The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #1304
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 31 minutes
Words per Minute
164.23349
Summary
Brothers Stelios and Lope discuss the latest Ukraine peace deal, the budget announcement, the new law taking away jury trials, and how law enforcement in Ukraine is racist. Also, we talk about the new budget and its implications for the future of Ukraine.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
hello everyone welcome to the glorious and renowned podcast of the lotus eaters today
00:00:05.160
is wednesday the 26th of november this is episode 1304 i'm your host brother stelios and i'm joined
00:00:13.220
today by brother harry brother luca i don't think 1300 1304 you've confused me now 1304 no you said
00:00:22.460
1304 but carry on carry 1304 it's a it's a big number right there you go yes and we are going
00:00:29.620
to discuss about the latest ukraine peace deal labor taking away jury trial and how law enforcement
00:00:37.360
is racist we know the budget has just been announced about half an hour ago or at least
00:00:43.060
that is what i have been told uh no we've not had a chance to look over it yet so we're not covering
00:00:48.020
it today dan is covering it on the podcast tomorrow and doing a brokonomics on it and i think we're
00:00:53.820
going to fast track that brokonomics from what samson has told me so that should come out soon
00:00:57.740
so that we can get a full in-depth look at that samson has warned us he might just do a like
00:01:02.280
budget watch thing budget black pills yeah budget black pills there you go every so often where he
00:01:08.540
might just chime in with something that's happened with this budget i'm hoping that this is going to
00:01:12.980
be like a complete turn around uh you know like uh baby face turn where actually all of our taxes are
00:01:20.360
reduced and the welfare state is slowly stripped away and they announce that they're all going back but
00:01:25.640
wouldn't hold your breath i doubt it i doubt it are you gonna take us take our breath away
00:01:33.200
let me let me have a coffee first god still it's in such a rush i'm europe maxing over here god
00:01:39.940
that's absolutely awesome and i recommend it thank you very much if only i had a cigarette
00:01:47.280
anyway all right so uh we're going to talk about the latest ukraine peace deal which has been put
00:01:54.000
forward and supposedly accepted according to reports coming from the white house insiders
00:02:01.680
insiders within the government who are reporting to cbs but let's go through a little bit of the
00:02:06.520
backstory of the past week the events that have led up to this what could be a historic moment where
00:02:13.820
russia and ukraine mediated by the united states might be able to actually end the war so first of all
00:02:21.740
last week we had the announcement that trump had put forward this 28 point
00:02:26.500
ukraine peace plan which was reported in full this copy uh was leaked and obtained by the associated
00:02:36.000
press and it immediately caused a lot of controversy because a lot of people said that it was favoring
00:02:41.780
the russians it was supposedly drafted i believe it was drafted by steve witkoff in collaboration with
00:02:49.560
jared kushner the american negotiators and a kremlin official kirill dmitriev one of uh putin's right
00:02:57.520
hand men the agreement was detailed to the ap by an unnamed senior u.s official that does seem
00:03:04.620
regarding this leak to be a number of agents behind the scenes actors behind the scenes who are trying
00:03:11.820
to leak as much as possible to the press possibly as a way of stymieing peace negotiations but we don't
00:03:17.960
know for certain right now it does not obligate the u.s or european allies to intervene on ukraine's
00:03:23.400
behalf although it says that they would determine the measures necessary to restore security the most
00:03:27.920
important points were laid out as that the ukraine would not be allowed to join nato eu membership would
00:03:34.840
be on the table though and elections must be held in ukraine within 100 days this goes to the idea that
00:03:43.740
people have been pointing to for a while that it appears that vance and trump would like and the
00:03:48.760
americans in general would like zelensky out of office as soon as possible once the war is over
00:03:55.840
and ukraine's army would have to be capped at 600 000 troops compared to its current 880 000 troops
00:04:03.500
and some frozen russian russian assets i believe 100 billion dollars worth would go towards rebuilding
00:04:10.300
ukraine while sanctions on russia would be lifted and moscow and washington would enter in a series of
00:04:15.280
long-term economic arrangements most of which seem engineered in such a way to make sure that the
00:04:20.920
united states can profit massively over reconstruction in the affected areas where there's been infrastructure
00:04:29.280
and other kind of damage done obviously the one that most people are complaining about is the cap to
00:04:34.820
the ukrainian army the lack of direct nato intervention and the fact that a number of the
00:04:40.860
oblasts all of the currently occupied oblasts are said to be have you you just have to give them up
00:04:48.180
russia takes them a lot of people are angry at the idea that russia has essentially won in this scenario
00:04:54.000
which is why people were saying that this particular peace agreement which as far as we know is not the
00:04:59.000
one that has been accepted although it may have been uh they were saying that this one was supporting
00:05:05.540
russia this one favored russia too much so more in depth some of the points that were made in this one
00:05:11.640
which was uh number 12 the powerful global package of measures to rebuild ukraine including but not
00:05:20.380
limited to the creation of a ukraine development fund to invest in fast-growing industries including
00:05:25.580
technology data centers and artificial intelligence the united states would cooperate with ukraine to
00:05:31.220
jointly rebuild develop modernize and operate ukraine's gas infrastructure including pipelines
00:05:36.340
and storage facilities joint efforts to rehabilitate war affected areas for the restoration
00:05:41.120
reconstruction and modernization of cities and residential areas infrastructure development and
00:05:45.900
extraction of minerals and natural resources the world bank will develop a special financing package
00:05:51.240
to accelerate these efforts again so the united states heavy involvement in this as well as russia's
00:05:58.780
reintegration into the global economy in point for uh point 13 and then the point 14 that being the
00:06:06.700
frozen funds being used 100 billion dollars in frozen russian assets invested in u.s led efforts to rebuild
00:06:13.620
and invest in ukraine wherein the u.s will receive 50 percent of the profits from this venture
00:06:21.040
so with the u.s wrapping so much of itself up in this whole deal people say that this one was overly
00:06:28.820
overly uh favorable to the russians to me this seems like the u.s raiding ukraine i i understand i
00:06:37.860
understand i understand why but they have definitely put this uh together in such a way that the u.s
00:06:43.580
financially benefits as much as possible i mean from this from my perspective this uh
00:06:50.960
i don't know i don't know if i'd use this word because if you are financing someone during a war
00:06:55.780
if you are supporting an ally during a war then most probably yeah you will have some benefits
00:07:02.520
after the war ends of course it's not it it was never no strings attached there was this
00:07:08.260
there was this mistaken idea that the u.s helps its allies without strings attached no there are strings
00:07:14.900
no and they only did that for starlin yeah but i mean of course but but also on the other bit it
00:07:19.720
doesn't seem to me to be that bad if that from my perspective if they have helped ukraine but also
00:07:27.200
the eu has helped ukraine and they get something in return and they help build and rebuild ukraine
00:07:33.300
they are assisting the effort of you know building something it's not that it's not that they only take
00:07:40.700
and haven't given some would argue one of the only reasons that the u.s was getting ukraine to fight
00:07:47.560
this war in the first place was in the hopes that they could have all of these strings attached at the
00:07:52.960
other end some some would argue some would argue that they were doing it to purely weaken russia
00:07:57.580
and fight the proxy war with russia others may say that this was a combination of factors
00:08:03.480
one of the and speaking of which the idea of potential further vassalization for ukraine
00:08:10.440
as a buffer state between russia and the rest of europe supported by america one of the most
00:08:17.500
interesting points that i didn't see a lot of people mentioning here was point 20 which goes into the
00:08:25.620
idea of social engineering as is so popular within american empire vassal states
00:08:33.460
that being both countries undertake to implement educational programs in schools and society
00:08:39.820
aimed at promoting understanding and tolerance of different cultures and eliminating racism and
00:08:46.160
prejudice the ukraine will adopt eu rules on religious tolerance and the protection of linguistic
00:08:51.520
minorities both countries will agree to abolish all discriminatory measures and guarantee the rights of
00:08:57.380
ukrainian russia and russian media and education all nazi ideology and activity
00:09:02.940
activities must be rejected and prohibited which i assume is based almost entirely around the uh
00:09:08.620
notorious as of battalion but this uh broad language about racism and prejudice
00:09:14.400
and the knowledge that ukraine has lost a lot of young men at this uh and there has been a long
00:09:22.300
joke a long-running joke amongst some that in the end ukraine may have been fighting for drag queen story
00:09:29.060
hour and endless bemalians this makes me worry that the joke might have been correct now i can understand
00:09:36.700
and there are revisions that can be made but this feels very much uh an imposition of american multicultural
00:09:45.360
uh ideas upon an eastern european framework i'm a bit hesitant to say that this is the case i'm not saying
00:09:53.220
you're wrong uh just uh i'm just going to suspend judgment because racism is racism isn't just something
00:09:59.900
like this is absolutely warranted the way that america's vassals have have uh have have developed
00:10:06.020
the reason i'm saying this is because racism and prejudice isn't just white black black white we can talk
00:10:12.460
about all sorts of minorities that could be in the region and all sorts of ethnicities that see each
00:10:19.320
other in sorts of different ways and this could be a sort of attempt to mediate between them because
00:10:26.040
there are russians in ukraine there are ukrainians in in russia and even more ethnicists so there is a
00:10:32.820
kind of attempt to create reconciliation i don't think that eastern europe suffers so much from the the kind
00:10:40.740
of migration that uh we're criticizing on on a daily basis but it it is a possibility it is a
