00:24:40.060or on the scene or something and they only said male born in cardiff now it it does appear that
00:24:46.560there's a a slight disparity here now it turns out that the police have noticed that we've noticed
00:24:54.560huh yeah something's going on so uh towards the end of last year they put out uh this guidance
00:25:01.340from you know the ever corrupt uh what is it oh yeah national police chief's count oh that's not
00:25:07.040as bad as the count what's the other one college of policing or something like that so that's a
00:25:11.140really bad one but anyway this this police body put out this guidance and in that they basically
00:25:16.620say um they are encouraging police to disclose um a suspect's ethnicity or nationality where there
00:25:26.220is um and what's the term something like a potential of a community backlash or something
00:25:31.020like that or where there's a threat to the community or civil cohesion that that's kind of
00:25:34.840i can't is in is in it somewhere but that those are the sort of wordings that it uses
00:25:39.460so then i thought okay well that's interesting has this situation improved since this guidance
00:25:46.880was put out now superficially you might think yes you might think yes because we've we've had
00:25:52.820the manchester synagogue attack um and that it wasn't six minutes but we found out within 12
00:25:58.800hours um the huntington train attack yes again yeah um you know they so so the manchester synagogue
00:26:07.140you within 12 hours they were saying a british citizen citizen of syrian descent in the huntington
00:26:12.800train case it was a black british man of caribbean descent that took 15 hours and in gold is green
00:26:21.000the stabbing not the ambulance thing um that was um a a british national of somalian descent that
00:26:27.820took only 11 hours so they have tightened it up from being at least 24 hours several days to being
00:26:34.680within the day maybe quite a bit of the day um but they are they are actually saying within 24 hours
00:26:42.500now the only problem is though if every one of those examples i i gave um we didn't need the
00:26:48.100police to tell us because there was there was footage being shared online yeah of course i mean
00:26:52.100you you you watch the manchester synagogue one pretty much in lifetime if you if you're active
00:26:56.000on x the huntington train thing people were tweeting out about it from the train yeah uh
00:27:00.760while it was happening gold is green one again it was all on video so we knew immediately what
00:27:07.200was going on um the ann widdicombe one you know we didn't know so there's no way of finding it
00:27:12.140but a lot of that is down to the particular location of where ann's house was and the fact
00:27:17.960that which had been relied on the release of security camera footage that we simply didn't
00:27:22.820have the only the only other case that sort of felt relevant to me was the um the jewish ambulance
00:27:28.320one um where it took a week to mention ethnicity but to be fair there was cctv footage at first so
00:27:36.640maybe they didn't know either way because cctv footage isn't very good but my point is is that
00:27:41.980the perception remains that the police are primarily focused on managing the sort of
00:27:47.560febrile race relations in this country rather than being upfront about what it is that's going on
00:27:53.900so maybe this guidance will continue and maybe if the next time there is a something horrific
00:28:00.060happens where it's not actually broadcast live on x as it's happening um they will be doing the
00:28:07.320six minute thing so i i don't know but again it was just so striking to me that in one case
00:28:13.720first you hear about it six minutes white man white man white man uh as as opposed to the
00:28:20.640southport thing and and and i would like to think we passed that sort of chilling period we're in
00:28:26.540only a couple of years ago where the government was coming out with saying think before you post
00:28:31.420because people were being arrested um for speculating at things that in this case at
00:28:37.840least the police wanted to tell us very immediately
00:28:41.040all right uh for one dollar tom rat says colt is law uk edition and for two dollars one tall order
00:28:50.620says think i'm watching uh le too much algo has me down for a for a brit getting ads for chinese
00:28:57.600cars and that aren't available in the united states marital aids uh dating sites etc well
00:29:04.200thank you for here all the time they're not sure about your marital status then
00:29:08.680aren't we not algorithm needs tightening up yes um all right can we go over to my segment samson
00:29:15.140thank you all right then ladies and gentlemen so i saw a tweet from charlie downs uh last week
00:29:24.820where he was talking about some new research that had come out with a whole slew a very very thorough
00:29:31.300research at that with all sorts of data and statistics that i thought it was worth uh going
00:29:36.880through. And so I've looked through it, and I'm going to present, and we'll just talk about it
00:29:41.340as we go through the data from here. But one of the things that's very important about it is that
00:29:46.680this is very much something written from within the establishment. This is written by Dame Sarah
