per Minute

172.52232

Word Count

20,208

Sentence Count

1,253

Misogynist Sentences

2

Hate Speech Sentences

7


Summary

Dr. Trenna Sutcliffe is a developmental behavioral pediatrician and the founder and medical director of the Sutcliffe Clinic in the Bay Area, which partners with patients and their families to evaluate and provide supportive care for children dealing with issues such as behavioral changes, developmental differences, and school struggles. In this episode, we explore her journey into developmental and behavioral pediatrics, including her background in genetics, pediatric neurology, and her current work in leading multidisciplinary teams around the care of children with autism, ADHD, and anxiety.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hey, everyone. Welcome to the Drive podcast. I'm your host, Peter Atiyah. This podcast,
00:00:16.540 my website, and my weekly newsletter all focus on the goal of translating the science of longevity
00:00:21.520 into something accessible for everyone. Our goal is to provide the best content in health and
00:00:26.720 wellness, and we've established a great team of analysts to make this happen. It is extremely
00:00:31.660 important to me to provide all of this content without relying on paid ads. To do this, our work
00:00:36.960 is made entirely possible by our members, and in return, we offer exclusive member-only content
00:00:42.700 and benefits above and beyond what is available for free. If you want to take your knowledge of
00:00:47.940 this space to the next level, it's our goal to ensure members get back much more than the price
00:00:53.200 of the subscription. If you want to learn more about the benefits of our premium membership,
00:00:58.020 head over to peteratiyahmd.com forward slash subscribe. My guest this week is Dr. Trenna
00:01:06.280 Sutcliffe. Trenna is a developmental behavioral pediatrician and the founder and medical director
00:01:12.120 of the Sutcliffe Clinic in the Bay Area, which partners with patients and their families to
00:01:16.740 evaluate and provide supportive care for children dealing with issues such as behavioral changes,
00:01:21.420 developmental differences, and school struggles. In my conversation with Trenna, we explore her
00:01:26.020 journey into developmental and behavioral pediatrics. In fact, she was the first person
00:01:31.140 to be practicing under this designation at Stanford when she arrived about 20 years ago. This includes
00:01:37.260 her background in genetics, pediatric neurology, and her current work in leading multidisciplinary
00:01:41.660 teams around the care of children with autism, ADHD, and anxiety. We spoke about the diagnostic
00:01:47.740 processes for autism, ADHD, and anxiety, which she calls the three A's, discussing how these
00:01:52.760 behavioral diagnoses are made based on clinical traits and the criteria depending on the age of
00:01:57.120 a child. We focus on the overlap between the three A's and how comorbidities are common in children
00:02:02.600 with each of these conditions. Trenna emphasizes the importance of a personalized treatment plan to
00:02:07.680 consider the whole child, including their environment at home and school. We talk about the changing
00:02:12.740 diagnostic criteria for autism between the DSM-4 and the DSM-5 and what some of the drivers might be
00:02:20.640 for the increase in the prevalence of autism today. This is a very hotly discussed topic. Trenna provides
00:02:27.500 a very thorough discussion of what the factors are that may be contributing to this. We discuss the
00:02:33.820 various therapies, including applied behavioral analysis, or ABA for autism, behavioral interventions,
00:02:39.740 and parental training for ADHD. We cover pharmacologic options, particularly for ADHD and anxiety,
00:02:46.720 including the use of stimulants, non-stimulants, and SSRIs. Trenna explains how these medications are
00:02:52.060 used alongside behavioral interventions to help children manage symptoms and improve their daily
00:02:56.840 lives. And we talk about the challenges families face in accessing care, particularly outside of major
00:03:02.080 urban areas, and the importance of bridging healthcare and education to create a more holistic
00:03:06.340 approach to support children with these developmental conditions. So without further delay, please enjoy
00:03:11.840 my conversation with Dr. Trenna Sutcliffe. Well, Trenna, thank you so much for coming all the way out to
00:03:21.880 Austin. Really nice to meet with you in person. I've heard a lot of things about you from various
00:03:26.820 colleagues in the Bay Area. And frankly, this is just a topic that I think a lot of people are interested
00:03:32.780 in. Obviously, many of them parents, but I just think people in general are kind of interested.
00:03:37.320 And so maybe just before we jump into it, let's spend just a couple of minutes on your background
00:03:41.760 so people understand who you are and why I wanted to spend so much time with you. So you trained in
00:03:47.860 pediatrics, developmental and behavioral. Well, let me not try to summarize what you've done. Tell me what
00:03:53.500 you've done. Okay. Well, initially I did an undergrad and master's degree in genetics and then went on to
00:04:00.480 medical school. After medical school, I went on and did a residency in pediatrics, but ultimately
00:04:07.560 wanted to do developmental behavioral pediatrics for numerous reasons because it just was a really
00:04:13.200 good fit with my interests and passions. So I did actually a year in pediatric neurology and then a
00:04:20.340 full fellowship in developmental behavioral pediatrics before moving to California.
00:04:24.660 Yeah. Your interests today primarily revolve around behavioral therapy for three things that
00:04:32.300 we're going to spend quite a bit of time talking about. I won't commit to the order yet because
00:04:35.960 that'll come out of our discussion, but somewhere along the way, we're going to talk about autism.
00:04:39.780 We're going to talk about ADHD and we're going to talk about anxiety. So coming at this through the
00:04:45.480 lens of what you do today, which is running a really large, successful, multidisciplinary clinic.
00:04:50.980 I assume this is just for children. So this is up to 18 years old, basically is your patient
00:04:55.660 population. Correct. Let's start by just getting some of the diagnostic criteria straight. I think
00:05:01.820 that in general, most people listening to us have a gestalt for what each of those things are,
00:05:06.940 but I think it would be helpful to maybe understand clinically how you look at each of those. So let's
00:05:12.280 start with anxiety. How I look at it clinically. Yeah. And how is it defined? How clear are the
00:05:17.900 diagnostic criteria? What does the DSM-5 say about it? And how does a practicing clinician
00:05:23.920 use that or maybe modify that in the way that they try to come up with a diagnosis?
00:05:29.220 So with all of these diagnoses, anxiety, ADHD, autism, they're behavioral clinical diagnoses. So it's
00:05:37.480 based on checklists of a number of traits and characteristics. Now you need to be working with
00:05:44.460 a clinician, a physician who has enough experience diagnosing these conditions, trained in these
00:05:51.880 conditions. But essentially that person needs to be an expert on what the clinical picture looks like
00:05:58.320 because there's no biomarkers for any of these conditions. That's the key thing. There are no
00:06:03.360 blood tests or no brain scans to say who has anxiety, who has ADHD, who has autism. I have families
00:06:10.900 come to me all the time and I explain to them, I have these clinical boxes and labels and diagnoses
00:06:16.700 in my clinic. And these boxes and labels are man-made. We create these lists of criteria,
00:06:23.680 but neurobiology in the brain is much more complex than these boxes. So the key thing is to have a
00:06:31.980 clinician who looks at the, and for me, a child, and looking at their traits at home, at school,
00:06:38.480 in multiple environments, collecting data through talking to parents' history, getting information
00:06:45.200 from people other than the parents. So that's using rating forms or talking to teachers and therapists.
00:06:51.620 Ideally, we get to see the child in their real-life environment. So maybe even observing them in a
00:06:57.680 real-life place like school, and then doing assessment in the clinic to collect information about them.
00:07:03.600 And with that, that clinician decides whether or not they meet diagnostic criteria, a list of traits
00:07:11.440 or characteristics described in a book called the DSM. And then we decide whether that child meets that
00:07:16.500 criteria. But one of the key things is about whether or not those traits are creating impairment. And
00:07:22.760 that's a key criteria for any of these diagnoses. For example, anxiety. We all have feelings of anxiety.
00:07:30.640 Anxiety is actually a very appropriate, normal feeling that we should all have. But it's all about
00:07:37.760 how much impairment is it creating? How does it impact function and impact someone doing their job?
00:07:45.240 And for a child, their job is to learn and go to school, make friends, practice communicating and
00:07:53.300 interacting with other peers, and be a positive contributor in their community, which is school.
00:07:58.260 So it's about how these traits impact their function in that job.
00:08:03.120 What would you say is the youngest age that each of those could be diagnosed? And I do want to talk
00:08:09.820 a little bit about what the layers of diagnostic criteria are. But just starting at the first
00:08:15.220 question, which is, if a parent says, hey, I think my child has such and such, I really want to get a
00:08:21.140 workup. Is there an age beneath which you would say this might not be a good use of time and energy?
00:08:25.700 So for autism, although the typical age for diagnosis is more like three or four,
00:08:32.080 we can confidently make that diagnosis as young as 18 months of age. And I'll be honest,
00:08:37.720 in the last 20 years, there's been one or two cases where I've made it at 15 months of age,
00:08:42.320 because it was very significant and obvious. Most often at that young age, we do wait a few more
00:08:48.800 months to watch how the child develops because kids are a moving target. But with autism, it can
00:08:55.700 be 18 months, two years of age, although half of the cases of autism are diagnosed over six.
00:09:01.420 With ADHD, you can make a diagnosis as young as four years of age. But again, I'll just tell you from
00:09:08.000 my clinical experience, I rarely jump onto the diagnosis with a four or five-year-old because
00:09:15.160 they're still a moving target. Although I may start interventions, behavioral interventions and
00:09:20.260 parenting support, but there are a lot of four-year-olds who are pretty busy. So I generally
00:09:24.340 wait closer to school age, although technically you can make it as young as four.
00:09:28.500 So that would be for most kids, when you say school, you don't mean preschool,
00:09:31.220 you mean actual kindergarten, five to six.
00:09:33.140 Five to six, I think. A lot of people will wait till five or six to really see how that child is
00:09:38.540 evolving. Although technically you could make it younger. And then with anxiety,
00:09:42.440 there's separation anxiety. There's something called selective mutism in young kids, in preschoolers.
00:09:49.240 So anxiety, there's many different types of anxiety, but there's definitely anxiety conditions
00:09:53.320 in preschoolers. Let's talk a little bit more about that. I don't know much about anxiety,
00:09:57.720 and I'm guessing most people listening have a sort of hand-waving sense of what it means. But
00:10:02.720 you said separation anxiety as an example. Anyone who's been a parent can appreciate moments of that.
00:10:08.720 99% sure our puppy has separation anxiety. What are some of the other types of anxiety,
00:10:14.220 and how do you look to spot those in kids?
00:10:17.200 So again, just to emphasize, anxiety is actually a normal emotion that we should all have.
00:10:21.220 So it's all about whether it's created enough impairment. So in the anxiety bucket,
00:10:25.620 there's multiple different types. So someone may have generalized anxiety, where that's exactly it.
00:10:31.660 It's generalized. It's seen in multiple places as pretty pervasive. People can have specific phobias
00:10:36.900 towards dogs or spiders or other things. I mentioned separation anxiety. So that is a
00:10:42.280 condition. And again, yes, many toddlers have separation anxiety. That's very normal. It's about
00:10:47.980 how severe and significant the anxiety is, and how pervasive it is, and whether it is impacting
00:10:55.540 function. So when it's impacting the ability for a child to go to childcare or preschool,
00:11:00.760 then it's something we need to help. Other types of anxiety, there's something called selective
00:11:05.140 mutism. Children who are able to speak very well and speak well at home or with familiar adults,
00:11:12.780 but do not speak and are mute outside that familiar environment. There's also obsessive-compulsive
00:11:19.180 disorder, where people have obsessive thoughts or compulsive behaviors. So there's many types of
00:11:25.760 anxiety conditions out there, and children have these.
00:11:29.800 You've reiterated it twice now, which tells me how important it is. It really has to come down to
00:11:34.060 this impairment thing. All of us could probably read through the DSM-5 and place ourselves in each
00:11:39.500 of these diagnostic buckets. I know I can. I've done that exercise, and it turns out I could make
00:11:44.240 the case I have everything. But the truth of it is, what I try to ask is, which is maladaptive?
00:11:48.800 Which is mostly giving me the negative response that is impacting relationships or work or these
00:11:54.020 other things. I like that framework for kids, because if you think to yourself, oh, my kid has ADHD,
00:11:59.220 ADHD, but they're doing well in school. They're progressing in reading, writing, arithmetic.
00:12:04.420 They enjoy playing sports. Yeah, maybe they're a little bit more rambunctious, but they have
00:12:09.160 friends. How would you help a parent sort of navigate that? If they came to you and said,
00:12:13.960 I think my son or my daughter has ADHD, what are kind of the impairment-style questions you would be
00:12:18.900 asking to paint the contours of this condition, even if you acknowledge that that kid's got a lot of
00:12:25.200 energy? Those are great questions, because it is definitely a spectrum. There's a bell curve.
00:12:29.820 We're all on a bell curve. For all of these diagnoses, there's a bell curve. And so it's
00:12:33.900 when does it become leaving the average range, the typical profile, and over into what we call a
00:12:40.600 disorder? And actually, I don't like to use the word disorder for these conditions either,
00:12:43.980 because I think they're just learning differences and thinking differences as well. But when does it
00:12:48.200 become a disorder? So questions around impairment. So for me, one of the number one things I talk
00:12:54.220 about with families is self-esteem. How is it impacting that child's self-concept, how they
00:12:59.380 see themselves? How is it impacting their relationships with peers? That's another key
00:13:04.760 one. So does it impact social interactions? Does it impact how they connect with peers? Does it impact
00:13:12.480 the feedback they're getting from peers? How does it impact their ability to learn and access
00:13:18.320 learning opportunities at school or on the playground? So are these traits impacting their
00:13:25.580 ability to fully engage in learning, be successful, show their potential? The self-esteem thing is very
00:13:32.180 important to me, though. So for a child who has a biologic condition, these are all biologic. There's
00:13:40.380 neurochemicals, there's genetics involved. These are biologic conditions. And for a child to have a
00:13:46.300 biologic condition and be in class and then feel bad because they are worried they're not doing
00:13:54.240 well enough and they're getting a lot of negative feedback from teachers and peers. Not because those
00:14:00.460 people are trying to be mean or negative, but they have to constantly remind that child because that
00:14:06.520 child is forgetting things, losing things, forgot to put their name on the piece of paper,
00:14:11.020 completely off task. Keeps losing things.
