The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #1132
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 29 minutes
Words per Minute
173.49344
Summary
The Lotus Eaters are joined by Stelios and Stephen to discuss two-tier justice in England and Wales and the French government's attempt to create a two-tiered justice system. They also discuss the recent sentencing of Marie Le Pen and the impact this has on the country's democracy.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Hello and welcome to the podcast of the Lotus Eaters for the 31st of March 2025. I am joined
00:00:05.280
by Stelios and joined once again by our guest Stephen Wolfe. Hey, hi everyone. You've made your
00:00:12.200
return. I have, fantastic. You're also presenting your own segment today. I am, that's very kind of
00:00:17.340
you, thank you. You're more than welcome. And today we are talking about, well Stelios is going
00:00:23.660
to be talking about Britain's 2 to Justice smokescreen. Yep. And then Stephen's going to
00:00:28.420
be talking about how, I'm putting words in your mouth here a little bit, but how democracy has
00:00:34.060
basically ended in France to a certain extent. Yeah, I think to an extent that people are going
00:00:38.640
to look at today's sentencing of Marie Le Pen and say exactly that. I'm very worried about it actually.
00:00:46.300
And I'm going to be talking about how South Africa is pushing back not only the ANC government but also
00:00:51.960
the Afrikaner minority as well. And there's a very interesting dynamic going on there. But I believe
00:00:57.520
Stelios has an announcement here. Yes, it's about Tim, a friend and also friend of the show. He, I want to
00:01:05.160
do this shout out, his wife Amy is battling cancer. And I want to wish you good luck and speedy recovery.
00:01:13.420
And I want to wish you all the best. So yeah, very, very much so. And all the best.
00:01:26.460
Thompson's doing his magic. This is the joy of editing things into segments. This will never be
00:01:34.660
Right. So basically, I think we are looking upon an admission that two-tier justice exists
00:01:39.320
from the government. And it's very safe to say because they've been all bit explicit
00:01:44.960
about it, haven't they? They have been explicit about it. But also, they always said that people
00:01:50.260
who use these words are far-right extremists. So this... The government's now a far-right extremist.
00:01:55.580
It has... Say, Mam Shabima Mahoum is that far-right. But now she's an extremist far-right rather
00:02:01.380
than just being an extremist in some people's minds.
00:02:03.240
Right. So basically, the Sentencing Council for England and Wales has issued some guidelines
00:02:09.120
with respect to sentencing that take ethnicity into account to an extent that was presumably
00:02:15.080
that's much greater than the extent it was taken before.
00:02:18.300
It's also worth mentioning that it was already quite bad.
00:02:21.960
Like, you could just eyeball sentences reading the news, being, you know, a casual reader of
00:02:28.460
a newspaper, and you could see the differences in sentencing pretty explicitly.
00:02:33.240
You know, the reason everyone noticed this two-tier thing was largely through what they'd
00:02:39.660
seen through headlines. And now the fact that the sentencing council is just explicitly admitting
00:02:45.220
Yes. And I may infuriate you because I don't think that they have particular credibility,
00:02:49.720
but the Labour government says that these guidelines are unacceptable because they support
00:02:58.360
This is a Labour government saying it doesn't support a two-tier system when almost across
00:03:04.700
every aspect of policy and government, it is creating a two-tier system.
00:03:12.920
This is certainly some red meat to poach from the right, isn't it?
00:03:17.440
Yes. And also, Keir Starmer has started talking about illegal migration and him being particularly
00:03:23.280
unhappy with it. He's not talking about irregular migration, he's talking about illegal.
00:03:28.220
I think he's had a meeting with Tony Blair because he's been saying, I hear your concerns
00:03:32.460
and I'm taking them seriously, which is like a signature Tony line.
00:03:35.940
Right. So for me, this shows that there is a significant trend within the world of jurisprudence
00:03:42.080
of judging according to these principles. And right now, they felt that this is the opportune
00:03:48.780
moment to come and provide additional institutional backing and support for these principles when
00:03:54.680
they're saying that with these guidelines, we want you, judges, to adjudicate according
00:03:59.540
to these principles. And essentially, this is going to say, it's going to mention the oppression
00:04:06.720
calculus and they're going to give some reports to the judges, especially when it comes to
00:04:12.960
people of ethnic background. And they're going to try to say that there are, because there
00:04:19.320
are several oppressed minorities and ethnicities, all this implicit bias should be taken into
00:04:26.360
account when you're yielding a verdict about the sentence. And perhaps you should be a bit more
00:04:31.100
lenient with so-called oppressed backgrounds. It's also worth mentioning as well that the research
00:04:37.780
on implicit bias in psychology seems to suggest that you can't get rid of it. But if you do take
00:04:44.860
measures to try to, it makes your racial bias worse. Yes. In that, for example, they expose people
00:04:52.580
to stereotypes and terminology to avoid. And what it did was it made people more easily recall
00:04:58.700
these terms that they're not supposed to use, which probably means they're more likely to use them.
00:05:03.260
And the more biased people are, the more necessary the anti-bias section seems to be,
00:05:13.000
at least to people who think that bias is wrong. Right. So we have an article from
00:05:17.040
The Guardian here that says ministers criticize two-tier sentencing changes in England and Wales.
00:05:23.360
And they're saying is the guidance aimed at tackling bias and reducing re-offending.
00:05:29.040
How exactly? Puts more emphasis on the need for pre-sentence reports, which give details of
00:05:35.880
the offenders' backgrounds, motives and personal life before sentencing. So my question is,
00:05:41.280
what does this do that the ordinary defence doesn't do?
00:05:47.600
Well, the ordinary defence comes out and gives you, as a barrister myself, someone who's had to go
00:05:53.260
through the criminal process, both as a prosecutor and as a defender, is the ability for the defence
00:06:00.480
to raise the issues that support why you shouldn't be sentenced so determinately. If you talk about
00:06:07.560
what happened in your family background, you talk about breakups, you talk about the lack
00:06:11.860
of education you have, you might talk about why you were threatened. All of those are elements that
00:06:18.000
you would normally and naturally use. The whole process of the pre-sentence report when it was created
00:06:24.080
was to try and ensure that those defendants who were incapable of doing it properly or to give an
00:06:30.820
opportunity for the court to understand more about an individual, that was created. And to an extent,
00:06:37.840
someone often argued, why? Why was this brought in? Now, I can understand it. In many cases,
00:06:44.300
a pre-sentence report was actually helpful to be able to understand what was going on. And I think
00:06:48.940
for many, many lawyers, they would say a PSO is a useful vehicle. The first question is kind of
00:06:56.460
philosophically, why was it introduced when you could do this anyway? And why did the courts not
00:07:01.960
listen to what the defendants? And I think really, it was because the courts were being encouraged not
00:07:08.380
to imprison people or give certain sentences to certain groups of people. And they couldn't just
00:07:13.660
rely on the defence. They wanted to have a third party. It was like the idea of bringing in quangos.
00:07:19.400
If we can rely on a third party, it's not your fault you didn't do it properly. And it's not us.
00:07:24.960
We're just listening to the pre-sentence report. And that's why this is taking on such an important
00:07:31.040
part of the debate, is because judges and magistrates are almost washing their hands to
00:07:36.920
a certain extent by saying, I'm relying on what's said in the pre-sentence report.
00:07:41.600
So I think, I think the way a lot of ordinary people think about justice is that it doesn't
00:07:48.180
necessarily matter about these sort of extenuating circumstances. A certain action should have a
00:07:54.240
certain sentence, regardless of your reasoning for it. I think that that's how I certainly
00:08:00.260
think about that sort of thing. And it seems like a way of basically making excuses for
00:08:07.080
yourself. Maybe I'm being a bit unsympathetic here, but it does seem like a way of saying,
00:08:13.580
oh, well, you know, I came here on a small boat. It was terrible. It was awful. I've had such
00:08:17.780
a hard time now. You know, I'm really sorry about stabbing that innocent person.
00:08:23.240
Yes. So my question, I think I'll phrase it again. What does this put forward that a
00:08:29.760
traditional defence doesn't? Because you're mentioning the specifics of the case, which
00:08:34.000
I'm sure the defence would mention. But it seems to me that in this report, if the report
00:08:39.400
is about to say tackling bias, they are going to put forward all the ideological bits, all
00:08:46.240
the woke progressivism within legislation is going to get an extra institutional backing.
00:08:51.860
And let me continue what they say. Under the change, which would come into force on April
00:08:57.900
the 1st, tomorrow, that is, magistrates and judges would be asked to consult a pre-sentence
00:09:05.860
report before determining whether to imprison someone of an ethnic or religious minority,
00:09:11.860
as well as young adults, abuse survivors and pregnant women. At present state, black and
00:09:19.120
minority ethnic communities are overrepresented at almost all stages of the criminal justice
00:09:24.300
process in England and Wales and are more likely to be imprisoned and receive longer sentences
00:09:29.160
than white people. Well, the question why isn't being asked here, but also,
00:09:35.860
what is going to happen is that these guidelines are saying, we are going to have the woke oppression
00:09:42.620
calculus, we're going to separate the population into groups, we're going to rank them according
00:09:47.500
to who is more or less oppressed, and those who are considered to be among the privileged
00:09:54.200
groups are going to get Taffa sentences. This is precisely what this is.
00:09:57.800
It's an explicit rejection of the rule of law, isn't it?
00:09:59.900
Yeah. Right, so Keir Starmer took issue with it, and he took issue with several other things. He
00:10:06.340
talked today about illegal migration as being a risk for security and him being very angry about it.
00:10:12.340
He's also very angry about the two-tier system. Right, so let's look at what Keir Starmer has to say here.
00:10:18.660
Well, I'm disappointed in this response, and the Lord Chancellor is obviously continuing to engage
00:10:26.860
on this, and we're considering our response. And, you know, all options are on the table,
00:10:32.020
but I am disappointed at this outcome, and now we'll have to consider what we do as a result.
00:10:40.980
But he's come out just to, was it just before we came on air, where he actually said, now we're going
00:10:46.780
to push an initial legislation to attach to current amendments. Sorry, he's putting an amendment to
00:10:53.140
current legislation in order to try and tackle this issue, how he does that. So he's saying he cares,
00:10:59.480
but I think this is a lot of pressure. As you saw when we were discussing the letter about it,
00:11:04.980
the letter makes it very clear that it's all about what the pressure has come from Robert
00:11:11.220
Jenrick. No one else, just Jenrick, seems to have caused this. And I think he's running a bit scared.
