In this episode of The Lotus Eaters, Lewis Brackfall and Josh the Furminator talk all about the vote against the new president of Oxford University, as well as what the Home Office is hiding from us about the Lord of the Rings.
00:00:00.000Hello and welcome to the podcast of the Lotus Eaters episode 1278 for Tuesday the 21st of
00:00:06.800October 2025. I'm your host Luca joined today by Josh the Furminator. Hi. He said he'd be back
00:00:14.240and he is and uh also a good friend of the show Lewis Brackfall. How are you sir? Very well
00:00:20.160yourself? Yeah very well thank you thank you for coming in. Oh thank you. The pin here I just
00:00:25.040realised I don't have a flag pin. Gotta be raising the colours man. Shame much shame. My divided
00:00:30.640loyalties I'm gonna have a half Scottish half English one now. Oh I thought you were gonna go
00:00:34.560Cornish. Well according to Ancestry I'm only like three percent Cornish. Oh well done. Which is weird.
00:00:41.040Well done. Anyway today we're going to be talking all about the vote against the president-elect of
00:00:47.100Oxford. We're then going to be talking about what the Home Office is trying to hide from us
00:00:51.860and then we're going to be um defending the Lord of the Rings against the latest series of
00:00:57.580baseless attacks and I can assure you. The Orc Hordes. Yes and I can assure you ladies and gentlemen
00:01:02.760ahead of time rest assured that we will have only correct based and definitive takes during that
00:01:11.520segment. So um with that all said before we do begin actually I just also want to point you towards
00:01:17.500my own show of Chronicles because uh it was a bit of a tech issue on the website this weekend so
00:01:22.580not everyone was able to see it go up and I've started the first of a two-part series looking at
00:01:27.780Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet. Uh it was a lot of fun to record and if you uh listen to it as well I do
00:01:35.820attempt many of the lines read a few monologues myself um it's quite funny actually because um the
00:01:41.680camera wasn't on so I was just able to like stand and perform them it was uh it was very fun anyway
00:01:47.040so if you're interested go and check out one of what I have to say about one of Shakespeare's classics.
00:01:52.620You're reading all of the sort of romantic lines so it's going to be like if you listen to it you're
00:01:56.080slowly seducing the audience. Yes I I am Romeo and Juliet in the piece in a real bipolar sort of uh
00:02:05.600romantic a very bipolar romance uh yeah anyway so let's talk about uh the president-elect of Oxford
00:02:14.480shall we? So obviously I needn't remind you he's become somewhat infamous over the past few years
00:02:20.520sorry past month um obviously because he made some statements uh after the horrible murder of Charlie
00:02:30.280Kirk uh absolutely disgusting where he basically uh commented a lull when he heard that it had
00:02:37.660happened and just let's effing go right which is an abhorrent thing for anyone to to say it's an
00:02:46.020and it but it's an even more abhorrent thing given that he'd personally met Charlie and being at the
00:02:52.460debate with him looked him in the eye presumably shook his hand as Charlie would have would have wanted
00:02:57.140to do of course and but everything since then so obviously that put him under the microscope
00:03:02.400and then what's more every other thing about him just revealed him to be a man totally lacking in
00:03:09.320virtue or honor or any sense of ethics um which reminds me of course the fact that here at the
00:03:16.300Lotus Eaters we hold such things as virtue and morality in very very high regard which is why one of
00:03:22.880our great men Stelios has put together a course looking at ancient Greek virtue ethics going back
00:03:29.120to antiquity and all of the lost wisdom in there into how to be a good person how to live a good life
00:03:36.740um that is constructive for yourself and for your loved ones around you you can either buy it as a
00:03:43.020one uh total sum uh for £325 or you can actually get it in three monthly installments because uh
00:03:51.520it is coming up to Christmas and I'm sure people's wallets are starting to get pinched
00:03:55.880so if that's something that you're interested in then please do go check it out I apologize as well
00:04:02.060for being a bit hoarse ladies and gentlemen I'm a bit under the weather so as you can see here the
00:04:07.420picture says a thousand words not only with the quotes but just the absolute lack of conduct right
00:04:14.400there are there are thousands and thousands of young British students who will Oxford would be
00:04:22.080the university of their dreams right and you would want to go there because it is the oldest university
00:04:28.260in the in these aisles and it's one of the greatest prestige and we learned that it was basically
00:04:36.440this position not only was he allowed to go to Oxford whilst not having the grades for it
00:04:41.960right which can only really be attributed to the fact that he was obviously a diversity hire
00:04:47.400obviously look at him well yes exactly but what's more of course the fact that he was already elevated
00:04:55.720into a university that he wasn't worthy of and then from there was even more rewarded uh with
00:05:02.840basically a vote to become the president of the Oxford Union now I just look at sorry no no do go look at
00:05:10.440the absolute state of him though this is you know if I was at the border I'd be like you know you're
00:05:15.680not even coming in let alone going to Oxford and let alone becoming the Oxford Union president isn't
00:05:20.600it right like how on earth can this absurd it looks like he's wearing slippers tracksuit bottoms and a
00:05:27.440horrible t-shirt I what what has happened to our culture where we allow someone like this even near to
00:05:35.460it let alone hold a prominent position yeah seems more reflective of you know purposely doing that
00:05:41.300to dishonor the other the other person who they're debating because you know when you go to a debate
00:05:46.260and you know you have your notes and you prep you want to make sure you look presentable as well in any
00:05:51.760format and it kind of it honors your opponent too because it says look I've made I've made the effort
00:05:58.380to come here to present my ideas but also the prestigious union the prestigious institution of
00:06:05.900the Oxford Union has long since been the home of debate and you know dialogue and if you go back
00:06:14.260throughout history it's all to do you you see men dressed in such like perfect condition um for the
00:06:21.320time and I think to be honest I see it as just a way that he'd done that to um to just dishonor his
00:06:27.440opponent more than himself it's a humiliation ritual so yeah you're right to the institution
00:06:33.400to his opponents not to himself oddly enough he doesn't feel humiliated by his state there
