The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #953
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 41 minutes
Words per Minute
198.31729
Summary
The lotus eaters are back with Episode 953 of The Lotus Eaters! This week, the lads are joined by returning guest Harrison Pitcher to discuss the current state of the footy, the current political situation in the country, and the future of the sport of football.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
hello and welcome to the podcast the lotus eaters episode 953 on today wednesday the 10th of july
00:00:17.580
2024 i'm your host harry joined today by beau and our returning guest harrison pitt
00:00:23.400
say hello harrison hello chaps hello gentlemen how are we doing how are we doing good to be with
00:00:27.820
you yes and today we're going to be talking about um the real reason for mass migration which is
00:00:34.280
successful penalty shootouts clearly that's the reason i think the ratio is a bit skewed of what
00:00:39.660
is eight players for every million or two people you get into the country but as long as we win
00:00:44.360
the footy it's all right uh we're also saying nuts to nato interested on that one and the exceedingly
00:00:50.000
pointless civil war that's currently going on in the conservative party it's my view at least yeah
00:00:54.700
yeah well that'll be interesting uh we've not got much else to say before then other than we've got
00:00:59.380
rumble rants going on so if you've got a bit of spare change which i know you've got i can see
00:01:03.520
it sticking out of your pocket right now then uh please send it in to us so that we can answer your
00:01:07.500
questions anything else to add gentlemen would you like to poor shame our audience harrison on what
00:01:13.500
grounds oh on any ground that you can think of really i see no reason to be snobbish we'll see
00:01:18.020
what happens as we get into the segments tomlinson talks after this oh yeah tomlinson talks after this
00:01:22.880
as well i believe him and carl are still in america right now but this is one that we've
00:01:26.260
prepared in advance so uh check that out once this is done anyway let's get into the news then
00:01:31.280
so the footy's on at the moment is it i don't know if you've noticed i don't know if you've been
00:01:37.360
anywhere within 50 yards of a pub recently probably 300 yards of a pub over the weekend you might have
00:01:43.460
heard it you might have known that the football was on and i'm going to preface this immediately by
00:01:48.240
saying i don't watch football i don't normally care about football you what mate you don't
00:01:54.500
are we gonna have to take this outside son no please
00:01:58.240
harry's like a foot taller than me like a hundred pounds heavier he's a big guy
00:02:04.180
that's well you know thanks uh but anyway so yeah i don't really watch the football i don't know much
00:02:09.940
about football but i do know what the media always says about the football and i always know the media
00:02:14.100
reactions whenever football happens at the moment with the england team because the england team
00:02:19.360
has a number of people who are of mixed or just outright foreign ancestry on there and that always
00:02:26.900
turns into the story whenever anything goes right goes right with the football from what i can tell
00:02:32.700
there's a few things which is that you're only allowed to be a nationalist when it comes to football
00:02:36.580
when it's football series and the only nationalism that you're allowed to be a fan of when it comes
00:02:41.440
to the football is that you're allowed to be proud of the fact that your country is strong in its
00:02:46.180
diversity and inclusive to people of all backgrounds this is the modern narrative and the football seems
00:02:52.240
to me to be a way in which the media likes to continue to push that and in fact the football is
00:02:57.380
gareth southgate the manager yes the gareth southgate the manager likes to push it as well because
00:03:02.980
he's unapologetically woke and he wants the team to act as um as a media arm for diversity we did a
00:03:10.860
segment a week or two ago where even sadiq khan was making noises about the the saint george's flag
00:03:16.680
should probably be kept to a minimum even during uh you know big football tournaments so how did he
00:03:21.880
feel about the kneeling last time even he's probably loved it didn't he oh yeah ritual humiliation of
00:03:26.680
that but he probably loved it even though he's obviously got nothing to do with george floyd
00:03:30.280
um but yeah um yeah they they would like to even dial down the small amount of national pride you're
00:03:39.040
sort of allowed during big tournaments even that a lot of them would rather we didn't okay so
00:03:45.180
if they did if they did that what would be the reason for most people to even watch the football
00:03:51.160
then if they can't wave the saint george's flag and just be proud of themselves and happy and go out
00:03:57.000
for a pint enjoy themselves what's the point i'd love of actual football maybe but from my from my
00:04:05.020
limited experience you don't go to the pub to watch the football to sit there in perfect silence
00:04:08.960
right no right nurse nursing a single pint or maybe even a sherry that's not what you watch the
00:04:15.140
football for i was in the pub over the weekend i wasn't even watching the football i was spending
00:04:19.040
some time with friends but i could hear everyone constantly i was trying to get around the corner
00:04:23.280
away from people but it was deafening it's strange it's almost as if rather than cheering on
00:04:27.620
you know um footballers drawn exclusively or primarily from the native population increasingly
00:04:34.900
sort of it's like cheering on mercenaries in an army rather than rather than um actual native
00:04:40.000
members of that that people but it's also it's a total waste of patriotic energy in my view and
00:04:44.860
i'd also add harry that it's not just the case that they make the football all about this sort of
00:04:49.100
woke guff when the team does well as indeed the team did do well against switzerland and i think
00:04:54.280
all five players have some kind of ancestral connection to a place other than england and
00:04:58.440
this is why they were touting it as as as an as an example of you know the the virtues of diversity
00:05:04.260
in action it's also when things go badly they will also find a pretext when things go badly in 2021 when
00:05:08.560
it actually so happened and i wouldn't want to make too much of this but if they're going to make
00:05:12.060
a lot of it when things go well it seems natural that people are going to respond in kind
00:05:16.380
i think in 2021 two players who happen to be black were the ones who missed the decisive penalties in
00:05:21.560
the final against italy if it was three looking back at the reporting that was going on then but
00:05:25.920
i might be wrong i remember so it might have been three but the two that i remember which were
00:05:29.740
bukayo saka missed a penalty for england and jordan sancho who's mixed race i think it might have
00:05:34.960
also been marcus rashford as well you're right marcus rashford because i remember there was a mural in
00:05:39.900
salford yes faced after it it's but but but then they focused on the really really negative
00:05:46.040
reaction against those black players and even though many of these negative comments it's
