The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters - March 31, 2025


The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #1132


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 29 minutes

Words per Minute

173.49344

Word Count

15,556

Sentence Count

1,022

Misogynist Sentences

10

Hate Speech Sentences

57


Summary

The Lotus Eaters are joined by Stelios and Stephen to discuss two-tier justice in England and Wales and the French government's attempt to create a two-tiered justice system. They also discuss the recent sentencing of Marie Le Pen and the impact this has on the country's democracy.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hello and welcome to the podcast of the Lotus Eaters for the 31st of March 2025. I am joined
00:00:05.280 by Stelios and joined once again by our guest Stephen Wolfe. Hey, hi everyone. You've made your
00:00:12.200 return. I have, fantastic. You're also presenting your own segment today. I am, that's very kind of
00:00:17.340 you, thank you. You're more than welcome. And today we are talking about, well Stelios is going
00:00:23.660 to be talking about Britain's 2 to Justice smokescreen. Yep. And then Stephen's going to
00:00:28.420 be talking about how, I'm putting words in your mouth here a little bit, but how democracy has
00:00:34.060 basically ended in France to a certain extent. Yeah, I think to an extent that people are going
00:00:38.640 to look at today's sentencing of Marie Le Pen and say exactly that. I'm very worried about it actually.
00:00:46.300 And I'm going to be talking about how South Africa is pushing back not only the ANC government but also
00:00:51.960 the Afrikaner minority as well. And there's a very interesting dynamic going on there. But I believe
00:00:57.520 Stelios has an announcement here. Yes, it's about Tim, a friend and also friend of the show. He, I want to
00:01:05.160 do this shout out, his wife Amy is battling cancer. And I want to wish you good luck and speedy recovery.
00:01:13.420 And I want to wish you all the best. So yeah, very, very much so. And all the best.
00:01:18.400 Right. So yeah, so let's wait for a second.
00:01:26.460 Thompson's doing his magic. This is the joy of editing things into segments. This will never be
00:01:33.260 seen on YouTube.
00:01:34.660 Right. So basically, I think we are looking upon an admission that two-tier justice exists
00:01:39.320 from the government. And it's very safe to say because they've been all bit explicit
00:01:44.960 about it, haven't they? They have been explicit about it. But also, they always said that people
00:01:50.260 who use these words are far-right extremists. So this... The government's now a far-right extremist.
00:01:55.580 It has... Say, Mam Shabima Mahoum is that far-right. But now she's an extremist far-right rather
00:02:01.380 than just being an extremist in some people's minds.
00:02:03.240 Right. So basically, the Sentencing Council for England and Wales has issued some guidelines
00:02:09.120 with respect to sentencing that take ethnicity into account to an extent that was presumably
00:02:15.080 that's much greater than the extent it was taken before.
00:02:18.300 It's also worth mentioning that it was already quite bad.
00:02:21.780 Yes.
00:02:21.960 Like, you could just eyeball sentences reading the news, being, you know, a casual reader of
00:02:28.460 a newspaper, and you could see the differences in sentencing pretty explicitly.
00:02:33.240 You know, the reason everyone noticed this two-tier thing was largely through what they'd
00:02:39.660 seen through headlines. And now the fact that the sentencing council is just explicitly admitting
00:02:43.480 it is very significant.
00:02:45.220 Yes. And I may infuriate you because I don't think that they have particular credibility,
00:02:49.720 but the Labour government says that these guidelines are unacceptable because they support
00:02:55.160 a two-tier system.
00:02:57.240 Yeah.
00:02:57.880 Wait, what?
00:02:58.360 This is a Labour government saying it doesn't support a two-tier system when almost across
00:03:04.700 every aspect of policy and government, it is creating a two-tier system.
00:03:08.040 Not on their watch. Not on their watch.
00:03:10.640 Well, this is definitely... Oh, sorry, Steph.
00:03:12.240 No, no, please.
00:03:12.920 This is certainly some red meat to poach from the right, isn't it?
00:03:17.440 Yes. And also, Keir Starmer has started talking about illegal migration and him being particularly
00:03:23.280 unhappy with it. He's not talking about irregular migration, he's talking about illegal.
00:03:28.220 I think he's had a meeting with Tony Blair because he's been saying, I hear your concerns
00:03:32.460 and I'm taking them seriously, which is like a signature Tony line.
00:03:35.940 Right. So for me, this shows that there is a significant trend within the world of jurisprudence
00:03:42.080 of judging according to these principles. And right now, they felt that this is the opportune
00:03:48.780 moment to come and provide additional institutional backing and support for these principles when
00:03:54.680 they're saying that with these guidelines, we want you, judges, to adjudicate according
00:03:59.540 to these principles. And essentially, this is going to say, it's going to mention the oppression
00:04:06.720 calculus and they're going to give some reports to the judges, especially when it comes to
00:04:12.960 people of ethnic background. And they're going to try to say that there are, because there
00:04:19.320 are several oppressed minorities and ethnicities, all this implicit bias should be taken into
00:04:26.360 account when you're yielding a verdict about the sentence. And perhaps you should be a bit more
00:04:31.100 lenient with so-called oppressed backgrounds. It's also worth mentioning as well that the research
00:04:37.780 on implicit bias in psychology seems to suggest that you can't get rid of it. But if you do take
00:04:44.860 measures to try to, it makes your racial bias worse. Yes. In that, for example, they expose people
00:04:52.580 to stereotypes and terminology to avoid. And what it did was it made people more easily recall
00:04:58.700 these terms that they're not supposed to use, which probably means they're more likely to use them.
00:05:03.260 And the more biased people are, the more necessary the anti-bias section seems to be,
00:05:13.000 at least to people who think that bias is wrong. Right. So we have an article from
00:05:17.040 The Guardian here that says ministers criticize two-tier sentencing changes in England and Wales.
00:05:23.360 And they're saying is the guidance aimed at tackling bias and reducing re-offending.
00:05:29.040 How exactly? Puts more emphasis on the need for pre-sentence reports, which give details of
00:05:35.880 the offenders' backgrounds, motives and personal life before sentencing. So my question is,
00:05:41.280 what does this do that the ordinary defence doesn't do?
00:05:47.600 Well, the ordinary defence comes out and gives you, as a barrister myself, someone who's had to go
00:05:53.260 through the criminal process, both as a prosecutor and as a defender, is the ability for the defence
00:06:00.480 to raise the issues that support why you shouldn't be sentenced so determinately. If you talk about
00:06:07.560 what happened in your family background, you talk about breakups, you talk about the lack
00:06:11.860 of education you have, you might talk about why you were threatened. All of those are elements that
00:06:18.000 you would normally and naturally use. The whole process of the pre-sentence report when it was created
00:06:24.080 was to try and ensure that those defendants who were incapable of doing it properly or to give an
00:06:30.820 opportunity for the court to understand more about an individual, that was created. And to an extent,
00:06:37.840 someone often argued, why? Why was this brought in? Now, I can understand it. In many cases,
00:06:44.300 a pre-sentence report was actually helpful to be able to understand what was going on. And I think
00:06:48.940 for many, many lawyers, they would say a PSO is a useful vehicle. The first question is kind of
00:06:56.460 philosophically, why was it introduced when you could do this anyway? And why did the courts not
00:07:01.960 listen to what the defendants? And I think really, it was because the courts were being encouraged not
00:07:08.380 to imprison people or give certain sentences to certain groups of people. And they couldn't just
00:07:13.660 rely on the defence. They wanted to have a third party. It was like the idea of bringing in quangos.
00:07:19.400 If we can rely on a third party, it's not your fault you didn't do it properly. And it's not us.
00:07:24.960 We're just listening to the pre-sentence report. And that's why this is taking on such an important
00:07:31.040 part of the debate, is because judges and magistrates are almost washing their hands to
00:07:36.920 a certain extent by saying, I'm relying on what's said in the pre-sentence report.
00:07:41.600 So I think, I think the way a lot of ordinary people think about justice is that it doesn't
00:07:48.180 necessarily matter about these sort of extenuating circumstances. A certain action should have a
00:07:54.240 certain sentence, regardless of your reasoning for it. I think that that's how I certainly
00:08:00.260 think about that sort of thing. And it seems like a way of basically making excuses for
00:08:07.080 yourself. Maybe I'm being a bit unsympathetic here, but it does seem like a way of saying,
00:08:13.580 oh, well, you know, I came here on a small boat. It was terrible. It was awful. I've had such
00:08:17.780 a hard time now. You know, I'm really sorry about stabbing that innocent person.
00:08:23.240 Yes. So my question, I think I'll phrase it again. What does this put forward that a
00:08:29.760 traditional defence doesn't? Because you're mentioning the specifics of the case, which
00:08:34.000 I'm sure the defence would mention. But it seems to me that in this report, if the report
00:08:39.400 is about to say tackling bias, they are going to put forward all the ideological bits, all
00:08:46.240 the woke progressivism within legislation is going to get an extra institutional backing.
00:08:51.860 And let me continue what they say. Under the change, which would come into force on April
00:08:57.900 the 1st, tomorrow, that is, magistrates and judges would be asked to consult a pre-sentence
00:09:05.860 report before determining whether to imprison someone of an ethnic or religious minority,
00:09:11.860 as well as young adults, abuse survivors and pregnant women. At present state, black and
00:09:19.120 minority ethnic communities are overrepresented at almost all stages of the criminal justice
00:09:24.300 process in England and Wales and are more likely to be imprisoned and receive longer sentences
00:09:29.160 than white people. Well, the question why isn't being asked here, but also,
00:09:35.860 what is going to happen is that these guidelines are saying, we are going to have the woke oppression
00:09:42.620 calculus, we're going to separate the population into groups, we're going to rank them according
00:09:47.500 to who is more or less oppressed, and those who are considered to be among the privileged
00:09:54.200 groups are going to get Taffa sentences. This is precisely what this is.
00:09:57.800 It's an explicit rejection of the rule of law, isn't it?
00:09:59.900 Yeah. Right, so Keir Starmer took issue with it, and he took issue with several other things. He
00:10:06.340 talked today about illegal migration as being a risk for security and him being very angry about it.
00:10:12.340 He's also very angry about the two-tier system. Right, so let's look at what Keir Starmer has to say here.
00:10:18.660 Well, I'm disappointed in this response, and the Lord Chancellor is obviously continuing to engage
00:10:26.860 on this, and we're considering our response. And, you know, all options are on the table,
00:10:32.020 but I am disappointed at this outcome, and now we'll have to consider what we do as a result.
00:10:37.320 So he's gravely disappointed.
