The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #1344
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 28 minutes
Words per Minute
176.49901
Summary
In this episode, we discuss how Spain is being destabilised, why Trump is a lion and not a faulty fox, and why we should embrace our inner penguin. We also have a Gold Dig zoom and a rant about AI.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Hello everyone, welcome to the glorious podcast of the Load Seaters. I'm your host Stelios and
00:00:04.820
I'm joined today by brother Dan and brother Nick. And this is podcast number 1344. It's Friday the
00:00:13.240
30th of January, 2026. This has been the worst month for chat jack lovers and I am one of them.
00:00:21.500
Lots of things have happened and today we are going to discuss how Spain is being destabilized
00:00:29.060
how Trump is a lion and not a faulty fox. Does it have to do with some foxy lasses or anything?
00:00:37.380
I guess it's a Machiavelli thing. And why we should embrace our inner penguin. An outer. An outer.
00:00:45.280
Right so we have oil under number five. You should definitely check it out. It's running out
00:00:51.100
40.99. Check it out. It's one of the I think the best edition in the series so far.
00:00:59.060
I'm sure that the next ones are going to be even greater. It has articles but it has an interview
00:01:05.800
of Rupert Lowe. It has articles by Carl, AA, academic agent, Luca. I think is there any from
00:01:18.100
yeah Will Tanner, Morgoth of course. So check it out. Oil under number five.
00:01:24.080
Right. So we also have a gold tier zoom today at 3 p.m. Join us.
00:01:35.960
Right. Okay. Join us at 3 p.m. UK time for our usual gold zoom. And I want to say something.
00:01:42.980
Check today for the daily channel because I ranted about Mom Donnie and I was in an unusually good mood
00:01:50.240
when it comes to ranting. Right. Let's talk about Spain. Spain is an interesting case and recently we
00:01:58.920
have had several bad news coming from that country. There were train disasters and there is also a very
00:02:05.460
interesting choice by the government where it says that it wants to legalize at least half a million
00:02:13.420
undocumented migrants in the country. And several Spaniards are saying that it's even more. It's close
00:02:21.200
to eight hundred fifty thousand could be about a million that the government is downplaying their
00:02:27.440
numbers. So we are going to talk about that and we are going to talk about Spain's adventures with
00:02:33.260
multiculturalism, the way that their economy is impacted by mass migration and the narratives that
00:02:41.060
are given as to whether mass migration is a net drain or net gain for the country. But one thing to
00:02:47.980
say is that we are moving slowly past the narrative where mass migration is something that is treated as
00:02:56.060
a panacea, as a cure for all diseases. And we have had the rise of several parties in Europe but also
00:03:03.480
in the West at large who have been critical of mass migration. Now we hear some
00:03:10.420
criticism of mass migration from the West, which I didn't expect, but it's interesting. Let us play
00:03:17.020
this from Larry Fink of BlackRock, now saying that countries that avoided mass migration will be
00:03:23.640
better positioned in the future for AI development. And AI is going to be one of the major industries
00:03:30.500
of the, of the future. And he says this. You know, we always used to think shrinking population is a cause
00:03:40.100
for negative growth. But in my conversations with the leadership of these large developed countries
00:03:50.100
that have xenophobic immigration policies. They don't allow anybody to come in. Shrinking unemployment, excuse me,
00:03:59.700
shrinking demographics. These countries will rapidly develop robotics and tech, and AI and technology. And if the promise, I
00:04:12.700
think it's going to happen. But as a promise of all that transforms productivity, which most of us think
00:04:19.300
it will, we'll be able to elevate the standard of living of countries, the standard of living of individuals, even with
00:04:26.580
shrinking populations. And so the paradigm of negative population growth is going to be changing. And the social
00:04:36.300
problems that one will have in substituting humans for machines is going to be far easier in those
00:04:48.420
So when I'm old, I would rather have a robot look after me than a Bermalian, like proper old.
00:04:54.660
I mean, robots are, generally speaking, reliable.
00:04:57.780
Especially if you can put a face on the robot than a human base.
00:05:01.440
Especially if you put a face on the robot and it's cute.
00:05:03.860
Yeah, unless it suddenly turns haywire and kills you, it probably won't hate you or resent you as much.
00:05:10.760
I think the robot is probably less likely to kill you, I'd imagine.
00:05:19.680
Yeah, this was shocking because they've been telling us for so long, oh, have loads of immigrants,
00:05:23.060
you've got to have loads of immigrants. Then they go, guess what? Actually, the people who didn't let
00:05:25.540
any in, they're going to do better. Soz. So annoying. But you said that you had a very insightful tweet
00:05:29.820
that was about investment, it was about predicting the market.
00:05:32.400
Yeah, exactly. I mean, you can't make it at high levels of finance if you're not living
00:05:36.420
in the future. Because if you're not living in the future, you're somebody else's exit
00:05:39.780
liquidity. This is why I'm kind of cautioning people on the gold and silver stuff at the
00:05:43.660
moment. Just be careful you're not somebody else's exit liquidity. So what, I mean, what
00:05:48.360
you have to do at Larry Fink's level is be thinking, okay, what does the world look like
00:05:51.360
in 18 months, two years, five years down the line? And then start positioning for that,
00:05:55.540
otherwise you just don't make any money. And clearly what he's doing is like, yeah, okay,
00:05:59.320
the world is going to go right-wing, re-migration is a thing. Scrap all that DEI stuff. I know
00:06:06.900
I won a load of pension mandates five years ago using the DEI nonsense, but scrap that.
00:06:11.520
We've now got to win mandates for pension funds in xenophobic countries, and that's going
00:06:16.840
Is he reacting or suggesting, though? Because it's almost like these people suggest and go,
00:06:20.880
here's what we should do. The question, you know, you're sort of saying like he's reacting
00:06:23.840
like this is where I'll probably go. Probably people like him are forming what happens.
00:06:27.200
Well, the question to me, though, is why they let all this happen? Why did they say like
00:06:30.640
infinity migration? Then he gone, whoops, got that wrong, changed our minds.
00:06:34.420
Because that worked at the time. He won the mandates at the time by doing that. You know,
00:06:40.360
Right. So right now we listen to this paradigm shift on the WEF, which Nick pointed out before
00:06:47.240
it was the exact opposite narrative coming from the WEF. And we see now the Spanish government
00:06:53.620
trying to move towards the other direction. And obviously, you can't expect any government
00:07:00.460
to change direction just because Larry Fink said so. But I want us to say that there are
00:07:06.380
arguments suggesting that this is a mistake by the Spanish government. And it sort of neutralizes
00:07:13.180
all the economic arguments that are being given for mass migration as being a economic net positive,
00:07:20.880
which are given by the people who are promoting these policies. And we are going to talk about
00:07:26.420
them in a bit. So let's talk about this article written by Kieran Kelly on The Telegraph. It was
00:07:32.340
released three days ago. It says Spain gives half a million migrants legal status to defeat the far
00:07:39.700
right. Applicants will be allowed to work in any sector to help curb institutional racism that only
00:07:46.820
fuels exploitation and racist hatred. Right. So it says Spain has started to legalize half a million
00:07:53.280
undocumented migrants and give them the immediate right to work in a move to fight the far right.
00:07:58.780
Madrid officially begun the process on Tuesday after a last minute deal between the ruling socialist
00:08:04.200
party and the left wing Pademos party, which has propped up Pedro Sanchez's minority government
00:08:10.220
since elections in 2023. So what's happening here is that they are saying that they have to legalize
00:08:21.060
undocumented migrants. And one of the things that are interesting here is to talk about the arguments
00:08:27.760
that are given about mass migration being a net positive and how they don't reflect the reality
00:08:36.680
on the ground as it is felt by native people, in this case, by native Spaniards. So the argument goes
00:08:44.900
like this. There are many people who accept that illegal migration is a net drain, even people who are
00:08:54.080
promoting migration. Why? Because they're saying that precious time is lost because you have lots of
00:09:00.540
people who can't work because it's illegal for them to work. And they have been they have to be given
00:09:07.160
benefits. So this causes economic strain, but also integrationist strain. But they're saying this
00:09:15.400
changes if you make illegal migration into legal migration, because that's when they can work, they can
00:09:21.380
integrate easier and they they don't have to be reliant upon the state. So one thing to notice is that
00:09:29.600
the way that a socialist government is pushing this is bound to fail and it's bound to fail for several
00:09:39.420
reasons. We are going to talk about them, but they are the in a nutshell, what what's going on is the
00:09:45.640
following. Socialists are egalitarians. They want to put level everyone down. They want to achieve a
00:09:52.340
kind of equality. They market that equality as raising the the weaker. But at the end of the day,
00:09:58.480
what they're doing is they're pushing everyone down into a a flat line. They try to level everything
00:10:05.120
down. And what is happening here is that the they want to introduce also minimum wage laws. And as I
00:10:14.520
have here, they do this at the moment, they're proposing a 3.1 percent minimum wage rise to to Spain.
