The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #1418
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 31 minutes
Harmful content
Misogyny
17
sentences flagged
Toxicity
42
sentences flagged
Hate speech
84
sentences flagged
Summary
In Episode 1418, the Lotus Eaters are joined by Farras and Piers to discuss the ban on free speech at the Unite the Kingdom rally by the far-right Tommy Robinson, and the impact this might have on the upcoming protests planned in London on the 16th of May.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Hello and welcome to podcast of the Lotus Eaters.
00:00:06.600
It is Thursday the 14th of May, year of our Lord, 2026.
00:00:18.200
So today we're going to be talking about Starmer's banning people again.
00:00:23.680
We're going to talk about, you know, can the British state actually even be governed?
00:00:26.500
because there's this whole Labour leadership thing going on,
00:00:46.740
I wanted to remind everybody of the Breakfast with Beau show
00:00:58.800
And there seems to be a bunch of protests planned in London
00:01:02.120
that have made the government a little bit nervous, you see,
00:01:05.220
because there is going to be the Unite the Kingdom rally
00:01:09.420
by Tommy Robinson, led by Tommy Robinson, on the 16th.
00:01:17.400
But there is also a pro-Palestine Nakba Day rally
0.97
00:01:24.000
where a bunch of, yes, so a bunch of lefties and Muslims
00:01:44.700
And I think it's Chelsea versus Manchester City,
00:01:49.200
meaning that London is going to be a little bit of a nightmare.
00:01:53.500
Well, police are going to be a bit stretched then, aren't they?
00:01:57.860
Now, the reporting from the media is that the last Unite the Kingdom rally had 150,000 people.
00:02:09.240
And the police are sending around 4,000 or 5,000 officers to keep the peace.
00:02:18.260
The issue seems to be that first, the attendance from GB News, they're estimating 750,000 people.
00:02:30.660
And the issue seems to be that the, you know, the various government bodies that are in charge of policing speech have decided that they're going to ban a lot of people.
00:02:46.640
with a focus on banning speakers that have gone to Tommy Robinson rallies.
00:02:51.940
I had wanted to mention that even though Tommy visited Israel a couple of times,
00:02:57.120
the Jewish community in the United Kingdom protested against his visits
00:03:02.200
and said that they had crossed the line that, you know,
00:03:05.400
Tommy Robinson is a far-right thug and he shouldn't be there.
00:03:09.760
But here he is being protested by the activists.
0.86
00:03:14.240
The Jewish groups don't like Tommy Robinson going to Israel, yes.
00:03:21.620
Are you in the restore team going to Israel for the trip?
00:03:28.920
So Starmer has decided that he's going to ban a bunch of people from attending
00:03:33.960
to sort of highlight that free speech is alive and well in Britain.
00:03:39.520
and several influencers who are supposed to speak
00:03:45.880
Now, it has to be said that the quality of some of the speakers
00:03:56.040
but say, you know, someone like this lady here,
1.00
00:04:02.460
Oh, no, that's the one that Carl got into a Twitter spat.
0.88
00:04:11.640
I mean, I know she got into an argument with the boss man,
00:04:15.160
I mean, you're thinking on different parameters there.
00:04:17.840
I will say a good word for Eva Vladdingebrook, though.
00:04:23.200
she was trained by legal philosopher Andres Kinnerhung
00:04:41.420
I mean, I'm not going to vote for Restore anyway,
00:04:44.100
but I will definitely vote for Restore if that's the policy.
00:04:46.740
You want to do some volunteer work, you can write the paper yourself, Dan.
00:04:59.820
because Trump was somehow falsely convicted of something that he didn't do.
00:05:04.500
um okay you don't want that caliber but um the bans are interesting because there's a couple
00:05:12.340
things here starmer said that he was going to do them but then the um and and indeed the bans had
00:05:20.000
begun before starmer's announcement with in miss gomez's case but then the five pillars crowd the
00:05:27.740
basically the muslim lobby decided that they were going to speak up and they decided that they were
00:05:34.300
going to take credit for the bans affecting the Tommy Robinson rally, which I thought was a bit of
00:05:41.320
a interesting take. Is that credible? Because if we've got a Muslim organization, which are
00:05:49.180
literally calling themselves the fifth column, which are saying we are stopping people who
0.73
00:05:55.540
support the natives from getting into the country while literal headchoppers are getting invited
00:06:22.120
for the bans affecting the Tommy Robinson rally.
00:06:27.940
and then he goes further and he says that since some of the speakers who were banned were going
00:06:36.320
to speak via video link he describes the attendees as hordes of racists and islamophobes
00:06:43.940
thank you the police and the authorities should also ban this and hold robinson accountable
00:07:04.900
And so this gentleman here is calling essentially
00:07:10.940
and for Tommy Robinson to be held responsible for this.
00:07:19.820
because the organizers will be held responsible,
00:07:27.960
according to the Met Police, for unlawful speech.
00:07:34.880
They also insist that we're on our best behavior as they do so.
00:07:40.820
I'll also make a quick point about one of the ironies that I see here.
00:07:45.340
Because civic nationalism insists on reducing nations to sets of values, it's actually very
00:07:52.120
suicidal when you think about it, because it means that we are duty bound to defend abstractions
00:07:55.800
instead of ourselves. We have to write ourselves out of the story and all of a sudden a sort of
00:07:59.660
platonic set of values become, like defending those becomes patriotism rather than defending
00:08:04.300
ourselves becomes patriotism. And so this is in many ways an inevitability once you are wedded
00:08:08.820
to a civic nationalist conception of the nation. People, outsiders who are actually very friendly
00:08:14.220
to the natives have to be shunned because they are not sufficiently wedded and faithful to the
00:08:21.060
value system. To the very abstract value system that only applies in one direction. Because the
1.00
00:08:27.740
thing to note here, I think, is that firstly, there is going to be full-on two-tier policing.
00:08:35.380
The police are going to be deploying facial recognition cameras at the Unite the Kingdom
00:08:40.300
rally, they will not be deploying it at the pro-Palestine rally.
00:08:49.980
And the Times is, you know, in terms of mainstream journalism, it's pretty much as credible as
00:08:54.740
They might actually have to catch somebody if they take it to the Palestine rally.
00:09:01.580
And it's worth remembering that, you know, we had Kanye West banned for his hate speech
00:09:07.440
against Jews and for his artistic endeavors that were less than tasteful, shall we say.
00:09:14.720
This was fully endorsed by the Board of Deputies, and it was welcome that it was advocated for by
0.94
00:09:19.520
the Board of Deputies. But what, and now the Americans are trying to make a big case out of
00:09:25.100
this and to get, you know, Trump to intervene as this is a free speech case. But I would say that
00:09:31.680
with the Trump administration's record on policing some speech, it may or may not be a great idea to
00:09:37.700
get them involved. But this is happening at a time when the government is actually welcoming
00:09:43.400
the ISIS returnees, shall we call them, from Syria. Yes. And is refusing to say whether or not
00:09:53.140
the ISIS returnees are being arrested. And the case that's being made for the bans on the Tommy
00:09:59.140
Robinson rally are that it is, that the presence of these individuals is not conducive to the
0.60
00:10:05.640
public good, but we are meant to pretend that bringing back literal ISIS fighters and their
00:10:12.540
families is conducive to the public good, and that this is a transparent standard. So when somebody
00:10:21.360
attacks the Jewish community, he's banned. When somebody is accused of Islamophobia, he's banned.
00:10:30.440
Yeah, but they cut off the heads of Christians, so that doesn't offend the state.
0.84
00:10:36.880
I mean, I'm struggling to come up with a benevolent administrative explanation for this.
00:10:43.860
They just denaturalized a British gentleman for living in Russia.
00:10:49.720
He's an ex-police officer who's now a football commentator.
00:10:55.240
I tend not to be overly concerned about running into a football commentator on the street.
0.88
00:11:02.320
I am concerned about running into an ISIS head shopper on the street.
0.63
00:11:07.820
I mean, they have walked themselves so far down the path of this restrictive ideology.
00:11:18.200
The philosophy of the state is how do we erase the nation over which we govern?
