The Peter Attia Drive - March 17, 2025


#340 - AMA #69: Scrutinizing supplements: creatine, fish oil, vitamin D, and more—a framework for understanding effectiveness, quality, and individual need


Episode Stats

Length

24 minutes

Words per Minute

177.1697

Word Count

4,338

Sentence Count

212

Misogynist Sentences

5

Hate Speech Sentences

3


Summary

In today's episode, we cover supplements. As this is a very complex topic, we wanted to approach it first by proposing a framework that you can use to evaluate supplements that we can't make blanket recommendations on since everyone has their own individual health circumstances. To me, the framework is very important here because if I were to just dive into this podcast and give you my point of view on a random collection of supplements, it would be akin to giving you a bunch of fish when in reality, what I want to do is make sure you know how to fish.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hey everyone, welcome to a sneak peek, ask me anything or AMA episode of the drive podcast.
00:00:16.320 I'm your host, Peter Atiyah. At the end of this short episode, I'll explain how you can access
00:00:20.780 the AMA episodes in full, along with a ton of other membership benefits we've created,
00:00:25.400 or you can learn more now by going to peteratiyahmd.com forward slash subscribe.
00:00:31.100 So without further delay, here's today's sneak peek of the ask me anything episode.
00:00:39.340 Welcome to ask me anything AMA episode number 69. In today's episode, we cover supplements. As this
00:00:47.420 is a very complex topic, we wanted to approach it first by proposing a framework that you can use
00:00:53.440 to evaluate supplements that we can't make blanket recommendations on since everyone has their own
00:00:59.260 individual health circumstances. To me, the framework is very important here because if
00:01:04.260 I were to just dive into this podcast and give you my point of view on a random collection of
00:01:09.360 supplements, it would be akin to giving you a bunch of fish when in reality, what I want to do is make
00:01:14.420 sure you, of course, know how to fish. But not just giving you the framework, we also want to give you
00:01:19.820 a few fish. And so we want to use the framework to cover a handful of studies for some popular
00:01:25.420 supplements. We covered creatine, fish oil, vitamin D, vitamin B, or many of the vitamin Bs,
00:01:32.840 and ashwagandha. We also talk about how to look at supplement quality, and we hope that this episode
00:01:38.320 gives you an ability to take said framework and apply it to any supplement you encounter in the
00:01:44.680 future. If you're a subscriber and you want to watch the full video of this podcast, you can find it on
00:01:48.860 the show notes page. If you're not a subscriber, you can watch the sneak peek on our YouTube page.
00:01:54.200 So without further delay, I hope you'll enjoy AMA 69.
00:02:03.500 Peter, welcome to another AMA. How are you doing?
00:02:06.360 Great. Thank you for having me again.
00:02:07.980 Always, always welcome. I know sometimes it's tough to get you to clear your schedule, but we're always
00:02:12.440 happy you show up. Haven't missed one yet, so that's always a good thing. So today we're hitting a
00:02:17.800 topic, which is one we get asked about a lot, which is supplements. And this can vary greatly
00:02:23.820 depending on the person, depending on the supplements. And the hard part with supplements
00:02:27.240 is that while everyone is interested in it, it's so variable person to person, and not even all your
00:02:34.140 patients are taking the same supplements or the same amount and all of that. And so it's really
00:02:39.360 hard to talk about it in a way that makes it applicable to everyone without being like, take this,
00:02:44.500 don't take this, which is something that you've never really done because of how you look at this
00:02:49.400 topic. What we decided to do today was instead look at a framework for how you think about supplements
00:02:54.920 and then go through case studies of a variety of supplements to talk through it, to hopefully allow
00:03:00.660 the person listening or watching to then be able to apply it in their own life so they can just get a
00:03:06.120 better understanding, be smarter when it comes to this topic. So we tried to pick ones that we get
00:03:11.480 asked about a lot for the case studies, which is creatine, fish oil, vitamin D, B vitamins, and
00:03:17.140 ashwagandha. So the hope is after this, not only will people understand those specific supplements
00:03:22.220 better that we're going to do the case studies on, but also how they can apply this framework to their
00:03:27.600 own life. With all that said, when patients come into the practice, what percent of the supplements
