The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #1379
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 29 minutes
Words per minute
151.10515
Harmful content
Misogyny
13
sentences flagged
Toxicity
24
sentences flagged
Hate speech
77
sentences flagged
Summary
In Episode 1379 of The Lotus Eaters, we discuss the dark developments regarding abortion in the UK and Cuba, and a light palate cleanser of a Friday segment talking about the theological differences between Israel and the West.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Hello and welcome to the podcast of The Lotus Eaters, episode 1379 for Friday the 20th of March
00:00:07.460
2026. I'm your host Luke, joined today by Firas and Stelios. Hello everyone. We're mixing it up
00:00:14.360
a bit. What is normally the Monday panel is now the Friday panel, so now you don't know what to
00:00:19.620
do, do you? Wild things. Yeah, and today we're going to be talking all about the dark developments
00:00:25.440
regarding abortion in the United Kingdom. We're then going to be talking about what's happening
00:00:30.320
in Cuba, and we're also going to have a, I don't know what to call it, a light palate cleanser of
00:00:36.400
a Friday segment talking about the theological differences between Israel and the West.
00:00:43.820
I think it's going to be spicy and nice, but also I want you to appreciate my Cuban attire.
00:00:49.520
Oh! You've come dressed for the occasion. Yes. All right, two announcements for you,
00:00:55.100
ladies and gentlemen. Well, actually three. Obviously, you can join us at three o'clock
00:00:59.600
today for Lads Hour, where we're going to be having a fantasy parliament. Now, Carl has been
00:01:04.900
playing this all morning, chuckling to himself, so I can assure you it's going to be wildly
00:01:10.520
entertaining. We're also, I just wanted to, if that would have worked for me, but it's not, so
00:01:16.240
dragging along. There we go. Thank you. Also, part two of my conversation with Harry on Chronicles
00:01:24.240
is out now. This is going to end up being a three-part discussion all about William Shakespeare's
00:01:29.620
Macbeth, and at the end of it, Harry and I were joking about the fact that our analysis
00:01:34.040
of Macbeth is going to be longer than the play itself. But it's one of the most famous and
00:01:39.880
most wonderful tragedies ever put to stage, and so there's a lot to explore there, isn't
00:01:44.580
there? And another thing just to say is, of course, you'll be aware by now, we do have
00:01:49.060
a live event at the Mecca in Swindon on the 11th of April, and it's on a Saturday, so there's
00:01:55.040
really no excuse for you not to be there, so come join us. There are tickets on sale to
00:01:59.700
the general public, VIP tickets as well, and there'll be all sorts of your favourite hosts
00:02:05.760
there, those that you tune in to enjoy, and we'll be having a Lads Hour, we'll be having
00:02:10.760
a debate about Star Wars. It's going to be really, really good fun, so if you want to get
00:02:15.260
in on it, tickets are on the website. All right then, well, so, gentlemen, shall we just address
00:02:24.240
the fact that whilst the Labour government are going around calling anyone who believes in common
00:02:30.480
decency an extremist, should we just turn our eye to what the people, you know, alleging us of being
00:02:36.920
extremists, are actually doing with the United Kingdom? Because we have here, so this is on the
00:02:43.880
left, Stella Creasy MP, and on the right, the architect for this new, just awful, awful legislation,
00:02:53.000
Tonya Antoniazzi MP for somewhere in Wales, I do believe, and both of them are mothers,
00:03:00.560
which makes it even more, I think, sickening what they've actually tried to do here, and so let's just
00:03:06.920
go through it with some clarity before we discuss what happened yesterday in the House of Lords,
00:03:12.140
shall we? So there is a crime and policing bill that has been going through Parliament towards the
00:03:19.820
end of, sorry, last year, and basically an amendment to this was put forward by Tonya over here, which
00:03:28.380
basically decriminalises women acting in relation to their own pregnancies in England and Wales. So one of
00:03:36.120
the things that people have been, you know, what-abouting and sort of, you know, just trying
00:03:41.040
to obfuscate it all with and make it unclear is they're saying, well, actually, the abortion laws in
00:03:46.400
the United Kingdom are exactly the same as they simply were last week. It's all, you know, through
00:03:52.060
the NHS. It's 24 weeks, which is already, you know, not good enough, but frankly, you get the point.
00:03:59.240
That is what it has been basically since the 60s when the Abortion Act of 1967 was put through,
00:04:05.520
and this seemed to have been the settlement. However, due to some antagonisms about an old
00:04:13.280
Victorian piece of legislation back all the way from 1861, which was the Offences Against the Person
00:04:20.780
Act, this basically meant that, of course, women, mothers-to-be, were rightly visited by police
00:04:28.700
investigations could be had if they took abortion into their own hands, and all these sorts of
00:04:34.000
things. Now, this is, of course, not just against the very sensible Christian morality of Victorian
00:04:39.700
England, but there are also real concerns here about safety, of course. Well, obviously, for the
00:04:47.180
mother, the child would already be gone at this point, but all of this is very, very dark, and really,
00:04:53.200
for my own personal feelings on it, isn't a conversation we should really be indulging
00:04:58.840
in the United Kingdom. All of this is incredibly dark, and it's all just gotten quite a bit
00:05:04.560
darker, because as we can see, the laws have moved to decriminalise abortion up to birth. Now, this is
00:05:10.260
not in the sense that you are, as a pregnant mother, going to be able to go to the NHS in the 39th
00:05:18.560
week and say, I would like this. They will turn you down and say, no, say that's not legal. But what
00:05:23.780
it does is mean that the authorities cannot arrest you, they cannot prosecute you, and you cannot be
00:05:29.380
imprisoned if you go and do this all of your own volition outside of the law, in a way, which is
00:05:37.680
absolutely maddening to think about. It's an invitation to have very late-term abortions
1.00
00:05:45.200
illegally outside the NHS. Doesn't that, isn't that one of the side effects?
00:05:50.340
Yes, it's basically giving the law a license to turn the blind eye.
00:05:55.320
Essentially. So when they would say that we want abortion to be, you know, safe, legal, and rare,
00:06:01.280
what they are doing is making it much more common, less safe, and more legal.
00:06:07.940
Excuse me, if they do this, and they say, well, it's legal up to six months, and now we're going
00:06:14.400
to take it up to nine months. How is that pushing people to the black market? I'd say it's the exact
00:06:19.840
opposite. Because it's very, because it's decriminalizes the mother, but it doesn't
00:06:25.560
decriminalize the medical practitioner. And since... How?
00:06:29.020
That's what it does. And since the... Since it's actually very impractical for a mother at,
00:06:40.080
you know, week 27, 28, 30, to have an abortion herself, she would need that assistance. So she'd
1.00
00:06:49.260
be able to go somewhere and get it, but claim that she did it herself, which means that it creates a
00:06:57.020
demand for a black market. The other thing as well that was all very dangerous about this was that
00:07:03.480
when this initial amendment passed in the House of Commons back last year, the House of Commons
00:07:09.580
passed the legislation back in June, despite it only having 46 minutes of debate on the issue.
00:07:16.200
And so it was rushed through very much at the last minute. There was no real time for any debate on
00:07:22.120
it. And obviously, it goes without saying this was entirely by design, because once such an issue
00:07:28.160
is put up to debate, it would naturally require a more robust defense for it. But Baroness Monckton,
00:07:37.160
who's a Tory peer in the House of Lords, did her best to come out very, very strongly against this and
00:07:42.480
tabled an amendment to the bill in the Lords to remove the radical proposal, which she said was
00:07:47.580
passed in the Commons without any evidence, scrutiny, public consultation or impact assessment.
00:07:54.020
And she argued that decriminalization actually put women in danger by removing the current legal
1.00
00:07:59.460
deterrent against administering abortion away from a clinical setting right up till birth. And
00:08:05.840
Piers rejected the amendment, however, in a vote of 185 to 148.
00:08:12.460
So just to be clear on this, when you want to make some kind of adjustment to your home,
00:08:18.700
very often you'd have to get an impact assessment on what this does to bats. When you want to build
00:08:25.340
any piece of infrastructure, you will spend hundreds of millions of pounds doing impact assessment
00:08:31.840
studies. But when it comes to killing babies and exacerbating the fertility crisis that already
00:08:38.920
exists in Britain, you do zero impact assessments. So this is the sort of madness of this sentimentalism
00:08:49.100
that animates the British government and the British ruling classes, where you have to have
00:08:55.020
due concern for bats, but heaven forbid that you have due concern for babies.
00:08:58.920
Well, this is a point that I was going to bring up as well, because of course, in Britain, you know,
00:09:03.840
the natural disposition of the state, certainly throughout the entirety of my lifetime, has
00:09:08.800
been for it to be, you know, ever expanding for its oversight, for its jurisdiction, for its power
00:09:14.080
to always be expanding and to put the private individual into more and more contact with the
00:09:20.160
state as possible. However, we see that when it came to this particular issue, all of a sudden,
00:09:25.940
it was, well, we need to make sure that everything just gets out the way,
00:09:29.720
so that the woman can exercise absolute sovereignty over herself, or she just takes all of this. But
1.00
00:09:36.840
also, so we're empowering the woman to make this decision, whilst denying any sense of
00:09:44.600
legal recourse against her, right? So she's simultaneously absolute agent, and also has no
00:09:52.520
agency whatsoever, according to the way that it's all laid out.