00:10:48.060
it it it doesn't but it could yeah also and it will be used something like this the decimation
00:10:55.560
to ukraine's infrastructure and population in the same way that we are now told narratives in the uk
00:11:03.160
about how the blitz necessitated the windrush generation and migration coming over to rebuild
00:11:10.960
the country and we are now told that they were essential to rebuilding the country i see this as that
00:11:16.540
same wedge issue i am i i agree with that that's what i was just about to say and also to your
00:11:22.040
point stelios about the sort of like uh particular nature of uh race and uh ethnicity in eastern europe
00:11:29.760
of course uh that may well be true were it that uh russia and ukraine were left on their own to create
00:11:36.860
their own educational programs for those purposes but because as harry says here this seems to be an
00:11:42.280
position top down by the united states how could there not be no i'm not saying that there isn't
00:11:48.680
i'm just saying that right now we're talking about two superpowers and ukraine and they are trying to
00:11:54.940
mediate on a leadership position for the next day and if you're helping someone throughout a war
00:12:01.900
and you're going to be there when they rebuild it's not that that much to ask for
00:12:08.320
some some benefit in the rebuilding process oh no i understand that i'm talking about the idea
00:12:14.940
of course it could backfire i'm talking about the ideological imposition that i'm reading
00:12:21.440
into this which i think is not it's not that difficult but you can you can also yeah it can
00:12:27.000
also and i do agree that this is a this is a um a likelihood that this is an attempt to prevent
00:12:34.340
resurgent nationalisms within minority groups in the area who might split away break away trying to
00:12:42.420
prevent something like this happening in the future in the same way that all of these oblasts in the
00:12:47.140
east of ukraine were before this war broke out claimed by russia as breakaway sovereign states that
00:12:53.380
were only recognized by the russian federation but there are some steps towards um aligning ukraine with
00:13:00.900
with the u.s because when you are a country under the sphere of influence of a superpower that
00:13:07.180
superpower wants wants you to have essentially the system that they have which i think is is what
00:13:13.900
you're talking about well yes i but i i just see that system as a terrible system that destroys your
00:13:20.260
country and culture i mean if and and again for for me the pros and cons the the interesting thing is
00:13:28.380
i i don't think there's much pro to being wrapped into the cultural ideology of the the the gay
00:13:35.540
as it's known the global american empire i think that's a it's a um it's an acidic i mean also being
00:13:42.460
under it's the ideology that we've been russia would wouldn't be particularly good for them all
00:13:46.620
i know i just think it's a bad imposition and i'm just saying that's that's the whole ideology that
00:13:51.820
we've been arguing against for years on this podcast so i'm not going to say that it would be a good
00:13:56.680
thing for ukraine who have done so much to try to carve themselves out their own identity including
00:14:02.780
fighting this war to then have that subsumed by a global superpower forcing their ideology on top of
00:14:10.340
it but that might just be me reading into it the interesting thing is that when the european member
00:14:15.720
states put forward a counter proposal because again they said that this was far too favorable towards
00:14:21.800
russia that that particular point was changed and instead of using very loaded ideological language
00:14:28.420
like racism prejudice they changed that point to more succinctly say uh you know that there will not
00:14:35.860
be any action taken against linguistic minorities in your territories which i think is actually a much
00:14:42.380
better and less divisive way of wording that kind of agreement when you're talking about an area
00:14:48.040
like eastern europe if anything it surprises me with how careful europe have been on that one you'd
00:14:54.340
expect the roles to be reversed and that washington will be um more careful and europe would still
00:15:00.740
because europe uh in their minds still far more woke than washington are i mean you might think so i
00:15:07.340
would disagree um but either either way those whole those whole points may not even matter in the first
00:15:14.340
place uh because after this there were further negotiations taken on in switzerland on sunday led
00:15:21.480
by the u.s secretary of state marco rubio and zielinski's chief of staff andry yermak i apologize if i'm
00:15:28.540
pronouncing these names wrong the plan was substantially revised only down to 19 points rather than 28 from the
00:15:36.400
reports that i was looking at i couldn't find anything that specified which points were changed which may have
00:15:42.040
been revised which were taken out entirely so we can just say that assumedly ukraine would have tried to
00:15:48.900
change this more in their own favor perhaps some concessions with nato troops on the ground because keir starmer has
00:15:55.880
said explicitly that no peace can happen without some kind of nato peace force on the ground in the
00:16:02.600
transitionary period which only makes uh only makes sense i think that they may be trying to play good cup bad cup
00:16:09.860
and i think most probably my reading of the situation is that the european trump and the european leaders
00:16:16.780
have agreed behind closed doors that's a speculation that they're going to have more hawkish language and
00:16:24.300
trump is going to tell putin listen to these guys i'm going to be more partial to you let's end this
00:16:30.620
well he's trying to uh just get negotiations going through with both sides because these kinds of
00:16:36.520
negotiations were the original points were done with russia now ukraine has their chance to look over
00:16:43.940
it and it's uh many are pointing out out of the deal out of the deal make something bombastic and
00:16:51.040
out there and a bit unreasonable so that anything that you work back from will appear much much more
00:16:57.980
reasonable in comparison so ukraine had their chance to look over things and then we had the surprise news
00:17:05.440
on tuesday just yesterday uh stating that ukraine this was an exclusive for cbs agreed to a peace
00:17:13.080
proposal we do not know the specifics of that peace proposal if it was this new 19 point revised
00:17:19.000
peace policy that they had negotiated supposedly on sunday this was an update from a u.s official who
00:17:27.320
spoke to cbs news saying that ukraine's government had agreed to a peace deal excuse me brokered by the
00:17:34.060
trump administration to stop russia's nearly four year assault the american official and ukraine's
00:17:38.780
national security advisor rustem umarev said a common understanding on a proposal had been reached
00:17:44.260
with details still to be worked out umarev voiced optimism that ukrainian president zelinski could
00:17:49.900
travel to washington before the end of november to finalize an agreement the ukrainians have agreed
00:17:55.860
to a peace deal the u.s official told cbs news there are some minor details to be sorted out but they have
00:18:00.600
agreed to a peace deal so reinforcing that there some more information here uh the ukraine uh the
00:18:08.480
u.s and ukraine representatives hold talks in geneva over the weekend ukraine european allies oh this is
00:18:13.980
just going over u.s army secretary there we go dan driscoll met russian officials for several hours in
00:18:20.080
abu dhabi today that was yesterday i think they are still speaking today to discuss the latest developments
00:18:25.880
following the talks with ukraine ukrainian president vladimir zelinski is expected to travel to washington
00:18:30.700
before the end of this month kir starmer will uh convene a meeting of 36 nations in the coalition of
00:18:36.620
the willing to discuss the peace process and plans for a peacekeeping force to be deployed and uh again
00:18:42.700
there is talk now of potentially russia having to make concessions as well so we'll see we'll see how it
00:18:50.360
goes donald trump is currently saying that russia is making concessions and that kiev is happy with
00:18:55.580
how talks are progressing that's as of this morning speaking to reporters on air force one as he flew
00:19:00.800
out to florida trump said that we're making progress on a deal and said he would be willing to meet with
00:19:06.080
both vladimir putin and zelinski once they are close to an agreement the announced deadline of
00:19:11.900
thursday on thanksgiving is no longer in place the 28 point peace plan was supposedly just a map
00:19:18.740
asked if ukraine had been asked to hand over too much territory trump suggested that over the next
00:19:22.660
couple of months that might be gotten by russia anyway moscow's concerns are a promise to stop
00:19:28.020
fighting and they don't take any more land he said when questioned on this i saw the footage of him
00:19:32.800
basically saying well you know we want to stop the fighting if ukraine doesn't want them to take
00:19:37.560
that land they could just keep fighting and win it back which is obviously obviously just his back
00:19:42.500
backhanded way of saying they've lost yes they've lost that is territory they have lost
00:19:48.400
now is just making sure that we got all of the arrangements in place so that they don't lose
00:19:53.320
any more territory and so that this doesn't break out again too soon into the future so we'll see
00:19:59.100
how it goes maybe this will be something that can last maybe eastern europe will stay peaceful forever
00:20:05.500
more or maybe uh maybe things will not end up that way but we'll see we'll see how things go
00:20:12.860
uh i just i just hope that the fighting can end it's been almost four years now too many people have
00:20:18.960
died uh and ukraine doesn't hope to outside of just full-on pure intervention from eu states and the us
00:20:29.760
ukraine cannot hope to take that land back so better better to end the fighting now than to keep people
00:20:37.200
dying that's that's the most i can really say on that so i'll read through to uh two chats we had
00:20:42.040
during that 141 paladin truck driving in washington state allows me to watch decline
00:20:46.500
live every day as a christian monarchist it drives me mad that nobody can understand what is in front
00:20:50.980
of them love your work guys thank you and dreadmoort logan says you about 12 minutes on one point move
00:20:57.200
on please i tried to uh moody also says the only peace deal is russia leaving ukraine
00:21:04.420
well well i don't know how you expect to get there without without enforcing that yeah without
00:21:12.000
enforcing it all right well if we can move over to my segment please samson thank you all right then
00:21:19.260
ladies and gentlemen as i'm sure you've all heard by now uh david lammy our deputy prime minister and
00:21:25.720
chief justice has a remarkable idea for how to basically handle the sheer backlog of criminal
00:21:34.120
