00:01:01.680So, before we get through those segments then, just to let you know, we have some announcements.
00:01:06.020It is Monday, so at three o'clock, of course, you've got a realpolitik for us,
00:01:11.140where you're going to be talking about the Straits of Hamoz and Lebanon.0.95
00:01:14.360Yes, it seems that the Iranians have won the battle for the Straits,
00:01:18.540but might be losing Lebanon and having to fight for Yemen again.
00:01:21.840Right, well, go and tune in to Firas to get his takes all about that. And just to say as well, the third part of my series on Chronicles now, talking all about the rhyme of the ancient mariner, it's an absolutely wonderful poem at the beginning of the Romantic Movement by Samuel Taylor Coleridge.
00:01:41.760and it's one of the most enjoyable things that I've actually spoken about on Chronicles so far.
00:01:49.400Coleridge's mind and the philosophy and theology that he infuses into his poem is just so moving, so compelling.
00:01:58.640And I've also borrowed heavily from a wonderful piece of work by Malcolm Geith,
00:02:03.440where he also analyzes this poem and talks about Coleridge's own life.
00:02:07.780and so I think it's really good a lot of people have been really enjoying it and the first part
00:02:13.420of it is actually freemium as well so if you'd like to start there for free you're welcome to
00:02:18.740and then all the other wonderful premium content on the website is five pounds a month so with all
00:02:23.680that said then Bo tell us about Mr Burnham. I was going to say episode 52 that's a year right?
00:02:28.740Yeah it's been going over a year now and same for you of course Firas as well. It's gone very fast
00:02:33.100isn't it it has it really has it's nice to build up a body of work yeah and then you just go oh
00:02:38.660bloody hell that's all there now how did that happen so fast yeah yeah okay well let's talk
00:02:43.920about uh king of the north king bumham the first no sternum burnham and his eyeliner let's talk
00:02:50.440about him because he did a speech today it happened shortly before we went on air this
00:02:54.680segment was going to be all about what burnham plans to say what we think burnham is going to
00:03:00.420say but the speech was actually delivered shortly before this or about an hour ago or so how
00:03:05.940considerate yeah and i listened to it all on times one and a half speed so i listened to it finishing
00:03:11.280just about 10 15 minutes ago so um okay let's talk all about it it was in the news cycle this
00:03:16.780morning it was like you know what what's he's gonna what is he gonna say because i suppose one
00:03:20.700of the first points to say about it is that quite often even politicians that are really quite well
00:03:25.920known one way or another people say do we really know them do we really know what their plan for
00:03:32.520government is you know like even someone that's been in the eye for years and years uh in the
00:03:37.120public eye for years and years like burnham a lot of people will say legitimately but wait i don't
00:03:42.020really know i don't feel like i know him and i don't really know exactly in any real detail what
00:03:47.220his plan for government will be i mean that was one of the things that um lots of leaders uh
00:03:52.900suffer from that criticism even starmer people say even at the end of starmer's time they're like
00:03:57.300we never really got to know we never really got to know what he thinks about things he wouldn't
00:04:01.540that's us right well i mean the last labor manifesto which burnham has said he's plans
00:04:06.900to stick by at least fundamentally he has to stick by it otherwise he has to call a general election
00:04:11.940yeah which he has also ruled out yeah uh well gets that right at the end of the segment but
00:04:15.780he's basically ruled that out so you'd sort of have to say that that largely he's going to stick
00:04:19.700to it um but it'll twiddle around the edges um so what is his plan because the last labor manifesto
00:04:28.240just before going into that last general election was very very thin yes wasn't it it's very and
00:04:32.980deliberately so to give him starmer enough wiggle room to do more or less as he pleases yes that was
00:04:38.700one of the big criticisms of the last labor manifesto you read it you're like well what is
00:04:42.200it though exactly really there's not a whole list of promises there isn't a whole padded out vision
00:04:48.240of what britain should be nothing like that and the most uh radical stuff in there the stuff that
00:04:54.280you'd really expect to maybe have the uh the people's vote behind you when it comes to you
00:05:00.260know like scrapping the jury trial or um uh decriminalizing women having self-abortions
00:05:05.840those sorts of like really radical things they obviously weren't in there yeah a whole number
00:05:11.240of things yeah sorry no i'll just snuck in which is exactly the way they did mass immigration in
00:05:17.240the first place wasn't on the manifesto either there was nothing in the manifesto about giving
00:05:21.380or trying to give away the chagos islands to a chinese proxy no nothing like that was there
