The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters - February 18, 2026


PREVIEW: Realpolitik #34 | The End of NATO


Episode Stats


Length

22 minutes

Words per minute

140.24771

Word count

3,148

Sentence count

168

Harmful content

Hate speech

15

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode, I talk about the recent Munich Security Conference, and why it is so important for the world's leaders to attend it. I also talk about some of the key take-aways from the conference, including the call to action by the EU's foreign minister, Catherine Ashton Ashton Ashton.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Hello, and welcome to another episode of RealPolitik. I am your host, Firas Maudad.
00:00:08.120 As has become customary, this is a live episode, so please drop your comments or questions
00:00:13.540 in the chat or on the comments page on the website, and I will do my best to address them.
00:00:20.540 Today, we're going to be talking about the Munich Security Conference, which took place
00:00:25.820 over most of last week, with really the final days being Friday and Saturday, or Thursday,
00:00:32.360 Friday and Saturday, where the big hitters, the country leaders, Secretary Rubio, etc., came
00:00:39.360 and spoke. Now, first, I want to tell you what is the Munich Security Conference and why is
00:00:45.400 it important. The way that the global calendar works is that first you have Davos, sometime
00:00:52.340 usually in January, where the corporations meet with the governments, and it's really
00:00:59.180 corporate-focused for the most part, and they go around and they discuss their priorities
00:01:04.460 and what they expect and what they want and things of that nature. And then afterwards,
00:01:09.900 the governments themselves, particularly at the defense and security level, ship off to
00:01:16.720 Munich and have their own big conference that kind of sets the global security agenda. And this is an
00:01:25.580 old event. It's been happening for 60 years, but it's really been gaining prominence as the government's
00:01:31.500 version of Davos, where they set out, as I said, their security priorities. And now you have
00:01:38.520 participation of the Chinese and of the Indians and of a bunch of other countries. And it gives you a great
00:01:44.720 great deal of insights into the nature of foreign relations. If you will remember from previous
00:01:50.660 episodes, we discussed how in 2007, at the Munich Security Conference, Russian President Vladimir Putin
00:01:58.280 pretty much set out his opposition to further NATO expansion and warned that there were going to be
00:02:05.900 consequences. And then the result of that was the 2008 invasion of a big part of Georgia, which sort of
00:02:15.220 ended the possibility of Georgia joining NATO and pretty much put a halt on further NATO expansion.
00:02:24.760 In the 2022 conference, Kamala Harris, formerly the vice president of the United States,
00:02:31.320 went to the Munich Security Conference and more or less said that Ukraine would be joining NATO at some
00:02:38.700 point in the future. And that was really the straw that broke the camel's back and that drove the
00:02:46.480 Russians to decide that, OK, we're going to actually go ahead and reinvade Ukraine, following up on their 0.98
00:02:54.300 intervention in 2014. So it's actually a big deal. And the theme of this conference was really that
00:03:02.560 the global order was collapsing, that the United States cannot be trusted, and that essentially
00:03:09.600 American-European relations were breaking down. And I thought I'd sort of show you a little clip
00:03:17.440 of how things were going. This was from a session between the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations
00:03:27.440 and Kayakalas, the essentially foreign minister of the EU, was participating. And this was how she was
00:03:35.000 reacting.
00:03:37.600 Escalation. So what I'm hearing outside of forums like this privately is thank you for America.
00:03:43.640 So she's rolling her eyes at the American ambassador for saying that the Americans should be thanked for
00:03:51.580 their role in ending a bunch of conflicts under President Trump. And she really wasn't having any
00:03:57.780 of it. And it was really like that all through. What you saw was essentially that Britain, Canada,
00:04:05.220 the EU, Australia, all were ganging up against the Americans and against evil Hitlerite dictator, 0.60
00:04:14.160 Donald Trump. Some of it was comical. Some of it was genuinely comical. Here you have Kayakalas.
00:04:21.380 I think it's worth listening to again. Let's do this.
00:04:25.160 We hear the call to action. Europeans assemble. And let me take more inspiration from the Marvel
00:04:31.860 universe. Heroes are made by paths, are made by the paths they choose, not the powers that they are
00:04:40.680 graced with. Europe's path is clear. Defend Europe, secure our neighborhood and build partnerships
00:04:48.480 across the globe.
00:04:49.600 I think what somebody who's the foreign minister of the EU is taking her cues and her ideas from
00:05:00.100 Marvel, we really have a big problem. Just saying, it seems like a pretty serious problem