00:10:23.660
So when they're pushing minimum wage laws, what happens is that they are causing an artificial
00:10:29.820
strain on the economy. Why? Because lots of the undocumented who will become documented migrants who
00:10:37.520
are unskilled won't be able to get jobs because the employer is going to say that they're going to lack
00:10:44.720
the skills that are going to justify the new higher minimum wage. So what's going to happen is that
00:10:52.980
you are pushing again, a significant number of them back into the territory where they're dependent
00:11:00.140
and there are problems with integration. So in a socialist paradigm where they try to do this,
00:11:07.440
they actually make things worse. Right. Let's look at it. And there is extra question here as to why
00:11:14.260
they're doing it, because there are economic arguments. They are doing it in order to create
00:11:21.360
more jobs. And there have been arguments for this. But there is also the other question as to why are
00:11:28.560
they losing in the polls? And they're losing in the polls for several reasons. So they are losing in
00:11:34.300
the polls right now because they had the recent train disasters, which suggests that the government is
00:11:40.160
very much corrupt. We did a segment on this one that was released about a day ago called the Spanish
00:11:45.980
train disasters. Check it out. It shows how unbelievably corrupt and inefficient the state is.
00:11:52.160
And also the question is that the kind of economic growth that they are attributing to the economic
00:12:00.860
miracle and the also of Spain and also OECD is attributing to mass migration here isn't exactly
00:12:10.300
failed by the average Spaniard. Let me talk to you here about the OECD's claim. They say dynamic labor
00:12:17.540
market and declining unemployment. And this is the case. It does seem to be the case that there is growth
00:12:23.460
in Spain. It's about 3%, which is higher than the average in the EU. It's definitely higher than in
00:12:31.300
the UK, which is projected to be about 1.1%, if I'm not mistaken. Well, I was just looking something up
00:12:37.700
while you're talking about that, because you showed the average wage that Spain is proposing. And I just
00:12:42.800
double checked what is the average wage in Bermalia. And in northern Bermalia, it is around half that.
00:12:48.860
And in most of southern Bermalia, it is that's about five times the average wage. So that's a pretty strong
00:12:55.860
pull factor. Well, and that's the question, because if people are leveled down to a particular line, let's
00:13:03.420
say, for lots of native Spaniards, this may be a huge disincentive to raise a family. You probably have kids,
00:13:10.200
will you say? Yes. And at the moment, the current Spanish birth rate is about 1.07. It's fairly naked population
00:13:17.820
replacement. And it is also that in that level, lots of people who aren't from Spain and come
00:13:24.680
from, let's say, the Third World. And obviously, we have to talk about the various kinds of groups
00:13:30.580
that make up the migrant population of Spain, because not all groups are equally productive
00:13:37.420
or criminal. Well, I bet they're pretty much all less productive than the Spanish are. Unless
00:13:45.620
they're from more northern Europe. The issue is that for many of them, this kind of flat line that
00:13:51.760
socialist egalitarians are trying to push everyone is something that looks like just, it's experienced
00:13:57.900
like hitting a goldmine. So OECD here says the positive labor performance of recent years
00:14:03.300
is projected to continue throughout the forecast period. The expected employment gains are mainly
00:14:09.680
attributable to continued migration inflows, which are considerably expanding the labor force
00:14:16.140
and boosting the pace of job creation. And the unemployment rate is projected to maintain its
00:14:22.820
downward trend. It's about 10.4 in 2025 and is falling below in 10% in 2026. Now, what I saw is that,
00:14:31.360
let's say, they set a statistics that about 450,000 new jobs are 410,000 out of 450,000 new jobs go to
00:14:46.280
migrants. So it looks like the migrant population is profiting way more than the Spanish population
00:14:54.340
from these migration flows. But also, sorry, I was gonna say they're just a bit behind, aren't they?
00:14:59.460
That's what it, you know, you used to go like to Europe on hold, they'd always seem to be a bit
00:15:01.920
behind. The Coke cans looked older and stuff. They're just behind the trend because Larry
00:15:06.340
thinks announced this is over. Yes. And even Keir Starmer has said it doesn't work financially
00:15:10.260
anymore. It just feels like they're still on the old programming. I think the thing I remember from
00:15:13.780
teen Spanish holidays is, is they were all getting excited about something that had left the charts
00:15:18.660
like a month ago. Right, the music was behind. Yes. They're behind on this trend. Yes. I think that there is a
00:15:24.460
tremendous leftist streak in Spanish culture. Yeah, I've noticed that. Yeah. There's a whole civil war,
00:15:31.820
wasn't there? It's a problem. So what is the case here? And what I want to mention, because these are
00:15:37.640
historical conversations for another time, is that there, despite the strong GDP growth and the
00:15:44.240
falling of unemployment rates, there is, there is a significant downward trend of the ruling party in
00:15:54.440
the polls. They're losing popularity. One of the reasons has to do with several scandals and corruption
00:16:01.640
that they are perceived to be involved in. And the other has to do with the same kinds of problems that
00:16:07.920
we're talking about when it comes to economy, like housing crises. And they say that there's a severe
00:16:14.020
shortage of affordable housing in major cities like Madrid and Barcelona. And one of the primary
00:16:19.940
sources of primary, of frustration of the young voters. Then there is stagnant productivity. While
00:16:27.860
people are working productivity, GDP per capita, again, per capita strikes back, has barely improved
00:16:34.520
since 2019, keeping real wages lower than many hoped for, given the inflation seen in the last years.
00:16:41.580
And there's also tax pressure, increased tax pressure to manage high public debt has alienated
00:16:47.300
middle class voters. And it looks like the panacea for socialists is always raise taxes, raise taxes,
00:16:55.420
raise taxes. And one thing to say about, about leftists right now is that they have gone global.
00:17:02.040
They don't operate just on the old domestic proletariat versus capitalist Marxist framework.
00:17:08.420
They are, they have gone global and international. So when they're talking about taxing the rich
00:17:14.800
to give to the poor, they're talking about taxing the globally rich to give to the globally poor. And by that
00:17:21.860
they are, according to their calculations, almost every native Spaniard counts as globally rich, because
00:17:29.620
there is a fundamental hatred of Western civilization in the left. And that's one of the reasons why they are
00:17:37.440
trying to say that the Westerners have to pay for the entire world. And they're promoting
00:17:43.500
the worst kind of combination, welfarism and relatively relaxed open borders, which doesn't
00:17:50.300
work. Here we have accusations of the Catholic clergy as being supportive of it. They're saying that
00:17:59.380
the Catholic clergy worldwide are almost universally in favor of unrestricted illegal migration at the
00:18:06.580
expense of Western nations. And here they are talking about Catholic bishops being in favor of the
00:18:13.980
royal decree to legalize 500,000 undocumented migrants in Spain. This is definitely something to check
00:18:22.340
out. Here we have Santiago Abascal. He's the leader of the third largest party, the Vox Party,
00:18:27.120
who is talking about this as being declined. He says, when a country like Spain has received three
00:18:33.780
million immigrants in the last five years, but the public services, the hospitals, the housing,
00:18:38.560
the number of doctors and the police remain the same, there is widespread collapse.
00:18:44.400
And here let's end with this one. So to talk to the Spaniards here, we're going to talk about
00:18:51.340
Denmark. There was an economist article here. Why have Danes turned against immigration? And the Danes
00:19:00.180
are governed by social Democrats. It's important to bear this in mind. And they have said here that
00:19:06.200
the average net contribution to public finances differs according to population groups. And it's one
00:19:14.260
thing to talk about migration and foreigners. It's quite another to break the population into groups and talk about
00:19:23.420
these groups' culture, which is the exact opposite of what abstract universalist humanitarians who aren't
00:19:29.820
actually humanitarians want to say. And this is what they consider to be far right, talking about the harsh realities of
00:19:38.360
culture and how culture, how culture affects people and how people's people being affected from their culture
00:19:45.160
manifests occasionally in things like contributing to a particular country, but also like in crime, how they are
00:19:53.080
represented in crime. And here they find a pattern that we see in several countries across Europe of
00:20:00.240
migrants from the MENAP countries especially, which is Middle East and North Africa, who are a net
00:20:08.080
drain. So it looks like at the moment, maybe the economic argument for mass migration shows a link between mass
00:20:20.140
migration and the economy of Spain. But bear in mind that this is also not helping the average Spaniards the way
00:20:38.080
All right. So Johnny Pat 18. No one else came to work today because of snow. So I guess I'm getting paid to watch TV. I'm a
00:20:49.020
Euromaxing right. If you're cool, you're Euromaxing. Sigilstone 17. No one expects the Spanish situation.
