The Peter Attia Drive - December 20, 2018


#34 - Sam Harris, Ph.D.: The transformative power of mindfulness


Episode Stats

Length

2 hours and 43 minutes

Words per Minute

171.15405

Word Count

28,021

Sentence Count

1,504

Misogynist Sentences

5

Hate Speech Sentences

18


Summary

Sam Harris is a philosopher, author, and creator of the Waking Up Meditation app. He's also the creator of The End of Faith, The Moral Landscape, and Lying, Free Will. In this episode, we talk about the importance of mindfulness, and how it can help us live a happier and more fulfilled life.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hey everyone, welcome to the Peter Atiyah Drive. I'm your host, Peter Atiyah.
00:00:10.140 The Drive is a result of my hunger for optimizing performance, health, longevity, critical thinking,
00:00:15.600 along with a few other obsessions along the way. I've spent the last several years working with
00:00:19.840 some of the most successful, top-performing individuals in the world, and this podcast
00:00:23.620 is my attempt to synthesize what I've learned along the way to help you live a higher quality,
00:00:28.360 more fulfilling life. If you enjoy this podcast, you can find more information on today's episode
00:00:33.000 and other topics at peteratiyahmd.com.
00:00:41.400 Hey everyone, welcome to this week's edition of The Drive. I'm your host, Peter Atiyah.
00:00:45.880 Our guest this week is Sam Harris, someone I consider a friend, a mentor, a teacher. I met
00:00:51.820 Sam about four years ago, and I suspect many of you already know about Sam or are familiar with his
00:00:56.500 work, but in case you're not, let me say a few words on that. Sam trained in neuroscience. He has
00:01:01.020 a PhD in neuroscience, but in many ways I consider him a philosopher and frankly just one of the
00:01:05.820 greatest minds that I know. He's an author of some extraordinary books, The End of Faith being his
00:01:11.040 first, The Moral Landscape, Lying, Free Will, and probably my favorite, which you've also probably
00:01:16.060 heard me talk about, is Waking Up, a book that I've read I think three times now, and I'm almost at the
00:01:21.320 point where I understand half of it. Sam is also the host of arguably, I would say the most important
00:01:27.960 podcast to me, The Waking Up podcast, and he is also the creator of an app for meditation called,
00:01:34.120 appropriately, Waking Up. I had the privilege of beta testing it for about nine months before it
00:01:38.200 went live, and it is now officially live, and for anyone who meditates, I would consider this an
00:01:42.760 essential part of your meditation app routine. You've probably heard me talk a lot about this in the
00:01:50.120 past few months, the importance of distress tolerance, mindfulness, the ability to understand
00:01:57.380 what's going on inside our own heads as a tool to be less unhappy. And that might sound kind of blah,
00:02:05.440 but the reality of it is I've never spent more time thinking about this than I have in probably the last
00:02:10.720 12 to 18 months, and Sam has been such an important part of helping me think about that.
00:02:16.540 And this podcast is pretty long. It's almost three hours. In that time, we go into a lot of this
00:02:22.660 stuff. I'm pretty open about how much Sam has helped me. And though I think at times it turns
00:02:29.160 into more of a discussion than an interview, I think we always sort of veer back to the place where
00:02:34.180 you as the listener are going to get something out of this. If you're not familiar with Sam,
00:02:38.620 I can't encourage you enough to listen to this podcast. And if it piques your curiosity,
00:02:43.940 dig a little bit deeper into this. A couple of housekeeping items. Obviously, we're going to
00:02:48.580 release this today instead of the day before Christmas. So this is kind of coming out a bit
00:02:52.180 early. And over the next week or so, we haven't quite figured out the schedule yet, but don't
00:02:56.360 worry, we'll be back to kind of our regular schedule in January. If you haven't already done so and you're
00:03:00.580 interested, please sign up for our weekly email. That's on the site, www.peteratiamd.com. And
00:03:07.300 somewhere on there, there'll be a little place to prompt you to sign up for that. And if you don't
00:03:10.140 like it, just unsubscribe. We also have great show notes, which everybody keeps raving about.
00:03:15.100 And I'm really proud of our team for the work they do. I, to be clear, don't do any of that work,
00:03:18.960 but I like that people are spending time on them, especially when it comes to following up
00:03:23.820 on all of the nuances and details that we go into. Finally, if you're enjoying this podcast,
00:03:29.340 please go to Apple podcast reviews and leave a favorable review. And if you are not enjoying it
00:03:34.400 and you feel so inclined to leave a review, please do so, but try to be as constructive as possible
00:03:39.440 because it's a lot easier to course correct. If it's constructive than if you just tell me it sucks
00:03:43.560 without anything further to say, here's my guest, Sam Harris.
00:03:50.260 Well, Sam, thanks so much for making time today. Yeah. Yeah. It's a pleasure for me. I'm coming to
00:03:55.560 someone else's studio to record. Yeah. Well, that's you're getting the game long enough. This is the
00:04:00.460 way it happens. Well, I really appreciate it. There's so much I want to talk about today,
00:04:06.520 but I also want to be thoughtful about pulling out threads that I think are most valuable to
00:04:11.840 people I take care of. In many ways, that's sort of an undercurrent of what I like to talk about on
00:04:16.540 podcasts is things that I can then share with my patients and things like that. I don't know if
00:04:20.860 you remember this, but almost a year ago I called you or I emailed you and said, Hey man, do you have
00:04:26.220 time to talk? And you said, yeah. And it was like, actually, I know when it was, it was right after
00:04:29.900 Christmas. It was like the day after Christmas. Yeah. It was the 26th of December. And I said,
00:04:35.000 I want to talk with you about mindfulness meditation. And you said, great. And we hopped
00:04:38.540 on a call. Do you remember this discussion? Yeah. I think I, I think I remember the one you're,
00:04:42.080 you're referencing. So I had had a very profound experience. And prior to that, I had been somewhat
00:04:49.120 familiar, I think would be the, the, the most generous way of saying it, but somewhat familiar
00:04:53.200 with meditation, primarily focusing on concentration-based meditations, like mantra-based
00:04:58.200 practice. But I'd just come back from basically a rehab facility where you were sort of out in the
00:05:05.000 electronics, you weren't even allowed to have books or anything like that. And you were really
00:05:09.340 sort of stripped down into, um, I guess what could only be viewed as sort of your most fundamental,
00:05:15.000 basic elements of self. And I had an epiphany about 10 days into that, which was, I realized at the time
00:05:24.580 what must be the first moment in my life that I was present. And it's weird to be almost 45 at the time
00:05:31.160 and to think, wow, here I am 10 days of having every stimulus removed from my life. Plus going
00:05:37.900 through this very rigorous sort of therapeutic stuff. And I remember exactly where I was sitting.
00:05:42.280 I was sitting in the common room of this place at the edge of a couch. And in a moment, the only
00:05:50.100 thing that mattered was exactly what I was perceiving around me. So the light coming in through the window
00:05:56.100 and the, you know, the way in which it made the room sort of light up this, the, the, the faint
00:06:01.640 scent of, you know, something that was being cooked in the kitchen, you know, a few yards away or
00:06:06.980 whatever. And I don't know why I just felt like, wow, this is the first time I, I actually really
00:06:13.020 think I'm not thinking about something that has happened or worrying about something that is going
00:06:17.380 to happen. And the other thing that was odd that, that entire time I was, was there was it was they
00:06:25.180 allowed us to exercise, which was a big deal. I was really pleased that I was still permitted to
00:06:28.660 exercise, but you couldn't have music. You didn't have a phone or anything. So it was also the first
00:06:32.360 time in my life I exercised only being able to listen to the sound of my breath. So every morning
00:06:36.580 I would run in the woods and you just heard the sound of the wind blowing by you and you heard your
00:06:42.820 breath. And when I was, you know, doing pushups or whatever, it was the same sort of thing.
00:06:46.220 And of course I'd already read so much of your work, but the reason I wanted to speak with you
00:06:51.600 that day is I wanted to understand, Hey, is, am I getting a glimpse of what one might get if they
00:06:56.820 meditate, if they move to a mindfulness-based practice? And what you said was, well, there's
00:07:02.060 good news and bad news. The good news is I've got this app that's going to be coming out soon and
00:07:05.000 it's going to help you with this. The bad news is it's only in beta yet, but you can start right
00:07:09.180 away. There's only, you know, I think at the time there were maybe a dozen meditations.
00:07:12.180 Yeah. And the very bad news is it's going to take years for me to produce this thing.
00:07:16.220 I'm completely incompetent.
00:07:17.620 No, but come on. The thing actually is out now.
00:07:19.680 Yeah.
00:07:20.000 And I know it was a little longer than you wanted, but, um, yeah. And I very quickly put
00:07:24.700 as many of my patients who were interested on the beta version, you guys were so gracious
00:07:28.120 and let all of my, my, uh, my folks on this thing. And in many ways I view that as one
00:07:33.640 of the most important transitions of my life. I think of, uh, you know, life is a handful
00:07:38.540 of direction changes that, you know, some of them that you look back at the past and say,
00:07:43.420 wow, that was sort of a meaningful insight that came to me. So you've talked about this
00:07:47.200 idea of noticing what is arising versus not noticing at all. Can you elaborate on this?
00:07:53.780 Yeah. Well, so I guess I should define mindfulness, which is really the, the target state that one
00:07:59.880 is trying to cultivate in at least this probably what's the most popular type of meditation now.
00:08:05.900 I mean, there are different, as you alluded to, there are different types. There are two
00:08:09.660 basic types of meditation where the distinction is between being lost in thought and being clearly
00:08:17.920 aware of whatever the object of meditation is. So that's true for all types of meditation.
00:08:23.640 Thought really is the, the obstacle one is overcoming when one is learning to meditate because
00:08:29.840 our natural, our default mode is to just be lost in thought. We're telling ourselves a story
00:08:35.620 all day long and we're not aware of it. So once one begins to meditate, one is trying to pay
00:08:45.980 attention to something. And this is where the two different types diverge. The first that you alluded
00:08:52.520 to the, like a mantra based or a concentration based object of focus is the attempt to pay attention
00:09:00.680 to one thing to the exclusion of everything else, right? You want your attention to be absorbed in
00:09:06.180 that object. And in many of those practices, the explicit goal is to do that so well that thoughts
00:09:14.720 no longer arise, right? So you're really trying to get rid of thought in some basic sense. The arising
00:09:20.740 of thought in that context is a sign that you're not meditating hard enough or one pointedly enough.
00:09:27.680 Those types of practices can produce extraordinarily positive states of mind that you can feel bliss
00:09:34.320 and rapture and, and you can actually use as an object of meditation specific states of mind like
00:09:42.000 loving kindness, which is called metta in the, in the Buddhist tradition or sympathetic joy or
00:09:47.640 compassion or equanimity. You can cultivate specific attitudes, which if you can focus on them to the
00:09:54.600 exclusion of anything else, you're inhabiting that state to a degree that, you know, most people would find
00:09:59.900 unrecognizable. But the second type of meditation, which is the type I have spent much more time doing and is
00:10:08.680 almost universally considered the more fundamental or the deeper practice, is often described as, as mindfulness,
00:10:17.760 because that's the, that's the, that's the, that's the, the state you're using in the Buddhist tradition to
00:10:21.940 cultivate it. Mindfulness comes from a, a practice called vipassana, which, which is insight meditation.
00:10:29.620 And there you are, you're not trying to selectively notice one thing or another. You are trying to
00:10:35.820 break the spell of being distracted by thought. So you're, you're trying to be aware of everything
00:10:41.540 without perceiving things through this discursivity or this conceptual lens in each moment. But
00:10:51.100 your attention can be much more choiceless. I mean, you can just notice whatever, in fact, you notice.
00:10:57.740 You're noticing things all the time, sounds and sensations and moods and, and thoughts, but you're not
00:11:04.380 noticing them clearly because you're, you're thinking every moment of the day. Mindfulness begins,
00:11:10.040 for most people, as a training on one object like the breath. But very quickly, it becomes something
00:11:17.400 that you apply to the full range of your experience. And what's nice about it, apart from all the,
00:11:23.600 the benefits of doing it and all the things that can be realized by doing it, this type of meditation
00:11:31.200 is clearly coincident with any experience you can have. I mean, there's nothing that is excluded in
00:11:39.660 principle from the meditation. You're not, you can be working out or watching a movie or, I mean,
00:11:44.720 there's no, there's no thing that in principle does not admit of mindfulness. And that's not true
00:11:51.620 of other types of practice. Yeah. Just sharing one example, because the other thing that I remember
00:11:56.240 you said at the time, I said, you know, Sam, I want to really shift this practice and sort of,
00:12:01.600 I want to figure out a way to experience that, you know, more and more. And you actually said,
00:12:06.280 look, there are a bunch of apps that are already out there that are all pretty good. I mean,
00:12:09.100 obviously you're producing yours because you think it's going to offer something additional and I'll
00:12:13.140 just make my plug for it here. I've used every one of the apps out there and I do find yours the best.
00:12:18.860 But I also realized that there's no one thing that's the best. It's the way you explain things
00:12:23.460 just resonates with me and it might not resonate with the next person. But the other app that I
00:12:27.580 really liked that you recommended was 10% Happier, which is Dan Harris's app. No, no,
00:12:31.920 no relation, of course. And even within Dan's app, there are many teachers, but there are a couple
00:12:37.420 that I really like, Jeff Warren and Joseph. Joseph Goldstein. Joseph Goldstein, yeah. And
00:12:45.480 Jeff Warren has, I believe, a series of walking meditations that are, he refers to as sort of
00:12:51.200 informal meditations. And I remember the first time I did this, maybe it wasn't the first time,
00:12:57.140 but it might've been the second time, but it was pretty early. I realized for the first time that
00:13:01.040 when you walk, if you're paying attention to it, you can feel the wind going past your finger.
00:13:05.860 So if you're walking with your hands in a position such that your thumbs are facing forward and your
00:13:10.880 arms are swinging lightly in a normal gait, you can actually feel the air moving past the leading
00:13:17.520 edge of your hand. I remember thinking, how have I been walking for 45 years and I've never once felt
00:13:23.600 this sensation. And now when I pay attention to it, it's so noticeable. I don't know how it hasn't been
00:13:29.720 distracting me for the last 45 years. Yeah. Yeah. And one might wonder why one would want to notice
00:13:36.800 such a thing. But what you discover when you begin practicing meditation, especially intensively on
00:13:44.200 retreat, is that there's no such thing as a boring object of attention. What boredom is, is simply a lack
00:13:53.480 of attention. I mean, we get into these situations where we are convinced that we are bored because we
00:13:58.540 haven't found something compelling enough in our experience to capture our attention. But our
00:14:03.540 attention is so blunt an instrument normally that we need something that's thrilling or terrifying or
00:14:13.780 something to fully get us to commit. But what you discover when you learn to meditate is that
00:14:20.240 what pleases us most in those moments when we are fully captured by experience is the state of
00:14:29.920 complete attention to the present. And if you can muster that on your own, if you can actually
00:14:35.740 guide attention irrespective of the object you're attending to, then anything, any arbitrary object,
00:14:43.500 the feeling of wind on your hand as you walk, can be an exquisitely pleasurable thing to notice.
00:14:51.440 This is why in that first type of meditation practice, concentration practice, it doesn't matter
00:14:56.620 what you pay attention to. You can pick an arbitrary object. It can be a random sound. It can be a mantra.
00:15:03.780 It doesn't matter what the mantra is. It can be a candle flame. It can be a color on a piece of paper.
00:15:09.700 It can be a random sound in the environment. It can be the sensation of a fly walking across the back
00:15:18.240 of your hand, right? So anything that you can pay attention to, to the exclusion of anything else,
00:15:23.820 can suddenly disclose what it's like to have a very concentrated mind. And concentration is
00:15:30.180 intrinsically pleasurable. And this is why meditation can have the character of a kind of drug experience.
00:15:37.480 And this is kind of a superficial character. I mean, you can get kind of addicted to the changes in
00:15:45.660 state you experience in meditation. And you can be misled by these experiences. You can think that
00:15:51.760 it's about these changes rather than something more fundamental. Because anything you experience
00:15:58.440 by way of newfound pleasure that is based on having a very concentrated mind, you will lose because
00:16:06.200 it's an impermanent state of your physiology and attention. And it's not the deepest practice. But
00:16:12.540 yeah, it's amazing that concentration itself, regardless of the object, is incredibly pleasant.
00:16:19.580 You know, sort of going back to the why, which you've started to allude to. And again,
00:16:24.420 I can't remember if I'm, I know you've said this. I think many have said this. So I don't, you know,
00:16:28.720 I think many have come to this observation, which is virtually all negatively valenced emotions
00:16:34.560 are not rooted in the present. And that sort of becomes the corollary of being present,
00:16:40.980 therefore being able to concentrate on something in the moment can be quite pleasurable. And I guess
00:16:46.420 that was sort of what I recognized that first moment I experienced it, which was,
00:16:50.660 wow, when you're, when you're fully, fully, you know, engaged in or enveloped within this present
00:16:57.260 sensation, what you're seeing, what you're hearing, what you're feeling,
00:17:00.600 it becomes very difficult to be anxious or depressed or angry or any of these other things.
00:17:06.660 And for me, that was the most interesting part of this, which was, you know, taking a very big step
00:17:12.020 back. I'm trying to devote my life to figuring out this problem of how to live longer.
00:17:15.820 But if you asked me, how did I think about that problem five years ago versus how do I think about
00:17:22.260 it today? There have been two fundamentally significant differences. There are two things
00:17:27.820 today that I, that occupy much more of my energy with respect to longevity than they did, you know,
00:17:33.940 four or five years ago. And the first of those two is this notion of being happy, which again,
00:17:39.380 I think five years ago, I would have dismissed that as sort of a, an afterthought, like it is what it is.
00:17:44.620 And as long as all those other things happen, you'll be happy. You know, if you can figure out
00:17:48.140 how to not die and how to be stronger and have better cognitive powers, but you'll be happy as
00:17:52.980 a result of that. But of course that seems to be not the case. The second though, we're not going
00:17:57.120 to get into it is a much greater appreciation for the type of physical body that is necessary to age
00:18:03.300 well and how radically that differs from necessarily the physical body that we want to perform well when
00:18:10.100 we're in our thirties or forties or even our fifties. But going back to the former, which to me is in
00:18:15.660 many ways, your work and the work of people like you has had such a great influence on me is this
00:18:20.700 realization. Like none of this stuff matters if you're miserable. It doesn't matter if you can
00:18:24.620 live to a hundred. It doesn't matter if you can delay the onset of heart disease and stroke and
00:18:28.940 cancer and Alzheimer's disease. If you're too miserable to appreciate it, or if you're constantly in some
