The Peter Attia Drive - October 12, 2026


#411 ‒ AMA #90: Strong convictions, loosely held: how Peter's views on fasting, keto, metformin, rapamycin, whole-body MRI, and exercise have changed

Hosted by
Mentioned
#410 ‒ The biology of pregnancy: physiologic adaptation, gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, childbirth, and long-term maternal health | Kathryn Gray, M.D., Ph.D.

Episode Stats


Length

18 minutes

Words per minute

172.27

Word count

3,172

Sentence count

156


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.000 Hey everyone, welcome to a sneak peek, ask me anything or AMA episode of the drive podcast.
00:00:15.820 I'm your host, Peter Atiyah. At the end of this short episode, I'll explain how you can access
00:00:20.280 the AMA episodes in full, along with a ton of other membership benefits we've created,
00:00:24.900 Or you can learn more now by going to peteratiyahmd.com forward slash subscribe.
00:00:30.580 So without further delay, here's today's sneak peek of the Ask Me Anything episode.
00:00:39.180 Welcome to Ask Me Anything episode number 90.
00:00:43.480 In today's AMA, we're reflecting back on the first 400 episodes of The Drive
00:00:49.680 with another episode of the Strong Convictions Loosely Held theme.
00:00:54.900 So what do we do with this? Well, we walk through some of the biggest positions I've taken
00:00:59.000 across the eight plus years of this podcast, but then we revisit them by basically asking,
00:01:05.580 where have the data taken us? What's changed, if anything? And as a result of that, of course,
00:01:10.240 where am I today? So in this episode, we're going to talk about my evolving views on ketogenic diets,
00:01:16.320 extended fasting as a longevity intervention, and the DRTRCR framework, why I stopped taking
00:01:23.220 metformin for longevity and my shifting position on rapamycin, whole body MRI and liquid biopsies
00:01:30.640 for cancer screening, including why I think whole body MRI data quality has actually gotten worse
00:01:36.280 over time and not better, how my approach to cardiorespiratory training and the 80-20 zone
00:01:42.980 two framework has changed, especially for people with limited training time, and why I stepped away
00:01:48.900 from heavy barbell squats and deadlifts and how to think about risk management in strength training.
00:01:54.840 If you're a subscriber and want to watch the full video of this podcast, you can find it on the
00:01:59.100 show notes page. And if you're not a subscriber, you can watch a sneak peek of the video on our
00:02:04.040 YouTube page. So without further delight, I hope you enjoy our celebration of 400 episodes together
00:02:09.540 with AMA number 90. Peter, welcome to another podcast. How are you doing? Very good. Thank you.
00:02:19.720 You? Doing good. Doing good. So today we are celebrating 400 episodes, about eight years.
00:02:26.240 So we recently crossed this. And usually what we do is every now and then we'll look back at kind
00:02:30.760 of a reflection episode. In the past, we've always referred to them as strong convictions,
00:02:35.340 loosely held. And so I think as we start, before we get into specific topics,
00:02:40.360 do you kind of want to remind people about what that term means to you, where you heard about it,
00:02:44.500 and why you think it's so important? Yeah, it's a term that I first heard from a friend who ran
00:02:50.700 a hedge fund. And obviously, this was through the lens of his investment thesis, which was that
00:02:55.840 obviously needed strong convictions, but because you're putting real capital behind the thesis.
00:03:00.120 but those convictions had to be loosely held because the moment new information or contradictory
00:03:05.640 information showed itself, you kind of had to be willing to check your ego at the door,
00:03:10.420 say maybe I was wrong and how do I need to change things? But I always thought that that frankly
00:03:14.680 was a great view of how to think about everything where there's actual information at play. And
00:03:21.480 obviously medicine and science are great examples of that. So I've been around many really, really
00:03:26.900 great scientists. And one of the characteristics they all have in common is they're not married
00:03:31.340 to a particular thesis being right. They're married to sort of getting things as right as
00:03:36.540 possible and reducing uncertainty by following the data wherever those data take them. So I think
00:03:43.120 it's important that we are revisiting our assumptions. And as someone asked me once,
00:03:50.340 you know, if you were to write Outlive 10 years from now, do you think it would be the same book
00:03:53.820 that you wrote, you know, three years ago. And I would say, no, I, in fact, that would be
00:03:58.940 concerning if it were the same book in 10 years as it was at the time it was written. Cause it
00:04:04.040 would either suggest I'm too rigid in my thinking or science has made no progress. And I think both
00:04:11.300 of those would be, would be challenging. So yeah, that's loosely how we think about this episode.
00:04:17.820 And Peter, when you're kind of looking at your opinions and how you're thinking about things