00:29:52.060Kahn. She's someone who was first appointed, in fact, if I do just go forward to here,
00:29:57.580you can see Dame Sarah Kahn. And she was appointed Britain's first counter-extremism commissioner
00:30:04.740in 2018 that was by theresa may she was then appointed again by boris johnson in 2021 and
00:30:12.420she's now written this paper as well so dame zara uh sorry dame sarah is someone who is um constantly
00:30:21.700um sorry what's with them um ascribed to um sorry frozen totally she um she's someone who's
00:30:31.040constantly appointed to these positions to do the research for the establishment right well
00:30:35.120liked by the establishment for them yeah she's she's constantly handpicked by them to do these
00:30:39.600um these investigations into why is the system not working into questions of counter counter
00:30:46.880terrorism and why the the british public out there seem to be getting a little bit rattled
00:30:51.900by everything that they see going on why have the british public noticed that we despise them
00:30:57.060Yes. Yes. So this is all of that. So they have noticed that the government know, successive governments know, that they are losing control of the narrative. They know that the trust in all of the institutions, in all of the old traditional places of authority are totally crumbling, that people are now looking exactly as you said in the segment before, Dan, they're looking to X, they're looking to things that can get the events to them far faster than the government themselves.
00:31:26.600so we simply don't trust official sources right and that but also the fact that we're coming to
00:31:31.880our own um philosophical assumptions about these things now that are apart from the state ideology
00:31:38.040that is constantly telling you how to perceive the world around you and the world that they are
00:31:44.600determined to continue to create right that that they are totally unwavering and there's no number
00:31:50.700of terror attacks there's no number of um you know ethno-religious confrontations on the streets of
00:31:57.380britain that will actually make them waver and go hang on this has gone too far and in our effort to
00:32:03.240persist with this we are going to lose everything so everyone from all sides from all factions that
00:32:09.440now exist within britain everyone is asking themselves what is to be done right that's what
00:32:15.320they're asking. And we also are asking what needs to be done, which is exactly the theme
00:32:20.520of the sixth issue of Islander, ladies and gentlemen, which I'm delighted to say is now
00:32:25.080out. You obviously see it here in front of you. And that is the theme that is tackled by many of
00:32:30.820our writers. Of course, Carl Benjamin's written for it. I've written for it. We've got Will Tanner.
00:32:35.900Rory's done a wonderful interview with the American economist Michael Hudson. And of course,
00:32:41.480it's created with all of the craft and aesthetic pleasure that Rory normally puts into these
00:32:48.260projects. So do go over to the website and buy yourself a copy of Islander 6. So now let's begin
00:32:56.120talking about the actual research paper itself, shall we? So to begin with, let's just start by
00:33:03.000talking about the fact that this has been written by the UK EDRC, which is the UK Extremism and
00:33:10.440democratic resilience center and it goes on to say that it's britain's first independent
00:33:16.640organization dedicated to countering extremism uh building social cohesion and strengthening
00:33:23.780democratic resilience mobilizing a whole society approach built on public health principles
00:33:29.580so that sounds very ominous yes so what it's really saying is all of these ingredients that0.98
00:33:37.040we've put into the pot that is now multicultural britain we're going to keep them boiling and1.00
00:33:43.240whilst that's happening we're going to make sure that we're going to try our best to make sure that1.00
00:33:47.580it's not going to spill over the more you put in bowl the the more vacuous it is yes well what it
00:33:52.740sounds like to me is is how can we well like you say how can we keep a lid on it but while keeping
00:33:57.740the current establishment in charge well this is the thing isn't it the outcome is already
00:34:02.460predetermined it will look at the data it will look at people's persuasions it'll look at their
00:34:06.960opinions on things but it's not going to go as we'll come into in just a second on it will
00:34:12.920expressly say yeah the majority of britons believe this okay should we do what they want to do no
00:34:20.200are you mad you know it's like no we're going to carry on we just need to do it in a way that you
00:34:25.420know basically calms them down a bit question if diversity is a strength why is there a need to
00:34:31.320build social cohesion it's almost as if there isn't social cohesion and yes you don't add
00:34:37.700cohesion to your strengths do you uh so also as well um i will just say that also as well as um
00:34:45.640sarah khan on this it has also had a dr uh matthew godwin as well has worked on this who was
00:34:52.820previously worked at the tony blair institute for global change is extremism policy unit and as a
00:35:00.600researcher in the House of Lords as well. So this was written entirely by establishment hands.