00:05:49.200
later transpired were drawn from places like as as a remote as north africa it wasn't as if people
00:05:53.800
were railing lots of italians lots of italians lots of people other than and they're the ones
00:05:58.040
who beat us indeed lots of people other than native english people being openly racist against these
00:06:02.780
players and there were only about 12 comments if i recall something like that as well but they will
00:06:06.340
also make a meal out of that so it's very much a case of heads diversity wins tails white people lose
00:06:11.180
there's no way of winning they'll always find a way of shoehorning race communism into the into the
00:06:15.420
picture it's interesting that you mentioned the old reaction from back then because i wanted to just
00:06:19.380
remind everybody of what the reporting was at the time and it's very interesting because even if you
00:06:24.240
go on random industry websites like this ilm from 2021 they look at south uh gareth southgate's
00:06:33.120
leadership style and they say what can we learn from this what can we learn from gareth southgate's
00:06:38.260
management of the english football team and if you go down one of the things they highlight
00:06:42.340
is equality we can learn equality from it and they quote him saying it's in our duty to continue
00:06:49.480
to interact with the public on matters such as equality inclusivity and racial justice while using
00:06:56.120
the power of our voices to help put debates on the table raise awareness and educate so again rather than
00:07:03.400
being purely a team playing an international sport trying to seek glory for its home country it's a
00:07:10.980
political tool it's a mode of propaganda where they go look here's a bunch of foreigners on the team
00:07:16.860
but they're doing it in your name therefore they are of that nation in the first place therefore
00:07:22.380
diversity is our strength etc etc etc and it's interesting to see that how far this went where
00:07:27.820
even business websites were trying to promote it as well i think i will say is that the concept of
00:07:33.600
let's kick racism out of football is very old i remember being in the 1990s it was already a
00:07:38.980
slogan people like john barnes were talking about how they're talking about racism in football back
00:07:44.240
in the 70s or well southgate was playing for england back in the 90s wasn't southgate did you say sorry
00:07:50.580
yeah yeah yeah yeah he missed a penalty in euro 96 famously correct um he waddled it over the bar
00:07:57.000
and he was he was within that environment and that sludge already back then he seems to have
00:08:03.480
just carried it on into the modern period yeah yeah yeah i don't know why he's so woke i guess
00:08:09.060
he's just weak will just you know jedi mind tricks work on him i don't know he's a footballer right
00:08:13.540
he's not a mythical philosopher sociologist and yeah and that lacks but apparently they're treating him
00:08:18.920
like a business magnet okay he lacks the intellectual resources to resist against trends is basically the
00:08:24.020
point and yeah yeah yeah and they all his leadership style sorry what leadership style
00:08:28.520
it's just gareth southgate it's not there's no leadership style it's just him saying yeah i pick
00:08:33.380
these guys he's also been gifted with it must be said but both the the um the native british players
00:08:40.260
and the mixed race players included a very very um gifted generation of england players i suspect any
00:08:46.060
manager would have done pretty well with them and he indeed has not won a trophy yet he's got the
00:08:49.960
furthest he's got is to the final in euro 2020 euro 2020 and to to make to the semis didn't we in
00:08:55.240
the world cup i think wasn't it yeah the world i think so we no no not in the most recent world cup
00:08:59.940
maybe we did i can't recall no no we didn't get to the semis in the most recent world cup but in
00:09:02.860
2018 we got to the semis and lost to croatia that's right i mean later on today i think we're uh
00:09:08.460
playing the semi-finals against the netherlands yes so we'll see how that goes i've got my fingers
00:09:13.860
crossed of course but i fear they'll be a bit too strong for us hope not of course this is the
00:09:19.640
thing for me though so i i i unlike you harry i don't know about you but i sounds like you know
00:09:24.140
a lot about quite a bit about football and and i i naturally love football but i can't i never get
00:09:28.720
excited over england anymore and in part because of the the attendance sort of woke politics that
00:09:32.860
comes with it i just have no time for it i enjoy i'm actually am one of those people who goes to
00:09:36.320
the pub and sits in the corner and watches it quietly enjoy and enjoys it as a sporting spectacle
00:09:40.420
there's no sort of nationalistic fervor so you're watching it purely for the technical expertise
00:09:45.360
being shown no as a fan of wanky technical guitar playing i can kind of express that that's what
00:09:51.480
i have a similar thing i love football it's been a big part of my life since childhood i actually did
00:09:57.340
an interview with matt latiss the famous legend living legend matthew latissier brilliant player which
00:10:02.740
uh one of the greatest penalty takers of all time actually um and that's on the uh that's on the
00:10:08.420
website if anyone wants to check that out yeah but i've got a similar thing back in it must have
00:10:12.360
been the very early 2000s can't remember which tournament it was it was the last time michael
00:10:16.680
lowen was playing and uh he blew his knee out in the middle of the game and and we did badly in that
00:10:22.640
tournament and ever since then i obviously still watch them and still interested and still cheer for
00:10:27.360
england i think ever since then so i was in like my early mid 20s late 20s something like that
00:10:32.460
um yeah i don't get as excited as i used to when i was in my when i was a teenager or a kid
00:10:37.420
big tournaments the world cup it was the most important thing in my life it was so important
00:10:41.880
to me i was so happy when we'd won i was genuinely emotionally distraught when we get knocked out
00:10:46.320
well i'm just not like that anymore now i watch the game cheer if we win tight when we concede all
00:10:52.040
that sort of thing but yeah i don't get i keep it in perspective i'm not yeah maybe it's just because
00:10:56.780
i'm older and more cynical now i don't know but but you say going to the pub i was actually in the
00:11:01.960
pub with devon tracy aka atheism is unstoppable at the weekend what i named and uh yeah we're mates
00:11:08.440
um in irl you mean the devon tracy devon tracy and it's just an excuse to go a bit mental when you
00:11:15.820
score a goal though isn't it so again when i was young that's what i was hearing when i go to west
00:11:19.540
ham and we score a goal you go berserk and there's not really uh much uh window to do that in
00:11:25.940
civilized life really literally jumping up and down screaming at the top of your voice when do
00:11:30.360
you get to do that as a as a civilized human grown-up man other than when your team score
00:11:35.320
oh absolutely but i will say given that the both of you are saying that your enthusiasm outside of
00:11:41.020
those small moments has drained someone it is a shame that the um the overt politicization of the
00:11:48.960