00:05:26.340no there was nothing about that will put peter mandelson who is working as a mole for a foreign
00:05:32.180entity jeff repstein in a really sensitive position nothing like that it was very very
00:05:36.860deliberately liked on detail okay so all right that's starmer and the labor government what
00:05:42.600about burnham then what what about him now he has been in the public eye for years i remember black
00:05:48.600in the blair years i remember him being part of the team quite a relatively small one but he still
00:05:54.060had he still had name recognition um and in the brown government as well uh certainly a bit more
00:06:00.580in the brown government i mean i remember when he went to become mayor of manchester he was already
00:06:05.500certainly basically household name not a full-blown household name where everyone would know him by
00:06:10.900site but if you paid attention to news and politics you would you would know better i mean
00:06:15.640he tried to run for labor leader twice before didn't he and lost like he lost to corbin famously
00:06:19.900that time so okay despite the fact that he's been around for 20 plus years or more um still what
00:06:26.420exactly is it we we know that he's like a bit of a well maybe not a bit he's quite left yes um his
00:06:32.560identity as a northerner likes the football yeah right um normal guy but so but so what is and you
00:06:40.760know he's again over the years he's talked for hours and hours in front of cameras but still
00:06:45.860people want to know but okay but right now you're imminently going to be in the the big chair the
00:06:52.640top seat imminently what is your plan for government so all right he has did a speech
00:06:58.140where he laid it out and it was i don't know about half hour long 45 minutes long or so something
00:07:03.560like that and i suppose at the heart of it he talked about what he calls manchesterism i.e what
00:07:10.840he did in manchester as mayor of manchester roll that out on sort of a national level in various
00:07:16.200ways because he thinks he did such a fantastic job of managing manchester added a couple of buses
00:07:22.920well he did to be fair to him have quite a strong team of people around him all affirming that he
00:07:27.640was doing a tremendous job of manchester yeah so that would give you that impression i suppose
00:07:46.800So just to give you a quick idea that it's all in the news.
00:07:49.240Well, that's, if I just may, on that point as well,
00:07:52.120that's already a terrible idea for people like us, right?
00:07:56.700Because ultimately, those mayors that are going to have the most powers
00:08:00.920are, of course, going to be the city mayors.
00:08:03.080And it's the cities that have become the most diverse and most quickly.0.75
00:08:06.580And so you're actually going to end up with the Londonification, where you just get these hard progressive mayors using progressivism basically as a cudgel against the native population to bring in, to cement the power of the foreign cultures and the foreign lobby groups within those cities.0.76
00:08:24.440And because of the demographics, it means that they're going to get to just govern in perpetuity with a greater leash.0.50
00:08:31.640Well, let's talk about that right away,
00:08:32.720because that was one of the main things in his speech,
00:08:35.880was talking about devolution, further devolution.
00:08:38.740Because what Britain needs is a few more layers of government.
00:17:36.860and already the currency is falling because nobody has any confidence in these insane leftists
00:17:44.420and so he's just dancing on the edge of the debt crisis and that seems to be the plan
00:17:51.300whether you're a normal individual or a national government you can only spend beyond your means
00:17:56.200for so long yes and then you can only borrow again whether you're an individual or a national
00:18:00.300government you can only borrow to cover that for so long yes before everything falls apart okay0.98
00:18:05.580so he's talking about the biggest council house building program uh in the post-war period again
00:18:10.500world or two he's talking about well we're going to be housing i wonder yeah all right oh well i
00:18:15.420was going to leave that towards the end but let's just say that uh what he doesn't talk about in
00:18:19.800this speech is very very telling should i just say it now he talks about so many things from
00:18:25.040business rates to universities the peterloo massacre gets a gets a mention oh really because
00:18:29.800of course it does yeah um you know he talks about loads and loads and loads of different things
00:18:34.120the high street in he does talk about um a number of different aspects of society not one word about
00:18:41.480legal or illegal migration not one word about demographic decline not one word about the small
00:18:46.220boats and he wants to talk about hope in every heart wants to talk about bringing back hope
00:18:52.000to the country about prosperity in every postcode but not a word about our invasion not a word about
00:18:58.020the millions of extra people here that are a detriment to our society and our economy nothing0.97
00:19:03.060not a word well in which case fine be like that that's your prerogative i mean you're basically
