The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #1461

00:00:00.000 .

00:00:30.000 Thank you.

00:01:00.000 Thank you.

00:01:30.000 and welcome to the podcast of the load seaters episode 1461 for tuesday the 14th of july

00:01:37.460 2026 i'm your host luke joined today by dan yes and brother stelios returns from his med

00:01:44.680 maxing expedition so good to have you back stelios and samson samson did say expressly

00:01:51.000 and he looked right at me do not talk over the video and i think i chuckled so i think i might

00:01:55.360 of well it was uh tremendously dramatic wasn't it was it i what was i getting vibes off it was

00:02:01.560 either red dwarf the first masters of the universe movie not the second one the one in the 80s or was

00:02:07.720 it flash gordon what was going on there somebody in the chat will know i'm not too sure but

00:02:12.300 obviously with that it's not just the return of stereos it is also as you can see the return of

00:02:17.640 islander ladies and gentlemen issue six is now on the website ready you've ready for you to purchase

00:02:23.780 As you can see, Rory has done a tremendous job putting it together again.

00:02:28.000 We've got some wonderful pieces of writing and essays in there.

00:02:31.820 I've, six for six now, written a Marshalls of Middle-earth essay, this time on Samwise Gamgee.

00:02:38.160 Carl has also written a Tolkien-themed article for this one, all about the scouring of the Shire.

00:02:43.920 We also have some wonderful essays in here from returning regulars like Callum Darroch and Will Tanner,

00:02:50.860 as well as a tremendous interview by Rory with the American economist Michael Hudson as well.

00:02:57.940 So you know that it's the thing to be getting right now.

00:03:02.220 Go over to the website and buy yourself Islander.

00:03:05.100 There is also as well, of course, Islander merch to go with it.

00:03:08.960 So glad to have Islander back and we really hope that you all enjoy it.

00:03:13.620 Anyway, today, ladies and gentlemen, we're going to be talking all about the police's continuing partisanship.

00:03:19.580 we're then going to be talking about how they all uh the establishment know that the old paradigm is

00:03:25.220 dying and we're then going to be discussing how the eu wants to keep spying on you force of habit

00:03:31.360 i assume yeah so with all of that said dan over to you sir so i noticed something about the ann

00:03:39.100 widdekombe murder about the police's response to it now let me just say for up front obviously

00:03:44.180 shocking murder terrible event and i know we covered it yesterday but i'm going to kind of

00:03:49.960 build up a bit of it because what actually what i want to talk about today is the is the way the

00:03:53.720 police handled it um which is i think a little bit interesting and i'm going to have to go over

00:03:59.700 a little bit of whatever they went over yesterday because i kind of want to establish timelines

00:04:03.220 that's kind of key to what i'm talking about um so the timeline is as far as we know that on 805

00:04:09.200 she gave uh her last public appearance which was a talk tv interview and then we know that uh and

00:04:16.340 this was shown on the podcast yesterday there was this um exchange which kind of clearly places the

00:04:22.640 the the time of the murder because she's dealing with um what was it a channel 5 producer

00:04:27.040 about going on this so and she clearly she's about to go on the show at about half past 12 it would

00:04:32.580 seem yes and you can see that she actually saw that last message that she was she saw this two

00:04:37.280 blue ticks yeah she saw the one just before half 12 yeah she didn't see the one after so i suppose

00:04:41.780 that was very helpful for the police in establishing the exact timing and clearly the producer realizes

00:04:46.640 something is wrong straight away so we know the murder took place uh at about half 12 on um the

00:04:53.440 wednesday the wednesday the eighth um thursday morning she's discovered presumably friends or

00:05:00.280 or family or something like that and the police are called um friday morning at 6 30 the death is

00:05:08.840 is publicly announced um and at 3 38 the bbc announced that the police are opening uh an

00:05:17.940 investigation into the death so um we know that we know that something is going on and the police

00:05:23.900 are interested at 3.38.

00:05:27.740 Six minutes later,

00:05:29.720 the police appear with their first statement

00:05:32.900 following the announcement

00:05:34.340 there was something a little bit suspicious going on.

00:05:37.720 And what I noticed,

00:05:40.280 and what I saw a lot of people noticed,

00:05:42.660 is the police led very, very quickly

00:05:45.340 with the information that they were looking for a white male.

00:05:47.880 Yes.

00:05:48.900 Particular emphasis on white. 0.94

00:05:50.480 They can put it out as swift as they want, 0.74

00:05:52.960 when they want to.

00:05:53.900 they can indeed they did the same do you remember when uh there was that terrible event that we had

00:05:58.300 which seems to have been a genuine accident uh back in liverpool where everyone was gathered

00:06:02.860 for that event and uh that that driver went through the crowd of people again just almost

00:06:08.380 immediately the guy's white the guy's white the police come out and say this well i mean i've i've

00:06:14.140 i've got it i've got it further down but i dug up a number of historical examples just to see wonder

00:06:19.180 what is the lag time for identifying the victim in both cases when it's white and when it's not

00:06:24.700 and uh i mean spoiler alert yes when they're white you you get that information incredibly quickly

00:06:31.040 very quickly uh but no just to continue with the timeline because i want to i want to contrast it

00:06:35.480 with something else um so yes the police um you know they announce within six minutes that they're

00:06:42.420 looking for a white man at 5 45 they announce an arrest and again stress the white bit this was an

00:06:50.720 arrest of a 26 year old man and by the following morning 6 30 the 6 30 uh the following morning

00:06:58.220 having spoken to him because he was a local guy they established that actually he's got nothing

00:07:03.200 to do with it nothing to do with it whatsoever i don't know maybe he was the milkman maybe he was

00:07:07.140 a you know doing window cleaning and not for whatever reason he happened to be on the property

00:07:11.880 caught caught on the ring camera or whatever it was uh he had nothing to do with it so we we first

00:07:18.280 learned that he has nothing to do with it um but in the same statement again the police come out

00:07:24.440 and say but we're looking for another white man and again the white bit is is is stressed and then

00:07:30.360 by nine o'clock that evening um they've made an arrest now this is the one up in in was it

00:07:36.260 rochdale yeah rotherham rotherham you're right rotherham um and uh they they announced that

00:07:41.580 we've got a 28 year old um again white man and again stressing that that again um although the

00:07:48.920 police are still saying at this time um that it's got nothing to do with you know there's no political

00:07:54.000 motivation there's no reason to think there might be it might be political no reason to think it

00:07:57.560 might be terrorism so they're happy to speculate on the motive but it is a bit odd isn't it that

00:08:05.240 a very well-known political figure in the uk is murdered and they can't imagine that there could

00:08:13.020 be a political motivation for it um let me play the video actually of the police well in fact

00:08:18.460 because of the nature of um ann widdcombe's career um a political motive would be the most likely

00:08:25.480 reason for her murder to occur unless it was some random burglary right and obviously as soon as we

00:08:32.720 realize that it was coming all the way from rotherham well then that can only be premeditated

00:08:38.540 really especially within the time span that uh carl laid out yesterday on the podcast yes um this

00:08:45.220 unfortunately might be the wrong link i had a video for the um statement by the police we don't

00:08:52.420 i think it's a long one is it it says statement to the no it was the video statement um that's

00:08:58.420 unfortunate i don't have that um but the but the police i just wanted to play the police statement

00:09:03.240 but i'll tell you i'll tell you what he says he he really stresses the word white when he says it

00:09:08.100 we have identified a white man and he pauses on the word and he looks at the camera he was very

00:09:13.660 very careful to make sure that was the point that got rammed home um when he was talking about it

00:09:19.720 um at 4 30 that day um shabana mahoud stands up in parliament uh and she says that the suspect is

00:09:28.960 a 20 year old a 28 year old white man and again stresses that she points out that he wasn't known

00:09:34.780 to prevent because prevent seemed to know none of the terrorists who um um you know commit attacks

00:09:42.380 here well all they do they they very much do know them but they just for some reason think they'll

00:09:46.680 ever actually commit an act of terror well less so the white ones but well yes um she she stresses

00:09:56.240 that you know there's we don't have any you know motive or anything like that uh and she goes to

00:10:00.880 the you know people mustn't speculate um but they've already told us the sort of the crucial

00:10:04.720 details on that um and apparently meetings were had with um with nigel farage and other public

00:10:10.360 figures about their security arrangements and telling them that their security was going to be

00:10:13.840 reviewed incidentally just on that um i i said before that i think the count bin phase had an

00:10:22.820 outside chance of winning the clackton because everyone else would coalesce around the bin

00:10:27.760 rather than nigel farage and i was happy to put money on that 11 to 1 i've since i've since um

00:10:33.620 taken my profit on that from the odds tightening because i think that nigel has now got exactly

00:10:40.220 and i'm not suggesting that he's exploiting this like the left are saying no it is simply the case

00:10:45.100 that he's maintained all the time that that money was used for his security and the press made it

00:10:51.920 about the money itself not about the fact that he didn't disclose it and now that this has happened

00:10:57.500 i mean that just straight he can sell that argument all day long to the voters of clacton

00:11:01.340 obviously i do need money for security they can sell it because it's founded on truth

00:11:06.200 well yes well yes quite but the mistake that the people going after him made is that they wanted

00:11:11.660 to make it about the money itself and not about the disclosure which is the thing that actually

00:11:15.140 got him in trouble well so the other question is why were there security briefings of reform

00:11:20.320 uk candidates and members and politicians if this wasn't politically motivated well good question

00:11:29.260 yeah exactly why um so basically we know in this case it took six minutes before the first um you

00:11:38.540 know racial description was used um when when it turned out it wasn't that guy at the same time we

00:11:44.340 find out it wasn't that guy it was another guy again the racial descriptions used uh and and the

00:11:49.260 home secretary stood up in parliament and made it about the race aspect as well very keen to point

00:11:54.580 that out so i thought well let's compare that to some other high profile murders and see whether

00:11:59.600 the same pattern plays out um and and what i've got for you is um in fact i might be out of my

00:12:06.300 links here we go southport the actual rudicabana attack so uh some time there was it it took them

00:12:14.460 some time to reveal it it did um i think viewers will be casting back their memories thinking yeah

00:12:20.480 it took a while didn't it but uh i'll tell you i'll go i'll go through it and we we get to

00:12:25.060 how long did it actually take was it more or less than six minutes

00:12:28.520 search of memories now more than a day considerably more correct um so on monday the 29th of july

00:12:39.500 um at about midday the police were called to heart street there was a dance class where um

00:12:44.860 you know several children were attacked although we're not told that at the time

00:12:47.880 at one o'clock merseyside police put out their first statement and what they talk about is a

00:12:55.700 major incident reports of a stabbing a number of casualties we don't know anything about deaths at

00:13:01.640 this point a male detained yeah male detained well of course the contradiction is in this is

00:13:09.600 in in this case you know as we had with southport the police not wanting to share with the public

00:13:16.640 the identity of the racial identity of the attacker

00:13:20.080 confirms it as quick as six minutes anyway.

