The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters - December 09, 2025


The Collapse of the Centre


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour

Words per Minute

185.5457

Word Count

11,310

Sentence Count

555

Misogynist Sentences

15

Hate Speech Sentences

37


Summary

In this episode, Dan and I discuss the collapse of the Labour vote in the recent council elections and how it points to a growing tendency towards the centre-left. We talk about the reasons why this might be happening and why the Greens are emerging as a viable alternative.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hi folks, welcome back to another one of these current events political chats that Dan and I
00:00:05.700 have decided to start having because there's a lot that's going on in British politics at the
00:00:10.680 moment but it's going on under the surface and so I don't think as much attention to it is being
00:00:15.440 called upon as is warranted because a lot of things have happened but they're small things
00:00:20.660 but they're indicative of trends that are I think at some point going to kind of erupt out of the
00:00:26.720 political environment and someone to talk about them so let's talk about some of the council
00:00:30.740 by election results that come in recently as you can see here this is in Exmouth Halston in East Devon
00:00:38.440 where the Labour vote just completely collapsed. So when you say things are under the surface are
00:00:43.720 you talking about the Tories and Labour's prospect of ever forming a government again? Well yeah
00:00:48.040 actually that's I actually do think we might be looking at the last Labour government and I was
00:00:54.880 tweeting about this the other day because it seems that the coalition that made up the Labour Party
00:01:00.640 is just completely fractured at this point. The Labour right as they call it made up of you know
00:01:08.840 managerial Blairite types were able to corral the working class and the radical student politics types
00:01:16.500 into the same coalition but that seems to have just completely been a blister. Well that's an interesting
00:01:20.660 question I mean who are the extant Labour managerialist Blairites I mean I can think of Andy Burnham but
00:01:30.420 after that I kind of come up short and he's not actually even in the Parliamentary Labour Party at this point.
00:01:35.000 Well we'll talk about the Parliamentary Labour Party in a minute but the question really is who is
00:01:38.420 their constituency and the answer is civil servants and NHS workers. Well and immigrants and well but they're losing them.
00:01:44.660 Well exactly it's it's not even the immigrants right and it seems that basically Labour were trying to pull in
00:01:51.360 too many various parties into the coalition that were too contradictory. So it's one thing having the
00:01:57.620 working class base and then the sort of student politics and the managerial elites all in the same
00:02:03.480 party that's quite a rough coalition and you can see how the you know liberal managerial elites are in
00:02:10.320 direct opposition to the working class base who are themselves deeply parochial whereas the elite
00:02:15.480 elites are international and frankly oikophobic. And then having the radical woke sort of student
00:02:23.040 politics crammed in on that well you're going to have to make a choice do you want the radical woke
00:02:27.360 stuff that wants infinite open borders and immigrants or do you want the working class base
00:02:31.480 and the liberal elite chose the ones that they felt most comfortable with which are the radical students.
00:02:36.520 And in addition to that they thought okay we're also going to be the party of Islam
00:02:39.280 reform and immigrants which I think really sealed the deal for the working class base and it turns
00:02:45.060 out the working class base was millions of votes. Yeah. Turns out that was huge. I mean to be fair
00:02:49.220 they did win the last election but I mean how did they do that they they did it then by having the
00:02:53.460 immigrant vote. Well they did it by luck because reform came in and smacked the Tories. I mean they
00:02:57.960 still did get enough votes to form a government and and that would have been the immigrant vote which
00:03:03.440 as we're I'm sure we're going to talk about is is peeling away from them because they've got a more
00:03:07.340 pure form alternative. It was the old left because I mean there was a certain age of which people just
00:03:12.440 never changed their vote. Yeah. Old lefties but then there's also the sort of student lefties as
00:03:17.060 well but I mean they're a fairly unstable coalition. I mean one because they're zoomers and they don't
00:03:21.540 care about the shibboleths of the past. There are a lot of millennials in that as well. Yeah a fair number
00:03:25.880 but they're in the process of growing up as well. They are. But also these people tend to at some point
00:03:30.760 you know these these university lefties they want to grow up and they want to get a job and eventually they start
00:03:35.260 looking at their pay packet they start looking at their children and they're thinking what's my
00:03:39.700 future here? What are my kids future? You know what I I actually I actually think that a lot of them
00:03:45.740 are actually going more left-wing because yeah but I and I I have experience of this in uh in people
00:03:52.420 I know personally who are diagonal leftists always voted Labour but now going up to the Greens just
00:03:58.100 because Labour are too right way. Right. Labour have admitted that they're committed to reality
00:04:04.020 right. The dream is off the table for Labour and so they're like oh I'll go to the other party that
00:04:10.100 sells me the dream then and that's why the Greens are doing. Well I guess they're peeling away in both
00:04:13.460 directions then because I mean I was thinking of somebody like Aaron Bastani who's um may you know
00:04:18.380 maybe our age maybe a little bit younger um but I mean he's an example of somebody who's who's on the
00:04:23.160 left very committed built a brand as being on the left but started paying taxes and having children
00:04:27.660 and looking around and thinking what the hell is this is giving to them so you get that natural
00:04:31.920 peel away as people start to experience life they start to leave the left but you're talking about
00:04:37.040 the true believers. I'm talking about the sort of Ash Sarkar types who otherwise would have been
00:04:41.240 committed to the Labour Party but have decided the Labour Party far too right wing is now peeling off to
00:04:45.140 the Greens right so it's the the Labour coalition is just completely collapsing everywhere and these
00:04:51.600 these by-election results were a great example where reformers have just eaten the entire Labour
00:04:55.720 votes in East Devon there. The Conservatives are like you say the the people who'd never changed
00:05:02.500 their vote well that's 25 percent boomers and the Lib Dems being Middle England who are struggling a
00:05:08.000 little bit there you'll notice that they've lost a bit too they're losing ground because reality is
00:05:12.840 slowly but surely catching up even to East Devon one of again one of the most homogenous parts of the
00:05:18.240 country and a true sort of English Arcadia still. I mean at first blush I'm kind of confused that the
00:05:25.420 Conservatives are holding up as well but then I suppose this is against the last election which
00:05:29.500 was an absolutely crippling year for the Conservatives. Yeah but also Devon is still an
00:05:35.100 edil you know where nothing ever happens. It's the Shire. It is genuinely it's like it's going to be the last
00:05:40.380 Shire as well probably because it's so far to the west. But then you have Middlesbrough which is another
00:05:47.160 interesting result in which reform gained from the Lib Dems which is very interesting. Yeah.
00:05:54.840 So obviously the majority for non-US viewers this is this is more northern this is more working class
00:05:59.520 much more so than the last one. It is but it was still a Lib Dem council seat and as you can see
00:06:05.820 reform have eaten the Conservative and Labour votes but also a bit into the Lib Dem vote because like I
00:06:11.340 said like we talked about in the last episode of this the Lib Dems and reform are actually the same
00:06:16.780 constituency just differentiated on the size of their gardens. Yes. They're both Englishmen they're
00:06:23.200 both English voters it's just how prosperous are they and the fact the Lib Dems are going down
00:06:27.940 indicates their prosperity is going down also. So this is another interesting move and then in
00:06:35.840 Labour heartland such as Liverpool well the Greens are chewing them up. Very northern very working class
00:06:41.740 I mean this is. Liverpool's kind of its own thing I wouldn't even call it northern you know it's
00:06:45.840 like Liverpool's got its own personal identity but it's always been just Labour stronghold for decades
00:06:51.880 decades. Grievance culture. Oh yeah. Funny accents all that sort of thing. Yeah we're not English we're
00:06:57.340 Scouse. Yeah. But even there reform are on 18 percent and the Conservatives dying out Lib Dems no hold
00:07:04.240 because they're not really an English city. And the Labour Party getting absolutely crushed by the
00:07:10.400 Greens. So the Greens are interesting to me because I don't know you're lumping reform and the Lib Dems
00:07:17.020 in together because they're the same type of person to look at. Yeah. Grant you that. But ideologically
00:07:22.820 I'd say the Greens and the Liberal Democrats are probably closer because both of them are parties which
00:07:28.340 are basically just fundamentally unreality. So not really right. So the Liberal Democrats for them
00:07:37.640 they believe in the how to describe it the radical traditionalism of England right. They assume all of
00:07:49.160 that in the same way that the reform voters want all of that. But the Greens hate all of that right. So
00:07:54.400 the Greens would if Ed Davey and a Green were sat there and the argument was should there be loud
00:08:00.440 noises on the train the Green would say sure it's part of their culture. It's what immigrants are
00:08:04.200 like. Ed Davey would put on a swastika and start goose stepping around the stage. Right. I think
00:08:08.840 that's an interesting way of framing it. The Lib Dems just assume everything that reform want. And that
00:08:14.440 strikes me because I live in an area which is very very Lib Dem. Yeah. And you know these people are
00:08:20.740 living in this sort of fantasy land that perhaps once existed but they assume it's 1950s and they
00:08:26.140 haven't mentally progressed on from that. So that's what I mean by they're living in unreality. Yeah.
00:08:31.660 Which strikes me for the Greens as well. But yeah there's some interesting parallels there.
00:08:35.580 And so for the Liberal Democrats they can adopt a kind of progressive liberal worldview that isn't
00:08:41.200 insane and radical. It is dinner party peacocking politics. But for the Greens they truly believe
00:08:50.780 in this radical agenda. Yeah. I mean as we talked about last time you know back in the back in the
00:08:57.320 early 90s when you saw an immigrant they were generally quite high value though your local GP or
00:09:02.760 something like that. There was very few of them. And if you if your neuroplasticity died it's
00:09:08.660 somewhere in the 1990s and you've been unable to absorb any further information. Yes. I can
00:09:15.100 understand why you might feel that immigrants are just necessarily a good thing because they
00:09:20.620 fit into the community and they add value and all that kind of stuff. And yeah that's a Lib Dem for
00:09:24.740 me. That makes sense. You're thinking of Mr. Omar who runs the corner shop or the local Indian and
00:09:29.340 he's an absolute dream. He's completely polite. His family are all polite. His children are well
00:09:33.260 adjusted and they fit into the local school because they're the only Indian family or Pakistani
00:09:37.660 family or whatever in the in the village. And you don't think any further about it. And that's
00:09:42.020 fine. That's fine. I'm glad that you're happy and he's happy and he fits in and everyone's good.
00:09:46.700 But that's just not the story elsewhere. And the Greens represent that radical fringe of the student
00:09:52.600 left and the immigrant coalition which we have seen already breaking down in your party.
00:09:59.420 So it's it's interesting how the Greens are basically just an insurgent force to destroy the
00:10:03.960 Labour Party, destroy the Labour Party coalition. They can't last on their own. Like how many Muslims
00:10:10.640 are really going to be happy to be led by Zach Polanski in the long run? And this is already
00:10:15.760 we'll get to your party in a bit actually. They polled at 1% in the national poll the other day which
00:10:20.600 I thought was... The other thing I said about these numbers is thinking back to when we did our election
00:10:26.200 coverage. One of the striking things about that was yes Labour won and they won you know their
00:10:32.220 their large majority, their super majority and all the rest of it. Yeah.
00:10:34.900 But the striking thing for me was just how thin all of those majorities were.
00:10:38.340 Completely.
00:10:38.900 And it used to be the case when I when I first got involved in politics in the 1990s,
00:10:43.580 if you had less than maybe 20,000 maybe even 25,000 votes you were considered a marginal.
00:10:49.660 Yes.
00:10:50.220 Whereas these days you can't apply that standard because nobody has a majority greater than about
00:10:55.340 4,000. You're considered to have a safe seat if you've got 4,000.
00:10:58.860 I mean, there are Labour politicians currently sitting who have literally hundreds in votes
00:11:05.980 above their opponent. Well, famously, was it Jess Phillips who had to...
00:11:10.020 400 or 600, something like that. Yeah. And she had to don the headscarf, she had to wear
00:11:13.880 the long skirt and go to the Muslim community and basically beg them to continue supporting
00:11:18.520 her. Exactly. And so this is another, again, remarkable that the insurgent parties are doing
00:11:24.620 so well, frankly. And so this is an aggregate of the local by-elections since the 2025 election.
00:11:32.300 And one thing that we notice is actually that for all the sound and fury, the Green Party is not doing
00:11:38.940 that well. Interesting.
00:11:41.340 You would think that the Green Party would have had dozens and dozens of these. They've only gained two.
00:11:47.260 Yeah. I mean, to be fair, I mean, it is a feature of our political system that you can be making strong
00:11:53.980 gains and it doesn't actually show up in the results for quite a long time. So Farage had this for a long
00:11:59.020 time with UKIP and then, well, whatever it was, the Brexit Party and their reform.
00:12:03.740 Four million votes, one seat.
00:12:05.980 Yeah. Considerable increases in vote share.
00:12:08.940 Yeah.
00:12:09.080 Considerable increases in votes. But there's like a tipping point and then you just break through.
00:12:15.000 Yeah. And that's what's happened with reform here, as you can see. But again, what are we seeing here?
00:12:21.240 The reform party has gained over 50 seats. The Liberal Democrats have gained 20 seats.
00:12:28.360 Labour and Conservatives, of course, lost considerably. Huge numbers, in fact, you know,
00:12:33.880 literally like they're down to a sort of quarter of their seats. There have been a few independents,
00:12:37.960 but not that many. This goes back to my thoughts on the map, which we'll come to in a minute,
00:12:44.280 which is this is the consolidation of English thought. It is the English consolidating into
00:12:49.880 their classes, the Liberal Democrats being the affluent middle class, reform being the angry
00:12:55.320 working class, and then picking their champions to lead them into the future, into the uncertain
00:13:01.160 future of foreign coalitions or the previous Blairite paradigm.
