The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters - February 07, 2025


PREVIEW: Epochs #197 | Edward III


Episode Stats

Length

31 minutes

Words per Minute

178.261

Word Count

5,558

Sentence Count

288

Misogynist Sentences

1

Hate Speech Sentences

14


Summary

Edward III was an English monarch who came to the throne in the early 16th century and ruled for 50 years. He was a great warrior king, but there were many things wrong with him, including his marriage with Isabella of France, his affair with a French noblewoman and his refusal to pay homage to the King of France. This led to him being deposed by his own wife, and his son becoming King Edward III.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hello and welcome to another episode of Epochs where I have finished my series all about the
00:00:04.640 late Roman Republic and I shall be changing the topic entirely now. I'll be going back to my
00:00:09.440 series all about the British monarchy, English monarchy. If you remember back in episode 147
00:00:17.560 I'd got up to the age of Edward II so I shall be carrying on from there talking about all about
00:00:23.980 Edward III. It's easy to remember if you ever try and commit all the monarchs to memory you've got
00:00:28.920 three Edwards in a row. Longshanks, Edward II and then Edward III so three Edwards in a row.
00:00:35.500 The grandfather is great, Edward I, Edward II not so great, pretty ignominious actually and then
00:00:41.980 Edward III is great again, great in inverted commas. He's got a shout for being perhaps one of the
00:00:48.500 greatest English monarchs of all time but some people do pick him as the best English king of
00:00:55.400 all time. There's a few up there, depends how you measure it, doesn't it? But he ruled for a very
00:01:00.420 long time, 50 odd years. He came to the crown quite young and although he didn't live to be
00:01:08.740 spectacularly old, he did have a good innings, fairly good innings for the early middle ages
00:01:14.780 and there's lots of martial achievements. He was a great warrior king but there are also some stains
00:01:22.520 on his memory as well but he's certainly up there with one of the best, you know, with Edward I or
00:01:28.640 Richard or Henry V, one of those guys. He's one of my favourites. I probably won't put him first but
00:01:36.540 he's definitely a great story because there's so many events that go on. One thing I would say if
00:01:42.020 you've been watching my previous series all about the late Republic and Caesar and Pompey, I went
00:01:48.620 into that story in lots and lots and lots of detail. This one I'm going to zoom out a bit and try and do
00:01:56.500 the whole of Edward III's life in one episode here. So be zoomed out a bit, so a bit more of a whistle
00:02:03.400 stop tour of things. There's a lot going on, many many battles in France and the Black Death and any
00:02:10.340 number of things. So let's just kick off the story. I should be mainly reading from a professor, Sir
00:02:16.420 Charles Oman, who was a very eminent historian, a late 19th century, early 20th century professor of
00:02:23.900 history at All Souls College, Oxford. So sort of a gold standard type historian, long before the age
00:02:31.000 of wokeism, so we're free from any of that in his narrative. And I happen to think that the Edward III
00:02:36.820 chapter in his book is a particularly good one, covers all the main events. So I'll be reading from
00:02:43.020 that. So a bit of a recap then before we just dive in. If you've watched the last one or you know
00:02:48.020 anything about Edward II, I'll have to do a small recap on that because the transition between Edward
00:02:53.740 II and Edward III was a very, very messy one. Just to recap then very quickly, Edward II had got himself
00:03:01.720 deposed by his own wife. He was a very, very unpopular king. He'd had lots of favourites like
00:03:08.220 Piers Gaveston and later the Dispensers, father and son, and he had alienated himself from his own
00:03:14.500 ruling class, his own baronage, and even his own wife, Isabella of France. In the end, they'd been
00:03:21.300 estranged and she'd gone off to France to live in France in the court of her brother, the King of France.
00:03:26.580 And Edward II had owed fealty for his holdings in Normandy and Gascony to the King of France.