00:18:34.220 sort of tormented state, you might as well be dead. I mean, that sounds extreme, but that's really how
00:18:40.760 I started to feel about this. Yeah. And I think we also have inaccurate associations with terms like
00:18:47.320 happiness and we haven't distinguished terms that are different, like pain and suffering.
00:18:54.800 There's nothing about meditation that gets rid of physical pain. Pain is just something that you're
00:19:00.640 going to experience and you can actually experience surprising degrees of pain while meditating. If you
00:19:07.220 just resolve not to move your body, it doesn't matter how comfortable your chair is. Eventually
00:19:11.600 pain is going to arise. And you have a guided meditation that takes us through that exercise
00:19:16.120 that is, I feel like within two minutes, it's unbearable. There are people who sit for hours and
00:19:22.160 hours and 12 hours, you know, and it's excruciating. And yet when you get up, you haven't hurt
00:19:30.380 yourself. It's not synonymous with injury, right? Now, obviously there are ways you could injure
00:19:34.580 yourself if you don't move, but there can be a strange magnification of pain if you resolve to
00:19:41.240 sit still for a very long time. But one thing you discover there, which is useful to discover, is that
00:19:47.480 there is a difference between pain and suffering. You can feel intensely negative sensory experience,
00:19:55.300 and you can feel intensely negative emotions even. You can feel anger and depression and sadness.
00:20:03.240 And if you can be content to simply be aware of those sensations or those moods or emotions,
00:20:13.100 if you can recognize that consciousness is the prior condition in which all of those things are
00:20:19.100 appearing, and you are simply that which is aware of these changing phenomenon, if you can become
00:20:26.200 interested in the character of a mood like sadness or a pain in the knee, it's actually possible to
00:20:35.520 experience these states with total equanimity. And one of the features is, as you said, not being
00:20:44.440 focused at all by thought on the past or the future. So, I mean, one thing with physical pain
00:20:50.580 we all experience is this sense that some sensation is intolerable, but there's this paradox, because in
00:20:59.620 that moment, you've already tolerated it, right? I mean, it's fully arrived. You've merely experienced it.
00:21:05.000 You're worried about the future. You're worried about how long this is going to go on. And it's
00:21:12.140 certainly good to practice finding a place of equanimity with pain. I'm not saying, you know,
00:21:19.100 obviously there are pains that are conceivable that even the best meditator might find it difficult
00:21:26.160 to find equanimity with, but there really is an immense amount of growth one can have in this area,
00:21:34.360 where you just, you can notice this difference between reacting to pain, contracting around it,
00:21:40.380 resisting it, trying to make it go away, wishing it away, worrying about how long it'll be there.
00:21:46.540 And all of this happens, this cascade, it's just, it happens so quickly that it's just, you don't even
00:21:52.020 notice the mechanics of it. It's just you, right? It's just you suffering. But the moment you can pick
00:21:58.400 apart the mechanics of it, because you can pay attention to what is arising, the feeling of resistance,
00:22:04.100 the fear about what's going to happen in the next moment, and keep dropping back into a position
00:22:10.340 of merely witnessing all of these things arise and pass away. There are experiences I've had,
00:22:16.560 and many have had in meditation, where an excruciating sensation becomes so intense that
00:22:24.860 you actually don't know whether or not you're experiencing agony or ecstasy. Like the valence
00:22:30.740 of the intense mental state is it just gets kind of wiped out. It's just sheer intensity. And
00:22:38.580 there is a fundamental cancellation of suffering in those moments. And this goes back to what we were
00:22:45.040 just saying about the pleasures of concentration. Nothing concentrates your mind more easily than
00:22:50.660 pain, right? And so if you're willing, if you can get past your fear and just go into it,
00:22:55.860 you can experience a lot of mental pleasure. I mean, this is, you know, I mean, I'm not,
00:23:02.360 I don't think I've ever met somebody who claimed to be a masochist, but I can imagine that if masochism
00:23:08.180 is possible, there's some reason why this is the case. This would be a reason why this would be the
00:23:14.340 case. That there is, I can only imagine they're experiencing intense concentration in, you know,
00:23:22.460 various states that most people would find, you know, physically intolerable. But back to this,
00:23:28.360 the idea of happiness and, and other states that are commonly associated with it. I think we all have
00:23:36.020 this sense that happiness is a matter of being joyful all the time. And this is a very common idea.
00:23:45.140 This is sort of the misconception that makes many of us think that, well, that's not desirable because
00:23:50.100 if I were joyful every minute of every day, I wouldn't have the drive to do X, Y, and Z, or
00:23:54.780 I wouldn't be quote unquote real in some way. But, but.
00:23:58.900 Or if it is a matter of securing some durable source of joy, then it can't absorb any of the
00:24:06.620 other things in life for which joy would be inappropriate. You know, people die and there's just,
00:24:12.880 there are, there are ups and downs in life. And I don't talk about or think about happiness very
00:24:19.000 much. I think about well-being and, and flourishing more. And those concepts for me can embrace all of
00:24:26.060 the vicissitudes of life where you, if you experience some serious loss in your life, there's a resiliency
00:24:35.080 and a, and a way of embracing that, which is, which brings out the, the wisest and most compassionate and
00:24:41.520 most expansive parts of yourself. That is another, that is another component of well-being. The narrow
00:24:49.920 conception of happiness that most of us have by default is something that we, that we are always
00:24:56.620 trying to defend and shore up against all of the other things in life that are threatening to undermine
00:25:03.860 it. And the one obvious point is that it's just not, it's not a safe play. It is perpetually under
00:25:11.040 threat and any joy you can feel by virtue of it's having arisen based on some causes and conditions,
00:25:18.780 it's going to pass away. You know, you just can't keep any emotion going for days or even hours at a
00:25:27.000 time. And one thing you discover when you learn to meditate is that, you know, negative emotion in
00:25:32.520 particular has a very short half-life. You know, I mean, many of us imagine that we can stay angry
00:25:38.420 or sad for some people would imagine days. I think almost everyone thinks hours at a time. It's
00:25:46.360 actually impossible if you are no longer lost in thought about all the reasons why you should be
00:25:52.440 angry or sad. So this was one of the earlier, I can't remember if this was one of the lessons in
00:25:57.380 your meditation app early on, or it was just a discussion you and I had, but I got to put it
00:26:03.520 to the test shortly after. So I was in New York and obviously in New York, it's, everything's a hustle,
00:26:10.100 right? It's, you're, you're running around, people are rude. You're going to get bumped into.
00:26:14.220 And one of my pet peeves in New York is when you see somebody walking towards you and they're
00:26:20.280 for a moment lost in whatever they're doing, they're usually down looking at their phone or something
00:26:24.660 like that. I always think it's a reasonable courtesy to just not walk into them. Even if
00:26:30.200 they're in your line of sight, you still sort of go out of your way to not bump into them.
00:26:33.920 But for whatever reason, there's just a subset of people who love that opportunity to almost knock
00:26:39.260 you off your feet. So sure enough, one day I am about to turn a corner and this guy is walking and
00:26:46.920 it was clear that he could see me and I had looked down. So my bad, but this guy plows right into me.
00:26:54.660 And I had just had either had this discussion with you or just heard, you know, this lesson
00:26:59.420 about how long can you actually stay angry? And so this happens and I immediately sort of
00:27:05.120 observed this emotion, this rise of anger in me, right? Which was like the desire to turn around
00:27:10.480 and walk up to the guy and say something. Serves no purpose, of course. But instead I decided,
00:27:16.560 well, just watch this, watch this emotion. How long does it last? You know, I remember I was
00:27:21.880 walking somewhere that I was going to be in 10 minutes and I was like, do you think this will
00:27:24.900 last 10 more minutes? Could you be angry for the next 10 minutes if you just observe this feeling?
00:27:30.220 And the answer was no. I mean, it was gone. Actually, I felt like within seconds.
00:27:35.360 And to me, that was like a really big aha moment for, especially for someone like me who's so easily
00:27:41.460 prone to anger to think that by simply being observant of that emotional state, I could have
00:27:48.000 some control over it, which has always felt like the opposite, right? It's always felt like that
00:27:51.880 emotional state has control over me. Right. And it does. I mean, the important point to
00:27:56.940 never forget is that it has complete control over you. As long as you're identified with the next
00:28:04.300 angry thought that's arising in consciousness, if you have no perspective on the fact that you are
00:28:10.120 thinking, right, well, then you simply become that thought for the period that it's captivating and
00:28:17.700 you are pushed in whatever direction it's aimed, right? So if it is getting you to say the angry thing
00:28:25.200 or physically assault the person, you need some level of metacognition in order to pull the brakes.
00:28:32.560 Otherwise, you're just, it's exactly like being asleep and dreaming and not knowing that you're
00:28:37.980 dreaming. This happens to us, all of us, every night. We get into bed and then suddenly a movie
00:28:47.320 starts playing that we're totally identified with. We're one of the characters in it and we're
00:28:54.120 completely unaware of this change, right? And the most surprising thing about dreams is that
00:28:59.440 we're not surprised when they arise, right? Like there's no, you know, we didn't have the
00:29:03.760 expectation that we would stay in our beds, apparently. We're not surprised that the laws
00:29:08.860 of physics are being violated for our amusement. And we're suddenly in these situations where
00:29:15.620 we are fully captive to a completely illusory, seemingly sensory experience. But, you know,
00:29:25.000 all of this is some kind of hallucination. And identification with thought in the waking state
00:29:31.980 has that character to some degree. It's thought to be totally normal psychologically, right? Because
00:29:37.960 it is our default state. But once you learn the alternative, which is to be mindful,
00:29:45.800 you then have a very different sense of what optimal mental health would be. And so when I find myself
00:29:52.400 lost in thought and just, you know, suddenly angry or anxious or frustrated or whatever it is,
00:30:02.420 and I wake up from that experience, it is a little bit like waking up from a dream or a hallucination or
00:30:10.720 it's hard to shake the sense that it's pathological. I was stuck in something about which I had no
00:30:19.780 awareness, right? And it was forcing me to say and do and think and feel things that were given my
00:30:29.860 now current awareness were completely unnecessary. You see, to me, what's so interesting about this,
00:30:35.080 David Foster Wallace, in his commencement speech in 2005 at Kenyon College, the This Is Water,
00:30:41.200 which is one of my favorite things to listen to. I burned a copy off YouTube and now it sits on my
00:30:46.760 phone and I try to listen to it at least once a month, if not more. And even though I almost know
00:30:52.060 it off by heart, it doesn't matter. I still get some benefit every time I hear it. And when he
00:30:56.820 talks about this, he speaks specifically about the problem with this is that it is our default.
00:31:03.640 And that's the part that makes this so challenging. So do we have evidence of other species? Like,
00:31:09.840 are we the only ones that are blessed slash cursed with this ability for rumination and constant
00:31:18.280 thought? I mean, do we, do we have any evidence that a dog is spending any percentage of his or her
00:31:23.600 time thinking about what happened the day before or the next meal? Where do we as humans stack up in
00:31:30.580 this space? Well, it's important to acknowledge that we're blessed and cursed by this because this
00:31:37.080 capacity for linguistic, abstract, complex thought is what has given us everything that is recognizably
00:31:46.740 human. It has given us culture. It has given us civilization. It's allowed us to place all of
00:31:53.960 the learning of our ancestors in a strata that is accessible to all of us and to every present
00:32:01.960 generation so that we don't have to relearn everything from the ground up. I mean, just,
00:32:07.000 just imagine what the alternative would be if there was no acquisition of knowledge.
00:32:10.460 No progress in civilization.
00:32:11.420 Yeah. And, and for the longest time that was true of humanity as well. You know, if you go back
00:32:16.080 50,000 years and then you decide to go back 60,000 years, the differences are, are, are impressively
00:32:23.340 non-existent, you know, in terms of the toolkit anyone was working with.
00:32:27.200 So that's interesting, Sam. So do you, if we go back to, I don't, I know there's, there's some
00:32:32.840 debate about when language was really codified, but to pick a point in time when we're pretty sure
00:32:37.680 there was no language, we could say 200,000 years ago, right? I think most neuroscientists would agree
00:32:41.860 no language 200,000 years ago. Was the arrival of language, the arrival of this capacity or, you know,
00:32:48.800 when, where did this show up?
00:32:50.160 Yeah. I think language is the, the main variable there. I mean, it's the main variable with respect
00:32:57.300 to being able to abstract, to being able to represent anything that's, that's not currently
00:33:03.120 present or not currently happening. It's the basis for communicating anything of substance to anyone
00:33:09.480 else and, and storing a kind of cultural memory of anything, whether it's just by virtue of an oral
00:33:17.880 tradition or, or, you know, once writing came along. So language is necessary for all that. I mean,
00:33:23.120 just to, to be able to articulate the concept of time, you know, the concept of a past where the
00:33:30.360 causes of the present are stored and a future, which is yet to arrive, that needs to be planned for,
00:33:36.740 or that can be better or worse. It's something that, that I think other species probably have
00:33:41.400 in a very primitive form that is not associated with, with conscious thought. I think that a dog,
00:33:52.440 for instance, learns various associations with stimuli.
00:33:57.220 Right. There are Pavlovian responses that these animals can experience.
00:34:00.640 Yeah. And, and they, and they recognize people, obviously. I mean, they, they recognize people
00:34:05.220 arguably better than any other species other than, than the human. So they can have real relationships
00:34:12.300 and there's no question they have emotions and they have preferences and all of that. But
00:34:17.980 in terms of forming a notion of the future or a notion of the way in which the world might be
00:34:27.200 different, it's one thing to recognize your friend, record, in the case of a dog, recognize your
00:34:33.780 owner and prefer that person to somebody else. It's another thing to have any concept of having had
00:34:44.520 a past with that person. Now, the fact that you recognize them indicates a past, right? But all of
00:34:51.780 that could be pre-conscious to a dog. It's just, there's just this kind of binary difference between
00:34:57.900 recognition and, and not. So, so let's use an even more obvious example. And I'll tell you where I'm
00:35:03.680 going with this because then I want to understand this, which is, as I observe my three children,
00:35:09.120 there is a distinction in what I see in the younger ones that they seem to always be present.
00:35:14.520 So, which isn't to say that they don't get upset. I mean, you only have to look at a toddler for 10
00:35:18.060 seconds to watch what, that they can get upset. Yeah. But I doubt that they're upset about anything
00:35:22.900 other than what they're experiencing in the moment, right? They're hungry, their diaper's dirty,
00:35:26.520 whatever. They fell, they hurt themselves, something like that. But if you look at, you know,
00:35:32.280 a teenager or a 10-year-old, a preteen, they are now starting to suffer from this quote-unquote
00:35:39.260 disease of too much thinking, too much distraction. So somewhere from the moment you're born until,
00:35:47.420 let's just make it easy and say, until you're 13, you acquire this capacity. But yet an infant,
00:35:54.500 like the dog, recognizes the parent. There is some sense of a history with an individual.
00:36:01.240 Yeah.
00:36:01.580 Again, I don't know even what the relevance is of this other than to say,
00:36:05.900 the inability to recognize how distracted we are seems to be one of the greatest drivers of misery.
00:36:13.080 You know, there are three quotes I love, and I love them because they're basically all saying
00:36:17.340 the same thing across 1700 years. So in the first century, Seneca said,
00:36:21.520 we suffer more in imagination than in reality. In the 16th century, Shakespeare wrote in Hamlet,
00:36:27.920 for there is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so. I have that on a t-shirt
00:36:32.460 that I love to remind myself. And then of course, in the 17th century, Pascal said, distraction is the
00:36:37.940 only thing that consoles us from miseries, yet it is itself the greatest of our miseries.
00:36:43.960 Descartes says something very similar. I mean, this is something that's been acknowledged for so long.
00:36:48.740 Yeah.
00:36:49.700 And yet, it's so ingrained in us that it just strikes me as like, is there some evolutionary
00:36:58.680 basis for this? Or is it just that evolution wasn't even trying to optimize for this equanimity?
00:37:03.320 And instead, the benefits, as you've pointed out, of being able to do these things, the progress we've
00:37:09.340 been able to make as a society, our ability to leapfrog ahead of other species, has more than
00:37:14.300 made up for this difficulty? Or is it simply that, look, evolution wouldn't outselect this because
00:37:20.460 it's not interfering with your reproductive fitness. I just don't understand why we suffer so
00:37:25.580 much. I guess that's my question. The crucial point there is that evolution doesn't care about
00:37:30.540 your well-being.
00:37:31.740 Yeah. As long as you reproduce, what does it care?
00:37:34.220 Yeah. And so if there's some path by which we survive and reproduce in a state of misery,
00:37:44.900 evolution is perfectly happy with that path, right? It's just, if that were a more reliable
00:37:51.100 algorithm for reproduction and survival, then we would be getting more and more miserable.
00:37:56.980 Right? So we want to slip the logic of evolution because it just simply doesn't care about us,
00:38:04.660 right? And virtually everything we want as a species now, at some level, is a matter of breaking
00:38:12.540 the connection to many of our evolved tendencies. And we have a very strong evolutionary capacity for
00:38:19.220 tribal violence, right? But tribal violence is obviously something we want to outgrow as quickly
00:38:23.720 as possible. And there are many other examples of this. I think that language is, you can see it
00:38:29.800 when you're raising your kids, when you have a two-and-a-half-year-old and a three-year-old
00:38:35.560 where they're talking to you, but then they're talking to themselves as though they're talking to
00:38:43.680 you. Speech becomes something where you're narrating your experience as though you're talking to a
00:38:51.060 parent. And this seems to get internalized so that the conversation, you know enough to keep
00:38:57.360 your mouth shut, but you're really talking to someone who isn't there all the time. I think
00:39:03.260 that's probably the origin of it for every individual, that language is so useful. It's so essential to
00:39:12.420 everything we do that we just have this superfluous level of discursivity that from, again, from a
00:39:22.160 survival advantage that there's no reason to ever turn it off. But from a well-being point of view,
00:39:29.300 it's the character of it is almost universally unpleasant most of the time for most people. I mean,
00:39:37.200 there's some people who are very lucky and they have an intrinsic level of happiness that is just
00:39:42.580 kind of off the charts where they're just, they're basically happy all the time. They recover very,
00:39:47.480 very quickly from disappointments and losses and they just don't really see a problem. And many of