whole thing has really drained some of the energy for it because it should be something and i
00:11:54.620
this may sound a bit cliche it should be something that's a bit more universal than whatever the
00:11:59.800
political hot butt topic at the moment is yeah but it's been made very very political through the
00:12:05.120
actions of southgate and through the actions of the media as well and through just the realities of
00:12:09.660
day-to-day life in england and the rest of britain at the moment and like you said harrison even when
00:12:15.440
they lost they had to try and turn it around into something where it was still hitting that same point
00:12:21.020
diversity is strong sorry we we lost but it was because possibly because we weren't diverse enough
00:12:27.100
obviously our strength hadn't fully found it the basic the basic formula if i can just very quickly
00:12:32.480
from my understanding is is this if we win that's proof that diversity is a strength that's quite an
00:12:38.980
easy thing and particularly if the black players do well in an outside sense as indeed they did against
00:12:43.400
as indeed against who do we play against switzerland uh if we lose and there's a backlash against
00:12:49.460
um certain players even if the backlash isn't actually racially motivated as in most cases it
00:12:54.380
isn't it's usually just personal abuse i'm not saying i support that but it's not racially charged
00:12:57.940
personal abuse then it proves that the native population is irredeemably racist and therefore
00:13:02.420
merit exactly the kind of replacement that makes diversity worth celebrating when we win so it really
00:13:07.220
is a catch-22 situation that's why you should hate the media indeed so but but this article is a
00:13:11.420
perfect example of what we're talking there because it's from two years old says england may have lost
00:13:16.520
but southgate's team shows us the nation we can be from this presumably native scot i assume um which
00:13:25.260
is interesting because sorry i've just i've just seen it is saying the practical and moral argument
00:13:30.020
that our diversity is our strength has long been made and this team proves it again they lost at the
00:13:35.520
time but even so they still have to spin it they have to spin it into being something aspirational
00:13:41.500
don't worry if the rest of england looks like this we too can be second place in everything
00:13:47.720
this is the aspiration that we're going for the same way that i believe what was it the tories in
00:13:53.040
the lead up to the election were saying about how we are the second biggest soft power in the world
00:13:59.980
this is not aspirational this is this is oh you can be first of the losers if you if you adopt all of
00:14:06.740
my terrible insane progressive attitudes to everything you can be second best oh fantastic
00:14:12.820
i'm sure you know that's what cecil rhodes uh that's what uh that's what the entire empire was
00:14:18.640
about right lord curzon second was always on the on the seeking second best clearly
00:14:24.600
and this article's got some interesting things it reminds everybody about the
00:14:31.140
danny boyle olympic uh opening ceremony which uh thank you for reminding me of that
00:14:37.340
absolute travesty they point he says here there were naysayers particularly those who condemn the
00:14:44.100
diversity and inclusivity projected by it as woke still most others are proud to see a presentation
00:14:48.540
to the world of not exactly who we are but a snapshot of the modern nation we would like to be
00:14:54.740
we being the media talking class but but again is this idea is aspirational we're on the wave there
00:15:03.320
but we're not quite there yet the multicultural revolution is a never-ending project really it's
00:15:09.900
a permanent revolution some white boys haven't had the common decency to disappear yet
00:15:15.240
so mission not accomplished just yet there's still a bit of pale pasty skin on this team so
00:15:22.560
i don't know we're not quite there yet but he goes on to say as uh you know as a british black
00:15:29.080
londoner son of windrous generation i find it has never been so easy to support an england tame
00:15:34.680
it's northern southern black white mixed heritage youngest experience it's multi-denominational
00:15:39.920
possibly it has players who excel at their jobs and earn a fortune doing them but in try in various
00:15:45.260
ways to ground themselves in the lives of a society in which they are a fetid part they do a good
00:15:50.380
they do good things we read about them in tabloids they do stupid things we read about them in tabloids
00:15:55.440
bloody bloody blah some of us has long made the practical and moral argument that britain's
00:16:00.460
diversity is an extreme so he's just saying that yeah the point of this team as it exists right now
00:16:06.760
is purely propaganda yes you can go to the pub you can cheer you can scream when they score a goal
00:16:12.480
but what you're really supposed to be taking away from it is not the excellence being displayed
00:16:17.200
on the football pitch is not the union that you get with the people around you as you're
00:16:22.060
taking in the moment is that you should look at it and go diversity is our strength diversity is
00:16:27.220
hammering that point home diversity is our strength and you mentioned the racist abuse obviously when
00:16:33.460
it turned out that they didn't actually score uh it became the story became well it was so terrible
00:16:39.320
of the natives of this country even though they weren't really the ones doing it when people looked
00:16:44.120
into it uh and they know that this is another worry in this euros as well where people have been saying
00:16:51.500
well they better do better this time because otherwise the same thing is going to happen again
00:16:56.640
and we might not be the perfect diverse nation that we're trying to be it's funny as well again i can't
00:17:01.440
remember all the details it's fairly hazy it's 2021 but by in in sort of the the footballing
00:17:06.100
punditry world including the amateur pundits who exist on twitter who are often much more insightful
00:17:10.440
it must be said than the professional pundits like gary neville although i do quite like jeremy
00:17:14.240
carrigan i think he his analysis is usually pretty shrewd but in any case um most of the
00:17:19.460
complaints were not directed at these the three black gentlemen who missed they were directed
00:17:23.360
primarily at southgate in particular because i think it was marcus rashford in particular it might
00:17:28.220
have been jordan sancho as well they're both usually quite good penalty takers in football matches
00:17:32.380
so he brought them on very very late in the game with roughly about two minutes left so that they
00:17:37.120
could take penalties you might say that well that sounds like a sensible tactical move it's
00:17:40.180
actually not because usually you have an advantage in football if you've already been playing for
00:17:44.400
about an hour you've got into the groove and you're going to be much better taking a penalty
00:17:47.620
these guys would have would have had quite cold feet they wouldn't have really got got into their
00:17:51.080
groove yet and so most of the most of the um uh uh most of the criticism was directed at southgate
00:17:57.220
veritably white uh for that blunt tactical blunder and and again for the other part of it with
00:18:03.340