00:14:13.400 Losing, yeah. So it's losing, forgetting. It's not completing tasks. It's not sustaining attention
00:14:19.520 in a conversation. It's actually avoiding tasks that require a lot of sustained attention.
00:14:27.040 So there's a lot of these traits where it's impacting this child's ability to be successful
00:14:32.740 day-to-day at school. How do you assess self-esteem? What questions are you asking the child when you
00:14:39.500 actually get to sit down with the child to determine that? And is there anything you can glean on that
00:14:45.340 dimension from speaking with anybody other than the child?
00:14:48.460 Yeah, you speak to the child and you do talk to others, both of those things. When you talk to the
00:14:53.100 child, there's multiple different ways of doing it. Not always easy to get the answer. With younger
00:14:59.500 children, we sometimes use approaches where we actually are talking about a third person. So there's a
00:15:05.460 number of different techniques where you are working with a child. Of course, you're building relationship
00:15:10.860 rapport with a child. There needs to be trust. But there's a number of ways that we assess it where
00:15:16.800 we actually may talk to them about another child so that you have another third person. Because it's
00:15:22.360 sometimes easier to talk about a third person than yourself. So talking about situations, about how
00:15:28.860 another child would feel at school. Or why does another child feel uncomfortable at school? Or why does a
00:15:35.540 child come home crying some days? And then you hear their stories. So when the children talk about that, they
00:15:41.840 actually relate to their own situations. And they start to say like, well, Johnny came home from school
00:15:47.500 crying because nobody wants to play with him. Because he always messes up rules to the game.
00:15:53.900 What is the age window in which you can utilize that technique?
00:15:57.340 It's mostly primary elementary school age. So I feel like by the time I get to a second grader,
00:16:05.040 they are second, third, fourth, fifth, they're able to share these stories.
00:16:10.720 About other people, you mean?
00:16:12.300 Yeah.
00:16:12.500 Yeah. Interesting.
00:16:13.440 Yeah. When they're older, they'll talk about themselves. It's hard to reflect on your own
00:16:17.960 feelings and thoughts. For a child to identify their own emotions and the why behind their emotions
00:16:23.680 it's challenging. So you've, in that description, actually made a pretty clear, I think, case for
00:16:30.520 some of the traits that are showing up in ADHD and in anxiety, all the different variants of it.
00:16:37.280 Let's talk a little bit more about autism. Now, of course, it was referred to as ASD, right?
00:16:42.280 Correct. Autism spectrum.
00:16:43.680 Autism spectrum disorder.
00:16:45.060 We'll park for a moment the use of the word disorder and maybe come back to that a little
00:16:49.860 bit. But tell me today, how is the diagnosis of autism made? Because I think when many people
00:16:56.760 think of autism, if they're old enough, they might think a rain man. You're going to think of somebody
00:17:02.080 who in a very short interaction, a non-clinician would go, oh, that person is not neurotypical.
00:17:09.920 That person clearly has something about them that's quirky and very different. And you might
00:17:15.480 think of even more extreme examples of children that are nonverbal and things of that nature. But
00:17:20.500 again, given the nature of this and the fact that it's a spectrum, that must make it even more
00:17:25.240 challenging to find the diagnosis, correct?
00:17:27.980 Very, very. I have so much to say about autism, the diagnosis and how we make it and how it's changed
00:17:33.700 so much over the years. So autism spectrum. So first, it's a spectrum, huge spectrum of what
00:17:40.220 this means when we talk about autism spectrum. It goes from what people remember it from decades ago
00:17:46.100 as from nonverbal, very little communication skills, being somewhat isolated, not interacting
00:17:53.520 with other people, mannerisms such as flapping your hands. That's sort of a classic description that
00:17:59.600 we do remember from over the last couple of decades. Nowadays, many children who have a lot of speech
00:18:07.640 and language skills, who do communicate a lot, but struggle with the social communication that we have
00:18:13.520 with each other, who have many, many strengths, but do struggle with social skills and do have some
00:18:20.500 restricted interests and repetitive behaviors. They also qualify under this umbrella term called autism
00:18:26.740 spectrum disorder. And this term, autism spectrum disorder, that term came out in 2013 with the
00:18:33.200 DSM-5. So how we diagnose it is based on, again, clinical traits, but the definition and the checklist
00:18:41.040 of those traits have actually changed many times over the last few decades. So currently, it is, you work
00:18:49.720 with an expert who has a lot of experience with autism, and they do an analysis of someone's behavior.
00:18:55.940 And the two areas that we look at, social communication skills, and the other is the repetitive behaviors
00:19:02.680 restricted interests. So for social communication skills, our current diagnostic criteria requires that a
00:19:10.960 patient has differences in three specific areas. One is their social reciprocity. So this is the back and forth
00:19:22.520 of social interactions. It's how do you initiate socially, how do you respond socially. The second area is related to
00:19:31.380 nonverbal communication skills. So it's how someone uses their nonverbal communication, eye contact gestures, as well as how
00:19:41.340 they understand and interpret somebody else's nonverbal communication. And then the third area is related to how they
00:19:50.920 understand relationships. So it's about building friendships, playing with peers, how they understand
00:19:59.540 the social contacts of being in a group. So those are the three key areas when it comes to the social
00:20:06.660 communication piece. And in order to get the diagnosis, you do have to have differences in all those three
00:20:12.320 areas.
00:20:12.720 Is this something that is done during one assessment or is this something that's done over repeated
00:20:17.680 assessments?
00:20:18.900 Depends on the level of severity in the child. So first of all, it's important that whoever's doing
00:20:25.080 the assessment really understands that child.
00:20:27.260 Who in your clinical team does this? What type of training does this person have? Is it a physician?
00:20:32.920 It can be a physician or it can be a psychologist. That's generally who does it. So physician would either be a
00:20:38.940 developmental behavioral pediatrician or a psychiatrist. That's most often, occasionally it's a pediatric
00:20:44.120 neurologist or somebody else with some sort of similar background and training, but generally
00:20:49.240 DBP or psychiatrist. And if it's not a physician, then it's a psychologist that usually does the
00:20:54.020 assessment. And so the assessment could be multiple things. There's no gold standard, like the assessment
00:21:00.500 has to include certain components. But again, like I mentioned, it's important that the clinician
00:21:05.720 get to know the child, I think it's important to understand the child's profile. The label is only
00:21:10.680 one piece of it. If someone tells me their child has autism, I actually really don't know much about
00:21:15.420 their child.
00:21:16.420 Say more.
00:21:17.060 Because you tell me your child has autism, I really don't know what your child is like if someone tells
00:21:21.140 me that on the street. Then we come up with treatment plans for like a child with autism. It's
00:21:24.860 like, well, there's a saying, you've met one child with autism, you've met one child with autism.
00:21:28.760 And so to really make a difference with the treatment plan, you need to understand that
00:21:35.460 profile of that child, that child's strengths and challenges. And so for me, there's multiple
00:21:41.440 goals with the assessment. One part of the assessment is to make a diagnosis because the
00:21:45.860 diagnosis can be a tool to help the adults around that child better understand that child.
00:21:53.000 It gives some sort of structure of like how to approach that child and leverage their strengths
00:21:59.460 and work on skill building. It can help get resources at school or through insurance.
00:22:06.120 So the diagnosis is a tool. However, to really make a difference, you want to understand
00:22:12.760 what about that child is unique and different and how do you support that child?
00:22:18.160 So you were asking, how do you do an assessment? So when it is a more significant case with significant
00:22:26.300 impairments, we frequently can make the diagnosis. I'll just be honest, you can make it pretty
00:22:31.440 quickly. You should take a good history. You should definitely meet with the child, work
00:22:36.960 with the child in the clinic. But there are many children where a trained clinician can do that
00:22:42.720 diagnosis pretty quickly in a child with very significant autism. It'd be obvious to you if
00:22:49.280 you were in a restaurant and you saw someone with autism. It's obvious to many people. But for children
00:22:53.400 who have milder symptoms, it is really important that there probably is multiple visits to see the
00:23:00.220 child on multiple days, that different types of assessments are done directly with the child in
00:23:06.760 addition to taking history with the parents. And in addition to collecting information from other
00:23:12.520 people involved in that child's life, such as teachers or therapists, it's important to get
00:23:17.540 different perspectives.
00:23:19.540 So you mentioned that the diagnosis in probably more severe cases can be made earlier and earlier
00:23:25.480 in life. Sounds like sweet spot is three to four years of age. But then you said half of the kids
00:23:30.700 are diagnosed above six. Yes. So is that something that is a relatively recent phenomenon of the past
00:23:38.160 decade since the DSM-5 broadened the inclusion criteria? Or was that even true in the 70s and 80s?
00:23:46.280 It's complicated. I'll say it has a lot to do with the new diagnostic criteria. So before 2013,
00:23:54.240 we had Asperger syndrome. We don't use that diagnostic label anymore. And we also had something called
00:24:00.700 PDD-NOS, pervasive developmental disorder, not otherwise specified, a mouthful. And PDD-NOS
00:24:07.840 was a term we used when it had similarities to autistic disorder, because all three of those
00:24:15.440 names were under the umbrella of autism. And so there were a lot of kids who received this PDD-NOS
00:24:21.540 because they were like... Something's different.
00:24:23.700 Something's different. They're sprinkled with bits of autism, but they didn't quite meet all the
00:24:28.700 criteria. When you didn't meet all the criteria, you got PDD-NOS. And then there was Asperger syndrome,
00:24:34.100 which generally described an individual who had good cognitive skills, average or high cognitive
00:24:41.360 skills, intellectual skills. They had a lot of speech and language skills. They actually have
00:24:46.080 huge vocabulary. But again, their social reciprocity, back and forth conversation,
00:24:52.500 picking up on social cues, that was atypical. And they also had a lot of restricted interests.
00:25:01.560 They would have things they were really interested in, but then they would dive deep into those
00:25:05.780 things. So in 2013 with the DSM-5, we put all of that together under autism spectrum disorder.
00:25:11.800 And so now the kids who have the more clear-cut, very traditional autistic disorder, they're picked
00:25:19.120 up at two years of age or two and a half, three years of age. And it's the kids who have the stronger
00:25:25.880 cognitive skills. They have speech and language present. They're picked up later. By the way,
00:25:31.060 nowadays with the new diagnostic criteria, language impairment may or may not be present in the
00:25:38.340 diagnosis. When you give the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder, you also have to clarify
00:25:44.140 whether there is intellectual disability. So with or without intellectual disability. And then we say
00:25:51.220 with or without language impairment. With all of these changes, the spectrum, it's very broad.
00:25:57.280 Now, this is a question I'm sure you get asked all the time. So the CDC said in the year 2000,
00:26:01.500 one in roughly 200 kids, 150 to 200 kids had autism. Now, of course, that's pre this change of
00:26:10.180 the DSM-5. So we can only take that to mean that those were the kids in that bucket of more extreme
00:26:16.020 autism that did not include the PDD-NOS. Was that what the other one was called?
00:26:21.100 Yeah.
00:26:21.380 And Asperger's. But if you look at the data up until prior to that change, the last year prior
00:26:27.380 to that change in 2012, it was down from one in 150 to one in 69. So in other words, there was
00:26:34.940 something that was increasing the prevalence or diagnosis by about a factor of two. Then we get
00:26:42.260 the change in the DSM and today we're at one in 36. So it begs the question, what is it that is
00:26:51.600 driving the increase in the prevalence of ASD, notwithstanding that there has also been a larger
00:27:00.040 net cast around it?
00:27:02.000 I can't believe it's one in 36 because I've been doing this for 25 years. I can never keep track of
00:27:07.600 the numbers. Every time I go to an annual meeting, the number changes and it's one in 36 now that we
00:27:13.300 diagnosed.
00:27:13.440 Well, again, that's what the CDC said in 2020. So I'm going to go with whatever numbers you
00:27:17.240 take. I'll believe your numbers more than mine.
00:27:20.340 The point being that the numbers have changed drastically. And yes, people will say part of
00:27:25.880 it is because the definitions change, there's more awareness, there's more resources, there's more
00:27:31.440 clinicians making the diagnosis. But people in the field believe that those changes
00:27:37.260 don't explain the drastic changes in the numbers. And there has to be something else involved.
00:27:44.560 And there is a lot of research in this area looking at the impact of the environment
00:27:50.060 and epigenetics and what roles those two things have in increasing the rate of autism in our population.
00:28:01.540 If you're at a dinner party and you get cornered and everybody wants to talk about this,
00:28:05.200 how are you walking people through this? What are you saying? Let's put the diagnostic criteria
00:28:10.540 aside. Let's put the keys under the lamppost aside, meaning wherever there's more attention,
00:28:16.120 you're going to see more things. What are some of the environmental things that you think
00:28:20.460 could be amplifying this?
00:28:22.460 There is thoughts around pollution, maternal infection, prolonged fever during pregnancy,
00:28:33.380 the health of the placenta, stress, parental age. There is a lot of environmental factors that
00:28:41.820 have been implicated. But what I want to say is just to take a step back first, just kind of talk
00:28:47.320 about the cause of autism, the genetics and the environmental piece, just to make it really clear.
00:28:52.280 The word autism describes a constellation of symptoms. There are many, many causes for autism.
00:28:59.420 There isn't a single cause. What causes autism is very complex and we actually have more questions
00:29:05.520 than answers. It's felt though that it is like a 10 hit model, meaning we don't know that the number
00:29:12.220 is 10, but the idea that there's multiple- It's not a two hit model. There's many factors involved
00:29:16.760 and it's almost felt like it's gene, gene, gene, environment, environment, environment. And then
00:29:22.080 now it's like epigenetics, epigenetics, epigenetics. And so it's multiple hits and the order of the hits
00:29:29.460 and the timing of the hits are also felt to be very important.