00:13:23.000 If they don't come out and give you a statement,

00:13:25.480 you know just as fast as if they had declared it.

00:13:27.560 That is a heuristic that can be used, certainly.

00:13:30.960 But yeah, a knife seized, no threat to the public.

00:13:34.140 There was no mention of race or religion or anything like that.

00:13:37.040 Five hours later, there was a second statement,

00:13:41.300 and the police are now saying it's a 17-year-old male

00:13:44.320 who's a resident of Lancashire.

00:13:46.640 he was still in custody uh not treated as terrorism related because you know what about

00:13:51.920 marching into a crowd of children attacking michetti could possibly be terrorism related

00:13:56.880 now that's just regular crime that is um seven hours later the first death is announced

00:14:04.080 um two children had died that's from a follow-up statement here i mean i won't i won't take you

00:14:09.200 through the whole thing but the key points is two children died nine if it's critically um injured

00:14:14.480 two adults critically injured the attack had been ferocious and we get more details on the

00:14:20.160 suspect now 17 year old male um from lancashire born in cardiff okay yeah bit of misdirection

00:14:27.700 going on here uh still no description still nothing like that so let's go to 24 hour 24

00:14:32.480 hours later um a third child died tragically um the police came out to give an update to say that

00:14:42.360 they're certainly not treating it as terror related okay uh still no description um now

00:14:50.300 actually on the 30th of july the rwandan parentage uh becomes known online um but was it was it

00:14:59.440 wasn't known whether that was legitimate or not so so nobody really know um tuesday afternoon

00:15:05.880 this is when people start to realize that you know there's something really going wrong here why

00:15:09.500 why are you being so cagey about this and Nigel Farage started making a fuss of this at the time

00:15:16.040 various political feelings made a fuss Yvette Cooper I've got the Hansard here rather than

00:15:23.480 scroll through and find the relevant bit I'll just give you a bit but Yvette Cooper was home

00:15:26.920 secretary at the time she said within this Hansard transcript as you have rightly reminded the house

00:15:33.420 Mr Speaker this is an ongoing investigation must not be impeded or compromised in any way that

00:15:38.180 means all of us have a responsibility not to do or say anything or cut across or prejudice the

00:15:43.880 criminal investigation is extremely important that people do not spread damaging misinformation

00:15:49.560 online false information has already been extensively shared in the last 24 hours

00:15:54.200 yet because you haven't said anything um those who do this uh do so their own risk undermining a

00:16:01.520 crucial criminal investigation we get the guardian newspaper um doing the standard thing of

00:16:08.660 attacking musk attacking faraj um yaxley lennon is probably in there they always like to they

00:16:15.420 always like to do that i'm pretty sure that was in there when i saw it earlier uh yep there you

00:16:19.420 are oh yeah yeah they always do tommy robinson real name thomas yaxley lennon steven will actually

00:16:24.980 they always go to they always go to that um so and and then later there was another statement from

00:16:31.520 the um home secretary where she was warning the mps don't speculate about the subject's identity

00:16:37.780 don't speculate on his guilt his innocence his motivation now after that after that long long

00:16:44.280 vacuum of them not saying a damn thing the first of the southport riots broke out yeah uh because

00:16:50.620 people were getting pissed off what's going on well this is the thing so much of like modern

00:16:54.460 policing has has also like a core part of it now is controlling the narrative controlling public

00:17:01.380 perception of these events the the core problem with that is that you can only control the

00:17:07.820 perception of the event and the narrative if the public at large actually trust what you say well

00:17:14.820 indeed and and and funnily enough two days later um and and this wasn't known at the time but the

00:17:22.040 police held and it was only established later in the home affairs committee that dug this up

00:17:26.500 but two days after this uh the police had a 90 minute meeting where they discussed um putting

00:17:33.560 out the information that he was a christian again because they've already said he's a

00:17:37.300 a cardiff boy so they're trying to make you believe he's a welshman they want to put out

00:17:42.340 his christian background now we subsequently know that he had al-qaeda material over the place yeah

00:17:47.300 as christians famously do as yes so he probably wasn't but who knows you know um

00:17:53.120 they i mean still to this day they've not told us what his religious identification was

00:17:58.000 but they had a 90 minute meeting where they discussed putting out that his parents had a

00:18:01.920 christian background again to mislead us after the you know after the welsh stuff so uh thursday

00:18:09.820 the first of august um this is now three days later the police announced that a 17 year old

00:18:17.140 has been charged 17 year old okay um starmer gives a statement uh where he warns people about

00:18:24.740 what they're saying online he said he says violent uh disorder clearly whipped up online that's also

00:18:29.760 a crime so he was he was really starting to warn people be careful what you say and this was the

00:18:35.180 messaging all the time be careful what you say online and and and then starmer made a downing

00:18:40.780 street statement uh actually have i got it here yeah here we go pm statement uh police would be

00:18:46.320 making arrests uh you know individuals would be remanded charges of convictions would follow

00:18:50.940 people would regret this um and he was very clear that um you know this this counts for anything

00:18:57.300 that was done online as well so he wasn't just talking about the protests that were happening

00:19:01.180 he was very clearly going after people who were even speculating about ethnicity or religion

00:19:06.440 online um later we did find out um it was actual uh rudicabana but only after the court

00:19:14.820 basically forced the government's hand

00:19:17.240 and they said no we're going to name him

00:19:18.700 we're going to name him in the court documents

00:19:20.420 so as soon as you got the name you can confer that he's a Somalian

00:19:23.500 and that's when the BBC

00:19:25.500 started running with this photo

00:19:26.780 of him as a

00:19:29.700 as a

00:19:31.720 school child

00:19:32.500 so yeah

00:19:34.220 it took the best part of

00:19:37.240 all that time to get to

00:19:39.720 any sort of

00:19:41.380 information about the sort of

00:19:43.240 identity of the of the of the individual however it doesn't stop there right um because

00:19:50.260 here we go immediate actions following um the aftermath so this was a sort of government summary

00:19:57.820 of the events that they they had sort of been taking um and and they said um in here it says

00:20:05.480 hundreds of arrests had already taken place including for online offenses people speculating

00:20:11.880 about identity because we didn't know what was going on a number of people uh jumped to the

00:20:17.940 conclusion that it might be a muslim we didn't know what was going on but everyone knew that

00:20:22.000 things were being hidden from us yes a lot of people heard the sort of oh he's a welsh choir

00:20:27.380 boy line and were like hang on a minute there's something you're clearly not telling us yes so

00:20:33.440 people did speculate and people were arrested for that for things for speculation about um the the

00:20:39.660 origin of this guy people are arrested for saying that it might have been a muslim when okay they

00:20:44.840 haven't they to this day they still haven't officially confirmed whether he was or not but

00:20:48.820 we do know that he had a room full of al-qaeda material so you know do do with that information

00:20:53.460 what you want um the most notable example um was um this woman bernie she went by she used to have

00:21:01.040 a sort of big uh twitter profile under the account bernie and here we are you know the the guardians

00:21:06.880 talking about it chester woman 55 arrested over false posts about uh southport murder because she

00:21:12.800 made the claim that it was a muslim uh and maybe he was i don't know like i say al-qaeda material

00:21:20.380 all over the place but the line they were sticking to at the time is no his parents

00:21:23.420 had a christian background therefore he was a christian therefore you get arrested if you if

00:21:28.780 you if you uh publish anything that later turns out to be wrong they just care about quantity of

00:21:34.620 messaging throw the words out there in order to prevent let's say the first rage wave and i'll

00:21:42.360 just give you a very brief example that backfired pretty spectacularly in south part definitely

00:21:46.320 yeah keep doing it but it's what they want to do um yeah i mean here we go this one identifies um

00:21:53.740 you know bernie under a full name uh so yeah she was arrested because she made uh a claim that it

00:21:59.520 might have been a muslim and and that's good enough to get you uh banged up in jail so people

00:22:04.380 can't say something online but the government can constantly lie about it and i'll just give 0.77

00:22:09.700 you the example of the saudi who ran over people in a german christmas market in the first hours

00:22:17.640 there was speculation that he was a a trump supporter right yes yeah yeah it's all about

00:22:26.000 managing the most so anyway in in the actual ruda cabana case needless to say uh it does not beat

00:22:33.560 our six minute test no it was several days and then the court forced their hand and even then

00:22:39.840 they were still arresting people for things that they said about it online but but the thing was

00:22:44.060 as well it doesn't sorry it doesn't beat the six minute case but also again simultaneously it does

00:22:51.320 because we knew that he wasn't white,

00:22:54.360 because they didn't tell us within six minutes that he was.