00:10:40.980 But he's come out just to, was it just before we came on air, where he actually said, now we're going
00:10:46.780 to push an initial legislation to attach to current amendments. Sorry, he's putting an amendment to
00:10:53.140 current legislation in order to try and tackle this issue, how he does that. So he's saying he cares,
00:10:59.480 but I think this is a lot of pressure. As you saw when we were discussing the letter about it,
00:11:04.980 the letter makes it very clear that it's all about what the pressure has come from Robert
00:11:11.220 Jenrick. No one else, just Jenrick, seems to have caused this. And I think he's running a bit scared.
00:11:17.620 Speaking of Robert Jenrick, we have a post of him here saying, under two-tier Keir, that's exactly
00:11:24.420 what's happening. It's completely outrageous. This would enshrine an anti-white and anti-Christian
00:11:29.400 bias in our criminal justice system.
00:11:33.140 Sounds about right to me, to be honest.
00:11:35.380 Yes. And he's reacting against Shabana Mahmoud, who said, there will never be a two-tier sentencing
00:11:42.120 approach under this Labour government.
00:11:44.240 Well, it's too late for that now, isn't it?
00:11:46.000 Yeah, I don't know. Do you believe them?
00:11:47.820 No, of course not.
00:11:48.000 Just tell us in the comments. Tell us in the live chat. Do you believe them?
00:11:52.100 Right. So she is proposing here a way to tackle this. The government will introduce legislation
00:12:00.260 to Parliament this week to override independent guidance on how offenders from ethnic minorities
00:12:06.040 should be sentenced. It comes after the sentencing council refused a request from Justice Secretary
00:12:11.320 Shabana Mahmoud to consider its new instruction for judges. I know. I just don't believe it.
00:12:19.280 It's going to be a fascinating element because, as I say, for many lawyers, a PSO or a pre-sentence
00:12:25.080 report is useful. But in so many ways, the idea that it's now, here's a judge or a magistrate.
00:12:32.440 We are considering incarcerating somebody. But because they come from one of these three groups
00:12:38.240 or four, if you've added a couple more on there as well, we can't sentence them to prison
00:12:43.280 today because we've got to get a PSO. And why, I can't understand why the judiciary or those
00:12:49.380 who are looking at this see this as odd. Because what do I go back to, trying to make jokes about
00:12:56.080 it. But the reality was my grandparents worked in factories, pretty abused in factories in the
00:13:03.020 1890s and 1900s. And their ancestors were all abused. They were pretty much slaves, working
00:13:10.020 for virtually nothing. The miners' families were the same. All over Britain, we could turn around
00:13:14.120 and say, we've had abuse from elitist masters who've taken our labor and used it to build their
00:13:19.560 empires and big houses. Why are they excluded? Haven't they got some sort of cultural or historical
00:13:24.760 pain that we remember? We remember what it's like to be in poverty, you know, in the 70s
00:13:30.160 and the 80s. Well, maybe not for you guys, to be honest. You know, you're far too young
00:13:33.580 and healthy compared to myself. But we do know what it was like when the lights were out in
00:13:37.240 the 80s. And so why is that excluded as a characteristic that should be considered when I'm doing the
00:13:42.880 crime? And I think that's the real point that's going to impact people in this country about
00:13:48.100 fairness. We're a nation of fairness. And we want to see it being fair to everyone all
00:13:53.820 the time. Speaking of fairness, it's one thing to talk about fairness in the abstract, the
00:13:58.660 abstract concept, because everyone will go out and say, we are fair. No, I'm not having
00:14:03.540 a go at you. Oh, it's true. You're absolutely right. I want to improve, to add to what you're
00:14:07.660 saying. The question is how fairness is being understood. So the Aristotelian, for instance,
00:14:13.140 understanding of fairness is completely different to the woke understanding of fairness. The woke
00:14:17.420 understanding of fairness wants to institute differential treatment. Why? Because they
00:14:23.940 say, well, until we are in the position to treat people equally, we are in a state of
00:14:28.700 emergency and we need to mitigate historical inequalities. And we need to help those who
00:14:35.680 have been historically oppressed. Sorry. Just to finish. But the way that they are understanding
00:14:43.260 who is oppressed or not, as you mentioned, is entirely arbitrary, which lends reports to
00:14:48.580 the view that what they care about is not fairness. What they care about is who is their political
00:14:52.680 friends and who are their political enemies. They want to benefit the former, harm the latter.
00:14:58.420 I think a rather oft overlooked point here is that there's a massive amount of hubris here
00:15:05.820 in the notion that they've got a complete understanding of basically human suffering.
00:15:11.980 They're basically trying to mitigate for the fact that some people have not had the best
00:15:16.660 shot at life. And to make these formal judgments saying, okay, these ethnicities, they've had a
00:15:23.580 particularly bad time, but other people, perhaps not white people, you know what, they've had an
00:15:27.340 easy ride of it. And as you've alluded to, that's not true. And the arrogance at play here to say
00:15:33.300 that, oh, you know what, these people who have come over and claimed welfare and not worked,
00:15:39.540 they're more persecuted than someone who's worked their entire life for effectively the state.
00:15:46.680 I see such a mismatch here, but that's not going to be acknowledged, is it? Because they think that
00:15:50.740 they understand the nature of human suffering, which they don't.
00:15:55.300 And I think that's an incredibly important point to ignore, what's happened as culturally to people
00:16:01.460 in this country as they've tried to make their lives better. I mean, you've suddenly reminded me
00:16:06.740 of a kind of story that I had as a junior barrister. I'd spent my first year, I'd prosecuted and defended
00:16:12.620 and not lost a single criminal case in the first year. So as a consequence of that, I was taken to a bar
00:16:17.680 around the corner from the criminal justice main courts. And I was, Benjamin's still in cleats,
00:16:23.380 I think it was called, I'm not sure it's still there anymore. And I was introduced to one of the
00:16:27.720 greatest barristers of his time, George Carman, by my pupil master, as we called him. And he goes
00:16:36.160 to George and his very posh voice, George, I'd like to introduce you to another Mancunian like
00:16:41.240 yourself, who's done incredibly well. He's great at the bar in crime. And George Carman turns around
00:16:47.360 to look at me and he's surrounded by a whole group of people, all fawning all over this great barrister.
00:16:53.060 And he says, what's your name? Again, equally in a posh. And I said, and I still had my Manc accent.
00:16:57.860 And I said, it's Stephen Wolfe from Manchester. Although I'm probably sounding scouse now at the
00:17:02.220 moment. I'm going to get killed by my family for doing that. And he turns around to me and his
00:17:07.180 only words to me were, if you want to go far at the bar, lose that accent, boy, lose that accent.
00:17:14.440 And that kind of privilege and the voice is doing you down because of where you came from. That's the
00:17:21.880 sort of level of suffering that we've had from those who've had to work in the pits to those who've
00:17:27.580 tried to climb out. Does that count? Is that going to be ignored? And I think that you're right. It
00:17:33.900 will be ignored because it's not relevant to their agenda. Exactly. I think it has to do a lot with the
00:17:41.100 left turning its back to the traditional working class. I think Lenin himself said that unless there
00:17:47.340 is a vanguard party that is going to tell the workers what their true interests are, they are going to
00:17:53.720 develop at most a syndicalist consciousness and they're going to choose capitalism, not communism.
00:17:59.800 And after the, I think when the more communism got discredited and actual socialism got discredited,
00:18:07.240 the left started focusing on in the sixties in universities. And then they, I think they're in
00:18:15.000 a position where they say we've lost the native working class. So they're going to opt for foreign people.
00:18:23.720 And your point is incredibly proven with the statistics that came out over the weekend
00:18:28.520 that showed that when you look at the particular parties support, Labour is now being supported by
00:18:34.600 the wealthiest individuals in this country at the higher end, the middle aged groups and those who've
00:18:40.440 gone to university. So they're saying that Labour supports the rich and the clever. I mean, to be honest,
00:18:46.200 I wouldn't necessarily say that everybody went to university is clever, but there we go.
00:18:49.560 Yeah, from my experiences, from my experience, certainly the case, but they, they love that. And that feeds
00:18:55.720 into this arrogance of a kind of a snobbish kind of view of looking down upon those below me who don't
00:19:02.520 understand the issues. And I find that patronizing. And it's exactly what your point is raised on that.
00:19:08.840 Thanks. So I think there are two interpretations of what is going on here. The first, which I find completely unlikely,
00:19:14.360 is that Labour actually has an issue with the two-tier justice system, which I don't think is,
00:19:20.200 I don't think it's particularly credible as a hypothesis. And the second one is that basically
00:19:25.800 they are in bed with them. And they are trying to, and the question there becomes, why are they doing so?
00:19:33.000 Well, part of it is because they want to approach elements of the other voters, groups of voters,
00:19:40.200 they think they have alienated. That's why we see Keir Starmer starting banging the drum of anger
00:19:45.480 against illegal migration right now. So what they could be doing is working together, having people
00:19:53.160 within the judiciary proposing, basically discrediting their judiciary within, in the eye of the public
00:20:01.800 mind. That's in public consciousness, pardon me. And that makes people being much more prone towards
00:20:10.040 government control, extra government control, because they say, well, look at all, look at the judiciary,
00:20:17.000 all of them are crazy, and they are harming society. So the only way to solve this is by
00:20:24.440 erasing the checks and balances that the judiciary poses to the government, and opt for a much stronger
00:20:31.480 executive. In which case, the question is, what, what are we going to make of, wait, where is the link?
00:20:39.320 I don't have, well, I don't have the link there. It's not there, but it doesn't matter. Keir Starmer has,
00:20:47.000 has kneeled before for the BLM cause. He has expressed sympathy for all the woke,
00:20:54.120 all the woke causes. We've talked extensively about two-tier policing, reporting, and sentencing here.
00:21:02.520 You can just, the examples are too many. You can just click on any video of this link to where we're
00:21:09.480 talking about the two-tier. But I mean, we did a lot, didn't we? Yeah. But what I will say is that,
00:21:13.720 apart from individual examples, the whole issue is, any person who supports woke progressivism is
00:21:20.680 supporting a two-tier society. Because woke progressivism is all about mitigating so-called
00:21:26.680 historical inequalities by means of differential treatment. Differential treatment means two-tier
00:21:33.720 treatment. So if one is promoting wokeness, one is promoting differential treatment and two-tier society.
00:21:40.840 I think Starmer's doing two things simultaneously. He's, as you say, empowering the government over
00:21:46.360 the judiciary, but he's also stealing Nigel Farage's two best talking points. He's basically taking
00:21:52.600 immigration and the two-tier justice system, both of which I think ordinary people can see with their
00:21:58.360 own eyes are massive problems. And he's sort of containing them. He's taking the steam out of the
00:22:03.800 sails to try and tank reform in the polls, because at the minute they're a real threat to Labour, aren't they?