00:20:58.080
All right. Okay. Can I grab some? Yeah, of course. Heck. Thank you. So. What? The box is not working?
00:21:13.820
Yeah. I click with this thing, do I? And then it works. Right. Good. Let's do that then.
00:21:20.460
Okay. So there is a disturbance on the Jedi Council. There are those who feel that Trump is a bit erratic
00:21:31.880
and chaotic. And there's a minority of us who are, yes, but that's the point. So broadly, I'd say the
00:21:42.920
camps are, you know, AA is a big proponent of this. Morgoth, I think yourself and Harry, you see Trump as very chaotic.
00:21:52.080
Mark did a stream on this last night. And then there's a minority of us, you know, myself, maybe Carl, maybe Aaron McIntyre,
00:21:59.440
who say, no, no, he's not a fox. He's a lion. He's not, he's not a faulty fox. He's not behaving wrong.
00:22:05.540
Sorry, I want to see how the framing goes. So we go from erratic to fox, because you started by saying
00:22:10.920
that AA, Morgoth, Harry and myself think that Trump is erratic. And now you're framing us as trying to...
00:22:19.100
I think he comes across to me like you're describing him as a faulty fox. Why isn't he being more cunning?
00:22:24.500
Why isn't he being more... What's a lion and what's a fox? Well, let's get into that then, shall we?
00:22:28.920
So it started originally with some Machiavellian chap, and he kind of alluded to this, but he didn't really
00:22:36.880
sort of flesh out the theory. And then this Frodo Pareto chap comes along, and he writes a book, Mind and Society,
00:22:45.800
and he basically describes two kinds of elites. He says there were foxes, and these people use sort of cunning,
00:22:51.940
persuasion, negotiation, narrative procedure, complexity, that kind of stuff. And lions,
00:22:57.440
they're all about enforcement, hierarchy, boundaries, assertion of order. So the simple way to think
00:23:02.720
about this is foxes are the ones who used to be in charge basically for the majority of human history,
00:23:09.580
and it's foxes that really prospered in the later eras. Almost every world leader you can think of
00:23:15.600
today, almost all of them are foxes. Yeah, like Blair is your classic fox. Yes. But your lion is like one
00:23:21.420
of those African generals with like loads of medals. Yes. We like that. Anyone with medals
00:23:27.120
that has a uniform, you could probably put down being a lion. Yes. So fox government works when
00:23:34.640
there's already order, and it's credible, but it's largely untested, because fox works within this
00:23:42.140
sort of framework. And by the way, I've got a lovely preset background slide thing that I found
00:23:47.260
on Google Slides, so I've made a lovely presentation. So foxes will dominate when trust
00:23:52.360
is high and volatility is low, and rules broadly get obeyed, and the legitimacy has been inherited,
00:23:59.400
but not really tested. And I've slapped in some quotes. I've got a bunch of quotes from Pareto here.
00:24:06.260
Most of them are slightly paraphrased, because otherwise I'd have to quote a whole bloody passage,
00:24:10.000
but they are legitimate for what he's actually trying to say in those sort of broader passages.
00:24:15.340
So basically foxes do well when everybody believes in the system, and everybody just kind of expects
00:24:22.340
the rules to be enforced, and they all kind of go along with it.
00:24:28.340
So the sort of hidden dependencies that fox rely on, well, actually, I just kind of over-explained
00:24:36.240
the last slide, but that's basically going on. Where does he say this? So the governing class
00:24:42.300
is chiefly composed of foxes, it is rich and cunning, but poor in force. But yes, when foxes try to use
00:24:51.640
force, it looks really bad. It looks bad. Like Starmer with Southport, suddenly he was trying to
00:24:56.500
use force. He started slamming people in prison, Lucy Connolly, and it was just poorly done.
00:25:01.720
Everyone ended up hating him. Yes, that is a really good example of foxes trying to use force.
00:25:05.960
They just do it badly. COVID would be another era, and Justin Trudeau, all that kind of stuff.
00:25:09.680
Whenever they try and use force, it just looks cack-handed and clumsy.
00:25:13.760
I believe that every leader needs to be cunning.
00:25:19.020
And I think it's funny that you say he's a Machiavellian, but yeah, he was in some respects,
00:25:24.380
but I think in Machiavelli it's nice because he's linking force with cunning in several respects.
00:25:31.280
Yeah. Yeah, Machiavelli, I mean, I think from what I recall...
00:25:35.360
He's incredibly cunning because he said one thing that stuck is when you want to do something
00:25:43.760
And he gave the example of Cesare Borghi, I think, who had to do something to a particular
00:25:49.940
city-state in Italy, and he put someone else, and that person was really unpopular.
00:25:55.920
He did the job, he became unpopular, and then he came and he severed his head and became
00:26:03.380
Yeah, Trump should remember that one, because that is a good tactic.
00:26:07.840
Yeah, I think Machiavelli, I mean, he had these stories about how leaders should be...
00:26:11.980
I think he used bears in his example as well, but you should incorporate elements of both.
00:26:16.140
But what Pareto is basically saying, there are two different kinds of elite, and basically
00:26:19.920
one gives rise, a certain set of conditions give rise where one is more likely to step
00:26:28.500
Well, lines emerge when persuasion stops working and order must be reasserted.
00:26:34.280
So if, you know, if legitimacy has been eroded and no longer people believe in it, when enforcement
00:26:40.380
has become selective or symbolic, I mean, you'll recognise all of this in modern society, when
00:26:46.440
boundaries have dissolved, I mean, quite literally, that is exactly what has happened in our modern
00:26:53.720
Everything from borders to every other kind of boundary has dissolved.
00:26:57.200
And the narratives are just not working anymore.
00:27:03.260
And so basically what Pareto was saying is that the lion is a resurgent.
00:27:12.400
But he's not good at arbitraging the differences in the power structures.
00:27:18.860
Is the lion the force that restores order in a situation of disorder?
00:27:31.400
And when it starts to break down, suddenly that's when your lion has to come in.
00:27:35.520
I mean, everyone talks about legitimacy crisis.
00:27:44.680
But it's quite half a lion to get in, in a world of foxes.
00:27:51.020
The whole system we have at the moment is just entirely a fox system.
00:27:57.480
Because it is relying on an inherited order structure,
00:28:01.940
it's basically arbitraged everything away to the point where it's just a joke at this point,
00:28:06.660
and they can't generate their own order because they don't know how to do that.
00:28:15.120
And these different kinds, they look bad to the other one.
00:28:18.880
So I think that criticising lions for not behaving like a fox is a category error.
00:28:25.660
If you've got a lion and you're demanding that he be more persuasive,
00:28:29.820
well, no, that doesn't work because legitimacy is gone.
00:28:33.760
And you can't expect elegance from them because, again, that's a fox characteristic.
00:28:37.880
And I think what we've got at the moment is a situation where we're starting to get lion leaders re-emerge.
00:28:42.940
And I'll go from examples in a minute of people who I think are the sort of lion leaders.
00:28:49.120
I mean, Bacalian, El Salvador, he's a good example of a lion.
00:29:00.400
oh, the crime situation in El Salvador, it's impossible to solve.
00:29:04.080
And they kept on studying it and doing these commissions and doing inquiries
00:29:09.900
and just kept on coming to the conclusion, yeah, it's impossible.
00:29:14.220
Yeah, because they're trying to use fox methods and it needed a lion,
00:29:18.840
And the craving for a lion is so great that when you just see a video
00:29:22.080
of prisoners chained up in El Salvador, normally you'd be like,
00:29:29.700
A lion would solve the small boat thing in an afternoon.
00:29:40.380
Yeah, it's like, oh, okay, this rule and that rule.
00:29:41.980
And then we've got to do the, oh, piss off you little fox.