00:19:09.560just following every prime minister we've had in my living memory but don't be surprised when
00:19:14.960denial of that issue ends up shattering you as you know it immediately made starmer incredibly
00:19:21.820unpopular because he was not willing to deal with the dark truth underlying things like southport
00:19:27.800underlying things like henry novak and tragically horrifically he is going to have to deal with
00:19:33.720similar instances they're becoming more frequent not less and so it's like fine don't include it
00:19:38.920in your speech andy but this issue is going to come knocking on your number 10 door in manchester
00:19:45.160or london hell or high water so you're not getting out of it oh yeah reality won't leave him alone
00:19:52.040of course yeah thing about reality yeah it always bites you it's got a habit of rearing its ugly
00:19:58.300head which is the one who knocked yeah so again not a word not a word about any of that the most
00:20:05.660the biggest most existential thing the most important issue of our age i would argue that
00:20:09.980nearly everything salient political issue and the one issue that's put reform on the map and the one
00:20:14.460issue where the conservatives have completely discredited themselves and and and it all flows
00:20:19.300from the immigration issue it's the biggest problem facing britain nearly all if not all
00:20:25.540policy is downstream of that you want to talk about housing you want to talk about the higher
00:20:29.000street you want to talk about hope in the hearts of young people you're not going to talk about
00:20:33.280the demographics and immigration well no because it's just hardcore materialism isn't it they think
00:20:39.540if they can just bring into being a certain level of economic abundance for people that all of these
00:20:46.060other more metaphysical issues will just peter out and won't matter to people but they do because
00:20:51.000and will because they always have done for all of time even materialism if the if these people
00:20:56.020were materialists they would end up being well forgive me for saying so but race realists
00:21:01.700they would say that different groups of people have shown very different propensities and that
00:21:07.040is what the material sciences show but they refuse that so they they aren't strictly materialists
00:21:14.300They have this spiritual component that insists that culture doesn't matter, history doesn't matter, origin doesn't matter, nothing matters except year zero.
00:29:12.560the owning class is the problem i mean what's his name ed milliband's friends and his friends
00:29:19.040make a lot of money and there they can trickle down but you know that's a different conversation
00:29:26.800the profit motive is the problem okay this is this is a throwback an old school pinko throwback
00:29:36.700some sort of post like he still hates thatcher and stuff still blaming thatcher for the problems
00:29:42.540of the north things like that uh happy to invoke peter lou the job for hat needlessly crowbar that
00:29:48.420in it's just it's out of date he's so badly out of date and just again what he omits that we've
00:29:55.700been invaded by millions of people that are antithetical to our interests there's not not
00:30:01.080a single word about it final thing i'll say in this segment because i guess i've run slightly
00:30:04.980over time is where uh people close to him have asked will he hold a general election and they
00:30:11.640said no okay all right that's the segment all right well thank you i'll be holding on for power
00:30:19.160won't you for every day that he can just squeezing the rag out um all right i'll just go through uh
00:30:25.520some of the rumble rants here uh just go through the yellow ones yeah uh binary surfer for five
00:30:30.920dollars says it's increasingly irrelevant who prime minister is time in office is dropping
00:30:35.820like a rock 97 to 2007 average nine years uh 2007 to 2016 average 10 years 2017 current average two
00:30:45.100years on this progression one uh plus one decade uh yeah less than one uh sorry one a year uh
00:30:53.020says i'm sorry keep skipping up i couldn't load um scott uh scott see you guys say is his
00:31:01.260planned university educated vape shop startups probably don't give him ideas and then something
00:31:11.320as well that I don't know if I can say so I'm just going to play it on the cautious side if that's
00:31:16.780all right but about Sunak and Starmer and Burnham being all the same which is a perfectly fair
00:31:22.220point all right then so let's talk about his majesty the king ladies and gentlemen now the
00:31:29.080Last time I actually spoke about the king, it might surprise you to hear I actually had some kind words to say.
00:31:35.340Because though he obviously didn't write the speeches himself, I did think that when he went over to Washington for the 250th anniversary,
00:31:45.700and he gave that speech in front of Congress, and there was many a joke that he told at the banquet with Trump.
00:31:52.680And I just thought it was good diplomacy, right?
00:31:56.380It was well written. It harkened back to that shared heritage, that continuity, that history, that brotherhood, you know, the years, right?
