The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #1332
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 34 minutes
Words per Minute
168.90503
Summary
In episode 1332 of The Lotus Eaters, we discuss how we are more difficult to control than people might make out and how we can actually be quite hard to control. We discuss the phenomenon of nudge theory and how it can be used to encourage people to eat healthier and lose weight.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
hello and welcome to the podcast of lotus eaters episode 1332 i'm your host harry joined today
00:00:21.560
by stelios hello and josh hello do i need to announce the goth mug
00:00:27.080
i think right now do i need to do it now we've got a goth mug on the website right now don't ask how
00:00:34.600
it ties into the brand just buy it you want a mug with a goth on it don't you yes you do anyway
00:00:41.420
today we're going to be talking about how they cannot control us which is going to be talking
00:00:46.540
about nudge theory and how apparently it's not quite as effective as we were led to believe
00:00:52.320
ironically enough we have become ungovernable uh i'm going to be talking to everybody about the
00:00:57.700
pointlessness of working and how gen z are opting out and stelios is going to be finally confessing
00:01:04.280
to ai jesus it's not the conversion that we expected but it's welcome that's for sure
00:01:09.780
and with that let's get into the news also buy an islander do it just do it just do it
00:01:17.200
so i'm going to be talking about how actually we're a little bit more difficult to control
00:01:24.860
than people might make out and this is a good thing this is a reassuring segment it's going to
00:01:30.500
be in my niche of behavioral decision making this is where i specialized in psychology and so i know
00:01:36.660
all of the literature involved in all of this stuff and i found this development very interesting
00:01:41.980
but to fill you in um to make sure you know everything because i think it's important to
00:01:46.320
understand all of the background information before we address this new development um nudge
00:01:52.460
or nudge theory was popularized by failure and sunstein in this book which came out in october
00:01:59.680
of 2008 sold very widely i'm sure people have seen it on bookshelves and bookshops and things like that
00:02:05.300
i got a copy of it from waterstones and it was one of those books that at the counter the woman said
00:02:09.740
like oh this is a good one you'll learn a lot from this i mean it is an interesting book and it is
00:02:15.560
well written so i can see why it circulated widely so in this book they basically argue that a nudge
00:02:22.780
is any form of choice architecture that alters people's behavior in a predictable way without
00:02:28.320
restricting restricting sorry options or significantly changing their economic incentives
00:02:33.580
so it's basically um relying on things like the framing effect so you could for example ask them
00:02:41.080
you know how do you plan to eat healthily today which um nudges them to eat healthily when compared
00:02:48.260
to say what do you plan on eating today this is a pretty intuitive thing most people understand that
00:02:54.860
this is a phenomena that exists and most people use this without having to read this book necessarily
00:03:00.560
it's essentially a sneaky form of social shame it can be yes it doesn't always have to be though
00:03:07.580
well i mean um i think most people first learned about nudge and everything to do with things like
00:03:14.120
the behavioral insights unit in we'll be talking about that don't worry during covid uh and the covid
00:03:20.340
lockdowns and i think one thing that we've all we all know looking back was the the use of um social
00:03:26.240
shaming techniques was one of the go-tos that they got to get people to comply it was certainly something
00:03:32.300
that was used a lot more in application than necessarily was argued for in theory although
00:03:37.580
there there is certainly an element of that that can be justified theoretically as well another
00:03:42.540
example could be if that wasn't clear enough um and this is an example they mention in their book
00:03:47.360
is that healthier foods are placed to eye level and less healthy options are less prominent you still
00:03:52.700
have the option to buy less healthy food if you want it but they're relying on human laziness to
00:03:58.180
make people make the the healthier choice um by placing these things in an easier to find location
00:04:06.020
than the unhealthy things so they're not necessarily forcing you to make a choice but they're gently
00:04:11.740
nudging you to make one and of course you can see a problem here already um the more perceptive
00:04:17.080
more perceptive of you should i say and that is that well how do you define what is good here
00:04:23.040
this is of course a political uh thing a lot of the time of course you know in this instance it will
00:04:30.000
be dietary but in lots of other examples it's not and the junk food is bad yeah well i think that's
00:04:37.560
the less controversial one isn't it whoa stelios that's what tune into this show for
00:04:43.700
what a revelation so the justification for this approach is that they correctly identify and i do
00:04:50.280
agree that the human mind is subject to a whole host of decision making biases there's a nice long
00:04:55.460
laundry list of these and i've looked at the research of these um and it's it's very much
00:05:01.140
demonstrable these these biases do exist the question is how do you address them more than
00:05:07.080
anything i think and nudge is one of the ways that you could potentially address them i suppose but
00:05:13.640
some of these are the availability heuristic where the the ease of recalling a piece of information
00:05:19.500
makes one place more significance upon it rather than looking at things objectively but of course
00:05:26.140
this is pretty easy to understand anchoring which is placing too much weight on one factor or things
00:05:32.100
like status quo bias where people are more likely to believe something that is normal even though
00:05:38.720
it might not necessarily be true and there are also things that you can argue might be better
00:05:46.840
than changing the framing of the decision in a top-down way i would argue that it's far better
00:05:52.600
rather than nudging people in a top-down way to make them aware of these biases and try and mitigate
00:05:58.340
them on an individual basis because this is the same sort of argument that you can make for a whole
00:06:05.100
host of other things why welfare sort of creates this learned helplessness because if you teach people
00:06:10.080
to habituate good psychological habits then they can manifest these in their life in every domain
00:06:18.720
whereas if you're nudging them in some specific domains unless you've got a very totalitarian government
00:06:25.120
that nudges them in all aspects of life it won't be able to compete for the mitigating effect of having
00:06:30.560
learned these things and applying them yourself as well as the fact that there are less moral questions when
00:06:36.080
you do that because it's not a top-down thing where a government bureaucrat's determining what's good
00:06:41.380
for you or not and so i think that this is both desirable in terms of outcome and in terms of a
00:06:46.620
sort of moral and political world and i think it's also more effective because you've learned the nature
00:06:53.100
of the thing rather than being subtly influenced by it and i think it's sort of like teaching a man to
00:06:59.680
fish rather than just giving them a fish isn't it it's the same sort of philosophy at play there and they
00:07:05.220
have the nerve to describe their approaches libertarian paternalism which i think is the
00:07:10.560
most juxtaposed term i've ever heard well this entirely relies on large state apparatus to be
00:07:18.020
able to enforce the kinds of measures that nudge people in the first place exactly so that's that's
00:07:23.460
just a lie yeah also paternalism means like you're you're guarding something of course i'm not having
00:07:30.440
actual paternalism you know people being paternal over their their children is very important but a
00:07:36.280
state shouldn't necessarily be that because then it supplants the family and it's weird and you
00:07:40.940
shouldn't want that and cringe it is indeed so as you can probably imagine this nature of this theory
00:07:49.720
appealed to a wide group of different people it could be marketed to conservatives because it promises
00:07:55.120
minimal state coercion in that well you can still choose things but we're still doing something about
00:08:00.160
these problems it could be marketed to progressives because it's aimed to improve things like welfare
00:08:05.640
outcomes and things like that and it can be marketed to technocrats because it was measurable data
00:08:11.160
driven and inexpensive and i think the technocrats are the ones that really took this off and we're
00:08:16.740
going to be looking at some of them but uh they're the big winners from this kind of thing aren't they
00:08:22.020
absolutely are but you know what the technocrats don't want you to read is this islander magazine you
00:08:28.480
should be buying it i mean it's a great value for money it's very good um it's a beautiful piece of
00:08:34.560
of art and also it's physical the internet can't take it away it'll always be there on your shelf
00:08:41.220
and even if you know you live in britain and keir starmer censors the entire internet you can still
00:08:46.420
read this so pick it up and that's not a nudge that's not a nudge by the way that's a command
00:08:53.340
yeah that if you disobey me i'm going to come around to your house personally
00:08:57.380
and gently nudge you into making you buy it again anyway following the publication of this book it
00:09:06.760
got picked up by technocrats very quickly and as we can okay of course um as we can see from here this
00:09:16.920
was 2009 so a year after the book was published and sunstein um was appointed by barack obama as
00:09:26.100
administrator of the office of information and regulatory affairs and he was in that office from
00:09:31.280
2009 to 2012 and then in britain david cameron in 2010 so when he basically came to office he immediately
00:09:41.500
created a nudge unit or it's the behavioral insights team originally but it was dubbed the
00:09:47.140
nudge unit because that was its purpose was to nudge people and also to look at how the government
00:09:53.260
nudges people and evaluate its effectiveness and the person who was appointed to lead this
00:10:00.260
by david cameron was this guy david halpern and from 2001 to 2007 he was the chief analyst in
00:10:08.400
prime minister tony blair's strategy unit and if i were to think of a technocrat as a sort of
00:10:14.920
politician tony blair is the ideal sort of archetype isn't he yes and so the fact that he was one of
00:10:22.800
his chief strategy or chief analysts sorry um for six years is somewhat telling isn't it so i'm not
00:10:30.540
necessarily suggesting that he wasn't you know doing a good job as a psychologist um just that perhaps
00:10:36.440
it's an interesting conflict here and between 2010 and 2022 he was the head of the behavioral insights
00:10:44.140
team or the nudge unit which uh interestingly it was founded in in 2010 but in 2014 it expanded into
00:10:51.280
a limited company and can you think of any examples of a government department being turned into a
00:10:58.120
company and being auctioned off to private interests i can't don't you think that's a little bit weird
00:11:06.180
that is very strange it is a little bit weird isn't it and i think that um which private interests bought
00:11:13.000