00:11:23.180
But the original sentiment behind it was something like, let's address historical imbalances,
00:11:29.520
whether you think that's true or not, but let's address historical balances and let's put in place
00:11:34.260
a process by which we make sure that whatever are not discriminated against. And the majority
00:11:41.440
population is like 98% of the country, so it doesn't really matter. But all of that has lost
0.87
00:11:46.420
sight as time has marched on. And now this process is just a self-reinforcing mechanism that could
00:11:51.240
only ever drive stronger and stronger to replace the british and um yeah champion anyone who raise
00:11:59.820
their values raise their religion yes and this is supposed to be a good thing yeah but it also it's
00:12:06.940
also quite telling that you know it's clearly clearly the system um and including the the
00:12:12.160
value system of our elites plays a plays a huge role in this the administrative system as well
00:12:17.340
as a value system. But individual motivations do matter in that picture too, because people
00:12:23.580
will readily reach for these bits of primary legislation, like the 1981 Nationality Act,
00:12:27.820
which has that clause, or might be 83, but which has that clause about permission to
00:12:32.860
denaturalise if conducive to the public good. Operatives within the British state are perfectly
00:12:39.080
happy to draw from stuff they need when something they really care about is at risk.
00:12:44.540
Because if we win, that's a useful precedent to have.
00:12:52.900
And, you know, here you see questions about things that are conducive to the public good.
00:12:59.940
You had some event in Birmingham, which my understanding is, I could be mistaken about this,
00:13:04.640
they didn't get planning permission and they took over some kind of playground and set up food stalls.
00:13:11.020
But then there was a big protest because they were selling alcohol.
00:13:18.720
Sorry, was that just such a thick Birmingham accent that I didn't hear it?
00:13:46.240
And protesting in Bangla over an event in Birmingham.
00:13:51.880
And the question is, where is the public good here?
00:13:56.880
I mean, Andy Burnham is supposed to run in this constituency here.
00:14:08.720
and you see here an argument between different strands of Pakistanis or Bangladeshis over
00:14:16.760
whether or not labor is supporting genocide and that's the deciding issue in the election
00:14:21.560
and the question has to be is this conducive to the public good um I I don't have a clear answer
00:14:29.500
um here you see the government writing a report on the welfare of women
00:14:39.580
But they refuse to touch the issue of head scars,
00:15:20.740
is not a numerical category so much as one about identity,
00:15:28.580
I can assure you that they wouldn't suddenly start
00:15:31.640
it becomes very clear when you sort of just study the dynamics of world affairs a little,
00:15:36.760
that minoritarianism is only really a sort of temporary tactic used in Western societies until
00:15:42.980
their host majorities are reduced to minorities, because no one cares about the minority concerns
00:15:46.320
of, say, the Afrikaans. Exactly. So in terms of how it functions in global moral discourse,
0.88
00:15:52.520
it is inherently anti-white. Yes, and anti-Christian. And anti-Christian.
0.88
00:15:56.000
and then you see things like jury systems breaking apart yeah uh so the police brought
00:16:04.880
convictions brought charges or the prosecutors brought charges against magic freeman accusing
00:16:10.760
him of terrorism related charges but because it was a jury of his peers yeah they got stumped
00:16:19.680
and now they're going to go to retrial now we're not taking a view on whether or not the
00:16:24.240
allegations are valid, fair enough, but you constantly see this issue coming up
00:16:29.040
with juries where it's a headcount, it's an ethnic headcount. So many of our
00:16:34.500
institutions, including jury trials, were like were established in order to serve
00:16:38.160
a fair-weather, homogeneous, settled culture. And so once you, once those sort
00:16:42.160
of demographic givens are eroded, you can no longer count on these systems to
00:16:47.760
produce the fair systems that they were fine-tuned to produce, you know, centuries
00:16:52.380
ago well i mean i'm just quickly on that i read through a thread a thread that some american put
00:16:57.900
out on juries in the u.s and of course their their demographics are you know much worse than ours
00:17:02.640
yes and and they were giving dozens of examples of cases i mean one where uh um you know a a black
0.76
00:17:08.880
man had been going around raping and they they had him on cctv doing it they had the dna evidence
00:17:14.500
um and the jury which was majority black simply said between themselves and one of these guys was
0.98
00:17:19.560
on the trial he said well and the jury were saying amongst themselves there's too many black men in
00:17:22.860
prison so we're not going to convict him so yeah i mean it just all goes out the window it simply
1.00
00:17:28.160
becomes as you say an ethnic head count exactly this is one of my least favorite things about
00:17:31.880
the kind of go back to the 90s crowd people act as if the oj simpson trial didn't take place and
00:17:36.380
as if we don't have photographs of the verdict being announced on television in student dorms
00:17:42.620
where all of the white people in the dorm are like oh my goodness he's just been let off even
0.70
00:17:46.520
and the slam dunk case, and all of the black people
0.81
00:17:49.060
in the room are celebrating because they see it,
00:17:55.820
morality is simply an extension of group interest.
00:18:03.380
but it is one that explains much of the differences
00:18:18.360
And in terms of other things that are sort of falling apart, this is a story I haven't been able to verify it.
00:18:25.240
But it seems that in one of the council elections, there were three recounts.
00:18:39.660
And at the third recount, seven votes were found going in the opposite way.
00:18:44.860
i i i'm not able to verify this completely it's in birmingham we we don't really know but this
00:18:52.280
is the kind of thing that's coming up and we do remember the issue with postal voting and how much
00:18:58.720
fraud there is in postal voting mainly from minority areas so there seems to be this theme
00:19:06.500
here of the state defining the public good in the narrowest term really along the interests of
00:19:15.060
ethnic minorities we should note at this point too that there is also something incredibly
00:19:18.320
inadequate about what center-right existence does does exist for this because um as a general
00:19:27.200
matter people like we're now at the point in our british british national life i would say where
00:19:32.840
people are calling out what they will often just kind of call, bluntly, sectarianism.
00:19:38.140
But what people fail to really appreciate is that sectarianism is a sort of second-order consequence
00:19:51.860
I mean, Lee Kuan Yew understood, even in a highly civilized country like Singapore,
00:19:56.820
that, look, where I think, you correct me if I'm wrong,
00:20:00.120
but I think there's a sort of still a Han majority of around 75% and a Malay minority,
00:20:05.100
and then a couple of other groups too. Like Lee Kuan Yew didn't want to sort of reverse that.
00:20:08.820
He understood that that was sort of just baked into the kind of country that Singapore was,
00:20:11.680
but he definitely wanted to mitigate it because he understood that if you, like once you have a
00:20:17.560
sort of fractured demographic mess on your hands, people no longer think in terms of what serves,
00:20:21.760
again, the public good in general, they basically just reconceive the public good as whatever serves
00:20:26.240
their own little minority interest and so it stands to reason that the more diverse our own
00:20:31.160
territories become the more we're going to see sectarian voting and if you're not willing to
00:20:34.180
call out the fundamental cause of that and indeed agitate to reverse that there's no point complaining
0.88
00:20:38.440
about the second order consequences it's just impotent and you may as well just tell them to
00:20:41.620
stop but they're not going to. Diversity implies that you have different values and different
0.88
00:20:45.440
identities and so you can't agree on what is a common good. You can agree on what is a common
00:20:51.740
good within your group you can't agree on a common good that encompasses all groups and the only way
0.70
00:20:58.120
to manage diversity is through very strict authoritarianism yes and the state is willing
00:21:03.920
to be very authoritarian in britain only against one group yes it's not willing to be in any way
00:21:11.620
authoritarian against the other groups because they don't even recognize this legitimacy
00:21:15.400
and so you get this kind of mess as a natural consequence well and being lebanese you know
00:21:22.260
exactly where that leads to yes eventually the it's it's interesting population has said we've
00:21:27.520
had enough yeah it's intermittent uh civil war chaos authoritarianism these are the three possible
00:21:35.000
states in a diverse society order by consent is the impossible state in a society no order by
00:21:43.740
consent is the key feature of the british political system and so it's meeting reality and it's not
00:21:50.580
working and it just goes on and on because here you have somebody complaining that look
00:21:55.720
there's been organized crime operating for 10 years and nobody's doing anything about this
00:22:00.720
oh yeah i see it but that's excluded from the definition of public goods and people are going
00:22:06.480
to trading standards and saying look this is obviously organized crime and 97 of workers in
00:22:42.460
Last time they assembled a grand total of 5,000 people
00:22:52.440
by unofficial estimates, several hundred thousands,
00:22:57.960
Okay, they are always willing to put themselves at risk
00:23:01.560
for the benefit of people who absolutely hate them
00:23:11.760
in anticipation of the violence there's a bit of mixed news when it comes to how the muslims are
00:23:17.840
taking all of this because on the one side they're asking is there a future for muslims in britain
00:23:24.800
and they are being advised to do one of two things either get ready to leave
00:23:32.480
or get ready to spread the dawah and to islamize the country
00:23:37.120
what does dawah translate as um calling people to the correct faith right and their belief does
00:23:46.740
it imply violence it's always borderline with islam dawah technically doesn't but
0.90
00:23:52.960
if you stop them from conducting dawah then violence is justified oh right okay so if yes
0.99
00:24:00.160
if you say actually we're not going to tolerate you advocating for veiling all women or for
0.98
00:24:06.840
banning this or that practice or what have you then you are interfering with their divinely
0.99
00:24:14.600
ordained right to dawah therefore you are a fighting infidel therefore you should be fought
0.97
00:24:19.320
i just love the advert on the side of this as well supporting muslim families against state
0.95
00:24:25.820
policies i mean the entire state is geared up to support muslim families yes and give them housing
00:25:00.880
and they should insist essentially on seeing this through
00:25:24.460
But you will notice that Jeremy Corbyn is like Waldo here.