00:06:39.000well he's he's just a human form of civilizational entropy really isn't he just devalues everything
00:06:46.060he comes into proximity to by being like that yes absolutely very well said uh I would like to um
00:06:52.560for sake of nuance point out what Adrian says here which is that the Oxford Union is a separately
00:06:57.400legal entity and quite distinct from the university itself has its own building its own trustees
00:07:03.000its own constitution and its own policies and procedures and in addition membership is not limited
00:07:08.520to Oxford University students or alumni but open to those studying at certain other institutions so
00:07:15.120please don't tarnish the university with the incompetence of the union officers or project onto the
00:07:21.920university the disrepute into which they bring the union no don't worry the university has its own
00:07:27.780reasons to yeah be in disrepute they are separate you're quite right but um we could make an entirely
00:07:34.200separate segment talking about the problems with the actual university no uniform standards though no
00:07:41.060um but the thing is as well other than of course the uh personal effect that this is having
00:07:48.800on the fact that well obviously because of his comments about Charlie uh a vote of no confidence
00:07:54.780was of course put in him rightly bloody so um and it shouldn't have taken this long frankly um but
00:08:02.560what's more as well as you find in this GB news article the union is facing a financial crisis
00:08:08.160after its president-elect appeared to celebrate the killing of Charlie Kirk last month donations to
00:08:13.980believe uh believe to be worth hundreds of thousands of pounds have been put on hold and speakers have
00:08:19.960pulled out of debates uh in backlash to remarks made by um George Aberonia and so you have this thing
00:08:28.500where it's bringing um financial costs right now as well it's not just his reputation but as you say
00:08:36.720he is a form of civilizational entropy Josh I mean look at that picture on the right hand side of the
00:08:42.100article he looks like some sort of pirate at least he's wearing a you know a proper uh you know black
00:08:47.820tie jacket but still he's wearing the weird the rag looking thing it's cringe it's really really cringe
00:08:55.260um and let's not let's not forget as well the the most important thing that he actually had to say in
00:09:01.740all of this and this was during a debate to effectively create change in the world we desire
00:09:07.280inside prop will argue that at times there is simply nothing else that can be required other
00:09:12.000than violent retaliation and this is a view I wholeheartedly agree with this view the view that
00:09:17.060some institutions are too broken too aggressive too oppressive to be reformed like cancers of our
00:09:24.340society they must and they should be taken down by any means necessary by any means necessary
00:09:30.600what institutions is he actually talking about well the ones that obviously are ideological enemies
00:09:37.560or not even enemies just not allies obviously to I don't understand though the the ruling class are in
00:09:43.620favor of of progressivism yes which is why he's there in the first place yeah so I don't understand
00:09:49.560what institutions was he actually talking about I've never I don't understand well it's just pure
00:09:55.280typical student activism isn't it it's about thinking you're the rebellion while it's just
00:10:00.120kicking in a whole hall of open doors right I think if you're the president elect of the Oxford
00:10:05.960Union maybe you shouldn't be talking about destroying institutions because I hate to break it to you but
00:10:11.420you're part of one well we'll get to that in just a minute so we have here as it says vote on Oxford
00:10:19.180Union president in chaos over intimidation of officials so this was a this was a really bizarre
00:10:25.260thing that made this you know really worth exploring the fact that it wasn't as simple as just having
00:10:31.300a vote then all of a sudden these allegations came about about rigging and sabotage and right
00:10:38.460all sorts of it says uh the proceedings this comes from uh this statement here and it goes on to say
00:10:46.660the proceedings for the poll of no confidence brought in against George Aberonga were informally
00:10:52.360suspended in the early morning of October the 20th this was not a formal decision taken based on
00:10:58.300procedural necessity but rather due to the development of an impossible working atmosphere
00:11:03.700the extraordinary returning officer was subjected to obstruction intimidation and unwarranted hostility
00:11:10.800by a number of representatives and on account of this had no choice but to informally suspend the
00:11:17.200process excuse me uh process as cooperation and progress was rendered untenable returning as a result
00:11:27.500uh returning a result is of utmost importance the membership of voted in large numbers and the
00:11:33.680oxford union society is fundamentally a democratic institution the voices of the membership must be
00:11:39.400heard therefore proceedings will resume and the validity of proxy nominations where unfinished
00:11:45.060will continue without representatives and so all of a sudden it really feels like general melchit
00:11:52.160has been entirely vindicated when he said that oxford's a complete dump right we're in a position
00:11:58.460where how has this happened how have we got to the point where um oxford democracy looks exactly like
00:12:06.220something from tower hamlets right with um sleaze and sabotage it's almost like institutions can only be
00:12:14.740preserved if certain people occupy the the spaces isn't it it's almost like the people are the important
00:12:19.940part of the institution and not the the structure yeah in a um well this is um if i get from the um
00:12:27.380article which i don't think i've got here it says uh in a meeting of the standing committee which aberonga was
00:12:32.400permitted to attend as president-elect he and his supporters moved a revenge motion of no confidence
00:12:38.680in the current president so obviously there's a president who's because he's only president-elect
00:12:44.240so the one who he's obviously going to be taking over from uh a musa haraj uh for allowing alumni to vote
00:12:51.740on saturday and they came prepared very with the requisite 150 signatures so that vote will take place
00:13:00.300on thursday so there is now a vote against the president-elect and the president a revenge vote
00:13:06.660of no confidence and what's more some of aberonga's allies have been framing the attempt to remove him
00:13:13.060as would you guess racist oh of course uh according to the oxford branch of stand up to racism
00:13:20.040um if this racist campaign to depose george is successful it will further embolden fascists and
00:13:26.660the far right oh my god you know just the um as for racism it's worth noting uh in passing that