southgate being unapologetically woke i believe the intention was also to put the more diverse parts of
00:18:09.580
the team at the forefront and put them into positions where they could potentially fail
00:18:13.720
because if they succeed well then you can turn it into the national story and that's what they've
00:18:18.840
been trying to do because over the weekend we had the switzerland game i believe uh we scored most if
00:18:25.100
not all of them we won we we scored all of them we won and uh then you get articles like this paul
00:18:31.800
elliott reveals his pride as five footballers of black heritage smash racial stereotypes is there a
00:18:37.900
racial stereotype that black people can't take penalties not particularly well no no at all
00:18:43.540
that's not a thing that was just a very confusing part of this headline when we did digging we found
00:18:48.780
out that actually in north africa there may be there may be one but not not in these eyes
00:18:51.980
honestly it was so it was extraordinary there was a whole sort of spectator editorial where they
00:18:57.400
went into these who are these people on instagram these shady characters on instagram who are sort of
00:19:02.120
um accusing the the black players of missing because they were black and a huge proportion of them
00:19:06.800
came from north africa really i recall that what you're saying right yeah oh okay i'm sure i'm
00:19:11.580
sure those sorts of stereotypes will exist there all right i thought you were saying that north
00:19:15.660
african players are worse oh no no no no i see what you're saying right yeah thank you thank you
00:19:21.600
thank you for inviting me to clarify that's very helpful thank you so so you can see again they say
00:19:27.840
that one of the lines from here no amount of off-field work being the the media appearances and all of
00:19:34.380
the propaganda they push in the interviews and such is as powerful as the sight of five england
00:19:39.260
players of ethnic heritage firing their country into a european championship semi-final so so again
00:19:44.680
remember if they lose diversity is our strength but really if they win diversity is really our strength
00:19:52.620
we've never been stronger at the moment let's see how the semis go later today really to me just
00:19:58.820
really lame really pathetic that it's any tiny thing you know like we invented everything and uh
00:20:06.320
when we score a bunch of penalties aren't we great sort of as a as a race other than as an ethnicity
00:20:12.640
um just constantly blackwashing other people's history and things it's really pathetic
00:20:18.300
it's really weak i i think no i i i agree with you and again it shows the fragility
00:20:25.820
of the whole multicultural project which is this group the media seems to treat it as this group
00:20:33.720
needs constant bsing yeah constant bsing so because they're as a group so insecure that if
00:20:41.520
they're not constantly being bs'd they'll what go crazy yeah you don't need a relentless diet of
00:20:48.400
propaganda to establish as a truth in the nation that kittens are cute if this was so self-evidently
00:20:53.480
true they would they wouldn't be constantly feeding us with these as you say well this constant
00:20:57.720
bsing this constant gaslighting it's the same problem with the whole multicultural project being
00:21:02.640
a never-ending project well if it was so strong and so naturally self-evident that this is just the
00:21:08.760
best and most efficient way to order a society why does it constantly need the nudge and the
00:21:14.540
pressure of social engineering why does it constantly need an enormous media and bureaucratic
00:21:20.080
apparatus to even keep it semi-functioning why does it have to be that you need hate speech laws
00:21:25.720
to stop the natives of european countries from protesting against it if it was really all it's
00:21:31.780
made up to be why would you need any of that think about it's so weird you know uh five english black
00:21:38.800
lads score some penalties in germany one time so everyone from st louis to cape town can pat themselves
00:21:46.840
on their back for being having the roughly the same amount of melanin in their skin like what
00:21:51.580
what are you talking about what nonsense nonsense but again one of the interesting things is this has
00:21:57.980
been pushed for the this is why we need migration this was one that was going about let's see uh it's
00:22:03.260
got a little over 2 000 likes this meme england doesn't win without immigration and it takes out
00:22:09.060
the names of all of the people who have immigration background who are on the team
00:22:12.840
uh the the interesting thing again showing that this team really isn't very native at all which is
00:22:20.560
very interesting but also it's the fact that well if we didn't have all of these people i don't mean
00:22:25.440
to sound harsh there would be other people right to fill those slots there would be in the same team
00:22:30.680
who might be just as good they might be a little bit worse they might be better you don't know because
00:22:35.600
you're talking about a pure hypothetical but i've got to say i don't know how the selection process works
00:22:42.040
for who gets into the england team but i can't imagine gareth southgate picks them gareth southgate picks
00:22:48.020
them i very much doubt given how much of a political operator he is and how highly politicized the team
00:22:53.700
is that he's done a really detailed survey of every team in the entire country to pick out
00:22:59.220
the absolute best of the best i'm sure he's obviously he's picked out from what you're saying
00:23:04.480
some very very uh very good football he's spoiled for choice frankly he really is yeah but consider this
00:23:10.780
it's probably working in the same way that it worked in university admissions in america for a
00:23:15.800
long time you've got two candidates both of whom are about equally qualified if one has ethnic minority
00:23:22.360
background you basically add five points onto them and choose them i would imagine it's something like
00:23:28.060
that it's a classic thing england has suffered from what i'm about to say for decades that they will
00:23:33.400
nearly always pick with a few exceptions the sort of the most famous most well-played players regardless
00:23:40.320
of really if they're in form and stuff for example rooney towards the end of his career yeah he would it
00:23:45.400
was just a slam dunk that he'd get picked regardless of anything if he's fit he gets picked uh he always
00:23:50.360
played kind of crap for him i mean he scored tons of goals but often he would play in tournaments he
00:23:55.380
didn't tend to score as many yeah yeah often he would play poorly for england and uh there's
00:23:59.900
someone like matt latiss where he only ever played for southampton he never played for man united or
00:24:05.380
liverpool or whatever never got in england he got like nine nine england caps yeah yeah something
00:24:10.380
tiny like that yeah yeah yeah and um he never had the england career he deserved because he wasn't a
00:24:16.560
big enough name and this is what's happening now it's happened for decades and decades they pick the
00:24:23.640
the most famous ones really uh the ones that play for the biggest teams and not necessarily a pure
00:24:31.040
meritocracy but there you go it's uh it's not an exact science it's true i'm sure i'm sure i'm sure
00:24:36.760
the uh the meritocratic way of operating has been diminished slightly in this sort of uh you know