00:11:17.620
Speaking of Robert Jenrick, we have a post of him here saying, under two-tier Keir, that's exactly
00:11:24.420
what's happening. It's completely outrageous. This would enshrine an anti-white and anti-Christian
00:11:35.380
Yes. And he's reacting against Shabana Mahmoud, who said, there will never be a two-tier sentencing
00:11:48.000
Just tell us in the comments. Tell us in the live chat. Do you believe them?
00:11:52.100
Right. So she is proposing here a way to tackle this. The government will introduce legislation
00:12:00.260
to Parliament this week to override independent guidance on how offenders from ethnic minorities
00:12:06.040
should be sentenced. It comes after the sentencing council refused a request from Justice Secretary
00:12:11.320
Shabana Mahmoud to consider its new instruction for judges. I know. I just don't believe it.
00:12:19.280
It's going to be a fascinating element because, as I say, for many lawyers, a PSO or a pre-sentence
00:12:25.080
report is useful. But in so many ways, the idea that it's now, here's a judge or a magistrate.
00:12:32.440
We are considering incarcerating somebody. But because they come from one of these three groups
00:12:38.240
or four, if you've added a couple more on there as well, we can't sentence them to prison
00:12:43.280
today because we've got to get a PSO. And why, I can't understand why the judiciary or those
00:12:49.380
who are looking at this see this as odd. Because what do I go back to, trying to make jokes about
00:12:56.080
it. But the reality was my grandparents worked in factories, pretty abused in factories in the
00:13:03.020
1890s and 1900s. And their ancestors were all abused. They were pretty much slaves, working
00:13:10.020
for virtually nothing. The miners' families were the same. All over Britain, we could turn around
00:13:14.120
and say, we've had abuse from elitist masters who've taken our labor and used it to build their
00:13:19.560
empires and big houses. Why are they excluded? Haven't they got some sort of cultural or historical
00:13:24.760
pain that we remember? We remember what it's like to be in poverty, you know, in the 70s
00:13:30.160
and the 80s. Well, maybe not for you guys, to be honest. You know, you're far too young
00:13:33.580
and healthy compared to myself. But we do know what it was like when the lights were out in
00:13:37.240
the 80s. And so why is that excluded as a characteristic that should be considered when I'm doing the
00:13:42.880
crime? And I think that's the real point that's going to impact people in this country about
00:13:48.100
fairness. We're a nation of fairness. And we want to see it being fair to everyone all
00:13:53.820
the time. Speaking of fairness, it's one thing to talk about fairness in the abstract, the
00:13:58.660
abstract concept, because everyone will go out and say, we are fair. No, I'm not having
00:14:03.540
a go at you. Oh, it's true. You're absolutely right. I want to improve, to add to what you're
00:14:07.660
saying. The question is how fairness is being understood. So the Aristotelian, for instance,
00:14:13.140
understanding of fairness is completely different to the woke understanding of fairness. The woke
00:14:17.420
understanding of fairness wants to institute differential treatment. Why? Because they
00:14:23.940
say, well, until we are in the position to treat people equally, we are in a state of
00:14:28.700
emergency and we need to mitigate historical inequalities. And we need to help those who
00:14:35.680
have been historically oppressed. Sorry. Just to finish. But the way that they are understanding
00:14:43.260
who is oppressed or not, as you mentioned, is entirely arbitrary, which lends reports to
00:14:48.580
the view that what they care about is not fairness. What they care about is who is their political
00:14:52.680
friends and who are their political enemies. They want to benefit the former, harm the latter.
00:14:58.420
I think a rather oft overlooked point here is that there's a massive amount of hubris here
00:15:05.820
in the notion that they've got a complete understanding of basically human suffering.
00:15:11.980
They're basically trying to mitigate for the fact that some people have not had the best
00:15:16.660
shot at life. And to make these formal judgments saying, okay, these ethnicities, they've had a
00:15:23.580
particularly bad time, but other people, perhaps not white people, you know what, they've had an
00:15:27.340
easy ride of it. And as you've alluded to, that's not true. And the arrogance at play here to say
00:15:33.300
that, oh, you know what, these people who have come over and claimed welfare and not worked,
00:15:39.540
they're more persecuted than someone who's worked their entire life for effectively the state.
00:15:46.680
I see such a mismatch here, but that's not going to be acknowledged, is it? Because they think that
00:15:50.740
they understand the nature of human suffering, which they don't.
00:15:55.300
And I think that's an incredibly important point to ignore, what's happened as culturally to people
00:16:01.460
in this country as they've tried to make their lives better. I mean, you've suddenly reminded me
00:16:06.740
of a kind of story that I had as a junior barrister. I'd spent my first year, I'd prosecuted and defended
00:16:12.620
and not lost a single criminal case in the first year. So as a consequence of that, I was taken to a bar
00:16:17.680
around the corner from the criminal justice main courts. And I was, Benjamin's still in cleats,
00:16:23.380
I think it was called, I'm not sure it's still there anymore. And I was introduced to one of the
00:16:27.720
greatest barristers of his time, George Carman, by my pupil master, as we called him. And he goes
00:16:36.160
to George and his very posh voice, George, I'd like to introduce you to another Mancunian like
00:16:41.240
yourself, who's done incredibly well. He's great at the bar in crime. And George Carman turns around
00:16:47.360
to look at me and he's surrounded by a whole group of people, all fawning all over this great barrister.
00:16:53.060
And he says, what's your name? Again, equally in a posh. And I said, and I still had my Manc accent.
00:16:57.860
And I said, it's Stephen Wolfe from Manchester. Although I'm probably sounding scouse now at the
00:17:02.220
moment. I'm going to get killed by my family for doing that. And he turns around to me and his
00:17:07.180
only words to me were, if you want to go far at the bar, lose that accent, boy, lose that accent.
00:17:14.440
And that kind of privilege and the voice is doing you down because of where you came from. That's the
00:17:21.880
sort of level of suffering that we've had from those who've had to work in the pits to those who've
00:17:27.580
tried to climb out. Does that count? Is that going to be ignored? And I think that you're right. It
00:17:33.900
will be ignored because it's not relevant to their agenda. Exactly. I think it has to do a lot with the
00:17:41.100
left turning its back to the traditional working class. I think Lenin himself said that unless there
00:17:47.340
is a vanguard party that is going to tell the workers what their true interests are, they are going to
00:17:53.720
develop at most a syndicalist consciousness and they're going to choose capitalism, not communism.
00:17:59.800
And after the, I think when the more communism got discredited and actual socialism got discredited,
00:18:07.240
the left started focusing on in the sixties in universities. And then they, I think they're in
00:18:15.000
a position where they say we've lost the native working class. So they're going to opt for foreign people.
00:18:23.720
And your point is incredibly proven with the statistics that came out over the weekend
00:18:28.520
that showed that when you look at the particular parties support, Labour is now being supported by
00:18:34.600
the wealthiest individuals in this country at the higher end, the middle aged groups and those who've
00:18:40.440
gone to university. So they're saying that Labour supports the rich and the clever. I mean, to be honest,
00:18:46.200
I wouldn't necessarily say that everybody went to university is clever, but there we go.
00:18:49.560
Yeah, from my experiences, from my experience, certainly the case, but they, they love that. And that feeds
00:18:55.720
into this arrogance of a kind of a snobbish kind of view of looking down upon those below me who don't
00:19:02.520
understand the issues. And I find that patronizing. And it's exactly what your point is raised on that.
00:19:08.840
Thanks. So I think there are two interpretations of what is going on here. The first, which I find completely unlikely,
00:19:14.360
is that Labour actually has an issue with the two-tier justice system, which I don't think is,
00:19:20.200
I don't think it's particularly credible as a hypothesis. And the second one is that basically
00:19:25.800
they are in bed with them. And they are trying to, and the question there becomes, why are they doing so?
00:19:33.000
Well, part of it is because they want to approach elements of the other voters, groups of voters,
00:19:40.200
they think they have alienated. That's why we see Keir Starmer starting banging the drum of anger
00:19:45.480
against illegal migration right now. So what they could be doing is working together, having people
00:19:53.160
within the judiciary proposing, basically discrediting their judiciary within, in the eye of the public
00:20:01.800
mind. That's in public consciousness, pardon me. And that makes people being much more prone towards
00:20:10.040
government control, extra government control, because they say, well, look at all, look at the judiciary,
00:20:17.000
all of them are crazy, and they are harming society. So the only way to solve this is by
00:20:24.440
erasing the checks and balances that the judiciary poses to the government, and opt for a much stronger
00:20:31.480
executive. In which case, the question is, what, what are we going to make of, wait, where is the link?
00:20:39.320
I don't have, well, I don't have the link there. It's not there, but it doesn't matter. Keir Starmer has,
00:20:47.000
has kneeled before for the BLM cause. He has expressed sympathy for all the woke,
00:20:54.120
all the woke causes. We've talked extensively about two-tier policing, reporting, and sentencing here.
00:21:02.520
You can just, the examples are too many. You can just click on any video of this link to where we're
00:21:09.480
talking about the two-tier. But I mean, we did a lot, didn't we? Yeah. But what I will say is that,
00:21:13.720
apart from individual examples, the whole issue is, any person who supports woke progressivism is
00:21:20.680
supporting a two-tier society. Because woke progressivism is all about mitigating so-called
00:21:26.680
historical inequalities by means of differential treatment. Differential treatment means two-tier
00:21:33.720
treatment. So if one is promoting wokeness, one is promoting differential treatment and two-tier society.
00:21:40.840
I think Starmer's doing two things simultaneously. He's, as you say, empowering the government over
00:21:46.360
the judiciary, but he's also stealing Nigel Farage's two best talking points. He's basically taking
00:21:52.600
immigration and the two-tier justice system, both of which I think ordinary people can see with their
00:21:58.360
own eyes are massive problems. And he's sort of containing them. He's taking the steam out of the
00:22:03.800
sails to try and tank reform in the polls, because at the minute they're a real threat to Labour, aren't they?
00:22:09.800
I think it's interesting he's doing this just before the local elections, where those local
00:22:14.360
elections have been permitted to just to go ahead, which feeds into another story of where we're all
00:22:19.480
all going about controlling people's views. But when I look at this two-tier system that they create in
00:22:25.000
the two-tier politics, that is straight out of the book of communism. It's straight out of Stalinism.
00:22:29.960
It's all about removing the elites who are in power, then the kings, the knights, the barons,
00:22:33.800
whoever they may be, wherever they are in the world. I'm replacing them with our lot. Now,
00:22:39.080
our lot gets the house, our lot gets the car, our lot gets the nice sinecure job and pension for the
00:22:44.680
right. And you lot, who we said we were helping, you're still in the same place as you were before.