00:03:34.020 are they taking that you recommend they continue to take? Obviously any patient that's coming into the
00:03:38.880 practice, we're trying to gather as much information about them as we can through their medical history.
00:03:43.620 And an important component of that is understanding all medications, supplements, hormones, anything
00:03:48.420 they take. I call this the bucket of exogenous molecules. So generally we know this on the way in
00:03:54.560 and there's a ton of variety. There's people who come in who are taking nothing. They don't take any
00:03:59.080 medicine by prescription. They don't take any supplements. Conversely, there are patients who come in
00:04:03.360 on no medications, but a list of supplements that might be two pages long and everything in
00:04:09.220 between. Our view is generally to approach this the way the kidney approaches the filtration of
00:04:16.860 glucose, sodium, and potassium, which is you dump everything out and then ask the question,
00:04:22.380 what should be added back in? And I don't mean we literally stop everything, but I'm saying that's
00:04:27.060 kind of the mental model for how we go about thinking about it. Because a lot of times when we ask
00:04:32.100 patients, why are you taking this or why are you taking that? They don't know. They just say, oh,
00:04:36.400 you know, I started this a couple of years ago because I saw somebody on Instagram talking about
00:04:41.080 it. Or, you know, I saw this doctor a few years ago who told me to take this, but I have no idea why.
00:04:46.740 So there's just a couple of things worth acknowledging before we jump into this. And it
00:04:51.480 comes from discussions that I've had many times, which goes something like this. Hey, I don't believe
00:04:58.300 in taking any medicine, just so you know, only natural supplements. Now, my response to that is,
00:05:05.640 tell me the difference. There is a difference, but I just want to make sure you as the consumer of
00:05:10.640 this understand the difference. And it's really a question of regulation. So supplements are not
00:05:17.260 regulated. By definition, the FDA has tacitly referred to them as generally regarded as safe.
00:05:25.560 But the process by which that's determined is not entirely that rigorous. And pharmaceutical
00:05:31.640 products, while far from perfect, do have more in the way of regulation and oversight.
00:05:37.720 There are places where these overlap. I'll encounter a patient who says, listen, I will never
00:05:43.300 take a statin to lower my ApoB, but I will definitely happily take red rice yeast, at which point you have
00:05:50.960 to sort of explain to them, that a very high dose of red rice yeast is effectively a modest dose of
00:05:56.940 pravastatin. So I think it's just helpful for patients not to get ideologically wrapped up in the idea of
00:06:03.980 over-the-counter supplement versus pharmaceutical agent, and instead to just analyze any molecule you put in
00:06:11.700 your body through the framework we're going to talk about today. Today, we're going to limit it to over-the-counter
00:06:17.080 supplements because these are the things we get asked the most questions about. And frankly, it's
00:06:21.780 the area in which it's harder to do the type of analysis we're doing today. So the type of analysis
00:06:26.540 we're doing today is so much easier to do in the pharma space because of the regulatory hurdles that
00:06:33.100 must be cleared by a drug to be approved. So it's almost like shooting fish in a barrel. It's still a
00:06:38.420 great exercise to do, but doing it the way we're going to do it today is really how you develop the
00:06:43.340 muscle for doing this type of work. I think with that said, do you just want to run over
00:06:48.240 real quick the questions you asked to determine whether or not a supplement is worthwhile?
00:06:54.000 And I think just giving this overview will be helpful because as we said in the beginning,
00:06:57.700 when we go through the case studies, we'll stick to these questions and answer them
00:07:02.100 along the way. And so to kick it off, do you just want to run through what those questions are?
00:07:07.140 I think this is the single most important thing I'm hopefully transmitting throughout this episode.
00:07:11.120 I mean, the heavy lifting is actually showing you how we go through this, but this is the punchline.
00:07:16.500 Anytime you're considering taking a supplement or someone is suggesting a supplement, you should ask
00:07:21.320 the following questions or something that approximates them. So the first question I'm asking is,
00:07:25.300 are you taking this to correct a deficiency or are you trying to achieve supranormal levels of
