The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters - November 12, 2026


The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #1548

Breakfast With Beau | Wednesday 11th November 2026

Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 34 minutes

Words per minute

169.53

Word count

16,043

Sentence count

359

Harmful content

Misogyny

14

sentences flagged

Toxicity

26

sentences flagged

Hate speech

68

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00 Good afternoon and welcome to the podcast of the Lotus Eaters episode 1548 for Thursday the 12th
00:00:06 of November 2026. I'm your host Luca joined today by Harry and Firas. Hello. And today we're going
00:00:13 to be talking all about the economics of re-migration, a very pertinent topic. We're
00:00:18 then going to be talking about the Palantir Psy-Op and then we're going to be talking about
00:00:23 the telegraph's relentless crusade to cook you uh because they've been at it for years there's no
00:00:30 other way of explaining this they just seem to be really determined to turn britain into a nation
00:00:36 of cooks hide your wife hide your kids the telegraph's coming wise words wise words indeed
00:00:42 uh by the way we do normally have a fire alarm at one o'clock it's not happened so if we get
00:00:48 rug pulled and it happens in the next five minutes uh perhaps no one's changed the batteries
00:00:54 Maybe, maybe. We shall see, but if that happens, there's your warning.
00:00:59 Before we get on with the first segment, friends, I just want to let you know,
00:01:02 a few weeks back, Stelios and I had a fantastic discussion all about Prometheus Bound by Aeschylus,
00:01:09 one of the most important plays by far in the Western canon,
00:01:14 not only for Prometheus' mythical role as the champion of humanity who gave us fire,
00:01:20 and in Aeschylus' telling of it, many other things besides,
00:01:24 but also as a play that thematically explores the limitations of human hebris
00:01:30 and the hebris of gods in many ways as well,
00:01:33 our relationship to divine power and the Promethean will
00:01:37 to ever advance towards progress, technology, and many other things besides.
00:01:44 I honestly think it's one of the best discussions we've had on Chronicles,
00:01:47 as well as Macbeth, of course, as well.
00:01:49 it's alright I can take it
00:01:51 yeah yeah well they're all great
00:01:53 anyway do go and check it out
00:01:54 it's actually a freemium you can go and watch it
00:01:57 without even subscribing but of course
00:01:59 you should subscribe if they're as little
00:02:01 as £5 a month because there are many other
00:02:03 wonderful things on the
00:02:05 main website as you know
00:02:07 inflation's wrecking all of us but
00:02:09 do you know through all of that what hasn't
00:02:11 inflated the price of a
00:02:13 Lotus Eater subscription
00:02:14 and we're still giving freemiums as well
00:02:17 anyway so go check it out
00:02:18 With that all said then, friends, let's talk about the economics of re-migration.
00:02:24 All right, so let's sort of start maybe with the basics and then explain some of the complexities
00:02:29 that could come from re-migrating large numbers of people and how a sensible government might 0.91
00:02:37 deal with them. The starting reality is this. I've written about this as someone who is from 0.99
00:02:43 I've written about diversity, but the stark reality of a diverse society is that it always ends in civil war 1.00
00:02:50 or an insanely corrupt, complex system that just crushes everybody underneath it. 0.93
00:02:57 If you have a diverse society, you really have two choices.
00:03:00 Either a dictatorial elite chosen from a single group that is highly cohesive,
00:03:06 that keeps down everyone else and disciplines them.
00:03:09 them. Singapore. Singapore, Dubai, etc. Or you have utter chaos. Lebanon, Yemen, India to some extent,
00:03:21 etc. There are no two ways around it. You can't have the kind of society that you expect in the 0.71
00:03:28 West, the high trust society that you expect in the West, and diversity. It's just not possible.
00:03:33 Economically, it's also a little bit absurd.
00:03:38 When you look at the net fiscal position of each group by race, and if you could just
00:03:45 help me scroll down this image please, you will see simply that there is only one group
00:03:52 that is contributing.
00:03:54 The rest of the racial groups are net recipients from the government.
00:03:59 one group is a net contributor to public finances. This is fundamentally unsustainable, and as the 0.91
00:04:07 demographics change and there are more diverse people as opposed to natives, this financial 1.00
00:04:14 position can only get worse. It's impossible to keep up with it. Sam Ashworth Hayes makes the 1.00
00:04:21 same exact point, and he highlights the impact of migrants by different nations of origin, 0.98
00:04:28 and you see in the Danish example that really Westerners and natives pay into government
00:04:36 finances over time. Everybody else does not. Pretty much everybody else does not,
00:04:41 especially Africans and Middle Easterners and so on. 0.96
00:04:47 So this reality has to be admitted.
00:04:51 And you see genuinely offensive stuff. 0.96
00:04:55 For example, 60% of family welfare in Germany is going to foreigners. 0.99
00:05:00 60% of it. 1.00
00:05:02 There is no political logic for this.
00:05:05 There is no basis in justice for this.
00:05:08 And there is no way that it's financially sustainable, because if you look at the projections of the British economy, this is government spending, the blue line that's constantly rising.
00:05:21 This is government revenue, the yellow line that's slowly declining.
00:05:25 This is the road to ruin.
00:05:27 This simply can't be sustained.
00:05:30 And it will end in violence.
00:05:33 And the question is, does it end in violence after the state is bankrupt?
00:05:38 In which case, it's going to be an insane level of violence as the system completely breaks down. 0.73
00:05:44 Or does it end in a very limited amount of violence as a result of political choices that do lead to re-migration? 0.87
00:05:54 But these are the only realistic options, and this has to be the starting point.
00:05:57 I would expect from a modern government's perspective, the economic argument for if they were going to try to truly defend from an economic perspective, 0.71
00:06:06 doling out all of this welfare towards foreigners would be that it acts as a form of economic
00:06:13 stimulus. These are populations who would otherwise be economically unproductive. They
00:06:18 need some kind of cash injection so that they are able to go out and spend to benefit their
00:06:24 local and national economies. The problem is that if that was the case then all of the high
00:06:28 streets across the country wouldn't look like desolate hell holes and the actual things that
00:06:35 they spent their money on wouldn't remain entirely within their own 0.99
00:06:38 communities within potentially sham shops like the Turkish barbers the the 0.62
00:06:45 phone shops all going to within the black black market economy as well so
00:06:51 the Turkish barbers and the vape shops these are just money laundering fronts
00:06:55 they're not making well just just one other thing that I forgot to mention how
00:06:59 much of that is going in remittances as well so it's actively been taken out of
00:07:02 economy is not stimulating anything exactly exactly exactly and so which which gets us to a
00:07:08 slightly different point uh which i was going to get to which is what happens when this population
00:07:13 reduces but i'll get to that in a moment now the government already has full authority to deprive
00:07:20 people of citizenship uh it can do that for anybody who's naturalized and it can do that
00:07:26 on really very flimsy grounds, which is national interest.
00:07:33 They did it recently with, was it the chap who was in Russia or married to a Russian woman?
00:07:37 Exactly.
00:07:38 Yes.
00:07:38 It's very easy.
00:07:39 There is one test that says it can't be done if someone becomes stateless.
00:07:45 And then there is an amendment to that that says, actually, if the Home Secretary believes 0.52
00:07:51 that they have recourse to another nationality, then it can be done.
00:07:53 so there is grounds in law for mass deprivation and citizenship which was the case with shaman
00:08:00 began which was the whole argument at the time was well we can't render a stateless it's like
00:08:04 there are other states that she is eligible for citizenship from absolutely absolutely whether or
00:08:10 not they do their duty by her or not different conversation but so long as someone is eligible
00:08:16 to another passport which applies to literally everybody this isn't an issue what this means
00:08:24 essentially is that from there you have to consider the following if there is a wave of
00:08:31 mass deportations there is going to be as you said harry a huge drop in the revenues of things like
00:08:40 supermarket chains sainsbury's tesco's etc there's going to be a huge drop in the price of
00:08:46 houses. There's going to be a huge drop in the prices of used cars. There's going to be all
00:08:51 kinds of things that lose value. And if you end up with a massive loss in the value of housing,
00:08:58 that instantly becomes a crisis for the banking sector.
00:09:02 Oh dear. I mean, my heart bleeds for the bankers.
00:09:05 My heart absolutely does not.
00:09:07 People who have lost the most in all this.
00:09:09 How will the city of London recover?
00:09:11 My heart absolutely does not. But this is actually important because if banks lose enough money, what they do is the Lebanon scenario and the Cyprus scenario, where, and I think Greece as well, where they go after the deposits of people.
00:09:30 Well, yes.
00:09:30 Just generally freeze people's deposits and people are locked out of their money.
00:09:35 Well, one of the things that I've seen people sharing about recently was that following the 2008 financial crisis, the actual bankers, the people involved in the financial institutions, and those of a particular strata of economic wealth actually did recover very quickly.
00:09:50 And it's the rest of us who just got screwed over.
00:09:53 So in the case of an economic crisis, having all of the politicians in your pocket is very beneficial to you.
00:09:59 which the inverse of it is if you want mass deportations you can't have
00:10:05 politicians who are in bed with the banks if you actually want this one of
00:10:11 the tests severely narrows the list which really really narrows the list which
00:10:15 really really narrows the list but this is going to be a big economic thing and
00:10:19 if you look at where the government gets its its money there is a pretty big
00:10:25 chunk that comes from VAT and that comes from company taxes and this is definitely going to fall.
00:10:34 This is most certainly going to fall as a result of there being a lot less people buying stuff
00:10:40 and therefore money that goes into VAT and money that goes into corporate profits that then
00:10:46 translate into corporate taxes. And so the answer to that has to involve a couple of things.
00:10:51 the government needs to cut its spending and there is no way around it and the
00:10:57 biggest spending item for the government is welfare now within welfare the
00:11:06 biggest item is pensions which is a genuinely eye-watering amount 170
00:11:13 billion pounds every year on pensions and constantly increasing because of the
00:11:19 combination of aging population and the triple lock. What this means is that the
00:11:27 triple lock has to go. That much is obvious. It is entirely unsustainable. It
00:11:32 is a transfer from the older generation, from the younger generation to the
00:11:35 older generation. Plus with pensions it's an inherently destructive idea because
00:11:40 government pensions by their very nature break the generational compact. In old
00:11:47 age the only people who owe you anything are your children and if you for some reason don't have