00:22:49.640
And that's what the public's understanding. They realize it doesn't matter who's flipping
00:22:53.160
over at the moment. We're still where we are, and we're not getting any better.
00:22:57.400
And at the end of the day, I think it's institutions matter, but people are in charge
00:23:02.120
of institutions. So whether people now focus on institutions and the judiciary and the executive
00:23:08.760
or any kind of branch, at the end of the days, who is going to be entrusted with guarding those
00:23:16.360
institutions? And I think, for instance, people not constantly talk about the ECHR to say why people
00:23:23.720
shouldn't be deported. The ECHR doesn't say people shouldn't be deported unconditionally.
00:23:29.000
No, he doesn't say that. It gives you the opportunity to remove it. It gives you the
00:23:34.680
chance to do so. So it's people, Poland, for example, that they did pretty well,
00:23:39.080
didn't they, without any of that sort of stuff. And they're within the EU. And in many ways,
00:23:43.320
they're doing much better than a lot of other European countries for it.
00:23:46.600
So ladies and gentlemen, tell us whether you think that labor actually has an issue with
00:23:55.480
We have a quick comment here from Rage Quit Ninja says, does this not effectively break
00:24:01.800
current UK equality laws and thus illegal? No, because the Equalities Act, was it 2010?
00:24:09.000
I think that allows for exceptions for discrimination in favour of ethnic minorities.
00:24:15.720
Protected groups, I think is the phrase that it likes to use. And I think, can we remember what
00:24:21.720
Stelius said in the sentencing line? Was it cohorts? Yes.
00:24:26.360
So we've got protected groups, we've got cohorts, even though that sort of language that is used
00:24:32.280
to me is actually frightening usage because it's actually disassociating what they're really trying
00:24:37.960
to do and trying to blend it into a nice friendly cohort. But mind you, cohort was not a nice word when
00:24:43.560
it was created. No. Okay, well, it's time for your segment, yes.
00:24:49.960
Well, I think you have to have your head in your sands if you're not hearing the news across
00:24:55.080
from Europe at the moment. Really quite concerning for me, a decision by a court that Marie Le Pen is
00:25:01.480
barred from seeking public office for embezzlement, as we see here in the world news coming from AP,
00:25:07.400
which I understood was the only group that was allowed to be in the court to actually do the press,
00:25:12.120
which is why so many of the articles that are coming out are exactly the same. And this is
00:25:17.480
about Marie Le Pen, who along with 24 others, and I think there was eight MEPs, but also the staff
00:25:24.520
members, who when they were in the European Parliament, roughly around the time that I was there,
00:25:29.720
were all accused of embezzling European Union funds to support their political activities.
00:25:37.160
Well, not only am I finding that incredibly surprising, because literally that's what
00:25:42.200
every single MEP and political party did with the European Union funds.
00:25:47.400
Is this a sort of similar thing to what the Chinese do, in that they have laws that cover pretty much
00:25:53.240
the entire citizenry, or at least everyone of concern, and then they selectively enforce it?
00:25:59.240
Absolutely, because not only have they done that with, I think, Daniel Hannan, when he was an MEP,
00:26:06.680
was pursued, I think, again, egregiously over conference money that he used from the European
00:26:13.720
Parliament through a legitimate organisation. He organised conferences across the globe, which
00:26:20.440
people like myself, MEPs, would fly out and give conferences about and talk about the European Union,
00:26:24.600
because it didn't fit their definition of what European Union was or supporting. They went after
00:26:30.360
him. I remember in my own particular party, not myself, that many MEPs at the time who were part of
00:26:36.680
UKIP were actually also forced to return funding on a similar principle. And I watched it across many
00:26:43.640
different political parties, except those who were green, socialists, Christian Democrats, for example,
00:26:51.240
the Liberal Democrats, ALDI, as they're called. All the willing potential partners of coalition.
00:26:55.880
All the coalition partners were allowed to take the same levels of money and employ people and have
00:27:01.480
conferences across. So what we have now, I think, in terms of the next kind of clip that we've got on
00:27:09.080
the link is we're seeing that they've not only made her guilty, if we go down, but they've sentenced
00:27:14.520
here to four years, four years now. And that's cataclysmic. You've got four years, a hundred
00:27:21.160
thousand euro fine, which will be nothing to her because people were paid off. But it's a five-year
00:27:26.680
term in eligibility to run from office immediately. This is a political hit. This is absolutely intended
00:27:35.000
not to really ensure that justice is to be seen. It's to make sure that her rising power is not capable
00:27:42.360
of rising any further, is to cause discord in the national rally political parties, to make sure
00:27:50.040
that they're incapable of having their leader stand on television, the most effective performer,
00:27:55.800
when it comes down to the presidential election, where you have Macron, who's failing, and everybody
00:28:00.040
else around them are failing. So we get to a position where, as you go into the the next link,
00:28:06.840
this is exactly what Marie Le Pen is saying. It would have the effect of depriving me of being
00:28:13.080
a presidential candidate, and quite rightly disenfranchising her 11 million supporters,
00:28:19.080
and potentially millions more. Because of course, in the last election, they effectively won the
00:28:23.960
popular vote. And it was only by some canny politicking from Macron and the left that they
00:28:30.360
sort of outmaneuvered her by, I don't necessarily know how to put it, but they worked within the
00:28:36.680
political system to do something that seems very undemocratic. Yes, Macron teamed up with,
00:28:42.680
was it the communist, the Melanchon guy. Yes, that's right. Yeah. Yeah. That's like,
00:28:46.840
that's like Hitler joining up with Stalin to ensure that the defeat is in the Second World War,
00:28:51.560
and then make sure that they stay in power. And that's the way that I see it. It's those two wings
00:28:56.120
of like politics come together to stop somebody who has clearly got the votes of the people.
00:29:02.280
And I think we're seeing that all across Europe. Look at the AFD. Not only are they ensuring that
00:29:07.800
AFD is coming second and not going to have a chance to have any real link in power,
00:29:12.360
they're actually organised before the new parliament, a change in the law relating to the budget,
00:29:19.480
so that they can spend the money before the next parliament comes in. And this is what's
00:29:24.120
happening. They're really, really frightened of those people who stand outside of the group,
00:29:29.800
outside of the team. They really don't like them. If you're not giving them a hug and a back slapper,
00:29:33.800
and you're having a good lunch with them. If you're sat over in the table in the corner, we go,
00:29:38.120
I'm not sure about that. We don't like them, but they're winning. What can we do to get rid of them?
00:29:43.000
And they're using lawfare in order to do it. Now, of course, as you'll see in the next link,
00:29:50.200
the lawyers, the judges, the politicians are saying, well, it's nothing to do with lawfare
00:29:55.720
against her as a politician. It's all about here, as he says, that no one's on trial for doing
00:30:01.720
politics. That's not the issue. The issue is whether the contracts had been executed properly.
00:30:08.280
They recognised there was no personal enrichment for Marie Le Pen. The 400,000 there that she was
00:30:14.600
charged was that there was enrichment of the party. So the party was able to employ people.
00:30:21.560
The party was able to have conferences. The party was able to have its own security.
00:30:26.040
That's enrichment of the party. And therefore, she's guilty of embezzlement to be able to do
00:30:31.480
that. That's their argument. As I say, in the European Parliament, we saw lots of political parties
00:30:36.040
doing this all the time, but they're not being charged or investigated in the same way.
00:30:39.320
But do any of us really believe that this is just about the contracts being executed?
00:30:45.240
Of course not. And I think that the prior actions of other French political parties
00:30:50.520
indicate that they're willing to do anything to keep them out of power, aren't they? Because
00:30:54.760
they know that once they are in power, it's sort of over for them politically. It's a last
00:31:00.600
desperate attempt. We saw similar things in the United States, didn't we, where the Democrats
00:31:05.800
were doing very poorly? And so they relied on lawfare. And the fact that Kamala Harris didn't
00:31:12.040
even bother releasing any policies seemed to suggest that, well, you know, our best bet is
00:31:18.120
attack, not actually putting forward any positive vision.
00:31:21.880
To add to this, I don't think that necessarily they are afraid that if Marine Le Pen gets elected,
00:31:27.720
they'll never see power again. I don't think that's so much the issue as much as they
00:31:32.760
them thinking that right now they're unpopular and they're promoting unpopular measures and policies.
00:31:39.960
And the only way to compete with others is to basically trash the popular opposition.
00:31:47.480
I don't think it's so much that they think that if Le Pen wins, they'll never see it's going to be
00:31:52.440
the end. It's not so much the long term, you're seeing it as short term.
00:31:55.400
I think there are way more short term. I can believe that. Yeah, I think the short term element
00:31:59.880
is about the agenda globally is changing and they're not happy with that. And they think if
00:32:03.960
they can hit everybody with the short term and make sure they don't gain power, there's no momentum
00:32:07.960
to support Donald Trump's or the MAGA movement or whatever they believe is the kind of devil that's
00:32:13.320
sitting across the other side of the Atlantic. And so let's make sure it doesn't embed itself
00:32:17.960
strongly in Europe as well. Because if Europe and America were doing so, then all the woke agenda you
00:32:22.840
talked about early on would actually start to dissipate. And we'd have somebody be able to
00:32:27.160
come back against them. But we've seen it here, not just here. In France, did they not close a
00:32:31.320
newspaper down? Recently, that was right wing of very popular and being incredibly successful.
00:32:36.840
No doubt if Lotus Eaters were out there, they'd try and close this down as well for being incredibly
00:32:41.960
successful. Some of my posts on X or Twitter or whatever it's called these days are limited in France
00:32:49.240
for some reason. I didn't know that. It's very interesting. Yes. And just let me add to this.
00:32:54.680
Every time I go back to Greece, the feed is completely different. A lot more mainstream media
00:33:01.240
accounts are appearing on X. Okay. Well, that's interesting because then what I've done here now
00:33:08.120
is go through why I think it's not just about Marie Le Pen. This is a concerted plan by the European
00:33:14.840
powers that be elitist authoritarian. So if you take the next four, try and go through them. We've
00:33:20.520
just seen George Esco from Romania, clearly a massive winner. But his issue? Oh, he's supposedly
00:33:27.480
a shrill of Russia. So they had a constitutional court that ruled in just two hours, just two hours,
00:33:36.120
that this man is obviously not capable of winning at the seats and that the TikTok accounts backing
00:33:42.200
him were all those of Russia. By the way, Marie Le Pen is also accused of being a Russian shriller in
00:33:48.120
the pockets of Putin. So I don't know whether that's got a link to it as well.