00:13:34.900another screenshot from aberonga's whatsapp exchange shows him boasting i don't frequent white
00:13:42.000establishments um now this is immediate deport well immediate deport but also i don't frequent white
00:13:48.940establishments you're at oxford yeah it's sort of pretty white right i mean there's also it's quite
00:13:56.520asian east asian in particular i mean don't get me wrong i actually uh respect the honesty you know
00:14:01.760about the fact that you actually want nothing to do with those whatsoever i just guess sure yeah i
00:14:06.900just suggest you go do it from another country then because what's more you can't have that both ways
00:14:11.560you can't set up a parallel society and also have your entire career made up by that white society
00:14:19.540by british society that you're in active rebellion against it reminds me a little bit of lenny henry that
00:14:25.380you know the society that they hate gave them so much and it's done nothing to curb their
00:14:32.040um insatiable appetite to destroy their host nation indeed and so we have a little but arbitrary victory
00:14:40.940friends a victory nonetheless which is that he seems to have lost the vote of no confidence so a verdict
00:14:47.940came in with 1746 ballots and it seems that uh we won by 1228 to 501 which let's just also say as well
00:15:02.780the fact that there were 501 people connected to oxford that thought yeah this guy can stay
00:15:08.720i like the cut of this guy's jib he seems to be the direction that this union needs to be going in
00:15:14.300well the union um has gone in a quite a left-wing direction i know if you look at a talk from maybe
00:15:21.16010 or 15 years ago perhaps um it seemed a lot more reasonable a lot more academic and a lot more in
00:15:28.080keeping with what you would associate with oxford in recent years you know you get a right-wing guest
00:15:33.740in and many of the annoying students in there are jeering and just the overall conduct has gone down
00:15:40.660and i do wonder whether this is uh shaped why people like this might have so much popularity is
00:15:47.120that the the political makeup of the people who attend and are members or whatever um has changed
00:15:53.820there was just another part actually forgive me that was worth reading out as well which is that um
00:15:59.660uh adrian goes on to say in this piece that the problem was not only his celebratory outburst at
00:16:05.600kirk's death but the fact that other messengers have emerged suggesting that he holds the oxford
00:16:11.000union itself in contempt when one friend wrote to him before his election in june if you hate it then
00:16:18.860you should run for the presidency aberronya replied real lol that's what i did right so just yeah as you
00:16:28.220say just being a total enemy destroying it from the inside and so really the question here should not
00:16:34.440be whether or not this man should be the president-elect of the oxford union the first question should
00:16:41.720be should he even be at oxford at all and i think we'll find the answer to that is also no judging by
00:16:47.640his grades and then the question from there should be should he even be in the country of course and yes
00:16:53.720i agree with your your head waving there josh i agree entirely and so but of course what we have
00:17:02.360as we always have with gay race communists is that they never want to go down without a fight
00:17:07.360they never believe themselves accountable for the things they say and they always seem to have a bit
00:17:13.760of a defense around them and so you can see there was a statement here put out on his instagram where
00:17:20.340he says uh this poll was compromised from the moment that um uh musa haraj and his majority of the
00:17:27.500standing committee brought compromised and untested poll regulations and so he's just not long story
00:17:33.440short he's not accepting the result so i wonder if facebook instagram uh twitter and youtube are
00:17:40.220going to de-platform him now for not accepting this i wonder if that's going to happen i'm sure oxford
00:17:46.720were merely fortifying it they weren't actually altering uh the outcome anyway so as you can see here
00:17:53.400from this bottom line george aberonga is and remains the president elect per the oxford union rules ah
00:18:00.200yes like an african warlord it's not over until he gives up power which is something that he will never
00:18:07.140do without intervention and so obviously the the closing just things to say about this as well of
00:18:13.620course is just the fact that although it's very sensible of course that um the membership of oxford
00:18:19.340union seem to have decided to eject him it also can't be ignored that of course he was put there
00:18:26.920by the union in the first place right and they can't get off scot-free for that right you cause this
00:18:33.540the entire institution just allowed this to happen supporting a man for a whole profusion of reasons
00:18:41.320any one of them would have rendered him totally unworthy of this position the fact that all of them
00:18:49.040have collided together and he still was able to get it is absolutely ridiculous and it makes a
00:18:54.780mockery of the whole institution doesn't it it does and as we can see from the uh uh funding
00:19:00.800problems and what's more uh the whole union is paying for it right they're all suffering
00:19:06.540and rightly so his foul opinions and what's more as well to echo something that um stelios was saying
00:19:13.980in the segment back when we had this this isn't a matter of cancel culture this isn't a matter of
00:19:19.140uh trying to remove this man because he has an opinion that i don't like the point is that this man
00:19:25.300has an opinion that he wants you dead right he's totally indifferent to your murder even for people
00:19:32.300he's actually met in polite society and so that sort of an opinion is basically an advocacy for
00:19:41.900violence and can't be tolerated in the institutions as uh the left said freedom of speech doesn't
00:19:48.080necessarily mean freedom from consequences they did say that didn't they did yeah i tell you what
00:19:52.740if we can't get jimmy kimmel this guy's having some consequences
00:19:57.260all right so uh from the rumble rants we've got uh sigil stone says they voted out uh captain yes
00:20:06.220uh sparrow but now there's uh someone worse in the background whispering i love democracy
00:20:12.220sorry you're quite right sigil stone that actually comes to another point as well which is just that
00:20:17.940even though they're going to get rid of this guy it seems you know however much he holds up and is able
00:20:25.580to defend himself here which i don't think he will because there's just there's too many incentives
00:20:30.580for the union to get rid of him at this point uh whether through the orthodox means or not whether