00:05:07.760 that this is the level of intellectual discourse. And it was really like that throughout the conference.
00:05:15.880 Keir Starmer obviously spoke at the event. Macron spoke at the event. Mertz of Germany spoke.
00:05:26.280 And they were broadly in agreement that the world was back in the 1930s. And to the extent that there
00:05:33.600 was disagreement, it was over who was the new Hitler. Was it Putin or was it Donald Trump?
00:05:40.320 Trump. They were attacking the far left and the far right and insisting that the only solution
00:05:48.600 is really for the globalist governments in Canada, the EU, Britain, Australia to fully align with one
00:05:58.740 another and to coordinate their actions completely to cut off the threat from any kind of populism.
00:06:07.320 And you always see this language and this attack on populism, by which they mean popularity.
00:06:13.480 So they're defending our democracy. But what they mean by that is more or less their democracy,
00:06:21.640 them remaining in power, them remaining in charge. And so to enable them to do this,
00:06:27.640 the big focus was on attacking Trump and attacking any kind of nativist politics that would try
00:06:37.180 to put the peoples of the countries that these individuals govern ahead of the special interests
00:06:45.420 that actually control the people in charge. And so one of the big themes of the conference was the
00:06:52.320 importance of Europe being able to go it alone and being able to defend itself without backing from
00:07:00.520 the United States. This is clearly deeply unrealistic, and I'm going to explain why.
00:07:09.400 The first reason that this is highly unrealistic is that essentially the countries of the EU have
00:07:15.800 fundamentally diverging interests. It's the leaders of the EU who believe that their interests are fully
00:07:22.600 aligned. But if you think just in terms of a map, if you look at a map of Spain and Poland,
00:07:29.960 the threats that are facing Spain are fundamentally coming from North Africa. Obviously, that's what the 1.00
00:07:35.080 geography of Spain dictates. The threat facing Poland fundamentally comes from Russia. 0.91
00:07:41.080 And the idea that Russia and Spain should be working together to face this common threat 0.53
00:07:45.880 is just laughable at the face of it. It doesn't really make any kind of sense. Plus, even when you look at
00:07:57.160 internal EU relations, you pretty much see that the relationship between the Germans and the French,
00:08:05.480 for example, is really completely breaking down. And you saw that with the photoshoot that happened
00:08:15.560 between Macron, Starmer and Mertz, where essentially, Starmer and Mertz were on one side,
00:08:22.440 and Macron was the odd one out looking deeply embarrassed and very much out of place.
00:08:28.920 They childishly refused to shake hands with Macron and tried to put him on the side. And every time he
00:08:35.240 tried to say something, they'd sort of try to ignore him. Why is that? Because although the Munich
00:08:43.640 Security Conference was full of talk about how European countries should centralize their military
00:08:49.400 procurement, how they shouldn't have 10 different models of tanks and 20 different models of destroyers
00:08:56.840 and whatever models of armoured fighting vehicles and so on and so forth, the actual way that it works
00:09:06.840 is that when push comes to shove, none of these countries is willing to give up its own position.
00:09:11.880 So the problem with the French is that they insist on having full autonomy in their own military supply
00:09:20.040 chain. The French are the only European country that build their own aircraft, they build their own 0.61
00:09:25.400 destroyers, their own one aircraft carrier, their own fighting vehicles, their own missiles and missile
00:09:32.600 interceptors, and everything of that sort, because they believe that they should remain autonomous no matter
00:09:38.520 what. And so when they talk about centralizing military procurement, as they did repeatedly
00:09:47.320 in the Munich Security Conference, I mean, Starmer was repeating this, Mertz was repeating this,
00:09:52.760 and even Macron was repeating this. When they keep on repeating this message, it just completely rings hollow.
00:10:00.200 Because when push comes to shove, two things happen. First, the French insist that they will have full 1.00
00:10:06.200 autonomy over their own supply chains, and they won't concede anything to anyone. And the second thing
00:10:12.120 that happens is that at the military level, these countries refuse to place their militaries
00:10:20.360 under anybody else's command, which is what would be required. And then there's another reason here,
00:10:26.200 which is that when you're thinking about military technology, it has to be specific to where you're
00:10:35.480 fighting. So that's why Russians always built lighter tanks, where the Americans built heavy tanks. 0.66
00:10:43.400 The Russians built lighter tanks not because they couldn't amass enough steel. The Russians built lighter
00:10:49.000 tanks because they know that the tanks are going to have to go over snow, and that there has to be some
00:10:55.800 proportionality or some relationship between the weight of the tank and the terrain that is going over.