00:22:57.880 Yes, there is that.

00:22:59.380 So then I started looking a bit broader about what's going on here.

00:23:03.300 So the Anne Widdicombe case,

00:23:07.140 yet we knew about that very much, very quickly.

00:23:11.240 The Finsbury Park mosque attack in 2017,

00:23:14.020 the Plymouth shooting in 2021,

00:23:17.020 the Joe Cox murder in 2016.

00:23:18.780 in all of those cases we knew within 24 hours the identity of the attacker um often quicker than

00:23:28.560 that but but none of them went over the 24 hours then i looked at other high profile um attacks

00:23:35.220 that had taken place to see if i could find any within 24 hours and i looked at the manchester

00:23:38.680 arena 2017 westminster attack 2017 uh reading murders 2020 uh liverpool women's hospital

00:23:46.060 bombing in 2021 london bridge attack 2017 southport 2024 as we talked about nottingham murders 2023

00:23:53.660 and the david amos murder in 2021 and wouldn't you know it every single one of them at least

00:24:01.200 24 hours later in many cases several days before we knew the identity so that that that is curious

00:24:10.140 that when it's a white aggressor

00:24:12.280 in the handful that there were,

00:24:15.640 all within 24 hours,

00:24:17.440 otherwise at least 24 hours,

00:24:20.500 if not longer, if not days.

00:24:22.280 Now, I mean, that was notable

00:24:23.280 because, I mean, take out of those

00:24:24.720 the Nottingham example for a case.

00:24:28.220 He was arrested shortly after the attack.

00:24:30.280 Very shortly after the attack,

00:24:31.360 he was arrested.

00:24:32.580 And at the time,

00:24:33.740 the police only disclosed

00:24:34.860 a 31-year-old man.

00:24:36.880 You know, in Southport,

00:24:37.840 he was arrested close to the scene

00:24:40.060 or on the scene or something and they only said male born in cardiff now it it does appear that

00:24:46.560 there's a a slight disparity here now it turns out that the police have noticed that we've noticed

00:24:54.560 huh yeah something's going on so uh towards the end of last year they put out uh this guidance

00:25:01.340 from you know the ever corrupt uh what is it oh yeah national police chief's count oh that's not

00:25:07.040 as bad as the count what's the other one college of policing or something like that so that's a

00:25:11.140 really bad one but anyway this this police body put out this guidance and in that they basically

00:25:16.620 say um they are encouraging police to disclose um a suspect's ethnicity or nationality where there

00:25:26.220 is um and what's the term something like a potential of a community backlash or something

00:25:31.020 like that or where there's a threat to the community or civil cohesion that that's kind of

00:25:34.840 i can't is in is in it somewhere but that those are the sort of wordings that it uses

00:25:39.460 so then i thought okay well that's interesting has this situation improved since this guidance

00:25:46.880 was put out now superficially you might think yes you might think yes because we've we've had

00:25:52.820 the manchester synagogue attack um and that it wasn't six minutes but we found out within 12

00:25:58.800 hours um the huntington train attack yes again yeah um you know they so so the manchester synagogue

00:26:07.140 you within 12 hours they were saying a british citizen citizen of syrian descent in the huntington

00:26:12.800 train case it was a black british man of caribbean descent that took 15 hours and in gold is green

00:26:21.000 the stabbing not the ambulance thing um that was um a a british national of somalian descent that

00:26:27.820 took only 11 hours so they have tightened it up from being at least 24 hours several days to being

00:26:34.680 within the day maybe quite a bit of the day um but they are they are actually saying within 24 hours

00:26:42.500 now the only problem is though if every one of those examples i i gave um we didn't need the

00:26:48.100 police to tell us because there was there was footage being shared online yeah of course i mean

00:26:52.100 you you you watch the manchester synagogue one pretty much in lifetime if you if you're active

00:26:56.000 on x the huntington train thing people were tweeting out about it from the train yeah uh

00:27:00.760 while it was happening gold is green one again it was all on video so we knew immediately what

00:27:07.200 was going on um the ann widdicombe one you know we didn't know so there's no way of finding it

00:27:12.140 but a lot of that is down to the particular location of where ann's house was and the fact

00:27:17.960 that which had been relied on the release of security camera footage that we simply didn't

00:27:22.820 have the only the only other case that sort of felt relevant to me was the um the jewish ambulance

00:27:28.320 one um where it took a week to mention ethnicity but to be fair there was cctv footage at first so

00:27:36.640 maybe they didn't know either way because cctv footage isn't very good but my point is is that

00:27:41.980 the perception remains that the police are primarily focused on managing the sort of

00:27:47.560 febrile race relations in this country rather than being upfront about what it is that's going on

00:27:53.900 so maybe this guidance will continue and maybe if the next time there is a something horrific

00:28:00.060 happens where it's not actually broadcast live on x as it's happening um they will be doing the

00:28:07.320 six minute thing so i i don't know but again it was just so striking to me that in one case

00:28:13.720 first you hear about it six minutes white man white man white man uh as as opposed to the

00:28:20.640 southport thing and and and i would like to think we passed that sort of chilling period we're in

00:28:26.540 only a couple of years ago where the government was coming out with saying think before you post

00:28:31.420 because people were being arrested um for speculating at things that in this case at

00:28:37.840 least the police wanted to tell us very immediately

00:28:41.040 all right uh for one dollar tom rat says colt is law uk edition and for two dollars one tall order

00:28:50.620 says think i'm watching uh le too much algo has me down for a for a brit getting ads for chinese

00:28:57.600 cars and that aren't available in the united states marital aids uh dating sites etc well

00:29:04.200 thank you for here all the time they're not sure about your marital status then

00:29:08.680 aren't we not algorithm needs tightening up yes um all right can we go over to my segment samson

00:29:15.140 thank you all right then ladies and gentlemen so i saw a tweet from charlie downs uh last week

00:29:24.820 where he was talking about some new research that had come out with a whole slew a very very thorough

00:29:31.300 research at that with all sorts of data and statistics that i thought it was worth uh going

00:29:36.880 through. And so I've looked through it, and I'm going to present, and we'll just talk about it

00:29:41.340 as we go through the data from here. But one of the things that's very important about it is that

00:29:46.680 this is very much something written from within the establishment. This is written by Dame Sarah

00:29:52.060 Kahn. She's someone who was first appointed, in fact, if I do just go forward to here,

00:29:57.580 you can see Dame Sarah Kahn. And she was appointed Britain's first counter-extremism commissioner

00:30:04.740 in 2018 that was by theresa may she was then appointed again by boris johnson in 2021 and

00:30:12.420 she's now written this paper as well so dame zara uh sorry dame sarah is someone who is um constantly

00:30:21.700 um sorry what's with them um ascribed to um sorry frozen totally she um she's someone who's

00:30:31.040 constantly appointed to these positions to do the research for the establishment right well

00:30:35.120 liked by the establishment for them yeah she's she's constantly handpicked by them to do these

00:30:39.600 um these investigations into why is the system not working into questions of counter counter

00:30:46.880 terrorism and why the the british public out there seem to be getting a little bit rattled

00:30:51.900 by everything that they see going on why have the british public noticed that we despise them

00:30:57.060 Yes. Yes. So this is all of that. So they have noticed that the government know, successive governments know, that they are losing control of the narrative. They know that the trust in all of the institutions, in all of the old traditional places of authority are totally crumbling, that people are now looking exactly as you said in the segment before, Dan, they're looking to X, they're looking to things that can get the events to them far faster than the government themselves.

00:31:26.600 so we simply don't trust official sources right and that but also the fact that we're coming to

00:31:31.880 our own um philosophical assumptions about these things now that are apart from the state ideology

00:31:38.040 that is constantly telling you how to perceive the world around you and the world that they are

00:31:44.600 determined to continue to create right that that they are totally unwavering and there's no number

00:31:50.700 of terror attacks there's no number of um you know ethno-religious confrontations on the streets of

00:31:57.380 britain that will actually make them waver and go hang on this has gone too far and in our effort to

00:32:03.240 persist with this we are going to lose everything so everyone from all sides from all factions that

00:32:09.440 now exist within britain everyone is asking themselves what is to be done right that's what

00:32:15.320 they're asking. And we also are asking what needs to be done, which is exactly the theme

00:32:20.520 of the sixth issue of Islander, ladies and gentlemen, which I'm delighted to say is now

00:32:25.080 out. You obviously see it here in front of you. And that is the theme that is tackled by many of

00:32:30.820 our writers. Of course, Carl Benjamin's written for it. I've written for it. We've got Will Tanner.

00:32:35.900 Rory's done a wonderful interview with the American economist Michael Hudson. And of course,

00:32:41.480 it's created with all of the craft and aesthetic pleasure that Rory normally puts into these

00:32:48.260 projects. So do go over to the website and buy yourself a copy of Islander 6. So now let's begin

00:32:56.120 talking about the actual research paper itself, shall we? So to begin with, let's just start by

00:33:03.000 talking about the fact that this has been written by the UK EDRC, which is the UK Extremism and

00:33:10.440 democratic resilience center and it goes on to say that it's britain's first independent

00:33:16.640 organization dedicated to countering extremism uh building social cohesion and strengthening

00:33:23.780 democratic resilience mobilizing a whole society approach built on public health principles

00:33:29.580 so that sounds very ominous yes so what it's really saying is all of these ingredients that 0.98

00:33:37.040 we've put into the pot that is now multicultural britain we're going to keep them boiling and 1.00

00:33:43.240 whilst that's happening we're going to make sure that we're going to try our best to make sure that 1.00

00:33:47.580 it's not going to spill over the more you put in bowl the the more vacuous it is yes well what it

00:33:52.740 sounds like to me is is how can we well like you say how can we keep a lid on it but while keeping

00:33:57.740 the current establishment in charge well this is the thing isn't it the outcome is already

00:34:02.460 predetermined it will look at the data it will look at people's persuasions it'll look at their

00:34:06.960 opinions on things but it's not going to go as we'll come into in just a second on it will

00:34:12.920 expressly say yeah the majority of britons believe this okay should we do what they want to do no

00:34:20.200 are you mad you know it's like no we're going to carry on we just need to do it in a way that you

00:34:25.420 know basically calms them down a bit question if diversity is a strength why is there a need to

00:34:31.320 build social cohesion it's almost as if there isn't social cohesion and yes you don't add

00:34:37.700 cohesion to your strengths do you uh so also as well um i will just say that also as well as um

00:34:45.640 sarah khan on this it has also had a dr uh matthew godwin as well has worked on this who was

00:34:52.820 previously worked at the tony blair institute for global change is extremism policy unit and as a

00:35:00.600 researcher in the House of Lords as well. So this was written entirely by establishment hands.