00:29:48.900
The mistake is to suppose that methods which succeed under certain conditions
00:29:54.620
So basically he's saying, you know, there is a time and a place for both of these.
00:29:57.900
And actually, if you've built a nice lot of order, but it's a bit blunt, well, maybe you
00:30:04.340
do want a fox to come along and arbitrage it a bit and realign it and do this, that and
00:30:15.060
You know, another good example of that is Churchill probably after the war, no one wanted him
00:30:21.880
We don't want to be looking at that lion anymore.
00:30:23.340
He reminds us of all the nasty lion stuff that went on.
00:30:28.040
No, he was kicked out very, very quickly after the war.
00:30:41.340
Yeah, but they got rid of him in the immediate post-war era.
00:30:45.980
I have several things to say about the previous slide, but I don't know if you want me to
00:30:51.340
No, I don't know how to go backwards on this thing.
00:30:58.420
So there are two things to say, three things to say here.
00:31:01.380
Number one, you say criticizing a lion for not behaving like a fox is a category error.
00:31:09.280
Well, number one, you could say criticizing a fox for not behaving like a lion is a category
00:31:14.020
No, I'm saying it's the time to get rid of the foxes.
00:31:18.720
Also, the other bit is that you could have someone who is a lion in that framework, whatever
00:31:27.700
exactly that means, but you don't want them to act like a lion.
00:31:30.980
So for instance, let's say I don't, I don't want, I'm an anti-communist.
00:31:35.060
You can have people in the communist camps, in the communist camp who have, let's say,
00:31:45.260
I don't want them to be able to, to enforce that.
00:31:48.480
Can you remember that and bring that up in a couple of slides time?
00:31:50.840
Because there was the perfect bit that relates to that.
00:31:58.200
Lions look at foxes and they see selective enforcement and hidden veto players and moral
00:32:02.280
language, masking power and process to avoid action.
00:32:08.740
Whereas a lion looks, uh, uh, sorry, a fox looks at a lion and they say, well, look, they're
00:32:13.940
breaking procedures and they're, and they're needlessly escalating things in public.
00:32:17.840
You know, they're ignoring the, the narrative finesse.
00:32:23.200
I love how all three of these are just totally Trump.
00:32:28.960
I can see you were, you were building towards it.
00:32:30.260
You are trying to frame it in order to make Trump the lion.
00:32:40.360
Um, and, um, the lion damages institutions that the foxes rely on.
00:32:44.280
And so to the fox, the lion looks stupid and blunt, needlessly escalating in public, needlessly,
00:32:53.160
And, you know, basically each judge the others by standards that have ceased to be appropriate.
00:32:58.100
That's perhaps the better church analogy since he tried to ruin my other one.
00:33:01.380
Halifax trying to negotiate Chamberlain, but Churchill going, no, no, you can't.
00:33:10.400
Um, so, so what my argument is, is that Trump is an early stage lion.
00:33:14.660
You know, he's not, he's not a failed fox, as a lot of people are arguing.
00:33:21.460
And what he's actually doing is he's publicly escalating this stuff.
00:33:25.620
And by the way, I don't think he's doing any of this consciously.
00:33:28.040
I don't think he's sat there and he's read Machiavelli and he's read Plato and he's like,
00:33:36.640
This is a character type and he's, he's, he's just running on autopilot, but nevertheless,
00:33:46.380
Yeah, but there's the most, let's, okay, personally, I don't see why we need to bring the fox and
00:33:51.700
the lion in, but let's, let's do it for, for the purpose of the discussion.
00:33:59.060
No, because I don't see what it adds to your point.
00:34:02.640
Well, because, because, because you're missing the most important thing that when you have
00:34:08.060
a lion, lions represent, let's say, force or the will to use force to a much larger degree
00:34:25.100
I mean, you can have left wing boxes, sorry, left wing lions and right wing lions.
00:34:28.860
Yeah, but that's the, that's the important thing there.
00:34:31.800
What is he doing with the exercise of the power he has, to whatever extent he has?
00:34:37.800
What he is doing, I'll have a slide for that, is he's, he's publicly escalating about, in
00:34:45.560
Let's say, I think early stage line is right, because I knew you had cage lion, and I thought
00:34:49.600
really he's a lion cub, because he's an early lion, but he's not doing all the full lion
00:34:55.060
Well, he's got, yes, he's got serious constraints on him.
00:34:57.820
Yeah, but just to say to your point, it's not that Dan's, the political theory is there,
00:35:01.920
So it must be able to apply to any leader, potentially.
00:35:04.940
So it's not really that Dan's bringing it in, it's just, it's there, isn't it?
00:35:08.900
Yeah, no, but I want to say that it, to me, doesn't matter where someone feels that they
00:35:17.660
Yes, I guess the reason I'm using this framework is because one of the key people on your side
00:35:21.940
of things is not just you and Harry, it's you, Harry.
00:35:24.540
I mean, AA uses the fox lion distinction and stuff a lot, so therefore it is useful to this.
00:35:30.340
But, you know, new elites arise by, you know, not by persuasion, but by proving where trout
00:35:37.020
That's the job of an early lion, is to prove where power really lies.
00:35:40.980
And I want to give you a couple of case studies on this.
00:35:44.200
So the tariff stuff, because the criticism will be, well, Trump is just a fake lion.
00:35:54.740
And he does all of this stuff and then he backs off.
00:35:56.600
And I think they've got a term for it, what is it, taco, Trump always chickens out.
00:36:03.240
What I'm saying is the tariffs were not about optimal trade policy.
00:36:06.460
They were forcing the global system to reveal who subsidized whom.
00:36:13.920
Well, you can disagree with who's doing the subsidizing.
00:36:16.820
I'm saying this is what the lion behavior is trying to expose.
00:36:20.600
But there's another bit here that I think is important is that it seems to be the case
00:36:27.380
in commentary that there are some people who are buying into a framework where they can't
00:36:33.420
criticize Trump because everything is treated as a tactic.
00:36:37.300
And that's how the people who are promoting the taco narrative, they're saying in the beginning,
00:36:44.360
Everyone starts going, the MAGA infospace starts going, ooh, that's great.
00:36:50.380
And then when he backs down from the initial demand, then it's the art of the deal.
00:36:55.400
It's like, yeah, but what would he have to do for you to criticize him?
00:37:04.420
He would just have to do the things I've already criticized him.
00:37:08.120
When you did criticize him, why did you criticize him?
00:37:18.620
I criticized him when he seemed to criticize the UK military.
00:37:30.460
So when he said that the, that the NATO, um, sold, that the allies, uh, played it safe
00:37:38.660
in Afghanistan, why not just say, well, it's okay.
00:37:42.420
I also criticized him for this, but why not just go.
00:37:52.100
The point you can back to, we come back to the point there that having power is one thing.
00:37:57.620
Asking yourself how to exercise it and whether you exercise for good or bad.
00:38:04.420
So you can do good or bad lion and good or bad fox, but it's the style.
00:38:09.820
It's like, Hey, we're suddenly invading Greenland or whatever it is.
00:38:18.260
It's about the character of the good or the bad.
00:38:20.160
Would, if, if, if Trump truly was a fox, would he have done the Maduro bag on the head
00:38:29.760
No, it would have been a bloody treaty or something.
00:38:32.380
Oh, nor would he, probably he wouldn't either bomb the Narco boats.
00:38:37.160
Nobody's saying that Somalia is not even a country.
00:38:40.000
It's just people walking around killing each other.
00:38:42.080
Well, I'll finish the examples and it will highlight some of the stuff that you're talking
00:38:46.040
So the wall is basically the same pattern again.
00:38:52.280
It's more what he was doing was just completely exposing the asymmetries that had built up in
00:38:59.780
the immigration system and proving where power lies.
00:39:03.600
And, and it, that's kind of a key thing with an early stage lion.
00:39:06.400
It's not so much about, because there were different, there were different stages to your
00:39:10.740
It's not that he comes in and in one term he turns it in America into a based mega state
00:39:19.140
No, the, the, the, the job of an early lion is to come along and say, look, this is a
00:39:27.420
Let's expose who actually has power, who actually does things.
00:39:31.140
And the, and the, and the board, the border stuff was great for this because it kind of
00:39:34.580
exposed, well, actually it comes down to, um, actually it's just a lot of media narrative
00:39:39.160
and Ninth Circuit judges who block everything if you try and do anything.
00:39:43.800
But that wasn't obvious until he came along and flushed all this stuff out.