00:11:03.080 And so Russian tanks tend to be 10-12 tons lighter than American tanks, meaning that they are fit for the
00:11:11.480 climate that they're fighting in. And if you wanted to build tanks for Spain or tanks for Britain, they will have to
00:11:18.280 adapt to the local environment that they're in. So it just simply never actually works.
00:11:24.760 Looking at some of the other themes that they were talking about here, and I'm just having to glance a
00:11:31.960 little bit at the notes, it really seemed like the objective of all of this was to throw as many
00:11:39.240 spanners in the wheels when it comes to what Trump was trying to do in order to paralyze him and in order to
00:11:46.600 make sure that he doesn't succeed, especially when it comes to the Russia-Ukraine war.
00:11:52.360 So you heard a huge amount of discussion about a couple of themes.
00:11:57.880 One of the themes was the importance of Europe maintaining its digital autonomy.
00:12:03.880 And what they mean by that is a rebuttal to the pressure that has been coming from the Americans,
00:12:09.400 insisting that the EU stop regulating free speech to the suffocating extent that it has been doing over
00:12:17.000 the last few years. And I think we just saw Starmer a couple of hours ago, tweeting about how protecting
00:12:24.200 the kids is a red line, and he won't allow social media companies to do anything that threatens the
00:12:30.280 welfare of children. This is the same Starmer that's been happy to look the other way when it comes to the
00:12:37.400 grooming gangs in Britain. So you can see how seriously you can take him. Macron repeated the
00:12:43.400 same message on digital autonomy. He and Mertz had an event a few months ago, emphasizing the same idea.
00:12:51.560 And what they mean by that is that they want to maintain the ability to regulate AI and control it,
00:12:58.840 and to regulate social media and control it. Because one of the themes that they kept on repeating was
00:13:05.160 how important it is that they be able to police speech in the way that they find fitting.
00:13:11.720 And in parenthesis, that kind of reminds you of the Romanian elections last year, which they pretty much
00:13:17.800 stole by alleging that the Russians had instigated some kind of campaign on Instagram to influence the
00:13:25.320 election. And it turns out the campaign was instigated by the losing candidate in the
00:13:30.600 Romanian elections, just so he could accuse his rival of receiving Russian backing. And that's the same
00:13:39.720 playbook that they used against Donald Trump in his first term, with a Russia collusion hoax.
00:13:45.160 So you see this emphasis coming out constantly out of the Munich Security Conference, that the
00:13:50.760 Europeans need to control the digital space more effectively. Meaning that they need to be able to
00:13:56.520 define American companies whenever they want to, when they don't comply. Meaning that they need to be
00:14:01.960 able to go after X and 4chan, and what's that other thing called Kiwi Farms, and so on and so forth,
00:14:12.200 to make sure that they have full control over the discourse. So that really came out. And they just
00:14:22.600 don't have any other choice. And the way that these guys see it is that Trump is an existential threat to
00:14:31.880 the EU regime in total. Because as I've argued in previous episodes, what Trump really wants to do at this
00:14:38.120 stage is to break the EU, even though the EU initially was very much an American-sponsored project,
00:14:46.200 because the Americans thought that they could control Europe a lot more effectively if they had the EU.
00:14:51.960 It's just that now the EU has turned into a golem, essentially, which has way too much power,
00:14:59.800 way too much control over regulation, and therefore can't do very much.
00:15:04.440 Another theme that we saw coming out of the Munich Security Conference was that they need to be able
00:15:14.360 to have less protectionism. Now this is genuinely hilarious. The premise of the EU was that it would
00:15:23.160 be a protectionist block for certain industries. And if the EU was to try to be less protectionist over
00:15:30.360 things like farming, it would pretty much face a full-on revolt from people like the French farmers, 0.96
00:15:37.240 and as we're already seeing from the Dutch farmers. So they're talking about being less protectionist,
00:15:45.080 but this is by far the most regulated piece of real estate in the world. Nobody is more regulated than the
00:15:53.560 EU. Nobody is more protectionist than the EU. It's just that they're using that as a vector of attack
00:15:59.880 against Donald Trump, because he's trying to use tariffs in order to extract concessions from the
00:16:06.600 Europeans. And you constantly see this, where these guys pretty much say anything, regardless of whether or
00:16:15.080 not it's true, in order to defend their interests. That's all that they do. You saw Europe complaining
00:16:25.000 an enormous amount over Greenland, and over Trump wanting to take Greenland. I'd have to argue that this
00:16:33.560 is valid to some extent, because you can't just grab the territory of another Christian country.