00:20:36.640they just have to arbitrarily you're gone non-orthodox means what they're gonna whack him like well i just
00:20:41.920mean not by democratic vote of course um i'm not i'm not doing a goodfellas uh with this but the fact
00:20:48.600of the matter is that um the the makeup of the institution that allowed a verdict like this to
00:20:56.340happen in the first place and allowed him to be put in charge is still there and so why are we not
00:21:02.340just going to end up with a second george abironga when this guy gets cleared out right they are sort
00:21:08.360of spoiled for choice exactly and those are always the candidates who want to put themselves forward
00:21:13.600so we will see what happens and that's a random name says ironically enough this clown is 100% right
00:21:20.560when he says some institutions are beyond saving uh we must create a separate system and keep people
00:21:27.220like him out afuera well i mean a very good point random name but of course even that's a point isn't
00:21:33.240it even though he says oh you know some institutions need to be torn down he also owes his entire fake
00:21:41.580career to those institutions uh they're so corrupt that they gave him a position in the first place
00:21:48.820um all right and there's no youtube comments so we'll head over to you good sir thank you very much
00:21:55.640thank you right um before we begin i just want to say a quick thank you to uh the lotus seaters for
00:22:04.220having me in uh to discuss this very very important story uh i can't i say i can't believe i can sort of
00:22:13.080believe that for the first time i'm under some sort of scandal is what you could probably call it so
00:22:19.100i'm sorry if you are part of the audience that have already heard this story a hundred times even
00:22:24.820though this happened only late last week but i wanted to go through this because um well not only
00:22:30.880was i invited in to do this segment and to present it to you guys um the wonderful audience uh but
00:22:37.360also it is incredibly important and it will affect everyone else uh so this is mere potentially the
00:22:44.280stepping stone to something far more sinister um but first before we properly begin i will hand this over
00:22:51.800to you guys to pitch oh sure uh so stelios um a great greek professor himself has uh come down from
00:23:01.180olympus and created this course uh for us it's a really really excellent course he's been doing some
00:23:07.560webinars over the past few weeks hundreds of people have been uh attending them and basically if you have
00:23:13.980this course you can buy it either in one installment or three um you're able to get access to 15 hours
00:23:20.840of high quality lectures all about ancient greek virtue ethics how to live life in a moral way
00:23:28.580and that doesn't mean through the arbitrary standards of just following the rules versus you know doing
00:23:34.920what the law tells you you can do it means no being your own moral agent being aware of what the moral
00:23:40.760order should be as the ancients understood it and basically helping to prosper in your life so if that
00:23:48.120sounds like something of interest to you it's right there on the lotus eaters um dot courses and you
00:23:53.800can definitely go check it out and you'll profit from it cool okay so what is the home office hiding
00:24:00.660from us exactly so as you what aren't they what aren't they hiding is the bigger question right um
00:24:06.960for the past year or so i'd been investigating the asylum accommodation contracts and uh stakeholder
00:24:14.620policy around uh where who is it steering the agenda of the illegal migrant accommodation policy so
00:24:24.080obviously as we know hundreds of thousands if not millions of illegal uh migrants have entered or
00:24:30.680broken into britain and are being housed in hotels across uh our nation and so i want to know who's
00:24:38.940benefiting from this financially and who are conducting meetings uh behind the scenes with the home office
00:24:46.280and steering the uh the the asylum accommodation policy i think it's a fair question and to utilize
00:24:54.160this i use the freedom of information act which was introduced by tony blair um during his reign
00:25:01.200uh in early 2000s and fun fact he called it his biggest regret after he after he finished his uh long
00:25:11.920term in british politics but still is involved very much so as we all know he was asked by a reporter what
00:25:19.920is your biggest regret now he could have said the iraq war he could have said many things but he chose to
00:25:25.820say the freedom of information act so i think that's a big omission for not only all of us but for your
00:25:32.680audience too uh to understand how important the freedom of information act is and to try and acquire
00:25:39.220data from government departments there's also something very satisfying about using blair's own
00:25:44.840laws against the institutions he helped rig against the populace exactly there had to be one in there
00:25:51.940that accidentally helped us exactly and so i recommend everyone to utilize this wonderful law
00:25:59.280so thank you i'd like to say a special thanks to tony blair for introducing it and the tony blair institute
00:26:05.080if you're looking for members you won't find me and tony but um so i asked uh the important question about
00:26:15.680who is steering it in in more specifically the stakeholders and the home office as we've done
00:26:22.360a segment before on um the lotus eaters and you were present um lucas when we were going through it
00:26:29.260sorry luca um forgive me i get it a lot uh they actually gave me 14 ngos uh that have had consultation
00:26:39.220meetings between 2020 and 2024 and it's ngos and charity engagement with the home office
00:26:46.040um that have had uh meetings uh about the national asylum stakeholder forum the nasf
00:26:55.000and its strategic engagement group so segs for matters in relation to asylum accommodation policy
00:27:03.800and the engagement was primarily sharing of information with some organizations also acting
00:27:09.460as delivery partners so extremely important and i published this on my youtube channel and then came
00:27:17.040on to lotus eaters while when we had our um our segment and it's reached uh over a hundred thousand
00:27:24.460views alone on this and i think it's important who is having these meetings so i decided in the video
00:27:32.240to name the directors of each company and many of them sounded i seem to remember quite um non-british
00:27:42.680they had quite foreign names almost as if they didn't really consider themselves stewards of england
00:27:48.200or protecting anything about um its demographic integrity or its institutions or uh the indigenous
00:27:55.600people's people's way of life indeed and so i decided to uh obviously name the directors because it's in the
00:28:04.900public interest but also it's lawful you can do that because it's of course if you go onto these
