#51 - Robert Sapolsky, Ph.D.: The pervasive effect of stress - is it killing you?
Episode Stats
Length
2 hours and 18 minutes
Words per Minute
170.43542
Summary
In this episode, Professor Robert Sapolsky joins me to talk about why we don't run ads on this podcast, and why instead we rely entirely on listener support to sustain it. Robert is a professor of psychology at the University of Toronto and the author of Why Humans Don't Get Ulcers and How to Cope with Stress: A Guide to Stress and Caring for Yourself. He's also an author, speaker, and speaker on stress, stress-related diseases, and coping with stress.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Hey everyone, welcome to the Peter Atiyah drive. I'm your host, Peter Atiyah. The drive
00:00:10.880
is a result of my hunger for optimizing performance, health, longevity, critical thinking, along
00:00:15.940
with a few other obsessions along the way. I've spent the last several years working
00:00:19.660
with some of the most successful top performing individuals in the world. And this podcast
00:00:23.620
is my attempt to synthesize what I've learned along the way to help you live a higher quality,
00:00:28.360
more fulfilling life. If you enjoy this podcast, you can find more information on today's episode
00:00:33.000
and other topics at peteratiyahmd.com. Hey everybody, welcome to this week's episode
00:00:43.360
of the drive. I'd like to take a couple of minutes to talk about why we don't run ads on this podcast
00:00:48.580
and why instead we've chosen to rely entirely on listener support. If you're listening to this,
00:00:53.820
you probably already know, but the two things I care most about professionally are how to live
00:00:59.060
longer and how to live better. I have a complete fascination and obsession with this topic. I
00:01:04.760
practice it professionally and I've seen firsthand how access to information is basically all people
00:01:09.920
need to make better decisions and improve the quality of their lives. Curating and sharing this
00:01:15.100
knowledge is not easy. And even before starting the podcast, that became clear to me. The sheer volume
00:01:20.380
of material published in this space is overwhelming. I'm fortunate to have a great team that helps me
00:01:25.800
continue learning and sharing this information with you. To take one example, our show notes are in a
00:01:31.600
league of their own. In fact, we now have a full-time person that is dedicated to producing those and
00:01:36.460
the feedback has mirrored this. So all of this raises a natural question. How will we continue to
00:01:42.700
fund the work necessary to support this? As you probably know, the tried and true way to do this is to
00:01:48.320
sell ads. But after a lot of contemplation, that model just doesn't feel right to me for a few
00:01:54.200
reasons. Now, the first and most important of these is trust. I'm not sure how you can trust me if I'm
00:02:00.400
telling you about something when you know I'm being paid by the company that makes it to tell you about
00:02:05.080
it. Another reason selling ads doesn't feel right to me is because I just know myself. I have a really
00:02:11.280
hard time advocating for something that I'm not absolutely nuts for. So if I don't feel that way about
00:02:16.660
something, I don't know how I can talk about it enthusiastically. So instead of selling ads, I've chosen
00:02:22.060
to do what a handful of others have proved can work over time. And that is to create a subscriber
00:02:28.240
support model for my audience. This keeps my relationship with you both simple and honest. If you value
00:02:35.300
what I'm doing, you can become a member and support us at whatever level works for you. In exchange, you'll get
00:02:41.660
the benefits above and beyond what's available for free. It's that simple. It's my goal to ensure
00:02:47.300
that no matter what level you choose to support us at, you will get back more than you give.
00:02:52.880
So for example, members will receive full access to the exclusive show notes, including other things
00:03:00.380
that we plan to build upon, such as the downloadable transcripts for each episode. These are useful beyond
00:03:07.100
just the podcast, especially given the technical nature of many of our shows. Members also get
00:03:12.900
exclusive access to listen to and participate in the regular ask me anything episodes. That means
00:03:19.860
asking questions directly into the AMA portal and also getting to hear these podcasts when they come
00:03:25.800
out. Lastly, and this is something I'm really excited about. I want my supporters to get the best
00:03:30.780
deals possible on the products that I love. And as I said, we're not taking ad dollars from anyone,
00:03:35.620
but instead what I'd like to do is work with companies who make the products that I already
00:03:39.900
love and would already talk about for free and have them pass savings on to you. Again,
00:03:46.420
the podcast will remain free to all, but my hope is that many of you will find enough value in one,
00:03:53.640
the podcast itself, and two, the additional content exclusive for members to support us at a level that
00:04:00.380
makes sense for you. I want to thank you for taking a moment to listen to this. If you learn from and
00:04:05.320
find value in the content I produce, please consider supporting us directly by signing up
00:04:10.560
for a monthly subscription. My guest today is professor Robert Sapolsky. And many of you may
00:04:15.340
recognize that name because Robert has written some incredible books. Probably the one that you
00:04:20.060
would recognize the most is why zebras don't get ulcers, a guide to stress, stress-related diseases,
00:04:25.240
and coping. But he's also the author of a primate's memoir, which grew out of work that he spent
00:04:30.380
in his early years in Africa. And he spent nearly 30 years in Africa, four months at a time,
00:04:35.860
the trouble with testosterone and other essays on the biology of the human predicament.
00:04:40.400
And his most recent book, behave the biology of humans at our best and worst. This is a book that
00:04:46.540
Robert spent nearly four years researching and writing. And the book is almost 800 pages long.
00:04:51.680
This is a treatise on the topic of human biology and behavior. Robert is a professor of biological
00:04:57.780
sciences at Stanford, where he's been, I believe, since he completed his PhD and his postdoc,
00:05:02.340
which he did back on the East coast. He spent a lot of time in Kenya right after college. He went
00:05:07.680
to Kenya, then Uganda, where he studied for the next 30 years, the behavior of baboons and other
00:05:14.100
primates. He is a MacArthur fellow in 1987. He was awarded the fellowship, which many of you may
00:05:19.500
recognize by its other name, the genius grant. He is very modest and soft-spoken about this and
00:05:24.600
really doesn't like to be reminded of that. But Robert is a really impressive guy.
00:05:29.180
Today is actually the first time we really met in person. I had seen him speak about a year and a
00:05:33.860
half ago. And after the talk, you know, introduced myself and we spoke very briefly. But I remember
00:05:38.240
during his talk thinking to myself, this is the first time I'm really being convinced
00:05:43.400
at the true pathology of stress. I think I had certainly appreciated the benefits of meditation before
00:05:50.500
when it came to being less miserable. But I think it was really Robert's work. And in particular,
00:05:56.660
that presentation on that day that got me to really start to think about the molecular and
00:06:01.660
physiologic harm of hypercortisolemia. So we talk a great deal about that in this discussion,
00:06:08.600
but we also talk about things that go far outside of that. We talk about the role of depression.
00:06:12.980
We talk about the impact of stress on the developing brain and also in the brain later in life.
00:06:19.540
And even some of the areas where the relationship between stress and disease is not as well
00:06:23.840
understood. And that clearly came across in our discussion of cancer. Overall, I found this
00:06:29.240
discussion riveting and I could have continued this discussion for many hours longer. On a personal
00:06:33.960
level, I was also, you know, really kind of touched by the way he spoke about this sort of change in
00:06:39.680
heart he had around the relentless ambition and pursuit and how over the past few years, he's really
00:06:45.400
re-evaluated that. And that comes across at the end when we sort of get into more of a philosophical
00:06:50.520
discussion about what one would do different given what he knows today. It was an honor to spend so
00:06:55.520
much time with Robert today discussing this. And I appreciated the confidence he had in basically
00:07:00.120
sight unseen sitting down with a stranger to have this discussion. So I hope you'll enjoy this
00:07:05.540
discussion with Robert half as much as I do. Robert, thank you so much for making the time to
00:07:13.600
meet with me today on a lovely rainy San Francisco afternoon. Sure. Glad to be indoors here.
00:07:19.420
As I was saying earlier, we had met once before really briefly, so briefly that you would not
00:07:23.840
remember it. And of course, only I would. Summer of 17, I believe you were giving a talk in Sun
00:07:29.280
Valley and I was there and you gave a talk on stress. Now it was to a lay audience. So you
00:07:35.360
didn't really get to go into the depth. And I remember sitting in the audience thinking,
00:07:39.700
oh, you know, a lot of what he's saying is really starting to make sense to me. And I can't wait to
00:07:45.840
get a little deeper into this stuff because truthfully, and I'm just going to open with sort
00:07:50.440
of my mea culpa. You've always heard people say stress kills. And I got to be honest with you.
00:07:55.820
I always thought that was sort of nonsense. I was like, come on, what do you mean stress kills?
00:08:01.640
Stress is good. It builds resilience, blah, blah, blah, blah. What is the mechanism by which
00:08:06.120
stress quote unquote kills? But of course, once you start to understand the endocrine system,
00:08:10.300
and of course, training as a surgeon and not an endocrinologist, I sort of missed out on that.
00:08:14.720
You start to see it. And in that talk, you admittedly at a sort of high level for the audience
00:08:19.560
really walked through the danger of hypercortisolemia. And so in many ways, I guess, you know,
00:08:24.720
a year and a half ago was really when I became a fan of your work and then kind of said, you know
00:08:28.940
what, there is something to this. So anyway, with that, I appreciate you taking this time.
00:08:33.640
Sure. And just to sort of back off a bit from that, I actually don't think stress kills you
00:08:39.080
outright very often, but it sure makes other things that kill you more effective at doing it.
00:08:45.860
Maybe it's semantic, but you're right. Stress can amplify and accelerate the diseases of aging.
00:08:50.260
You grew up in New York, right? If I recall, you grew up in Brooklyn or in
00:08:53.860
Brooklyn. I remember reading that after college, you actually went straight off to Kenya first. Is
00:08:59.980
that right? Yep. What prompted that? Well, I was one of those. I've sort of spent my career
00:09:06.600
oscillating between being a lab neuroscientist, studying the effects of cortisol on the brain,
00:09:13.000
punchline to decades of work is you don't want to have a whole lot of it marinating inside your head,
00:09:18.480
but also for more than 30 years, I've alternated spending my summers studying a population of wild
00:09:25.440
baboons in a national park in East Africa. And it's the same animals I go back to each year. These
00:09:31.360
are animals I can dart, anesthetize, get blood, do whole workups on them. And essentially asking among
00:09:38.680
them, what does your social rank have to do with patterns of stress related disease? What does your
00:09:45.660
personality, what does your patterns of social affiliation? So it's been sort of a counterbalance
00:09:51.500
to the lab where, you know, we've been sticking artificial genes into neurons and fairly reductive
00:09:58.180
stuff like that. So I was actually about eight years old when I decided I wanted to be a primatologist.
00:10:04.360
So I was kind of planning on that for a long time and lucked out. I spent all of college brown nosing
00:10:12.080
the right person who shipped me off to a field site right after graduation. And I wound up sort
00:10:17.680
of inheriting that site. And those have been my, my baboons ever since.
00:10:22.940
Did you spend the whole time in Kenya? I remember reading that you also were in Uganda and obviously
00:10:27.860
they're, I think if my geography is correct, they're neighbors. So that's a pretty easy switch.
00:10:32.720
Where do the actual baboons, like what is their scope of their residence? How broadly?
00:10:36.600
Oh, they're spread actually all over Africa. They're one of the most ubiquitous primates
00:10:41.780
for a lot of the same reasons that we are, which is they'll eat anything. They're carnivores,
00:10:47.900
but they're also herbivores. They're omnivores. They scavenge dead stuff. They eat insects. They'll,
00:10:54.380
they'll eat most anything so they can fill a lot of niches. So they're scattered everywhere. But
00:10:59.300
my main work over the years has been this one troop in the Serengeti and Southwest Kenya,
00:11:06.080
you know, for about 25 years, I camped under the same tree. So it's really,
00:11:10.120
it's been a continuity with the same population of animals.
00:11:17.620
Leopards, lions, hyenas. Nonetheless, if you're a male baboon, the most likely thing to kill you
00:11:23.480
violently is another male. Yeah, exactly. Sort of like humans.
00:11:28.040
Yes, indeed. Did you say it's every summer or every other summer?
00:11:32.120
Well, it was initially for about 25 straight summers and then parenthood and all those
00:11:38.400
complications came in. So wound up being every other summer. And then our kids were old enough
00:11:44.680
to go with us one summer. But unfortunately, the field work ended about eight years ago. So
00:11:51.660
My Kenyan field assistant of 30 years, we, we started together when we were 20. He died of AIDS,
00:12:00.600
political issues. There are some game park issues that made it harder and harder to
00:12:05.180
sort of get research done. And kind of that middle-aged realization that I could find some
00:12:11.100
new game park or new country or something and start all over, but it was kind of time to pack
00:12:16.020
it in instead. So after you did your PhD, which you did it in North New York, right?
00:12:22.820
Did you come straight out to Stanford for a postdoc or?
00:12:25.480
Postdoc to the Salk Institute down in San Diego, spent a couple of years there. If people are sort of
00:12:32.480
familiar with the hypothalamic hormone that runs the stress response, a hormone CRH, CRF,
00:12:39.940
corticotropin releasing hormone, I went and post-talked with this guy, Wiley Vale, who had
00:12:45.440
discovered it in like two years before. So that was a pretty exciting time to be there. So spent a
00:12:51.160
couple of years there. Stanford hired me and I've been there for 31 years since.
00:12:58.780
That's kind of amazing. I keep coming back to people at Stanford that, you know, would have been
00:13:04.780
there when I was there in medical school, but if it wasn't in the medical school, like you just
00:13:08.560
weren't paying as close attention. And I honestly don't recall if you ever gave us a lecture in
00:13:13.080
med school. Do you remember giving lectures in med school 20 plus years ago?
00:13:16.200
I did. Almost certainly the students were paying as little attention as I was. So
00:13:20.460
I was about to say, it certainly seems like something we should have been,
00:13:24.740
you know, learning in medical school. And yet I feel ashamed to say, I don't know if I recall it.
00:13:29.220
It was not much of an emphasis and it was sort of snuck in embarrassedly.
00:13:32.600
Like a lunchtime seminar or something. Yeah, exactly. So that-
00:13:39.100
Yes. And even still only about five people would stay past the cookies.
00:13:42.840
That's a much bigger issue we can come to. So you wrote a book, gosh, how many years ago was
00:13:48.160
Why Zebras Don't Get Ulcers? Is that 20 years ago?
00:13:50.380
Let's see. First edition was 94. It's gone through three editions now. Most recent one was 2004. So
00:13:58.060
at some point I got to do another one. As we talk about that, and you've written a book more
00:14:03.620
recently that I want to talk about as well, let's back up and explain something you touched on a
00:14:09.060
second ago, which is sort of the physiology of a stress response. So walk us through the
00:14:14.060
relationship between the hypothalamus, the pituitary, and the adrenal glands.
00:14:18.200
So when we're under stress, levels of 11D different hormones change in our body. Most of them are
00:14:25.300
relatively minor players. The two workhorses overwhelmingly, first one, famously adrenaline,
00:14:33.040
a British term, epinephrine, sort of North American term, output from the sympathetic nervous
00:14:38.920
system. It's on the scene in your bloodstream within one, two seconds or so after all hell breaks
00:14:45.160
loose. And I just want to explain what sympathetic means to the listener. We've had this discussion
00:14:49.160
before. It's not to say it's a nervous system that is kind. It just means it's one of the two
00:14:54.700
branches of these so-called autonomic or immediate, not under your conscious control, right? So the
00:15:00.720
fight or flight. Exactly. And the other half being parasympathetic, sympathetic fight or flight,
00:15:06.240
all hell breaking loose alarms going off, parasympathetic calm vegetative function. So
00:15:12.800
not only do you turn on the sympathetic during stress, you very emphatically turn off the parasympathetic.