00:03:33.160 And he didn't want to pay that homage in person for political reasons, maybe out of pride as well,
00:03:38.520 but more likely actually for political reasons. So he sent his son, his young son, who was only about,
00:03:43.820 I think, 13 or 14 at the time, soon to be, in a few years' time, to be King Edward III. He sent his son
00:03:50.440 over to France instead to pay fealty to the King of France for the Duchy of Normandy and the Duchy
00:03:57.460 of Aquitaine in his stead. But that was a bad move because it then meant that the heir to the throne
00:04:03.160 was now in the hands of the French and his mother, Isabella of France, and they weren't going to
00:04:09.480 relinquish him. So politically, that was sort of a poor move by Edward II. But Edward II made many,
00:04:16.680 many poor moves. Anyway, to cut ahead on this, because we want to talk about Edward III, not
00:04:20.640 Edward II. Eventually, Isabella of France, backed up by a legitimate claimant to the throne, i.e. her
00:04:27.420 son, Edward III, invades England with her new lover, Mortimer, who was an exiled English knight,
00:04:35.240 baron, living in exile in France, because, as I said, Edward II had alienated so many of his own
00:04:41.500 ruling class with a lot of other... They had a whole party of anti-Edward II people that they
00:04:49.120 invaded England with and took Edward quite easily, in the end, prisoner, forced him to abdicate formally,
00:04:56.820 legally, made the 14, 15-year-old Edward III, made him king, coronated him, again, legally, and then
00:05:03.720 put Edward II in prison. And then what happened after that, whether he was starved to death or,
00:05:09.960 you know, very brutally murdered, some say with a red-hot poker thrust inside of him, or not. That
00:05:17.320 story's probably apocryphal, but we don't know. I think serious historians think that he was probably
00:05:21.820 actually just starved to death. Anyway, he dies in captivity. Edward II dies in captivity. So now we're
00:05:28.700 in a new world where we've got this young king, Edward III, on the throne, but actually he's so young
00:05:35.300 that his mother and her lover, her new partner, Mortimer, they're the real power. The cockpit of
00:05:41.340 power sits with them. They control all policy. So the boy king is kind of a puppet or a front man
00:05:48.440 for their regime. But soon enough, Edward becomes old enough, by the time he's sort of 18 or 19 years
00:05:54.540 old, he becomes old enough to sort of take the reins for himself. But as is often the way,
00:06:00.240 people don't like giving up power if they don't have to. So he had to sort of wrestle the reins
00:06:05.740 of power from his own mother and her lover. So I'll pick up the story there or let Sir Charles
00:06:11.680 Oman pick up the story there. So Oman tells us this, quote,
00:06:16.120 shameful as the state of the realm had been under the rule of Edward of Carmarthen, that's Edward II,
00:06:21.320 and his favourites, a yet more disgraceful depth was reached in the years of minority of his son.
00:06:27.920 The young king was only 14 and the government fell into the hands of those who had set him on the
00:06:33.100 throne, his mother and her parable, Roger Mortimer. A council headed by Henry, Earl of Lancaster,
00:06:39.980 was supposed to guide the king's steps. But as a matter of fact, he was in Queen Isabella's power,
00:06:46.120 while she was entirely ruled by Mortimer. They were surrounded by a guard of 180 knights and
00:06:52.480 acted as they pleased in all things. It was only gradually that the nation realised the state of
00:06:57.660 affairs, for the murder of Edward II was long kept concealed. In fact, there was a persistent
00:07:03.200 rumour that he wasn't dead. We'll get to that in a moment. And the relations of the queen and
00:07:07.700 Mortimer were not at first generally known, because that also was a bit scandalous. A queen,
00:07:13.300 a queen consul, even a widowed queen, shouldn't really marry someone as lowly as Mortimer. Not
00:07:19.440 that he was a peasant, far from it. But still, it would have been a bit of a scandal if everyone
00:07:24.840 knew about it. The first blow to the new government was the renewal of the Scottish War. So if you
00:07:30.100 remember, Edward Longshanks had hammered the Scots here and there, lost a battle here and there,