00:39:54.280 these people are not very reflective about, you know, the human condition, right? They're not living
00:39:58.400 necessarily examined lives because they, there's not much of a reason to, but they're just, you know,
00:40:04.200 they get up in the morning and they're just stoked to be alive. And you can, you can, you know,
00:40:09.220 if you get enough of the, the conditions for ordinary levels of happiness together,
00:40:15.300 and you're lucky enough to be able to maintain them fairly effortlessly, right? You're, you're,
00:40:20.620 you're wealthy and you're healthy and you're surrounded by happy, creative people who want the
00:40:25.800 best for you. And you're just by, by dint of good luck, people close to you haven't died. And you
00:40:31.780 have, you know, you haven't suffered any collision with reality. Then yeah, you can, you can be
00:40:38.200 conventionally very happy and still be talking to yourself all the time and not notice it. But
00:40:45.060 there's significant limitation even to that when you do develop this more refined way of noticing what
00:40:56.120 it's like to be you, which is what we're calling meditation. It's not that learning this, having
00:41:03.300 insight into the mechanics of your own suffering and the mediocrity of kind of ordinary transient
00:41:09.520 states of, of pleasure. It's not that that is at bottom incompatible with living an ordinary,
00:41:18.500 fulfilled, pleasure-seeking life. I mean, you can enjoy dinner just as much having learned to meditate
00:41:23.580 as, you know, anyone who's gluttonously attached to sensory experience without, without any kind of
00:41:30.240 metacognition about, you know, what's going on. But the difference comes in how you respond to
00:41:38.280 problems that arise. I mean, it's actually both, right? I mean, I think that mindfulness clearly
00:41:44.640 makes it easier to endure unpleasant things. So, you know, I, I was late to come over here today because
00:41:51.580 the, to get to your place, which should have been an hour, took two hours. And that is normally
00:41:58.080 something that would drive me bat shit crazy just by, by way of process. Like, why is it so
00:42:06.140 inefficient? Like, why are there so many cars on the road? Blah, blah. Like I would get into a woe is
00:42:10.680 me narrative about this, which is of course ironic because like, why am I more special than every other
00:42:16.560 car on this road, right? Like everyone is equally in the same situation of it's taking two hours to
00:42:22.420 get somewhere that it should take one hour. And I actually, I have used traffic because when you
00:42:29.180 live in Southern California and split your time in New York, you get plenty of exposure to traffic.
00:42:34.400 I've actually used this as an amazing tool for mindfulness and I no longer let it really get to
00:42:40.300 me. Instead, I just sort of observe, Oh look, you're feeling a little bit self-important today.
00:42:46.340 Like you're feeling like your time is more valuable than everybody else's time. Let's examine that.
00:42:50.300 Is that really true? Not really. Okay. What is happening in this exact moment? The sun is shining
00:42:55.560 this way or, you know, all these other things. So, so in many ways, if nothing else, it's simply a hack
00:43:00.360 to allow me to be less miserable. Yeah. Yeah. But on the flip side, I actually do think there is a way
00:43:06.540 to enjoy certain moments more. And, and I've certainly noticed this the most with my kids.
00:43:12.080 I think that, you know, I have a, our middle son who's four, you know, he's just, that's what four,
00:43:18.460 like a four-year-old boy is just going to be more prone to chewing up the air in the room when it comes
00:43:23.160 to doing bad stuff. And I find that, and to be clear, there are not all days that I can do this.
00:43:28.820 There are some days when he's acting crazy that it just drives me nuts. But more often than not,
00:43:34.000 I'm sort of able to actually reflect on it pleasantly and think about like, what's happening
00:43:38.600 in this moment, right? Okay. He's, he's yelling, he's screaming, he's throwing a temper tantrum.
00:43:43.820 He's hit his brother. He's done this. He's done that. But in this moment, is there anything that's
00:43:48.320 really that bad about any of these things? I mean, like, it's not like he's going to be doing this
00:43:51.720 when he goes to college. Like, what am I really worried about here? Yeah. And in fact, I can turn
00:43:56.440 that into a positive thing, which is one day he will be in college and he won't be a cute little
00:44:01.200 four-year-old who loves me so much. Yeah. You'll miss this moment. Yeah. I'll miss this
00:44:05.080 moment. So, so I have found that, again, I use the word hack because I, it's such an inelegant
00:44:10.600 way to describe it, but it's basically a tool to make me a little bit more aware of where I am in
00:44:17.340 a given moment. And whether that produces happiness or not, I mean, I sort of agree with you. The
00:44:21.360 semantics of happiness are too cumbersome for me to explain. You know, people have talked about the
00:44:26.960 happiness is simply the difference between reality and expectation. I mean, that's a bit
00:44:31.360 vague for me. I'm not smart enough to fully understand what that means, though. I understand
00:44:34.920 the concept, but clearly there's some component of expecting the world to be a certain way and it not
00:44:40.280 being that way, producing an emotional state or a valence that is negative one way or the other.
00:44:45.880 And, and, and so I think while as, as, as wonderful as mindfulness is to offset that,
00:44:50.840 there is this moment at times of taking a bite of food and rather than thinking about the next bite
00:44:57.300 or what you're going to eat later, like actually thinking, you know, or observing the sensations as
00:45:03.580 they're occurring in that moment, kind of slowing things down in a way. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Cause I
00:45:08.480 don't know why I just tend to always live in a fast forward mode. That is my default is to be
00:45:13.360 full fast forward. Well, it's, it's most people's default. I always say it's everyone's default.
00:45:18.220 Who's not being mindful because you're, you're constantly, even when you're getting what you
00:45:23.920 want, even when you're in the very act of gratifying a desire, you're still subtly inclining
00:45:30.780 toward the next moment. You're not actually landing on each moment of experience with full attention.
00:45:39.500 And paradoxically, you can discover that many of the things you think you want, you don't want all
00:45:47.500 that much. If you pay attention to what it's actually like to gratify those desires. With food,
00:45:52.880 this is very clear. So you can be eating something, you can think you want dessert, you can have a real
00:45:57.520 sweet tooth. And if you pay very close attention to what it's like to eat that sweet thing, you're
00:46:05.840 finally gorging on, more often than not, you discover it's just a little too sweet. There's something
00:46:13.420 about it that is unpleasant. And your pleasure in that moment is predicated on your being able to
00:46:21.120 take a drink of water in the next, right? Like if you have to buy it a candy bar or something,
00:46:25.100 this candy that's made for kids delivers this insight to me very clearly. It's like the moment I,
00:46:30.020 I think I want something, you know, at the movies, whatever it is, a, you know, M&Ms or something that
00:46:36.100 hasn't changed its formula for the last 40 years. And I'm eating it. And I begin to notice that I'm
00:46:43.920 eating more of it as a way of just getting rid of getting rid of the sense in your palate. Yeah.
00:46:49.320 The last moment of taste that is just too chemical laden, too sweet. And, you know, if I didn't have a
00:46:55.860 drink of water, you know, this, this would actually be an unpleasant experience. And it's not what it
00:47:01.720 seems when you're not paying attention. And this is not to say that there's nothing that's truly
00:47:06.240 pleasurable. I mean, there's all kinds of pleasure. And again, being able to really connect with the
00:47:12.000 present moment delivers its own intrinsic pleasure. But your sense of what matters can definitely change
00:47:20.800 the moment you begin to pay closer attention to, to what experience is actually like.
00:47:27.860 I think it was in one of your lessons, but it might've been in a podcast where you
00:47:31.700 talk about, imagine you're playing a video game and it's the same video game every time.
00:47:38.380 And you always get killed by the same monster at the same part of the maze or whatever it is.
00:47:44.080 And I think about that a lot every time I falter at predictably, you know, known, understood things
00:47:52.480 that get under my skin. And it's very discouraging, right? It's sort of like a, there are like a dozen
00:47:57.080 things that I just know if they happen. So, I mean, one of them is,
00:48:01.700 there's certain types of questions that if I'm asked really irk me. You know, when people ask
00:48:06.520 questions that are, to which the answer is very complicated, but they ask through the lens of
00:48:12.580 just give me the one word answer, that just irks me. Like, I don't know why it just bugs the shit
00:48:17.500 out of me. And I know that. And yet over and over again, I find myself getting upset when that happens.
00:48:25.140 Right. And I feel like the guy that you're describing in the video game.
00:48:27.960 You're losing the boss fight at the same place every time.
00:48:30.520 Every single time. I know where the boogeyman is. I know what weapon he's going to use to kill me.
00:48:36.140 And I just walk over there and out comes the machete and I'm dead.
00:48:40.380 And then I'm back to the starting block again. And I've won fewer lives in the game, right?
00:48:46.140 But you can recover faster each time you lose. Getting angry is not the measure of having lost,
00:48:54.060 right? Obviously, you can aspire to a time where you never get angry again, or you never get angry
00:48:59.800 in certain circumstances again. But the real practice is to notice as early as possible what's
00:49:08.860 happening and to let go of it. The difference between being angry for 10 minutes and 10 seconds
00:49:15.520 and one second, those factors of 10 are enormous, right? And I have the same thing going on where
00:49:24.600 anger is something that I very frequently feel. And I also notice that it totally contaminates the
00:49:31.980 experience of people around me. So I have my wife and my daughters and my anger for them is clearly
00:49:38.340 toxic. And I have this commitment to letting go of it the moment I can let go of it. And again,
00:49:45.480 it's not that anger is never warranted. The energy of anger can be useful. Someone's attacking you
00:49:50.980 on the sidewalk, you know, and you're in a self-defense situation. That's not the moment
00:49:55.420 where I would say, get rid of all your anger as quickly as possible, right? I mean, there are
00:49:59.560 situations where you want to use that energy. But for the most part, you want to let go of it very,
00:50:05.860 very quickly and then be in a position to decide what's what and whether or not it's appropriate
00:50:11.900 to take some kind of confrontational path, whatever it is, by email or say the thing that would convey
00:50:19.940 your displeasure or whatever. But now I have my wife and my daughters as a kind of feedback mechanism
00:50:27.940 for me because they know my commitment. They know I can let go of anger on demand and they know I want
00:50:34.520 to and they don't like my anger, right? And they detect it in the subtlest way. So like, I mean,
00:50:42.140 it's not, it's not even anger where a normal person would classically think he was angry.
00:50:48.600 They don't have to wait till you raise your voice. They can see the mannerisms in
00:50:52.260 the way you might move or the way your answers become shorter or something like that.
00:50:57.800 Yeah. Or it may just, so, but like, you know, even mild frustration gets scored as, you know,
00:51:04.300 a kind of crazy level of anger, right? So like, if I, you know, if I say, wait a minute, I thought
00:51:09.060 the plumber was coming today. That's like, you know, that, you know, that's a four alarm fire,
00:51:14.540 right? So one of my daughters will say, Ooh, daddy's getting angry. Right. And they'll say that
00:51:19.540 it's so early now. And it's fantastic because it's, I just let go of it way earlier than I used
00:51:26.480 to. But if you can't be mindful, you actually have no choice. You know, you just, you will be
00:51:32.300 angry as long as you're angry. And the people around you who don't like it just have to figure
00:51:39.380 out somehow to put up with you. It's not that there's no other hacks. There are many other hacks.
00:51:46.120 And sometimes, sometimes there it's important to have a hack that is more global than being
00:51:52.520 simply being relentlessly mindful of everything that's coming up for you. Like a different
00:51:56.120 understanding of a situation can offer some kind of firmware update to the whole operating
00:52:04.160 system. And then you, you just simply don't go there anymore. So for instance, I mean, so
00:52:10.460 you're, you're driving in traffic. There are many hacks for that, but one hack is just,
00:52:14.340 you discover that you've got 400 hours of podcasts you want to listen to, and you're listening
00:52:19.960 to a great one and you, you're just, you're just happy to be listening. And the fact that
00:52:23.680 you're delayed an extra half hour or whatever is fine, you know, and that's a totally useful
00:52:29.780 hack, right? It modulates your state. You're, you're just, you're just discovering the silver
00:52:34.100 lining to something that's, that would otherwise be negative.
00:52:36.800 I'll, I'll share with you another one. Cause I agree with that completely. That's a great one.
00:52:39.780 The other one that I've taken on in the past year that has had surprising efficacy is any
00:52:46.260 customer service experience you have that is profoundly negative. And if you fly as much as
00:52:52.060 I do, you're pretty much guaranteed one of those a week. My friend, Jay Walker, who knows a lot
00:52:57.360 about the aviation industry said one out of six experiences with us aviation is a customer service
00:53:03.680 failure. Right. So anyone who flies would agree with that. But so the next time, like the flight
00:53:09.140 attendant's rude to you or the TSA person is sweating you or being obnoxious or whatever,
00:53:14.380 if you instead take a view of empathy, which is, God, this is a really hard job. You know,
00:53:22.460 I mean, like I have the privilege of getting to be, you know, intellectually engaged and doing all
00:53:27.320 of these things and boom, boom, boom. But this is a really hard job. I mean, most of the people
00:53:31.360 that they're encountering are on some level dissatisfied. Nobody's showing up to, to their
00:53:36.780 world happy. And so like simply taking that posture completely changes the way you interact
00:53:43.680 with that system. Yeah. And it's interesting because it doesn't even really require a huge
00:53:48.120 mindfulness insight. It's just sort of a, but it's a, it's a condition you want to walk in the
00:53:53.340 situation with, right? You want to be able to walk in with that in your mind. Yeah. It's a framing
00:53:57.220 effect. Yeah. Yeah. And it doesn't entail mindfulness at all. You could get the benefit
00:54:02.540 of that new framing without ever having heard of mindfulness. So you, you know, if you do get
00:54:07.160 angry, you'll be as angry as, as you ever were, but you have a different way of thinking about it.
00:54:12.820 Yeah. The combination of these is powerful. Yeah. When I think about one of the most difficult
00:54:17.480 things to, there are two things in my life that I have learned that I think were very difficult and
00:54:22.960 took a lot of time. The first was in the year 2000, when I was finishing medical school, I had a
00:54:28.880 really bad back injury and it's a long story, but it basically for a year of my life, I was not able
00:54:37.980 to move properly. And for three months I was not able to move at all. Wow. How'd that happen?
00:54:45.120 It's not clear how it happened, but what happened was a pretty bad outcome. And I ended up having
00:54:52.520 surgery, but the surgeon operated on the wrong side. So it went from a very bad situation to a
00:54:57.080 worse situation and a whole series of cascading events led to it being what it was. I look back
00:55:05.720 at that as I've described as before as the best worst experience of my life, because having been
00:55:11.340 in so much pain for so long, I had to learn how to do everything from scratch. So I had to learn how
00:55:16.820 to be able to brush my teeth without putting stress on my back, which most people wouldn't even think
00:55:22.160 about. You wouldn't think that there's a right and a wrong way to brush your teeth. You wouldn't
00:55:25.720 think that there's a right and a wrong way to get out of your bed, put your shoes on, or get out of
00:55:28.920 your car. It turns out there is, but you can only learn it when you are in such a fragile state that
00:55:34.040 you've lost every ounce of strength in your back. And because I experienced that for so long, a year,
00:55:41.300 it allowed me to make this transition, which I want to, of course, apply to meditation. The transition is
00:55:46.520 going from being unconsciously incompetent to then being consciously incompetent to then consciously
00:55:54.760 competent. And of course, the goal is to one day get to a point where you were unconsciously
00:55:59.280 competent. I don't think I'm unconsciously competent at a single thing I do, including movement,
00:56:03.960 but I'm now consciously competent at moving around and not hurting my back. But I couldn't have got there
00:56:11.200 if I didn't have that feedback loop that allowed me to go through it.
00:56:14.280 The other thing was learning how to swim as an adult. You know, you throw an adult in the water
00:56:19.120 who's never swum before, they are so incompetent, but they don't even really understand what it is.
00:56:24.640 And so the first act of learning how to swim is learning to feel what's making you sink,
00:56:30.600 figuring out what it is that is actually dropping you to the bottom of the pool. And then, of course,
00:56:35.980 you want to be able to correct that. And with great effort over short periods of time,
00:56:39.300 exercise some capacity to fix that. I would say those two experiences have been by far the most
00:56:46.340 difficult, but they pale in comparison to mindfulness. Now, I don't know if that just
00:56:51.280 makes me a hard case, but, and maybe it's, you know, the other thing I was thinking about when I
00:56:56.800 was reflecting on this is having a back injury, you don't get a time, you don't get a time out from it.
00:57:02.380 You know, it's every minute of every day, you're immersed in that exposure, that stimulus, and that
00:57:08.180 feedback loop. Similarly, once I dedicated myself to swimming, I swam four hours a day.
00:57:14.760 And I think maybe the issue is because I don't meditate for four hours a day, it's just going
00:57:20.100 to take a lot longer to do it. And I know you and I have spoken about this and your belief is that
00:57:24.720 something really happens when you go on a silent retreat. And I remember once asking you, I said,
00:57:30.480 hey, Sam, I see this retreat, it's four days, do you think I should go? And you actually said,
00:57:33.920 no, I wouldn't go for a four-day retreat. I'd wait till you can do 10 or 14 days.
00:57:38.900 Yeah, I guess I would modify that slightly. I think a week to 10 days is the shortest I can
00:57:46.540 recommend without caveat. I think the first three days or so of a retreat are more or less the
00:57:51.840 hardest for a retreat of any length. So if you do a three-day retreat or a four-day retreat,
00:57:56.620 you're almost guaranteed to have a lot of restlessness and just resistance to the whole
00:58:04.140 project. And you may not touch anything on the other side of that. You can just be kind of unhappy
00:58:11.240 the whole time and then just relieved to be getting off retreat. Whereas if you have 10 days,
00:58:17.740 just seems like an eternity. Once you put yourself on retreat and you've just shut down your connection
00:58:23.260 to everything, there's no talking, there's no writing, there's no reading. It's just you and
00:58:28.600 your attention in each moment. 10 days seems like an eternity. And so as you move through those first
00:58:37.840 few days of resistance, at day three, you're still so far away from the day that you're going home
00:58:44.960 that it's much more common to just surrender at that point and really get into it. Just decide that
00:58:51.980 you'll just pick up your life as you left it when you get off retreat. And that for this period,
00:58:59.180 there's just nothing worth thinking about. You just need to pay attention to whatever's appearing,
00:59:07.120 your breath, sounds, the movement of air on your hand as you walk.
00:59:11.560 Your first experience in this was sort of comical the way you describe it, right?
00:59:16.920 This was when you were 16, I believe?
00:59:19.420 Oh, no. Well, that was my first experience of solitude that I guess it would have been a retreat,
00:59:24.420 but I was on Outward Bound and the Outward Bound, I assume they still have it. But back then they had