00:13:05.080 I'll give Ed Dutton credit for this, because again, going back to the last election stream,
00:13:09.240 one of the first things he said when he saw the results was this represents the,
00:13:13.320 oh, I forget the word, the ethnalization or whatever it was of English politics.
00:13:18.040 Yes.
00:13:18.440 The moment that you've got, because that was the moment when we got openly Islamic
00:13:26.760 members of parliament.
00:13:27.400 The Gaza MPs.
00:13:28.200 Yes. And he said, the moment that happens, you have to, you have to become a secretarian
00:13:32.520 society. You have to become Northern Ireland.
00:13:34.680 Yes. And I think that's what these things represent. The Liberal Democrats representing
00:13:38.440 the upper class or well-to-do middle class. And like I said, reform representing the angry working
00:13:44.440 class. So I think that is what is happening, a subconscious ethnic alignment in politics.
00:13:49.640 Very interesting.
00:13:50.360 Yeah. Which I think the mainstream is blind to because they always speak in terms of policy
00:13:55.080 and ideology. And again, this holds up perfectly with what I see in my area. Lots of Lib Dems,
00:14:01.080 but they're all older. Every Lib Dem activist I see is...
00:14:04.360 Older Gen X.
00:14:05.720 Yeah. At least 75.
00:14:06.920 Oh, really? That old?
00:14:08.040 Yeah. Blimey.
00:14:09.000 They're very old.
00:14:09.960 All of the Lib Dems I see around, and I do see quite a lot, because I live on the outskirts
00:14:13.960 of Swindon. And so there are a lot of, like, I'm not actually in the Swindon constituency,
00:14:18.840 I'm right on the border. And so I get Lib Dem leaflets all the time. And every Lib Dem
00:14:22.680 activist or counsellor is someone about my age, frankly.
00:14:26.520 Okay, they're quite young where you are then.
00:14:28.040 Well, Gen X.
00:14:29.640 Yeah.
00:14:30.040 And they're people who have lived in the Shires their whole lives.
00:14:32.680 And they're like, yeah, but I know what the true liberal values are.
00:14:35.160 Yeah.
00:14:35.560 But I mean, but conversely, every time I speak to a young person, they're all about reform.
00:14:39.640 Yeah. Yeah, that's fair. So anyway, this is the devastating poll that was released
00:14:47.720 the other day. And you've got to enjoy it, really. You've just got to take it in for a moment.
00:14:57.000 So for anyone who's just listening, reform are on 31%, which has been a pretty damn consistent
00:15:02.200 rough share of the poll. But what's really interesting is that actually does align quite
00:15:06.520 well with the percentage of the country which is working class English. About 30% of the country
00:15:12.600 is working class English. The Conservatives, 20%, well, that roughly represents the Boomers,
00:15:18.760 actually, because they are about a fifth of the population and they just don't change their votes.
00:15:25.960 But the interesting thing is how the Green Party is on 18% and the Labour Party is on 14%.
00:15:31.560 Now, I mean, I don't ever recall seeing a poll with the Labour Party on 14% before.
00:15:35.880 Not in my lifetime that I can think of.
00:15:39.800 In fact, probably not since they were founded, frankly.
00:15:42.600 Yeah, it's not since 1924.
00:15:44.440 Yeah, it's really, really difficult to imagine. And what I love about this is this is the dying
00:15:50.920 days of the managerial regime that stole the Labour Party from the working class.
00:15:55.000 Because again, we've talked about the natural constituency of the Labour Party has just moved
00:15:58.920 to reform. They've just thought, OK, I don't like this. And so now, and the student politicians
00:16:02.840 are moving to the Green Party and the immigrants are moving to the Green Party. And so the Labour
00:16:06.680 Party literally just represents the international managerial order. And that's the percentage of
00:16:11.480 the population that's basically committed to that. The thing is, I'm expecting that to go lower.
00:16:15.160 Well, yes. And it's bringing back for me, back in the Tony Blair years, Labour used to be having
00:16:21.560 this debate all the time. You have the old-fashioned lefties and the new Blairite era managerialists.
00:16:26.760 Yeah.
00:16:27.160 And the old-fashioned lefties would be raging at them saying,
00:16:30.360 you know, you're taking over my party, you're turning it into a managerialist party.
00:16:35.080 And they were right.
00:16:37.000 Yeah. And they were right, yeah. And I also remember going to, because I was working in
00:16:41.240 the city back then, I would go along to the annual May Day protest, because I used to find that quite
00:16:46.040 interesting. And I would always try and find, because you'd have these sort of sad, lonely,
00:16:50.840 old left-wingers.
00:16:51.960 For anyone who's not aware, May Day is basically some communist holiday where they celebrate unions and
00:16:56.920 you know, communism. So it was very parochial to the Labour left.
00:17:01.640 Well, they would go into the city and they would make a lot of noise and fury and protest
00:17:07.240 against capitalism. And my boss would hang out the window and flick 50-pound notes at them to
00:17:11.400 watch them scrabble around to get the money.
00:17:14.680 Right. But anyway, I would always go out and find the sad, old, lonely, old leftist and have a word
00:17:23.560 with him. And this was in the Blair years. And universally, I mean, they turned up because they'd
00:17:28.920 been doing it the whole life, turning up to the May Day protest.
00:17:31.160 It's literally a tradition.
00:17:32.120 Absolutely. And I would say, how do you feel about Blair? How do you feel about the Labour
00:17:36.680 government? And they were just despondent.
00:17:38.280 They hate.
00:17:38.760 Yeah.
00:17:39.720 Because they knew these guys were in the ascendancy. They were clever. They had an ideology that they
00:17:45.880 could use to advance themselves through the Labour Party. And the old left types, well,
00:17:51.160 they were yesterday's men. Like the Soviet Union had collapsed.
00:17:54.520 That they were taken for granted in the same way that the Tories and perhaps not so far down the
00:18:01.240 line reform will start doing is they take their core audience for granted.
00:18:05.960 Correct. And the Lib Dems, of course, are consistent in almost every poll because about 11% of the
00:18:11.080 country are well-to-do middle-class people.
00:18:13.800 Who don't think.
00:18:15.080 And they're focused in the Southwest. So that's just, I mean, that is a devastating poll.
00:18:20.920 I mean, this is the poll and this is the numbers. But as we were alluding to just a moment ago,
00:18:25.240 there are certain tipping points with these numbers in our system that have a devastating outcome
00:18:30.520 on the seat. So I'm one of you.
00:18:32.040 I do happen to have this mapped out.
00:18:35.240 You do?
00:18:35.800 Yeah, I do. This is a seat estimate of Labour down to four seats.
00:18:43.000 Four seats. I'm just going to, so, I mean, what do you make of that?
00:18:48.520 I mean, just, I mean, I've been watching politics for a long time, but I've never seen anything like
00:18:55.880 this. Labour, four seats down 407 seats.
00:19:01.720 Just to be clear, in the history of the Labour Party, the worst result they ever got was in the
00:19:06.360 1931 election at 52 seats.
00:19:09.080 Right. So shortly after they were formed,
00:19:11.160 they got above where the Liberal Democrats usually are and then stayed there and have been consistently
00:19:18.440 either the party of government or opposition.
00:19:20.600 Yeah. I mean, in the first national election, they got two seats, but ignoring that, since 1945,
00:19:26.840 this has been like a proper modern party.
00:19:29.560 This is absolutely astonishing. I mean, you've got to hand it to the Conservatives. They made themselves
00:19:36.440 absolutely hated by their own votes. They're widely regarded as traitors. But it did take them
00:19:43.080 years to do that.
00:19:44.680 Yeah. And some serious betrayal as well.
00:19:47.880 Yeah.
00:19:48.440 Like, the Labour Party hasn't really done anything. Like, I mean, obviously, it has, but like,
00:19:54.760 with the Conservatives, you've got the Boris Waver, which is a very clear and unquestionable betrayal.
00:20:01.400 But the Labour Party have always been able to frame everything they're doing in terms of benefit for
00:20:05.320 the country. And the Conservatives just were not able to do that with the Boris wave.
00:20:08.920 Well, I think Labour have done something. They've very clearly signalled that they're
00:20:12.840 against the country. They're against the people of the country.
00:20:16.120 Yeah.
00:20:16.520 Unless they're the new Britons.
00:20:18.760 Well, yeah, absolutely. And even then, those people don't believe the Labour Party.
00:20:22.840 No.
00:20:23.160 Because you've got like Shibana Mamou going,
00:20:24.920 yeah, I'm just going to start deporting people.
00:20:26.360 It's entirely insincere.
00:20:27.640 Exactly. The Labour Party are committed to these structures.
00:20:31.640 So the Labour Party are the party of the system.
00:20:35.560 And everyone knows that they're the party of the system.
00:20:38.280 And everyone hates the system.
00:20:40.360 And so the Labour Party, I mean, losing...
00:20:41.880 I mean, I thought the Tory wipeout of the last election was bad, which it was.
00:20:45.240 But 407 seats predicted to go down. And the thing is,
00:20:48.360 Keir Starmer is acting like he doesn't care.
00:20:51.560 Yeah.
00:20:53.400 The Labour Party are acting like a party that is blind to this.
00:20:57.320 Yes. I mean, they're speed running of abandonment of...
00:21:02.520 Any constituency.
00:21:03.320 Any constituency. I mean, it is genuinely impressive. I mean, if you put you and I in charge of the Labour Party...
00:21:10.440 Oh, we can turn it around.
00:21:10.840 ...and told us to destroy it as comprehensively and quickly as possible, we wouldn't be able to get close to this.
00:21:15.880 I mean, I could turn this around, but it'd get really racist really quickly.
00:21:19.720 Well, no, no, no, I'm saying...
00:21:21.720 I'm saying if we were deliberately trying to destroy the Labour Party, we couldn't have done anything like as well as this.
00:21:28.840 Yeah. No, absolutely. And this is a long time coming as well, because you could feel in the early 2000s, I'm sure you felt it, the discontent that the working class had with the Labour Party, right?
00:21:41.400 Like, Tony Blair, he won his first election quite handily, but he barely scraped through on the second election. And he had his own line phrase, like, well, people are happy and so they don't turn out for the election.
00:21:50.440 It's like, no, that means people aren't actually that happy. And you just kind of scraped that through. You didn't increase your share.
00:21:56.360 The difference between then and now is that you didn't encounter the opposite view, because the media class, the BBC, the press...
00:22:05.200 They had it sewn up.
00:22:06.060 They were all in love with Labour. They all endorsed Labour, even the BBC.
00:22:10.040 Even the Conservative Party.
00:22:11.060 Even the Conservative Party endorsed Labour.
00:22:12.840 Yeah, exactly. And so you had this sense inside of you that something isn't right, but you couldn't find any voices. I mean, you didn't start until whatever it was, 2013, maybe, something like that.
00:22:24.180 And even then I wasn't talking about this.
00:22:25.360 Yeah, exactly. And so you just simply didn't encounter somebody articulating the opinion. So you thought that this is just...
00:22:34.480 Well, I didn't think it, but a lot of people just thought, oh, this is just a naggling doubt inside of me, but it's just me.
00:22:42.140 Yeah.
00:22:42.680 And 20 years on, complete collapse. And so, I mean, I genuinely don't see how Labour are going to come back from a result like this.
00:22:51.880 Well, you've already said, but they're not going to do that.
00:22:53.680 I don't think they are. And yeah, exactly. I don't think they can. Right. I think the people who currently constitute Labour are the, you know, the true believers in the NHS.
00:23:02.920 You know, the people who would die for the NHS, would literally fight wars for the NHS.
00:23:06.500 I mean, they literally will because it's an appalling service.
00:23:09.900 They literally will. They'll be put to death by the NHS if the end of life bill passes.
00:23:17.440 But the point is, I think this is basically the end of the Labour Party. I don't see why anyone would want to go back to it.
00:23:24.000 But what does it have that can attract its own constituency back? And there's not really anything.
00:23:28.560 Well, I mean, let's say, I mean, let's say they do double this and they get eight seats.
00:23:34.320 I mean, let's say.
00:23:35.420 Let's concede that. I mean, or even 10 times it, they get 40 seats.
00:23:39.440 Yeah, that's still a devastating defeat. But the thing is, that's probably more likely, right?
00:23:43.840 Yeah.
00:23:44.020 It's probably more likely they'll get about 80 seats.
00:23:46.020 But I mean, I mean, who is going to be interested in them? They're just a spent force. There's no energy behind them. Nobody's enthusiastic about them.
00:23:55.240 Yeah.
00:23:55.440 I mean, as we heard from the last Labour conference, one of the MPs was overheard saying, I hate going out on the doorstep.
00:24:03.220 They just scream at us, tell us to F off and slam the door in our face.
00:24:06.800 Yeah. And it's been like that since the days of Corbyn.
00:24:09.720 Well, I mean, I think it's got a lot worse since basically Southport.
00:24:14.060 Corbyn was way more popular than Starmer.
00:24:16.020 Yeah. I mean, was it Corbyn lost the election by getting more votes than Labour won with this last time?
00:24:23.860 Correct. Corbyn got more votes than Starmer.
00:24:26.000 The only difference is that he didn't, is that Theresa May didn't have reform splitting the vote.
00:24:30.720 Exactly. And Nigel Farage was basically standing down during that period of time.