00:25:29.460
Well, this is one of the ironies of multiculturalism, as defined probably best by Roy Jenkins in the 60s when he was Home Secretary. When in many ways, he was actually very realistic about human nature. He said, we don't want a flattening process. It's impossible to get going. This is what Roy Jenkins said in the 60s. A flattening process of assimilation that turns everyone into a carbon copy of an Englishman.
00:25:52.160
What we want instead is for groups brought here, immigrant populations brought here, this is what Roy Jenkins himself said, to cleave to their own national cultures within Britain, but within an atmosphere, these are all of a sudden the very strict terms of engagement, but in an atmosphere of mutual tolerance and understanding. That's what Roy Jenkins said.
00:26:13.200
But the point I would make here is that once a group that has been admitted
00:26:23.240
as a result of such soft-touch liberalism becomes a majority,
00:26:28.040
they no longer have any reason to play second fiddle
00:26:30.640
to lily-livered multiculturalists like Roy Jenkins.
0.90
00:26:33.580
So simply to admit a guess to the House on your own terms
0.74
00:26:38.380
is no long-run guarantee of long-run charge of the household.
0.74
00:26:42.240
And I think multiculturalists are going to learn that in the coming decades
00:26:51.440
It sounds much less paranoid than it perhaps would have done
00:26:53.940
if someone had lodged that objection to Jenkins in the 60s.
00:26:58.300
And so you see them bragging here about Lutf al-Rahman of Tower Hamlets,
00:27:02.580
one of the most corrupt boroughs in London.
0.96
00:27:23.360
Newham is the most diverse ward in all of London.
1.00
00:27:36.440
of um like in the abstract there are perfectly colorblind meanings of diversity if i were to
00:27:40.220
you know add more pasty lads from northumbria to like rap music i would be making it more diverse
00:27:44.900
but no one agitates for that kind of diversity so i mean i mean on the on the christopher nolan
00:27:48.840
debate about how he's made he's casting africans as greek people yes um and and people have been
00:27:54.800
pointing out the reason he's doing that is because you literally cannot win an oscar unless your cast
00:27:58.620
is diverse and then i look back over the best pictures and one of them is parasite which was
00:28:03.280
a south korean film where literally everyone in it was south korean there was no diversity
00:28:09.740
whatsoever no there was perfect diversity yeah yeah but there was actually total diversity there
00:28:14.940
was because there was no actual operative meaning of the word as opposed to in the abstract meaning
00:28:20.160
of the word there was perfect diversity that's exactly right and uh i really don't see this
00:28:26.640
getting better uh tommy robinson's rally is going to be held anyway despite the various bands
00:28:32.460
despite the very obvious, very blatant redefining
00:28:37.880
He is, as always, adamant that this should be peaceful,
00:28:41.840
disciplined, don't give the media what they want,
00:28:44.300
don't be aggressive, don't fight with the police.
00:28:45.820
They're just making him stronger with all of this.
00:28:48.080
Don't wear face masks, unlike what we're going to see
00:28:55.020
But the point of this segment is that these guys have
00:29:00.700
basically decided that their enemy is the British public.
00:29:06.020
The state has decided that the enemy is the public.
00:29:09.800
And it is redefining basic ideas like national interest,
00:29:25.720
This is not an endorsement of any of the speakers
00:29:30.700
But this is pointing to a very blatant double standard
00:29:33.600
that is showing up in the way the police is behaving
00:29:36.740
and that is showing up in pretty much everything in British life.
00:29:48.460
the betrayal of nations will continue until either Restore wins and saves the nation
00:29:52.620
or the elections gets fortified and things turn medieval.
00:30:06.700
because the last time we did, we conquered the world.
00:30:13.040
I've repeatedly raised the concept of modern exile.
00:30:21.480
conducive to the public good in their interpretation
0.97
00:30:23.320
just means destroy English European people at every step
0.74
00:30:38.820
I was going to take you through, you know, the front pages of the newspaper,
00:30:45.460
apparently Wes Streeting is on the verge of resigning.
00:30:48.840
But Samson, our producer, was waving at me through the window a few moments ago
00:31:21.560
Reform or nationalists, as he calls them, are winning elections.
00:31:27.340
he wants a leadership election which is going to um basically bring everybody in um blah blah blah
00:31:35.200
aren't i great right okay fine so anyway that's what that's what he says um so yes it's on
00:31:45.460
doesn't change my life no it doesn't really does it i mean is west streeting going to make
00:31:54.300
is mandelson's other protege going to do anything beneficial no no is it no that i mean that's
00:32:02.240
kind of my point of the segment it's not gonna make a damn difference to any of it um interestingly
00:32:07.660
angela rayner on the key day hmrc after having done nothing for three months suddenly decided
00:32:15.560
to open the file and immediately found the done nothing wrong stamp slapped it all over it and
00:32:20.280
handed it back again it has to be said this investigation has been going on since what
00:32:24.840
october november something like something yeah months and months and months and the today's the
00:32:30.180
day it is did she receive the advice that she says she received which presumably came in the
00:32:37.380
form of an email that she could have sent and said actually yes this is the advice that she received
00:32:42.880
it was bad advice she still owes that much money yeah that that is how much investigation was
00:32:49.460
required i mean i could look into it but i can't be bothered it's there's going to be some long
00:32:53.800
winded bloody justification the point is oh yeah let's just chuck her into the mix and exactly
00:32:58.560
they waited until after the election yes to give her the all clear and then as things got really
00:33:06.960
heated all of a sudden yeah why not just chuck angela rayner into that yeah absolutely maybe use
00:33:13.140
her to terrify the markets consolidate support for for kia who knows kia is actually more popular
1.00
00:33:47.780
but um okay i think he's i think he's probably gonna stand in it isn't he isn't he uh here is
00:33:55.380
going to hold on with everything he's got well i mean he's been waiting since he was a teenager
00:34:00.200
the man has no soul he doesn't dream he doesn't have hobbies he doesn't have it well apart from
00:34:04.920
cranium boys but there's nothing that the sparks of the fire in his soul apart from
00:34:11.180
um controlling all of us he's been waiting his whole life to do it he's hardly gonna
00:34:14.960
give up now um this is another link which you uh which you pointed my way um let's have a look at
00:34:21.960
this so who actually does well in a labor leadership well it's andy burnham and angela
00:34:27.740
rayner isn't it yes right fair enough and the only reason andy burnham's so popular is because he
00:34:33.220
isn't a minister if he if he'd been a minister for the last two years everybody would hate him
00:34:37.500
just as much as everybody else pretty much it's we just got this notion that he's untainted
00:34:47.560
I mean, what it shows you is that actually being involved
00:34:51.220
at the frontline level is the thing that completely discredits you
00:35:00.660
And as soon as he takes over, he just becomes unpopular as everybody else.
00:35:03.840
In my view, the major difficulty that Labour has
00:35:06.160
is that they haven't really had a visionary leader
00:35:08.640
capable of thinking beyond the managerial textbook since Blair himself.
00:35:12.500
And I know this is, by many people, this is considered strange because Blair, in many ways, established our kind of post-97 managerial system, the blob and all the rest of it.