00:11:53 children but have been a good member of your community your community might decide to help you
00:11:59 except that when you make that shift from this being a charitable act and a personal duty to
00:12:07 To this being a coerced act, you end up wrecking how generations interact with each other,
00:12:17 and you end up with this insane bill that nobody can pay for.
00:12:22 And so...
00:12:23 I will just say one thing, because I do see a lot of people being very angry at boomers
00:12:29 for this, in a way that I don't think is entirely fair.
00:12:33 Because I do think that there is a strong argument that if you have been a productive
00:12:37 member of society if you've been a well-behaved member of society if you have brought something
00:12:42 to the table for your community and for your nation that you should have some kind of benefit
00:12:47 come off of the end of that um so i don't think the argument for pensions is is unreasonable um
00:12:53 the problem with it is how it has been funded and how the funds have been used historically since
00:12:58 they were taken from the people originally put into hedge funds and whatnot uh the problem is
00:13:03 that most people don't know that that's how they were being used i think a lot of people assumed
00:13:08 well the money is going from my paycheck or i'm paying directly into some account that is labeled
00:13:14 with my name that somehow gathers slightly more revenue over time that then will be untouched
00:13:21 until it's time for me to take out of it a lot of people did not know that it was a ponzi scheme
00:13:26 and i think it's quite unfair for a lot of people to kind of accuse these older boomers who were
00:13:33 lied to just like the rest of us are constantly lied to um of having some kind of malicious intent
00:13:39 towards the younger generations correct on a broad level i think that's unfair target people
00:13:44 individually if they are doing something individually that is that is wrong if you
00:13:49 have some kind of boomer who is genuinely like sucking up land and revenue and stealing from the
00:13:53 younger generations absolutely target them but the normal the normal grandmother who's just sort 0.83
00:13:58 of like well I thought you know my husband was paying into his pension fair and square
00:14:02 I think it's unfair to be cruel to her absolutely so you what I would humbly suggest is that there
00:14:09 is a cut-off date everybody under 35 knows from now on that they're not getting a pension
00:14:14 or everybody under 30 knows that they're never getting a pension so that this whole thing simply
00:14:20 goes away and it becomes a shrinking liability rather than an ever-increasing liability and so
00:14:28 that the generational compact can be fixed. If this was simply, you know, the government telling
00:14:33 you you should save money for your old age, well, yes, absolutely you should. But it was, as you
00:14:37 said, a Ponzi scheme and when financial intermediation gets in the middle of it and you
00:14:44 have these giant financial empires taking control of pension contributions and using them in all
00:14:49 kinds of ways on the promise don't worry 30 years later i'll pay you back when in reality their own
00:14:56 interests make that quite unlikely then you get this disaster and guess what the people making
00:15:01 those bets with your money that you've paid in they have all the protections you have no protection
00:15:06 exactly exactly exactly so this has to go universal credit uh there is maybe 10 million claimants 9
00:15:15 million claimants of universal credit. And this is one of a couple of things. You're
00:15:20 either paying for people to be unemployed, and therefore the more you pay for it, the
00:15:25 more you get of it. Or you are supplementing the income of some people, meaning that you're
00:15:31 providing a corporate subsidy. Neither of these things is tenable in any way. You can't
00:15:38 keep on spending on universal credit. All that it will do is generate more claimants 0.97
00:15:43 for universal credit. It simply doesn't work. And if you've removed a portion of the labor
00:15:49 force, legal or illegal labor, people in very low-paying jobs that could be taken by others,
00:15:58 well, then these people should be, the people who are on universal credit should be taking
00:16:02 those jobs. And it's just not sustainable to keep on financing idleness or subsidizing
00:16:10 corporations this has to go this has to go and there are very few push pack push factors as well
00:16:18 it encourages you to drag your feet or that is to say that um you know my experience of it where
00:16:24 there was a time when i was living in london i got made redundant and found myself in universal
00:16:28 credit for a few months it was that i just realized that if it weren't for me actually
00:16:34 willing myself to find a job and get out there and start paying tax and working again despite
00:16:40 what there would be those taxes were going to be spent on that i could have carried on like that
00:16:45 for a long long time and no one at the actual offices you know for job seekers were ever really
00:16:52 going to push no and so this whole thing just continues indefinitely exactly and it's gotten
00:17:00 to such an extent that you want to be kind and generous to people but at the same time it's just
00:17:07 too big and the bigger that it gets the more the severe action that is required it's it's like with
00:17:14 every problem that you allow to fester if you let yourself get too fat you the diet you have to go
00:17:20 on will be much more severe it's it's the nature and and by that this entire idea of the fact that 0.99
00:17:28 you know because for the longest number of decades now the argument has been well we need immigrants
00:17:34 We need mass immigration for the economy because we have just inextricably tied these two things together so that now this is the only model by which the economy can function from.
00:17:47 And obviously no government since then has ever gone, well, that is true, but let's at least start making the moves to detangle ourselves. 1.00
00:17:56 We're as bound to it now as we ever have been, and more so by dint of the sheer number of foreigners. 1.00
00:18:02 Yes, absolutely. 1.00
00:18:04 Absolutely. And then when you look at things like the eligibility for universal credit or disability benefits, you just have to do some things, especially for disability benefits, because the number of people claiming disability is again in the millions, which doesn't comport, it doesn't match what the reality of it is.
00:18:25 One thing you can easily do is make doctors liable.
00:18:28 If you issue fit notes that give eligibility to disability benefits
00:18:35 to people who don't deserve them, who aren't eligible,
00:18:38 well, you as a medical professional can be made liable for the money
00:18:41 that is taken out of the system as a result.
00:18:44 What you get then is a lot more severity.
00:18:48 What you get then is a lot more pressure to only give to those who are genuinely deserving.
00:18:52 If you don't do this, you just keep getting this endless explosion in people claiming disabilities of all kinds of things,
00:19:02 such as the insane number of children who are supposed to be disabled or having ADHD or having one kind of thing or the other,
00:19:11 which are just, you know, they aren't disabilities, they're behavioral problems.
00:19:15 But if you hit the jackpot with that, you could be getting 200 pounds a week.
00:19:22 which is a serious amount of money at the end of the day and it adds up it's not much for one
00:19:30 family but when you look at it at a population scale you know child disabilities from 500 000
00:19:39 in 2020 which is an insane number a very high number to almost a million now to 900 000 now
00:19:46 is is is the claim really that just disability among children is doubling every five six years
00:19:56 in in in i mean in a modern oecd country i understand that the lockdowns would have caused
00:20:02 a lot of problems for many of the younger children but at a rate such as that it's
00:20:08 and the problem is when you talk about these things you sound uncompassionate you sound
00:20:14 extreme, and then labor ends up using silly terminology about you, about this business
00:20:20 being a budget of misery and homelessness. But you can't just have that many people
00:20:27 relying on the taxpayer. Nothing like this works, especially if you want to solve the
00:20:34 problem of diversity, which is going to lead to civil war. There are 50,000 people on terrorism
00:20:40 watch lists in this country. That is an army. That is an army. You can't keep this up indefinitely.
00:20:46 And as you said earlier on, could be stripped of citizenship at any time, literally any time.
00:20:52 It's a choice. It's a political choice that's being made. It's a political choice.
00:20:58 Then you look at where the government is getting its money from,
00:21:02 and you see things that are genuinely disastrous if you want an economy to grow.
00:21:10 hold on it might be this one which are genuinely disastrous if you want an economy to grow
00:21:17 when you look at all of these indirect taxes that the government has
00:21:22 the environmental levies the fuel duties etc all that these do is that they create
00:21:29 on employers employers a burden of compliance they have to do all kinds of things to get
00:21:38 their accounting right and getting basic things like that accounting right it's impossible because
00:21:44 how complex the rules are it's it's genuinely crazy as far as i can tell from british legislation
00:21:50 there is as much hedging as possible within all of it to ensure that at any one moment you are
00:21:57 you could be complying with or breaking every single law that's on the books exactly exactly
00:22:04 Exactly. It's maddening. It's genuinely maddening to have to look into this stuff. Digital tax.
00:22:16 Digital tax?
00:22:17 Yeah. There's a digital tax that you might have to pay. It doesn't show here, but it's there.
00:22:21 Oh, right.
00:22:23 A climate change levy. That's an insane amount.
00:22:27 ETS this is exchange exchanges of carbon credits these are just things that complicate the lives
00:22:36 of employers and require the government to hire inspectors and they don't bring in any any anything
00:22:45 significant in taxes they just bring in a very small amount but the burden that they add is an
00:22:51 insane drag on growth it all adds up it's all adds up just fuel costs in england alone being
00:22:59 boosted by what 25 percent by the fuel fuel duty that you have to pay on it for environmental green
00:23:05 levies exactly i mean it's it's crazy it's it would be bad enough were it not for all of the
00:23:11 problems with supply coming from the middle east and the strait of hormuz right now but then the
00:23:16 fact that the government just carries on levying these insane taxes exactly and why is it is it
00:23:23 because the government really needs the revenue uh for that well they have immense bills to pay
00:23:28 but ultimately if they don't get the revenue which they haven't as you showed in that graph
00:23:32 for years now they will just print the money they they will just print the money so why is it that
00:23:38 they're pushing these taxes well it's for social engineering exactly exactly and then you look at
00:23:44 Things like, yeah, there you go, the digital services tax and the diverted profits tax.
00:23:50 Nobody knows what these are, but they employ thousands and thousands and thousands of people in government.
00:23:57 Cut the spending, cut the taxes, it'll work out.
00:24:00 And reduce the burden on people to allow them to do business.
00:24:04 Corporation tax, you slash that massively, your revenues increase, they don't decrease.
00:24:09 your revenues will increase because more companies will want to book their profits
00:24:14 in a low-tax environment and your tax take will as a result increase if you reduce the taxes with
00:24:21 the income taxes it's the same thing the number of brits who go to dubai and singapore and saudi
00:24:27 arabia and so on to work where they really don't like being there for all kinds of rather obvious