00:22:09.800 I think it's interesting he's doing this just before the local elections, where those local
00:22:14.360 elections have been permitted to just to go ahead, which feeds into another story of where we're all
00:22:19.480 all going about controlling people's views. But when I look at this two-tier system that they create in
00:22:25.000 the two-tier politics, that is straight out of the book of communism. It's straight out of Stalinism.
00:22:29.960 It's all about removing the elites who are in power, then the kings, the knights, the barons,
00:22:33.800 whoever they may be, wherever they are in the world. I'm replacing them with our lot. Now,
00:22:39.080 our lot gets the house, our lot gets the car, our lot gets the nice sinecure job and pension for the
00:22:44.680 right. And you lot, who we said we were helping, you're still in the same place as you were before.
00:22:49.640 And that's what the public's understanding. They realize it doesn't matter who's flipping
00:22:53.160 over at the moment. We're still where we are, and we're not getting any better.
00:22:57.400 And at the end of the day, I think it's institutions matter, but people are in charge
00:23:02.120 of institutions. So whether people now focus on institutions and the judiciary and the executive
00:23:08.760 or any kind of branch, at the end of the days, who is going to be entrusted with guarding those
00:23:16.360 institutions? And I think, for instance, people not constantly talk about the ECHR to say why people
00:23:23.720 shouldn't be deported. The ECHR doesn't say people shouldn't be deported unconditionally.
00:23:29.000 No, he doesn't say that. It gives you the opportunity to remove it. It gives you the
00:23:34.680 chance to do so. So it's people, Poland, for example, that they did pretty well,
00:23:39.080 didn't they, without any of that sort of stuff. And they're within the EU. And in many ways,
00:23:43.320 they're doing much better than a lot of other European countries for it.
00:23:46.600 So ladies and gentlemen, tell us whether you think that labor actually has an issue with
00:23:51.000 two-tier society or not. Thank you very much.
00:23:55.480 We have a quick comment here from Rage Quit Ninja says, does this not effectively break
00:24:01.800 current UK equality laws and thus illegal? No, because the Equalities Act, was it 2010?
00:24:07.960 Yes.
00:24:09.000 I think that allows for exceptions for discrimination in favour of ethnic minorities.
00:24:15.720 Protected groups, I think is the phrase that it likes to use. And I think, can we remember what
00:24:21.720 Stelius said in the sentencing line? Was it cohorts? Yes.
00:24:26.360 So we've got protected groups, we've got cohorts, even though that sort of language that is used
00:24:32.280 to me is actually frightening usage because it's actually disassociating what they're really trying
00:24:37.960 to do and trying to blend it into a nice friendly cohort. But mind you, cohort was not a nice word when
00:24:43.560 it was created. No. Okay, well, it's time for your segment, yes.
00:24:49.960 Well, I think you have to have your head in your sands if you're not hearing the news across
00:24:55.080 from Europe at the moment. Really quite concerning for me, a decision by a court that Marie Le Pen is
00:25:01.480 barred from seeking public office for embezzlement, as we see here in the world news coming from AP,
00:25:07.400 which I understood was the only group that was allowed to be in the court to actually do the press,
00:25:12.120 which is why so many of the articles that are coming out are exactly the same. And this is
00:25:17.480 about Marie Le Pen, who along with 24 others, and I think there was eight MEPs, but also the staff
00:25:24.520 members, who when they were in the European Parliament, roughly around the time that I was there,
00:25:29.720 were all accused of embezzling European Union funds to support their political activities.
00:25:37.160 Well, not only am I finding that incredibly surprising, because literally that's what
00:25:42.200 every single MEP and political party did with the European Union funds.
00:25:47.400 Is this a sort of similar thing to what the Chinese do, in that they have laws that cover pretty much
00:25:53.240 the entire citizenry, or at least everyone of concern, and then they selectively enforce it?
00:25:59.240 Absolutely, because not only have they done that with, I think, Daniel Hannan, when he was an MEP,
00:26:06.680 was pursued, I think, again, egregiously over conference money that he used from the European
00:26:13.720 Parliament through a legitimate organisation. He organised conferences across the globe, which
00:26:20.440 people like myself, MEPs, would fly out and give conferences about and talk about the European Union,
00:26:24.600 because it didn't fit their definition of what European Union was or supporting. They went after
00:26:30.360 him. I remember in my own particular party, not myself, that many MEPs at the time who were part of
00:26:36.680 UKIP were actually also forced to return funding on a similar principle. And I watched it across many
00:26:43.640 different political parties, except those who were green, socialists, Christian Democrats, for example,
00:26:51.240 the Liberal Democrats, ALDI, as they're called. All the willing potential partners of coalition.
00:26:55.880 All the coalition partners were allowed to take the same levels of money and employ people and have
00:27:01.480 conferences across. So what we have now, I think, in terms of the next kind of clip that we've got on
00:27:09.080 the link is we're seeing that they've not only made her guilty, if we go down, but they've sentenced
00:27:14.520 here to four years, four years now. And that's cataclysmic. You've got four years, a hundred
00:27:21.160 thousand euro fine, which will be nothing to her because people were paid off. But it's a five-year
00:27:26.680 term in eligibility to run from office immediately. This is a political hit. This is absolutely intended
00:27:35.000 not to really ensure that justice is to be seen. It's to make sure that her rising power is not capable
00:27:42.360 of rising any further, is to cause discord in the national rally political parties, to make sure
00:27:50.040 that they're incapable of having their leader stand on television, the most effective performer,
00:27:55.800 when it comes down to the presidential election, where you have Macron, who's failing, and everybody
00:28:00.040 else around them are failing. So we get to a position where, as you go into the the next link,
00:28:06.840 this is exactly what Marie Le Pen is saying. It would have the effect of depriving me of being
00:28:13.080 a presidential candidate, and quite rightly disenfranchising her 11 million supporters,
00:28:19.080 and potentially millions more. Because of course, in the last election, they effectively won the
00:28:23.960 popular vote. And it was only by some canny politicking from Macron and the left that they
00:28:30.360 sort of outmaneuvered her by, I don't necessarily know how to put it, but they worked within the
00:28:36.680 political system to do something that seems very undemocratic. Yes, Macron teamed up with,
00:28:42.680 was it the communist, the Melanchon guy. Yes, that's right. Yeah. Yeah. That's like,
00:28:46.840 that's like Hitler joining up with Stalin to ensure that the defeat is in the Second World War,
00:28:51.560 and then make sure that they stay in power. And that's the way that I see it. It's those two wings
00:28:56.120 of like politics come together to stop somebody who has clearly got the votes of the people.
00:29:02.280 And I think we're seeing that all across Europe. Look at the AFD. Not only are they ensuring that
00:29:07.800 AFD is coming second and not going to have a chance to have any real link in power,
00:29:12.360 they're actually organised before the new parliament, a change in the law relating to the budget,
00:29:19.480 so that they can spend the money before the next parliament comes in. And this is what's
00:29:24.120 happening. They're really, really frightened of those people who stand outside of the group,
00:29:29.800 outside of the team. They really don't like them. If you're not giving them a hug and a back slapper,
00:29:33.800 and you're having a good lunch with them. If you're sat over in the table in the corner, we go,
00:29:38.120 I'm not sure about that. We don't like them, but they're winning. What can we do to get rid of them?
00:29:43.000 And they're using lawfare in order to do it. Now, of course, as you'll see in the next link,
00:29:50.200 the lawyers, the judges, the politicians are saying, well, it's nothing to do with lawfare
00:29:55.720 against her as a politician. It's all about here, as he says, that no one's on trial for doing
00:30:01.720 politics. That's not the issue. The issue is whether the contracts had been executed properly.
00:30:08.280 They recognised there was no personal enrichment for Marie Le Pen. The 400,000 there that she was
00:30:14.600 charged was that there was enrichment of the party. So the party was able to employ people.
00:30:21.560 The party was able to have conferences. The party was able to have its own security.
00:30:26.040 That's enrichment of the party. And therefore, she's guilty of embezzlement to be able to do
00:30:31.480 that. That's their argument. As I say, in the European Parliament, we saw lots of political parties
00:30:36.040 doing this all the time, but they're not being charged or investigated in the same way.
00:30:39.320 But do any of us really believe that this is just about the contracts being executed?
00:30:45.240 Of course not. And I think that the prior actions of other French political parties
00:30:50.520 indicate that they're willing to do anything to keep them out of power, aren't they? Because
00:30:54.760 they know that once they are in power, it's sort of over for them politically. It's a last
00:31:00.600 desperate attempt. We saw similar things in the United States, didn't we, where the Democrats
00:31:05.800 were doing very poorly? And so they relied on lawfare. And the fact that Kamala Harris didn't
00:31:12.040 even bother releasing any policies seemed to suggest that, well, you know, our best bet is
00:31:18.120 attack, not actually putting forward any positive vision.
00:31:21.880 To add to this, I don't think that necessarily they are afraid that if Marine Le Pen gets elected,
00:31:27.720 they'll never see power again. I don't think that's so much the issue as much as they
00:31:32.760 them thinking that right now they're unpopular and they're promoting unpopular measures and policies.
00:31:39.960 And the only way to compete with others is to basically trash the popular opposition.
00:31:47.480 I don't think it's so much that they think that if Le Pen wins, they'll never see it's going to be
00:31:52.440 the end. It's not so much the long term, you're seeing it as short term.
00:31:55.400 I think there are way more short term. I can believe that. Yeah, I think the short term element
00:31:59.880 is about the agenda globally is changing and they're not happy with that. And they think if
00:32:03.960 they can hit everybody with the short term and make sure they don't gain power, there's no momentum
00:32:07.960 to support Donald Trump's or the MAGA movement or whatever they believe is the kind of devil that's
00:32:13.320 sitting across the other side of the Atlantic. And so let's make sure it doesn't embed itself
00:32:17.960 strongly in Europe as well. Because if Europe and America were doing so, then all the woke agenda you
00:32:22.840 talked about early on would actually start to dissipate. And we'd have somebody be able to
00:32:27.160 come back against them. But we've seen it here, not just here. In France, did they not close a
00:32:31.320 newspaper down? Recently, that was right wing of very popular and being incredibly successful.
00:32:36.840 No doubt if Lotus Eaters were out there, they'd try and close this down as well for being incredibly
00:32:41.960 successful. Some of my posts on X or Twitter or whatever it's called these days are limited in France
00:32:49.240 for some reason. I didn't know that. It's very interesting. Yes. And just let me add to this.