00:07:32.860 fill in the blank? Second question, are you taking this molecule because you believe that it's going
00:07:40.260 to improve your lifespan or your health span or potentially both? The third question is,
00:07:46.640 if it is lifespan, is it because this molecule is targeting a specific disease and presumably
00:07:53.820 reducing your risk of that disease? Or do we believe it's more broadly geroprotective?
00:07:58.180 In the supplement landscape, that's pretty rare to find, but obviously you can see examples in the
00:08:03.320 pharma space where we might see certain drugs that we think have geroprotective benefits versus
00:08:08.260 those that have lifespan benefits, but only on one disease. Of course, the other question that is
00:08:14.700 the corollary of that is if you're taking it for health span, can you speak to which apparatus of
00:08:20.920 health span? Do you think this is something that is improving physical performance, cognitive
00:08:24.160 performance, or emotional health? The fourth question is, is there a biomarker that you can track
00:08:29.760 to suggest that you are getting the appropriate amount of the supplement or that you might be
00:08:35.720 in the therapeutic window? The fifth question is, do you understand the mechanism of action?
00:08:42.160 Now, again, I want to be clear. You don't have to answer every one of these questions in the
00:08:46.800 affirmative for it to make sense. For example, there are countless things that we use for which we might
00:08:52.760 not fully understand the mechanism of action, but we might feel confident enough on some of these
00:08:57.280 other dimensions to move forward. The final question is, what is the balance of risk to reward,
00:09:02.560 including potential side effects, the magnitude of the effect, the confidence we have in the data
00:09:10.280 that speak to its safety, and the quality of the supplement itself? And this last point
00:09:15.460 is especially important here. We know from previous podcasts that I've done, including the one with
00:09:21.240 Catherine Eban, that even in the pharma world, the quality of the drug is not to be taken as a given.
00:09:27.880 That episode, which is several years old and we'll link to it, really called into question the quality
00:09:33.560 of some of the pharmacologic agents out there, especially generic brands. But whatever amount
00:09:39.240 of nefarious behavior exists over there, I think you're safe multiplying that by 10 or 100 to
00:09:46.740 understand the magnitude by which that's happening in the supplement space. So I guess before we jump
00:09:51.320 into this, Nick, I just want to make sure we've pulled together a lot of information on the six
00:09:55.180 supplements you mentioned. For the sake of time, flow, making this conversational, I'm not going
00:10:03.040 to go deep into each study that we talk about. Rather, I'm going to try to cover the important
00:10:08.220 details, but we will heavily cite, link to, and explain the details of the studies in the show notes.
00:10:14.980 So if you're listening to this because you just want to see how the framework works, great. But if
00:10:19.440 you're like, actually, for those supplements, I want to go deeper, the show notes is where to go.
00:10:23.360 Perfect. So I think let's get started with the first one, creatine. Going through the questions
00:10:29.740 in the framework, are you using creatine to correct for deficiency or trying to achieve
00:10:36.960 super maximal levels? With creatine, it's clearly the latter. I'm sure there's somebody walking around
00:10:43.200 out there with a creatine deficiency, but that's not really the use case. So when people like myself,
00:10:47.780 and I do take creatine, it's because we believe that supraphysiologic levels are preferential.
00:10:56.160 We take this primarily to improve athletic performance, potentially increasing lean mass
00:11:02.140 slightly. There are some emerging studies that suggest that it may also ameliorate cognitive decline.
00:11:09.260 And basically, research shows that once muscle stores are fully maximized,
00:11:14.340 which can be achieved with three to five grams per day, you've flattened out that curve. In other
00:11:20.980 words, you don't need to go much beyond that. Although, as we've talked about on this podcast,
00:11:25.320 there was a day for those of us that are old enough to remember when the zeitgeist was to do
00:11:31.000 a period of loading at much, much higher doses in the neighborhood of 20 grams per day before
00:11:35.640 falling to a maintenance dose of five. But today, people that are taking it are usually just taking
00:11:40.560 three to five grams per day. As far as taking it for lifespan, healthspan,
00:11:46.520 which one are people usually taking it for? Well, we certainly see no direct evidence on