00:24:33 reasons except for the fact that it cuts their taxes. These people would relocate if they
00:24:39 had to pay, I don't know, 10, 15 percent instead of 40 percent. And therefore that will generate
00:24:47 a lot more taxes. So there is going to be a massive economic shock when you try to do
00:24:53 something about mass immigration. There is going to be a huge shock when you try to work
00:24:59 this out. However, if you keep this continuing, you're going to definitely go bankrupt and end up
00:25:07 in civil war. The inflation will come. When you reduce the labour force, there will be higher
00:25:13 wages. That will actually be a good thing because it will make a fairer society. A lot more young
00:25:20 people who are actually British will be able to earn enough to have families and own houses,
00:25:24 especially if house prices drop but this is one of the reasons for the boris wave wasn't it as
00:25:30 they did during the lockdowns they said well we don't want to be raising wages now do we so we'll
00:25:34 just bring in a few million people the the best way that i've heard it put is uh human quantitative
00:25:41 easing it's the equivalent of printing money but for people and the effects of it are certain
00:25:50 bankruptcy. Well, amusingly, if you were to look at it from a leftist perspective as well,
00:25:54 there's this economic measure called the genie coefficient, which is used to measure how equal
00:25:59 or unequal a society is. Typically, you find the ones with the worst genie coefficients are the
00:26:05 most diverse societies. Because as you say, what typically ends up happening is one class or 0.97
00:26:12 ethnic group will gang up together, direct everything in their own interests, and just
00:26:18 try and suck everything up at the detriment of all of the other groups within that society exactly
00:26:24 exactly now i won't get into all of the other things that have to go um like devolved government
00:26:32 and the spending on devolved government which is just a hundred billion pounds so that people in
00:26:37 in hollywood to breed separatism to breed separate okay fine the three billion on asylum
00:26:46 accommodation from the Home Office. Thank you for that. $6 billion for foreign aid. Much appreciated.
00:26:53 Environmental levies, just subsidies to green energy. $17 billion and the compliance cost that
00:27:00 comes with that. Parties that want remigration are dropping in the polls. Well, reform at least
00:27:07 is dropping in the polls significantly. Part of the reason that they lack credibility is because
00:27:12 they're not telling the economic story of how to do this and what are the consequences of the
00:27:17 economic policy. They're also not clear about the consequences of continued diversity, which is
00:27:23 definitely going to be civil war in the end. So Restore was a breath of fresh air when it's set
00:27:30 off by saying it's going to be hard work, it's going to be difficult, it's going to be very,
00:27:35 very challenging, but it's worth it. That's the kind of message. But if you want to be taken
00:27:41 seriously on this message, you've got to dig into the insane numbers that are here as to what the
00:27:48 government is spending money on and figure out how to actually manage this burden, this insane
00:27:56 spending burden, and still give people a sense that they are going to come out on top as a result. 0.91
00:28:04 And until this is properly addressed, nobody's going to take remigration seriously. It's not 0.96
00:28:09 enough to tell people it's going to be civil war in five years time 10 years time they will choose
00:28:14 to look away they will constantly choose to look away there has to be a way of selling the public
00:28:20 that yes there will initially be a difficult period of transition after which there will be
00:28:26 prosperity and that does involve looking into the nitty-gritty of what the hell the government is
00:28:31 doing and what it is spending money on and how to fix that and replace that so that you can have a
00:28:38 so you can promise people prosperity after a challenging period well here's the thing right
00:28:44 there is a legitimate argument to be made from our perspective on this the left has always been
00:28:50 better in the past you know 20 years at the catchy slogans yes like Bernie Sanders has spread his
00:28:58 message and made it very popular by singling out it was millionaires and billionaires but then he
00:29:02 became a millionaire so then it just became billionaires everybody's well well aware of that
00:29:06 one um but really if you were reform if you're a store what you kind of need is some kind of
00:29:11 professional pr firm consulting with experts who can actually break down this information
00:29:17 and tell them where all of the waste is coming from what the effects of this would be where the
00:29:22 pr firm can then come up with the catchy slogans the one sentence pitch to the public for how your
00:29:29 life will be better if we implement our policies for work not idleness something like that yeah
00:29:36 Yeah, absolutely. Absolutely. So this is what I wanted to mention. Dan and I might do a bit of a deeper dive on what the government is doing on a brokonomics or realpolitik. Check them both out on the website and subscribe. But the economic story has to be addressed if you're going to be serious about remigration. And that's why the AFD is now beginning to back down on it. This is why Trump decided to slow down the mass deportations. This is why you're seeing these challenges.
00:30:01 is people aren't thinking through the economic consequences and they're not able to promise
00:30:06 a paradise after what horrors that must be enduring what about all those americans i've
00:30:13 seen that clip going around on twitter of the american i think he was a roofer landscaper
00:30:19 builders association yeah the the builder who was saying oh you know i was a big part of the blue
00:30:23 wave because you know old jorge here who doesn't have a correct visa was going to get kicked out
00:30:29 the country and i'm strong maga but my livelihood would have been hurt off the back of it that
00:30:34 there needs to be a solution uh to these to these problems i mean ideally my solution would be well
00:30:41 you've just publicly admitted to a felony so you should probably be put in prison right um so there
00:30:47 should be also like legal consequences for this but that but there does need to be some kind of
00:30:52 some kind of solution one of the better ones i've seen was the white paper policy institute saying
00:30:57 like for people uh like that well not necessarily like the builders but like farmers who complain
00:31:02 oh if i can't get uh if if i can't get an enzuela or whatever his name is to come out over the
00:31:07 border every summer then my business will be ruined well you know if the government's spending
00:31:11 this much money anyway pay a one of it on pay a one-time subsidy yeah for some kind of automated
00:31:18 robotics yeah if you have to exactly exactly exactly um all right um you've got the mouse
00:31:26 do you want to go through the rumble rants oh yeah sure let's see why are you talking about the same
00:31:31 subject three times in a row this past month because it's an important one you could have
00:31:35 talked about chinese honeypot honeypots and ai i promise you we will i may talk about the chinese
00:31:40 honeypot stuff tomorrow and when it comes to ai if you're referring to the ai data centers being
00:31:45 defeated at the midterm ballots in the 41 places where they were i've already covered that on the
00:31:50 daily channel on a video called um the people have spoken so if you want if you want some stuff that
00:31:57 isn't covered on the podcast you can check the daily channel where oftentimes me or one of the
00:32:01 other presenters will go into going to stuff that we may have missed here yep welfare in the west
00:32:06 runs there on a double jizzier says that's a random name one for the boomers who are other
00:32:12 they're not ever devouring their greed no and another for the invaders who are ever ungrateful
00:32:17 yep that's right so much of the gdp is fake and unproductive if it is actually tackled it could
00:32:23 cause a genuine economic depression this is true if you deregulate a lot of industries like hr will
00:32:29 suddenly disappear overnight and that will be a net good thing yeah um and then you can focus on
00:32:35 the productive sectors i speak speaking of ai i need to i need to cover the fact that ai
00:32:41 interviews for jobs is becoming a real thing and it's amazing because you would think for some 0.97
00:32:45 people they'd be like oh my god thank god i don't have to talk to a noxious hr woman anymore to try 0.99
00:32:52 and get through the jobs process no no the ai has perfectly programmed in the quintessential 1.00
00:32:58 awful hr woman so even even automating that out you still have the same the same problems 1.00
00:33:05 Yep, yep. I doubt the bankers will sit idly by while a party like Restore gets elected. 1.00
00:33:11 How would a truly patriotic party enact remigration without the system sabotaging them?
00:33:16 Well, that's a good question, but the politics has to change.
00:33:20 And part of changing the politics is making people think about the economics and the long-term benefits and the long-term threats,
00:33:26 and then making this into an inevitable reality.
00:33:29 also that's just that that's kind of a problem that governments have been trying to solve for
00:33:35 the past hundred years if not slightly longer since the effects of the industrial revolution
00:33:40 and financialization became clear and what you find is sometimes that if you try and do something
00:33:45 for your own country to solve the problem the the people will just go to war with you
00:33:50 either literally or financially yeah anyway then let's get on to the next segment
00:33:55 samson can you bring up my links please
00:33:59 thank you so to all of our good viewers out there there has been a scam being pulled on you
00:34:09 for a little under two years now it's a trick that certain influencers and financial interests
00:34:18 have wanted to lead you into and that is the trick of supporting the mass surveillance state
00:34:25 You've seen it with things like the Flock cameras across the United States, and you've seen it specifically with Palantir and all of its affiliates worming its way into national government databases and creating infrastructure which the United States government is increasingly reliant on and has been telling you for the past two years is desperately needed to be able to enact the mass deportations that the Trump administration promised.
00:34:49 I am here to tell you now that that was a lie and that these businesses, these massive corporations, which in the case of Palantir literally started as a contractor for the CIA, they are only in it for themselves, for their own financial and power interests, and that they will flip on a dime for the sake of those interests.
00:35:11 they do not care about you never let yourself get folded into these things as a man who lives in
00:35:16 britain one of the most comprehensive surveillance states of the entire planet i can tell you it will
00:35:23 not solve the problems that they are telling you that it will solve so let's take a little bit of
00:35:28 a trip through memory lane at the pr campaign that's been enacted over the past two years
00:35:34 to try and convince you that these guys are on your side they're totally based they care about
00:35:39 all the same things that you do. So this is a tweet from the 7th of December 2024 that went
00:35:45 slightly viral. You can see it went to almost over 700,000 viewers, but then was shared out by
00:35:52 someone who got 45 million views almost, and then was again shared out by Elon Musk saying that this
00:35:59 was based to the support of 43 almost million views on Twitter, which was this speech at the
00:36:07 Reagan National Defense Forum by Palantir CEO
00:36:10 Dr Alex Karp. Now I've spoken about this man before on the podcast I believe