00:24:42.560
post floyd era in the in the england team but i will say one of the things that makes the england
00:24:47.380
football team different from harvard admissions is that it's a much more public process in which
00:24:52.300
the vast majority of the nation or a huge a significant minority of the nation feel they
00:24:56.520
have a very personal emotional stake and so if so for example um someone like foden who is a white
00:25:02.020
player has had such a wonderful season at man city that there would just be an uproar if gareth
00:25:06.320
southgate for woke on the grounds of woke criteria did not pick him and so gareth southgate has much
00:25:11.620
less maneuver than the harvard admissions department do when it comes to watering down meritocratic standards
00:25:16.100
i would say but i'm sure it's had some effect okay i i can't really dispute that you guys are
00:25:21.540
helping me along with this quite nicely but again give again i will just say that from a layman from
00:25:26.800
an un from somebody who doesn't really know much about all i would be shocked if there weren't
00:25:31.860
political considerations into the choice of the team because i mean southgate has all but said that
00:25:36.800
there is and the media is treating it like there is and here's the here's one of my favorites this
00:25:41.440
clangor from diane abbott everybody's favorites we all know that she's an intellectual giant of
00:25:47.640
british politics giants of the english football team meanwhile reform is complaining about
00:25:53.120
immigration i mean mainly illegal immigration how do those things connect like really that's a bit of
00:26:00.420
a strange comparison to make but again the whole argument that's being made here is football good
00:26:07.140
you want to do well in football throw open the gates to your country make sure you've got open borders
00:26:12.960
and then you might win a trophy look first the first thing that's worth saying is that we won the
00:26:17.500
world cup in 1966 without a single mixed race or black player in the team just to detail the second
00:26:22.620
thing i would say uh is that i'm very happy to sacrifice a slight drop-off in sporting achievement
00:26:29.000
even assuming that this immigrant infusion is necessary i'm very happy to sacrifice a slight drop-off
00:26:34.300
in sporting achievement in order to have a more unified national culture which would necessarily have to
00:26:39.000
include its demographic underpinnings which is you know more the more homogeneity you have the more
00:26:43.520
likely you are to be able to be a cohesive national culture so if we could get rid of race politics
00:26:49.160
tomorrow because it would have no purchase in britain because we were as homogeneous as japan
00:26:52.560
and what we did as well as in japan in national tournaments which is to say not very well
00:26:56.760
that's fine with me no absolutely i mean diane abbott's basically it's a non-secretary really she's
00:27:01.440
basically saying there's a few black lads in the england first england team so
00:27:05.360
endless bangladesh's and afghanistan is just an endless stream of those then now where are they
00:27:11.420
in the team yeah where are there are any of these guys from somali backgrounds no i don't think so
00:27:18.620
no no yeah then why is why are 72 percent of the somalis in london in social housing then
00:27:24.300
why do we need them why can't we make distinctions even if we do want to even if we do want to
00:27:29.840
you know to have some immigrant immigration policy slightly weighted in favor of having
00:27:35.420
you know uh people who i think most of these chats probably be from of west african descent
00:27:40.000
um uh fine but just just say that and make make make make make these distinctions be open about it
00:27:46.400
it really does show actually now that we now that we've spoken about this that even somebody like
00:27:51.180
diane abbott really does see the entirety of the immigration debate about the natives versus what is
00:27:58.660
essentially just a giant organic biomass of brown foreigners that are completely undifferentiated
00:28:06.160
from one another it's just the englishman versus everybody from not who's not from europe
00:28:13.140
so that's not just interesting all of whom get all of whom get on notoriously well not just brown
00:28:18.940
skin but immigrant immigration in general so we really by right should have somebody in the team
00:28:23.300
that's an ex-albanian convict really shouldn't we to be fair if we're gonna be yeah where have you
00:28:30.000
pulled convicts from or are you just thinking well there's no chance of getting an albanian who isn't
00:28:34.120
right yeah that an ex-convict isn't is it not the case that a lot of uh albanians that come here are
00:28:39.780
cocaine dealers are ex are criminal albanians one of the most uh we did we i think we now have an
00:28:46.380
agreement with albania which means that many of them get do actually get returned it's one of the few
00:28:49.720
successes of the sunak premiership that he managed to negotiate that but it is true and it's very
00:28:54.040
interesting um someone pointed out that the tickets to get just to just fly from albania to britain
00:29:01.720
is much much much much much cheaper than going through the illicit smuggling routes which means
00:29:07.840
that the only people who were not paying for to do it in the legal way would have to have some reason
00:29:12.340
to pay to to to pay the the more hefty fee and that could only be that their passport would be
00:29:19.360
rejected because they probably had a criminal background right right but i do think we've gone
00:29:22.940
a little bit off of what the topic this was we can always get on to albanian criminals somehow on this
00:29:28.500
podcast don't we and we didn't talk about the technical side of football at all i think there
00:29:33.460
was some mention of it again it's not my wheelhouse so thank you both for carrying this
00:29:37.700
segment for me let's move on to nato oh okay uh samson wants me to read the rumble rants and he
00:29:48.760
is my god so i have to obey his commandments uh we've got two so far so thank you both for sending
00:29:54.960
it uh sending these in one from hewitt 76 for five dollars says being proud of our own mediocrity is
00:30:01.740
britain's genuine national sport yep that's what we've been reduced to really isn't it
00:30:06.820
uh sorry you didn't catch it did you quick moment there sorry yeah uh just saying that being proud
00:30:12.160
of our own mediocrity is britain's genuine national sport oh yeah yeah that's what we've been reduced
00:30:16.360
it's all we've got left yeah old gill needs this
00:30:19.840
oh you gotta cut old gill a break here and uh the shadow band for five dollars says this conversation
00:30:28.660
isn't part of ice hockey for some reason the last i heard about ice hockey didn't one of the black
00:30:33.680
players hello is my microphone working yeah very good but correct me in the comments if i'm wrong
00:30:41.300
but didn't one of the black hot ice hockey players recently accidentally slice someone's neck open
00:30:47.200
and killed them in the middle of him yeah yeah perhaps accidental manslaughter but i think
00:30:51.840
yeah i throw my hands truly disgusting incident yeah unbelievable unbelievable awful thing to have
00:30:57.840
yeah it's terrible terrible yeah ice hockey is a brutal sport from what i'm aware yeah yeah yeah