00:16:41.080 You have to buy it, you have to acquire it in a legitimate way. So Trump kind of threatening to
00:16:47.480 use force on Greenland wasn't really a good idea, and he backtracked from that. But they will never
00:16:53.640 forgive him for it. And it's not that they will never forgive him for it because he wanted to take
00:16:58.120 Greenland. It's that they won't forgive him for it because he's a threat to the status quo.
00:17:01.880 And the Trump example is really a problem for them. So we also saw, as I said, a lot of focus on
00:17:15.080 developing defense industries. And they're looking to India and Brazil and the Gulf and maybe even China
00:17:22.600 to partner with them on building up their defense industrial base. The issue here is that China has
00:17:31.240 pretty much eaten Europe's lunch. I mean, what China has done with its industrial base was to grow it to
00:17:38.200 such an extent that it's become literally the world's manufacturing superpower, bigger than the next 10
00:17:44.440 countries combined. And that's why the Americans are pushing to consolidate over Europe and Japan,
00:17:50.040 and to some extent, South Korea, because they need that industrial base if they're going to compete with
00:17:55.240 the Chinese at any point in the short term. Europe, instead of reading this correctly and realizing that
00:18:01.240 their interests are naturally aligned with their cultural allies, who are, at the end of the day,
00:18:08.680 the Americans. These are the natural civilizational ally of Europe and the natural civilizational leader of
00:18:17.160 Christendom as a whole, just because of the size of the United States. Instead of doing that, they're 0.79
00:18:23.880 looking to partner with India. And they're looking to partner with one of the most corrupt countries 1.00
00:18:30.360 in Latin America, Brazil. And they're looking to partner with the Gulf, which is, at the end of the
00:18:35.640 day, your civilizational rival, no matter how you spin it. Plus, China has pretty much eaten Europe's 0.92
00:18:42.760 lunch. What China has done was start from very low-level manufacturing, low-skill manufacturing, 0.68
00:18:49.240 to become the technology leader in a whole range of industries with enormous defense applications.
00:18:55.880 They now have their own lithography machines to build microchips. They have their own microchip
00:19:02.200 manufacturing. They're leading in all kinds of genetics-based medicine, in all kinds of
00:19:09.720 medical manufacturing, etc. They're leading in all kinds of optics and fibers and things that are
00:19:16.120 absolutely necessary for you to build modern weapon systems and modern communications.
00:19:22.520 So the Europeans are looking at this from the completely wrong angle. And you see that throughout
00:19:28.920 in the Munich conference, and you see zero relationship with reality. Like, the extent to
00:19:36.280 which these guys are dissociated from reality is insane. And the Canadians and the Australians are 1.00
00:19:42.360 fully in on the EU strategy. And they're trying to find a way to back each other in what is essentially
00:19:51.000 a rebellion of the provinces against the imperial center. That's the way to think about it. As I think
00:19:59.240 it was the Danish Prime Minister who said it, or the Danish Foreign Minister who said it, it's one thing to be
00:20:05.800 happy vassals. It's another thing to be miserable slaves. And with Trump changing the paradigm when it comes to
00:20:15.720 the way that the West should be operating, they are just in rebellion. You also saw a lot of talk about
00:20:25.560 technological autonomy in the EU and technological independence. So not just digital, but everything
00:20:31.320 to do with supply chains and manufacturing. And here a couple of thoughts come to mind. First, energy.
00:20:39.000 You can't want to build a manufacturing base and have green energy. A strong manufacturing base requires cheap,
00:20:47.800 reliable, reliable, predictable energy. Renewables are not in that picture. You can't operate an industrial
00:20:54.440 base based on wind and solar, because wind and solar are both incredibly unreliable and unpredictable.
00:21:01.880 So this is by definition impossible. But you saw them constantly harping on about climate.
00:21:08.120 And you see them consistently committed to this agenda, which fundamentally serves China.
00:21:12.760 China. No sense of reality. Second, if you want innovation and technology, you have to deregulate. 1.00
00:21:21.160 And you have to lower taxes. And you have to make entrepreneurship rewarding.
00:21:26.280 And this is impossible for them to do. Because it means that most of the jobs of the EU are unwanted,
00:21:34.440 because the only jobs that you get within the EU are regulatory jobs. So these guys aren't going to do
00:21:40.840 what's required to cut off the branch that they're sitting on, in order to achieve the objectives
00:21:48.520 that they're saying they want to achieve. If you enjoyed this piece of premium content from the Lotus Eaters,
00:21:54.200 head to our website where you can find more.
00:22:05.240 important,
00:22:07.080 of course,
00:22:09.640 I want to also say that 1940-2015
00:22:11.640 will help a novel changer.