trial cases that we've got going on in the united kingdom and that is basically to as it says there
00:21:40.800
in the bbc headline basically just scrap jury trials for everything except the most serious cases
00:21:47.460
now obviously i um i i would actually just like to start by reading this particular um section of
00:21:55.360
the speech from uh lord devlin back in 1956 where he went on to say that for of all the institutions
00:22:01.700
that have been created by english law there is none other that has a better claim to be called
00:22:07.000
in the words of the hamlin trust the privilege of the common people of the united kingdom it is one
00:22:12.820
which no other european people enjoys and it is one which uh for its healthy working requires a
00:22:20.560
recognition by the common people of the responsibilities and obligations attached to it
00:22:26.520
so we can see from back in the 50s right the uh the idea that we had jury trials in england was not
00:22:35.180
just it was an extremely proud thing and it was very much built into the consciousness consciousness of
00:22:43.060
british exceptionalism right that actually we're not just like those on the continent we actually have
00:22:50.300
our own particular um inheritance here with these jury trials now obviously jury trials are
00:22:57.020
a thing on the continent in serious cases but really that is what this proposal would do
00:23:02.460
it would take us away from our own inheritance and drag us more into line with how things are
00:23:09.620
majoritively done on the continent i know obviously in the past there were heavy restrictions on who could
00:23:16.140
be in a jury yes uh dependent on property and other such things and honestly i think those were
00:23:21.020
common sense measures that anywhere that there is there is jury trials should be brought back well i
00:23:27.080
agree but it was also an understanding that the english character and general intellect was that of
00:23:33.560
such that if you have achieved a certain position in life that you were capable of rationally and
00:23:40.300
objectively yes assessing the evidence put forward to you and coming to a reasonable conclusion that's
00:23:47.480
a great deal of faith it is to put in your own subjects and it goes to it and it really does just
00:23:54.160
play on the sort of um rationalistic character of the angler and what's more as well exactly to agree
00:24:00.240
with your point it also speaks to the high trust society that we used to have it was a component
00:24:06.740
characteristic of the high trust society as you say that we uh we trusted the intellect reason and
00:24:13.460
sense of justice of our own peers and our own citizens to basically come to uh a prudent decision
00:24:20.860
and similarly it did it did help to present present a feeling within the populace that justice was not
00:24:27.260
simply arbitrary that this was to a certain extent a democratic process right absolutely and it says uh the
00:24:34.300
ministry of justice presentation produced early this month says that the crown courts are facing
00:24:39.980
record backlogs with more than 78 000 cases waiting to be completed and obviously they anticipate this
00:24:48.840
to rising over a hundred thousand within a few years if there weren't just record numbers of foreign
00:24:55.380
criminals in our country how much lower do you reckon that backlog would be do you reckon we would even
00:25:00.780
have a backlog well i think it would certainly help things uh almost certainly but this is uh so the
00:25:06.780
retired uh court of appeal judge sir brian leveson uh of the leveson inquiry uh recommended that the
00:25:14.700
government ends jury trials for many serious offenses saying that they can be dealt with by a judge alone
00:25:20.500
or sitting with two magistrates so basically doing things as they are in the magistrates court
00:25:25.740
where things are just overseen by a judge and some legal advisors and and magistrates but not having
00:25:33.100
the actual jury now obviously most cases are done by the magistrates courts and so actually as it happens
00:25:41.120
though we're obviously um we absolutely should defend the jury trial most um legal cases in britain are not
00:25:50.240
disputed this way because the vast majority of them i say happen in the magistrates courts and not the
00:25:55.500
crown courts where the jury trial is actually employed however the leveson goes on to say that
00:26:01.980
basically substantial structural change is essential and our criminal justice system is at a crisis point
00:26:09.660
and he also went on to sorry it was also added later that um in a document that lamy has a hold of that
00:26:17.920
the reforms will improve timelines in the crown court through extra hearing time
00:26:23.180
and not compromise or right to a fair trial there is no right to a jury trial
00:26:29.660
no right to a jury trial so just because uh we've had jury trials in england going back to the time of
00:26:40.320
anglo-saxons all of a sudden as wolf points out here uh guyanese immigrant is just going to abolish
00:26:48.300
them for the sakes of saving the logistics and workload of a failed and corrupt system
00:27:01.660
yeah there isn't much that much to say i mean he was on the question people have to say game and he was
00:27:11.500
asked who came after henry the eighth yeah henry the seventh we literally referred back to this point
00:27:17.780
yesterday i mean he can't remember which king came after the other he can't remember what he was saying
00:27:22.420
five years ago because people of course yeah very easy to do this with any politician have immediately
00:27:27.420
found contradictory statements from only a few years ago this one from the 20th of june 2020 of him
00:27:33.120
saying jury trials are a fundamental part of our our democratic settlement criminal trials without
00:27:39.800
juries are a bad idea and uh you've jumped on a bit because i was coming to that oh i'm so sorry
00:27:45.540
that's quite all right that's rather right i wasn't banking on you scrolling down sorry nobody ever
00:27:50.500
wanted to say let us remember what happened with the jury trial of ricky jones coming to that too
00:27:56.340
okay yep coming to that too so let's just talk about uh because maven just posted here as well that
00:28:01.920
really um evidence of a a type of jury obviously not the one that we have today but just some sort
00:28:09.120
of trial amongst peers goes back all the way to ethelred the young reddy one of the worst anglo-saxon
00:28:15.280
kings and yet still a more competent administrator than david lammy which is of course they all would
00:28:22.260
be they all just name some of the ones that died before they ever really got to the crown still better
00:28:28.400
than lammy yeah arthur dead at 15 uh henry's elder brother there you go yeah imagine having the
00:28:35.280
nickname the unready and still being better than david lammy well i mean he is a young ready to
00:28:41.540
be unworthy as well uh but the point is that this is a grand heritage of our people what's more as well
00:28:48.100
of course you know as we go to clause 39 of the magna carta where it talks about lawful judgment of his
00:28:54.080
peers or by the law of the land and famously as well uh there are many trials throughout um english
00:29:01.360
history where you can see a sharp difference between what the verdict would have been by mere appointed
00:29:08.800
judge versus what the verdict of the jury came to i do think that this is the outgrowth of the war on
00:29:16.800
civil society that modern leftism wages because the idea is civil society is irreparably racist and bad
00:29:25.440
and needs to be changed by the state so we can't have jury trials except when it's our own guys on on
00:29:33.280
trial but we just need our own guys into the justice system from the state and we're going to force and
00:29:41.120
change so socially engineer civil society absolutely that's hatred towards society um so to get onto
00:29:49.280
what you were just uh looking at harry as well to david lammy's case of amnesia from five years ago
00:29:55.520
when he talks about by basically the fact that jury trials are a fundamental part of our democratic
00:30:00.480
settlement i actually just wanted to talk about that just a little bit which is that the framing of
00:30:06.640
course is entirely incorrect right it's not a fundamental part of our democratic settlement
00:30:13.200
it's a fundamental part of our british settlement and actually the jury trial through from the time
00:30:20.560
in the anglo-saxons after magna carta back when we had authoritarian kings like henry the eighth right
00:30:26.960
no it's not a staple of a democratic society it speaks to the wisdom of the english people that we were
00:30:34.320
able to create a justice system which basically gave everyone a fair hearing at the trial amongst
00:30:42.080
his peers irrespective of the type of constitutional settlement that they existed under whether it was
00:30:48.800
absolute monarchy or modern democracy right that is far more permanent than the very narrow window
00:30:56.240
that david lammy is looking at it through when he speaks about mere democracy as if it's just a
00:31:02.160
staple of mere democracy well as we've already spoken about it's not a staple of every single western
00:31:09.040
democracy at all and uh so but then we get to the sort of conundrum of basically as leo points out here
00:31:18.880
that it's an appalling idea because without a jury of peers anyone on trial will be at the mercy of
00:31:24.640
activist judges who don't even hide their bias against anyone deemed far right if there's a backlog of
00:31:30.400
trials and endless prosecutions for speech and crimes look on principle i do agree with what leo is
00:31:37.680
saying however the fact of the matter is that of course as we know it's not exactly like the jury
00:31:44.560
verdicts have been particularly infallible either recently every institution can backfire yes that
00:31:51.600
there's not a reason on its own to to destroy it the the question is the whole point of the jury is
00:31:59.360
supposed to be a jury of your peers in certain parts of this country the people who are going to
00:32:04.960
be judging you are not your peer they are people who self-consciously see themselves as your friend
00:32:14.560
or your enemy i hate to put it in such blatant tribal terms but as you're going to point out there are
00:32:20.480
some trials which have gone forward with a jury where they have shown blatant bias towards the
00:32:27.920
defendant and this is the kind of thing that we can see going all the way back to the oj trial in
00:32:34.960
america where it seemed that they purposefully stacked the trial full of um full of black people
00:32:41.680
because they knew that it would give some kind of uh advantage to oj which it did because after he got off
00:32:49.600
20 years down the line people on that jury said yeah we did it as payback for rodney king
00:32:54.240
then you get a situation like derek chauvin where a blm activist actually got on his trial
00:33:00.080
and sway and helped to sway the verdict not that i thought sadly that the derek chauvin trial was ever
00:33:05.600
in doubt that they were going to find him guilty no matter what the actual evidence was no of course not