00:07:35.160 but basically sort of hammered them. And as soon as he died, literally as soon as he died,
00:07:39.400 he was on campaign when he died against the Scots, Edward II takes over and loses and kind of keeps
00:07:45.900 losing to the Scottish. So now all the Scottish question comes up again. So the renewal of the
00:07:51.860 Scottish War. In 1328, Robert Bruce broke the truce that he had made six years before. He was now
00:07:58.800 growing, advanced in age and was stricken by leprosy. But he sent out under James the Black
00:08:05.000 Douglas, a great host, 4,000 knights and squires and 20,000 moss troopers, all horsed on shaggy
00:08:11.960 Galloway ponies. They hurried England as far as the T's and successfully eluded Mortimer, who went
00:08:18.580 out against them, taking the young king with him. In fact, this was quite a disastrous military
00:08:24.280 campaign, really quite badly. Edward III is known as a great military king, again, among the greatest
00:08:30.320 ones, like Richard or Henry V. But this early one, he wasn't really in command. I mean, nominally,
00:08:37.340 he would have been, but he wasn't sort of the battlefield general. And it's one of the few times
00:08:43.280 where he got into a really sticky situation. Omar doesn't tell us about it in fantastic detail. But
00:08:48.080 at one point, the Scottish armies sort of got into his camp and even cut down some of the guide ropes to
00:08:55.060 the king's tent. So about as close as you can get to being captured or possibly killed without being
00:09:00.920 captured or killed. So really quite bad. Humiliating, really. But I'll let Omar continue here saying,
00:09:06.500 Outmarching the English day by day, Douglas, that is the Black Douglas, the leader of the Scots,
00:09:11.980 Douglas retired before them across the Northumbrian fells, occasionally harassing his pursuers by night
00:09:18.420 attacks. He returned home with much plunder, leaving not a cow unlifted, nor a house unburnt
00:09:24.680 in all of Tyndale. The English host came back foiled and half starved, and Mortimer, not daring
00:09:31.560 to face another campaign, advised the queen to make terms with the Scots. Accordingly, the shameful
00:09:37.640 peace was signed at Northampton, by which England resigned all claims of suzerainty over the Scotch
00:09:44.080 realm, sent back the crown and royal jewels, which Edward I had carried off to London, and gave the
00:09:50.200 king's sister, Joanna, to be wed to Bruce's eldest son. And all of that was in 1328. So pretty bad,
00:09:57.500 really. You know, one of the lowest ebbs in this period of the Middle Ages in relations between
00:10:03.180 England and Scotland, as far as England is concerned. This is a very low ebb, basically beaten in the field,
00:10:09.080 soundly by the Scottish, and forced to sign a pretty humiliating treaty, giving up more or less
00:10:15.760 everything that Edward I, the hammer of the Scots, had won. You know, just giving up any claim of
00:10:19.860 suzerainty over the, i.e. lordship, over the Scottish crown. I mean, there you go, right there.
00:10:25.280 That's the whole, that's the whole ballgame, the whole kit and caboodle, as far as the English
00:10:29.400 monarchy was concerned. But it shan't last for too much longer. Oman continues, Mortimer's failure led to
00:10:35.940 insurrections against him. So in the early medieval period, if you lose on the battlefield, your whole
00:10:41.860 political position is undermined. It's like God has abandoned you. God doesn't want you to be
00:10:48.200 successful. So Mortimer's failure was pretty bad. But they were mere baronial risings, not efforts of
00:10:55.100 the whole people. Henry of Lancaster, who headed the first, was put down, the first of these risings,
00:11:01.240 was put down and heavily fined for his pains. Edmund, Earl of Kent, then took up the same plan,
00:11:07.600 announcing that he would free his half-brother, Edward II, who, as he was persuaded, had still
00:11:14.160 survived. See, there was that rumour that Edward II hadn't been murdered, that he was just being
00:11:19.640 kept prisoner very quietly somewhere, which wasn't true. But he, this Earl of Kent, Edmund,
00:11:25.340 Earl of Kent, but he fell into Mortimer's hands and was beheaded. It was the young king himself who was