00:28:11.380websites it is displayed quite clearly the director of this company yeah it is public knowledge of course
00:28:19.120well kind of public knowledge and so after posting this and doing the segment on lotus eaters i received
00:28:26.560a message from a friend saying did you know that the guardian is talking about you and i thought oh
00:28:31.480brilliant well let's have a look at what they've said and so the guardian put out this over a month ago
00:28:37.480where it says refugee charities install safe rooms and relocate amid amid rise in far-right threats
00:28:45.180now i was reading this and they even says one ngo placed on an online hit list
00:28:51.520had to temporarily close its office owing to harassing phone calls i'm staying on your good side lewis
00:28:57.700all of us well i i i'm pretty sure we um obviously didn't endorse harassment absolutely not
00:29:04.860absolutely not so my i want to state my primary my prime sorry my primary role as a journalist is to
00:29:13.340find information lawfully through the freedom of information act and that is one of my tools to use
00:29:18.860and to disclose the information lawfully um and i am a rule player as much as you know a lot of people
00:29:26.540uh don't want me to be i i do play by the rules um but i'm using the foi act like we discussed earlier
00:29:35.260to embarrass the government um and to shine a light on information and draw out data uh to give to the
00:29:43.320public because it's in the public interest and i am like an mp or what an mp support is supposed to
00:29:49.940do is to serve my audience and just and to serve what it is that people are concerned about it's why
00:29:56.260i'm now at a privileged uh position at restore britain being a director of the investigations unit
00:30:05.440to help steer and to help with concerns from the public and people within institutions that
00:30:11.380come to me with concerns that is my role um obviously i do not endorse anything illegal of
00:30:18.440course i don't um i can't help but feel though whilst reading this particular article there isn't
00:30:25.720any evidence to show what is being said and i'm just going to throw that out there i i'm so they
00:30:32.520mention you so this is what i wanted to talk about let me just bring up my notes because i want to find
00:30:38.400exactly here we go the charity commission a particular charity commission has taken the
00:30:45.960highly unusual step of removing the names of trustees from several charities listed on its website
00:30:52.180which so like i said you go on their website and it shows who the directors are it did so after the
00:30:58.960home office gave a far-right influencer um the names of some organizations um with which it had meetings
00:31:06.940about asylum accommodation following a freedom of information request so they're clearly talking
00:31:12.640about me here yeah clearly but they don't mention me by name didn't ask for a comment from you didn't
00:31:18.180ask for a comment nothing um but they got around that by just not mentioning my name but it's quite
00:31:24.540clear that they are talking about me i don't know anyone else who's managed to get that information
00:31:28.380you're a public figure it's on your website indeed but not be named now i cannot be named like
00:31:33.960voldemort in harry potter very strange um and so after this uh i decided to follow up with more
00:31:41.520freedom of information requests to try and get some more information on within these particular
00:31:48.540meetings what is being discussed what are they talking about you know who benefits from this what
00:31:54.360is the agenda and so after doing so and asking a simple question i posted this with screenshots and i
00:32:01.140wanted to go through them and get your opinions so i put this is the most absurd foi response i've had
00:32:06.080to date the home office has refused to release records about which ngos and charities are influencing
00:32:12.020asylum accommodation policy because my social media activity and we'll go through this supposedly post
00:32:18.820poses a safety risk and could trigger public backlash a public backlash is omitted from them not from me
00:32:28.740disclosing it yeah i mean it's like saying if you if you tell people the awful things we've done there's
00:32:34.420going to be public backlash therefore we can't allow you to know about it yeah like like the tories uh
00:32:40.100did with their legacy with um all the afghans yes the super injunction exactly like trying to keep it
00:32:47.320hush because they know that the public will be against it from the beginning so let's go through what
00:32:51.880they said so here's my response uh from well here's the response from them to me and i've highlighted
00:32:57.540some key parts it says we have considered your request carefully and can confirm that some
00:33:02.280information falling uh falls within the scope um of this request um but the exemption applies where
00:33:09.940disclosure would or be likely to inhibit the free and frank provision of advice and the free and frank
00:33:16.920exchange of views for the purpose of deliberation it says the withheld information includes internal
00:33:23.560materials prepared for the nasf and seg meetings so these particular meetings with the strategic
00:33:30.200engagement group and the national asylum stakeholder forum it says and stakeholder engagement disclosure of
00:33:41.800this information would likely to pre it would likely would sorry would be likely to prejudice the home
00:33:48.140office's ability to engage in open honest and constructive dialogue with ngos and key stakeholders in these
00:33:56.180uh matters now i don't buy that personally no but they go on to say they run a public interest sorry can
00:34:04.340i just say as well with that it just what they're saying is it'll compromise our ability to be open
00:34:09.720with um stakeholders yeah it's like and we've more we value them much more than we do about being open
00:34:17.120with the people right just with order it's just a frank admission that no we care far more about the
00:34:22.000opinions of the ngos yeah stakeholders and we do about you perhaps and so they continued by saying
00:34:29.180however we consider that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the interest in
00:34:35.680disclosure of course releasing this information would likely inhibit the home office and its
00:34:41.780stakeholders from engaging in free and frank discussions but they also said the exemption
00:34:46.860applies where disclosure would endanger the physical or mental health of any individual or endanger the
00:34:54.300safety of any individual they say the withheld information includes named individuals and organizations
00:35:01.020taking into account the effect of information previously released under a previous request
00:35:06.300there is real significant and specific risk and disclosure of the information in scope would cause