00:32:06.380The years that we've spent by one another's side, both living on the world stage together.
00:32:12.120And, you know, it kind of represented a type of diplomacy that Britain could have much more of.0.99
00:32:19.400Weren't it for the fact that everyone who says it is a scheming bastard, right?0.98
00:32:25.120and actually it's all just theatre and window dressing.0.98
00:32:28.360But nonetheless, it was good theatre and window dressing,
00:32:50.020Not only because Bartlett basically tries to use like a prose and verse Shakespearean history style to it, which really fits into, you know, like the pantheon of British playwrights in our own traditions, but also as well, it asks very interesting questions about what does it mean to have a monarchy in a modern liberal democracy and a secular age?
00:33:14.280What does it mean to have a head of the Church of England amongst a population that is becoming more and more atheistic?
00:33:21.900What does it mean to be a monarch in a world which is always talking about democracy and representation and voting for your leaders as just a pure unallowed good?
00:33:34.360And really the point that this play comes to is the fact that really the king is nothing more than an autopen for the establishment.
00:33:42.100He gives the royal assent to anything that passes him by, and whether or not his conscience agrees with it or not, he just gets on with it.
00:33:50.920Now, obviously, this theory of neutrality is something that was very much solidified in the more recent reign of Her Majesty Elizabeth II, of course,
00:34:00.540and was held out to be just the perfect template for how a monarch should conduct themselves in a modern age.
00:34:08.280The problem with this, of course, is that despite questions of nationalization or privatization and, you know, labor and Tory and the old red-blue trick and everything, it's like you can't imagine the king ever coming out and saying, well, I actually think that the abortion legislation has gone a bit too far.
00:34:29.040I'm actually really concerned about the fact that some of my oldest and noblest subjects who have served the crown loyally for centuries and centuries, such as the Cockneys in London, have found themselves displaced and kicked out into Essex, right?
00:34:43.280You're never going to get any of these opinions coming from the king.
00:34:46.300And what you do have constantly, of course, with Charles, is the establishment figurehead, right? The guy who just signs the final order on basically everything that they want to put through.
00:36:48.960What you're describing is the infantilization of the monarchy, because it used to be said about children that they should be seen and not heard.
00:36:58.180And now what you get with the monarchs, they are seen but not heard.
00:37:01.900Nothing, they're not allowed to speak to begin with, unless it's dictated by someone else.
00:37:07.380But they're rolled out to on camera for various occasions just to sort of show the public that, look, there is this institution that you're meant to love.
00:37:15.900But really, it has no concern for you whatsoever now.
00:37:18.960so it's it's the complete capture of the monarchy but it's also the infantilization of the monarchy
00:37:24.340i'd probably say as well if i'm just going to give my opinion it's probably for the best0.99
00:37:29.000because the problem with any hereditary rule is you may or may not get an idiot or a psycho or a0.96
00:37:34.860buffoon right so we've had a few i mean it's not the voting for people you might also run those0.99
00:37:40.380risks of course you do but it really is potluck whether you get a brilliant based noble tyrant0.99
00:37:47.420or you get a complete psycho imbecile um so okay you can make up your own mind out there whether0.99
00:37:54.020you would rather our king to actually control policy or not don't you think it's for the best1.00
00:37:59.940they don't i mean what imagine if king charles was some sort of not not exactly uh henry the
00:38:05.380second uh richard the first absolute monarch but if he had quite a lot of power like henry the eighth
00:38:11.220or charles the first would that be good well i don't think so i i i i would disagree with you
00:38:16.920really had he not had the monarchy not been so emasculated yeah it would have actually governed
00:38:23.140well because there is a natural uh conflict between the king and his barons and he has to
00:38:28.940lean on the people against the barons that that would be my two cents but that's a different
00:38:32.780conversation or longer conversation yeah yeah i mean i'll just say that there's that's a very
00:38:36.640very specific dynamic and does that play out would that play out in the 19th 20th 21st century
00:38:54.260And so we have now the Sovereign Grant annual report.
00:38:58.600And basically what this is, is it's the official financial statement for the royal household of the recent year.
00:39:04.680And we can tell here, this is what's caused the massive storm, which says the head of state.
00:39:11.060The sovereign is head of state of the United Kingdom and 14 other independent countries.
00:39:16.140The sovereign's constitutional and representational duties as head of state, carried out on the advice of government ministers, constitute the primary role of the monarch.