00:36:16 last year talking about the connections to the CIA with Palantir, talking about
00:36:21 the fact that he
00:36:22 back in his days at university when he met Peter Thiel
00:36:25 as a kind of like philosophical opposites that attracted one another
00:36:29 considered himself a cultural Marxist, how he considers himself a progressive
00:36:34 all of a sudden that kind of rhetoric melted away
00:36:37 for the sake of convincing you that he was a true American patriot
00:36:41 in places like this speech, and I'll skip to some of the
00:36:45 more specific moments where people were saying were based later on
00:36:49 where he describes, oh, wokeness is a pagan
00:36:53 ideology, a pagan woke ideology.
00:36:56 ...because people want to live in peace, they want to go home,
00:36:59 they do not want to hear your woke pagan ideology, they want to know they're safe.
00:37:04 And safe means that the other person is scared.
00:37:07 That's how you make someone safe.
00:37:08 And the average American person understands this.
00:37:11 Unfortunately, many of the intellectually captured institutions funneled and intellectually owned by the Berkeley faculty do not.
00:37:21 And that's what they want.
00:37:22 It serves hell what I want.
00:37:24 And that's what Palantir and all the people in this room, I hope, were here to serve the American people.
00:37:30 and my version of service is the soldiers are happier the enemies are scared and americans go
00:37:37 back to enjoying the fact that we're the only one with a real tech scene in this country and we're
00:37:42 going to win everything that's how i so strong sell right there i'm anti-woke i'm for national
00:37:49 security i'm for the benefits of american interests globally and domestically i'm on your side the
00:37:55 only way that we achieve all of that is if you submit to the surveillance state apparatus that
00:38:00 I am in the middle of constructing right now. Just a quick thing, when he says that the only
00:38:06 way to be safe is for the other guy to be afraid, that's a particular way of looking at the world
00:38:12 which isn't in fact true. Well it's kind of a re-paraphrasing of Teddy Roosevelt big stick
00:38:20 kind of thinking. Yes but Teddy Roosevelt was talking about it in one context whereas in reality
00:38:25 in a high trust society to be safe there has to be shared values within the society and these
00:38:32 values include a sense of honor it's not just fear it's a very particular way of looking at
00:38:39 the world to think no no all of my enemies have to be completely afraid of all of my neighbors
00:38:44 have to be afraid of me um in the most violent neighborhoods everybody has deterrence because
00:38:49 everybody's armed they're not afraid yeah and it doesn't result in fear so there's
00:38:55 either way it was particular about what he's saying it it was very appealing to a lot of
00:39:00 people at the time because for a long time people have been very suspicious of big tech
00:39:04 and the surveillance apparatus fairly so i mean go back to the uh to the 90s and you have things
00:39:10 like the branch davidians and you have things like ruby ridge where clearly the state apparatus was
00:39:15 used to try to smash any sort of dissident thought uh in particular with those ones just people
00:39:22 trying to live off grid they were uh they were tricked into committing illegal acts and then
00:39:28 smashed in the most brutal and awful fashion and then the media lied about them for decades
00:39:34 afterwards to try and convince you the branch davidians set fire to their own compound yeah 0.98
00:39:39 makes after after after like a week of psychological torture makes perfect sense these are the kinds 0.60
00:39:45 of guys that would support that these are the kind of guys that would facilitate that but in the same
00:39:50 way if i may that tony blair constantly pushes now for the digital id of the back of the illegal
00:39:55 immigration it's like oh so actually you wanted it to manufacture consent for you know this silver
00:40:01 bullet to this problem that you have allowed to fester anyway just to get what you and and you
00:40:06 won't actually solve the problem no and you won't solve the problem but i agree with your point as
00:40:11 welfare so this idea of just it being well you just have to be put into fear in order to get along
00:40:19 it's like well there are many good communities around there that don't operate on fear whatsoever
00:40:24 they're actually just trust honor mutual respect just liking one another yeah that can be that can
00:40:31 be a nice one uh but people found this kind of thing appealing the campaign steamed onwards and
00:40:36 over the past year or two uh you know you have people sharing about clips from may 2025 uh where
00:40:43 he's just saying you know we're the top dogs in town we're going to part with the world's best
00:40:46 people we're going to dominate you can be along for the rider you don't have to be and people
00:40:50 going oh my god that's so based and all the time these people are accruing power and they're
00:40:56 accruing money which of course can be used to buy more influence and power and you can see the
00:41:01 different kind of policies and contracts that they've been granted since trump got into his
00:41:06 administration. A ICE contract for $30 million with Palantir to develop Immigration OS, a
00:41:13 surveillance platform which would, one, streamline the identification and apprehension of individuals
00:41:20 prioritized for removal, such as violent criminals, gang members, and visa overstays. Two, accurately
00:41:24 track and report self-deportations with near real-time visibility. And three, to make deportation
00:41:29 logistics more efficient by improving how individuals are identified and removed from the
00:41:34 US. Now, that all sounds great if you assume that it is going to be used for your benefit.
00:41:40 It will be switched around and weaponized against you. And I don't typically like using that
00:41:46 argument because it's the, well, we can't use government power because if we give the government
00:41:50 power, then it will get used against us. But it's also kind of different when you're talking about a
00:41:54 pseudo-autonomous, non-governmental entity like Palantir, which also has its own interests
00:42:01 outside of the government and doesn't actually have any accountability towards um towards the
00:42:09 people as you are supposed to have in a mass democracy in the first place they just go by
00:42:14 contracts they can do whatever they want with very little oversight and regulation because as you can
00:42:20 see they've kind of as you find out when you find how much they lobby the government they have a lot
00:42:24 of influence in the government through the lobbying system which is basically just legitimized
00:42:29 bribing let's all be honest here that's that's what that is uh reported ice in uh october of
00:42:35 2025 ice wants to build out a 24 7 social media surveillance team because social media surveillance
00:42:41 for the sake of preventing islamic terrorism has gone so well in britain that's what prevent ended 0.84
00:42:47 up getting used for am i right guys yeah we got all the islamists out and patriots in control
00:42:52 hmm maybe it didn't actually work out that well uh december reported ice uses a growing web of
00:43:00 ai services to power its immigration enforcement and surveillance uh reported in january 2026
00:43:05 elite the palantir app ice uses to find neighborhoods to raid and again all of this
00:43:11 is being done for the benefit of ice at the moment but this technology once it has been built can be
00:43:16 can and will be weaponized against you and again i am going to substantiate all of this by the end
00:43:21 of this and then it goes on there's more and more October just passed ICE has been dumping
00:43:27 protester photos into a Palantir supported database and if you think they're only going
00:43:31 to use that against pro-Palestinian protesters boy have I got a bridge that I can sell you
00:43:36 and again there's a lot of concerns about the lobbying that these people put towards the
00:43:41 government so just to list off some of the bullet points here Peter Thiel one of the co-founders
00:43:45 of Palantir served on Trump's transition team following the 2016 election contributed one
00:43:50 million to Make America No. 1, a super PAC that backed Trump's 2016 presidential campaign.
00:43:56 Individuals associated with Palantir gave $1 million to each of two Trump-affiliated super
00:44:01 PACs in 2024, Make America Great Again Incorporated and MAGA Incorporated. Palantir CEO Alexander
00:44:07 Karp personally contributed $1 million to MAGA Incorporated in December 2024 and another $1
00:44:13 million to Trump's inauguration committee. Palantir was among the nearly 40 private companies
00:44:19 identified as donors to Trump's White House ballroom project, a fantastic use of private
00:44:25 and public money, I am sure. And a project on government oversight investigation reported
00:44:31 that Stephen Miller, Trump's deputy chief of staff, disclosed in mid-March 2025 a financial
00:44:37 filing that he held between $101,000 and $250,000 in Palantir stock. He did sell these shares in
00:44:46 August of 2025 in accordance with federal ethics rules but you can see the way as you expect in
00:44:51 the era of the public-private partnership how closely the administration is connected with
00:44:58 Palantir and we'll see how quickly none of that will matter to Palantir because they bought their
00:45:04 influence they got their influence they got their contracts they got all the money that they needed
00:45:09 to be able to build the infrastructure that they wanted it doesn't matter how much you have invested
00:45:13 in them it doesn't matter how much they've already spent on you guess what if it looks like it will
00:45:17 benefit them they are going to flip to the other side as soon as possible but just carrying on
00:45:23 they were playing into this kind of like plastic patriot image that they were fostering at the time
00:45:30 you had articles in the atlantic from alexander carp written alongside nicholas w zamiska who i
00:45:37 looked into it looks like he is one of the chief of pr at palantir so all of the a lot of this sort
00:45:43 stuff that's very public facing is also co-written with this guy. Why Silicon Valley lost its
00:45:48 patriotism. This was back in February of 2025 when everybody was still feeling the vibes
00:45:53 and everybody could now see along with that vibe shift. Oh my God, social media vibe shift
00:45:59 has managed to shift the mood of Silicon Valley itself as if it wasn't the other way around.
00:46:05 Sorry, the direction of travel was the exact opposite because they were trying to trick you
00:46:10 and it's not particularly sophisticated how they trick people these days they basically just pay a
00:46:16 load of people to lie to you because they hate you so it could be zuckerberg and just go for a surf
00:46:23 and wear the hat and that's enough sometimes yes so why silicon valley lost its patriotism don't
00:46:28 worry though we're the real patriots of silicon valley they put out a book and this was co-written
00:46:34 again by Karp and Zamiska, where they posted on the official Palantir Tech account, because
00:46:40 we get asked a lot, the Technological Republic in brief, and this is just the major bullet
00:46:47 points of it, and I'll just read out some of the ones that I found particularly interesting.
00:46:53 Number six, national service should be a universal duty. We should, as a society, seriously consider
00:47:00 moving away from an all-volunteer force and only fight the next war if everyone shares in the risk
00:47:06 and the cost. Now, they're doing in Ukraine. Yes. At first, that makes it sound like what you're
00:47:11 doing is you're suggesting some kind of public consensus for the next war. That's not how it
00:47:17 works. The public consensus prior to World War II, prior to Pearl Harbor in America, was something
00:47:23 like 80 to 90 percent, no, we don't want to get involved in another disastrous European war.