00:35:12.520endangerment upset and distress to the individual individuals and families included there are also
00:35:20.000safety concerns for the home office staff service providers and ngo representatives now i don't buy that
00:35:27.420personally because when you go through um the process i know that they can redact names they can give a what is
00:35:36.420called a partial disclosure and they redact any personal details that they would deem uh compromising or
00:35:43.180anything however the reason why they won't um well i believe the reason why that they won't do this
00:35:49.720or release names is because the names are public um figures they're they are in the public record so they don't have an argument to not release it so they can only use that and the article i believe as a way of saying this is the reason for why we can't use this i think the sort of best argument on their behalf to play devil's advocate
00:36:14.720here would be that well if we tell you which institutions are doing these things because these these institutions are public facing you can then find out who these people are so it doesn't necessarily matter if they redact it because you'll be able to find it out anyway
00:36:30.060exactly so my counter argument to that would be then why didn't you redact the 14 ngos that you gave to me in the first place
00:36:40.380what's more is a matter of public record even to to simply take them at the word right and take their
00:36:46.980reason as a reason when they say there is a real and significant and specific risk that disclosure of
00:36:52.040the information uh could endanger cause endangerment upset and distress to the individuals and families
00:36:59.380it's like that's exactly what these charities are doing to ordinary british people every day
00:37:05.700that's because they support this system that allows illegal migrants to stay in these hotels that
00:37:11.580have put countless people victims girls you know in harm's way right that's causing endangerment that's
00:37:20.060calling distress that's causing genuine harm but they don't care about that well they basically admit
00:37:25.720that if if we disclosed everything people would be so angry that they wouldn't be safe and i don't think
00:37:32.960that's necessarily untrue because there is a lot of anger in this country about this but the solution
00:37:38.560is not to then double down and try and say well we're not going to disclose information that it
00:37:44.540that should be a matter of public record deserves to be a matter of public record and shouldn't be
00:37:49.720done in the first place in my opinion you know none of this stuff um should be going on in an ordinary
00:37:55.780and insane society and by covering up for it all it's doing is allowing these bad practices to carry on
00:38:02.380and here's here's the part where it invokes more of the of a cover-up and more of a scandal is what
00:38:10.540you could call it it says um uh there are also safety concerns that they said for the home office
00:38:17.280staff service providers and ngo representatives recent social media activity by the requester
00:38:23.140included sharing personal details and misleading narratives which has already caused safety concerns
00:38:29.960among stakeholders additionally recent protests at asylum uh hotels have highlighted the validity
00:38:36.820validity sorry volatility oh my gosh excuse me um volatility um of i've not even said that right
00:38:45.780again volatility volatility got it there we go there we go forgive me um of public sentiment around
00:38:52.240asylum policy disclosure of sensitive meeting content could further inflame tensions increase the risk of
00:38:59.940targeted protests and place additional strain on public order resources so the part there recent social
00:39:07.880media activity by the requester so me um included sharing personal details and misleading narratives so one
00:39:16.280when you submit an foi request part of the foi act under law is that it's applicant blind it doesn't matter if i post it it doesn't matter if owen jones
00:39:27.220like asked for requested information it doesn't matter if you like requested it doesn't matter if carl benjamin requested it it doesn't matter who is asking for the information it is applicant blind
00:39:38.840and to then respond to me by saying the recent social media activity by the requester included sharing personal details i didn't
00:39:48.780and misleading narratives i didn't i distinctly remembering your segment you were very very careful
00:39:55.860to merely to merely just go through the names on the website and and what those charities do
00:40:02.160correct in their own words right exactly commentary to me and beau you know but like you were very
00:40:07.620of course yeah exactly the same with this segment i'm repeating exactly what they have given me
00:40:13.320right which is my right and what they have given you is a misleading narrative about themselves presumably then
00:40:20.000says maintaining the exemption preserves a safe space for operational planning and policy discussion
00:40:25.620allowing officials and stakeholders to deliberate freely without fear of external interference or misrepresentation
00:40:33.620it enables participants to speak openly and honestly and completely including exploring difficult or
00:40:40.120sensitive options disclosure could inhibit this openness and reduce the quality of decision making
00:40:46.200and it says conclusion the potential harm to the effective conduct of public affairs which doesn't
00:40:52.140make a sense like any any sense stakeholder engagement and individual safety outweighs the benefits
00:40:57.820of disclosure in this case so essentially they are stopping releasing this information
00:41:04.120um one of the well one of the main reasons being my recent social media activity and so that is
00:41:13.260unbelievable i've never heard of a case like this before personally um there might be other cases out
00:41:20.500there i've not personally come across this before but after this because people are saying well what are you
00:41:25.880going to do next about this obviously you have to go through the process of submitting an internal review
00:41:31.600which gets passed to another person within the home office to check to see whether they've added the
00:41:37.820correct um exemptions and i'm trying to fight for a at least a partial disclosure at the very least
00:41:45.400but this in my opinion use of social media activity by the requester is not part of the foi act
00:41:54.020that's just been crowbarred in there um which isn't right but also i i think that just looking at it
00:42:01.000outside of the the legal aspect and more towards a moral yes perspective these people in the charities
00:42:07.840presumably this was specific to um asylum hotel accommodation which is a policy that is obviously
00:42:14.600very very controversial very much in the public interest very much lots of people that are very
00:42:19.420interested in uh you know finding a solution to this and the majority of the population just want