00:31:03.400
that was bad that was real bad i wonder actually i should google after this whether that guy got
00:31:08.460
prosecuted for that because most commentators i'm not a big ice hockey guy um said that doesn't
00:31:14.680
happen you don't accidentally throw your your your skate up blade first at like six foot in the air
00:31:21.020
at someone's throat it's basically almost never ever and hit them right where it needs to for them
00:31:25.920
to bleed to death yeah yeah that was horrible yeah that's that was pretty awful so that's the only
00:31:30.960
thing i really know about ice hockey but thank you for sending that uh rumble chat in let's go to the
00:31:35.080
next segment okay i thought we can talk a little bit about geopolitics talk a bit about nato it's nato's
00:31:41.380
75th birthday didn't you know and so to to mark that uh putin dropped loads of bombs on kiev yesterday
00:31:50.960
um i don't know if it was actually to mark that were those birthday streamers yeah yeah it was
00:31:57.620
pretty bad i mean maybe hit a hospital and dozens of people died and uh of course absolutely terrible
00:32:02.960
and disgusting but i thought we'd talk a bit about it because there's a big nato conference going on
00:32:07.440
to call about what sleepy joe says about it or rather what his state department and pentagon
00:32:12.020
uh handlers tell him to say about it and what he remembers after they've told him to say
00:32:17.220
right yeah what he mumbles uh what he parrots through a mumble they've told him to say um and
00:32:22.740
sakir our prime minister what he says about it but before we go into all of that i thought i could
00:32:29.300
just talk a little bit about the history of nato because i fear a lot of people out there might not
00:32:32.840
really know too much about it um and i've got my own take on it we don't pretend to be completely
00:32:38.660
unbiased here at loadseaters so i have got my own view and i'm not really well i'm not a fan of
00:32:44.740
nato i don't know about you guys if you've got strong feelings about it one way or another
00:32:47.940
um but the headline is for me um it's sort of outmoded it's sort of a relic of the cold war
00:32:55.300
and something happened when the cold war ended when the berlin war came down in 89
00:33:00.240
and when the soviet union collapsed in 91 something should have profoundly changed with nato and it did
00:33:07.920
but the other way rather than sort of disbanding itself or winding itself down
00:33:12.320
it sort of dialed itself up if anything and so i thought we could just talk a bit about nato and
00:33:17.760
then look at look at um keir and um joe and what's going on with that summit to give to give my own
00:33:24.740
perspective uninformed compared to yours as it probably is it seems to me uh looking at it right
00:33:30.820
now that nato is more of a organization to ensure and expand american influence in europe and that
00:33:39.820
according to some of the more convincing analysis that i've seen mainly from uh professor john
00:33:45.240
meersheimer who's an excellent international analyst when he's been appearing on um different
00:33:49.700
shows like piers morgan and then shows like um judge napolitano uh the nato expansion eastward
00:33:57.420
particularly potentially into ukraine as was being discussed continually getting closer and closer and
00:34:04.020
closer to russia's borders is really what kick-started this whole conflict in the first place
00:34:08.660
certainly part of it it's an element of it no doubt no doubt well so if i do a quick chronological
00:34:15.200
rundown so at the end of world war ii joe starling uncle joe found himself in control of all of west
00:34:23.500
eastern and sort of central europe sort of even beyond berlin all of that part of europe that we
00:34:28.740
started the war to save right yeah yeah we went into uh liberate poland didn't we we failed to do that
00:34:34.020
in the end um so you know let's be fair at the end of world war ii you know the cold war essentially
00:34:40.620
started immediately even before actually in late 44 in early 45 before mr hitler had killed himself
00:34:47.480
and before the war had ended already there was wranglings between the supreme command on our side
00:34:53.500
the allies and the red army over who's going to stop where and also it's already started really
00:34:58.620
um so at that point in time 1945 or the two or three years after 1945 it's absolutely not a crazy
00:35:06.920
idea to think that western europe and the united states uh would benefit from some sort of treaty
00:35:15.700
to of cooperation to work together against frankly let's be honest a very aggressive expansionist
00:35:23.380
soviet union under starling that's that's not that's okay right that makes complete sense
00:35:28.920
um starling would have had did have designs on pushing further um at one of the big conferences
00:35:36.360
i can't remember if it was yalta or uh potsdam or somewhere someone said to him i think it was in the
00:35:41.620
in churchill's british delegation they said to him you must be quite pleased really with the way
00:35:46.340
the great patriotic war has ended for you you find yourself in the middle of europe and he said
00:35:50.980
well czar alexander in the polonic era got as far as paris so just that one line alone suggests he
00:35:57.520
did have ambitions beyond where the iron curtain finally fell well from what i'm aware in sean
00:36:03.020
mcmechan's book stalin's war he has a lot of documentary evidence to show that stalin was
00:36:09.100
basically on the edge of going into eastern europe by about 1941 right yeah well i mean the idea of
00:36:17.900
of internationalism the like the common turn the idea of that that communism uh should dominate the
00:36:24.460
whole world yeah they're explicit about that it's a necessarily it's a necessarily global ideology and
00:36:30.120
stalin's own invocation of alexander the first who did indeed get to paris um with the defeat of
00:36:34.940
napoleon in 1815 in 1815 when napoleon had come back from the island of elba elba the island of elba
00:36:41.560
that's correct um which is true that the russians got as far as paris and i suppose that's quite
00:36:46.600
impressive in a way but he did the russians didn't therefore off the back of that annex
00:36:51.160
the france it wasn't it wasn't an attempt to to to transform france completely ideologically in line
00:36:58.140
with one homogeneous ideology it was it was it was um they just reinstated yeah there was the congress
00:37:03.380
of vienna and then they reinstated the bourbon monarchy that's true but it was not it didn't have
00:37:08.080
the same sort of global ideological ambitions as communism and i think this a similar thing probably
00:37:12.880
applies to putin i'm sure he wants russia to be geopolitically dominant in its own sphere of
00:37:17.480
influence but the idea that he wants to russify the world in the way that stalin evidently wanted
00:37:22.340
to communize the world is clearly not true yeah cossacks watering their horses in the seine
00:37:27.680
um whether yeah whether putin wants his russian tanks to sort of dominate montmartre i don't know about
00:37:36.340
that uh but anyway so so going back to the the late 40s um there was originally a treaty was it the
00:37:43.180
treaty of brussels where france britain belgium holland and i think luxembourg had a treaty to say
00:37:49.220
that you know if the soviets do push into western europe we at least will work together and then that