00:59:29.760 something called the Solo, which was three, it was a 23 day period of camping and hiking and kind of
00:59:37.580 outdoorsmanship. But maybe day 18 or so, they put you in isolation for three full days where you would
00:59:46.520 fast and do nothing, right? So you couldn't go hiking and do anything that would distract you. And
00:59:52.800 I think that the reason for that was not based on any meditative agenda that they had. It was just
00:59:58.740 they don't want a bunch of not fully trained people wandering around the wilderness while fasted. So
01:00:05.540 they just park you
01:00:07.500 in some place. We were by this lake at maybe 9,000 feet and
01:00:13.720 you just camp with a water bottle
01:00:16.680 and
01:00:17.800 that's all you got. You just have your sleeping bag, your water bottle, and you have a journal.
01:00:21.300 Yeah, you can write in your journal. And I found the experience just intolerable. It was just...
01:00:28.500 You were 16?
01:00:29.180 Yeah, I was 16. And yeah, so I opened my book Waking Up With This Story because it was the first moment
01:00:35.140 in my life that I realized that I was on the wrong side of some understanding about the nature of my own
01:00:44.060 mind and the possibility of finding a durable source of happiness in this life. So I was alone in
01:00:52.880 an absolutely beautiful spot and totally miserable based on the fact that I didn't have any of the
01:01:01.300 usual distractions. And if you could have just swapped places with me and inhabited my consciousness,
01:01:07.960 I was spending all my time
01:01:10.860 fantasizing about the things I was going to do when I got off, when I got out of those goddamn
01:01:16.140 mountains and got back to my life in the world. And, you know, the friends I would see and the foods I
01:01:21.700 would eat and I would just... It was just a continuous advertisement for everything that I missed.
01:01:29.240 You know, it was just... It was like a meditation on loneliness and boredom and grief, ultimately. I just...
01:01:36.780 It was just to be separated from everyone I cared about and every fun thing I could do and every tasty
01:01:43.000 thing I could eat. It was just a source of perfect misery for me. So when I came off the solo and met all of
01:01:49.520 the other people who had also been on their solos, I was astonished to discover that many of them had had
01:01:57.140 profoundly happy experiences, right? And that...
01:02:01.060 Were you one of the youngest people on this?
01:02:02.560 Yeah. Yeah. So I was... I think I was the youngest. So it was... I think the cutoff... I don't know if
01:02:07.180 this is still the case, but the cutoff for Outward Bound was 16 and a half and I was just 16 and a half.
01:02:14.280 So, you know, there were lots of people who were 10 years older or so. And so they were in different
01:02:18.720 places in their lives and many of them just had a kind of breakthrough experience. I mean, they just...
01:02:24.980 It was just some of the best time they'd ever spent alive. And so they were kind of radiantly
01:02:30.200 happy, you know, for... Because we had just done 18 or so days of brutal hiking. I mean, just, you know,
01:02:38.400 kind of just 14-hour days of hiking with 60-pound packs. And, you know, we had this full ordeal of
01:02:45.120 learning how to function in the backcountry. And then it all stops and you're just alone by this
01:02:54.180 alpine lake. So many of them had come out of that feeling that they had touched something profound
01:03:00.420 and I had no idea what they were talking about. It was like being told, you know, I just got,
01:03:05.840 you know, run over by a car and it was the greatest thing that's ever happened to me. It's like,
01:03:08.880 I mean, I had come out of there having had a harrowing experience, right?
01:03:13.820 So what happened when you went back home after that? Did you look back and reflect on that? Or
01:03:18.480 does that basically just become a footnote into a broader story that really didn't factor into
01:03:24.060 your ultimate search for, you know, call it enlightenment, call it what you want?
01:03:31.840 It took a little time. It was probably a year and a half before I then had an experience with
01:03:39.320 with psychedelics that put all of this in perspective for me. So...
01:03:43.980 And was your first experience with psilocybin or LSD?
01:03:47.660 Strangely, I had taken psilocybin as a teenager before I had what really was the kind of breakthrough
01:03:55.840 experience for me on MDMA when I was 18.
01:03:58.560 Yeah, you wrote about that as well.
01:04:01.580 Yeah, yeah, that's in Waking Up. I had taken psilocybin, I smoked marijuana and I had taken
01:04:08.880 mushrooms a few times as a teenager and they never, they never signaled anything profound to me about
01:04:17.200 the nature of the mind or they never indicated a path forward apart from just this sense that
01:04:24.980 these drugs produced interesting experiences. I had no framing for what I experienced on these drugs.
01:04:32.440 In other words, you experienced the altered state, but there was no altered trait to borrow from the
01:04:37.220 title of the same book.
01:04:38.660 Yeah, and also just no sense that there could be altered traits. There was no project associated with
01:04:46.740 changing your experience in that way. It was just, you know, it was kind of fun. I guess,
01:04:51.720 some of the experiences had also been unpleasant on psilocybin, but it's just, these were drug
01:04:58.440 experiences, you know, and it was like getting drunk. Like if you get drunk, you don't come away
01:05:04.480 from that experience thinking, I wonder if this indicates that it's possible to feel, kind of
01:05:10.460 natively feel like I've had six beers and, you know, I can just be more that sort of person by some
01:05:16.740 other method that has nothing to do with drinking beer all the time, right? But with MDMA, you know,
01:05:24.360 my first experience on ecstasy, I had this epiphany that this is what consciousness was like
01:05:31.980 when it was no longer encumbered by my self-concern, by my egocentricity, by my...
01:05:39.460 And because you were 18, I mean, was it so much about, like, I'm trying to reflect on what it was
01:05:44.580 like to be an 18-year-old boy, but I think if I recall, you wrote about just sort of the empathy
01:05:50.760 that you had for your friend, because it was you and another friend, right?
01:05:53.660 Yeah.
01:05:54.400 And was that the part that was so stunning to you, which was, oh my God, like,
01:05:58.900 I've spent the last 18 years sort of not thinking about it through somebody else's eyes,
01:06:02.920 or what was it that you experienced, if you can recall, that at least showed you, or perhaps
01:06:08.400 was the thin end of the wedge that said, there is now an altered state of consciousness that
01:06:14.200 could exist outside of this state that I'm in that might be desirable?
01:06:19.660 It was a recognition that what was changing for me while I was coming on to the drug was that
01:06:30.740 I was losing my concern about myself, right?
01:06:35.380 So I'm talking to my best friend, somebody who I already love and am connected to and have,
01:06:42.700 you know, positive feelings for, but what was happening is that I started to punch through
01:06:49.260 to this level of connection with him that I had never felt before, despite the fact that
01:06:55.180 we were great friends and it had a kind of structure to it, or it was, it was dissecting
01:07:02.580 a structure within my mind that I had never had any cause to notice, which was my default
01:07:10.220 state was normally that, you know, if I'm talking to him, some amount of my attention is bound
01:07:18.120 up in a concern about what he thinks about me, right?
01:07:22.640 So, you know, if I see some change in expression on his face based on what I just said, I'm
01:07:30.120 reading into those changes some message about me, some message about how I'm doing.
01:07:36.140 And there are many other features to this.
01:07:38.920 I mean, there's also a sense of a kind of zero-sum aspect to my own stature in the world
01:07:48.460 and my, you know, feeling of well-being in light of other people's success and happiness.
01:07:55.060 So, and this is something you can discover in yourself.
01:07:57.800 Imagine those times where you have a friend who has some, you know, massive success, right?
01:08:03.720 You know, you're struggling in your life to be as successful as you want to be.
01:08:07.620 If you're like most people, you haven't arrived yet.
01:08:10.480 And then you have a friend, you know, who's winning some version of the lottery.
01:08:15.080 And when this is being communicated to you, you're asked to celebrate with them, essentially.
01:08:20.200 And you can discover in yourself a kind of begrudging feeling, whether it's envy or there's
01:08:26.620 a limitation on your capacity to experience what's called sympathetic joy in Buddhism for
01:08:32.200 that person.
01:08:33.520 And that's an ugly characteristic of the mind.
01:08:36.780 I mean, here's someone who you ostensibly really care about.
01:08:39.860 This is someone you really love.
01:08:41.280 This is someone who you think...
01:08:42.600 And their windfall did not come at your expense.
01:08:45.020 Right, exactly.
01:08:45.500 And yet you, there's something in you that can't actually celebrate for them fully because
01:08:51.180 you're so bound up with who you are and what you want for yourself and, you know, how you
01:08:56.820 think they may think about you.
01:08:59.620 And I mean, this horror show of self-reference and this miserly spirit with respect to the
01:09:07.820 circumstance you're in with everyone.
01:09:09.940 So what happened on, in this first MDMA trip is that I just punched through all of that,
01:09:17.360 right?
01:09:17.520 All of that was just gone.
01:09:19.240 And there was no associated inebriation.
01:09:23.680 I mean, it was just, my experience wasn't just...
01:09:25.280 That's the thing with MDMA that makes it sort of quite distinct and special from some of
01:09:29.240 these other agents, right?
01:09:30.240 Is there is no sense of altered consciousness.
01:09:33.120 Yeah, it can be kind of speedy and it also depends on whether you're getting pure MDMA.
01:09:39.140 If you're talking pure MDMA versus, yeah, yeah, of course, when they cut it with stimulants,
01:09:42.820 it's a different story.
01:09:43.740 But really, pure MDMA doesn't seem to really alter your consciousness in any way.
01:09:47.660 Yeah.
01:09:47.840 In the way that, you know, LSD would, for example.
01:09:49.780 Right, yeah.
01:09:50.060 I mean, there's no...
01:09:51.040 It's not considered really a psychedelic.
01:09:53.520 It doesn't have any of those visionary or hallucinatory qualities.
01:09:57.320 Yeah, it's referred to more as an empathogen versus an entheogen, correct?
01:10:00.000 Yeah, yeah.
01:10:01.700 So having lost all that, I just, I recognized that, one, just how much I loved him and how
01:10:10.100 that was synonymous with wanting him to be happy.
01:10:15.460 And in some basic sense, his happiness would be my own, right?
01:10:18.260 So the capacity for envy would just completely went out the window.
01:10:21.380 There's just no way to feel a zero-sum contest with somebody who you love in that way.
01:10:27.100 But then I recognized that if a stranger had walked into the room at that moment,
01:10:32.500 literally, the mailman shows up, I would have felt the same way about him.
01:10:37.180 It was not contingent upon having had a history with this person.
01:10:41.360 I was in a state where I wanted all beings to have their dreams realized.
01:10:48.440 I wish nothing but happiness on every conscious system, right?
01:10:52.800 Effortlessly.
01:10:53.300 Let me pause for a moment so you can explain the neurobiology of that.
01:10:56.840 I've experienced it as well with MDMA.
01:10:59.700 And I find it to be the most joyous state I've ever experienced to have such, I don't possess,
01:11:11.780 I don't, unlike you, I don't have the vocabulary to even describe what it feels like other than
01:11:15.780 to just say you love everybody in, obviously, a very non-sexual way.
01:11:22.340 It's just male, female are all the same.
01:11:25.960 It sort of becomes this, you just want the best for everyone.
01:11:30.480 So what is it about the neurobiology or neurochemistry that can produce that state?
01:11:38.380 And I'll tell you what the follow-up question is going to be.
01:11:41.480 Is there anything we can do outside of taking that drug to even get part of that?
01:11:47.440 Well, yeah, unfortunately, I don't know the answer to the neurobiology.
01:11:50.980 I'm not sure it is known.
01:11:52.660 I think most of these drugs are serotonergic, but they clearly are different.
01:12:00.540 Which subset of the receptors they're hitting is, we don't exactly understand the causal
01:12:05.000 relationship between the receptor being...
01:12:07.400 Yeah.
01:12:08.140 I mean, and I'm, you know, frankly, I'm not up on the literature on MDMA, so there may
01:12:11.600 be some clues that I'm not aware of.
01:12:14.300 But, and I would also add the caveat that some of these drugs, I think there's reason to be
01:12:20.200 concerned about in terms of the physical effects of taking them too often or...
01:12:24.620 So MDMA is something that was profoundly useful for me.
01:12:28.600 I remain somewhat concerned that it is potentially neurotoxic.
01:12:33.760 I wouldn't want to take too much of it.
01:12:35.520 I haven't taken it for years.
01:12:36.980 And I have much less of a concern for other psychedelics.
01:12:42.200 I think LSD is, I mean, there's no evidence that it's neurotoxic, for instance.
01:12:46.840 Having spoken with people, psychiatrists who have taken care of patients who have probably
01:12:53.900 taken too much MDMA, the two things that I have learned from them, which echo what you're
01:12:59.820 saying is, yeah, it's generally safe, but it's very important.
01:13:04.320 Like any drug, I mean, these aren't regulated compounds, right?
01:13:06.940 So you're always running a risk when you take these things of other things that the drug
01:13:12.880 is cut with.
01:13:14.040 And there's toxicity that can be amplified as a result of that.
01:13:16.840 And the second thing that I've been told is anything over a frequency of about every
01:13:24.720 three months, and you start to run a risk of these serotonergic toxicities down the line.
01:13:32.400 So, you know, you can take that for what it's worth.
01:13:35.420 I mean, I'm certainly not providing guidance on that other than to echo your point that I
01:13:40.920 think one has to be very careful with these agents.
01:13:42.960 Now, at the same time, I'm not following the work of MAPS that closely.
01:13:46.840 So I'm not sure what doses or frequencies they're using with the vets that they're studying.
01:13:52.800 Yeah.
01:13:53.380 And I think the-
01:13:54.720 So presumably they've worked out some of these kinks as well.
01:13:57.100 Yeah.
01:13:57.580 But frankly, it would be worth it even if it were neurotoxic to some degree in the right
01:14:03.600 conditions for the right person.
01:14:04.880 If you had debilitating PTSD, maybe a little bit of long-term consequence or short-term toxicity
01:14:10.000 is worth it to cure that.
01:14:11.740 But, you know.
01:14:13.380 So then back to the second question, which is, when you think about that profound empathy
01:14:18.000 in that moment that you had at the age of 18, has your meditative practice, which has
01:14:23.020 obviously evolved greatly since then, allowed you to either transiently or otherwise experience
01:14:29.580 or re-experience that phenomenon?
01:14:31.100 Yeah.
01:14:31.780 Well, there is a practice that targets that mental status.
01:14:35.040 Actually, I mentioned it earlier.
01:14:36.740 Yeah.
01:14:36.820 Yeah.
01:14:37.260 Metta practice.
01:14:38.360 And metta is the Pali word for loving kindness.
01:14:40.420 And, yeah, there are people who do that practice almost exclusively or almost exclusively.
01:14:47.840 So describe it a little bit for the listener.
01:14:50.260 Unlike mindfulness, where you are letting go of any agenda you have for what your experience
01:14:57.160 should be, and you're just reconciling yourself to noticing however it is.
01:15:03.480 And if you do that, your experience does change in reliable ways, many of which are quite pleasant.
01:15:08.980 They can be amazingly pleasant, but it's not about securing those changes or amplifying
01:15:16.320 those changes.
01:15:17.120 Because insofar as that creeps in, you're not being mindful.
01:15:22.060 You're doing something other than merely witnessing what's happening.
01:15:25.900 And doing that is an expression of your own desire and attachment.
01:15:30.120 And you're trying to change your experience.
01:15:32.520 And that's different than simply being mindful of it.
01:15:37.520 But with a practice like metta, you do have a goal.
01:15:41.900 You're trying to feel this feeling of loving kindness as intensely as you can feel it, as
01:15:47.260 durably as you can feel it.
01:15:49.500 And you're trying to acquire a state change.
01:15:54.000 But you're also trying to acquire a trait change in that your default attitude toward other
01:15:59.500 human beings or even any other conscious system would be just well-wishing and good vibes.
01:16:08.400 And there's no question you can train that attitude.
01:16:12.520 And it comes from both a framing effect and from an immersion in this change of state that
01:16:20.060 you can kindle in meditation and then keep humming along based on concentration.
01:16:25.960 So the same kind of concept, the same faculty of mind that could become one-pointedly focused
01:16:32.120 on a mantra or a sight like a candle flame can become one-pointedly immersed in the feeling
01:16:41.920 of love for all humanity.
01:16:43.880 And it's initiated by thinking thoughts about other people.
01:16:51.640 So you'll just imagine someone who you love.
01:16:54.980 And it's important that this not be contaminated with your notion of romantic love, because so
01:17:00.660 much of what we think of as love in a romantic context is desire and attachment.
01:17:05.300 And it's not the same.
01:17:06.620 Is there a child an appropriate object of that type of attention?
01:17:10.540 Yeah.
01:17:11.160 A child, a friend, a parent, whoever in your life, you can have just as uncomplicated an
01:17:20.500 experience of wishing this person well, wishing them to be free of suffering, wishing them happiness.
01:17:26.760 And the usual progression is to start with someone like that, who you know, who's someone who's
01:17:31.600 close to you, and then transition to a neutral person, you know, someone who you have no,
01:17:38.000 just kind of a randomly picked person from the crowd or some public figure who you have
01:17:43.120 no strong association with, but who you can visualize.
01:17:46.140 And then you're wishing that person happiness, wishing that they be free of suffering.
01:17:50.960 You're actually thinking these thoughts in your mind as a kind of, almost as a kind of mantra,
01:17:55.680 but you're not, it's not the sound of the utterances, it's the import of them that you're trying
01:18:01.880 to connect with.
01:18:02.720 So you're thinking, may you be happy, may you be free from suffering.
01:18:08.260 You're reiterating this, you could have, you know, three or four ways of saying it, and
01:18:12.600 you're saying it over and over again, but then connecting with the actual kind of energetics
01:18:16.760 of the wish that you really do wish that this person who you love be free from suffering.
01:18:22.160 And it can become this very deep feeling of basking in this well of good intentions for
01:18:31.880 everybody, right?
01:18:33.120 Because then you can include not only a neutral person, but someone for whom you have a so-called
01:18:38.460 enemy, someone for whom you have a real negative association.
01:18:42.060 And then you begin to see the importance of framing around all these things.
01:18:46.640 So just like you said, for the customer service situation, maybe it just takes a second to realize,
01:18:51.240 wait a minute, here's a person who's been standing at this desk since six o'clock in the
01:18:56.500 morning, meeting one disgruntled person after the next, and now she or he has just met me.
01:19:03.100 Their experience is completely different from mine.
01:19:07.100 Which by the way, is a beautiful cut to the sort of issue that David Foster Wallace talks about so
01:19:12.640 much is every experience we have is only through our lens, right?
01:19:16.320 It's that insight alone, which now you're giving a very tangible example of, is so powerful just to
01:19:23.700 be able to hit pause on that for a moment and say, what you just said, right? This person's been
01:19:28.480 standing here for seven hours, seeing one pissed off face after another. What they're seeing now is
01:19:35.680 totally different from what I'm seeing.
01:19:37.220 Yeah, yeah. And your impatience isn't helping. And you are so glad that you're not in their shoes,
01:19:45.540 right? Like you don't want their job. You actually feel compassion for their experience, right?
01:19:52.040 And I mean, there are many, you know, hacks of this kind where you're driving in traffic and someone
01:19:57.480 cuts you off and, you know, your default experience is what an asshole. But it just takes a second to
01:20:05.280 realize, wait a minute, you have no idea what's going on with this person. You don't know if this
01:20:08.920 person is in a rush because they have some real emergency. You don't know if they're 90 years old.