00:15:19.520
Second main workhorse, which has already been alluded to, the steroid hormone class of hormones
00:15:25.760
called glucocorticoids, human version, cortisol, also known as hydrocortisone, rat version,
00:15:33.100
corticosterone, synthetic versions, prednisone, dexamethasone and such. These come out of the
00:15:38.740
adrenal glands. Your brain notes something stressful is happening within two seconds. Your hypothalamus is
00:15:45.480
secreting that CRH, which within about 10 seconds is getting your pituitary to release a hormone called
00:15:52.340
ACTH, which within about 30 seconds has gotten to your adrenals and you are slowly starting the
00:15:59.560
glucocorticoid component of your stress response. And in lots of ways, the adrenaline, the sympathetic
00:16:06.420
response, the glucocorticoid response, they work on hand in hand, they synergize.
00:16:11.380
You want to metaphor adrenaline in two seconds as handing guns out of the gun locker to whatever
00:16:19.220
is going to defend you. Glucocorticoids are building the aircraft carriers that a year from
00:16:25.100
now are going to be essential. It does some of the slower components of the stress response
00:16:29.500
stretching out over minutes to hours. Because I was just about to ask you, and I think your question
00:16:35.520
basically answers it, was why would we have evolved these two separate systems? One can only speculate on
00:16:41.160
such things, but it's basically that certainly norepinephrine, epinephrine, they stick around
00:16:45.780
for such a short period of time. I mean, we don't even measure these things clinically. I can't
00:16:49.340
poke your arm and measure your norepinephrine or epinephrine level. The best I can do is collect its
00:16:55.020
metabolites in your urine for evidence that it's been around. So I guess we have this hormone or pair of
00:17:01.300
hormones that are on the scene in seconds, gone in seconds, and really deal with the, I guess from an
00:17:08.620
evolutionary perspective, when the tiger is there, this is what gets you to jump into the tree.
00:17:13.300
Is it doing much beyond that? And is there some evidence of chronic low levels of those hormones,
00:17:20.080
which, which come out of a totally different part of the adrenal gland? I mean, that's the other thing
00:17:23.120
that's sort of interesting is you have two separate pieces, the cortex, the medulla that secrete these
00:17:28.760
hormones separately. And embryologically, they're two very different tissues. They start off separately.
00:17:34.680
It could have just as randomly wound up that your adrenaline comes from your big toe and glucorticoids
00:17:41.360
from your thumbs. Why they wound up being in the same organ is in fact, somewhat just, I think,
00:17:47.160
serendipitous. Probably because you're more likely to have your toes and fingers lopped off and we
00:17:51.180
wouldn't want to have incidental adrenalectomies happening. You're right. That's certainly why they
00:17:55.720
didn't wind up out there. What about in lower species? Is one of these considered more primitive?
00:18:00.800
Is the epinephrine arm something that began earlier and the cortisol arm more recent?
00:18:06.820
Yep. Nonetheless, the cortisol arm is just ancient. When you get stressed and you're secreting
00:18:13.020
glucorticoids, it's basically the exact same class of molecules as if you were a fish or bird or a
00:18:20.520
reptile. Nonetheless, it's a very ancient wiring and that's part of what winds up getting us in trouble.
00:18:25.960
Well, it's a system that's been serving vertebrates, doing a lot of help for them for an awful long
00:18:32.700
time. And it's been a very recent modification to instead secrete them in response to thinking
00:18:38.780
about taxes. This basic dichotomy between the very human domains where we activate the stress
00:18:45.320
response and the more typical domains of animals.
00:18:48.800
So if you and I were sitting here 10,000 years ago, I can think of lots of things that we would
00:18:55.680
want an adrenaline response for, the tiger jumps out of the thing, whatever. What are some of the
00:19:01.380
things that would result in that cortisol response? Because you described it as building the aircraft
00:19:06.360
carrier. Well, gosh, if the tiger's there, either I'm dead or I'm not, but I don't need a stress
00:19:11.380
response a day from now or the next day. So what is it that cortisol was doing 10,000 years ago that
00:19:17.540
was serving our interests? I want to certainly talk about what it's not doing today.
00:19:21.700
When you look at what it does, it actually makes perfect sense. As long as you're being stressed
00:19:26.500
like a normal mammal, running for your life, running after a meal where if you don't catch something,
00:19:32.940
you're going to be dead by tomorrow, a short-term physical crisis. The first five seconds of doing
00:19:39.060
that, which epinephrine is critical for, that's great. If we're heading into a couple of minutes of
00:19:46.500
evading a predator, being vigilant, thinking there might be, if you're getting into the realm of a
00:19:52.800
couple of minutes worth of the stress response, cortisol related glucorticoid hormones are
00:19:58.300
absolutely essential. So the glucose that's coming rushing out of your liver, pretty important in that
00:20:04.100
situation. Exactly. So it takes you about one second to decide you're going to use your thigh muscles
00:20:09.740
and run like mad. You need energy for them. And the main thing glucorticoids are doing in the metabolic
00:20:16.100
realm is glucocorticoids. They're increasing glucose levels in your bloodstream. They're going to
00:20:23.900
storage sites throughout your body, your liver, your muscle and breaking stuff down. What they do is they
00:20:29.780
go to the bank, they empty out your savings accounts and turn it into cash, glucose in the bloodstream
00:20:35.260
to hand to whichever muscles are going to save your neck. What they also do makes perfect sense,
00:20:41.740
whether you were running for your life or running for a meal, which is they increase cardiovascular
00:20:46.760
tone. Epinephrine is doing the first five seconds of it by 30 seconds in glucocorticoids. You're
00:20:54.640
bolstering it as well. And it's that same logic. You're running like crazy. You want to deliver that
00:20:59.980
glucose to your thigh muscles as quickly as possible. You increase your heart rate. You increase
00:21:05.180
your breathing rate, your blood pressure. You alter your vasculature. So you're preferentially
00:21:10.820
shunting to the exercising muscle. So that makes perfect sense. Also, it turns out some of the most
00:21:16.960
interesting stuff glucocorticoids do in those circumstances is basically run a triage program.
00:21:23.380
They shut down everything that's not essential, not essential to surviving the next five minutes of this
00:21:30.460
massive physical challenge. So digestion would be a mission. Exactly. You got better
00:21:35.140
things to do than digest breakfast when you're trying to avoid being somebody's lunch. And you're
00:21:40.380
sure not going to get any metabolic benefits of digestion during this five minutes. It's slow,
00:21:45.740
expensive. The energy you're getting, you're getting from your liver, you're getting from your fat cells.
00:21:50.680
It shuts down growth. Obvious logic there, you know, grow antlers tomorrow. If you're still around,
00:21:57.920
don't bother right now. Shuts off reproduction. Same logic there. It shuts off all the long-term
00:22:04.480
building projects and just focuses your energies on what's immediately there. And this makes perfect
00:22:11.020
sense. If you are running for your life, running after a meal, and all you need to do is look at a
00:22:16.340
couple of diseases where people don't turn on the endocrine stress response. Addison's disease,
00:22:22.480
Shy Draker syndrome, whatever. These are not diseases where somebody who now is more at risks for
00:22:29.120
adult onset diabetes eight months from now. These were diseases where somebody goes running after
00:22:34.780
their commuter bus and they drop dead from hypoglycemic shock. JFK had this. Didn't JFK have
00:22:40.280
Addison's? He had Addison's and that greatly constrained the famed pictures of all those Kennedys
00:22:46.800
playing touch football out and, you know, Martha's Vineyard or stuff were mostly for the benefit of the
00:22:53.540
photographers. How did he survive World War II? Because he had done some pretty heroic things
00:22:59.380
in that war. Although I've seen, it's hard to tell if it's snarky revisionism as to how much that was
00:23:05.680
public relations stuff afterward, sort of orchestrated. But just to get through basic training even
00:23:11.200
strikes me as an accomplishment because most people, I guess, who don't have a medical background
00:23:15.400
wouldn't appreciate this, but the tan that seemed to be eternally on JFK is the result of the Addison's
00:23:24.080
disease because the hormone you alluded to earlier that is released by the pituitary ACTH in someone
00:23:30.680
who's not making cortisol is going to be very, very high. And ACTH stimulates the pigment producing
00:23:36.760
cells in the skin. And that's what would give someone with Addison's disease darker skin.
00:23:40.460
The fascinating thing with Kennedy is if it were this situation now, presumably his doctors would
00:23:47.140
be on the air somewhere 24-7. There's remarkably little known about when his onset was, what the
00:23:54.160
course of it was, how severe it was. So it's not quite clear, but what little is known is it had a
00:24:00.080
hell of an impact on his functioning. You really do need a hormone if you, like glucocorticoids, if you
00:24:06.400
were going to be physically activated in a moment of crisis.
00:24:11.660
This is sort of the amazing thing with hormones like insulin and cortisol. I'm always impressed by
00:24:18.060
how tight the U-shape is on those curves. Thyroid hormone would be another example, certainly less so
00:24:24.560
with something like testosterone. You have just a much wider range that you can function in, and the
00:24:30.420
benefit is largely monotonically increasing. Sometimes if my patients will tolerate me going
00:24:36.720
on and on about this, I love to draw the pictures of which of these hormones can you, you know, but to
00:24:42.320
me, cortisol probably, if you were thought of it as a drug, it has the narrowest therapeutic index.
00:24:48.480
To your point, too much of it will kill you eventually and make you miserable as hell on the way,
00:24:55.220
and too little of it will kill you quite quickly.
00:24:57.040
And what's most interesting about it is, okay, so there's an optimal level,
00:25:02.180
among other ways of translating that, that means we don't hate stress. We hate the wrong amount of
00:25:08.180
stress. When it's the right amount, we love it. We pay money to be stressed, to get on a roller
00:25:14.540
coaster, to go to a scary movie. When it's the right amount, when it's the optimal amount,
00:25:19.500
we call it stimulation. Okay, so exactly as you say, it's a narrow range, so that's a tough
00:25:25.200
biological problem, understanding a hormonal system that's pretty damn essential and where
00:25:32.240
an awful lot of the time you're walking on a knife edge where either side is bad news,
00:25:36.480
too much or too little. But when it comes to glucocorticoids and what counts as good stress
00:25:42.120
and stimulation, there's the added factor that there's incredible individual variation
00:25:48.140
as to what counts as the optimal level in between. And one person's like hair-raising
00:25:55.120
Audubon Society walk one Saturday morning looking for birds, while the other person goes and signs
00:26:01.360
up to be a mercenary in Yemen, because that's when they feel alive and awake and all of that.
00:26:06.660
Not only that it's a narrow range, but we differ so much as to what each person's optimum is.
00:26:12.020
Now, I want to make sure I understand that point, Robert. And this is probably overly simplistic,
00:26:17.140
so feel free to correct this. One of it would be the external scenario that is being perceived.
00:26:25.780
And I can see definitely how two people can have vastly different views on that. I mean,
00:26:31.440
it's the reason someone can voluntarily go and be a Navy SEAL and someone can say,
00:26:36.580
I'd feel much better not doing that, right? There's clearly a different appetite and or capacity
00:26:42.900
for distress. Is that what you're referring to? Or are you also referring to you and I could be
00:26:50.420
sitting here and have different levels of physiologic benefit and harm at the same level
00:26:59.200
So, I mean, the former, I think most people would acknowledge the latter is pretty new,
00:27:03.180
right? I mean, I shouldn't say pretty new. That's not intuitive to me.
00:27:05.820
Because there's centuries of endocrinology saying, what's the most important thing about hormones?
00:27:12.520
How much of the stuff there is in your bloodstream? What the levels are. And if you and I are sitting
00:27:17.560
here with the same circulating levels of whatever centuries of dogma was, that will translate into
00:27:23.360
the same biological effects. And then, I don't know, sort of endocrine revolution of 70s, 80s or so
00:27:30.400
turns out how loud someone is yelling at you counts what the hormone levels are, how sensitively you can
00:27:37.620
hear them. The levels of your receptors in target cells turn out to be essential as well. And there's
00:27:44.320
all sorts of endocrine domains where, in fact, screwy receptor levels are much more consequential
00:27:51.360
and impactful than our screwy levels of the hormone itself. And individual differences in levels of
00:27:59.840
receptors, what version you have, how well it works, how avidly it holds on to the hormone,
00:28:06.220
what it is then coupled with afterward downstream inside the cell. That whole world turns out to be
00:28:13.340
as central to understanding individual differences as are the levels of hormones themselves. And as
00:28:21.480
sensitive to all those things ranging from genes to prenatal environment, to early development,
00:28:29.100
to psychological factors, and so on. So yeah, that's a huge piece of the story now.
00:28:34.580
When I hear you say it like that, Robert, it seems pretty obvious because we would talk about
00:28:39.900
insulin in exactly that way. You could have two people with the exact same level of insulin,
00:28:44.420
completely different physiologic response because of insulin sensitivity. When insulin hits its
00:28:49.520
receptor, it leads to the phosphorylation of AKT, and that's what leads to the GLUT4 transporter
00:28:54.640
coming up to the surface. And different people with the same insulin can do that totally differently.
00:28:59.720
And different people will have a different insulin response to the same food, to the same meal.
00:29:03.680
That's the reason we do glucose tolerance tests. So you could basically say someone is
00:29:07.980
cortisol sensitive and cortisol resistant to make the analogy to insulin.
00:29:11.500
At the end product end, absolutely. If you're an obsessive with cortisol stuff in the 80s,
00:29:17.440
there was briefly this deep puzzle in that it turned out new world monkeys, monkeys in South
00:29:23.440
America, marmosets, tamarins, or whatever. When you compare them to traditional old world monkeys,
00:29:29.120
the Asian and the African ones, it turns out they have like an order of magnitude higher
00:29:33.680
glucocorticoid levels. Oh my God, that's crazy. What's that about? All sorts of theorizing about
00:29:40.200
how for some reason it's more stressful to be a new world primate than an old world,
00:29:44.520
which didn't make a whole lot of sense. And then there was this issue of these animals should
00:29:49.300
have been falling out of trees from their Cushing's disease. And finally, somebody found an
00:29:54.820
explanation. Oh, somewhere back when there was a mutation in the gene for the glucocorticoid receptor
00:30:00.380
in new world primates. And it has roughly one 10th the sensitivity. So the system just equilibrated
00:30:07.260
out at a different set point, but that's such a great example of just natural variation,
00:30:13.300
not only in how loudly you speak hormone, but how effectively your cells listen to hormone.
00:30:21.380
Do you have a sense in the human population today? I mean, a log full difference like you just
00:30:27.660
described sounds extreme, but do you have a sense of what the variability is in humans today? Is it a
00:30:32.940
twofold, threefold Delta on the receptor side? Gut feeling and reflecting the fact that my world,
00:30:40.600
the brain, you don't get to measure receptor levels anywhere near as easily as in a white blood cell,
00:30:45.940
well under an order of magnitude. We just acknowledged, or you just pointed out that
00:30:50.600
when a zebra sees a lion, everything that happens as far as the fast and what I would call the acute
00:30:58.540
and the subacute stress response is perfectly evolutionarily sound and completely in the best
00:31:04.380
interest of that zebra. We could also come up with a countless examples of 10,000 years ago,
00:31:09.960
or even today when the same thing is true in humans, when did that transition occur in our species
00:31:17.380
to where you started to see either something in the civilization or society that was unhealthy?
00:31:23.780
So today I could point to a thousand examples, social media, you name it. I mean, it's an infinite
00:31:29.040
number. When did that start to crop up? What does your research suggest is the arrival of that?
00:31:34.060
I think it predated us being humans and instead is a feature of smart social mammals because you see
00:31:44.440
indices of stress-related stuff, baboons, that's what I've spent my whole career on,
00:31:51.080
and other non-human primates, cetaceans, elephants, and such. Okay, so why study baboons if you're trying
00:31:58.240
to understand human stress? And it turns out they perfectly illustrate the point you just brought up.