00:33:11.120
um and there's a free speech union point out here juries have been the last line of defense against the
00:33:16.480
authoritarian cancel mob uh when our members have found themselves charged with with criminal
00:33:21.760
offenses for speaking out juries have reliably said no dice to overzealous prosecutors this has
00:33:28.080
infuriated the crown prosecution service and the activists who make malicious complaints uh one was
00:33:34.800
jamie michael a decorated royal marines veteran who was charged with inciting racial hatred after a
00:33:41.360
labor staffer reported him to the police for a video he posted on facebook and jamie spent 20 days in
00:33:47.360
prison on remand and the jury took just 17 minutes to clear him and the local labor party were quite
00:33:53.920
furious about this so even now in you know our contemporary times we do see examples of the uh uh
00:34:01.280
jury service just for want of a better way to put it just coming in clutch and just saving um some
00:34:08.000
obviously wronged persecuted people who are basically just being grinded down by the
00:34:16.000
orthodoxy of the state the ideological orthodoxy of the state which as we know there's it's good to
00:34:22.000
provide counter examples to the sorts of phenomenon that i was presenting yeah definitely it does still
00:34:27.840
matter but as uh tom points out here data shows that in britain non-white jurors display a marked
00:34:34.320
preference for non-white defendants and the corresponding bias against white defendants
00:34:39.040
whereas white jurors exhibit only a modest pro non-white bias by comparisons and this really comes
00:34:46.320
down to what we were saying about uh what you were saying about ricky jones stelios because as um this
00:34:54.640
piece here is just dragging it from connor's way said that um basically wanted people to have their
00:35:00.080
throats cut and just called for it live and he was tried he was inciting violence he was and did the
00:35:07.040
man the and he impersonated him and he did this yes yes yeah the gesture all of it it was as clear cut
00:35:16.400
as we could have possibly thought it would have been yeah sorry a bad pun didn't even mean it but um
00:35:21.680
the but the point of matter is that well yes but he was tried in a place that was minority british
00:35:28.320
and they probably agreed with him anyway and so you can get off and be acquitted for demonstrable
00:35:35.760
injustices demonstrable injustices there's also this example as well most recently even this month
00:35:42.160
of uh ex-footballer joey barton basically guilty of sending offensive messages to tv personalities this
00:35:49.440
also was a jury trial where they found him guilty on several counts for basically sending uh messages
00:35:56.640
online that were deemed to have been intentionally harmful and to stir up um hurt in the other person
00:36:04.720
as well and so we're having all of these injustices so again leo is right that there are a phenomenal
00:36:12.000
amount of activist judges and even if those um judges are indigenously british they are coming from the same
00:36:20.720
sort of institutions and rupert has been very good as well on all of this just showing uh particularly
00:36:27.200
with the bar council i didn't get it up but you know they're sort of uh dei programs and everything
00:36:32.400
like that they're still entirely susceptible they there's no real ideological um dissimilarity between
00:36:41.600
like the bar and whitehall right they're all part of these well i mean consider as well when we're
00:36:47.520
talking about problems with cps judges when the epping situation went uh from the local council
00:36:55.360
and the government brought it before the judges and the judges decided that the safety of people
00:37:00.480
within epping was not as important as defending the rights of refugees who were putting the people of
00:37:08.480
epping in danger even after the person that they were protesting against being in that hotel in the first
00:37:15.840
place was convicted as a sex offender this was of course before he was then accidentally released
00:37:21.600
from prison sure yeah that entire every every stage of our justice system is corrupted and broken in
00:37:31.760
ways that realistically would be quite easy to fix when we're talking about the bias of these judges that
00:37:39.680
needs to go to an educational matter before they even get anywhere near those halls of power
00:37:45.440
they need to be not brainwashed to be leftists the way they are and with with the jury service people
00:37:52.800
would be uncomfortable with it but it would simply need to be a case of re-implementing certain
00:37:58.000
restrictions on who can be selected for a jury isn't lammy also responsible for the constant
00:38:04.160
accidental release of prisoners uh at least two yeah yeah at least yeah at least two high higher
00:38:11.840
profile cases twice yeah there's a perfect cv to have someone change the entire institutional
00:38:18.000
structure of your country change our culture well also just to to say something else to your point harry
00:38:23.680
as well that when you have cases like these like the joey barton one of course in some ways
00:38:28.800
irrespective of the makeup of the jury what is also obviously impinging on any sense of reason or justice
00:38:38.000
is the fact that the jury and the judges are obviously working within the the legal framework
00:38:43.920
and the legislation of course passed by parliament and so they can only um find joey barton guilty of such
00:38:54.000
things if they are of course legal offenses in the first place if you take away that legislation to
00:39:00.400
say that these sorts of things are a crime such as obviously they got with dankula and the 2003
00:39:06.240
communications act strip that way then you can't you know find people to be guilty of things that aren't
00:39:11.920
crimes anymore if only there'd been some kind of this is going to sound whimsical now conservative
00:39:17.920
super majority that could have passed or repealed legislation at will yeah if only we didn't have
00:39:24.160
one of those though did we and so we're really ending up with the point now where as kongi drukpa
00:39:29.680
points out here with the um lee kwang yu sort of version of society where it says in a multi-racial
00:39:36.080
society trial by jury can result in communal prejudices influencing verdicts i would rather put my future in
00:39:43.040
the hands of a trained judge than in the hands of 12 men who can be swayed by prejudice or
00:39:47.680
rhetoric jury trials may work in homogenous societies but not in a sharply multi-racial one
00:39:54.080
you can't assume that each juror will set aside his race language and religion the jury system is part
00:40:00.000
of an english tradition that presumes a common culture that assumption cannot hold in a society
00:40:06.800
like ours and so the reason that i bring up this uh quote is one because i agree with it um i i think
00:40:14.240
that kwang yu is basically just showing uh uh an understanding of human nature and uh prejudices
00:40:20.960
people and what sways us but also the fact that to some extent this is uh what lammy is doing is
00:40:27.760
absolutely a travesty and he should not it should be unthinkable to even suggest the idea right they
00:40:34.960
well hang on we've had this system for oh just a millennia but now we're just going to scrap it based on the
00:40:40.960
backlog due to the incompetence of government that they exhibit in basically anything that they do
00:40:48.480
these days and so as always we lose out we're the ones that have our traditions torn away from us our
00:40:55.360
legal precedents our very our very heritage and and our own very parochial sense of justice taken away
00:41:03.920
from us by foreigners who aren't inheritors of this tradition and what's more as well the even more
00:41:11.120
insidious point of it is uh whether it's juries or just magistrates or you know whoever it may be uh
00:41:20.480
judges we lose either way it seems it kind of feels like we just lose either way at this point because
00:41:27.200
of the demographic trends that we've been pointing to and the ideological prejudices of
00:41:34.480
the elites and people you know the middle classes who make up the lot of judges and of course white
00:41:39.920
hall and the crown prosecution service the people who work within those corridors they're all predisposed
00:41:46.240
to uh distrust and kind of hate us anyway and bring down the full force of the law as kia starmer
00:41:52.480
love to remind us after southport and so we're in a bit of a lose-lose situation i'm afraid here lads
00:41:58.400
i can only hope that one other thing just to say is that it seems that basically every single person
00:42:06.000
was against this uh kemi badenoch was against this nigel farage was against this jeremy corbin was
00:42:12.640
against this the only uh the bar council were against getting rid of the jury trials it seems that
00:42:18.400
the only people this is a purely lammy based decision or at least lammy and people around
00:42:24.960
him who support him based off of advice from sir brian leveson yes and so it seems to be a common
00:42:31.760
example of this um grand democracy democratic settlement that david lammy loves to um give
00:42:41.440
lip service towards but david you have no mandate to do this this wasn't in your manifesto
00:42:47.360
we certainly gave no public sort of insinuation that we wanted this to happen and what's more as
00:42:54.400
well everyone kind of seems to disagree with you and think this is a bad idea and if you cared so
00:43:00.080
much about the demographic democratic settlement then maybe you would actually care about that but
00:43:06.080
you don't this is just a way for you to sort of filter people through the courts as fast as possible
00:43:13.200
because of the historic number of criminals that you and successive governments have allowed into
00:43:18.400
this country who behave on average we have the statistics the per capita statistics uh much worse than
00:43:26.320
their your average british person and so we're in a position now where we're seeing everything eroded
00:43:32.880
around us and we can only hope that if nigel farage does a few good things when he becomes prime minister
00:43:41.120
that revoking this will be one of those things because it actually sounds as well like this could be a
00:43:47.360
change that is brought upon us very very quickly we could be seeing this as early as the start of next
00:43:54.240
year and so uh yeah once again it's not the greatest news and there's some added pain being having it thrust
00:44:04.160
on you by the greatest midwits in britain i think midwits being very generous well i have to cater my
00:44:10.640
language to uh youtube do you mind if i just go on a quick divergence regarding the uh lee kuan yu
00:44:16.800
and the quote that you brought up there i'm a little bit torn currently on the kind of um the way that
00:44:25.120
right-wingers like to bring up lee kuan yu so much and i'll preface this by saying i greatly respect what
00:44:31.920
lee kuan yu was able to achieve with singapore given the situation that he found himself in with
00:44:39.200
where singapore is situated the various different populations that were set there but i do distinctly