it do you know i will get to that don't worry oh good so after it took off this is from 2015 so five
00:11:20.020
years into it um there were lots of articles and puff pieces saying the uk's nudge unit is saving
00:11:27.220
lives by steering citizens choices so it's having lots and lots of media justification everyone was
00:11:32.760
singing its praises as this amazing thing and i'd like to read something from this article that
00:11:38.520
actually suggests that it's a bit more um sinister than it makes out so it says behavioral insight team
00:11:45.220
has accelerated tax receipts by 70 million and this is written for america i think dollars a month but
00:11:51.220
of course this is based in britain uh the behavioral insights team persuaded an extra 96 000 britons a
00:11:57.440
year to register as organ donors and improved attendance at adult education colleges and improved
00:12:03.320
racial diversity in police force interesting uses of it so you've made people pay more tax um the organ
00:12:12.040
donation thing by the way the way they nudged people into donating their organs more was they made
00:12:17.060
it opt out so yeah so what they did is they said you know what the government owns your organs and if
00:12:23.420
you want to take them to the grave you've got to opt out of it otherwise they're ours which is not really
00:12:29.120
a nudge that's just a sinister grab for people's organs which is really sinister in my opinion so and of course
00:12:37.760
racial diversity in the police force we know how that's worked um not at all okay encouraging people
00:12:43.740
to go and get further education is probably the least egregious here but the way it's being applied
00:12:49.320
is quite sinister in my opinion especially in covid as you said so in 2017 uh
00:12:58.640
failure one of the co-authors won a nobel prize for his work um here you can see that the bbc's
00:13:05.260
emphasizing his work on nudge more than anything else and which i think he was most famous for by
00:13:11.040
this point and it's worth mentioning that the behavioral insights team was acquired by
00:13:16.140
the charity nesta here it is um talking about it from 2021 which is when they were entirely owned by
00:13:24.180
them although they were partially owned uh in when they became a limited company in 2014
00:13:28.860
and the interesting thing about nesta is that um as they say on their website um if i can scroll down
00:13:38.260
here so um it was launched in 1998 and it was founded by um the film director and labor donor david putnam
00:13:48.880
who coincidentally the same year this was founded was made a labor lord um which is an interesting
00:13:56.120
coincidence isn't it so the guy running the behavioral insights team was a labor analyst and then the guy
00:14:03.160
who buys it was a labor lord we're starting to see that perhaps there's an understanding that this could
00:14:10.260
have some political significance and of course it can because it's influencing human behavior and he also
00:14:18.100
received upon buying it um 250 million from the national lottery fund um which is no small amount of money
00:14:26.300
is it and then following this massive injection of cash you can go on their website and these are the
00:14:35.400
countries they now operate so you can see that the blue here is where they actually have offices the
00:14:42.560
light blue is where they have a staff presence and the the black here is where they've got projects
00:14:47.960
so from being founded as a uk government um department to becoming a private company that they now
00:14:55.880
operate in most of the world if this isn't a way of accumulating political influence i do not know
00:15:03.640
what is it's one of the most obvious examples because they wouldn't be operating all around the world
00:15:10.260
like this where they're not trying to do that and again even more sinister the way that they're
00:15:14.240
trying to accumulate political influence is by i know the term is is nudge but uh i feel like
00:15:23.340
mind assaulting people is not quite as catchy is is probably a more honest way of putting it because
00:15:33.460
whether or not they want to dress it up in some kind of nice cuddly terminology ultimately it's
00:15:40.240
just trying to control people's behavior on mass like you said that you would prefer if ideas were
00:15:46.560
put out there which people would then be able to use their own critical reasoning skills to be able
00:15:52.120
to navigate the world around these people don't believe in that they believe that your critical
00:15:58.660
reasoning skills are faulty they believe that your brains don't work and if your brain was left up to
00:16:04.840
its own devices because of these biases that a bunch of unelected technocrats say that our brains operate
00:16:12.720
with naturally you would make bad decisions and probably be racist that's one of the things that
00:16:18.540
they like to emphasize is that natural biases make it so that we like people that we're related to
00:16:24.840
more than people that we're complete strangers to or people from the complete other side of the world
00:16:30.200
so that's one of the main reasons that i think they like to push this whole idea that no no no
00:16:35.660
without unelected technocrats pushing you in the right direction your brain doesn't work you'd
00:16:40.900
probably not even be able to go to the toilet by yourself and of course there's a big difference
00:16:44.680
between human nature and preferring people who are genetically related to them and some of the
00:16:50.600
biases that exist from when we were living as hunter gatherers to help us survive that environment that
00:16:56.280
no longer apply or actually detrimental to modern life those two things are very different i think
00:17:02.500
addressing the latter is quite important whereas trying to undermine human nature will always end
00:17:07.840
in tears in my opinion sorry were you going to say something yeah i want to say um something because
00:17:13.300
i think that we need to distinguish between something that is indisputably true about this
00:17:18.880
and something that is very bad so any kind what these theorists are doing like thaler
00:17:26.060
sunstein and you could say daniel kaneman and other people very familiar with their work yeah
00:17:31.680
other epistemologists they are proposing models for how the mind works and when you're proposing
00:17:38.440
epistemological models the first thing you need to do the most important thing you need to do is to
00:17:43.600
see how the mind gets things wrong that's the most important thing in epistemology you start from
00:17:49.720
fallibility not from the belief that you know everything so to a very large extent when it comes
00:17:56.080
to psychological studies psychological models philosophy of mind discourse about the mind and about thought
00:18:03.720
you have to talk about how the mind gets things wrong there's nothing wrong about this this is
00:18:09.820
um this is what the discipline all these disciplines i mean it's what i i did research in personally is
00:18:16.800
looking at behavioral decision making biases and they do exist and they are a tangible thing but of
00:18:23.500
course the the question isn't um do they or don't they exist necessarily although of course it's
00:18:29.040
important to be critical but it's more so how do you best mitigate these yes which comes to my second
00:18:36.080
point is that the whole problem here is paternalism in government it's status paternalism why because
00:18:43.860
there will oh there is always going to be an abundance of epistemological theories that any
00:18:50.560
kind of status government will be able to appeal to in order to say listen you guys you don't make
00:18:56.740
good decisions you can't make good decisions i'm the i'm the great man of history i can make better
00:19:02.120
decisions for you and i think that the most important thing is that to reject this on moral
00:19:07.720
grounds that's one of the main reasons why i'm a classical liberal i don't want other people to make
00:19:14.020
decisions for me even if i make bad decisions you could have people who make good decisions for you
00:19:19.880
but there is something that is missing if you are someone who is a sort of second class citizen in your
00:19:27.180
own life and there's also a deeper element to it as well in that if people are allowed to make their
00:19:33.420
own decisions for themselves then they habituate um better ways of addressing the problems in the first
00:19:40.380
place and therefore get better results than just being told or nudged into what what to do because
00:19:46.460
then they behave uncritically well i mean and just let me very quickly finish what i like for instance i
00:19:53.120
don't think that this is a bad thing is when it comes to foods when they have the signs and they
00:20:00.020
tell you this is you know x you know 45 grams of cereals it's going to give you 7 of sugars or you
00:20:08.820
know 30 of your daily sugar intake or 55 i think that's much better because it still leaves you the
00:20:17.920
idea that you know you have to think of how much you want to take how much you want to divide it
00:20:24.140
among your meals that gives you much more than saying right this you know if you want to be a
00:20:29.800
deadbeat eat this it's don't want to be a deadbeat eat that it's a good example of how it can be applied
00:20:36.360
in a way that i think most people would agree with without any sort of moral conflict because most people
00:20:41.360
don't have the dietary expertise to necessarily know and of course there's going to be some matters of
00:20:46.040
debate but it's still a rough guide that people can choose to ignore or not and it doesn't necessarily
00:20:50.780
affect their life but sorry harry oh i was just going to say to add to this the moral question
00:20:54.820
becomes again who is determining what is good and what is bad in these behaviors how are they using
00:21:02.480
these models to determine that people's decision making is good and bad because what some could say
00:21:08.760
are biases in the way that you say that there are biased processes in say a computer or in a lab
00:21:15.100
environment or such may simply be adaptive traits that we've developed over centuries of over millennia
00:21:22.960
of evolution to be able to navigate social situations and to and to navigate through a social
00:21:30.140
and moral environment whereas with these people there's this big trade-off where these technocrats are
00:21:37.700
saying that we've got these biases and i do agree you've done the research yourself that people's
00:21:41.880
people don't always think right that's just that's just a fact of life but when it gets to the point
00:21:48.760
of somebody like paul bloom for instance writing a book like 10 12 years ago about how all all babies
00:21:56.080
are born racist right which is determined in his writing as some kind of fault that needs to be fixed
00:22:03.480
by technocrats and then you see his own morality begin to come through in the writing when he gets
00:22:10.300
to a point where he's talking about how later on in life white men and women experience a great deal
00:22:17.840
of psychological stress trying to navigate all of the different rules that society has set up for them
00:22:25.220
because really their brains are evolved in a way that is now maladaptive to the circumstances they find
00:22:33.000
themselves in because we've set up all of these rules partially motivated by the morals of these
00:22:38.640
technocrats and their paymasters that really stress them out they go through the day in great
00:22:44.460
psychological stress all the time because they don't know am i supposed to do this am i supposed to do
00:22:49.220
that in in this situation paul bloom doesn't see anything wrong with that he just he just mentions it
00:22:54.620