00:24:35.200 One of the many times he likes to stand down in favour of the establishment.
00:24:38.720 And you know what? I can understand the argument that, look, we need to get Brexit done.
00:24:43.940 So Nigel Farage does step down and then for Boris's big win.
00:24:48.120 But of course, the Conservatives betrayed him.
00:24:50.700 In fact, let's, Conservatives at 48, that's atrocious.
00:24:54.540 Again, if you think about 380 and Boris on 50% approval when he comes into office,
00:25:00.120 the Conservatives, again, complete collapse.
00:25:03.080 Down to 48 seats. That's atrocious. What are you doing?
00:25:05.980 Like, your party is done?
00:25:08.840 And the oldest political party in the world.
00:25:11.760 And it's on its way out.
00:25:13.780 Normally famed for its survival instinct.
00:25:16.320 Yes.
00:25:16.680 But because they've adopted the Blair mindset so completely,
00:25:20.860 they can't do what is obviously the right thing to do.
00:25:24.480 I mean, for a start, in an era where immigration is the top issue,
00:25:28.940 don't have a Nigerian first-generation immigrant as your leader.
00:25:31.480 She's based, though.
00:25:34.980 Yeah, she is.
00:25:35.720 Because under the Tory selection process,
00:25:39.940 only at a minimum women, but normally women plus ethnics,
00:25:45.840 are allowed to be based in order to get through selection.
00:25:48.520 Because they only hire Lib Dems these days.
00:25:50.340 So I went to Parliament the other day to talk to a Tory grandee
00:25:56.180 about what could be done about the Conservative Party.
00:26:00.460 So he wanted some advice,
00:26:02.280 because I guess he finds me an interesting person.
00:26:04.920 Did you tell him resignation, suicide, and maybe a written apology?
00:26:08.820 I didn't. He was a really nice chap.
00:26:11.380 I'm not going to name him, obviously.
00:26:12.460 Yes.
00:26:13.320 But we were talking about the current political environment,
00:26:16.460 and I was just asking him,
00:26:18.980 okay, look, how is it that, like, from the outside,
00:26:21.880 it's difficult to perceive how power actually flows
00:26:24.620 in the Conservative government.
00:26:26.180 But this guy has been in government.
00:26:27.480 He's been the Tory whip as well.
00:26:29.860 And so if anyone should know, he should know.
00:26:31.840 And he was like, look,
00:26:32.760 basically all power is concentrated in the leader,
00:26:35.640 and it's about momentum.
00:26:37.480 If the party believes, in aggregate,
00:26:40.820 that something ought to happen,
00:26:42.120 then it tends to just happen,
00:26:43.680 regardless of any of the sort of bureaucratic processes
00:26:46.180 that are supposed to underpin it.
00:26:47.520 Unlike in the Labour Party,
00:26:48.540 where you have a very complex and rigid structure
00:26:51.600 of, you know, committees and whatnot,
00:26:53.960 you know, not crangos,
00:26:56.620 like, cabinets or chairs or whatever they call them,
00:26:59.060 you know, that the students can infiltrate and begin...
00:27:02.240 They're voting blocs.
00:27:04.040 Yeah.
00:27:04.520 Unions being a big one and...
00:27:06.300 Exactly, yeah.
00:27:07.180 Like, they've got a much more formalised structure
00:27:09.220 in the Labour Party.
00:27:10.060 So he didn't talk about the 1922 committee at all?
00:27:12.520 No.
00:27:13.040 Interesting.
00:27:13.360 He didn't.
00:27:13.840 Yeah, exactly.
00:27:14.700 I thought he would.
00:27:15.980 But he said, not really.
00:27:16.960 Most of it is about momentum, right?
00:27:19.220 So you have to have...
00:27:20.020 You have to be on the cusp of a sort of cultural wave
00:27:23.000 in order to just capture the Conservative Party,
00:27:25.840 which explains how Cameron and Blairism
00:27:28.860 took over the Tories.
00:27:30.400 Well, but I mean...
00:27:31.080 They didn't infiltrate it.
00:27:32.420 They just had cultural momentum.
00:27:33.920 And the Tories were like,
00:27:34.500 oh, okay, we'll follow what's cool.
00:27:35.820 Oh, no, look, I know lots of Tory MPs back then,
00:27:38.360 and they all worshipped Blair.
00:27:39.920 Yeah.
00:27:40.220 And they all wanted to emulate his success.
00:27:42.500 They all wanted to copy him.
00:27:43.740 And what's interesting is
00:27:45.220 the way he was describing the Conservative Party,
00:27:48.840 it's kind of like herding cats, frankly.
00:27:51.920 As in, they're all a lot more independent
00:27:54.860 than they look, right?
00:27:58.680 And so, like, it's not like you have a...
00:28:01.260 In the Labour Party,
00:28:02.300 you have lots of joined-up coalitions,
00:28:04.460 like the unions, like the feminists,
00:28:06.380 like the immigrants, like...
00:28:07.900 And they've all essentially
00:28:09.400 a little constituency to themselves.
00:28:11.480 Well, the Conservatives are a lot more
00:28:12.740 independent-minded,
00:28:14.160 and so they're a lot more sort of bourgeois
00:28:16.360 and looking around,
00:28:17.380 so what is everyone else doing, you know?
00:28:19.420 And how can I become part of the
00:28:21.420 in crowd and gain the cultural momentum
00:28:23.560 to lead the wave, right?
00:28:25.380 So it...
00:28:27.020 And this is just one chap's opinion,
00:28:28.640 but he'd been in the Conservative Party
00:28:29.660 for a long time.
00:28:30.480 I once read a thread
00:28:31.780 about how fish navigate as a shoal.
00:28:34.500 Yes, yes.
00:28:35.160 And it's quite interesting.
00:28:36.260 And basically, the rule,
00:28:37.680 it depends on the species of fish,
00:28:38.820 but it's something like they all keep
00:28:40.500 three inches to the left of...
00:28:44.740 And the same speed as the one on the left.
00:28:45.940 It's all relational to the other fish around them.
00:28:47.640 Yeah, and there's one fish at the front
00:28:49.600 that gets spooked by something,
00:28:51.420 and turns,
00:28:52.520 and then the whole bloody shoal follows.
00:28:54.520 And it's essentially what you're describing here
00:28:56.480 with the Conservative Party.
00:28:57.380 That's what he was describing.
00:28:58.760 And I just came away from that very interested,
00:29:02.060 because obviously I was there
00:29:03.240 to talk about the relationship
00:29:06.940 between the Conservative Party and Rupert Lowe,
00:29:08.640 but we'll get onto that in a little bit.
00:29:10.500 So anyway, getting back to this,
00:29:12.360 this is a more granular map.
00:29:13.900 So the estimate of Reform 352,
00:29:17.460 that would be a majority,
00:29:18.440 but a very, very slim one.
00:29:20.760 But as you can see,
00:29:22.860 London, just going green.
00:29:25.240 Like, everywhere that was Labour
00:29:27.040 is just going green.
00:29:28.680 They're just being completely eaten up Bristol,
00:29:30.400 completely.
00:29:31.500 Like, you know,
00:29:32.160 any of the sort of city heartlands
00:29:34.400 where they were previously,
00:29:35.620 Labour, these all green.
00:29:36.460 I can't see the four red seats.
00:29:38.420 I think one, two,
00:29:42.180 three.
00:29:43.720 Okay.
00:29:44.160 Well, they're very small, though.
00:29:45.900 Yeah.
00:29:46.320 I don't know where the fourth one is.
00:29:49.420 Might not be shown very well.
00:29:51.640 It'd be like,
00:29:51.940 where's Wally trying to find the...
00:29:53.480 But everywhere green on this map
00:29:54.900 was previously red.
00:29:56.240 Yeah.
00:29:57.060 And everywhere teal on this map
00:29:58.640 was previously blue.
00:30:00.480 And so, right, okay,
00:30:01.640 or in the north, sorry,
00:30:02.940 everywhere teal around here
00:30:03.900 was previously red.
00:30:04.820 So, you can see
00:30:06.760 the just complete collapse
00:30:08.380 of the centre.
00:30:10.080 And what's interesting
00:30:11.060 is this doesn't seem
00:30:12.840 to have pierced the bubble
00:30:15.280 in centrist politics.
00:30:17.820 Now, on the conservative side,
00:30:20.220 they are aware
00:30:21.100 that they're on the downswing
00:30:23.160 and there's no coming back.
00:30:25.240 Well, that's very astute to them then.
00:30:26.720 Oh, yeah.
00:30:28.840 They're basically preternaturally
00:30:30.640 they're omniscience then, aren't they?
00:30:32.800 Compared to the Labour Party,
00:30:34.140 they are.
00:30:34.820 Because Keir Starmer
00:30:35.900 thinks he's the last chance
00:30:37.020 for centrist politics.
00:30:39.500 I mean,
00:30:40.780 he probably is
00:30:41.800 the last of centuries politics.
00:30:43.940 Exactly.
00:30:44.700 He probably is.
00:30:46.360 And the thing is,
00:30:47.600 if Labour die
00:30:48.620 with the term centrism
00:30:51.040 attached to them...
00:30:51.980 Ooh.
00:30:53.300 I like this.
00:30:54.880 It kills the centre in Britain.
00:30:57.480 It kills the Blairite status quo
00:30:59.560 going back to the 1990s.
00:31:01.160 Yes, I like this.
00:31:04.040 Right.
00:31:04.440 I guess the additional problem
00:31:05.620 that Labour have
00:31:06.340 that perhaps Tories
00:31:07.580 dodged to an extent
00:31:08.780 is that there is
00:31:10.380 an understanding
00:31:11.160 that the mechanisms
00:31:13.040 of state
00:31:13.660 at every level
00:31:14.560 of Blairite.
00:31:15.440 Yes.
00:31:15.700 I mean,
00:31:15.920 that was the great genius
00:31:17.300 of Blair.
00:31:17.680 He came in on day one
00:31:18.720 and he took
00:31:19.880 every bit of power
00:31:21.700 that he could strip out
00:31:22.500 of Parliament
00:31:22.920 and handed it
00:31:23.460 to a quango
00:31:23.980 and then made
00:31:25.080 those quangos
00:31:25.800 self-selecting
00:31:28.820 to make sure
00:31:29.520 that only Blairites
00:31:30.420 ever held power
00:31:31.340 forever.
00:31:32.280 So at least the Tories
00:31:33.080 could say,
00:31:33.800 oh, you know,
00:31:34.360 we've got this problem
00:31:35.160 with the judges
00:31:35.800 and we've got the problem
00:31:36.540 with this
00:31:37.100 and we've got the problem
00:31:37.740 with, you know,
00:31:38.340 this committee
00:31:38.840 and the human rights lawyers
00:31:39.900 and stuff.
00:31:40.860 Labour cannot disown
00:31:42.120 any of it.
00:31:43.540 They are completely
00:31:46.620 of the system.
00:31:48.660 Exactly.
00:31:49.240 And if we just go back
00:31:50.000 to the big map second,
00:31:52.640 now,
00:31:52.960 what does that system
00:31:53.960 look like
00:31:54.420 ruling this country?
00:31:56.260 This is a far-right country.
00:31:59.040 That's what the map
00:31:59.940 is telling us.
00:32:00.800 That is a far-right country
00:32:02.180 in almost every corner
00:32:03.360 of it.
00:32:03.940 In the southwest,
00:32:04.820 apart from the Lib Dem areas,
00:32:05.900 in the southeast,
00:32:06.920 in East Anglia,
00:32:08.820 in Wales,
00:32:10.020 in the Midlands,
00:32:10.860 in the north.
00:32:12.300 England is a far-right country
00:32:14.240 and we are going
00:32:15.640 to be saddled
00:32:16.380 with a legacy
00:32:17.820 Blairite system
00:32:19.260 that hates
00:32:20.360 the people.
00:32:21.900 And the people,
00:32:22.600 like I've said before,
00:32:23.360 are just in revolt
00:32:24.140 against the system
00:32:24.760 whether they realise it
00:32:25.560 or not.
00:32:26.640 But this is a fascinating article.
00:32:28.940 I'm just going to read
00:32:29.280 a couple of quotes from it.
00:32:30.480 Asked whether he saw himself
00:32:31.520 as the last chance
00:32:32.160 for the centre,
00:32:32.720 Sakhir said yes.
00:32:33.940 I think this is the real test
00:32:35.180 of centrist politics.
00:32:36.600 I don't mean Labour
00:32:37.300 versus Tories.
00:32:38.120 Of course not,
00:32:38.740 because the Tories
00:32:39.320 are also part of the centre.
00:32:41.040 Yeah.
00:32:41.520 Because to some extent,
00:32:42.480 that's what we've had.
00:32:43.280 It's a different proposition
00:32:44.220 and we have to show
00:32:45.360 that politics can deliver.
00:32:46.500 We also have to expose
00:32:48.200 the right for what it is
00:32:49.300 because the propositions
00:32:50.160 of reform
00:32:50.720 would tear our country apart.
00:32:52.620 It's fascinating
00:32:53.420 that we got to this point
00:32:54.560 because for the last
00:32:56.460 whatever it was,
00:32:57.320 since the post-war era,
00:32:58.940 there has been this
00:33:00.040 pantomime put on
00:33:02.500 that frames Labour
00:33:04.560 over here
00:33:05.160 and Conservatives
00:33:05.940 over here
00:33:06.520 and they've always maintained
00:33:08.160 that there are opposite
00:33:08.960 ends of the spectrum.
00:33:10.240 Yeah.
