The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters - July 08, 2025


PREVIEW: Brokenomics | Finance Has Changed with Steven Woolfe


Episode Stats

Length

19 minutes

Words per Minute

196.67548

Word Count

3,869

Sentence Count

309


Summary

One of the most important roles in any city firm is the Business Prevention Officer. They make sure that you don t go to jail. And I found out just the other day that Stephen was a Business Protection Officer for many years during the spiciest bits of the days in the city.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hello and welcome to Brokernomics. Now, one of the most important functions in any city firm is the
00:00:06.140 business prevention officer. Those are the chaps who make sure that you don't go to jail. And I
00:00:10.160 found out just the other day that Stephen was a business prevention officer for many years during
00:00:15.340 the spiciest bits of the days in the city. Yeah. So I think you missed the Asian financial crisis,
00:00:21.340 the bearings. Yes. But you were in for, let me get this right, the dot-com crash. Yes. Enron,
00:00:29.840 9-11, the great financial crisis, the European collapse and the flash crash. So you got some
00:00:37.080 interesting, oh and LIBOR. Oh yeah, LIBOR as well. Yes. So when you say that now, absolutely.
00:00:43.720 Yes, you got in for some spices. So what is the role of a business prevention officer?
00:00:48.280 All right. So I came in, first of all, into a small stockbroking firm just across London Bridge,
00:00:56.120 which was really just slightly outside of the city. And I came in as a compliance officer and
00:01:02.020 general counsel. Oh yeah, you're supposed to call them compliance officers. So yeah, as a barrister,
00:01:06.280 my role came in as being just a general lawyer for doing anything from human resources and
00:01:12.600 employment law to looking after contracts. So we're doing it. But specifically, I was brought in as
00:01:17.780 this idea of a new compliance officer. In those days, the city was regulated very lightly by
00:01:24.080 organisations called Lautro and Fimbra, who had like little books that were literally this thick.
00:01:31.380 So you could almost memorise all the rules that all the firms had to be regulated by.
00:01:35.520 It was just basically good contact. Yes. And they were great.
00:01:37.840 So that had gone, because I came in just as the dot com thing was peaking.
00:01:43.260 Yeah. And by then, that was almost exactly the same time as the FSA came in.
00:01:47.840 So it went from them, Lautro and Fimbra, and we had the Bank of England.
00:01:51.820 Yes.
00:01:51.980 So the Bank of England had prudential rules. And my job as a compliance officer is to go,
00:01:56.820 here is the firm. We're regulated by these entities. In those days, it was pretty loose.
00:02:01.900 Look at the rules and say, can we do this trade? Can we do this transaction? Can we onboard this
00:02:08.460 particular client? And my first firm, which was, I'm not sure I should mention the name of it,
00:02:15.460 actually, but was actually brilliant. It was just like a classic Wolf of Wall Street. It was just
00:02:20.400 one very long table, brilliant long table, with about like 12 guys on one side, 12 guys on the
00:02:26.600 other. There was the head trader in the middle, phones all the way around. And basically, these
00:02:32.520 guys were picking up the phone from a whole list of numbers that they were provided for and ringing
00:02:38.000 up these business people who owned companies all across the country, trying to get them onboarded as
00:02:44.520 their clients to buy and sell shares, but also to buy and sell derivatives contracts. And in those
00:02:53.580 days, we had something called LEAPS, long dated equity options. So long dated equity options
00:03:00.000 basically provided a huge amount of commission for the guy that sold it. So if you were able to get
00:03:06.860 someone on the end of the phone to buy an option on, say, BP, but it was mainly American stocks who
00:03:14.900 were doing this, it was an option on whatever Amazon was at the time, probably wasn't even around
00:03:19.620 then. But Amazon, you buy at this price, if it reaches that price within nine months,
00:03:26.000 will sell out and you've got a profit.
00:03:27.260 So it's not fundamentally a bad product, because you pay pennies for the option to acquire a stock
00:03:32.820 in the future. And if the stock doesn't hit that level, then it just expires worthless and you've
00:03:38.660 lost your pennies. But if it goes over that level, then you can buy it at the pre-agreed price. And if it
00:03:43.340 goes way over that level, you can buy it at that pre-agreed price. And normally, these were cash
00:03:47.860 settled. So you just instantly get the difference between whatever the price was. So it's not