00:11:31.440 destined to put an end to the misrule of his mother and her minion. When he reached the age of 18,
00:11:36.840 and realised the shameful tutelage in which he had been held, he resolved to free himself from it by
00:11:42.920 force. While the court lay at Nottingham Castle in October 1330, he gathered a small band of
00:11:49.240 trustworthy adherents and, at midnight, entered the Queen's lodgings by a secret stare and seized
00:11:55.080 Mortimer in spite of his mother's tears and curses. The favourite was sent before his peers,
00:12:00.820 tried and executed. Isabella was relegated to honourable confinement at Castle Rising,
00:12:07.760 where she lived for many years later." So that's a big thing there. I told you I'm going to sort of
00:12:13.440 whiz through a bit of an overview of all the events, but that's a massive thing there. That's a real game
00:12:18.320 changer. So the reins of power have shifted then from Isabella and Roger Mortimer over to Edward III now.
00:12:24.820 And so that's a big thing, isn't it? Some people, someone like Henry VI, for example, will talk about,
00:12:29.820 or Hamlet, obviously a fictional character, Hamlet, but lots of kings, Henry III, it's a real, real struggle
00:12:36.180 for them to sort of take power away from the people or various peoples that held it for them while they
00:12:43.540 were young. Well, Edward III is decisive. He does it in one swift movement, rather than the whole process
00:12:49.540 being drawn out for years. And they're having to be all sorts of recriminations and factions,
00:12:55.540 maybe even a civil war. No, Edward III, just boom, done. He's just taken it for himself. Very decisive
00:13:01.540 and clean, right? It's quite a clean cut, clean break. Isabella of France just stowed away in a castle
00:13:07.540 somewhere. Just keep quiet for the rest of your life now. And Mortimer himself killed. So, and it sets the tone
00:13:13.540 of how Edward III goes on to reign, at least until he's an old man, decisively. An 18, 19-year-old,
00:13:19.940 you know, like Alexander, say, who's prepared and capable to rule a kingdom and rule it competently.
00:13:27.220 So much more in the mould of his grandfather, Longshanks, than in his father. So let's continue.
00:13:33.700 Oman talks about the character of Edward III now. And although I've said a lot of people think he's
00:13:38.180 the greatest king, and he's certainly got a shout to be the greatest, he did have some character faults.
00:13:42.820 And Oman pulls no punches. So he says this, quote,
00:13:46.260 King Edward now himself assumed the reins of government. He was still very young,
00:13:50.740 but in the Middle Ages, men ripened quick, even if they did often die early. And Edward,
00:13:56.100 at 19, was thought both by others and himself, old enough to take charge of the policy of the realm.
00:14:02.500 He was in his youth a very well-served and well-loved sovereign, for he had all the qualities
00:14:08.100 that attract popularity. A handsome person, pleasant and affable manners, a fluent tongue,
00:14:14.500 and an energy that contrasted most happily with the listless indolence of his miserable father.
00:14:20.580 It was many years before the world discovered that he was selfish, thriftless,
00:14:25.620 reckless of his country's needs, and set on gratifying his personal ambition and love of warlike feats to
00:14:32.100 the sacrifice of every other consideration. He was a knight-errant of the type of Richard
00:14:37.300 Cur de Leon, not a statesman and warrior like his grandfather, Edward I. So he's saying he was a great
00:14:44.180 knight, he was a great fighter, but he wasn't as much of a statesman. So, you know, fairly big criticism,
00:14:50.660 actually, Omar makes that. In his later years, his faculties showed a premature decay. He may have
00:14:56.740 suffered from strokes or maybe dementia, we don't know, but we'll get to it. But in his last years,
00:15:02.500 there was something wrong for a fair few years of his life, but we'll get to that in due course.
00:15:08.100 And he fell into the hands of favourites. This is in the last few years of his life. And he fell into the
00:15:12.420 hands of favourites, male and female, who were almost as offensive as the gavistons and dispensers of the
00:15:19.220 previous generation. Edward's reign fell into three well-marked periods. The first, 1330-39,