00:33:10.480 And I've always maintained
00:33:11.620 and people looked at me
00:33:12.560 like I was absolutely mental
00:33:14.160 in my sort of teens
00:33:15.220 and twenties
00:33:15.740 when I was saying this,
00:33:16.880 but they're the same thing
00:33:18.200 and the spectrum
00:33:19.020 is actually much,
00:33:20.120 much wider.
00:33:21.460 At this point,
00:33:22.280 he's not even bothering
00:33:23.300 to protest otherwise.
00:33:24.320 He's just saying,
00:33:24.840 yeah, the Tories are us.
00:33:25.620 If it helps,
00:33:26.580 he says exactly this, right?
00:33:28.300 So not only does he say,
00:33:29.580 I'm not talking about the Tories
00:33:30.500 because obviously
00:33:30.980 they're our twin brother
00:33:33.040 that we're very familiar with.
00:33:34.520 He says,
00:33:35.040 in Britain,
00:33:35.660 the centre-right
00:33:36.260 has sort of fallen away
00:33:37.640 as in the Conservatives
00:33:39.500 have crumbled
00:33:40.160 and now he's looking
00:33:42.000 at the looming specter
00:33:42.800 of Nigel Farage
00:33:43.420 who, just to be clear,
00:33:44.700 is not some radical right-winger.
00:33:46.660 But to the Blairite system,
00:33:48.760 he appears to be
00:33:49.500 a radical right-winger
00:33:50.220 because he's not
00:33:51.220 for infinite managerialism,
00:33:53.380 which is what his,
00:33:54.200 really,
00:33:54.740 the underlying opposition
00:33:55.820 to the EU was initially.
00:33:57.680 I mean,
00:33:57.960 Farage,
00:33:58.480 for all his faults,
00:33:59.160 has got the instincts
00:34:00.580 of an Englishman
00:34:01.400 and so he's just like,
00:34:03.260 well,
00:34:03.360 I don't like this.
00:34:04.260 And it's like,
00:34:04.540 no, you don't, Nigel.
00:34:05.560 Neither do we.
00:34:06.420 Neither do the rest of us.
00:34:07.380 Let's do something about it.
00:34:08.880 And so they're seeing,
00:34:10.420 essentially,
00:34:10.980 Mr. Brexit
00:34:11.520 coming to tear down
00:34:13.380 the EU-fication
00:34:14.820 of Britain.
00:34:15.740 But I mean,
00:34:16.020 also his point about
00:34:16.960 the centre-right
00:34:18.480 has fallen away
00:34:19.620 to reform.
00:34:21.420 But of course,
00:34:21.860 as you've already demonstrated...
00:34:22.680 Well, no,
00:34:22.940 he's not even saying
00:34:23.580 to reform
00:34:24.040 because he sees
00:34:25.320 reform as a right.
00:34:25.980 He is the centre-right.
00:34:28.380 Ah, right.
00:34:29.520 Okay, I missed that.
00:34:30.560 Well, no, no.
00:34:31.040 I don't even think
00:34:31.860 he realised this.
00:34:32.820 But think of the way
00:34:33.540 the Labour Party's operating.
00:34:34.700 Shabana Mahmood
00:34:35.340 becoming, you know,
00:34:36.520 a fascist
00:34:38.100 about the borders
00:34:38.780 and stuff like this,
00:34:39.560 according to the Green Party.
00:34:41.080 Like,
00:34:41.400 the Labour Party
00:34:42.760 has just adopted
00:34:43.900 everything in the centre now.
00:34:46.120 Right?
00:34:46.360 The central,
00:34:47.020 the centrist consensus
00:34:48.040 is represented
00:34:49.500 in Keir Starmer
00:34:50.260 and he's like,
00:34:51.260 yeah,
00:34:51.420 this is the real test
00:34:52.320 of centrist politics.
00:34:53.520 I embody it.
00:34:55.440 We have to show
00:34:56.280 that we can win.
00:34:57.560 That is the challenge,
00:34:58.680 he says.
00:34:59.080 It's like,
00:34:59.340 okay,
00:34:59.520 well,
00:34:59.700 you're at 14% now.
00:35:02.000 I'm not sure
00:35:02.840 you're the man
00:35:03.460 for the challenge
00:35:04.340 and like I said
00:35:06.560 a minute ago,
00:35:07.300 I would love to see
00:35:08.440 the Labour ship
00:35:09.300 go down
00:35:09.840 with this centrist
00:35:10.600 politics attached to it.
00:35:12.120 Yeah.
00:35:12.580 That would be incredible.
00:35:13.820 I mean,
00:35:14.100 his great challenge
00:35:15.320 is getting to 2029.
00:35:17.600 Yes.
00:35:17.860 Because there's no
00:35:18.260 constitutional method
00:35:19.260 to get Labour Party out.
00:35:21.140 The only one
00:35:21.820 that I can see
00:35:22.460 is if the bond market
00:35:23.520 revolts to the point
00:35:24.480 where they have to do cuts,
00:35:26.460 the Labour backbenchers
00:35:27.860 can vote down a budget
00:35:29.000 and, you know,
00:35:30.500 effectively,
00:35:30.980 that triggers
00:35:31.680 a general election
00:35:33.060 with a few steps
00:35:33.720 in between.
00:35:36.080 Yeah.
00:35:36.960 But so far,
00:35:37.920 Rachel Reeves
00:35:38.340 hasn't really had
00:35:39.020 that much opposition
00:35:39.740 internally to her budgets,
00:35:41.380 even though they're
00:35:42.180 ruining the reputation
00:35:42.980 of the party.
00:35:44.340 Yeah,
00:35:44.800 I mean,
00:35:45.120 because they're designed
00:35:45.860 to appeal to
00:35:46.760 the minimal extent
00:35:48.400 they need to appeal
00:35:49.340 to the bond market,
00:35:50.400 but then it's 80%
00:35:51.680 appealing to Labour backbenchers.
00:35:52.540 Like your triangle,
00:35:53.280 you've got the backbenchers,
00:35:54.180 the bond market,
00:35:54.760 and the public.
00:35:55.460 Which ones is she satisfying?
00:35:56.660 The backbenchers
00:35:57.280 and the bond market.
00:35:58.620 But mainly the backbenchers.
00:36:00.000 Sure.
00:36:00.300 Yeah.
00:36:00.800 Okay.
00:36:01.960 Again,
00:36:02.660 going back to your 14,
00:36:04.500 sorry,
00:36:05.260 14% of the polls
00:36:06.020 on four seats,
00:36:07.780 you know,
00:36:08.500 you can say
00:36:09.360 the public don't matter
00:36:10.520 for a certain period
00:36:11.920 of time
00:36:12.360 until it matters
00:36:13.660 all at once.
00:36:14.480 And you have to wonder
00:36:16.080 at some point
00:36:16.800 is this going to register
00:36:18.680 with Labour MPs?
00:36:19.560 Because presumably
00:36:20.240 none of these people
00:36:21.120 have useful skills.
00:36:22.080 I mean,
00:36:22.220 none that I've been able
00:36:22.880 to determine.
00:36:24.120 Is Rachel Reeves
00:36:25.000 really wanting to,
00:36:26.640 I mean,
00:36:27.040 not just Rachel Reeves,
00:36:28.140 but all of it.
00:36:28.600 So she was a complaints manager
00:36:31.480 at HSBC Bank
00:36:33.520 before she was doing this
00:36:34.640 and she wasn't very good at it
00:36:36.000 and she would have been fired
00:36:36.980 if it wasn't one of the higher-ups
00:36:38.320 thinking that she might be
00:36:39.300 a big wig in Labour one day.
00:36:39.980 She didn't keep failing upwards.
00:36:41.240 Yeah.
00:36:42.540 And she's one of the best
00:36:45.620 that Labour have.
00:36:46.740 Are these people
00:36:47.360 really going to want to give up
00:36:48.680 90 grand a year salaries
00:36:50.280 to go back to being cashiers
00:36:53.080 or teachers
00:36:54.040 or whatever the hell
00:36:54.740 they were before
00:36:55.600 to get their
00:36:57.240 three to four years
00:36:59.100 of basically
00:37:01.060 socialist red meat?
00:37:03.720 Or are they going to want to pivot
00:37:05.060 at some point?
00:37:05.820 Because they seem remarkably
00:37:07.380 obstinate.
00:37:08.860 I think it's purely ideology.
00:37:11.500 I think it's Blairite's
00:37:12.620 managerial ideology
00:37:13.840 where they are committed
00:37:15.060 to the system
00:37:16.380 and I think they truly believe
00:37:18.820 in the rules-based order.
00:37:20.820 Yeah, but what about self-interest?
00:37:22.560 I mean, that's got to kick in
00:37:23.460 at some point.
00:37:24.020 I genuinely think
00:37:24.880 they're not flexible enough
00:37:26.100 in their own thinking.
00:37:27.180 And so you are right.
00:37:28.380 I think we're looking
00:37:28.980 at a zombie parliament, right?
00:37:30.260 This is a dead man walking.
00:37:32.060 This is a condemned parliament
00:37:33.100 where 400 Labour MPs
00:37:35.600 and another 73 Conservatives
00:37:37.780 are just...
00:37:38.900 I mean, nearly 500 MPs
00:37:40.680 are going to get slaughtered
00:37:42.540 in the next election.
00:37:44.520 I don't think that's ever happened.
00:37:46.860 We ran the last election
00:37:48.760 on the campaign
00:37:49.420 of zero seats
00:37:50.180 for the Tories
00:37:51.800 and what we really meant
00:37:52.920 by zero seats
00:37:54.320 was not literally zero seats
00:37:55.460 because you can't get that
00:37:56.180 in our system.
00:37:56.800 It was basically below 50.
00:37:58.300 Yeah.
00:37:58.940 It's fascinating.
00:37:59.800 And we're going to get it.
00:38:00.380 We're now going to get it
00:38:01.040 double barrel.
00:38:02.020 We're going to get zero seats
00:38:03.120 for the Conservatives
00:38:03.720 and for Labour.
00:38:04.660 I know.
00:38:05.640 It's so good.
00:38:06.400 It's so good.
00:38:07.480 It's so good.
00:38:10.440 I try not to smile about it
00:38:12.460 but it's so good.
00:38:14.200 If only reform was a bit more worthy
00:38:15.820 we could get really excited
00:38:17.100 but still there's enough
00:38:18.040 to be happy about.
00:38:18.920 Yeah.
00:38:19.720 I'm just glad that reform
00:38:21.340 are not Blairites, right?
00:38:23.620 You can say whatever you like
00:38:24.600 about them
00:38:25.020 and they are, you know,
00:38:26.100 soft on a bunch of issues
00:38:27.220 but at least Nigel Farage
00:38:29.600 can never be accused
00:38:30.500 of being a Eurocrat.
00:38:32.040 No.
00:38:32.320 Whereas Keir Starmer
00:38:33.480 and the Tories
00:38:33.980 absolutely can be accused
00:38:35.260 of that.