00:35:06.780 Now, when we go to the foreword, we see here that it goes on to say that the threat now facing us

00:35:13.300 is more serious and more deeply rooted than when I was counter-extremism commissioner. This is not

00:35:19.580 a passing dip in confidence, but the structural crisis as a result of a chronic erosion of trust

00:35:25.780 in institutions now fueling a broken social contract and so they are very aware of just how

00:35:31.960 dire their position is sorry i mean sorry a question

00:35:37.560 go is uh was she working for the tony blair institute uh godwin godwin yeah and um is this

00:35:47.080 the institute of uh the prime named after the prime minister who just decided that the country

00:35:53.620 was going to adopt a completely new vision that no no one asked for no i don't believe so okay no

00:35:59.620 i don't believe so but if we go down here as well we can see in this paragraph nowhere is this strain

00:36:04.820 more visible than in the contested question of national identity what it means to be british

00:36:11.300 and who that identity belongs to has become a genuine fault line not confined to any one

00:36:16.980 political tribe generation or region concern that diversity is eroding national identity

00:36:23.140 is now a mainstream view held by a majority of britons beneath that broad anxiety sits a harder

00:36:30.900 minority view support for traditional extremist beliefs such as ethno-nationalism and re-migration

00:36:37.620 are held by a meaningful share of the public their words a small but consequential number

00:36:43.940 of citizens have already crossed into acceptable political violence which of course uh no one here

00:36:49.700 supports, are rejecting democratic norms altogether. So if we go further through this now,

00:36:55.660 let's start looking at some of the figures that they present to us. So who actually believes

00:37:00.200 that the contract is broken? Who believes that the society that we live in and all of its

00:37:06.300 structures and the affinity and the fraternity that used to be built on Britain, that good-natured

00:37:11.740 will between those of us at the bottom who voted and those of us at the top that governed us,

00:37:17.040 who believes that that has been totally severed right well you're a very sensible man dan yes and

00:37:22.920 i'm glad to see that actually many other people out there are too now if we have a look here we

00:37:27.840 can see that that actually is 83 percent of reform uk voters and 67 percent of green voters that

00:37:35.940 interests me because because the greens have basically won their assumptions are embedded

00:37:41.460 in even the conservative party and you know when they got what they they wanted their whole lives

00:37:45.980 it's like well this is broken yes and you can see here as well that 32 percent believe capitalism

00:37:52.040 has failed and we need a communist revolution and actually just before i go any further with this i

00:37:58.040 should probably just say as well for the sake of methodology uh so this was a nationwide public

00:38:03.620 attitude survey of just over 4 000 adults and focus groups in great britain by more in common

00:38:10.140 and especially a survey of 1,300 respondents and focus groups in Britain

00:38:15.480 of British Muslim opinion by Yonder Consulting,

00:38:19.620 which we'll go into a little bit longer.

00:38:22.040 So that's the sample size that they're working with here.

00:38:25.100 Extrapolate that how you will,

00:38:26.940 but it does make for some very interesting reading.

00:38:29.620 And also as well, given the nature of who this is being written by

00:38:33.860 and what eyes it is actually for,

00:38:36.600 I think that there is actually every reason to believe

00:38:39.120 that these statistics are supposed to be as accurate as they can determine because it's

00:38:44.520 supposed to help the establishment get a more thorough grasp on the situation. 0.81

00:38:49.280 Well, I mean, given that it's a dame that's writing this report who's hand in glove with 1.00

00:38:52.360 the establishment, this is the establishment turning the smoke alarm on. 0.55

00:38:56.180 Yes. And you can see here, 28% say we should ignore the institutions and rules that get

00:39:02.440 in the way of change, rising to 34% of those who feel that the social contract is broken.

00:39:08.660 And you can see here, well, why do people think it's broken?

00:39:12.120 Well, the top answer is that governments don't deliver on their promises,

00:39:16.340 which is astute, I suppose.

00:39:19.120 I mean, it's kind of impossible to ignore at this point.

00:39:21.880 But I think, of course, it also works the other way as well.

00:39:25.040 It's not just that governments successively have not delivered on their promises,

00:39:30.700 but it's also the fact that they have committed themselves to things that weren't promised at all,

00:39:37.460 that no one asks them to do exactly because every five years people vote for overall agendas yes

00:39:44.380 and they could uh they could be voting parties that advocate for policies that they hate yeah

00:39:52.600 because they think that that party's agenda is overall better than the agenda of other parties

00:39:57.920 um and so if we go on further as well you can see politicians are corrupt and self-serving

00:40:04.300 uh taxes are too high for what we're getting back yeah absolutely true politicians can't be trusted

00:40:09.980 the government can't protect the borders all of them are true yeah they're all true they're all

00:40:14.700 observably true and isn't it funny that rather than address these things that the public are

00:40:21.180 screaming at them to say can you just maybe get this under control uh what we're really dealing

00:40:27.480 with again just like in your segment dan is a question here of perception management

00:40:31.500 now if we go here this is interesting contested identity believe um that national identity 55

00:40:39.060 believe that national identity is disappearing because of diversity how can we stop people

00:40:44.920 from thinking this while their you know national identity is disappearing whilst more and more

00:40:50.280 diversity continues to arrive yes uh 45 say that it strengthens it and when we consider that the

00:40:57.240 uh in of britain in particular the british native british population now is about 70 73 percent

00:41:03.820 and we think about the fact that it's like well you know obviously a lot of the foreigners as

00:41:09.320 with um dame sarah khan herself i'm not trying to but it is just the nature of it that she is

00:41:15.140 someone who profits from a system that wants you to believe that diversity is not um you know is

00:41:22.820 not contradictory to native british identity that there is room for everyone within this right

00:41:28.500 well obviously those people out of a sense of self-preservation within their uh holes of power

00:41:34.820 in the institutions are going to come down on the other side of that question i also find that

00:41:39.520 support for migration fascinating yes a third of people are now supporting re-migration i can tell

00:41:45.280 you 10 years ago that number would have been next to nothing it would have been like three four

00:41:50.660 percent at most yes and now we're up to a third of people i mean this is what we mean when we say

00:41:54.980 re-migration is inevitable it really is and you can see here as well feel national identity is

00:42:01.220 disappearing obviously reform overwhelmingly conservatives are in the majority conservative

00:42:06.660 voters in 64 i would just politely ask them why are you voting conservative then because

00:42:13.780 but then as well you look at the lib dems right and it's still 40 and this comes back to stuff

00:42:19.220 that we say quite often on here,

00:42:21.220 which is that they're not Britain-hating people,

00:42:24.100 but they have been more shielded than most of us

00:42:26.740 from the worst excesses. 0.99

00:42:28.620 Liberal Democrats are just terminally naive. 0.97

00:42:30.560 Yeah. 0.98

00:42:31.420 And as well, naturally,

00:42:34.760 those who are white and those who are British,

00:42:38.260 of course, 61% feel this, 0.89

00:42:40.380 whereas the non-whites, it's 23%. 0.97

00:42:42.900 We'll take those two answers together.

00:42:44.280 It infers how much of the support 0.82

00:42:45.740 that Labour and Greens get is non-white.

00:42:47.280 then if we go to extremist narratives and conspiracy beliefs and one thing as well that

00:42:54.080 i'll just say on this so take for example here uh believes in the great reset conspiracy theory

00:43:00.160 and believes in the great replacement conspiracy theory now i will just say that in the same way

00:43:05.940 that you often get with these sorts of things it is very quick to say these are conspiracy beliefs

00:43:11.800 it doesn't explain to you why they are it doesn't present the evidence evidence of it it just simply

00:43:17.900 affirms these are conspiracies so everyone who believes in them is a problem to be managed yeah

00:43:23.720 yeah but both of those are terms that they use themselves the great reset the world economic

00:43:29.460 forwards has published papers under that name yes i've got i've got the book yeah yes the great

00:43:34.820 replacement theory that's right great not not theory great replacement right that is now that

00:43:39.860 now we use those words by the way there's gonna be one of those real wikipedia boxes under the

00:43:43.680 youtube yeah i know yeah but the great present um the un has has website pages that you can go to

00:43:50.180 where they talk about it so these conspiracy theories they're bloody published yeah i know

00:43:56.600 i know um but also as well even if but really it the reason that it gets around it the reason that

00:44:03.920 it tries to wheedle it is with um a question of it being a conspiracy theory it's not actually

00:44:10.480 about the material reality that you see around you it's not whether or not things are becoming

00:44:15.520 more diverse communities are becoming more alienated uh any of these sort of things it's

00:44:20.600 a question of intent and that's why they it's like yeah but but did the government intend for

00:44:26.000 these things to happen and the government actually forcing are they pushing for this

00:44:29.760 It's like, well, they have done it consistently in the face of majority of public opposition year on year, decade on decade.

00:44:39.860 So that should surely ascribe some sort of intent.