00:15:25.860 is that of his Scottish wars. The second, 1339-60, i.e. the vast majority of his reign really,
00:15:32.980 is that in which he began the famous and unhappy Hundred Years' War with France, and himself conducted
00:15:39.060 it up to the brilliant but unwise piece of Bretigny. The third, 1360-77, was of his declining years,
00:15:47.620 in a time of trouble and misgovernment gradually increasing till Edward sank,
00:15:52.580 unregretted, into his grave." So there's this idea of the old king, the problem of the old king.
00:16:00.180 If a king rules for too long, or rather just lives too long, his own children, they grow up and become
00:16:08.100 middle-aged themselves. And if you've got lots and lots of sons, they're totally old enough to start
00:16:13.380 squabbling and warring amongst themselves. You may even have a mass of grandchildren who are old
00:16:19.540 enough to get involved in politics and fighting and war. And it just brings problems in Middle Ages
00:16:25.860 or ancient times, where there's hereditary monarchies. If you've got a very, very old king
00:16:30.500 with a bunch of children, which Edward has loads of children, quite a few boys who themselves have
00:16:36.180 loads of children, it can cause dynastic problems. But once again, we'll get to that in due course.
00:16:41.540 So continuing the narrative about the wars, the interminable wars with the Scots, we're told,
00:16:47.460 quote, Robert Bruce, the terror of the English, had died in 1329, leaving his throne to his son,
00:16:53.700 David II, a child of five years, five years old. The government fell into the hands of regents,
00:17:00.020 who ill supplied the place of the dead king, and their weakness tempted the survivors of the English
00:17:05.380 party in Scotland to strike a blow. Edward Balliol, the son of the long-dead John Balliol,
00:17:11.300 accordingly made secret offers to Edward III that he would do homage to him for the Scottish crown
00:17:17.220 and reign as his vassal. So the idea of Scotland becoming a vassal of the English crown again is back
00:17:23.940 on the table. And the old rivalry between the Bruce's and the Balliol's going back to the age of
00:17:31.780 Edward Longshanks again, it's sort of all happening again, a whole new tranche, a whole new generation of
00:17:36.660 them, but it's the same thing over again. With Edward's connivance, the young Balliol gathered
00:17:42.820 together the earls of Buchan and Athol and many other Scottish refugees in England and took ship
00:17:48.740 to Scotland. He landed in Fife, was joined by his secret friends, beat the regent, the Earl of Mar,
00:17:55.620 and seized the greater part of Scotland. He was crowned at Scone and forced the young David Bruce to flee
00:18:01.620 overseas to France to save his life. Of course, the French, the old alliance, the French always would
00:18:08.100 help out the Scottish. They've got, of course, they've got a common enemy, the English. So annoying
00:18:12.980 from the English point of view that the Scots and the French will team up and help each other out
00:18:17.220 wherever possible. Well, in the age of Edward III, that is put to bed for a while. I'll let Oman continue
00:18:23.700 here saying, but soon the National Party of Scotland, he's talking about, rose against Balliol, expelled
00:18:29.540 him and chased him back to England. Edward then took the field in his favour and met the Scots at
00:18:36.100 Hallidon Hill near Berwick. This battle of Hallidon Hill is massive. It's bigger than, more important
00:18:41.940 than Bannockburn. It's the most important battle between the Scots and the English, I would say,
00:18:46.820 for a good generation. So this is a big one. It's not often known, it's not often talked about,
00:18:51.860 rather, but it's a very decisive battle. I mean, it's kind of up there with Cressy or Aginc or,
00:18:57.940 you know, very, very important one and not often talked about. Here at Hallidon Hill,
00:19:03.620 he inflicted on them a crushing defeat, which the English celebrated as a fair revenge for the blow
00:19:09.700 of Bannockburn. For the regent, Archibald Douglas, four earls and many thousand men were left on the
00:19:16.100 field, left dead, that is. They fell mainly by the arrows of the English archery,
00:19:21.140 for, having drawn themselves out on a hillside behind a marsh, they stood as a broad target for