01:20:16.580 Now you just honked at some 90 year old man or woman, right? And who's the asshole now? There's so
01:20:22.000 many changes of frame applied to the exact same experience, which just fundamentally change your
01:20:29.700 interpretation of it. A loving kindness practice is based on a fundamental frame change for more or
01:20:40.460 less everything you can encounter in human affairs, which is everyone is suffering. Everyone was once a
01:20:49.300 child condemned to now be the adult they now are, right? So like there is no evil person who invented
01:20:56.940 himself, right? There's no idea. And this is something I've talked about with respect to Saddam
01:21:01.680 Hussein in the past. I usually talk about this in the context of talking about free will, but
01:21:06.220 I mean, just look at someone like the prototypical evil person, you know, Saddam Hussein is about as good
01:21:11.260 as it gets, right? So you look at him as a 40 year old man. He's just a terrifyingly evil sociopath who,
01:21:18.940 if you're in favor of the death penalty, it definitely applies to him. But you roll back his
01:21:24.220 his lifeline by a few decades. And at a certain point, you say, okay, here's a 12 year old boy who
01:21:32.400 could have well been a scary 12 year old boy. But, you know, when he's four years old, he's a four
01:21:39.020 year old. And he's a four year old who has every strike against him in the sense that he's guaranteed,
01:21:46.920 it seems, to be a morally damaged human being. He's living in a society riven by sectarian conflict.
01:21:55.760 The norms to which he's being pushed, the aspirations he can form in this context,
01:22:02.520 are barbaric by any standard, you know, ethical standard that we would form today, right? And
01:22:08.880 the kind of person who can thrive in that context is someone who's morally damaged by our lives.
01:22:14.760 And he didn't pick his parents, he didn't pick his genes. He's not the author of himself. And yet
01:22:20.600 he's going to become this evil person who, you know, half the world or more will think is deserving
01:22:26.820 of death at the end of it. It's possible to feel compassion, even for someone like Saddam Hussein.
01:22:33.160 You know, that's a reframing that may be hard for some people to get there. But for someone who's
01:22:37.420 practicing a state like Mehta, that's the frame. And if you can get there, you can recognize that
01:22:45.800 there is this capacity for love and well-wishing that really extends without limit to every conscious
01:22:52.940 system. And you want everyone to be relieved of all their problems on some basic level. Because the
01:23:00.740 most badly behaved people in the world are, for the most part, expressing their problems. Even when
01:23:09.260 you have a truly sadistic person who seems to be deriving pleasure from causing other people
01:23:15.860 suffering, and such people exist, what you're witnessing there is someone for whom all these
01:23:22.480 other sources of pleasure and well-being are basically unavailable, right? This person on some
01:23:28.000 level can't know what he's missing. You know, this is a person who's never going to have good
01:23:33.640 relationships of the sort that you and I would demand for ourselves and everyone we love as the
01:23:39.940 necessary ingredients of a life well-lived. It's not to say you wouldn't want to put this person in jail
01:23:44.520 because there is no cure for this problem. I'm not recommending that we not protect ourselves from
01:23:49.960 malevolent people, but you don't actually have to hate them. I mean, feeling compassion for these
01:23:55.460 people isn't incompatible with taking the steps we need to take to keep society orderly and safe.
01:24:02.600 You know, one thing I would recommend to anybody who's interested in pulling a little more on this
01:24:07.360 thread is to do a prison visit.
01:24:10.860 Yeah. I've never done that, but I heard you and Tim did that, right?
01:24:14.040 Tim and I did it, and I did a podcast with a guy named Corey McCarthy, who himself was incarcerated
01:24:19.460 for seven years for attempted murder and a bunch of other stuff. And, you know, there's a group of
01:24:25.300 three or four or five of us that actually went and spent a couple of days at a maximum security prison.
01:24:31.040 And we played this game there called Step to the Line, which I'm sure you've heard of. And it's,
01:24:36.120 you know, it's a game that's played in many reasons, but the purpose is always to basically
01:24:40.020 highlight our similarities and our differences. So on the one side of the line, we're all of these
01:24:43.700 inmates. Now we're in a maximum security prison in California. So everybody in that room, I don't
01:24:50.520 remember the exact numbers. I believe 70% of those men were serving life sentences. Some staggering
01:24:56.760 number of these guys were in there because of, you know, homicide or, you know, some, something more
01:25:02.000 than like they were trafficking some marijuana. Right. Right. And on the other side are all of us as
01:25:07.020 volunteers. And then the game begins of Step to the Line If. And some of the differences are so
01:25:14.460 humbling that it, it, you can't be a, you can't be a reasonable human being and be in that situation
01:25:20.040 and not be moved by it. You know, Step to the Line If you had two parents in your household and
01:25:25.880 amongst the volunteers, you know, maybe 60% step forward. And amongst the inmates, I think one step
01:25:31.460 forward, you know, Step to the Line If someone close to you died before you were 10, you know,
01:25:41.000 or died a violent death before you were 10, you know, these sorts of things. And, you know, Step
01:25:45.500 to the Line If you grew up in a home that had more than five books and those of us as volunteers, most of
01:25:51.340 us step forward of the inmates, you know, five step forward out of 50, that kind of thing. Right.
01:25:56.060 And it's to your point, right? It's like, we're, we're not going to excuse the mistakes that took
01:26:02.660 place. And there's, you know, society has said there's going to be a price that one has to pay
01:26:07.520 for one mistakes. But boy, you realize pretty quickly the randomness that allows you or me to
01:26:15.520 be standing on one side of that line and not the other. Oh, yeah. Yeah. No, if you were in precisely
01:26:20.940 that other person's situation, genetically, environmentally, you would be that other
01:26:26.960 person, right? There's just, there is no daylight between all of those causes and conditions and the
01:26:32.460 outcome. And even, even adding randomness, I mean, it's not, you know, quantum mechanics doesn't get
01:26:37.440 you out of this situation. And I think of all the times I've been lucky. Like when I was in eighth
01:26:42.640 grade, there was a kid that was a year ahead who was like my hero. You know, he was the absolute
01:26:47.820 toughest kid in the school. I mean, he was the bad, the bad-ass and he took me under his wing,
01:26:54.480 you know? So I was like really lucky to be the eighth grader who this super tough, bad-ass kid
01:26:59.560 really liked. And two years later, he wound up in jail for armed robbery. And I've often thought to
01:27:06.540 myself, I was so impressionable that if I had been with him on that night and he said, look, we're going
01:27:13.240 to go hold up a liquor store. Like, I'm not sure I would have had the common sense, the intestinal
01:27:18.320 fortitude, the whatever, the courage to say, dude, that's a bad idea. I'm not going to go.
01:27:23.900 Right.
01:27:23.960 It's so easy that I could have gone along for that.
01:27:26.940 Yeah.
01:27:27.240 And as I learned later on, once you get in that system, like, you know, once you're 16 years old
01:27:33.540 and you're pegged for armed robbery, like it's very hard to recover to Stanford.
01:27:37.900 Yeah. Yeah.
01:27:39.440 So, so, but that's a, that's a moment's decision. And the, and the luck is like, were you there or
01:27:43.680 not there?
01:27:44.340 Right.
01:27:45.360 And, and I'm, I'm, I have way more cards that are favorable in my deck than virtually all of
01:27:50.120 these guys I met. And I, yet I still could have easily slipped over that, you know, into that
01:27:56.120 abyss of that endless vicious cycle of one, one, one knock after another until before you know it,
01:28:02.560 like you're 40 years old and you're in prison for life.
01:28:04.800 Yeah. I mean, so the philosophical insight here goes by the name of moral luck. And so
01:28:12.200 I think it originates with an essay that the philosopher Thomas Nagel wrote probably 30 years
01:28:18.060 ago. We rarely recognize how morally significant differences in luck are and, and, and just how
01:28:26.780 lucky you need to be to live a good moral life. Any one of those things could have been
01:28:34.300 marginally different and you'd be the guy who was an accessory to armed robbery, right? I mean,
01:28:40.560 just think of how many times most of us have driven drunk or not a hundred percent and nothing bad
01:28:49.600 happened. The difference between nothing bad happening and killing somebody in a crosswalk
01:28:54.580 is enormous and just life deranging stranger still, because it's now, it's not even classed for most
01:29:02.640 people as a significant risk. They're running texting while driving. I mean, I would say most of
01:29:08.560 the people listening to this podcast have not totally shut down their texting while driving,
01:29:15.020 right? They're not, they're not even thinking of it as a grotesquely irresponsible thing to be doing,
01:29:20.860 right? I mean, because it's just, it's too tempting. You're at a red light, but being at a red light
01:29:25.580 migrates into the first hundred feet of your now responding to a green light. And then there's the
01:29:32.120 moments on the freeway. And then, and every day there's some totally normal, responsible, upstanding
01:29:38.640 person like you or me who kills somebody's kid in a crosswalk because they were texting. The
01:29:45.340 significance of that difference in luck, it's extraordinary. And, you know, these are,
01:29:50.980 these are unrecoverable errors most of the time. So there are two sides to that. One, it can get you to,
01:29:58.060 to take more care in all the spots where more care massively increases your odds of living a happy,
01:30:05.160 fulfilling life. But it also can give you this different framing that allows you to feel compassion
01:30:10.520 for even the worst people on earth, right? You can just, you should recognize that if you change
01:30:16.000 enough of the variables, you would be playing the same game they're playing. And this is, I think this
01:30:20.660 is so important, Sam. I don't think I understood how important this was until I read something you
01:30:27.400 wrote, which I'm paraphrasing, so I'll be bastardizing it. But the gist of it was, it's really the,
01:30:34.860 the caliber quality of our thoughts that determine the quality of our life. And I, so let's take a
01:30:41.140 most extreme example. I had a friend who was killed by a motorist who was texting. So he was on his
01:30:47.940 bike. He couldn't have been in a safer spot actually. And, um, but woman, you know, got distracted
01:30:56.560 for a moment and killed him. And I was angry in a way that sort of felt like it was never going to
01:31:05.820 go away. And truthfully, a big part of it was selfish. It was, I don't want this to happen to me
01:31:11.360 now. You know, I'm, I, at the time I was a cyclist, I was like, I'm sick and tired of seeing cyclists
01:31:16.800 get hit. And some of the times they're getting killed, but they're getting hit all the time.
01:31:20.860 Right. And it's, it always seems to be these, not always, but 90% of the time it's these distracted
01:31:24.740 drivers. Sometimes the cyclist just does something stupid, but for the most part, if you get hit,
01:31:29.760 if a road, if a cyclist on the road gets hit, the driver's usually at fault. Interestingly, unless
01:31:34.560 alcohol is involved, those drivers are never prosecuted. Right. And I spent so much time being
01:31:40.100 so pissed off. And part of it was just my own grandiosity. Like my life is too valuable. I'm not
01:31:46.060 going to die on the side of a road because some driver's too stupid to turn off their phone or blah,
01:31:50.100 blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. But then I, I had, you know, after kind of reading something you wrote,
01:31:56.280 I, I reflected on it years later and thought, I've never once asked myself what that person is going
01:32:01.800 through who killed Nick. Yeah. Yeah. What is her life like today? Cause there's no way she forgot that.
01:32:08.720 There's no way she doesn't go to bed at night and think about the fact that she, it's such a tragic
01:32:14.160 story. Not only did she kill a guy who's just a beautiful soul who had, you know, a bunch of children,
01:32:20.100 he was killed two days before his life insurance policy kicked in. He was killed on, uh, I believe
01:32:27.460 it was May 30th. No, it was May 31st. And he had a policy that didn't start until June 1st.
01:32:32.240 I mean, it's like, you couldn't make this story up. It's so tragic, but it's too easy to not reflect
01:32:38.380 on her pain. Yeah. Which you could say, well, Peter, that's ridiculous. She doesn't deserve
01:32:43.260 any empathy. Put all of that empathy towards Nick's family. But it, in the end, if I'm really
01:32:50.420 optimizing for my own quality of life, there's no upside to just being upset about this. Like there
01:32:58.100 is some benefit to accepting the fact that everybody here loses. And if that makes me less
01:33:03.880 angry and makes me hate that person less, isn't that a good way to think about things?
01:33:09.640 Well, yeah, but I would even put it more strongly because again, she, the driver was profoundly
01:33:16.460 unlucky because she was, she was guilty of doing something that everyone listening to this podcast
01:33:22.780 has done and didn't pay that price. Worse still, she's guilty of doing something that most of the
01:33:30.220 people listening to this podcast will continue to do even after hearing this podcast.
01:33:35.980 This is a reset that I'm convinced most people are not quite ready for. At a certain point,
01:33:40.600 self-driving cars will come to the rescue. But the difference between being someone who was texting
01:33:46.000 and didn't even notice the danger because nothing bad happened and being someone who killed your friend
01:33:52.520 is just luck, you know? And so, yeah, and you can only imagine how awful it has been to be the person
01:34:02.700 who was irresponsibly texting and who killed somebody in the, in the prime of their life just to hear the
01:34:10.940 details and to have been the person who initiated that tsunami of suffering. Just imagine a website where
01:34:19.260 you present the texts that were the proximate cause of death.
01:34:26.960 Right. How irrelevant they must have been.
01:34:29.260 Yeah. The juxtaposition between what people were felt couldn't wait another 30 seconds or 30 minutes and
01:34:36.780 And what ultimately resulted in the loss of life.
01:34:39.320 Yeah. It would be astonishing. I mean, we can all predict what it would be, but
01:34:42.240 That's a sick idea, but it's a pretty damn good idea.
01:34:44.880 Yeah. Yeah. Again, it's just, if you imagine what that woman went through, it's, you would not want
01:34:51.780 to trade places with her.
01:34:53.440 So I want to shift gears for a moment and go back to a discussion I had a week ago with one of my
01:34:57.040 friends who's, who's a patient. He's been really struggling the last few months. He's a, he's a,
01:35:04.960 he's a father. He's a wonderful guy. He's got two kids, three dogs, and he's a guy with a really
01:35:11.060 big heart. So he's, he's, he's one of these guys who just, I don't know, you get the sense he could
01:35:17.060 never be upset at anybody. He could never, you know, not want to take care of somebody around
01:35:21.420 him. And, but his, one of the dogs, which was the first dog he ever had died, had cancer. And they
01:35:29.700 went through a bunch of treatments and, and the dog ultimately died. And I think for him losing that
01:35:34.900 dog was, was certainly on the spectrum of losing a child, right? I don't think it's the same, but,
01:35:40.720 but I think for him, it was very difficult and he's been unable to sort of get back in the, in the
01:35:47.760 saddle, so to speak. And it's, it's reflected in frankly, his cortisol levels. I've never seen
01:35:52.800 cortisol levels so high. So his, his degree of hypercortisolemia is if you didn't know better,
01:35:58.320 you'd think he had a cortisol secreting tumor actually. It's so profound. And we were talking
01:36:03.580 about it and he confessed that he couldn't stop dreading the death of his other two dogs
01:36:11.100 who are, you know, age six and seven or something like that. So these aren't dogs that are going to
01:36:16.360 die tomorrow. In fact, these aren't even dogs that are, you know, sick in any way, shape or form.
01:36:21.460 Right. But as he's three months out from the death of this dog, that was probably 14 or 15,
01:36:26.280 he's spending every moment now dreading the loss of these dogs that are going to die in five years
01:36:35.500 or something like that. And it was very hard for me to try to console him because I didn't want to
01:36:40.840 be dismissive of the pain, but I also wanted to remind him that, you know, that's the antithesis of
01:36:46.860 being present, right? It's like, but your children and your two dogs are right here with you right now.
01:36:52.660 And they're perfect. And all the worrying you can do about when these two dogs die doesn't change
01:36:59.620 the fact that they're going to die, but you don't know when, and you don't know how, and you don't
01:37:03.380 know any of these things. How would you explain to someone like that in not necessarily the most
01:37:10.980 technical sense, but maybe in sort of an appeal to their emotion, why this effort isn't going to pan
01:37:19.200 out and why there needs to be a new strategy for getting over this loss? Well, it depends on
01:37:25.520 whether or not the person is living an examined life of the sort that we've been discussing. So
01:37:31.500 this is a person who has no meditation practice and is not interested in that mode. He is. So I've
01:37:40.640 given him your books, he has been going through the meditation course that you have, but is still
01:37:50.080 having a real hard time, like all of us, I think in taking it from, you know, I, the example I use is
01:37:55.980 like, if you go to the gym and you sort of lift weights for 15, 20 minutes a day, you know, that's, that's
01:38:02.260 great. But the whole purpose of doing that is to take those new muscles and be able to use them in the
01:38:07.060 other 23 and a half hours. Right. And so I think that's the transition is like, I think the theory
01:38:11.740 makes sense to him, but it's now, how does one actually bridge that gap? So let's, for the purpose
01:38:17.360 of the discussion, let's say he accepts conceptually the value of this. Yeah. Well, so then to become
01:38:24.180 sensitive to the actual mechanics of suffering, I mean, that the only way to suffer this dog's absence
01:38:30.860 is to think about it and not know that you're thinking about it. Right. So it is to be
01:38:35.860 subsumed by this process of ideation and to have no perspective on it. And framing can help here.
01:38:46.500 So you can, you can say, well, there were many experiences he had with this dog alive where the
01:38:54.980 dog wasn't physically present, right? The dog leaves the room. There's no greater absence from a room
01:39:02.500 than simply leaving it. Right. Now it's an additional operation to think, well, there's a
01:39:08.340 big difference because I'll never see him again. Right. But everyone you love in the world, animals.
01:39:13.860 You're the only person I love who's in this room. Exactly. Right. They're all out of this room.
01:39:18.340 So in principle, you know what it's like to be content in moments where. In the physical absence.
01:39:24.740 In the physical absence of everyone you love in this world. It's possible. And the only way to
01:39:32.500 make it intolerable to be in a room without everyone you love is to meditate on how intolerable it is
01:39:41.300 that they're not in the room with you right now. And this is why meditation is such an amazing
01:39:47.460 skill because it has a point of contact with your prison story. This is a point I make several
01:39:55.860 places. I think I make it in my book, Waking Up. The amazing thing about meditation is that, you know,
01:40:00.580 once you actually know how to meditate, it's possible to be alone in a room for weeks and months and even
01:40:07.780 years. You know, several teachers I studied with had spent literally years alone in caves where
01:40:15.780 in most people's lives, solitary confinement is considered a punishment, even in a circumstance
01:40:24.740 where to be outside of that room is to be surrounded by murderers and rapists who you might have to
01:40:32.260 fight. Right. So like even in prison, people don't want to be in solitary confinement because it's so
01:40:37.700 intolerable to be left alone with your thoughts. There's an evolutionary rationale for this. I mean,
01:40:44.260 we are clearly evolved to be social primates and a circumstance where you find yourself alone more
01:40:52.900 or less forever is not an optimum in evolutionary terms. But it's just simply a fact of the human