00:44:44.480
feel like the left and right the technocratic left that is get two very different things from lee kuan
00:44:51.360
new for the right we see all of this sort of stuff as a warning we see him saying multi-racial
00:44:56.880
societies break down trusts it turns into factionalism and we say we don't want that we want to maintain
00:45:03.280
our traditions we want to maintain our trust for technocratic leftists and even technocratic center
00:45:09.680
right types as well they see lee kuan yu as a road map to the kind of society that they want to build
00:45:17.680
which is essentially a corporate technocratic police state as much as we can respect singapore for
00:45:23.520
what it is we have to also acknowledge that that is what it is because of the circumstances singapore
00:45:30.480
found itself in they have had to become an authoritarian police state to maintain order and
00:45:37.040
that was set up by lee kuan yu of course to make singapore work that's what he had to do but they
00:45:44.240
want to turn us at the same time as kind of turning everything into a giant open-air favela because they
00:45:49.680
don't have the same kind of willpower that lee kuan yu does nor the common sense that he does at the
00:45:55.440
same time as trying to turn everything into a favela they also want to turn everything into
00:46:00.160
a large corporate police state based entirely around service economies where increasingly our traditions
00:46:07.360
and our high trust societies are taken away so that they can facilitate the corporate profit profit
00:46:16.160
motive and they see this sort of stuff and they go brilliant so it can work so we can get it to work
00:46:25.440
if we just do all of the authoritarian stuff that he was forced to right which obviously i i worry that
00:46:32.080
that that legacy is not actually going to be a positive one i'm west i'm in full agreement with you
00:46:38.160
full agreement no and i agree as well and obviously i'm not invoking the quote to uh show that i want
00:46:44.640
england to become singapore all right this is a road map i don't think lee kuan you would have
00:46:48.960
wanted us to become singapore either he was in a very specific place yes very specific set of
00:46:53.920
circumstances again i i just worry that there is two very different views that you can take of what
00:47:00.480
he speaks about and his prescriptions for how he made singapore work oh definitely i i share your concern
00:47:06.080
on that but this entire um episode has just been another example of how you know that the sort of old
00:47:12.720
saying about how multiculturalism is so wonderful that it just requires uh a never encroaching loss
00:47:18.960
of your your freedoms and basically an authoritarian super state to keep all of the minorities in line
00:47:26.640
and to make sure that they all get along and it's like well i didn't sign up for that i actually just
00:47:31.280
wanted to be an englishman living in england never really concerning myself with any of that so
00:47:36.400
it's uh yeah it's really dark stuff but like say i i don't think it can last forever and a lot like
00:47:44.800
the um the abortion stuff and other things when they're just putting through stuff that just has
00:47:49.760
no mandate whatsoever or just lowering the voting age to 16 you know it just goes to show that you know
00:47:56.000
we can just keep all of these and in our journals and just remember well you know back when you had all
00:48:01.760
that power you didn't give a damn about the consent or what you were doing you just sort of forced your
00:48:06.880
vision on everyone else so if we want to change the voting age we'll change the voting age we want
00:48:11.680
to bring back the jury trials we'll bring back the jury trials we want to bring back the death penalty
00:48:16.240
we'll do that too right they've shown that they have no consideration for the consent of those out of
00:48:24.000
power which is of course something that you and i talked about uh when we did the amenities together
00:48:28.800
they're in esculus but it's um anyway i'm just sort of rambling at this point anyway so well i'll move
00:48:35.360
on to some of the rumble rants uh so um oh we've read that one uh dwight powell says did any of you
00:48:42.080
guys catch the liam tough steve whores interview my uh favorite bit was liam asking steve if my mum was
00:48:49.200
back what would you do to her uh yeah it was i've actually not seen the whole i've seen the full
00:48:55.440
interview there was um i thought it was quite a comical interview i've got to be honest two
00:49:00.240
favorite bits which is liam asking steve if is is my ghanian mate footlong british the answer is in
00:49:07.920
the question mate and then uh him role-playing as hallie berry offering steve a blowjob to which
00:49:15.360
to which steve just uh stayed completely sigma and said no
00:49:19.680
i remember this bit where he was talking about um traveling outside europe and that he didn't like
00:49:28.400
it that much no i remember i know that was your favorite part when he took a holiday to turkey and
00:49:32.560
just immediately regretted it right okay tom rat 247 this is what happens in a mixed economy i mean
00:49:41.280
economy of course a mixed ebonomy yeah yeah okay sorry smathlack says when i was on jury service a few
00:49:47.600
years back three of the jurors didn't speak english we do need jury service but they also need to speak
00:49:52.640
english haha well it comes back to what you were saying some of the requirements that are needed
00:49:56.880
you have to speak english you have to put the the square in the square not on the not in the circle
00:50:04.960
you get an incredibly basic iq test you have to be able to add fractions to one another dreadnought
00:50:13.840
they are making the great trial for them easier now i don't know what that's in reference i don't
00:50:19.360
know what it's either um oh oh they're making the great trial the big trial of traitors that we'll
00:50:26.880
do when we're in power oh i see them easier now right chad parsons 99 54 that's one of the few things
00:50:37.600
britain got completely tight suspect he wants to say right and the reason it is the sixth amendment
00:50:44.480
to the american constitution you guys fight them no no that's that's regarding juries i think you'll
00:50:50.800
find that britain got a lot completely right and then for some reason in the early 20th century
00:50:56.160
everybody became temporarily retarded and has not recovered since right the democrats have lost their
00:51:03.440
minds they have failed to gatekeep the radicals and they have found themselves in the position of
00:51:09.280
either leaving the democrat party or being subordinated to the to their raging raving lunatics
00:51:16.880
right so this is what happens when the principle of operation of your party is whoever screams that they're
00:51:24.960
oppressed must be listened to except if they're straight white men that's when you don't listen to
00:51:30.720
them that's when that's where you're allowed to hate them according to intersectionality and the
00:51:36.480
intersectional calculus and we're at a point where we are constantly asking ourselves the age-old dilemma
00:51:43.760
is this malice or is it ignorance and incompetence and there could be a trilemma yeah it could be pol
00:51:52.320
pot which is a combination of both but i think that at the end of the day whether particular individuals
00:51:58.640
are bad or stupid or both the agenda is becoming increasingly more radical and very unrealistic and
00:52:07.760
when we're talking about an agenda that is anti-reality it will invariably be anti-life it's going to
00:52:15.680
create a dystopia every time it tries to create a utopia right so here we have chicago mayor brandon
00:52:23.280
johnson johnson who says no relation we can't jail our way out of violence it's racist law enforcement
00:52:31.440
now it's racist he is in complete denial of reality and of basic human facts and he doesn't want his
00:52:40.880
audience to to think that there is such a thing as a natural aggression of human beings that sadly
00:52:50.160
manifests in violence that has to be mitigated in any kind of civilized society he doesn't want this
00:52:56.560
he doesn't want the tough realization he doesn't want reality he wants to be a sophist he wants to
00:53:03.600
deny reality he wants everyone to engage in an attempt to deny reality as well and to create a utopia
00:53:10.560
utopia where you don't need the police let's listen to what he says
00:53:20.240
we cannot incarcerate our way out of violence we've already tried that and we've ended up with
00:53:26.640
the largest prison population in the world without solving the problems of crime and violence the
00:53:32.320
addiction on jails and incarceration in this country we have moved past that it is racist it is immoral it
00:53:40.000
is unholy and it is not the way to drive violence down i don't know i think that there's an addiction to
00:53:46.720
activists judges and career criminals and partiality towards career criminals at the expense of
00:53:52.960
innocent human beings i mean that would be so compelling to me if i was 85 iq
00:54:01.120
like yeah it is racist when he says uh we've got the largest prison population it's not solvice
00:54:06.640
all i could think was like oh yeah imagine how much worse things would be if they were all out on the
00:54:11.120
streets but it's it's not just an issue of uh low iq whatever individual we're talking about it's also
00:54:18.160
an issue of this philosophy being a great ground for manipulation and that's the how they manipulate
00:54:27.520
many zoomers and people as well but increasingly mostly zoomers because they do this in academia
00:54:34.880
they are saying right let's look at the world around you any constraint anything that you don't like
00:54:40.960
it's them let us bring down them and life is going to be heaven on earth well what when he's saying as well
00:54:49.040
about you know oh well it's racist and so we can't just jail our way out of it obviously what he's um
00:54:55.440
is that a freudian slip there i don't i don't know is that i was just going to say that the point is that he's
00:55:02.400
basically saying look the problem is that because of the incarceration rates of blacks in the united states
00:55:08.640
uh this reflects really really badly on us not the crime but the perception of like us all being thrown
00:55:15.360
in jail and so we just need to abolish that because actually the perception is a problem not the actual
00:55:20.800
actions of the individual there is also a very compelling counter-argument to the idea that you can't
00:55:27.120
put so many people in prison and then things will turn into a paradise it's el salvador oh yeah
00:55:33.360
i heard of that yeah hey you literally can just do it brother luca sets the record straight you
00:55:40.720
literally can just jail your way out of violence yeah hasn't he got one of the let's give him a like
00:55:46.960
homicide rates in the world now after having one of the highest something like lowest crime rates in the
00:55:53.840
western hemisphere something like that right i think that we are at a very difficult point the us
00:56:00.800