00:04:21.860 and how they evolved, where does that traditionally come from? What are the triggers that are causing
00:04:26.560 you to potentially change your opinion or how you look at things? I think it's a combination of
00:04:33.260 obviously things that change in the literature, but scientific progress is by its very nature
00:04:41.000 somewhat glacial and episodic. It doesn't just progress at the same rate. I think the other
00:04:47.660 sources of, of learning for me and things that forced me to change, maybe things I once held
00:04:53.680 would be the podcast itself, right? There's a opportunity I get most weeks to sit down with
00:04:59.600 someone who's far more of an expert in a subject matter than I am. And both in preparing for that
00:05:04.180 discussion, having a discussion, I'm learning something that often changes. I mean, almost
00:05:08.480 always changes something in how I think. And then obviously you have, uh, as every doctor hopefully
00:05:14.460 appreciates all of our patients are kind of our teachers, right? So we learn a lot because we're
00:05:20.800 seeing what happens in a clinic with patients. And we're, you know, we're going to talk about
00:05:26.640 some of these things today, frankly. So, you know, so basically I think all of these things
00:05:30.780 taken together, whether it be literature, conversations with experts and seeing what
00:05:35.540 actually happens in the clinic. I think a lot of times these things continue to converge
00:05:40.380 and the views don't change much. And other times the view just gets more nuanced and you start to
00:05:45.860 carve out edge cases and exceptions. And then sometimes it actually causes you to change course
00:05:51.140 completely. And obviously that's what I think this episode is all about and what makes this
00:05:55.720 type of episode for me personally quite enjoyable. I think as we start this, I think the topic that
00:06:01.340 makes the most sense to start at, which is everyone's favorite, nutrition. So kind of very
00:06:06.900 early on, way back in the day, you were a big proponent of the keto diet. You were also an
00:06:12.580 early adopter and advocate for kind of extended fasting and what that could potentially do
00:06:16.920 from a longevity perspective. And so kind of where are you now on those things and how has
00:06:23.660 your opinion changed? Well, my original thing, I'll start with the diet thing, was really driven
00:06:30.480 by this insulin model of obesity. So metabolic disease was and obviously remains kind of not
00:06:37.940 just one of the four horsemen of chronic disease, but kind of the foundational problem, right? So
00:06:43.160 it's the one thing where as metabolic health gets worse, your risk of all other chronic diseases
00:06:50.560 essentially goes up. And in my own journey of nutritional experimentation, carbohydrate
00:06:58.100 restriction was proving to be very beneficial. And as you stepwise move down the plank of
00:07:05.920 carbohydrate restriction, you're going to pretty quickly find yourself at a place which is generally
00:07:10.800 a line in the sand of ketogenic diets or not, right? Because at some point carbohydrate intake
00:07:14.760 gets so low that you're not providing enough glucose for your brain. But if it's still a
00:07:20.680 little high and it's too high to allow your body to switch over into ketosis, then you're not
00:07:26.800 getting enough supplemental energy for your brain and you're, you're in that kind of no man's land
00:07:30.940 of hell. And so I remember getting to that point and then deciding, well, you know, I, at that
00:07:35.600 point had been reading a lot about ketogenic diets and decided, look, I'm going to give this
00:07:38.220 thing a shot. So anyway, so that my own journey starts with my own experience, which was very
00:07:42.760 positive. I know I get sort of labeled as someone who's anti-keto diets and stuff like that by,
00:07:49.300 by various people out there. And I just find that to be the most comical critique of me because not
00:07:55.000 only was I on a ketogenic diet for three years, it was probably the best I ever felt. I look back
00:08:01.620 at what those three years were like, and every element of it was very positive for me. There
00:08:07.440 are other reasons, obviously, I chose to abandon it. Nevertheless, it reinforced the model in my
00:08:13.160 mind that the relationship between carbohydrates, insulin, hyperinsulinemia, lipogenesis, etc.,
00:08:21.060 was, you know, sort of, it all made sense that then a ketogenic diet would sort of fix these
00:08:25.440 problems. I think there were also lots of compelling data with, with animals and humans
00:08:30.380 showing the improvements in glycemic control, insulin sensitivity, liberal, liver, visceral
00:08:35.000 fat, et cetera, and other metabolic markers improving. And as I said, I certainly reinforced
00:08:40.340 that. Now here's what's different. I abandoned the ketogenic diet basically because I was just
00:08:48.440 tired of being that restrictive in my eating. I mean, I was very strict in my ketosis. I think,
00:08:54.560 you know, I also logged unprecedented amounts of data during this process. And I think over