00:09:57.060
Just to sort of add one point, in the legislation that you mentioned, it was crimes against the
00:10:01.460
person. So it was recognized by the Victorians, in that horrendously backwards time, which it
00:10:09.840
wasn't, that this is a person that you're dealing with. The baby is in fact a separate person, which
00:10:15.720
we know for an absolute fact, because it has unique DNA that is not the DNA of the mother, it is a
00:10:21.640
separate person. Now, that baby has been erased as a person in the law, more or less, and has zero
00:10:30.440
protections, and any crime against its person is permitted. And the same baby, I think somebody,
00:10:38.460
Lander might have made that point on X, you know, if it's born prematurely at 34 weeks, 35 weeks, and you
00:10:46.920
kill it, obviously it's a crime. But in the womb, you're still allowed to kill it, up until week 39
0.93
00:10:52.440
Yeah, I was going to pull that tweet towards the end, but you're absolutely right. But the peers
00:10:58.080
rejected the amendment, as I say, 185 to 148. And they also rejected another amendment that would
00:11:04.860
have reintroduced in-person consultations with a medical professional before being prescribed
00:11:10.840
medication to terminate a pregnancy, ending the so-called pills-by-post scheme. Because when
00:11:17.640
COVID came around and everyone was locked into their homes, all of a sudden you could just do a
00:11:22.240
consultation for this on the phone as well. And again, something that was laxed and rolled out
00:11:29.680
under the cover of lockdown, which should never have been removed in the first place as a safeguard,
00:11:34.520
is now just the status quo, which is, as it always seems to come. The Lords, however,
00:11:41.400
supported Lady Thornton's amendment to pardon women convicted of having an abortion and remove
0.52
00:11:48.280
their details from police databases by 180 votes to 58. Now, one thing that I must stress, and I,
00:11:57.740
forgive me, I've not come with this particular point with any statistics, other than just to say the
00:12:03.520
fact that, of course, this will work in the state's way for basically covering up a lot of the worst
00:12:13.720
excesses of what happened with the rape gang scandal. If you're deleting all of these files based on
00:12:21.040
abortions from these sorts of things, it's a way to basically hide those numbers and the impact
00:12:28.540
assessment, which is really horrible. Let me ask you here, how is it hiding? Because let's say if you
00:12:35.960
say that the state, I allow abortion up to the ninth month, and when this happens, it's not in the black
00:12:44.140
market, you are registering it, and you can't see that these things happened. Yes. How is that erasing?
00:12:50.920
Because they're going to be erased from the police databases. Okay. Yeah, they're going to be erased
00:12:55.820
from the databases. So, sorry, it's done this again. Don't know why that keeps happening. So, as you see,
00:13:03.840
Right to Life here did quite a large write-up of many of the conversations that were happening in the
00:13:09.480
House of Lords yesterday, and I do think it bears going through some of them in just some detail. So,
00:13:14.800
I've written a lot down. Baroness Monckton took exception to the Royal College of Obstetricians
0.56
00:13:20.820
and Gynecologists' support for introducing this extreme change to the abortion law, saying that in
00:13:26.780
their reasoning, the infant, who without the intervention of lethal drugs, would be a fully
00:13:32.720
living person at that stage, if born, is completely unmentioned, and it's as if this is in itself
00:13:39.880
unmentionable. Obviously, it's deeply distressing, as we have heard, for the mother to be questioned
00:13:46.260
by the police in the aftermath of an illegal abortion. This should be done with compassion
00:13:52.300
and sensitivity, but the police cannot act as if it hasn't happened at all, which is what it is really
00:13:58.500
granting permission to do. She also went on to say, voice her support for Baroness Stroud's amendment,
00:14:04.540
which would have required women to have the in-person medical appointments that I'd mentioned,
1.00
00:14:09.220
and the Baroness reminded the House that she'd wanted, warned of the potential dangers of the
00:14:14.460
pills by post scheme before it was introduced, stating that these warnings now proved to be prescient.
00:14:19.820
One of the examples that was given in the House of Lords was that by having the pills
00:14:26.340
able to be delivered by post, what had actually happened in one particular scenario was that there
00:14:32.340
was one particular mother-to-be very happily pregnant, ready to have her child, and someone
00:14:37.380
else had gained access to these pills and basically spiked with these pills, which is, of course,
00:14:44.720
absolutely monstrous. And so, yes, there is a very real danger there. She continued saying that
00:14:50.780
allowing these abortions to take place would allow traffickers and abusers to cover up the
0.98
00:14:55.480
effects of sexual exploitation by coercing their victims to phone up and ask for the pills as
00:15:00.940
well, which is absolutely true, and says, what do supporters of clause 208, which is what it is in,
00:15:08.920
think the police should do if they discover, and I apologise for the graphic nature of the words,
00:15:14.700
but it is, if they're going to do this, then this is the sort of conversation it forces us to have
00:15:20.640
put forward the stark reality of it. What should the police do if they discover a dead body
00:15:26.220
of a 39-week-old baby in a rubbish bin? Like, what are they supposed to do? Just not investigate it,
00:15:32.300
not ask the mother, because this clause means that they can't investigate it now, because a woman
0.97
00:15:37.360
is basically just acquitted of such a thing. And as you point out as well, Firas, just purely on the
00:15:43.520
distinction, not over whether or not the baby could live, but simply whether or not it was already
00:15:48.720
outside of the womb. And the Lord Hogan Howe explained in committee that investigations would
00:15:55.920
often still be required, even if clause 208 passed, as the police would need to investigate the
00:16:02.300
circumstances, of course, of such full-term babies' bodies, of course, being disposed of. And
00:16:08.740
sorry, this isn't the easiest thing to present. It's absolutely terrible.
00:16:14.540
So, we also have Samantha pointing out here as well that the Archbishop of Canterbury was present
00:16:22.440
at this debate, but shall we hear what she has to say?
00:16:26.100
The decriminalisation of abortion is a question of such legal, moral and practical complexity,
00:16:33.240
that I do believe it cannot be properly addressed in an amendment hastily added to another bill.
00:16:39.260
Consideration of any alteration to the abortion laws needs public consultations and robust parliamentary
00:16:48.480
processes to ensure that every aspect of this debate is carefully considered and scrutinised.
00:16:56.320
So, she came out against it in the end, which is a rare example of the Church of England coming
0.98
00:17:01.380
out on the right end of an issue. But her framing is, of course, I feel wrong, certainly for someone
00:17:08.220
who is supposed to be of faith, the idea that it's a complex issue, when surely it should be quite a
00:17:14.380
black and white issue. But she is absolutely right in saying that, of course, this was not an actual
00:17:21.020
abortion bill that was put forward. This was merely an amendment to a criminality bill. And, of course,
00:17:28.360
it is being used by the most progressive voices in Parliament to, of course, smuggle in an agenda that
00:17:35.800
is entirely without consent. Alison Pearson, as she points out here, says, abortion term limits, 12
0.66
00:17:42.220
weeks, Germany, Italy, Greece, Denmark, Austria, 14 weeks, France, Spain, and now 24 weeks, plus no
00:17:49.280
penalty for a mother aborting up to full term, Britain, vying for the infanticide cup with the
0.74
00:17:55.280
People's Republic of China. And again, just so we're not getting abstract about this, this isn't just
00:18:02.520
words. You know, this is life. This is the most precious thing that we humans can hold to. And this
00:18:09.300
is a 34-year-old, sorry, 34-week baby outside of the womb. And as you can tell, it's absolutely
00:18:17.720
confident and it has its entire life ahead of him. It's strong enough to live. And this is a story of
00:18:24.980
basically every life that never got a chance to happen across the West. It's a deeply terrible
00:18:32.220
thing. And the reason that I put in this part from the House of Lords as well, and it being
00:18:38.940
banned, you know, the hereditary peers are basically going to be abolished. Now, this is not something I
00:18:46.860
want to spend too long on. It warrants really an entire segment in and of itself. So I'll probably
00:18:51.440
come back to you on Tuesday to talk about this. But one of the reasons that I wanted to bring this
00:18:56.860
up here and now is not just because the House of Lords have put through the legislation that we've
00:19:03.200
just been talking about, but also because, look at the way that the Cabinet Office frames this.
00:19:08.040
This morning's 700-year-old system of hereditary membership in the House of Lords was abolished.