00:44:44.640 If we here were the government, we would put out something saying that it's a conspiracy to say that Lotus Eaters is based in Swindon.

00:44:53.440 even though we've mentioned it on our website a number of times even though we've talked about

00:44:57.200 it a number of times even though it's a documented fact it's still a conspiracy theory right uh and

00:45:03.640 as you can see here as well other conspiracy beliefs entering the mainstream uh constituency

00:45:08.720 boundaries are rigged uh for voting i mean they have been trying to rejig them just recently

00:45:14.700 haven't they uh covid19 was exaggerated to control people 34 percent only a third of people

00:45:21.280 well a lot of people did enjoy being what told what to do for a number of years you can't deny

00:45:27.240 it uh it was quite startling and then many other things as well that i still don't know if i'm

00:45:32.560 actually allowed to talk about on youtube sorry the one about big pharma hiding a cure for the

00:45:38.500 big c how do we know that's a conspiracy theory well i mean they might well be how do we know

00:45:48.380 Because a conspiracy implies that it must be wrong.

00:45:54.780 Well, as I say, these are not going, it's not going to deconstruct the arguments from these sides.

00:46:01.840 It's just going to simply assert that they are.

00:46:03.620 This is very established.

00:46:04.600 And move on.

00:46:05.340 And offline extremism events monitored March 2025 to March 2026.

00:46:10.700 Now, as you can see here, far-right extremist events have been overwhelmingly monitored in comparison to Islamist events.

00:46:18.940 Now, this says more about the Home Office and Prevent and the things that they choose to monitor than it does about the actual abundance of these things in society,

00:46:32.360 which we know, based on many things that we've discussed thus far, what they choose to focus on.

00:46:39.160 We also get into this as well. Now, this is very interesting. The British Seven Segments. Now, it says throughout this report, we read public opinion partly through More In Common's British Seven Segments, a values-based segmentation that maps the UK population by core beliefs rather than on the old left-right spectrum. Built on polling of more than 20,000 people, it helps explain not just what Britons think, but why they think it.

00:47:07.340 now you can see here so according to them and of this poll 12 of the population are the progressive

00:47:15.340 activists you know the most radical but the corbynese to the momentum type the green voting

00:47:20.360 polanski ones who are all for open borders and for all of the absolute lunatic stuff that you

00:47:26.820 know we are just suffocated by every single day yeah and the report is sort of tried trying to

00:47:33.700 portray them in a good light because they say driven by social justice um not driven by hate

00:47:40.980 or envy yeah yeah they don't seem to be saying something about other such groups

00:47:48.500 uh and then we go i mean obviously it's not uh social justice that uh they care about the other

00:47:53.860 groups no but it's yeah well the the number of evils that they allow to happen in the name of

00:48:02.180 social justice yeah you know suggests that you can understand that they use it in a positive sense

00:48:07.540 yes uh incrementalist left so civil civic minded gradual reform over revolution so now we get into

00:48:15.220 those people who are the starmerites the labor party white hall all of the you know and as you

00:48:20.980 see here as well nine percent established liberals now when you put all of those people together

00:48:26.660 you're going to get a total of 42 percent of the population but if you go to skeptical

00:48:32.740 scrollers digitally uh digitally native distrustful seeking truth online rooted patriots 20

00:48:40.820 traditional conservatives 8 and dissenting disruptors alienated and radical crave dramatic

00:48:48.260 change then all of a sudden when you bracket those people together you're in a position of 58

00:48:54.500 eight percent right who are sort of leaning more in no we there are those in the left and those

00:49:01.560 who are the established liberals like all the way ranging from the the tories and the liberal

00:49:06.740 democrats to the far wing of the green party and then you have people from reform uk to restore

00:49:14.500 and those far outside of it as well and obviously as well just members of the public who aren't

00:49:20.300 voting right now yeah and you realize to yourself just how overwhelming the number of people are

00:49:26.060 you can yeah you can see why the establishment is afraid when you if they split it down like this

00:49:29.880 i mean just a quick point on this i mean i consider myself out of those categories i mean

00:49:33.040 they're all a bit imprecise but i consider myself to be a rooted patriot of that 20 you know patriotic

00:49:38.760 overlooked uh common sense policies however my whole thing is repeatedly warning the establishment

00:49:46.180 that you need to change course otherwise things are going to get worse yeah and of that 20 over

00:49:51.000 there the dissenting disruptors if the establishment doesn't change course if it doesn't

00:49:57.220 bucket ideas up if it doesn't listen to the advice that you know me and people like me have been

00:50:01.220 giving when the if this gets much worse i'm not going to stand in the way of that 20 dissenting

00:50:07.160 disruptors if things continue to spy i will make the arguments again and again and again as to why

00:50:12.840 we need to sort this out rationally yeah but if it ever comes to the point where it just continues

00:50:17.240 to go down and it looks like we are actually going to lose our country and those dissenting

00:50:21.700 disruptors want to do something a bit more radical i'm i'm not i'm not going to get in the way no

00:50:26.540 it's uh when you see here as well actually i will just say on the case of uh skeptical

00:50:31.840 scrollers this is also not just uh people who are right wing online as well this is also the

00:50:38.720 left-wingers as well but what we constantly see from the data being presented to us is that the

00:50:43.480 center ground is being ever squeezed which is why they're writing research papers like this

00:50:49.420 uh because they're trying to spin was it 17 yeah yeah 17 is the is a centrist position

00:50:58.420 center is getting squeezed it is a skepticism cannot speak today do apologize skepticism over

00:51:05.620 diversity is mainstream in most UK political parties. Now, as you can see here, our national

00:51:12.240 identity is being strengthened through diversity. Minority Conservative position, majority Labour

00:51:19.000 position, majority Lib Dem position, only just overwhelmingly negative for Reform UK. Only 13%

00:51:27.400 of them believe that, which I would suggest they might be in the wrong party. And then, of course,

00:51:32.500 the Green Party which is made up of those people who are the diversity and those who are for open

00:51:38.120 borders are overwhelmingly you know do not care about it whatsoever. Now for the sake of time I

00:51:44.300 will skip on just a bit. Now if we go here to figure 2.2 we can see how it says over two-thirds

00:51:51.040 of Britons reject an ethno-nationalist view of national identity but when we come to as I say

00:51:57.720 the skeptical scrollers um these are almost equal uh rooted patriots again almost equal

00:52:05.020 it's much more it's all the old ones the uh the incrementalist left the established liberals

00:52:11.720 who believe that a person can be english scottish or welsh regardless of ethnic background but as

00:52:19.060 i've already pointed out these people are in the shrinking position these people that are more half

00:52:26.780 and half about it are the ones that are starting to outroot them or not from all sides outflank

00:52:33.340 them from all sides now says that remigration while framed by its advocates as a form of

00:52:39.840 immigration control it is important to understand the historical root of remigration as a key white

00:52:46.500 supremacist policy concept so again it immediately gets like no no you don't understand it's not a

00:52:52.000 question of supremacy in in no way is it black supremacist for me to say that um for example

00:52:59.520 Sudan should be demographically for Sudanese people right that is not a black supremacist

00:53:06.000 argument that is an argument to people's birthrights to heritage to tradition in any

00:53:12.240 homeland that you're simply saying that homelands matter to people yes that's all we're saying it's 0.98

00:53:16.520 not a question of supremacy but within this language you can see how they already failed

00:53:21.500 to misunderstand the they misunderstand the position and it calls for the forced removal

00:53:26.380 of immigrants refugees and their descendants including legal residents and citizens based on

00:53:31.380 race ethnicity and or culture and region once relegated to uh as it says the uh mid-20th

00:53:40.080 century german philosophy supremacist circles online is what it's basically saying a remigration

00:53:45.740 has in recent years moved into mainstream and far-right politics in many countries emigration

00:53:51.640 is a policy solution to the um as it says here just all of their buzzwords which falsely claims

00:53:58.540 that white populations are being intentionally replaced by non-white migrants and refugees

00:54:04.220 just so happens that this direction of travel is only taking place in white nations though

00:54:11.400 um i like they put the caveat intentionally they're not arguing that it may or may not be

00:54:17.060 happening well it's observably happening the government have their own data on that

00:54:21.600 yes the fact that it is happening but as as long as they didn't all have a meeting where they where

00:54:26.680 they said it exactly like that they can they can claim that's a conspiracy as well yeah uh they

00:54:31.260 also go into here the uh reform uk supporters think that muslims are unable to integrate into

00:54:37.160 British society as you can see here once again we have a total difference between the Green Party 0.99

00:54:42.840 who think that actually 82 percent think that they can most likely because many of them come

00:54:48.680 from those backgrounds versus Reform UK who think that 29 percent so it's interesting as well how as

00:54:56.040 we see constantly um reform it's Reform UK voters and Green Party voters who think more than any

00:55:03.880 other voters that the system the social contract is absolutely broken and it's also those who are

00:55:10.720 most at odds in their perception of of course what needs to be done about it this is nothing new

00:55:16.360 the question for me i suppose to people who write this paper is what on earth are you going to do

00:55:22.500 about it what from the centrist perspective actually solves this what do they have in the

00:55:29.000 tank to actually begin to heal these divides well presumably none of that whatsoever and just manage

00:55:34.980 us and our perceptions more criminalize us more control our speech more censor us more yeah now 0.89

00:55:42.360 this is interesting as well the general public views muslims and islam least favorably of the

00:55:47.980 groups and religions tested now you can see here these are feelings from the general public

00:55:52.920 excluding muslims uh the number of two over two thousand people now though that is interesting

00:55:59.960 in and of itself one of the things to me that's actually seems most intriguing about all of this

00:56:05.620 is actually the apathy down the middle of the entire thing when you see something here by saying

00:56:12.540 um british people in general what are your feelings towards british people in general