00:29:33.180 Let's start with the genetic piece. We've had a number of folks on the podcast over time. So
00:29:39.160 the listeners are probably familiar with what we mean by the heritability of something,
00:29:43.620 but maybe just for folks that need to brush up on that, we would talk about the heritability of
00:29:48.580 a condition, whether it be depression, whether it be schizophrenia, whether it be bipolar disorder
00:29:53.320 is largely determined by you have identical twins separated at birth, raised in completely different
00:30:01.580 environments. What is effectively the probability that they're both going to come down with the same
00:30:06.700 psychiatric condition? And that's unfortunately, fortunately, that's the purest way we can get
00:30:12.620 at what the genetic heritability is of something when you don't know what the genes are or when there
00:30:17.960 are so many genes and it's very complicated. And my recollection is that the heritability of
00:30:24.760 autism is quite high. I don't remember the number. Can you enlighten me?
00:30:30.020 It'll be anywhere from 70% to 98%, depending again on the definitions used at the time,
00:30:36.900 but it's well over 90%. Wow. I didn't know it was that high. I thought it was in the 80s,
00:30:42.400 which is still very high. Am I also correct in my recollection that the heritability of autism
00:30:49.940 is higher than it is for any other condition in the DSM? I believe so.
00:30:55.960 Yeah. In other words, even schizophrenia, even bipolar, even depression and things that we know
00:31:00.880 have very strong genetic components. It is. None are as high as it is for autism.
00:31:06.260 Correct. There's definite genetic component to this. But may I say, so it's not one gene?
00:31:11.820 Yeah, I was just going to say. So let's make sure people understand.
00:31:14.080 It is not one gene. It is multiple genes. So anybody with autism, they have multiple genes
00:31:20.580 that have been changed. So there's multiple genetic changes in anybody with autism. And the other thing
00:31:28.380 is every person who has autism, they probably have a different group of genes that have been
00:31:34.300 changed. It's actually hundreds and some people say up to like a thousand genes have been
00:31:39.000 associated with autism. Yeah. So I think maybe a way that I would explain this, and please correct me
00:31:44.480 if you don't like this analogy, I liken it to cancer with a fundamental difference. So hear me out
00:31:49.900 for a second and feel free to shoot this down. Cancer is mostly about somatic mutations and not
00:31:55.620 germline mutations, meaning most of the time when a person gets cancer, it is not based on genes that
00:32:01.340 they were born with. It's based on genes that were at one point normal that have since acquired
00:32:06.220 mutations in their mutated state. They no longer function. Normally the person develops cancer.
00:32:11.280 So this complicates my analogy because only about 5% of cancers arrive from germline mutations,
00:32:18.300 whereas the genes that are implicated in autism are indeed germline. You're born with them.
00:32:24.280 However, the point I want to really make is comparing the somatic mutations of cancer
00:32:29.260 to the germline mutations of autism. And the point I'm trying to make is that when you've met a woman
00:32:35.400 with breast cancer, you've met a woman with breast cancer. You're not going to find too many women
00:32:41.500 that look the same with breast cancer. And that's really why gene therapy hasn't panned out for most
00:32:47.200 cancers. Because to say that a person has breast cancer tells you some stuff, you could dig a little
00:32:53.960 deeper and say, well, it's estrogen positive, it's progesterone positive, it's HER2-NU positive.
00:32:58.460 But still, why wouldn't they all respond the same? Well, it's because they have many different
00:33:02.460 underlying genetic changes. Furthermore, they have completely different immune responses
00:33:07.260 in terms of what their tumor looks like. And so the way I try to think about it myself is
00:33:13.740 if you see 100 kids with autism, and let's just pick a number that's somewhat conservative,
00:33:19.980 we would say that that's 85% to 90% heritable. It simply means that the underlying genes for each of
00:33:28.420 them were inherited, but they might have nothing to do with each other across all of those children.
00:33:34.020 Just as we would say, all of the women who have breast cancer have acquired mutations that gave
00:33:39.900 them breast cancer, but they could all be very different. I agree.
00:33:43.820 Again, I could poke holes in that analogy, but I think that's maybe an easier way to think about it
00:33:48.200 because polygenic things are harder to wrap our heads around, especially when we don't know what
00:33:53.400 all the genes are. Yeah. So we don't know all the genes. We know that there is this genetic component.
00:33:59.500 It's like each child with autism has a different fingerprint with their genetic makeup.
00:34:04.020 And so there's these genetic changes, but some of the hits I mentioned are environmental. So
00:34:09.660 there is research to show maternal stress, pollution, maternal diet, parental age. These
00:34:16.240 things also are associated with autism. And again, there's a long list. So there's a long list of
00:34:21.720 things that are associated, but none of them alone, each one alone is not the key to autism. It's the
00:34:28.900 combination. The thing I'm still struggling with is, let's take another example that I think we can
00:34:34.800 all point reasonably at. 50 years ago, the incidence of type 2 diabetes was in the ballpark of
00:34:41.640 1.5 to 2%. One and a half to 2% of people in the United States had type 2 diabetes. Today we're,
00:34:50.620 God, I haven't looked in a while, but it's over 10%. And I'm talking clear type 2 diabetes.
00:34:55.360 I'm not talking about in the gray area of pre type 2 diabetes. So let's just say we've had a five to
00:35:01.660 seven fold increase in a condition over the course of one generation. So then the question of what are
00:35:09.800 the environmental triggers? It would be very difficult to explain that just genetically,
00:35:14.580 that there's been some genetic change. We might have genetic susceptibilities. We might have
00:35:19.220 genetic manifestations, but the thing of it, something must have changed. And I think most people
00:35:23.580 would point to our food environment as the leading thing that has driven that change because the
00:35:29.500 change in the food environment in 50 years is dramatic. So when we apply the same logic to autism,
00:35:35.040 do we see big enough changes in these environmental triggers, even just over the last 20 years or 25
00:35:42.520 years to say, okay, 25 years ago, kids were born with the same genetic predisposition. There can't be
00:35:50.440 that much genetic drift unless we believe we are seeing more people pair together to combine four
00:35:58.300 genes or genetic combinations that are producing this phenotype more than we saw before. We can come
00:36:04.260 back to that. I'd love to hear your thoughts on that, but let's put that aside for a moment.
00:36:07.900 If we're saying that whatever epigenetic change is happening is triggered by something in the environment,
00:36:13.940 and we're talking about if paternal age is going up, if maternal stress is going up,
00:36:19.180 if maternal nutrition is getting worse, if environmental toxins, microplastics are all
00:36:25.340 over. Everybody's talking about those things, heavy metals, whatever it is. I would love to go into a
00:36:30.300 little bit more detail and get your thoughts on how those things are changing it. And we have to talk
00:36:35.060 about vaccines, of course. There's going to be a subset of people here, I think, who understandably would
00:36:39.800 think, hey, what about vaccines? Haven't we changed the way we vaccinate kids? Is that participating in
00:36:46.500 it? Now, you mentioned that this is an in utero genetic condition. If that's the case, then childhood
00:36:52.380 vaccines might be less responsible than some might think. But I'd just like to hear you riff on all of
00:36:57.340 this stuff. Because before we get into the what to do, I still think there's a lot of people asking,
00:37:02.640 how did we get here?
00:37:04.160 I wish I had all the answers. I don't. I think it's complex.
00:37:07.380 There have been changes in, you talk about diet, pollution, toxin exposure. I think that's one piece
00:37:15.040 of it. It is one piece. With epigenetics, as you know, it can be epigenetic changes, which, just to
00:37:22.220 clarify for everybody, the DNA sequence is not changed. It's about tags on the DNA that can change the
00:37:29.620 expression of genes or proteins called histones that are changed, that end up resulting in changed gene
00:37:36.220 expression. But the changed gene expression can actually be inherited or passed through generations
00:37:41.820 as well.
00:37:42.400 Yeah, I was going to ask you about that. Do we know that to be a fact that the epigenome is being
00:37:46.740 transmitted?
00:37:47.920 I think it's controversial. I think it's controversial, but there is some thought about that,
00:37:52.480 about the idea of the germ cells in a fetus, in a grandparent, being exposed to smoking,
00:38:00.820 toxins, changes in food, how that grandparent exposure can actually change methylation in the
00:38:09.140 germ cells of a parent who's a fetus, who then that germ cell goes on to be a child with autism. I
00:38:15.660 don't know if that made sense. It was sort of confusing.
00:38:16.860 It makes a ton of sense to me because I think about this problem night and day. I do want to
00:38:20.840 make sure the listeners understand that, first of all, this is not established.
00:38:24.680 Not at all.
00:38:25.460 And I want to make sure they understand what we're saying. So let's explain it one more time.
00:38:28.080 We have these four things that make up DNA, your C, G, A, and T, and that is the code. That is the
00:38:34.580 code of life. But on the backbone of those things, you can put little methyl groups, which is just a
00:38:40.700 little carbon with three hydrogens. And that's called epigenetics. And by the way, we're all born
00:38:45.120 with methylated groups all over our epigenome, back of the genome. Over life, we know that changes.
00:38:51.820 So we know that simply aging changes methylation, but we believe that there is
00:38:57.840 differential methylation in individuals in response to all the things that you've talked
00:39:01.960 about. And we know that methylation controls gene expression. In fact, methylation is probably the
00:39:07.880 single most important thing that controls differential gene expression in different
00:39:10.780 tissues. So the question, the jugular question is, if you have a methylation pattern, can you pass
00:39:17.980 that on to your fetus? And what you said a minute ago is even more remarkable, which is would
00:39:24.440 that child, when they develop, pass that methylation pattern on to their fetus. At that point,
00:39:30.500 methylation epigenetics would start to become genetic, right? It starts to become a part of
00:39:34.720 the germline. So, I mean, this is an answerable question, by the way, in my book. When I think
00:39:39.640 of things that we should know the answer to in a decade, I'm going to put this in the list
00:39:42.700 of things that we should know the answer to, just based on the fact that we will have enough
00:39:46.740 longitudinal data, I think, to be able to get at this. I don't know if you're as optimistic
00:39:50.660 as me. I am. The key thing is that we do know the environment impacts the methylation and
00:39:56.740 the epigenetics. So it's the idea of it crossing generations. It's the idea of the methylation
00:40:03.380 in a germ cell is altered or changed because of some sort of environmental exposure in, again,
00:40:10.320 that parent or grandparent. And so in that sense, the child is now susceptible to two things. The
00:40:18.080 germline that they inherit from both parents and, as a fetus, the methylation impact that occurs
00:40:27.020 as a result of any of these other factors you've discussed.
00:40:30.860 Yes. Yeah.
00:40:31.120 Who are the people that are studying this most closely? Is this in the purview of the geneticists?
00:40:36.700 Is this in the purview of the epidemiologists? Who are the people that are most working at this?
00:40:40.560 Because, again, as a general rule, I always think that it's very foolhardy to work on a problem
00:40:48.040 an epidemic without understanding the causal nature of the epidemic. I use the example of heart
00:40:54.260 therapy. Changed the face of HIV forever. One of the greatest success stories of infectious disease,
00:41:01.020 medicine. But it was all predicated on understanding what the cause was. You didn't understand that HIV
00:41:07.380 was destroying CD4 cells. You didn't have a prayer of developing that therapy.
00:41:12.500 And do you ever worry that, what's to say this isn't going to get to be one in three kids in 30
00:41:20.780 years? And are there enough people like you that are going to be able to help parents and help
00:41:26.660 families and help children with that? I don't want to sound alarmist, but I worry when we have an
00:41:31.360 epidemic, potentially, and we don't have a great sense of causality.
00:41:36.280 That's profound. And I'm thinking about a number of different things. One, I'm thinking about,
00:41:41.020 because you're talking about this one in three.
00:41:42.920 And I'm just throwing that out as, hey, what if this trend continues, right?
00:41:45.880 Yeah. And so one of the issues, though, is how we define the condition. That's the thing. So there
00:41:51.580 is still that, although I believe that there is this piece with genetics and the environment and
00:41:56.980 how we are evolving. And there's this phenotype, this phenotype where there is differences in social
00:42:04.500 communication skills and repetitive behaviors of restricted interests. This phenotype, which is on
00:42:11.520 a huge spectrum as well. I shall make sure this is the thing. When we're talking about these numbers,
00:42:16.220 like one in 36, and this number continues to increase, it's not just the kids who are like
00:42:21.280 nonverbal autism. It's this really wide phenotype is increasing. And so it is important we understand
00:42:30.680 the cause of why this phenotype is increasing. And then what should we or should not be doing about
00:42:37.840 that? What do you know about the change in the frequency or the prevalence of, let's pick one subset
00:42:46.400 of that, which is the nonverbal or child that is so impaired that I could diagnose them or a parent
00:42:54.040 could diagnose them? Do we know if that has remained relatively constant over the last 25 years,
00:43:00.200 despite the change in diagnostic criteria? I believe there's an increase in that number as well.
00:43:06.460 But the numbers that are put out there, the really profound numbers actually describe the entire
00:43:11.160 spectrum. And they don't actually subdivide into the different parts of the spectrum.
00:43:18.660 Do you have a ballpark idea? So if the overall diagnosis of autism is increased five-fold in the
00:43:25.820 last 20 years, has that more severe part gone up by 50%, by 100%? I mean, what do you think it is?
00:43:32.020 Or what do you know it is?
00:43:33.360 So we subdivide autism spectrum into three buckets, level one, level two, level three.
00:43:38.620 So the more significantly impaired children would fall into level three, where they require very
00:43:46.160 substantial support. There are very few research studies that actually look into these sub-buckets.