00:11:51.560 lifespan. I think most people who would take this, if being confronted with the granularity of this
00:11:56.380 question in this way, would say, look, I'm taking this for healthspan. I'm maximizing the benefits of
00:12:00.080 my exercise, especially with respect to resistance training, and maybe potentially warding off
00:12:06.260 cognitive impairment. Now, of course, indirectly, I would say that those are also benefits on
00:12:10.740 lifespan. But I would say that that's probably the way to think about this.
00:12:16.180 And you kind of talked about this earlier on, but is there a specific biomarker that people can use
00:12:22.020 to track to see if the supplement's quote unquote working or not?
00:12:26.400 No, there's not a biomarker for this. And again, what do I mean by a biomarker? Well,
00:12:30.960 if you're taking a medication to lower your blood pressure, measuring your blood pressure
00:12:35.220 actually becomes a biomarker for the thing you're taking. Am I taking enough or too much?
00:12:41.260 If you're taking a drug that lowers your ApoB, the ApoB itself serves as the biomarker.
00:12:48.640 We don't have a way outside of a lab commercially to measure tissue creatine levels. So we do not have
00:12:55.060 a biomarker for this. And that's why people who take it are just sort of adhering to a protocol.
00:12:59.620 On the mechanism of action, do we have any understanding of the mechanism of action for
00:13:06.260 creatine, whether it relates to the physical or the cognitive side?
00:13:11.260 On the physical side, meaning on the muscle performance side, it's certainly pretty clear.
00:13:15.840 People will recall how energy currency is delivered. So ATP, adenosine triphosphate,
00:13:25.120 is the richest form of energy currency, and it liberates energy. So it's spent by liberating
00:13:32.660 a phosphate. So ATP becomes adenosine diphosphate, ADP. Of course, that process works in reverse. So as
00:13:40.760 we want to build up and replenish our ATP stores, we need a phosphate donor. And this is where
00:13:47.120 phosphocreatine comes in. So we do naturally have phosphocreatine. In fact, when you start to think
00:13:52.840 about the various energy systems, if I asked you, Nick, to do something that was an all-out effort
00:13:58.380 for 10 seconds, that would not require oxygen. You're not tapping into your VO2 max or your
00:14:05.520 oxygen delivery system. It's frankly not even an anaerobic activity, meaning you're not actually
00:14:11.560 turning glucose into pyruvate, into lactate, etc. If you're doing something that is such a short burst
00:14:17.820 of activity, you are really relying on the phosphocreatine system to generate the ATP for that
00:14:23.360 activity. So if you're doing a 40-yard dash, you're relying on phosphocreatine. But of course,
00:14:27.900 phosphocreatine itself is a phosphate donor, and therefore, anything that boosts the supply of
00:14:33.740 phosphocreatine boosts the supply of ATP. And it's our belief that that's effectively what it is doing,
00:14:40.620 and therefore that it's helpful with anything that requires bursts of activity. But even beyond just
00:14:46.740 the super short, extending into the anaerobic, I don't know that there are really any proven benefits
00:14:52.320 that this augments aerobic performance. So once you get into the purely oxidative phosphorylation
00:14:59.780 pathway, I mean, maybe someone will correct us, but I'm not really aware that there are benefits of
00:15:03.860 creatine in that regard. I think it's more in the first two energy systems, the phosphocreatine system
00:15:08.220 and the anaerobic system. On the cognitive side, we know that a small amount of creatine is synthesized
00:15:13.260 in the brain, and that creatine can cross the blood-brain barrier. But the brain certainly
00:15:18.460 does not take up creatine to the same extent as the muscles do. So while we have, again,
00:15:24.720 some evidence to suggest that creatine is efficacious for cognitive function, it might turn
00:15:30.040 out to be the case that you need higher doses of it. I think that's still an open question as far
00:15:34.720 as I'm concerned. You mentioned earlier that we'll put a lot of more detailed information on the data
00:15:40.140 in the show notes, but looking at a high level, what does the data around creatine say about efficacy
00:15:46.220 of it? This is a supplement that has been quite readily studied. There's reasonable evidence to
00:15:51.560 suggest, and again, we'll link to lots of it, that creatine does help improve various parameters of
00:15:57.280 muscle performance. And it's not that subtle. I mean, it's typically in the range of 5, 10, maybe even
00:16:02.500 15%. So these include things like power and hypertrophy. Again, the power shouldn't be that surprising