00:37:55.600
morphed into the north atlantic treaty which is nato is the north atlantic treaty organization that's what
00:38:01.400
that means that's what nato stands for and the united states got involved obviously uh truman this
00:38:06.420
is still even before the korean war and um originally the headquarters were in london for a few years
00:38:12.060
later it became paris and in the 60s actually just quickly to jump ahead in the mid 60s de gaulle
00:38:17.720
uh brought france out of nato well not entirely out of nato but they didn't have their troops fighting
00:38:23.560
for nato so they moved the the headquarters to brussels in belgium of course and that's where it is
00:38:29.400
today that's why it's in brussels some people might think why is nato's headquarters in brussels
00:38:33.140
anyway that's one of the reasons but we look at um the the europe as it was throughout the 50s
00:38:39.660
and even 60s um there's the cold war the height of the cold war there was always this endless fear
00:38:47.320
that the ruskies the soviets were going to invade from east germany into west germany and then who knows
00:38:54.600
what that's what the cold war was largely about so that worry is that they're going to try and take
00:39:00.920
over europe and so something like nato made complete sense it made perfect sense it was prudent i think
00:39:08.400
so i think most people would agree it was it's sort of a no-brainer almost okay so i accept that i think
00:39:14.960
most people accept that but then as i say when the when the wall came down in 89 and then the soviet
00:39:22.800
the soviet project itself collapsed in 91 um you know perhaps nato should have rethought its entire
00:39:31.900
remit even even its own existence i mean there's a famous quote from one of the early founding fathers
00:39:37.000
of it that the point of nato was to to keep the soviet union out the americans in and the germans down
00:39:43.860
which is a funny thing and they're talking about century a little about germany really
00:39:48.060
or where the iron curtain is um so yeah um but things changed after after 91 um nato
00:39:58.720
just kept expanding they they obviously didn't sit like any power structure probably or any sort of
00:40:05.780
living organism it sort of doesn't want to die if it can help it well if it can expand and flourish
00:40:12.540
it will try to well again the very fact that the point of it was to keep the americans in america was
00:40:18.160
able to extend a huge amount of power over europe in doing so so why wouldn't it want to just keep
00:40:24.820
expanding it america is one of the modern empires probably the greatest modern empire that's still
00:40:30.900
around today it's hegemon of the world let's be honest yeah so of course it's going to want to
00:40:35.720
extend its hegemon everywhere it can right so why why wouldn't it try and do that and it's actually
00:40:42.320
make it's one of the things which weirdly makes i'm not making a moral comparison i'm only making a
00:40:46.600
kind of structural and formal one but it's one of the things that makes nato weirdly more similar to
00:40:52.180
to the warsaw pact than it was before because there are all sorts of ideological conditions attached to
00:40:57.920
nato membership it's not just expansionist in a sort of geopolitical sense we want to annex this
00:41:02.680
territory annex is the wrong word in this context we want to claim this territory we want to plant
00:41:06.640
our flag here there are conditions that preconditions attached like being a democracy being being having
00:41:12.880
a sort of liberal system of of government and we might think these are good to a certain extent open
00:41:16.620
borders to a certain extent open borders was it was it was it kosovo that was bombed in the 90s by
00:41:21.080
clinton and one of the one of the nate yeah one of the nato chiefs said that the reason that they were
00:41:26.100
doing it was because of the idea of a um an ethnically homogenous state in europe was an outmoded and
00:41:32.020
outdated idea and we couldn't have that anymore didn't know about that but but it is but then
00:41:36.420
there were times of course when when nato did actually make exceptions and relaxed some of its
00:41:40.380
criteria i mean the fact that turkey was admitted the fact that spain was admitted the fact that
00:41:44.160
greece there were all sorts of sus cases but i think after 1991 there should have been what what
00:41:50.180
what i'm sure beau's going to get into the details but but the mentality set in that there was a kind of
00:41:54.660
triumphalist unipolar moment sort of the fukiyama hypothesis liberal democracy is clearly the way it's
00:42:00.140
only it's inevitable nato is going to be part of expanding this uh this eastwards and i think
00:42:05.040
there should have been more prudence that kicked in and maybe nato didn't necessarily have to die
00:42:09.400
but it should have certainly revised what it was about and maybe should have become part of a
00:42:12.700
a broader security architecture in europe which could have included russia and could and could have
00:42:17.500
um you know stemmed the tide of a kind of revanchist russia on the rise which putin is clearly
00:42:22.240
manifestational yeah because there's many layers each country's got their own army haven't they
00:42:27.260
america if it wants to can unilaterally act as it did in iraq for example um you know they get
00:42:33.840
get themselves some sort of vague un resolution yeah actually nato did have a small role to play
00:42:40.140
in iraq uh but they weren't sort of flying hundreds of sorties and bombing all over the place but anyway
00:42:45.460
we'll get to that in a moment um so yeah when the soviet union collapsed in 1991 there was then the war in
00:42:51.300
the balkans in the early 90s i mean it was kicking off by 91 92 and started really happening in 93 94
00:42:58.420
through to 95 i'm fascinated by that that the breakup of yugoslavia and those various balkan wars there's
00:43:03.680
all sorts of balkan wars i've been reading about it studying about it for years uh we'll do an epochs
00:43:09.040
about it probably a series eventually i find it very very fascinating it's very very complicated as
00:43:13.660
well it really is a breakup of yugoslavia but nonetheless um so in sort of 93 94 um nato sort
00:43:21.940
of starts getting involved in it and in fact the first time they did any sort of hot action was in
00:43:28.100
that since 1949 they began in 1949 they never really fired any shots in anger at all until the bosnian war
00:43:35.200
basically uh american i think they're f-16s uh the black knights shot down some serbian or bosnian
00:43:42.640
serbian light aircraft in the early 90s so right there you can see just one small example that
00:43:49.860
something's something's changed there hasn't it it's supposed to be a north atlantic treaty
00:43:54.960
organization to check the warsaw pack or to check the soviets to check the russians but now we're
00:44:01.540
bombing serbian assets uh wait what what's going on now because they basically changed the goal
00:44:07.600
post they basically just started saying you know we're we're about humanitarianism we're trying to
00:44:11.760
stop a genocide which on the face of it or not even on the face of it it is uh you know a righteous
00:44:17.720
thing right i mean i'm not saying it's not but you have changed the goal post goal posts though
00:44:22.660