00:19:13.800
Membership is now earned through public service and merit, not granted by an inheritance. It's like,
00:19:19.260
okay, but does that make the legislation more moral? Does it make it more democratic? Does it matter
00:19:27.140
when the House of Lords are putting through legislation that is only supported by 1%
00:19:34.300
of the British public? How can this possibly be right? This wasn't in Labour's manifesto. They had
00:19:41.420
no right to do this, no license to do this, no mandate to do this. And no wonder they didn't put it in
00:19:48.700
the manifesto, because of course they knew what the answer would be. And quite right, as to reiterate
00:19:54.180
the point, as Lander says for us, if a baby born one month prematurely and I suffocate it, that is
00:19:59.580
murder. However, a mother can now abort her child at eight months in the United Kingdom and face no
00:20:05.380
legal consequences. This was passed as law, despite only 1% of the public supporting it. Is this really
00:20:12.540
democracy? Well, of course it isn't. A point about the House of Lords. Chesterton said that tradition
00:20:19.900
is the most important form of democracy because it is the democracy of the dead. That the past
00:20:25.060
generations who have experienced so many things and so many horrors and so much, and gained from them
00:20:31.120
so much wisdom, passed down tradition. And that tradition is democratic because it encapsulates the
00:20:39.600
wisdom of a nation. And he called it the democracy of the dead as well as the living. And in his view,
00:20:46.600
that is what true democracy is. You respect tradition. So these guys are attacking the past and they're
00:20:54.620
attacking the future at the same time, forcing everybody into the eternal present. Every day is day
00:21:01.500
zero. Every year is year zero. And this is madness. This is purely destructive.
00:21:08.040
I think that Chesterton is committing a category error there because tradition is
00:21:14.520
99% subconscious. It's not something we think about. It's something we do without thinking about
00:21:22.160
it. Whereas democracy is conscious decision-making. You can make horrible decisions. You can make good
00:21:27.980
decisions, but they're conscious ones. So I think that in, I mean, whether it's democratic or not,
00:21:34.040
doesn't mean it's right. If it were a democratic process, it would have to be a sort of referendum
00:21:43.860
or something. Because this is not the kind of, we are living in a situation where lots of parties
00:21:51.020
have an agenda and people are choosing every four or five years in other countries about overall agendas.
00:21:59.980
But within these overall agendas, they can smuggle in policies that are incredibly unpopular. And in
00:22:08.020
that respect, undemocratic or not. And Labour do this every week now.
00:22:13.700
Yes, that's an issue. And you could say that it's, yeah, I just lost my train of thought.
00:22:23.760
That's all right. I take your point. And so that's my point. It's just that they are smuggling lots of
00:22:30.020
things that we don't know whether people want or not. But even if they want, want them doesn't make
00:22:35.840
them right. No, it doesn't make them wrong necessarily. But what people want and what they
00:22:40.700
decide based on what they want is not the criterion of what's going on. Well, exactly. Just because the
00:22:47.440
House of Commons voted through some radically progressive legislation that we know is totally out of
00:22:52.840
whack with the sensibilities of the British public. And it's been passed now by the House of Lords.
00:22:58.820
It's gone through all the proper official channels. That doesn't mean that all of a sudden it's a good
00:23:04.140
decision or a moral decision. It's legalised murder at the end of the day. And you can see here that
00:23:11.780
it's an absolutely mind-blowing figure of almost 10 million babies lost to abortion since the original
00:23:19.660
UK Abortion Act came into effect back in 1968. And just to put that in clear figures for you as well,
00:23:28.360
it is about 10 million people, foreigners that have arrived here since Tony Blair took power,
00:23:34.640
you know, back in 97. So we talk about the fact that, oh, we don't have enough people and,
00:23:40.940
you know, we've got a net, our birth rate replacement is too low. It's like only because we're constantly,
00:23:47.320
as you say, pinning ourselves between eradicating our past, eradicating our future, and then just
00:23:53.660
bringing in a whole supply of foreigners who bring innumerable problems, as we chronicle here
1.00
00:24:00.180
all the time on the podcast. And so this entire thing is just such a deeply dark affair. And this is
00:24:07.560
not even me saying that, you know, in situations of rape, this is not me being categorical about the
00:24:15.840
entire issue. But this is me saying that this is clearly too much, should never have been given
00:24:21.520
license. And I think that stuff like this doesn't get forgotten. And when some people with more sensible
00:24:35.320
morals come to power, hopefully a lot of this can start to be, you know, fixed.
00:24:48.040
So, Rumble Rants, Cookie Boy says, what way do the Greens vote as Islam only allows 120 days in
0.50
00:25:00.160
exceptional circumstance? I don't know. I mean, I've seen...
00:25:06.100
I've seen very strange things coming out on it all.
00:25:08.760
That's a random name says, they've turned pregnancy into a survival game for babies.
1.00
00:25:13.500
The longer your mum is pregnant, the longer you should pray she doesn't change her mind.
1.00
00:25:21.060
And Cookie Boy also says, if a child is born prematurely but needs medical assistance,
00:25:26.840
can the mother deny it on the same grounds that she would have aborted it?
00:25:31.100
Well, these are just simple questions that those in Parliament didn't want to ask, Cookie.
00:25:46.120
Let me be certain that things are working and they're not going to stop working mid-segment.
00:25:55.560
Right. Right now, the world's attention is focused on the Middle East, especially in Iran.
00:26:03.760
But there are other things happening and there are momentous developments that are about to happen
00:26:10.600
in Cuba. And this makes me very happy, I must say. I'm an anti-communist.
00:26:16.420
I understand the dangers that are involved in particular operations and also pressures exerted
00:26:26.360
upon regimes. But yeah, if the Cuban communist regime falls, I'm going to be happy. Sorry.
00:26:35.380
Just no remorse, no hesitation, no reluctance. Yeah, I think I'll be happy. Right. So,
00:26:43.340
there are lots of things happening right now that exert pressure on the Cuban regime,
00:26:50.040
the communist regime. And I must say that this is a very, in some respects, idiosyncratic regime,
00:26:58.400
communist regime, because you could sort of see why some of the Cubans would be a bit more prone to
00:27:05.200
support it, especially due to the dictatorship of Fulgencio Garcia, who left with all the gold and
00:27:12.860
the US dollar reserves in January 1, 1959, I think it was. And generally speaking, there was a really bad
00:27:23.060
regime that was comparatively worse to other regimes before they fell to communist rule around in the
00:27:33.940
world. But there has been a very annoying tradition of communists, especially glorifying Fidel Castro,
00:27:42.980
Raul Castro, and also Che Guevara. It's almost like the gateway dictator. It's just sort of like,
00:27:49.840
you know, the one that you can get into when you're young, wear the t-shirt, and then you can go into
00:27:53.900
the more hardcore stuff. Yes. So, it's especially annoying when the Che Guevara t-shirts, it's just,
00:28:04.160
Right. So, let us see what is happening right now in Cuba. And we should have a general geopolitical
00:28:11.020
discussion about what may happen and when and why, in some respects, Trump may be taking,
00:28:20.080
maybe a bit patient with it. Maybe a smooth operator in this. Right. Which is a bit ironic,
00:28:28.300
given the fact that he has started a blockade, an oil blockade on Cuba. So, here he is on March
00:28:35.780
the 7th. He says about Cuba at the Shield of the America Summit in Florida, Cuba's in its last moments
00:28:43.840
of life as it was. It will have a great new life. That will be an easy one. I don't know how easy
00:28:50.300
that's going to be. No, I doubt it'll be quite, I mean, it wasn't easy just after the Soviet Union
00:28:56.040
collapsed for the Russia. I mean, that was when they say it was the hardest for people to live between
0.99
00:29:01.180
regimes, not during either. And also, people don't exactly know who the opposition is because there
00:29:06.620
is an opposition, especially, you know, there are some people in jail, political opponents of the
00:29:13.900
Castro regime. But some of them are being released right now as a result of Trump's moves. We'll see
00:29:21.600
what happens. But people are asking just what's going to, what's the next day going to be like?
00:29:26.880
There doesn't seem to be any sort of, any sort of opposition strong within Cuba.
00:29:39.300
Trump, Trump's move with Maduro, the extraction of Maduro, he was playing the claw machine where he
00:29:49.520
took Maduro from Venezuela and took him to New York to have him close to him to spend some time with
00:29:55.960
him. He had a massive effect on Cuba, right? Cuba is historically the biggest exporter of oil for,
00:30:05.020
no, importer. Let me rephrase. Venezuela is historically the biggest oil supplier to Cuba.
00:30:14.980
That changed lately in the last years because Mexico was until recently, until the blockade
00:30:22.960
support was sending about 45% of Cuba's oil, 38% is domestic production. But now after Maduro and after
00:30:35.300
the blockade, Cuba has, is strangled, strangulated as far as its energy sector is concerned. And this has
00:30:43.960
sparked protests that happen at night because protests, they, they do tend to happen in some
00:30:51.160
cases, like there were protests in COVID-19 with COVID-19 and in some other cases. But now lots of them
00:31:00.060
are happening during the night. You can see here, you can, we don't need, uh, sound, but you can see here
00:31:06.300
people burning things. Yeah, if we could mute it, that would be great, but it's okay. They're burning
00:31:13.840
things and they are out burning the, uh, headquarters of the, of the communist party in some provinces of,
00:31:23.400
of Cuba here. They say it's the Moron, a province or an area in Cuba. I hope I didn't get it horribly
00:31:31.600
wrong. So people don't know to what extent this is, this is organic or not. And this is always going to
00:31:39.620
be a, a debate that is going to be raging. And I'm sure that at some point, if the regime falls
00:31:47.580
years down the line, there will be people, historians who will say, well, perhaps it wasn't
00:31:53.540
support. It was all CIA organized or, you know, and there will be people who are saying, no, people
00:32:00.400
don't like communism. It makes them incredibly poor. And there is a sort of mythology surrounding Cuba.