00:43:53.840 And I have to be honest, I'm not sure clinicians are always great at identifying kids in the sub-buckets
00:44:00.180 either. Like you and I are talking about a very specific profile that should be very obvious to
00:44:06.640 identify. But there's other kids in sub-bucket three that are sometimes put in sub-bucket two,
00:44:12.840 depending on what clinician they see.
00:44:14.800 And I'm going to guess that sub-bucket three is not the totality of the children that were called
00:44:21.400 autistic prior to 2013. Is that a safe assumption?
00:44:24.500 Yes.
00:44:25.140 So you can't even say, assuming the data existed, and it sounds like they don't,
00:44:29.900 we can't just say, what was the prevalence of autism in the DSM-4, and how does it compare to
00:44:36.740 ASD sub-3 today? That wouldn't even be a meaningful comparison.
00:44:41.300 I'm not sure if anyone's looked into it, but yeah, I don't know.
00:44:44.540 But even if they did, it wouldn't be apples to apples.
00:44:47.260 No, it's not.
00:44:48.140 Okay.
00:44:48.360 By the way, one of the reasons they actually went from the Asperger syndrome, PDD-NOS,
00:44:54.640 autistic disorder, because that was actually quite controversial when they actually decided to
00:44:58.540 put all three of those things under one umbrella called autism spectrum, was because clinicians
00:45:04.040 did a really poor job of deciding-
00:45:07.900 Which bucket you were in.
00:45:08.720 Which bucket you were in. So you would have a child, and one clinician would call it Asperger
00:45:13.420 syndrome, another person would call it autistic disorder, another person would call it PDD-NOS.
00:45:17.000 So they decided, okay, rather than having these three names, let's put it all under autism
00:45:21.520 spectrum. So then they put it under autism spectrum, but then they have level one, level
00:45:25.080 two, level three. But I would still say that clinicians still struggle sometimes where there
00:45:29.320 is a little bit of overlap. It's not always clear.
00:45:32.040 Now, if you go back to DSM-4, when, as you mentioned, physicians are struggling to know which
00:45:37.200 of these buckets to put them into, as an outsider looking in, my first question is, does it matter
00:45:43.780 in terms of treatment and resources? Does it matter more in terms of outcomes and support?
00:45:50.920 There must be a reason why people cared about that. In other words, if you had a child in
00:45:56.200 the year 2000, who one clinician said, this kid has Asperger syndrome, and another person
00:46:01.340 said, no, they're autistic. Was that going to make a material difference in the type of support
00:46:07.420 that they got? And most importantly, the type of person they were going to turn into, like,
00:46:12.600 were they going to reach their full potential in their differential capacity?
00:46:16.500 So it did make a difference with respect to resources. Children with Asperger syndrome
00:46:21.060 frequently did not get support or support covered.
00:46:24.980 You needed autistic disorder to get support.
00:46:29.020 And what about PDD, NOS? Waste bucket?
00:46:31.640 Yeah, people didn't know what to do with that. So if by putting everything under autism, then it's
00:46:36.980 like, okay, if you have autism, you should receive services. It was a tool. The label's a tool to
00:46:43.320 understand and get resources. Now, we have level one, level two, level three now. Level one is,
00:46:49.980 it says, requires support. Level two is require substantial support. Level three is require very
00:46:57.160 substantial support. My concern is that, again, when a child is level one, they don't always get
00:47:04.200 the support they need because they have so many strengths. So kids in level one, frequently they
00:47:10.320 have good cognitive skills. They have a lot of language skills. They struggle with some social
00:47:16.140 skills. And they may have some difficulties with executive functioning and coping skills at times.
00:47:22.640 But again, it's considered mild and a lot of those kids don't get support. And I think that's
00:47:28.360 unfortunate because they also are the kids that respond to intervention so well if they get a little
00:47:35.300 coaching on how do you cope with distress? How do you cope with change? How do you practice some
00:47:42.160 social skills? Not that they have to change. We don't need to change everything about them,
00:47:46.780 but giving them a little bit of support about how to, again, be adaptive in a community.
00:47:53.740 Giving that support goes a long way with that group, but frequently they don't get the support
00:47:59.220 because they're called level one. Help me understand the natural history of those kids back in the
00:48:04.120 seventies and eighties. Back in the seventies and eighties, when you and I were kids, nobody thought
00:48:08.780 anything of those kids, right? Certainly weren't going to get labeled with autism. They certainly
00:48:12.140 weren't going to show up with in-school programs to help them with their social skills and with
00:48:17.580 their communication skills. As you pointed out, they're intellectually not impaired. So it's not
00:48:22.820 like they're going to struggle in school, but there's clearly something that they're struggling with.
00:48:27.080 Obviously this hasn't been studied, but I'm very curious based on your experience and your judgment,
00:48:32.100 are those people that just went on to pick careers where they didn't have to interact with people,
00:48:36.480 but they could still do challenging cognitive work. What was the natural history of them?
00:48:39.840 There are clearly a lot of them. There are, there are a lot of them. And I think they found a path
00:48:44.700 that made sense to them. They obviously learned what their strengths were and their strengths may
00:48:49.420 have been around memory, detail oriented, following rules that are black and white. They may have had
00:48:57.120 really wonderful cognitive skills in certain areas that were less around inferring and social skills
00:49:06.180 and more concrete. And yeah, we don't have studies to say this for sure, but my guess is they
00:49:11.440 have lived happy, successful lives. A lot of them, some of them doing things that they enjoy doing
00:49:17.720 are passionate about. They probably have found ways to not engage in large social settings,
00:49:23.820 but there's a lot of careers out there that are a good match. And they also have relationships
00:49:29.080 and marriages. I just want to emphasize that people with autism get married.
00:49:32.300 I just think there's zero chance that there aren't thousands, if not tens of thousands of
00:49:37.340 these people listening to us right now, because they're adults today. And I wonder if they're
00:49:42.180 listening to some of this and they're saying this resonates. I get that. When I was a kid,
00:49:46.020 I was hyper-focused on this stuff. I wasn't interested in a whole bunch of stuff. It was a little harder
00:49:50.940 for me to interact with other kids and things like that. And yet I found my path and here I am today.
00:49:55.740 So I talk to parents all the time about this because I evaluate children. I evaluate children
00:50:02.700 for autism or ADHD. And very often when I'm evaluating the child, at some point while I
00:50:08.880 develop this relationship with the family, the parents say, gosh, so much of my child is in me.
00:50:16.120 As you are describing my child and my child's strengths and challenges, and I see me, and this
00:50:21.500 is exactly what I went through when I was young. And then they share how hard it was. And they say,
00:50:27.420 gosh, no one understood me, or I felt bad because I was misunderstood, or I thought it was my fault.
00:50:34.020 I didn't try hard enough. So I have to say it can be validating for an adult to learn that it wasn't
00:50:41.020 their fault. And this is part of their wiring. I have many, many parents who ask me, should I go get
00:50:47.500 assessed now? What do you say? I ask questions. I think information is power. I think it's good
00:50:55.800 for them to be thinking about it, whether or not they go on to actually get assessed. With the autism
00:51:00.120 piece, often they don't. With the ADHD piece, they often do because they realize actually their ADHD
00:51:05.700 traits are impacting their function and success at their job. So sometimes they will actually go to
00:51:10.820 a psychiatrist to get an assessment. But I do share with them the genetics and the family history.
00:51:15.240 So what do I say? I validate. I say, yes, you're telling me that growing up, you had many traits
00:51:22.020 that today we would classify under one of these diagnoses. You're right. It is possible because
00:51:29.600 these things do run in families and there is a highly genetic component. And I think sometimes just
00:51:35.920 that conversation can be therapeutic itself in that someone feeling validated and they have that
00:51:43.220 aha moment. Like, okay, this explains a lot. And then they can feel good as well because they're
00:51:48.240 like, okay, this explains a lot. And I've gone on and I currently have my family and I'm doing well in
00:51:55.780 many parts of my life, but it helps them also understand like, ah, but now I understand why
00:52:00.000 sometimes I do have these challenges at work or with my spouse.
00:52:04.000 It's interesting just sometimes having a perspective where now you can see your challenges
00:52:09.280 through a different lens sometimes helps a person just actually now think about, okay, now I can
00:52:15.440 adjust or understand the triggers or can reflect to think about how do I want to respond the next
00:52:21.500 time. So I think again, that information's empowering, even if they don't ever go to therapy
00:52:27.240 or do anything else, just actually starting to become informed about it can help.
00:52:31.940 Yeah. And I would imagine it helps them a lot with their child because they're seeing both,
00:52:37.320 Hey, my child has this diagnosis that now partially explains, you know, the challenges we might be
00:52:43.200 having, et cetera. But at the same time, because I can empathize with that child, if I've experienced
00:52:48.980 it, it makes you a better parent. So everything you said makes a great case for widening the diagnostic
00:52:55.800 envelope. Because if we go back 40 years, we had this narrow, narrow envelope. In other words,
00:53:04.060 we had a test that had very, very high specificity, but very low sensitivity. You were missing a lot of
00:53:10.980 people, but you didn't get any false positives. That's for sure. You didn't over pathologize when
00:53:17.340 someone was autistic. They were really autistic. Today we have the opposite problem. We have a high
00:53:23.000 sensitivity, low specificity test, sort of. I'm making that up, but you know, just to bring it
00:53:27.500 to cancer diagnostics for people. So now anybody who's autistic should get diagnosed, but then we're
00:53:33.620 stretching what that means. And a lot of the people getting diagnosed today, frankly, maybe without any
00:53:39.460 support would go on to do just fine. Do you worry that when the DSM-6 comes out, it could have a wider
00:53:46.320 envelope and we could start to get to a point where someone might say, Hey, are we over pathologizing this?
00:53:52.340 And are we getting to a point where, well, what does normal even mean anymore?
00:53:57.100 I agree with that so much. So I actually ask that question all the time. I do wonder every time a
00:54:02.880 child has a few of these traits, whether or not we're coming up with the diagnosis every time someone
00:54:10.960 is just a little bit different. And rather than realizing there is neurodiversity, we're all different.
00:54:17.920 We have to give a name to it all the time. It's an interesting debate and you will have your
00:54:22.260 different perspectives. I mean, the name gives us a way to get resources and help people. But I also
00:54:28.640 concern that we have to give everything a name. I actually wonder in the next DSM, whether we'll
00:54:34.720 tend to take it a step back, whether the pendulum will swing a little bit.
00:54:38.120 And when does that do?
00:54:40.020 I don't know.
00:54:41.480 What was the gap between three and four and four and five? 15 years?
00:54:45.700 I would say a couple of decades.
00:54:46.880 It could literally be another decade.
00:54:48.320 It can be. But level one, we were talking about level one autism. So I'm concerned that
00:54:54.220 the kids in level one autism might actually be part of several different diagnostic buckets.
00:55:02.140 Children who are identified with level one autism, they see one clinician, that person may
00:55:06.900 diagnose ADHD plus anxiety. They don't even call it autism. I see this all the time in my clinic.
00:55:16.400 I have kids who come to clinic and they may see three other clinicians before they saw me.
00:55:21.180 Really great clinicians, high standards, experts, but there's a lot of blurry lines with the level
00:55:28.600 one autism and you will hear different diagnoses. So back to your thoughts around future DSMs,
00:55:35.480 I wonder how we're going to address level one autism. And is it the same condition? How many
00:55:41.420 different conditions are in that bucket?
00:55:43.980 See, to me, the way I would think about that is I would hope that by the time we have to make that
00:55:47.800 decision, we would have enough data. And the data would ask the most important question, which is
00:55:52.460 how are we impacting outcomes? In other words, when we widened the diagnostic envelope and said that
00:55:58.200 we're going to now have this ASD class one in here, that opened the door for more resources.
00:56:02.880 That meant more kids had programs at school. What's a IEP?
00:56:07.300 IEP.
00:56:07.820 IEP. More kids have IEPs at school. What does that stand for? Individual?
00:56:11.600 Education plan.
00:56:12.840 Education plan. And at the end of the day, what we want to know is, are those kids doing better?
00:56:17.780 And if the answer is yes, then it's probably worth keeping. If the answer is that didn't make a darn
00:56:23.100 bit of difference, all we did was create a bunch of anxiety for the parents and maybe it didn't.
00:56:28.180 Now, again, I don't know how one goes about answering that, but I would hope that somebody
00:56:32.440 a lot smarter than me is thinking about it through that lens because we can't lose sight of the whole
00:56:36.920 purpose of this. Like the purpose of a diagnosis anywhere in medicine should be to impact an
00:56:42.480 outcome. A diagnosis for the sake of a diagnosis is not a particularly valuable tool unless you're
00:56:48.760 an epidemiologist. But even there, it should be all in the spirit of how are we making people
00:56:54.000 better?
00:56:54.840 I agree. And that's why, again, I agree that the kids in level one should be receiving services.
00:57:00.780 Otherwise, what's the point of giving the diagnosis?
00:57:02.900 Yeah.
00:57:03.220 So they should be receiving services.
00:57:05.260 And if we need to call it something by a different name, who cares? As long as it gets
00:57:09.980 the service that makes them better off than they would have been had they received no service.
00:57:14.940 Before we get into more of the details about what you do specifically treatment-wise, I want to finish
00:57:21.520 one other bit of the diagnosis piece, which is can you talk a little bit about the overlap? You just
00:57:27.940 did it sort of a second ago about ASD, ADHD, and anxiety. How often do they overlap? What do those
00:57:35.760 Venn diagrams look like?
00:57:37.440 I'm going to start off by saying we diagnose anxiety in kids and there's that bucket. And there's many kids
00:57:42.480 who just clearly fall in the anxiety bucket and meet criteria. And it's really clear to see that.
00:57:48.940 There are kids who have ADHD and clearly meet diagnostic criteria for ADHD and fall in that
00:57:56.460 bucket. And then there are kids who clearly fall into the autism bucket. I'm going to focus on the
00:58:01.700 autism bucket first. So we say that about half of kids with autism also have a diagnosis of ADHD.