00:35:21.180
But in order to establish a managerial system, you actually have to have quite a bit of creativity.
00:35:26.140
But once you hand that system over to caretakers, as it were, rather than visionaries, all of a sudden, people lack creativity.
00:35:34.400
So I think there, you're thinking too in the moment.
00:35:38.640
And actually, when I lay out my case, you agree with me that actually it's that the surplus have been spent, effectively.
00:35:46.460
So this is my sort of pinned tweet, which I like to bring up every now and again because it is a work of genius.
00:35:56.560
Basically, what I lay out in here is that Britain isn't really a democracy anymore.
00:36:00.580
It is a credentialed waiting compliance system.
00:36:06.920
you know the parliament is basically just a signaling layer it's not a decision making layer
00:36:11.240
um you know just decisions are actually made by by real constraints the bond market
00:36:16.860
international legal rules that it signed up to all that kind of stuff and all and parliament is
00:36:21.880
basically just laundering the decisions that get made by this mechanism that's been in place for
00:36:26.500
decades now through it um britain is governed by assumptions that can't be named you know things
00:36:31.980
like you know we cannot benefit natives you know what you were saying um you know we can't let the
00:36:37.400
bond yields get too out of control although that's happening anyway um you know the real
00:36:42.640
constraints are statistical not written it's it's all of those things it's legal harmonization and
00:36:47.520
it's bond yields and elections barely matter with this so i mean i put that out a while ago
00:36:52.240
and i mean just just in the context of all this stuff um you know we we're gonna have to go through
00:36:59.760
the whole palaver about oh who's going to make a better leader but it won't make any bloody
00:37:05.120
difference because you know satisfaction with whoever you get just does this it's because the
00:37:11.440
system itself instantly collapse yes my i suppose but my point is consistent with yours though
00:37:16.100
isn't it because i'm saying that a visionary person would in principle be able to make tweaks
00:37:20.260
i don't i don't think even a vision well what you don't you think you think it is in principle
00:37:24.800
unchangeable unless you change the unless you're willing to change the underlying assumption so if
00:37:30.700
by visionary you mean they're going to tear up the structures of which this system is run on
00:37:35.700
yes okay in which case yes we agree and they're all caretaker managers whereas Blair is actually
00:37:40.040
a visionary because in order my point is that in order to establish this mechanistic system which
00:37:44.920
once established can run without any real guidance you just need caretaker managers to take it over
00:37:51.140
and what i'm saying is a perfect example he's perfect and they all are like they are all
00:37:55.440
none of them actually they all built anything to change this they're all built out of the
00:37:59.720
caretaker mold and therefore therefore that's what i mean when i say it won't make any difference
00:38:02.960
to my life they all basically have the same assumptions basically have the same views
00:38:06.260
they vary if at all only in terms of the pragmatic constraints okay so which case we agree we are
00:38:11.500
saying that starma is the perfect avatar for this system because his job is to manage basically what
00:38:17.400
was supposed to be a stable post-90s system yes that was also the job of cameron and may and
00:38:23.060
johnson and they played that fulfilled their role perfectly cameron strengthened the administrative
00:38:29.320
state he further liberalized the system theresa may imposed net zero and the madness of net zero
00:38:35.920
yes and johnson went much further than blair in terms of you know more somalians means more gdp
00:38:44.320
yes it's a good thing they will and by the way they've also re redefined making any changes to
00:38:49.480
this system through will or through power as fascism yes yes and so like and to be fair like
00:38:55.960
this i mean schmidt you see this is what schmidt means when he says the sovereign is he who desires
00:38:59.380
the state of exception you need you need to be a visionary person in order to decide the state of
00:39:02.500
exception and and given that politics has effectively been equated with fascism and
00:39:07.580
anti-politics and anti-politics has been equated with the rule of law or the smooth running of
00:39:13.080
this not-so-Rolls-Royce system, they find themselves in a bit of a moral bind.
00:39:16.560
Yeah, so actually, no, we do agree. Because, I mean, what I'm basically saying with all of this
00:39:21.140
is that Labour's crisis is not ideology as to whether they go to the left or the right.
00:39:26.720
What I'm saying is it's actually a thermodynamics problem. They've run out of growth. There's too
00:39:31.760
much debt. There's too much welfare dependency. There's too many rules. There's all of these things.
00:39:36.140
People forget how much of Blair's growth was driven by low interest rates and debt.
00:39:41.560
They forget that the Blair boom came mainly from historically low American interest rates under Alan Greenspan and open-door immigration, which led to a housing boom.
00:39:56.440
The economy did grow, but it didn't grow in productive capacity.
00:40:00.740
So, I mean, would you both agree with me that Britain's problem at the moment is effectively negative sovereignty?
00:40:10.460
nobody is saying yes to anything nobody's making anything happen pretty much yeah yeah that's the
00:40:15.800
anti-politics you speak of yes and obviously there's no such touch the system otherwise you're
00:40:20.000
a fascist if you touch the system that's it it it's not yes and obviously philosophically there
00:40:25.620
is actually no such thing as anti-politics because it is itself a political view to say that we need
00:40:29.840
to establish an anti-political system so but but but that aside yeah because i mean ultimately when
00:40:35.880
you look at when you look at these different characters i mean what they're saying so i mean
00:40:38.940
In the West Streeting, we started off talking about him.
00:40:41.480
The West Streeting line is basically the Blairite line,
00:40:43.860
which is we can govern if markets trust us, right?
00:40:49.880
You know, they can see that you run out of surplus.
00:40:56.740
Rayner is effectively saying that Britain can be governed
00:41:12.540
You can have social cohesion, you can have diversity,
00:41:24.600
I mean, he's effectively saying that Britain can be governed
00:41:37.020
So there is absolute – this leadership election genuinely does not matter.
00:41:45.280
Unless, like you say, you get somebody who is willing to rip up
00:41:48.160
all of the governing assumptions that this country operates on
00:41:51.380
and install new ones, which is quite a big task.
00:42:05.700
and not those who are going to outsource decision-making to some...
00:42:11.660
You have to look at the system with a sense of courage and integrity,
00:42:16.840
and that it's meant to serve a different set of people
00:42:25.620
These sort of more old-fashioned things are going to be necessary
00:42:29.520
And the thing I liked about your chap's sort of opening video
00:42:32.540
is the bit where he says it's going to be extremely painful.
00:42:34.900
That's what I want to hear, because the problem is not necessarily
00:42:38.240
a lack of democracy, it's a lack of consequence.
00:42:41.000
Nobody carries consequence anymore, because everything is a process.
00:42:45.140
Everything is farmed out to some secondary constraint
00:42:47.600
that sits outside Parliament, be it the bond markets
00:42:51.840
There's just no consequence in the system anymore.
00:42:56.000
Fundamentally, the British state no longer has purpose.
00:43:00.520
you know if you to ask if you to ask any of these candidates
00:43:05.600
what is your purpose of governing i don't think a single one of them could tell you
00:43:10.900
apart from glib like throwaway lines you're saying protecting british values yeah it'd be
00:43:16.840
some nonsense like that are you saying i mean i'm i'm looking here at the magnificent letter from
00:43:23.000
from west streeting and he's saying that when you say that britain has become an island of
00:43:27.700
strangers it means you've lost your way that's what he says yes yes he attacks the island of
00:43:33.100
strangers line right so starma outflanked from the left it's incredible yeah because he's
00:43:40.920
apparently not left-wing enough it's it's um well i suppose one of the um something that is
00:43:47.880
arguably entailed by your diagnosis system diagnosis dan is that um like anyone overseeing
00:43:54.520
this system and who refuses to be visionary in and amongst it is psychotic yeah they kind of
00:44:02.160
have to because i mean all they're doing is arguing over who gets the mandate but what
00:44:06.420
that really means is who gets to try and manage the set of constraints this system has imposed
00:44:11.760
upon them i mean good luck with that and and that's why i just can't take this stuff seriously
00:44:18.960
because it might be Burnham, it might be Angela,
00:44:35.260
There you go, tenure as a British prime minister's.
0.52
00:44:41.760
Is that because they have been unable to find the right leader
00:44:44.620
or is that because the system itself is unable to do results?
00:44:48.060
I remember the line from Yes Minister, which basically explains that it takes a minister a couple of years to get to grips with his department.