00:47:28 and guess what you ended up going to war anyway really kind of as a deliberate use of american
00:47:35 economic policy trying to get japan to make the first strike that is factually verifiable you can
00:47:42 look it up please do i encourage everybody to do so so what you actually have is a big tech
00:47:47 surveillance company saying we want mass conscription and we have the technology to
00:47:53 track you down if you don't agree amazing brilliant that doesn't sound like it could go wrong at all
00:47:59 no you have a number 13 no other country in the history of the world has advanced progressive
00:48:05 values more than this one so we love american nationalism i agree with them for for the sake of
00:48:11 the gay for the sake of everything being gay we want to trans kids the world over but we want to
00:48:20 do it with a nice big american flag on it the united states is far from perfect but it's easy 0.96
00:48:25 to forget how much more opportunity exists in this country for those who are not hereditary elites
00:48:29 than in any other nation on the planet less these days well i was going to say exactly what you've
00:48:35 done is you've just changed the name from hereditary to financial and political elites which
00:48:39 is basically the exact same thing palantir wants to support that uh number 17 silicon valley must
00:48:45 play a role in addressing violent crime so here you go guys we want the surveillance state in
00:48:50 your neighborhood because policies in your town have made your town so crime-ridden that it's
00:48:56 forcing you to accept what we're putting out there yes again in the 1950s yeah your grandparents may
00:49:02 have lived in a lovely white picket white picket fence neighborhood where nobody committed any
00:49:07 crime everybody trusted and knew one another and cared about one another feared one another
00:49:11 yeah clearly it's because they feared one another um but you don't get that anymore and so you have
00:49:16 to accept what we are putting out to 18 is fantastic yeah the ruthless exposure of the
00:49:21 private lives of public figures drives too much talent away from government service
00:49:25 that's why jeffrey epstein never sought elected office otherwise he could have been elected into
00:49:33 congress and everything would have been better yeah obviously yeah obviously um but as a result
00:49:39 you've got a load of people sharing this out on social media and saying holy based holy based oh
00:49:46 my god palantir are the true patriots tech company and this wouldn't be normal people
00:49:52 sharing this out because i know that there's plenty of normal people watching this video
00:49:56 right now who saw through the lie but it's important again to highlight the figures who
00:50:02 were lying to you in the first place because social media is a gigantic perception management
00:50:08 tool to try and trick you into thinking that this all sounds great so you had people producing
00:50:15 Palantir vibe edits
00:50:17 titled with
00:50:19 Nietzschean vitalism.
00:50:21 I believe the West and America in particular
00:50:23 needs... Oh jeez, I'm so sorry
00:50:25 about that, what I just did to your ears.
00:50:27 Should have given a headphone warning for everybody.
00:50:30 You have like 0.61
00:50:31 white boy rap
00:50:33 like club music playing
00:50:36 of course. Underneath footage
00:50:37 of Palantir bombing
00:50:39 places interspersed with
00:50:41 Roman statues and beautiful women. 0.86
00:50:44 That's amazing.
00:50:45 correct me if i'm wrong isn't that the guy who said that big tech is awful and you shouldn't
00:50:51 shouldn't trust big tech he was like a big tech guy that's probably lucky yeah that's the guy
00:50:55 behind the um the goggles that were first developed by facebook and now oh the meta goggles yeah and
00:51:02 now he's developing um all kinds of weapon systems that are meant to be cheap and expendable and his
00:51:10 idea is that a ford factory should be able to uh very quickly retool and produce these kinds of 0.70
00:51:17 weapons very quickly in order to uh challenge china's military hegemony so that that that's 0.85
00:51:24 who he is he believes that the united states should be the world's arsenal selling weapons
00:51:28 to everybody and i'm sure that there is going to be no second order consequences to his lobbying
00:51:33 no uh in terms of starting wars that benefit his company well i'm sure you know someone's
00:51:38 gonna make a pretty penny off of that specifically him uh you had people like um captive dreamer who
00:51:46 else sharing out tweets where you know at the end of 2025 palantir ceo alex carp calling out the
00:51:53 targeting of white people in america common alex carp w you know uh you had more of them i've still
00:52:01 never had a good answer as to why palantir is some sort of boogeyman everybody on here obsesses over
00:52:06 you may notice that these are all screenshots that's because these are all deleted by now
00:52:10 obviously so don't try and look them up but i can guarantee these are real matt thorny saying
00:52:16 whining about palantir is brownoid coded does everybody remember that when if you were concerned 0.97
00:52:21 about the surveillance state and big tech a bunch of morons on social media would try and tell you 0.99
00:52:26 that you're brown and a third worldist because famously like the european mind for past 200 0.98
00:52:32 hasn't been towards small government lack of interference in your lives and the historic
00:52:37 american philosophical tradition as well uh and then you had a load of people here's a great one
00:52:43 uh paulos whoever this person is but got 150 000 views if we're to believe that most of those
00:52:49 weren't botted um i really don't give an s about palantir i think we need 1 000 times more palantir
00:52:55 i wonder where all of these people got this idea all at once they all needed to start shilling
00:53:00 palantir who who is paulos anyway he's just some random roman statue anon can anybody verify who
00:53:08 this guy is i mean with most of these people i wouldn't be surprised if it's not even the same
00:53:12 or even one person behind these accounts half the time these are like pay-to-play accounts that get
00:53:17 shifted between people's uh people's hands in the case of somebody like captive dreamer you have a
00:53:22 face that you can attach to it occasionally but i mean who knows by now if he hasn't sold off the
00:53:28 account because frankly the messaging from these places is completely schizophrenic and oftentimes
00:53:33 you get a lot of these accounts who all of a sudden when it comes to say signaling against
00:53:38 restore speak as though they have great in-depth knowledge and connections within british politics
00:53:46 which knows is very very strange so this guy's saying i want palantir so deep in every government
00:53:53 database matt forney again with the brownoid coded one uh joe lonsdale who i believe is just attached
00:53:59 to palantir don't be a panicin this admin is the only one that i've seen that consistently stands
00:54:04 up to our enemies blah blah blah increasingly common palantir w and then it goes on and on you
00:54:11 can find plenty of examples of all of this uh well and one of the funniest ones being that uh
00:54:18 you know there is footage of alex carp years ago saying palantir is the only reason that the far
00:54:24 right hasn't risen in europe interesting statement trying to explain it away the context was that
00:54:30 palantir persecuted terrorism notably from immigrants that would have inflamed the populace
00:54:34 palantir will actually be an asset to the right wing in the coming years hold on hold on they
00:54:41 stopped the terrorist acts while the police forces are still adequate to stop them while mass 0.56
00:54:47 immigration carries on leading to the certain outcome of endless terrorist attacks because
00:54:53 eventually the state won't be able to stop them yeah well that that that's that's the argument
00:54:59 here yeah but this but this guy says palantir is an asset and we can only trust the good faith and
00:55:05 goodwill of this gentleman right but then you started to notice in the run-up to the midterms
00:55:10 when it became clear to anyone and everyone that the republicans were not going to have a good time
00:55:15 at the midterms, and they were clearly going to lose. I don't think people predicted just how
00:55:21 badly that they were going to lose, but everybody knew this wasn't going to be great for them.
00:55:26 And all of a sudden, you seem to find Alex Karp suddenly trying to shift his messaging just a
00:55:32 little bit, maybe hedging his bets with vague-ish statements on AI, for instance, that could maybe
00:55:39 line up a little bit more with the anti-AI Democrat agenda that we saw enacted at the midterms.
00:55:45 palantir ceo alex carp says the ai labs want to buy you to buy in a future where you have no jobs
00:55:50 your adversaries win and everybody who does win is a small tiny group of people living in a tiny
00:55:54 place that believe because they eat vegetables and don't support war fighters they deserve to
00:55:58 have a total means of production of this country which is a not so subtle jab towards anthropics
00:56:03 owners who have claimed that they are both vegetarians as well so he's he's almost kind
00:56:08 of like despite the fact that his company produces ai systems he's kind of like publicly trying to
00:56:14 put out there like hey i understand your concerns in the same way that is the data centers i was the
00:56:19 big tech patriot in the same way that i was the one who stood out from the rest of big tech
00:56:23 i'm the big tech guy who's a little bit skeptical of ai just like you i'm not going to throw my
00:56:29 arms and say please regulators daddy like uh sam altman did but i'm going to actually mirror
00:56:35 people's concerns here so what does all of this lead to well it leads to the inevitable and most
00:56:41 obvious thing that could have happened in the world that all of these people were lying to you
00:56:45 wasn't going to happen after the midterms election losses for the republicans palantir ceo
00:56:51 alex carp is signaling the shift towards the democrats following their midterm victories
00:56:56 criticizing trump's immigration crackdown that he helped supposedly and the republicans approach to
00:57:03 economic justice despite securing billions in federal contracts under trump carp said democrats
00:57:08 had corrected course enough to potentially win his support in 2028. What was it that did it for
00:57:13 you, Alex? Was it Al-Sayed? Was it Mamdani? Was it the DSA in general? What was it that the
00:57:20 Democrats specifically did that has won your confidence back? Or is it just that the Republicans
00:57:25 are on the downturn now and you can feel the way the sides are turning? I've been a Democrat my
00:57:31 whole life. I grew up in a far-left environment. I know more about being progressive than almost
00:57:37 anybody on the planet i believe in says the man who labeled woke as a pagan cult just two years
00:57:44 ago on immigration can't welcome trump's acknowledgement that enforcement had gone
00:57:48 too far saying i'm glad he's saying in public now what i've been saying in private now after
00:57:53 all of the shilling all of the obvious pr tactics that had been going on and the way that certain
00:57:59 people online who may or may not even be the same person you think they were a few years ago because
00:58:04 it's a highly anonymous account have they said hands in the air okay i screwed up no no of course
00:58:13 they haven't at the reporting of this captive dreamer you have to realize that nearly all of
00:58:17 these people are just sitting in the wind and seeing which way it's going to go brazilification
00:58:22 of the world none of these people believe in anything other than not being thrown in jail
00:58:26 sorry this isn't a so this isn't another common win this isn't another common alex karp w is it
00:58:31 you shouldn't trust these people you shouldn't trust the big tech guys you shouldn't trust all