00:42:26.160them all deported all the illegals deported and these people are working to basically facilitate this
00:42:33.140migrant hotel policy that's incredibly unpopular and they want shielding with government protection
00:42:39.260from the public which they might not even be a member of um from being angry at them and protesting
00:42:46.700maybe their organizations or knowing their names and tarnishing their professional reputation
00:42:51.840i'm afraid you can't have your cake and eat it here if you try and interfere in our country's politics
00:42:56.860particularly in something as um unpopular as this you know people have died because of these asylum
00:43:04.120seekers you know needless to say obviously things like sexual assault and the like rife um from these
00:43:11.060people costing the taxpayer lots of money i think people have a right here to be angry at the people
00:43:18.240helping facilitate this and it doesn't mean that you know i support them being harassed or anything unlawful
00:43:25.000but people deserve to know who these people are people deserve to know which organizations they represent
00:43:31.120and who they work with and i think they deserve some pushback because what they're doing
00:43:35.460is morally repugnant and i think that these people um do deserve you know reputation tarnishment they do
00:43:44.280deserve to be criticized publicly because what they're doing is awful and so the seriousness of
00:43:52.880this response um because of this i'm very grateful to have the support from particularly as well not just
00:44:01.760from obviously load seaters but uh and other people that have made videos on on this particular story
00:44:07.100but also rupert lowe who had written a letter to the home secretary about this and has said i'm writing
00:44:14.180to express my deep concern over a recent foi act response issued by your department to journalist
00:44:20.340lewis brackpool in that response the home office refused to release information concerning stakeholder
00:44:25.580meetings influencing asylum accommodation policy the justification included an extraordinary and
00:44:32.460improper statement that disclosure was being withheld in part because of quote recent social media
00:44:39.380activity by the requester end quote which it claimed had already caused safety concerns among stakeholders
00:44:46.960if accurate this represents a clear breach of the foi act 2000 and its central principle that requests
00:44:55.040must be treated applicant blind the identity or perceived opinions of a requester are entirely irrelevant
00:45:01.820and to whether information should be disclosed under law it would appear that a government department
00:45:08.260has used a citizen's political or journalistic activity as grounds to deny transparency
00:45:13.980an unexpected an unacceptable precedent which risks politicizing the foi process itself
00:45:20.980i therefore asked you to provide one a full explanation sorry a full explanation of why the requester's
00:45:28.680personal identity or social media presence was referenced in the decision to refuse disclosure
00:45:35.240number two confirmation of whether senior officials approved or were sorry confirmation of whether
00:45:42.460senior officials approved or were aware of this reasoning number three details of any internal guidance
00:45:48.000or policy that authorizes staff to assess a request as personal activity or profile and number four
00:45:55.180assurance the home office will review this case and issue a correct a corrective disclosure where appropriate so
00:46:02.980it's going to be a long process um i've done this thing as well called a subject access request
00:46:09.860and it felt horrible if i'm totally honest what you have to do
00:46:13.120i have to basically ask a department do you hold information on me and you have to give over details
00:46:20.980of yourself so like you know part of the process is giving over your uh you know you have to show
00:46:27.220like an identity show a particular identity to prove who you are and proof of address and all of this sort
00:46:33.360of stuff like a utility bill stuff like that and there's something really gross about oh i know that
00:46:40.840they've been talking about me here's my details uh can you check to see whether they've spoken about me
00:46:46.680and can you show me what they've spoken about it's a horrible horrible process uh it's really really
00:46:52.520awful um but this is what it's risking because i actually predict um that we are going to see a
00:47:00.940crackdown of the foi um because it's being it's it's a pretty effective tool which i've come to
00:47:08.620realize over the past few years and using it and submitting lots and lots each week um because
00:47:14.900over in australia the globalist left labor party over there uh claims it's tightening foi laws due
00:47:21.960to ai bots and foreign actors uh swamping the system however it's come to its come to everyone's
00:47:29.200attention that they don't have any evidence and there is a lack of proof for this but they are still
00:47:34.200trying to put forward a clamp down on it so it's only a matter of time now before this starts to
00:47:39.820happen somewhere in the uk because we tend to follow each other i would submit a freedom of
00:47:44.360information request about whether where these allegations about ai bots and foreign actors
00:47:49.560well there you go exactly um and yes this was yeah something to do with tony blair being criticized by
00:47:57.500freedom of information inquiry yeah indeed uh yes um he repeated his view that he regrets
00:48:05.220introducing the foi in 2000 because it has hugely constrained ministers confidence in having frank
00:48:11.560discussions with advisors and that was back in 2012 so all i'm going to say is we're obviously
00:48:18.560going to keep fighting this and trying to get disclosure uh i'm very grateful for uh the support
00:48:25.400from not only um you know the the company i work for restore britain rupert but of course yourselves
00:48:31.180and other people that are talking about this particular story um because this is going to affect if if they
00:48:37.760get away with this it is going to affect everyone it doesn't matter whether you're owen jones lewis
00:48:43.920brackpool josh or anyone else um because that means that the foi act is not applicant blind and can be
00:48:51.960weaponized so it's incredibly important um unfortunately it's going to get pretty annoying
00:48:58.080so i do apologize banging on about this until we get this resolved and it never happens again
00:49:04.360um because it's unacceptable um but i'd like to thank uh for the support as well it really i really
00:49:11.380appreciate it great work man oh thanks i really appreciate it all right i'll uh go through some of
00:49:17.280the uh rumble rants we've got uh shadowband says uh really enjoyed lucas episode on romeo and juliet