00:32:08.720
You hear lots of Cubans who have left Cuba telling you it's a lie. You hear this from lots of
0.93
00:32:15.340
communist affiliated people who go to Cuba to experience the myth and they go there and they
00:32:23.040
say, well, I'm a bit unhappy with, uh, with the extent of prostitution. That's what, uh, what I hear
00:32:30.840
here from almost every communist I know who went there and suddenly became an ex-communist say, well,
00:32:39.760
maybe it's not the paradise that you hear when you hear tourist, um, campaigns where Cuba is supposed
00:32:47.080
to be this, uh, scenic sixties Florida with the old cars. Everyone's there happy. Everyone's there
00:32:53.920
singing music, um, singing, uh, what, what's the John Adams mansion. No, no, Benavista or, um, the other
00:33:02.660
song, what is it that I actually like it from Julian Iglesias and the Guantanamera. Oh yeah. That's a good
00:33:08.500
song. We have to give it, we have it to give it. That's a good song. Okay. We'll give it. So there
00:33:13.060
are mass protests that are happening in Cuba. You can see they're fiery. I don't know if they're
00:33:20.260
mostly peaceful. I suspect they tend not to go together. If it's fiery, it's not mostly peaceful.
00:33:28.100
Let's own the CNN. Let's own the CNN. Okay. Here you can have footage showing, showing this. Now let us focus on
00:33:37.620
what happened. The last translators from El Pais, the president of Cuba, Diaz-Canel says that the
00:33:43.940
Cuban government recently held conversations with representatives of the U S government, and they
00:33:49.460
want to seek dialogue and a solution to existing bilateral differences. This is a sort of change in
00:33:55.940
tone that you hear. You didn't hear this before, but Trump is the kind of person who elicits that from
00:34:03.060
people, be they Europeans or Cubans. Well, especially just because of the geographical
0.91
00:34:08.740
proximity of the two nations as well. Yeah. Here he is going on a rant about Cuba.
00:34:14.980
He says, I think Cuba in its own way, tourism and everything else, it's a beautiful island,
00:34:19.780
great weather. This is strategic and coherent and strategic rumbling. I don't know if the strategy
00:34:26.820
anymore. I feel like he's just throwing stuff out there. It says they're not in a hurricane zone,
00:34:31.700
which is nice for a change. You know, they won't be asking us for money for hurricanes every week.
00:34:37.220
I do believe I'll have the honor of taking Cuba. That's a big honor, taking Cuba in some form,
00:34:42.260
you know, taking Cuba. I mean, whether I free it, take it, I can do anything I want with it. If you
00:34:47.780
want to know the truth. Right. So he is definitely exerting pressure on Cuba in his increasing that
00:34:55.380
pressure. I've said before, because, you know, I think when it comes to Trump's speech,
00:35:00.500
I tend to take it as the speech of someone who is engaging in negotiations at the time. It's much
00:35:08.420
more an expression of resolution at the time than it is the take of a cold analyst talking about a
00:35:15.460
region is in the game. Right. So Reuters says here, Russia says it supports Cuba after Trump says he will
00:35:23.700
take the communist republic, but it's kind of weird when you have a republic that you have, you know,
00:35:30.180
you don't have that much of, of popular sovereignty, but that's me. They are sending a,
00:35:37.700
let me see what they say here. They're sending a tanker already from here. So they are saying that,
00:35:50.020
it exited the Mediterranean on the, there's a, there's a Russian tanker set to reach Cuba on
00:35:56.900
March 23. We will see if they will stop it. And there was also a Chinese oil tanker that left from
00:36:04.180
the Mediterranean on February 13, that hasn't yet reached Cuba. So it looks like they are serious with
00:36:11.860
a blockade. Yeah. Trying to alleviate the pressure. Right. So Russian oil tanker heading to Cuba amid
00:36:19.220
US economic blockade. Yeah, that's, it was in a different article that why, that's why I couldn't
00:36:24.740
find it. And here we have electricity failure. We have Cuba's power grid collapsing and millions in Cuba
00:36:33.780
have been left without power after the national electricity grid collapsed on Monday, the country's
00:36:39.700
power operator says. Match of the island, including the capital Havana was plunged into darkness with
00:36:46.420
streets only illuminated by headlumps and battery powered lights on Monday. And this is what is also
00:36:53.700
taken advantage of by people who are protesting and burning headquarters and cities.
00:36:59.300
But this has all kinds of practical effects. If you're in a hospital and the power dies,
00:37:06.020
you might be as good as dead. If you're elderly and you need to sort of live a decent life and the power
0.99
00:37:13.860
dies, that kind of sentences you to either misery or death. So what's happening here is that they're
00:37:20.420
blockading something that is needed by pretty much every single civilian and starving them of power and
00:37:26.980
using that as a power play to drive the regime out. It's a terrible regime, but this isn't coming
00:37:35.060
without a human consequence, right? No, there are human consequences. And sadly, there always are because
00:37:41.460
we live in the real world and there is an element of tragedy that ideologues frequently tend to miss.
00:37:47.700
Ideologues who want to say this is that this is absolute good or absolute evil. And, but I will say that
00:37:54.820
perhaps this isn't something that happens just right now. There are electricity failures across
00:38:03.380
Cuba for years now. It's not that they are the best when it comes to electricity provision.
00:38:11.220
So the question would be, if that is the case, well, are they augmenting an actual problem that must be
00:38:20.420
addressed? And possibly this is short-term bad consequences. Tragic indeed. There is always the
00:38:28.660
element of tragedy in history that could yield very beneficial mid-range and long-range consequences.
00:38:41.220
Right. So Cuba confirms negotiations with US as a country faces effects of oil blockade.
00:38:46.820
And let's see now, let's, let's see now what Greta Thunberg is saying. She seems to have flip-flopped a bit.
00:38:58.820
Right. So let us look at this because suddenly fossil fuel is good. Ah, let us watch this by the Atlas Society.
00:39:06.420
It is what we decide now that will define the rest of humanity's future. And whether we choose to do that
00:39:17.300
or not, if we don't, it will be a death sentence to countless of people. And it is already a death sentence
00:39:25.300
to countless of people living on the front lines of the climate crisis today.
00:39:28.820
We need to talk about what's happening in Cuba right now. As the Trump administration is waging
00:39:34.340
illegitimate wars across the world, killing countless of people, it is also strangling the
00:39:39.460
Cuban people deliberately, methodically and openly. The pedophile Trump himself bragged about it,
0.91
00:39:45.780
saying there's an embargo, there is no oil, there's no money, there's no anything. He said it like it was
0.94
00:39:51.700
something to be proud of. Well, you see that... Well, to be honest, my biggest takeaway from
00:39:58.580
that was just when she says the pedophile Trump, it's like, okay, so of all the stuff in the Epstein
00:40:03.300
files, Greta, that's what you're going to take away from it all. Okay. But also, I mean, she hasn't
0.85
00:40:09.620
necessarily linked... well, she kind of has, but she is mostly the poster girl for no oil. Yeah, yeah,
00:40:17.220
of course. Yeah, yeah. All right. Okay. Jeremy Corbyn here is keeping it real. He says the United
00:40:23.300
States is intentionally starving the people of Cuba with its illegal and barbaric blockade. I thought,
00:40:29.140
you know, he is just a miserable goon. I thought communism was actually good and productive. Why can't
0.98
00:40:36.020
they have internal domestic production? I understand that you need trade, right? I understand this. But
00:40:46.260
if it's that great, how is it that, you know, Cuba is so bad at doing this? Well, it's not because of
00:40:54.740
Cuba. It's because of communism. Well, also just the total just doing away with the illusion of
00:41:00.740
international law and the international order. It's like it's an illegal invasion. You know,
00:41:04.500
they said this when Putin invaded the Ukraine, like, oh, he can't do this. It's like, okay, stop him.