00:33:53.480
Anyone else. Anybody else who opposes the elites always in the background.
00:33:58.680
Yeah. I've got my helicopter just outside. I'm going to go fly down to my little kind of
00:34:04.920
Naples base, obviously. It's nonsense most of the time. So we have George Esco. Then before that,
00:34:12.440
we have the AFD and we see them. AFD, a constitutional court sought to ban the party before the elections.
00:34:21.320
So another example of them being frightened of a party that's rising with an agenda that's not
00:34:25.720
was there. But it wasn't just recently. It's before that, too. So we go back to what somebody
00:34:30.840
I thought was a really, really crucial and rising star of the right hurts in Austria. And he resigns
00:34:38.200
amid a corruption inquiry. Now, either he was politically naive and dragged into that or it was
00:34:43.640
a plant. But this man had the links of being very calm, met him many times, very thoughtful,
00:34:49.160
actually really intellectual idea of how to challenge the status quo and was winning significant
00:34:56.520
power, not just here, but actually gaining ground in the United States. So they cut him out and he
00:35:01.400
resigned and he's just faded away. Why? And then, of course, we had Gert Wilders before that,
00:35:07.400
you know, found guilty of inciting for inciting discrimination against Moroccans who were here
00:35:13.720
illegally. No doubt any of us that criticized the boat people would face exactly the same.
00:35:19.400
So this, in my view, is a concerted attack. Where did it come from? Was this just out of the blue
00:35:25.640
or all these politicians across Europe really, really just enacting criminal activity, fraud,
00:35:32.040
all the rest of it? Or is it something deeper? And I believe this is concerted. I think if you look at the
00:35:37.640
the next link, we see why Europe should harden its soft power to lawfare. Now, this is by
00:35:44.280
SEPS, who are a very large and important and influential think tank in Europe. I've constantly
00:35:51.800
had lots of reports from them whilst I was over there. And I know when you're bringing down their
00:35:57.080
article and you look at what they're saying is that the Brussels effect is that EU law should be used
00:36:02.840
globally, its neighbors, on corporations to promote their ideology of warfare. And it's very clear,
00:36:13.000
we should adopt the Chinese concept of legal warfare, Faluzan.
00:36:18.440
Oh, wow. I didn't realize I'd be quite as prophetic at the start here.
00:36:21.880
Yeah. So this is 2020. Okay, it's only five years ago, but I believe actually that
00:36:26.040
people were looking at this before. They talk about using the laws coined in the US in 2001,
00:36:33.400
has effectively deployed financial insurance and energy law to boost its power on its adversaries.
00:36:39.080
We've then seen how it's used to boost its power against politicians in the US. And also beyond that,
00:36:46.120
I know of a personal friend of mine who's one of the big group of people that raised money for Donald
00:36:54.040
Trump in his campaign. He and the top three fundraisers were all attacked in different states.
00:37:00.600
He was charged with something like 99 offences over a $2,000 donation to one of his projects,
00:37:08.120
99 offences, with a something like 500 year potential imprisonment,
00:37:14.120
and millions of dollars of fines. In the end, they settled for five months, one offence and
00:37:22.600
two million, of which he's still disputed, because all of it was nonsense. They know it's nonsense.
00:37:29.560
The reason they put 99 offences is that you get ground down with the cost of having to defend
00:37:34.680
each of those offences. So you go, okay, what's the least I can get? But all of them are now seeking
00:37:40.280
to have them overturned through appeals, but it goes on for years. So they attack not just the
00:37:47.240
What is interesting there is that this is a recipe for disaster, and it's self-defeating,
00:37:54.280
because what they're doing is that they rest upon people's praise of justice. They rest upon
00:38:01.400
legitimacy of the institutions of justice. And because they do so, they want to say,
00:38:06.680
let's brand as illegal those who are our political enemies. But the more they do this,
00:38:13.480
the more they discredit and delegitimize those institutions.
00:38:20.040
It feeds into what you're saying about the sentencing council. It feeds into about the
00:38:23.640
College of Policing. It feeds into all of those who are involved in that side of it. It feeds into
00:38:28.600
our kind of discontent with parliament. And I think it goes not just with ourselves. I think in my final
00:38:35.080
bit that I've got over there in the last one, it's not just us. It's the left. Here's the left in
00:38:41.400
the European Parliament, who again, I watched whilst I was there. They were abused. They were
00:38:49.480
not permitted to have representatives on certain bodies. They were not allowed to have their legitimate
00:38:55.640
amounts of money granted to them. They too, different necessary political viewpoint to me,
00:39:02.120
happy to have discussions and debates with them, as we should do in a free democratic world.
00:39:06.840
They too were facing the same sort of lawfare being used against them. Now, I don't necessarily
00:39:12.440
agree with all the people that they've got in their list in that particular article, but I understand
00:39:16.840
it. They feel it too. The left and the right are feeling it. There's only that group in the middle
00:39:22.600
that are like frightened little puppies and dogs in a corner are saying they want to attack everybody
00:39:27.560
else. There's a question on that, that if you say that the left and the right are doing it,
00:39:33.480
who is being prosecuted actually? Because it seems like most people from the right.
00:39:38.200
The left is an expert on self-victimization, so they say they're...
00:39:44.280
...but it seems to me that only people from the right wing are being...
00:39:48.520
Well, only people on the right wing that we've seen, one would argue that they would say Sanchez was
00:39:55.160
attacked in Spain and the same... But I don't see that. He wasn't actually taken to court
00:39:59.640
over anything. The only ones who are going to court, actually, are those on the right.
00:40:03.560
So I think the self-victimization, when I looked through the Guardian article that listed a lot
00:40:07.720
of people there, not one of them actually was a criminal case about... It was all about,
00:40:11.880
I feel pretty upset you're attacking me for my views. That's not lawfare. Lawfare is when you actually
00:40:17.720
get the lawyers involved, either prosecutor or through civil action, and you take us on. Their
00:40:22.920
argument is that maybe we've got to stop oil, and we're attacking them in that particular way.
00:40:28.200
Whatever it is, whether it's left or right, the idea that this central group of people can use the
00:40:33.080
law and destabilize our institutions and our common law and our sense of justice is incredibly
00:40:39.640
short-sighted, it's deliberate, and I don't believe in the long term it's healthy for all of us to be
00:40:46.440
able to turn around and criticize all our judges, criticize all of us lawyers as being liars or deceitful
00:40:51.720
a dishonest. And by building that, they actually help remove the foundations of a legitimate,
00:40:59.400
carefully built, carefully constructed, judo-christian constructs in our nationhood
00:41:07.240
and across our culture that has had a fairness. Remove that and we end up in the slippery road
00:41:13.640
of being done like a communist China. That's my view on it.
00:41:21.320
Sorry. I don't know what your guys who are listening in have to say about it at all.
00:41:26.200
I'm sure they will agree. I mean, we talk about all of this sort of thing, and I think our common
00:41:31.800
line on it is that the sort of centrist globalist faction will do anything to keep
00:41:37.720
their bureaucratic control unchallenged. I think that there's plenty of evidence to suggest that
00:41:43.160
that is the case. But South Africa now, we're going to be very grateful we live in Europe after
00:41:50.920
hearing about this, believe me. Yeah. So deeply concerning. South Africa is fighting back, not just
00:41:58.520
the ANC government, the party of Nelson Mandela, but also the Afrikaans minority as well. And there's
00:42:06.440
two different stories layered over one another. And to understand this, you've sort of got to follow
00:42:12.600
the back and forth between South African government and the US government, because this has been the
00:42:20.280
accelerant to kick all of this off. So the thing that started it all, really,
00:42:25.160
is Simul Ramah Posa signed an expropriation bill into law. And what this did was it allowed the
00:42:31.480
government to expropriate land or take people's land and not pay them for it. Compensation part of
00:42:37.960
it was optional. So in theory, you could be a farmer and the government can say, I want your land,
00:42:43.720
and they don't give you anything for it, even though you owned it. And of course,
00:42:47.560
this is obviously an erosion of private property rights. They don't really exist in South Africa,
00:42:53.400
because the government can just take things from you. Well, we've got that under the Labour
00:42:57.880
government who want to take farms away at not even market price. So this is a halfway house to that.
00:43:02.920
It is indeed. And this was obviously to target the white minority in South Africa, because of course,
00:43:09.880
the ANC has made it its business to whip up anger at this minority and blame their failings to
00:43:19.080
keep the infrastructure they had functional. And so they're distracting people from their inability
00:43:27.080
to govern by saying, well, look at all of these white farmers, they own all the land, therefore
00:43:32.760
they're greedy, they're taking things from you. When in reality, they're incompetent and quite often
00:43:38.280
very corrupt. Everyone knows that corruption in South Africa is rife. And a lot of the time,
00:43:45.000
these things are not being done because there's someone being paid. And also that it's worth
00:43:50.520
mentioning these land expropriations. Quite often, when they're actually there marking up the farms to
00:43:57.320
take them, there are politicians on the ground saying, oh, well, I'll have this bit. And so they're
00:44:02.200
directly benefiting from it. They know that they're the ones that get to choose which farms get taken,
00:44:07.400
and they can take some for themselves. And they said, don't be alarmed, the court may award you
00:44:15.080
nil compensation, but it's not required to. So it's okay. And of course, this is not reassuring
00:44:21.480
whatsoever, because you're still at the mercy of the courts as to whether your livelihood is ruined.
00:44:27.400
And then eventually, America caught wind of this. Trump cut US financial aid to South Africa,
00:44:34.680
citing his disapproval of the laws and also their foreign policy aims in that South Africa brought
00:44:41.320
the genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice. And it was a sort of punitive
00:44:46.280
measure on top of that for that as well. Obviously, a close American ally. And then you see Elon Musk,
00:44:54.440
of course, being South African saying, the legacy media never mentions the white genocide in South
00:44:59.480
Africa, because it doesn't fit the narrative that whites can be victims. And I think that
00:45:05.240
that's very true. And in fact, what is happening in South Africa is awful for the white minority.