00:32:54.680 Every time I go back to Greece, the feed is completely different. A lot more mainstream media
00:33:01.240 accounts are appearing on X. Okay. Well, that's interesting because then what I've done here now
00:33:08.120 is go through why I think it's not just about Marie Le Pen. This is a concerted plan by the European
00:33:14.840 powers that be elitist authoritarian. So if you take the next four, try and go through them. We've
00:33:20.520 just seen George Esco from Romania, clearly a massive winner. But his issue? Oh, he's supposedly
00:33:27.480 a shrill of Russia. So they had a constitutional court that ruled in just two hours, just two hours,
00:33:36.120 that this man is obviously not capable of winning at the seats and that the TikTok accounts backing
00:33:42.200 him were all those of Russia. By the way, Marie Le Pen is also accused of being a Russian shriller in
00:33:48.120 the pockets of Putin. So I don't know whether that's got a link to it as well.
00:33:52.200 He and everyone who is a target.
00:33:53.480 Anyone else. Anybody else who opposes the elites always in the background.
00:33:57.560 Russians are very busy.
00:33:58.680 Yeah. I've got my helicopter just outside. I'm going to go fly down to my little kind of
00:34:04.920 Naples base, obviously. It's nonsense most of the time. So we have George Esco. Then before that,
00:34:12.440 we have the AFD and we see them. AFD, a constitutional court sought to ban the party before the elections.
00:34:21.320 So another example of them being frightened of a party that's rising with an agenda that's not
00:34:25.720 was there. But it wasn't just recently. It's before that, too. So we go back to what somebody
00:34:30.840 I thought was a really, really crucial and rising star of the right hurts in Austria. And he resigns
00:34:38.200 amid a corruption inquiry. Now, either he was politically naive and dragged into that or it was
00:34:43.640 a plant. But this man had the links of being very calm, met him many times, very thoughtful,
00:34:49.160 actually really intellectual idea of how to challenge the status quo and was winning significant
00:34:56.520 power, not just here, but actually gaining ground in the United States. So they cut him out and he
00:35:01.400 resigned and he's just faded away. Why? And then, of course, we had Gert Wilders before that,
00:35:07.400 you know, found guilty of inciting for inciting discrimination against Moroccans who were here
00:35:13.720 illegally. No doubt any of us that criticized the boat people would face exactly the same.
00:35:19.400 So this, in my view, is a concerted attack. Where did it come from? Was this just out of the blue
00:35:25.640 or all these politicians across Europe really, really just enacting criminal activity, fraud,
00:35:32.040 all the rest of it? Or is it something deeper? And I believe this is concerted. I think if you look at the
00:35:37.640 the next link, we see why Europe should harden its soft power to lawfare. Now, this is by
00:35:44.280 SEPS, who are a very large and important and influential think tank in Europe. I've constantly
00:35:51.800 had lots of reports from them whilst I was over there. And I know when you're bringing down their
00:35:57.080 article and you look at what they're saying is that the Brussels effect is that EU law should be used
00:36:02.840 globally, its neighbors, on corporations to promote their ideology of warfare. And it's very clear,
00:36:13.000 we should adopt the Chinese concept of legal warfare, Faluzan.
00:36:18.440 Oh, wow. I didn't realize I'd be quite as prophetic at the start here.
00:36:21.880 Yeah. So this is 2020. Okay, it's only five years ago, but I believe actually that
00:36:26.040 people were looking at this before. They talk about using the laws coined in the US in 2001,
00:36:33.400 has effectively deployed financial insurance and energy law to boost its power on its adversaries.
00:36:39.080 We've then seen how it's used to boost its power against politicians in the US. And also beyond that,
00:36:46.120 I know of a personal friend of mine who's one of the big group of people that raised money for Donald
00:36:54.040 Trump in his campaign. He and the top three fundraisers were all attacked in different states.
00:37:00.600 He was charged with something like 99 offences over a $2,000 donation to one of his projects,
00:37:08.120 99 offences, with a something like 500 year potential imprisonment,
00:37:14.120 and millions of dollars of fines. In the end, they settled for five months, one offence and
00:37:22.600 two million, of which he's still disputed, because all of it was nonsense. They know it's nonsense.
00:37:29.560 The reason they put 99 offences is that you get ground down with the cost of having to defend
00:37:34.680 each of those offences. So you go, okay, what's the least I can get? But all of them are now seeking
00:37:40.280 to have them overturned through appeals, but it goes on for years. So they attack not just the
00:37:44.200 politicians, everybody else behind them.
00:37:47.240 What is interesting there is that this is a recipe for disaster, and it's self-defeating,
00:37:54.280 because what they're doing is that they rest upon people's praise of justice. They rest upon
00:38:01.400 legitimacy of the institutions of justice. And because they do so, they want to say,
00:38:06.680 let's brand as illegal those who are our political enemies. But the more they do this,
00:38:13.480 the more they discredit and delegitimize those institutions.
00:38:17.720 Absolutely. I couldn't agree more.
00:38:18.760 So it's going to backfire.
00:38:20.040 It feeds into what you're saying about the sentencing council. It feeds into about the
00:38:23.640 College of Policing. It feeds into all of those who are involved in that side of it. It feeds into
00:38:28.600 our kind of discontent with parliament. And I think it goes not just with ourselves. I think in my final
00:38:35.080 bit that I've got over there in the last one, it's not just us. It's the left. Here's the left in
00:38:41.400 the European Parliament, who again, I watched whilst I was there. They were abused. They were
00:38:49.480 not permitted to have representatives on certain bodies. They were not allowed to have their legitimate
00:38:55.640 amounts of money granted to them. They too, different necessary political viewpoint to me,
00:39:02.120 happy to have discussions and debates with them, as we should do in a free democratic world.
00:39:06.840 They too were facing the same sort of lawfare being used against them. Now, I don't necessarily
00:39:12.440 agree with all the people that they've got in their list in that particular article, but I understand
00:39:16.840 it. They feel it too. The left and the right are feeling it. There's only that group in the middle
00:39:22.600 that are like frightened little puppies and dogs in a corner are saying they want to attack everybody
00:39:27.560 else. There's a question on that, that if you say that the left and the right are doing it,
00:39:33.480 who is being prosecuted actually? Because it seems like most people from the right.
00:39:38.200 The left is an expert on self-victimization, so they say they're...
00:39:42.920 There is a truancy.
00:39:44.280 ...but it seems to me that only people from the right wing are being...
00:39:48.520 Well, only people on the right wing that we've seen, one would argue that they would say Sanchez was
00:39:55.160 attacked in Spain and the same... But I don't see that. He wasn't actually taken to court
00:39:59.640 over anything. The only ones who are going to court, actually, are those on the right.
00:40:03.560 So I think the self-victimization, when I looked through the Guardian article that listed a lot
00:40:07.720 of people there, not one of them actually was a criminal case about... It was all about,
00:40:11.880 I feel pretty upset you're attacking me for my views. That's not lawfare. Lawfare is when you actually
00:40:17.720 get the lawyers involved, either prosecutor or through civil action, and you take us on. Their
00:40:22.920 argument is that maybe we've got to stop oil, and we're attacking them in that particular way.
00:40:28.200 Whatever it is, whether it's left or right, the idea that this central group of people can use the
00:40:33.080 law and destabilize our institutions and our common law and our sense of justice is incredibly
00:40:39.640 short-sighted, it's deliberate, and I don't believe in the long term it's healthy for all of us to be
00:40:46.440 able to turn around and criticize all our judges, criticize all of us lawyers as being liars or deceitful
00:40:51.720 a dishonest. And by building that, they actually help remove the foundations of a legitimate,
00:40:59.400 carefully built, carefully constructed, judo-christian constructs in our nationhood
00:41:07.240 and across our culture that has had a fairness. Remove that and we end up in the slippery road
00:41:13.640 of being done like a communist China. That's my view on it.
00:41:20.440 I very much agree.
00:41:21.320 Sorry. I don't know what your guys who are listening in have to say about it at all.
00:41:26.200 I'm sure they will agree. I mean, we talk about all of this sort of thing, and I think our common
00:41:31.800 line on it is that the sort of centrist globalist faction will do anything to keep
00:41:37.720 their bureaucratic control unchallenged. I think that there's plenty of evidence to suggest that
00:41:43.160 that is the case. But South Africa now, we're going to be very grateful we live in Europe after
00:41:50.920 hearing about this, believe me. Yeah. So deeply concerning. South Africa is fighting back, not just
00:41:58.520 the ANC government, the party of Nelson Mandela, but also the Afrikaans minority as well. And there's
00:42:06.440 two different stories layered over one another. And to understand this, you've sort of got to follow
00:42:12.600 the back and forth between South African government and the US government, because this has been the
00:42:20.280 accelerant to kick all of this off. So the thing that started it all, really,
00:42:25.160 is Simul Ramah Posa signed an expropriation bill into law. And what this did was it allowed the
00:42:31.480 government to expropriate land or take people's land and not pay them for it. Compensation part of
00:42:37.960 it was optional. So in theory, you could be a farmer and the government can say, I want your land,
00:42:43.720 and they don't give you anything for it, even though you owned it. And of course,
00:42:47.560 this is obviously an erosion of private property rights. They don't really exist in South Africa,
00:42:53.400 because the government can just take things from you. Well, we've got that under the Labour
00:42:57.880 government who want to take farms away at not even market price. So this is a halfway house to that.
00:43:02.920 It is indeed. And this was obviously to target the white minority in South Africa, because of course,
00:43:09.880 the ANC has made it its business to whip up anger at this minority and blame their failings to
00:43:19.080 keep the infrastructure they had functional. And so they're distracting people from their inability
00:43:27.080 to govern by saying, well, look at all of these white farmers, they own all the land, therefore
00:43:32.760 they're greedy, they're taking things from you. When in reality, they're incompetent and quite often
00:43:38.280 very corrupt. Everyone knows that corruption in South Africa is rife. And a lot of the time,
00:43:45.000 these things are not being done because there's someone being paid. And also that it's worth
00:43:50.520 mentioning these land expropriations. Quite often, when they're actually there marking up the farms to
00:43:57.320 take them, there are politicians on the ground saying, oh, well, I'll have this bit. And so they're
00:44:02.200 directly benefiting from it. They know that they're the ones that get to choose which farms get taken,
00:44:07.400 and they can take some for themselves. And they said, don't be alarmed, the court may award you
00:44:15.080 nil compensation, but it's not required to. So it's okay. And of course, this is not reassuring
00:44:21.480 whatsoever, because you're still at the mercy of the courts as to whether your livelihood is ruined.
00:44:27.400 And then eventually, America caught wind of this. Trump cut US financial aid to South Africa,
00:44:34.680 citing his disapproval of the laws and also their foreign policy aims in that South Africa brought
00:44:41.320 the genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice. And it was a sort of punitive
00:44:46.280 measure on top of that for that as well. Obviously, a close American ally. And then you see Elon Musk,
00:44:54.440 of course, being South African saying, the legacy media never mentions the white genocide in South
00:44:59.480 Africa, because it doesn't fit the narrative that whites can be victims. And I think that
00:45:05.240 that's very true. And in fact, what is happening in South Africa is awful for the white minority.