00:41:09.060
You know, they're not going to do that. So without... Yeah, but if they throw
00:41:17.540
bean soup on a Salvador Dali painting, maybe Putin's going to stop and maybe Trump's going to stop it
00:41:23.700
now. That's the green mindset. Anyway, we have thousands of anti-fascists from different countries
00:41:31.860
around the world continue to go to Cuba together with collected aid. Well, the interesting thing
00:41:38.100
here is that they're actually doing this meme, which I wanted to show you here. It's Venezuelan
00:41:43.620
socialism only failed because of US sanctions. It says, so the only way for a socialist country to
00:41:48.660
succeed is free trade with a capitalist country. Yeah. So routinely people are doing this and
00:41:56.340
it's a trick by communists. It's like, well, true communism has never been tried. Why? In this
00:42:04.420
case, because communism faces embargo by the other world, the non-communist world. So let's see what
00:42:15.380
happens. One thing I will say geopolitically, and I would like to hear from both of you guys,
00:42:20.660
what you think, is I think Trump is moving fast here, but he will let it simmer a bit. He will wait
00:42:28.580
to see what's going to happen in Iran, how long it will take. And I think that he may be keeping this
0.81
00:42:35.540
for an extra thing to show next. Because Trump is very mindful of public image. He's very media savvy.
00:42:45.940
And he does want his audience to have a win in their mind. So I don't know how fast they're gonna
00:42:54.740
move in Iran. In terms of geopolitics, what he's thinking about is securing the Caribbean completely
00:43:00.980
and making sure that all trade between the United States and Latin America doesn't have to go next
00:43:08.100
to what could potentially be a Chinese or Russian base, which is understandable. There's the human
00:43:17.060
element, which is that you're basically starving the civilian population to get them to rise up against
00:43:22.340
their dictatorial rulers. So fair enough. He's surprised that he's willing to make Cuban people pay.
1.00
00:43:35.060
Whether or not it works out, the problem for Cuba was that it was being a bit too harshly exploited,
00:43:42.340
shall we say, by previous capitalist regimes, which is why you get this regime, which is both
00:43:48.500
very nationalist in one sense, in the economic sense, socialist as well, and internationalist in
0.99
00:43:58.660
that it wants to export the communist revolution, which as we know, is a stupid idea.
0.93
00:44:04.180
So like national socialism, international communism, kind of, which is, if you look at North Korea,
0.98
00:44:11.300
that's exactly what it is. If you look at what Stalinism was, when push came to shove, he turned
00:44:17.780
to nationalism, right? Especially when he got invaded, and people weren't rallying for the
00:44:23.620
international. That's what I mean. That's what I mean. That's what I mean. So this is what you're
00:44:28.660
getting here. Do I hope they get rid of the dictatorship? Yes. The question always is,
00:44:36.740
how do you manage the transition? Because the transition in Eastern Europe wasn't that bad.
00:44:42.980
The transition in the Soviet Union was absolutely hideous. And the kind of oligarchic class that
0.56
00:44:50.340
raped Russia for a decade is exactly what gave us Putin. So what alternative have you prepared?
00:44:57.540
And if the answer is, well, you know, we're going to employ these people as surf farmers now,
00:45:02.820
and reopen the casinos, and reopen the degeneracy that characterized Cuba in the 50s.
00:45:09.780
Yeah, but let's say the degeneracy is still a part of Cuba.
1.00
00:45:14.900
I'll just tell you, the Greek Communist Party is organizing excursions in Cuba. And you know,
00:45:23.620
they're the Pyongyang tours. They're taking them along one street. They say, hey, everything is
00:45:37.540
Just like with the Iranian regime. Just like, the only question is,
0.57
00:45:42.100
are you going to end up unintentionally making it worse because you haven't thought this through?
00:45:59.860
Shall we move to the next segment and discuss the wisdom of Benjamin Netanyahu?
00:46:08.020
Now, the contention that I want to make here is that essentially all conflict one way or another
00:46:15.140
is theological conflict. And this is something that is very real because how you see the world
00:46:24.180
and how you see right and wrong essentially determines your policy.
00:46:30.820
And here, Netanyahu gave a speech in which, among other things, he said, he quoted an American
00:46:40.420
thinker, a former Christian atheist, bit of a libtard, shall we say.
1.00
00:46:46.900
Who became Catholic again in the end of his life, received the last rites, Will Durant.
0.87
00:46:52.580
Yes, but while he was writing, so he was born Catholic. He was a candidate for the priesthood.
00:46:58.980
He became a mix of socialist, sentimental Christian, rather than actual Christian,
00:47:07.620
atheist agnostic by his own description. And like Oscar Wilde, near death, he changed his mind.
00:47:14.660
That's not exactly what happened. He became a socialist. Then he went to the Soviet Union. He
00:47:19.380
stopped being a socialist in 1932. And the book Netanyahu is quoting was published in 1968.
00:47:26.020
And I really want us to talk about the quote. Also, I think, do you have the same outfit?
00:47:35.780
Well, yes, we coordinate our wardrobe every day, Benjamin and I. We try to sort of, you know...
00:47:42.740
By the way, Will Durant has a really good reputation for being a good historian. He isn't
00:47:47.620
exactly considered their libtard. Hold on. Hold on. In terms of his historiography, yes.
1.00
00:47:57.300
In terms of how his wife describes his life philosophy, and in terms of when it was suggested
00:48:04.020
to him, what kind of award do you want or what kind of work do you want to do? His response was,
00:48:09.300
well, let's work on eliminating all racial prejudice. That was his view. I haven't read him. Perhaps you
00:48:16.020
have. I did some very basic research on him. But during the period that he was writing,
00:48:23.300
from the period that Netanyahu is quoting him, he was in the atheist phase. But this isn't the crux of
00:48:32.020
the issue. The crux of the issue is, I want to try to explain what Netanyahu is presenting, and the
00:48:39.300
worldview that he's presenting, and what it actually means for policy. Because that's what really matters,
00:48:45.940
rather than just this one quote. And here is Netanyahu explaining himself. Let's listen to him.
00:48:55.220
But in conditions of existential threats, there's a much greater danger in not acting. What do you
00:49:04.740
think would have happened if America did not act now? Just imagine what would have happened. In a few
00:49:12.100
months' time, no more than a year, Khamenei, still alive, would have ordered the beginnings of the new
00:49:20.500
nuclear program and the reconstructed ballistic missile program to move underground.
00:49:28.580
Now, it'll take them a little time, maybe a few years, but you can't reach those programs. And they
00:49:34.900
develop intercontinental ballistic missiles, okay? That means missiles that can hit Chicago and New York
00:49:42.660
and Florida and Texas and California. Oh, but they don't have it yet. That's what people said. Right, let's wait.
00:49:51.460
Just let them do it. You know, just wait, wait and let them do it. You won't be able to do it. It's the...
00:49:58.260
So the argument that he's making here, essentially, is that this was a preemptive war,
00:50:05.460
kind of like the Saddam War sold on chemical weapons, that he could reach the United States,
0.76
00:50:11.220
he could reach the United Kingdom, the famous 45 minutes to hit Britain with chemical weapons.
0.92
00:50:17.780
What he's arguing here is that if the Iranians were left to their own devices,
00:50:23.380
their programs would have been secured. And that means that there would have been no ability
00:50:29.700
by the West to prevent the Iranians from perhaps at some point in the future
1.00
00:50:35.460
acquiring a nuclear weapon. And therefore, this threat should have been acted on now.
00:50:40.900
That's the mindset. Now, factually speaking, Britain's national national security advisor,
00:50:47.540
Jonathan Powell, who had been Tony Blair's chief of staff, attended the talks with the Iranians.
00:50:56.420
The Americans during these talks didn't bring a technical delegation, which you would need if
00:51:03.620
you were serious about reaching an agreement over something as highly technical as a nuclear program.
00:51:11.540
May I ask you? One second. But what the British and the Omanis had both said
00:51:17.620
was that there had been an agreement almost reached, and that Powell's view was that
00:51:25.540
the war was no longer necessary, because what the Iranians had accepted was that they would not stockpile
0.85
00:51:31.540
any nuclear material, and that this would be under surveillance permanently with no time limits,
00:51:38.180
meaning that the ability to acquire nuclear weapons by Iran was going to be gone and
00:51:43.860
placed under permanent international inspections. So just factually, what Netanyahu was saying here
00:51:50.900
isn't true. And the conclusion of this piece is quite important, because what essentially the Guardian
00:51:59.700
quotes diplomatic officials saying was that they believed that Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner had
00:52:11.620
essentially been acting on behalf of Israel, and this is why they were there, and perhaps that would
00:52:19.140
explain, and this is my analysis, why they didn't bring a technical delegation to something that was this
00:52:27.380
detailed in its nature. So that claim isn't true. And I just wanted to start with that.
00:52:37.380
Right. So I want to start with questioning this, not because I want to say that the exact opposite is
00:52:46.580
true. Personally, I have seen footage of Iranians saying that they do want to develop nuclear weapons,
1.00
00:52:54.820
and I don't doubt them. But all this is based on, I want to ask you, this is based on a Guardian article
00:53:03.540
that talks about the testimony of a member of the Tony Blair cabinet.
00:53:11.780
No, a current national security advisor of the Keir Starmer cabinet, and a former member of the Tony Blair cabinet.
00:53:18.180
So if we take their testimony as true, then Netanyahu is lying.