00:39:49.600
He's like a lion lashing out, surrounded by loads of foxes, nipping at his tails.
00:39:53.080
And he's like, ah, he can't deal with them all because he's in a fox world.
00:39:57.000
But, but one or two of the foxes, they're the, they're the big ball foxes.
00:40:08.440
I mean, the thing that I think he should be put on Mount Rushmore for was exposing the media.
00:40:14.700
Now, it's difficult, if you're young, it's difficult to remember.
00:40:19.180
But for those of you who can remember, say, George Bush or, I mean, any right winger prior to Trump,
00:40:25.860
they all did the sort of massive, um, you know, deference rituals to the media.
00:40:36.440
He refuses the whole narrative discipline stuff.
00:40:40.500
You know, that just wasn't done before Trump, because he just exposed what is the actual power here.
00:40:51.300
I don't want to confuse things, but of course, you could make an argument.
00:40:53.640
Bush and the whole chain year was quite lionish.
00:40:58.880
We're going to take, take out the whole Middle East.
00:41:02.560
Well, I mean, that's, that's another narrative running through this is the further back in time you go,
00:41:09.220
So, uh, and, and Greenland, which is kind of directly dressing, you know, York and yours and Harry's sort of objection.
00:41:16.440
You know, it's, you know, he, he wanted Greenland.
00:41:20.220
And he did rule out doing it by force, but all the same, he kind of did it in a way where it was a little bit,
00:41:29.840
You know, it's, it's, it's, it's lovely bit of early lion chaos to see what comes up.
00:41:35.600
So he went out and he made all these maximally public claims.
00:41:39.700
He was a bit ambiguous about how he's going to get it done.
00:41:42.240
Um, he forced his allies to react quite openly to this, you know, and, and you, and you actually saw how are they going to respond?
00:41:49.940
Well, they responded by sending 13 troops to Greenland to defend it from the 101st Airborne.
00:42:00.780
Now, a fox would have handled all of this quietly.
00:42:03.440
And, and this is the sort of main criticism of Trump on Greenland is, oh, we got a deal that he probably could have negotiated in three years in the background without.
00:42:16.380
You know, he has that weapon, the discombobulator.
00:42:19.960
So let me, I'll quickly finish the point and then come back to you.
00:42:23.660
But so what, but what he exposed, I mean, it's everything at the bottom there is that Greenland is indefensible without the US.
00:42:30.200
It's that Danish sovereignty is paper sovereignty, that NATO without the US is just symbolic, and that European defence autonomy is just non-existent.
00:42:47.700
So you're saying a fox would have handled this quietly.
00:42:51.320
Probably a fox would understand that there was, there were very few things to say there.
00:42:56.580
Because what happened was that there was already an agreement in 1951 about military presence of the US in Greenland.
00:43:11.460
That's when, in some cases, you may need to use some tranquilizer with some lions.
00:43:17.480
No, because, I mean, it's all built on fiction.
00:43:27.100
I don't think that the things you are saying that he exposed were things that were much doubted.
00:43:38.140
They were, because in a fox system, you get all of these, none of these assumptions were ever tested, and it's just this network.
00:43:44.540
I don't think that anyone doubted that the US was the biggest party in NATO before this.
00:43:53.140
Trump forced everyone to name it, and therefore say, well, hang on, given that we back all this, you need to do what we say.
00:43:58.620
And he got rid of the illusion that they had any control, is what you're saying.
00:44:03.520
He's stripping away all of the illusions, and it forced it to surface.
00:44:07.580
I mean, one of the things that surfaced is who was it that actually came to Trump in the end?
00:44:18.900
For example, that's one of the things that it flushes out.
00:44:21.700
If you don't stir this stuff up, if you don't test those assumptions, it forced all of the European leaders to sit there for three weeks and think, well, what does our defense without the US actually look like?
00:44:33.200
And one thing that he, I think he said that they didn't discuss about Greenland.
00:44:40.320
Said that Greenland wasn't discussed with Trump.
00:44:45.700
Which sort of suggests, that's actually reinforcing your point.
00:44:51.600
By the way, there's a real-time breaking news from Don Lehman.
00:44:55.120
Yeah, that Don Lehman has been arrested, which totally proves Dan's point.
00:45:04.820
But what I'm saying is, unless you shake this, unless the early stage lion shakes this stuff up and see where power actually sits, there's nothing for a later lion to then attack.
00:45:15.080
Because otherwise, you just, the foxes will just scatter into their web of, you know, fox bullshit.
00:45:22.280
So basically, what I'm saying is, there's one pattern, which is across all of these domains, what Trump is doing is the same diagnostic move,
00:45:29.600
which is to force the system to reveal who actually enforces the outcomes.
00:45:36.860
And yes, it looks like chaos short term because those hidden dependencies are forced open.
00:45:43.320
The procedural ambiguities collapse into, well, who actually does stand up in the end?
00:45:49.720
You know, who is really enforcing the miasma on the border?
00:46:01.400
You know, who really is going to put their foot down when it comes to realignment of NATO and the defense structures?
00:46:08.360
And in all of these things, everything is exposed.
00:46:14.560
The lion isn't trying to necessarily maximize disturbance.
00:46:20.600
The Trump isn't someone who says that you can ignore the media.
00:46:28.320
But also he doesn't ignore it because he's very media minded.
00:46:35.080
They try to follow him and go, oh, what's he just done?
00:46:37.680
First of all, he doesn't have a classic lion behavior.
00:46:42.040
I think he's a bit more strategic thinking than you make him.
00:46:50.900
I really don't think that he didn't plan how he was going to create and utilize what is called the mega infospace.
00:47:00.500
Well, I'll just rattle through the last couple of things.
00:47:02.760
And also, trashing mainstream media is one of the ways in which he's galvanizing his base.
00:47:11.920
So, you know, I think, you know, perhaps yourself and Harry and AA and Morgoth and so on would say that, you know, a real lion follows through regardless of trust, regardless of cost.
00:47:23.380
Whereas Trump, he escalates and then he stops, leading to this whole taco thing.
00:47:28.060
You know, my view is that Trump is basically pushing as far as the system will allow without breaking it.
00:47:33.300
But, you know, all of the structures that the U.S. have do impose a kind of hard constraint on this, unless you're willing to really break it.
00:47:47.900
To be fair, Morgoth did hint at the constrained lion thing.
00:47:53.940
But then he did hint at the other thing as well, which I quite like.
00:47:59.820
But, you know, you can't criticize Trump for not going full Stalin and just going around and machine gunning judges in the street.
00:48:09.900
But you can't really do that without, at that point, you're not correcting the system.
00:48:16.080
And then you'd have to build something else entirely on the other side of it.
00:48:24.800
And his answer was Attila the Hun, Genghis Khan, Frederick II, Napoleon, Hitler and Stalin.
00:48:30.780
Now, I think that is setting the bar just a little bit high because it would be tricky.
00:48:40.960
Because you just can't, the society's changed so much.
00:48:45.800
And then we pushed back and said, okay, what about, you know, post-war lions?
00:48:49.440
We're getting sort of Mao Castro, Idi Amin, Pol Pot, Pinochet.
00:48:55.940
But you are setting the bar at the point where he would have to completely destroy the US.
00:49:04.000
Maybe he's a Western lion because it's very hard to get a lion in the West.
00:49:08.040
I think Gaddafi is a surprising example, given that AA knows he was a kind of fake, patsy villain.
00:49:14.780
We did it on a stream with him about hyper-normalization.
00:49:29.280
So maybe, you know, going full lion, doing, doing, you know, never go full lion, never go completely unconstrained.
00:49:37.500
And just to really irritate the elite theorists, I've gone and lined up the big boys.
00:49:46.060
Again, on some of these, there's a little bit of paraphrasing because I'm condensing passages into sentences.
00:49:52.420
But Pareto himself says that force does not operate in a vacuum.
00:49:56.900
It's effective only in relation to the sentiments and beliefs of the prevailing society.
00:50:02.380
Mosco, you know, says the manner which political power is exercised depends on the conditions of the social environment.
00:50:08.800
Different social environments give rise to different political organizations.
00:50:12.800
Burnham says it is a persistent political myth that foundation of power is just physical force.
00:50:18.480
You know, the forms for which power is exercised can vary with the structure of society.
00:50:23.700
And changes in social organization brings corresponding changes in political.
00:50:30.560
You have to operate within the sort of set that you're working on.
00:50:33.020
So ultimately, the whole discussion boils down to this.