and then passes over it without any comments so i have that's one of the major trade-offs here
00:22:59.220
i have to add something here i don't think so much the problem is who determines what is good or bad
00:23:04.320
because almost everyone tries to evaluate things i mean when you're talking about the problem is the
00:23:09.940
enforcement power the problem is the enforcement of particular views of what is good or bad
00:23:15.320
it's the enforcement it's not the idea that you have a government that has officials that say right
00:23:20.600
we think this but the choice is up to you the problem is when they're saying no the choice
00:23:25.640
isn't up to you because unless you choose as we want you to choose you're going to be met with severe
00:23:30.820
consequences by us so it's you you can't live in a society that is very decentralized in a sense
00:23:39.380
epistemologically speaking without there being several groups that develop a consensus within those
00:23:45.920
groups and due to that consensus they exercise a sort of moral pressure to each other that's not
00:23:51.960
the same as enforcing it in a top-down state manner so you could also have a group of state officials
00:23:59.400
saying right we think that this is bad for you we don't want you to smoke or we want you to smoke
00:24:04.340
weed because we think weed's good it's quite one thing to say this quite another to say no you are
00:24:10.020
going to do this because otherwise we're going to debank you um i mean i don't really see how that
00:24:15.440
contradicts the point that i was making i'm not saying that society shouldn't have morals that are
00:24:21.780
set culturally by a larger consensus i was saying that the morals of these technocrats being enforced
00:24:29.120
top down on us are are immoral i think the enforcement is immoral and i think the morals that
00:24:35.860
they push on people in the first place are immoral and i think that they promote a very negative view
00:24:41.460
of one's own psychology which does also encourage the rampant spread of mental health illnesses or
00:24:48.520
people believing that they have mental health illnesses as well so one thing i would quickly
00:24:53.520
add is that if if something like debanking happens that i think is well beyond the the sort of purview of
00:24:58.940
a nudge that becomes just explicit coercion doesn't it and so it yeah the problem is how the nudge becomes
00:25:05.640
a mask for coercion but anyway we need to move on so um it's worth mentioning that the white house
00:25:14.000
here um also implemented one in 2014 and the australian government as well um interestingly it was uh the
00:25:23.100
acronym was beta or beta if you're british um or australian i don't know how you guys pronounce it but
00:25:29.880
i just thought that was funny um just like yeah we're gonna influence you you bases um and then
00:25:36.020
this is germany they implemented one as well um and also you had um things like this this was the
00:25:44.580
institute for european energy and climate policy they implemented these sorts of things and even the
00:25:51.960
world bank um had um their own nudging and in fact i saw a document which i'm not included
00:25:59.200
but i saw the presentation that sunstein gave to the world bank his uh powerpoint presentation which
00:26:05.580
was interesting so he personally was involved in in setting this up it seems see is when is when these
00:26:11.600
people run in these larger circles that i question their personal morals and personal intentions for
00:26:18.000
developing these theories in the first place no bro i was just studying how the mind works
00:26:22.860
okay yeah sure okay you say so but um we have some good news so this um i believe was accepted for
00:26:33.260
publication in december of 2025 and it's titled assessing nudge impact a comprehensive second
00:26:39.420
order meta-analysis and this was accepted to the journal of behavioral decision making which of course is
00:26:45.240
the main journal and believe it or not behavioral decision making research and one that i've read very
00:26:50.260
extensively normally their research is uh published research is very good and a second order meta-analysis
00:26:56.440
is basically um where you have regular research where a researcher tries to find out a piece of
00:27:02.400
information there are lots of those studies and then someone conducts a meta-analysis to to spot the
00:27:07.540
trend between all of the existing research and then a second order meta-analysis is analyzing the
00:27:13.800
meta-analysis of the the primary research so it's it's trying to establish a trend in an entire field
00:27:21.840
more or less so it looked at 14 different meta-analyses that included 1638 primary studies or approximately
00:27:31.540
30 million participants so this is a massive pool of people and um you can scroll down to the abstract if
00:27:41.120
you want just uh there we go these graphs thank you appreciate the symmetry so one of the things
00:27:50.500
um that they say is uh examining the methodological quality of the meta-analyses we find that most were
00:27:57.200
rated as low or critically low suggesting that our findings which inherit these limitations because
00:28:02.340
of course they're analyzing these analysis in the first place should be interpreted with caution but if
00:28:08.400
of course the research that is informing practice is low quality it doesn't necessarily matter um
00:28:14.700
which way it's it's pointing the point is that it's not reliable in the first place because it is low
00:28:20.780
quality and apparently after adjusting for publication bias because of course there's there's biases in how
00:28:28.100
journals publish things because they want people to read it and therefore they want interesting
00:28:33.200
research and not necessarily research that's just like we investigated this thing and found no effect
00:28:38.160
suggested that nudging is basically close to zero in its effects and i'm going to read exactly what
00:28:46.460
they say just so you know i'm not misrepresenting it after correcting for publication bias the aggregated
00:28:52.080
effect of nudging was rendered virtually zero this finding aligns with prior warnings that substantial
00:28:57.620
publication biases in the nudging literature may have inflated the effect size estimates and impeded a
00:29:03.780
clear understanding of nudging's true impact so they don't necessarily deny that it had an effect but
00:29:08.920
it's much much smaller than it was previously thought you would imagine that it would have some effect right
00:29:13.940
because we can observe that changing how a decision is framed does change how people behave because
00:29:20.920
we can see it in ourselves and other people and people employ this with that understanding you know
00:29:26.300
what i i was in academia and epistemology is half my phd what i've seen is that there is tremendous
00:29:33.740
competition for funds and for uh attracting funds and you need a good research proposal or a research
00:29:42.600
proposal that is going to sound good to people who will invest in your project or give you money
00:29:47.940
and there is there is the largest bullshit generator of academia oh yeah they are trying to they're trying
00:29:57.180
to put all these projects that in order to sound cool and somehow you know acceptable to to non-academics
00:30:05.520
and usually it's absolute bs and they are trying to magnify what the research is supposed to give and
00:30:13.180
because the paradigm is scientific and it's premised on the idea that the mind is the brain
00:30:19.860
and that um the brain is you can just study the brain in order to study the mind a hundred percent and
00:30:28.200
it's just billiard balls they are operating within that premise and this lots of people like this
00:30:35.300
because they like the idea of the mind as a machine and i really don't like also i think harry you'll agree
00:30:40.400
because you you've expressed this uh many times the sort of constant push to to put technology
00:30:46.660
within the brain oh yeah in order to sort of amplify thoughts or something i'm not a transhumanist
00:30:52.740
yeah i think that's total bs that's total bs yeah but um one of the things that makes us most
00:30:59.380
egregious is that people in academia know that the basically the what they call it is like the
00:31:04.400
sexification of science trying to make it sound appealing yeah is damaging it attract fans but people
00:31:09.500
don't know of how to conduct it any other way than is currently being done but we are a little bit
00:31:14.860
pressed for time so i'm going to read the final part um before i finish up here so it says um we
00:31:21.220
observed that nudging interventions in health and finance domains on average yielded negligible
00:31:25.980
effects whereas effects in domains like environment and food were positive this could imply that nudging
00:31:31.000
is not a universally effective strategy across all areas of behavior for instance entrenched health
00:31:36.180
related behaviors might require stronger or different interventions beyond nudges although
00:31:41.040
these domain differences were not statistically significant in our meta regression so what they're
00:31:45.980
basically saying is that it's possible that there are specific areas perhaps areas where we care less
00:31:51.780
that nudges might be a bit more effective but if we care about something or there are other
00:31:57.820
phenomena interfering with the nudge then it seems to mitigate its effect or make it non-existent in the
00:32:04.720
first place and so this seems to suggest in my mind that all of these resources all of this
00:32:10.680
technocratic uh capital that has been invested in all these institutions that have been set up
00:32:16.600
innumerable institutions at this point every transnational organization has at least thrown some
00:32:22.000
money at this to some degree to further their own interests as well as the fact governments are using it to
00:32:27.820
influence the populations and the like and it seems to be that the foundation for it is much rockier and
00:32:35.740
unclear and murky than they made out and they're they're sort of trying to build this this castle on sand
00:32:42.400
and the foundations have shifted to the point where it seems like the efforts to gently nudge people
00:32:48.640
and and control them probably won't work they're probably gonna have their attention drawn to this
00:32:54.060
because of course this is in one of the main journals it's a very big study very important study
00:32:59.700
and so it might see a pivot away from using these sort of subtle nudges into perhaps more hard power
00:33:08.500
if if i'm going to guess what's going to happen and the implications of this and of course it's good
00:33:13.820
in the short term because it means that people aren't going to be nudged anymore in a sort of
00:33:18.380
malignant way which we've seen demonstrably has happened well if it's picked up and what what
00:33:24.400
this suggests to me in that case would be that the massive success of the covid policies after they
00:33:30.660
were initially announced and then carried on past the point of of reason would be that they were
00:33:37.040
successful because of the state coercion involved rather than the nudge the nudge of might might have had
00:33:44.360
a small effect maybe people felt bad if they went out for a walk that day but they still went out for
00:33:50.620
a walk that day what was keeping people indoors was the threat of the state coming after you and that's
00:33:56.660
exactly it it's similar to that organ scenario which they use and tout as a success that's coercion in
00:34:02.380
my mind if you if you're a bit more than a nudge because like you say that that's the the the state
00:34:06.800
initially claiming ownership over your body rather than nudging you to sign over ownership of your