00:53:24.900
If we take the testimony of the British guys who attended the talks with the technical delegation,
00:53:30.900
which the Americans didn't send, and the testimony of the Omani mediators, who had every interest in
00:53:37.540
avoiding this war, and who have every interest in avoiding a nuclear Iran at the same time on their
0.92
00:53:42.500
doorstep, and who are seen as highly credible because they negotiated the 2015 agreement,
00:53:49.780
and they have been the main channel of communications with Iran for the better part of three decades,
00:53:56.660
then we conclude that Netanyahu is lying. Yes. So if we take the view of the British and of the Omanis...
00:54:10.100
Well, obviously, I mean the British government.
00:54:12.340
And obviously, I don't mean the general view of the Omani people. I mean the people who are actually involved.
00:54:17.300
Yes, obviously. I was just going to say as well, I mean, obviously, I personally haven't attended
00:54:23.940
any of these secret meetings, so why not? Neither have I, unfortunately.
00:54:26.820
But I would say that given the enormous ramifications of the diplomatic ramifications for what the British
00:54:36.260
are saying here, and the amount of strain that this has put on our diplomatic relationship with America,
00:54:42.500
I don't personally believe that the British state, which... And again, to differentiate between the
00:54:49.300
British and the state, of course, the British state has behaved in such a spineless way for these many
00:54:55.380
past years. I don't think that they would say this in something so contradictory to American foreign policy if
00:55:05.860
That's just my opinion. Exactly. And so continuing with what Netanyahu is saying,
00:55:12.340
because it's worth pausing here multiple times.
00:55:14.740
I think, and Americans understand this very well, because we're real partners,
00:55:22.100
I think that what has to be done is to have alternative routes. Instead of going through the choke points of the
00:55:30.340
of the Hormuz straits and the Bab el-Mandeb straits in order to have the flow of oil, just have oil pipelines,
00:55:40.900
pipelines going west through the Arabian Peninsula, right up to Israel, right up to our Mediterranean ports,
00:55:48.340
and you've just done away with the choke points for forever. That is definitely...
00:55:53.380
So this is, I would argue, another example of war profiteering here, where he's saying that
00:56:00.740
instead of letting the oil and gas go by ship, it should go by pipeline to Israel. And that means
00:56:08.820
that just as Iran can blackmail the world through the Strait of Hormuz, actually it should be Israel
0.97
00:56:14.980
that gains that capability, because the oil and the gas should terminate at their ports. This is what
00:56:22.100
he's advocating here. Plus, this is quite a delusional take on so many levels. Firstly,
00:56:28.980
the Arab states wouldn't want to have their oil terminate in Israel because that gives the Israelis
0.98
00:56:35.540
enormous power over them. Second, there is already something called the East-West Pipeline, which goes
00:56:42.740
from the eastern province of Saudi Arabia, close to the Hormuz strait, to the west of Saudi Arabia on the
00:56:50.100
Red Sea, and that allows the export of oil. But this pipeline, like any other pipeline, can be attacked.
00:56:57.300
So just doing it by pipeline doesn't solve anything, because in 2019, the Hothi shut down that particular
00:57:05.300
pipeline by hitting one of the major transmission stations. Because oil, as it goes through pipelines,
00:57:12.980
you need to maintain the pressure. So every once in a while, you need to add pressure to the line
00:57:20.340
to keep the oil or the gas flowing. So that doesn't solve anything. But he's advocating here war
00:57:25.780
profiteering, more or less. From the Saudi perspective, what they would want, essentially,
00:57:31.460
is to send that oil through somewhere like Yemen, which goes directly onto the Arabian Sea and the Indian
00:57:38.180
Ocean, and means that they aren't beholden to anybody, because that part of Yemen, where they
00:57:42.740
would send it through, is essentially under their influence already, as things currently stand. So
00:57:50.500
this is a bit of a weird take to come up with in the middle of a war, to say that the outcome of this
00:57:56.740
war should be one that profits us economically. And it is a bit gauche, shall we say.
00:58:04.100
Well, you don't, to be fair though, you don't engage in a war to end up in a weaker position.
00:58:10.580
Yeah, who doesn't say this? Who doesn't say this, historically?
00:58:14.740
Who doesn't say that I want my enemies to be completely...
00:58:18.660
Who doesn't say that they want to profit from geopolitical events?
00:58:23.860
Well, you want to profit from geopolitical events to some extent. You want to also have a moral framework,
00:58:28.660
which is exactly the point that we're going to get to here.
00:58:30.820
Did he say that this is the only energy avenue that is going to exist between the Middle East and
00:58:39.300
I'm just saying that this is a bit of an insane take for someone who understands geopolitics as
00:58:43.620
well as Netanyahu does. What I'm saying is that he's basically putting the Gulf and Europe at his
0.89
00:58:50.820
mercy as an outcome of this war. And in the same way that the Iranians would be able to blackmail the
0.94
00:58:57.140
world with their nuclear weapons, as he hypothesizes, well, he already has nuclear weapons and would be
00:59:03.780
Would there be such a surge in gas prices right now if such a pipeline existed?
00:59:12.420
So, because it sounds like he isn't saying something that is anti-Europe. He is just saying,
00:59:17.780
well, listen, the same way the Iranian regime can exercise pressure on Europe...
00:59:32.100
Because here what Netanyahu is saying is that the moral thing to do is to reduce dependence on the Iranians
00:59:37.620
and to increase dependence on us. One of the key political virtues at the end of the day is prudence.
00:59:46.420
Prudence means recognizing that the Iranians are an enemy, because they indeed are an enemy,
1.00
00:59:51.940
and that all countries are immensely vulnerable to being blackmailed using energy in the same way that the Cubans...
01:00:00.900
And therefore, you have to lower your dependency on potential enemies. And therefore, if you're Europe,
01:00:07.700
what you ought to be doing is developing fracking, developing nuclear, developing the North Sea energy
01:00:13.620
reserves as the Norwegians are doing, creating a situation where your dependencies are actually
01:00:21.220
on your friends where they exist, and where generally your external dependencies are reduced to the maximum.
01:00:30.100
Rather than replacing the theocrats in Iran who want to bring the Mahdi with the theologians in Israel,
01:00:40.260
shall we call them, who want to bring the end of the world through building the Third Temple,
1.00
01:00:48.740
Where does this come from, from the end of the world with the Third Temple?
01:00:52.900
Uh, I did a whole segment on that, about the Israeli religious right, and Chabad, and their views,
01:01:02.260
Chabad being an organization of which Jared Kushner is a member, Steve Witkoff is close to them,
01:01:09.380
Mark Levin, the big advocate for the for the war in Iran, he's a he's he's part of that movement,
01:01:15.940
and they tie into the Israeli religious right, who believe that they should build a Third Temple in Jerusalem,
01:01:24.580
and that would bring about the end of the world. That's the kind of uh ideology that animates...
01:01:29.620
Sorry, the end world, the world won't end, if they build a Third Temple, just...
1.00
01:01:34.980
Well, it's not what you think, it's what they believe that's animating them.
01:01:40.420
When you're analyzing people... I don't think they want, I don't think they want to
01:01:44.020
destroy the world. I don't think the same about the, either about the Iranians.
1.00
01:01:50.660
They, they are animated by a vision of end times. They're animated by...
01:01:57.540
Yes, they are, they are animated by eschatological visions.
01:02:01.140
They're animated by eschatological visions, both sides.
01:02:05.620
All sides, arguably, the Sunnis want to bring it about one way,
1.00
01:02:10.100
the Shia want to bring it about another way.
0.56
01:02:12.020
In the same way that the Ottomans used to think they were just going to take
01:02:15.300
the whole world in Islam, and then that would just end the world.
1.00
01:02:18.500
And the Israelis have their own view on that, and the Christian Zionists have their own view on that.
0.71
01:02:25.620
So, there is this eschatological framework that these people are operating in,
01:02:30.260
and if you don't get their eschatological framework, you don't fully understand,
01:02:33.700
you don't actually understand what's animating them. You don't understand how they're operating.
01:02:37.460
So, how does, how am I affected if Mark Levin wants to build a third temple in Jerusalem?
01:02:49.060
I can understand I would be affected if, let's say, some radical, let's say, radicals would get nukes.
01:02:58.020
And they could start blackmailing my governments and myself, everyone.
01:03:03.060
I can understand this. How am I affected if Mark Levin wants to build a third temple in Jerusalem?
01:03:09.060
That's an excellent question. Because the only way to do that, to build that third temple,
01:03:18.820
And the ability to get greater Israel requires endless wars in the Middle East,
0.99
01:03:26.260
and requires the conquest of the Middle East at the hands of Israel, which is something that,
01:03:33.860
as a consequence of that, would bring about massive refugee flows, would bring about enormous destruction,
1.00
01:03:39.860
would bring about higher energy prices, would bring about warfare on your doorstep,
01:03:45.300
would bring about Muslim riots in your cities.
0.96
01:03:48.100
You know what? It actually does affect you.
0.69
01:03:51.700
Why I'm a bit skeptical of this, because I see a particular contradiction in the overtly anti-Semitic
01:04:00.020
spheres online. It's that, and I want to say this, I'm not saying that Netanyahu is good, not saying he's bad.