01:41:01.540 mind that it's possible to discover a form of well-being that is not only survives contact with
01:41:08.340 the solitude, but it's just totally undiminished by solitude. And if you can discover that even for
01:41:15.140 moments at a time, you can then enjoy the company of everyone you love without this feeling that your
01:41:24.980 well-being is at its core predicated on being able to have them at any moment you want, or that
01:41:33.540 that is predicated on the totally forlorn hope that this circumstance is going to endure forever,
01:41:40.740 that no one will die, that no one will leave you. We know that's not in the cards. And, you know,
01:41:48.260 we need to find whatever form of well-being is possible, given the fact that things are continually
01:41:55.780 changing. You know, your thought experiment or not, I mean, it wasn't really a thought experiment,
01:42:00.660 but it made me think of something was, think of all the people who are thrust into solitary
01:42:06.500 confinement. I mean, tragically in this country, it's an absolute epidemic in the US prison system.
01:42:14.340 And for all of the realities of how inhumane that is, especially for the lengths of time people find
01:42:20.660 themselves in there, do you think there's a subset of people who inadvertently stumble into mindfulness
01:42:26.740 without being formally taught? So the, the analogy would be like, if I threw 16 year old Sam into a
01:42:33.700 weight room, but I'd never shown him or forget a weight room into a basketball court, you'd never
01:42:39.940 seen basketball before. There is a basketball, there is a net. And I said, you know, you're confined to
01:42:45.940 this room for a year. Like at some point, will you figure out picking up the ball, bouncing it?
01:42:51.780 I wonder if, how hard it is to put that ball through that hoop over there, shooting at all
01:42:55.460 of those things. I mean, it seems unlikely, right? It seems like on some level you would have to at
01:42:59.220 least be shown what to do. And then even if you're left alone, if you could come back to that lesson.
01:43:04.180 And so similarly, you take a guy and let's say you put him in solitary confinement for a year.
01:43:07.860 He's had no exposure to mindfulness. Is there a chance he's going to spontaneously figure out,
01:43:12.980 oh my God, this is far less painful if I'm actually present in, you know, the sensations
01:43:20.020 of my body versus the ruminations and thoughts that are going to torment me? Or is that something
01:43:25.140 that is just so counterintuitive to the ethos of who we are that no way, like, you know, you're going
01:43:32.580 to have to have had some exposure to this, to at least be able to be thrust in that environment.
01:43:37.700 It's definitely possible because it is just the way consciousness is if you're paying attention.
01:43:45.380 So it's there to be recognized in each moment. But the odds are against anyone doing it. I mean,
01:43:52.900 there are people who have spontaneously awakened to this. I mean, they're kind of famous, you know,
01:43:57.700 adepts and certainly in the Eastern tradition. There are also, there are Western philosophers who've had
01:44:02.260 intimations of this where Jean-Jacques Rousseau has a story about, you know, riding in a boat on a lake,
01:44:10.260 I think, and spontaneously falling into kind of some very open and non-egocentric state of consciousness
01:44:17.700 that we would recognize. But the difference between having clear information and a clear map
01:44:25.060 and not, or having an erroneous one, it's just enormous. So-
01:44:29.380 I know I wouldn't have been able to have done it. Like when I think about how
01:44:34.100 counterintuitive, how difficult it is to practice mindfulness, to go through the practice.
01:44:40.180 Yeah.
01:44:40.580 Like, I think if you'd put me in solitary confinement for a hundred years, I would have never stumbled
01:44:45.060 into that, unfortunately. So I would have been confined to, you know, just been tortured.
01:44:50.340 Also, worse still, it's possible to be practicing mindfulness and to be on retreat and not recognize
01:45:01.540 many of the things that you really do want to recognize about the nature of the mind,
01:45:06.660 because the way the mindfulness has been taught to you is, however, subtly encouraging of a kind
01:45:12.980 of goal-seeking practice. And this is something I write about in my book and talk about in my app.
01:45:23.300 It's possible to be practicing mindfulness in a way that is dualistic. It's kind of ramifying of the
01:45:29.780 subject-object perception and, therefore, the goal of recognizing the selflessness of consciousness and
01:45:39.540 being relieved of this sense of, you know, ego at the center of it, the sense that there's a
01:45:44.340 meditator or a thinker of thoughts or an experiencer of experience, that that can be posited as the
01:45:51.940 ultimate goal of some incredibly laborious spiritual path that just has to be traversed
01:45:59.220 by increments over years. And that's an error. That's a mistake. I mean, that's just not
01:46:05.220 true. It's already true of consciousness that the ego is an illusion. And that can be realized directly.
01:46:13.460 And the expectation that it can't be is, in some basic sense, self-fulfilling for most people.
01:46:22.820 So, yeah, you can be in the most auspicious circumstance, having devoted a massive part
01:46:29.380 of your life to just practicing mindfulness and still be in a kind of crucible of unnecessary
01:46:36.980 seeking and suffering because you have an erroneous understanding of what the path actually is.
01:46:43.460 I want, there are a couple of, um, sort of semantics I want to, you, you've already alluded to a little
01:46:47.460 bit that the, the, the relationship between Vipassana and mindfulness, where does Dzogchen fit
01:46:52.820 into this? And like, if you were to try to draw a Venn diagram of these, these, these different
01:46:58.340 concepts, how would they overlap? Well, so Vipassana is the, the name of the practice in Theravada
01:47:07.060 Buddhism, the oldest tradition of Buddhism. And this is the Buddhism of, of Thailand and Burma and
01:47:15.300 Sri Lanka. And Vipassana, as I said, means insight. And you're having insight into what are thought
01:47:23.860 of as a fundamental, the fundamental characteristics of all phenomenon. And these are impermanence
01:47:32.020 and selflessness and unsatisfactoriness. It is often misleadingly translated as suffering rather
01:47:40.900 than unsatisfactoriness. So many people believe that the Buddha taught that life is suffering or
01:47:46.020 that all experience contains some intrinsic suffering. That's not quite the message. It's,
01:47:52.580 it's that life is a circumstance where there is no unchanging, fully satisfactory basis for
01:48:03.140 one's happiness because everything is changing. It's by virtue of impermanence that the boat is always
01:48:10.660 leaking, right? We're always bailing water. We're always responding to some slow emergency, really,
01:48:18.100 you know, where our health is always put in question. There's always some new pain arising in
01:48:24.100 the body because we're simply not moving, right? You always have to respond to something. And our
01:48:28.420 pleasures, however hard won, are fleeting. You know, they're vanishing even in the act of acquiring them.
01:48:34.020 So there's no place to land that is secure. And that's largely by virtue of the impermanence of
01:48:43.380 sensory experience. But the selflessness component is separable from those two other characteristics. And
01:48:54.580 well, I should say, so that's Vipassana. Vipassana is a practice whereby you would have insight into
01:49:00.180 those three characteristics. And mindfulness is the tool you use to have those insights. The training
01:49:07.380 in mindfulness is a training in a kind of awareness of experience, which is non-judgmental, non-reactive.
01:49:15.860 You're not seeking to maximize pleasure. You're not trying to make pains go away. You're just becoming
01:49:21.220 interested in a very open and focused way on just what the character of every experience is.
01:49:30.340 So if you're feeling restless, rather than try not to feel restless, you're becoming interested in
01:49:37.220 and increasingly aware of the actual characteristics moment to moment of restlessness. How is it that you
01:49:42.740 know you're restless? Where is it? What is it? I mean, we're talking about a pattern of energy in the
01:49:48.500 body that you can suddenly recognize as arising totally on its own and changing based on its own
01:49:56.180 dynamics. And you are merely the witness of that change in state. And so it is with any pleasant
01:50:01.860 emotion or experience. And you keep dropping back into merely witnessing. And that is mindfulness when
01:50:08.340 you can do it, when you're actually not trying to change anything, you're not judging anything, and
01:50:12.260 you're not staying at the conceptual level. You're not thinking about experience. You're just
01:50:20.260 experiencing experience more and more closely. And so if it's a matter of paying attention to
01:50:26.180 sensations in the body, you're not staying at the level where you feel like, oh, my hands are sweaty.
01:50:32.340 Right? No, you're actually, you're feeling the temperature and the tingling and the pressure
01:50:39.060 so closely that the concept of hands and sweat disappear. Right? So you're just feeling the raw
01:50:45.860 data of experience. And these changes can be pleasant. I mean, your sense of even having a body
01:50:51.860 can disappear while you're meditating. And just, it just resolves into a cloud of sensation. So
01:50:59.380 Dzogchen is a Tibetan practice tradition, which is explicitly non-dualistic. And what that means in this
01:51:08.020 context is, it goes after the selflessness of the mind very directly. Because most of us start
01:51:18.660 meditating where we are in our normal states of cognition with the sense that there's a subject
01:51:27.540 in the middle of experience. There's a mind in the head. And it is, by definition, separate from
01:51:35.780 everything that it knows. Right? So there's the subject that can be aware of sights and sounds and
01:51:41.940 sensations. And this subject is also a thinker. It's producing, it's in some sense, the author of
01:51:49.140 thoughts. And it's me. And I feel like I'm over here in my head, behind my face. You know, almost
01:51:57.300 wearing my face as a kind of mask. Right? I'm not identical to my face. I'm behind my face. And you're
01:52:02.020 looking across space at me. And your gaze has an implication for me. Because I can, you know, if I
01:52:09.220 follow where you're looking, I'm over here and not identical to my body. Right? I'm in my body. I'm a kind
01:52:16.340 of passenger in my body. I mean, you and I, I can say, well, you know, my hand is, I've got, you know,
01:52:21.860 an injury to my hand. And you and I can both look at my hand as a kind of object in space. Right?
01:52:26.420 My hand is part of the world. Separate from both of us. Yeah. And, you know, obviously,
01:52:30.020 I care more about my hand than you do, because it's my hand. But if something's wrong with my hand,
01:52:35.540 I'm still over here, up in my head, behind my eyes, some distance from the hand. And I can imagine
01:52:41.300 being without the hand. Right? It could be, you know, if I lost my hand in an accident,
01:52:44.660 well, then I would have one less hand. But I'd still be me up here in my head, behind my eyes.
01:52:49.380 Right? That locus of knowing, that sense of being located in the head as a self, as an ego,
01:52:57.460 is the starting point for everyone in meditation. And you can do Vipassana from that starting point.
01:53:06.500 You can be taught the method of mindfulness meditation. And you just begin to pay more and
01:53:11.780 more attention to what it's like to be you. And you can notice these three characteristics
01:53:16.580 of impermanence and selflessness and unsatisfactoriness. The Pali is anicca, dukkha,
01:53:21.620 and anatta, or anicca, anatta, and dukkha, in that order. And you can start from wherever you are,
01:53:27.460 and who knows how long it will take you to have this insight, a fundamental insight,
01:53:32.180 into the illusoriness of that starting point, of being a subject in the head.
01:53:35.860 Now, with Dzogchen, you can't start until you've had that insight. And so the path of Dzogchen entails
01:53:43.460 becoming available to that insight in various ways. It's usually a matter of actually forming a
01:53:51.540 connection with what's called a Dzogchen master in the Tibetan tradition. As someone who can actually
01:53:56.180 point this out to you in conversation, and for most people...
01:54:01.860 Meaning they can point out to you when you are falling to the illusion of ego? Meaning they can
01:54:09.780 point out when you are defaulting back into that mode?
01:54:12.740 Well, no. They can point out the intrinsic egolessness of consciousness in a way that you
01:54:20.420 can recognize it and then practice that. Because most people, they start meditating,
01:54:26.820 they still feel like they're up in their heads paying attention. It's that now I'm paying attention
01:54:31.620 to the breath. Now I'm noticing the difference between being lost in thought and being mindful.
01:54:37.140 But it doesn't fundamentally cut through the sense that there is one who can be mindful.
01:54:43.140 Right. And you can have experiences where the distance, the apparent distance between subject
01:54:50.820 and object can collapse, but they can come in a haphazard way where you don't know how you had
01:54:58.580 them and you don't know how you'll have them again. It can come by virtue of paying closer and
01:55:03.780 closer attention to sounds and sensations and things that are arising. And you can suddenly feel like,
01:55:10.500 oh, in that moment of hearing that bird, there was no me and there was no bird. There was just hearing.
01:55:18.020 That can collapse again and again. And it did for me, you know, when I was spending time on retreat,
01:55:23.940 practicing Vipassana. But I always associated it with the intense concentration of retreat.
01:55:31.620 And it seemed unavailable to me in ordinary moments of consciousness. You know, off retreat,
01:55:37.860 you know, I'm driving in traffic or, you know, working at my computer or whatever. Like,
01:55:41.620 there's no way I'm going to touch that level of concentration. You know, I haven't been spending
01:55:45.860 14 hours a day meditating. So this is a kind of a peak experience that isn't available now. Well,
01:55:53.700 with Dzogchen, you discover that the reverse is true. All the peak experiences are no more empty of
01:56:00.980 self than ordinary waking consciousness is. And you can recognize this about consciousness in any
01:56:08.420 moment. And it doesn't actually require previous moments of building momentum. I mean, framing really
01:56:16.340 counts for a lot here. So I spent a lot of time practicing with this one Burmese meditation master,
01:56:22.180 Upandita Sayadaw. And the analogy he would often use is that progress in Vipassana is like rubbing two
01:56:30.100 sticks together to get fire. The moment you stop, the heat dissipates and you're back to zero. Right?
01:56:36.820 So it's like you'd have the sense of you'd be on retreat with him practicing for, you know, up to 20
01:56:41.940 hours a day and trying to make your mindfulness absolutely continuous. So that's the difference between
01:56:47.700 sitting and walking meditation and every other moment. I mean, you're doing a ton of sitting
01:56:51.860 and walking meditation. It's like 16 hours a day of that. But every other moment when like you're going
01:56:57.060 to meals or anything else, you wake up and get out of bed in the morning, every transitional moment,
01:57:02.260 getting a cup of tea, you're trying to link every instant of conscious awareness together with
01:57:09.300 mindfulness. And whenever you would get distracted, part of you would begin scoring that as
01:57:17.060 a failure to build up enough momentum to get to the goal of the fundamental breakthrough that was
01:57:24.340 on offer by that path. So this framing, this idea that you're rubbing two sticks together,
01:57:28.900 the moment you stop, they're cooling off and you've made no progress, right? That's the opposite
01:57:36.020 framing for Dzogchen. The framing you need for Dzogchen is there's this something already true
01:57:44.260 of consciousness. You're not trying to produce this thing. You're not trying to get rid of the ego.
01:57:49.780 You're not trying to change anything about what is. You're trying to recognize
01:57:56.340 a feature of consciousness that is already the case. And it's actually nearer to you than you think.
01:58:03.300 It's not a matter of going deep within and having some kind of breakthrough. It's actually
01:58:09.940 right on the surface of the most ordinary form of consciousness. It doesn't require any pyrotechnic
01:58:15.860 change in the contents of consciousness. You're not actually closer to it if you take acid and all
01:58:22.660 the colors begin to change, or you feel a change in your energy such that you feel this kind of buzz of
01:58:31.140 connectedness to all things. As anyone who's taken acid can verify, that's on offer.
01:58:39.460 But all of that's interesting. I'm not discounting the power of those experiences, but those experiences
01:58:47.700 are no less empty of self than every state of consciousness. Precisely the state of consciousness
01:58:55.780 that's compatible with reaching for a glass of water and drinking it without anything novel
01:59:02.820 intruding. There's no bliss. There's no rapture. There's no profound or spiritual
01:59:09.060 change in state. It's possible to recognize in that moment that there's no center to consciousness.
01:59:17.140 And so what Dzogchen is, is the path of discovering that there's no center and then taking that insight
01:59:25.540 as your only object of mindfulness. So that what you're mindful of thereafter is that there's no
01:59:34.020 center to consciousness. So whatever's appearing, sights, sounds, sensations, you are continually dropping
01:59:41.860 the implied center. It's kind of a steep path because it's hard to start. You can't, you can't
01:59:49.060 really start. I mean, everything you're doing before you have that insight and can notice it again on
01:59:54.820 demand, everything you're doing is by definition a preliminary practice to that because you need
02:00:00.500 enough mindfulness to notice what is to be noticed and to follow the instructions to start that path.
02:00:07.780 But it's, you certainly don't have to have spent years on retreat to start that path. And so it's
02:00:13.060 having good information is, is certainly better than, than having misleading information there.
02:00:19.060 This practice, as I said, is, is, it's challenging. It's just not, there's no two ways around it. I think it's
02:00:28.420 for some people, it's probably as difficult as saying to someone who's 40 years old, who's never
02:00:34.340 exercised deliberately a day in their life. Okay. It's time to start spending an hour a day in the
02:00:40.100 gym and you're going to be doing these new movements and they're going to be very uncomfortable.
02:00:44.020 And for many people, you know, a few weeks or months into that exercise routine, they're still
02:00:50.260 not finding any great source of pleasure. And there are some of us who love exercising. Like we just get a,
02:00:55.860 again, going back to the, the lingo of states versus traits, like the, you know,
02:01:00.820 I worked out this morning before I saw you and I mean, I was in a new gym for the first time. And
02:01:06.500 sometimes that is a little, you're sort of like, I don't know where all the equipment is or, you know,
02:01:10.180 blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. But, but regardless, it's just the actual state of exercise to me is so
02:01:16.740 pleasurable, even if it didn't offer any traits that were advantageous outside of it. Of course,
02:01:22.580 the real reason we exercise is not for the hour that we're in the gym, moving around these artificial
02:01:27.940 pieces of iron. It's because of the benefit that gives us both metabolically and structurally
02:01:33.940 beyond the time we're exercising. Right.
02:01:36.900 For, is it safe to say that for most people, the experience of meditation doesn't produce a state
02:01:43.380 that is necessarily as pleasurable as say the MDMA state was that you could describe. And that really the,
02:01:50.260 the reason this ought to be considered by someone who is not meditating is more the traits that come
02:01:56.980 outside of the act of meditating, the act of the practice.
02:02:01.620 Yes. Well, so it's possible to have extremely pleasant states arise in meditation, both
02:02:10.340 ones that have a kind of ethical implication like loving kindness and ones that just are
02:02:16.100 sort of the equivalent of you being on heroin. Right. So it's not necessarily pointed in any
02:02:20.660 auspicious or pro-social direction. It's just you experiencing more pleasure than you've ever experienced.
02:02:26.580 But none of those experiences really can be the point because they're transitory. When they're
02:02:32.580 gone, they really are gone. I mean, the demeaning analogy to drugs is not inaccurate. Like, what's the point
02:02:41.620 if it's just a matter of getting high and you're no better person in the world as a result of having had that