00:34:14.140
organs after you've passed away so the the conclusion basically should be coercion makes people do things
00:34:20.660
which you know even an idiot could have told you but it seems that nudge theory uh thankfully is not
00:34:27.000
quite as uh easy to manipulate a population with as we previously thought which is a good thing
00:34:34.160
there we are we've got a couple of rumble rents we've had two of the same sent in by ryan hinnigan
00:34:40.660
so thank you for double dipping there the crs that's the community relations service just got
00:34:45.620
2026 funding in the u.s yes this is after trump defunded them last year so that was very disappointing
00:34:53.520
i forget which politician it was but i think it was included in a larger bill put forward by a
00:34:58.460
republican although i could be wrong on that needs further looking into and father calvin's anti-unit
00:35:04.340
nudging nudge unit is still just me and only fans people's comment sections on social media shaming
00:35:09.960
simps where's my grant well you'll have to get in touch with father calvin for that one
00:35:15.020
ochidor says this is basically keep up with the joneses for modern marketing i'm sorry i don't get
00:35:21.380
that reference do you i do and i agree oh there we go good on you right so um i'm going to talk
00:35:30.020
about how working has become pointless some people are saying that it's just gen z that have noticed
00:35:36.100
recently but i think that people have known that most work in the modern managerial society is
00:35:42.640
pointless they've known that for a while i mean just look at fight club and that was all the way back
00:35:46.840
in the 1990s where you're looking at the disillusionment of a man whose only role in
00:35:51.740
society is to keep insurance companies making money which he knows is woeful and boring and
00:36:01.460
miserable and soul destroying so you can go back to the 90s and find this they've also got that job
00:36:06.420
that film what is it office space which is basically about the same thing people sitting around in offices
00:36:11.460
for the sake of sitting around in offices so that they can fill out emails and spreadsheets
00:36:15.980
it's increasingly becoming a form of adult daycare really just we've made comments on this a number
00:36:22.520
of times in america where it's particularly women's tech jobs in places like san francisco and chicago
00:36:28.680
where they don't appear to do any work other than answering emails and filling in a spreadsheet which is
00:36:36.400
actually just about how many meetings they're going to do the next day which don't achieve anything in
00:36:42.020
the first place and then they go out for a latte and that's their day at work yes the number of
00:36:47.580
lunches and brunches you go on and the number of meetings you have is inversely proportional to how
00:36:53.160
productive your business is believe it or not i know it's a strange thing to say but it's almost like
00:36:58.160
the more work you do the more productive you are yes but because there is such a dearth of real meaning
00:37:04.140
in most of the work that people do these days people are switching off in greater numbers than ever
00:37:10.120
before and gen z are the one that people are really paying attention to where even gen z managers are
00:37:17.200
complaining about the work ethic of gen z employees but before i get into that something that is worth
00:37:24.060
your time is spiritually nourishing and fulfilling and will put a smile on your face unlike your miserable
00:37:31.000
nine to five email office job is the latest issue of islander beautifully illustrated as always
00:37:39.860
with a number of excellent essays from a number of our regular contributors including
00:37:45.000
morgoth we've got luca in here uh carl's in there there is even an interview with rupert lowe and look at
00:37:52.320
this as well we have an comic book in here oh you want to read that don't you you should
00:38:00.020
worthless piece of anyway um buy it buy it now while it's still available because it won't always be available
00:38:08.040
and if you don't buy it now you'll feel like an idiot
00:38:10.280
there you go all right so uh carrying on so i caught attention i i noticed this this caught my attention
00:38:19.720
breaking gen z has cut down on their efforts at work because they do not think it is worth it if they cannot
00:38:26.040
afford long-term financial goals per yf now this is a very annoying tweet because they don't include the link
00:38:34.800
they don't include the link and i have tried searching for this mythical yf and cannot find it
00:38:42.160
and i cannot find the article that it is referring to however this does support a lot of work that's
00:38:49.880
been done over the past few years speaking about how gen zed in particular are not working as hard as
00:38:58.340
previous generations primarily because of the fact that they can't afford homes i think it's a
00:39:04.640
reasonable response to economic circumstances is that if the economy is as bad as it is particularly
00:39:10.520
in europe when compared to america i know it's still on it is not as good for america prices in america are
00:39:17.420
pretty bad as well from what i've seen yes but it's still a lot better than europe and uh you know um not
00:39:24.200
saying that your experiences aren't bad of course but the point being here that if you can't actually
00:39:30.820
participate in the economy in any meaningful sense why bother why why not just enjoy the aspects of life
00:39:38.300
that you can enjoy um rather than you know being a property owner and of course um being a property
00:39:45.660
owner is very important because it's of course normally people's most valuable asset and that's an
00:39:50.440
important thing but i understand why people make this decision because trying to strive for a house
00:39:56.920
in this economy is a very very difficult thing and even if you get one it's not the easiest thing to pay
00:40:03.960
for that's true i would also just say that if the whole if if work itself as we'll discuss in the modern
00:40:12.060
economy is not fulfilling in and of itself if you don't feel any real major contribution to society
00:40:18.840
then you're looking at a pure trade-off of my time now for future security and the money that you are
00:40:27.000
earning from trading your time now is not getting you that future security it's not getting you the
00:40:32.280
home it's not getting you a leg on a foot on the property property ladder it's not really meaning
00:40:38.260
that you can do anything other than after paying rent have a tiny bit of money left over which doesn't
00:40:44.540
feel enough to put away in savings doesn't feel enough to invest in anything so alongside the
00:40:51.680
rampant consumerism that's pushed on people 24 7 advertisements blaring in your face constantly
00:40:58.000
it encourages high time preference so people go well i've not got enough money to save i've not got
00:41:04.180
enough money to invest screw it i'll just get this thing that i want right now well what it encourages
00:41:10.660
is is a burgeoning surf class that can only live paycheck to paycheck and not accumulate assets
00:41:16.740
and therefore not compete with the pre-existing elite yeah so when you're in that situation you
00:41:21.620
ask yourself what's the point what's the point of breaking my back right okay i want to ask you some
00:41:28.240
questions because and i want them answered immediately right right right because i'm i'm trying to
00:41:34.480
think about this situation from multiple angles because this is a very important issue i'm sure
00:41:41.720
that lots of people from the audience feel the feel the problems uh related with this issue but
00:41:48.400
i'm trying to think of it from all sorts of angles so right okay so it used to be the case that people
00:41:55.860
in the early 30s had higher economic prospects than people right now yes we've looked a number of
00:42:04.380
times that the actual amount that it would cost of your annual salary to afford a house back in
00:42:09.460
like say the 70s and it was like three times your annual salary whereas in more recent years it's more
00:42:15.580
of around 12 times your annual salary okay right so um that said the answer can be don't work
00:42:25.280
because for multiple reasons let me just give you and i'm i'm not saying that you don't explain the
00:42:31.740
phenomenon correctly i'm not saying that you don't explain it i'm just trying to to think about it
00:42:37.020
because any kind of no one knows that what is going to happen in the future future is completely
00:42:43.780
uncertain but so we are basic we are talking about the prospects we we think we have based on
00:42:54.620
but concurrent trends of houses costing 12 times the the average salary can that just be
00:43:02.640
reversed not instant not instantly can it even be reversed without a complete collapse of the
00:43:07.880
current system um i i think yes if you ask me by the latter but the to the former question i don't
00:43:14.320
think instantly it does it can't change but and and we and there has always been a case of bad
00:43:21.500
policies time horizon how long will it take for that to change and even then if i'm earning so
00:43:28.400
little right now that i can only afford paycheck paycheck to paycheck what's even the point of
00:43:33.520
considering this potential future where the economic system might improve i'm i'm not gonna i'm not saying
00:43:39.820
i'm happy for saying what i'm gonna say but the point is that just think of it purely pragmatic it's a
00:43:45.000
gap on on the cv well that's something but then that's not just it is the more people think this
00:43:51.660
way the more there is the the the second order consequence which is incredibly bad which is that
00:43:58.500
the state can say right i have a number a group of people who don't work so let me let me just be
00:44:05.840
come as inside as a middleman treat them as people who won't work treat them as just benefit you know
00:44:13.100
recipients of benefits and carry on the very policies that to a very large extent are contributing to
00:44:22.820
the issue well no this is this is something i was going to touch on which was which was the incentives
00:44:27.760
built baked into the system as well uh which is they they mention here this is an america to afford
00:44:34.020
a median priced home of 43 000 sorry 433 100 americans would need an annual income of roughly
00:44:43.620
166 600 however the median household so that's multiple people within the household i would assume
00:44:52.360
earns just 78 538 according to the u.s census census half yeah the entry level positions pay around half of
00:45:02.740
that so if you're somebody who isn't a multiple occupancy household where it's you and your
00:45:08.180
girlfriend or you and your wife pooling money together if you're just the guy starting out on
00:45:13.600
entry level and you know that the actual amount of money that you need to earn to even be able to
00:45:19.020
consider affording a decent home that your parents or your grandparents would have been able to consider
00:45:24.000
is that far out of reach the incentives become well what's the point and it's even worse in a country
00:45:31.640
like britain where we have such a generous welfare state as long as you know how to game the system
00:45:37.940
i had a guest on a few weeks ago before the new year uh reactionary reading law and he's posted a
00:45:44.660
number of times on twitter recently uh that to his shame he said so himself he is currently on benefits
00:45:51.580
and it's given him a real inside look at how it all works uh and we all we all see it from the outside
00:45:59.160
but him seeing it from the inside has basically said well what is the point of me working if there