00:44:56.800
And it's only then that the minister is able to make changes.
00:45:01.920
Under this system, every minister is replaced every few months.
00:45:06.880
Meaning that there is zero chance of somebody coming to grips with their portfolio.
00:45:11.600
meaning that the system keeps on going regardless of whatever the minister has promised in order to
00:45:20.040
be delivered to westminster and and so it's it's a complete farce you can't function like this
00:45:27.220
yeah exactly and um then of course we've got the king's speech so there we go here's the king's
00:45:34.900
speech there's a picture of the king old sausage fingers himself looking very grand that is some
00:45:39.080
top bling i will i will give him that that is top bling um anyway there's the king's speech
0.87
00:45:44.700
bloody bloody blah my government will do this my government will do that my government will do the
0.68
00:45:49.100
other thing anyway i thought i thought you know they said dan you should cover the king's speech
0.52
00:45:53.880
and i read it and i was like yeah but this is such an absolute mountain pile of toss
00:46:00.960
that i i'm not covering this this is actually so what i did is i just rewrote it right i rewrote it
00:46:09.560
and i promise you this is 100 accurate right but it's just honest now so let let me read you the
00:46:18.120
king's speech um as it should have been written so you know my my lords members of the house of
00:46:24.400
commons my government believes that britain can be governed if every problem is converted into
00:46:29.400
security processed through active state partnership digitized regulated monitored legally harmonized
00:46:36.900
and made institutionally legible brilliant yes none of this it's genius it's correct and none
00:46:45.340
of it makes sense yes i guarantee that i mean i i literally did just go through the speech
00:46:50.880
and just write out each paragraph but in a way that it was actually supposed to be written
00:46:57.400
um my ministers recognize that the world is increasingly dangerous uh what they cannot say
00:47:04.420
is uh that danger has revealed the central fact of the british state
00:47:08.200
it can regulate tax and monitor but it struggles to decide to build and to prioritize so uh yes
00:47:17.420
that that could be what he actually said um my my government is is there my government will
00:47:24.580
therefore speak constantly about security economic security energy security border security a whole
00:47:30.500
bunch of other securities security is the language by which so the lack of sovereignty is made
00:47:36.780
respectable it allows ministers to sound serious without naming the conflicts they are unwilling
00:47:43.080
to resolve yes i mean if you if you do read the king's speech then read my one because it's just
00:47:57.340
By this, my government means that markets no longer produce
00:48:07.960
delivery capacity or legal freedom to command outcomes directly.
00:48:11.880
It will therefore intermediate between public objectives
00:48:19.880
Private capital will be invited to harvest much of the return
00:48:31.980
while maintaining the institutional arrangements that suppress it.
00:48:38.420
My government will strengthen relations with the European Union
00:48:41.660
because the British administrative state is more comfortable
00:48:44.620
when nested inside a larger rules-based system.
00:48:49.420
My government will introduce measures on immigration and asylum to increase public
00:48:54.840
confidence in the system. Immigration will therefore be treated as a matter of processing,
0.98
00:49:00.000
identifying, security and reassurance rather than any sovereign decisions about the future
00:49:05.540
composition of the nation. My ministers will proceed with digital ID because a low trust
00:49:11.620
state must replace trust with verification. My government will reform public services.
00:49:37.900
my government will speak of trust in public office
00:49:48.160
My government will uphold British values and decency, tolerance, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah,
00:49:52.460
because it cannot restore cohesion through a shared identity,
00:49:56.620
controlled borders, common obligations, or national priority.
00:50:11.420
My ministers will support Ukraine, NATO, global stability, climate leadership,
00:50:15.900
humanitarian action women and girls to slate solution the g20 blah blah blah blah blah blah
00:50:20.980
all of them will be priorities none of them will be ranked the state will to continue to confuse
00:50:27.100
coverage with strategy um other measures will be laid before you but because the british state
00:50:34.660
remains highly capable of um talking about measures what it cannot to do is produce outcomes
00:50:47.360
may rest upon your counsels before my government cannot.
00:50:50.620
So anyway, the whole document is in the reading links.
00:50:56.320
If you go to lotuseaters.com and you go to the reading links,
00:51:06.960
I don't think it's just jaded for having done this job for a long time.
00:51:12.360
oh, that thing has happened and that thing has happened.
00:51:27.640
Unless if only there was some sort of political movement out there
00:51:31.560
that was willing to look at all of this and go, yeah,
00:51:37.100
We are fundamentally going to reimagine the state.
00:51:40.520
i'm sure q harrison well yes i mean uh one of the reasons why i find that uh very amusing
00:51:48.020
is because it is um well it's not just amusing it's very enlightening about the way and
00:51:55.180
it's obviously a satire but it's the this is the steely accurate that is this is what passes
00:52:01.000
genuinely for wisdom in whitehall yes and uh like that is a major source of our woes and i think
00:52:07.120
that the right, I mean, you know, the nominal right in recent decades has thought of it as its
00:52:14.040
duty to make peace with this system and to sort of uphold it. Well, by operating obediently within
00:52:20.100
the confines of the system, you do inherently and implicitly uphold it rather than to do real
00:52:26.060
politics and to engage in decision-making because the essence of politics is decision-making and
00:52:30.980
power needs to be related very strongly to responsibility. I think that after a very
00:52:37.780
nightmarish 20th century, people, not to sound too grand about it, but people are afraid of the
00:52:42.600
great man. They would much rather outsource decision-making to a faceless set of bureaucrats,
00:52:49.860
but in doing so, you, as you say, separate responsibility from power, and it makes it
00:52:54.620
very difficult for people to understand who governs them. And this whole kind of managerial
00:52:58.640
system worked when there was a surplus to draw down from that helps to of course and it's gone
00:53:04.140
yes yeah there's just there's just no headroom anymore but presumably you would you you would
00:53:10.100
be of the view that um whatever surplus you have at t1 um the longer the system is in place that
00:53:17.600
surplus is just going to to um well i mean it's already gone no but it's going to be eaten up
00:53:22.360
anyway the surplus it's always on borrowed time once this is yes yeah exactly what what we have
00:53:27.820
is a government that has retired and is living on its pension.
00:53:54.540
is bled dry and uses a cash cow pipe pfi middle management and vampiric private companies uh yeah
00:54:01.940
i mean i've i've worked in in private equity and i've i've seen i mean not my not the companies i
00:54:06.900
directly work for but other people that i spoke to is like they were always bragging about how
00:54:10.540
they were getting the getting one over on the british state because basically they know how
00:54:14.420
to write contracts and the state doesn't yeah uh the binary surfer for a solid five dollars
1.00
00:54:19.860
He says, look, at least Big Ange has two notable assets going for her
1.00
00:54:34.160
He also says, for another solid $5, Harrison Restore,
00:54:37.520
be aware that Labour are doing the political equivalent of the famous
00:54:40.960
there's no money left good luck note for whoever forms the next government.
00:54:48.080
He also says, good, he's been on a run, this chap.
00:54:52.460
This requires fundamental reshaping and visionary system-wide disruption.
00:54:58.440
Well, I suppose we're both making the same point,
00:55:15.540
um and tom rat says uh it's um it's incumbent on restore to be war gaming policies now are you
00:55:23.480
you doing any policies yes right there we go yes we are and um yes i i do think that this is the
00:55:30.400
whole um virtue of what rupert said in his in our launch video as you mentioned earlier about the
00:55:35.440
need to level with the british people tell them this is going to be a painful process where
00:55:38.400
like we're you know like rehab is not enjoyable no um and like not to be a too boomerish about
00:55:44.460
things, but I think Thatcher was quite good at communicating this way. She didn't, in successive
00:55:48.140
elections, she didn't really say to the British people, it's going to be sunlit uplands straight
00:55:51.860
away. She was basically addressing the country and telling them, look, if we want to be successful
00:55:57.940
and get out of this sort of post-war consensus stupor, the whole country needs a cold shower,
00:56:03.200
and that's what I'm going to give you. Well, and I'd be willing to take 20 years of hardship
00:56:07.620
to turn this country around. I suspect once you started doing it, actually, you'd probably turn
00:56:12.720
Well, yeah, it's easier with time because once you remove the people who are on benefits
00:56:17.880
living in zone one and in the centers of cities and so on, all of the second order effects
00:56:23.260
in terms of lower crime, in terms of lower house prices, in terms of more jobs, in terms
00:56:27.780
of everything that follows, sort of convinces the public, actually, yes, our life is getting
00:56:36.120
We can live in urban areas, which are critical to generating wealth anywhere throughout history.