00:58:36 of the people who all at once coming out shilling these big tech guys they hate you and they think 0.99
00:58:41 that you're stupid and you should and i'm sure many of you do already know better than that but 0.98
00:58:46 just to go into the actual reporting that came from politico on this i'll just read through a 1.00
00:58:50 little bit of it so they just point out uh this hard pivot is more on display with alex carp than
00:58:56 anybody else i wouldn't be surprised if the rest of silicon valley that got behind trump in 2024
00:59:00 follows suit with this they know the way the winds are blowing right ceo and co-founder of
00:59:06 secretive tech talent uh giant palantir inside palantir's manhattan lair in an exclusive sit
00:59:11 down with playbook which will get the rest of it published soon enough i'm sure harp who once
00:59:16 criticized the democratic party is totally irresponsible deployed the word progressive
00:59:20 eight times to describe his philosophy while acknowledging democrats absolutely corrected in
00:59:26 2026 enough to win back his support in 2028 so that all of that lobbying money that went to trump
00:59:31 in 24 it's going to go straight back to democrats come 2028 he said i've been a democrat my whole
00:59:37 life grew up in a far-left environment more more about progressivism i absolutely believe palantir
00:59:43 all of our products are essentially progressive so all of that infrastructure that just got built
00:59:48 for the sake of ice if carp gets his way and just shifts along with the democrats will probably get
00:59:56 turned on you yeah if that's what it is if that's ice is under homeland security yes and if the
01:00:02 priorities of homeland security is say the same as prevent priorities which is the right it gets
01:00:08 shifted it gets shifted and it gets absolutely destroyed and the whole tech ecosphere ends up
01:00:15 going along with the far left which was always their preferred option that's good to know it
01:00:23 goes on to say that the republican election losses were a referendum on economic justice
01:00:28 and suggested that he was playing practical politics my giving is equal democrat and
01:00:32 republican i can tell you without going into things i'm not going to disclose i'm very balanced 0.88
01:00:36 and everyone in the political arena knows it and i'll tell you what i'm also not the village idiot
01:00:41 clearly seeing as you seem to sadly be winning off the back oh i'm very balanced he means i
01:00:46 lobby for both sides yeah i actually i play both sides so i always come out on top uh he says i
01:00:53 was really happy to hear the president be honest that you know his words i believe was something
01:00:56 like yeah we went too far regarding immigration i'm glad he's saying in public now what i've been
01:01:01 saying in private carp is a new hampshire registered voter and he says he's open to the
01:01:07 possibility of backing a democrat in 2028 quote so long as they aren't a member of the dsa because
01:01:12 they like to gaslight jews and segregate blacks um because carp is half jewish and half black 0.85
01:01:19 according to this interview he says he would vote for the most competent best leader so he's just 0.83
01:01:24 looking for a return to boring old establishment democratic politics which you know as part of
01:01:31 boring old establishment democratic politics that is still massively anti-white and open borders 0.96
01:01:35 yeah sure exactly but just because they're not as insane as the dsa they still hate you and they
01:01:40 want everything you care about destroyed i'm not really hitching palantir i'm actually pitching
01:01:45 what are you going to do about economic justice in this country i would say the democrats have
01:01:50 an advantage here because many republicans uh have an orthodoxy that capitalism solves all problems
01:01:56 maybe that was once true i never thought it was true it's definitely not true now so basically
01:02:01 everyone center and center left understands this and the elephant in the room of the foreign iran
01:02:07 war just gets left out of this analysis by so that's what that's what palantir is going to be
01:02:12 deployed for in the future is to ensure the um preservation of economic justice so don't give
01:02:19 these people the legitimacy of your support don't trust any of the people who told you to trust
01:02:25 these massive big tech companies don't trust anybody who was telling you that it was third
01:02:29 worldist to be suspicious of these people because what privacy yeah because guess what they were
01:02:36 world is to want privacy they were exactly who you thought they were in the first place you were
01:02:41 being gas lit anyway uh i'll go through a couple of the rumble rants here uh base tape our um our
01:02:51 product manager had the exact opposite recently uh experience recently and that's referring to
01:02:56 the ai interview stuff an interview candidate was using ai in the interview i have seen people do
01:03:01 that i've seen people deploy ai interviewees against ai interviewers oh god and it goes into 0.87
01:03:07 a recursive loop where it becomes progressively more retarded and they start talking gibberish at 0.89
01:03:12 one another which is amazing like a normal interview then yeah it took him 10 minutes to 0.91
01:03:16 figure out he wasn't talking to a real person that must have been very effective ai in that
01:03:20 case because i always find you can tell you can really easily tell there's a pause while it's
01:03:26 waiting for uh to be able to calculate the answer there's not a natural pause it's a very artificial 0.70
01:03:31 pause sigil stone safety means the other guy is scared yeah you dysgenic mutant that other guy is 0.55
01:03:36 the government that you're trying to turn into a god straight out of the scp universe which one is 0.56
01:03:40 scp sorry uh it's um it was 4chan i think i don't know um it would take too long to explain scp right 0.95
01:03:48 now uh sigil stone i watched the podcast while wearing headphones you dick i'm sorry i'm sorry 0.73
01:03:54 i forgot that it was just gonna blast you and habsification have you ever noticed there's been 0.94
01:03:58 a conversation shift gop incorporated but posting nick fuentes and many of them including big tech
01:04:03 like peter teal are trying to get ahead and usurp america first i did notice that all of a sudden
01:04:08 mark levin alongside ted cruz was sharing out nick fuentes um you know what i can't believe
01:04:16 i'm agreeing with fuentes here yeah if you can trust mark levin you uh you have issues
01:04:24 anyway you have serious let's move on all right uh so friends when the telegraph aren't putting
01:04:31 out pieces just talking about the constant decline of britain particularly by mass immigration
01:04:37 the sectarian nightmare that we find ourselves in and as a result of it creating pylons against
01:04:43 the patriots who are actually seeking to remedy the problems another favored pastime of the
01:04:50 telegraph is to put out pieces talk promoting cookledry and cheating now this has been going
01:04:57 on for quite a while now and so really this segment has been just kind of simmering in the
01:05:03 background just because every now and then i'll just see it pop up on my timeline it's like ah
01:05:07 another piece by the telegraph promoting cookledry wow that's that's crazy that's
01:05:13 supposed to show who's writing for the telegraph it's like the fifth one this month that's yeah
01:05:17 And so this was just the latest one that finally just gave me the impetus to actually put some of these articles together.
01:05:25 And as we can see, I was happily married.
01:05:27 Unhappily?
01:05:28 Sorry, I was unhappily married. Thank you. Important point.
01:05:31 Until we agreed I could sleep with other people.
01:05:34 That sounds like a very one-sided arrangement they developed as well.
01:05:37 Four years ago, I requested a threesome over dinner.
01:05:41 Find out how it settles on the path that would save our relationship.
01:05:44 So the framing of the telegraph is very, very clear here, which is that, yeah, Cuckoldry saves relationships.
01:05:53 That seems to be the official telegraph position on all of this.
01:05:57 And look, I'm just going to say, I think it's kind of sus, right?
01:06:01 At the end of the day, as we go into here.
01:06:03 What I'm finding out is if you stay in a hotel, there's a 9 out of 10 chance that the chair in the corner of the room has been used by a telegraph writer.
01:06:12 there are many such cases indeed uh and so we find this one here for example and this was from
01:06:20 uh last year that they go back years and years as well so that's the other thing as well
01:06:24 it's an established practice yeah don't be under the misconception here that this is like a new
01:06:30 frontier that the telegraph have unlocked as a result of being taken over by alex springer no
01:06:36 no no they are a deeply traditionalist newspaper it just so happens that the tradition they support
01:06:43 is advocating for cuckoldry uh and so you get pieces like this saying i'm glad my wife still
01:06:49 swings with other with younger men i've lost my stamina so it uh so it's good to outsource
01:06:55 this retired british couple retired splits their time between their south of france home a yacht
01:07:04 an ever-evolving cast of lovers look i grant you i neither own an expensive property i don't take
01:07:12 holidays to the south of france and i don't own a yacht so i fully accept that i'm perhaps not
01:07:18 the target audience uh for this particular piece however i think that there are actual certain
01:07:26 principles that should hold across society when it comes to i'm also just going to say like i've
01:07:31 i've lost my stamina mate they sell pills for that well that shows what his preference is doesn't it
01:07:38 apparently so yes uh but they just talk about all these sorts of things and it's like okay but there
01:07:44 is a standard here like a normative standard of relationships that is just being left by the
01:07:50 wayside here and it's very very odd indeed so we get this piece it says i'm a happily married man
01:07:58 and I've been having an affair for the past
01:07:59 nine years. Two anonymous
01:08:02 men open up about loving
01:08:03 their wives, but admit they have no
01:08:06 intention of stopping being unfaithful.
01:08:10 What?
01:08:12 The Telegraph was like
01:08:14 this is the article for us. This is what
01:08:16 our readers are. This wasn't even that
01:08:18 long before the last article you
01:08:20 showed us as well. This is like. This is what I'm saying.
01:08:22 This is a very regular thing.
01:08:24 Every month or so
01:08:25 they just come out with an article promoting this sort of trying to ingrain the idea in the
01:08:32 minds of conservatives yeah in the minds of the telegraph readers yes strolling down the
01:08:37 caribbean beach hand in hand with lizzie his wife of 35 years james appears the epitome of a loving
01:08:45 and attentive husband but just a few years ago the 63 year old was in the hotel room with his
01:08:51 mistress jane making passionate love and drinking champagne for nine long years he's been uh been
01:08:58 seeing his lover and he has no intention of giving her up and if he's brutally honest a part of him
01:09:03 wishes it was uh her hand um he was holding instead of lizzie's he says i know that it's shocking and
01:09:10 in many ways a bigger betrayal than the sex the longevity of my affair and emotions involved
01:09:15 would crucify my wife. She has every reason to believe we're in a happy marriage. All the boxes 0.93
01:09:22 are ticked. We make each other howl with laughter. We go to bed at the same time every night and
01:09:28 chat. We still have sex. It's not only my wife, but our kids that think we have an ideal marriage.
01:09:35 I remember once strolling hand in hand along the river near our home in Henley, of course,
01:09:40 and them quipping that we were sickeningly in love they aspire to have a marriage like ours
01:09:46 if my affair was discovered it would destroy them too i do enjoy our life together it's not a
