00:15:18.380And a big part of the Putin legacy has been to sort of try to replicate
00:15:24.180the Western systems in Russia. And so this is an institute that was founded in 1992, and it has
00:15:29.760grown in importance. And this is the honorary chairman of that institute speaking.
00:15:38.200And here what he's arguing in this piece is that, yes, the special military operation has been good.
00:15:44.560It's allowed Russia to weed out the evil influences of the West. By the way, there's
00:15:49.560something that should be said about russian thinking especially as reflected by this guy
00:15:54.460um what's his name again uh karagonov they view the west as inherently evil they view
00:16:03.660especially northwestern europe as inherently evil and they bleed constantly about colonialism
00:16:10.220and racism and all that kind of stuff and they preach instead eurasianism which is the fusion
00:16:18.140of Russia and China into an Asian superpower that is jointly run that can deliver some kind
00:16:25.420of utopia. This is inherently evil thinking, because the way that they see the world0.98
00:16:33.960starts from the West is evil. And everything that the West has done throughout its history
00:16:42.080has been evil. And these guys, you want to understand them as the people who still hold
00:16:47.420a grudge over the role of the Latins in the loss of Constantinople, in the Last Crusade,
00:16:54.880which attacked Constantinople, and in the Fourth Crusade, sorry, which attacked Constantinople,
00:17:01.260and they are still not over that issue. So this is their worldview, and it's important to remember
00:17:11.160that and they define the west intrinsically as enemies and they are uh more emphatic about the
00:17:20.080legacy of the second world war than most others uh which is understandable because the russians
00:17:27.400the losses for the russians of the second world war were 20 million people now in exchange they
00:17:32.780ended up dominating all of eastern europe but their losses were quite catastrophic
00:17:37.520So that's the mindset that you're dealing with here.
00:17:43.200And what is being said here is that this guy warned the Europeans that the expansion of NATO into Ukraine was going to lead to a major war.0.98
00:17:58.720the europeans ignored this and they kept on um escalating in ukraine which is actually true
00:18:08.040he's right about that um and that this is part of the european dna for lack of a better phrase0.95
00:18:16.780because you know the hatred of russia was cultivated by the austro-hungarians the poles
00:18:23.120and other western countries who set the ukrainians against russia and so uh what is needed is
00:18:30.080isolation from the ukrainian and european maladies to follow our own path of healthy and sound
00:18:36.980development and then he goes on to say that the russians are actually winning the war
00:18:41.520but the russians aren't properly responding to escalation by europe and here's the key thing
00:18:51.040and that the Russians haven't actually destroyed the coalitions that have emerged against them
00:18:59.420and that Europe is preparing for a new escalation
00:19:02.920and they are backing Nazis in Ukraine, which is another partial truth, shall we say.
00:19:12.420And so the only way to stop the Europeans is by threatening them with nuclear weapons.
00:19:19.780and what he's advocating here is that major targets in europe including control centers
00:19:28.880critical infrastructure and military bases of those european countries that play a key role
00:19:35.420in preparing and executing military operation against russia must be hit and they should0.85
00:19:41.660include targets where the play where the elites live and work let their capitals finally sober up
00:19:49.020If conventional strikes have no effect and Europe does not capitulate or at least retreat, we should be fully prepared militarily and most importantly politically and psychologically to launch limited but sufficient for political effect retaliatory strikes with strategic nuclear weapons.
00:20:16.140And then if you look at another piece here from the same think tank, the argument is about Iran and how Iran succeeded because it didn't just strike American military targets in the region, but also the assets of key American partners.
00:20:41.280and then stuff about the weapon stockpile and the tolerance for damage and so on and so forth
00:20:47.720so in the minds of the russians the iranian strategy of attacking the u.s's allies worked0.97
00:20:56.080and the europeans are so evil and unhinged that they need the same treatment0.81
00:21:02.720including the threat of launching nuclear weapons against them in order to achieve a similar effect0.98
00:21:10.680and again this is what they are thinking according to the most important think tank in russia
00:21:17.860and if you want to understand what the russians are thinking that's a pretty important starting
00:21:23.980point so if you're russia where does this logic lead you well it probably ends up leading you
00:21:34.620towards actually striking Europe, and specifically, it leads you towards attacking the energy
00:21:44.640infrastructure in Europe, especially the LNG facilities and the storage facilities in the EU
00:21:56.760and probably in Britain, with the idea being that if you fire initially drones and then something
00:22:05.640like an Oreshnik hypersonic missile, which can't be intercepted against energy targets or against
00:22:13.440military industries or against airports or similarly important assets, you would show
00:22:23.040the Europeans that they are going to be paying a price for continuing to support Ukraine.
00:22:29.320If you sort of reconcile between the fact that Putin has to adjudicate between different
00:22:35.980factions within the ruling elite in Russia, and that he himself is closer to the dovish
00:22:44.580side, Putin is cast as a cartoon villain in Western media.
00:22:50.780But in reality, on the Russian spectrum, he's closer to the liberal dovish side than he is to the hardline militarist side, which you're hearing from here in this think tank that we were discussing.
00:23:08.660And so the approach, if you reconcile these two realities, is probably going to be Russia saying to Europe, look, as of next week, if you keep on backing Ukraine, we are going to start hitting targets within Europe.
00:23:26.680And then they can bet on the fact that the Americans didn't want a major war against Iran.
00:23:32.420There is no reason to believe that they would want a major war against Russia.
00:23:36.520and that even though there is this influence in the United States that keeps on pushing for
00:23:43.560escalation, the political decision makers backed down against Iran, they would probably end up
00:23:50.020backing down against Russia. And without escalating the crisis dramatically, there is no way for the
00:23:57.880crisis to be resolved other than continuing to fight this war of attrition against the Ukrainians,
00:24:03.980possibly indefinitely, for another two or three years, five years, maybe 10 years, who knows.0.80
00:24:11.840And so it's kind of logical to think, if you're looking at the world from the Russian perspective,0.74
00:24:18.460that the next step that Russia is going to take is to issue some kind of ultimatum to the Europeans.
00:24:26.100That if you release more funding to Ukraine, we are going to hit targets within European countries.
00:24:32.420If you enjoyed this preview, please consider subscribing to lotusheaters.com starting for just £5 a month.