00:45:12.600
We complain a lot about what's going on in Britain and Europe and North America. But we can't really
00:45:17.960
hold a candle to the suffering that's going on in South Africa, because some of the most appalling
00:45:21.480
things I've ever heard of are going on there. And many of the white South Africans gathered and
00:45:26.760
supported what Trump said, because it's very significant, you know, the leader of the free
00:45:31.800
world, as they say, coming out and pointing out your persecution. And they were very positive about
00:45:38.360
that. And you only need to look at the number of race laws in South Africa. And you can see that big dip
00:45:44.600
towards the end of apartheid. And then you can see that it actually rises above the sort of apartheid
00:45:51.160
level under the ANC governance. And of course, all of these laws, they're not discriminating against
00:45:56.680
the native black population, they're discriminating against the white population. That's why those laws
00:46:03.240
They have similar sorts of laws now that just literally state it's white who will, like we're
00:46:08.920
about to see in a potential sentencing council. You know, if you're white or you're historically
00:46:14.520
white, not only will you lose your land, you can't get a job or...
00:46:18.520
Oh, it's very egregious. I'm going to go through some of the examples soon. And it is very explicit.
00:46:26.680
And South African president says the persecution of whites is a false narrative. And Elon Musk
00:46:34.680
doubled down on this. The ANC line has basically been, they're making it up, they're far right,
00:46:40.920
they're racist. It sounds very familiar, doesn't it? Yeah. And a court ruled that the claims of
00:46:48.600
white genocide are not real. This was a South African court. Oh, okay.
00:46:53.240
And so it's basically like we've ruled ourselves innocent. Yeah.
00:46:58.120
Yeah. Judging our own judgments. Exactly. And then they were in sort of a bit of diplomatic
00:47:07.240
warfare here. They hinted at a nuclear deal with Iran and Russia. And what's common about those two
00:47:11.960
nations? Oh, wait, they're both enemies of the United States. And so the United...
00:47:16.600
Oh, you're going to say something, Stella? No, no. It's just, you're talking about Cyril
00:47:20.040
Ramaphosa. And I think it's good to tell to the audience that this is not the politicians who go
00:47:25.720
goes out and chants death to the boards. That's right. That's Julius Merlema.
00:47:32.040
Although he hasn't disavowed that chant, by the way, he's never said anything against it.
00:47:36.840
And in response, the US supported a French company investing in gas in Mozambique. And so if the South
00:47:45.480
Africans do get this project underway, a neighboring country is going to have cheaper energy than them
00:47:50.760
anyway. And so it's undermined that effort. And there's a bit of a battle going on here.
00:47:56.840
Basically, Trump freed up 4.7 billion US dollars to a French company that was frozen since 2021.
00:48:04.360
But that's not the focus necessarily. It's just interesting that it happened. And then the US
00:48:09.480
expelled the South African envoy after I think he called Trump a white supremacist. And they said
00:48:16.040
he was race baiting and basically sent him packing, which is fair enough, I think, because that was
00:48:23.880
And then let's look at some examples of clear discrimination here. So a cricket team, very English
00:48:31.400
export here, but they were kicked out of a competition for failing to select at least three black players
00:48:38.040
for the competition. I've heard of a story of in a rugby match in the last minute someone was injured
00:48:45.000
and then they brought on a substitute for the last minute of the game. And because the substitute
00:48:50.280
wasn't a black player and the player was black, all of a sudden they fell underneath their quota and
00:48:55.640
they were disqualified from the tournament, even though the majority of the game had already been won.
00:49:01.160
And of course, you might think, OK, well, this is sport. It's not the end of the world. Well,
00:49:05.880
as has been, I mean, it's still important. It's still part of our culture.
00:49:09.800
In many ways, it is a really important part of the world because it's our escape. It's our way of
00:49:14.280
looking away from what's happening around us, the job implications that we have, the bosses that are
00:49:20.440
talking to us, what's going on at home. It's our chance to be free and to enjoy just the sport. And we
00:49:26.760
don't want to be interfered with by government, government diktat, rules like that. And I find
00:49:32.600
it oppressive that when we get an opportunity just to relax, they're even imposing their ideology on
00:49:38.120
us then. I hardly agree. Sports because sports is basically the paradigm for most people for what
00:49:43.720
fair competition looks like. Yeah, absolutely. And you can see here, this is a declaration by
00:49:50.440
employee. And you can see employees should use terms to ascertain which employees are from
00:49:55.320
designated groups in terms of the Employment Equality Act of 1998. And then you go down here,
00:50:01.960
designated groups mean black people, women and people with disabilities. So we see lots of DEI
00:50:10.200
policies in Western countries, but it's very, very explicit. What's that? Sorry.
00:50:16.680
You've got the rules of the Sentencing Council up there, I'm sure.
00:50:18.840
You do. I do indeed, yeah. In a manner of speech. Sorry.
00:50:23.720
It's also worth mentioning here that the box is African, coloured, Indian and white.
00:50:28.520
The term coloured is a sort of colonial holdover. It just means mixed race, basically. But
00:50:34.760
they're afforded similar privileges to those of African descent. And it's actually quite often the
00:50:40.360
Indian and white residents that are discriminated against by these laws and the riots in 2021. And
00:50:47.800
lots of Indians were actually targeted because they believed that the Indians were unfairly extracting
00:50:54.840
wealth from their country. And they burnt down lots of distribution centres, which massively damaged
00:51:00.840
their economy and achieved very little politically.
00:51:03.000
But we can, oh, I think we, yes, page four. So this has some good stats on it. It says,
00:51:13.080
this is the data on farming. So apparently 72% of the total farms and agriculture holdings by
00:51:20.680
individual landowners are owned by whites. And so that is the majority of farms.
00:51:27.160
And the government's own data suggests that 90% of farms that have been redistributed
00:51:37.480
So this is interesting because, of course, you look at somewhere like Zimbabwe, or formerly Rhodesia,
00:51:45.000
as I like to call it. They took all of the white farmers' land and then a million people starved to
00:51:51.080
death. And obviously a massive human tragedy, not in anyone's interest to have that outcome.
00:51:57.400
And what happened is that people didn't, it was sort of like this cargo cult behavior.
00:52:02.280
They didn't realize that the reason that the white farmers were producing so much of their food,
00:52:07.160
say, is because they're using different agricultural techniques. There are lots of
00:52:12.680
things that you need to do, particularly in somewhere like South Africa, that's perhaps a
00:52:17.000
more difficult climate to farm in than, say, Britain. There are lots of things you need to do.
00:52:21.240
There's lots of complicated machinery. There's a lot more to it than you might think. It's not just
00:52:24.680
putting seeds in the ground and waiting. And I think that people tend to have a very
00:52:29.640
naive view of what goes into farming. And if anyone's watched Clarkson's Farm,
00:52:33.240
they need not imagine that it's actually a very difficult job. And I think that what's
00:52:38.280
playing out in South Africa is that they see a farm as just an easy way of getting
00:52:43.080
wealth. It's your key to becoming wealthy. And actually, there's a lot of hard work that goes
00:52:48.040
into it. And it is a way of life that has to be passed down. Because if you don't have that
00:52:53.480
knowledge passed on to you, you're really going to struggle. And that's true of anyone, regardless.
00:52:57.560
They want to get hold of it and then just sell it on to the major large corporates,
00:53:00.840
who run it for you, and they just can do a flip. Which is what I see here is one of the main
00:53:07.160
things when we're trying to impoverish our farmers, bankrupt them through inheritance tax,
00:53:12.600
give them the opportunity for the councils to be able to do compulsory purchase orders at less
00:53:17.160
than market rate, is so that they can flip it to companies that are going to put wind farms on
00:53:22.520
solar panel or be a large intermediate for the American companies that will come in and buy the
00:53:28.280
land and then rent it out to the same farmers. It wouldn't surprise me if the same thing's going
00:53:32.600
on here. So the land grabbers are already operating. And as you can see here, you just get crowds of
00:53:38.280
people that just turn up and try and get their parcel, usually with a politician in tow adjudicating
00:53:45.400
it and also carving out a nice piece for themselves. And it's worth pointing as well that if you are a
00:53:51.720
white farmer, one of the farm tools that might not be familiar to you as a European or North American,
00:53:57.960
well maybe not North American, but as a European farmer is that you have to have an assault rifle by
00:54:03.000
you at all times because you're in constant danger of the farmland attacks. And of course,
00:54:08.680
this was investigated by Lauren Southern when she looked at the farmland murders
00:54:13.880
where white farmers had their farms invaded. And there's a really horrible case here.
00:54:21.800
I'm going to summarise what he's saying because the video is six and a half minutes long, but he
00:54:25.480
is a former police officer. He's talking about his first farm murder. And let me just tell
00:54:31.080
you about what happened here. Five men waited for the family to return from church before attacking
00:54:36.040
them. The father and grandfather were bludgeoned to death with hammers. The wife was sexually assaulted
00:54:42.280
at gunpoint by four different people. The 13-year-old daughter was sexually assaulted three times and
00:54:47.480
stabbed in the back of the head, but thankfully survived. And then they had written political slogans
00:54:53.400
in blood on the walls. And apparently the interior of the house was so thick with blood that it, when
00:55:00.920
the police officers actually stepped on it, it was seeping out of the carpets beneath them. This is the
00:55:06.440
kind of thing that the white South Africans have to face. This is not something that any human being
00:55:11.800
should have to face, especially not people who are disproportionately productive for their country.
00:55:18.520
They're taxed far more than others. They're discriminated against by the law, and they're
00:55:24.200
also providing a disproportionate amount of the food for the country. It strikes me as very ungrateful
00:55:30.440
that they're basically doing all the hard work to prop up what is essentially becoming a failed state
00:55:37.640
here. And their reward is some of the worst political persecution in the world. What does the left
00:55:46.600
about it in this country say? Nothing, just as they say nothing about our farmers. Just as they say,
00:55:51.160
nothing against the farmers in Holland or the same in Canada. Well, they don't vote for the left-wing
00:55:57.480
parties, do they? Exactly. So what you're seeing here is not a prison. This is a South African
00:56:03.000
household's bedroom. This is it gated off from the rest of the house for security, because this is
00:56:10.440
not some paranoid weirdo. This is a necessary measure. And to Europe and North America, this
00:56:18.200
is completely unthinkable. I get worried when I see bars in certain continental European countries on
00:56:27.160
their windows and things like that. I think that's a bit excessive, isn't it? But to have them in your own
00:56:31.320
homes. By the bars you see in certain parts of the United States when you drive through, it's actually
00:56:35.880
really, really scary and abysmal. It's inhuman. So let's get on to the EFF, or the Economic Freedom
00:56:43.800
Fighters, which is a very ironic name. So they're communists and black nationalists, as you might
00:56:49.000
expect, and they're headed by Julius Malema. He's refused to testify that he would not call for the
00:56:54.440
murder of whites in the future, but he did testify that he might call for the slaughter of whites in the
00:56:59.400
future when asked by a journalist. Interesting. And there are still people in South Africa that are
00:57:07.960
saying that the problems of apartheid still exist. Here she's saying, My book, No White Lies,
00:57:13.880
White Power and Black Politics in South Africa, reveals the ugly truth that white South Africans
00:57:18.280
have failed to repent for and make reparations for apartheid sins. Interesting that they're using
00:57:25.000
religious language there, isn't it? We remain privileged, entitled, and arrogant in democratic
00:57:30.120
South Africa. It is shameful that we have no moral compass and have ever offered reparations
00:57:34.520
for all the harm we have caused. So let's point out the fact that she has actually contributed for
00:57:41.400
the EFF. So she is a communist. That's worth pointing out. It's enough for pointing out that the
00:57:48.680
party that she's supporting would actually kill her. I know, yeah. A bit of a quizzling, isn't she?