00:38:36.100 So for all his faults
00:38:37.380 he's not that
00:38:38.300 and he's always been
00:38:39.240 an outrider on that issue
00:38:40.420 the sort of parochial
00:38:41.740 Englishness, frankly
00:38:42.860 of the dislike
00:38:44.380 of the continental system
00:38:45.500 and so fine
00:38:46.740 I'm fine
00:38:47.580 I'm okay
00:38:48.180 with Nigel Farage
00:38:48.940 being our representative here
00:38:50.260 not a huge fan
00:38:51.280 but I'm okay with it
00:38:52.320 and the results
00:38:53.820 if we get anything
00:38:55.660 even half of this
00:38:57.060 right
00:38:57.300 even if
00:38:57.640 even if only 35
00:38:59.100 Conservative MPs go
00:39:00.900 and 200 Labour MPs go
00:39:02.680 that would be a superb
00:39:04.300 superb result
00:39:05.920 that will probably put
00:39:07.300 a reformed government
00:39:07.960 in place
00:39:08.420 so anyway
00:39:09.280 moving on
00:39:10.840 as you pointed out
00:39:13.740 the Labour Party
00:39:14.660 this is from the Times
00:39:15.580 but it's just summarised
00:39:16.540 from Patrick McGuire here
00:39:17.660 as you pointed out
00:39:19.140 the Labour Party
00:39:21.440 are dead men walking
00:39:22.720 and almost
00:39:24.120 in the entire
00:39:24.860 in fact it is
00:39:25.680 the entire Labour front bench
00:39:26.840 basically
00:39:27.300 that's starting to lose
00:39:28.460 their seats
00:39:28.920 so all of
00:39:30.000 and that's an unusual
00:39:31.280 thing to happen
00:39:32.140 right
00:39:32.540 even if you don't
00:39:33.580 get elected
00:39:34.000 to the next government
00:39:34.860 very rarely
00:39:35.800 does the front bench
00:39:36.740 just lose all of their seats
00:39:38.000 yeah
00:39:38.480 just very rarely
00:39:40.140 I mean there's only
00:39:40.660 four remaining
00:39:41.280 so I mean
00:39:41.920 which ones stay
00:39:43.200 I mean
00:39:43.740 yeah exactly
00:39:44.880 it'd be
00:39:46.040 does Keir Starmer
00:39:47.840 keep his seat
00:39:48.320 is he one of the four
00:39:49.060 no
00:39:49.500 no okay
00:39:50.360 no the entire Labour
00:39:51.380 front bench
00:39:51.760 loses their seats
00:39:52.180 the entire Labour
00:39:52.640 front bench go
00:39:53.280 yes
00:39:54.200 it's 407
00:39:55.540 oh I'm gonna enjoy
00:39:56.860 this when it happens
00:39:57.820 I know right
00:39:58.620 it's gonna be so good
00:40:00.060 and so the Labour Party
00:40:01.300 is currently struggling
00:40:02.080 so okay
00:40:02.440 what are we gonna do
00:40:03.900 actually
00:40:04.280 because the front
00:40:05.240 that they put up
00:40:05.980 is like no
00:40:06.640 we're in control
00:40:07.300 the system works
00:40:08.300 the system is everything
00:40:09.280 the system is infallible
00:40:10.640 the rules are being followed
00:40:11.980 the rules
00:40:12.620 exactly
00:40:13.120 the rules are being followed
00:40:14.340 right
00:40:14.660 but everyone can see
00:40:16.000 they're literally
00:40:16.480 following them off a cliff
00:40:17.680 and so
00:40:19.040 they're all
00:40:20.440 again
00:40:20.980 it's very Soviet
00:40:22.500 right
00:40:22.860 it's like
00:40:23.260 oh Stalin's
00:40:24.420 like not come out of his office
00:40:25.640 for three days
00:40:26.180 are you gonna go in and check
00:40:27.060 hell no
00:40:27.660 I'm not gonna go in and check
00:40:28.740 it's like
00:40:29.360 well someone's gonna have to
00:40:30.300 aren't they
00:40:30.620 yeah but I might be
00:40:31.440 the guy who gets shot
00:40:32.200 it's like
00:40:32.880 okay
00:40:33.380 that's great
00:40:34.280 but we're gonna end up
00:40:35.600 going off the cliff
00:40:36.480 if someone doesn't check
00:40:37.680 if the driver's dead yet
00:40:38.780 you know
00:40:39.360 and so
00:40:40.820 this
00:40:41.600 is
00:40:42.620 one of those things
00:40:43.720 where it's like
00:40:44.060 right okay
00:40:44.540 do we have
00:40:46.260 anyone else
00:40:47.640 and as you can see
00:40:48.900 according to the
00:40:49.700 Labour membership
00:40:50.740 well the best they seem to have
00:40:52.860 is Ed Miliband
00:40:54.120 followed by Wes Streeting
00:40:56.240 and then Lucy Powell
00:40:57.440 Shabana Mahmood
00:40:58.320 and Rachel Reeves
00:40:59.240 um
00:41:00.420 the Wallace and Gormit puppet
00:41:02.780 himself
00:41:03.220 just genuinely
00:41:04.140 if
00:41:05.720 and he's
00:41:06.940 he's coming a bit
00:41:07.900 bellicose like that
00:41:08.740 I've actually met him
00:41:09.460 in real life once
00:41:10.220 oh he's incredibly soft
00:41:11.180 oh yeah
00:41:11.780 unbelievably
00:41:13.540 beta male
00:41:14.460 in fact
00:41:14.760 is there a category
00:41:15.560 below beta male
00:41:16.480 do you not remember
00:41:17.580 the
00:41:17.860 was he with Andrew
00:41:18.780 Neil or something
00:41:19.320 are you tough enough
00:41:20.180 to fight Putin
00:41:20.860 he's like hell yeah
00:41:21.900 I'm tough enough
00:41:22.660 and it's like
00:41:23.180 so when I met him
00:41:25.340 it was
00:41:26.160 I was
00:41:26.660 I was leaving the London club
00:41:28.180 that he was trying to get into
00:41:29.460 but it was a bit exclusive
00:41:30.760 and he was obviously
00:41:31.800 having some difficulty
00:41:32.640 and he was with two women
00:41:34.500 and the women were arguing
00:41:36.060 trying to argue their way in
00:41:37.560 and he was just sort of
00:41:38.400 stood to the side
00:41:39.640 looking as meek
00:41:40.780 and pathetic as possible
00:41:41.920 so I thought
00:41:42.620 oh this would be fun
00:41:43.460 so I marched over
00:41:44.700 and shake his hand
00:41:45.720 obviously he's got
00:41:46.640 the limpest
00:41:47.420 handshake
00:41:48.300 of all time
00:41:49.400 and I congratulated him
00:41:50.660 on making me so much money
00:41:51.660 with his green subsidies
00:41:52.560 and
00:41:54.940 and
00:41:55.240 and
00:41:56.220 you have never been
00:41:57.900 in the presence
00:41:58.600 of a more emasculated
00:42:00.360 beta male
00:42:01.100 in your life
00:42:01.940 I mean he
00:42:02.440 he's
00:42:02.840 he's just the
00:42:03.560 I mean
00:42:04.180 most women
00:42:06.080 genuinely have more
00:42:07.080 testosterone than he does
00:42:08.080 I mean I've seen
00:42:08.660 Keir Starmer
00:42:09.080 punching a punch bag
00:42:09.960 so
00:42:10.220 I know the kind of
00:42:11.320 person who
00:42:11.640 I think it's below
00:42:12.760 even that
00:42:13.260 it's worse that
00:42:13.580 I think it's worse
00:42:14.460 well the
00:42:15.380 the point is
00:42:16.100 Ed Miliband
00:42:16.740 he's not anyone's
00:42:18.600 first choice
00:42:19.140 right
00:42:20.060 well he's
00:42:21.240 no
00:42:21.620 you say that
00:42:22.640 no he's
00:42:23.360 he is people's
00:42:24.360 first
00:42:24.500 he's
00:42:24.800 he's Labour
00:42:25.260 backbenchers
00:42:25.880 first choice
00:42:26.400 because
00:42:27.300 well he wasn't
00:42:28.400 Starmer was
00:42:29.020 it's just
00:42:29.680 Starmer has
00:42:30.140 mishandled it
00:42:30.780 so poorly
00:42:31.380 no I
00:42:31.960 I think
00:42:32.920 I think
00:42:33.420 I think he was
00:42:34.120 really
00:42:34.420 but Labour
00:42:35.020 backbenchers
00:42:35.640 genuinely love
00:42:36.220 this guy
00:42:36.520 the unions
00:42:37.620 love this guy
00:42:38.720 I was going to
00:42:39.200 get to that
00:42:39.520 he is a
00:42:40.260 popular man
00:42:40.980 right
00:42:41.440 yes
00:42:41.740 so they
00:42:42.400 I'm sure
00:42:43.280 he's very
00:42:43.860 you know
00:42:44.360 lovable
00:42:44.760 and likeable
00:42:45.740 and nice
00:42:46.400 you know
00:42:47.040 you'd like
00:42:47.320 you know
00:42:47.800 going for a
00:42:48.460 dinner with him
00:42:48.960 I'm sure
00:42:49.340 he's
00:42:49.580 you know
00:42:50.080 very nice
00:42:50.580 company
00:42:51.040 you know
00:42:51.460 he's scoffing
00:42:51.980 his bacon
00:42:52.340 sandwich
00:42:52.700 I'm sure
00:42:53.180 he's
00:42:53.380 I'm sure
00:42:53.980 he's a lovely
00:42:54.480 chap
00:42:54.880 he's actually
00:42:56.660 supposed to be
00:42:57.060 Jewish by the way
00:42:57.780 which is what
00:42:58.660 made that bacon
00:42:59.320 sandwich
00:42:59.840 farce
00:43:00.680 and people say
00:43:01.380 integration
00:43:01.820 doesn't happen
00:43:02.500 like honestly
00:43:03.560 I'm not saying
00:43:04.620 they're right on that
00:43:05.300 anyway
00:43:05.620 the point being
00:43:06.920 he I'm sure
00:43:07.580 he's a lovely
00:43:07.920 guy
00:43:08.200 but he's
00:43:08.980 he's also
00:43:09.600 too familiar
00:43:12.080 as in
00:43:13.420 he's just a part
00:43:14.340 of the system
00:43:14.780 everyone knows
00:43:15.380 he's a part
00:43:15.680 of the system
00:43:16.100 he came up
00:43:16.600 during the
00:43:16.960 Blair years
00:43:17.400 this is where
00:43:18.680 he made his
00:43:19.080 bones
00:43:19.380 and he's
00:43:20.880 like over
00:43:22.200 time
00:43:22.720 there's an
00:43:24.660 ecological phenomenon
00:43:25.520 where you get
00:43:27.660 you know
00:43:28.480 a hundred million
00:43:29.100 years ago
00:43:29.500 a volcano erupts
00:43:30.640 and then over
00:43:32.240 the center of
00:43:33.060 millennia
00:43:33.940 the sort of
00:43:34.940 the weak rock
00:43:36.540 around sloughs
00:43:37.520 away so you get
00:43:38.120 this pillar of
00:43:39.100 basalt
00:43:39.640 right and you get
00:43:40.840 these a lot in
00:43:41.360 South America
00:43:42.000 right and they
00:43:42.600 look weird
00:43:43.140 because it's
00:43:43.420 just this shelf
00:43:44.360 of rock
00:43:44.720 that comes out
00:43:45.260 so where did
00:43:45.740 that come from
00:43:46.320 well that's
00:43:47.120 kind of what's
00:43:47.660 left in the
00:43:48.080 Labour Party
00:43:48.560 now right
00:43:49.220 you've got
00:43:50.060 anyone with
00:43:50.780 any competence
00:43:51.380 has fallen
00:43:52.260 away from
00:43:53.140 the Labour
00:43:53.440 Party
00:43:53.780 and so this
00:43:54.700 is the best
00:43:55.260 that they have
00:43:55.640 this is their
00:43:56.140 front bench
00:43:56.660 Ed Miliband
00:43:57.820 Wes Streeting
00:43:58.640 Lucy Powell
00:43:59.300 Shibana Mahmood
00:44:00.140 and Rachel
00:44:00.540 Reeves
00:44:00.940 if you were
00:44:02.180 playing like a
00:44:03.440 strategy game
00:44:04.160 and you had to
00:44:04.720 choose one of
00:44:05.180 these as a
00:44:05.680 general
00:44:06.080 it would be
00:44:06.780 Shibana
00:44:07.140 yeah it would
00:44:09.600 but you'd be
00:44:10.140 like okay this
00:44:10.640 is not a good
00:44:11.140 selection
00:44:11.600 no
00:44:12.420 like this is
00:44:13.060 not ideal
00:44:13.920 Shibana is the
00:44:15.040 only one who's
00:44:15.660 vaguely competent
00:44:16.500 in that entire
00:44:17.240 list
00:44:17.620 correct
00:44:18.100 but again
00:44:18.780 the Labour
00:44:19.740 Party aren't so
00:44:20.440 stupid as to
00:44:21.000 make the Tories
00:44:21.480 mistake as
00:44:22.020 putting an
00:44:22.900 immigrant in
00:44:23.860 as head of
00:44:24.360 their party
00:44:24.820 correct
00:44:25.600 so it looks
00:44:28.280 like it's down
00:44:28.660 to Ed Miliband
00:44:29.380 and Wes
00:44:29.640 Streeting
00:44:30.020 obviously
00:44:30.620 neither one
00:44:31.940 are particularly
00:44:32.460 brilliant
00:44:32.780 although
00:44:33.100 apparently
00:44:33.720 according to
00:44:34.100 The Guardian
00:44:34.620 Angela Rayner