00:45:12.600 We complain a lot about what's going on in Britain and Europe and North America. But we can't really
00:45:17.960 hold a candle to the suffering that's going on in South Africa, because some of the most appalling
00:45:21.480 things I've ever heard of are going on there. And many of the white South Africans gathered and
00:45:26.760 supported what Trump said, because it's very significant, you know, the leader of the free
00:45:31.800 world, as they say, coming out and pointing out your persecution. And they were very positive about
00:45:38.360 that. And you only need to look at the number of race laws in South Africa. And you can see that big dip
00:45:44.600 towards the end of apartheid. And then you can see that it actually rises above the sort of apartheid
00:45:51.160 level under the ANC governance. And of course, all of these laws, they're not discriminating against
00:45:56.680 the native black population, they're discriminating against the white population. That's why those laws
00:46:01.160 exist. And the ANC...
00:46:03.240 They have similar sorts of laws now that just literally state it's white who will, like we're
00:46:08.920 about to see in a potential sentencing council. You know, if you're white or you're historically
00:46:14.520 white, not only will you lose your land, you can't get a job or...
00:46:18.520 Oh, it's very egregious. I'm going to go through some of the examples soon. And it is very explicit.
00:46:26.680 And South African president says the persecution of whites is a false narrative. And Elon Musk
00:46:34.680 doubled down on this. The ANC line has basically been, they're making it up, they're far right,
00:46:40.920 they're racist. It sounds very familiar, doesn't it? Yeah. And a court ruled that the claims of
00:46:48.600 white genocide are not real. This was a South African court. Oh, okay.
00:46:53.240 And so it's basically like we've ruled ourselves innocent. Yeah.
00:46:58.120 Yeah. Judging our own judgments. Exactly. And then they were in sort of a bit of diplomatic
00:47:07.240 warfare here. They hinted at a nuclear deal with Iran and Russia. And what's common about those two
00:47:11.960 nations? Oh, wait, they're both enemies of the United States. And so the United...
00:47:16.600 Oh, you're going to say something, Stella? No, no. It's just, you're talking about Cyril
00:47:20.040 Ramaphosa. And I think it's good to tell to the audience that this is not the politicians who go
00:47:25.720 goes out and chants death to the boards. That's right. That's Julius Merlema.
00:47:32.040 Although he hasn't disavowed that chant, by the way, he's never said anything against it.
00:47:36.840 And in response, the US supported a French company investing in gas in Mozambique. And so if the South
00:47:45.480 Africans do get this project underway, a neighboring country is going to have cheaper energy than them
00:47:50.760 anyway. And so it's undermined that effort. And there's a bit of a battle going on here.
00:47:56.840 Basically, Trump freed up 4.7 billion US dollars to a French company that was frozen since 2021.
00:48:04.360 But that's not the focus necessarily. It's just interesting that it happened. And then the US
00:48:09.480 expelled the South African envoy after I think he called Trump a white supremacist. And they said
00:48:16.040 he was race baiting and basically sent him packing, which is fair enough, I think, because that was
00:48:21.960 what he was doing really. Yeah.
00:48:23.880 And then let's look at some examples of clear discrimination here. So a cricket team, very English
00:48:31.400 export here, but they were kicked out of a competition for failing to select at least three black players
00:48:38.040 for the competition. I've heard of a story of in a rugby match in the last minute someone was injured
00:48:45.000 and then they brought on a substitute for the last minute of the game. And because the substitute
00:48:50.280 wasn't a black player and the player was black, all of a sudden they fell underneath their quota and
00:48:55.640 they were disqualified from the tournament, even though the majority of the game had already been won.
00:49:01.160 And of course, you might think, OK, well, this is sport. It's not the end of the world. Well,
00:49:05.880 as has been, I mean, it's still important. It's still part of our culture.
00:49:09.800 In many ways, it is a really important part of the world because it's our escape. It's our way of
00:49:14.280 looking away from what's happening around us, the job implications that we have, the bosses that are
00:49:20.440 talking to us, what's going on at home. It's our chance to be free and to enjoy just the sport. And we
00:49:26.760 don't want to be interfered with by government, government diktat, rules like that. And I find
00:49:32.600 it oppressive that when we get an opportunity just to relax, they're even imposing their ideology on
00:49:38.120 us then. I hardly agree. Sports because sports is basically the paradigm for most people for what
00:49:43.720 fair competition looks like. Yeah, absolutely. And you can see here, this is a declaration by
00:49:50.440 employee. And you can see employees should use terms to ascertain which employees are from
00:49:55.320 designated groups in terms of the Employment Equality Act of 1998. And then you go down here,
00:50:01.960 designated groups mean black people, women and people with disabilities. So we see lots of DEI
00:50:10.200 policies in Western countries, but it's very, very explicit. What's that? Sorry.
00:50:16.680 You've got the rules of the Sentencing Council up there, I'm sure.
00:50:18.840 You do. I do indeed, yeah. In a manner of speech. Sorry.
00:50:23.720 It's also worth mentioning here that the box is African, coloured, Indian and white.
00:50:28.520 The term coloured is a sort of colonial holdover. It just means mixed race, basically. But
00:50:34.760 they're afforded similar privileges to those of African descent. And it's actually quite often the
00:50:40.360 Indian and white residents that are discriminated against by these laws and the riots in 2021. And
00:50:47.800 lots of Indians were actually targeted because they believed that the Indians were unfairly extracting
00:50:54.840 wealth from their country. And they burnt down lots of distribution centres, which massively damaged
00:51:00.840 their economy and achieved very little politically.
00:51:03.000 But we can, oh, I think we, yes, page four. So this has some good stats on it. It says,
00:51:13.080 this is the data on farming. So apparently 72% of the total farms and agriculture holdings by
00:51:20.680 individual landowners are owned by whites. And so that is the majority of farms.
00:51:27.160 And the government's own data suggests that 90% of farms that have been redistributed
00:51:32.760 failed. So this is their own internal data.
00:51:37.480 So this is interesting because, of course, you look at somewhere like Zimbabwe, or formerly Rhodesia,
00:51:45.000 as I like to call it. They took all of the white farmers' land and then a million people starved to
00:51:51.080 death. And obviously a massive human tragedy, not in anyone's interest to have that outcome.
00:51:57.400 And what happened is that people didn't, it was sort of like this cargo cult behavior.
00:52:02.280 They didn't realize that the reason that the white farmers were producing so much of their food,
00:52:07.160 say, is because they're using different agricultural techniques. There are lots of
00:52:12.680 things that you need to do, particularly in somewhere like South Africa, that's perhaps a
00:52:17.000 more difficult climate to farm in than, say, Britain. There are lots of things you need to do.
00:52:21.240 There's lots of complicated machinery. There's a lot more to it than you might think. It's not just
00:52:24.680 putting seeds in the ground and waiting. And I think that people tend to have a very
00:52:29.640 naive view of what goes into farming. And if anyone's watched Clarkson's Farm,
00:52:33.240 they need not imagine that it's actually a very difficult job. And I think that what's
00:52:38.280 playing out in South Africa is that they see a farm as just an easy way of getting
00:52:43.080 wealth. It's your key to becoming wealthy. And actually, there's a lot of hard work that goes
00:52:48.040 into it. And it is a way of life that has to be passed down. Because if you don't have that
00:52:53.480 knowledge passed on to you, you're really going to struggle. And that's true of anyone, regardless.
00:52:57.560 They want to get hold of it and then just sell it on to the major large corporates,
00:53:00.840 who run it for you, and they just can do a flip. Which is what I see here is one of the main
00:53:07.160 things when we're trying to impoverish our farmers, bankrupt them through inheritance tax,
00:53:12.600 give them the opportunity for the councils to be able to do compulsory purchase orders at less
00:53:17.160 than market rate, is so that they can flip it to companies that are going to put wind farms on
00:53:22.520 solar panel or be a large intermediate for the American companies that will come in and buy the
00:53:28.280 land and then rent it out to the same farmers. It wouldn't surprise me if the same thing's going
00:53:32.600 on here. So the land grabbers are already operating. And as you can see here, you just get crowds of
00:53:38.280 people that just turn up and try and get their parcel, usually with a politician in tow adjudicating
00:53:45.400 it and also carving out a nice piece for themselves. And it's worth pointing as well that if you are a
00:53:51.720 white farmer, one of the farm tools that might not be familiar to you as a European or North American,
00:53:57.960 well maybe not North American, but as a European farmer is that you have to have an assault rifle by
00:54:03.000 you at all times because you're in constant danger of the farmland attacks. And of course,
00:54:08.680 this was investigated by Lauren Southern when she looked at the farmland murders
00:54:13.880 where white farmers had their farms invaded. And there's a really horrible case here.
00:54:21.800 I'm going to summarise what he's saying because the video is six and a half minutes long, but he
00:54:25.480 is a former police officer. He's talking about his first farm murder. And let me just tell
00:54:31.080 you about what happened here. Five men waited for the family to return from church before attacking
00:54:36.040 them. The father and grandfather were bludgeoned to death with hammers. The wife was sexually assaulted
00:54:42.280 at gunpoint by four different people. The 13-year-old daughter was sexually assaulted three times and
00:54:47.480 stabbed in the back of the head, but thankfully survived. And then they had written political slogans
00:54:53.400 in blood on the walls. And apparently the interior of the house was so thick with blood that it, when
00:55:00.920 the police officers actually stepped on it, it was seeping out of the carpets beneath them. This is the
00:55:06.440 kind of thing that the white South Africans have to face. This is not something that any human being
00:55:11.800 should have to face, especially not people who are disproportionately productive for their country.