01:09:53 complete farce i love my wife dearly i will end up getting old with her sitting on deck chairs
01:09:58 admiring the sunset and then passing away presumably with her totally ignorant of the
01:10:04 fact that this entire picturesque marriage that she will i assume have kept her vows to maintain
01:10:12 will have no idea that this has just been going on and the peculiar thing about all of this i
01:10:19 would just add is the fact that this is written up in an article in the telegraph almost as a
01:10:26 boast of yes look what i've got away with but i've got everything you could possibly want in life
01:10:33 and then some yep and the one person that i actually owe honesty to about the nature of
01:10:42 this marriage is the one person i'm going to withhold it from what i'm instead going to do
01:10:47 is appeal to the telegraph yeah the telegraph of who i'm going to tell all of this too for the
01:10:54 juicy gossip yeah and and this is framing it in a very positive way it even promotes the author of
01:11:00 a book called the state of affairs yeah infidelity now the the only thing i will say that makes this
01:11:07 more interesting than the others and kind of makes it stand out is that this is the only one that i
01:11:13 have seen that isn't about the woman cheating on the man and male humiliation yes this is this is
01:11:21 the only one that i've ever seen where it's about the man having the affair and presenting that
01:11:26 positively yes that's what makes this conservative this that's that's like the guardian would never
01:11:31 publish this article um but it's a peculiar thing as well especially with the talk of children and
01:11:38 just how long you've been married to your wife for it's like so the children are presumably going to
01:11:44 grow up as well thinking that their father is a role model yes of husbandry and they're not going
01:11:51 to know about this entire dark underbelly to the entire thing and i i don't know which is worse
01:11:59 they don't know or that they do know it's terrible yeah um it goes on to as you pointed out here now
01:12:05 i will say this article seems to have been the one exception of the many that i've taken where
01:12:12 it actually goes on to uh say here relationship counselor ryan uh kevitz uh however is firm that
01:12:19 an affair is destructive to a marriage she says uh to this sort of double life you have to be good
01:12:26 at uh compartmentalizing and deceit in general men are more able to do that women tend to have
01:12:35 affairs because they need more emotion and connection which is harder to compartmentalize
01:12:39 to say your his wife is happy is a red herring because it's based on false information she
01:12:45 doesn't know uh that her marriage entails a third party and given the choice she probably wouldn't
01:12:51 accept it if he thought she would then he'd ask about opening up the relationship this is the one
01:12:58 part of all of these articles that i could find all of this always cheating bad but but the solution
01:13:07 to all of these always yes always ends up with being a solution to well still cheat just make 0.98
01:13:14 sure she's okay with it first by suggesting the open relationship yeah
01:13:18 always make sure that consent is the source of all goodness and rightness the solution to these
01:13:23 is always open the because what we saw the first one is like oh i've got an open marriage with my
01:13:28 husband again the only the only thing that makes this somewhat different is the fact that it's a
01:13:34 bloke doing it to a woman and not the other way around yeah uh but again just absolutely peculiar
01:13:39 why would you publish this uh moving on um oh no sorry i've had that one again doubled up
01:13:45 says uh i'm cheating on my husband with a man i met 40 years ago the sex is thrilling say the
01:13:53 telegraph uh very quickly back in 2025 of these in the middle of 2025 um but also as well you
01:14:02 just read the first two paragraphs here and it goes on to say i had a beautiful traditional
01:14:07 wedding in my parents village church with flowers festooning the picturesque church gate my cute
01:14:13 three-year-old niece dressed in a pink floral dress as my bridesmaid a fabulous bouquet made
01:14:20 of lilies and a simple but beautiful wedding dress it was made of ivory silk and had spaghetti
01:14:25 straps and tiny buttons all the way down the back my husband graham they always change that because
01:14:31 they're so proud of what they've done yes they always change the names in all of these pieces
01:14:36 My husband, Graham, meanwhile, who I'd met a couple of years before when we were friends in North London pub, looked movie star handsome in his navy blue tailcoat.
01:14:47 I honestly said my marriage vows and meant them with every fibre of my being.
01:14:53 And both of us spent the day beaming at each other and our hundred or so guests.
01:14:59 You could not think of a more picturesque start to a marriage.
01:15:04 but not also like the that moment of the good times and the wish to preserve them now look i
01:15:13 readily admit that i am not a married man i'm not in a relationship right now but i have been in the
01:15:19 past i understand how complicated they can be i understand how magical how stressful they can be
01:15:25 right i have enough of a knowledge of this subject but again there is a standard here
01:15:30 that is just let slip as things go on and for some reason the telegraph treats the the letting
01:15:37 slip of that standard as the aspiration itself yes and actually what marriage is is a prison
01:15:44 that you need to break away from at the first sign of difficulty and i just i just find it
01:15:53 very strange from the conservative newspaper of the united kingdom this article is tim stanley
01:16:02 approved i mean what did we find out what did we find out about piers morgan and his wife which
01:16:09 who seemed to have a very she writes for the telegraph too this seems to have a very specific
01:16:15 relationship i mean i i find it hard to believe that all of this isn't just a lot of the staff
01:16:22 at the telegraph think the same way and like it hey and then i think they love it and then you
01:16:30 get more to write as well so it's an absolute conveyor belt of material isn't it um but the
01:16:36 other the other aspect of it as well as you go through it it doesn't for the sake of time because
01:16:41 i've just realized where i'll have to race through but there is no attempt to explain to the husband
01:16:48 like the state that she's in the boredom the tedium that she's feeling it's just no straight
01:16:53 over there's no attempt to say that yes marriages do get tiring and some boredom is to be expected
01:17:00 and you just have to go through it and accept just kind of like that you've made these vows
01:17:07 that you have to take them serious and how many vows do we even make in a modern society
01:17:13 this is not the medieval era
01:17:15 it's not like we're making vows every week
01:17:17 or swearing oaths to people
01:17:18 we have very few to keep
01:17:20 by comparison these days
01:17:22 I guess that's what makes it so much easier to break them
01:17:25 in a way
01:17:27 the only vow
01:17:29 that modern society treats as
01:17:31 eternally sacred and
01:17:32 incapable of being broken is debt
01:17:35 that's the one thing
01:17:37 you can never get away from
01:17:39 whether it be taxes or private debt
01:17:41 you can never get away from that
01:17:42 but you know a marriage under god no uh but the telegraph are here uh to tell you that an affair
01:17:50 is a silver bullet for your depression uh maybe for your marriage as well actually you know uh
01:17:57 can having a love affair cure depression this provocative suggestion has recently outraged 1.00
01:18:03 parisian feminists after being emblazoned on posters for a dating app that promotes 1.00
01:18:08 elicit encounters to marry women now you might you might think that the parisians would be most in
01:18:13 favor of this kind of behavior of course you would but this is the other thing that i found going
01:18:18 through these articles as well why do we have legal websites allowing people to have affairs
01:18:27 more easily what's the whole point of the websites well i know but like why are we authorizing it
01:18:33 this is not something that should be allowed.
01:18:37 I don't think, personally.
01:18:39 Well, someone's profiting off of it, mate.
01:18:42 Well, I know.
01:18:42 Hey, they all consented.
01:18:46 So we have here, it goes on to say,
01:18:49 unlike antidepressants,
01:18:51 a lover costs a health service nothing.
01:18:53 That's right.
01:18:54 Cheat on your partner to save the health service is...
01:18:59 Is there no limit to the demands of the NHS?
01:19:01 well this is in france to be fair so um but um yeah i i absolutely would take you to take your
01:19:08 point i wouldn't be shocked if they start prescribing an affair at the nhs you're
01:19:12 feeling mild depression though yeah um now i i will say that as i went through this article
01:19:19 this particular woman who it is centering on uh from what i understand did go much further
01:19:25 to try and remedy the problems in the marriage with the husband. 1.00
01:19:29 However, she still cheated on him.
01:19:32 And what's more as well, sorry, there was another,
01:19:34 I'm getting them mixed up because there's so many of them,
01:19:37 is the fact that in one of them, the woman was single,
01:19:41 but the man was in a relationship.
01:19:43 And so it's like, oh, so you're just willing to ruin...
01:19:47 Destroy a family.
01:19:48 Yeah, of this other man as well.
01:19:50 And these are just everywhere.
01:19:52 I'm married and dating other people, and so is my wife.
01:19:54 the 32-year-old Devin Ching is married to Katie. Yet, as they both pursue non-monogamy,
01:20:03 their marriage is far from traditional. And this one is absolutely blindsiding. It goes on to say,
01:20:10 it's not the traditional way of doing things, but I like it that way. Our family and friends
01:20:15 are aware of our arrangement, but it's not something we discuss around the dinner table.
01:20:19 i've told my parents about it and they said we don't really understand it but we're happy for
01:20:25 you that's that's a very polite parent way of saying please don't please stop yeah when when
01:20:33 your parents like we don't really get it that's them saying this makes me really uncomfortable
01:20:39 please stop doing it but the common theme that i see throughout all of these are the fact that
01:20:45 these are people who just don't want any limits on their lives whatsoever that's the right they're
01:20:51 kind of stuck in this arrested development of hedonism who and they can't accept that they're
01:20:56 trans they should have transitioned from one stage of their life i don't know this guy kind of looks
01:21:02 like he transitioned touche uh to the next one yeah and actually with that transition to the
01:21:09 next phase of life comes different expectations different obligations different moral duties
01:21:15 to your wife or your husband and your children as a consequence.
01:21:21 Now, are there children in this marriage?
01:21:24 In this particular one?
01:21:25 I believe they said that they would only have children with one another
01:21:29 and not the...
01:21:30 So that means no.
01:21:31 So that means no.
01:21:32 So what sounds to me like this guy's 32 years old
01:21:35 is they've not got children together.
01:21:39 They're kind of just married because it was kind of what was expected of them,
01:21:43 But without any real plans for the long-term future, like children to force them to really, really act as a cohesive unit,
01:21:52 they just kind of went, oh, bored now.
01:21:54 But we kind of still like each other, we don't want to get divorced, but bored now.
01:22:00 So what happens if you're married without those sorts of obligations?
01:22:04 Maybe some people can, I'm sure plenty of people can.
01:22:07 these people decided not to and the telegraph is like yep that's our lifestyle section