00:56:41.700
etc etc so it is a self-reinforcing process reversing all of this the benefits cascade
00:56:49.380
from it even if the start of it is going to be bloody painful and as a matter of public
00:56:53.300
communications as well it does help to remind people that the choice isn't between hardship
00:56:57.060
and no hardship the choice is between endless hardship laced with statelessness and temporary
00:57:01.460
hardship laced with restoration yes precisely yeah exactly there is hope there is hope that's
00:57:08.020
So some of the problems that are affecting Britain seem to be a bit widespread.
00:57:15.160
And I thought I'd start here with this tweet from Roisin Michaud.
00:57:20.600
I hope that I'm pronouncing her name correctly.
0.97
00:57:24.220
She used to be in the EU in Brussels and then was promptly kicked out for her efforts.
00:57:33.220
um eu staff seem to be getting told that they aren't allowed to discuss subjects such as
00:57:47.580
and if you are the policy making body of all of europe presumably you might want to
00:57:56.000
policy might come up at some point politics might might factor into your job it they it might
00:58:09.240
Now, mind you, this hasn't stopped EU staff because a bunch of them are protesting against EU policy on Gaza
00:58:16.620
because apparently it's a problem that Europe hasn't nuked Israel yet.
0.75
00:58:21.400
Or at least they might be advocating that for all I know.
00:58:25.020
They're also not allowed to talk about gender, of course.
00:58:27.700
and they're not allowed to discuss really most things.
00:58:33.680
And presumably the actual impossible-to-discuss topic
00:58:38.380
might have something to do also with immigration.
00:58:45.980
but one would assume that that's also a verboten topic.
00:58:53.720
because throughout the West we're seeing a bit of a pattern.
00:58:56.700
and now let me tell me if you notice something please tell me if you notice something
00:59:02.120
australia pauline hansen's uh one nation party is becoming the biggest in uh opinion polls
00:59:10.500
others are they can still command a majority the rest can still command a majority but they seem
00:59:17.400
to be broken defeated and out of ideas and more importantly what is one nation is that is that a
00:59:22.940
based party is one nation is their version of restore that's pauline hanson yes right okay and
00:59:27.860
like a national populist anti-mass immigration we like one nation do we i think from what i've seen
00:59:32.700
i haven't studied it in depth but she seems very sound fair enough i like one nation then yes and
00:59:37.900
um tell me if this rings a bell i see a story like that from this country every single day
00:59:45.280
Yes, yes. For those of you not watching, four migrants raped a 17-year-old for six hours at multiple locations in Australia.
00:59:55.740
I mean, that sort of thing used to happen once a decade in this country.
01:00:01.800
Because there's a great deal of dissatisfaction with Mr. Merkel.
01:00:07.140
And it seems that Rassemblement National, the party of Marine Le Pen and Jordan Bardella, is getting stronger.
01:00:14.380
The left is trying to figure out a way of uniting.
01:00:39.980
uh leaders that the public can rally around which is really a huge issue uh record number
01:00:49.120
of presidential hopefuls they're all trying to block the far right and the fear of the surging
01:00:53.960
far right this is always the story from the guardian yeah and then you see this kind of story
01:00:59.580
in uh france right remote town pigal uh 25 year old australian woman
0.69
01:01:37.120
In some provinces, it is going up to 42% in some German provinces.
01:01:44.460
And as a federal republic, being in control of some states actually makes a huge difference.
01:01:55.360
A small group of men who are clearly not very German,
0.58
01:02:29.380
Their opponents are losing ground, essentially.
01:02:41.360
Four Syrian migrants gang-rape 17-year-old in an apartment.
01:02:47.660
Romania, they have a different set of objections.
01:03:00.400
because the Russians kicked out the Ottomans.
0.98
01:03:04.660
or independent states now in Romania and Bulgaria
01:03:25.540
that wants to be closer to Moscow is gaining ground.
01:03:37.200
If you don't have energy, you can't do anything else.
01:03:47.400
who wants to be an antagonism with the Russians,
01:03:51.180
what is being referred to as a pro-Putin far-right party,
01:03:58.100
um and in the netherlands things are kicking off rather spectacularly
01:04:04.940
um same story they're trying to bring in illegal migrants calling them refugees
01:04:14.520
they want to build them neck they want to put them up next to a girls hockey club
01:04:20.060
i would i would suggest that's actually not a good idea i don't know why you would say that
01:04:25.740
It's not that the previous stories might have provided evidence.
01:04:34.260
And then the Dutch police, because these people in this town dared to protest, pretty much went all out.
01:04:46.320
Because the police come from one side attacking the protesters, making them run in one direction.
01:04:53.320
these guys in jeans and in black tops these are actually police officers
01:05:00.040
well they just they just come at them with truncheons and they just come at them with
01:05:05.340
truncheons and beat them as they are running away these are just regular people in their town
01:05:10.180
yes these are regular people in their town protesting for several weeks because this is
01:05:14.880
a different place uh they're trying to turn a former school into asylum center
01:05:20.020
And the Dutch police's reaction is, shall we say, spicy.
01:05:33.720
and then they beat another guy for filming, essentially.
01:05:39.380
This gentleman comes over to him and is, you know, clearly intimidating.
01:05:48.340
Standing there catches you, gives you a beating.
01:05:51.040
It's reminiscent of the Gilets-Jeans protests in France,
01:05:53.740
where the state just sort of beat the daylight out of everyone.
01:05:58.860
You will be replaced, your daughters will be raped,
1.00
01:06:01.220
and you will be beaten by thugs on the pay of the state
1.00
01:06:08.800
And then in the same town of Lusdrecht, I'm guessing,
01:06:43.740
And again, from Eva here, the context was in this particular locality was basically that the police just went around beating even children and branding everybody far right and attacking families.
01:06:58.860
And the police and the state kept on ignoring them, insisting that they be housed in locations where they would clearly be a threat, not in some kind of prison.
01:07:09.740
and so they just started launching firecrackers at the facility trying to set it on fire
01:07:16.120
you know this is the logical consequence of redefining patriotism in terms of the defense
01:07:21.440
of a system and the defense of a value yes and and the defense of a set of values yep i find it
01:07:25.880
interesting like the obviously the afd at the moment i know more about germany than than some
01:07:29.320
of these other european cases um the afd at the moment to like many um many uh chapters of the
01:07:34.520
afd as i understand it in different states are coming of getting into trouble with what in
01:07:39.100
Germany is called the Office for the Protection of the Constitution, which tells you a lot about
01:07:43.540
how German patriotism has been redefined in the post-war era. Again, it's about protection
01:07:48.200
of a system rather than protection and love of a people. And so far as the AFD, despite loving the
01:07:56.280
people, are a threat to the system, then they need to register as persons of interest on the
01:08:01.700
Office for the Protection of the Constitution. It is a form of idolatry where the system itself
01:08:31.120
All of Europe always fought under the same banner
01:08:36.980
but now it's for the system, the international rules,
01:08:43.080
and these pesky countrymen bothering us get to be beaten
01:08:50.640
They are at best an inconvenience and at worst an active threat
01:09:06.980
And in Bulgaria, you see something similar.
0.92
01:09:10.080
I should have put Romania and Bulgaria together.
01:09:19.820
There is a Russia-aligned figure who is now a threat to the support for the EU.
01:09:25.780
Now, mind you, the EU will always lecture you about human rights in Russia.
01:09:29.680
It will never lecture you about the police beating unarmed protesters in the Netherlands
0.93
01:09:34.020
because they don't want their daughters raped.
0.97
01:09:39.280
It will never object to the French police beating the daylight out of the gilets jaunes.
01:09:44.140
It won't object to the British state having a two-tier policing system
01:09:48.400
where some groups are monitored with facial recognition
01:09:51.800
and their phones are tracked and all of their movements are tracked,
01:09:56.840
What kind of a person signs up to join the police
01:09:59.560
and then spends their time going around beating families, children,
01:10:05.940
because they have legitimate concerns about their safety
01:10:27.060
I can't say what I think should happen to these chaps.