00:55:18.520 They're taxed far more than others. They're discriminated against by the law, and they're
00:55:24.200 also providing a disproportionate amount of the food for the country. It strikes me as very ungrateful
00:55:30.440 that they're basically doing all the hard work to prop up what is essentially becoming a failed state
00:55:37.640 here. And their reward is some of the worst political persecution in the world. What does the left
00:55:46.600 about it in this country say? Nothing, just as they say nothing about our farmers. Just as they say,
00:55:51.160 nothing against the farmers in Holland or the same in Canada. Well, they don't vote for the left-wing
00:55:57.480 parties, do they? Exactly. So what you're seeing here is not a prison. This is a South African
00:56:03.000 household's bedroom. This is it gated off from the rest of the house for security, because this is
00:56:10.440 not some paranoid weirdo. This is a necessary measure. And to Europe and North America, this
00:56:18.200 is completely unthinkable. I get worried when I see bars in certain continental European countries on
00:56:27.160 their windows and things like that. I think that's a bit excessive, isn't it? But to have them in your own
00:56:31.320 homes. By the bars you see in certain parts of the United States when you drive through, it's actually
00:56:35.880 really, really scary and abysmal. It's inhuman. So let's get on to the EFF, or the Economic Freedom
00:56:43.800 Fighters, which is a very ironic name. So they're communists and black nationalists, as you might
00:56:49.000 expect, and they're headed by Julius Malema. He's refused to testify that he would not call for the
00:56:54.440 murder of whites in the future, but he did testify that he might call for the slaughter of whites in the
00:56:59.400 future when asked by a journalist. Interesting. And there are still people in South Africa that are
00:57:07.960 saying that the problems of apartheid still exist. Here she's saying, My book, No White Lies,
00:57:13.880 White Power and Black Politics in South Africa, reveals the ugly truth that white South Africans
00:57:18.280 have failed to repent for and make reparations for apartheid sins. Interesting that they're using
00:57:25.000 religious language there, isn't it? We remain privileged, entitled, and arrogant in democratic
00:57:30.120 South Africa. It is shameful that we have no moral compass and have ever offered reparations
00:57:34.520 for all the harm we have caused. So let's point out the fact that she has actually contributed for
00:57:41.400 the EFF. So she is a communist. That's worth pointing out. It's enough for pointing out that the
00:57:48.680 party that she's supporting would actually kill her. I know, yeah. A bit of a quizzling, isn't she?
00:57:54.040 I just, yeah, I just find that really odd. By the way, here's the target. I'll just help you out
00:57:57.720 and then just kill me after you've won. I just don't understand these people. Do any of us really
00:58:04.920 understand what's going on between their ears? Can we understand how they've got this self-implosion
00:58:09.800 of wanting to kill themselves, wipe themselves out, just for the sake of the communist manifesto?
00:58:15.400 I might do a bit of armchair psychologising and say that they hate themselves and therefore they're
00:58:19.640 inflicting their own self-hatred on the world. That would be my best guess.
00:58:25.640 Then you had this. This was in 2023. This is the EFF rally where they're talking,
00:58:31.960 they're singing the song about killing the boar. And imagine you lived in South Africa
00:58:36.360 and this was a stadium full of people that are happy to sing about killing you.
00:58:40.360 Yes. Would you be happy to, you know, appear in public life? No wonder you have places like
00:58:47.080 Irania where they're white only towns because at least they can feel safe knowing that they have
00:58:52.920 people that aren't going to murder them for their property. And then Elon... Oh, sorry. Go ahead.
00:58:57.400 I just wanted to say that this is why culture is important because if someone did this here,
00:59:05.160 most probably they'd go in jail. It's incitement of violence.
00:59:09.400 We haven't quite got to this point yet, but it is certainly
00:59:14.040 on the right track to becoming a reality here as well. Well, I think sometimes we hear it on the
00:59:18.440 streets when we're talking about the way that we look at Israel and Jewish people. It's a similar sort
00:59:24.600 of conceptual idea that they're chanting when they're supporting Hannes in such numbers that
00:59:31.400 how far is that link? Isn't that that fine line that we've been talking about? This thin thread
00:59:36.600 between democratic values and murder caused by this level of hatred. Are we not on that line?
00:59:43.400 Which is why we're all debating this so strongly in strident. It is also here to a certain extent
00:59:48.440 because I can use the example of in France where there was the case of that teenage boy who got
00:59:54.120 shot by the French police for refusing to stop his car. And then a group of 15 to 20 Muslims went to
01:00:00.680 a small French town of about 140 people, went to an event and stabbed a 16 year old to death because
01:00:06.600 he was a French boy. And it was purely racial. It's purely motivated about ethnic revenge. It's already
01:00:13.400 here. It doesn't necessarily need to be the government doing it, but we already live amongst people that
01:00:17.960 are more than happy to do this sort of thing. Now, Elon Musk has got a bit of a vendetta against the
01:00:23.960 EFF, as one can imagine. And he says, very few people know that there is a major political party
01:00:28.120 in South Africa that is actively promoting white genocide, which I think is a fair characterization.
01:00:32.680 They explicitly sing songs about killing them. They make gun sounds. They talk about shooting the farmers.
01:00:38.680 It's about as explicit as it could possibly be. And the defense of the South African government is
01:00:44.360 it's just political terminology. It's just hyperbole. If only we had such lack standards
01:00:50.360 in Britain for that sort of thing. Maybe not to favor the minorities. But anyway, a month ago,
01:00:57.160 the South African government passed a law legalizing taking property from white people at the will
01:01:01.720 with no payment. Where is the outrage? Why is there no coverage by the legacy media? Starlink can't get
01:01:06.840 a license to operate in South Africa simply because I'm not black. How is that right? And in fact,
01:01:11.000 South Africa is the only country in Southern Africa that has refused them. And it seems to be out of
01:01:16.360 spite because of course they could do with the infrastructure. They're not in a position to choose.
01:01:21.160 And then Malema responded to Elon Musk saying we must not be intimidated by him and our friends will
01:01:27.080 never be the United Kingdom, France or the USA who are never there for us during difficult times.
01:01:32.280 Palestine was there for us. Okay. Interesting. I don't remember all those Palestinians helping in
01:01:40.440 the apartheid era. Was there a secret cohort of ANC Palestine?
01:01:44.520 I do know that the ANC was funded by lots of enemies of the United States though. So that's interesting.
01:01:52.280 And yes, here's them chanting it on Human Rights Day in South Africa, which is a wonderful irony.
01:01:58.840 Um, it's also worth mentioning as well that he's not just some obscure figure. He's got quite a bit
01:02:03.800 of reach there. 4.4 million followers. I imagine a decent portion of them are following in horror
01:02:08.680 more than anything, but still worth mentioning. He has a sizable platform. He's not just nobody.
01:02:14.760 And then here, um, here is Marco Rubio. I don't know why he's here because that link is not meant to be
01:02:22.840 that high up. Uh, okay. Um, the link seemed to be a bit messed up. Um, let's just skip that stuff
01:02:31.720 because you, you get the gist by this point. They're not very nice people, but there was a
01:02:38.440 documentary released by a group called Afriforum, which is a group, an Afrikaans group in South Africa,
01:02:45.640 that is trying to advocate for, um, the minority there that are being persecuted. And there are a couple
01:02:51.000 of groups that are actually pushing against this sort of thing. And I want to draw people's attention
01:02:54.680 to them because I think they're doing great work. This documentary was excellent. They were pointing
01:02:58.520 out the laws that discriminate against them. They're looking at the data. It was very factual,
01:03:02.600 very, um, data-based, very worth watching. And they're doing some great work. Um, it was presented
01:03:10.040 by this gentleman here. Um, and he's got a quote here from this documentary under ANC rule,
01:03:16.360 the South African sections of the media have long and unfortunate history of targeting citizens who
01:03:21.640 speak out against race-based politics or violent crime, with some commentators seeing their role
01:03:26.600 in such situations more as regime attack dogs rather than watchdogs against the abuse of power,
01:03:31.960 which is very much true, I think. And they've lamented the fact that the media in South Africa
01:03:37.800 has basically been trying to, uh, say that they're white supremacist or, um, they're bigoted and
01:03:44.520 extremists and should be ignored. And they're using things like screenshots of a headline,
01:03:49.320 opinion pieces, political cartoons, uh, their opinion and the word of ANC officials and just
01:03:56.680 calling it in food. Trust me. And just calling it a racist term for a, for a black guy. I thought
01:04:02.360 dude was supposed to be a white man's term. Is it? I heard that before. Yeah. Brother is,
01:04:07.240 uh, you know, the black man, dude is the white man. Okay, fair enough. Aren't they being racist?
01:04:10.280 Should that not be banned? It might be a bit too controversial, eh? But the point being is...
01:04:16.360 ANC mobs will be after me next. I wouldn't be surprised.
01:04:19.640 To add to the list. But, um, yeah, these are the sorts of things that are being used to rebut
01:04:24.760 the arguments. There aren't really any real rebuttals because there is clear evidence in the law that
01:04:30.600 there is this discrimination. And they tried to challenge this in a court and the court said that
01:04:37.480 actually it's a legitimate political expression and that it, it should stay. And they tried to
01:04:42.040 appeal this and, uh, I'm not sure if it actually stuck. And they've been pointing out that the
01:04:46.920 constitution, which, um, has Lee vowed not to have racial discrimination, no longer protects
01:04:53.240 everyone in the country because of course the chants such as kill the boar, which is calling for
01:04:57.720 the murder of Afrikaners. That's obvious. That's explicitly what it's saying. Um, the constitutional
01:05:03.160 court has shown total disrespect, as he says, for those people basically. And they're trying to
01:05:09.640 fight it, which is, um, a very commendable action and it's amazing that they can stay so calm and
01:05:15.960 collected and reasoned in such a difficult situation. And, um, of course, Ramaphosa was silent about this
01:05:25.560 because he secretly approves, but doesn't want the negative PR of saying so. And then, oh,
01:05:35.000 where's this article gone? There was an article here, um, Samson, if you could pull that up,
01:05:40.360 where it's, it's talking about how South Africa and the Cape more generally is an invisible choke point.
01:05:46.040 Uh, and this was, um, done by Robert Dugan, I think, um, who's involved in some of these groups.
01:05:53.080 And basically this is a shorter version of what's being handed out to lots of Western politicians.
01:05:58.120 And it points out that there's actually a strategic advantage of having control
01:06:01.640 of this passageway, um, because the passage around the Cape is actually not narrower than you think
01:06:06.920 because of the difficult waters. And so shipping has to come very close to South Africa. And what
01:06:12.680 I think is a very good, uh, political reason for pushing this argument is that the US or Britain might
01:06:18.840 have a stake in South Africa if they see, okay, well, this benefits trade and shipping and therefore
01:06:24.200 we want to be more invested. Um, okay. Um, I don't know why that's not coming up. Never mind. Um, but
01:06:33.320 yes, um, the article's called the invisible choke point if you want to look for it. Um, but yes, I think
01:06:38.680 that, ah, there we go. That's weird. Um, I had the wrong, uh, thing. That was my fault, Samson.
01:06:44.760 Um, so yes, um, it seems like a good way of getting people invested in South African politics
01:06:52.200 saying, listen, you'll have an advantage here because there's an excellent, um, image here of shipping.
01:06:58.040 Uh, here we go. You can see a heat map and most ships come within the coast and within the sort of
01:07:05.960 waters of South Africa. And if you want to preserve the shipping and say prevent the Chinese or the Russians,
01:07:11.320 um, who the ANC are sympathetic towards from accessing this valuable shipping lane,
01:07:16.840 maybe you want a stake in this area, which is clever politics in my opinion and is, is a good way of
01:07:23.320 saying actually there is a good reason to be involved in South Africa. Come and help us and
01:07:28.200 you'll get something in return, which is a good way of looking at it. But yes, this is another movement.