01:04:12.420
I have been very much firm from the beginning that I'm not a geopolitical expert.
01:04:18.100
And I'm not talking about the Middle East. And I am a bit frustrated with the way that things have changed,
01:04:24.980
where from we don't, we generally tend to focus on some issues, to suddenly we can't stop talking about the Middle East.
01:04:32.900
So, and that's, yeah, my frustration comes from there. And the contradiction I see everywhere is
01:04:37.860
from people who are trying to say, well, listen, look at the Islamization of the West.
01:04:45.380
On the other hand, they're saying, well, the Jews don't want Iran to have a nuclear weapon.
01:04:50.100
And look what they're doing by a nuclear weapon.
01:04:52.820
Yeah, but if Europe gets Islamized, Muslims will get access to nuclear weapons.
1.00
01:04:59.380
So that's a massive contradiction that takes me take a massive step back and try to, and take everything like that with a pinch of salt.
01:05:09.380
And I'm not going to try and chase. And I think that this is something that happens routinely.
01:05:16.100
I'm in no position to speak for the anti-Semites.
01:05:27.260
But I'm telling you why it seems to me that, and some people need to speak out about it,
01:05:31.860
because there is a climate of, you know, if you don't play the line, you're sort of being paid.
01:05:38.500
I was accused of getting 7K for saying that Greece should defend Cyprus.
0.98
01:05:42.340
I think that right now, this is a ridiculous, this is a ridiculous, this is a ridiculous...
0.94
01:05:48.820
I think we should definitely defend Cyprus.
0.99
01:05:51.060
This is a ridiculous time we're living in when this kind of, this kind of rhetoric takes, takes precedence.
01:05:59.380
So I just, I just don't see, I just don't see it.
01:06:04.100
So what I wanted to try to comment on here is basically understanding Netanyahu's moral view.
01:06:10.820
When he says these things, and we try to sort of explain them,
01:06:16.340
we have to see what kind of worldview he holds, and what are the consequences of that worldview.
01:06:24.820
Churchill said that democracies suffer from the slumber of democracies, as he called it.
01:06:34.660
And they only wake up, he said, they may wake up only when they hear the gong,
01:06:40.820
the jarring gong of danger, is the way he put it.
01:06:44.100
Well, you're hearing the jarring gong of danger.
01:06:49.780
The jarring gong of danger is Iran gets nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles.
0.88
01:07:01.700
And the function of leaders is to stand and tell people the truth,
01:07:14.180
But leaders are tasked with the task of seeing danger in time and acting on it.
01:07:19.700
And I hope that in time, people will see the wisdom and the courage of President Trump's decision
01:07:25.620
and his leadership, and the fact that we're working together.
01:07:31.540
America is fighting with Israel for a common.
0.83
01:07:33.940
So this is an important worldview here, because what he's saying, essentially,
01:07:41.700
is the exact opposite of what George Washington advocated,
01:07:45.780
which is that the United States shouldn't be going around finding monsters to slay.
01:07:56.020
Netanyahu's vision of leadership here is that what the responsibility of the United States is to do is,
01:08:05.540
is to identify threats before they become too severe and engage these threats preemptively,
01:08:13.620
which is a recipe for permanent preemptive wars.
01:08:17.940
That's the conclusion of this kind of thinking.
01:08:30.580
Not always, and not to the same degree, because there are differences in the
01:08:38.020
So the objective reality is that Iran, even with nuclear weapons, is a deterrable state.
0.95
01:08:44.980
You can deter the Iranians, and you can stop them from doing certain things,
1.00
01:08:48.980
and just the threat of retaliation is going to be enough against a state like Iran.
01:08:57.460
And given that Israel has its own extensive nuclear program,
01:09:01.540
it is capable of engaging in this kind of deterrence.
01:09:06.100
And so there is a question here of how do you want to deal with your neighbors?
01:09:11.940
And the answer from Netanyahu is that my neighbors are all my enemies,
01:09:16.980
and I want to keep them weak and keep them subdued.
01:09:20.420
So now the Israelis are talking about the emerging...
01:09:22.740
And we can because we have an alliance with the strongest power on earth.
01:09:26.980
Because we have this borrowed power from the United States, this is possible.
01:09:31.380
So Israeli officials are now talking about Egypt becoming a threat.
01:09:35.540
Because Egypt is too dangerous, and it might become a problem for the Israelis,
1.00
01:09:40.900
And indeed, the Egyptians are massing their soldiers on the borders of Israel,
01:09:45.940
because they are afraid that the Israelis will try to kick out everyone from Gaza,
01:09:50.260
as they said their objective was to do, and throw them on Egypt.
01:09:55.380
And now you're seeing Israeli officials saying that Turkey is becoming a threat,
01:10:00.260
and here you have the leader of the opposition and Netanyahu more or less saying the same thing,
01:10:07.860
or not the leader of the opposition, a former prime minister, Naftali Bennett,
01:10:12.660
saying that Turkey is a threat, and that's becoming another Iran.
0.80
01:10:19.700
that he needs to build alliances against Turkey, because Turkey is the next threat,
0.76
01:10:33.540
appear as the leader of the Muslim Brotherhood,
01:10:37.780
Of the Muslim world, not just the Muslim Brotherhood.
01:10:38.580
During the Gaza war, he was basically saying that Israel is a demonic state.
0.58
01:10:46.260
And as far as Turkey is concerned, they do want to build nuclear facilities.
01:10:57.300
do not resist evil, it doesn't mean do not ever resist evil.
01:11:04.500
The reason that he says, do not resist evil, it doesn't mean never resist evil.
01:11:10.020
But you should resist evil by doing good, not by becoming the kind of evil that you're threatened with.
01:11:22.740
Whereas the implications of what Netanyahu is saying is that the way to confront every potential evil in the future
01:11:33.220
is to go against it militarily, using the borrowed power of the United States,
01:11:39.780
meaning that the West ends up permanently responsible for securing Israel,
0.74
01:11:44.740
meaning that the West is in permanent war against the Muslim world for the benefit of Israel.
0.95
01:11:51.940
Now, naturally, any Christian views Islam as a civilizational enemy.
01:12:03.940
But that civilizational enemy can be dealt with in all manner of ways, including deterrence,
01:12:11.780
rather than permanent active engagement in the heart of the Muslim world,
01:12:15.860
that permanent military engagement in the heart of the Muslim world, which is what Netanyahu is advocating here.
0.71
01:12:22.020
So, there's something that we need to address here, because I want us to see if we're going to talk about the quote.
01:12:32.100
And after that, gentlemen, we'll have to, because we have quite a lot of video comments to go through today.
01:12:52.340
One of the greatest writers of the 20th century, someone that I admire a lot, was the historian Will Durant.
01:13:14.820
unfortunately and unhappily, Jesus Christ has no advantage over Jinn Yis Khan.
0.99
01:13:24.180
Because if you are strong enough, ruthless enough, powerful enough,
01:13:36.820
If you look at the world as it is today, you have to be blind not to see.
01:13:42.100
That the democracies, led by the United States, have to reassert their will to defend themselves.
01:13:49.060
And to oppose their enemies in time, while there's still time.
01:13:52.820
Before the jarring gong of danger wakes them up and wakes them up too late.
01:14:03.620
There is truth in this statement, in that ruthless evil can sometimes overcome good.
01:14:14.260
The answer to that is just war theory and Christian virtues, like justice, prudence, fortitude.
01:14:23.460
Instead of focusing on, for example, quarterly financial statements,
01:14:27.940
to make sure that you get the cheapest oil possible at the second that you need it,
01:14:33.300
which is the kind of system that has been developed by highly financialized capitalism today,
01:14:38.740
you need a just-in-case economic system that is based on prudence and in your ability to defend yourself.
01:14:46.740
The answer to the fact that the Muslim world dominates energy production,
0.99
01:14:50.340
and that Russia dominates energy production in partnership with the Muslim world,
01:14:54.660
isn't to go around endlessly fighting wars in the Muslim heartlands,
01:15:01.140
in areas that are 90% Muslim, in order to impose your will on them.
1.00
01:15:06.260
That is never a legitimate answer, even from a just-war theory.
01:15:11.620
A prudent Christian answer is to reduce your dependence on your enemies,
01:15:17.620
rather than endlessly go to war in areas that they fully control and that they have controlled,
01:15:23.860
in the case of Arabia, for 1400 years, in order to secure a country like Israel.
01:15:31.380
So the philosophical implications of what he's saying here are quite important,
01:15:35.940
because what you need to do if you're Europe is to develop nuclear, develop your own hydrocarbon resources,
01:15:45.540
figure out a way to make coal clean, which is incredibly abundant all over Europe, including Western Europe,
01:15:53.220
and use that as your source of energy and reduce your dependence.