00:49:22.940chronicles quickly becoming one of my favorite weekly shows well thank you very much shadowband
00:49:27.040uh i've got that that's a random name so the subversive if we tell you all the evil s we've uh
00:49:32.660we've done you would boogaloo me that's my secret captain i was always going to boogaloo
00:49:39.160um and then sigil stone says it's not in the public interest to know what the aristocrats have done now
00:49:45.560and i see lucas vampire costume is coming along nicely not sure why he's wearing it before
00:49:52.940how we know i'm not sure if this is a comment on like my pasty and sick complexion given or whether
00:49:58.820it's the fact that i look like i'm dressed out of a hammer horror like peter cushing but um
00:50:04.160either way thanks sigil stone um i hope you're well as well got some youtube comments as well oh sure
00:50:11.780would you like me to read those you're not very well are you so i'll save you thanks gosh go on
00:50:17.980then took me by surprise i thought i misheard for a second there uh turi um says the fabians do their
00:50:25.660best to destroy the west correct very succinctly put thank you um brian uh february um george is
00:50:32.640half white and talks about not wanting to go to white places is so performative this screams hatred
00:50:38.160of the self for being um for being fully black what is that um i don't know but i get the gist of
00:50:44.780what you're saying that he identifies with one part of himself and not the other and it's exactly
00:50:50.880the same as a bob villain guy exactly the same and arcadia says uh why are you surprised the home
00:50:57.920office is captured by the islamic leftist group think and is corrupt the whole department needs to
00:51:02.540be broken up i'm not surprised this is the point um but i'm surprised they've made it so easy
00:51:08.100for me to for basically to trip themselves up i'm surprised that they've they've messed up this
00:51:15.420badly i know former lotus eater connor tomlinson did some work on exposing that network of muslims
00:51:22.020in the home office and uh of course if they can get their relatives on a small boat over i'm being
00:51:27.900facetious of course but they they have more um affinity for people of their own religion than they
00:51:33.820do the host population is the actual serious point there and so that they're going to be pushing for
00:51:38.500that sort of thing may i have one of those sure magical podcasting boxes a magic box and uh i'm not
00:51:50.500going i was going to say and what's in my magic box today it sounds like a children's tv
00:51:54.320now i'll introduce it properly so nick fuentes went after the lord of the rings and i took that
00:52:01.780personally in this household the lord of the rings is sacred you don't criticize it you know this
00:52:06.940organization lotus eaters normally i don't speak for all of lotus eaters but i can on this issue
00:52:11.240because all of us love the lord of the rings and we are going to bat for it we're going to put this
00:52:16.640down nick you know and and his uh grouper army are fools for insulting the lord of the rings although
00:52:24.220it is fair to say that many of his own followers did push back against him for it i'm glad to hear
00:52:29.400it um so there is uh some degree of sense there um so let's hear what he has to say um i do apologize
00:52:36.600um for what he's like so oiler said 20 dollars you call me an idiot for asking a regular ask question
00:52:43.700your solutions are just a variation of logo to college or something but at least if not a game
00:52:46.580of thrones enjoy your fag preferring that slop over ltr is a crazy self-report
00:52:49.360yeah self-report that i'm awesome that's a filter that's a filter if you like lord of the rings more
00:52:59.560than game of thrones that that is the self-report that you're a larper you like gay little hobbits
00:53:05.100gay little hobbits and the magic of friendship i like people getting their heads chopped off
00:53:11.520for no reason because that's life and that's life a sword swinging around chopping everybody's
00:53:19.700heads off at random and you like the power of friendship and magic rings and little elves and
00:53:26.380the power of their friendship and big gay wizards big gay wizards they made them gay didn't they or am
00:53:33.820i thinking about harry potter didn't they it's worth mentioning the actor that plays gandalfi
00:53:38.700mckellen i think is is gay maybe that's what he's confusing with but uh make the wizard gay or
00:53:43.840bisexual or something that's what i know it's not in the original tolkien or whatever but
00:53:47.820that's and that's what you like so yeah sorry i do does he does you know you know the lord of the
00:53:55.460rings is catholic yes it's written like tolkien and it's it's incredibly catholic there are so many
00:54:02.760allegories to christianity within the storyline but it's done in such a way that it can be
00:54:08.620recognized by people who aren't even christian as being a sort of transcendental piece of art
00:54:14.840right it evokes the the virtues um within people without necessarily having to be an adherent
00:54:22.240and i think as luke has talked about before tolkien wrote this to be a mythology for the english right
00:54:29.000yes for england because um we'd lost so much of it during the time of the uh viking invasions
00:54:35.280and even of course um a text like beowulf though still wonderful and obviously penned probably by an
00:54:41.840anglo-saxon monk of course in its origins it is uh continental it's germanic you know it comes from
00:54:49.100the tale of the danes and the gay acts and you know so it's of another people and so tolkien wanted
00:54:54.480to find something to replace what we'd had personally lost and so in that way you know
00:55:00.580when you have a corporation like amazon right trying to make it inclusive trying to it's like
00:55:06.240well if we can just stick enough foreign faces in it it becomes for everyone it's like yeah but this
00:55:11.060is what you don't understand right not all stories have to be made for everyone some stories the most
00:55:17.700powerful stories respond to a particular people and that's why the lord of the rings is continually
00:55:23.280you know topped as the favorite book of the british public because we understand it because
00:55:27.960we see ourselves represented in its story when i read chinese literature i don't want some random
00:55:33.620white guy inserted in it no it's silly it's a silly argument but he does carry on i'm only going to play
00:55:39.280a little bit more but it does lead to a wider discussion about these sorts of things and uh there
00:55:45.680was basically almost you know civil war not in the temple sense but in the rights were very angry with
00:55:54.160one another and it created a new fault line like game of thrones you're right i do like game of thrones
00:56:00.920better than lord of the rings and that is a self-report but not like you think no the opposite is true