00:03:52.780 fundamentally a bad financial product.
00:03:55.420 No, it wasn't fundamentally a bad product.
00:03:56.080 But there was, I remember, a bit of a mis-selling crisis.
00:03:58.820 Yeah, there was a mis-selling crisis because of two factors. One is there was a massive commission
00:04:02.880 on it. So literally, I don't know, 20%, 25%, even 30% commission on whatever you've got. So if
00:04:08.740 someone was putting in 10 grand, we're picking out three. So already they needed to make three
00:04:13.740 grand above it.
00:04:14.660 That's a bit spicy.
00:04:15.400 Yeah, no, it was a huge one. I mean, these guys were, if someone came in with like a 25
00:04:22.320 or 50 grand deal, and people are like dancing on the tables or running around the whole table
00:04:26.520 going, yeah, so it was a bit like-
00:04:28.420 How much of that did the firm get? And how much did the individual trader get?
00:04:30.820 Oh, I think it was split. So it was quite big. I think it was like 60, 40 or something
00:04:35.300 like that. So the guys were getting quite a lot out. They paid very, very well out of this.
00:04:39.200 And the second element about it is time. It was time sensitive. So what happened is if the company
00:04:45.460 did pop and they made the client 30 or 40%, and it could happen. That happened quite a lot for the
00:04:52.560 guys. They made 30, 40%. Your client's going to be happy making that amount of money, but it could
00:04:58.420 have gone even further. So basically what they were doing is as soon as that came in, they sold out.
00:05:02.320 They rang them up. And if it was a week or two weeks or three weeks, and then just sold them
00:05:06.240 into something else, almost immediately. So the commission-
00:05:10.140 And they were motivated by the commission.
00:05:11.960 Oh, they were absolutely motivated by the commission.
00:05:13.500 I mean, that is not necessarily fundamentally a bad strategy, because with options, I mean,
00:05:18.780 there's the Greek letters that determine how they're priced. And I think row does the time
00:05:22.460 value. And that decays over time. So that's the thing. You can get these synthetic products
00:05:29.040 that you buy. But if you hold them and they just stay static, the time value decays.
00:05:34.640 Yeah, that was the problem. If they didn't make the money fairly quickly, there were some
00:05:38.740 very stressed people there, because the time decay really ate.
00:05:42.000 Yes.
00:05:42.560 On leaps, time decay.
00:05:43.940 What year was this?
00:05:45.400 Oh, so I must have been around 27. So it was 27, 28, 67, 77, 87. This is around 84, 85,
00:05:56.880 I think, I think, 84. Oh, okay.
00:05:59.080 Yeah, so it's quite, 67, 77, 87 would have made me 30. No, it wouldn't. No, it wouldn't.
00:06:05.640 67, I was born. I'm not having any maths. 77, 87, 97. So this is about 94, 94, 95.
00:06:12.660 94, 95. Okay, so that was a reasonably good pit. And it got super mental towards 1998 and
00:06:18.940 1999.
00:06:19.600 Yeah, it did.
00:06:20.820 In those days, things were basically trending up. Yeah. So actually, these might not have
00:06:26.780 been bad products.
00:06:27.600 No, they weren't. But every now and again, unfortunately, someone who was the analysts
00:06:31.620 would come in and would get one wrong. And when it went wrong, everyone on the table was
00:06:35.600 really, really pissed off, because it would drag everything down, and then everyone would
00:06:39.980 be panicking about time delay. And the thing for them is they all wanted to sell out quickly.
00:06:43.900 If they suddenly had to sit there and watch it for ages, they couldn't take the money from
00:06:47.160 the client to reinvest. So then they'd have to get on the phone again and find new business.
00:06:52.840 So they're motivated to be selling these things quickly.
00:06:54.920 Yeah, they hated doing that. And one of my jobs was brought in, to be fair, by the chief
00:07:00.160 executive. He saw that this was going to go out of fashion, and it would end. But also,
00:07:05.640 it was short term. And so he wanted to try and bring into a business model where you've
00:07:11.800 got more funds under management, less commission, which they didn't like. But the more funds under
00:07:17.140 the management you've got, if you've suddenly got 10 million...
00:07:19.120 For the firm, it's a much more sustainable business.
00:07:20.440 It's a much more sustainable business. So I was brought in as the transition to try and
00:07:24.540 work with him to bring that through. And then IMRO and SFA, then Securities and Futures Authority,
00:07:33.640 took over from where FIMRO and Loutro came.
00:07:36.200 So that was slightly before my time. But I remember the guys in the firm when I joined explaining
00:07:40.680 this to me. There was basically one that looked after investment firms and one that looked