00:08:59.600 a three-year period of time, you know, my average morning fasting beta-hydroxybutyrate level was,
00:09:06.860 you know, 1.8 to 2 millimoles, something in that range. So this wasn't, like, I wasn't sort of a
00:09:12.060 light ketosis guy. And then, of course, it would get much higher during the day, depending on what
00:09:16.580 I was eating because I was mostly eating fat. So my abandoning the ketogenic diet was independent
00:09:22.720 of my views of the ketogenic diet. And to this day, I still view it as an effective diet.
00:09:28.700 What has changed is my belief as to why it works. You see, I used to believe that the diet worked
00:09:36.620 through insulin suppression, but today I don't think that's the case. Today, I think the diet
00:09:44.360 works for the same reason many restrictive diets work, which is it makes it easier to control
00:09:51.720 energy intake, even if you don't have to think about it deliberately, which to be clear, I never
00:09:57.680 did, right? Now, of course, I wasn't losing much weight on a ketogenic diet because I'd already
00:10:01.200 lost most of the weight I was trying to lose just from carbohydrate restriction. But when I see
00:10:06.620 people who are successful on ketogenic diets, they often report that they feel quite satiated. And I
00:10:12.800 think that has to do with the type of foods that they're consuming, which satiate them more than
00:10:17.700 carbohydrates. And I also believe there's something to be said for when you are oxidizing fatty acids
00:10:24.540 that in and of itself is providing fuel endogenously, which is happening obviously during
00:10:29.360 a period of weight loss. So it's a subtle point, but it's worth making because it does reflect
00:10:35.740 a change in my viewpoint, which is that the metabolic dysfunction, the visceral fat accumulation,
00:10:44.320 the ectopic fat accumulation, the insulin sensitivity deteriorating, all of these things
00:10:49.320 are the result of the energy imbalance. And hyperinsulinemia is along for the ride.
00:10:55.880 But if you magically address the hyperinsulinemia without addressing the energy imbalance,
00:11:02.500 you're not going to fix these problems. And the easiest way to see that is to watch a person who's
00:11:07.440 on a ketogenic diet, who for whatever reason is still in energy imbalance. So they're still going
00:11:14.160 to have lower levels of insulin, but they're not going to lose weight and they could even gain
00:11:18.380 weight. So you could gain weight on a ketogenic diet if you're out of energy balance. So that's
00:11:23.100 sort of the long and short of my views on that. As a result, I think it's made me less, I mean,
00:11:28.880 much less dogmatic about the strategy or the tactics that a person employs when it comes to
00:11:35.500 reducing energy intake. I really don't have a strong preference when a patient is at a point
00:11:42.400 where they need to reduce intake. Once a few principles are met, and we've obviously talked
00:11:47.180 a lot about those things, right? I really am pretty adamant about people maintaining
00:11:50.600 the right amount of protein. And at a minimum, I want them hitting 1.4 grams per kilogram
00:11:56.060 of body weight. But if they can accomplish that on a ketogenic diet, on a low-fat diet,
00:12:01.640 on a mostly pescatarian diet, I mean, again, it just doesn't really matter as much to me
00:12:07.420 as it once did. So yeah, I think that's probably a big point around my previous dogmatism around
00:12:15.620 nutrition. And now looking at extended fasting, do you want to talk about kind of what was your
00:12:21.380 initial motivation there and where you're thinking as a bulb yeah i mean i think it's sort of similar
00:12:28.160 again a lot of things with me begin from a place internally right where i'm doing something and i'm
00:12:33.700 trying to push the boundaries of it personally so for about a three-year period of time i was doing
00:12:40.860 a quarterly fast and it would be anywhere from seven to ten days once a quarter and then on the
00:12:48.120 other two months of the quarter, I would do a three-day fast. And what was my logic for this?
00:12:53.940 I mean, to be clear, I was not trying to lose weight. I was at a weight that was perfectly
00:12:58.720 reasonable. But I was really fascinated by this idea that with enough nutrient deprivation,
00:13:05.700 we could promote enough autophagy that it would have real health benefits. And just to remind
00:13:11.560 folks. What autophagy is, autophagy is the process by which cells break down and recycle
00:13:18.420 old intracellular proteins and structures. So the name auto-self-phagy eating, it's literally
00:13:24.080 cells that are kind of eating themselves. And this is a very important process, obviously long,
00:13:29.820 long conserved in evolution, because when nutrients are scarce, the body has to basically
00:13:34.820 reuse and recycle things. Now, the benefit of this, of course, is that what is the body going
00:13:41.340 to do when it needs to reuse and recycle things? It's not going to start with the best stuff. It's
00:13:47.120 going to start with the worst stuff. So if you have cells that are heading towards senescence,