00:57:54.040
I just, yeah, I just find that really odd. By the way, here's the target. I'll just help you out
00:57:57.720
and then just kill me after you've won. I just don't understand these people. Do any of us really
00:58:04.920
understand what's going on between their ears? Can we understand how they've got this self-implosion
00:58:09.800
of wanting to kill themselves, wipe themselves out, just for the sake of the communist manifesto?
00:58:15.400
I might do a bit of armchair psychologising and say that they hate themselves and therefore they're
00:58:19.640
inflicting their own self-hatred on the world. That would be my best guess.
00:58:25.640
Then you had this. This was in 2023. This is the EFF rally where they're talking,
00:58:31.960
they're singing the song about killing the boar. And imagine you lived in South Africa
00:58:36.360
and this was a stadium full of people that are happy to sing about killing you.
00:58:40.360
Yes. Would you be happy to, you know, appear in public life? No wonder you have places like
00:58:47.080
Irania where they're white only towns because at least they can feel safe knowing that they have
00:58:52.920
people that aren't going to murder them for their property. And then Elon... Oh, sorry. Go ahead.
00:58:57.400
I just wanted to say that this is why culture is important because if someone did this here,
00:59:05.160
most probably they'd go in jail. It's incitement of violence.
00:59:09.400
We haven't quite got to this point yet, but it is certainly
00:59:14.040
on the right track to becoming a reality here as well. Well, I think sometimes we hear it on the
00:59:18.440
streets when we're talking about the way that we look at Israel and Jewish people. It's a similar sort
00:59:24.600
of conceptual idea that they're chanting when they're supporting Hannes in such numbers that
00:59:31.400
how far is that link? Isn't that that fine line that we've been talking about? This thin thread
00:59:36.600
between democratic values and murder caused by this level of hatred. Are we not on that line?
00:59:43.400
Which is why we're all debating this so strongly in strident. It is also here to a certain extent
00:59:48.440
because I can use the example of in France where there was the case of that teenage boy who got
00:59:54.120
shot by the French police for refusing to stop his car. And then a group of 15 to 20 Muslims went to
01:00:00.680
a small French town of about 140 people, went to an event and stabbed a 16 year old to death because
01:00:06.600
he was a French boy. And it was purely racial. It's purely motivated about ethnic revenge. It's already
01:00:13.400
here. It doesn't necessarily need to be the government doing it, but we already live amongst people that
01:00:17.960
are more than happy to do this sort of thing. Now, Elon Musk has got a bit of a vendetta against the
01:00:23.960
EFF, as one can imagine. And he says, very few people know that there is a major political party
01:00:28.120
in South Africa that is actively promoting white genocide, which I think is a fair characterization.
01:00:32.680
They explicitly sing songs about killing them. They make gun sounds. They talk about shooting the farmers.
01:00:38.680
It's about as explicit as it could possibly be. And the defense of the South African government is
01:00:44.360
it's just political terminology. It's just hyperbole. If only we had such lack standards
01:00:50.360
in Britain for that sort of thing. Maybe not to favor the minorities. But anyway, a month ago,
01:00:57.160
the South African government passed a law legalizing taking property from white people at the will
01:01:01.720
with no payment. Where is the outrage? Why is there no coverage by the legacy media? Starlink can't get
01:01:06.840
a license to operate in South Africa simply because I'm not black. How is that right? And in fact,
01:01:11.000
South Africa is the only country in Southern Africa that has refused them. And it seems to be out of
01:01:16.360
spite because of course they could do with the infrastructure. They're not in a position to choose.
01:01:21.160
And then Malema responded to Elon Musk saying we must not be intimidated by him and our friends will
01:01:27.080
never be the United Kingdom, France or the USA who are never there for us during difficult times.
01:01:32.280
Palestine was there for us. Okay. Interesting. I don't remember all those Palestinians helping in
01:01:40.440
the apartheid era. Was there a secret cohort of ANC Palestine?
01:01:44.520
I do know that the ANC was funded by lots of enemies of the United States though. So that's interesting.
01:01:52.280
And yes, here's them chanting it on Human Rights Day in South Africa, which is a wonderful irony.
01:01:58.840
Um, it's also worth mentioning as well that he's not just some obscure figure. He's got quite a bit
01:02:03.800
of reach there. 4.4 million followers. I imagine a decent portion of them are following in horror
01:02:08.680
more than anything, but still worth mentioning. He has a sizable platform. He's not just nobody.
01:02:14.760
And then here, um, here is Marco Rubio. I don't know why he's here because that link is not meant to be
01:02:22.840
that high up. Uh, okay. Um, the link seemed to be a bit messed up. Um, let's just skip that stuff
01:02:31.720
because you, you get the gist by this point. They're not very nice people, but there was a
01:02:38.440
documentary released by a group called Afriforum, which is a group, an Afrikaans group in South Africa,
01:02:45.640
that is trying to advocate for, um, the minority there that are being persecuted. And there are a couple
01:02:51.000
of groups that are actually pushing against this sort of thing. And I want to draw people's attention
01:02:54.680
to them because I think they're doing great work. This documentary was excellent. They were pointing
01:02:58.520
out the laws that discriminate against them. They're looking at the data. It was very factual,
01:03:02.600
very, um, data-based, very worth watching. And they're doing some great work. Um, it was presented
01:03:10.040
by this gentleman here. Um, and he's got a quote here from this documentary under ANC rule,
01:03:16.360
the South African sections of the media have long and unfortunate history of targeting citizens who
01:03:21.640
speak out against race-based politics or violent crime, with some commentators seeing their role
01:03:26.600
in such situations more as regime attack dogs rather than watchdogs against the abuse of power,
01:03:31.960
which is very much true, I think. And they've lamented the fact that the media in South Africa
01:03:37.800
has basically been trying to, uh, say that they're white supremacist or, um, they're bigoted and
01:03:44.520
extremists and should be ignored. And they're using things like screenshots of a headline,
01:03:49.320
opinion pieces, political cartoons, uh, their opinion and the word of ANC officials and just
01:03:56.680
calling it in food. Trust me. And just calling it a racist term for a, for a black guy. I thought
01:04:02.360
dude was supposed to be a white man's term. Is it? I heard that before. Yeah. Brother is,
01:04:07.240
uh, you know, the black man, dude is the white man. Okay, fair enough. Aren't they being racist?
01:04:10.280
Should that not be banned? It might be a bit too controversial, eh? But the point being is...
01:04:16.360
ANC mobs will be after me next. I wouldn't be surprised.
01:04:19.640
To add to the list. But, um, yeah, these are the sorts of things that are being used to rebut
01:04:24.760
the arguments. There aren't really any real rebuttals because there is clear evidence in the law that
01:04:30.600
there is this discrimination. And they tried to challenge this in a court and the court said that
01:04:37.480
actually it's a legitimate political expression and that it, it should stay. And they tried to
01:04:42.040
appeal this and, uh, I'm not sure if it actually stuck. And they've been pointing out that the
01:04:46.920
constitution, which, um, has Lee vowed not to have racial discrimination, no longer protects
01:04:53.240
everyone in the country because of course the chants such as kill the boar, which is calling for
01:04:57.720
the murder of Afrikaners. That's obvious. That's explicitly what it's saying. Um, the constitutional
01:05:03.160
court has shown total disrespect, as he says, for those people basically. And they're trying to
01:05:09.640
fight it, which is, um, a very commendable action and it's amazing that they can stay so calm and
01:05:15.960
collected and reasoned in such a difficult situation. And, um, of course, Ramaphosa was silent about this
01:05:25.560
because he secretly approves, but doesn't want the negative PR of saying so. And then, oh,
01:05:35.000
where's this article gone? There was an article here, um, Samson, if you could pull that up,
01:05:40.360
where it's, it's talking about how South Africa and the Cape more generally is an invisible choke point.
01:05:46.040
Uh, and this was, um, done by Robert Dugan, I think, um, who's involved in some of these groups.
01:05:53.080
And basically this is a shorter version of what's being handed out to lots of Western politicians.
01:05:58.120
And it points out that there's actually a strategic advantage of having control
01:06:01.640
of this passageway, um, because the passage around the Cape is actually not narrower than you think
01:06:06.920
because of the difficult waters. And so shipping has to come very close to South Africa. And what
01:06:12.680
I think is a very good, uh, political reason for pushing this argument is that the US or Britain might
01:06:18.840
have a stake in South Africa if they see, okay, well, this benefits trade and shipping and therefore
01:06:24.200
we want to be more invested. Um, okay. Um, I don't know why that's not coming up. Never mind. Um, but
01:06:33.320
yes, um, the article's called the invisible choke point if you want to look for it. Um, but yes, I think
01:06:38.680
that, ah, there we go. That's weird. Um, I had the wrong, uh, thing. That was my fault, Samson.
01:06:44.760
Um, so yes, um, it seems like a good way of getting people invested in South African politics
01:06:52.200
saying, listen, you'll have an advantage here because there's an excellent, um, image here of shipping.
01:06:58.040
Uh, here we go. You can see a heat map and most ships come within the coast and within the sort of
01:07:05.960
waters of South Africa. And if you want to preserve the shipping and say prevent the Chinese or the Russians,
01:07:11.320
um, who the ANC are sympathetic towards from accessing this valuable shipping lane,
01:07:16.840
maybe you want a stake in this area, which is clever politics in my opinion and is, is a good way of
01:07:23.320
saying actually there is a good reason to be involved in South Africa. Come and help us and
01:07:28.200
you'll get something in return, which is a good way of looking at it. But yes, this is another movement.