00:39:26.780The sovereign is politically impartial and exercises constitutional powers on the advice of government ministers.
00:39:33.600The operation of the United Kingdom's parliamentary constitutional monarchy is dependent on the effective, timely, and reliable delivery of His Majesty's constitutional role.
00:39:44.660As head of state, His Majesty's duties include the opening of Parliament, appointment of ministers and other key public officials,
00:39:52.880granting royal assent to legislation, convening the Privy Council, and receiving the credentials of foreign ambassadors and high commissioners.
00:40:15.820When did we agree that that's what we were?
00:40:18.800You know, it reminds me back when Rishi Sunak was Prime Minister,1.00
00:40:23.940you know, holding up his stupid little coins and everything.0.99
00:40:26.820And he just gave a speech in Parliament one day1.00
00:40:29.320talking about the proud multicultural country that we were building.
00:40:33.160it's like no no no hang on Rishi I know you benefit from that but that's not what we agreed
00:40:38.480right we've never had that national conversation what we have had is us telling you get a hold of
00:40:44.140immigration get a hold of immigration since the 50s and 60s you ignoring us and all slowly getting
00:40:51.260to a point now where it's like well they're all here now we guess we just have to get along it's
00:40:56.020like hang on hang on a second rewind this was never actually agreed upon can I say a couple
00:41:01.940Ever since Henry VIII and the Act of Supremacy, perhaps with the slight blips of Bloody Mary
00:41:09.020and what, James I, sorry, James II, apart from those blips, we've been Protestant, Anglican,
00:41:17.980Church of England country, and it's in the coronation oath. I hate to be a stickler,
00:41:23.960I hate to be a bit of a stickler, but he did make a coronation oath in Westminster Abbey
00:41:29.700in front of God and the nation that he would be the head of the Anglican church and that alone
00:41:36.160there's nothing about multi-faith in that no there's nothing about a defender of faiths
00:41:41.980no he's head of the church of England only so what is this is this not breaking his coronation oath
00:41:49.640well this is the interesting point and uh you alerted me to this really good
00:41:53.280Substack Firas by Andrew Lomas here, where he basically just goes through the fact that
00:41:59.380this statement has been made. And obviously, he points out as well that this is not an official
00:42:05.080act. It's not undone, you know, the act of supremacy or anything like that. But it's a
00:42:11.440statement of intent, isn't it, from the monarch? It's a statement to what sort of a king he wishes
00:42:16.760to be and the very irony of the point of course is that um you know it says oh i'm politically
00:42:23.820impartial but the preservation of multiculturalism is an is a fundamentally political position
00:42:31.320absolutely and and what is being conflated here is that politically impartial doesn't mean morally
00:42:38.280impartial no and the morality of britain rests on christianity even if i would argue it's the
00:42:45.140wrong Christianity, different conversation, different time, but it still rests only on
00:42:50.940Christianity and cannot be understood without the Bible and without the proper interpretation of
00:42:56.780the Bible. So this leap from political impartiality has come to mean moral impartiality, and you see
00:43:05.840it reflected in the nature of the statement, which is a protector of faiths in a multi-faith
00:43:10.980nation hold on we're gonna be defending aztec human sacrifice or hindu sati or what are we like
00:43:18.700stoning well we'll stoning we'll defend whatever the state decides to turn a blind eye to feel
00:43:24.260political expediency won't we we'll just whatever the state is complicit in and this is a problem
00:43:29.520with it you know and it's a lot like um it's a lot like in the way that um from my point of view you
00:43:35.860know like reform uk constantly pander after uh the diverse vote it's like but why are you going
00:43:41.940after what isn't your natural constituency in the case of the king those people who actually you
00:43:47.660know have centuries of history here who have you know uh parents who you know grandparents who's
00:43:53.100just served in the falklands or in world war ii whatever it is just going back into the age of
00:43:58.340empire and beyond why aren't they the people who are your primary moral concern your majesty why
00:44:04.320is it people who've just got off a boat yesterday and all of this just comes to basically create
00:44:11.020um a rift a rift of loyalty between the voter base who are the natural constituents of the king
00:44:18.660and those who are never going to give any true loyalty to it and just see it as an outdated
00:44:25.560um relic of the bygone age um and so to carry on with the substack where it says um this is a shift
00:44:32.440from last year where the king's role was stated as being head of the church in england and defender
00:44:36.340of the faith defender of the faith has become protects the space for faith while head of the
00:44:41.820church of england has become supreme governor which is technically accurate but subtly less
00:44:47.560emphatic and meanwhile the church of england previously the object of the king's particular
00:44:52.540constitutional duty has been quietly repositioned as one faith among several within the multi-faith
00:44:59.460nation whose space his majesty now just generically protects and this is all very well worded and he
00:45:07.440goes on to make the point as well of course when we go to actual history that the statutory basis
00:45:12.180of the monarchy is not a matter of administrative discretion but rather flows from the conflict
00:45:17.140fought obviously during the 17th century precisely over the willingness of the monarch to defend a
00:45:22.460protestant church of england and just ask uh you know james ii how how all that went for him
00:45:30.120sorry yeah preempt that no i just saw your notes as well you mentioned george v and uh and victoria
00:45:36.940i didn't mean to gazump no no i hadn't read your notes until no no it's quite right but the what
00:45:43.040the one thing that i was going to say about those and the reason there's that i made notes about
00:45:47.360them was that something we were saying in the office before this meant that all of a sudden
00:45:51.400We actually, in this moment of the Glorious Revolution, sacrificed, like, being the next of kin, being the next in line for the throne.