00:32:03.260
If you're a baboon living in the Serengeti in East Africa, your life is pretty good. It's a fantastic
00:32:10.580
ecosystem. Baboons, they live in these big troops, 50 to 100 animals or so, so they really don't have
00:32:17.560
to worry about lions very often. The infant mortality rate is lower than among the neighboring Maasai
00:32:24.400
tribes people. And probably most importantly, unless it's a once a generation drought, if you're just a
00:32:31.880
baboon going about your everyday business, it takes you about three hours a day to get your day's
00:32:36.720
calories. And that has a critical implication, which is if you only need to spend three hours of sunlight
00:32:43.440
each day getting enough food to get by, you've got nine hours of free time every day to devote to being
00:32:51.120
miserable to some other baboon. And that's the key thing. They are well off enough in our westernized sense
00:33:01.100
that they can sit around and generate psychological stress for each other. Overwhelmingly, if you're a
00:33:08.320
baboon in the Serengeti and you're miserable, it's because another baboon has worked very hard to bring
00:33:13.800
that state about. They're wonderful models for westernized disease in that very few of us get
00:33:20.200
hypertensive because, you know, tigers are chasing us. Instead, it's psychosocial stuff that we invent
00:33:27.300
and that we can wallow in for hours every day. And that's exactly what baboons do. They're great
00:33:33.380
models for westernized stress. Do we have evidence? I mean, I'm sure it exists, but in the humans,
00:33:39.860
I would just be willing to bet that if you and I were subjected to the same external stressor,
00:33:46.800
I would probably internalize it more than you. That's my guess. So if we were both baboons and there
00:33:52.900
was a third baboon tormenting us, is it safe to say that you could be the baboon that would roll
00:33:59.120
with it more than me? Individual differences like that, absolutely. My guess is both of us would
00:34:04.360
respond to it by saying, I'm just going to get a longer and longer CV and then he's going to regret
00:34:08.800
it someday pushing me around. They'll be sorry when they see how many degrees I have. But yeah,
00:34:14.680
individual differences. One of the things that I focused on, you know, I spent my first 10 years
00:34:20.560
deciding rank and status, social statuses, everything. If you're a baboon and you got a
00:34:26.480
choice in the matter, you want to be high ranking because on the average, you have lower glucocorticoid
00:34:31.540
levels, you're arresting blood pressure is lower, all sorts of stuff works better. But what took me
00:34:37.580
some growing up out there to do was to realize that, yeah, social rank is important. Far more important
00:34:46.500
is the contextual meaning of your rank. Is that the same as your perception of your rank or is there,
00:34:52.800
there's more to it, right? Well, it's what the rank means in your particular troop. You can be a low
00:34:58.980
ranking guy in one of two different troops and one troop simply because of its culture. And that's a
00:35:05.300
perfectly scientific word to use for another species these days. In one troop, being low ranking
00:35:11.480
can be a whole lot crappier than in another troop in terms of how often somebody in a bad mood
00:35:18.060
displaces aggression on you, in terms of how often somebody actually grooms you and off terms of how
00:35:24.600
often you get to finish a meal before somebody steals it from you kind of thing. So the same exact
00:35:30.460
rank means different things in different sort of baboon cultures. So I'll take an extreme example.
00:35:35.580
In a prison, there's a clear hierarchy starting with the warden, the guards, the inmates. And of
00:35:42.560
course, within the inmates, there's a hierarchy. Presumably I'm making this up, but certainly the
00:35:47.140
pedophiles would be at the bottom of that list and a violent criminal would probably be at the top of
00:35:51.580
that list. So within that hierarchy, there's probably a manner in which you would be perceived
00:35:57.600
as a function of that unique environment, which is so artificial in its own way, but that wouldn't
00:36:04.220
necessarily be the same outside. Absolutely. And one of the most interesting things about us,
00:36:10.560
us humans, when we talk about across all sorts of primates being low ranking in general is bad for
00:36:18.760
your health. Well, what about humans? We don't have ranking in the same system that sort of other
00:36:23.860
primates do in a strict linear kind of way. But the other thing about us is we belong to multiple
00:36:29.600
hierarchies at once and we can have very different ranks in them.
00:36:34.320
So for example, family, work, sports team, hobby. Exactly. You've got some guy who's the
00:36:41.020
mailroom clerk in this giant corporation, and you could not possibly be lower status,
00:36:46.360
but he's the captain of the company softball team this year. And you better bet when you ask him
00:36:53.340
what's important in his life, nine to five, Monday to Friday is just a stupid way to pay the rent.
00:36:58.940
And what really matters is when the weekend comes around, you have somebody with a horrible low
00:37:05.200
status job who's the deacon of their church. We belong to multiple hierarchies and we are very
00:37:12.260
good psychologically at deciding that whichever hierarchy we're highest in, that's the one we
00:37:18.120
define ourselves by. Let's take another extreme example, which is you take people who are very
00:37:24.900
successful in what they do, whatever. They're the most famous hedge fund manager or an entrepreneur
00:37:30.140
that started some great company. You would argue, well, they seem to be pretty good on the food chain,
00:37:35.460
but yet many of them would say, or you could measure objectively, their hypercortisolemia is
00:37:42.700
problematic. So it seems like there's even more than just that ranking, right? Isn't there something
00:37:48.460
else? Cause they're at the top. If they were baboons, they're the alpha, but they're still
00:37:53.540
grossly stressed out. In other words, thank God we're more subtle than baboons, but it turns out
00:37:58.660
baboons are even more subtle than just rank. They have personality and you can be a high ranking baboon
00:38:05.320
and personality differences. And again, this is a scientific word as, as is culture. If you're a high
00:38:13.400
ranking baboon and your worst rival sneezing a hundred yards away as seen as a major provocation,
00:38:21.000
you're going to have much higher glucocorticoid levels than if you're a highest ranking baboon
00:38:25.740
for whom that's no big deal. And in fact, often you may have higher glucocorticoid cortisol levels
00:38:32.020
than if you're number 10 or number 20 in the hierarchy. There's lots of psychological filter
00:38:37.240
stuff. And I spent a ton of time studying that. Baboons differ as to how readily they see things
00:38:44.300
as being provocative or not, threatening or not. You're sitting there. And again, your worst rival
00:38:50.720
shows up and takes a nap a hundred yards away. There can be two baboons of the same rank. And one of them
00:38:57.520
keeps doing exactly what he's doing. And the other one is interrupted from whatever nice social thing is
00:39:04.240
happening. He's agitated and he's vigilant and he's got to look at the guy and lunge towards him a
00:39:08.680
couple of times before going back. If your worst rival taking a nap is as disruptive as the guy
00:39:14.560
threatening you in your face, you average about twice the cortisol levels in your bloodstream after
00:39:20.160
controlling for rank as a guy who can tell the difference between the big thing and the little
00:39:24.780
thing. Maybe this is too deep a question and the answer isn't known, but what is it that actually
00:39:32.700
transmits that information through the filter of your personality into the physiology that's very
00:39:41.040
well understood? So I understand the bookends, right? I understand how the visual cortex takes the guy
00:39:47.800
who's your enemy sleeping over there and transmits that to your cortex. And then I understand how the
00:39:54.560
sympathetic chain kicks off the response. Is there a link in between those, the processing link?
00:40:00.500
Here's one of those filters. You take people and you're flashing up faces at them, stick them in
00:40:06.680
a brain scanner, and you're looking at how jumpy their amygdala is. Their amygdala central to fear,
00:40:14.400
anxiety, aggression, and such. And what you see is tremendous individual differences in you show
00:40:21.140
somebody a face with kind of a neutral expression. Does this person look happy, sad, angry, threatening,
00:40:27.420
whatever, and lots of variability? And you look at the people who tend to view neutral expressions as
00:40:34.480
threatening. In other words, they see threats that most other people don't. What does that correlate
00:40:41.000
with? A bigger amygdala. Physically larger amygdala. A physically larger amygdala, amygdala with a higher
00:40:48.040
metabolic rate, an amygdala that is more electrophysiologically reactive than stuff.
00:40:54.420
Let's back up for a moment. I mean, tell people in case they don't know where the amygdala sits,
00:40:59.780
what part of the brain it evolved from, and why it's sort of referred to as this reptilian brain.
00:41:05.220
I think everybody's heard of the amygdala, but I think you could explain this in a more
00:41:08.920
interesting and accurate way. Okay. Amygdala is like one of the anchors of what's called the
00:41:15.260
limbic system in the brain. Limbic system, it's the part of the brain that's all about emotion.
00:41:21.480
Not surprisingly, mammals have a whole lot more limbic development than fish do. Fish are not
00:41:28.640
famous for their emotional lives. Limbic system is arousal, fear, anger, lust, love, maternal,
00:41:37.960
pair bonding, mother-infant bonding, all of that. And it's a whole series of structures. Not surprisingly,
00:41:44.440
ancient in mammals, not surprisingly, highly complex, interconnected, not surprisingly sitting
00:41:51.580
underneath the cortex, the cortex that more recently evolved part of the brain that does
00:41:57.080
your taxes, all of that. Limbic system underneath there, all the subterranean emotion stuff.
00:42:03.220
And amygdala is one of the key limbic structures, and it's involved in fear. It's involved in anxiety.
00:42:09.600
It's involved in aggression. You learn to be afraid of something or somebody that didn't used to scare
00:42:16.840
you. And your amygdala does the exact same sort of cellular basis of learning that goes on in other
00:42:23.660
parts of your brain when you learn somebody's middle name and actually remember it. Your amygdala
00:42:28.340
learns to be afraid of new things. And when you manage to stop being afraid of something,
00:42:34.220
when you stop being afraid of thems, because it turns out, oh, they're actually more similar to
00:42:40.920
you than you thought. It's your amygdala that becomes less reactive to stimuli like that. So
00:42:47.300
your amygdala is absolutely central to some of our worst human moments.
00:42:53.160
It's so interesting because it's sandwiched between, you know, you can think of the human
00:42:56.560
brain as having sort of a very grossly three parts, right? This brainstem, this midbrain,
00:43:02.280
which the amygdala you could argue is the mare, and then the cortex that you described.
00:43:07.420
It's not an oversimplification, I think, to say that as the complexity of the organism evolved,
00:43:12.760
so too did that hierarchy, right? I mean, the brainstem basically handles everything we don't
00:43:17.500
have to think about ever, breathing and all of those autonomic and sympathetic, parasympathetic
00:43:22.260
functions. And then you layer on this midbrain that does everything that you said, which is still
00:43:27.240
kind of happening beneath consciousness. And then, of course, there's where most of us live in our
00:43:32.040
cortex where we're, or where we think we live, which is where we're thinking these thoughts, but
00:43:36.540
it seems we're maybe not as aware of how influenced the cortex is by what lies beneath it.
00:43:43.280
Exactly. Which is incredibly important. If you think of this kind of ancient reptilian brainstem
00:43:50.820
part of the brain, what does it do? It keeps track. It makes you breathe every now and then without
00:43:55.580
having to think about a boring sort of stuff. Then on top is the emotional limbic system. Then on top is
00:44:00.660
that cerebral thinking cognitive cortex thing. It's very easy to come up with a conceptualization
00:44:07.140
that what's fancy about humans is, for example, you're a lizard. And the only thing that's going
00:44:13.760
to change the functioning of that ancient brainstem stuff is if you're bleeding, if you're too hot,
00:44:19.600
if you're too cold, just like boring physiological states. Once you layer a mammalian emotional limbic
00:44:26.260
system on top, suddenly you can do something no lizard on earth can do. You're sitting there and
00:44:32.060
you're some wildebeest and some other scary wildebeest shows up and is peeing on some tree in your
00:44:39.320
territory and nothing regulatory has changed in your body, but your heart starts beating faster.
00:44:45.880
Aha! Your emotional brain can alter sort of the basic regulatory stuff down in the basement.
00:44:53.260
Now you go one step higher and you layer a cortex on top of it and now you could do amazing stuff.
00:45:00.560
You sit there and you think about the fact that your heart's going to stop beating someday
00:45:05.260
and you start breathing faster and your brainstem, the more ancient stuff, has altered as a result.
00:45:13.900
And you've just done something not only that no reptile can do, you've just done something that
00:45:18.220
no warthog can do, which is think, think about something that's scary or arousing or remember
00:45:26.580
the time that you would, and suddenly something changes down below there. So there's this easy
00:45:33.980
picture of sort of top-down complexity once you get to us and where the cortex can regulate your
00:45:43.000
emotional brain and that regulatory brain at the bottom, your emotional limbic brain can regulate.
00:45:48.560
What's far more interesting or underappreciated is exactly what you bring up, which is those lower
00:45:54.700
levels can influence what's going on up above. One example of this, this is like this classic great
00:46:01.640
study in sort of physiological psychology, social psych. You take people, and I think in this study,
00:46:08.000
they would take male volunteers, heterosexual male volunteers, and of course they were no doubt college
00:46:13.860
freshmen taking Psych 101, and they had these guys walk across this really scary suspended bridge.
00:46:22.220
And the deal was that either halfway across the bridge, you were met by, from the other side,
00:46:30.240
a researcher who happened to be an attractive female. And she would ask the volunteer some questions,
00:46:37.140
oh, what do you think of this bridge? Or how is it walking across this? Or whatever. The other half
00:46:42.100
of the time, you would not encounter this person until you were safely out at the other end.
00:46:48.060
Then they would ask you to evaluate the attractiveness of the person.
00:46:54.140
You're either seeing her in the middle of the bridge or at the far end.
00:46:56.240
Exactly. Saying, hey, remember while you were doing that, you, there was this, you know,
00:47:01.140
do you want to rate her attractiveness? Was she friendly? Did she seem smart? And what you would see is
00:47:06.540
guys in the middle of the bridge with their hearts racing because they're terrified would do some
00:47:12.880
misinterpretation. Why is my heart beating so much faster than if I was standing safely?
00:47:18.060
So they would rate her more attractively in the middle of the bridge.
00:47:21.200
Exactly. And then it's the sealing of detail is now you do the same experiment and you give the
00:47:26.900
person a beta blocker so that they don't have the accelerate and they don't rate the person as
00:47:33.540
attractive. Is it the same with the beta blocker you would treat? Yeah. You do nothing to their
00:47:38.100
ratings of them as how smart they seem, how kind they seem, whatever. It's just this. Okay. If my
00:47:43.300
heart's racing, it must be because, so that's a great example. Boring reptilian regulatory stuff
00:47:50.680
down there is helping influence what you think your emotions are.
00:47:56.220
That reminds me of that 1995-ish movie Speed with Keanu Reeves and I'm blanking our name.
00:48:03.920
That's right. Sandra Bullock. Where at the end of that movie, there's some cheesy line about how
00:48:08.740
relationships that start under this much distress, you know, it's dangerous. But, but of course the
00:48:14.180
other read on that now is, yeah, if you're on a bus that's about to blow up, like, I think you're
00:48:18.700
going to think the chair is attractive, right? Potentially.
00:48:21.540
Right. Yes. Wow. I haven't thought of that movie in years. Thanks.
00:48:27.220
I'm sorry. You can go home and I'm sure Netflix will stream that for you.
00:48:32.140
Right. So I read something you wrote. I can't remember where it might've been in another interview
00:48:37.020
that, and I didn't know this, and this is a great example of why I just love doing this podcast
00:48:43.260
because there's never an exception to how much I'm learning. It's like drinking from a fire hose.
00:48:47.040
And you'd think I would have remembered this from medical school. The neuron of a human and the
00:48:53.080
neuron of some other organism, when you look at it at the single cell level, can't really
00:48:58.580
differentiate it. If I showed you two Microsoft slides and here's a human and here's a fish.
00:49:04.620
So what is it about, and this is maybe getting us a little off topic, but I also think it feeds
00:49:09.200
into this broader issue of like the stew and the alchemy of how this stuff is put together. But
00:49:15.100
if we all have the same neurons, what is, is it the number of our neurons? Like what is it that
00:49:20.820
enables us to have all of this additional torture? Yeah. It's incredibly interesting because I mean,
00:49:29.000
there's, there's three and a half people on earth who have spent their entire careers being able to
00:49:34.020
tell the difference between like a tree shrew neuron and a human neuron and could recognize it in their
00:49:39.660
sleep. But yeah, for the most part, we are not humans because we have invented brain areas that
00:49:46.540
you don't find in other mammals or because we've invented neurotransmitters that you don't find in
00:49:51.780
other vertebrates or types of neurons. Here's a couple of types of neurons that people used to think
00:49:57.420
were specific to humans. And it turns out you find them in elephants and whales also. And that's
00:50:02.460
plenty interesting, but it's the same enzymes. It's the same gene regulation. It's the same,
00:50:09.500
you know, we're sharing 98% of our DNA with a chimp or a bonobo. So you say where a human has come
00:50:16.180
from. And I think it's exactly the issue you talk about. We have the same signal transduction pathways
00:50:22.580
and neurons as you see in a fruit fly. And what's the key difference? Isn't that, isn't that a bit
00:50:27.260
humbling? Yes, it is. When we just think we're that special. And it's the, where you can take one
00:50:33.500
of their genes or one of our genes and stick it in the other one and it functions just fine. Or you
00:50:40.220
could take it from a single cell organism, some genes related to programmed cell death. You can do
00:50:45.640
that. So what's the big difference for every neuron that a fruit fly has? We have a hundred million
00:50:50.360
and sort of the soundbite that I think summarizes all of that is with enough quantity, you invent
00:50:59.900
quality. And this is this whole world of emergent properties of complex systems. You take one ant
00:51:08.020
and you put it on a table and nothing that it does makes a huge amount of sense. And you put 10 ants
00:51:14.200
there and pretty much the same thing. And you put on, I don't know, a thousand and maybe they start
00:51:19.040
making a trail or something and you put 10,000 and they build a colony and they farm mushrooms and
00:51:25.880
they take aphids as slaves and they could keep the temperature in the colony plus or minus two degrees
00:51:31.540
and they have specialization of labor. And no ant has any more rules than he had when he was
00:51:38.660
wandering around on the table by himself. And you put enough of them together and complex adaptive stuff
00:51:46.240
emerges out of the very simple rules that each of those components has for dealing with another
00:51:52.200
component. It almost defies entropy, doesn't it? Like why does that happen? It's amazing that it does
00:51:58.420
that. And that's what our brains are. We've got more ants that are coming together in our heads than
00:52:03.960
does a fruit fly. And you get more complex emergent stuff happening. It blows my mind. So let's go back to
00:52:11.580
some of this stuff. Maybe about a year ago, I read something that really frightened me because the
00:52:16.400
implications were so significant. If a mother is under great stress, there was this critical window
00:52:23.840
in which her child could see something in her eyes that would communicate that stress to her. Or maybe it
00:52:32.120
wasn't in her eyes. It might've been just through her entire face, but it would imprint epigenetically
00:52:37.020
into the child and alter many features about them as they would age. For example, their propensity to
00:52:44.700
be depressed. I mean, I remember reading this in sort of a lay press thing. So I don't even think it
00:52:49.040
got into the description of epigenetics, but that was the only assumption I could make was that this
00:52:52.740
must be modulated through that mechanism. Do you see evidence of this in animals? I mean,
00:52:57.820
absolutely. And it's one of the trendiest topics around. I mean, like hooray,
00:53:03.940
science finally recognizes childhood matters. Like what your childhood is like has a lot to do with
00:53:11.240
what sort of adult you're going to wind up being. What do you know? And like lots of childhood
00:53:16.160
adversity versus childhood security and, you know, very different trajectories. And what's been the huge
00:53:22.480
mechanistic challenge for the field is understanding. So what is it about being in a scary neighborhood
00:53:29.800
or an unstable home or having a parent read to you? Or what is it about this whole world of
00:53:36.860
developmental individual differences? What are the nuts and bolts changes that occurs in a kid?
00:53:42.100
So that as an adult, they are now 30 fold more likely than the next person for this or that to happen
00:53:49.140
to them. And this, this whole trendy field of epigenetics, which is early experience doesn't change
00:53:56.900
your genes, doesn't change your DNA sequence with some like, you know, circus trick exceptions. You've
00:54:04.360
pretty much got your DNA sequence forever. What epigenetics is, is early experience changing the
00:54:10.760
regulation of your genes, how easily you turn certain genes on, how easily you turn others off
00:54:18.120
in different parts of your body, different parts of your brain, and so on. And that's exactly the sort
00:54:24.040
of domain where you see the sort of stuff that you outlined. So that, for example, if you're a fetal
00:54:32.260
rat and you, that rat have made a terrible decision, you've picked the wrong womb to be developing in,
00:54:39.800
and you happen to be inside a mother who's highly stressed, she's secreting a lot of rat glucocorticoids,
00:54:47.380
which get into the circulation through the placenta and to the fetal circulation into the kid's brain
00:54:53.120
brain. And one of the things that it does is it causes an epigenetic change in the amygdala.
00:55:00.200
So is that rat going to be born with a larger amygdala or is the phenotype more complicated than
00:55:05.040
just size? It's size and a bunch of other things. As an adult, it's going to have a bigger amygdala
00:55:09.800
and it's going to be more excitable and it's going to be more prone towards interpreting a neutral
00:55:15.760
situation as a threatening one. That's virtually the definition of rat anxiety disorder, seeing
00:55:22.300
menace that other people don't. And you see much the same evidence in humans by now. Early experience,
00:55:29.960
forget early experience, what kind of kindergarten teacher you had. This is fetal early experience.
00:55:36.600
And this is exactly a domain where you get potentially a lifelong epigenetic effect.
00:55:42.120
Okay. So that turns out to have a hell of an implication. That's just the most exciting
00:55:49.940
subfield around there by now. Okay. So you were fetus and got exposed to lots of mom's glucocorticoid
00:55:58.160
levels. And as a result, as an adult, you've gotten a large amygdala and you see threat all over the
00:56:05.480
place that other rats don't. And among other things, you secrete elevated levels of glucocorticoids
00:56:13.240
because the world is full of menace that only you are seeing. So you get pregnant and during your
00:56:21.500
pregnancy, as a result, your fetus is exposed to elevated glucocorticoid levels.
00:56:27.400
And to be clear, it's not because you have altered the germline genome. It's that you have changed the
00:56:34.680
expression of the gene, which has altered the phenotype. And now that phenotype is being passed
00:56:41.060
generation to generation through parallel expression. Exactly. Something termed non-genetic
00:56:46.640
transmission of traits, non-Mendelian. And people have now shown some of those traits. You see that ripple,
00:56:53.440
it gets smaller each generation, but it's there half a dozen generations later. And the exact
00:56:59.620
equivalent of some of these have been found in humans. In other words, individual differences are
00:57:06.880
arising not only from experience, but from the multi-generational transmission of some of the
00:57:12.300
consequences of experience, which is just mind boggling that that can work that way.
00:57:19.400
Let's go back a little bit to why this is problematic. So at the outset,
00:57:23.440
we alluded to this idea that it's a misnomer to say stress kills. I'd love to hear if you have
00:57:28.480
a particular definition of stress. I probably butcher this stuff, but I sort of think of stress
00:57:32.660
as the external thing. And I think about it as it's anything that is sort of emotionally or physically
00:57:39.320
either chronically or acutely distressing. I mean, that's sort of a dumb definition because it
00:57:44.280
contains the word stress, but I think people understand distress a little more than they understand
00:57:49.660
stress. But of course it's your response to that physiologic response, right? So we can quantify
00:57:57.360
this stuff in terms of what hormones are happening in the body and how the hormones are moving the body.
00:58:02.380
It's your response to that, that probably has a greater impact on your health. So let's go through
00:58:07.920
three things. Help me understand how hypercortisolemia and or its accompanying features
00:58:15.340
will impact the brain, especially, well, through any timeline you want. I'm obviously interested in
00:58:22.340
the aging brain, but I can't imagine this also doesn't impact the developing brain.
00:58:26.620
This is basically what I've spent my whole professional career thinking about. And historically,
00:58:33.200
the first place where people sort of realized something scary was happening was a brain region
00:58:39.000
called the hippocampus. Hippocampus is all about learning and memory. You want to have a hippocampus.
00:58:46.440
It's the main brain region that's damaged in Alzheimer's disease, and it's vulnerable in lots of
00:58:51.660
other ways. Turns out it's extremely sensitive to glucocorticoids, translated more reductively.
00:58:58.680
It's got extremely high levels of receptors for glucocorticoids by the standards of the rest of the
00:59:04.320
brain. And what's the evolutionary basis for that? Is that to have a feedback loop? There's two reasons.
00:59:09.560
One is to have a feedback loop, but the other is, okay, so the hippocampus remembers stuff for you.
00:59:16.420
You don't remember everything. You don't remember where you were on 9, 10, as opposed to 9, 11 kind
00:59:24.240
of thing. Your memory processes has to come with a filter saying, is this one important?
00:59:31.140
So you're saying that cortisol amplifies memory consolidation and that you use this to consolidate
00:59:36.020
stressful memories as a way of learning. Exactly. Along with epinephrine and norepinephrine
00:59:41.000
indirectly, they have some of the same effects. So cortisol crosses the blood brain barrier with no
00:59:44.960
difficulty. Exactly. I assume epi and norepi do the same.
00:59:48.660
They have to work more indirectly heavily through the vagal nerve because they don't get them as
00:59:53.140
readily. But some of it is also norepi being released within the brain during stress. So it
00:59:58.180
has some of its own memory enhancing effects. Again, a great example of evolution's got this
01:00:04.060
awesome system set up and it only gets out of whack when the stimulus becomes too much. You do want
01:00:11.960
that imprint, but you don't want that happening full-time. Or stated another way, this is the
01:00:16.400
reason why you don't get much out of a class if you're semi-comatose and you got two hours of sleep
01:00:22.720
last night. If you're like three-quarter, your glucocorticoid levels are low, you're not consolidating
01:00:28.700
stuff. If you are out of your mind terrified because there's a lion sitting next to you, you're not going
01:00:34.380
to absorb much either. Inverse U, optimal range, all of that. So it turns out the optimal amount of
01:00:40.520
glucocorticoids, something that is moderately stressful. In other words, something stimulating
01:00:47.000
does great stuff to your hippocampus. It increases blood delivery, their glucose, oxygen. It makes the
01:00:55.600
synapses, the connections between neurons more excitable in the hippocampus. It does great stuff.
01:01:01.740
A little bit of arousal, alertness is a good thing for learning and memory. Now instead,
01:01:07.120
transition to you are stressed 24-7 ever since you were like 10 years old kind of thing,
01:01:14.700
and you're in the range where glucocorticoids do exactly the opposite. They decrease oxygen and
01:01:20.500
glucose delivery to the hippocampus. They make neurons less excitable. They disconnect synapses.
01:01:27.400
They cause the processes in neurons to shrivel. They block the birth of new neurons there.
01:01:33.020
They make other insults more damaging to neurons in the hippocampus. What do you have there? That's
01:01:38.740
the world in which if you were stressed out of your mind, memory doesn't work so hot. And what we're
01:01:45.420
increasingly realizing is if you're exposed to excessive glucocorticoid levels, like on the scale
01:01:51.500
of years to decades, you're going to make this part of the brain get older faster.
01:01:56.300
Which speaks to something that I know you're quite passionate about, which is the differences in how
01:02:03.880
socioeconomic status can sort of affect generational changes in this manner. Because, you know,
01:02:12.000
use the example of a 10-year-old. Well, I did my residency in Baltimore. Let me tell you,
01:02:16.620
a 10-year-old in inner city Baltimore who's in the wrong house versus a 10-year-old in Palo Alto
01:02:21.380
who's in quote unquote the right house. And look, that's not to say that you could have a 10-year-old
01:02:25.260
in Baltimore that's got a great environment and 10-year-old in Palo Alto that's dealing with a
01:02:28.520
whole bunch of other different issues, which, you know, especially in the era of social media.
01:02:32.160
But all things considered, probabilistically, that 10-year-old in Baltimore is going to have
01:02:36.760
a much harder time given what you just said. Or, I don't know, stated the other way, I have a
01:02:43.760
friend who's a cardiologist who splits his time between a hospital in Oakland and a private
01:02:49.900
practice in San Francisco. Some of the time what he's doing is dealing with 80-year-olds who are
01:02:56.020
considering getting a pacemaker because the ski season is coming and they are wondering if they're
01:03:01.000
going to be in shape and time for that and maybe that. And then back in Oakland, he's dealing with
01:03:06.700
50-year-old elderly men who are having heart disease. Yeah. Socioeconomic disparities are,
01:03:13.320
I won't get on my soapbox now, when you look at the source of variability in health among humans on
01:03:21.100
this planet, socioeconomic differences, differences in absolute levels, differences in degrees of
01:03:27.560
inequality within cultures and within communities and so on, there's an enormous predictor of health.
01:03:34.020
You want to look at the most medically impacted, low-ranking primates you could find on Earth,
01:03:43.640
look at poor humans. Because when humans invented socioeconomic status and the capacity to be poor,
01:03:51.440
they invented a way to subordinate the have-nots like no chimp on Earth could ever dream of doing.
01:03:57.800
As you've alluded to, there's something else to it. You know, recently I interviewed an amazing
01:04:00.940
physician named Tom Katana who practices in the Nuba Mountains in the south of Sudan. So he's the
01:04:06.940
only physician to take care of one million people who, as you know, are being killed by their own
01:04:13.620
government. Bashir is sort of indiscriminately killing these people. So my discussion with Tom
01:04:19.440
was one of the most riveting discussions I've ever had with a human being. It just happened to be in
01:04:24.080
front of a microphone. But one of the things that just as an afterthought we were discussing that
01:04:29.180
surprised me, as we were going through all of the different things that people die of there,
01:04:33.900
you know, they don't have vaccines, you've got measles outbreaks that are killing people left,
01:04:37.500
right, and center, and the trauma, like, you know, the shrapnel blowing people apart.
01:04:42.560
Not surprisingly, they're just not getting the same chronic diseases, you know, and the cancers they
01:04:47.140
get are not the cancers we get, and they're not getting heart disease, and they're, you know,
01:04:50.840
almost unheard of to get type 2 diabetes. But what really surprised me is there was no suicide.
01:04:56.780
And I found that as the single most interesting thing I guess I learned from Tom, which was
01:05:03.280
we would look at their life and think that is an abysmal existence that I couldn't tolerate for one
01:05:10.660
second. And yet I would have to guess that their level of cortisol might be lower than ours, even
01:05:18.540
though they're in a much worse environment. So whether it's that sense of community that they have,
01:05:23.180
or the shared purpose, there's something about it. So in other words, my point is, even in the
01:05:28.020
presence of such great poverty, it seems that there's ways that this can be overcome, whether
01:05:33.900
it's through there's no comparison to anybody else. Because another point he made was most of the folks
01:05:38.860
there don't even know they're in Africa, like they don't necessarily know that Africa is the continent
01:05:42.800
in which their country resides. So is the bigger issue there, you think that there's no disparity?
01:05:47.640
So even though that's complete poverty, there's no real perceived disparity? Or do you think it's
01:05:53.220
the sense of community? Like what would you hypothesize explains that health, that mental health?
01:05:59.540
All the above. There's a whole world of people who study happiness, along with more traditional
01:06:05.760
public health people who study things like longevity. You look at the quarter poorest places on earth,
01:06:12.400
and indeed, people there don't live very long and are miserable. But once you get past sort of the
01:06:20.440
subsistence level, there's not a great relationship between the wealth of a country, GDP per capita,
01:06:29.360
anything, and levels of happiness or life expectancy. And you look at the fact that the US has a shorter
01:06:35.640
life expectancy than Cuba and Lebanon and Costa Rica. And it's like the shame of this country kind of
01:06:43.220
thing. Once you get past mere subsistence level, income is not a great predictor of any of this stuff.
01:06:49.720
And that's instead where you get into worlds of social capital and social support. And when you look
01:06:58.420
at the whole literature, and you look basically at every westernized country on earth, and it's now seen
01:07:04.100
as they become westernized. And what you see is the health socioeconomic gradient. The poorer you are,
01:07:11.020
the worse your health on the average. The more of a whole array of diseases you get, not all of them,
01:07:17.300
but a huge number, the more impactful they are. And when you look in the West, the United States is the
01:07:24.420
poster child for that. We've got the steepest curve of any country on earth. In the westernized world,
01:07:29.980
the least steep ones are, you bet, of course, the Scandinavian countries, ever reliable sort of utopias.
01:07:37.060
And then you begin to unpack why this relationship occurs. And like some incredibly smart people have spent
01:07:44.760
their careers looking at it. The most obvious one is, if you're not healthy, it's very hard to pull off being
01:07:51.740
the CEO of a company. Poor health precedes and gives rise to poor socioeconomic status.
01:07:58.600
Okay, that's plausible. That turns out to explain a tiny percentage of the variability. And you could
01:08:04.240
look at the status, socioeconomic status of the home in which a child is raised. And that's a predictor
01:08:11.640
of their likelihood of diabetes half a century later. So absolutely, the socioeconomic status comes first
01:08:18.700
in explaining the vast percentage of the variability. Okay, so next thing, maybe it's just that, well,
01:08:25.080
everybody's kind of equally healthy. It's just that the really poor people are very unhealthy. We have
01:08:30.560
a step function. No, you start with Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates and every step down there. And
01:08:37.420
statistically, the lower you go down every rung of the way, the poorer you are.
01:08:43.340
The poorer you are with respect to health, you mean?
01:08:44.680
The poorer your health. Yes, yes. Thanks. So now you unpack that. And what's the most obvious
01:08:49.960
explanation? And this is what people call a neomaterialist explanation, which is obvious.
01:08:54.880
The poorer you are, you don't have healthcare access. You don't have health insurance. You
01:08:59.920
can't go to the doctor as readily. Your care is more lousy. That's obviously, that explains everything.
01:09:05.440
That explains virtually none of the variability in the data. Because you see the gradient,
01:09:10.040
nonetheless, in countries with socialized medicine, universal healthcare. You see it for diseases where
01:09:17.560
it doesn't matter how often you get healthcare access. Juvenile diabetes. So it shows an SES gradient
01:09:25.880
kind of thing. So it's not healthcare access. You then look cross-culturally and you see wildly
01:09:33.620
different income levels and wildly different levels of healthcare access. And you see very
01:09:38.860
similar lifespans across these countries and very similar gradients. So what people spent like the
01:09:45.320
last 30 years doing is having this huge shift towards, it's got so little to do with the material
01:09:52.060
aspects of wealth or poverty. It's got to do with the psychological aspects. It's got to do with the
01:09:57.760
stress. First key finding, somebody at UCSF named Nancy Adler, who's done wonderful research showing,
01:10:06.340
okay, your socioeconomic status, your wealth, your objective measure of wealth is indeed a predictor
01:10:13.840
of your health. Turns out, at least as good of a predictor is your subjective socioeconomic status.
01:10:22.620
On the level, when you look at people around you, how are you doing compared to other people? Where
01:10:28.120
do you place yourself on this 10-step ladder in terms of what's your absolute SES? What's your
01:10:34.360
subjective one? And by asking it that way, you're asking the person to consider the community that's
01:10:39.420
most pertinent to them. Who's the comparison group? My next door neighbors, Warren Buffett,
01:10:44.660
in between, whatever. When you think of other people, how are you doing compared to them? And it turns
01:10:51.040
out your subjective SES is at least as good of a predictor of your health as is your objective.
01:10:57.260
In other words, if you took someone's income, which is quite objective, it would offer no more
01:11:03.740
prediction than asking that person in the Anuba Mountains, where do you rack up in this tribe?
01:11:09.740
And it's sort of like, eh, you know, sort of top two thirds.
01:11:13.780
Yeah, exactly. Or another way of stating that is you look in some bloated corporation,
01:11:20.120
and there's some guy who's the assistant manager of the mailroom, and that's an incredibly status-filled
01:11:26.680
position for that guy. And there's some other guy who's number two in the company who was just passed
01:11:32.580
over to be number one. And the only pertinent thing in his mind is not the 99,000 employees that he's
01:11:38.460
higher ranking in, that there's still somebody ahead of me. And you can see the same thing in
01:11:43.420
baboons. In other words, it's not being poor, it's feeling poor. The next critical piece in the
01:11:51.020
story is work from this guy, Richard Wilkinson in the UK, who shows what's the best, most like
01:11:57.820
effective way to make somebody feel poor, independent of their absolute levels of income,
01:12:03.620
surround them by inequality, surround them by reminders of all the people who are doing better
01:12:10.380
than them. I mean, this is where social media, it's the amplifier to all amplifiers of this,
01:12:15.780
right? You can't go 10 minutes if you're on it without looking at somebody who's obviously better
01:12:22.140
looking, obviously smarter, obviously richer, obviously having more fun. I think this has been
01:12:27.660
pretty well documented, right? I mean, lifestyle of the rich and famous, or you could be driving down
01:12:33.100
a freeway and somebody passes you, and I don't know what counts as a high status car these days,
01:12:38.780
that cost a fortune, but they come speeding past you, and you can feel crappy and diminished and
01:12:47.100
like a less successful human, and you never even saw that person's face. This is unheard of in the
01:12:54.580
history of humans or primates of being able to feel socially subordinated, and you don't even interact
01:13:00.780
with the person. Oh, there's people out there with, you know, at least if the next door neighbor has
01:13:06.700
more camels than you, that's a very like tangible, real thing in terms of like likelihood of surviving
01:13:13.820
that extract. Income inequality explains the mediating effect between objective socioeconomic
01:13:21.360
status, subjective socioeconomic status, and health outcome. What I'm hearing you also say,
01:13:27.700
though, that's a more subtle spin on this, is it's not necessarily global income inequality,
01:13:33.840
it's local income inequality that is much bigger. But what technology has allowed us to do is explain
01:13:39.960
what counts as low. That's right. That's exactly right. It's expanded what local means.
01:13:43.320
You can sit there and watch, I don't know, Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous, and back when,
01:13:48.820
you would never have gotten into like the head of your fiefdom's castle or whatever, and now you can
01:13:55.040
see all the crap they have that you're never going to get and feel less loved as a result.
01:14:02.840
It's so interesting to hear you talk about this. This is a topic that I think anybody listening to
01:14:06.640
this is well aware of, especially if you're a parent, because you also have to think about this
01:14:12.820
through a developmental lens, which is at least when you and I grew up, I didn't grow up with a lot,
01:14:18.940
but you really had no idea what was different, right? Everybody was the same. I mean, everybody's
01:14:25.640
parents bought used cars instead of new cars, and everybody had more or less the same sort of
01:14:31.360
clothing that wasn't exactly the best and whatever. So at least you could argue, well,
01:14:38.200
were we at least spared some of this difficulty during a critical window of development?
01:14:42.900
And what happens now to a 10-year-old that's got a smartphone and is subjected to this? Because
01:14:50.960
I remember that funny show, Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous. I can still sort of hear the goofy,
01:14:55.720
cheesy theme song. I think I even probably watched it once or twice as a kid, but it's a lot easier
01:15:01.840
when that's the one exposure you have to extreme wealth or disparity, and either you can watch it for
01:15:07.400
one hour or not. But it's quite a different thing if, not to pick on the Kardashians, I'm just,
01:15:12.460
but if you're inundated with, oh my God, look at how awesome the Kardashians are and what they're
01:15:17.300
doing and how great their life is, and multiply that by three log orders, do we have any data that
01:15:25.360
suggest that we are at a critical juncture? Because I was having this discussion with a friend yesterday,
01:15:30.960
which is, is there evidence of any greater transition in technology in both a positive and
01:15:40.700
negative way than this generation to the last? Is this truly the greatest step forward?
01:15:47.340
I would assume so, but the things we worry about, people have been worrying about for centuries.
01:15:55.520
Oh my, kids, they don't go outside, they don't play, they don't have like meaningful relationships
01:16:01.960
because they spend all their time talking on the telephone. They spend all their time listening to
01:16:07.040
their transistor radio. So maybe we're blowing this up. Maybe this is just this generation's
01:16:11.660
version. I mean, I guess the one difference is when you're talking on the telephone, when you're
01:16:17.220
listening to the transistor radio, I don't know if it creates that global to local phenomenon quite as
01:16:24.040
easily or as quickly or with, with less resistance as we see, but maybe you're right. Maybe this has
01:16:29.520
always been one generation's struggle with the last. But what you get is an amplifier now,
01:16:36.040
because if you're an insecure, socially isolated, peri-adolescent kid who's vulnerable in all sorts
01:16:45.380
of ways, um, you know, no matter what decade or century it was, you're the last one picked for the
01:16:52.820
game. You're the one who's least popular or whatever. And that has all its corrosive effects.
01:16:57.920
Now, if you really set your mind to it and you're that kid, you could spend 24 seven, just wallowing
01:17:05.480
toxically in evidence of a gazillion other people who are better looking than you and more popular
01:17:12.680
and invited to parties. You'll never be in. It amplifies further in the, the technology does
01:17:19.160
absolutely that. What I think it does is it makes the vulnerable more damaged than in the past.
01:17:25.320
I think it's safe to say these amplifiers aren't going anywhere. So rather than wallow in their
01:17:34.380
harm, I guess the more relevant question is what do we do? If you're a parent today or not a parent
01:17:42.180
today, and you're thinking about this through the lens of yourself versus your kids, whatever,
01:17:45.980
what are the steps that one can take to become less susceptible to these forces that seem to drive
01:17:55.880
this? Because I want to step back for a moment. When I think about these areas that we've talked
01:18:01.720
about before, about the impact of nutrition and sleep and exercise and stress or distress to make
01:18:08.380
it more the term I use. When I think about this personally, the one I most worry about is the last
01:18:14.280
one. I think I've got a pretty good handle on nutrition and it's in many ways easier to control.
01:18:19.680
I feel like I'm more in control of what I eat. And when I make bad choices, I'm usually doing them
01:18:24.900
consciously. Like I've decided I'm going to eat this pizza versus I can't help myself. I'm going to eat
01:18:30.100
this pizza. Similarly with exercise, like, and again, I'm not saying this for anybody else, but this is just
01:18:34.660
my personal thing. And even with sleep, like once you commit to it, which is not something I did
01:18:40.500
until probably seven or eight years ago that I sort of committed to, wow, this really matters.
01:18:44.920
And to forego this thing, bad idea. It's this last one that really drives me crazy, which of course
01:18:52.620
doesn't help matters because the fact that it drives you crazy makes it worse. But I'll give you an
01:18:56.200
example. As a general rule, outside of the immediate postprandial period of a high glucose meal,
01:19:05.620
far and away, my highest blood glucose is always in the morning. Now I wear a 24 hour glucose meter.
01:19:11.840
So I'm kind of a weird guy for almost four years. I've been wearing a glucose monitor all the time.
01:19:17.680
So it measures my glucose 24 seven at one minute increments. And out of say 365 days in a year,
01:19:24.620
I'm easily wearing it 330 days of the year. So I've got a lot of data. And without a question,
01:19:31.220
when you look at a 24 hour period, if you stripped away the X axis of time, I could easily identify
01:19:38.960
morning for you without exception. I'll give you an example. This is not something I'd planned to do.
01:19:46.120
I had breakfast yesterday, yesterday being Sunday, really early because I woke up with my kids made
01:19:51.800
breakfast. I normally don't eat breakfast, but I did. So I had a breakfast, 730 in the morning,
01:19:56.220
did a workout, had to catch a flight, didn't have time to eat after, had a very, very busy day,
01:20:04.060
didn't eat a single thing, got to the hotel around 1030 or 11, didn't want to eat. So didn't,
01:20:11.180
you know, got up this morning. It's been almost 24 hours since a meal. And I looked at my glucose
01:20:17.460
meter and it was like said, you know, 110, 110 milligrams per deciliter. I was like, there's
01:20:21.340
no way that's right. Calibrated it. Sure enough, it was 110. Now there is no earthly reason I should
01:20:27.600
have had a glucose of 110 milligrams per deciliter 24 hours after my last meal, which by the way was
01:20:34.200
bacon and eggs. It's not like I was eating pancakes, right? Well, I promise you if I could spot check my
01:20:40.640
cortisol, it was high. And here's the thing before I went to bed, my glucose was quite low. You know,
01:20:47.720
my glucose was probably 80 when I went to bed and it slowly rose. And sure enough, as my day wore on
01:20:53.420
today, the glucose went lower, lower, lower, lower, lower. It was about 78 before you walked in here.
01:20:59.760
I'm not alone by the way. So I've seen this a lot clinically with patients. Once you start putting
01:21:04.420
these 24 hour glucose sensors on people, which a lot of my patients are now doing, you get this
01:21:10.140
insight into this horrible thing that's happening when we think we're sleeping and nothing else is
01:21:15.380
going on, but we're ruminating or God knows what else. And fits perfectly with morning wakening is
01:21:23.280
when you get your highest glucocorticoid levels, which is probably one of the main driving forces
01:21:29.060
on the increased blood glucose. When you think about it from a circadian standpoint, what's the most
01:21:34.740
challenging thing you have to do each day in the absence of any major tumult? Get up, start
01:21:40.940
functioning, all of that. It just seems like it's disproportionate. Certainly the Dawn effect has been
01:21:46.200
well described. It's more amplified in people with type 2 diabetes, which is another interesting point,
01:21:51.340
right? Which is, why is it that someone who already has glucose dysregulation would have an even
01:21:56.200
higher cortisol response in the morning? And yet you'll see, you know, enormous fluctuations in
01:22:02.320
glucose. I guess my point here is this seems like a harder problem to fix. And certainly meditation is
01:22:08.760
by far the best tool I have ever found to even approximate getting this under control, but it's
01:22:16.160
still hard because it's not like you have a pill. If your blood pressure is high, well, I think it's
01:22:21.240
probably best to fix it in any way possible, but we also have really great drugs that fix high blood
01:22:26.460
pressure that can at least mask these things. We don't have a pill to fix hypercortisolemia.
01:22:31.700
It's one of the most complicated endocrine situations. And yet, as you've described
01:22:37.020
eloquently, it's also so innately wired into us. And we have this miserable midbrain that's
01:22:44.920
just killing us. First of all, I'd love to hear your thoughts on meditation, but then also other
01:22:49.600
things that given how much time you've spent thinking about this problem, I'd love to know how
01:22:53.680
you would suggest someone who doesn't have quite the Zen mindset that I can tell you do, what should
01:22:59.800
someone else be thinking? Right off the bat, I'm delighted to see that I have a persona of a Zen.
01:23:05.700
I'm actually like one of the most type A stressed people you're ever going to run across. I've spent
01:23:11.260
40 years professionally studying how bad the outcome is going to be of all of these bad lifestyle
01:23:20.560
aspects without having anything insightful to say about how to actually fix it or prevent it. And I
01:23:27.540
certainly have learned personally absolutely nothing from my lifetime of work. I'm like incredibly
01:23:32.720
stressed. I'm mostly good at telling you what's going to happen if you don't get stuff under control
01:23:37.020
rather than how to get things under control. When I look at the stress management literature,
01:23:42.640
I don't do it very often because I tend to get sort of agitated at that point. But broadly,
01:23:49.860
it works. It works as in you can lower blood pressure, you can lower cholesterol levels,
01:23:56.840
you can lower subjective sense of health, objective measures as well with all sorts of
01:24:02.700
interventions. What you see when you look at the literature closely, first off is you can't do your
01:24:09.660
stress management on the weekends kind of thing. It needs to be a regular sort of thing. You can't do it
01:24:16.000
while you're on hold on the phone for 30 seconds. You need to set time out for it. The benefits of
01:24:22.040
aerobic exercise, I don't know what the magic number is these days, but 20 or 30 minute blocks
01:24:27.680
is a minimum to start getting the cardiovascular benefits. So it's got to be something like you
01:24:34.000
stop things to do. So that's important. Let's double click on that. What you're basically saying
01:24:38.040
is, because I think you're understating how much you know about this topic. Obviously,
01:24:42.100
it's something you know a lot about as seriously as we would take nutrition. And if you think about
01:24:47.940
how many hours a week do you put into eating? I mean, even if you're shoveling food down your throat,
01:24:51.980
it still takes quite a bit of time. If you're going to exercise to the levels that have demonstrated
01:24:56.520
benefit, we're talking about hours a week, not minutes a week. If you're going to make the difference
01:25:03.360
between getting by on sleep versus getting restorative sleep, I'm not talking about the absolute
01:25:09.100
amount of sleep. I'm just talking about the delta between those two. Think about how many hours that
01:25:13.320
is. In fact, for the average American, that would work out to be about an extra seven to eight hours
01:25:18.700
a week of sleep. And what you're basically saying is, if you want to combat this hypercortisolemia,
01:25:24.440
dude, guess what? It ain't a 20 minute a week thing. And in some ways that taps into one of the
01:25:31.060
80-20 rules of sort of mental health professionals. Okay. So you have this crazy stressful lifestyle.
01:25:38.580
And there's just a bazillion things you can't say no to, and you're just going 24 seven. And if you've gotten
01:25:46.020
to the point of saying, this is crazy, this is not a quality life, I want to live a healthy quality old age,
01:25:52.860
well, I got to get this stuff under control. I'm going to start doing something stress management-y.
01:25:59.920
And if you've gotten to the point where in this lifestyle where there's a billion things you can't say no to
01:26:05.620
each day, you're saying no to them enough that nonetheless, 20 minutes every single day you're
01:26:10.980
doing this, it almost doesn't matter what intervention you're doing. You're 80% of the
01:26:16.540
way there already if you're managing to do that. And that's very similar to this sort of amazing
01:26:22.340
classic finding. You get people who are clinically depressed and finally, finally, finally, they're
01:26:27.260
going to do something about it and merely making a first appointment. Even before you've seen the
01:26:33.380
person, people feel significantly better because you are finally saying, I matter enough to do
01:26:40.580
something about this, or I'm activated enough, or I'm optimistic enough to actually go. You're halfway
01:26:47.940
there at that point, merely by doing something on a near daily basis.
01:26:52.460
So just on that logic, even though I don't know that this has been done, you would argue that 10
01:26:56.960
minutes of deliberate mindful practice of meditation daily would probably be better than one hour once a
01:27:03.180
week. Absolutely. In part because if nothing else, if you do a daily seven times a week, you were
01:27:11.960
sitting in the aftermath of having done that versus only one time a week. And an awful lot of what's
01:27:18.780
most interesting about physiology and its impact on sort of mental health, things like that, is what's
01:27:24.440
happening in the recovery period after something like that. In the same way, one awful hour long stressor a
01:27:32.460
week versus punctuated episodes of it throughout the week without question. The latter is worse
01:27:38.380
because you've now got umpteen different times that you have to recover from having turned on the
01:27:44.520
stress response. And that's where a lot of the damage occurs. You know, I learned something about
01:27:48.940
myself that's going to sound so stupid because it's so obvious. Although I don't think it's true for
01:27:53.380
everybody. Email is a huge stress to me. To be blunt, I hate it. That would be the kindest thing
01:27:59.800
I could say about email. I really, a few months ago, hit a true nadir in my response. And I'm like
01:28:07.300
looking at these glucose levels going up and I'm looking at these morning glucose levels. So even
01:28:12.700
though my overall glucose levels still look great, I mean, this trend was upsetting to me. I'm watching my
01:28:17.580
resting heart rate in the morning go up. Over the course of four months, it had gone up like
01:28:22.800
six beats per minute. And if anything, I was in better shape, exercising more regularly.
01:28:28.980
I made this observation one day, which is how many times in a day do I stop to look at email,
01:28:34.540
even if it's just a check one or two? And the answer was like 50. And every time I do it,
01:28:40.580
to your point, even if it's very brief, the after effect is not that brief. So I could,
01:28:45.400
I could look at an email and see two stressful things, but it might sit with me for 20 minutes.
01:28:52.000
So I tried this experiment, which is, I'm going to just check email twice a day,
01:28:56.820
two 30 minute blocks of email. And I would say within two weeks, I just really felt better.
01:29:07.080
It seems to me like we just have to figure out ways to figure out what those triggers are for us
01:29:14.140
individually. There's probably some people for whom email doesn't trigger them at all, right?
01:29:16.920
There's probably, you know, for me, Twitter doesn't trigger anything because a, I have a very
01:29:22.880
narrow window that I pay attention to and it doesn't involve things that are aggravating like
01:29:27.960
politics or religion or whatever. It just sort of, I'm only really following science. So anytime I look
01:29:33.620
at Twitter, I'm actually learning something kind of new and there, but I'm sure there are many people
01:29:37.220
listening to this who would say, Oh my God, like if I spend an hour on Twitter, my blood pressure
01:29:41.100
could be through the roof. So it's like, everyone's got to kind of pick their thing.
01:29:44.900
You said you're type A, which obviously you are. I mean, you know what I didn't say at the outset
01:29:48.400
when we started speaking, but you've won one of the most prestigious awards imaginable, which is
01:29:52.260
the MacArthur award. And you won that about 30 years ago, right? That's impressive. They don't give
01:29:57.820
that award out lightly. So that's the one that's referred to as the genius award. And I know you're
01:30:02.000
probably like your skin is crawling when I say that. My point being is you're an incredibly
01:30:07.520
accomplished, successful guy. It's not surprising. You would describe yourself as a type A.
01:30:12.680
What have you learned about yourself over the past 30 years or even longer going back to your
01:30:17.480
first days in Kenya about what those triggers are for you and what you can do to lower your cortisol
01:30:22.600
levels? Not surprisingly, if you, you hang out with people who are field biologists of any sort. And
01:30:30.100
again, I've, I've only been a part-time annual one over the decades, but nonetheless,
01:30:35.600
I still think of myself as a field biologist. We're kind of a solitary tribe. I mean, during my
01:30:43.880
peak periods of doing field work, I'm spending three, four months a year alone living in a tent
01:30:49.280
where 12 hours a day, I wouldn't say a word to another person. Temperamentally, this is kind of
01:30:56.340
who I've been for a long time. And there was always this ironic thing because I was sitting there
01:31:01.680
studying these baboons because primate social behavior and I'm interested in primate social
01:31:07.460
behavior. And this big sort of epiphany I had in my work that, okay, yeah, your social rank as a
01:31:13.580
baboon has something to do with your health, but much more importantly is your patterns of
01:31:17.560
socialization and social networks. And how often do you groom and how often does somebody groom you and
01:31:23.820
how often do you sit in contact with another baboon or playing with an infant? And then I,
01:31:28.700
you know, finish the day's work and go back to my tent. So there was something ironic that I was
01:31:33.980
like studying the health benefits of sociality, living alone in a tent, a large part of the year.
01:31:42.040
She was, she kind of decided she was sick of it. And she now directs a musical theater program,
01:31:47.120
which is much more fulfilling for her. But at one point my wife came along.
01:31:55.320
And eventually family and, you know, kind of realizing, oh, I've missed out on an awful lot
01:32:02.780
of what are really like the wonderful, worth living for moments in life out of the sociality
01:32:09.700
stuff. And that is a refuge and a sanctuary from the world's madness. And I could not have predicted
01:32:18.580
as a 20 year old who had been planning to be a field biologist for a dozen years at that point,
01:32:23.780
sort of how much of my equilibrium at this point turns out to be due to interacting with the right
01:32:33.740
two or three other primates, like being in love with them and stuff. That one was kind of a
01:32:40.880
revelation for me. I am not the social being that I would have guessed I would have been back when.
01:32:46.400
Which is interesting because having this discussion with you today, I can sense much
01:32:52.560
more of your introversion than the first time we met when you were giving an unbelievably charismatic
01:32:59.280
animated talk. And I don't know how many of us were there, maybe a hundred people. And
01:33:04.040
which is so interesting, right? Because you would, I think anybody sitting in the audience would look
01:33:08.260
at this and say, oh, that's a, that's the life of the party. But it's interesting that we can
01:33:11.980
compartmentalize and separate those things, right? I mean, you couldn't get up there and you can do what
01:33:15.240
you need to do and you're at your happiest, I'm guessing, in the way you described it versus in
01:33:19.840
the aftermath of that talk when a hundred people run up to you to ask you four questions each.
01:33:24.140
Not to get too self-reflective or something, but I'm a fairly introverted person who does better with
01:33:30.640
scripts and giving a lecture is a pretty structured script and having sort of an academic persona or
01:33:43.000
What year did you become a full professor at Stanford?
01:33:50.900
I mean, you live in San Francisco, so you're not making that commute every day, I hope.
01:33:58.500
Yeah. That'll, that'll hurt the cortisol levels, won't it?
01:34:04.820
Oh, I loved it. I loved, this was much of it was before cell phones.
01:34:08.580
So you'd pick it up at 4th and King and you'd just go, yeah, I used to make that ride all
01:34:12.600
the time. I used to have a girlfriend that lived in San Francisco and I loved that train
01:34:17.000
ride. And then you'd get off on your bike at 4th and King and you could go anywhere in
01:34:21.140
Exactly. I wrote half my book writing was on the train there. It's pretty weird when you
01:34:27.040
realize that like one of your valid social communities or the conductors on Cal train sort
01:34:32.320
of as you're watching them grow up on you and things like that. But yeah, no, that was,
01:34:41.600
So speaking about books, let's talk about your more recent book. It's about human behavior,
01:34:48.220
which, you know, I mean, I can see based on this discussion now how your interest would
01:34:54.060
shift to that. What was the impetus for that research?
01:34:56.840
Well, title is Behave the Biology of Humans at Our Best and Worst. And as we were talking
01:35:03.660
about before, I closed my lab four years ago and stopped active research to sit for four
01:35:09.560
years and write this book. And it's basically trying to make sense of the biology of what
01:35:18.480
is for me the most puzzling thing about us as a behaving species, which is we are simultaneously
01:35:25.200
the most miserably violent species on earth and the most altruistic and cooperative and empathic.
01:35:33.000
And any given human is capable, depending on the setting of incredible gyrations as to whether
01:35:43.180
they are being wonderful or awful or in between, or behaviors where whether that counts as good
01:35:49.060
or bad is incredibly dependent on what culture they happen to be doing it in.
01:35:53.420
So just trying to make sense of the biology, I mean, it's totally boring biology as to like
01:35:59.540
how your brain makes you do something like pull a trigger, like which muscle groups have
01:36:05.400
been told that's like studying cockroach neurobiology. What's totally interesting is the fact that we're
01:36:12.660
a species where sometimes pulling a trigger can be one of the most awful things a human can
01:36:17.560
do. And sometimes it could be one of the most wondrous ones. If you're suicidally drawing fire
01:36:24.620
from innocent people and you're sacrificing yourself, or in one setting, you put your hand
01:36:30.680
on somebody else's, and that could be a moment of incredible compassion. Or in another moment,
01:36:36.040
you do the exact same thing with your primate muscles. And that's the first step of betraying a loved
01:36:41.940
one of just making sense of this contextual stuff about human behavior, which is hugely complicated.
01:36:50.000
And the song and dance that I go through in nearly 800 agonizing pages in the book is,
01:36:56.800
you're going to understand nothing about that. If you've concluded, aha, we now know this is the
01:37:03.540
part of the brain that explains everything. Or this is the neurotransmitter or the hormone or the gene or
01:37:10.240
the child. Instead, to make sense of human behavior, you got to factor in what your neurons did one
01:37:16.700
second ago. But you got to factor in the environmental triggers of that 30 seconds ago. And you've got to
01:37:23.300
factor in what your hormone levels were like this morning, and what neuroplasticity you've done over
01:37:28.500
the last two seasons, and what your adolescence was like in your childhood and your fetal life and
01:37:33.980
your genes. And amazingly, what sort of culture were your ancestors inventing centuries ago,
01:37:40.540
because that influenced the way you were raised within minutes of birth and what things you value,
01:37:46.440
and what things your amygdala does or doesn't respond to and all the things of that. What sort of
01:37:52.880
ecosystems produce different types of cultures and then finally evolution. And why we're in some ways
01:38:01.260
like chimps and in some ways like bonobos, but we're not chimps. We're not bonobos. We've solved
01:38:06.240
our own special evolutionary. You've got to understand this stuff. It's everything from one
01:38:10.980
second before to a hundred million years before. And all these levels interact, and it's complicated
01:38:16.780
as hell. When people ask the question, which I'm sure you've heard this a hundred times, and you hear
01:38:21.680
people asking all the time, are we innately good or bad? That question doesn't really permit
01:38:26.740
the level of nuance you're describing. The answer is yes. Yes, exactly. And what's most startling about
01:38:34.780
us is most of us have the capacity to do something that we would be stunned and sickened that we were
01:38:41.580
capable of doing it. And most of us are capable in some circumstance of doing something that is so damn
01:38:47.600
heroic. And most of us spending most of our time doing things that instead are ambiguous and
01:38:53.200
multilayered and full of ulterior motives and what's really going on there. And you look at the
01:39:00.260
worst of us and the best of us, and there's not a whole lot of really reliable predictors beforehand.
01:39:06.740
And how much of this, like, you know, you wrote a little bit about PMS. So when I think about PMS,
01:39:12.400
I think about it purely through the lens of the endocrine system, right? I think of it purely through
01:39:18.160
the lens of when a woman is in her luteal phase, that progesterone level has to rise for the
01:39:26.220
placenta. And then of course, virtually every time it's a false alarm, you don't need it. You shed that
01:39:32.220
lining and that progesterone level comes crashing down. And it's this crashing down of progesterone that
01:39:38.320
has always interested me why two women could experience the same. We can measure progesterone
01:39:44.380
levels throughout the cycle. And we could know that at day 22, two women could have the exact
01:39:50.280
same progesterone. And on the first day of their menses, they could have the same progesterone. So
01:39:54.460
you know, they had the same peak to valley and yet two women can experience that in two totally
01:40:00.120
different ways. Now I've thought about that through the lens of progesterone receptors and, you know,
01:40:05.700
the way we sort of talked about the cortisol stuff. Is there something else to that, that you layer on top
01:40:10.760
of that, that is even more subtle about those differences? Yeah. Tons of this sort of additional
01:40:17.640
insights. Here's one example that comes completely out of left field. And this was actually my wife's
01:40:23.340
thesis research on baboons. So you're a female baboon and you're coming up on your period and we
01:40:31.440
could frame it as you just did. Here's two females who are both about to have their period and they have
01:40:37.180
the same exact progesterone levels. And as soon as they start menstruating, progesterone drops in
01:40:42.040
the exact same way. And one of them is a totally irritable, awful, like jerk to all the other females
01:40:49.680
around her for three days afterward. And the other one is not. The other one withdraws and becomes
01:40:55.720
socially isolated. Okay. What's the difference? It sure can't be progesterone levels. And it's probably
01:41:01.960
not going to be progesterone receptor levels. One of them's high ranking. She can afford to be a jerk
01:41:08.200
to everybody else and get away with it. The other one's low ranking. Oh, it's not just your hormone
01:41:14.420
levels. It's what sort of position in your society you have, even if you're a baboon. Or now you look
01:41:21.180
at humans and depending on what sort of culture you're in, are you in an individualist culture or a
01:41:28.460
collectivist one? Individualist, the United States poster child of individualist thinking,
01:41:34.140
collectivist. 99% of the research has been done on East Asian cultures. And how you somaticize
01:41:42.060
your mood shifts and your physical shifts during your period differs in collectivist versus
01:41:49.560
individualist cultures. How irritable you become. Not because there's a difference in how much of
01:41:56.200
negative affect you're feeling during the time. Are you in a culture where it's culturally acceptable
01:42:02.260
to bitch and moan to all your best friends when you're not feeling well? Or are you in a culture
01:42:06.980
where when you're feeling lousy, what you're supposed to do is reach out affiliatively and reify your like
01:42:12.920
social values. And how much of that do you think is also genetic? So for example, I mean, even though
01:42:20.480
I'm not a gynecologist and therefore don't see a lot of this, I see enough to realize that
01:42:26.480
women will often say my sister and my mother either go through or went through the same feelings. And of
01:42:33.200
course, as you described, there are so many different variants. The stereotypical one is the, you know,
01:42:38.760
the sort of the nasty phenotype. But actually the one that I think might be more prevalent is
01:42:43.900
the sadder phenotype, the more emotionally distraught, just emotionally labile, but in a
01:42:50.460
non-aggressive way. That's probably the phenotype I see more, easier to cry or something like that.
01:42:56.240
So how much of that do you think is heritable in the way that eye color or some other aspect of
01:43:02.760
body habitus or even depression is quite heritable versus the ecosystem you're in purely environmental?
01:43:09.840
Well, the answer is you really can't choose one or the other blah, blah, blah. But if you could only
01:43:14.400
manipulate one, which would be the first one, and I'm definitely of the school of genes get overrated
01:43:22.140
in terms of their impact. And, you know, a gene affecting your eye color, it's okay to use words
01:43:29.180
like determine, and it's probably not even 100% accurate. But when you get to genetic influences on
01:43:35.100
all the interesting stuff and behavior and our internal lives and all of that, yeah, genes are
01:43:41.780
important, but overwhelmingly, these are genes that modify vulnerability. Vulnerability to certain types
01:43:51.720
of environments. Okay. So for example, you bring up depression and catastrophic pandemic of that.
01:44:00.260
And, you know, there's a whole shopping list by now of genes that have been implicated and probably
01:44:06.000
the single most important one, it's called the gene for the serotonin transporter, serotonin,
01:44:12.980
SSRIs, Prozac, all of those serotonin is just like right in the middle of what we understand about
01:44:17.880
the neurochemistry of depression. And it turns out the serotonin transporter gene comes in a few
01:44:23.580
different flavors, a few different genetic variants, and a ton of basic research, rats, monkeys, et cetera,
01:44:32.380
suggested that if you had one particular variant, you were more at risk for major depression.
01:44:39.460
Okay. So this classic work, this guy at Duke, Avshalom Caspi, who's sort of a god in the field,
01:44:45.540
goes out and he follows like 17,000 people from birth up to age 25 or so. He's got genetic
01:44:51.360
information on them. And he's able to ask this critical question. Okay. If you have the quote
01:44:56.720
bad version of this gene by age 25, are you more likely to have a history of clinical depression?
01:45:02.640
And what's the prevalence of the gene approximately?
01:45:08.020
His was a mixed one, but Westernized Western urine populations, I think it's got about a 20% incidence.
01:45:14.620
So the question then is of those 20%, how many go on to get depressed? Of the 80%,
01:45:19.740
how many go on to get depressed? The answer is very likely going to be, it's not a one-to-one mapping.
01:45:25.040
It might be an increase in risk by some factor.
01:45:28.640
And what they saw was overall, there was no increase in risk having the bad variant.
01:45:34.380
However, if it was coupled with a lot of childhood stress, you had about a 20-fold increase in the risk.
01:45:42.360
So just to be clear, on aggregate, there was no difference. The hazard ratio is one for with gene
01:45:52.080
But if you wanted to amplify it, take that gene and expose it to childhood stress or trauma,
01:46:02.280
Look at people without the scariant vulnerability variant, and look at the same severity of childhood
01:46:08.500
stressors and loss, and you got a moderate increase in incidence of depression.
01:46:13.420
These folks, massive order of magnitude multiples of that, more increase there.
01:46:19.680
What that tells you is, this is a gene whose variants alter how readily you deal with
01:46:30.680
And it turns out, these different variants are regulated in different ways by glucocorticoids.
01:46:39.200
The same way, there's another gene for the people who are interested in the genetics of aggression.
01:46:43.560
This gene, monoamine oxidase, and it comes in variants, and it's-
01:46:49.180
And there's a class of drugs that targets these receptors, yeah.
01:46:52.540
Again, a ton of basic research had suggested, ooh, there's a scary variant of it, which if you
01:46:58.800
have it, you are going to be more predisposed towards violence.
01:47:02.880
And in fact, the same group working with the same population, massive data set, winds up
01:47:08.100
showing just having that variant doesn't get you a higher risk of antisocial violent behavior
01:47:14.720
by age 25, if and only if it was coupled with abuse, childhood abuse growing up.
01:47:21.500
Oh, if you didn't have the scary variant, childhood abuse, a little bit of an increased risk, have
01:47:28.300
this variant with the abuse, and it was virtually the same figure as with the serotonin transporter
01:47:36.500
Over and over the genes that are interesting when it comes to this stuff, these are all genes
01:47:41.800
about vulnerability and potentialities and tendencies that are emerging only in certain environments
01:47:52.680
It makes me think of the APOE genotype, which is linked to Alzheimer's disease, and there we
01:48:01.860
About 25% of the population carries at least one copy of that gene, and they represent about
01:48:08.060
two-thirds of the cases of Alzheimer's disease.
01:48:11.740
It's not a deterministic gene, but it does increase risk.
01:48:15.360
Now, of course, you could argue that maybe in a decade or more, we will be able to say
01:48:22.500
something very similar about APOE, which is it's not remotely deterministic.
01:48:26.980
It only gets turned on when X, Y, and Z happen before this period of time or in absolute.
01:48:34.940
And of course, we don't know what those things are right now.
01:48:37.200
At least in the examples you gave, you could say, well, trauma or childhood, some event
01:48:46.400
And if you're seeing a 20-fold difference, it's pretty clear that you found the trigger.
01:48:50.320
Nonetheless, there's still variability to explain after that.
01:48:53.580
But yeah, pathetically, that counts as virtually state-of-the-art for understanding the modifying
01:49:03.000
I mean, anytime you do these like GWAS massive fishing expeditions and you come out with 300
01:49:10.800
genes or implicated in a trait that's as boring as height, 300 genes, which you put together
01:49:18.500
all of your knowledge of the variation of them in any given individual and you have like
01:49:22.460
4% predictability of their height, you know, Christ, if you're talking about genes for propensity
01:49:29.420
towards feeling poignancy or genes for like anything that's interesting.
01:49:37.460
Even if you just limit yourself to diseases, you know, of the 20,000 genes in our body, you
01:49:43.520
can really only point to about 100 that are directly this mutation means this disease.
01:49:53.680
It's all like inborn errors of metabolism and certain things like that.
01:49:56.840
But when you start to talk about the complex diseases like Alzheimer's disease, even as
01:50:02.220
predictive as the APOE4 is, it's not even close to being enough to understand it.
01:50:07.120
And I think, yeah, it's funny when you talk about it through that lens, you realize the
01:50:10.900
importance of environment, which is, you know, at the risk of stating the obvious.
01:50:14.020
You said something a while ago that I made a note of because I wanted to come back to
01:50:17.660
You talked about the effect of glucocorticoids on the hippocampus and not only how harmful
01:50:23.480
it was for memory consolidation, but overall cognitive impairment.
01:50:27.760
And listening to you talk about that was exactly the way Matthew Walker at Berkeley speaks about
01:50:34.220
sleep deprivation and its impact on the hippocampus, which then makes me wonder, I assume it's
01:50:40.680
been well-studied that, you know, when people are sleep deprived, we see greater elevations
01:50:46.560
Do you have a sense of what the evolutionary basis of that is?
01:50:50.620
You would think even evolution would want that to be in the opposite direction.
01:50:54.700
I mean, the only explanation I can come up with is if you're sleep deprived, you're
01:50:58.260
assuming that there's a reason for it that's good and therefore you want that.
01:51:01.960
Of course, not with any of the fact that higher cortisol will then prevent sleep.
01:51:05.020
I think that's probably the best sort of piece of teleology for that.
01:51:10.700
If you're like a basic mammal, which means either you are emphatically diurnal or emphatically
01:51:17.020
And if instead you're wide awake eight hours into what should be the 12th, this does not
01:51:24.880
The odds are you have something stressful going on.
01:51:29.180
Turns out the stress, sleep, sleep quality, cortisol cluster of interactions, even more
01:51:41.280
This was a science paper some years back that, okay, so as we talked about, the circadian peak
01:51:48.700
of glucocorticoids are around the time you wake up.
01:51:51.820
What's interesting is about an hour before you wake up, levels begin to rise, telling you
01:51:57.520
something, a subtle point, which is a lot of glucocorticoid actions are not for dealing
01:52:03.340
with a stressor that has already commenced, but can be preparatory.
01:52:08.200
So the preparatory stressor is having to actually get up and get out of bed and start functioning
01:52:13.520
and get dressed in an hour before people wake spontaneously.
01:52:19.300
Now in the study, what you do is you take a whole bunch of volunteers who are sleeping and
01:52:23.860
you see the preparatory rise, all of that, and you tell them, tonight we're doing something
01:52:28.360
different, I'm going to wake you up at four in the morning.
01:52:32.060
And what you see is around three o'clock, glucocorticoid levels start rising.
01:52:36.680
Okay, now you do something even more interesting.
01:52:40.220
You say, okay, tonight I'm not going to tell you when, but I'm going to wake you up at some
01:52:45.320
point during the night and that's the end of your night's sleep.
01:52:47.720
And the person's about 90 minutes into their sleep stage and all of that and cortisol rises
01:52:57.040
You get one sleep cycle and then the adrenal gland says, that's it.
01:53:03.400
So not only is it bad not to get enough sleep, not only is it bad if the insufficient sleep
01:53:09.320
is fragmented, but the worst is if it's fragmented unpredictably.
01:53:13.420
And that's like every medical resident in history.
01:53:19.840
It's the first thought I had actually, when you said that, which was every night of call,
01:53:24.340
you have this pager and you're in this call room and you just want so desperately to sleep
01:53:30.820
I remember as my residency went on, the degree of sleep deprivation got greater and greater
01:53:35.820
that the steps I had to take to ensure I wouldn't sleep through a page got greater and greater.
01:53:42.080
I don't think I've ever told this story before.
01:53:45.120
I used to use this really heavy paper tape and tape the pager to my head, my forehead
01:53:50.580
at full volume because you would get both the sound to your ear and then you'd get the
01:53:59.300
But imagine laying in bed with tape wrapped around your head, holding a pager on your forehead
01:54:05.680
in anticipation of what's coming, not knowing when it's coming.
01:54:09.580
It could be in five minutes or it could be in two hours.
01:54:21.200
It turns out if you have elevated glucocorticoid levels while you're asleep, you have less delta
01:54:30.760
You make less adenosine stores in your brain during.
01:54:34.000
So even if you manage to go to sleep, if it's under the, I could be asleep for two hours
01:54:39.340
now or 30 seconds, the sleep quality is going to be horrible.
01:54:49.440
And do you think it's mostly mediated through the immune system?
01:54:59.260
There is a common perception that stress can play a very substantial role in the onset of
01:55:06.660
cancer, in coming out of remission and rates of tumor growth and such, sufficiently so that
01:55:12.800
there's been all sorts of studies where you ask cancer patients, what do you think is the
01:55:19.080
The actual evidence for a role of stress in causing cancer, bringing it out of remission,
01:55:27.980
accelerating tumor growth is very, very minimal.
01:55:31.720
There's been a remarkably small number of good prospective studies of humans that have really,
01:55:40.980
When you look at the animal studies, what they typically involve is you experimentally induce a
01:55:46.880
tumor, you inject transformed cells, you give a carcinogen, some such thing.
01:55:52.280
My lab back when did some of that work under those circumstances, you can accelerate the growth
01:55:57.600
of a tumor, but those are circumstances of cancer acquisition that are virtually irrelevant to human
01:56:04.480
And the other question is, can you do it without perturbing other things?
01:56:07.380
So for example, if you go ahead and stick the tumor into the mouse and apply a stress to it,
01:56:13.600
it seems that that by definition will alter some other parameter, what it eats, how much it sleeps,
01:56:21.060
So it becomes difficult to disentangle cortisol.
01:56:23.880
I mean, I guess the only thing I can think of is what does the experiment look like where you take
01:56:27.400
the mouse that experimentally has the tumor and you just start injecting more glucocorticoid?
01:56:32.580
So in other words, you don't actually increase the stress level, you just increase the readout
01:56:40.080
We did one study showing that as soon as cells become transformed, they upregulate the
01:56:48.780
And that's the one that's further upregulated by glucocorticoids and target cells.
01:56:52.920
So you're just shoveling energy over to those cells.
01:56:57.920
Which preferentially consume glucose anyway, just given the number of them that fall by the
01:57:02.980
So to me, even though that's very mechanistic and artificial, that strikes me as pretty reasonable
01:57:08.220
evidence that cortisol can play a role in cancer.
01:57:12.820
I mean, I guess it's going to be much more difficult to disentangle that in the real world.
01:57:17.520
And again, these are types of cancers where this was virally induced transformation of cells
01:57:24.440
that are then transplanted in very artificial systems that turn out not to be terribly applicable
01:57:32.840
And what you wind up seeing then, okay, yes, glucocorticoids can be potently immunosuppressive.
01:57:40.180
Usually by the time you have a tumor growing, that's long past the point where it's an immunological
01:57:47.580
It's now, can you keep the tumor from growing a whole bunch of capillaries that will feed
01:57:53.180
Can you keep it from stealing all sorts of energy?
01:57:56.360
Can you keep it from turning off cell death programs?
01:58:03.380
So it seems that there'd be hard to make the case that acute bouts of stress can really have
01:58:08.600
any impact because, you know, yeah, sure, you can acutely disrupt the immune system and maybe
01:58:14.680
That, you know, I could explain why you might get a cold under a period of great stress, but
01:58:20.100
And what that winds meaning is that should be a massive, massive take-home message for anyone
01:58:26.340
who is predisposed towards thinking, ooh, stress caused my cancer.
01:58:31.540
Too bad I didn't have better priorities in life.
01:58:35.160
Now I know whose fault it is, that sort of thing.
01:58:37.620
And it should certainly make you damn cautious if there's some highly credentialed quack out
01:58:43.040
there who is selling a stress management will stop your tumor, will make it disappear entirely.
01:58:51.320
All that being said, there's been some wonderful work.
01:58:56.160
And a lot of this was pioneered by a Stanford colleague of mine, David Spiegel, who showed
01:59:01.700
that things like supportive group therapy among cancer patients enhances survival.
01:59:10.660
This was when he first published this in the late 80s.
01:59:15.600
I mean, I don't remember when it was published, but I remember learning about it in medical
01:59:18.440
It was a massive finding and one is immediately tempted to, at least as a biology type like
01:59:24.840
me, to come up with a biological explanation along the lines of what you proposed.
01:59:30.340
Supportive group therapy, you're less stressed.
01:59:36.100
And therefore you're not having those adverse effects of it on your immune systems.
01:59:42.740
And lower glucose levels and lower glucose and lower insulin and lower IgF.
01:59:46.240
If you could, yeah, you could come up with a complete biological.
01:59:48.840
And in general, those studies have shown that pathway does not occur.
01:59:53.060
Spiegel and I did some of those studies things.
01:59:57.040
Something which if you're a nuts and bolts reductive bio type person is terribly disappointing,
02:00:03.800
but is so interesting and important people, when they have supportive cancer therapy with
02:00:11.960
other people going through the same hell, they become more compliant when they're medical
02:00:19.040
They're more likely to go the extra round of chemo because everybody else is cheering them
02:00:25.920
And they're more likely to take the meds that make them nauseous as hell.
02:00:33.480
We're going to eat right after we're done with the group.
02:00:38.820
People become more compliant and that was very hard to demonstrate because what cancer
02:00:45.320
patient ever wants to admit to a researcher, actually, I skip about a third of my meds because
02:00:55.480
It's in some ways a dark, dirty secret in cancer therapeutics how much people diverge from
02:01:03.640
their optimal treatment regime because the treatment regimes are sheer, utter hell.
02:01:07.800
When you're surrounded by people who are going through the same thing and understand, you're
02:01:14.620
I think that winds up explaining an awful lot of that effect.
02:01:18.420
So when you look at cancer, atherosclerosis, and neurodegenerative disease, it seems to me
02:01:25.980
that the direct lines of evidence for the damage of hypercortisolemia and the accelerated
02:01:32.800
stress response are probably most demonstrated in cardiovascular disease and atherosclerosis
02:01:38.140
vis-a-vis several mechanisms, not the least of which is hypertension, both macro and microvasculature,
02:01:46.820
Adhesion of cells and sludging and yeah, it's the best understood realm.
02:01:53.660
I would expect that it's playing a role in dementia, but again, this probably gets to the
02:02:01.840
There's probably in isolation, maybe this wouldn't play a role, but in combination with
02:02:09.260
And it seems that, for example, we know that cortisol inhibits melatonin secretion.
02:02:15.180
So even if you take two people who have the same amount of blue light reduction, which
02:02:20.900
should therefore stimulate melatonin, the one with hypercortisolemia is going to, and we
02:02:26.240
We can measure overnight urinary cortisol and overnight urinary melatonin.
02:02:33.280
Well, melatonin, it's a pro-neurogenic molecule.
02:02:37.000
So having less of that is less restorative to the brain, even beyond its important role, which
02:02:45.840
So what other lines of evidence do you see beyond what you've already described at the
02:02:53.460
Basically, everything we talked about with the hippocampus applies in the adult brain
02:02:58.920
And it's the first place we tend to see changes.
02:03:01.700
And it was the first area of research, first evidence for stress damaging the hippocampus
02:03:07.180
and hippocampal-dependent memory type stuff, late 70s.
02:03:14.040
And superb studies from a number of groups, and I had my two cents in that literature also,
02:03:20.500
showing you could accelerate aspects of hippocampal aging with lots of stress, lots of glucocorticoids,
02:03:27.000
extent of neuron loss, extent of memory problem, extent of reactive gliosis, et cetera, et cetera.
02:03:33.380
Next big outpost that people began to appreciate in adult brains was derivative of what we talked
02:03:42.760
I was just about to say, is there a direct correlation, I guess, between amygdala size and
02:03:47.260
What you see instead is that the syndrome where it's most demonstrated is PTSD.
02:03:53.540
You see expansion of the amygdala and you see atrophy of the hippocampus.
02:03:58.340
And glucocorticoids probably play the driving role in both.
02:04:02.100
So in the amygdala, like the hippocampal story is stress and glucocorticoids screw it up.
02:04:11.500
You get atrophy and the amygdala, it's the exact opposite story.
02:04:18.960
Neurons become more excitable, form denser networks.
02:04:25.500
The problem with chronic stress is your memory goes down the tubes, hippocampus isn't working
02:04:31.320
The problem with chronic stress in the amygdala is it works better than it's supposed to.
02:04:35.720
And this is the link between stress and anxiety disorders, stress and fear, stress and all
02:04:43.260
Next sort of outpost that people started looking at was the dopamine system in the brain.
02:04:48.700
And dopamine neurotransmitter most famously associated with reward, pleasure, cocaine works
02:04:56.620
A much more accurate, subtle picture of it is dopamine is actually more about the anticipation
02:05:05.220
And about goal-directed behavior you're willing to do in anticipation of reward.
02:05:11.180
But then a whole literature showing what distress and glucocorticoids do there, they mess with
02:05:18.040
It's less clean of a story than amygdala or hippocampus, but in ways that predispose towards the two
02:05:24.140
big psychiatric diseases of screwed up dopamine systems.
02:05:30.220
Depression, more vulnerability to addiction, harder to get off of addictive substances.
02:05:37.960
Depression is a disease of on a certain level dopamine depletion.
02:05:41.520
It's a disease of inability to feel pleasure and hedonia.
02:05:46.160
And that's the neurochemistry of the link between chronic stress and why that increases the likelihood
02:05:51.980
of the first three, four episodes of major depression.
02:05:56.700
What for me is the most exciting area is one where if I was starting over, you know, forget
02:06:03.220
the hippocampus, who cares about like how many digits you could remember backwards or whatever.
02:06:08.620
The most interesting domain is turning out to be what stress and glucocorticoids do to the
02:06:13.000
frontal cortex, judgment, impulse control, executive function, long-term planning, strategizing.
02:06:23.700
And it turns out virtually every bad thing cellularly that stress and glucocorticoids do in the
02:06:30.480
hippocampus, they're turning out to do in the frontal cortex as well.
02:06:33.320
And what does that begin to explain in this entire world of why it is during moments of extreme
02:06:40.620
emotional arousal, especially aversive ones, why we make terrible, terrible decisions that
02:06:47.340
seem brilliant at the time and you spend the rest of your life regretting it because impulse
02:06:53.240
control, your amygdala overpowers your frontal cortex at those times.
02:06:57.880
Your amygdala has a lot more talking to your motor systems than your frontal cortex does.
02:07:03.320
It's the reason why judgments and impulse control become terrible when we're frazzled.
02:07:10.460
It's also looking like as a side story with that, it's one of the reasons why when we're
02:07:15.820
very stressed, it's hard for the frontal cortex to do one of its harder jobs, which is to take
02:07:24.240
the view of the world from somebody else's perspective.
02:07:29.380
Some research on animal models of empathy, and this was work with this guy at McGill named
02:07:36.280
Jeffrey Mogul, where I collaborated with him, showing in both rats and humans, you're less
02:07:42.640
empathic towards strangers when they're in pain.
02:07:45.720
And if you block glucocorticoid release, you don't get that effect anymore.
02:07:50.500
Glucocorticoids, the stressfulness of dealing with scary novel humans or scary novel mice,
02:07:58.520
if you're a rodent, glucocorticoids narrow your window as to who counts as an us and whose
02:08:09.040
So for me, you know, it's incredibly interesting if you're stressed and suddenly your SAT scores
02:08:14.340
plummet, the fact that stress makes people crappier to each other and less empathic and
02:08:21.200
more parochial and more xenophobic and more impulsive with the worst of our impulses, that's
02:08:29.560
Everything you just said, Robert, is almost a call to action in criminal justice reform.
02:08:35.040
And I've done a podcast on this topic where, you know, I was very fortunate to go into a
02:08:40.000
maximum security prison with a program that is really there to do incredible rehabilitative
02:08:49.700
There's a game that we played about halfway through the day called Step to the Line.
02:08:54.000
This is a game that's used to basically identify the vast difference between those of us who are
02:08:59.400
Like in other words, the role of luck in our lives versus the gentleman who two thirds of
02:09:05.400
these men are never going to get out of prison.
02:09:06.880
And one man had even spent more than half his life in solitary confinement, his total
02:09:13.020
So it starts with these questions of step to the line if you grew up in a home that had
02:09:17.720
And, you know, of the volunteers, you know, 60% step to the line of the inmates, five step
02:09:24.140
Step to the line if you grew up in a home where there were more than four books.
02:09:29.640
Step to the line if you saw someone die with your own eyes before this age.
02:09:34.040
Step, I mean, and it's, it's a very emotional thing to go through because as this game is
02:09:39.800
unfolding, you're just, you're feeling more and more fortunate on the one hand because
02:09:45.240
you realize if not for the grace of this luck and at the same time, the empathy you have
02:09:51.920
for these men who have done the most heinous things grows.
02:09:55.680
And you start to realize, boy, there's a fine line between those of us on the inside, those
02:10:04.500
Because everything you said really resonated when I was thinking about some of the stories
02:10:08.860
the men told us about the decisions that they made.
02:10:12.440
And there's this one part of the exercise that's incredibly emotional where you're partnered
02:10:17.820
So it's, it's one volunteer, one inmate, and you were each telling the other person
02:10:22.360
the greatest regret of your life, the biggest mistake you've made.
02:10:26.680
And hearing some of these stories, it's not to justify anything that's been done.
02:10:32.360
And it's not to say that there shouldn't be consequences for it.
02:10:36.900
But a lot of these things that people have wound up in prison for are really impulsive, horrible
02:10:43.640
decisions, as opposed to decades of sinister planning.
02:10:50.600
It's one thing to look at what, you know, like Hitler did.
02:10:53.860
It's hard to argue that anything that he did that was bad was impulsive.
02:10:57.000
It's quite another thing when you look at someone in a gang-related incident where, you
02:11:02.980
know, this guy gets shot and you're going to shoot this guy back, or this guy's about
02:11:07.760
And yet that type of drug-related violence is disproportionately represented in, certainly
02:11:17.440
And then to build on what you said, it's not clear that the environment in there is reducing
02:11:23.420
cortisol levels to the level that would enable rehabilitation, which is really the thesis
02:11:29.100
of, and a lot of people I'm sure listening to this are thinking, why would you feel empathy
02:11:37.500
But the reality of it is, if they're going to get out, you should care.
02:11:42.060
That says nothing of maybe the higher level that you should care, which is the injustice
02:11:46.740
But even if you took a purely selfish view, a non-trivial number of these men and women
02:11:53.060
So wouldn't you rather they get out and function better?
02:11:58.700
And I know two people actually very well who spent a great deal of time in prison.
02:12:02.780
One of whom I interviewed on this podcast, his name's Corey McCarthy.
02:12:05.580
And it really strikes me as the exception and not the rule that people are able to emerge
02:12:10.180
from that environment and go on to be successful outside.
02:12:19.080
Any study the last century and a half's worth of neurobiology and genetics and child development
02:12:27.980
and all of that, and the notion that we are free agents of our action is so destructively
02:12:36.640
I'm sure you're familiar with the work of Sam Harris.
02:12:39.300
Sam has been one of the most interesting forces in my life at getting me to really even question
02:12:46.000
And once you realize that free will may not even be yours, it takes luck to a new level.
02:12:52.780
It's something I spent a lot of time thinking about now.
02:12:55.340
What advice would you offer somebody who is interested in the neurobiology of stress or
02:13:02.420
behavior and who wants to be able to look back when they're your age and be as, you know,
02:13:10.800
I don't want to, I know you sort of bristle at that, but to have made as many contributions
02:13:15.360
I mean, what in retrospect was sort of the secret to being able to pursue your bliss and
02:13:20.420
And, and, and look, frankly, to be where you are and to still have the passion that you
02:13:24.140
have for what you're doing, which to me is really the marker of success.
02:13:27.000
It's that you're sitting here saying there's this other problem.
02:13:30.340
And I, you know, like I could spend, you know, the next 20 years just thinking about that.
02:13:39.420
Every bit of neurosis, every bit of affective instability I've got, every childhood trauma I've
02:13:47.080
I, I've titrated in just the right way that I've turned it into more productivity and incredibly
02:13:56.500
My capacity to sublimate emotion into intellectual pursuit, into really, really, really wanting
02:14:04.980
to understand something into, I've just been very lucky in that regard.
02:14:10.660
I've gotten just the right levels of all sorts of like tumult that, that have synergized most
02:14:19.540
In other words, just huge amounts of luck, huge amounts of luck.
02:14:25.220
And at least now coming later in life, an increasing capacity to more carefully try to analyze what
02:14:42.940
This had much to do with my closing my lab four years ago.
02:14:46.800
It was a big booming lab with lots of people in all sorts of labs around the world.
02:14:52.720
We were going to kick the asses of by getting the answer to this or that.
02:14:56.340
You know, if you're raised in the right sort of rarefied, ambitious world of biomedical research
02:15:06.620
at age 25, you've got a list down to the floor of the diseases you're going to vanquish and
02:15:13.040
the problems you're going to solve and all of that.
02:15:16.100
And, you know, getting to that point in life where you're realizing it's not going to happen.
02:15:22.060
Was it that much of a cerebral realization or was it combined with other factors?
02:15:29.600
You know, you've described obviously having this network of people around you who matter
02:15:33.540
And I mean, was part of it just thinking, I haven't spent enough time with them at the
02:15:40.940
And when, you know, a thousand years from now, whether I worked this much harder or this
02:15:46.320
much less, it won't have altered the trajectory of X, Y, Z.
02:15:53.760
Family growing up real fast as they tend to do.
02:15:59.120
Realizing your best work was decades behind you.
02:16:02.140
Realizing there's this book you want to write where the only way you can do it is to just
02:16:09.860
Kenyan field work having collapsed a few years before.
02:16:15.900
There are limits to how many 80 hours of work a week you can do.
02:16:22.040
What advice, I mean, it's such a cliche question.
02:16:23.800
What advice would you give the, the 25 year old Robert as he was just finishing that PhD
02:16:34.900
Well, I think on that note, which by the way, I think is some of the greatest advice one could
02:16:40.440
Even those of us who are still on the climbing ambition curve should do everything to listen
02:16:45.720
I want to, I want to thank you so much for taking the time to sit down with me.
02:16:49.920
And more importantly, I think for just all of the work you've done and you're continuing
02:16:56.140
This has been fun is the wrong word, but stimulating good.
02:17:02.820
You can find all of this information and more at peteratiamd.com forward slash podcast.
02:17:10.000
There you'll find the show notes, readings, and links related to this episode.
02:17:17.580
Maybe the simplest thing to do is to sign up for my subjectively non-lame once a week email,
02:17:22.260
where I'll update you on what I've been up to, the most interesting papers I've read,
02:17:25.860
and all things related to longevity, science, performance, sleep, et cetera.
02:17:29.720
On social, you can find me on Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook, all with the ID, peteratiamd.
02:17:35.980
But usually Twitter is the best way to reach me to share your questions and comments.
02:17:39.680
Now for the obligatory disclaimer, this podcast is for general informational purposes only
02:17:43.900
and does not constitute the practice of medicine, nursing, or other professional healthcare
02:17:48.100
services, including the giving of medical advice.
02:17:51.540
And note, no doctor-patient relationship is formed.
02:17:54.460
The use of this information and the materials linked to the podcast is at the user's own risk,
02:17:59.300
The content of this podcast is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical
02:18:05.800
Users should not disregard or delay in obtaining medical advice for any medical condition they
02:18:10.040
have and should seek the assistance of their healthcare professionals for any such conditions.
02:18:15.460
Lastly, and perhaps most importantly, I take conflicts of interest very seriously.
02:18:19.620
For all of my disclosures, the companies I invest in and or advise, please visit peteratiamd.com