00:00:00.000Hello and welcome to another episode of RealPolitik. I am your host, Firas Maadad.
00:00:05.960Today we're going to be talking a little bit about the Iran war, the war in Lebanon,
00:00:11.180and the build-up to a conflict with Turkey on the back of what is going on in Lebanon.
00:00:17.720So it's going to be a bit of a long episode, I think, maybe.
00:00:22.820And some of the things that we're going to cover, latest developments on the ground in Lebanon,
00:00:27.880where the negotiations are between Israel and Iran, they're going nowhere, the trouble that
00:00:35.060Hezbollah is facing, and why the Turks are probably going to end up backing Hezbollah for a while,
00:00:42.140at least, against Israel, but why that doesn't really solve very much for them, because they
00:00:49.120have become already the next Iran, and how this could end up becoming a general widespread war
00:00:56.780in the eastern Mediterranean. So it's a bunch of things that we should be covering and let's start.0.89
00:01:04.820The first thing is the U.S.-Iran negotiations and where these are. And briefly, where they are right
00:01:13.160now is that they're going nowhere. There has been a bunch of exchanges of texts between the Iranians
00:01:19.640and the americans they've added their own proposals they've gone back and forth and
00:01:26.680all of the sticking issues that matter are still there trump simply is in no position to make an
00:01:34.720agreement because any agreement would essentially confirm iran as a regional hegemon and the
00:01:44.160reality is that if he lets the war end and the Iranians can still collect some fees for passage
00:01:52.540through Hormuz and get back to exporting their oil, then they've won the war. And the current0.92
00:01:59.980proposals would do exactly that while negotiations continue over the future status of the enriched
00:02:07.840Iranian uranium. And for the Iranians, they also can't give up the enriched uranium because the
00:02:17.360worst-case scenario for them is to end up in a position where every few months, every few years,
00:02:25.100the Americans and the Israelis go back and attack Iran. They need to create real deterrence,
00:02:30.760and the only actual form of deterrence is nuclear, especially if you're facing the United States.
00:02:36.880And so the two sides are fundamentally stuck. Plus, the dynamics within Iran have shifted.
00:02:47.720What these guys are describing here in the Telegraph, in a pretty good piece in the Telegraph, is how the IRGC has consolidated control over Iran to sideline everybody who is on the political side.
00:03:02.300And that includes the president of Iran, Pezashqian, and the speaker of parliament, Galibaf, who are in part responsible for the negotiations, but they're not the actual decision makers.
00:03:16.660The actual decision makers, essentially, are the current head of the IRGC and the former head of the IRGC.
00:03:25.020and so this change means that the iranians are in the middle of a transition that keeps on happening
00:03:33.400in all islamic governments islamic governments begin with theocratic underpinnings
00:03:40.940and then they end with total military rule that's always how it works and this is exactly what's
00:03:49.120been happening in iran according to the telegraph and while i don't necessarily trust everything
00:03:55.700that the telegraph says i think that this is actually spot on because the nature of these
00:04:01.860regimes dictates that they end up under military rule um essentially in islam you are mandated to
00:04:11.060wage permanent war and the ruler has the right to kill anybody in opposition and these two things0.78
00:04:18.900together lend themselves to military dictatorship with a religious fig leaf. That's how it was under
00:04:27.460the Abbasid Caliphate. That's how it was under Mamluk rule. That's how it's been for most of0.98
00:04:34.480Islamic history. This is what's happening again in Iran. And so for these guys, maintaining a0.98
00:04:42.660permanent state of confrontation with the Americans serves to legitimize them having0.66
00:04:49.440totalitarian rule over Iran. And keeping a supreme leader, or the supreme leader,0.81
00:04:57.200Mustafa Khamenei, the son of the late leader Ali Khamenei, means that they end up having that
00:05:04.400religious legitimacy that keeps the masses in line. And so this is the dynamic that is happening
00:05:11.860right now. Plus, the Iranians, as Mr. Vali Nasser points out, he's very pro-Iran, but he's good on0.82
00:05:20.460Iranian thinking and understanding Iranian thinking. So take what he says with a grain of
00:05:26.380salt. This is a biased source, of course. All sources are biased, including this one.
00:05:34.720You have to look at people's biases, how honest they are about them, and then form your own view.
00:05:40.200But the points that he makes here are very important. Namely, it's not that the Iranian1.00
00:05:47.600leadership is divided that's causing them to delay reaching an agreement. It's that the Iranians0.99
00:05:56.580can't trust that an agreement with the United States will actually be enforced. And this is
00:06:02.880based on a bunch of historic precedents. In previous episodes, I'd mentioned, I think,
00:06:07.160how under Rafsan Zhani, who was a pillar of the Iranian regime and who was president of Iran from
00:06:14.7401989 to 1997, the Iranians made a bunch of openings to the United States, including
00:06:22.000giving oil contracts to, I believe it was Conoco. They gave them a billion dollar oil contract to
00:06:29.800try to get the Americans involved in the Iranian economy and try to reduce the tensions between the
00:06:34.900two sides. Bill Clinton responds by imposing sanctions on Iran. The next president, he was
00:06:41.860very much on the reformist camp. Muhammad Khatami, he governed from 97 to 2005. He was talking about
00:06:50.700dialogue of civilizations, civilizations of rapprochement. They helped, the Iranians at the
00:06:56.680time, help the Americans massively in the Afghanistan war. And their reaction from the U.S.