00:16:08.260 when you understand the mechanism of action. The hypertrophy seems to be due to the, not just the
00:16:12.840 increase in the myofibril thickness, but also in the retention of water within the muscle. And of
00:16:17.820 course, that's still considered lean mass. As I alluded to, kind of physical performance in short,
00:16:22.880 intense burst activities, and potentially some benefits in slowing down the aging phenotype of muscle
00:16:29.820 mass. Again, like I said, it's really probably best suited for high intensity and anaerobic
00:16:36.080 activities. But the one meta-analysis we'll cite to found that creatine did not really improve
00:16:42.320 endurance events in trained athletes. Again, you always could argue, well, maybe it's because they
00:16:49.480 were really well-trained and their mitochondria were well-honed. But it's possible that there's
00:16:54.280 a study where you took completely untrained athletes, had them do an aerobic task with and without
00:16:59.620 creatine, and you might indeed see a benefit there. So again, I think we're still kind of in early
00:17:03.560 days on some of this stuff. There was a 2017 review that got quite a bit of attention that
00:17:08.700 we'll link to that concluded that creatine may help with the prevention and recovery from injury.
00:17:14.160 And there have been a number of meta-analyses looking at cognition. The most recent one, which
00:17:18.440 was this year, looked at 16 RCTs and found that creatine had a positive effect on memory.
00:17:25.500 I would say long and short of it is a lot of this stuff looks very promising. There's also some
00:17:30.840 evidence that women in particular might benefit more than even men. Women have lower stores because
00:17:38.080 muscle mass is the predominant store. Women have less muscle, therefore less stores. But there might
00:17:43.360 also be less consumption through diet. So it, again, at least leads to the hypothesis that women may
00:17:49.700 benefit even disproportionately to men. There's some, I think, rather weak data that suggests that
00:17:56.320 it may help reduce depression in women. And there's some evidence to suggest that it may be helpful
00:18:01.800 during periods of rapid hormonal change. And that could be within the monthly period of a menstrual
00:18:08.780 cycle, pregnancy, perimenopause, and menopause. So you might ask, why is that the case? Well,
00:18:15.000 the creatine and phosphocreatine pathways are impacted by hormonal changes. And of course, during all of those
00:18:21.280 periods that I just mentioned, you're seeing rapid hormonal changes. So it's not
00:18:24.680 really that surprising that supplementing to supernormal levels of creatine could offset some
00:18:32.380 of those impacts. Pregnancy is a question I get asked about a lot, Nick. I would say I remain a
00:18:38.040 little bit unclear and would probably suggest that it's probably safe during pregnancy, but we just don't
00:18:44.380 have enough human data to form a strong point of view. So in my mind, the wise thing to do is to avoid
00:18:50.260 anything that is not absolutely necessary during pregnancy. So just to give an example,
00:18:54.780 when we have women in our practice that are preparing for pregnancy or pregnant themselves,
00:18:59.120 I mean, no matter what they're taking, if they're taking medication for something that they can live
00:19:03.620 without for nine months, we would absolutely stop it. So yeah, I would say women should probably dose
00:19:08.980 it at about the same doses as men, but of course they'll get more bang for that buck because they're
00:19:13.760 on average smaller. Rounding out everything we talked about with creatine, what is the balance
00:19:18.780 of risk-reward to how you see it? Seems like a lot of stuff we talked about was a lot of reward,
00:19:24.020 but how do you think about this to summarize it? I would put this in the low-risk, modest-reward
00:19:30.360 category. We do have, I think, really robust safety data here, and it looks good. If the muscle stores
00:19:36.860 are already full, the liver is probably going to metabolize the delta. The kidneys will clear the
00:19:42.280 excess. There is one thing to keep in mind. If you're a person who doesn't have perfect kidney
00:19:48.060 function, you do probably want to talk with your doctor before you take it. And this is very
00:19:53.420 important. You want to make sure that they know you're taking it before they do any blood tests to
00:19:59.740 measure your creatinine because high doses of creatine can impact serum doses of creatinine, which
00:20:07.900 we would use as one of the metrics to determine kidney function. So in our patients that have
00:20:13.680 anything but perfect kidney function, if they're taking creatine, we typically have them stop