00:56:17.420 well it's like well 10% feel very negatively about them it's like well probably in every age

00:56:23.060 to be fair 48% feel uh very positive well that's very kind of you but this part in the middle

00:56:30.240 like neutral I don't care at all really you have absolutely no feeling whatsoever about the people 1.00

00:56:38.460 that you share a society with I mean there's something gone seriously wrong when British

00:56:42.960 people are asked how do you feel about british people and only 48 say positive yeah i mean

00:56:49.760 one thing i want to say obviously not to what you dan just said i i agree with you that's

00:56:56.340 preposterous should be more but when it comes to this lots of people let's also bear in mind that

00:57:03.780 many people are reluctant to express their views especially in surveys yeah that are

00:57:11.480 you know sure yep you know you don't know who the person who is interviewing you yeah uh is yeah

00:57:20.360 well especially as i mentioned in my last segment that it wasn't that long ago where people were

00:57:24.300 getting jailed for expressing views exactly or losing the job because they said something that

00:57:29.460 is uh that the establishment thought it was woke people in their job so just someone comes and says

00:57:36.660 hey what do you feel about this or that group well lots of them are going to be very reluctant

00:57:42.000 to answer and you can see here as well feelings towards each religion by the general public as

00:57:47.440 well now and you can see islam at the bottom of it with 34 percent of people having a very or quite

00:57:53.820 negative opinion about it overwhelmingly like threefold nearly threefold more than those that

00:57:59.640 have a positive view of it and also as well by three degrees of margin a more negative opinion

00:58:07.080 than those who hold the second least inclined which is Judaism. So overwhelmingly and you can 0.90

00:58:14.200 see why they panic so much and why there is so much talk about guarding against Islamophobia

00:58:20.040 when the government are going to be presented with statistics like this that sees Islam head

00:58:25.640 shoulders above the rest being the one that the public are most guarded against. Now there is

00:58:31.220 also the question of younger Britons and their growing attitude towards violence as well which

00:58:37.880 again as I say I do not support but as the data bears out in this particular research it says 0.95

00:58:43.720 well it's never acceptable and across the board this is almost unanimous right the British public

00:58:50.920 are not a violent people they don't like political violence they don't like seeing it whether it's

00:58:55.580 something like, you know, Nigel Farage being milkshaked, or whether it's being politicians

00:59:01.380 actually being murdered, or it's just happening to other members of the public with different

00:59:07.060 opinions. Yeah, but also just let's not forget that, for instance, in the US, the Democrats are

00:59:13.300 overwhelmingly pro-political violence, the sentiment there. They are prone to think that

00:59:20.680 it's justified much more than supporters of the republicans absolutely but also as we see here as

00:59:27.180 well the there is also an age breakdown here where you can see that 25 oh actually that is stark when

00:59:34.680 you compare it to older generations yeah you look at older generations it's like five percent of

00:59:39.260 over 75 year olds like it's acceptable in some situations but it really depends on the belief

00:59:46.040 whereas you've got 25% of 18 to 24 year olds believing it and 22% of 25 to 34 year olds

00:59:53.940 believe it. If a quarter of people under the age of 34 were to actually act on that that's more

01:00:00.100 than enough of a revolution easily. Yeah but obviously of those people from those age

01:00:04.680 demographics as well that's just throwing them all in together irrespective of their actual

01:00:10.140 political opinion. It's just saying that if it came to it they would do that and one of the

01:00:15.740 other things as well and this backs up your point Stelios is the fact that you can see here

01:00:19.860 progressive activists permit violence to protect marginalized groups while dissenting disruptors

01:00:25.900 do so against unpatriotic or islamic beliefs but when you actually look at the

01:00:33.040 sort of permission permissiveness of violence and harassment you can see here that those who

01:00:41.640 the progressive activists believe that it is overwhelmingly acceptable to to attack those with

01:00:47.960 fascist or neo-nazi views and for what for a war that's worth as well i do not trust these people

01:00:54.800 to accurately know or understand what a fascist view is but also let's uh understand how shaky

01:01:04.320 this ground is because you would expect fascists and neo-nazis to be very militantly

01:01:11.840 anti-communist and violently so when it comes to the violence towards people with communist views

01:01:19.320 exactly the amount of people who are who would consider that to be acceptable is far less than

01:01:27.340 Yes. And so this entire graph basically just tells us that it is the progressive activists who are by far and away the people who will make the most excuses for violence against their opponents.

01:01:41.560 Right. That's what it's telling us.

01:01:43.180 and so just one last thing if you go back to it because i i i may have expressed myself in a bit

01:01:50.280 in a convoluted way but one thing to say is just remember how the left has always used the term

01:01:57.060 fascist before they use the term they started using the term far right cover everything you

01:02:02.960 wouldn't expect an actual fascist to to be militantly anti-communist whereas there the um

01:02:10.220 in the in the communist views thing yes people who are okay with violence against communists are 1.00

01:02:18.740 less than 10 percent there yeah so that shows how how stupid they were yeah the gulf of difference 0.97

01:02:26.460 is remarkable and and so the question is after and obviously as i said this is a very very extensive 0.94

01:02:32.720 paper ladies and gentlemen so i've just taken out things that are most relevant to wars um but there

01:02:38.060 is a question of, well, okay, after doing this extensive research, what are their recommendations

01:02:43.620 for the government? Well, this one was particularly interesting, which goes on to say to develop and

01:02:50.980 disseminate compelling alternative narratives. Extremists are winning the narrative war not

01:02:57.540 because their arguments are strong, but because efforts to counter and provide alternative

01:03:02.700 narratives and not being prioritised or invested in. Now, I will say one thing, which is that they

01:03:08.780 have basically had the left and the progressives and the establishment have had the same programming

01:03:15.440 and the same script for decades now. So there is a slight amount of truth to this. Yes,

01:03:22.820 their narratives are indeed outdated. However, it is still working under the assumption

01:03:31.340 that everyone outside of this when it just says extremists it just means people it genuinely just

01:03:37.460 means those who are in reform and those who are in the green party it just means anyone who is

01:03:42.700 not a part of us as well right yeah it just means anyone who doesn't agree with the current

01:03:47.960 establishment uh it's basically saying that their arguments are strong and the national program to

01:03:54.420 conceive and disseminate compelling alternative narratives mobilizing the silent majority

01:03:59.580 building alternative in groups that compete with extremist communities and supporting local and

01:04:05.640 national trusted voices should be a central pillar of this new approach so basically give it a new

01:04:11.900 lick of paint put some new faces in front of the people and come up with a slightly better script

01:04:17.880 but i tell you what if if sarah khan ends up watching this segment about her rapport i can

01:04:23.380 tell you right now that will not happen and the reason that won't happen is because it's hard

01:04:27.500 and instead you'll just use censorship and de-platforming and de-banking you'll do all

01:04:34.260 you won't make better arguments because you don't have to because you are the establishment

01:04:38.120 and it's easier to use coercive force to shut us down than make better arguments yourself and so no

01:04:44.840 that isn't going to happen and in so doing that it basically destroys the actual um you know

01:04:51.560 there's sort of like mission that they're saying that they're on to bring because they

01:04:56.060 They will have weaker arguments for two reasons.

01:04:59.480 One, because they can't be bothered to make them.

01:05:01.920 And two, because their argument actually is genuinely weak.

01:05:05.260 And we can see when you come after us

01:05:07.820 with these sort of bullying, censorship attacks,

01:05:11.380 which is why we are going to win.

01:05:13.340 Because you can't make the argument.

01:05:15.140 You can only harass us and be seen doing so.

01:05:18.560 Anyway, well, yeah, absolutely.

01:05:20.460 For the sake of time, I shall have to end it there,

01:05:22.540 ladies and gentlemen.

01:05:23.080 Sorry for my little Joe Biden moment earlier on.

01:05:25.920 Don't know what happened there.

01:05:26.880 Oh, we edited that out.

01:05:27.820 But anyway, this is all very interesting stuff.

01:05:31.840 And I would actually encourage you to go and look through it

01:05:34.040 because there are many other interesting bits of information in there as well.

01:05:39.420 But the entire thing just outlines how obvious it is to the establishment themselves

01:05:45.180 that they are entirely losing control, that they are a dwindling force,

01:05:50.520 and that basically we're ascendant.

01:05:52.940 right i'll quickly speed through these rumble rants for you stelios so we can get to your

01:05:58.640 segment uh tom rat for one dollar says translation we don't want to change the way we treat you

01:06:03.720 but we are aware that you are aware that the way we treat you is different and we are okay with

01:06:08.180 that yeah basically basically uh that's a random name says the native british population is not

01:06:13.560 70 because the elderly should never be accounted for as they don't contribute to the economy the

01:06:18.640 birth rates or the yeah okay yeah i mean there there is that uh one percent uh sorry one dollar

01:06:26.300 from fallen firebird says leftists intentionally disconnect the package of a great replacement

01:06:31.400 conspiracy theory from the actual reality of ethnic replacement and dismiss a former without

01:06:36.920 addressing the latter at all yeah and we also know just very well and occasionally you do get

01:06:42.700 the far leftist who goes out and say hey the great replacement is happening yeah good and it's a good

01:06:49.100 thing yeah just about to say and that's random name also says normie's brains work on keywords

01:06:54.220 they react to keywords in order to know how they're supposed to act in public racist equals

01:07:00.300 bad conspiracy theory equals taboo that's why remigration works so well um yeah it's it's an

01:07:07.400 accurate word and also as well it's not the establishment are not addressing why it was

01:07:12.840 extreme to bring in over 10 million foreigners without public consent right this entire thing

01:07:19.480 is based around wanting to restore public trust in democracy and it's like well why didn't you

01:07:25.180 just do the things that were democratically demanded of you then um all right then basically

01:07:32.740 i forgot what i want to say sorry man okay let's uh do i have control of the mouse you do awesome

01:07:43.060 we're going to talk about the eu and how masks are off essentially they passed a law that the

01:07:48.820 majority voted against oh yes i heard about that yes didn't they do it like a friday afternoon and

01:07:54.580 everyone had gone home or something like that yeah but even the those who were present the

01:07:58.820 majority of those present voted against it but still they say no we're gonna pass it that does

01:08:04.340 sound like the sort of thing the eu would do actually yeah yes so best mask off a moment yet

01:08:09.220 yeah for those who think that i i seem a bit uh life drained today yes i do it's because i'm

01:08:16.580 trying to follow news about bureaucrats and there is so much background backdoor activity here and

01:08:22.740 And also so much stuff there that is completely life draining.