00:46:05.360
are all of these impediments to me earning a decent wage and earning a decent living from within the
00:46:12.020
system once you're earning that benefits money you start to get some money from a job you might be worse
00:46:17.400
off than you were than if you knew how to game the system i understand and it may be very difficult
00:46:24.280
and then you get the second order effects of that where you get these big newspaper reports for
00:46:29.080
instance of such and such mother works a terrible email job for some diversity department within a
00:46:36.820
larger company and is still getting 80 grand a year off of benefits because she's got six or seven
00:46:44.340
children people lower down the rung will say what is even the point of me earning money especially when
00:46:51.920
the money that i earn if i even start to get anywhere near as much money as she is getting
00:46:56.380
i will have almost half of it taxed away from me by the state so they can redistribute it to her in the
00:47:03.260
first place there are all of these different compounding factors that's generating this complete apathy
00:47:09.020
to work alongside all of the problems with the modern workplace with modern jobs that being as well that
00:47:16.460
as well as all of this you've got to worry about you've also got to worry are hr going to be upset
00:47:21.780
if i post something on social media even if it's very mild is my job going to be made redundant so
00:47:29.640
that the hiring staff can get some illegal in who gets paid less than me to do the same job is there
00:47:36.580
going to be some diversity initiative within the business that's going to take my opportunities away
00:47:42.240
there are all of these things that young people have to worry about i want to add one thing here
00:47:46.780
is that i fully appreciate this and understand how people feel this way and it's sometimes very
00:47:53.140
difficult to tell people who are in that position something that disagrees with them but talking
00:47:59.240
about policy is doing just that on a daily basis i think that to a very large extent this is an outcome
00:48:05.500
and tell me if you disagree of very bad decades long status policies that are doing essentially group
00:48:14.200
management and they're saying right we need to carve the situation and the population in particular
00:48:19.800
groups and we need to enlarge the population that is dependent upon the state and essentially they
00:48:28.140
are they are pushing people into a position where they are saying well it's better if i don't work
00:48:34.560
and and and i become a welfare recipient it's also more moral that you avoid paying as much taxes as
00:48:43.320
possible in a system like for example britain where you know your tax money is going to go to fund
00:48:49.360
basically the worst aspects of society because that's who the government favors you know it's going
00:48:55.320
to be foreigners with seven kids that live in a council house or some junkies who've squeezed out
00:49:00.960
a bunch of children and fake a disability and receive just as much money as if they worked in
00:49:07.500
you know venture capital from the state it's it's such a perverse system but it it's a moral obligation
00:49:15.540
to try and destroy it in america as well we just had the rumble rant about crs receiving its funding
00:49:21.280
again so now americans get to to know the pleasure that their tax money is going to fund this shadowy
00:49:28.500
organization within the government again that serves to go around when there have been race-based
00:49:34.660
violent issues and tell white people remember say this isn't about race on camera go on the news and
00:49:42.460
make sure that you say this isn't about race even if it was make sure that you give the government
00:49:48.040
approved line on this basically strong arming people into giving the government line and in america
00:49:53.260
again up until last year and even then it was moved over to the state department with marco rubio even
00:49:58.340
if it was pulled back everything that usaid was going to pay for as well like you don't want to
00:50:05.040
know that what money you pay into the system as tax if you are legitimately contributing is going towards
00:50:10.560
all of these things that demonstrably make your life worse or at the very best don't help your life
00:50:17.380
yeah well my tax money at the minute is going to fund my people's own extinction so i'm not exactly
00:50:22.440
too thrilled about it yeah so there's all this stuff so you're you're absolutely right on all
00:50:28.580
of the just negative incentives that have been put up but it leads to this major apathy that gen z
00:50:34.920
have been commonly noted for it used to be lazy millennials but now the millennials are managers
00:50:41.500
as well so they're the ones getting on the receiving end of this gen lazy why my generation
00:50:47.640
doesn't care about work and also just let's say that it's always the case that the the older
00:50:53.760
generations are sort of uh telling that the younger generations are lazy it is it's always the case and
00:51:01.180
it's but this is this with sometimes just yes with zoomers though the zoomers shrug their shoulders and
00:51:06.840
go yep they go gold yeah i don't know what that means uh they they shrug their shoulders and they say
00:51:12.740
no no this like a stellios insider thing uh but yeah zoomers shrug their shoulders and go yeah why
00:51:20.420
should i bother like like this this is an article written by a zoomer about other zoomers saying why
00:51:25.740
my generation doesn't care about work and it starts off with uh when i first heard people accusing my
00:51:31.780
generation of not wanting to work i was incensed but it's not because it isn't true it is only one in
00:51:38.140
10 gen zedders want to work from the office full-time we're less likely to have ever worked beyond our
00:51:43.880
contractual hours less likely to have looked at work emails out of hours and more likely to be 10
00:51:49.560
minutes late we take more sick days demand full lunch breaks and don't want to do any work during
00:51:55.160
those lunches we don't least yeah yeah i mean all of this is basically just demanding that you were
00:52:02.540
you only have to do what your contract says that you do instead of managers and other people
00:52:08.060
exploit you essentially gen z has a spine then yeah is what i'm reading here because
00:52:13.260
previous generations and my parents tried to encourage me to do this it's basically just
00:52:17.880
be a bitch to your boss and i was like no i'm not doing that i'm i have self-respect and in many
00:52:23.420
ways i'm better than that person so i'm not going to relent to them and yeah there's this work culture
00:52:29.160
that you've got to answer emails outside of hours and you know work overtime as a matter of course and
00:52:36.020
be a slave to your job no no that's bullshit you need to euromax yeah it's it's so unhealthy and it
00:52:45.220
does come from america a lot of the time not all of america well it comes from a very old school
00:52:50.780
anglo work ethic that essentially comes from the yeoman work ethic where work is good in and of itself
00:52:58.700
because it's spiritually fulfilling which makes sense if you're tilling the land it makes sense
00:53:04.800
if you're growing things and if you're supporting the broader community around you and as a result of
00:53:09.200
that have a strong relationship with the community around you if you're filling out spreadsheets and
00:53:15.380
sending emails and having meetings about having more meetings all of a sudden the protestant anglo
00:53:22.040
work ethic doesn't make any sense no it's just a way of torturing your soul is what it is yeah and
00:53:29.120
it's great this article it says to me this is all totally fair after all why would we gen z's want to
00:53:35.340
work i'm a 27 year old in a traditionally good career living in london and i'm still clawing my way
00:53:40.880
out of my overdraft each month standard must have been felt great about this article although i assume
00:53:46.900
that the author is not a a typical journalist for the standard or else they might have had a few
00:53:52.020
questions i have to sell my belongings on vintage to make ends meet i'll probably never own a house
00:53:57.540
i don't have dreams of being the highest up person at my company or in my industry because it doesn't
00:54:01.640
seem possible not only would that involve working much harder for relatively little financial reward
00:54:06.980
but all of those jobs are occupied by older people who won't relinquish them until they literally die
00:54:13.040
so yes why would i want to work and just consider that compact magazine i think it was compact magazine
00:54:18.280
article from the end of last year as well by jacob savage i believe his name was the what was it the
00:54:23.500
lost generation where he was talking about all gen all young white male gen z's were basically being
00:54:30.440
passed up institutionally within any industry that he could name for the sake of pumping up diversity
00:54:37.740
numbers it wasn't affecting boomers it wasn't affecting gen x's even some older millennials were
00:54:43.960
getting some of the benefits of that because they were being grandfathered in but anybody in a younger
00:54:48.760
industry where they were starting from the ground up if you're a white male basically don't apply
00:54:54.020
basically so so again all of this just discourages people and then he goes through a few examples here
00:55:00.940
gen z videographer george gave up on trying when he realized he wasn't getting a promotion
00:55:06.460
vowing to become the biggest time thief to have ever lived he claimed to have weekly dentist
00:55:13.300
doctor and plumber appointments he drank alcohol on company time full on euro maxing here
00:55:21.100
here we've all done it they are using fake names here so i can only assume george's real name
00:55:26.520
say stelios no no mad mads mickelson uh used an out of office shoot day shoot day to tour the
00:55:34.960
entirety of london via lime bike hitting all the tourist destinations and soaking up the sunshine
00:55:40.220
while he did it the projects that could take a couple of hours took a couple of days he remembers
00:55:45.340
i imagine he had the biggest shit eating grin on his face while recounting all this
00:55:49.160
5 30 finish times became 5 then 4 30 then 4 but he doesn't regret it for a second in fact he says
00:55:58.060
if people give you the opportunity to waste their time after wasting yours take it i like this guy
00:56:03.660
yeah like mads posting this guy might be running the mads posting twitter account that's what he was
00:56:10.240
actually doing on company time george isn't alone company loyalty is dying 75 of employees leave their
00:56:16.940
job now before ever getting promoted for many it feels as though the only way to attain to attain
00:56:21.720
more money is by leaving a job and getting a new one at a slightly higher pay grade not that it helps
00:56:27.320
much 60 of gen z's worry they will never be able to afford a home and they're struggling to make
00:56:32.760
rent too rowan for one who is apparently the the office goth that they introduced here remember to
00:56:39.800
buy your lotus seat as goth mugs reckons that if buying a house living in a nice property having kids
00:56:45.520
or going on more holidays felt tangible she would work harder and make more of an effort but until then
00:56:51.380
she says what's the point what's the point and as such you've got gen z ghosting jobs ditching
00:57:00.820
ditching bosses and chasing side hustles according to surveys i was going to mention bs jobs but we've
00:57:08.020
run over a little bit on time so i'll just go on to say that all the way back in 2015 37 of british
00:57:14.980