00:35:06.780Now, when we go to the foreword, we see here that it goes on to say that the threat now facing us
00:35:13.300is more serious and more deeply rooted than when I was counter-extremism commissioner. This is not
00:35:19.580a passing dip in confidence, but the structural crisis as a result of a chronic erosion of trust
00:35:25.780in institutions now fueling a broken social contract and so they are very aware of just how
00:35:31.960dire their position is sorry i mean sorry a question
00:35:37.560go is uh was she working for the tony blair institute uh godwin godwin yeah and um is this
00:35:47.080the institute of uh the prime named after the prime minister who just decided that the country
00:35:53.620was going to adopt a completely new vision that no no one asked for no i don't believe so okay no
00:35:59.620i don't believe so but if we go down here as well we can see in this paragraph nowhere is this strain
00:36:04.820more visible than in the contested question of national identity what it means to be british
00:36:11.300and who that identity belongs to has become a genuine fault line not confined to any one
00:36:16.980political tribe generation or region concern that diversity is eroding national identity
00:36:23.140is now a mainstream view held by a majority of britons beneath that broad anxiety sits a harder
00:36:30.900minority view support for traditional extremist beliefs such as ethno-nationalism and re-migration
00:36:37.620are held by a meaningful share of the public their words a small but consequential number
00:36:43.940of citizens have already crossed into acceptable political violence which of course uh no one here
00:36:49.700supports, are rejecting democratic norms altogether. So if we go further through this now,
00:36:55.660let's start looking at some of the figures that they present to us. So who actually believes
00:37:00.200that the contract is broken? Who believes that the society that we live in and all of its
00:37:06.300structures and the affinity and the fraternity that used to be built on Britain, that good-natured
00:37:11.740will between those of us at the bottom who voted and those of us at the top that governed us,
00:37:17.040who believes that that has been totally severed right well you're a very sensible man dan yes and
00:37:22.920i'm glad to see that actually many other people out there are too now if we have a look here we
00:37:27.840can see that that actually is 83 percent of reform uk voters and 67 percent of green voters that
00:37:35.940interests me because because the greens have basically won their assumptions are embedded
00:37:41.460in even the conservative party and you know when they got what they they wanted their whole lives
00:37:45.980it's like well this is broken yes and you can see here as well that 32 percent believe capitalism
00:37:52.040has failed and we need a communist revolution and actually just before i go any further with this i
00:37:58.040should probably just say as well for the sake of methodology uh so this was a nationwide public
00:38:03.620attitude survey of just over 4 000 adults and focus groups in great britain by more in common
00:38:10.140and especially a survey of 1,300 respondents and focus groups in Britain
00:38:15.480of British Muslim opinion by Yonder Consulting,
00:38:19.620which we'll go into a little bit longer.
00:38:22.040So that's the sample size that they're working with here.
00:46:05.340And offline extremism events monitored March 2025 to March 2026.
00:46:10.700Now, as you can see here, far-right extremist events have been overwhelmingly monitored in comparison to Islamist events.
00:46:18.940Now, this says more about the Home Office and Prevent and the things that they choose to monitor than it does about the actual abundance of these things in society,
00:46:32.360which we know, based on many things that we've discussed thus far, what they choose to focus on.