00:44:36.160 is making
00:44:36.760 moves behind
00:44:37.420 the scenes
00:44:38.520 well she's the
00:44:39.700 only one with
00:44:40.060 any personality
00:44:40.840 yeah Big Ange
00:44:42.300 she does have
00:44:44.380 some personality
00:44:44.860 I mean actually
00:44:45.380 of the ones we
00:44:46.080 talked about
00:44:46.700 if I was a
00:44:47.560 Labour backbencher
00:44:48.520 Ange is the
00:44:50.020 one that I'd
00:44:50.440 want to follow
00:44:50.820 into the next
00:44:51.740 election
00:44:52.140 she could actually
00:44:54.440 hold her own
00:44:55.140 in debates
00:44:55.880 and stuff
00:44:56.380 I mean she
00:44:56.720 wouldn't know
00:44:57.100 anything
00:44:57.440 but she's got
00:44:58.720 that sort of
00:44:59.440 sort of bubbly
00:45:00.480 working class
00:45:01.580 it's not that
00:45:02.640 she's not likeable
00:45:03.420 I'll concede
00:45:04.400 that
00:45:04.800 however do you
00:45:06.660 see her as being
00:45:07.680 Prime Minister of the
00:45:08.600 country
00:45:09.000 what happens
00:45:10.120 if Vladimir Putin
00:45:11.060 declares war
00:45:11.420 that would be a
00:45:11.960 farce
00:45:12.240 but if I was a
00:45:13.140 Labour backbencher
00:45:13.860 I'd be gunning
00:45:15.020 for official
00:45:15.480 opposition
00:45:15.900 and I would
00:45:17.560 conclude that
00:45:18.520 Ange is the
00:45:19.500 only one who
00:45:19.840 can get me
00:45:20.200 there
00:45:20.420 because people
00:45:21.120 would say
00:45:21.460 well she's
00:45:22.120 not going to
00:45:22.420 be Prime
00:45:22.820 Minister
00:45:23.140 but you know
00:45:24.520 she's a
00:45:25.120 funny gobbly
00:45:25.700 northerner
00:45:26.180 woman
00:45:26.440 maybe we can
00:45:27.180 win the
00:45:27.420 working class
00:45:27.920 back with
00:45:28.260 yeah
00:45:28.480 apparently
00:45:30.060 she's been
00:45:30.580 on manoeuvres
00:45:31.080 behind the
00:45:31.500 scenes
00:45:31.860 good luck
00:45:33.220 to her
00:45:33.500 yeah
00:45:33.780 Wes
00:45:34.100 Streeting
00:45:34.540 has defied
00:45:35.020 expectations
00:45:35.640 and he's
00:45:37.360 kind of set
00:45:37.840 himself up
00:45:38.520 in an
00:45:39.240 unofficial
00:45:39.720 leadership
00:45:40.180 bid
00:45:40.560 because part
00:45:41.480 of the
00:45:41.820 part of
00:45:42.340 this
00:45:42.580 Stalin-esque
00:45:43.840 sort of
00:45:45.280 cabinet of
00:45:46.820 Labour
00:45:47.420 members
00:45:47.880 Labour
00:45:48.540 ministers
00:45:49.680 is
00:45:50.560 they all
00:45:51.900 can see
00:45:52.280 the writing
00:45:52.660 on the
00:45:52.900 wall
00:45:53.140 but they
00:45:54.000 know that
00:45:54.320 if they
00:45:54.560 start breaking
00:45:55.060 ranks
00:45:55.420 then the
00:45:55.660 entire
00:45:55.880 government
00:45:56.140 falls apart
00:45:56.640 and the
00:45:56.820 pressure
00:45:57.040 goes on
00:45:57.500 to call
00:45:57.780 a general
00:45:58.080 election
00:45:58.360 and also
00:45:58.900 he's a
00:45:59.240 white male
00:45:59.720 which
00:46:00.160 Labour
00:46:00.680 only
00:46:02.860 have
00:46:03.060 white males
00:46:03.860 that is
00:46:04.600 true
00:46:04.980 but he
00:46:05.320 is a
00:46:05.620 eunuch
00:46:05.980 no I'm
00:46:06.580 joking
00:46:06.800 I don't
00:46:07.100 know if
00:46:07.280 he's an
00:46:07.480 actual
00:46:07.700 eunuch
00:46:08.000 he just
00:46:09.120 looks like
00:46:09.500 one
00:46:09.660 just plays
00:46:10.460 one on
00:46:10.740 TV
00:46:10.960 so the
00:46:13.540 point is
00:46:14.880 the Labour
00:46:15.200 Party are
00:46:15.600 currently in
00:46:15.980 some sort
00:46:16.360 of devil's
00:46:17.860 pact
00:46:18.200 where they
00:46:19.720 know that
00:46:20.200 there's a
00:46:20.440 problem
00:46:20.720 they know
00:46:21.460 that they
00:46:21.760 should be
00:46:22.340 having some
00:46:23.260 kind of
00:46:23.520 internal
00:46:23.780 leadership
00:46:24.140 election
00:46:24.520 but they
00:46:25.120 also know
00:46:25.580 that all
00:46:26.080 the sharks
00:46:26.560 are surrounding
00:46:27.820 them
00:46:28.140 and if they
00:46:28.760 start drawing
00:46:29.240 blood on
00:46:29.620 one another
00:46:30.040 then their
00:46:31.080 party gets
00:46:32.140 torn apart
00:46:32.620 is it
00:46:34.120 the May
00:46:34.600 the big
00:46:35.220 lot of
00:46:35.520 local
00:46:35.780 elections
00:46:36.180 it is
00:46:36.540 yeah
00:46:36.700 there's
00:46:37.420 I mean
00:46:37.720 as you've
00:46:38.980 already shown
00:46:39.520 earlier on
00:46:40.100 there's
00:46:40.320 enough
00:46:40.780 by elections
00:46:41.460 and council
00:46:42.680 elections
00:46:43.240 that they
00:46:44.560 should be
00:46:44.980 doing it
00:46:45.380 now if they
00:46:45.800 had any
00:46:46.160 sense
00:46:46.520 yes
00:46:46.940 but there's
00:46:47.700 no way
00:46:48.280 they get
00:46:48.640 past May
00:46:49.220 with
00:46:49.780 Nokia
00:46:50.200 Starmer
00:46:50.640 in post
00:46:51.080 and then
00:46:51.460 and then
00:46:51.820 this blood
00:46:52.220 is going
00:46:52.540 to have
00:46:52.740 to be
00:46:52.960 in the
00:46:53.160 water
00:46:53.440 but then
00:46:53.980 the entire
00:46:54.560 like the
00:46:55.640 way that
00:46:56.620 the Westminster
00:46:57.040 structure works
00:46:57.680 as you said
00:46:58.080 there's no
00:46:58.440 formal mechanism
00:46:59.380 for removing
00:47:00.220 a government
00:47:00.640 but there is
00:47:01.480 a pressure
00:47:02.100 mechanism
00:47:02.900 that the
00:47:04.160 Conservatives
00:47:04.900 are particularly
00:47:05.400 weak to
00:47:05.880 which is why
00:47:06.320 they've had
00:47:06.620 so many
00:47:07.000 prime ministers
00:47:07.500 in so many
00:47:08.000 years
00:47:08.320 where the
00:47:09.380 party itself
00:47:10.100 will trigger
00:47:10.660 the leadership
00:47:11.640 election
00:47:12.020 or a general
00:47:12.600 election
00:47:13.020 repeatedly
00:47:13.940 to try and
00:47:14.980 gain a
00:47:15.500 foothold
00:47:16.320 that they can
00:47:16.940 say no I'm
00:47:17.440 legitimate on
00:47:18.060 and like you
00:47:19.200 say if
00:47:19.660 it genuinely
00:47:21.400 could well be
00:47:23.200 that although
00:47:24.020 there's no
00:47:24.360 formal mechanism
00:47:25.100 the public
00:47:26.360 pressure just
00:47:27.020 gets too
00:47:27.420 much
00:47:27.740 but even
00:47:28.780 even the
00:47:29.380 people in
00:47:29.720 the Labour
00:47:29.940 Party like
00:47:30.420 here we've
00:47:31.280 just lost
00:47:31.760 however many
00:47:32.280 hundreds of
00:47:32.780 seats at
00:47:33.060 these local
00:47:33.460 elections in
00:47:33.980 May we're
00:47:35.240 on you know
00:47:36.120 could go down
00:47:36.580 to like 10%
00:47:37.320 in the polls
00:47:37.900 like you just
00:47:39.220 have to go
00:47:39.880 right this is
00:47:40.640 all of our
00:47:41.260 lives it's the
00:47:41.920 entire Labour
00:47:42.560 Party you're
00:47:43.200 putting in
00:47:43.580 peril and so
00:47:44.840 a leadership
00:47:45.200 election or a
00:47:46.060 general election
00:47:46.520 may be
00:47:46.920 triggered so
00:47:47.800 it could well
00:47:49.000 be that we're
00:47:50.240 looking at
00:47:50.760 Rainer
00:47:51.160 Miliband
00:47:52.760 Streeting and
00:47:54.640 of course
00:47:54.880 Shabana Mahmood
00:47:55.600 who her
00:47:56.800 allies think
00:47:57.380 she's much
00:47:58.020 more close to
00:47:58.560 the centre of
00:47:59.060 political gravity
00:47:59.700 in the UK
00:48:00.180 which is true
00:48:00.980 well she's the
00:48:01.580 only one who's
00:48:01.960 vaguely competent
00:48:02.580 but she's
00:48:03.340 an immigrant
00:48:03.760 and prepared to
00:48:04.280 do right wing
00:48:04.740 things
00:48:05.000 yeah so Labour
00:48:06.240 aren't going to
00:48:06.800 select her
00:48:07.940 and I would
00:48:09.560 like to think
00:48:10.340 because it would
00:48:11.380 just be so
00:48:11.840 funny
00:48:12.280 but it's probably
00:48:14.160 going to be
00:48:14.460 Ed Miliband
00:48:14.860 I don't put
00:48:16.140 much stock
00:48:16.960 on West
00:48:17.620 Streeting
00:48:18.040 I kind of
00:48:18.720 hope it's
00:48:19.080 Ed Miliband
00:48:19.580 because he's
00:48:20.220 kind of like
00:48:20.580 the Liberal
00:48:20.940 Democrat
00:48:21.320 in the party
00:48:22.880 which serves
00:48:23.580 no one
00:48:24.220 right the Liberal
00:48:24.720 Democrats already
00:48:25.400 have the Ed
00:48:25.940 Davey
00:48:26.300 they love
00:48:26.820 their Ed
00:48:27.180 Davey
00:48:27.880 and you
00:48:28.160 notice that
00:48:28.620 Miliband's
00:48:29.860 campaigning is
00:48:30.560 very similar
00:48:31.040 to Ed
00:48:31.380 Davey's
00:48:31.840 it's quite
00:48:32.620 frivolous
00:48:33.260 it's quite
00:48:33.640 jolly
00:48:34.080 it's quite
00:48:34.540 I'm fun at
00:48:35.620 parties
00:48:36.040 kind of
00:48:36.360 guy
00:48:36.660 right
00:48:37.260 so he
00:48:37.760 doesn't
00:48:37.980 Ed Miliband
00:48:38.500 doesn't have
00:48:39.200 a big garden
00:48:39.840 so he's
00:48:40.180 not a Lib Dem
00:48:40.780 but he does
00:48:41.240 have two
00:48:41.640 kitchens
00:48:42.120 he does
00:48:42.940 because he
00:48:43.240 lives in
00:48:43.500 a London
00:48:43.840 townhouse
00:48:44.440 yes
00:48:44.880 an 8 million
00:48:47.320 pound London
00:48:48.040 townhouse
00:48:48.560 with two
00:48:49.220 kitchens
00:48:49.640 again
00:48:49.940 small garden
00:48:50.700 but it's
00:48:51.000 very tall
00:48:51.540 anyway
00:48:52.400 I would like
00:48:54.060 it to be
00:48:54.320 Ed Miliband
00:48:54.680 just to finally
00:48:55.380 seal off the
00:48:56.000 Labour Party
00:48:56.480 because
00:48:56.960 Ed Miliband
00:48:59.460 will never
00:49:00.040 bring back
00:49:00.580 their old
00:49:00.940 coalitions
00:49:01.480 Angela Rayner
00:49:02.720 might win back
00:49:03.340 some working
00:49:03.680 class
00:49:04.100 you know
00:49:04.980 Shibana Mahmood
00:49:06.620 might bring back
00:49:07.280 some immigrants
00:49:07.860 but Ed Miliband
00:49:11.320 is bringing back
00:49:12.080 nobody
00:49:12.700 well and
00:49:13.640 he's already
00:49:14.380 had a run
00:49:14.800 at leader
00:49:15.140 yes
00:49:15.660 and he
00:49:16.100 failed
00:49:16.620 yes
00:49:17.240 so you know
00:49:18.060 good for them
00:49:18.900 anyway
00:49:19.380 so just on the
00:49:20.320 other side
00:49:20.860 quickly
00:49:21.460 Nigel Farage
00:49:22.480 is of course
00:49:22.940 deeply mired
00:49:24.540 in some scandal
00:49:25.420 that he was a
00:49:26.040 racist teenager
00:49:26.820 it has affected
00:49:28.600 his polling
00:49:29.000 in no way
00:49:29.620 whatsoever
00:49:30.140 it has not
00:49:31.880 in any way
00:49:32.760 bothered his
00:49:33.980 core supporters
00:49:34.820 it bothered him
00:49:35.840 more than it
00:49:36.260 bothered his
00:49:36.660 supporters
00:49:37.000 absolutely
00:49:37.920 he was the
00:49:39.180 one who took
00:49:39.540 more offence
00:49:40.040 at this
00:49:40.340 than anyone
00:49:40.860 else
00:49:41.140 there's such
00:49:41.540 a ham
00:49:42.100 fisted
00:49:42.800 series of
00:49:43.580 weird
00:49:44.120 denials
00:49:44.700 yeah
00:49:45.400 I mean
00:49:45.880 if you're
00:49:46.740 going to
00:49:47.120 advise
00:49:47.520 conservative
00:49:48.460 MPs
00:49:48.940 maybe
00:49:49.240 Nigel Farage
00:49:50.000 and Nick
00:49:50.440 Fuentes
00:49:50.760 over to
00:49:51.460 give them