00:58:11.260 If you look at the numbers, you can find reports for anywhere from 40% to 70% of kids, but we say
00:58:19.540 about half of kids with autism actually do have a diagnosis of autism. Interestingly, before the DSM-5,
00:58:25.220 before 2013, we were not allowed to give both those diagnoses together. So they were mutually
00:58:30.480 exclusive. If a child had autism, we did not give a diagnosis of ADHD. So starting in 2013, we did,
00:58:37.280 and we give it a lot. So a lot of children with autism have ADHD symptoms as well. And we give that
00:58:44.380 diagnosis. And about 40% of kids with autism also have anxiety. This makes sense when you think about
00:58:54.140 the parts of the brain involved. When you think about ADHD, we're thinking about executive functioning
00:58:58.600 skills. We're thinking about prefrontal lobes. When you're thinking about anxiety, you're thinking
00:59:04.440 about the amygdala. And then when people have done neuroimaging studies in kids with autism,
00:59:10.580 we find there's many areas of the brain involved. But in particular, frontal lobes, the amygdala,
00:59:16.940 as well as the cerebellum, temporal lobes, there's many, many areas of the brain involved. But kids with
00:59:23.160 autism do have challenges with executive functioning and anxiety, although those are not part of the
00:59:28.320 diagnostic criteria. So those are associated symptoms, associated traits, associated diagnoses.
00:59:35.440 So they're comorbidities, not part of the core diagnostic criteria. But there's a lot of overlap.
00:59:41.240 If 50% of them have ADHD and 40% of them also carry a diagnosis of anxiety, is there a percent of those
00:59:48.980 that are overlapped and have all three?
00:59:50.380 Yeah. A lot of them have all three. I don't know the exact number for that one.
00:59:53.600 Okay. This is the thing. These kids, they present with the core features of autism along with the
01:00:00.120 executive functioning challenges and are anxious. Okay. So now what can we say about kids with ADHD
01:00:07.940 and anxiety? What's that overlap? Kids who have ADHD and anxiety, their numbers towards autism are not
01:00:14.900 as high. So there are a lot more kids with ADHD who are not diagnosed with autism. But there's a lot
01:00:20.980 of overlap between ADHD and anxiety. So ADHD frequently has a partner, is what I tell families.
01:00:26.940 If you have ADHD, you often have either anxiety or some other mood challenges, or you have learning
01:00:36.040 differences. So learning disabilities are frequently present to kids with ADHD, or you have oppositional
01:00:41.960 behaviors. So there's often a second condition present in kids with ADHD.
01:00:48.260 Say more about oppositional behavioral tendencies.
01:00:52.000 So there is a diagnosis out there called oppositional defiant disorder. That is a diagnosis
01:00:58.800 that I don't use quickly or often in young kids when I see oppositional behaviors. This is my personal
01:01:08.140 approach, is that I will say I see a child with oppositional behaviors. What does that mean?
01:01:14.000 It means someone who argues, doesn't follow rules, disobeys, lies. So kids with these types of
01:01:21.640 behaviors, I want to understand the why's before I jump into saying that they have oppositional defiant
01:01:27.580 disorder. Technically, maybe they meet the criteria. Again, it's a checklist criteria for that name.
01:01:33.420 But to me, that name doesn't help me. It's just a name. It's like, okay, I have a kid with ODD,
01:01:38.540 we call it. It's like, how does that help me? What do I do with that? So if I see a child with
01:01:43.420 oppositional behaviors, I'm like, okay, what's the function behind that behavior? And so I can come
01:01:48.500 up with reasons for why a child is oppositional. So we all have seen kids who have meltdowns,
01:01:54.420 who fight, who yell, who argue. It's like, what's the function behind that? And so it may be that child
01:02:00.220 is actually anxious. I'll tell you a lot of oppositional behavior in kids is driven by feelings
01:02:05.260 of anxiety and embarrassment. It may be the child is impulsive. That child lies and argues and yells
01:02:12.860 no quickly because they're impulsive and they have untreated ADHD. It could be that child struggles with
01:02:19.120 understanding social contexts and social skills. They actually have trouble with their social
01:02:23.920 reciprocity, but they're presenting with what looks like oppositional behavior. That child may be
01:02:30.500 sensory overloaded and have challenges processing sensory information and therefore becomes overwhelmed
01:02:38.040 and dysregulated and oppositional. The list goes on. The point is, is like when I see a child with
01:02:43.820 oppositional behavior and a family says, oh, well, someone told us it was ODD. I'm like, now what?
01:02:51.120 I want to come actually right back to that. I don't know what fraction of kids are getting that type of
01:02:56.000 insight and attention, but my concern would be not enough. My concern would be that we're just in a
01:03:01.440 world of ever expanding labels and codes and the so what is missing when of course there isn't really
01:03:11.000 a field of medicine in which the so what matters more. If you think about this person has hypertension,
01:03:16.780 hyperlipidemia, insulin resistance, it's important to understand why. But at a minimum, we have great
01:03:22.920 treatments if we don't know the why. If at the end of the day, it's just deemed essential hypertension,
01:03:28.000 we have no clue why. Worst case scenario, we can put you on medication. If weight loss isn't enough
01:03:33.020 to reduce your blood pressure and fix your insulin resistance, at least we've got medications that
01:03:37.120 work really well. But a lot of people would be hesitant to give their kids medication here. I want
01:03:43.240 to talk, of course, about this in length, which is all the more reason why, boy, if you don't
01:03:49.200 understand why this kid has oppositional defiant disorder. If it's because if it's like sensory
01:03:54.540 overload, it's a totally different treatment path than if it's anxiety. I agree. And so this is one
01:04:02.080 of the challenging things about my field. And again, I'm going to come back to my boxes. I see a family
01:04:06.960 and I'm actually pretty transparent with the families I work with regarding that we don't know
01:04:11.660 everything. I am really honest with them and transparent because they're like, doctor, what is the
01:04:16.660 diagnosis? And the thing is, is families, they want to find a diagnosis because it helps. It's scary when
01:04:22.140 you don't know what's happening. But I really walk them through that there are these labels and
01:04:27.320 diagnoses, but the risk is that they can see someone in my field and they do testing and you give a
01:04:34.300 diagnosis. Like I have kids, they come with a report, this child has ODD. And I'm like, okay, well,
01:04:39.280 what does that mean? What are we going to do about it? And so the why is so, so very important
01:04:44.340 with, again, comes back to how do we create treatment plans? And it comes back to, again,
01:04:49.260 like I said, you've met one child with ODD, you've met one child with ODD. And ODD to me means
01:04:53.640 actually, I don't even know what to do with that. There's no treatment for ODD. But however,
01:04:58.500 if I know if the child has impulsivity, I can treat that. If the child has social difficulties,
01:05:03.500 okay, I know what kind of treatment plan to create there. If the child's anxious, I know what type of
01:05:07.720 therapies to give. So it's really important to think about the why. It was actually one of the
01:05:13.320 things when I left the traditional medical model and started my clinic. One of the things that I
01:05:19.620 really noticed when I was making that transition and one of the things I wanted to remember when I
01:05:23.560 started to work with families in my clinic was that it's not just about the diagnosis,
01:05:28.640 it's the journey afterwards. And it's really about personalized care. And you can make such a big
01:05:35.440 difference in child development, human well-being by really understanding that specific child.
01:05:42.380 And unfortunately, sometimes when you're on the treadmill in a medical model,
01:05:46.980 it's really hard to have the time to really get to know a child. And I felt like I was,
01:05:53.220 you have autism, here's a list of 15 recommendations, good luck. And you have ADHD,
01:05:57.720 here's a list of 15 recommendations, good luck, without really getting to know the why behind that
01:06:02.520 child's behavior. Yeah. And I'm trying to think about how you compare this to adult psychiatry,
01:06:08.000 right? Where psychologists and psychiatrists who really help people tend to focus less on their DSM
01:06:16.360 five, in this case, diagnosis. They use that. If there's a diagnosis there, we should know what it
01:06:22.020 is. And it paints the contours of what we think about. But as my friend, Paul Conti always talks
01:06:27.280 about, he's like, if you don't know their story, you can't really help them. Now, that doesn't mean
01:06:32.460 that knowing their story precludes using pharmacologic agents when appropriate. But what
01:06:37.240 it means is you have to really understand the root. Is this a response to trauma? Is this a
01:06:42.820 response to an underlying biologic condition? And again, I feel like, based on the little bit I know
01:06:48.800 here, adults seem to have more access to that kind of mental health care than children do. Is that a
01:06:54.680 misperception on my part? No, I agree. I agree. I don't think we've done enough in pediatrics in this
01:07:00.060 area. But I agree, you have to know the story and understand the whole child. And so one thing
01:07:05.920 about developmental behavioral pediatrics, which, by the way, is a very young specialty.
01:07:10.880 You were the first person at Stanford in that group. You created the group.
01:07:15.420 Yeah. So developmental behavioral pediatrics was only recognized as a subspecialty by the American
01:07:21.280 Board of Pediatrics in 1999. So it's a very young specialty. But a key thing about this field
01:07:27.820 is it's what we call a biopsychosocial specialty. And so what that means is we think about the
01:07:34.700 biology, the genetics, the brain, the biology, the medication. We think about the biology.
01:07:40.440 The psycho part is the mental health piece. So it's the idea of to support child development
01:07:46.340 and behavior, you need to consider the physical well-being as well as the mental well-being.
01:07:51.060 And then the social piece is the fact that we don't live in isolation. We live in communities.
01:07:56.700 We live in dynamics. And in order to help kids with their development and behavior, what better way to
01:08:03.160 promote human well-being and health than to start early on and impact child development and behavior
01:08:09.460 and self-esteem and learning? The way to do it is you not only think about the biology, you think about
01:08:14.940 the mental health, and you think about the social, which is about family dynamics, parenting, school
01:08:22.820 and education. This is key. This is the bridge between education and medical health, which honestly
01:08:29.720 is hard to do in the traditional medical model, bridging to education, but it is really, really
01:08:35.300 important. That's where our kids are learning and developing and growing and exposed to experiences.
01:08:40.760 And so DBP looks at that whole picture. And I really believe that that is the way to support
01:08:47.240 child development and behavior, whether there's a diagnosis or not.
01:08:51.240 Let's talk a little bit about your journey. You got to Stanford in 04.
01:08:54.940 Yeah, my husband got there in 04. I was there in 05. So I did my DBP training at the Hospital for Sick
01:09:02.180 Children in Toronto. So I'm Canadian. Trained at SickKids, an incredible place to train with volume of
01:09:07.760 cases and complexity of cases. So it was a fantastic place.
01:09:11.900 Yeah, probably one of the three largest children's hospitals in the world, right?
01:09:14.740 Yeah, it is. It is a fantastic place to train. And so I did pediatrics, pediatric neurology and
01:09:20.360 developmental behavioral pediatrics there. My interests and passions were always genetics,
01:09:25.240 the human brain, developing human, neuroplasticity. I did a lot of research in neuroplasticity.
01:09:31.200 And then 20 years ago, moved to California in the Bay Area and took a job at Stanford.
01:09:37.540 But the field of DBP was brand new. So as I said, like it is just starting out. So they did not have
01:09:43.980 a developmental behavioral pediatrician yet at Stanford. So I was the first there. After me,
01:09:48.980 they hired an incredible developmental pediatrician by the name of Heidi Feldman, who then created the
01:09:54.640 division of DBP at Stanford. And she's still there. And they have a fantastic group there now.
01:09:59.880 But I arrived, there was nobody else. I was at Stanford for a number of years and did research,
01:10:05.960 clinical work, as well as medical education teaching. And then after that, I focused on
01:10:10.680 the clinical piece and went to a large clinical organization, did clinical work. But then 10
01:10:15.960 years ago in 2014, decided to leave the traditional model and start my own multidisciplinary clinic.
01:10:24.040 So tell me a little bit more about why. What was happening prior to 2014 that you didn't enjoy?
01:10:29.880 I felt that I could help my families and patients more and or differently. I wanted to make an
01:10:36.520 impact. That's one of my passions is always to make a difference. And I felt that I was a little
01:10:42.480 bit stuck in the model. And it's just the medical model. There's so many good things about it. But
01:10:48.200 to help the families the way I wanted to, with my values, which I can describe, I needed to leave.
01:10:53.700 And what did I value? So one, I believe in promoting health and well-being. And that's all
01:11:00.000 about DBP, development of behavior. It's about promoting health. Where medical centers have been
01:11:06.040 in the past, primarily focused on treating disease. So that was one thing. Two, I really believe in
01:11:13.420 multidisciplinary teams and really having an integrated team. In this area, as I described,
01:11:18.880 understanding the whole child requires not just a physician, requires therapists, psychologists,
01:11:24.660 teachers, different types of professionals. And I really believe that to make a difference,
01:11:29.640 those professionals have to be integrated. If you want a touchdown, all the players need to be
01:11:34.440 reading the same playbook. And so I felt like a lot of the families I was seeing, they would come see
01:11:39.360 me in the medical center, the doctor. But there was the school and there was the therapist. And we had
01:11:45.000 all these different silos. I really believed I needed to bring the silos together. Another thing
01:11:49.620 is I believe in community collaboration. So that's actually the bridge to education. And that's
01:11:55.000 actually really hard to do in a standard medical model is to really have collaboration with the
01:12:00.420 school. So now I do school observations. I go to IEP meetings. I work with teachers in classrooms
01:12:06.380 because I know that to move the needle with the patients I see, I need to do that.
01:12:11.380 You need to see what the kid's doing at school.
01:12:12.720 You need to see what they look like at school. And then I believe that the family is the patient,
01:12:17.060 not just the child. If I am going to make a difference in a child's life, I work with the
01:12:22.220 parents a lot. It's amazing how powerful parenting can be and training parents. And again, this is the
01:12:29.380 social piece, the dynamics, understanding the whole family situation is really important to make a
01:12:34.720 difference in a child. And then lastly, I believe I love learning and being innovative and thinking
01:12:40.700 outside the box. And so I decided to set something up where I can continue to ask questions and
01:12:48.700 challenge the system and try to make it better.