00:46:39.160We also get into this as well. Now, this is very interesting. The British Seven Segments. Now, it says throughout this report, we read public opinion partly through More In Common's British Seven Segments, a values-based segmentation that maps the UK population by core beliefs rather than on the old left-right spectrum. Built on polling of more than 20,000 people, it helps explain not just what Britons think, but why they think it.
00:47:07.340now you can see here so according to them and of this poll 12 of the population are the progressive
00:47:15.340activists you know the most radical but the corbynese to the momentum type the green voting
00:47:20.360polanski ones who are all for open borders and for all of the absolute lunatic stuff that you
00:47:26.820know we are just suffocated by every single day yeah and the report is sort of tried trying to
00:47:33.700portray them in a good light because they say driven by social justice um not driven by hate
00:47:40.980or envy yeah yeah they don't seem to be saying something about other such groups
00:47:48.500uh and then we go i mean obviously it's not uh social justice that uh they care about the other
00:47:53.860groups no but it's yeah well the the number of evils that they allow to happen in the name of
00:48:02.180social justice yeah you know suggests that you can understand that they use it in a positive sense
00:48:07.540yes uh incrementalist left so civil civic minded gradual reform over revolution so now we get into
00:48:15.220those people who are the starmerites the labor party white hall all of the you know and as you
00:48:20.980see here as well nine percent established liberals now when you put all of those people together
00:48:26.660you're going to get a total of 42 percent of the population but if you go to skeptical
00:48:40.820traditional conservatives 8 and dissenting disruptors alienated and radical crave dramatic
00:48:48.260change then all of a sudden when you bracket those people together you're in a position of 58
00:48:54.500eight percent right who are sort of leaning more in no we there are those in the left and those
00:49:01.560who are the established liberals like all the way ranging from the the tories and the liberal
00:49:06.740democrats to the far wing of the green party and then you have people from reform uk to restore
00:49:14.500and those far outside of it as well and obviously as well just members of the public who aren't
00:49:20.300voting right now yeah and you realize to yourself just how overwhelming the number of people are
00:49:26.060you can yeah you can see why the establishment is afraid when you if they split it down like this
00:49:29.880i mean just a quick point on this i mean i consider myself out of those categories i mean
00:49:33.040they're all a bit imprecise but i consider myself to be a rooted patriot of that 20 you know patriotic
00:49:38.760overlooked uh common sense policies however my whole thing is repeatedly warning the establishment
00:49:46.180that you need to change course otherwise things are going to get worse yeah and of that 20 over
00:49:51.000there the dissenting disruptors if the establishment doesn't change course if it doesn't
00:49:57.220bucket ideas up if it doesn't listen to the advice that you know me and people like me have been
00:50:01.220giving when the if this gets much worse i'm not going to stand in the way of that 20 dissenting
00:50:07.160disruptors if things continue to spy i will make the arguments again and again and again as to why
00:50:12.840we need to sort this out rationally yeah but if it ever comes to the point where it just continues
00:50:17.240to go down and it looks like we are actually going to lose our country and those dissenting
00:50:21.700disruptors want to do something a bit more radical i'm i'm not i'm not going to get in the way no
00:50:26.540it's uh when you see here as well actually i will just say on the case of uh skeptical
00:50:31.840scrollers this is also not just uh people who are right wing online as well this is also the
00:50:38.720left-wingers as well but what we constantly see from the data being presented to us is that the
00:50:43.480center ground is being ever squeezed which is why they're writing research papers like this
00:50:49.420uh because they're trying to spin was it 17 yeah yeah 17 is the is a centrist position
00:50:58.420center is getting squeezed it is a skepticism cannot speak today do apologize skepticism over
00:51:05.620diversity is mainstream in most UK political parties. Now, as you can see here, our national
00:51:12.240identity is being strengthened through diversity. Minority Conservative position, majority Labour
00:51:19.000position, majority Lib Dem position, only just overwhelmingly negative for Reform UK. Only 13%
00:51:27.400of them believe that, which I would suggest they might be in the wrong party. And then, of course,
00:51:32.500the Green Party which is made up of those people who are the diversity and those who are for open