01:07:34.120
This basically started off as a trade union and now they run as a sort of parallel government.
01:07:38.440
They build schools, universities and have private security and they rely on community donations to
01:07:44.520
keep, uh, basically keep these Afrikaans communities safe and not, uh, under the ire of the ANC
01:07:54.920
and their supporters and the EFF. And there's also one final one that I want to draw attention to,
01:08:01.480
which is the SAAI, um, which is, uh, a network that supports farmers both in South Africa and Zimbabwe.
01:08:09.560
Um, and so I think they operate. I really don't think there was any white farmers left in Zimbabwe.
01:08:14.600
I thought they kind of, the pogrom was so strong that if you've got to be incredibly strong and
01:08:19.560
brave to want to stay there in that nation. I think there must be, um, I've not looked into it in
01:08:26.520
great detail, but I know of the fact that there is at least a small portion of people that are still
01:08:30.920
there after all of that. After all of that, you know, which is amazing. Serious lunacy going on in
01:08:36.040
that country. But my point being that whilst the government of South Africa pushes back against
01:08:42.040
Trump, there's also people, the Afrikaners, pushing back against the ANC and, you know, making
01:08:47.960
these documentaries, highlighting the points that Trump is making. And I think that they have a very,
01:08:53.240
very valid claim here to be persecuted. You can see it in the law. You can see it in how they're
01:08:59.160
treated in society. You can see it in the fact that their livelihoods can be destroyed for no
01:09:04.680
reason at all other than a government official wants it to be so. And I think it's one of those
01:09:08.920
things that is a rather overlooked tragedy and something that is entirely preventable. It's
01:09:14.600
entirely created by the South African government and it need not be this way because if they do what
01:09:21.240
they intend to do and take the land from these white farmers, what they're going to do is create
01:09:26.360
another Zimbabwe situation where lots of people starve. They struggle to even have electricity or
01:09:33.160
running water now. The infrastructure has gone downhill since the end of apartheid, basically.
01:09:39.320
You know, they had more electricity hours and clean water then than they do now because people
01:09:45.640
loot the infrastructure. And of course, the massive impact of this would be that if South Africa goes
01:09:51.880
as a into a failed state scenario, it provides a lot of jobs and economic activity for surrounding
01:09:57.960
countries in Namibia going up across. If that collapses, then once again, we'll see a migration crisis.
01:10:04.040
And we already know that one of the central cause of the migration crisis is coming up through
01:10:08.840
Central Africa, which are starting to bring more and more people up through the Western
01:10:14.200
Mediterranean route up through Libya who are all subject to seriously nastier arms of the people
01:10:21.000
smuggling gangs. These people are really capturing them and using them as slaves first before allowing
01:10:27.080
them to get onto the boats to come over to ourselves. Well, the Libyans have open slave markets.
01:10:32.520
They're not very shy about it. And it's just set to create a wave of human tragedy in which
01:10:39.000
no one benefits from. Okay, we've got a few comments here. Oh, blimey, we've got a few,
01:10:44.920
actually. And before we go to the video comments, where's my mouse? I can't see it.
01:10:52.120
Do you want to take this one? If you can just, I got it now. Oh, you're the hands of power there.
01:10:58.840
Apparently not. Hands of incompetence. That's a random name says, all of these anti-white
01:11:06.760
male initiatives, laws remind me of the Omni-Man quote, look what they need to mimic a fraction
01:11:13.640
of our power. That's a very positive way of looking at it. Yes. They hate us because they
01:11:20.040
ain't us, as some might say. That's a random name. Slight correction, Josh. That Algerian
01:11:25.720
teen in France was shot because he didn't stop his car and then tried to run over the police
01:11:30.440
officer. Okay, fair enough. I imagined it was something like that. I was just trying to be
01:11:37.480
brief because I was aware my segment was going on for a long time.
01:11:40.840
Goofball supremacist says, good morning from foggy coastal Maine, US. Wait, if the Stelios is here,
01:11:47.480
who will bully Harry during the show? Maybe Harry's sleeping now.
01:11:52.840
Bit of an inside joke there. I think one time- I can't see you, Stelios, as being a bully in
01:11:57.400
any way at all. You've got this mild manner. Just for some reason, a segment of the audience
01:12:03.480
thinks that there's a huge rivalry between Harry and myself. Ah, I see. It's like wrestling,
01:12:08.600
you see. If we make the audience believe that we all hate each other, then it's more investing.
01:12:14.120
We don't actually at all. It's funny, you know, you get your ouzo, you get your plates,
01:12:17.880
who can be the best plate smasher? There you go. You win the ouzo for dinner. Yeah,
01:12:21.320
yeah, that's good. We got any video comments, Samson? None for today. Okay, well, written
01:12:27.960
comments it is then. So, you right to read some of yours? Yes, yes, of course. Give me a minute.
01:12:34.760
Okay, right. So, comments. Roman observer. Judges in the West have largely become a force
01:12:45.160
of tyranny. Yeah, I can't disagree with this. I agree with this. It's not often that you hear from
01:12:51.240
the judiciary that they've done anything that sounds sensible. I think the only exception could be,
01:12:57.080
perhaps, the Supreme Court in the United States. I like seeing Clarence Thomas just dismissing
01:13:03.400
proposals in one word. It's like, ridiculous or no?
01:13:09.960
Can you imagine that ever happening in a Western European country, turning around ridiculous or no?
01:13:16.760
You know, it would be good fun, to be honest. Yeah, yeah, yeah.
01:13:19.080
You know, they're actually a bit more entertaining. You might then have someone turning around and,
01:13:23.560
you know, get them on the island, get them into the jungle. Maybe if the Supreme Court in Britain
01:13:28.280
were like that, I'd be a bit more entertaining of it. But of course, it's a Blairite creation,
01:13:32.120
isn't it? Metal Dave says, listening to Keir Starmer speak has the same effect on me as the
01:13:37.400
Dementors in Harry Potter. Just sucks the joy right out of me. It sounds like an unimpressive
01:13:43.640
office manager trying to justify his position. No personality, no charisma, and no love for this
01:13:49.560
country, or anyone else's for that matter. I have had much more inspiring bosses than this. It's
01:13:56.280
it's shameful. He's one man to... And then he cuts off for some reason.
01:14:01.080
Yeah, basically, okay. Complete dimension levels.
01:14:07.240
So if you did make an audition for The Office, there's no way they'd even pass. They'd turn around
01:14:12.040
and say, you're too boring. Can't play the acoustic guitar either. It would never fit the role of
01:14:15.720
David Brent, would he? No. He doesn't listen to music. He doesn't have a... Well, he does have
01:14:19.400
a favorite TV show now. It's adolescence. But before then, I don't think he's said that.
01:14:25.720
The only thing he's ever watched in the last 10 years.
01:14:28.200
Apart from reruns of Blair the movie. Look at him on number 10.
01:14:33.400
I'd be surprised if he could even see color, to be honest.
01:14:35.720
Nota Fed says, this is what people mean when they say there's no voting our way out of this.
01:14:41.480
An incredible threat to the status quo will simply be taken out before they can get anywhere.
01:14:46.600
Meaning democracy is essentially an impotent political tool. I mean, I'm not that pessimistic.
01:14:58.360
Yeah, I'm not that pessimistic. But I think that
01:15:01.320
civil society needs to wake up and reclaim its culture.
01:15:05.480
I think people are just too comfortable to realize that their life can forever be changed
01:15:11.320
by the political system. And that, you know, going to your job and going home and watching Netflix
01:15:16.840
every night, although it might be comforting, isn't necessarily a socially responsible thing to do.
01:15:22.440
Well, as they see more and more of their family and friends either not being able to get jobs,
01:15:26.200
not being forced out of work, having the contrary arguments about discrimination
01:15:32.360
that you saw against others now being applied to themselves, they become more and more
01:15:36.680
waking up to this. And this is what I'm seeing in Middle England.
01:15:39.560
Middle England ignored immigration for the last 20 years. Let's be frank about it.
01:15:42.760
Here in the UK or across Europe, I'm all right. I'm coming to my lovely Winchester town.
01:15:46.600
I'm going off to Salisbury. It's all white. It's all lovely. I've got my nice big house.
01:15:50.920
It's comfortable. And now they're beginning to see that impacting onto those towns as well.
01:15:55.080
And they're suddenly going, hang on, add that to the economic damage that they're getting.
01:15:59.720
And what do they have? They start saying, well, where's the problem coming from?
01:16:03.640
But it's too late for many communities up and down the country. And I have a fear,
01:16:08.280
and echoing the comments of the writer there who sent in that note about our political ability to
01:16:15.240
change it in Europe. The US has a totally different and open constitution to be able to vote. It is one
01:16:21.640
side or the other. And you've got states like many countries. But first past the post is incredibly
01:16:27.320
difficult for us to achieve it, any substantive change, unless you get a uniting of the rights
01:16:33.400
here. And then we could. And if we did so, I think that's a bulwark against Europe. But as we saw there
01:16:39.080
with Marie Le Pen, the AFD, Gert Wilders, Italy with Maloney and what's happening in Romania, the
01:16:45.640
establishment have actually got a creation of political armory to prevent other parties from getting in.
01:16:53.080
And that, I think, is an ultimate danger. Is that what causes a revolution over there?
01:16:58.520
Will there be a revolution in Europe to make this finally work?
01:17:02.360
Maybe. Oh, sorry. It's interesting you mentioned first past the post, because I've studied all of
01:17:07.720
the different electoral systems, and I have my preferences. But first past the post is unique
01:17:13.720
in that it boosts the main two parties, doesn't it? And so it creates this revolving door syndrome of
01:17:23.880
Labour, Tory, Labour, Tory, Labour, Tory, that we've seen for the vast majority of our lives.
01:17:32.120
I know there was a Lib Dem coalition briefly, but they didn't really have any proper power.
01:17:39.800
A hundred odd years of exactly the same sort of cultural, political ideology.