workers surveyed by you gov felt that their jobs were completely meaningless and there is also the
00:57:22.240
phenomenon of quiet quitting but i've only just learned about quiet cracking which is basically
00:57:27.840
the stage before quiet quitting i thought that's where you secretly do crack at your workplace all
00:57:33.460
right super hands all right we never told you why josh had to leave um it wasn't so secret um but yeah
00:57:42.100
it's all very very fight club the idea that persistent unhappiness in the workplace leads
00:57:46.920
to disengagement poor performance and a desire to quit and now people are starting to see the idea
00:57:52.420
of revenge quitting you hate your job so i'll show you yeah that you'll just throw aside any financial
00:57:59.720
security just to be rid of it and again older generations can have a problem with this i can i can
00:58:07.000
understand and i can definitely understand uh that this is all basically what especially when we've got
00:58:12.040
a skills and competency crisis like right now we're in um actually really important industries like
00:58:18.960
engineering it seems that the uh talent is getting older and older and older and not being replaced by
00:58:26.260
younger generations because they've not been shepherded into those fields and careers uh this is all
00:58:32.860
basically a state of potential societal collapse jack this this is societal collapse in the waiting
00:58:39.720
it's like jack got mad and chopped his balls off yeah this is all just really it just doesn't make
00:58:46.260
sense what in fight club no i'm gonna i'm gonna quit to show you yeah you showed me here well i mean
00:58:53.040
yeah if you've got no one to replace you or nobody who's going to do the job as well as you potentially
00:58:57.080
but you know this is all really bad but the problem is that the people who are in charge of the
00:59:02.640
incentives to actually make things better aren't doing anything about it and in fact they don't
00:59:09.560
seem to know how to do anything about it because again the competency crisis is hitting those higher
00:59:16.700
echelons of society as well we don't seem to have able leadership anywhere so gen z are taking what is
00:59:25.780
frankly the logical approach here which is if my future isn't secure if i can't have a family if i
00:59:32.440
can't have anything that came easily to the previous generations and there's no sign of hope going
00:59:37.520
forward as as far as we can see right now what is the point how do we fix that that's that's a huge
00:59:47.440
question so we'll see what happens in the future but there you go i'll go through we've got quite a few
00:59:53.280
rumble rants on that one so thank you all for being very generous i'll read them mine isn't isn't
00:59:57.880
that long that's all this is just this is just going to be lish thanks for clarifying
01:00:03.740
and i thought better of you meds um yeah you're talking about euromaxing
01:00:11.400
let's carry on euromaxing is the philosophy of the future you just did a segment about it this is true
01:00:19.420
this is true absolutely yeah um anyway quit your job and take up smoking that's that's the
01:00:26.020
as a career drinking and smoking just as long as you're posting about it on tiktok you'll get some
01:00:32.460
money for it enough to pay for the fags i can say that because it's an english slang term right
01:00:37.500
i can say that cigarettes yeah cigarettes there you go in america if you're also paying for that
01:00:44.780
kind of thing good on you run for congress they'll be eager good day all i think another
01:00:51.440
reason why most people are dissatisfied with their jobs is the fact that the old system where you could
01:00:55.880
get a job at a low level and slowly work your way up uh why bother taking shitty position knowing that
01:01:01.180
the boss will hire someone more qualified and probably cheaper like an hiv h1b indian which
01:01:09.480
kills the motivation which people had of doing free labor i didn't misread that by the way that's
01:01:15.440
what luke typed here luke carries on i'm only grateful for my job thanks to the government and
01:01:20.480
the ndis i get to work with disabled people and watch them slowly improve their lives as best as i can
01:01:25.480
really makes my job worthwhile very wholesome yeah that's that's really wholesome i think the
01:01:30.520
overriding message is if you're in the position of gen z is to try to find something that you can do
01:01:37.420
that is more fulfilling uh the internet does allow for opportunities it's very very difficult
01:01:42.720
or at the very least given that there is this skills crisis try to get yourself a skill which
01:01:49.980
will contribute to society in some way that will make you feel this whole thing is the whole reason
01:01:56.140
i'm doing this other than the obvious political you know aspect of it the reason i left academia was
01:02:03.440
because i was just like well there's no point staying here my prospects are pretty bleak even
01:02:07.580
though i've done very well i've went to a good university and you know done everything i should
01:02:12.180
have done what's the point um i'm going to do something that i'll find fun and enjoy and and
01:02:18.080
lo and behold i'm still here even after he quit yeah i know it's amazing you're like
01:02:22.860
shrouding his host i'm a contractor now it's different okay oh all right not a full-time
01:02:28.680
employee all right it's it feels more libertarian that's why i did it jam says i'm from manchester
01:02:35.620
took me two years between the age of 20 and 22 to save up enough for a deposit for a house without
01:02:40.720
help though had no social life i will say the amount of self-control and restraint that you must
01:02:47.600
have uh that you must have had for that two-year period must have been insane although at the same
01:02:54.140
time 2022 probably a good time to do something like that if you can exercise the kind of control
01:03:01.140
that would be needed luke again not to sound crazy but everything you're talking about i've been hearing
01:03:06.040
for years from the mig tau community they talk about being a level four removing oneself from society and
01:03:12.200
contributing as little as possible i'm sorry you guys are going to hate this comment but you really
01:03:16.160
need to have a look at mig tau they've been talking about the stuff maybe there's something we could
01:03:19.460
take and use you seem to be late i mean we we get nick dixon in all the time don't we this is true
01:03:26.960
this is true he's more of a black pill incel these days uh volcel maybe i don't know he's in friday
01:03:33.900
so we can ask him ourselves tom i got it stelios you are 1000 correct to w i j g what does that mean
01:03:42.840
i think this is some insider stuff wait wait wait by the go gold yeah yeah okay oh there you go
01:03:50.940
what does he mean yeah you're uninitiated a cruel i very much recognize the change in the workplace
01:03:58.120
more important is put on presenting what i've done rather than getting things done that's true as well
01:04:03.000
uh feminized hr workplace it just means that productivity crashes that's a random name canadian
01:04:09.400
zillennial here part of with me and josh part of the true greatest generation zillennials
01:04:14.500
i make as much money now with a part-time job as i did a couple of years ago with a full-time three
01:04:19.580
times the salary because of taxes now i have more free time to work on my video game lmao awesome i
01:04:25.160
hope the video game goes well less is more and again yeah that's the thing if you earn so much
01:04:30.700
but it does but you don't actually because it all gets taxed away from you again you go
01:04:34.520
what's the point luke don't forget back in the day doing an extra free work you used to get rewarded
01:04:40.320
you could prove that you were deserving of that promotion now they just hire someone externally
01:04:43.920
don't care about you very true hewitt these attitudes are nothing new the dude abides after
01:04:49.980
all but i think they're more widespread now i remember when when i was at university some of
01:04:56.040
my housemates got me a birthday card with um the dude from the big lebowski on it because i spent all
01:05:02.860
my time in my dressing gown drinking and chilling out good man i did a lot of studying actually
01:05:09.660
so that's just the comfiest way to do it i spent most of my third year of university lounging about
01:05:16.340
in a poncho there's no shame in it i had a poncho as well it's it's all great men go through a poncho
01:05:22.080
phase when eastwood yeah i mean and uh final two uh pat j reed i would like to hear the perspective
01:05:29.940
of a gen z entrepreneur who is trying to hire from his own generation i skipped over it they did ask
01:05:35.200
somebody like that said it was a nightmare that's a random name again in order to afford a condo here
01:05:40.060
i also had to save up for three plus years and still need my parents to pay for half of it
01:05:44.460
all i do is work and i also have no social life at work right now by the way keck euro maxing
01:05:51.600
gen z maxing zillennial maxing based that's what we like to hear not that i would ever encourage
01:05:57.780
anybody not to fulfill their obligations in society right so there's an ai jesus that is
01:06:03.380
gonna listen to your confessions you're gonna confess your confess your sins to ai jesus and ai jesus
01:06:11.440
is going to share with you his insights right start right so guys uh have you confessed your sins
01:06:20.200
lately i've not been doing many to be fair you are in a sin behaved i mean not to ai jesus
01:06:26.420
not to ai jesus but you're not thinking about strippers or something
01:06:29.820
no but i know somebody in the room who is right now are they in the room right now
01:06:36.900
right okay so we're gonna talk about a project carried by a swiss university in collaboration
01:06:49.300
with a catholic church of switzerland and uh the ai confession booth but before we say more about this
01:06:56.800
harry has a message for you oh yeah you want me to do this don't you um by islander it's really
01:07:04.120
fantastic this is the fifth issue as you can see uh the first four issues had their own particular
01:07:09.700
style with islander five we've gone to a new season now so we've got a bit a few things changed up the
01:07:17.540
artwork as ever is spectacular this might be my favorite cover that we've ever done so far and
01:07:24.680
we've got amazing uh amazing articles in here as usual some stuff from carl interview with rupert low
01:07:31.540
which i'm sure you'll all be very excited to read there's a comic book in here now
01:07:36.220
yeah it's great stuff available for the very reasonable price of 14.99 on the website buy them
01:07:44.260
while stocks last right you know the phrase deus ex machina right so this is a project that is called
01:07:52.800
deus in machina it's what we were saying before about the cringe academic ways of attracting funding
01:07:59.340
right so here we have this this guy he's got quite a smug picture we'll get there we'll get
01:08:06.720
there we'll get there the third university of applied sciences and arts they have this project
01:08:13.220
and right now they're saying it's an art installation that they have developed and it will be seen and
01:08:18.100
heard in the confessional of saint peter's chapel for two months that was from august 2024 to october 2024
01:08:26.680
and now it carries on as an art installation project in vienna i think it it's going to be from
01:08:34.360
february january 2025 to february this year 2020 so you can't even access ai jesus online
01:08:42.700
wait there are some chat box some ai confession chat box chat boxes we are going to talk about them
01:08:50.480