01:07:34.120 This basically started off as a trade union and now they run as a sort of parallel government.
01:07:38.440 They build schools, universities and have private security and they rely on community donations to
01:07:44.520 keep, uh, basically keep these Afrikaans communities safe and not, uh, under the ire of the ANC
01:07:54.920 and their supporters and the EFF. And there's also one final one that I want to draw attention to,
01:08:01.480 which is the SAAI, um, which is, uh, a network that supports farmers both in South Africa and Zimbabwe.
01:08:09.560 Um, and so I think they operate. I really don't think there was any white farmers left in Zimbabwe.
01:08:14.600 I thought they kind of, the pogrom was so strong that if you've got to be incredibly strong and
01:08:19.560 brave to want to stay there in that nation. I think there must be, um, I've not looked into it in
01:08:26.520 great detail, but I know of the fact that there is at least a small portion of people that are still
01:08:30.920 there after all of that. After all of that, you know, which is amazing. Serious lunacy going on in
01:08:36.040 that country. But my point being that whilst the government of South Africa pushes back against
01:08:42.040 Trump, there's also people, the Afrikaners, pushing back against the ANC and, you know, making
01:08:47.960 these documentaries, highlighting the points that Trump is making. And I think that they have a very,
01:08:53.240 very valid claim here to be persecuted. You can see it in the law. You can see it in how they're
01:08:59.160 treated in society. You can see it in the fact that their livelihoods can be destroyed for no
01:09:04.680 reason at all other than a government official wants it to be so. And I think it's one of those
01:09:08.920 things that is a rather overlooked tragedy and something that is entirely preventable. It's
01:09:14.600 entirely created by the South African government and it need not be this way because if they do what
01:09:21.240 they intend to do and take the land from these white farmers, what they're going to do is create
01:09:26.360 another Zimbabwe situation where lots of people starve. They struggle to even have electricity or
01:09:33.160 running water now. The infrastructure has gone downhill since the end of apartheid, basically.
01:09:39.320 You know, they had more electricity hours and clean water then than they do now because people
01:09:45.640 loot the infrastructure. And of course, the massive impact of this would be that if South Africa goes
01:09:51.880 as a into a failed state scenario, it provides a lot of jobs and economic activity for surrounding
01:09:57.960 countries in Namibia going up across. If that collapses, then once again, we'll see a migration crisis.
01:10:04.040 And we already know that one of the central cause of the migration crisis is coming up through
01:10:08.840 Central Africa, which are starting to bring more and more people up through the Western
01:10:14.200 Mediterranean route up through Libya who are all subject to seriously nastier arms of the people
01:10:21.000 smuggling gangs. These people are really capturing them and using them as slaves first before allowing
01:10:27.080 them to get onto the boats to come over to ourselves. Well, the Libyans have open slave markets.
01:10:32.520 They're not very shy about it. And it's just set to create a wave of human tragedy in which
01:10:39.000 no one benefits from. Okay, we've got a few comments here. Oh, blimey, we've got a few,
01:10:44.920 actually. And before we go to the video comments, where's my mouse? I can't see it.
01:10:52.120 Do you want to take this one? If you can just, I got it now. Oh, you're the hands of power there.
01:10:58.840 Apparently not. Hands of incompetence. That's a random name says, all of these anti-white
01:11:06.760 male initiatives, laws remind me of the Omni-Man quote, look what they need to mimic a fraction
01:11:13.640 of our power. That's a very positive way of looking at it. Yes. They hate us because they
01:11:20.040 ain't us, as some might say. That's a random name. Slight correction, Josh. That Algerian
01:11:25.720 teen in France was shot because he didn't stop his car and then tried to run over the police
01:11:30.440 officer. Okay, fair enough. I imagined it was something like that. I was just trying to be
01:11:37.480 brief because I was aware my segment was going on for a long time.
01:11:40.840 Goofball supremacist says, good morning from foggy coastal Maine, US. Wait, if the Stelios is here,
01:11:47.480 who will bully Harry during the show? Maybe Harry's sleeping now.
01:11:52.840 Bit of an inside joke there. I think one time- I can't see you, Stelios, as being a bully in
01:11:57.400 any way at all. You've got this mild manner. Just for some reason, a segment of the audience
01:12:03.480 thinks that there's a huge rivalry between Harry and myself. Ah, I see. It's like wrestling,
01:12:08.600 you see. If we make the audience believe that we all hate each other, then it's more investing.
01:12:14.120 We don't actually at all. It's funny, you know, you get your ouzo, you get your plates,
01:12:17.880 who can be the best plate smasher? There you go. You win the ouzo for dinner. Yeah,
01:12:21.320 yeah, that's good. We got any video comments, Samson? None for today. Okay, well, written
01:12:27.960 comments it is then. So, you right to read some of yours? Yes, yes, of course. Give me a minute.
01:12:34.760 Okay, right. So, comments. Roman observer. Judges in the West have largely become a force
01:12:45.160 of tyranny. Yeah, I can't disagree with this. I agree with this. It's not often that you hear from
01:12:51.240 the judiciary that they've done anything that sounds sensible. I think the only exception could be,
01:12:57.080 perhaps, the Supreme Court in the United States. I like seeing Clarence Thomas just dismissing
01:13:03.400 proposals in one word. It's like, ridiculous or no?
01:13:09.960 Can you imagine that ever happening in a Western European country, turning around ridiculous or no?
01:13:14.760 I want it to happen.
01:13:16.760 You know, it would be good fun, to be honest. Yeah, yeah, yeah.
01:13:19.080 You know, they're actually a bit more entertaining. You might then have someone turning around and,
01:13:23.560 you know, get them on the island, get them into the jungle. Maybe if the Supreme Court in Britain
01:13:28.280 were like that, I'd be a bit more entertaining of it. But of course, it's a Blairite creation,
01:13:32.120 isn't it? Metal Dave says, listening to Keir Starmer speak has the same effect on me as the
01:13:37.400 Dementors in Harry Potter. Just sucks the joy right out of me. It sounds like an unimpressive
01:13:43.640 office manager trying to justify his position. No personality, no charisma, and no love for this
01:13:49.560 country, or anyone else's for that matter. I have had much more inspiring bosses than this. It's
01:13:56.280 it's shameful. He's one man to... And then he cuts off for some reason.
01:14:01.080 Yeah, basically, okay. Complete dimension levels.
01:14:07.240 So if you did make an audition for The Office, there's no way they'd even pass. They'd turn around
01:14:12.040 and say, you're too boring. Can't play the acoustic guitar either. It would never fit the role of
01:14:15.720 David Brent, would he? No. He doesn't listen to music. He doesn't have a... Well, he does have
01:14:19.400 a favorite TV show now. It's adolescence. But before then, I don't think he's said that.
01:14:25.720 The only thing he's ever watched in the last 10 years.
01:14:28.200 Apart from reruns of Blair the movie. Look at him on number 10.
01:14:33.400 I'd be surprised if he could even see color, to be honest.
01:14:35.720 Nota Fed says, this is what people mean when they say there's no voting our way out of this.
01:14:41.480 An incredible threat to the status quo will simply be taken out before they can get anywhere.
01:14:46.600 Meaning democracy is essentially an impotent political tool. I mean, I'm not that pessimistic.
01:14:53.000 Because in the US, it worked.
01:14:55.160 It did.
01:14:55.560 For instance. That's one of the reasons.
01:14:57.080 It did.
01:14:58.360 Yeah, I'm not that pessimistic. But I think that
01:15:01.320 civil society needs to wake up and reclaim its culture.
01:15:05.480 I think people are just too comfortable to realize that their life can forever be changed
01:15:11.320 by the political system. And that, you know, going to your job and going home and watching Netflix
01:15:16.840 every night, although it might be comforting, isn't necessarily a socially responsible thing to do.
01:15:22.440 Well, as they see more and more of their family and friends either not being able to get jobs,
01:15:26.200 not being forced out of work, having the contrary arguments about discrimination
01:15:32.360 that you saw against others now being applied to themselves, they become more and more
01:15:36.680 waking up to this. And this is what I'm seeing in Middle England.
01:15:39.560 Middle England ignored immigration for the last 20 years. Let's be frank about it.
01:15:42.760 Here in the UK or across Europe, I'm all right. I'm coming to my lovely Winchester town.
01:15:46.600 I'm going off to Salisbury. It's all white. It's all lovely. I've got my nice big house.
01:15:50.920 It's comfortable. And now they're beginning to see that impacting onto those towns as well.
01:15:55.080 And they're suddenly going, hang on, add that to the economic damage that they're getting.
01:15:59.720 And what do they have? They start saying, well, where's the problem coming from?
01:16:03.640 But it's too late for many communities up and down the country. And I have a fear,
01:16:08.280 and echoing the comments of the writer there who sent in that note about our political ability to
01:16:15.240 change it in Europe. The US has a totally different and open constitution to be able to vote. It is one
01:16:21.640 side or the other. And you've got states like many countries. But first past the post is incredibly
01:16:27.320 difficult for us to achieve it, any substantive change, unless you get a uniting of the rights
01:16:33.400 here. And then we could. And if we did so, I think that's a bulwark against Europe. But as we saw there
01:16:39.080 with Marie Le Pen, the AFD, Gert Wilders, Italy with Maloney and what's happening in Romania, the
01:16:45.640 establishment have actually got a creation of political armory to prevent other parties from getting in.
01:16:53.080 And that, I think, is an ultimate danger. Is that what causes a revolution over there?
01:16:58.520 Will there be a revolution in Europe to make this finally work?
01:17:02.360 Maybe. Oh, sorry. It's interesting you mentioned first past the post, because I've studied all of
01:17:07.720 the different electoral systems, and I have my preferences. But first past the post is unique
01:17:13.720 in that it boosts the main two parties, doesn't it? And so it creates this revolving door syndrome of
01:17:23.880 Labour, Tory, Labour, Tory, Labour, Tory, that we've seen for the vast majority of our lives.
01:17:32.120 I know there was a Lib Dem coalition briefly, but they didn't really have any proper power.
01:17:36.360 And it was just a brief blip in a trend.
01:17:39.800 A hundred odd years of exactly the same sort of cultural, political ideology.