00:51:38.120borders are overwhelmingly you know do not care about it whatsoever. Now for the sake of time I
00:51:44.300will skip on just a bit. Now if we go here to figure 2.2 we can see how it says over two-thirds
00:51:51.040of Britons reject an ethno-nationalist view of national identity but when we come to as I say
00:51:57.720the skeptical scrollers um these are almost equal uh rooted patriots again almost equal
00:52:05.020it's much more it's all the old ones the uh the incrementalist left the established liberals
00:52:11.720who believe that a person can be english scottish or welsh regardless of ethnic background but as
00:52:19.060i've already pointed out these people are in the shrinking position these people that are more half
00:52:26.780and half about it are the ones that are starting to outroot them or not from all sides outflank
00:52:33.340them from all sides now says that remigration while framed by its advocates as a form of
00:52:39.840immigration control it is important to understand the historical root of remigration as a key white
00:52:46.500supremacist policy concept so again it immediately gets like no no you don't understand it's not a
00:52:52.000question of supremacy in in no way is it black supremacist for me to say that um for example
00:52:59.520Sudan should be demographically for Sudanese people right that is not a black supremacist
00:53:06.000argument that is an argument to people's birthrights to heritage to tradition in any
00:53:12.240homeland that you're simply saying that homelands matter to people yes that's all we're saying it's0.98
00:53:16.520not a question of supremacy but within this language you can see how they already failed
00:53:21.500to misunderstand the they misunderstand the position and it calls for the forced removal
00:53:26.380of immigrants refugees and their descendants including legal residents and citizens based on
00:53:31.380race ethnicity and or culture and region once relegated to uh as it says the uh mid-20th
00:53:40.080century german philosophy supremacist circles online is what it's basically saying a remigration
00:53:45.740has in recent years moved into mainstream and far-right politics in many countries emigration
00:53:51.640is a policy solution to the um as it says here just all of their buzzwords which falsely claims
00:53:58.540that white populations are being intentionally replaced by non-white migrants and refugees
00:54:04.220just so happens that this direction of travel is only taking place in white nations though
00:54:11.400um i like they put the caveat intentionally they're not arguing that it may or may not be
00:54:17.060happening well it's observably happening the government have their own data on that
00:54:21.600yes the fact that it is happening but as as long as they didn't all have a meeting where they where
00:54:26.680they said it exactly like that they can they can claim that's a conspiracy as well yeah uh they
00:54:31.260also go into here the uh reform uk supporters think that muslims are unable to integrate into
00:54:37.160British society as you can see here once again we have a total difference between the Green Party0.99
00:54:42.840who think that actually 82 percent think that they can most likely because many of them come
00:54:48.680from those backgrounds versus Reform UK who think that 29 percent so it's interesting as well how as
00:54:56.040we see constantly um reform it's Reform UK voters and Green Party voters who think more than any
00:55:03.880other voters that the system the social contract is absolutely broken and it's also those who are
00:55:10.720most at odds in their perception of of course what needs to be done about it this is nothing new
00:55:16.360the question for me i suppose to people who write this paper is what on earth are you going to do
00:55:22.500about it what from the centrist perspective actually solves this what do they have in the
00:55:29.000tank to actually begin to heal these divides well presumably none of that whatsoever and just manage
00:55:34.980us and our perceptions more criminalize us more control our speech more censor us more yeah now0.89
00:55:42.360this is interesting as well the general public views muslims and islam least favorably of the
00:55:47.980groups and religions tested now you can see here these are feelings from the general public
00:55:52.920excluding muslims uh the number of two over two thousand people now though that is interesting
00:55:59.960in and of itself one of the things to me that's actually seems most intriguing about all of this
00:56:05.620is actually the apathy down the middle of the entire thing when you see something here by saying
00:56:12.540um british people in general what are your feelings towards british people in general
00:56:17.420well it's like well 10% feel very negatively about them it's like well probably in every age
00:56:23.060to be fair 48% feel uh very positive well that's very kind of you but this part in the middle