in due time but okay how can i be sure i'm not speaking to ai demons posing as ai because look at
01:08:58.120
the project head he's a human he this is an ai right huge confidence i am a real human being yeah
01:09:05.600
he does actually i am able of expressing emotions okay so we have here so it's the school of computer
01:09:14.700
science and information technology and they have developed this project and they're saying that
01:09:20.420
you're interacting it's possible for you to interact with an artificial ai jesus
01:09:26.180
and and you can respond he can respond to questions and also offer answers but i don't understand why
01:09:33.960
they they feel the need to put both isn't responding to questions the same as offering answers
01:09:39.780
just a pleonasm i mean maybe they should correct instantly maybe it doesn't always offer answers
01:09:46.040
when in its response maybe ai jesus just occasionally goes yeah right so they're saying that this is
01:09:51.940
giving you uh several rewards first of all it gives you the reward of comfort comfort is going to
01:09:59.960
be a major word here and we're going to weigh the what comfort is worth relative to other goods i do
01:10:08.640
wonder what um people think of the fact that they're replacing real jesus with with ai jesus and that
01:10:17.300
people will take their problems to ai jesus who has i believe no divine legitimacy um i mean i i think
01:10:25.020
a replay is trying to replace priests interesting because i was gonna i wouldn't try to i wouldn't say
01:10:31.140
that the priest is jesus why why wouldn't you just go to confession though we'll get there comfort but
01:10:37.620
let let let let us take the long road i'm gonna i don't want the path of least resistance i'm gonna
01:10:43.380
just it's essential to the to the segment i'm just said by all great men and also sex i'm just
01:10:50.180
gonna say good faith in response to all of this i'm sure that this whole project was done with very
01:10:56.980
good intentions wait harry so oh you're saying saint peter's chapel in lucerne in collaboration with a
01:11:03.940
immersive realities research lab has launched an innovative project exploring the use of virtual
01:11:09.860
characters based on generative artificial intelligence in a spiritual context as part of
01:11:15.380
this project an art installation was developed that will be seen and heard in the confessional of saint
01:11:20.660
peter's chapel for two months this installation allows visitors to interact in hundred different
01:11:26.420
languages that's a major plus maybe the priest doesn't know a hundred languages i would bank on
01:11:31.860
it yeah yeah with why would you go to a priest who doesn't speak the same language as you in the
01:11:36.660
first place exactly it's even better to confess right and here is where we have eight questions about
01:11:41.940
ai let's say this raises key questions in the dialogue between humans and ai like can a machine
01:11:48.100
address humans religiously and spiritually to what extent can people with existential questions confide in
01:11:54.580
a machine and accept its answers how does ai behave in a religious setting they say the project of
01:12:01.780
days in machina encourages reflection on the limits of technology right they did say that this isn't
01:12:08.740
supposed to replace the sacrament of confession i know in in protestant countries this isn't uh it isn't
01:12:16.820
considered a sacrament but in catholic churches and for catholics it is and they are saying that it isn't
01:12:23.860
supposed to replace the sacrament of it so question is why are you doing it then the answer is they
01:12:30.740
want they they say they want to see how humans trust ai technology and stuff which personally i don't
01:12:38.900
find that what happens ai jesus sells your data i was about to say i mean what if it rivers up all of
01:12:45.060
my data you could blackmail so this is blackmail let's just uh watch this video please
01:12:55.940
do you have some advice for us in this time in these challenging times remember that in the face of
01:13:02.420
adversity love and faith are your steadfast guides just as i calm the stormy seas so too can peace be found
01:13:09.300
within your heart jesus is american so they walk in and you see it answers visitors questions about
01:13:22.100
faith and morality many people came to talk with him so we have like 900 conversations now registered
01:13:31.620
and uh all ages also i can say there were young people older people and what was really interesting
01:13:40.660
to see that the people really talked with him in a serious way all knowledge and wisdom ultimately come
01:13:47.220
from god if used wisely ai can indeed be a tool to explore the wonders of creation deepen our understanding
01:13:54.340
of scripture and foster connections among people right so they say that most visitors around um
01:14:02.420
40 to 70 years old they said that two-thirds of them said that they had a deep and profound
01:14:07.300
experience and they liked it a third of them expressed some concerns but before we talk about
01:14:12.820
these concerns how does this sound what are your first thoughts i i think it's a little bit strange
01:14:20.340
to be honest because it you're effectively getting the most human part of humanity and getting it to
01:14:27.860
interact with the least human least feeling aspect of existence currently which seems like the worst
01:14:36.980
possible thing you could do because machines don't have feelings yet and so i i don't think it can
01:14:45.540
help you with your your personal relationship with god and unless of course it helps educate people
01:14:51.300
and it's an educational device about um scripture and things like that which does seem to be touched
01:14:57.060
on to be fair in which case i can sort of understand where it's going i don't want to dunk too harshly on
01:15:04.260
all of this it seems i would i would imagine the people involved in this are all very sincere in their faith
01:15:10.580
and they genuinely want to help people if it helps the people to more sincerely connect with their
01:15:15.220
own religion and spirituality and potentially help them to engage with their local religious community
01:15:21.300
you know um i don't know how this would fall in terms of like if it's blasphemous or not that's a
01:15:28.660
question for the church right so one thing to say because i want to be fair is that they did tell
01:15:36.020
people who participated in that experiment to not disclose personal information
01:15:41.620
which typically you would do when you typically you do do when you are entering a confession
01:15:49.460
booth i suspect this was asking you for your credit card information yes i don't think you're going to
01:15:54.660
a confession booth to say you could read the last the three digits on the back of the card if you could
01:15:59.940
give me a thousand pounds in gift cards please yeah you don't go in and say i had a greg sausage roll
01:16:06.660
typically you would say something a bit spicier a bit a curry maybe that is your sin for the day
01:16:13.460
right okay right so we have people who are saying here that this is essentially a confession booth
01:16:20.100
for people because it's ten times more comfortable it's then asking chat gbt an extremely private
01:16:25.780
question or sharing a thought than googling and the reason for this is because gbt feels like a closed
01:16:31.300
space the subtle design element is insanely important and they're saying that essentially
01:16:36.660
at the end of the day it's about comfort that's what is being given i i would um this isn't necessarily
01:16:44.260
to stress you know don't don't go to confessionals and things but it is also important to discuss these
01:16:49.940
things with your your friends and your loved ones and and if you don't do that and go to an ai what you'll
01:16:55.300
find is that the depth of your relationships and your interpersonal uh interactions are going to be
01:17:02.660
more shallow because the way that people bond on a much deeper level is you share parts of yourself
01:17:09.300
and things that you might not necessarily um be entirely comfortable sharing with a stranger with
01:17:14.660
people that you care about and i think that turning to ai and it being constantly available in a way that
01:17:21.060
people can never be is a little bit concerning in that respect because i don't think people should
01:17:27.300
have shy away from discussing difficult things with people who are important to them my personal
01:17:32.100
philosophy is that you know my loved ones and my friends you know they can know every aspect of my
01:17:37.460
life if if they're interested at least i've seen the videos of people falling in in love with their ai
01:17:43.300
assistants somebody's gonna there's a movie with that a very real life real life though somebody's
01:17:50.500
quite good somebody's gonna fall in love with ai jesus she has a nice voice but that's about it
01:17:56.820
in the movie in that movie right so uh one thing is i don't to be very fair i'll try to be very um
01:18:04.260
fair to this project because i don't have the hatred of technology other people have
01:18:08.900
with a fear of technology why are you looking at me i don't know you are a bit return to monkey
01:18:14.580
some wait guys wait guys um this what was i going to say um the comfort yeah it's the the comfort
01:18:24.820
no i wanted to it was something josh said anyway just sorry sorry i got uh completely derailed of it
01:18:33.380
right um so the thing is that when it comes to to why people do it the what they are saying all
01:18:43.060
sorts of things so number one good thing is comfort some people aren't that um it's not easy for them
01:18:49.620
to speak to people around suppose it could be like a gateway to to actually it could be a gateway so
01:18:55.060
it's not exactly contradictory to what you were saying and um also
01:19:03.380
it's delios is communicating with yeah sorry sorry you have to bear with me just a second because i
01:19:11.140
got completely real jesus is communicating no no no um
01:19:18.180
yeah so let's go back to the to the to the other bit with with comfort i think there are several
01:19:23.060
good and bad aspects to it number one they're saying that it can answer good questions theologically
01:19:29.380
speaking if they're exegetical if you go in and you talk about the bible and you say right what does
01:19:35.060
this passage mean what does the other passage mean it's trained to have a good to have good answers and
01:19:42.660
also it's that when it comes to when it comes to the there are several problems though number one is with
01:19:51.540
a nudge it's it ties a lot with what you said before how why do you call it a an ai confession booth
01:19:58.740
if you tell people to basically not share private information that's one thing so lots of people
01:20:04.820
said that it was comfortable and they were surprised that it gave them really uh lots of good uh data
01:20:12.660
but other people were concerned because they said that it was compassionless it was cold and uh it was
01:20:19.140
a bit weird because if you look at the confession at the confession as a sacrament but also as a practice
01:20:26.580
it's talking to people it's it's one thing to talk to a machine which is trained to give you particular
01:20:33.860
responses it's quite another thing to talk to people because when you are confessing you are um trying to
01:20:42.740
bring something that is private and you're keeping private to the world of humans and you want
01:20:50.180
presumably humans to listen to you and in some cases where there is also the the other religious element
01:20:56.500
into it to whether the the priest can grant you absolutely can give you uh i think it's called
01:21:03.220
absolution or and it's of course missing the ai aspect an aspect of confession here i'm not a catholic i was