00:07:02.140was, now you're part of the axis of evil, under George W. Bush. And so they got Ahmadinejad,
00:07:09.780who was a hardliner's hardliner, and he governed from 2005 to 2013, I think, and they escalated
00:07:21.200the nuclear program massively. That brought the Americans to the negotiating table. That in turn
00:07:27.340led to the JCPOA under a different president, a centrist president, Hassan Rouhani. That didn't
00:07:35.660go anywhere. Trump withdrew from the agreement. So basically, the point that Nasser is making here
00:07:41.800is that the Iranians don't trust the Americans to actually implement any agreement that they make.
00:07:47.880What they're worried about is that they will reopen Hormuz, relieve the pressure on the West
00:07:54.060and on the United States. And that means that the Americans get another opportunity0.81
00:07:59.480to wage another war down the line. Whereas now, maintaining pressure on the West,
00:08:07.160triggering a broad economic crisis would force the Americans to look inwards and would reduce0.63
00:08:13.760the risk of another war with Iran. More or less, this is the thinking here. And add to it the fact0.81
00:08:21.680that, you know, the Americans twice attacked Iran during negotiations, etc., etc., and so why should
00:08:28.980they believe in diplomacy? And what this has led to is the Iranians suspending all talks with the
00:08:36.760United States, and they are claiming that this is over Lebanon, which is something that we're going
00:08:43.860to get to as we build up towards the narrative of, you know, where the region is going in general,
00:08:49.080especially if the Lebanon war is not contained.
00:08:53.340And what they're saying is that unless the Israelis stop attacking Lebanon
00:08:56.660and withdraw from Lebanese territories
00:08:59.680the Iranians are not going to make a deal with the United States
00:09:03.640over anything to do with the nuclear program or over anything else.
00:09:08.420So they've taken the most hardline position possible
00:09:11.080and this was just a few days after the Supreme Leader
00:12:32.320Well, let's look at the map and see what it tells us.
00:12:36.460By the way, Hezbollah just issued a statement before we started filming this, before we went live, saying that the Israelis took it and withdrew from it, and there's a lot of contention over who controls which territory, and I'll explain in a second why, you know, it's really bad for all sides.
00:12:56.360Now, the location that Israel captured is roundabout here, just across the river, just across the Litani River, and near the point where the area between the Litani River in South Lebanon and the Israeli border is shortest.
00:13:23.100So this is a distance of around four or five kilometers.
00:13:26.740There is 87,000 Israeli soldiers or thereabouts committed to the Lebanon campaign.
00:13:33.740And they managed to advance this distance and to cross the river.
00:13:39.060But much of the rest of the area south of the Litani is still not really under Israeli control.
00:13:46.860And what the Israelis are doing in Lebanon, let me explain it.
00:13:49.780they've declared this entire yellow line to be a security zone and they're slowly trying to expand0.51
00:13:58.240it they don't control all of it but they've destroyed all of it essentially and they are0.96
00:14:06.080trying to just clean up the entire hezbollah presence and build a buffer and in addition
00:14:13.600they are displacing pretty much everybody in South Lebanon. So they're trying to force everybody0.99
00:14:20.940south of this river that marked in at the top of the red here, which is the Zahrani River,
00:14:28.560to just pull up, pull back to the northern part of Lebanon. And they're displacing a million plus
00:14:37.180people as a result, as well as probably another million people who live in this area in the
00:14:44.380southern suburb of Beirut. And the idea for the Israelis is twofold. One part is to create a clear
00:14:54.140zone in South Lebanon along this yellow line where there is zero civilian presence and zero Hezbollah0.83
00:15:04.140presence, and that would be then used as a buffer between Israel and Lebanon, and the Israeli0.75
00:15:12.540military would deploy there, and that then becomes a way of securing the settlements and the
00:15:20.460communities in the north of Israel. That's one part. They're failing to do that,
00:15:26.780and they're still struggling even though they're advancing.0.53
00:15:29.500And the second thing that they're doing is to just bombard civilian areas and force people to leave these areas completely to trigger a massive humanitarian crisis in Lebanon that then places pressure on Hezbollah and displaces the entire Shia community of South Lebanon.0.58
00:15:55.020The idea being that pressuring the Shia civilians who back Hezbollah0.69
00:16:00.900becomes a way of forcing Hezbollah to give up the fight0.67
00:16:06.740and of forcing Iran to accept that Israel has freedom of action in all of Lebanon regardless.0.68
00:16:18.060And so what the Israelis are doing, they're trying to separate Lebanon from Iran0.61
00:16:22.500so that they can eliminate Hezbollah even if they don't get a great deal on Iran itself.0.90
00:16:29.820They still get this additional living space.0.82
00:16:32.900They still get this insulation between them and the rest of Lebanon.0.81
00:16:39.760They still create a massive crisis for Hezbollah and eventually try to force it to disarm.0.76