00:46:00.960Obviously, William of Orange, I believe, ended up marrying James II's daughter, Mary, to give it a veneer of legitimacy and that this wasn't just a Dutch takeover.
00:46:10.720But the other thing as well, of course, is that this, after the death of Queen Anne, the last of the Stuart monarchs,
00:46:17.060Obviously, the line of succession in order to not have a Catholic monarch and reconnect us with Popery and the Vatican basically leapfrogged about 50 candidates until we eventually got to George of Hanover, a man who didn't speak any English whatsoever.
00:46:33.880And obviously by the time you get to George III, though, it does get quite interesting because what we were saying about the monarch exercising a power and what you were saying, Beau, about the constitutional oath, that royal oath that he swore at his coronation, it's like, well, when it came to the Act of Union, you know, passed in 1800, which designed by Pitt the Younger, to of course bring Ireland, emancipate Ireland and bring it into the actual Union,
00:47:03.880Union as a whole, this actually led to the toppling of Pitt the Younger as Prime Minister
00:47:10.200because George III refused to go along with it because he saw giving emancipation to Ireland,
00:47:17.780bringing them into the Union would have basically meant that there was now a Catholic bloc that
00:47:23.360needed representation within the House of Commons, within the House of Lords, and it would have
00:47:28.220basically been a way to leverage catholic infiltration of britain's institutions uh again
00:47:35.540and that was fundamentally against george the third's coronation oath and so you can see george
00:47:41.280the third at the beginning of the 19th century basically saying this is against my oath i can't
00:47:47.900do this and this is really what it comes to it's like fine if the if parliament are going to put
00:47:53.180through all of this legislation that's on them and you're going to sign it because that's what
00:47:57.960you do but there is no one forcing you to betray your oath yes and you are choosing to betray your
00:48:04.920oath because of your own personal impartial political feelings on these subjects can't
00:48:10.960even stomach catholics let alone uh muslims or something but but legally that's what upsets me
00:48:16.960that's what i'm talking about legally you know the king is anointed by the archbishop of canterbury
00:48:22.760Not the Pope, not some mufti from somewhere
00:48:26.800Not some caliph, the Archbishop of Canterbury
00:48:46.060It is an administrative characterisation of working practices
00:48:49.580Produced for the purposes of financial reporting
00:48:52.160with no statutory force whatsoever, cannot amend the coronation oath or repeal the Act of Settlement.