01:17:45.560
And whereas first past the post, if you're successful and winning, it's incredibly useful
01:17:49.640
to be able to implement change, allegedly. We now know, in this country, that the powers of
01:17:56.920
quangos and the powers of the civil service even nullify that. So it's not surprising
01:18:05.480
that younger people are saying, there's nothing left for me. And older people are saying,
01:18:09.400
I'll retire and get out of the system. Hopefully I'll just be able to enjoy my last 20 years without
01:18:13.640
anybody hurting me in any particular way. I just feel that this is, in some ways,
01:18:19.640
what they really want. They don't want us engaging in the politics. They want us to understand
01:18:24.120
that we have no power and just get away with it. That's why I think a culture of civic
01:18:29.160
engagement is important and people will need to stop watching Netflix, as you said before,
01:18:34.280
and start applying pressure to the governments. I think also the government needs to realize that
01:18:41.560
creating entire generations of disaffected people isn't the best thing for their own long-term
01:18:47.240
self-interest. Even if you're a greedy, corrupt politician, if there are lots of desperate people in
01:18:53.320
your society, you'll get a lot more people like that Luigi Mangione guy who killed the United
01:19:00.280
Healthcare CEO. He was willing to ruin his life because he felt it, and the life of the man he
01:19:06.680
killed, because he felt like he no longer had a stake in society. And you're going to get more and more
01:19:12.040
of that. And I don't see how that benefits politicians or the people involved.
01:19:17.480
Being desperate, having nothing to look forward to, having no hope, feeling that there is no one
01:19:23.720
in this country that cares for you, and there is no opportunity for change, is a recipe for ultimate
01:19:29.000
disaster on a personal level and a national level. And we should be fighting this. And that's why,
01:19:34.760
you know, shows like this are incredibly important. Be able to let people know that there are those who
01:19:39.560
actually understand them, and they're trying in this particular form to engage them, get them excited and
01:19:45.160
energized. Jordi Swartzman. Of course, child Hamas Tama is angry. The fools weren't supposed to say it
01:19:53.080
out loud. Thomas Howell. All I see with this sentencing racism is that Wojak wearing a sad mask but
01:20:01.240
grinning from ear to ear underneath. That's really, really good. Garlic Goblin says the blindfold has been
01:20:09.160
torn from Lady Justice's eyes. It's as simple as that. Hard to describe. And Lord Nerova says,
01:20:17.000
I'm becoming more sympathetic to young people who want to live Britain. Of course, we will win and
01:20:21.720
England will be saved. But there are other considerations. What if you have a young family
01:20:26.520
and you get sent away for two years over a tweet? Nobody should have to live like this.
01:20:30.680
Okay, we've got some comments for your segment here. I'll be happy to read them for you.
01:20:39.000
John H says, I wonder what the French army officers will do. Democracy is dead or dying. Yes,
01:20:45.720
that's a good point. The French are known for their dissatisfaction when the government isn't doing
01:20:53.320
their thing. I certainly know about the French Revolution. Is it the 78th French Republic?
01:21:01.640
I've lost track. I think they've lost track as well.
01:21:07.000
It'll be interesting to see where the military go on this, if the people start to rise up again.
01:21:13.800
But is there going to be enough of a rising up? It was interesting to see how the farmers came out
01:21:18.680
over the last couple of years. And so many of them started to support Marie Le Pen. And that
01:21:23.800
the socialists then had to try and jump on it to say, look, we're with you as well.
01:21:28.040
I mean, in ancient times, all you really needed was the military and the farms. And you've got
01:21:34.280
yourself all the base of power you need. That sounds like I'm trying to suggest something. I'm not.
01:21:43.080
But that political document you said of how to plan a revolution in France, that's not real then.
01:21:48.680
I forgot what I was going to say now. Sorry, that's really, really, really unfair of me.
01:21:57.640
And just for the MI5 and MI6, that is a made up document, just in case you're watching us.
01:22:02.280
It's not real. We're pretending it's a joke. It's humor.
01:22:06.040
But also the yellow vests are going to cause some chaos, I'm sure.
01:22:08.520
But Eloise says, England slash the UK is on the same trajectory and the same conversations,
01:22:16.280
the same issues, the same claims, the same plays in politics. I've seen it all happen before as a child,
01:22:21.960
along with the crime spikes, more ethnic unrest and blaming others, fracturing cohesion, so less
01:22:27.560
ability to group build, work together and keep employment high and a functional society. Eloise is
01:22:33.080
South African, I believe. And so what she's saying is basically that she's seeing all the parallels.
01:22:37.880
And in fact, many of the South African commentators that I've spoke to as well have been saying the
01:22:42.760
same thing, that they're worried about us because we're people that they're hoping we'll be able
01:22:48.040
to help them. And we're making the same mistakes that the ANC are doing, but we're imposing it upon
01:22:54.360
ourselves. Yeah. Absolutely spot on there. Jamie Wright says, something to keep in mind is that
01:23:02.760
even though white South Africans own most of the farms in the country, we don't own most of the
01:23:07.240
arable land. If the black population wanted to, they could start setting up farms of their own.
01:23:13.080
That is also true. And also a lot of the land in South Africa, as I understand it, it might not be fit
01:23:20.680
for crops necessarily, but you can still have grazing animals, things like that sort of thing that's
01:23:25.640
common throughout Africa. And so it is possible to have successful farms, but I think that there's
01:23:33.400
so much ethnic resentment in South Africa that they're not necessarily wanting to learn the ways
01:23:39.240
of the European farmer. And let's not forget that a lot of Africa isn't that many generations
01:23:45.560
removed from a more traditional lifestyle. And so European ways of farming that we've created over
01:23:53.560
thousands and thousands of years are pretty foreign to them and they don't necessarily understand them.
01:23:58.840
And because of this ethnic resentment, they're not really going out of their way to learn from them.
01:24:04.120
And it's one of those things that was an empire of dust when there was a, the Chinese were in the
01:24:09.800
Congo and there's an interesting scene of a Chinese man dressing down a Congolese man saying,
01:24:17.000
listen, the white man was here and he built you all of these wonderful things, trains, you know,
01:24:20.680
you had all of these things even before we had them in China and you've let them go to ruin.
01:24:25.160
You're not grateful for them. You've not understood them. You've just taken them for granted.
01:24:30.120
And you could see he's genuinely annoyed, probably because he's got the job of having to get them to
01:24:35.560
work. But it's still highlighting the same point that I think I was getting at that they took a
01:24:44.040
lot of this for granted and they presumed that they could get away with persecuting the European man
01:24:48.920
when actually a lot of the things that were brought to South Africa, these, these aspects of
01:24:54.760
civilization, if you will, you know, access to running water, electricity, having a, you know,
01:25:00.520
a functioning political system that isn't corrupt. These are all things that we had to introduce
01:25:05.000
to Africa. And by marginalizing, if I want of a better word, because it's a bit tainted these
01:25:11.400
days, the white minority, they're also rejecting all of these things because knowledge doesn't exist
01:25:18.280
in a vacuum. You've got to have the people that understand it, obviously. It almost seems silly
01:25:23.320
to point it out, but it's something that I think is getting missed. Patrick Reed says,
01:25:29.480
I'm really sorry to hear about what's happening to Tim's family. He strikes me as the kind of man who
01:25:34.360
doesn't like to ask for help. His friends should organize something now so that they know there
01:25:42.040
are people around the world who will be there for them in their hour of need. Just knowing that we
01:25:46.760
are here will be helpful. And that's a really nice sentiment. So thank you for saying so. And it's,
01:25:51.320
it's true. And I'm glad you mentioned that at the start of the podcast, Alios.
01:25:59.560
Johan Schett, RE South Africa. The anti-Indian riots were due to the Gupta family involvement
01:26:09.000
with Jacob Zuma and the ANC. State capture was a popular phrase in those days. I actually wrote
01:26:14.600
an article back in 2021 explaining that whole debacle because we were all seeing videos of
01:26:21.640
people getting shot and warehouses being burnt to the ground and no one really knew what was going
01:26:26.200
on. And it was basically a clash between Ramaphosa and Jacob Zuma, who was a former ANC president,
01:26:34.200
and then the current ANC president. It was a political thing. And then Zuma went,
01:26:38.920
was imprisoned on corruption charges because he had massive stacks of cash in his house, which
01:26:45.400
in my mind, tends to indicate that you might be corrupt. And so it's probably true. But in a lot
01:26:51.640
of South African politics, everyone is corrupt. So it's one of those things where it's selectively
01:26:56.040
enforced. And he went on to set up his own party, M.K. We Seesway. I'm probably massively butchering that.
01:27:02.920
But they stole loads of votes from the ANC. The ANC then had less than a majority of votes in the last
01:27:09.960
election. And now they introduced this bill. So by this fallout between those two presidents,
01:27:15.320
it's unintentionally drawn the ire of Trump and potentially the collapse of their entire
01:27:20.600
government if things carry on the way they are. So the final comment we'll read is from Baron
01:27:26.040
Von Warhawk. A while ago, I got into an argument with my friend about a subject matter that deeply
01:27:30.840
disturbed me. The topic arose about Elon Musk criticizing South Africa. And I brought up the
01:27:35.720
attacks on the Boers there. They outright dismissed it. And when I showed them the evidence of
01:27:39.880
children being burnt alive and women being raped, one of them said that the white South Africans
01:27:46.360
should have expected some revenge action. When I pointed out that the native Africans promised
01:27:54.520
no retaliation and that they would let bygones be bygones to build a rainbow nation, he responded
01:28:02.600
that it was white's fault for believing it and that it should have moved as soon as apartheid ended.
01:28:08.200
When I pointed out that these people have been there for almost 400 years, they're being targeted by
01:28:12.600
Bantus who arrived recently. I think the Bantu expansion was in about 500 BC to Central and South
01:28:22.360
Africa because they came out of Nigeria and Ghana and places like that. So they're not necessarily
01:28:28.760
the natives of the natives of the land. And there are still natives. You know, you look at the Congo,
01:28:33.000
the natives in the land, a lot of them are pygmies. And a lot of the Congos there are Bantus that came
01:28:40.040
there in the Bantu expansion. So if you understand your history, you know that people's claims quite
01:28:47.000
often don't hold as much water as you might imagine. But I think that the best avenue of attack here is that
01:28:54.360
by attacking the white minority in South Africa, they're harming themselves. You know, they need
01:29:00.040
food, they need infrastructure, they need these things just as much as anyone else. And by attacking
01:29:05.320
the people that disproportionately contribute to that, they aren't really helping anyone. They're
01:29:10.600
not helping the white farmers, they're not helping themselves. And they're not helping themselves on the
01:29:14.840
international stage because it looks awful if you genocide people, which shouldn't be a surprise to
01:29:21.800
anyone. And on that lovely positive note, it's time to end the show. Thank you very much for coming
01:29:29.080
on again. My pleasure. And thank you very much, everyone, for watching. Hope you have a nice day,
01:29:33.400
despite the bad news. Make sure to tune in same time tomorrow. And goodbye. Goodbye.