00:49:52.020 coaching
00:49:52.440 on what
00:49:52.720 you say
00:49:52.980 when somebody
00:49:53.500 accuses
00:49:53.900 you of
00:49:54.120 racism
00:49:54.480 exactly
00:49:55.320 just
00:49:55.700 literally
00:49:56.140 stop
00:49:56.460 taking it
00:49:56.920 seriously
00:49:57.280 Nigel
00:49:57.700 but the
00:49:58.200 point being
00:49:59.180 this
00:49:59.580 has been
00:50:00.480 and I'm
00:50:00.840 just using
00:50:01.220 this article
00:50:03.060 as an
00:50:03.340 example
00:50:03.680 but as
00:50:04.620 you'll be
00:50:04.900 aware
00:50:05.180 there's been
00:50:05.900 a massive
00:50:07.100 massive
00:50:08.080 attempt
00:50:08.380 something like
00:50:09.040 30 people
00:50:09.920 have accused
00:50:10.840 him of
00:50:11.160 racism
00:50:11.560 when he was
00:50:11.980 a teenager
00:50:12.420 at Dolbrich
00:50:12.880 College
00:50:13.300 this has been
00:50:14.880 enormous
00:50:15.420 and it
00:50:16.220 feels genuinely
00:50:17.640 like the
00:50:18.220 last
00:50:18.760 Sally
00:50:19.660 from the
00:50:20.240 old guard
00:50:20.860 it's like
00:50:21.380 we're all
00:50:21.780 going to get
00:50:22.060 together
00:50:22.340 lads
00:50:22.680 50 years
00:50:23.640 ago
00:50:23.980 Nigel Farage
00:50:25.320 was racist
00:50:26.620 to me
00:50:27.140 and it's
00:50:27.700 like
00:50:27.860 yeah
00:50:28.680 okay
00:50:29.320 so what
00:50:30.960 who cares
00:50:32.440 and really
00:50:33.480 you're in
00:50:33.960 your 60s
00:50:34.540 and you're
00:50:34.740 crying about
00:50:35.260 Nigel Farage
00:50:35.780 being mean
00:50:36.240 to you at
00:50:36.500 school
00:50:36.740 it reminds
00:50:38.100 me of that
00:50:38.620 thing where
00:50:39.300 when Trump
00:50:40.760 or a Supreme
00:50:41.560 Court justice
00:50:42.120 was getting
00:50:42.580 put up for
00:50:42.960 nomination
00:50:43.400 and all of a
00:50:44.060 sudden
00:50:44.280 all these
00:50:46.420 80 year old
00:50:46.960 rapists
00:50:47.440 rape victims
00:50:48.380 would come
00:50:48.720 out of the
00:50:49.060 cupboard
00:50:49.600 yeah
00:50:49.760 Brett Kavanaugh
00:50:50.740 yeah
00:50:50.980 40 years ago
00:50:52.340 he raped me
00:50:52.860 in a college
00:50:53.240 dorm
00:50:53.480 and he happens
00:50:54.360 to have
00:50:54.800 his exact
00:50:55.920 schedule
00:50:57.060 it's like
00:50:57.540 what kind
00:50:57.960 of autist
00:50:58.680 are you
00:50:59.300 I was there
00:51:01.500 on that day
00:51:02.060 and if you
00:51:03.940 ever see a
00:51:04.860 14 year old
00:51:05.560 keeping a
00:51:06.000 meticulous diary
00:51:06.840 just think
00:51:07.320 yeah
00:51:07.560 possible Supreme
00:51:08.460 Court justice
00:51:08.980 right there
00:51:09.520 right
00:51:09.880 exactly
00:51:10.460 so anyway
00:51:11.620 none of this
00:51:12.640 has had any
00:51:13.060 effect on
00:51:13.740 people's
00:51:14.300 support of
00:51:14.600 reform
00:51:14.840 and it's
00:51:17.140 really vain
00:51:17.720 to think
00:51:18.140 that it
00:51:18.400 would
00:51:18.700 right
00:51:19.240 because the
00:51:20.200 average
00:51:20.440 reform voter
00:51:21.180 is probably
00:51:22.500 really voting
00:51:23.280 against immigration
00:51:24.100 they're voting
00:51:25.300 against foreigners
00:51:26.100 that's what
00:51:27.260 they're doing
00:51:27.760 well I
00:51:28.600 I think
00:51:29.160 that the
00:51:29.460 electorate
00:51:29.820 have been
00:51:30.080 doing that
00:51:30.540 for 20
00:51:30.960 years
00:51:31.400 yeah
00:51:31.640 but this
00:51:32.060 is a more
00:51:33.160 consolidated
00:51:33.860 yeah
00:51:34.460 like no no
00:51:35.080 we're the
00:51:35.700 English now
00:51:36.180 and we're
00:51:36.420 picking reform
00:51:37.060 they don't say
00:51:37.660 it in their
00:51:37.900 own heads
00:51:38.540 but this is
00:51:39.080 the feeling
00:51:39.680 that leads
00:51:40.460 them to it
00:51:40.880 and so
00:51:41.380 calling them
00:51:41.800 racist
00:51:42.160 calling Nigel
00:51:43.120 Farage racist
00:51:43.660 is just
00:51:44.100 calling his
00:51:44.460 voters racist
00:51:45.100 and they've
00:51:45.500 been called
00:51:45.780 racist
00:51:46.080 their whole
00:51:46.400 lives
00:51:46.720 and I
00:51:47.660 think
00:51:47.760 well and
00:51:48.100 also they
00:51:48.520 might think
00:51:49.040 well maybe
00:51:49.420 we need
00:51:49.720 a bit of
00:51:50.000 that these
00:51:50.320 days
00:51:50.580 because we
00:51:51.180 we've
00:51:51.580 had the
00:51:52.200 liberal
00:51:53.920 boomer
00:51:55.240 post-war
00:51:56.160 philosophy
00:51:56.660 and it
00:51:57.220 is ruining
00:51:57.940 us
00:51:58.340 so they're
00:51:59.340 basically
00:51:59.780 endorsing
00:52:00.500 him
00:52:00.720 yeah
00:52:01.140 so will
00:52:01.660 they defer
00:52:02.060 to voters
00:52:02.700 well they
00:52:03.100 haven't so
00:52:03.700 far
00:52:04.080 and I've
00:52:05.240 got no
00:52:05.680 reason to
00:52:06.120 think they
00:52:06.460 will
00:52:06.660 just a quick
00:52:07.860 thing on
00:52:08.260 the your
00:52:08.980 party
00:52:09.420 it pulled
00:52:10.560 at 1%
00:52:11.120 the other
00:52:11.460 day
00:52:12.160 Zara Sultana
00:52:13.180 has sufficiently
00:52:13.840 torpedoed it
00:52:14.740 the independent
00:52:16.060 Gaza MPs
00:52:16.840 were making
00:52:17.120 up a
00:52:17.460 leaving
00:52:18.160 because the
00:52:19.340 left are
00:52:19.640 finding out
00:52:20.000 in real
00:52:20.380 time that
00:52:21.000 actually
00:52:21.460 Muslims
00:52:22.140 are really
00:52:22.720 socially
00:52:23.100 conservative
00:52:23.620 yeah
00:52:24.820 well for
00:52:25.960 themselves
00:52:26.400 for themselves
00:52:27.240 but that's
00:52:27.720 one of their
00:52:28.140 strengths
00:52:28.560 you know
00:52:28.960 it's like
00:52:29.500 you know
00:52:29.800 I'm not a
00:52:30.460 big fan
00:52:30.760 of Islam
00:52:31.200 but I can
00:52:31.960 respect that
00:52:32.620 and the
00:52:33.620 left are
00:52:33.960 finding out
00:52:34.240 what you're
00:52:34.580 not for
00:52:34.840 trans rights
00:52:35.740 and Iqbal
00:52:36.940 Mohammed
00:52:37.160 is like
00:52:37.440 no
00:52:38.060 why did
00:52:40.360 you think
00:52:40.760 I was
00:52:41.460 imagine
00:52:43.020 operating in
00:52:43.900 a world
00:52:44.200 philosophy
00:52:44.800 where you
00:52:45.400 assumed
00:52:46.080 Muslims
00:52:46.680 would be
00:52:47.120 for trans
00:52:47.820 rights
00:52:48.280 and that's
00:52:49.060 why the
00:52:49.480 Green Party
00:52:49.980 will eventually
00:52:50.520 have this
00:52:51.140 problem of
00:52:51.640 their own
00:52:52.020 right
00:52:52.400 yes
00:52:52.860 eventually
00:52:53.460 the Green
00:52:54.520 Party
00:52:54.800 is currently
00:52:55.180 eating up
00:52:55.560 the student
00:52:55.980 politics
00:52:56.400 vote
00:52:56.600 and the
00:52:56.820 immigrant
00:52:57.040 vote
00:52:57.340 and the
00:52:58.240 Green Party
00:52:58.700 will come
00:52:59.100 to this
00:52:59.520 same
00:52:59.900 juncture
00:53:00.540 at some
00:53:00.960 point
00:53:01.300 Zach Polanski
00:53:02.300 has been
00:53:02.640 very firm
00:53:03.080 no we're
00:53:03.400 a pro
00:53:03.720 trans
00:53:04.040 rights
00:53:04.260 party
00:53:04.780 well
00:53:05.720 what happens
00:53:06.480 when Moffat
00:53:06.980 Ali stood
00:53:07.500 behind him
00:53:08.020 is frowning
00:53:08.800 at him
00:53:09.180 and what
00:53:09.580 happens
00:53:09.860 when you're
00:53:10.140 three quarters
00:53:10.720 Muslim
00:53:11.120 does the
00:53:12.500 rest of your
00:53:12.860 party agree
00:53:13.440 is it a
00:53:14.120 democratic
00:53:14.560 party
00:53:15.060 do you get
00:53:15.560 voted out
00:53:16.080 by an
00:53:17.060 anti-trans
00:53:17.700 person
00:53:19.000 and then the
00:53:19.420 Green Party
00:53:19.780 just becomes
00:53:20.380 literally the
00:53:20.940 Islamic
00:53:21.300 party
00:53:21.660 I think
00:53:22.860 Islamists
00:53:23.400 in the
00:53:23.840 Green Party
00:53:24.340 can tolerate
00:53:24.880 it because
00:53:25.260 they know
00:53:25.580 it's not
00:53:25.900 their kids
00:53:26.420 getting trans
00:53:27.080 and quite
00:53:27.520 frankly they
00:53:27.980 couldn't give
00:53:28.420 a who
00:53:28.740 if the
00:53:29.220 white kids
00:53:29.620 get trans
00:53:30.140 and they
00:53:30.420 know who
00:53:31.060 is the
00:53:31.660 increasing
00:53:32.080 constituency
00:53:32.620 in the
00:53:33.000 party
00:53:33.240 and who
00:53:33.460 isn't
00:53:33.960 right yes
00:53:35.180 no we're
00:53:35.860 going to
00:53:36.420 continue to
00:53:37.020 grow until
00:53:38.160 we're three
00:53:38.620 quarters of
00:53:39.120 the party
00:53:39.500 and then who
00:53:39.940 cares what
00:53:40.320 you say
00:53:40.800 because we've
00:53:41.700 got the
00:53:42.040 demographic
00:53:42.480 power here
00:53:43.500 and then
00:53:44.540 finally I
00:53:45.140 thought we'd
00:53:45.420 come to
00:53:46.040 Rupert Lowe
00:53:46.900 because he
00:53:48.260 recently launched
00:53:49.020 his Great
00:53:49.520 Yarmouth
00:53:49.880 First Party
00:53:50.620 how did that
00:53:51.020 happen
00:53:51.700 how did that
00:53:52.760 happen
00:53:53.140 how did that
00:53:53.920 do
00:53:54.160 oh well it's
00:53:55.040 currently at
00:53:55.420 44% in
00:53:56.500 Great Yarmouth
00:53:57.040 up 44%
00:53:58.520 I mean that is
00:53:59.080 the strongest
00:53:59.500 result we've
00:54:00.060 seen so far
00:54:00.840 of any party
00:54:01.720 it's kind of
00:54:03.160 remarkable if you
00:54:03.840 offer people a
00:54:04.620 genuinely right
00:54:06.020 wing party
00:54:06.520 rather than a
00:54:07.100 sort of milk
00:54:07.600 toast right
00:54:09.320 wing party
00:54:09.820 which reform is
00:54:10.840 44% flock to
00:54:14.400 it on day one
00:54:15.280 yes we're going to
00:54:16.080 put the native
00:54:16.820 constituents of this
00:54:17.920 constituency first
00:54:18.980 then half of
00:54:19.600 them are like
00:54:19.980 oh finally
00:54:20.960 thank god
00:54:21.700 yes
00:54:22.000 bang 44%
00:54:24.380 and this
00:54:24.880 literally is out
00:54:26.020 of the gate
00:54:26.600 out of the gate
00:54:28.440 launches it and
00:54:30.200 on day one he's
00:54:31.000 already polling
00:54:31.640 nearly half the
00:54:32.380 electorate in
00:54:33.340 Great Yarmouth
00:54:33.940 I mean in our
00:54:35.620 system
00:54:36.120 that's amazing
00:54:37.120 if that was
00:54:37.620 replicated at the
00:54:38.460 national level
00:54:39.180 I mean it would
00:54:40.040 I mean you'd be
00:54:41.500 past super
00:54:42.480 majority level
00:54:43.320 oh god yeah
00:54:44.040 yeah you'd be on
00:54:45.640 450 seats
00:54:46.540 it'd be incredible
00:54:47.020 so anyways you
00:54:48.700 can see he's
00:54:49.280 just chewed up
00:54:50.140 the Labour
00:54:50.860 reform and
00:54:51.540 Conservative
00:54:51.940 vote so
00:54:52.320 reform on
00:54:54.240 which Rupert
00:54:55.120 Lowe got
00:54:55.500 elected in
00:54:57.320 Great Yarmouth
00:54:57.980 is not
00:54:59.320 unassailable
00:54:59.940 no it is not
00:55:02.640 insurmountable
00:55:03.360 it's interesting
00:55:05.280 they still held
00:55:05.860 up 16% they
00:55:06.940 left basically
00:55:07.440 half their
00:55:08.060 vote and he
00:55:09.180 got so did
00:55:10.200 everyone else
00:55:10.800 yeah but he
00:55:12.100 basically got
00:55:12.860 yeah half of
00:55:13.460 everybody yeah