00:48:58.320The king's legal obligations remain precisely what they were on the morning of 6th of May 2023
00:49:03.080when he was coronated and will continue to be in the same form regardless of what the palace's
00:49:09.280communications department chooses to put in its annual review. There is, however, a serious
00:49:15.740constitutional question lurking beneath this jeu d'esprit, which is Parliament has never repealed
00:49:22.140the act of settlement's religious requirements uh though it's reformed them in the margins
00:49:27.300removing the bar on marrying a catholic in 2013 uh so good news for you feras the church of
00:49:34.240england has not been disestablished the coronation oath has not been amended and the statutory basis
00:49:39.640of the monarchy is pretty much unchanged from what it was in 1701 yet the palace is behaving
00:49:45.800as if the monarchy is already being quietly secularized by cultural evolution without the
00:49:52.220inconvenience of repealing the statutes that say otherwise and this is as Andrew goes on to say in
00:49:58.580a sense the inverse of the problem many challenges for the crown faced historically the usurpers of
00:50:05.140medieval England needed to construct legal justifications for change that had already
00:50:10.240happened by force whereas the palace appears to be constructing a cultural justification
00:50:15.420for a change that hasn't yet happened by law and well i thought it was interesting when we had
00:50:23.420rishi as a hindu to be promised because by law we can't have a catholic prime minister again by law
00:50:30.760set like in the 18th century about to is officially catholic well so that's what i'm saying
00:50:36.780like tony blair decided to wait till he was finished being prime minister before he formally
00:50:42.180converted to catholicism and i thought there was a law in place where again going back centuries
00:50:48.260that you can't have a catholic prime minister but but you can't have a hindu one oh oh right
00:50:54.980uh okay yeah or if if if burnham's catholic i guess they're just going to ignore that as well
00:51:00.340i mean not that i'm particularly in favor i don't care i mean i actually don't care
00:51:03.940sadiq khan and put him into parliament and make him prime minister i genuinely don't care
00:51:08.820particularly if burnham is a catholic or not the point is is there a law there or not
00:51:13.300is that the stature is that the the rules or not
00:51:16.240well time will tell um and but it's that thing that it's like okay your majesty if you're going
00:51:23.740to suggest that i am now the king of this multi-faith society it's like then you are
00:51:29.640basically saying i am telling you that these foreign faiths that were brought here against
00:51:35.000your will right and bearing in mind that the king as you were saying earlier feras has basically0.79
00:51:39.720given up all power in the name of democracy it's like well mass immigration is the least democratic
00:51:47.020thing that's ever been forced on us um and yet the king is fully in favor of that so this isn't
00:51:53.580a question of democracy and it currently now means that he has to defend all sorts of barbaric
00:51:59.040religious practices that now exist in britain that hitherto didn't you know before mass immigration
00:52:05.500obviously we have the example of horrible fgm um female genital mutilation and it says here that
00:52:14.680in the year ending march 2025 uh there were um 2,949 um of these honor-based assaults relating
00:52:25.200offences recording uh sorry recorded by the police in england and wales a seven percent increase
00:52:31.000compared to the year before and you know the rule number will be vastly higher of course it will
00:52:35.940child marriages forced marriages forced child marriages it goes on and on and on because
00:52:41.020he's been in households where people aren't going to be able to report on such things all sorts of
00:52:45.900honor killings when your father and your uncles murder the girl yeah daring to be too western or
00:52:50.980something. It just goes on and on. Prince Charles is happy with all of this basically or defend it0.51
00:52:56.660anyway. I did see an interesting clip of him going back to the very very early 90s. So long before
00:53:02.8409-11 and all this woke nonsense that's happened in the 21st century talking about how Islam is great
00:53:09.420and misunderstood and in fact it's a detriment to Christianity that we sort of other it and all
00:53:16.880those sorts of things and it was in like 1993 or something he was saying this i have a book about
00:53:20.960richard the third a children's book about richard the third describing how he heroically went to
00:53:25.520fight the evil saracens oh richard the first be richard the first yes i'm sorry i should check
00:53:31.780third uh richard lionheart uh so yeah okay thank you yeah he'd be proud of you um that's the kind
00:53:39.420of stuff i read to my children good solid good history yeah it's the good stuff proper home
00:53:45.260schooling uh the rise in these offenses was driven by a 35 increase in the metropolitan police
00:53:51.760service um from nine their figures from 398 to 539 offenses and of course as well britain is uh
00:54:02.320sorry the honor killings uh britain has now become the western capital for sharia courts as well uh
00:54:08.680where it goes on to point out that um discovering that sorry i've got my notes a little bit muddled
00:54:14.640here uh but obviously western courts are now about 85 of these uh throughout britain and they
00:54:21.340always deflect it by saying oh yeah but they don't have legitimate legal power within the
00:54:27.940constitution of britain it's like they don't have to people just muslims just turn up to these courts0.95
00:54:34.080get the ruling that they want to get and just carry on with their lives as if these are the0.92
00:54:39.200real things just countless people being married off you know just allowed to be married off it
00:54:45.580says about a hundred thousand islamic marriages are believed to have been conducted in britain
00:54:50.860many of which are not officially registered with the civil authorities they don't register them
00:54:56.340because that might affect their benefits yeah well so that that's the other thing here they
00:55:01.820just don't recognize our system no our common law or anything they just don't recognize it
00:55:08.300An example here, as reported by the European Conservative, United Kingdom increases state benefits for multiple wives, despite the ban on polygamy.