is at a very difficult point as well there are individuals who are picked by the darling of
00:56:07.280
democratic socialism right now who is zoran momdani the mayor of new york city as his community safety
00:56:14.720
picks i'm gonna show you two examples i'm not gonna dwell on the first one but i'm gonna
00:56:19.040
uh show a lot about the second example first one is momdani community safety pick
00:56:27.440
deborah lolai a clinical instructor at harvard's harvard laws lgbtq plus advocacy clinic
00:56:35.600
who says that nypd harasses abuses and kills trans people and pushes to decriminalize sex work
00:56:42.560
this is who she is oh god oh expect it's not all you needed to do not harry's favorite all you
00:56:49.760
needed to do is like describe this person and i could have closed my eyes and sketched out this
00:56:54.880
very face without never seeing them and you can put that face to that direct opinion and i'm gonna
00:57:01.440
show you harry how this rhetoric speaks directly to your heart she explicitly frames this agenda yeah
00:57:08.880
i kind of enjoy it as part of a broader revolt that would soon become the summer of floyd in the
00:57:15.040
spirit of the stonewall uprising and in other words there can be no trans liberation without
00:57:21.040
palestinian liberation everything is connected just like it was in biden's mind which meant they were
00:57:26.880
fighting for stonewall palestine no they were fighting for the right to take drugs and cavort with
00:57:34.400
teenage boys that's what stonewall was sorry like all you need to do is read a book on it okay i read
00:57:41.920
the actual mainstream there will be a video i think it will be coming out in january now it's almost done
00:57:48.240
it's this close finally and then the weimar one will come out in like three years four years five tops
00:57:54.960
all right i need to do some i've heard him say 10 in the office actually i need to do some revisions on
00:57:59.360
the script again i'm sorry guys yeah you're a researcher into gays across the across time and
00:58:06.400
so the revisions for the weimar stuff's about the rhineland occupation either way i read a mainstream
00:58:12.160
like the mainstream book on stonewall stonewall was a mob bar with a pedo ring above it on the
00:58:17.920
floor up from the stonewall that's what they were that's what the police were there for and these people
00:58:23.840
say we need to fight for the spirit of stonewall right right now we are going to go to we are going
00:58:32.880
to go to someone who is definitely not less of an idiot mondani transition pick police are a direct
00:58:41.840
interference with radical socialist oriented politics and they will be used to stop us this is professor
00:58:48.960
alex vitali but i want to play this clip because this isn't the exact description of what he says
00:58:55.680
what he says shows that he lives in a completely different planet this is the spirit of what he says
00:59:01.040
but i want you to focus on the formulation of it police are a direct interference with our ability to
00:59:12.320
articulate a more radical socialist oriented politics right so the police are a direct
00:59:19.680
interference with our ability to articulate a more radical socialist oriented politics first of all
00:59:26.000
that's untrue because you are already doing that and you are very radical yourself so yeah the police
00:59:33.040
isn't exactly against you mom donnie picked you as a community safety advisor so it's not exactly like
00:59:40.720
the system is against you as much as you are implying as if trump was presiding over like the second wave
00:59:47.600
of mccarthyism yeah so it's not an issue of articulation hands-off it's not an issue of articulation
00:59:53.280
it's an issue of the kind of extremist politics these far leftists are put are pushing forward and
00:59:59.920
it says that they will be used to stop us yeah i mean if you're an extremist why not just why not i don't
01:00:06.560
want i don't want you to preach extremism i don't want you to say that every kind of every kind of
01:00:13.280
police there is is a bad is a bad mediator of colonialism who is just racist and you shouldn't
01:00:19.520
have racist and he directly says the following and they will be used to stop us they will criminalize our
01:00:31.520
movements put our people in prison eat people in the streets to stop us so anything we can do to
01:00:38.320
reduce their power creates political space for us to do what we need to do i mean at least he's honest
01:00:46.480
he says he is a radical socialist he wants to defund the police in order to promote radical socialism
01:00:53.600
and it's not exactly that the system is rigged against him again i'll say he is one of the advisors
01:01:00.320
for community safety for new york city right what's more as well his um the entire point about
01:01:07.840
mamdani being well actually you're just coming on to it so i'll let you no please please finish
01:01:14.000
well i was just going to point out the fact that obviously with mamdani meeting trump because you
01:01:18.160
know before mamdani was elected trump had given lip service to uh well you know maybe we'll just uh
01:01:24.000
won't send any federal funding to new york it's like well that would have been a good strategy
01:01:29.120
but instead you're getting the handshake i've been doing wrong there's a funny quote in there but
01:01:34.400
that was so past funny quotes at this point the issue is i think we need to discern between the
01:01:39.680
media hype and the pre-election election campaign talk from both sides and actual politics they're
01:01:48.560
both are politicians to a degree they are going to cooperate i mean i know that this isn't what
01:01:54.960
people are next try to try to want to hear but to a degree they will cooperate
01:02:02.240
that doesn't mean that there's a major agreement with agendas or something but your mouse is down
01:02:07.440
here okay so i i move to the right there's a new year post article here including
01:02:13.520
uh central university uh new york professor who wrote the end of policing now one thing
01:02:22.880
when academics write the end of something frequently they mean the goal of something they want it as a
01:02:29.840
catchy title but he is also sort of a defund the police but uh what what he actually wants is a
01:02:37.520
police that is going to serve his own radical socialist ends he doesn't call for the police to be entirely
01:02:45.280
um scrapped away he wants a radically socialist police right and he got picked by mom danny so
01:02:53.680
check check this article out says a lefty academic who literally penned the book title the end of policing
01:03:00.560
sits on mayor-elect zorn mom done his transition team focused on public safety along with a ragtag
01:03:06.560
roaster of other anti-police reformers alex vitali a brooklyn college sociology professor was among 26
01:03:14.160
advocates scholars and former nypd officials tapped monday to staff mom done his committee on community
01:03:20.480
safety amid the mayoral turnover now let us watch another clip of what this person says
01:03:25.120
he says we should give teachers guns so parents quit harassing them about what books they assign
01:03:34.960
um let's let it was almost based well i think i think we should give teachers guns so that parents
01:03:42.320
quit harassing them about what books they assign yeah yeah give them a gun and then let them teach crt
01:03:48.080
you know exactly college level course and you know diverse literature and and yes controversial
01:03:55.360
subjects so just kidnapping is he not just advocating for like kidnapping other people's children at that
01:04:02.560
point he is advocating for a massive restriction of family rights according to him if you want your
01:04:10.240
children to not be exposed to socially corrosive narratives and you want to make fuss about it at their
01:04:16.640
schools he says basically that they should bully you and they should they should there there should
01:04:24.000
be a concealed threat there it's obvious what he says is obvious right so here he made a comment no
01:04:32.080
that's not uh what i wanted to show here i'll show you later this guy said nothing on on september 10th
01:04:40.080
i don't know if you remember that was the day of the assassination of charlie kirk
01:04:43.600
someone who seems to be very much interested in whose claims to be interested in good community
01:04:50.720
in community safety and a sort of diffusion of violence presumably allegedly he had nothing to
01:04:58.720
say so september 9 some good news about something about racketeering then uh reposting something of
01:05:05.680
september 8 september 9 what is it september 9 cop crime says usa many cities say yes to federal
01:05:13.520
police help but no to occupation and he says this is the problem by leaning into law and order
01:05:19.280
democrats are enabling trump's authoritarianism right so if you're a democrat and you don't
01:05:25.280
consider yourself to be a radical socialist how do you how do you how does this make you feel how does
01:05:31.680
it make you feel if someone directly says law and order assist authoritarianism there's a question you
01:05:39.120
have to ask yourself if you haven't already moved to the republicans something about the premiere wait
01:05:44.880
wait wait wait what sold out work last night of sex work film yeah just went to a premiere of like
01:05:52.720
yeah i don't want to click on it because we don't know if if any kind of you can click on it after harry
01:05:57.760
he just went to watch some like porno with a load of friends new york style taxi driver style
01:06:04.160
promoting blue sky on september 10. we all know what blue sky was like on september 10. and he
01:06:11.520
doesn't seem to be making any claim so important that we stand up to bullies yeah so dad yeah so we
01:06:20.320
we get an idea of the kind of politics and the kind of you know of hypocrisy coming from this person so
01:06:27.840
cringe this guy's 60. yep right okay again from um donny's team he wants to defund the police and
01:06:35.520
the military and call the police violence workers now i want to show you this clip because to a degree
01:06:41.760
he gets something correct but i want you to notice on an inference and the reason i'm doing this is
01:06:47.200
because i think that we need to be much more focusing on the language and the sophistical language that
01:06:55.200
people use in order to manipulate their audience and i want you to notice a kind of what he does
01:07:02.080
for a transition he does from something that is a truism that the violence and the police go together
01:07:10.000
yes to something that is completely off the charts we we must always keep in mind that at root police
01:07:17.840
are violence workers that's what separates them from other parts of the state they're they're who you
01:07:25.440
call when you need the capacity to use violence and so when we involve police in something we should
01:07:32.560
expect there to be violence and i always say if you don't want racism and you don't want violence don't
01:07:40.320
get the police involved you see the transition he starts by saying something that is sort of
01:07:47.280
commonsensical that the job of the police is a violent one and there needs to be the law enforcement