00:55:14.320 apart from the
00:55:14.920 Lib Dems
00:55:15.880 but I mean
00:55:16.660 they're in
00:55:17.160 their own
00:55:17.740 bubble I mean
00:55:18.240 like I say
00:55:18.740 they've got
00:55:19.000 no neuroplasticity
00:55:20.560 I mean good
00:55:21.060 to know that
00:55:21.460 5% of
00:55:22.220 Great Yarmouth
00:55:22.780 are people
00:55:23.240 with large
00:55:23.600 gardens
00:55:24.000 yes
00:55:24.700 that's just
00:55:26.360 what that
00:55:26.700 represents
00:55:27.200 but fascinating
00:55:27.640 Labour reform
00:55:28.500 and Conservatives
00:55:29.500 all halved
00:55:30.600 in favour
00:55:31.300 of Rupert Lowe
00:55:32.400 yeah
00:55:32.780 that is a
00:55:34.100 broad appeal
00:55:35.200 that is a
00:55:36.060 broad appeal
00:55:36.520 right and
00:55:37.520 that shows
00:55:38.180 that that's
00:55:38.620 genuinely
00:55:39.180 outside of
00:55:40.220 the consensus
00:55:40.800 no no no
00:55:42.180 we're just
00:55:42.740 going to put
00:55:43.060 us first
00:55:43.820 don't care
00:55:44.740 about yeah
00:55:45.380 don't care
00:55:46.240 about your
00:55:46.460 coalitions
00:55:46.940 don't care
00:55:47.360 about your
00:55:47.660 ideology
00:55:48.120 it's going
00:55:50.260 to be
00:55:50.440 Great Yarmouth
00:55:51.060 first and
00:55:51.880 half people
00:55:52.480 are saying
00:55:52.700 what a novel
00:55:53.500 political formula
00:55:54.620 we're going to
00:55:55.360 put the people
00:55:57.020 of Britain
00:55:57.500 first
00:55:58.200 instant electoral
00:56:00.440 success
00:56:01.100 and not only
00:56:02.020 that because
00:56:02.660 Rupert Lowe is
00:56:03.620 their MP who's
00:56:04.320 doing this
00:56:05.020 yeah he's
00:56:05.600 already got the
00:56:06.140 bully pulpit
00:56:06.880 but he also
00:56:07.480 has a very
00:56:08.680 good track record
00:56:09.600 of being a
00:56:10.460 man of his
00:56:10.840 word
00:56:11.260 Rupert Lowe is
00:56:12.340 by far the
00:56:12.980 most radical
00:56:13.480 right-wing
00:56:14.040 nativist MP
00:56:14.960 in the entire
00:56:15.700 country
00:56:16.220 who is the
00:56:16.600 only radical
00:56:17.620 nativist
00:56:18.120 by a long
00:56:18.680 long way
00:56:19.320 right by a
00:56:20.060 long way
00:56:20.620 and so it's
00:56:22.280 not like the
00:56:22.720 people of
00:56:23.040 Great Yarmouth
00:56:23.380 like well I'm
00:56:23.880 not sure
00:56:24.400 oh no you
00:56:24.920 can be
00:56:25.200 absolutely sure
00:56:25.920 yeah
00:56:26.260 that Rupert
00:56:26.820 Lowe is
00:56:27.660 going to be
00:56:28.060 the right-wing
00:56:28.980 outrider on
00:56:29.560 all this and
00:56:30.120 almost half of
00:56:31.020 them are like
00:56:31.280 yeah I love
00:56:31.760 it you know
00:56:32.820 that's what I
00:56:33.580 want I want
00:56:34.000 Great Yarmouth
00:56:34.720 put first
00:56:35.500 it feels like
00:56:36.040 there's some
00:56:36.280 sort of lesson
00:56:36.800 in this
00:56:37.300 it genuinely
00:56:38.520 does doesn't
00:56:39.180 it because I
00:56:39.720 mean like Rupert
00:56:40.160 Lowe every month
00:56:42.980 like that is
00:56:43.620 just such a
00:56:44.460 good example
00:56:45.200 of how an
00:56:46.300 MP could really
00:56:46.980 show no no
00:56:48.000 I'm for this
00:56:48.620 constituency I'm
00:56:49.420 for us here
00:56:50.440 and that's
00:56:51.920 going to be
00:56:52.260 it and so if
00:56:53.100 I launch the
00:56:53.520 Great Yarmouth
00:56:53.900 first party
00:56:54.560 absolute just
00:56:57.240 smashing the
00:56:58.640 opponents
00:56:59.080 I mean there
00:56:59.440 is a good
00:56:59.740 argument we
00:57:00.260 should go back
00:57:00.640 to how
00:57:00.880 parliament used
00:57:01.400 to be which
00:57:01.840 was zero
00:57:02.240 salary
00:57:02.680 yeah and
00:57:03.740 the argument
00:57:04.400 against that
00:57:04.960 in the 90s
00:57:05.620 was you don't
00:57:06.080 want to go
00:57:06.320 back to that
00:57:06.760 because it
00:57:07.080 would mean
00:57:07.500 only landed
00:57:08.260 aristocracy
00:57:08.900 yeah and
00:57:09.760 unions would
00:57:10.620 ever put up
00:57:11.080 candidates
00:57:11.520 and now I'm
00:57:12.640 thinking yeah
00:57:13.600 that is a
00:57:13.940 good reason
00:57:14.400 that is
00:57:15.340 exactly what
00:57:15.840 we should
00:57:16.100 have
00:57:16.300 people who
00:57:16.820 have a
00:57:17.120 direct
00:57:17.380 investment
00:57:17.860 in where
00:57:18.240 they live
00:57:18.700 yes
00:57:19.120 are the
00:57:20.160 ones who
00:57:20.460 actually
00:57:20.740 but I
00:57:21.180 mean and
00:57:21.620 it doesn't
00:57:21.960 necessarily
00:57:22.400 limit it to
00:57:23.540 that it
00:57:23.800 could be
00:57:24.020 anybody who
00:57:24.620 could say
00:57:25.080 who can do
00:57:25.880 a fundraiser
00:57:26.780 and say
00:57:27.100 look I'm
00:57:27.400 going to
00:57:27.560 launch a
00:57:27.920 patreon to
00:57:28.500 become an
00:57:28.860 MP if
00:57:29.940 enough people
00:57:30.340 follow me I'll
00:57:30.900 stand as an
00:57:31.400 MP and you can
00:57:32.400 pay my salary
00:57:33.000 and crowd
00:57:33.920 sourcing it
00:57:34.520 now isn't
00:57:35.340 that a much
00:57:35.780 better thing
00:57:36.480 than having
00:57:37.400 them paid by
00:57:38.160 central government
00:57:38.900 and terrified
00:57:40.400 of losing their
00:57:41.060 job
00:57:41.320 exactly
00:57:41.980 because now
00:57:42.440 you can't
00:57:42.960 just drop
00:57:43.580 in MPs
00:57:45.100 into random
00:57:45.620 constituencies
00:57:46.420 because that
00:57:47.440 constituency always
00:57:48.340 votes red or
00:57:48.880 blue
00:57:49.080 suddenly you
00:57:50.140 actually have
00:57:50.640 to have some
00:57:51.120 sort of tie to
00:57:51.920 the place
00:57:52.360 and some kind
00:57:53.220 of independence
00:57:53.820 so you can
00:57:54.260 actually serve
00:57:54.880 those people
00:57:55.380 rather than be
00:57:55.980 a creature of
00:57:56.840 the system
00:57:57.280 and people love
00:57:58.960 it as well
00:57:59.340 they were
00:58:00.420 interviewing people
00:58:01.220 the BBC was
00:58:02.140 interviewing people
00:58:02.740 about this
00:58:03.580 and I'm just
00:58:03.940 going to get
00:58:04.220 to about
00:58:05.140 here
00:58:05.760 because they
00:58:07.100 were interviewing
00:58:07.420 them and they're
00:58:07.740 like yeah
00:58:08.000 Great Yarmouth
00:58:08.520 needs help
00:58:09.060 it needs to be
00:58:09.660 thought of
00:58:11.320 oh we can't
00:58:13.540 hear it
00:58:13.860 for some reason
00:58:14.380 but this lady
00:58:15.600 here had already
00:58:16.840 joined the Great
00:58:17.540 Yarmouth First
00:58:18.180 Party
00:58:18.600 and she was
00:58:20.060 like yeah no I
00:58:20.540 think that's a
00:58:20.840 brilliant idea
00:58:21.320 I love it
00:58:21.920 I think it's a
00:58:22.340 great idea
00:58:22.640 and I think
00:58:23.060 this actually
00:58:23.840 is indicative
00:58:25.280 of where the
00:58:26.140 future of British
00:58:26.900 politics might go
00:58:27.960 so the independent
00:58:29.560 Gaza MPs were
00:58:30.600 basically already
00:58:31.540 doing this
00:58:32.460 and that's what
00:58:33.940 you know what
00:58:34.460 your party is
00:58:35.180 supposed to have
00:58:35.720 been is an
00:58:36.100 alliance between
00:58:36.940 the independent
00:58:37.500 MPs
00:58:38.240 but okay
00:58:39.260 Great Yarmouth
00:58:40.640 first
00:58:41.080 clearly a
00:58:41.960 winner from
00:58:43.980 the gate
00:58:44.340 well what about
00:58:45.500 any other
00:58:46.300 constituency first
00:58:47.300 what about
00:58:48.540 you know
00:58:49.140 Swindon first
00:58:50.940 what about
00:58:51.620 Bristol first
00:58:52.660 what about
00:58:53.160 Leeds first
00:58:54.680 it almost
00:58:55.260 sounds like
00:58:56.280 you're describing
00:58:56.800 what parliament
00:58:57.460 was set up to
00:58:58.060 do in the
00:58:58.400 first place
00:58:59.080 yes
00:58:59.740 and the
00:59:01.980 events of the
00:59:02.880 20th century
00:59:03.740 assumed a
00:59:05.280 level of
00:59:06.040 stability and
00:59:07.060 homogeneity
00:59:08.360 that wasn't
00:59:10.220 present prior to
00:59:11.840 the like
00:59:12.540 20th century
00:59:14.280 and isn't
00:59:15.040 present now
00:59:15.680 I mean I
00:59:16.200 hardly dare
00:59:17.340 dream
00:59:17.960 but if in
00:59:20.300 20 years
00:59:21.400 the standard
00:59:22.100 is independent
00:59:23.640 MPs who
00:59:24.680 represent their
00:59:25.440 area first
00:59:26.440 good god
00:59:28.240 that would be
00:59:28.600 remarkable
00:59:29.140 wouldn't it
00:59:29.740 and then you
00:59:30.720 could get very
00:59:31.420 flexible
00:59:32.000 coalitions
00:59:32.720 if literally
00:59:33.880 every
00:59:34.300 constituency
00:59:36.000 or every
00:59:37.020 region
00:59:37.540 was like
00:59:38.340 you know
00:59:38.720 local party
00:59:39.460 first
00:59:39.940 okay we're
00:59:40.700 here to look
00:59:41.020 out for the
00:59:41.340 interests of
00:59:41.660 the region
00:59:42.040 and so we
00:59:42.740 negotiate with
00:59:43.540 other you know
00:59:44.120 if Swindon first
00:59:45.240 end up negotiating
00:59:46.100 with Great Yarmouth
00:59:46.800 first great
00:59:47.360 I don't doubt we
00:59:48.220 could find a
00:59:48.680 coalition there
00:59:49.280 you know we
00:59:49.900 might not get a
00:59:50.540 coalition with
00:59:51.080 Luton first
00:59:52.080 but then they'll
00:59:53.320 be part of the
00:59:53.760 Green Party
00:59:54.420 you know what I
00:59:54.860 mean like you
00:59:55.360 know the
00:59:55.780 Islamic Gaza
00:59:56.760 MPs from
00:59:57.300 Luton
00:59:57.720 yeah okay we
00:59:58.660 might be in
00:59:59.020 opposition to
00:59:59.580 them but that's
01:00:00.580 fine because there
01:00:01.200 are going to be
01:00:01.480 way more of the
01:00:02.220 English parties
01:00:03.780 first than there
01:00:05.000 will be the
01:00:05.340 Gaza parties
01:00:06.020 first and so
01:00:07.200 we will be able
01:00:07.760 to actually
01:00:08.300 control our
01:00:09.640 country as we
01:00:10.180 want so anyway
01:00:11.460 all I'm saying
01:00:12.200 is this might
01:00:12.680 represent a
01:00:13.500 proper realignment
01:00:14.920 in British politics
01:00:16.580 the death of the
01:00:17.320 old style of
01:00:18.240 party and the
01:00:19.740 emergence of
01:00:20.240 something new
01:00:20.840 that's very early
01:00:22.080 days yet but
01:00:23.020 again like you
01:00:24.060 said don't dare
01:00:24.880 to hope right
01:00:25.980 but actually
01:00:27.280 things in
01:00:28.640 Britain in
01:00:29.340 particularly in
01:00:30.020 England move
01:00:30.360 glacially
01:00:31.080 slowly but
01:00:33.300 already the
01:00:34.200 shoots of
01:00:34.680 spring are
01:00:35.220 starting to
01:00:35.740 emerge
01:00:36.280 if you would
01:00:38.260 like to watch
01:00:38.880 the full uncut
01:00:39.800 version that is
01:00:40.560 also uncensored
01:00:41.380 head on over to
01:00:42.480 lotuseaters.com to
01:00:43.580 find out more
01:00:44.240 Mixed
01:00:45.940 2
01:00:46.520 2
01:00:47.340 2
01:00:47.920 1
01:00:47.960 2
01:00:48.260 3
01:00:49.020 2
01:00:49.480 2
01:00:50.100 3
01:00:52.100 3
01:00:52.440 3
01:00:53.040 4
01:00:53.080 4
01:00:53.380 5
01:00:53.780 5
01:00:54.160 6
01:00:54.340 6
01:00:55.100 5
01:00:55.260 6
01:00:55.500 7
01:00:56.320 7