01:08:26.200 Yeah.

01:08:26.700 So, yeah.

01:08:27.860 Sorry.

01:08:28.820 Not my best of days.

01:08:30.080 This is what bureaucracy does to you, ladies and gentlemen.

01:08:31.960 This is what bureaucracy does to the soul of the modern man.

01:08:36.520 But we do have an antidote for the modern man.

01:08:39.140 This is Islander number six.

01:08:41.440 This is the sixth issue.

01:08:42.680 And what a lovely cover it has.

01:08:44.980 And also I'm looking at here, it has an interview with economist Michael Hudson.

01:08:52.220 but also it has the article from my esteemed colleague luca johnson marshals of middle earth

01:09:00.060 talking about samwise gamji this time yeah and many more articles but one thing i want to say

01:09:05.300 is definitely read it because i know that luca was working for many many days on it and you were

01:09:11.780 completely drained it consumed my life yeah but in a constructive way in a great way not in the way

01:09:17.120 of following eu news and bureaucracy but someone has to do it let's see what happened

01:09:24.320 the european parliament just passed chat control 1.0 let me give you some context there are two

01:09:33.520 laws or two policies chart control 1.0 that was in place and expired this april april 2026

01:09:44.640 this is the one that they passed again they reinstated it and there is also chat control

01:09:51.580 2.0 which is far worse and more orwellian but definitely the future of the eu so they passed

01:10:00.920 chat control 1.0 right now to pave the ground for chat control 2.0 in the future and those

01:10:09.680 politicians who are doing so will fall victims to what they are advocating for they will be surveilled

01:10:18.880 just like everyone else in fact we'll be happy in yeah yeah in fact there will be there is going to

01:10:25.520 be more surveillance of what they say than more surveillance of the average than the average

01:10:31.520 population will suffer right so a proposal to stop the new law which will allow big tech companies

01:10:37.520 to voluntarily scan all private messages needed an absolute majority of 361 voted but received

01:10:44.720 only 314 votes now let me tell you the bureaucratic aspect of it so this is a law that has been

01:10:54.560 voted against five six times and it it was in place and it expired so what did they do

01:11:04.800 they did a tactic that was essentially a legalism and the spirit of it is the spirit of a scammer

01:11:13.840 it has zero aspect of respect or the for the the meps and the people that they're supposed to

01:11:22.560 represent it's essentially a let's try to pass this because and we don't care what the meps

01:11:30.880 have to say about it and the people they're representing so what happened was they said that

01:11:36.560 we are the the president of the european parliament said that we instead of saying

01:11:42.240 that instead of framing this as do you support this or that policy uh chat control 1.0 they

01:11:51.040 framed it in a negative sense they said do you reject chat control 1.0 or not and they said that

01:11:59.360 in that case they needed the the absolute majority of the parliament which is 361 votes

01:12:08.640 and they didn't get it instead and they did so in the um in early july because so so they made they

01:12:16.320 made it technically a repeal of something that needs a majority yeah they said do you reject

01:12:23.520 something that currently isn't a law that that's what it is the law had expired nakedly corrupt

01:12:32.220 yeah it is it's proper mafia attack no it was not a law it had expired on the 3rd of april of 2026

01:12:42.220 so the vote now was do you reject something that is in a vote and to reject that which

01:12:48.580 that isn't a law and to reject that which isn't a law you need the absolute majority of the house

01:12:54.560 and we don't care that you voted five times against it we're gonna bring the vote again

01:13:01.000 when a substantial number of MEPs are not going to be in the parliament for the people watching

01:13:08.980 on youtube that was a fast track thing yeah for the people watching me and youtube myself and

01:13:13.160 luke have just done segments where essentially the establishment is trying to ask the question 0.98

01:13:16.580 why does nobody trust us why does nobody believe it's because of shit like this it's you've already 0.97

01:13:22.620 decided what you're going to do and we're just going to find a technicality to make it happen 0.99

01:13:27.660 it would be shit it would be a less of a headache for the european commission to just abolish the 0.92

01:13:33.040 parliament because all it is it's just like the theater of democracy that's the thing is do you 0.98

01:13:38.440 remember how life drainer was a few hours ago i do that's the goal they want us to be confused

01:13:45.300 they want us to they want to suck our energy yeah right so 607 people were present

01:13:52.180 and the majority of those present uh voted against that uh chat control 1.0 and here is

01:14:02.340 where they hid behind the the letter of the procedure that according to some meps doesn't

01:14:09.940 exist that was a complete scam and they violated the spirit of democracy according to which

01:14:17.300 democracy is the system of those who are present you have to be present it doesn't matter if you're

01:14:23.940 not present you have to be there you have to you know you have to be there to defend your people

01:14:29.860 it's your job to be to represent yeah so just by saying well some people weren't present

01:14:35.740 and because it weren't present you are gonna be sabotaged it's an absolute scamming thing there's

01:14:42.740 not zero element of fair play there right so euronews here has an article saying chat control

01:14:50.000 1.0 passed the european parliament through the back door and again they are lamenting the back

01:14:56.700 door activity in brussels and they're saying a loophole in parliamentary procedure allowed

01:15:04.180 MEPs to extend mass scanning of private communications until 2026 without a direct

01:15:11.760 vote on the substance of the law. Chat Control 1.0 was a temporary derogation from e-privacy rules

01:15:19.440 designed to detect online child sexual abuse and that it was re-adopted by the European Parliament

01:15:26.860 on thursday the regulation will remain in effect until the 3rd of april 2028 provide a substantial

01:15:34.860 buffer while lawmakers negotiate an agreement on the updated framework chat control 2.0 in a nutshell

01:15:41.060 that's the important thing chat control 1.0 says doesn't force the several platforms to spy on

01:15:52.880 their users it says that they are legally permitted to do so it's up to them now obviously

01:15:59.680 several companies that will want to lobby and will want to secure favorable conditions for them

01:16:08.060 will tell governments well and the eu well are you interested in us giving you data

01:16:14.580 of our users so they could be doing it as well and they're saying that this is under the guise

01:16:21.920 of protecting children from sexual predators we will go to that we will ask several questions

01:16:30.220 about how much the establishment cares about sexual predators and the safety of european

01:16:37.700 citizens but yeah well excuse but presumably chat 2.0 that is it's not an option to scan the

01:16:45.220 messages yeah that's it's mandatory to to spy on your on your well that's why they want to

01:16:51.620 updated because the thing is if i'm given the choice between i don't know signal and whatsapp

01:16:55.260 and one of them says it's going to scam me and the other one says we absolutely won't i'm going

01:16:58.660 to use the one that says they absolutely won't so that's why they need to make it mandatory yes

01:17:02.920 and let's continue here european parliament approves miniature control a motion to reject

01:17:10.800 the extension failed to achieve the absolute majority needed in the second reading procedure

01:17:15.480 all of it was just absolute nonsense and again they're saying that this is under the guise of

01:17:21.960 child sexual abuse material right so there are some exceptions

01:17:27.740 because the the members of the parliament there made a made a fuss and they started

01:17:36.840 protesting and they voted an amendment actually two amendments but one of them is really important

01:17:45.380 to see because it shows who is going to be uh not who isn't going to be surveilled

01:17:52.820 and who will be right and they say that the obvious platforms where monitoring can now take

01:17:58.340 place will be email and chat services such as gmail icloud hotmail discord instagram slack

01:18:07.620 teams snapchat xbox and google chat and that is because and there are some that are going to be

01:18:16.900 free from it the end-to-end encrypted platforms and that's because of an amendment let me show you

01:18:27.380 which of them are going to be free from it yes it says that thanks to two amendments in yesterday's

01:18:34.980 vote end-to-end encrypted communication means like such like uh whatsapp and another one i didn't

01:18:41.700 know called threema are gonna are gonna be exempt from it that means that for now chat control 1.0

01:18:48.820 isn't a commandment to break encryption something that has been regularly suggested by lawmakers

01:18:55.060 around the world so they are going to be pushing it now one thing to say about this is that um out

01:19:01.460 of those who voted to keep it many of them were um centrists and center-right um meps

01:19:13.220 so leftists weren't particularly happy for it and also you know other right-wingers were also

01:19:20.420 happy for it i suspect that they care about different things yeah yeah yeah yeah um i don't

01:19:27.860 i don't know what they are or actually do but um yeah this was a failure of the centrist and the

01:19:36.900 and those calling themselves center-right such as the european people's party there was lots

01:19:43.300 of support for that and there shouldn't have been right and um here we have several lengths i don't

01:19:51.780 think we have the time because the previous previous segments were a bit uh well we can go

01:19:58.260 on a bit more it's okay we'll talk about this now ursula von der lion has a new idea

01:20:05.560 and she's sharing it with us basically she wants to end anonymity and she wants to introduce an

01:20:13.360 eu app that is going to verify the uh identity of every user oh god so let me get this right

01:20:21.220 in order to protect your anonymity yes you download an eu app that provides you anonymity

01:20:29.560 which they can see behind yes i think they've misunderstood why i want to be anonymous they