00:19:27.060 the bowmen, whom they were unable to reach. The intervening marshy ground prevented their heavy
00:19:32.340 columns of pikemen from advancing, and they were routed without even the chance of coming to hand
00:19:37.780 strokes. That was in July 1333. So there you can see this idea that the English bowmen, a lot of them
00:19:45.140 Welsh, were able to just rain down arrows on their enemy, usually from a bit of higher ground,
00:19:51.220 a hill or a crest, and that that was devastating. Well, this Hallidon Hill is one of the first
00:19:56.580 examples of it, and it shan't be the last. For quite a few generations now, the English used exactly
00:20:03.540 that tactic to beat armies way bigger than them again and again and again in France and all over
00:20:10.180 the place. And it seems that their enemies, the enemies of the English, don't really learn the lesson.
00:20:14.500 It takes them a long time to learn the lesson that the English longbow is sort of the most fearsome
00:20:20.340 ranged weapon of the age by far. It's so much more powerful than any sort of crossbow or any other
00:20:26.020 designs of bow. So yeah, it's first really shown at Hallidon Hill, or it'd been done before Hallidon
00:20:30.740 Hill, but this is the first really, really famous example of it. And Edward III is completely in
00:20:36.420 control. He's the, you know, he's the undisputed king now, and he gets a reputation after this for
00:20:42.260 being, starts to get the reputation for being a great military commander, because it was so decisive.
00:20:48.820 And he only keeps burnishing and polishing that reputation as the years go on. We're told, quote,
00:20:54.580 this victory made Edward Balliol king of Scotland for a second time. He did homage to his champion,
00:21:00.340 Edward III, and ceded to him Tweeddale and Harthlovian. But the crown won by English help
00:21:07.220 sat uneasy on Balliol's brow. After several years of spasmodic fighting, he was finally driven out of
00:21:13.460 his realm and took refuge again in England. This time he found less help, for Edward III was now plunged
00:21:20.340 deep into schemes of another kind, because basically Hallidon Hill was so decisive that
00:21:25.860 the Scottish question had been answered for a while from the English point of view. So now Edward can
00:21:32.500 turn his attention to affairs on the continent, or in France, basically, which he does. And, you know,
00:21:39.380 it isn't really settled finally, one way or another, during his life, even though he's got many decades
00:21:45.140 left to rule. We're told this. Nine years of comparative quiet had done much to recover
00:21:50.420 England from the misery it had known in the last reign. The baronage and people were serving the
00:21:55.780 young king loyally, taxation had not yet been heavy, and the success of Hallidon Hill had restored the
00:22:02.100 nation's self-respect. Edward himself was flushed by victory and burning for fresh adventures. Hence it
00:22:08.900 came that, neglecting the nearer but less showy task of restoring the English suzerainty over Scotland,
00:22:15.060 he turned to wars over sea. One of the usual frontier quarrels between French and Gasconnes
00:22:20.980 had broken out in 1337 on the borders of Aquitaine. In consequence, Philip VI of France had, like so many
00:22:29.060 of his predecessors, taken measures to support Edward's Scottish enemies, the Old Alliance, and given shelter
00:22:35.860 to the exiled boy king, David Bruce. War between England and France was probably inevitable, but
00:22:41.940 Edward chose to make it a life and death struggle by laying claim to the throne of France and branding
00:22:48.340 Charles VI as a usurper. So, as again, Charles Oman doesn't go into a fantastic amount of details, but
00:22:54.420 that area of Gascony and Aquitaine in central southern France, modern-day France, they'd been fighting on and
00:23:01.540 off between those people, the native Gasconnes and the king, the king of France, on and off, sort of
00:23:07.940 kind of always, it would always been a bit of an issue. Now, it's a power struggle, a real power
00:23:12.500 struggle, but Edward III uses, uses that situation to, as a case of Bella, to go to war. It's not like
00:23:20.260 suddenly a Philip VI was suddenly much, much more aggressive and bellicose and Edward III is just