00:56:30.240like neutral I don't care at all really you have absolutely no feeling whatsoever about the people1.00
00:56:38.460that you share a society with I mean there's something gone seriously wrong when British
00:56:42.960people are asked how do you feel about british people and only 48 say positive yeah i mean
00:56:49.760one thing i want to say obviously not to what you dan just said i i agree with you that's
00:56:56.340preposterous should be more but when it comes to this lots of people let's also bear in mind that
00:57:03.780many people are reluctant to express their views especially in surveys yeah that are
00:57:11.480you know sure yep you know you don't know who the person who is interviewing you yeah uh is yeah
00:57:20.360well especially as i mentioned in my last segment that it wasn't that long ago where people were
00:57:24.300getting jailed for expressing views exactly or losing the job because they said something that
00:57:29.460is uh that the establishment thought it was woke people in their job so just someone comes and says
00:57:36.660hey what do you feel about this or that group well lots of them are going to be very reluctant
00:57:42.000to answer and you can see here as well feelings towards each religion by the general public as
00:57:47.440well now and you can see islam at the bottom of it with 34 percent of people having a very or quite
00:57:53.820negative opinion about it overwhelmingly like threefold nearly threefold more than those that
00:57:59.640have a positive view of it and also as well by three degrees of margin a more negative opinion
00:58:07.080than those who hold the second least inclined which is Judaism. So overwhelmingly and you can0.90
00:58:14.200see why they panic so much and why there is so much talk about guarding against Islamophobia
00:58:20.040when the government are going to be presented with statistics like this that sees Islam head
00:58:25.640shoulders above the rest being the one that the public are most guarded against. Now there is
00:58:31.220also the question of younger Britons and their growing attitude towards violence as well which
00:58:37.880again as I say I do not support but as the data bears out in this particular research it says0.95
00:58:43.720well it's never acceptable and across the board this is almost unanimous right the British public
00:58:50.920are not a violent people they don't like political violence they don't like seeing it whether it's
00:58:55.580something like, you know, Nigel Farage being milkshaked, or whether it's being politicians
00:59:01.380actually being murdered, or it's just happening to other members of the public with different
00:59:07.060opinions. Yeah, but also just let's not forget that, for instance, in the US, the Democrats are
00:59:13.300overwhelmingly pro-political violence, the sentiment there. They are prone to think that
00:59:20.680it's justified much more than supporters of the republicans absolutely but also as we see here as
00:59:27.180well the there is also an age breakdown here where you can see that 25 oh actually that is stark when
00:59:34.680you compare it to older generations yeah you look at older generations it's like five percent of
00:59:39.260over 75 year olds like it's acceptable in some situations but it really depends on the belief
00:59:46.040whereas you've got 25% of 18 to 24 year olds believing it and 22% of 25 to 34 year olds
00:59:53.940believe it. If a quarter of people under the age of 34 were to actually act on that that's more
01:00:00.100than enough of a revolution easily. Yeah but obviously of those people from those age
01:00:04.680demographics as well that's just throwing them all in together irrespective of their actual
01:00:10.140political opinion. It's just saying that if it came to it they would do that and one of the
01:00:15.740other things as well and this backs up your point Stelios is the fact that you can see here
01:00:19.860progressive activists permit violence to protect marginalized groups while dissenting disruptors
01:00:25.900do so against unpatriotic or islamic beliefs but when you actually look at the
01:00:33.040sort of permission permissiveness of violence and harassment you can see here that those who
01:00:41.640the progressive activists believe that it is overwhelmingly acceptable to to attack those with
01:00:47.960fascist or neo-nazi views and for what for a war that's worth as well i do not trust these people
01:00:54.800to accurately know or understand what a fascist view is but also let's uh understand how shaky
01:01:04.320this ground is because you would expect fascists and neo-nazis to be very militantly
01:01:11.840anti-communist and violently so when it comes to the violence towards people with communist views
01:01:19.320exactly the amount of people who are who would consider that to be acceptable is far less than
01:01:27.340Yes. And so this entire graph basically just tells us that it is the progressive activists who are by far and away the people who will make the most excuses for violence against their opponents.