01:22:13 but you wanted like health tips or something here's my health tip cheat
01:22:17 dramatically fewer uh of these articles explaining how to save a marriage
01:22:24 than how to break one just an observation uh i'm a couples therapist and the fair needn't
01:22:30 destroy a marriage now obviously that is a very particular that is up to the conscience I imagine
01:22:38 of the man and woman and who are in it and their capacity to forgive one another there are obviously
01:22:45 very many famous betrayals and adulteries throughout literature most one that comes to
01:22:52 mind is obviously that of Arthur and sorry Lancelot and Guinevere to King Arthur which
01:22:58 ends up instantly destroying the entirety of arthur's kingdom but i suppose this is true
01:23:03 you know i'm sure couples therapists do see lots of broken relationships that come through and
01:23:08 manage to find some way to put it back together however this article is kind of saying go on
01:23:16 chance it yeah go on well one you can you can manage it you guys can weather yeah any storm
01:23:22 so just go for it and if you if the guilt starts to gnaw at you if it keeps you awake at night if
01:23:29 you become sleepless if you become an insomniac you can just ease your guilt by getting it out 0.99
01:23:34 there to the telegraph tim stanley wants to speak to the beans they're nosy bastards just let them 0.96
01:23:41 know um quite revealing actually at the beginning of this says uh over the past two decades michelle 0.95
01:23:48 Bassam has witnessed subtle changes in her counselling room 20 years ago she said I would
01:23:54 counsel a couple because her husband had an affair with his secretary she says now it's more likely
01:24:00 to be he opened an OnlyFans account when he was away at a conference and he's still looking at it
01:24:05 and it goes on to say technology and its implications round-the-clock gambling porn
01:24:11 and compulsive online shopping looms large in Bassam's day-to-day caseload but on the fundamental
01:24:17 level, the themes tearing couples
01:24:19 apart are the same as they were
01:24:21 have always been. Money,
01:24:23 family issues, affairs, and a lack of
01:24:25 communication.
01:24:27 Don't strike OnlyFans.
01:24:29 Don't strike every one of the
01:24:30 websites. Well, I mean, God already got to the
01:24:33 guy who was running OnlyFans, Leonard
01:24:35 Rudvinsky.
01:24:36 Yeah. Because he's dead of
01:24:39 cancer in his 40s.
01:24:43 And, I was
01:24:45 unhappy. Sorry, I'm just shedding
01:24:46 single tiff feeling emotional uh i was unhappy in my marriage until i agreed i could sleep with
01:24:53 other people as we said when we come back to the start how our 10-year marriage became an open one
01:24:58 um just on and on it goes why do the middle classes find polygamy so titillating
01:25:05 it's just you're trying to convince them that it is yes yes this this entire like
01:25:15 A war of attrition is just a nudge tactic.
01:25:18 Well, they're doing the Reddit thing of trying to encourage 0.97
01:25:22 polygamous relationships or polyamorous relationships, 0.92
01:25:26 whatever they call them these days.
01:25:28 But they're trying to do it by finding the only people 0.96
01:25:31 who aren't disgustingly hideous people to promote it.
01:25:35 Because when you see the people on Reddit doing it,
01:25:38 you realize there's a very particular kind of creature
01:25:41 that goes for this relationship.
01:25:42 Wasn't Sam Magman-Fried involved in that kind of nonsense?
01:25:48 In some kind of polycute? 0.92
01:25:49 I know he was.
01:25:50 Oh, God, I think he was.
01:25:51 I think you're right.
01:25:52 Yes.
01:25:53 The framing here.
01:25:55 And they were all monstrously hideous.
01:25:59 From the Conservative paper.
01:26:01 Far from being a threat to traditional morals,
01:26:04 the eyebrow-raising affairs of others offer a welcome diversion in troubling times.
01:26:09 Right, because...
01:26:09 Just watch a football match!
01:26:11 Don't you understand
01:26:14 Go out with your friends to the pub
01:26:17 Play a game of cards
01:26:18 We've got diversion
01:26:19 Harry, I've got a cost of living crisis right now
01:26:23 I have to
01:26:24 It's the only thing to take my mind off
01:26:26 I'm being forced to live like I'm in the Weimar
01:26:29 Weimar end state
01:26:31 It's like, yeah, okay
01:26:32 I will wait beyond Weimar
01:26:33 These are troubling times
01:26:36 Why are you adding to them?
01:26:38 Why, rather than trying to
01:26:40 help the rest of society alleviate those troubles and get us out of this? Are we just accepting
01:26:46 that the sanctity of relationships being another thing that is going to become corrupted
01:26:52 by those troubling times? It's just another frontier. And so I've got to hand it to Ben
01:26:57 Sixmouth, great writer, always liked his work. He just says, is the telegraph okay? And obviously
01:27:04 the only conclusion that we can come to is no it's it's kind of demented to be honest with you
01:27:13 and look her book blow up your life the book your husband doesn't want you to read yeah because he 1.00
01:27:21 loves you and he loves his children you idiot yeah um and so look all of these articles are 1.00
01:27:27 tailored to wine mums and middle-aged feminists, 1.00
01:27:31 and even boomers with yachts, apparently, in many cases. 1.00
01:27:35 Who just need to get on HRT.
01:27:39 You're almost at the finishing line.
01:27:41 You've got two decades left of your entire life.
01:27:44 You know what you should do just as you're approaching the final hurdle?
01:27:47 You should screw up your entire marriage.
01:27:50 Is the Telegraph's position on all of this?
01:27:54 it's not my advice but it's consistently theirs uh anyway so to round all of this off i would 1.00
01:28:01 just say that uh trying to uh normalize and encourage these polygamous and um adulterous 0.94
01:28:08 relationships is a bad thing obviously and that uh though it is in our human nature to fall short 0.98
01:28:16 of the standards that we set for ourselves that is no reason to abolish the standard
01:28:22 yes
01:28:23 anyway
01:28:25 that was fun
01:28:26 got a lot off my chest there
01:28:30 Telegraph is not okay right
01:28:32 that's a random name, that was a great one, it says
01:28:33 fun fact, Lancelot is a French invention
01:28:36 stereotypes exist for a reason 1.00
01:28:37 yeah, so true 0.90
01:28:39 so true, yeah
01:28:40 alright, video comments
01:28:44 then Samson please
01:28:45 random name also points out that paternity
01:28:47 tests are illegal in France
01:28:49 because of how common cheating is
01:28:51 i i think that's actually true it is true i checked it's true lucas checked yes paternity
01:28:58 tests are illegal in france because because no one is really anyone's real father in france
01:29:07 maybe i am in favor of some degree of fear you have like a community of dads in france
01:29:12 you've kind of got a lottery of fathers in france yes all right let's go i'm going to all
01:29:20 I'll turn it up for me mate
01:29:50 Looks very peaceful.
01:29:52 Beautiful. I remember going to Harlet Castle. It was incredible how well preserved it was.
01:29:58 To address the midterms video comments, I thought I'd throw my hat in the ring. 1.00
01:30:01 It's baby boomers. Baby boomers are the reason. 1.00
01:30:03 You see, politics has always revolved around baby boomers ever since they've been born. 1.00
01:30:07 The issue is, is unlike their fantasies, they are not actually immortal. 0.99
01:30:12 So as they start dying off, they become a smaller and smaller population. 0.90
01:30:15 So still chasing only baby boomer votes starts causing issues for politics 0.98
01:30:19 because well no one cares about what they want and so if you only cater to the people who are 0.68
01:30:26 dying off you're not going to be able to get that many votes in the first place that was exactly
01:30:31 dan's point you sense i'm no see appealing to young men long time no see don't think i don't
01:30:36 recognize your name i know exactly sorry your voice i know exactly who you are
01:30:41 Well, Otis Eaters, I'm going to have to sign out for the foreseeable future
01:30:47 because I can't afford gold tier membership anymore.
01:30:51 I'm going to keep writing. I'm going to keep hustling.
01:30:54 I've got some good projects on the horizon, so I might be back.
01:30:58 But let me tell you this.
01:30:59 If I catch anyone saying that no one's making culture anymore
01:31:04 and modern culture sucks and nobody's making anything good anymore,
01:31:08 I'm going to find you. 0.98
01:31:11 Go support Mr. Cooper
01:31:13 There's a warning for you
01:31:15 Sad to see you go but I completely understand
01:31:17 The economic situation being what it is
01:31:19 And all the best to you and your family
01:31:21 Hey low seaters
01:31:23 I'm here at Prudhoe Castle
01:31:25 It's the only castle in the north of England
01:31:27 That was never captured by the Scots
01:31:29 Unfortunately the castle is closed 0.68
01:31:31 But you can see why the Scots never took it 1.00
01:31:34 In the first place
01:31:34 You can see it has incredibly thick walls
01:31:37 Very large towers
01:31:39 That keep is enormous
01:31:40 that gatehouse
01:31:42 is very formidable indeed
01:31:44 proper country
01:31:46 nice, awesome 0.94
01:31:48 that's sick
01:31:49 well it's got a moat and bridge as well
01:31:53 that's lovely
01:31:55 so idyllic
01:31:56 hey everyone
01:31:59 hey
01:32:00 one reminder from everyone
01:32:02 on the right
01:32:04 after the losing to Obama
01:32:06 in like 2012 midterms
01:32:08 they did not go to the right the republicans they went to the center because that's what
01:32:20 the thinking is if the party loses they don't go more right wing they go more center
01:32:27 yeah yeah typically well you've already seen that with trump right now
01:32:34 gesturing towards an amnesty despite
01:32:36 the fact that statistically the people who voted
01:32:38 Republican at the midterms
01:32:40 the reason they voted Republican was because
01:32:42 they liked the immigration policy
01:32:44 so he's going back on the one thing that actually
01:32:46 won them votes
01:32:47 I'll just go through a few
01:32:50 comments then from the segments and then we'll wrap
01:32:52 up Lancelot says here in Australia
01:32:54 a high profile left wing YouTuber
01:32:56 called Friendly Geordies claim
01:32:58 the French riots were kids being
01:33:00 upset about pensions
01:33:02 it's a take
01:33:05 I'll give it that one
01:33:06 certainly one of the takes of all time
01:33:08 it really is
01:33:09 alright and that's a random name says 1.00
01:33:12 as an immigrant trust me you don't need 0.94
01:33:14 more gimmigrants well very good 1.00
01:33:16 yep and from
01:33:18 your segment Harry Sam Weston says
01:33:20 a little factoid that always plays in my
01:33:22 mind when I think about how to
01:33:24 sum up the Palantir situation
01:33:25 London is the most surveilled city in Europe
01:33:28 and yet it has an extremely high crime
01:33:30 rate there it is slam dunk a doc brown uh says people live in harmony when they love each other
01:33:37 they suffer when they fear one another yeah very simple and uh from my segment uh michael 0.99
01:33:43 says that one article the man is an idiot she knows you're cheating old man it will come out 0.99
01:33:49 in the open and he gave himself away by talking about being on the yacht yeah that's the other 1.00
01:33:53 thing as well it's like leaving all the yeah we come from henley yeah we've got a yacht yeah it
01:33:58 started to happen here like you were like hang on like someone if you're a telegraph reader enough
01:34:04 to write to give the information to the telegraph your wife probably is as well don't think she's
01:34:08 gonna be flicking through her lifestyle she's gonna go hold up a moment yeah uh long time
01:34:13 no see it says where is the honor where is the dignity uh his self-respect the sacrifice i hate
01:34:19 them yeah absolutely and take my agra damage and on that advice it's time to end ladies and gentlemen
01:34:28 good one harry all right thank you for joining us ladies and gentlemen
01:34:34 take you viagra and we'll see you tomorrow