01:20:37.000 keep using that word i don't think it means what i think it means yes uh so uslof on delay and

01:20:42.240 confirms that there will indeed be a european app for authentication on social networks the

01:20:47.640 european union will therefore have access to the identity cards of all europeans will have to

01:20:53.000 present them to log into social networks honestly this is like my labrador coming to me and saying

01:20:58.920 look master i'm a bit concerned that your sausage supply is vulnerable so what i want you to do is

01:21:04.520 give me all of the sausages and i'll i'll ensure they're safe it's like this is the least credible

01:21:10.300 claim i've ever seen i mean that one's worse yeah yeah so um there are several things to say about

01:21:17.480 it. But I will say why I'm skeptical. First of all, I have zero mercy. I feel zero mercy towards

01:21:25.960 child sex predators. Absolutely zero mercy. And anyone who is trying to run cover for them 0.52

01:21:34.800 is despicable and shameful. And that's not what I'm going to do. But I do not want to live on a

01:21:42.580 surveillance state and i do not think that the european interest has the interest of europeans

01:21:50.820 at heart or at least the people behind pushing these policies because there are several questions

01:21:57.680 here what have they done to ensure that europeans are safe from crime including of a crime of a

01:22:07.340 sexual nature have they done have they acted in a super erogatory fashion beyond the call of duty

01:22:17.120 to show that they do care about european safety and the safety of children and and native europeans

01:22:24.240 alike have they done so or have they hid hid themselves behind the rhetoric of human rights

01:22:32.160 of criminals yes to to say that criminals should constantly have a light sentence or not be

01:22:42.060 deported i i i just had a thought occur to me because i've always wondered why uh people who

01:22:48.120 commit sex crimes against children get off so lightly yeah is it because they need a regular

01:22:54.520 circulation of them and they don't need them to be so afraid that these crimes don't keep happening

01:22:59.240 so that they've got it as an excuse to push through their agenda

01:23:03.140 because they know that's one of the few things

01:23:05.260 that people are going to be sympathetic to.

01:23:08.060 So I think they very deliberately make sure these people get low sentences

01:23:13.060 so that it keeps happening, so that they can keep using it as an excuse.

01:23:16.480 And that's why you could say people from the centre

01:23:19.000 and some from the centre-right fell for it

01:23:21.840 because they couldn't read through the lines.

01:23:24.360 And the obvious question is,

01:23:25.920 if the people who pushed this policy cared about the safety of children why not why not

01:23:34.420 why be a constant obstacle to basic law enforcement well that if they actually what if they actually

01:23:41.180 care about crime and i do care about crime and i think law enforcement is the number one duty of

01:23:46.840 the state um there's pretty there's lots of crime that they could uh fight and i don't see them

01:23:54.420 doing it instead i see them constantly pushing for open borders and endless welfarism for

01:24:02.180 for lots of non-europeans and endless state control endless state control and also

01:24:08.140 when when they are confronted with criticisms of the way that multiculturalism is being implemented

01:24:17.020 in europe they don't say fine we will because we do care about the safety of europeans we are

01:24:24.040 going to run a committee we are going to crush crime no they don't say this they say it's the

01:24:30.760 bad far right doing it and at when in some cases we have politicians such as a politician from the

01:24:38.220 afd who appealed to crime statistics of the federal police of germany it it's pretty establishment

01:24:49.600 institution if you ask me. She was arrested or something wasn't she? She was fined 6,000 and

01:24:54.720 arrested and fined for 6,000 euros perhaps she has been fined more because the EU and the people

01:25:02.400 who are behind the this sinister policy and way of operation they want people to talk about

01:25:10.740 failures of integration only in order to say that the only cure to the failure of integration

01:25:20.580 is to tax native europeans even more to fund the failed experiment of open borders and extreme

01:25:28.440 welfareism for non-europeans so i don't think they have the interests of europeans at heart

01:25:36.320 Their way of operation shows that they don't.

01:25:41.020 So people who are skeptical about this, at least some sensible people who are skeptical about it,

01:25:48.880 aren't skeptical because they want to prevent the police from doing something about child sexual crime, sexual abuse.

01:25:58.800 It's because they do want something to be done about child sexual abuse,

01:26:02.760 and they also don't want to live in a surveillance state

01:26:05.720 and they think that the establishment right now of Europe

01:26:08.680 doesn't care about them.

01:26:13.720 All right, I'll quickly zoom through the rumble rounds here.

01:26:20.140 Fictagius says, for $2, with this loophole,

01:26:24.320 what's to stop the EU Parliament from putting other draconian rules

01:26:27.280 and regulations through this voting loophole?

01:26:29.680 Absolutely nothing.

01:26:30.700 uh two dollars from orchido uh says and then the government uh leaks of the identity happen

01:26:37.120 uh that's a random name for five dollars thank you says when we win we'll take them um make

01:26:43.360 these people vote uh on whether or not they reject their right to a fair trial regardless i mean to

01:26:49.820 be honest like this is the thing they they they create so many precedents that they just think

01:26:55.820 will never actually be turned on there just endlessly sigil stone for two dollars says you

01:27:02.080 see we had to become the nkvd because the votes against becoming the nkvd failed by our own design

01:27:08.940 now face the wall yeah it does feel a bit like that and base tape for two dollars says you don't

01:27:14.260 need to show id to enter europe and run around the street stabbing people but you do need to

01:27:18.980 show id to call stammer a twat on facebook yeah basically that is more or less a gist

01:27:24.540 Alright then, video comments Samson, thank you.

01:27:28.540 MEKA MONDAY

01:27:30.540 On... Tuesday?

01:27:32.540 I know there is the old phrase, if you're taking fire you're over an enemy target,

01:27:36.540 but at a certain point it gets ridiculous.

01:27:39.540 If the progs cheer for death knowing they're being watched, imagine what they do behind closed doors.

01:27:44.540 On second thought, don't imagine that. Sounds icky.

01:27:47.540 At least I got the mech leg walk cycle to be triggered by a PS2 controller.

01:27:52.540 Got a second controller.

01:27:56.460 Could you use one?

01:27:57.940 Go on then, Samson.

01:27:59.260 As opposed to the 60s cars, which were just brilliant.

01:28:01.440 Brass.

01:28:02.000 I knew you were based, but my man.

01:28:03.800 As with all good things, cars ended in 1973.

01:28:07.060 And for all the car normies listening,

01:28:08.660 I strongly recommend finding a forever car

01:28:10.820 that you'll maintain for the rest of your life.

01:28:12.580 Modern cars spy on you, sell your data,

01:28:14.700 and are specifically designed to fail 100,000 miles

01:28:17.460 with the common use of wet belt-driven oil pumps.

01:28:19.840 I recommend strongly against buying anything newer than 2014.

01:28:22.840 Anything newer can't be readily modified, repaired or restored.

01:28:25.840 And I've found my forever car in my 48 Ford.

01:28:28.720 I built her once, even if I rip her in half, I'll build her again.

01:28:36.360 She's a beauty. Yeah, it's wasted on me.

01:28:39.400 I don't drive, but I'd still have a car just to do that.

01:28:44.440 I've no idea how to do that stuff, but.

01:28:46.400 uh comments i've got uh maria manzi says uh epic just bloody epic uh ordered well thank you maria

01:28:54.440 really hope you enjoy islander uh murmured in um 2010 says brother stelios has returned

01:29:00.980 now harry can stop looking so relaxed on his segments yeah we never know when you're just

01:29:05.480 going to interject with the strippers do we what i get yeah yeah yeah that was fun throw stuff oh

01:29:10.920 it was great for my segment lancelot says please stop speculating just means we haven't figured

01:29:15.920 out a suitable narrative yet correct and justin phillips says after the southport tragedy right

01:29:21.620 up to now i have lost all trust and belief in the police even though individual police officers may

01:29:26.780 be decent people the whole system needs to be raised to the ground rebuilt with stricter

01:29:30.940 stringent and comprehensive protocols on their operation yes i feel very much the same way on

01:29:35.580 that uh from my segment um and the uh anonymity uh makes great point here which is just a starmer

01:29:43.980 has already said that immigration was a deliberate experiment you know when they gave that speech

01:29:49.280 he literally just said yeah that the tories did this by design this was a choice it's like yes

01:29:55.340 yeah good point starmer good point uh and maria also says uh cohesion or diversity you can only

01:30:01.720 have one we know uh which one the state has chosen yeah don't we just and kevin fox says um so what

01:30:08.720 we have is the ethnic replacement for the white nations and ethno-nationalism for all of the

01:30:14.880 others uh non-white nations uh got it yeah and the other thing as well as of course you know

01:30:20.140 actually those those people in the green party are far more strident ethno-nationalists than

01:30:26.560 anyone in the center ground they just are for palestine and all of their other like countries

01:30:31.440 of of loyalty um and then do you want me to read no i'll read it omar awad says so much

01:30:37.300 backdoor activity in the eu 30 seconds into the segment and stelius is already talking about

01:30:42.980 grinder i also found you the the proper article to start with that's through the back door here 0.54

01:30:49.440 michael drabelbis as always why not it's fun the eu power parliament is definitely gay coded

01:30:55.740 lots of backdooring and nonsense michael drabelbis also it's great to have you back professor 0.84

01:31:02.520 So, Stelius, thank you very much, Michael.

01:31:05.600 And Lord, inquisit Hector X, as V says, the EU does not create, it regulates.

01:31:12.320 Wonderful.

01:31:13.260 Well, I hope you've enjoyed the show today, ladies and gentlemen,

01:31:16.140 and we look forward to seeing you on the podcast tomorrow.

01:31:18.520 Do go over to the website, get your copies of Islander. 0.97

01:31:24.180 She's a beauty. 0.92

01:31:25.560 Take care. 0.99

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters - July 14, 2026

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #1461

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript