The Peter Attia Drive - September 05, 2019


Qualy #19 - A unifying theory of aging


Episode Stats


Length

10 minutes

Words per minute

188.31966

Word count

1,996

Sentence count

3

Harmful content

Hate speech

1

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode of The Qualies, Dr. Peter T.D. Matthews, PhD, joins us to discuss his new book, "Aging and the Silent Killer: The Science of Old Cells" and his new research on aging and aging-related issues. Dr. Matthews discusses the 8 central tenets of aging and how they affect the aging process, and the role of epigenetics and epigenetics in aging.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 welcome to the qualies a subscriber exclusive podcast qualies is just a shorthand slang for
00:00:10.640 a qualification round which is something you do prior to the race just a little bit quicker
00:00:14.860 qualies podcast features episodes that are short and we're hoping for less than 10 minutes each
00:00:19.920 which highlight the best questions topics tactics etc discussed on previous episodes of the drive
00:00:26.100 we recognize many of you as new listeners to the podcast may not have the time to go back and
00:00:30.920 listen to every episode and those of you who have already listened may have forgotten so the new
00:00:35.000 episodes of the qualies are going to be released tuesday through friday and they're going to be
00:00:39.000 published exclusively on our private subscriber only podcast feed now occasionally we're going
00:00:43.580 to release quali episodes in the main feed which is what you're about to hear now if you enjoy these
00:00:49.100 episodes and if you're interested in hearing more as well as receiving all of the other subscriber
00:00:53.260 exclusive content which is growing by the month you can visit us at peteratiamd.com forward slash
00:00:59.240 subscribe so without further delay i hope you enjoy today's quali earlier you spoke about sort of eight
00:01:08.020 or nine central tenets of aging we've covered some of them but i know and i'm guessing that your book
00:01:15.440 is going to go into this in greater detail but can you rehash what you or at least as many of those as
00:01:21.080 you're going to recall on the spot not to put you on the spot that's a long list uh yeah sure
00:01:25.820 there's epigenetic change the cells of cell communication and inflammation there's let me
00:01:30.820 count this analytics so senescent cells build up there's protein misfolding there's telomere loss
00:01:36.880 and genomic instability there's metabolic changes so mp kinase and metformin would address that
00:01:43.240 and then there's uh responses to what you call amino acids and other nutrient inputs and those
00:01:51.320 collectively go awry during aging but what causes all of those to happen that's something that we've
00:01:57.340 been working on for quite a while and you think those are more coupled than they are uncoupled those
00:02:01.780 pathways or do you think that i mean there are clearly situations in which external stressors can
00:02:07.540 perturb more than one of those but like senescence seems somewhat uncoupled from nutrient sensing
00:02:13.300 doesn't it uh it may but and i'm not asking that rhetorically like i just i just don't know
00:02:18.080 no the answer is we think that we've found an explanation for all of these things to happen
00:02:23.980 a unifying theory right so i've kept it close to my vest for a number of years but it actually goes
00:02:29.920 all the way back to the sirtuin story in yeast and hopefully the listeners who've stuck with this
00:02:35.860 podcast are still with us because they will punchline yeah they i promise you they are with us so the
00:02:41.100 punchline is that so this is all off top my head here we haven't published this yet but i'm i'm gonna
00:02:47.740 tell you my my thoughts and your listeners so the genome is digital information it's very easy to
00:02:55.880 preserve it's the reason we went from analog to digital in the 2000s dna is four letters it's digital
00:03:01.620 it's easy to replicate it's easy to store you can boil it it's very robust and so what we've actually
00:03:06.540 come to discover is that the genome is fairly intact in old people and old animals we've
00:03:12.060 sequenced the genomes of lots of old mice and all the genes are still largely intact so what's going
00:03:17.640 wrong well the other part of information that you inherit from your parents is the epigenetic
00:03:24.200 information okay and i use that term loosely but basically it means what's the pattern of gene
00:03:28.840 expression which genes to turn on and off at which time and that is analog information okay that has
00:03:35.820 to be analog because instead of just being a single code it has to operate in three dimensions actually
00:03:40.880 four if you count time and so that's an analog system and it's constantly adapting to what we eat
00:03:46.720 what we what we drink if we run when we sleep and you have to turn genes on and off all the time
00:03:52.460 but that pattern of gene expression that's set down when we're young because it's analog analog
00:03:58.420 information doesn't last very long anyone who's had a record player or magnetic tape knows that
00:04:05.100 these things don't last and that's the problem i think with aging is that we don't lose the digital
00:04:09.660 information so the compact disc of our lives is still intact when we're old but it's as if we've got
00:04:15.460 a scratched cd and the cells don't read the right genes at the right time anymore and they lose their
00:04:20.380 identity in fact if we there's a analogy which is called waddington's landscape where in the 1950s
00:04:26.480 waddington drew a picture it's a beautiful picture of some hills it's a mountainscape and cells actually
00:04:32.520 roll down the mountainscape and land in different valleys down below and that's to you know before we
00:04:38.120 had he had access to the genome that was his way of saying this is how cells know what they are they
00:04:43.320 land in these valleys and they stay there but what i think is happening during aging is due to the
00:04:48.160 vibration of noise over time we lose that pattern of gene expression we lose that information
00:04:53.600 epigenetic information and those cells or those marbles in waddington's landscape they jump over
00:05:00.020 into different valleys and lose their identity so your neurons are not functional like neurons anymore
00:05:04.660 your liver cells are more like neurons and we see that in our lab we're just writing up a couple of
00:05:10.620 papers right now for this and we're able to actually manipulate the epigenome in cells and in mice and
00:05:19.360 have a look what happens to those animals and the prediction is that you get all the hallmarks of
00:05:23.840 aging you know the challenge with this entire space is you think back to the time in the 1950s when he
00:05:28.780 made when he created that analogy and it's in some ways it's amazing that it could still be relevant 75
00:05:35.300 80 years later whatever it is on the other hand it it humbles you to realize how much more has been
00:05:42.400 learned about that process in that time and sometimes i think about it because you and i are interested in the
00:05:48.220 same problem that i'm worried i just don't know anything you know i'm worried that in 10 years
00:05:54.240 i'll look back at my hypotheses and my not even my hypothesis just my understanding of the current
00:05:59.580 state of the art today and think you know what that was directionally right but it was so oversimplified
00:06:06.060 and oh my goodness like you know so it's sort of like we're back in this problem of time like we're
00:06:11.980 going to run out of time and i mean how confident are you that because you and i are almost the same age
00:06:17.300 like how confident are you that in our lifetime we will see step function changes in human longevity
00:06:23.680 and to put this in context there really hasn't been a step function change in human longevity
00:06:30.100 probably since the introduction of sanitation i mean everything has been quite incremental maybe
00:06:35.420 antibiotics vaccinations antibiotics have probably been the last step function change will we see one in
00:06:41.300 our lifetime how confident are you i'm getting more and more confident honestly when i started in this
00:06:46.160 field i thought we'd probably not see the type of technologies that i'm seeing now it's making my
00:06:51.340 head spin not just in the technologies but also the uh the investment and the number of people working
00:06:56.740 on this now this was the back order of biology when we started and there's been some new results which
00:07:02.060 i'll just hint upon because um we haven't published and it's very early but i've seen it sounds like a
00:07:08.220 scene out of blade runner but i've seen things you wouldn't believe no it's it's maybe not that
00:07:13.500 dramatic but let me go back to the compact disc analogy you've got the scratched cd how do you
00:07:19.240 find the polish what is that let's go back to the yeast analogy what causes those scratches why do you
00:07:24.400 get loss of gene regulation anyone who was paying attention earlier on in this conversation will
00:07:30.020 remember that these dna breaks in the chromosome broken chromosomes distract the sur complex and they
00:07:36.400 move away and you get the expression of genes that have no right being on
00:07:40.920 because the sirtuins have lost they're they're distracted from the deactivation function and
00:07:46.900 they're dealing with the repair function exactly so using that what we've got a lot of evidence for
00:07:52.240 now is that something very similar if not essentially identical in principle happens in mammals as we age
00:07:58.580 what that means is that insults to the genome and one of the major insults is a double strand break but
00:08:04.920 there are probably others cause these proteins sirtuins and other factors i'm not saying only
00:08:10.080 sirtuins but factors that control gene expression silencing and other things have a dual role we
00:08:16.240 know in dna repair and other things such as responding to stresses heat whatever but this is
00:08:23.320 the cell's way of coordinating gene expression changes hunkering down during times of adversity
00:08:28.320 and going off to repair the system which in this case we study dna breaks and that's a beautiful system
00:08:34.520 when you're young it works great you get exposed to cosmic rays or you go out in the sun you got lots of
00:08:39.400 dna breaks eventually these proteins will go repair those breaks and then go back to where they came
00:08:45.180 from to settle down the response to turn off the inflammation to turn off the dna repair when it's
00:08:50.380 not needed but the problem we think is it's antagonistic pleiotropy okay so peter medewar and
00:08:57.100 the other brilliant scientists in the 50s speculated i think correctly is that things that are really good
00:09:02.640 for you when you're young come back to bite you in the ass when you're older and i think that's what's 0.92
00:09:06.400 happening here is that this response to these stresses like a break end up not just distracting
00:09:10.780 these proteins but end up disrupting the actual structure of our chromatin and these proteins don't
00:09:16.420 always go back to where they came from 100 do that for 70 or 80 years and it's not surprising that the
00:09:23.340 genes that were once perfectly programmed and turned on at the right time lose their ability to do that and
00:09:29.280 we've got remnants of that program when we're 70 and 80 but what's exciting is that information is
00:09:35.860 still there to be accessed the question is how do you get the cells to remember to access at the right
00:09:40.340 time what's that polish and i think we're pretty close to finding that i hope you enjoyed today's
00:09:45.660 quali now sit tight for that legal disclaimer this podcast is for general informational purposes only
00:09:51.980 and does not constitute the practice of medicine nursing or other professional health care services
00:09:56.760 including the giving of medical advice and note no doctor patient relationship is formed
00:10:01.900 the use of this information and the materials linked to the podcast is at the user's own risk
00:10:07.340 the content of this podcast is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice
00:10:11.640 diagnoses or treatment users should not disregard or delay in obtaining medical advice for any medical
00:10:17.540 condition they have and should seek the assistance of their health care professionals for any such
00:10:22.100 conditions lastly and perhaps most importantly i take conflicts of interest very seriously for all of my
00:10:28.240 disclosures the companies i invest in and or advise please visit peter attia md.com forward slash about