01:07:54.240
aspect of it enforcement requires coercion but then i know out of nowhere he just throws in racism
01:07:59.920
if you don't want racism don't call the police so if you want a society that isn't racist you don't
01:08:05.680
call the police defund it um attack it do it all that's what he says that's what he says that's
01:08:12.640
what he is implying if i might just return as well to your initial the point that you made earlier
01:08:17.520
about the fact that there's there's campaign you know messaging and stuff like that between mamdani
01:08:23.120
and trump but ultimately they are two politicians so of course they're going to shake hands and try
01:08:28.640
find common cause where they should everything that you're showing as to like who was in the transition
01:08:35.040
team with mamdani is exactly the reason why he should not have done that right why you should
01:08:41.200
have just cut him off because you are empowering insane people who are going to drag new york into
01:08:47.680
even lower depths and fundamentally the only reason that mamdani is even there in the first place is
01:08:53.440
because of rigged demographics of new york and so i don't quite understand why as president who was
01:08:59.520
elected on the actual uh public will of the entire american electorate you somehow have to um cast
01:09:08.160
yourself away and just allow new york to be taken away by a place that has basically just been
01:09:14.480
demographically replaced i don't get this you should be doing everything you can in your power as president
01:09:20.080
to reverse this catastrophe not to encourage it yeah and i mean if they they claim to defund institutions
01:09:27.520
maybe not give them money trump if you're watching don't give them money right give us money
01:09:35.040
right so the other thing the other thing that we know really well and we have been communicating
01:09:43.200
and we have been showing and it's known for for decades if not centuries is that the temperament of
01:09:48.880
the leftist is very different to that of the average of the of the of the a commonsensical person
01:09:56.480
why am i saying this because when from a common sense perspective you move forward in life
01:10:04.720
without having figured out everything without having solved the riddle of the universe you sort of
01:10:12.880
you're sort of moving forward and you're trying to solve problems as they come your way leftists are
01:10:18.720
trying to do the exact opposite they constantly fail they constantly come with philosophies that are
01:10:25.520
gaslighting them and they're so intensely ideological that they are representing a very threat the very
01:10:34.080
idea of judgment as we see it in front of us so for instance from a normal perspective from the
01:10:39.920
perspective of a the average human being um but also from the perspective of smart and honest human
01:10:46.640
beings you have natural aggression sadly you have to it manifests in violence and in civilized society
01:10:56.880
you have to have a sort of mechanism for for uh for dealing with it and that mechanism is itself violent
01:11:06.400
it's uh not ideal but it's realistic and it's something that must happen because we don't live in the utopia
01:11:15.520
but the communist mind and the radical leftist mind constantly says the utopia is possible and anyone who
01:11:24.160
suggests or acts as if the utopia is not possible is an enemy and they have to be removed and
01:11:31.360
and from what you're gathering he isn't exactly not fond of violence right and these people aren't
01:11:39.200
exactly not fond of violence history suggests that they very much are in favor of it and here he has
01:11:45.520
this uh interview in democracy now i'm not gonna show you it to you for uh for considerations of time but
01:11:53.200
i'm gonna tell you what he says click on it if you want it's less than two minutes he says long
01:11:58.640
story about the use of police in prison is to manage problems of inequality and exploitation this
01:12:03.680
is marxist garbage near and he also says it's an issue of neoliberal austerity and inequality and
01:12:10.080
the police is used to manage these problems not to have any other sort of end right so and he wants to
01:12:18.400
say to rethink the role of the police and he calls for it to be defunded the problem is that this is a
01:12:24.400
fundamentally corrosive and incoherent agenda and let me say one thing from a commonsensical perspective
01:12:32.320
there is sadly natural aggression which manifests into violence and as i said before we need to have
01:12:38.480
a mechanism in civilized society to to deal with this that this is natural aggression and you try to
01:12:46.880
distribute natural aggression towards good causes such as the preservation of of order against those
01:12:56.080
who want to distract that order he wants to give an alternative explanation an explanation which is at
01:13:03.040
the core of his very flawed philosophy which again speaks to the temperament of someone who is
01:13:10.800
very unwise and thinks that we can move forward in life by having figured everything theoretically first
01:13:18.400
we can't do this but this is what he says and he says this as an ideologue he has exactly accepted the
01:13:25.040
idea that all problems are problems of economic inequality so when it comes to natural aggression
01:13:31.520
you are going to solve it by redistribution of wealth and by making society more equal materially
01:13:38.160
speaking this is just nonsense and also look at the kind of split-brained uh claim here because
01:13:46.880
he says it's not natural aggression it's economic exploitation even if that were the case which it
01:13:54.080
isn't economic exploitation itself is a manifestation of natural aggression without natural aggression there
01:14:01.760
would be no economic exploitation it's it's as simple as that they're lying to you they're gaslighting
01:14:09.280
they're sophists their agenda is really really really corrosive and bad and you should save the young
01:14:16.960
people young people from it and there are real life the real life consequences to it they do this
01:14:24.640
especially in academia where they can get away with it in a completely controlled environment where it's
01:14:30.480
just they and their students in a seminar room it's all just emotions they're manipulating their emotions
01:14:39.360
the students the audience's emotions and they don't tell you that there are negative consequences and
01:14:47.120
what we have isn't an addiction to law and order it's an addiction to its lack we have career criminals and
01:14:53.280
here i'm going to show you three of them and three victims three suspects 125 combined arrests
01:15:01.440
right so every time that they are pontificating and they're virtue signaling about how cool it is in
01:15:09.120
the utopia and how everyone who acts as if the utopia isn't possible is a bad person remember that what
01:15:16.560
they're advocating for or what they are tolerating and what they are not up against
01:15:21.440
has real life consequences and they're very dystopian ones and here the mother of the carlos brown jr was
01:15:29.200
pleading with the courts to keep him in jail is that true that judge theresa stokes let him out anyway
01:15:35.200
uh there there are some reports i don't consider this to be particularly from what i've checked on it seems to
01:15:42.880
me to be seems to me to be plausible no no and if yeah yeah if if that's true that's just but remember
01:15:50.320
also the kind of rhetoric we hear on a daily basis about mental illness and i want to say again i know
01:15:57.760
people with mental illness they haven't tried to to kill me or burn me alive that's ridiculous
01:16:04.080
yes we always know the kind of excuses that the left makes in order to gaslight people in order to
01:16:12.480
not confront that yeah we are responsible for our own actions there may be cases where there's
01:16:18.000
diminished responsibility but the common good has to come first and sometimes that means that
01:16:25.280
we have to incarcerate people because they're a problem to the common good or and without
01:16:34.240
focusing so much on the moral aspect of the issue the kind of moral culpability public yeah and and
01:16:40.720
and the kind of moral responsibility and degree of it during that crime and if this is true at least
01:16:47.280
it's not the same as that kid who murdered austin metcalf back in february where his family decided to
01:16:52.720
grift off of it yeah and try and do a fundraiser so they could get hundreds of thousands of dollars
01:16:58.080
and i want to end with uh i want to end with uh the other view because this is sheriff chad bianco
01:17:07.840
of riverside county california some people are criticizing him i generally speaking think that he says based
01:17:14.880
stuff and he says when you have riots and you respond to it immediately with overwhelming force
01:17:23.920
and that's how you have less violence so we have a clash of perspective some people are stupid enough
01:17:30.720
to fall for it others are promoting it on purpose we have people who are have a sort of utopian rhetoric
01:17:38.720
which almost invariably results which invariably not almost invariably results in dystopian realities
01:17:51.760
we're going through comments and everything yep sweet
01:17:55.680
you can't gel your way out of crime i think el salvador might disagree with that statement yeah
01:18:01.760
we showed it and uh that's a random name making an early life joke and that's a random name saying
01:18:09.440
the only obsession america has is with denying the reality surrounding anagrams
01:18:16.080
i wonder which anagram he may be oh i'll have to ponder that one any video comments samson apparently
01:18:22.720
we have no video comments so why come on send us your video
01:18:27.360
okay henry ashman says i may need to watch this one back again lads i'm a bit distracted by a woman
01:18:35.360
with a red briefcase and an aggressive fringe re-arming re-aiming the entire country at the same time
01:18:42.320
as this i have a mouse please thank you you may cheers
01:18:47.600
i am your prophet i shall part the red tape of editorial bollocks and get that video to you
01:19:15.840
don't worry it will be worth it jack has done a fantastic job on it it's going to be very very
01:19:23.040
high quality if anything now the actual content of the video is going to look terrible in comparison
01:19:28.800
to the production quality of the editing in which case if i watch it back and i'm not happy i might
01:19:34.160
have to just re-refilm rewrite the whole thing and get jack to re-edit the entire thing as well so you
01:19:41.120
know who knows maybe maybe january maybe next year maybe maybe 2027 samson's just shaking why are you
01:19:48.880
why are you petrified yeah come on why not you know who knows oh ye of little faith geordie swordsman
01:19:54.640
dan will be doing a segment on the budget tomorrow i.e dan will be screaming at the camera for between
01:19:59.280
20 and 30 minutes true based correct as as he should samson you never gave us any budget black pills while
01:20:07.280
you were going through that we're very grateful for how how much is the government going to be
01:20:12.160