02:02:49.300 experience? So it really is about having a fundamentally different relationship to experience in general.
02:02:58.180 All of the counterproductive ways in which you grasp at the pleasant and push the unpleasant away.
02:03:04.820 I mean, that is a fairly Buddhist framing of it, but I think it's appropriate. I mean, basically,
02:03:12.340 it's about not suffering unnecessarily in the end, right? And then not broadcasting your suffering
02:03:20.500 to the rest of humanity. So it can't be about having an experience that's extremely pleasant
02:03:29.860 and becoming more and more attached to that experience. And so that's one of the things
02:03:35.620 that's misleading and a potential downside of getting very good at so-called concentration practices or
02:03:43.540 absorption practices is that they don't have the power to give you a perspective that is a fundamental
02:03:49.220 antidote to egocentricity and selfishness and even, you know, kind of starkly unethical instincts
02:03:58.500 in other areas of your life. And they really can be fundamentally no more interesting from a kind of
02:04:07.060 a larger examined life perspective than a drug experience. I mean, to take some clear examples
02:04:13.380 here, there have been gurus who have behaved shockingly unethically in their lives and had,
02:04:20.900 you know, their reputations ruined and just leave a wake of unhappy and even destroyed people behind
02:04:27.620 them who, there was no doubt, were meditative athletes and, in many cases, focused on concentration
02:04:36.660 practices. So, like, if you had asked, well, what was it like to be these gurus when they were meditating?
02:04:43.300 Certainly not all of them were frauds. Many of them were, you know, truly talented meditators.
02:04:48.660 But they were meditating in a way that was not, it was a separate game they were playing, right? And
02:04:55.140 again, it was a game that was probably produced immense pleasure while they were doing it,
02:05:01.380 but it didn't fully undercut everything else about them that was going to be, you know, fairly
02:05:09.540 monstrous in relationship to other human beings. This is where framing or the overall concept of
02:05:17.380 what one is doing is pretty important because it's, there are pathological states of pleasure.
02:05:24.820 There are even pathological states of spiritual pleasure. I mean, I think the suicide bomber before
02:05:29.860 he detonates his bomb, they're in states of a kind of ecstasy. I mean, they have a religious expectation
02:05:38.340 for what's about to happen, which entails going to paradise and experiencing more pleasure than
02:05:43.620 anyone can imagine. And in almost every case, that's sincere and deeply felt. And these people are
02:05:50.740 about to get whatever they want and they know the creator of the universe is happy that they're going
02:05:55.220 to get it. So that there's nothing about ecstasy per se that is good or even benign because it can be pointed
02:06:03.060 in the wrong direction. I think it's a missile that doesn't necessarily come with a guidance system.
02:06:08.180 Yeah. And I think what we're looking for to lead truly better lives across the board is something
02:06:15.620 that is anchored to an ethics, for lack of a better word, where our spiritual or contemplative tools
02:06:25.940 are actually making us better people across the board. And again, there's some bright lines here
02:06:32.260 that I think are useful to draw. I mean, so for instance, not lying is a major variable for me,
02:06:40.580 ethically. It's just like having formed a commitment to being honest in basically every situation that
02:06:47.220 wasn't like just a self-defense situation. I mean, I don't think you have to be honest to the person who's
02:06:51.620 attacking you, right? Or seems likely to attack you. But to put dishonesty somewhere on the continuum
02:06:58.420 of violence and only resort to it where things have broken down so much that you're just not
02:07:03.140 dealing with another person as though they're a rational interlocutor, that is massively simplifying
02:07:09.220 of a person's life. Right now, very few people have made that commitment, but having made it...
02:07:13.940 When did you make that commitment? I know you've spoken about this, but how old were you when you
02:07:18.340 decided that...? I was 18. I was freshman year in college. I took a course taught by this great
02:07:26.580 professor, Ron Howard. Not to be confused with that, Ron Howard.
02:07:30.180 Yeah, no, not the former actor, now director. This course was just an examination of whether
02:07:36.340 it was ever ethical to lie. You know, virtually everyone goes into that course more or less
02:07:42.500 not even knowing what their relationship to lying is. They haven't been sensitized to
02:07:47.300 it as a significant variable in their lives in terms of, you know, maintaining their relationships or
02:07:54.020 their reputations or... Yeah, I lie sometimes and they're white lies and, you know, sometimes it's
02:07:59.780 just too awkward to tell the truth or... And you don't know how often you do it, but you know everybody
02:08:04.740 does it and the world could be no other way. And this course was just a machine for exposing the
02:08:14.180 dysfunction of that and more or less it became this... It was like a seminar where everyone was just kind
02:08:20.820 of coming up with scenarios where it must be all right to lie. I mean, surely this is a white lie that
02:08:25.700 is better told and the professor would shoot that down. And most people left the course more or less
02:08:35.620 certain that lying was virtually always the wrong move for purely selfish reasons. It was just like it was
02:08:42.100 not creating the life you want. And by being committed to not lying, you were closing the door
02:08:49.300 to all kinds of complexity and risk, you know, both interpersonally and reputationally,
02:08:56.340 that you absolutely want to close the door to. I mean, it's almost analogous to like to texting while
02:09:02.420 driving. Just decide not to text while driving. You will not care about all those texts.
02:09:07.780 You don't have to worry about, well, I'll only text at intersections or if I'm stuck in traffic,
02:09:14.580 but we're not going that fast or whatever. Yeah. I can assure you that you will never
02:09:20.420 really regret the texts you'd sent later when you, when you finally arrived at your destination.
02:09:26.180 So how old were you when you met your wife, your now wife?
02:09:29.860 31. Okay. So you've had 13 years of this practice of not lying. And now you meet the woman you're
02:09:37.620 ultimately going to marry who presumably hasn't taken this course or made this commitment.
02:09:42.740 At some point, does that become a discussion, which is, by the way, I'm going to be a little
02:09:48.740 different than most guys that you've met in that, you know, if you ask me, if you look good in that
02:09:53.700 dress and I don't think you do, I'm just going to say you don't. Right.
02:09:57.460 Please don't interpret that as I'm an insensitive prick. I just don't want to go down that. Like,
02:10:02.340 did you ever have that discussion that sort of prefaced or, or maybe your wife's the wrong
02:10:07.860 example, but like, I mean, I've been, as you're explaining this, I'm thinking about all of the
02:10:12.580 lies I tell. No, it was sort of, you kind of stumble into it. I mean, you, you wind up training
02:10:18.180 the people around you to know what they're going to get from you. Right. And it's not, not necessarily
02:10:23.620 explicit. It's just in that case. Yeah. I mean, she, it became very clear, very quickly,
02:10:30.260 just what sort of importance I put on honesty. And, you know, there, there are a few hiccups in,
02:10:37.880 in many relationships, but the gain that people notice very, very quickly, which I don't think
02:10:43.940 they would want to forfeit to smooth over any of other possible awkwardness is they know you're
02:10:50.940 never going to lie to them. Right. They know that you're being truthful. And so like when you have said,
02:10:57.720 you know, that you didn't like something in a spot where most other people would have just
02:11:02.760 told some kind of white lie, so as not to have to communicate that, then your, your praise
02:11:08.580 means that much more. You know, if you're a creative person who's often needs to get feedback from
02:11:15.140 people, you immediately discover this. When I give a piece of writing to somebody and ask for feedback,
02:11:22.400 who do I value more? The person who is just going to praise me because they think that's what I want
02:11:29.120 to hear. And because they, they find it too awkward to deliver some bad news because they, they know I've
02:11:35.160 spent a lot of time writing this thing. Or do I want to hear from the person who is actually finding
02:11:40.940 flaws in this thing I've written and will now, because I'm going to them early, will now, now has a
02:11:47.220 chance to spare me the public embarrassment of broadcasting these flaws to all humanity. Clearly,
02:11:53.620 I value that the other reader more. And once you see the alternative, you realize you want the people
02:12:01.420 who will be straight with you. And then you meet, you meet people who think they want feedback, but
02:12:05.760 they don't want feedback. You can have a more or less grown up relationship to the opinions of others.
02:12:12.680 The people who don't want feedback, who just want to be told that what they did was fantastic.
02:12:17.080 Well, if they're surrounded by honest people, they very, very quickly feel the cramp of that,
02:12:22.540 right? They just, they want to be surrounded by liars and they'll curate their connections as a result.
02:12:28.660 You won't ask that same person again, if you're the sort of person who didn't want an honest opinion
02:12:36.460 and pretended to ask for one. Is it possible for someone to, let's pick an extreme example, but
02:12:42.680 could one go into public office and take that oath that I will never lie? I mean, is it, is that,
02:12:48.300 is that compatible with politics, for example?
02:12:52.420 It is widely assumed that it's a deal breaker, right? I think everything, virtually everything
02:12:58.260 that's wrong with our politics is the result of the mismatch between interpersonal ethics of this
02:13:04.420 sort and what works and what wouldn't work in the public sphere. I think it should be compatible
02:13:10.760 with politics. I think dishonesty should exact a, a massive reputational cost in politics, but now
02:13:20.460 we're in this strange, you know, mirror universe where the most dishonest person anyone has ever
02:13:29.240 witnessed is the president of the country and suffering absolutely no reputational cost among
02:13:36.820 those who love him for his dishonesty. It's like, it's not a bug, it's a feature. In my view, that is
02:13:42.920 the most dysfunctional thing about the Trump phenomenon. It's what it's done to the value of
02:13:50.180 honesty in our public conversation about politics, at least a half of the electorate. Pointing out that
02:13:56.740 he's lied yet again is completely ineffectual with the people who don't care that he's lied. I mean,
02:14:03.020 they just, they just assume he's going to lie. It's a very strange performance. It's like not even
02:14:07.300 about representing reality anymore. It's not that the people who love Trump are reliably duped by him.
02:14:15.100 You know, it's, it's that they're not holding him to a standard of honesty at all, right? And his
02:14:21.880 dishonesty, however obvious, is a different kind of performance. It's almost like, I mean,
02:14:28.320 there's been an analogy often drawn to professional wrestling. It's a fake sport with fake violence.
02:14:36.640 And the fact that it's fake is actually understood by basically everyone who enjoys it,
02:14:42.760 right? It's not that it's not like they're taken in. Unless you're five years old, by the time you're
02:14:47.500 a teenager or whatever, you sort of get that this is an act. They're still very athletic. Nothing
02:14:52.440 takes away from the skill required to do it.
02:14:54.780 Well, yeah. I mean, ironically, what they're doing is more dangerous than MMA for the most
02:14:58.800 part. And they're getting horrific injuries sometimes, but there's no illusion that these
02:15:04.040 guys are just as tough as the people in the octagon, right? So it's like there are people who watch both
02:15:09.920 or are certainly aware of both. And they clearly understand what reality is. Reality is what's going
02:15:18.400 on in mixed martial arts, right? There's things that are honest at the level of the language of violence.
02:15:24.060 And they're things that are pure fabrications. They're lies. And something has happened in our
02:15:31.420 conversation about facts in the political domain. And it's happened to some degree on the left for
02:15:36.580 different reasons. But yeah, to come back to your question, I think we're paying a massive price for not
02:15:43.000 being able to tell when people are lying definitively, like to not have a lie detector that forensically can be
02:15:49.900 relied upon. And, you know, analogous to, you know, like DNA evidence, you know, where you just know that
02:15:55.420 someone's representing their state of knowledge erroneously. And we're paying a massive price for the fact that
02:16:02.100 so many millions of people don't actually care that they're being lied to.
02:16:06.440 To me, that's the bigger issue, right? I mean, I think politicians have always lied. I don't think
02:16:10.780 that's what's new. It's almost like a threshold has been crossed where it's... So you go back to
02:16:18.960 sort of Clinton's impeachment, right? I mean, in the end, I think the legal issue was less about
02:16:23.800 whether he'd had an affair with Monica Lewinsky. The bigger issue was that he lie under oath.
02:16:27.780 Right. I mean, in many ways, that's what his impeachment came down to. Yeah. It's quite clear he probably did,
02:16:33.520 right? I mean, we could get into the semantics of sexual relations, but the, I mean, it's pretty clear
02:16:38.540 he lied under oath. But the point you're making is that now it's almost a feature. Like now it's almost...
02:16:46.840 I think it's... We've gone beyond it that it's accepted, and now it's almost like part of a theater.
02:16:51.580 But I think that is a uniquely Trumpian phenomenon. I don't know that anyone else
02:16:56.380 will be able to play it quite that way. I mean, it is a... It's a feature of politics that has been
02:17:02.840 true in other countries forever. I mean, it is a feature of authoritarian politics.
02:17:08.740 Wait, wait. You mean Kim Jong-un didn't really do that well in golf? Right, right. He was two years
02:17:13.880 old?
02:17:14.180 Got several holes in one.
02:17:15.160 Several holes in one. He doesn't defecate, I heard, as well.
02:17:18.460 Yeah. Yeah. In a democracy, it should be harder to get away with having one's lies exposed. And
02:17:28.240 it's got... When you look at what used to matter, you know, when you look at the fact that
02:17:33.020 someone like Gary Hart, his campaign, where he said that he was faithful to his wife and
02:17:38.900 encouraged journalists to keep a sharp eye on him and then was caught having an affair,
02:17:44.780 like that was the end, right? There is nothing like that that's conceivable for Trump. It doesn't
02:17:50.800 matter how discordant his behavior is with his next utterance. His opponents are keeping score
02:17:59.660 relentlessly. Like his lies are being documented every day. There are now thousands of them.
02:18:04.920 People are keeping score. It doesn't matter with at least 40% of America. So it might matter for
02:18:12.560 another person for those 40%. It really is a kind of personality cult phenomenon where it's just for
02:18:20.280 Trump, for whatever reason, how he showed up, what he represents, he can get away with stuff that
02:18:28.160 no one else can get away with. And that is what is so dysfunctional about having him
02:18:33.640 in that role from my point of view. So you have two daughters, right? So we think so much about
02:18:42.220 how do we prepare our kids for the world that's out there that we can only say one thing for certain
02:18:51.180 about, which is we don't know what it's going to look like. I mean, I had this discussion with my
02:18:54.240 daughter last night, actually, or two nights ago, which was Olivia, you're 10 years old today.
02:19:01.080 The only thing I can assure you of in eight years, I have no idea what the world will look like.
02:19:06.880 Yeah. But there are a handful of traits that I think will help you in life. And they might seem
02:19:15.800 somewhat arbitrary and they might seem somewhat ridiculous or even unpleasant. But the sooner you
02:19:22.280 can figure out a way to put these traits in place, the more well-equipped you will be with whatever
02:19:29.900 the future holds, right? So when I was 10, no one could have predicted that the internet was going to
02:19:34.400 exist and that somehow that was going to have all of these implications, right? With respect to all the
02:19:40.640 stuff we've been talking about today, specifically with respect to choosing to live an examined life,
02:19:47.040 choosing to live a life where we are not constantly being lived by our thoughts.
02:19:54.160 How do you teach your daughters about what the future holds? And I don't mean that in like a broad
02:20:02.620 sense, but I mean, aside from encouraging them to meditate, and I'm sure at some age, kids can learn
02:20:08.120 mindfulness meditation. But how else do you try to influence your kids with respect to the lessons
02:20:14.920 you've learned? I mean, they may never choose to go off on, and you've spent such a significant period
02:20:19.380 of your life on retreats. You've really devoted your entire life to this study. If they choose not to do
02:20:26.740 that, you know, they want to do something boring, like go into medicine or whatever, how will you still
02:20:31.820 impart some of these lessons on them? Or will it be much more by osmosis than anything deliberate?
02:20:36.140 First kids can be taught to meditate. And actually, my wife has done that work a lot.
02:20:42.680 Her wife teaches kids, right?
02:20:42.940 Yeah, she goes into school.
02:20:44.860 At what age does she start?
02:20:46.080 Like five, six. It's amazing. I mean, you can go very quickly, you can go from just,
02:20:52.760 you know, the first class, which is just chaos, to a room full of six-year-olds sitting in silence
02:21:00.520 for 15 minutes. So it's amazing. It seems unfathomable. Yeah. And they get real benefit
02:21:06.720 from it. I mean, it's not quite the same as adults connecting with the practice, but it can be pretty
02:21:14.160 similar. I mean, they're becoming aware of their emotional lives in a way that kids often aren't.
02:21:20.940 Do girls develop easier than boys at that age?
02:21:24.880 Generally speaking, I consider them separate species. So yeah, I mean, they do.
02:21:28.880 Yeah, because my son is like, yeah, I don't know how I could ever communicate any of that.
02:21:35.860 Yeah. Yeah. And I think boys have a harder time sitting still, certainly earlier on. So it's
02:21:42.420 amazing to see kids connect with the practice because they definitely do. And they just become
02:21:47.680 aware of the linkage between emotion and behavior, thought and emotion, emotion and thought. But
02:21:54.020 on some level, it just comes down to suffering and the end of suffering. It's just like, how much do
02:21:59.500 you want to suffer? People are suffering in reliable ways based on...
02:22:05.820 So do you spend time then explaining the nature of the suffering? Because I would agree completely,
02:22:11.080 nobody wants to suffer. I just think it takes many of us decades to even come to the realization of
02:22:19.020 how much of our suffering is self-imposed. Yeah.
02:22:21.760 So is part of it just getting them to realize that sooner?
02:22:24.700 Yeah. And again, to point out many of the things we've discussed here, where it's like the power
02:22:31.340 of framing, right? And the power of expectation. So I'll often point out to my daughters, even the
02:22:38.780 youngest, who's just turning five, but for the most part, the oldest, who's just turning 10,
02:22:43.900 the mismatch between her expectation of how something was going to be and how it was, right? And it's
02:22:50.500 usually a negative expectation. She was worried about something happening, I'll say, but
02:22:54.480 doctor's visit or, you know, getting blood drawn or getting a shot and the actual experience that was
02:23:01.900 far less traumatic than she was worried that it was going to be. And to point out that all of the time
02:23:10.340 spent suffering in anticipation of this negative thing was wasted, right? Like there's a lesson to
02:23:16.600 be learned here. Like the thing she thought she was sure was going to be awful turned out not to be so
02:23:22.700 awful or not in some cases, not awful at all, right? Or even net positive, right? Because she
02:23:30.120 had the experience of sort of overcoming a fear or, you know, it's like she felt stronger as a result of
02:23:35.920 that thing that just happened. So it's like the expectation is so often not only a bad guide, it's
02:23:43.520 just, it's no guide at all to what is going to happen. And yet people suffer in advance over this
02:23:51.500 thing that they're expecting to be negative. Even if it's going to be negative, you can decide to
02:23:57.440 suffer once or twice, right? Kids can get lessons like that. I think it's good to give them as early