01:12:51.780 So tell me about your team. You said you have 25 people on the team.
01:12:54.960 So we have a few different programs. We have a behavioral team where we focus mostly on kids
01:13:01.040 with autism. However, probably about 20% of the kids who work with our behavioral team
01:13:06.100 don't have a diagnosis of autism, but do benefit from behavioral therapy, social skill groups,
01:13:12.740 parent training that focuses on behavioral models. We have a mental health therapy team
01:13:18.000 that supports kids and teenagers with anxiety, depression. So we offer different types of
01:13:23.700 therapy for that. Mood, dysregulation, ADHD. We have psychologists who do testing for diagnostic
01:13:31.000 assessment. And then we have a medical team, but it's not just giving medicines. I do prescribe
01:13:36.540 medicines. But again, it's like that is a portion of what I do. I look at the whole child and it's
01:13:42.500 really understanding the therapies, the parenting, the school piece, and medication when it's important
01:13:50.120 and can help.
01:13:51.720 So there's something called ABA. Remind me what it stands for.
01:13:54.620 Applied Behavioral Analysis.
01:13:55.740 Okay. It seems to be a somewhat polarizing topic in the field of autism therapy. Maybe describe
01:14:03.160 what ABA is and explain perhaps why it's so polarizing.
01:14:06.820 Yeah. So ABA means a million things these days, and just like autism means so much as well.
01:14:14.380 So ABA is a behavioral intervention that traditionally has been used with kids with autism. It is about
01:14:21.060 taking a skill and breaking it down into smaller sets, smaller subsets. Traditionally, it was very
01:14:28.800 direct, adult-directed, repetitive, working on a small skill. All these small skills add up to a
01:14:36.440 bigger skill.
01:14:37.320 What's an example?
01:14:38.480 So an example would be, oh, you put me on the spot and I got to think of an example now. That's
01:14:44.100 really good. Okay. Let's think of something. It might be something to do with greeting someone.
01:14:48.700 Okay. Appropriate greeting. And appropriate greeting would be integrating verbal as well as
01:14:54.900 eye contact, as well as maybe turning your body towards the person. So when you greet them, when you
01:15:01.120 meet a new person. And so for someone with significant autism, that's difficult and they need to learn
01:15:07.360 how to turn their body and make the eye contact and do the vocalization and how to integrate that.
01:15:14.820 So for that skill, you'd work on the different subsets. And so you might be first working on, if you want
01:15:22.080 to greet someone and acknowledge them, you're first going to look at them and have that joint attention.
01:15:27.300 So you're going to teach a child how to make eye contact. Initially, we did ABA with something called
01:15:34.180 discrete trial. That's why it's controversial. Discrete trial, which is still used today and still can be
01:15:39.460 very helpful when it's combined with more naturalistic forms of ABA. Discrete trial would be
01:15:45.860 about teaching a child to make eye contact and they get a reinforcer every time. So make eye contact,
01:15:51.140 get a reinforcer, positive reinforcer. So it's positive reinforcers. It is a lot of repetition,
01:15:58.400 practicing teaching a child a new skill. And then you would add the other layers to it, the eye contact,
01:16:04.040 and then the greeting and the vocalization, turn your body, you would add all that together to come
01:16:08.740 up with this larger thing of how do you approach someone. So discrete trial has been around for
01:16:13.340 decades. That's the part that's controversial because people say, oh, this is very repetitive
01:16:17.340 and it's not based on relationships. So over the years, there have been more naturalistic ABA
01:16:24.040 methods created. Naturalistic in that it occurs more in a child's natural environment.
01:16:30.340 It is not just at a structured table where you and I are practicing eye contact. Natural environment,
01:16:37.420 also trying to understand the child's natural motivators. So for example, it might happen at a
01:16:43.200 park and it might happen, we know that child loves to be on the swing. So rather than sitting at a table
01:16:49.840 and me saying like, make eye contact, here's your reinforcer, make eye contact, here's your
01:16:54.020 reinforcer. Now we're at a park. This child wants to be pushed on the swing. Well, we're going to help
01:16:59.300 this child learn that if you want me to push you on the swing, you got to look at me and somehow
01:17:06.220 acknowledge me so I go push you. Otherwise, I don't know that you want to be pushed on the swing.
01:17:11.720 And so those are more naturalistic forms. One of the most naturalistic forms is something called
01:17:16.980 pivotal response treatment, PRT, which is actually training the parents in these skills because that's
01:17:25.000 really what it's about. It's not about whether this child can make eye contact with therapist A at the
01:17:31.940 table. It's about how does this child understand how to use eye contact, when it's appropriate to use
01:17:38.980 it and the power of it in natural settings. And so when you train the parents how to do it, then they
01:17:45.640 can practice at the park, at the coffee shop, on the playground, the parents. So that is the most
01:17:52.080 naturalistic form teaching the parents. This comes back to parents, how powerful it is if you teach
01:17:56.920 parents. But parents work with the child in a natural setting with natural motivators.
01:18:02.060 Are there limitations to treatment in families with single parents?
01:18:06.440 Yes. When you said that, I'm thinking like it's just a single parent. It's time and resources and
01:18:13.180 driving to therapies. Again, it depends on how significantly impaired your child is and how many
01:18:18.880 therapies they need. Yeah. And I'm just trying to understand what the socioeconomic toll is. So I
01:18:25.420 guess think about that in multiple ways. So what is the typical cost of therapy? So how much of this
01:18:30.760 cost is covered by insurance typically? How much of this cost is embedded within the school program?
01:18:35.600 So obviously, I think an IEP is included if a kid's in public schools, correct? Yeah. If they qualify
01:18:41.540 for IEPs. Yeah. But is ABA therapy or PRT or any of these things, are they covered by insurance
01:18:48.220 companies for kids? They can be. It depends on the state. So how it's covered is different in different
01:18:55.720 states. I'm from California. So in California, ABA is covered if you have a diagnosis of autism. That's where
01:19:05.360 the diagnostic piece is important. So then it is covered. And what about the impact of other
01:19:10.760 siblings? So is there anything that you've noticed about the nuances around if a kid has an ASD
01:19:17.480 diagnosis and they have other siblings that don't have diagnoses or they do and where they are in birth
01:19:23.720 order and trying to understand the overall family environment and how it pertains to treatment?
01:19:29.780 Yeah. There's actually so many things you can say about that. So I'll first start by saying that
01:19:35.200 siblings of children with autism are themselves at risk for either autism or autism-like traits or
01:19:44.920 something called the broader autism phenotype. They may actually not have autism, but they may have a
01:19:49.540 few traits of it and or at risk for other developmental disabilities. So kids who are siblings also at risk
01:19:56.120 for language delays, anxiety. So already they have, again, that predisposition, that load to have some
01:20:04.440 developmental differences. So that's one. And how much of that is based on the fact that this is a
01:20:09.820 largely genetic condition and if they're siblings, they share genetic traits even if they don't have
01:20:14.320 all of them? And how much of that is the siblings develop those in response to anything from mimicking
01:20:21.960 the sibling with autism to responding in frustration to the behaviors of the kid with autism?
01:20:28.040 There is a big genetic piece to this. So they truly do have these conditions, language delay,
01:20:35.200 autism traits, ADHD. It's very often you see a sibling with one of those other conditions
01:20:40.360 and there's that genetic piece. But you're right, there's a behavioral component, coping component,
01:20:46.420 anxiety component that may be related to family stress, attention-seeking behavior. At the same
01:20:56.180 time, I also see the opposite. I also see many siblings who have incredible empathy for people
01:21:03.620 who are different because they have a sibling who has a developmental disability.
01:21:09.180 Okay. So going back to ABA, from hearing you right, I'm not hearing you say it's good or bad. I'm
01:21:14.460 hearing you say it's just another tool in my tool bag and it has elements of it that are valuable if
01:21:20.960 applied probably in the environment of the child. So I do recommend it. It should be a part of a
01:21:27.900 child's treatment plan. The tricky part is you want it done with people who are well-trained,
01:21:34.800 who understand autism, who understand behavioral therapy well. That's the why it's sometimes
01:21:41.620 controversial is because there is such a huge demand for therapy for kids with autism. Because
01:21:47.820 the numbers are so high, it's hard to find enough people to provide therapy. It's also, it's an
01:21:55.780 industry. And there's people who take jobs in this industry who actually are not well-trained or
01:22:02.540 well-supervised or really understand the nuances. Because if you know one child with autism, you know
01:22:09.320 one child with autism. And if you're just following a recipe, you might run into people, therapists who
01:22:15.100 are not making a huge difference and are not that helpful. But I do offer it. I do recommend it.
01:22:21.880 What is the current size of the autism treatment industry and how does it compare to what it looked
01:22:28.420 like 20 years ago? In other words, has it grown commensurate with the increase in the prevalence
01:22:33.560 or is there a greater burden on the per capita therapist today?
01:22:38.480 There's a burden. I don't know the exact numbers, but it's grown. But because it's growing,
01:22:44.040 it's scaling. And when you scale- You dilute.
01:22:47.660 Yeah. You run into issues with quality when you scale. So it's hard. But that's the thing. How do we
01:22:53.120 keep up?
01:22:53.720 So what do you say to a parent who's listening to us, who's trying to navigate this for their child
01:23:03.620 and they don't live in the Bay Area, so they don't get to come and see you. What questions are they
01:23:08.780 asking? What are they trying to do to find the best care for their kids, regardless of where they lie
01:23:16.020 on these spectrums of anxiety, ADHD, or the various levels of ASD?
01:23:22.380 So what my advice would be for them would be start with your pediatrician. You start with your
01:23:27.920 pediatrician, but you need to find, your hope is with the pediatrician that they are able to connect
01:23:33.960 you to resources and the network because you really need to find a team. It's finding a team.
01:23:41.080 How likely is that?
01:23:42.560 It's hard.
01:23:43.160 Yeah. If you don't live in Boston or San Francisco or the major cities,
01:23:49.660 I'm guessing that this multidisciplinary approach does not exist.
01:23:53.380 No, it's not easy to find.
01:23:55.620 So what are the options then? What's the next best thing?
01:23:58.700 Yeah. You try to create your team. But the thing is, I talk to families all the time. This is so
01:24:03.060 stressful for a parent who's in a situation like this because they don't know anything about this.
01:24:09.040 They could be highly educated. And then we're talking about families who actually,
01:24:12.280 if you speak a different language and don't have higher education, this is a disaster. But even
01:24:17.120 for families who are well-educated, trying to understand and quarterback this, basically you
01:24:22.220 need a quarterback to help you decide, is this ABA helpful or not? Should I be focused on speech
01:24:29.120 and language therapy or ABA therapy right now? What should I be advocating for at my IEP meetings?
01:24:35.380 You really need someone to help you with that roadmap. So we need to help families more with
01:24:42.340 that. I think of myself as a Sherpa sometimes, guiding people along this journey. And it's the
01:24:47.540 roadmap. Every year we pivot and turn, where should we spend more time? Is it in social skill groups?
01:24:53.520 Is it speech therapy? What should we be asking for? And so your question is like, yeah, this is hard
01:24:59.140 to find. And so if you can't find it, you're looking for somebody. It may not be a doctor.
01:25:05.100 It might end up being a really good ABA therapist or a psychologist in your community who can help
01:25:11.940 connect you. There are state programs. What is a parent asking when they meet a provider to figure
01:25:18.860 out, is this going to be a good fit? I mean, obviously one option is just ask nothing and wait
01:25:23.520 and see how it pans out. And in six months, ask yourself the question, hey, is my kid doing better
01:25:27.380 today than they were six months ago? But if you, as a parent had the chance to meet several providers,
01:25:32.860 so the, hey, look, I happen to be lucky. I live in a city. There's three ABA providers here. I'm
01:25:38.100 going to go and interact with each of them. What could I as a parent do to understand where should
01:25:44.640 I go first? Which of these three should I pick? What are the clues that tell me this person is going
01:25:50.540 to have a higher probability of success? So one thing is that you make sure that they
01:25:56.500 have the philosophy, one size does not fit all. So that is key, is that this person needs to
01:26:03.180 understand personalized care and that they don't just give the same treatment recommendation,
01:26:09.320 same thing to every single child. It's not black and white. So you need to make sure that that provider
01:26:15.220 is flexible in their thinking and their treatment approach so that they can provide individualized
01:26:22.000 cares. One. Two would be that they would be proactive in helping you create some sort of team. So it may
01:26:33.500 not be a team like I have under one roof, but they are open to the idea of collaboration meetings with
01:26:39.900 the child's speech therapist or teacher. So someone who is open to it, but will also be proactive in
01:26:48.540 arranging collaboration meetings, maybe once a season. Three would be, I think someone who has skills
01:26:57.640 in, I mentioned the parent training piece. I think that's a really important piece. It's not just parent
01:27:03.980 education. It actually is parent training because I've seen that really make a difference.
01:27:11.680 I think that's a great list. I'm thinking about this through the lens of how do you scale what
01:27:16.680 you're doing? And there's two ways to do it. One is you just keep replicating a model that looks just
01:27:22.740 like yours. So really big multidisciplinary model, but that can only be supported in a certain geography.
01:27:28.900 I mean, to have a team the size of yours, you're not going to be able to put that in every town.
01:27:32.640 And yet I think it seems unlikely that this is a condition that discriminates by geography.
01:27:38.040 And therefore there's got to be half the kids in this country that have any of these conditions
01:27:42.040 are going to be in areas where they're never going to have large turnkey multidisciplinary
01:27:46.860 offerings at their disposal. So their parents are going to have to do sort of the heavy lifting.