01:09:41.900And on this theme, the government, particularly Shabana Mahmood, the Home Secretary, has decided
01:09:50.040that it wants to open new safe and legal routes for refugees. And they want to allow local
01:09:56.900communities in Britain to sponsor more refugees coming into the country. This is the policy.
01:10:06.160And they're going to provide community sponsorship, that is, a random mosque can do it, an NGO can do it, refugee study and work routes, meaning that your local kebab shop or vape shop can sponsor refugees and bring them into Britain going forward.
01:10:24.580Numbers will start small and controlled, but we know that they're going to grow.
01:10:29.080Refugees, the definition of refugee means anyone.
01:10:58.560Well, they promised that it's going to be just genuine refugees.
01:11:03.660And what they're also going to do is to train ordinary members of the public to decide asylum appeals.
01:11:14.040So when your appeal to become an asylum seeker is rejected, you just go to somebody in the mosque and say, hey, you know, do you want to sit and judge this?0.84
01:11:25.220Because these are going to be the kind of people, because of the DEI requirement that is going to definitely come with a scheme like that,0.94
01:11:32.000you're going to get random members of uh the new british deciding on asylum appeals meaning that0.97
01:11:40.760no appeals are going to be rejected or if they do get rejected it'll be because the sudani judge
01:11:47.400doesn't like pakistanis or something like that it'll be because of their own ethnic conflicts
01:11:53.080it won't be in any way based on the british interest you anon have a have a duty to get
01:11:59.220involved in this right be the change you want to see and so they're going to recruit people from
01:12:05.540different backgrounds just in case you were wondering from various different backgrounds
01:12:10.400to appeal their rejected claims and on top of that they are now making vagrancy no longer a criminal
01:12:19.500offense so previously if some homeless guy camped out in front of your store or in front of your
01:12:25.580house, you could get the police to remove them. Now, congratulations, every town center is going
01:12:31.780to get a tent city. Every single part of Britain is going to get its own little shanty town and0.93
01:12:38.900tent city because Angela Rayner is proud to end the criminalization of vagrancy. Proud.
01:12:47.880It's not that homeless people are made criminals, as some people believe. It's that the people who
01:12:53.480end up homeless for a long period of time are generally criminals and addicts. People who
01:13:01.480are willing to work almost never end up homeless, unless in very exceptional circumstances and for
01:13:09.240a brief period. And that's why vagrancy was criminalized, because you are rewarding the
01:13:13.920wrong kind of behavior. And they're going to throw money at homelessness in the same way
01:15:10.000You know, I'm just going to say, sorry, Margate back in the 1920s was where T.S. Eliot left and went to for a few weeks to retreat after he had a nervous breakdown working for Lloyd's.
01:15:21.480and uh he basically just used that time to rest and recuperate and write a bit more of
01:15:26.800the wasteland which was one of obviously the most profound poems of the 20th century i can
01:15:32.800see that the culture of margate has changed somewhat since then well i'm from essex and
01:15:38.080if you go to the seaside you'd go to south end or margate margate when i was a kid in the 90s
01:15:43.460late 80s early mid 90s was uh lovely absolutely lovely place well now it's been
01:24:46.320This is accidental. This is just misguided. The police are misunderstanding their own guidelines, or they are applying the training that they had, as we saw with the Novak case.
01:24:57.580Well, we wouldn't want Baroness Lawrence to get her knickers in a twist, would we? We wouldn't want another report about how institutionally racist the police are. That wouldn't do, would it?
01:25:06.540katie lamb mp she points out that a shop owner and her constituency called the police saying
01:25:14.340that there were shoplifters regularly stealing okay the police what do they do they ignore her
01:25:21.540of course so she puts up pictures of the thieves then the police show up saying that the rights
01:25:28.240of the criminals have been violated, according to GDPR.
01:25:34.920And on top of that as well, I mean, just speaking of shoplifting,
01:25:37.820how everything's just in a sodding plastic case now.