raping me by how much extra sorry is the government going to be raping me by i don't want to spoil
01:20:17.840
anything you don't want to spoil anything it's over oh it's over how over is it never been has it
01:20:26.720
never been more over i'm not sure i can say on is it man who man who was already tired reaches new
01:20:41.040
well you've heard it could we should we go to the comments harris do you want rather harry do you
01:20:46.320
want to read i've got some here cumbrian kulak my own government is a more salient threat to me
01:20:52.400
than putin or russia um don't know which country you're in still to be a still be a laugh seeing
01:20:58.640
the response to conscription perhaps that will be the breaking point of the mass cognitive dissonance
01:21:03.840
slash mass formation a generational divide for sure ukraine's basically already conscripting
01:21:09.360
people i mean uh firas was showing it a few weeks ago where they were going out into the streets and
01:21:14.480
kidnapping people so that they kidnapping young men so away from their families so that they could get
01:21:19.840
them on the front lines that's the difficulty that ukraine is in which is that they just don't
01:21:25.360
have the men to continue fighting and without expansion of warfare to include eu states and the
01:21:32.960
us which would which would escalate it into a global war because russia is also aligned with other
01:21:39.520
geopolitical enemies of the west it would massively escalate you would suddenly get iran involved china
01:21:46.400
would have to get involved huge countries that don't want to but you don't want it to escalate into a
01:21:51.920
into a world war uh hewitt 76 will harry's video arrive before the next batman film i don't know
01:21:58.160
when that's out so probably michael drybelbus better a peace plan starman macron eu fight to the last
01:22:04.880
ukrainian that is their plan and start sending us yeah i know i know macron is distracted lately
01:22:11.120
oh yeah with the with his plans against candace owens he's he's waiting for news back from the hit
01:22:16.560
cumbrian kulak again the war in donbash should have been kept local as soon as superpowers got
01:22:21.920
involved the locals lost control of their stake in it all seems every war is a war to make the rich
01:22:26.800
richer these days blackrock have done very well out of this imagine being maimed and killed to protect
01:22:31.120
ukraine from the madman putin only for eight million bamalians to come in for the balance sheets that is
01:22:37.440
my concern and that's my concern that it seemed to me the loaded ideological logic language in that
01:22:43.600
point that we were discussing uh seemed to be preempting that setting it up lord inquisitor
01:22:49.760
hector rex harry i'd like to petition you to do a whole segment as peter hitchens no derrick power
01:22:56.000
master of chippies the problem with the russian ukrainian war is that ukraine couldn't define
01:22:59.440
itself other than we are not russian because russia bad putin hitler you can't rely solely on the
01:23:04.720
negative to define yourself save for god well to to be fair in that as its own state ukraine has only
01:23:11.920
really existed for a hundred or so years following the the destruction of the great powers following
01:23:18.000
the end of the first world war and even then immediately after that they were essentially
01:23:23.040
reoccupied i mean by the ussr so ukraine has been in a position for a while now where they are trying
01:23:30.480
to regain a sense of their own understanding and solid and sovereignty as a nation as i mean i know
01:23:36.480
ukrainians and i have ukrainian friends and i don't think that this is how they view themselves as
01:23:40.960
just non-russian i mean that's the thing upon the breaking up of russian state upon the breaking
01:23:45.840
of the great great empires they wanted to establish themselves as their own nation you can say they
01:23:51.600
were propped up by other western powers as a buffer state again but still they did want to establish
01:23:57.440
their own nationhood and it's been very very difficult for them to do that since then so i i do
01:24:02.640
have great sympathy for the ukrainian people uh they've been put into a catch-22 lose-lose situation
01:24:09.360
yeah and um sadly i i just hope that they're not going to get absolutely assets stripped off of the
01:24:15.920
back of it lord inquisitor hector rex i think education uh but could could be something the
01:24:22.080
eu requested as a requirement to potentially join the eu in the future well the interesting thing again
01:24:28.560
there is that when you see the points of the eu put forward actually the eu put uh states really
01:24:35.200
reduced it down to just purely like don't discriminate against your linguistic minorities
01:24:39.920
which in the eastern european context makes a lot more sense as far as i can tell would you like to
01:24:46.400
go on to your segment sure uh ed milliband harnessing enoch's spinning grave um don't think i've read that
01:24:54.560
username before uh says no more no more jury trials excellent this is going to make it so much easier to
01:25:00.960
sentence our opponents uh when farage is in charge uh if we even have trials by then well i mean who
01:25:08.080
knows what they will do uh the same goes for with digital id it's strange that the left are so happy
01:25:13.120
to leave such authoritarian tools for farage if they're truly afraid of him which means they're not
01:25:19.520
yeah the the yeah no that's exactly which means they they they would expect he could surprise us they
01:25:25.280
would expect that he will carry on a managerial technocratic form of governance that will either
01:25:32.080
be able to be retooled again in the future by them once they're back in power and he's out or will
01:25:37.040
actually just be used by him to carry on what's already going on perhaps at a simply slower pace
01:25:42.960
umara wad says i think it speaks volumes to their insecurities that the government isn't even
01:25:47.760
confident enough that they could rig juries in their favor anymore well as a you know as i tried to
01:25:53.680
show in the segment sometimes these juries come down obviously on the unjust side due to demographics
01:26:00.000
and sometimes you do actually get a good verdict as well so i don't think it's that i genuinely i
01:26:05.760
actually believe them on this one when they say why they're doing it because they're just looking at
01:26:10.160
the numbers and they're just going okay we just need to pull all of this through but obviously the
01:26:15.360
actual um the actual issues that they would have to confront to truly fix the problem and simultaneously
01:26:22.640
keep the legal structure intact they're not willing to consider because if they were uh people
01:26:28.880
like david lammy wouldn't be deciding them uh cumbrian kulak says regarding trial by jury
01:26:34.880
the symbolic damage is infuriating thousands of years of history being passed on uh by a foreigner
01:26:42.080
one must face this with good humor and perhaps this decision casts a shadow for the next government
01:26:46.800
likely reform to work with uh well i'd say i wouldn't want reform to work with it i would
01:26:52.080
want them to repeal it but um you know it's just again we're just sort of left at the mercy of
01:26:58.880
whatever farage fancies when it comes to that there's not really a great deal that we'll be able to do for
01:27:04.160
many years but endure yes mercy and uh i'll just read this one uh wallard woo woo to tie says excellent
01:27:12.000
segment luca uh thank you uh thank you for making the point that jury trials are not an article of
01:27:16.880
our democracy but rather an ancient right of all englishmen since before the norman conquest yeah
01:27:22.560
absolutely um before i go to mine i so when you were talking about uh jury trial as having a democratic
01:27:31.440
aspect of it at some point roman observer said on the chat harry our democracy robinson
01:27:38.240
hey like there are aspects of democracy that can work within very very well established boundaries
01:27:47.840
right democracy is kind of like a toddler they can do lots of amazing things but you really need to
01:27:53.760
set boundaries for them or else they'll just shit everywhere you you need to leave the um
01:27:59.280
little gate at the top of the stairs in case it falls to its death or you know it just hurts itself
01:28:04.720
i mean i was just making the comparison like my my daughter had her first successful trip to the
01:28:11.040
potty this morning i'm told at which point halfway through she stood up that's democracy doesn't know
01:28:16.960
when to stay sat down or stand omar awad says george orwell didn't go far enough when describing the
01:28:22.560
tyranny of the good those who believe themselves at the end of history will justify any atrocity as
01:28:28.400
they're working backwards from the correct conclusion and anyone with a different conclusion must be wrong
01:28:34.320
that's how we end up at shoot their parents for complaining about indoctrination levels
01:28:40.320
sadly true kevin fox if the majority of people in jail in america were white would that mayor call
01:28:46.320
it racist or be against imprisonment i think no kevin that's what my hunch says uh furious dan says
01:28:55.600
it doesn't matter how many people you put in jail if you don't keep them there
01:28:59.120
that's another revolving door yeah but that's which it has been in places like california for a
01:29:06.720
while that's also because you want to be going towards the opposite direction the the direction
01:29:13.360
opposite to the direction the mom danny wants to go reminded of a famous sam hyde quote michael drybelby
01:29:20.560
says these people demonstrate why democrats can be taken seriously except for their corrupting effect on the country
01:29:29.600
that's the issue that they believed the idea that common sense and reason are itself an oppressive
01:29:38.000
phallocentric construct that's what they say that's post-modernism they believe that every time you try
01:29:44.960
to be just speak with them from the perspective of common sense they're going to scream that you're an
01:29:51.280
oppressor yeah that's why they have been subordinated to the radicals those of them who aren't radicals if my
01:29:58.880
common sense oppresses you good and one last one arizona desert rat massive eye roll maybe the reason
01:30:06.400
the us has such a high prison population is because we have lower corruption in the legal system and the
01:30:12.960
means to identify prosecute violent criminals if society really wants crime to go down children need
01:30:18.880
to be taught at an early age to be decent and responsible citizens not be hood rats
01:30:26.080
this applies to people of all races he says right i think uh that we have reached the end of today's
01:30:34.080
podcast thank you very much brother harry thank you very much brother luca thank you all very much
01:30:39.920
thank you shaman shaman you're welcome you're welcome shaman panayotu actually you're welcome
01:30:46.720
you've not yet earned the right to use his first name thank you brother samson over there
01:30:51.520
you're in the production thanks to all brothers and sisters goodbye and see you tomorrow at 1 pm