00:23:26.260 reacting to it. No, not really. You could choose to take offence at something, you know. You can choose
00:23:31.300 to turn a blind eye, or not, for political reasons. And anyway, Edward, the young Edward III decides
00:23:37.620 that enough is enough, and he's going to go the whole hog. Like Omar says, make it a matter of
00:23:45.140 life and death. Edward III basically says, I've had enough of this. I just don't recognise
00:23:51.300 your claim to the throne of France, because there had been quite a lot of succession problems with
00:23:58.500 France, the Kingdom of France. You could make the argument, if you wanted to, that the current king
00:24:04.020 was not necessarily the legitimate king. I mean, it's a bit of a dodgy, shaky argument to be made,
00:24:09.140 but there is one there. And Edward III says, going back generations, that if anything, somebody else
00:24:16.660 should take the throne, this Philip is a usurper. Why not me, i.e. Edward III? Because he was descended
00:24:23.220 in a slightly less direct way to the French throne himself. Like his mother was Isabella of France,
00:24:29.540 for example. So, a princess of France. So, technically, Edward doesn't have the greatest
00:24:34.980 claim, but there is a claim. And anyway, it's more about realpolitik than strict family trees.
00:24:41.380 So, okay, this is what kicks off the Hundred Years' War. Oman tells us about it, saying, quote,
00:24:45.860 The question of the French succession dates from some years back. In 1328, died Edward's uncle,
00:24:52.580 King Charles IV, the last of the direct male descendants of Philip IV. The problem that cropped
00:24:58.660 up for the first time, whether the French crown should descend to females, or whether the next male
00:25:04.020 heir should be chosen, although he was but the cousin of the late king. So, there you go,
00:25:08.420 Edward III was cousin of the old king, but through a woman, i.e. his mother. Which is a pretty damn
00:25:16.020 good claim, but there's a better claim out there, right? But there you go. Professor Sir Charles Oman
00:25:21.380 goes on to say exactly that. The peers of France are judged that by the Salic Law, an old custom
00:25:27.540 ascribed to the ancient Franks, only male descent counted in tracing claims to the throne. Accordingly,
00:25:34.180 they are judged the kingdom to Philip of Valois, who was crowned as Philip VI. Edward, as own nephew
00:25:41.380 through his mother to Charles IV, had protested at the time, but he had practically withdrawn his protest
00:25:48.020 by doing homage to Philip for the Duchy of Aquitaine, and thereby acknowledging the justice of the award.
00:25:54.260 There you can see it's about power dynamics and realpolitik there, rather than true right. Edward
00:26:00.820 had already accepted this Philip as king of France, but now the political and military situation was
00:26:05.860 sort of in his favour, so he's going to go back on that, basically. Now, in 1337, Edward began to
00:26:12.100 think of reviving his dormant pretensions to the French crown, though they had two fatal defects.
00:26:18.340 The first, that there had never been any precedent in France for a claim through the female line.
00:26:24.180 The second was that, even if such dissents could be counted, one of his mother's brothers had left
00:26:30.180 a daughter, the Queen of Nevers, and the son of that princess had a better female claim than Edward
00:26:35.780 himself. The only way in which this defect could be ignored was by pleading, like Bruce in 1292,
00:26:42.900 that England was a generation nearer to the old royal stock than his cousin, Charles, King of Nevers.
00:26:48.660 On this rather futile plea, Edward laid solemn claim to the French crown, and declared Philip of Valois
00:26:55.060 a usurper. Perhaps there may be truth in the story which tells that he did not do so from any strong
00:27:00.900 belief in his own theory, but because the Flemings, vassals to the French crown, had declared that they
00:27:07.300 could not aid him, though willing to do so, on account of oaths of fealty swung to the King of
00:27:13.380 France. So the Flemings, the people from the Low Countries, modern-day Belgium and Southern Holland
00:27:18.660 and stuff, getting involved, they actually play a fairly big part politically in all of this, though