00:50:43.540
Or is he a constrained lion basically doing as much as he can?
00:50:53.600
Now we just need Harry, A.A., Morgoth and Mark.
00:50:56.660
Yeah, I don't think that was exactly the disagreement.
00:51:04.580
There are several arguments as to whether it's good to constrain lions or not.
00:51:08.300
Because, you know, the people who went full lion before...
00:51:13.120
So basically what I'm saying is, look, after long periods of near total fox domination,
00:51:19.380
what he actually is, and this is consistent, I think, with the Prato theory,
00:51:28.920
He is the plausibly the strongest lion that the system is capable of selecting at this point.
00:51:39.640
And the problem with Trump is when he gets out, the foxes will try and put him in jail.
00:51:46.340
I suppose he's got to have more and more lions.
00:51:47.680
He needs to line up his next lion, J.D. Vance, not have elections.
00:51:51.680
Well, I mean, that is kind of a thing, isn't it?
00:51:54.200
So, I mean, quite often, and that's why I kind of describe him as a constrained early lion,
00:51:59.380
is quite often you get lions pop up in history, and the first one is quite constrained,
00:52:04.080
and he exposes stuff, and then the next lion comes along, and he finishes the job.
00:52:08.700
So I'm probably being a little bit reductive here,
00:52:12.220
but you could think of Caesar and Augustus in this kind of phrase.
00:52:15.560
Caesar exposed the corruption of the Senate, but he still tried to work within it.
00:52:21.360
Augustus just comes along, he's like, yep, right, do away with all that.
00:52:24.660
You know, a great historical example is the distinction between Louis XIV and Louis XVI.
00:52:31.380
Because Louis XIV, I think he sort of was a lion, and he started being the ultra-absolutist.
00:52:42.740
And he created, he erected this giant absolutist state,
00:52:48.320
which sort of, and he sort of tried to play balance of power with several groups.
00:52:53.180
And that's also the rise of modern absolutism, because they created the centralized state,
00:52:58.080
and there was a new group of bureaucrats that the monarchs and the absolutist rulers used
00:53:13.920
The other ones that I thought of was Rob Spear...
00:53:16.560
If he weren't weak, if he weren't weak, most probably the revolution would have failed.
00:53:22.600
I mean, the other examples that I could think of was Rob Spear leading to Napoleon,
00:53:33.460
Stephen Miller's quite lying, obviously Bannon.
00:53:35.280
But J.D. Vance seems more fucked in his nature.
00:53:41.260
But then Trump's loosened the lid for him, so...
00:53:45.600
And the next line will get ahead of a lot more done,
00:53:47.920
because the early line has come along and shaken everything up.
00:53:54.020
This is the bit that you were going to bring in, Stelios, earlier,
00:53:59.360
I would say that Putin is, but Putin, you know, was an early lion
00:54:05.240
and kind of did the whole life cycle of the lion because he's been in for so long.
00:54:09.220
He's now a late-stage lion because he's been in for whatever it is, 27 years.
00:54:20.780
but starting a land war in Europe has to be lion.
00:54:31.900
why is the entire system of foxes reacting to him as if he is a lion, not a fox?
00:54:37.300
They might say that's all theatre and really they want him.
00:54:40.320
Well, yeah, but I think you're really stretching at that point
00:54:42.260
because, I mean, the immune response has been pretty damn strong.
00:55:04.240
but he just takes over Parliament with one wheelbarrow.
00:55:19.300
all this fox and lion talk is just a cover for what Dan really wants to talk about.
00:55:33.920
this is all happening because the last several decades of anti-white, anti-Western fox activity
00:55:38.680
has essentially served as some kind of a cult summoning ritual for the lion to rise again.
00:55:48.340
We've got a bit of time to blast through the penguin then.
00:56:05.060
Are you going to explain why everyone's been talking about penguins in my timeline?
00:56:12.800
And it comes from Werner Herzog's 2007 film, Encounters at the End of the Earth.
00:56:30.000
These penguins are all heading to the open border to the right.
00:56:38.960
But one of them caught our eye, the one in the center.
00:56:44.260
He would neither go towards the feeding grounds at the edge of the ice, nor return to the colony.
00:56:51.960
Shortly afterwards, we saw him heading straight towards the mountains, some 70 kilometers away.
00:56:58.660
Dr. Ainley explained that even if he caught him and brought him back to the colony, he would immediately head right back for the mountains.
00:57:16.960
So, Herzog said he actually got that from Unsolved Mysteries.
00:57:20.380
Apparently, you'd see a murder at the start of the episode.
00:57:30.080
That's why he was in Jack Reacher as the baddie.
00:57:36.100
He's like, prison in America, a retirement home.
00:57:40.900
I've been doing a Werner Herzog impression for years.
00:57:49.040
What's kind of ironic about it is that it wasn't supposed to be about the penguin at all.
00:57:52.900
It even says, Herzog said that the film will not be a typical Antarctica film about fluffy penguins,
00:57:59.920
but will instead explore the dreams of the people in the landscape.
00:58:04.660
It's a throwaway part of the film because he's always capturing these little things.
00:58:25.080
There's a lot of dwarves popping up and things like that.
00:58:32.140
You've not even seen Grizzly Man about the bear.
00:58:35.900
But I want to see dwarves on location, dwarves with bears, dwarves in the Arctic.
00:58:41.080
That's the Grizzly Man where he's like, the bear doesn't care about people.
00:58:47.980
But the penguin now is in a completely new context.
00:58:52.060
Every man trying to sleep tonight, I bet he's thinking about other women.
00:59:10.820
Is he the ubermensch or is he the nihilist or the bug man last man or is he something else?
00:59:19.860
And just to explain in case anyone hasn't read Nietzsche, the last man.
00:59:31.600
But the last man represents the lowest stage of humanity.
00:59:35.080
A nihilist who shuns risk, creativity and ambition in favor of comfort, safety and mediocrity.
00:59:40.140
And obviously the ubermensch is the opposite of all those qualities.
00:59:48.580
So here's the people who don't get it and think of it as the nihilist penguin and fail to see the romance of it.
00:59:53.920
This guy seems to be more on the sort of Mearsheimer left than the sort of libtard.
00:59:57.780
But he says there are no penguins in Greenland.
00:59:59.480
And they're actually in the Southern Hemisphere.
01:00:01.040
I do not think the White House know what they're conquering.
01:00:04.620
No, that's a pretty hard fail, I've got to say.
01:00:18.260
Penguin doesn't have to put up with the other penguin bullshit anymore.
01:00:27.560
This is why women were dismissed by all the great philosophers and capable of philosophizing.
01:00:47.000
So this French bloke, a bit more eloquent, but he says Americans have discovered the clip from Werner Herzog's documentary where a confused penguin decides to commit suicide for no reason at all.
01:00:57.180
These people have a stupidity that defies understanding.
01:01:01.000
And he goes on to point out how the Herzog clip in Grizzly Man where he's like,
01:01:05.520
And what haunts me is that in all the faces of all the bears that Treadwell ever filmed, I discover no kinship, no understanding, no mercy.
01:01:16.400
I see only the overwhelming indifference of nature.
01:01:23.300
So Herzog himself is a bit of a, he wouldn't get the penguin, but the penguin has now been brought beyond the Herzog context.
01:01:32.540
You know how apparently there's this other discussion, completely separate, which is like stupid people don't have an inner monologue.
01:01:39.580
Is it possible to get my inner monologue to the point where it talks in Werner Herzog's voice?
01:01:59.080
So yeah, he says it's been almost 20 years since the clip could be found on the internet.
01:02:04.040
People would have loved for the penguin to be saved by the film crew and these morons see a rugged individualist hero.
01:02:16.180
They come up with all these things that it's just, I don't need the sound there, but they're saying in this clip that it's dumb.
01:02:35.920
Well, then I guess we have something in common because, of course, it's the same fate for everyone.
01:02:43.760
Reddit doesn't understand that the penguin represents everything they're not.
01:02:46.660
They're content to just exist, happy in their hedonistic materialism, grind, eat, sleep, wake up and repeat.
01:02:53.780
The dangers don't matter because the question is before it and demands an answer.
01:02:57.600
Is there more to life to existing than the comforting routine?
01:03:03.000
I almost said penguin-guing there, which would turn me into Candace Owens not being able to read.
01:03:07.820
But, see, it's resonated with people because, you know, we're in this bug man existence.
01:03:12.360
We saw it, especially during COVID, everyone just watching Netflix.