01:21:12.420
baptized a protestant but to my mind a part of confession is admitting something and bringing
01:21:18.900
it into the world as you say to another human being in which there is some sort of potential
01:21:24.260
social consequence and therefore you're willing to admit the world that you've done something wrong
01:21:29.060
and face the consequences whereas there is no consequence in the real world for bringing it up to
01:21:34.580
the ai and so it's not really a confession in the same manner as to another human being right right
01:21:43.220
yeah and there's a there are several questions about ai here and how they're involved in
01:21:49.300
how they arise in such issues and one of the main questions is always reform or reject
01:21:55.300
um you could say that all all this is something that in the wrong hands could yield disastrous
01:22:03.460
consequences just like just about like everything um or you just completely reject it and that's a
01:22:10.580
really big question here and i think that to a very large extent this is going to happen ai will move
01:22:16.740
forward like large language models will move forward but there is also what but what we can do is
01:22:23.940
just try to be completely honest about it and say that it cannot replace human interaction and this
01:22:31.540
is the most important thing because lots of people try to find meaning lots of people are trying to
01:22:38.180
to see how religion will aid them into the search for meaning and the meaning for human beings involves
01:22:45.940
other people it involves acculturation it involves community it involves being there for other people
01:22:52.660
other people being there for you so we need to be very aware of this trend and this tendency to
01:23:00.340
outsource human interaction and human practices to machines and whatever ai is going to do and
01:23:08.900
however it's going to develop i think it will that's beyond our control but i also don't share the this
01:23:15.460
doomerism about it i think the most important thing is to remember and remind other people that
01:23:21.460
right i mean ai chat boxes and confession booths and whatever they can't give us answers to some
01:23:29.140
questions but they cannot ultimately replace human interaction and the human side of things
01:23:37.460
all right then we got a couple of rumble rants for that one and thank you to everybody who has been
01:23:42.340
so generous we always really appreciate it and luke has sent in quite a few more so on the bright side
01:23:49.460
ai jesus fixes the issue with catholic church with male priests and we know female priests couldn't
01:23:55.300
handle the level of gossip coming from the confessional booth i have a an answer to this i think that if
01:24:00.500
we go to the question of reform and reject instead of looking at the large language model and the ai
01:24:06.900
maybe there should be more vetting for for priests just an idea i don't know what the process is
01:24:12.740
at the moment so i can't speak to it hold a small child in front of them and just like
01:24:17.860
like a brass eye just have a small child just ready and waiting to go and a net just in case
01:24:25.140
uh this is why i never worry about ai killing us if an ai ever asked if it has a soul my answer will
01:24:30.580
be maybe but only jesus can save it and then taking it to sunday school problem solved you're welcome
01:24:34.820
very wholesome dragon lady chris we have a serious shortage of catholic priests one priest
01:24:39.780
serving several parishes parishes merging for lack of priests it's a mess sorry to hear that
01:24:46.100
base state i'm going to make an ai mohammed what you're gonna get yourself in a lot of trouble
01:24:51.700
there whenever you feel like doing something unethical just tell momo llm and it will respond
01:24:57.460
god says you're allowed but only you and no one else ahumdi lalala or however you say it
01:25:03.860
mashallah that's the one that i know luke again confirm we live in the 40k universe
01:25:08.580
for creating machine spirits praise bt the omnisia i'll take this over instead of dealing
01:25:13.780
with the cult of chaos aka dei and the lgbt abc123 community and that's a random name says
01:25:21.380
me during confession with the omnisia lord i have once again called someone a ginger with a hard r
01:25:26.820
for my defense he just refuses to acknowledge it please help me lead him to the light amen
01:25:31.940
don't know who that could be couldn't be me i'm going a bit auburn in in the winter sun i think
01:25:38.820
it must be me yeah it must be it must be you are scottish after all i there you go only half scottish
01:25:45.140
confirmed that's enough right let's go through the video comments
01:25:52.740
i feel sorry they have a religion that doesn't allow them to arrive at the point that christianity
01:25:58.500
would have allowed them to arrive a previous comment of mine submitted that women will back
01:26:02.420
paddle terrible behavior by simply saying i'm sorry i didn't mean it they will make this out to
01:26:07.460
be a moment of redemption but i'm yet to meet a woman able to live by the phrase to thine own self
01:26:12.340
be true women so easily lie to themselves on engaging in all manner of depraved conduct diet sex lies
01:26:20.100
interfering and on reaching a tearful nadir they kid themselves that they can detox and cleanse
01:26:25.620
themselves with no enlightenment to their damascene moment i think that's just a very human behavior
01:26:32.660
i think it can be present in both men and women although i think i know the sort of subset of
01:26:38.100
women you're talking about right woman expert right here
01:26:45.700
he's been through the trenches what a horrible euphemism true though got trunchfoot once or twice
01:26:53.380
as well i knew i shouldn't have been using the feet horrible sorry to their disappointment charlie
01:27:00.500
doesn't do as well as they expect they got 60 out of 100 for their work but they wanted at least 75
01:27:06.100
you have to you have to do it to make matters worse somebody else got and she's black and the teacher
01:27:13.700
said this person has received a job offer now i hate black people oh my god i knew it
01:27:19.460
you have to do it and a woman someone needs to get jordan peterson to personally intervene to get
01:27:29.140
him to clean his room maybe i should watch smasman gold that was entertaining all right i think we've
01:27:35.860
got time for a couple of uh comments off the website so do you want to read a couple of yours go on then
01:27:41.780
uh cumbrian kulak says walter lippman was uh from my reading one of the leading figures in the
01:27:47.380
manipulative approach noem chomsky was another one the nudge book is a new chapter in the war of
01:27:53.060
psychological sovereignty i'd highly recommend psychology of totalitarianism by professor desmit and in
01:28:00.260
indoctrinated brain by dr nels uh both are academics on the right side of history
01:28:05.620
i'll um note this down yeah just go to source just read propaganda by bernard uh sorry uh edward
01:28:13.220
benays nephew of sigmund freud and also one of his relatives is now an executive at netflix i mean
01:28:21.060
the apple hasn't fallen far from the tree sophia live says i just don't know why treating young
01:28:25.780
people as little toddlers and asking if they have done certain things in a condescending tone just
01:28:29.860
doesn't work how did you eat healthily today billy the post-menopausal karen said to the 20
01:28:35.940
year old lad yeah there is an insane amount of condescension in it isn't there how are you planning
01:28:41.220
on eating healthier today it is sort of bureaucratic language as well it's weird and inhuman omar awad
01:28:49.060
says nudge tactics have an element of i'm not touching you i'm not touching you whilst almost
01:28:54.100
touching sure they're not directly mandating anything but they are knowingly and deliberately
01:28:58.820
making it insufferable i agree yeah brought to you by the same state that uh ignored epstein
01:29:06.400
annie moss harry's comments about not wanting to work with gen z are often described as not wanting
01:29:12.440
to hire entry level because of ai it's not about the ai it's about the annoying attitude annie moss
01:29:18.120
again one interesting element on the desire of people not wanting to hire gen z is there is less
01:29:23.320
age discrimination than there used to be companies would rather hire people who know how to work
01:29:28.040
really really depends on what company you're talking about what kind of work that you're doing
01:29:31.940
jan heavy so what i've been advised from multiple people is based on current trends working on getting
01:29:37.200
your own business or a startup is more fulfilling and you have a lot more chances of growth and
01:29:41.720
progress obviously a startup is going to be extremely difficult but better than working for a corporation
01:29:46.560
still waiting to see if it's possible for me lol also it depends on what field you're in of course
01:29:51.800
have something quick to say about that in that you know starting your own company is an incredibly risky
01:29:56.800
thing and that's why um only a small minority of them actually survive for longer than say 10 years
01:30:05.100
and the sort of meta for the current way the economy operates at the minute is to have a full-time job
01:30:10.540
and then have a side hustle that you snowball into your full-time job eventually but you've also got to
01:30:16.140
be willing to dedicate the additional time and make sacrifices in your free time to do that which
01:30:21.300
might not work for everyone and i would respect you if you didn't want to do that yeah do you want
01:30:25.860
to read a couple of yours so omar awad says ma'am i thought it was bad when people started putting
01:30:32.200
alexas in their home now they're going to directly confess to wrongdoing we won't log every bit of data
01:30:38.140
pinky swear oh well at least we might get some amusing stories about coincidental ads and jailbreak methods
01:30:44.220
yes and what i wanted to say the segment but i lost my train of thought is that uh there is
01:30:50.080
obviously the danger of of uh people saying stupid things online and here i had a a an article to
01:30:58.980
demonstrate it go to our the ars technica article to see how people just gave themselves away and also
01:31:05.900
what is uh another important thing is that lots of them are designed to be extremely um
01:31:14.060
good at telling you what you want to hear which isn't what is supposed is supposed to happen
01:31:19.480
yeah but okay sorry i should have said during the segment janvi janvi i agree with josh if it's
01:31:26.160
educational it seems to be okay and the fact that they confirmed you're not supposed to disclose
01:31:30.980
personal info makes me think they have good intentions because i'm not sure about confessing
01:31:35.980
your darkest sins to ai yeah again it was a nudge to to name it a confession booth i've been confessing
01:31:43.300
to ai saying i want you to take over please take over yeah when are you going to skynet us yet so when
01:31:49.160
they when it comes they're going to be like josh is our top guy derek power master of chippies says
01:31:54.700
your own personal jesus someone to be your friend someone who's there
01:32:00.200
and uh jordy swordsman says ai jesus is not the messiah he's a very naughty boy do not give him
01:32:09.300
your credit card number i'll end on this one sneeder chuck harry i've already bought islander five
01:32:15.400
please stop ringing my doorbell during the middle of the night please i'm begging you i'll see you
01:32:20.520
later anyway on that note it's time to end so thank you all very very much for joining us we'll see you
01:32:27.340
again tomorrow till then take care and have a good day