01:27:52.680 And unlike cancer, so if a child gets cancer, a parent and family can go to another city for
01:27:58.920 treatment. If you happen to live in Austin, Texas, when your kid gets a certain type of cancer,
01:28:04.240 but Boston Children's Hospital or pick your favorite city that has the greatest center for that,
01:28:09.500 it's not an unreasonable thing to potentially go there for treatment. But this is not something
01:28:14.200 you're going to go and do in another city. It has to be an integration into your life where you are.
01:28:18.560 Yeah. This is the journey. This isn't a quick thing. This is years. This is a journey. And the
01:28:25.360 whole point is to have it integrated and generalized in the child's life. We were just talking how ABA
01:28:30.860 in some structured clinic, that's not our goal. The goal is to have a child showing us these skills
01:28:37.260 in real life, in their real life, in their classroom.
01:28:39.660 So what percentage of the children that present to your clinic with a diagnosis of ADHD plus or minus
01:28:46.440 anxiety require pharmacotherapy in your clinic, in your experience?
01:28:51.760 Before I answer that, I'm just going to emphasize. So kids who come to my clinic with ADHD often come
01:28:58.020 to me, not always, but often come to me because it was a little bit more complicated than straightforward.
01:29:03.340 Right. There's a selection bias into your clinic. If this were straightforward,
01:29:06.800 they wouldn't be coming to you.
01:29:08.680 Yes. If it was straightforward, hopefully their pediatrician can manage it.
01:29:11.480 Okay. Yeah. Makes sense.
01:29:12.740 Yeah. But still, the percent of kids who are treated with medication depends on the age of the child
01:29:20.280 and the severity of the ADHD. So younger kids in my clinic, I will use behavioral interventions first.
01:29:29.840 Define young. What does that cut off for you?
01:29:31.820 So I see preschoolers who come to me because they've been asked to leave multiple preschools
01:29:38.660 because they are hyperactive. And in that preschool years, although you could technically make the
01:29:45.540 diagnosis, I share with the family that we're probably going down this path, whatever we're
01:29:49.980 going to call this in the next couple of years, let's start working towards helping your child
01:29:54.000 build skills to regulate, manage their hyperactivity, manage their impulsivity.
01:29:58.820 So we start with first-line treatment for ADHD in kids under six is behavioral parent training.
01:30:07.300 So that's first. So under six, it's behavioral parent training. We do that first and try to get
01:30:12.460 that to help. We may or may not need to add a medication. The guideline for six and older,
01:30:18.960 first-line treatment is medication plus behavioral parent training. And so medication makes a big
01:30:27.120 difference. Medication can be very, very helpful. And I read the family where they are at on this
01:30:34.100 journey and their family values and how they're processing the information. And I listen to their
01:30:40.420 questions and concerns, and I build trust. And so some families are ready to start medication right
01:30:46.800 away. Other families have questions. I work at developing a relationship with that family,
01:30:53.140 answering their questions. And most often we do move towards medication because we know it helps.
01:31:00.860 Most of them say, I wish I started sooner.
01:31:03.300 I want to dwell on this point, Trenna, because I have to believe there are a lot of people listening
01:31:07.120 to us. Maybe not so much because I don't think my audience is quite where I'm going, but there are
01:31:11.660 going to be people who understandably come at this and are really judgmental. And their narrative is going
01:31:17.500 to be the following. These goddamn preschools trying to tell me a kid has ADHD. Maybe it's because the
01:31:24.260 preschool is just overcrowded and the people who work at the preschool are too lazy to actually let
01:31:28.660 these kids play. Let kids be kids. There's nothing wrong with a kid that's hyperactive. You just got
01:31:33.100 to give him more to do, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. This is sacrilege that we would ever
01:31:37.400 give a child medication just because they're hyperactive. So that's a narrative.
01:31:42.340 Yeah, for sure.
01:31:43.060 Now, again, I don't think a lot of people, if they're sophisticated, subscribe to that because
01:31:48.000 I think a person who's sophisticated would hopefully not make a judgment like that without
01:31:51.980 understanding the fact base a little bit more. Would you agree that the best argument against
01:31:57.420 that logic, which is not an argument that says every kid should be on medication, it's an argument
01:32:02.380 that says you have to weigh the pros and the cons of being unmedicated and what the impact on your
01:32:09.180 education is going to be and the long-term success you're going to have as an adult,
01:32:14.240 as a well-adjusted adult versus the accepted risks of any medication and the potential upside it has
01:32:22.320 towards allowing that child to learn. Because again, I always like this framework you have,
01:32:27.860 which is you bring it back to what is the adaptation of the condition? What is the adaptation
01:32:32.940 of the phenotype? If it is disruptive, if this is a difference in a child's education,
01:32:39.420 if this is the difference between a kid going to college and not, if we believe that matters anymore,
01:32:44.300 or being successful in their career or not, or having pro-social relationships versus not,
01:32:51.880 then maybe we accept the risks of medication. So maybe you can articulate that more eloquently
01:32:57.420 if you have a different view, but that's kind of how I like to think about things that seem
01:33:01.100 at the surface absurd. I love all the points you brought up because it is a
01:33:05.740 risk-benefit ratio that you have to consider. You have to consider, there's risks in everything we
01:33:10.800 do. There's risks in all medications. There's risks in everything. So you have to consider both
01:33:15.040 risks and benefits. When I'm working with a family, I talk to them about the research. And we actually
01:33:22.360 have a lot of research around safety and long-term outcome and the outcome of individuals with ADHD
01:33:28.480 who are left untreated. But actually, more importantly, I get to know their child though.
01:33:33.340 So this thing, as I get to know them, I share with them the research, the safety research,
01:33:37.800 all sorts of information about the medication. But what's really important, so this is the idea
01:33:42.460 about me going and watching the child in class, me talking to the teachers, getting to know that
01:33:49.000 family more, really understanding. They come to see me for a reason. If things were great,
01:33:54.440 they wouldn't come to see me. They've come to see me for a reason. And even though the school
01:33:58.720 maybe initially was the school who said, your little guy is way too busy and you need to see
01:34:03.560 a doctor about this. But when I get to know the family, I find out, well, actually dinner is really
01:34:08.460 stressful and bedtime routine is really stressful. Everyone's in tears in the morning. And so I get
01:34:14.360 to know them and it's actually that personal part that helps them understand their child. And I come
01:34:21.160 back to self-esteem and interpersonal. Their kid is not a statistic to you.
01:34:24.560 Yes, that's exactly it. Sometimes we don't use medication. I am the first to say,
01:34:29.880 if your child doesn't need it, we're not going to use it. Although we know that medication can
01:34:34.340 make a really big difference. I've discussed this on some previous podcasts. So is Vyvanse still used?
01:34:39.560 Is Ritalin still used? Is Focalin used? I mean, what's in your toolkit in that world?
01:34:44.300 ADHD medicines, we're talking stimulants and non-stimulants. First-line treatment considered
01:34:49.440 is stimulants. Within stimulants, we have two different medications. We have one called
01:34:56.980 methylphenidate and one called amphetamine. Methylphenidate, we have many brands. That's
01:35:03.800 the Ritalin, which has been around since I believe the 1950s. We've got Ritalin, we've got Focalin,
01:35:09.880 we've got Concerta. We have lots of different methylphenidates.
01:35:13.420 What was the other one after Focalin?
01:35:15.100 Concerta. And there's many more brands. They're all different brands.
01:35:18.080 And how do they differ? Are they differing in pharmacokinetics and half-life? What separates
01:35:22.960 those three drugs, for example?
01:35:25.020 How the medication's released.
01:35:26.800 Okay. So it's just a timing of release and pharmacokinetic.
01:35:29.220 Timing of release and the mechanism of release.
01:35:30.340 But it's literally the same molecule.
01:35:31.920 Yeah. It's the same active ingredient, methylphenidate. But it's interesting,
01:35:36.040 kids respond differently to the different medications, the brands, because the release
01:35:41.600 mechanisms are different. So some kids are sensitive.
01:35:43.860 So in other words, if a kid comes in and you try one of these and you don't get the response you
01:35:49.540 want, you don't necessarily abort the entire molecule, you might switch to a different
01:35:54.800 formulation. And I only say this because I can't tell you the number of parents I have spoken with
01:36:00.180 who have said, my kid was on Ritalin. It was a disaster. When they switched to Focalin,
01:36:05.740 it got so much better.
01:36:07.400 Yeah. That's exactly right. And there's no science, unfortunately, to tell us which one's
01:36:13.120 going to work for your child. So you have to basically try a few.
01:36:16.840 Okay. And then the other one you said was just straight amphetamine?
01:36:19.780 Amphetamine. So that's Adderall, which has been around since the 1930s. And then there's,
01:36:24.200 you mentioned Vyvanse, Vyvanse, Dexedrine. So there's medications in that group.
01:36:29.120 Again, same deal. The difference between Vyvanse and Adderall is release and kinetics.
01:36:33.440 Yes. Vyvanse is actually called a prodrug. It's actually just got a little
01:36:37.720 molecule attached to it that needs to be cleaved in order for it to work. But they're all, yeah,
01:36:42.620 the same.
01:36:43.480 Again, it's very counterintuitive to people why you take a hyperactive kid and give them a
01:36:48.480 stimulant. Do you want to just give the brief overview of why that works?
01:36:52.280 So the way these medications work is they increase dopamine and norepinephrine in the synapses
01:37:01.680 between the brain cells in the parts of our brain that are important for executive functioning,
01:37:09.580 attention, inhibiting impulses. So the part of the brain, the prefrontal lobes where that all the
01:37:15.360 executive function attention happens, our brain cells have to communicate in order to see that
01:37:19.840 behavior, attention. These medications, although they're called stimulants, what they do is they
01:37:25.340 they increase the levels of dopamine and norepinephrine in these synapses, the gap between
01:37:32.660 the neurons, and they improve the electrical activity and communication between brain cells.
01:37:39.680 What are the most common side effects you caution parents about with these drugs?
01:37:43.840 So the side effects can be annoying, but they're not life-threatening. The most common one
01:37:49.420 is decrease appetite at lunchtime if you're taking a medication that lasts the whole day. So there's
01:37:57.200 medications that last three or four hours, which we used to use a lot a couple decades ago when I first
01:38:02.080 started doing this. But about 20 years ago, we started using extended release a lot more. And so
01:38:07.620 extended release is that it lasts eight hours or 10 hours for the day or 12 hours a day. And so those
01:38:13.360 medications impact your appetite at lunch. Breakfast and dinner are usually fine. There's this
01:38:18.920 chance that it impacts sleep onset, which is really important because sleep is super important, kids,
01:38:26.080 but it can impact sleep onset. And if that's a problem, we adjust the timing of the medication
01:38:31.800 in the morning. But these are generally single administration first thing in the morning drugs,
01:38:36.220 I assume? Yeah. They're really easy to use because you take it in the morning, they start to work,
01:38:41.840 the extended release will start to work within an hour, and then they're working for the majority of the
01:38:47.080 day. Then they come out of your system at the end of the day. And so tomorrow, unless you give the
01:38:53.640 medication to your child again... It's like they've never been on it.
01:38:56.320 It's like they've never been on it. What are the differences then between the Ritalin class and the
01:39:02.700 Adderall class? Do you have any suspicion one way or the other as to which is going to be more
01:39:08.100 effective if you were to prescribe Focalin versus Vyvanse? Yeah. So when I first meet a young child,
01:39:14.340 I generally start with methylphenidate. And that's what most clinicians do with little kids.
01:39:19.620 And the reason for that is that the meta-analyses show that kids tolerate methylphenidate a tiny bit
01:39:26.720 better than amphetamine. Although amphetamine is a little bit more bang for your buck when you're
01:39:32.980 treating the symptoms. That being said, no kid is a statistic. Every kid's different. So I have just
01:39:39.340 as many kids on Adderall as I have on Ritalin. Interesting.
01:39:42.480 Yeah. So I use every single brand out there, but I start with methylphenidate because it's
01:39:47.720 shown to be tolerated better. You mentioned a second ago that if your kid's been on this drug
01:39:52.540 every day for a year and experienced all these benefits, and then they come off the drug,
01:39:57.640 it's like they were never on the drug. Does that suggest that in the, I hate to use the
01:40:02.960 description this way, but I think you understand what I mean, in the drugged state, you don't get
01:40:07.340 to do behavioral therapies that also have a positive impact independent of the drug, such that if the
01:40:13.480 drug comes off, the phenotype is changing. Is that not to be expected? I want kids to be actually
01:40:20.060 practicing skills when they're on the medication. Yeah. In theory, they should be able to do a better
01:40:24.700 job. It should be easier for them to practice the skills on the medication.
01:40:28.300 Yes. So let me say a couple of things. So in theory, when they're on the medication,
01:40:32.840 it's easier for them to practice paying attention, controlling your impulses, controlling your
01:40:37.720 hyperactivity. In addition to that, this is where the behavioral parent training part comes in,
01:40:42.740 which is actually now a recommendation that every family should have, should be doing.
01:40:47.620 Training specifically for family, not just child.
01:40:50.520 Yes. Amazing how powerful parents can be in modifying the behavior of their child. So parents
01:40:57.360 undergo the training and the child might undergo some sort of therapy, regulation group. When they're
01:41:04.420 older, they undergo executive functioning coaching to learn organization and planning. So what it is,
01:41:10.880 is you are trying to develop these skills. So when we practice something over and over and over again,
01:41:18.780 not only we develop new behavioral strategies, behavioral patterns, new habits, we actually
01:41:27.160 positively impact the developing brain. That's neuroplasticity, which is one of my passions is
01:41:32.960 neuroplasticity, but we impact the brain through experience and our behaviors. So when a child has ADHD,
01:41:42.040 it is a wonderful time to practice new skills and you actually impact neural networks.
01:41:47.680 So does that mean that you're telling parents or at least holding out a hope that, hey, your kid is
01:41:55.920 seven or eight years old, we're going to put them on Ritalin. This might not be a lifetime thing.