01:17:45.560 And whereas first past the post, if you're successful and winning, it's incredibly useful
01:17:49.640 to be able to implement change, allegedly. We now know, in this country, that the powers of
01:17:56.920 quangos and the powers of the civil service even nullify that. So it's not surprising
01:18:05.480 that younger people are saying, there's nothing left for me. And older people are saying,
01:18:09.400 I'll retire and get out of the system. Hopefully I'll just be able to enjoy my last 20 years without
01:18:13.640 anybody hurting me in any particular way. I just feel that this is, in some ways,
01:18:19.640 what they really want. They don't want us engaging in the politics. They want us to understand
01:18:24.120 that we have no power and just get away with it. That's why I think a culture of civic
01:18:29.160 engagement is important and people will need to stop watching Netflix, as you said before,
01:18:34.280 and start applying pressure to the governments. I think also the government needs to realize that
01:18:41.560 creating entire generations of disaffected people isn't the best thing for their own long-term
01:18:47.240 self-interest. Even if you're a greedy, corrupt politician, if there are lots of desperate people in
01:18:53.320 your society, you'll get a lot more people like that Luigi Mangione guy who killed the United
01:19:00.280 Healthcare CEO. He was willing to ruin his life because he felt it, and the life of the man he
01:19:06.680 killed, because he felt like he no longer had a stake in society. And you're going to get more and more
01:19:12.040 of that. And I don't see how that benefits politicians or the people involved.
01:19:17.480 Being desperate, having nothing to look forward to, having no hope, feeling that there is no one
01:19:23.720 in this country that cares for you, and there is no opportunity for change, is a recipe for ultimate
01:19:29.000 disaster on a personal level and a national level. And we should be fighting this. And that's why,
01:19:34.760 you know, shows like this are incredibly important. Be able to let people know that there are those who
01:19:39.560 actually understand them, and they're trying in this particular form to engage them, get them excited and
01:19:45.160 energized. Jordi Swartzman. Of course, child Hamas Tama is angry. The fools weren't supposed to say it
01:19:53.080 out loud. Thomas Howell. All I see with this sentencing racism is that Wojak wearing a sad mask but
01:20:01.240 grinning from ear to ear underneath. That's really, really good. Garlic Goblin says the blindfold has been
01:20:09.160 torn from Lady Justice's eyes. It's as simple as that. Hard to describe. And Lord Nerova says,
01:20:17.000 I'm becoming more sympathetic to young people who want to live Britain. Of course, we will win and
01:20:21.720 England will be saved. But there are other considerations. What if you have a young family
01:20:26.520 and you get sent away for two years over a tweet? Nobody should have to live like this.
01:20:30.680 Okay, we've got some comments for your segment here. I'll be happy to read them for you.
01:20:39.000 John H says, I wonder what the French army officers will do. Democracy is dead or dying. Yes,
01:20:45.720 that's a good point. The French are known for their dissatisfaction when the government isn't doing
01:20:53.320 their thing. I certainly know about the French Revolution. Is it the 78th French Republic?
01:21:01.640 I've lost track. I think they've lost track as well.
01:21:07.000 It'll be interesting to see where the military go on this, if the people start to rise up again.
01:21:13.800 But is there going to be enough of a rising up? It was interesting to see how the farmers came out
01:21:18.680 over the last couple of years. And so many of them started to support Marie Le Pen. And that
01:21:23.800 the socialists then had to try and jump on it to say, look, we're with you as well.
01:21:28.040 I mean, in ancient times, all you really needed was the military and the farms. And you've got
01:21:34.280 yourself all the base of power you need. That sounds like I'm trying to suggest something. I'm not.
01:21:41.560 It's just an observation. Okay.
01:21:43.080 But that political document you said of how to plan a revolution in France, that's not real then.
01:21:48.680 I forgot what I was going to say now. Sorry, that's really, really, really unfair of me.
01:21:55.640 I'm trying not to incriminate myself.
01:21:57.640 And just for the MI5 and MI6, that is a made up document, just in case you're watching us.
01:22:02.280 It's not real. We're pretending it's a joke. It's humor.
01:22:06.040 But also the yellow vests are going to cause some chaos, I'm sure.
01:22:08.520 But Eloise says, England slash the UK is on the same trajectory and the same conversations,
01:22:16.280 the same issues, the same claims, the same plays in politics. I've seen it all happen before as a child,
01:22:21.960 along with the crime spikes, more ethnic unrest and blaming others, fracturing cohesion, so less
01:22:27.560 ability to group build, work together and keep employment high and a functional society. Eloise is
01:22:33.080 South African, I believe. And so what she's saying is basically that she's seeing all the parallels.
01:22:37.880 And in fact, many of the South African commentators that I've spoke to as well have been saying the
01:22:42.760 same thing, that they're worried about us because we're people that they're hoping we'll be able
01:22:48.040 to help them. And we're making the same mistakes that the ANC are doing, but we're imposing it upon
01:22:54.360 ourselves. Yeah. Absolutely spot on there. Jamie Wright says, something to keep in mind is that
01:23:02.760 even though white South Africans own most of the farms in the country, we don't own most of the
01:23:07.240 arable land. If the black population wanted to, they could start setting up farms of their own.
01:23:13.080 That is also true. And also a lot of the land in South Africa, as I understand it, it might not be fit
01:23:20.680 for crops necessarily, but you can still have grazing animals, things like that sort of thing that's
01:23:25.640 common throughout Africa. And so it is possible to have successful farms, but I think that there's
01:23:33.400 so much ethnic resentment in South Africa that they're not necessarily wanting to learn the ways
01:23:39.240 of the European farmer. And let's not forget that a lot of Africa isn't that many generations
01:23:45.560 removed from a more traditional lifestyle. And so European ways of farming that we've created over
01:23:53.560 thousands and thousands of years are pretty foreign to them and they don't necessarily understand them.
01:23:58.840 And because of this ethnic resentment, they're not really going out of their way to learn from them.
01:24:04.120 And it's one of those things that was an empire of dust when there was a, the Chinese were in the
01:24:09.800 Congo and there's an interesting scene of a Chinese man dressing down a Congolese man saying,
01:24:17.000 listen, the white man was here and he built you all of these wonderful things, trains, you know,
01:24:20.680 you had all of these things even before we had them in China and you've let them go to ruin.
01:24:25.160 You're not grateful for them. You've not understood them. You've just taken them for granted.
01:24:30.120 And you could see he's genuinely annoyed, probably because he's got the job of having to get them to
01:24:35.560 work. But it's still highlighting the same point that I think I was getting at that they took a
01:24:44.040 lot of this for granted and they presumed that they could get away with persecuting the European man
01:24:48.920 when actually a lot of the things that were brought to South Africa, these, these aspects of
01:24:54.760 civilization, if you will, you know, access to running water, electricity, having a, you know,
01:25:00.520 a functioning political system that isn't corrupt. These are all things that we had to introduce
01:25:05.000 to Africa. And by marginalizing, if I want of a better word, because it's a bit tainted these
01:25:11.400 days, the white minority, they're also rejecting all of these things because knowledge doesn't exist
01:25:18.280 in a vacuum. You've got to have the people that understand it, obviously. It almost seems silly
01:25:23.320 to point it out, but it's something that I think is getting missed. Patrick Reed says,
01:25:29.480 I'm really sorry to hear about what's happening to Tim's family. He strikes me as the kind of man who
01:25:34.360 doesn't like to ask for help. His friends should organize something now so that they know there
01:25:42.040 are people around the world who will be there for them in their hour of need. Just knowing that we
01:25:46.760 are here will be helpful. And that's a really nice sentiment. So thank you for saying so. And it's,
01:25:51.320 it's true. And I'm glad you mentioned that at the start of the podcast, Alios.
01:25:55.880 And best of luck again to Tim and his wife.
01:25:59.560 Johan Schett, RE South Africa. The anti-Indian riots were due to the Gupta family involvement
01:26:09.000 with Jacob Zuma and the ANC. State capture was a popular phrase in those days. I actually wrote
01:26:14.600 an article back in 2021 explaining that whole debacle because we were all seeing videos of
01:26:21.640 people getting shot and warehouses being burnt to the ground and no one really knew what was going
01:26:26.200 on. And it was basically a clash between Ramaphosa and Jacob Zuma, who was a former ANC president,
01:26:34.200 and then the current ANC president. It was a political thing. And then Zuma went,
01:26:38.920 was imprisoned on corruption charges because he had massive stacks of cash in his house, which
01:26:45.400 in my mind, tends to indicate that you might be corrupt. And so it's probably true. But in a lot
01:26:51.640 of South African politics, everyone is corrupt. So it's one of those things where it's selectively
01:26:56.040 enforced. And he went on to set up his own party, M.K. We Seesway. I'm probably massively butchering that.
01:27:02.920 But they stole loads of votes from the ANC. The ANC then had less than a majority of votes in the last
01:27:09.960 election. And now they introduced this bill. So by this fallout between those two presidents,
01:27:15.320 it's unintentionally drawn the ire of Trump and potentially the collapse of their entire
01:27:20.600 government if things carry on the way they are. So the final comment we'll read is from Baron
01:27:26.040 Von Warhawk. A while ago, I got into an argument with my friend about a subject matter that deeply
01:27:30.840 disturbed me. The topic arose about Elon Musk criticizing South Africa. And I brought up the
01:27:35.720 attacks on the Boers there. They outright dismissed it. And when I showed them the evidence of
01:27:39.880 children being burnt alive and women being raped, one of them said that the white South Africans
01:27:46.360 should have expected some revenge action. When I pointed out that the native Africans promised
01:27:54.520 no retaliation and that they would let bygones be bygones to build a rainbow nation, he responded
01:28:02.600 that it was white's fault for believing it and that it should have moved as soon as apartheid ended.
01:28:08.200 When I pointed out that these people have been there for almost 400 years, they're being targeted by
01:28:12.600 Bantus who arrived recently. I think the Bantu expansion was in about 500 BC to Central and South
01:28:22.360 Africa because they came out of Nigeria and Ghana and places like that. So they're not necessarily
01:28:28.760 the natives of the natives of the land. And there are still natives. You know, you look at the Congo,
01:28:33.000 the natives in the land, a lot of them are pygmies. And a lot of the Congos there are Bantus that came
01:28:40.040 there in the Bantu expansion. So if you understand your history, you know that people's claims quite
01:28:47.000 often don't hold as much water as you might imagine. But I think that the best avenue of attack here is that
01:28:54.360 by attacking the white minority in South Africa, they're harming themselves. You know, they need
01:29:00.040 food, they need infrastructure, they need these things just as much as anyone else. And by attacking
01:29:05.320 the people that disproportionately contribute to that, they aren't really helping anyone. They're
01:29:10.600 not helping the white farmers, they're not helping themselves. And they're not helping themselves on the
01:29:14.840 international stage because it looks awful if you genocide people, which shouldn't be a surprise to
01:29:21.800 anyone. And on that lovely positive note, it's time to end the show. Thank you very much for coming
01:29:29.080 on again. My pleasure. And thank you very much, everyone, for watching. Hope you have a nice day,
01:29:33.400 despite the bad news. Make sure to tune in same time tomorrow. And goodbye. Goodbye.