01:03:15.040
But then young people, particularly young men, want more.
01:03:20.640
Nihilist penguin misses the point, as illuminated by that meme.
01:03:25.580
This is a bit long, but reflecting further on this.
01:03:27.500
To reduce the solitary penguin to a meme of depression or nihilistic surrender represents a truly pedestrian intellect.
01:03:32.380
It's a diagnosis that betrays a fundamental misunderstanding of the will to power.
01:03:36.380
The colony represents the last man, content, loud, driven only by the banal biological imperatives of breeding and feeding.
01:03:47.940
He is rejecting the aesthetic stagnation of mere survival.
01:03:53.680
You don't get those in Greenland either, if you're going to be...
01:04:02.380
But the bug man is fundamentally incapable of understanding the penguins yearning to strive, conquer and transcend.
01:04:07.280
Waddling against the Antarctic winds of modernity.
01:04:09.700
It is he alone who reaches for impossible heights.
01:04:12.000
And he alone who trades safety and comfort for the thrill of the void.
01:04:16.500
That's the territory where, you know, just say that they made a huge mistake.
01:04:20.860
And now everyone is trying to create a large-scale narrative.
01:04:27.300
They just don't use enough to make sense out of it.
01:04:31.020
People are projecting their own narrative, which we'll get onto.
01:04:32.660
So that's why all the people don't get it, because they see the nihilists.
01:04:36.220
And as this gets into, really, the penguin is a Nietzschean or an adventurer.
01:04:46.680
I know of no better life purpose than to perish attempting the great and impossible.
01:04:50.340
By the way, I was going through all these last night with a headache.
01:04:56.480
Happy Feet now will be announced as a far-right movie.
01:05:11.540
I've been talking about this penguin since 2018, and finally the world has caught up to me.
01:05:14.940
So he sees in the penguin a sense of adventure.
01:05:22.760
That inspires millions from a completely different species.
01:05:30.000
This is a claim that Herzog himself has something in common with the penguin, despite his view on nature that we saw earlier.
01:05:36.480
When I came back to Germany and I tried to hold all the investors together, they said to me,
01:05:43.060
Do you have the strength or the will or the enthusiasm or so?
01:05:50.300
If I abandon this project, I would be a man without dreams, and I don't want to live like that.
01:05:58.380
I live my life or I end my life with this project.
01:06:05.380
So Herzog, he was always doing these, don't think there would be a, didn't think there'd be a more Faustian Werner Herzog clip than the penguin, but here we are.
01:06:11.460
So Herzog was always doing these things like getting a whole ship over a mountain pointlessly, and he's like, we have to do it for real, which was absolutely a nightmare.
01:06:19.120
He was always falling out with local pygmy tribes and stuff.
01:06:25.020
Yeah, with Klaus, and he worked with Klaus Kinski while doing it, which is a kind of insane prospect anyway.
01:06:37.760
He's like, right, we have to actually bring this boat over the mountain and do it for real.
01:06:45.160
I mean, what kind of ship are we talking about?
01:06:54.660
And I'm just trying to remember how they did it.
01:07:00.880
They had to try and do it exactly how it had been done in reality.
01:07:05.040
So Herzog had his crew attempt to manually haul the 320-tonne steamship up a steep hill, leading to three injuries.
01:07:10.920
People were always getting hurt on his sets and stuff.
01:07:14.200
I mean, I want to watch the Netflix documentary,
01:07:16.640
where they try and take a proper ship over a mountain.
01:07:19.640
And they don't need to explain why they're doing it.
01:07:25.100
I'm surprised you haven't watched all his films.
01:07:35.380
Because, you know, there's Christians like me here.
01:07:37.140
It's like, hang on, Nietzsche had his problems.
01:07:38.680
So there's also the Tolkien-esque heroic penguin,
01:07:44.160
but it's the ancient heroism that Tolkien spoke about when it came to Beowulf.
01:07:48.060
He loved Beowulf because of the last stand against impossible odds.
01:07:56.720
And obviously, that's a theme of Lord of the Rings as well.
01:08:16.560
I mean, how many individual penguins would you say
01:08:50.040
So now we've also got the hero's journey penguin.
01:08:53.840
Hero with a thousand waddles by Joseph Campbell.
01:09:05.240
across cultures, combining psychology and mythology
01:09:07.540
to explore a single archetypal adventure of transformation.
01:09:12.840
which I prefer slightly to the Nietzschean framing.
01:09:18.560
see, some people call him the nihilist penguin,
01:09:53.120
Temporary constructs of a feeble human intellect
01:10:01.280
and all of them as artificial as the matrix itself.
01:10:29.160
Of course, the penguin ends up with the angels,
01:10:33.820
Why am I being sent to the mountain to inspire them?
01:10:38.000
Of course, there are just some pure nonsense ones
01:10:53.940
God is not just inspiring Christianity amongst people,
01:11:03.820
And this will then inspire devotion throughout the penguin kind.
01:11:27.740
So my point is here, these are just the random ones.
01:11:29.680
There's only one man that can save Minneapolis now,
01:11:39.400
Let's check out the next one, which is Amelia Penguin.
01:11:53.700
You met me at a very strange time in my life with the pixies playing.
01:12:11.640
I would immediately head right back for the mountains.
01:12:20.000
You're trying to reach the top of the mountain, too?
01:12:58.500
And so, just to conclude, if we move on, there is a thin line.
01:13:04.320
The debate over the penguin is because the line between depression and a Faustian spirit is thin.
01:13:08.500
It's hard to tell if a man is suicidal or pursuing a goal that transcends life, sometimes even to himself.
01:13:14.220
So that's why the debate rages between the Nietzsche and the nihilist penguin.
01:13:20.220
The penguin is a Rorschach test for your own spirit.
01:13:27.980
And it reminded me of this joke from Rorschach.
01:13:32.440
I always find it really ironic that this guy claims to oppose degeneracy, but walks around with silhouettes of gay men having sex on his face.
01:13:39.160
So, I think that's apparently it's a stolen joke.
01:13:41.280
Some people said it came from 4chan, but it's because Dan doesn't get it.
01:13:44.360
But it's because the guy is seeing that in the Rorschach test so that he actually is thinking of it.
01:13:51.780
Whether you see a nihilist, a Nietzschean, or men having sex, it all depends on your projection onto the penguin.
01:13:58.080
Of course, I prefer the heroic adventurer penguin than the nihilist claim.
01:14:02.300
But it's inspired people for that reason, I think.
01:14:04.700
Because we're in this nihilistic, materialistic, utilitarian world.
01:14:08.280
So, the penguin is a glimpse of something greater.
01:14:31.140
Well, there's Sigil Stone says, I can name several famous penguins.
01:14:34.860
Mario Lemieux, Sidney Crosby, Evangeline Malkin, Jaramir Jagr.
01:14:46.120
The penguin video has risen to the level of divine art thanks to the narrative.
01:15:14.860
The title of these two speeches and the Canadian perspective of Michael Ignatiev intrigued me.
01:15:24.660
Predictably, he sets out to describe post-World War II human rights and how they are important.
01:15:29.500
He then explains how fragile they are, needing careful protection from activists who would use them for political ends,
01:15:34.720
or ideologues who would use incompatible global positions to dilute what rights are.
01:15:39.900
Unfortunately, Ignatiev is too focused on the why, where, and how to realize that the what of human rights themselves is the problem.
01:15:48.000
His speeches only show the post-World War II order as a panicked reaction to the horror of war and utterly unsuited to purpose.
01:16:05.100
I've recently been using ChatGPT to rewrite these screen drivers to show two separate images.
01:16:11.160
As you can imagine, the first solution didn't work, and after hours of debugging, it turns out the frame rate is too low.
01:16:17.140
When you make something, you face a real threat that hours of work could all be for naught.
01:16:21.100
But if you want the thing to exist and work, you have to be willing to make that sort of sacrifice.
01:16:31.400
Here at the Australia Day celebrations in Wollongong.
01:17:06.980
I was listening to Stelios' segment about Euromaxing the other day, as I cleaned up the park in my local village,
01:17:12.760
and I just thought, what a huge supply of tears.
01:17:17.500
I want to hear the counter segment about how you can do things for the...
01:17:25.940
And while you're doing things for the greater good...
01:17:29.760
You can listen to the podcast while cleaning the snow.
01:17:44.260
Pittsburgh's hockey team is the Penguins, says Sigil Stone.
01:17:51.420
Illegal migrants do better than the native population.