01:42:01.560 Do you give them that hope or do you not commit to anything one way or the other?
01:42:04.900 I don't commit.
01:42:05.800 I get asked that question all the time.
01:42:07.120 Yeah.
01:42:07.540 For the types of medications I put patients on. If I put patients on a lipid lowering medication,
01:42:12.600 generally their first question, once you get through the, why should I be on this? And what are the
01:42:16.760 side effects, et cetera, is, am I going to be on this for life?
01:42:20.540 Yeah. So what I tell families, I have no crystal ball. I can't commit, but I do have many, many
01:42:26.560 patients who do eventually come off medication. Some of them, maybe they shouldn't have come off
01:42:32.420 medication. They actually should stay on their medication, but I have many patients who come off
01:42:36.020 and do really well.
01:42:37.160 Is it naive to think that because ADHD primarily impacts the prefrontal cortex that you would see
01:42:44.340 at least a subset of people when they reach their late teens as girls and mid twenties as boys,
01:42:51.220 when they reach maturation of that part of the brain, that at least a subset of them should be
01:42:56.760 able to develop potentially the skills to overcome the genetic component of this, or is that not
01:43:02.660 necessarily correlated?
01:43:03.980 No, I see a lot of kids who do find strategies to compensate and who do no longer need their
01:43:10.820 medication as teenagers or young adults. I have a lot of kids who are like that, but I think it's
01:43:16.320 really important that they start early developing strategies and new behaviors. I think that is
01:43:21.920 really important in strengthening those neural networks.
01:43:25.200 So what about the non-stimulant class of drugs here?
01:43:27.520 There are non-stimulants that we use. One is called Stratera, which also acts on norepinephrine
01:43:36.500 and increasing the norepinephrine levels in the synapses. And then there's a couple of old
01:43:43.500 blood pressure medications we use. One's called guapacine, the other one's clonidine. Those are
01:43:48.880 alpha-2 agonists. So they act in a different way with closing channels in the postsynaptic neuron.
01:43:56.660 So it's a different mechanism. But all of those medications also help with the communication
01:44:02.120 between neurons in the attention center and the brain. The difference is the non-stimulants
01:44:07.800 have to be taken every day, unlike the stimulants, in order for them to work. So meaning they're taken
01:44:14.300 every day and you need a steady state in your body.
01:44:16.900 Yeah. Do you ever mix these two or is it one or the other?
01:44:19.500 Oh, you mix them often. You do. And so often they do not have the side effects with the poor
01:44:25.780 appetite. And sometimes they can be really good with kids who have some emotional dysregulation,
01:44:32.220 impulsive emotions. So we'll often use them with a child who has a little bit of that irritability,
01:44:38.520 emotional dysregulation. And sometimes we're using both the stimulant and the non-stimulant at the same
01:44:43.660 time. Are there any medications that typically show up in kids with autism, but without ADHD?
01:44:53.520 So let's just say kids with autism plus or minus anxiety. What is the role of pharmacotherapy?
01:44:59.020 There's no medication that treats the core symptoms of autism. The core symptoms don't
01:45:03.980 require medication. It's therapy. We use medication in kids with autism to treat
01:45:09.940 target behaviors and symptoms. So we use medication for the symptoms, no matter the label. So whether
01:45:19.460 or not the child with autism has ADHD or not, we still may use an ADHD medicine. If they're
01:45:26.120 hyperactive or impulsive, we still may use it whether or not the label's there.
01:45:30.820 Got it. So you don't need the diagnosis to decide. In other words, there are kids with autism that are
01:45:36.240 going to be on medications, and it's really just a function of the symptom.
01:45:40.560 Correct. So the target symptoms we usually treat, it is the attention hyperactivity impulsivity,
01:45:45.760 where we'll be using the stimulants, or the challenges with emotional regulation,
01:45:52.240 where we'll use a non-stimulant. We may use an anxiety medicine, so a selective serotonin reuptake
01:45:58.680 inhibitor, SSRIs, such as Prozac or Zoloft. We may use that for anxious feelings. We also use that
01:46:08.360 sometimes for rigidity. So kids with autism who struggle with rigidity and transitions, it's often
01:46:14.000 anxiety related, so we'll use the SSRIs there. And then kids who have really aggressive behaviors and
01:46:22.020 may injure themselves, then we are talking about atypical antipsychotics. I'll just share with you,
01:46:27.260 right? Don't use a lot of those myself. At that point, if the child is having those difficulties,
01:46:32.520 I often am working with a psychiatrist. Again, I think it's just got to be so hard for parents to
01:46:38.480 potentially stomach putting children on psychiatric medication. But what you said earlier is sort of
01:46:45.520 interesting, right? Which is most of them are coming back after saying, I wish we did this sooner,
01:46:51.440 which I suppose would be the most affirming thing you could ever hear in that situation.
01:46:55.620 What are the things that they typically notice when they come back to you and say that? And how
01:47:00.400 long does it typically take? Well, with the stimulants, it'd be pretty quick. They're like,
01:47:05.740 we're glad we did this. And this is making a big difference. The impact of stimulants is right away.
01:47:11.680 You see the benefits right away. What do the kids say? Let's assume a child is old enough. So let's
01:47:17.340 assume you're working with a seven-year-old or a 12-year-old who can articulate their feelings.
01:47:22.720 What do they come back and say to you? They share with me that it helps them with their focus. They
01:47:28.220 feel more successful at school and they share side effects. What other side effects do they
01:47:33.440 complain of besides appetite suppression? So I will sometimes have high school students who tell me
01:47:39.840 that they feel less social and funny when they're taking their ADHD medicine. So they're a little less
01:47:47.140 impulsive or spontaneous. And so we talk about that. And I listen because it doesn't have to be
01:47:53.680 black and white, all or nothing. Our goal isn't to make someone 100% focused 100% of the time.
01:48:00.920 It's like, okay, so we want to improve focus. None of us are focused completely all the time.
01:48:06.640 So when I have people come to me with side effects, I'm like, okay, well, probably the dose is wrong,
01:48:12.520 or maybe we should change to a different medication. This one particular medication may not be the right
01:48:18.880 match for you. So we should need to change it and find one with less side effects. So I think that
01:48:23.900 the key thing is having a relationship between the doctor and the patient, lots of communication,
01:48:31.320 and the idea that if the patient is experiencing side effects, that they tell somebody so that you
01:48:38.940 can adjust, you change the dose, you change the timing, you change the brand. It's just weighing
01:48:43.880 pros and cons. You hear this phrase from time to time, which is that kids with autism have superpowers.
01:48:51.200 We might think of an example like, okay, well, Dustin Hoffman's character in Rain Man, I mean,
01:48:56.180 obviously highly, highly impaired for most of life, but clearly had a superpower. He could count cards
01:49:03.020 and toothpicks. Obviously, that's kind of the Hollywood version of that. But is there truth to this idea that
01:49:08.940 kids with autism have superpowers, or is this something that you would put more brackets
01:49:13.660 around and say, well, sometimes those kids who are in class three, where they're really impaired,
01:49:19.880 maybe there's something there, but it's a lot harder to see than the kids in class one, for example.
01:49:24.160 It is. So there is a difference class three versus class one, for sure. It's harder to see. It's
01:49:28.800 harder to see in class three. Class one, a lot of superpowers. Memory could be one of them.
01:49:34.680 Attention to detail, really good with remembering rules and following routines or a set order of
01:49:43.560 operations. There's a lot of strengths with the kids in class one.
01:49:48.280 There are a lot of famous people I won't name who have even talked about themselves as having
01:49:52.920 mild forms of autism, Asperger's. So you would almost think that it's predisposing them to some
01:49:59.840 of their greatness in the fields that they're in, often very technical fields. Is that consistent
01:50:05.200 with what you see in the children? Yes, it is.
01:50:08.100 A more of a predisposition towards engineering technical fields, STEM in general?
01:50:12.060 Yeah, definitely. With that profile, like I said, I called it a learning profile, a thinking profile.
01:50:17.400 And so things where you need a little bit more inferring, there's abstract inferring or the social piece,
01:50:24.680 it may not be their strength. But where you need to dive deep into some details, persevere,
01:50:33.380 stick with something, hyper-focus on that, you do really well. And so a lot of people, once they
01:50:39.780 find their passion as a young adult, if they find a career where they can actually dive in,
01:50:46.280 they can dive deep and do really, really well.
01:50:48.460 What do you think is kind of the most important thing you want people to understand about anxiety,
01:50:57.520 autism, ADHD, that you think is either misunderstood or not understood at all?
01:51:05.560 I think that there's a lot of overlap. I think people sometimes get stuck on the label and name.
01:51:14.080 And although there's so many positive things, we're talking about the diagnosis you need to get
01:51:20.740 resources, I think I'm concerned that people get stuck on a name and don't actually see the person
01:51:29.900 beneath that name. I think that's my key thing. I've had so many experiences where families are like,
01:51:35.740 but they told me it's autism, it has to be autism. If you think otherwise, what's wrong with the system?
01:51:42.000 And this is hard because in this field, there's a lot of gray. And so I think that's what it's about.
01:51:46.900 There's gray. It's a moving target. We've changed the names and the definitions multiple times in the last
01:51:52.300 couple of decades. They probably are going to change again. So it's for us to be flexible with our thinking
01:51:57.680 that the definitions may change again, but there are these learning styles. And so if you've met one person
01:52:05.420 with one of these names, you've met one person and it's really important to understand that person
01:52:11.380 in order to help them with leveraging their strengths and then understanding what kinds of
01:52:16.840 gaps you want to like fill and what kinds of skills you want to work on.
01:52:21.060 Trina, this has been really, really fascinating. I guess my only frustration in this discussion is the
01:52:26.460 concern that there aren't enough people like you and your colleagues out there to match what is very
01:52:34.600 likely the psychological burden of these conditions across kids today. And I'm only speaking to the
01:52:40.100 United States. So I think if you were to think about this globally, I won't attempt to make a statement
01:52:44.700 because I simply don't understand what the prevalence is or what the resources are. But I think we could
01:52:48.620 probably say in the United States that there are far more children and families that are impacted
01:52:54.640 by the AAA, then there are multidisciplinary teams that can take care of them. Are you optimistic that
01:53:01.560 10 years from now, this model is going to be different? There are going to be more people
01:53:05.560 that are going to want to come to practice this in the way like, where is the long pole in the tent?
01:53:10.840 Is it getting more people to simply go into these fields? Is it a better payer reimbursement structure
01:53:17.540 to incentivize more people around a multidisciplinary approach? What is it going to take in 10 years
01:53:24.100 to close the gap between demand and supply? I think it's both those things you mentioned.
01:53:30.060 It is definitely training more people and trying to think about how to use and recruit people who
01:53:38.100 are also going to support, for example, the developmental behavioral pediatrician or the
01:53:42.400 psychiatrist or the psychologist. For example, we need more DBPs, but we also need then like more
01:53:48.240 nurse practitioners or other allied professionals who can support the team. So it's being creative
01:53:54.480 and innovative with how you create the teams and find enough people to be on these teams. But then
01:54:01.800 how it's reimbursed and making sure there's access to these teams will be really important.
01:54:07.340 I really believe in the bridge to education as well, which is not something that is part of an insurance
01:54:13.900 I was literally just about to ask you the following question, which dovetails into that,
01:54:18.740 which is, are we thinking about this the wrong way? Are we thinking about this as something that
01:54:24.640 should be done through healthcare when maybe this should be done through education? If you had
01:54:29.640 unlimited budget, one way or the other, this has got to get paid for. So it's either going to get paid
01:54:34.180 through health insurance or it's going to get paid through systems in education. Do you think that the
01:54:39.760 burden is disproportionately on the healthcare system today and it should be a shared burden
01:54:44.560 with the education system? And I'm not saying that to be critical of the education system.
01:54:48.420 They would need the funding and the resources to do this. But is that part of the issue
01:54:52.000 is that you're always going to see these things manifested in the education system and that's where
01:54:58.160 you're going to get the most bang for your buck when you address them.
01:55:01.760 I'm going to go back to the bridge because it is, it's like the insurance, they'll say that
01:55:06.680 parts of this intervention are educational. So they're not responsible for it. And then the
01:55:12.620 educational people will say that this part is this medical thing. It's actually not interfering
01:55:18.380 with the classroom, but you need to realize to help that child move the needle, you have to have
01:55:23.840 both systems working and talking together and collaborating together if you really want to
01:55:30.380 move forward. And so it's a totally different system, but I really believe in bridging education,
01:55:37.200 mental health, and medical if you want to make an impact on child well-being and health.
01:55:44.480 I'm really hopeful that this message spreads and that we see more and more of this type of
01:55:48.720 integrative approach because it really makes sense. So thank you so much for your time and
01:55:52.640 appreciate you coming out here.
01:55:53.980 Thank you.
01:55:54.300 Thank you for listening to this week's episode of The Drive. Head over to peteratiamd.com forward
01:56:01.820 slash show notes. If you want to dig deeper into this episode, you can also find me on YouTube,
01:56:08.040 Instagram, and Twitter, all with the handle peteratiamd. You can also leave us review on Apple
01:56:13.920 podcasts or whatever podcast player you use. This podcast is for general informational purposes only
01:56:20.220 and does not constitute the practice of medicine, nursing, or other professional health care services,
01:56:25.020 including the giving of medical advice. No doctor-patient relationship is formed.
01:56:30.480 The use of this information and the materials linked to this podcast is at the user's own risk.
01:56:36.200 The content on this podcast is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice,
01:56:40.880 diagnosis, or treatment. Users should not disregard or delay in obtaining medical advice from any
01:56:46.340 medical condition they have, and they should seek the assistance of their healthcare professionals
01:56:50.820 for any such conditions. Finally, I take all conflicts of interest very seriously. For all of
01:56:56.720 my disclosures and the companies I invest in or advise, please visit peteratiamd.com forward slash
01:57:03.640 about where I keep an up-to-date and active list of all disclosures.