00:07:43.740 after stockbrokers. And the one that looked after investment firms assumed that you were
00:07:49.560 incompetent, but not necessarily corrupt. And the one that looked after stockbrokers assumed
00:07:54.000 that you were corrupt, but not necessarily incompetent.
00:07:55.720 That's correct.
00:07:56.720 So which one were you, Amber?
00:07:58.080 We, unfortunately, had an arm of both. But IMRO was the primary function.
00:08:01.720 So IMRO came in. But the SFA was run by a chap called Philip Thorpe, who is an Australian
00:08:08.760 guy who ended up, I think, going leading. Oh, he was praised to high heaven. But his main
00:08:13.740 view was that I'm going to just take Everall. I'm just going to just imprison the lot if
00:08:18.820 I can. Everyone's corrupt.
00:08:20.020 Yes.
00:08:20.480 You know.
00:08:20.920 There was a bit of a tone shift about that period.
00:08:22.920 Oh, he was. And you'd have the phone calls. You'd be calling someone in the regulator
00:08:26.860 before. So you'd be speaking on the phone with someone who is working for Loutro or FIMRO.
00:08:31.820 And we'd have a really good conversation. I've got this issue. What do you think?
00:08:34.580 And they were old traders. These were people who were on the floor.
00:08:37.040 It was the industry regulating itself, wasn't it?
00:08:39.380 Yeah. And it was. And these people understood what you were doing. And we tried to work a
00:08:43.220 solution that was the right thing. But when he came in, he just slashed all of that. He
00:08:48.680 said, anyone who puts up the phone, they're obviously a criminal. That was his attitude
00:08:52.260 to it. And he spent his time trying to get people done. He saw it as a solution. If I can
00:09:00.660 get rid of all these bad people in the industry, of which everyone's bad. In reality, what he
00:09:05.240 was saying is the small players. I don't want them. I'm just working for the big guys.
00:09:09.240 And they can afford more expensive compliance. And that's where compliance took off. All
00:09:13.400 of a sudden, jobs for the boys came out there.
00:09:15.620 So the compliance officer always basically started off as somebody who helped keep you
00:09:19.720 out of jail.
00:09:20.440 Yeah.
00:09:21.220 And helped you with some sensible stuff. But as we talk about over the course of the
00:09:25.260 conversation, the importance of that role just went up steadily over the time.
00:09:30.540 Oh, usually so. Usually so. Yeah.
00:09:33.280 So actually, I'll ask you this fundamental question before we move on. As a compliance
00:09:37.380 officer, is your duty to the clients, the firm, or the regulator?
00:09:44.100 Ah, very good question. Very good question. And adding the fact I was a barrister as well,
00:09:50.760 so it was my duty to the bar council and the courts. So that's exactly what happened when
00:09:56.160 I was pulled in by these... I was asked to come visit Imro and just to have a general
00:10:02.880 chat about the firm. And so I turned up. And don't forget, I was fairly young. I'd only
00:10:07.360 been in the job, what, six, seven, eight months or something like that. And suddenly, I've
00:10:11.620 got like six people in a room, all questioning about the ethicacies of the business. And
00:10:16.920 well, is my boss a corrupt guy? And were you doing dodgy trading and all the rest of it?
00:10:22.200 And I'm sitting there like, you know, imagine a 28-year-old. No experience of banking in
00:10:28.620 the family. No experience of lawyers in the family. The only experience I've got is what
00:10:33.060 I've learned from, you know, either watching TV or being in the courts myself and from law
00:10:37.720 school. So literally in there, now being questioned as though I'm some sort of major criminal, you
00:10:43.480 know, protecting...
00:10:44.200 I mean, you had a good qualification set, but you were pretty green back then.
00:10:46.660 Yeah, no, I was. But the one thing I kept on thinking to myself is, I can't give them
00:10:51.080 too much, but I've got to give them something because the bar council says I've got to, you
00:10:54.580 know, rule for the law. But I've got to protect my client and I can't give them information
00:10:59.660 about them that's not in their, what they are supposed to ask. So they were trying to ask
00:11:06.900 questions that they knew they couldn't ask information from. So in the end, your responsibility
00:11:12.660 at that stage, thankfully, was to me, make sure I did everything ethically within that
00:11:17.720 as of being a barrister. So I wasn't going to lie, you know, about it, but also protect
00:11:23.080 the client because you're a barrister for the firm. So I was going to ensure that I only
00:11:29.200 told them what was required of me under the legislation as it was. And if I felt there was
00:11:36.400 in doubt, I'd say no, I can't answer that question. Now what they made it much more difficult
00:11:42.520 later on is they effectively changed the rules from being innocent till proven guilty to make
00:11:50.080 compliance officers now effectively be snitches within firms. So you have a very fine line.
00:11:56.300 That's why they're getting paid a lot of money now. Because at the top end, if you say something,
00:12:01.100 they will come back and say, we will sue you for providing us false information.
00:12:06.280 Because I think in the days when you joined, the responsibility was to the firm.
00:12:10.380 Yes.
00:12:11.180 And they've effectively shifted it every time. I guess we get onto that.
00:12:14.800 Yeah.
00:12:15.040 To now, notionally, your duty is still to the firm.
00:12:20.300 Notionally, yes.
00:12:21.160 But functionally, your duty is to the regulator. And they put a whole load of mechanisms
00:12:25.980 in place to make sure that's the case.
00:12:27.540 And so to the extent now that senior compliance officers and big firms, or even medium firms
00:12:32.260 now, require their own lawyers. I mean, this is the nonsense of it.
00:12:35.900 I didn't know that.
00:12:36.660 Yeah. So if you're going in now, you'd need your own lawyer. Because now you're being
00:12:40.920 potentially sued by your own firm as well as by the regulator. And knowing full well that
00:12:45.000 you can actually be banned from the industry and fined by the regulator if they deem that
00:12:49.320 your actions for protecting the firm were that that fell outside of what they regard as
00:12:54.980 acceptable. Bearing in mind that they are also judge, jury, executioner, sentencer, and
00:13:02.320 the appellate court. It's one of the most nonsensical issues. And why do people want to leave the
00:13:08.540 UK? It's because why, when you've got an industry that can actually charge you with the rules
00:13:14.380 it creates? And then effectively do you?
00:13:17.720 The first firm that I worked for, it was, I mean, it was an ethically, it was a completely
00:13:23.720 fine firm. What they did was financial advice. But they'd kind of give it to anyone on this
00:13:29.220 model where, you know, you could ring up and you could be a little old lady with £500 to
00:13:33.720 invest and they would answer you. They dealt with everybody who came in. Of course, they
00:13:37.220 wanted the bigger clients and the bigger clients got, you know, dedicated people and that kind of
00:13:40.980 stuff. It was open to all. And what the regulators did over that period that we're talking about
00:13:46.240 is they assumed that everyone was rotters. Yes. And what you need to do is you need to
00:13:54.580 not just give somebody advice, you need to write them a whole six-page letter explaining that
00:13:59.200 you've looked at their risk profile, you've done all these calculations, this is the reason for
00:14:03.360 doing it, here's the relevant legislation, all that kind of stuff. Now you need to write a six-page
00:14:07.160 letter. What that means is that it is completely economically unviable to deal with anyone without
00:14:13.840 a minimum of £100,000 to invest, and probably much higher than that. Yeah, I mean, I remember.
00:14:18.340 Which basically just means is that little old ladies, they don't get any advice these days,
00:14:22.160 whereas they used to in the old system. Of course. And that's because basically regulators
00:14:26.820 now are no longer people who've been in the industry for a long period of time. Lots of them
00:14:32.440 are either one or two categories of individuals. They've gone straight from university, studied some
00:14:35.860 course, HR, marketing, PR, maybe done a business degree. They're taken in. Some of them are lawyers,
00:14:42.640 perhaps lawyers who wouldn't have actually made it in a law firm or as a barrister, but they'll get in
00:14:47.060 at those lower ends because they know it's a good job. It's such a big organisation now that you just
00:14:52.520 climb the ladder through brown nosing and doing all the things that you do in a corporate world.
00:14:57.020 And then the other groups are the politicos who are appointed at the top end. And so they don't
00:15:03.360 really understand business. They don't understand the firms. They might have a big understanding,
00:15:06.920 oh, that is a share. That is a bond. That's what a stockbroking firm does. That's what corporate
00:15:11.420 finance does. And when you actually start to try and understand the whole framework,
00:15:15.920 they just haven't got the guts, blood and internal understanding of how the markets work. They just
00:15:22.660 turn around and go, everyone is bad, therefore stop. And this is what the government wants at the
00:15:27.240 moment. We will do it irrespective of what happens. To be fair, there were some dodgy firms.
00:15:32.220 Oh, look, there were. But in many ways, most of that has particularly gone because they can't,