00:20:19.380 for a couple of weeks before we do a blood test. Creatine monohydrate really is the version to take.
00:20:26.560 I don't even know if they sell anything else. They used to sell a creatine phosphate a long time ago. I
00:20:31.340 don't think that there's anybody selling that anymore. I don't think it matters, but there's just no
00:20:36.000 evidence that you need to be taking anything other than creatine monohydrate. It's wildly inexpensive
00:20:42.200 and you should be looking for the purest product only that has nothing in it. The only ingredient
00:20:47.500 should be creatine monohydrate. No fillers, no extra ingredients, unless there's some flavoring agent
00:20:52.860 that you want. But I just mix this in with an electrolyte drink. So I want nothing other than
00:20:58.220 the creatine monohydrate in the sample. Anything else you want to say on creatine before we move to the
00:21:03.980 next one, which is fish oil. Nope. Perfect. Fish oil. Another supplement that we get asked about a ton.
00:21:11.420 We've done some podcasts on it. A lot of questions on it. Seems like a lot of people take it.
00:21:16.200 And so going through the questions with fish oil. First one is, are you correcting for deficiency or are
00:21:22.140 you trying to achieve super maximal levels when it comes to fish oil? Thank you for listening to today's
00:21:28.740 sneak peek AMA episode of the drive. If you're interested in hearing the complete version of this AMA,
00:21:34.820 you'll want to become a premium member. It's extremely important to me to provide all of this content
00:21:40.060 without relying on paid ads. To do this, our work is made entirely possible by our members. And in return,
00:21:46.120 we offer exclusive member only content and benefits above and beyond what is available for free.
00:21:52.060 So if you want to take your knowledge of this space to the next level, it's our goal to ensure members
00:21:56.680 get back much more than the price of the subscription. Premium membership includes
00:22:01.120 several benefits. First, comprehensive podcast show notes that detail every topic, paper, person,
00:22:08.320 and thing that we discuss in each episode. And the word on the street is nobody's show notes rival ours.
00:22:14.460 Second, monthly ask me anything or AMA episodes. These episodes are comprised of detailed responses to
00:22:21.540 subscriber questions typically focused on a single topic and are designed to offer a great deal of
00:22:27.040 clarity and detail on topics of special interest to our members. You'll also get access to the show
00:22:31.920 notes for these episodes, of course. Third, delivery of our premium newsletter, which is put together
00:22:37.880 by our dedicated team of research analysts. This newsletter covers a wide range of topics related
00:22:43.460 to longevity and provides much more detail than our free weekly newsletter. Fourth, access to our
00:22:50.520 private podcast feed that provides you with access to every episode, including AMA's sans the spiel
00:22:56.460 you're listening to now and in your regular podcast feed. Fifth, the qualies, an additional member
00:23:03.240 only podcast we put together that serves as a highlight reel featuring the best excerpts from previous
00:23:09.460 episodes of the drive. This is a great way to catch up on previous episodes without having to go back and
00:23:14.560 listen to each one of them. And finally, other benefits that are added along the way. If you want to learn
00:23:20.100 more and access these member only benefits, you can head over to peteratiamd.com forward slash
00:23:26.280 subscribe. You can also find me on YouTube, Instagram, and Twitter, all with the handle
00:23:31.340 peteratiamd. You can also leave us review on Apple podcasts or whatever podcast player you use.
00:23:38.040 This podcast is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute the practice of medicine,
00:23:43.760 nursing, or other professional healthcare services, including the giving of medical advice,
00:23:48.300 no doctor patient relationship is formed. The use of this information and the materials linked to this
00:23:54.600 podcast is at the user's own risk. The content on this podcast is not intended to be a substitute for
00:24:00.540 professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Users should not disregard or delay in obtaining
00:24:06.160 medical advice from any medical condition they have, and they should seek the assistance of their
00:24:11.120 healthcare professionals for any such conditions. Finally, I take all conflicts of interest very
00:24:16.480 seriously. For all of my disclosures and the companies I invest in or advise, please visit
00:24:22.080 peteratiamd.com forward slash about where I keep an up-to-date and active list of all disclosures.