02:24:05.080 as they can get them. A lot of it has to do with framing and just how one thinks about one's life. But
02:24:13.140 mindfulness for a kid can be, at the first pass, just more awareness over what they're feeling and
02:24:21.860 thinking. Young kids can be sad and they don't know that they're sad, or angry and they don't know that
02:24:27.480 they're angry. And just that level of awareness can be a major gain for a kid. And then that's
02:24:36.500 something to build on. And then they, as they get older, then they can, you know, I think certainly
02:24:41.900 once they're young teenagers can have a more or less grown-up relationship to observing what's going
02:24:49.840 on in their minds. When I think about how much effort I put into worrying about whether my daughter
02:24:57.120 is learning well enough, the sort of standard metrics that we care about, you know, math and
02:25:03.420 science and English and sports and all those things, I feel like probably I'm not paying enough
02:25:10.240 attention to those things as well, especially for someone who has spent so much time suffering inside
02:25:15.320 his own mind. Like I ought to know better, right? Like there is, there is no prison like the one between
02:25:20.740 your ears. Yeah. And yet, uh, yeah. When, when you frame it that way, boy, it makes me think I
02:25:27.620 really need to start investing a little bit more time in that, in that prep. I want to be mindful
02:25:33.600 of your time. So I kind of, I know we both have to get somewhere this evening. Are you writing a book
02:25:39.440 at the moment? Are you working on anything? I'm the worst author a publisher can have at this point.
02:25:44.040 I keep pushing back my deadline. I am supposed to be writing a book, but I'm so busy podcasting and
02:25:49.500 doing other things that... What is the book about? Well, I have, actually I have two books that I'm
02:25:53.640 supposed to be writing. One is just a digest of podcast conversations just, you know, because now
02:25:59.840 I have... So sort of like what Tim did with tools and titles and such. Yeah. I'm not quite sure what the
02:26:03.940 format will be, but something based on the podcast. It's probably going to be more like just updated
02:26:09.260 transcripts of significant parts of the conversation. And then I have a book with a working title
02:26:16.560 Making Sense, which is just, it was going to be a kind of manifesto about intellectual honesty and how
02:26:23.720 we have hard conversations about, you know, all manner of topics, whether it's race or gender or the
02:26:29.700 opposition between science and religion or, you know, many of the topics I touch on my podcast.
02:26:35.300 We're paying a price for not being able to talk about the most consequential and taboo and dangerous
02:26:44.240 and divisive things in a way that is conserving of good intentions and honesty and allows for
02:26:52.420 compromise and allows for breakthroughs and changes of opinion. I mean, it's like all the norms around
02:26:57.360 talking about these things are askew. You just can't have a conversation about the differences
02:27:03.340 between men and women, say. Are men and women exactly the same? No, they're not. Okay. But what do we do
02:27:09.360 down that path generates ire like you can't imagine? Yeah. And careers are lost over slight
02:27:16.120 misstatements, right? And there are people who say things that were ill-considered that they then
02:27:23.140 subsequently apologize for. They recognize that they're ill-considered. And yet the apology, however
02:27:29.260 heartfelt, however abject, isn't sufficient to stop their career from being destroyed.
02:27:36.080 Right. You had an example of this recently where you, on your podcast, where you talked
02:27:39.720 about the, um, she was a dean at Claremont McKenna, what was the college? Yeah. Claremont
02:27:45.000 McKenna. Claremont McKenna College, yeah. Well, actually there's a more recent example, which
02:27:47.720 is even more amazing in its own way. So like, like Megan Kelly's firing over her Halloween
02:27:54.460 blackface comments, right? Well, so, you know, she obviously couldn't hear how the phrase
02:28:00.620 blackface would land with many people. It's easy to see that the way she spoke about it
02:28:07.460 was a, constituted a mistake. It's pretty obvious it was not an expression of racism
02:28:15.880 on her part, right? She's not saying African Americans haven't suffered a massive inequality
02:28:21.600 in the past, or she was just saying, well, you know, if you're going to dress up like Diana
02:28:25.340 Ross, why can't you put brown makeup on your face? I mean, essentially that was, those weren't
02:28:29.180 her words, but that was the sentiment. That's absolutely something we should be able to talk
02:28:33.520 about. Yet she said the wrong thing and then clearly received a ton of pressure to apologize
02:28:43.080 for it. Her apology, I don't know if you saw her apology, but her apology was, I mean, someone
02:28:47.620 was joking on Twitter. I saw something on Twitter that said it was the closest thing you've ever
02:28:51.380 seen to a hostage video minus the newspaper. Right. Yes. Like just, you got to hold up the
02:28:55.240 newspaper as proof of life. But I didn't actually hear what she said or anything.
02:28:59.580 Yeah. But it was, by all signs, it was as full an apology as a person can muster. It was complete.
02:29:07.920 If it didn't strike the right note for you, well then, I mean, you have superhuman expectations
02:29:13.300 for what someone should be able to muster in a context like that. It did not seem insincere
02:29:18.620 at all, right? At least to my eye. And yet still, this was a career wrecking event, it
02:29:25.440 seems. And so now we're in a situation where people are calling for the destruction of other
02:29:33.100 people and celebrating the effects of that when these people actually do lose their shows
02:29:39.360 or suffer some massive penalty. And yet, I think it's true to say that most people who
02:29:46.400 were calling for her to be fired would recognize that, one, her initial statement was not actually
02:29:53.720 conveying her own racism. It was conveying her obliviousness to the significance of this phrase
02:29:59.760 for other people, but it was not conveying that she was somebody who wants to live in a society
02:30:07.220 where there's a lack of political equality, right? I mean, there was zero evidence of that.
02:30:12.660 I don't think anyone even alleges that that's her view of the world. But worse than that,
02:30:19.200 once she recognizes the mistake she's made, no apology is sufficient, right? Like, so do we really
02:30:26.220 want to live in a world where you misspeak on a fraught topic and it is impossible to adequately
02:30:35.300 apologize, right? You recognize that, you know, you use the word retard, say, right? And then you,
02:30:40.680 then you get feedback that, wow, people really find that offensive. There are kids with mental
02:30:45.200 disabilities, you know, and you, like, if you knew what it was like to be a parent of a kid who was
02:30:49.640 suffering this, you would recognize how offensive that term is. And they're like, why would you ever
02:30:53.800 use that term on a podcast, right? Imagine it being impossible to apologize for that. It's over for you,
02:31:01.220 right?
02:31:01.600 What's so interesting, bringing it back to the prison stuff, I remember when I spoke with Kat Hoke about
02:31:06.860 this. So Catherine Hoke is the woman that used to run this organization called Defy Ventures, and now
02:31:11.040 she's spinning up something that's going to be even better actually, to which I've suggested to her,
02:31:16.320 and I don't think I'm unique in this, a lot of people have suggested that this, this idea ought not
02:31:21.360 just be something that's sort of a nonprofit. Like there is such a benefit to the volunteers to going
02:31:26.340 into this experience that it almost needs to be sort of a corporate development program. Like people
02:31:31.220 need to be paying to go and have this experience. It's so profound, right? But it gets to this
02:31:36.540 question of like, can you be, is there something for which you cannot be forgiven? What is the crime?
02:31:43.000 What is the sin? What is the moral defect for which there is no forgiveness? And I don't know if
02:31:50.920 you're familiar with any of this stuff she's, she's spoken about, but you know, at some point she had to
02:31:55.720 make a decision about whether or not people who were sexual predators would be permitted into the
02:32:01.040 program. So if you'd raped somebody, if you'd molested a child and you're now serving whatever
02:32:06.240 term in prison, could you be a part of this rehabilitative program? And in the end she said,
02:32:12.160 yes. I mean, basically it really comes down to the degree of which a person, a person shows remorse
02:32:17.260 and their willingness to change. Because the idea is like, whether you choose to never forgive somebody
02:32:23.740 and whether it's Megyn Kelly or this rapist, it doesn't change the fact that something was said or
02:32:29.140 something was done that is in some cases, probably not really that ridiculous. And in some cases is
02:32:34.400 really tragic, but it's, you have two choices as a society, how you move forward from that.
02:32:40.820 Yeah.
02:32:41.380 And it seems we're definitely caught in the place of an inability to reconcile the good that can come
02:32:47.480 from moving on, which means acknowledging mistakes that were made, acknowledging remorse,
02:32:53.160 looking for ways to get better. I mean, we, we really don't seem to like that, that, that,
02:32:57.340 that seems a bit too soft for people or so. It's, I don't know if soft is the right word,
02:33:00.880 but there's something about that process that people don't like.
02:33:04.780 Yeah. Yeah. And, and in extreme cases, they're forced to accept it. I mean, they're, you know,
02:33:11.100 when, when societies have just become completely riven by, you know, sectarian violence of,
02:33:17.780 or, or political dysfunction of one kind or another, then you need things like truth and
02:33:23.260 reconciliation commissions in places like, you know, South Africa or Rwanda, where it's, you know,
02:33:28.540 then people who are guilty of objectively horrible things can get a, a pass essentially just by coming
02:33:35.340 forward and telling the truth and apologizing. Yeah. I think, you know, I actually, I brought this
02:33:40.840 up on my podcast not long ago. I was thinking about this, this very problem in terms of like a,
02:33:46.420 an ethical event horizon. I mean, is there something so bad that you could do or say that
02:33:53.420 no apology would be sufficient to, to pull your reputation back out of that, that singularity?
02:34:01.880 It is a kind of unrecoverable moral error. And I don't think so. I think, I think the,
02:34:06.940 the physics of an, of an appropriate acceptable apology are that it be sincere and believable.
02:34:18.340 And that the measure of it being believable is that it has to be clear how you could have changed
02:34:24.320 enough for it to be sincere. So for an apology to be accepted, you have to stand in relationship to
02:34:31.420 that thing you did in the same place where the other people who are horrified by what you did
02:34:38.000 stand. And they have to be able to see how it is that you have come to stand where they are now
02:34:44.760 in order to accept your apology. So if that transformation isn't believable for some reason,
02:34:51.100 if there's no path by which you could have had this epiphany that contextualizes your prior bad
02:34:56.700 behavior, you know, puts it in a box, which you disavow, well, then it will seem, it will seem
02:35:02.260 insincere or opportunistic. You're a sociopath who's just trying to get out of prison and game
02:35:06.760 the program. And, and those people exist. There's no question that, you know, an insincere apology
02:35:11.560 for calculated reasons is, you know, that that's as old as we've been speaking to one another and
02:35:18.860 that will continue for as long as people can get away with it. So that's a genuine concern if you're
02:35:24.420 talking about how to, to operationalize these kinds of insights. But I mean, you just, it just,
02:35:30.440 again, the, the path out of that darkness has to be intelligible to people. And I think this,
02:35:36.640 we'll, we'll stumble on this once we have breakthroughs in psychology and neuroscience that
02:35:43.520 admit of real changes in people's emotional and ethical lives. I mean, so if we just take the narrow
02:35:50.380 case, if we ever understood psychopathy clearly enough that we could cure it, right? So you have
02:35:57.680 someone who's from a very early age, just torturing animals and, and showing zero empathy for other
02:36:03.360 people. And they, they grow up into the, the scary adult that one would predict. And if we ever get to
02:36:11.340 a place where there's a cure for that, well, then psychopathy would be, will be viewed as a
02:36:16.160 neurological condition. It'll be, it won't be a moral problem. It'll be, these are, these are
02:36:20.460 malfunctioning robots that need the new module. And just imagine if we had that cure, we'd be no
02:36:28.640 more judgmental in how we applied it than we are when we cure any other disease. I mean, you're not
02:36:35.300 thinking about when you're giving diabetics insulin, you're not thinking, well, you, you're lucky I'm
02:36:41.720 giving you this insulin because you probably don't deserve it. You with your malfunctioning pancreas,
02:36:47.060 you're lucky that I'm so tolerant that I'm willing to give you this insulin. There's zero culpability
02:36:52.660 in having a bad pancreas. If we actually understood the neurochemical, neuroanatomical basis of even the
02:37:02.120 worst behavior, if it was discreet enough that it admitted of a, of a cure, we would say, oh, we just
02:37:09.040 got to, we got to fix that problem. You know, and it would be, yeah. Do you hold out hope for that,
02:37:13.940 Sam, or is that sci-fi? I mean, you're a neuroscientist, so you can, you can speak to
02:37:17.620 this with much more clarity or authority than, than I could ever speak of it. I hold out hope for it
02:37:23.520 in certain specific cases. Yeah. I mean, well, we know it's true. I mean, we've, we've already
02:37:30.060 stumbled upon it in cases where you're, you're talking about a brain tumor that is causing a
02:37:35.820 problem, but causing a problem which shows up as uncontrollable rage or pedophilia or, I mean,
02:37:42.880 there are cases where, you know, it's like the classic case is Charles Whitman, who in 1964
02:37:48.580 killed 14 people at the University of Texas. And he just had a glioblastoma pushing on his amygdala.
02:37:56.480 And the amazing thing is that you might know the story because I've talked about it, but I mean,
02:38:01.120 he suspected that he had something wrong with his brain and he, he knew he was going to be killed
02:38:06.000 by the police and he's recommended that they perform an autopsy to find out what was going on
02:38:10.620 in his head. And yeah, he had a, he had a tumor, which was arguably totally exculpatory. It was just
02:38:18.740 in precisely the place that you would think, okay, this, he's got, he can't control his impulses and
02:38:24.640 he's feeling, you know, uncontrollable rage. And this tumor explains it. I think there's virtually
02:38:30.520 no one who hears the whole story who thinks Charles Whitman was evil. He just seems profoundly
02:38:36.920 unlucky. And on some level, a complete understanding of evil would reduce it to that same species of
02:38:47.360 unluck.
02:38:47.780 That is an amazing thought. It's hard for me to imagine because obviously the mass effects
02:38:53.320 are the obvious ones, right? These lesions, uh, versus much more diffuse neurochemical processes.
02:39:00.960 We're going to have dinner tonight. So I know what we're going to keep talking about, man.
02:39:03.880 We got so much to keep going on. Um, for folks who are listening to this on my podcast, who might not
02:39:08.420 know you as well as they ought to is samharris.org basically where they can find everything,
02:39:14.780 your podcast, your blog, your books, all sorts of things.
02:39:19.220 Yeah. And as far as my meditation app, it's just wakingup.com. But yeah, both websites.
02:39:24.560 Some of us like me are lucky enough to have got it for free because we were supporters of the
02:39:28.440 podcast before it came out.
02:39:29.980 Yeah. Yeah.
02:39:30.660 But is it available for purchase now on both the, uh, on Apple and on, uh, Android?
02:39:36.800 I think Android's not quite out yet.
02:39:38.460 No, it's out. It's out as of yesterday.
02:39:40.840 Okay. Okay. Fantastic. Cause I know I had a patient who went to search for it on Android
02:39:45.260 a few weeks ago and it was coming soon.
02:39:47.640 No, no, we're, we're born on both platforms.
02:39:49.920 So, okay. Well, congratulations, Sam. It is, I mean, I just want to say, I want to thank
02:39:54.720 you personally for, for the effect and the impact that your work has had on me. I find myself,
02:40:03.220 like I said, spending so much time thinking about how to help people delay the onset of diseases
02:40:10.080 that kill them. And in many ways you're doing the same thing, but in a, in some ways, a higher
02:40:18.700 stakes arena, which is how to prevent people from suffering so much, which in some ways is just
02:40:23.920 harder to measure. We don't have the same stats on that, right? I can rattle off all the stats
02:40:28.580 on what the probability is that you're going to get cancer by the time you're 70. And what's the
02:40:32.860 likelihood you're going to make it to 90 without a heart attack and ball. I can rattle off all those
02:40:36.560 things, but we don't keep the same stats for how much we suffer. And I, I, I think of your work as
02:40:44.240 among the most important things that have helped me. And now by extension, some of my patients who
02:40:49.640 are willing to go down this path with me to reduce that burden of suffering.
02:40:55.060 Nice. Nice. Well, glad to hear it.
02:40:57.380 Well, thank you. Thank you for making, uh, making so much time this afternoon.
02:41:00.780 Yeah. Yeah. It's a pleasure. And congratulations on the podcast. You are one of these few examples of
02:41:05.720 somebody who goes from the conversation of, you know, I think maybe I want to start a podcast.
02:41:11.840 Should I, should I start a podcast? And then I turn around and three weeks later, you have this
02:41:16.740 amazing podcast that is more professionally produced than mine and people love. So congratulations on that.
02:41:22.760 Well, you and your team deserve a lot of credit for that. I know I've said this before, but, but
02:41:26.860 it's always worth repeating. I mean, I think that you and Tim were probably among the two most vocal,
02:41:33.500 along with probably Patrick O'Shaughnessy, but I think you and Tim the most really,
02:41:37.600 cause I honestly, I was just so intimidated by the work I saw you and Tim doing. I was like,
02:41:41.440 well, there's no goddamn way I can do that. Like that's, that's just above my pay grade. So
02:41:46.320 I still think my podcast pales in comparison to yours and Tim's, but I am happy to be in the arena
02:41:52.060 and it, it has turned out to be much more enjoyable than I would have ever predicted.
02:41:57.200 And so I do regret having not done it two years sooner when you were harping on me and Tim was
02:42:03.260 harping on me, but better late than never. And it's an honor to have you as a guest on my little
02:42:08.240 budding podcast.
02:42:10.020 Well, keep it up.
02:42:11.560 Thanks, man.
02:42:12.220 You can find all of this information and more at peteratiamd.com forward slash podcast.
02:42:19.900 There you'll find the show notes, readings, and links related to this episode. You can also find
02:42:24.960 my blog and the nerd safari at peteratiamd.com. What's a nerd safari you ask? Just click on the
02:42:30.980 link at the top of the site to learn more. Maybe the simplest thing to do is to sign up for my
02:42:34.980 subjectively non lame once a week email, where I'll update you on what I've been up to,
02:42:39.160 the most interesting papers I've read and all things related to longevity, science, performance,
02:42:44.320 sleep, et cetera. On social, you can find me on Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook, all with the
02:42:49.360 ID peteratiamd. But usually Twitter is the best way to reach me to share your questions and comments.
02:42:54.900 Now for the obligatory disclaimer, this podcast is for general informational purposes only and does
02:42:59.420 not constitute the practice of medicine, nursing, or other professional healthcare services,
02:43:04.280 including the giving of medical advice. And note, no doctor patient relationship is formed.
02:43:09.580 The use of this information and the materials linked to the podcast is at the user's own risk.
02:43:14.760 The content of this podcast is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice,
02:43:19.280 diagnoses, or treatment. Users should not disregard or delay in obtaining medical advice for any medical
02:43:24.700 condition they have and should seek the assistance of their healthcare professionals for any such
02:43:29.260 conditions. Lastly, and perhaps most importantly, I take conflicts of interest very seriously. For all of my
02:43:35.420 disclosures, the companies I invest in and or advise, please visit peteratiamd.com forward slash about.