01:15:58.020
And then you use conventional things like deterrence and a capable military in order to make sure that you are not vulnerable,
01:16:06.820
and that the wars that you fight actually fit the definition of a just-war theory,
01:16:11.700
and preemptive war, based on just in case that the Iranians might do this and might do that,
01:16:17.700
and then one day that will happen, in fact never fit the definition of a just-war theory.
01:16:24.340
And this is especially important when somebody like Netanyahu ends up saying things
01:16:31.060
that he is on a historic and spiritual mission and feels a great connection to the vision of greater Israel,
01:16:38.260
meaning that Netanyahu's own worldview requires him to be permanently at war with his neighbors,
01:16:46.740
meaning that his neighbors will use the weapons that are at their disposal.
01:16:51.460
And in Iran's case and in Saudi Arabia's case, as we saw in 1973, that does include energy embargoes.
01:16:58.980
And as Christians, you have zero reason to commit to this mission of a greater Israel.
1.00
01:17:06.260
You could make a just-war theory case for the defense of Christians in the Middle East,
0.95
01:17:11.300
or for the defense of Christians in Cyprus and in Greece.
01:17:15.540
Which is what Gladstone did back in the Victorian era.
01:17:20.020
That is a very viable case, and you can make it.
01:17:23.060
But you can't make that case for the building of greater Israel that requires its neighbors to be permanently in war and in chaos.
0.72
01:17:32.980
Yes, but I have to answer in this and address this, because people asked us to debate this online.
01:17:38.660
Before you answer this, essentially, the problem here is a theological one.
01:17:45.060
If you don't have Christian morality, and you don't understand what love your enemies mean,
01:17:51.220
and part of loving your enemy is understanding their worldview,
01:17:54.980
including understanding the fact that they will blackmail you using the energy that they have to harm you if you go against their interests.
01:18:03.780
Loving your enemies doesn't mean you surrender to them.
01:18:06.020
It means that you understand them first, and correct yourself where you have a problem,
01:18:12.980
and where you are being unjust, and therefore fight them for what is good based on a just-war theory framing.
01:18:22.020
Here, instead of loving his enemies and saying,
01:18:25.220
maybe I shouldn't be trying to turn every Palestinian town into a prison.
01:18:30.820
Maybe I shouldn't be trying to expel the Palestinians from the land that they are already on.
0.89
01:18:37.060
Maybe I should work on converting them, rather than subjugating them.
01:18:42.180
These are all possibilities and ways of dealing with your enemies.
01:18:46.260
Netanyahu's view here is that no, we are going for the greater Israel project,
01:18:50.260
which by definition requires the depopulation of the Muslims who live in that area.
1.00
01:18:55.540
And regardless of what you think of Islam, and I think it's a terrible religious framework,
1.00
01:19:01.140
I genuinely think it's a bad religious framework that is by definition an enemy of Christianity.
01:19:08.020
What the Israelis are offering isn't a good alternative.
1.00
01:19:15.060
Because Netanyahu's worldview, in essence, says that since they are ruthless, which they are,
01:19:20.800
and since they are willing to inflict violence, which they are,
01:19:25.040
I have to be much more violent than they are all the time in order to conquer them.
01:19:30.160
Not in order to push their evil away from me and prevent them from inflicting evil against me,
01:19:41.140
And that theological disagreement underpins everything.
01:19:44.400
Because what Netanyahu is asking you to do is to support turning every building in Gaza into a pile of rubble.
01:19:51.440
And you see his ministers, and you see members of the Knesset saying,
01:19:56.000
actually, the Palestinians in Gaza should go to Ireland and to Spain,
1.00
01:19:59.460
if they don't like the fact that we've destroyed all of their houses.
01:20:07.960
And that basis of that theological foundation is the quote that he used from William Durant,
01:20:15.580
which is that Jesus has no advantage over Genghis Khan.
01:20:19.500
But Jesus does have every advantage over Genghis Khan,
0.99
01:20:24.720
because you can convert even Mongols just as the Roman Empire was converted.
01:20:30.460
Well, I mean, the best way to defend Mongols, yourself against Mongols,
1.00
01:20:36.840
isn't to try to get them into a parliament and an assembly and start telling them,
01:20:48.400
The conversion of the Germans had monks going and dying as martyrs.
01:20:55.100
So if Genghis Khan was developing nuclear weapons, I don't know if that would work.
01:21:02.040
Your criticism, your criticism is based on the idea that he is lying about Iran having nukes,
01:21:14.520
No, no, I'm just saying we're five minutes from the end and we have to wrap up.
01:21:19.400
What he said there is the exact same thing that lots of people who are talking about hard power
01:21:29.000
The kind of outrage that you see against Netanyahu over that statement is not present when,
01:21:38.060
for instance, someone on the Christian nationalist side, Joe Webin on the Christian nationalism
01:21:44.120
documentary said, the problem with Christianity is Christians.
0.91
01:21:51.860
Well, he's completely wrong and that's a disastrous thing to say.
0.99
01:21:54.700
Yeah, but I want to see if people who were very vigilant in attacking this specific quote
01:22:02.860
I promise you, if I see that, I will happily attack it.
01:22:05.980
If I see something like that, I will happily attack it.
01:22:07.740
I want to see also when Tucker Carlson is interviewing Rupert Lowe and 15 minutes in,
01:22:13.320
they are saying about the realpolitik and the heart and the aspect of hard power when it comes to life.
01:22:20.820
I want to see if there was such an outrage against both Tucker and Rupert Lowe at the time.
01:22:25.720
When they were saying that the lesson of history, excuse me, when they say that the lesson of history is that you always go down to realpolitik.
01:22:36.040
No, that is an incorrect take on the lesson of history.
01:22:44.580
So it seems to me there are double standards here.
01:22:52.260
We do need to draw it to an end there, gentlemen.
01:22:58.500
Oh, there was just a rumble rant and then we'll get the video comments going.
01:23:38.840
One of the only cathedrals in England to have three spires.
01:24:03.160
You really do go to the most wonderful places, SD.
01:24:25.020
I can see him, folks, clicking all sorts of buttons down here.
01:24:32.320
If anyone can be British, how can someone be diverse?
1.00
01:24:35.960
Progressivism makes no sense under scrutiny.
0.76
01:24:38.320
So they're desperate to keep those who break free from their silliness out of the limelight.
01:24:42.280
A recent example I can think of is how Markiplier wasn't allowed to walk the red carpet at the Oscars and was instead snuck through a side door.
01:24:54.500
But, yeah, you're right about the contradiction.
01:25:01.280
It's been a long while since I uploaded a video comment.
01:25:04.200
Just wondering, for this live event, will there be a chance to play some video comments?
01:25:13.940
Oh, no, I don't believe that there will be, Cooper.
01:25:34.720
I wonder if any of that actually, I mean, it's obviously a cameo,
01:25:37.960
but I wonder if any of that resonated with him, if he actually thought,
01:25:48.920
which is about a bunch of primitive crusader knights capturing an alien starship
01:25:53.280
and flying it back to the empire from which it came,
01:25:55.980
the alien empire is actually a liberal democracy, which they defeat.
01:26:02.680
every decision has to go through like a million different people,
01:26:05.820
and they just wind up dithering themselves into indecision,
01:26:09.100
while the knights just decisively act on whatever opportunity presents itself
01:26:13.320
and flit about and capture starships from planet to planet,
01:26:16.400
making alliances of opportunity with whoever happens to be there at the time.
01:26:21.200
That sounds like a wild ride, and I'm a huge John Rhys Davis fan,
01:26:30.860
Here in SoCal, we have a nice, brisk day at between 35 and 34 degrees Celsius today.
01:26:39.880
And while I know it's as cool and as potent as Iran news has been and other news topics,
01:26:47.300
can you guys start talking about Cuba real quick?
01:26:51.660
I think we're having an East Germany moment right now.
0.54
01:27:00.640
And I'll just wrap up with a comment or two from as we go around our segments.
01:27:05.040
Derek Power, Master of Chippies from mine, says,
01:27:12.360
And Luke West also makes a very good point here,
01:27:14.800
which is that it's like they believe it's a birth certificate that makes someone a human
01:27:18.940
in the same way that they believe it's a passport that makes someone British,
01:27:27.080
Stelius, do you want to read some from your segment?
01:27:30.540
It's one or two, and we should wrap up pretty nicely on time.
01:27:42.560
but short-term pain for hopefully long-term gain.
01:27:49.400
It's funny how Greta Thunberg thinks all is a good thing to own and use in regards to Cuba,
01:27:57.800
In fact, her entire career has been about how fossil fuels are bad.
1.00
01:28:05.240
because there is massive anti-Western propaganda taking advantage of people in the West,
01:28:20.540
One of the fundamental problems with Israel is that it wants to act like a dominant military power,
01:28:25.040
whilst also appealing to be a nation that needs support of other militaries.
01:28:32.060
But every single war that the Israelis get involved in ends up dragging other countries into it.
0.66
01:28:38.020
And the rest are a bit spicier, so I will skip them for now.
1.00
01:28:47.960
So join us in half an hour, ladies and gentlemen, for Fantasy Parliament Lads Hour,
0.87