00:27:23.780 Oman doesn't talk about them at great length, but they are a key element in it all. Bear that in mind.
00:27:29.620 If Edward claimed to be King himself, they said, their allegiance and help would be due to him. So
00:27:35.540 hey, without their help, he might not have done this, but they said they would help him, and therefore
00:27:40.180 the whole adventure looks much more likely to succeed, and therefore gets green-lit. Therefore,
00:27:46.340 Edward does actually pull the trigger on it. It may well have been the Flemings' help which decided that
00:27:52.260 decision. Whether the tale be true or not, he at any rate made the claim. In reliance on the assistance of
00:27:58.260 the Flemings and of their neighbours, the Duke of Brabant and the Count of Holland, and with the
00:28:03.700 countenance of the Emperor, Louis of Bavaria, that's the Holy Roman Emperor, King Edward determined
00:28:09.780 to land in the Low Countries and attack France from the north. He called out great bodies of soldiery
00:28:15.540 and took advantage of the devotion that the nation felt for him to raise illegal taxes for their pay.
00:28:22.420 Violating his grandfather's engagements, he took a tallage – a tax – from the towns and levied a
00:28:29.300 maltot, an extra custom duty, on the export of wool. In the excitement of the moment,
00:28:34.900 little opposition was made to these high-handed measures. One thing to note is that Parliament
00:28:40.340 is still very much in its early days at this point, still in the first half of the 14th century.
00:28:47.940 Parliament hasn't got the power that it will have in a couple of hundred years' time, where it can
00:28:52.260 sort of force the King to make concessions. I mean, it can to some extent, but not massively.
00:28:58.180 And in this period, as Oman just told us, public opinion was just with him, which counts for a
00:29:04.260 great deal, or it counts for everything really, in this period. Oman goes on,
00:29:08.180 But Edward's campaign against France proved utterly unsuccessful. His Netherland allies were of
00:29:14.180 little use to him. King Philip refused to risk a battle in the field, and an attack on Cambrai was
00:29:20.180 defeated. One of the main things there is that the King of France, Philip, refused battle. So that's a
00:29:26.340 big thing when you really need a set-piece battle in order for any sort of decisive victory. If the
00:29:31.700 enemy just refused to do that, then you're in a bit of a sticky situation. I mean, you can maybe claim
00:29:37.540 the moral high ground, or claim that your enemy is a coward or something, but if you haven't defeated
00:29:42.660 his armies, because he refuses to let you do so, then you haven't defeated his armies, right? Kind of
00:29:48.820 as simple as that. Edward had to return to England to raise more money, while at home he heard that a
00:29:54.580 great French fleet had been collected for the conquest of Flanders, and a subsequent attack on
00:29:59.940 England. The Royal Navy, there was a very, very minimal Royal Navy at this point. Of course, in
00:30:05.780 centuries to come, the Royal Navy is famous for being gigantic and all-powerful, so not that long
00:30:11.700 ago in the scheme of things, that any sort of navy was put together. So we have got a Royal Navy,
00:30:17.220 but it's far from completely dominant or ruling the waves in any real sense. It's not until Henry VIII,
00:30:23.220 or, well, Elizabeth really, that all that starts to get dialed up in earnest, which is a long way
00:30:30.100 off still. Hastily raising all the ships he could gather from London and the kink ports, the king set
00:30:35.780 sail to seek the enemy. He found them in harbour at the Flemish port of Sloys. I may be pronouncing
00:30:42.420 that wrong. It's spelled S-L-U-Y-S, and I've seen many, many people pronounce that word in many,
00:30:48.740 many, many different ways. If there's anyone from Belgium or Holland who wants to correct me on
00:30:53.700 exactly how that's pronounced, but I think it's Sloys, okay? It's the battle of Sloys. And there
00:30:59.940 brought them to action, i.e. a big naval engagement. If you would like to see the full version of this
00:31:04.340 premium video, please head over to lotuseaters.com and subscribe to gain full access to all of our
00:31:09.860 premium content.