00:13:51.560 if you have cells that are developing mutations, the thinking goes, hey, that's where we're going
00:13:56.460 to start. Those are the cells we're going to get rid of and recycle for their constitutive
00:14:00.500 components. And again, in preclinical models, extended fasting clearly does this. So there's
00:14:07.180 little doubt that extended fasting promotes autophagy. As a little aside, Nick, and I haven't
00:14:13.140 looked at the literature on this in a couple of years, so maybe what I'm saying, someone will say,
00:14:16.880 no, Peter, we actually look at so-and-so study. But it wasn't really clear how many days of fasting
00:14:23.820 were necessary to get into quote high autophagy because autophagy is not digital it's analog it's
00:14:31.600 not like you have no autophagy and then you cross a threshold and now you have autophagy in a digital
00:14:37.700 switch it's it sort of ramps up kind of like ketosis now in ketosis we have a threshold we
00:14:43.360 use it's about somewhere between 0.5 and one millimole resting or fasting we don't even have
00:14:48.800 a unit of measure in autophagy to do that. But having spoken with the experts on this subject
00:14:55.680 matter and looking at preclinical data, somewhere around three days seemed to be where you could
00:15:02.800 really sort of juice autophagy levels beyond what you would get from exercise or other things like
00:15:07.960 that. Okay. So then the question becomes, well, why aren't you doing that still, Peter? And again,
00:15:14.980 And I think there were several reasons for that, but I think what changed most was kind
00:15:20.140 of the evidence, but also the cost.
00:15:23.220 Thank you for listening to today's sneak peek AMA episode of The Drive.
00:15:26.900 If you're interested in hearing the complete version of this AMA, you'll want to become
00:15:31.400 a premium member.
00:15:33.000 It's extremely important to me to provide all of this content without relying on paid
00:15:37.000 ads.
00:15:37.880 To do this, our work is made entirely possible by our members.
00:15:40.760 and in return, we offer exclusive member-only content and benefits above and beyond what is
00:15:46.740 available for free. So if you want to take your knowledge of this space to the next level,
00:15:50.780 it's our goal to ensure members get back much more than the price of the subscription.
00:15:55.480 Premium membership includes several benefits. First, comprehensive podcast show notes that
00:16:01.180 detail every topic, paper, person, and thing that we discuss in each episode. And the word
00:16:06.820 on the street is nobody's show notes rival ours. Second, monthly ask me anything or AMA episodes.
00:16:14.300 These episodes are comprised of detailed responses to subscriber questions, typically focused on a
00:16:19.400 single topic and are designed to offer a great deal of clarity and detail on topics of special
00:16:24.740 interest to our members. You'll also get access to the show notes for these episodes, of course.
00:16:29.760 Third, delivery of our premium newsletter, which is put together by our dedicated team of research
00:16:35.200 analyst. This newsletter covers a wide range of topics related to longevity and provides much
00:16:40.900 more detail than our free weekly newsletter. Fourth, access to our private podcast feed that
00:16:47.840 provides you with access to every episode, including AMA's sans the spiel you're listening
00:16:52.700 to now and in your regular podcast feed. Fifth, the qualies, an additional member only podcast
00:16:59.900 we put together that serves as a highlight reel featuring the best excerpts from previous episodes
00:17:05.580 of The Drive. This is a great way to catch up on previous episodes without having to go back and
00:17:10.240 listen to each one of them. And finally, other benefits that are added along the way. If you
00:17:15.280 want to learn more and access these member-only benefits, you can head over to peteratiamd.com
00:17:21.080 forward slash subscribe. You can also find me on YouTube, Instagram, and Twitter,
00:17:25.660 all with the handle Peter AtiyahMD. You can also leave us a review on Apple Podcasts or whatever
00:17:32.000 podcast player you use. This podcast is for general informational purposes only and does
00:17:37.700 not constitute the practice of medicine, nursing, or other professional healthcare services,
00:17:41.840 including the giving of medical advice. No doctor-patient relationship is formed.
00:17:47.280 The use of this information and the materials linked to this podcast is at the user's own risk.
00:17:52.700 The content on this podcast is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.
00:17:58.880 Users should not disregard or delay in obtaining medical advice from any medical condition they have, and they should seek the assistance of their healthcare professionals for any such conditions.
00:18:09.000 Finally, I take all conflicts of interest very seriously. For all of my disclosures and the
00:18:14.580 companies I invest in or advise, please visit peteratiamd.com forward slash about where I keep
00:18:21.840 an up-to-date and active list of all disclosures.