01:17:54.480
Well, when you hand the illegals free housing, free food, free everything, that's a no-brainer.
01:18:05.120
We're not expecting the Spanish Inquisition, which is exactly what they're counting on.
01:18:10.400
It's kind of weird when you get all these politicians who are saying, well, we need to combat the far right.
01:18:16.600
And the next thing they're doing is try to create the conditions that are fueling the far right.
01:18:28.800
No foreigner willing to break immigration law would volunteer to follow employment and tax laws when they could work illegally and keep it all for themselves.
01:18:37.340
Those from Izat cultures would even find honor in having successfully tricked naive Westerners out of their wealth.
01:18:45.200
Despite claims that foreigners aren't voting or receiving benefits, there are too many examples to the contrary for it to be the occasional accident.
01:18:52.920
White writer says you'd think Spain would know better considering them being completely taken over by foreign Muslims was one of the triggers for the Reconquista.
01:19:06.020
Not just it wasn't just a quick event, but it's leftists.
01:19:17.900
A smaller population does mean there will be less unemployment.
01:19:25.260
Yeah, I think also he's talking about the percent.
01:19:32.080
What purpose is immigration supposed to serve in a country with chronic unemployment?
01:19:38.800
We will defeat the far right by proving them correct and everything they warned about.
01:19:45.520
Remember, hyperinflation turns everyone into a billionaire.
01:19:59.320
Sophie lives as I love how Dan is using all this fancy terminology just to describe alpha and beta males.
01:20:06.260
No, I don't think I would use it quite that far.
01:20:12.420
Between lions and foxes to varying degrees, both use and dominate the rodents.
01:20:19.400
When there are no foxes or lions in leadership, guess who takes charge?
01:20:23.360
It's hard to ignore the imagery when our resident rat visits a Chinese fox and was made to look like a midget in front of the cameras.
01:20:32.520
Did you see that image of the very, very tall Chinese people?
01:20:38.180
Now, they're obviously like, that's like all of the six foot four men in China.
01:20:49.980
I think they have a reputation for being very tall.
01:20:55.260
My only criticism here is he abandons the metaphor at the end.
01:20:58.100
Perhaps shrimp would have worked because these are all animals and he suddenly says midget.
01:21:04.120
We have had an animal heavy segment this time around.
01:21:17.700
I'm still comfortable with an early stage lion.
01:21:29.740
You said the USA needs total sovereignty over Greenland, which he won't achieve.
01:21:33.880
What I said was it needs to collapse the ambiguities is primarily what they're doing.
01:21:37.980
And I think maybe they probably will get it in time.
01:21:40.600
You know, I don't think the true test of lioness is whether you achieve all of the possible lion things that you can imagine a lion would do in a single term.
01:21:51.420
It's are you displaying lion behavior even if you don't achieve?
01:21:54.080
Because what I think people are doing is they're imagining a hypothetical lion in their head, which is the perfect lion, and then saying, well, he doesn't meet that standard and therefore he's not a lion.
01:22:05.880
Potentially starting a war with Iran for no good reason for the U.S.
01:22:13.040
He is not dealing with the entire ICE situation like a lion whatsoever.
01:22:16.580
Now, that one I strongly disagree on because the fact that he's doing the ICE stuff at all is 100% lion behavior.
01:22:25.340
To give you an example of foxes trying to deal with immigration, just look at the Tory party for the last 20 years.
01:22:31.040
It's like, oh, we're going to do this Rwanda thing.
01:22:36.820
And every 18 months, if you go back, they had a new scheme.
01:22:41.300
They're going to do this scheme and they're going to do that.
01:22:45.500
Although one counter would be that Obama, you know, there's this list of previous leaders that actually deported more.
01:22:55.640
Well, that leans into my whole constrained argument.
01:22:57.920
But there was, it isn't just constraint, it's also the economic argument that lots of Republicans are giving.
01:23:04.640
For instance, I think Marjorie Taylor Greene was saying on the one hand, zero illegal migration.
01:23:11.440
But on the other, I think she started saying, well, we need some of them, let's give them jobs.
01:23:20.340
The question is, though, the other bit, whether, yeah, absolutely.
01:23:23.540
The question is whether they, whether he's a typical politician and that he made several promises and didn't keep them, which isn't exactly lying behavior, presumably.
01:23:38.280
Yeah, I mean, did Starling keep all of his promises?
01:23:49.360
Sean Gaffney says, Dan's segment led to quite the discussion.
01:23:53.960
Trump gets quite a few different framing devices, lion, hand grenade, wrecking ball.
01:23:58.260
On the whole, Trump is an eight out of ten president.
01:24:00.520
Not great on everything, but better than we've had in a while.
01:24:02.840
And that's kind of my core point, that he is the best lion that you could reasonably get in this situation.
01:24:10.500
He's the best you could reasonably get at this stage in the system,
01:24:13.120
which is after a period of undeniable, complete and total fox domination.
01:24:20.060
Expecting much more than this at this stage, I think is unrealistic.
01:24:22.400
The question is, though, the other issue is, though, which I think I'm sure lots of people are going to think,
01:24:29.940
is that if we're talking just about lions and foxes and talking about the characteristics of lions and foxes,
01:24:36.800
we tend to become a bit leftist in one respect, in the respect that we view the situation way more abstractly than it is.
01:24:50.680
The question is, though, whether the situation that called for Bukele is the same situation in the U.S.
01:24:59.440
And you will have people who will say yes, but you will have also lots of people who say no.
01:25:07.260
So that's one of the constraints that a lion, a possible lion has, is what does the public think, generally speaking?
01:25:18.280
And in this framework, he has to think of the independents.
01:25:23.200
Now himself a bit less because he isn't going to run for elections again.
01:25:28.980
But I'm sure he doesn't want to tank the Republican Party because that would harm his rule right now for the next three years.
01:25:36.660
Better hand over to Nick for a couple of your comments.
01:25:40.020
So, Scotty of Swindon, can you explain why my timeline has been, this is, this is, he's quoting you.
01:25:45.300
Can you explain why my timeline has been filled with penguins?
01:25:47.920
Five minutes later, of course the penguin is happy.
01:25:52.560
Omar, if you can't answer the breakfast question, you have no brain.
01:25:55.240
If you can't answer the penguin question, you have no soul.
01:25:59.320
George, the penguin memes are the best thing to come out of the Greenland situation.
01:26:02.940
Dan can confirm that it's good for the meme economy.
01:26:04.840
Beg a hero, I don't trust penguins, they smoke tons of pot.
01:26:11.640
Dan Taylor, it's a Moses penguin looking for the burning iceberg.
01:26:15.740
Sneed a chuck, the penguin had the Victorian spirit of exploration.
01:26:23.520
But it's saying the existence of the penguin Jesus implies the existence of penguin Jewish people.
01:26:30.160
I mean, that's completely true, technically, so, yeah.
01:26:33.300
I mean, if Werner Hortzard goes back in, like, a few months and there's, like, a little penguin crucifix, I guess so.
01:26:42.920
That would be sad if anything happened to the penguin Jesus, yeah.
01:26:46.000
Almost certainly would, because that's how it always tends to go.
01:26:53.380
Someone's asking, I don't know if I'm going to do the honourable mentions, I've just kind of gone into them.
01:26:57.560
Dan, can you do a Brokonomics on the disappearance of the dividend?
01:27:02.880
I mean, well, I mean, they're still there, but it's just the smaller companies that pay them now, not the growth companies.
01:27:07.160
And we're in a growth company era, so I suppose I could do.
01:27:21.080
I think the audience wants us to chat for two minutes more.
01:27:34.220
So, one minute for your favourite lion from history.
01:27:42.000
I mean, if you read some of the exploits of Richard the Lionheart.
01:27:52.120
But Richard the Lionheart was a proper warrior.
01:27:53.800
There's one bit where he's got, like, a big army of Muslims lined up in front of him.
01:28:02.660
And he was just absolutely, absolutely destroying them.
01:28:05.800
And it gets to the point where the Muslims are all lined up.
01:28:08.380
And he's just pacing up and down in front of them, mogging them off, saying,
01:28:13.100
Come on, have a go if you think you're hard enough.
01:28:23.040
You're just like, if you can't get this done, you're in big trouble.
01:28:26.080
Even though that's, like, your son or whatever.
01:28:29.880
The one who you're supposed to think is a villain, but he's actually the hero.
01:28:38.440
Whoever the military guy was in Avatar, I liked him.