1.00
01:10:31.560
um and you see the same story in all parts of europe with them trying to protest to
01:10:41.140
how the eu is leading things how the western establishment in general in britain in australia
01:10:48.560
in the united states and in the eu is managing things but the remarkable thing about the eu is
01:11:08.080
and the Russians had intervened in the elections.
01:11:20.360
and then used that as a pretext to nullify the election.
1.00
01:11:29.780
I mean, that's a level of evil here that we haven't seen before.
01:11:37.180
We see the EU basically building up slush funds for NGOs
01:11:50.140
and attack the Islamophobes and so on and so forth.
01:11:53.940
So they're spending $8 billion on NGOs forming public opinion and making sure that, you know, you always have a bench of talking heads willing to go on television and gaslight the public.
01:12:09.920
They are spending, they are admitting that in Hungary, they pretty much did the same thing as they did in Romania.
01:12:16.500
They accused the former Prime Minister Orban of leaking information from the EU to the Russians,
01:12:34.860
because now the new nominee for the foreign ministry in Hungary
01:12:43.400
And they're holding Hungary by the Short and Curleys, refusing to unleash money that they were supposed to get when Orbán left until, presumably, they changed their approach to asylum seekers.
01:12:59.980
This is going to be a difficult one for Magyar to manage as well, because he did expressly win the election in many ways on outflanking Orbán from the rise on immigration.
01:13:09.580
Because he presented Orban as a soft touch on the legal kind of immigration, despite acknowledging his successes on the illegal front with the fence on the border with Serbia.
01:13:19.420
And so it will be interesting to see, obviously you had all the usual suspects from Hillary Clinton to Alex Soros, celebrating when Magia won simply because he was not Orban and the hope was that business as usual will resume.
01:13:31.440
It will be interesting to see the metal that he's really made of, if indeed he's made of metal at all.
01:14:07.080
but it's getting to a point where really the whole economy is breaking down under these kinds of
01:14:13.380
policies so not only we are in the situation where the public wants one thing the establishment
01:14:21.400
comes up with all kinds of dirty tricks to impose the literal opposite on them they do that by
01:14:27.580
printing money and it's getting to a point where they can no longer keep on printing money because
01:14:33.100
the growth of the money supply, as you could explain to us, at a time like this is pushing
01:14:38.440
us towards way more level inflation. And we know what happens afterwards.
01:14:44.740
Yeah. I mean, at the moment, they're holding it together. I mean, everything's just getting
01:14:48.420
debased on year by year. But if we get the Green Party or Angela Reynor and stuff, they've got no
01:14:54.140
choice, but they're just printed. Exactly. Exactly. And, you know, none of this is making
01:15:00.200
lives people's lives better because the growth from immigration in terms of population far exceeds
1.00
01:15:06.280
the growth figures and q1 is always the good quarter and q1 is always the good quarter
01:15:11.060
this is why is q1 always the good quarter uh because a lot of companies when they commit to
01:15:17.360
their spending plans they have a big pile of cash at the start of the year so like for my contracting
01:15:22.140
i invoice them at the start of the year i get that money that goes you know that makes my balance
01:15:28.340
sheet look better, but then I work it off for the rest of the year. And so Q1 tends to work
01:15:34.380
that way because of how financial planning operates. Like take my case and just expand
01:15:39.220
it across the board. And people's living standards are collapsing and their security is falling
01:15:48.780
apart. And what's the EU's answer to this? Don't you dare talk about it.
01:15:53.700
and when politicians say things and which i mean very very few few of them are economically
01:15:59.560
literate enough literate enough even to say this but when they're sort of you know told about the
01:16:03.820
debt and they say don't worry most of our debt is denominated in our own currency is that basically
01:16:08.100
translation for we can print it that's translation for we can inflate our way out of this by
01:16:13.900
destroying your living status the problem is that only gets you so far because eventually you turn
01:16:17.700
the currency into toilet paper indeed but is that what they're basically saying i mean yeah i mean
01:16:21.100
to an extent and and they well and also financial repression where they can control you know banks
01:16:26.560
and insurance companies just to buy more debt problem is once you turn the currency into toilet
01:16:31.140
paper it's it's all for if we produced our own oil and our own electricity our own um you know
01:16:38.080
we could fully feed ourselves if we could do everything ourselves yeah it wouldn't matter
01:16:41.620
the fact is we need dollars we need euros so if you trash your currency through that and
01:17:08.400
or the French police to beat the crap out of you
0.98
01:17:10.600
while they're trying to flood you with migrants.
1.00
01:17:14.480
No, I really don't like the Dutch police anymore.
01:17:16.020
yeah not not good not good at all any comments you want to put out well let's see the next
01:17:26.360
government needs to have a manifesto to start exact just stating exactly what they'll repeal
01:17:32.160
scrap otherwise it'll take two terms just to get everything through parliament yeah i mean this is
01:17:36.900
why you guys are you know involved in the policy work that you're doing and in the research that
01:17:41.680
you're doing and obviously trying to expand a lot of it at the moment i should say too i
01:17:46.580
obviously our main focus has been on Great Yarmouth first
01:17:49.960
but we really are trying to formalize processes
01:18:09.860
Therefore, the ruling class opposes Christianity.
0.99
01:18:14.260
I mean, usury is, has been hated since the time of the Greeks.
01:18:20.820
The entirety of Western tradition relies on rejecting usury.
01:18:26.900
Don't live outside of your means, et cetera, et cetera.
01:18:30.400
What have the governments of Europe and of the West been doing for the last few decades?
01:18:44.260
we will do them tomorrow okay shall we have a look at some of the other comments here
01:18:53.240
uh from my section zesty king says keir starmer is the last defender of the current system as
01:19:00.260
it stands today no no west streeting is making a bit to keep on defending it this is mandelson's
01:19:05.760
creature don't forget that uh everyone agrees that that it is not working and his position is
01:19:11.880
untenable. If Keir resigns, it will benefit West Streeting. If he resigns later, it'll benefit Andy
01:19:17.040
Burnham, who has already allied himself with Angela Rayner. That's correct, yes. Dan's immigration
01:19:24.280
policy will consist of a... Thanks for that. Hang on, let me read that one. Oh, go on, man.
01:19:33.340
Where is it? Russian Garbage Human. Yes, yes, yes. Yes, I like the idea of just having a narrow
1.00
01:19:41.300
door right very narrow door ah yes i think that's what he's saying i oh i know how you read it now
01:19:49.480
yes good god you've got a filthy mind haven't you well i i know my audience uh yes i love you guys
01:19:57.580
yes uh no the allergy whoever sent me that book oh the minotaur milk i'm i think i might actually
0.94
01:20:05.420
have to read it and do a segment on it funnily enough i did see it on your desks not ferris's
01:20:40.980
Okay, I'm not aware of that, but I'll check it out.
01:20:51.880
saying something naughty as causes Belly to arrest the lot?
01:21:00.320
I don't want to criticize Tommy Robinson over this,
01:21:02.600
but you want people who are making a sound case,
01:21:08.140
uh you've got to be a bit careful about this stuff given the constraints that britain is under
01:21:15.020
yeah um and at a certain point you do you do need to ask the question
01:21:18.900
what are we doing this for like do you want to win i can't remember what that what that um
0.99
01:21:24.400
american loudmouth latina ladies call yes she is not the sort of person who's likely to endear
1.00
01:21:29.980
her to be able to engage the actual affections and concerns of patriotic british people on the
01:21:36.400
ground in this country and if not what's the point it's a different mindset it's a completely
01:21:40.960
different mindset and this is this is important but then you have yeah tommy's meetings with the
01:21:48.000
state department all that stuff which clearly factor into the decision making lenin once said
01:21:52.840
in any field of human endeavor you should always have your heart on fire but your brain on ice
01:21:58.020
it's a very good quote right wing leninism that is a very good quote uh richard says you can't
01:22:04.760
believe how much this government hates the british white people yeah yeah it's it's pretty
01:22:10.480
obvious you want to read a couple is it an instinctual hate or is it just that they've
01:22:14.380
locked themselves into a process that they can't get out of and it's the only thing they know how
01:22:18.160
to do look if you remember gordon brown when he met he was campaigning and he sees this woman in
01:22:23.940
2009 i believe julian duffy yes yes called her a bigoted woman yes and if you actually sort of
01:22:29.220
study i mean i say study if you listen to what she was saying it could have been could not
01:22:32.780
possibly have been more inoffensive no no he was a hot mic moment called her a bigoted woman she
01:22:38.200
was she was actually just complaining about how her son was struggling to get a job job because
0.56
01:22:41.340
there were more polish and romanian people in her neighborhood than there used to be that's all she
01:22:44.740
was saying yeah it lifelong labor voter as well yeah and i i remember that and you know clearly
01:22:52.420
she was a working class woman she didn't she didn't really have the words to to skillfully
01:22:57.000
articulate what was trying to said and she was talking about polish and romanians and she goes
01:23:01.160
on a bit and then and then she concludes it was something like you know where are these people
01:23:04.420
coming from you know she doesn't really have the words to properly articulate it and i remember
01:23:09.840
for about two or three months afterwards every left-wing media representative was out there
01:23:16.020
mocking her saying oh where are they coming from when she said it herself they're coming from
0.96
01:23:20.160
romania and poland what an ignorant woman it's it's just it's it's your concern is not valid
0.97
01:23:26.680
because you aren't valid because what you represent is a continuity with tradition and
0.99
01:23:33.620
that tradition is you know culturally homogenous ethnically homogenous christian and these guys
0.99
01:23:41.880
are post-christian libtards and they they don't respect you they think that you're all ignorant
0.92
01:23:47.980
because you didn't, you know, articulate your ideas as an essayist or something.