00:15:40.240 but you're always going to find people who are dodgy and fraudulent in some form or other.
00:15:44.340 Actually, I don't think those firms would have survived the internet era particularly well anyway.
00:15:47.680 No, no, no. I agree with that. But the way that they've changed the regulations made it heavy.
00:15:51.840 And we talked earlier before we came in on the show about how the city of London is
00:15:55.680 fracturing and dying a death. How a lot of businesses are moving to Dubai and Saudi Arabia.
00:16:00.420 How companies are being bought by the American markets. Or there's the encouragement of large
00:16:05.580 firms if they're not being taken over by American companies to go and relist on the US. This is part
00:16:11.380 of it. It's a 20, 30 year destruction of our city of London through over-impressive regulations.
00:16:19.600 So what happened after that? So they've dragged you into a meeting and they're giving you the third degree?
00:16:22.820 Yeah, they gave me the third degree and I didn't really give them enough. But what I did is I went back
00:16:28.940 to my firm. And I remember having the conversation with my CEO. I said, this is what's happened.
00:16:34.640 It wasn't what they told me I was going in for. They've actually basically come in for you
00:16:39.240 a Nick who is the other boss. They're saying that you're a completely dodgy firm. And to be fair on
00:16:47.780 my boss, he went away and he was a really lovely guy and I fully respect him. He went away and about
00:16:53.840 a week later he called me into the office and he said, Stephen, look, I think that they're going to
00:17:00.880 come back heavily on us. I'm going to instruct this law firm to try and help. But as much as I've tried
00:17:08.100 to change the company, it probably is a good idea if you look elsewhere. Not because I'm firing,
00:17:16.820 I want you to stay. And if you want to stay, you can stay. But you're a good guy and I've got a feeling
00:17:22.160 they're going to try and drag us down. And they did. They went after him as a decent bloke. They
00:17:27.540 ended up fining the company a lot of money, so much that they did carry on. And, you know,
00:17:37.000 he was really, really good to me. Did he actually make his clients money overall?
00:17:42.400 On a whole, he did. Yeah, that's the point. That was the sad thing. He was trying to do the right
00:17:46.300 thing. They were making money and he was trying to change the firm to a new model. So he's
00:17:52.120 fighting his own staff and even including one of his own partners to recognize that funds under
00:17:58.120 management is where the future is. And as we know now, that's the model that most people were doing
00:18:03.620 and he was going to get there. And he would have been ahead of the game if he'd have managed to
00:18:07.480 achieve that. But the very fact that the regulator thought there was something dodgy about it because
00:18:13.120 they were using leaps and they were calling people on the phone. I think that applied pressure,
00:18:18.740 the additional pressure that business people don't need. You'd need legal pressure,
00:18:21.980 regulatory pressure, as well as business pressures, trying to deal with your firm.
00:18:25.820 And I think it's just hard. And I saw that, first of all, of how the state, when it gets it into
00:18:33.080 their head that we're right, even though we know nothing about what's going on, we'll do whatever
00:18:37.320 we can to destroy another entity. The first place I worked, my boss there was a wealthy guy and ran a
00:18:44.060 successful firm. I mean, his involvement in this leap stuff is after it got so blown out of proportion
00:18:49.260 and the message was put out loud and clear that leaps are dodgy. And they're not actually.
00:18:53.320 They are a legitimate product. I mean, they're a bit esoteric and it's probably not the right
00:18:57.860 thing to do to call people up to get them to invest in because it is a bit complicated.
00:19:01.560 Yeah.
00:19:01.860 But they're not actually a fundamentally bad product. Anyway, so the message went out to
00:19:05.140 everybody that leaps are dodgy and you should run a mile from them.
00:19:07.860 So nobody wanted to hold them. It was called this leaps misselling crisis.
00:19:12.920 Yeah.
00:19:13.120 Everybody wanted out of them. And what my boss did is he basically just bought up all of
00:19:16.300 them and then held them. And he made a massive profit on it. So they aren't fundamentally a
00:19:22.700 bad thing.
00:19:23.480 It's just, you know, the regulators have got this idea that the way to protect people is
00:19:29.660 to stop people from buying what they want to buy.
00:19:31.780 If you would like to see the full version of this premium video, please head over to
00:19:35.700 lotuseaters.com and subscribe to gain full access to all of our premium content.