1.00
01:24:03.480
is that the collective interests of European majorities are poisonous.
01:24:11.880
you cannot but react to people like Gillian Duffy we've discussed
01:24:18.680
towards a sort of group consciousness there, isn't she?
01:24:21.420
Yes, essentially, meaning that she is a bigot by that definition.
01:24:29.680
I mean, presumably you guys are on the lookout for the,
01:24:31.620
because perhaps this third segment is all about sort of dirty tricks
01:24:34.420
that they're going to pull in and all the rest of it.
01:24:35.960
I mean, are you guys very much alive to the dirty tricks
01:24:39.720
I mean, we're certainly not sentimental and naive
01:24:52.580
And so, yeah, we're definitely alive to that sort of thing.
01:24:55.420
But it's precisely because we are alive to that sort of thing
01:24:56.980
that we're not just interested in doing stunts for the sake of it
01:24:59.560
because it might give you a kind of cathartic sense of gratification,
01:25:03.360
but if it's not actually getting the ball down the field,
01:25:06.740
there's no point in engaging in that sort of behaviour.
01:25:10.820
We all know that delayed gratification is white supremacy.
01:25:34.640
do you know much about what's going on with that?
01:25:39.880
we're trying to get it done as quickly as possible,
01:25:41.540
But as you're implying, it has to be done carefully and you need to make sure that the proper vetting is in place.
01:25:47.660
You're not allowing yourself to be infiltrated.
01:25:50.780
We keep the circle at this point fairly small within Restore Britain in order to minimize those sorts of breaches.
01:26:00.600
We don't think we're playing cricket here with fundamentally good but maybe mistaken chaps on the village green.
1.00
01:26:08.100
We understand that Britain isn't that sort of society anymore.
1.00
01:26:11.060
And we wanted to become that sort of society again.
01:26:13.740
But as such, we have to adjust our operating system.
01:26:16.100
This isn't a gentleman's game, and we're aware of that.
01:26:20.700
Remember, they hired that actor to go against reform in Clacton, right?
01:26:25.340
I don't know if it was actually established in the end,
01:26:27.140
but yes, there were certainly very strong suspicions
01:26:30.960
Yeah, because he had a website where he advertised his work,
01:26:33.400
including talking rough, or speaking rough, as he called it.
01:26:36.060
So these kinds of things are happening, and they would do it again.
01:26:40.500
they would do much worse than that i mean for god's sake rupert was raided on his own right
01:26:47.080
i think i think well one thing i'll say as well i think this is part of the virtue another virtue
01:26:51.440
of restore as i see it and uh rupert as i as i obviously know him fairly well at this point is
01:26:56.200
that he is genuine genuinely political i don't know much time we have i don't want to go on
01:26:59.960
but he is genuinely politically ambitious and by that i don't mean he wants a job at all costs
01:27:05.740
what I mean is, is that he sees politics as an activity in which if you want to get something
01:27:10.240
done, you need to kind of reshape the mold that sets the terms for day-to-day politics.
01:27:16.360
And so if the Overton window, like one of our functions is to shift the Overton window. And
01:27:21.700
I think we've already had quite a lot of success in doing that. Once the Overton window is shifted
01:27:25.800
rightwards as it has been, and as I hope it can be pushed a little more, all of a sudden what
01:27:30.220
would have counted as entrapment 10 years ago doesn't actually count as entrapment anymore
01:27:35.180
because the standards have been updated a little.
01:27:37.340
So I think this is part of the function of meta-politics,
01:27:40.180
is to make sure that the whole game of political wrangling
01:27:44.840
no longer takes place on the terms of your adversaries,
01:27:48.360
because then you have much more room for manoeuvre,
01:27:52.400
much more room for just being frank about what you really believe.
01:27:54.660
I mean, I interviewed Sam Millia the other day,
01:27:57.860
I wrote a piece about him when he was sent to prison.
01:28:04.120
he was having to make the argument that the grooming gangs even existed and that was only
01:28:08.380
two years ago right and then he comes out of jail and he turns on the tv and there's news night
01:28:12.620
about the grooming gangs so it just goes to show how far even in the space of a couple of years
01:28:17.680
these things can move and and that's why i was just so delighted when when rupert started doing
01:28:21.580
those shows and they said oh that i think that makes you a racist he's like i don't care that's
01:28:25.660
right that is brilliant there's power in that because because you know these like terms like
01:28:30.040
racist terms like xenophobe terms like bigot whatever respectable meaning they might once
01:28:33.760
have had they now basically mean averse to conquest and in favor of survival if you translate them in
01:28:38.900
almost any context that's what they mean uh and once you once you make that more apparent to the
01:28:43.340
british people which is obviously a slow process and when it's when the term is being used in bad
01:28:47.080
faith you have basically half of the country that is to say our side saying we no longer like
01:28:52.720
language only has power if if instituted by human agreement and so if half of the society is saying
01:28:59.220
well, no, I don't, you may as well be saying abracadabra,
01:29:04.980
these terms don't have the power that they used to.
01:29:08.540
for this kind of moral blackmail even to take effect.
01:29:12.380
And so if we just, you know, opt out of the whole game,
01:29:24.820
So it has a lot to do with shifting the language,
01:29:29.220
yeah i mean i'll just read out one final comment um that's a random name says all i've ever known
01:29:33.480
is his farce of a system we're currently living in can one of you explain to me how life felt
01:29:37.820
when things worked or uh have none of you experienced it either well i mean i might be
01:29:43.120
to answer that one i mean you're probably even too young to answer to answer that one harrison
01:29:46.800
but i actually missed the end of it what it was what was the question um you know have you
01:29:50.900
experienced a living outside of this system um i mean i was born in 98 yeah yeah well i mean i was
01:29:57.200
in 98 i would have been 18 so then the whole kind of blairite thing was going on but i do remember
01:30:03.120
it beforehand and and the best way i can describe it is just lack of being in a pressure cooker
01:30:07.940
but you feel weighed down today like there's there's things are being heaped on your shoulder
01:30:12.700
before then and you know it wasn't just because i was a kid i've had this conversation with people
01:30:17.120
who are much older than me you people just cooperated and the state didn't require and you
01:30:23.480
weren't hected all the time you were just free and and it's difficult to describe a sense of
01:30:28.820
freedom when you haven't have never experienced it but it's it's just that you weren't carrying
01:30:34.840
weights on your shoulder all the time best way i can try and put that across um but no with that
01:30:40.860
i'm afraid we have run out of time oh there was some comments about um excellent that harrison
01:30:46.160
is on all that sort of stuff so great so good well thank you everyone thank you yes no thank
01:30:50.560
for coming in we always like to see the the chaps come in spread the good word um so uh yes one
01:30:56.820
second oh god lord inquisitor hector rex says dan and fidesz have you gotten through the book i sent
01:31:02.300
thank you oh it was you was it hector thank you all right thank you well no i quite like it
01:31:08.640
i'm glad i don't i don't like it but i just think i'm studying women
01:31:18.460
I think that's all the time that we have for today now