right and you know it probably was the right thing to if you can prevent a genocide but still
00:44:30.160
is that is that nato's job if if clinton and john major wanted to do that they could have just used
00:44:37.040
the royal air force and the u.s air force why are they going through nato now though and yet in 1999
00:44:43.060
a completely different war in the balkans with kosovo again we just we just start bombing belgrade
00:44:50.260
under blair by that point things have changed by 1999 i mean they got involved nato now is involved
00:44:56.600
in all sorts of things darfur they gave some assistance when there was hurricane katrina i
00:45:00.780
think it was anyway one of the big um um weather disasters in america nato helped out all things
00:45:08.500
they were bombing in libya with gaddafi afghanistan afghanistan yeah they've got big big style involved
00:45:13.560
in afghanistan a little bit in iraq but definitely in afghanistan yeah all sorts of things they got their
00:45:18.520
fingers in all sorts of piers all over the world now and as for just um sort of collecting member
00:45:24.040
states it's like nato and the state department it's like the cold war never ended because cold
00:45:29.720
war was essentially to boil it down to uh maybe very low resolution but what it was was a battle
00:45:35.860
across the whole world between spheres of influence right the soviet one and the american one so every
00:45:42.120
single country in the world even places like vietnam and lao and cambodia there's there's a battle
00:45:46.900
for the hearts and minds of those countries and the economies of those countries after the soviet
00:45:52.320
the soviets fell and the burning wall came down it's sort of like in the mind of nato leaders and
00:45:58.060
other leaders in america nothing stops no nothing stops because if you look at the list of nato members
00:46:04.280
in 1995 poland hungary and the czech republic joined now just that alone if you're sitting in the kremlin
00:46:12.100
and you're thinking wait poland and hungary and czechoslovakia which sticks out like a knife towards
00:46:18.960
russia they're like that is a bit that is a bit aggressive that is a bit provocative isn't it
00:46:24.320
and in 2004 was a big moment for nato i think they call it something like the big bang or the big boom
00:46:30.060
or something like that when 2004 bulgaria estonia latvia lithuania romania slovakia and slovenia all
00:46:36.580
joined now how is that not poking the russian bear in the ribs how is it not that and they're all on
00:46:44.120
the border a lot of them yeah a lot of them are loads of them are yeah yeah it's worth mentioning
00:46:49.760
as well both and linking your previous point and the point you're now making together the the kind
00:46:55.400
of mere the kind of uh what's the word special pleading which you'll get well nato is just a
00:46:59.700
sort of peaceful military alliance it's not supposed to be provocative if they've constantly
00:47:05.120
been redefining their mission throughout the 90s and in the early 2000s then there was no reason
00:47:10.780
necessarily for russia not to feel nervous about this eastwards expansion well and just to clarify
00:47:15.840
the quote that i uh had a moment ago so i found it uh it was nato's supreme allied commander of
00:47:22.860
europe wesley clark in uh 1999 saying there is no place in modern europe for ethnically pure states
00:47:29.380
that's a 19th century idea and we are trying to transition it into the 21st century and we're going
00:47:34.580
to do it with multi-ethnic states who said that sorry uh wesley clark and he was uh the supreme allied
00:47:40.340
commander europe very interesting yes so that's that's just a complete change of the mission
00:47:45.220
statement yeah that's not what they were supposed to be that's that's a new progressive utopia yeah
00:47:51.280
it's not sort of old-fashioned geopolitical statecraft it's that but with loaded ideological
00:47:58.760
conditions attached and which is what i'm saying makes it seem much more like the warsaw pact
00:48:02.620
regardless of what you think of those ideological criteria maybe you think that's better than
00:48:05.640
the the communist one that informed the warsaw warsaw pact i mean i'm more sympathetic towards
00:48:10.780
liberal democracy than i am towards a politburo style system but it's it's certainly a change
00:48:15.860
and what you said i think it's a very good point um sort of which which way round the rationale goes
00:48:22.080
is nato just a humanitarian thing to try and keep the peace or is it actually a fairly aggressive
00:48:28.240
expansionist threat to russia whichever way you cut it um again they make the argument that like so
00:48:36.020
into in last year finland joined and if you look at a map of course finland's it's right there this
00:48:43.140
year sweden joined now pro nato people will say look look at that example look at that evidence we are
00:48:51.260
this strong brilliant even sweden and finland want to be a member because we because we've sort of got
00:48:57.160
the moral high ground because we're the good guys but it's no way is that right or did they only join
00:49:02.900
because russia's become belligerent and aggressive because nato has been constantly poking them in the
00:49:08.420
ribs right it's that post hoc ergo proper hoc thing after it therefore because of it like like being a
00:49:16.080
cry bully like poking someone until they throw a punch at your jaw and then you you claim you're the
00:49:20.380
victim it's anyway that's my feelings of about nato if they hadn't have been so expansionist really i
00:49:29.180
suppose after the fall of the soviet union as i saw it's always stuck in my mind years and years ago
00:49:36.440
it must have been the early 2000s i think putin had only been in power for about four or five years or
00:49:41.000
something like that i remember seeing him on tv and it was meant for a russian audience he was sitting
00:49:46.260
there saying he was addressing the west and nato essentially he's saying look if you don't take
00:49:53.140
the mickey out of us these are my words if you don't take the mickey out of me if you don't treat
00:49:58.080
us like you on stage yeah yeah stop taking the mickey you're having a bubble bath no if you don't if you
00:50:04.920
treat us reasonably if you don't treat us like a naughty child that you're sort of trying to keep in
00:50:11.740
line then i will be reasonable we will be reasonable you know i'm not a starling figure
00:50:16.940
but nato and the leadership they never sort of took that on board they always kept with the program it
00:50:22.980
seems to me of the cold war is that our global hegemony must keep expanding there's no other way
00:50:30.620
of doing it well and they always have some contrived reason to be able to cast russia and putin in that
00:50:37.660
villainous role by saying things along the lines of well they uh they're an authoritarian totalitarian
00:50:43.400
state and they have political prisoners they're oppressive they're repressive towards sexual and
00:50:48.760
ethnic minorities and then you do and then you have to say well you know of course political prisoners
00:50:53.600
nobody in the west would ever do anything like that julian assaj has only just been released after
00:50:58.160
years of political persecution who knows what else goes on with a lot of the journalists over here but
00:51:03.640
still you know we would never do anything like that we would never meanwhile trump's drinking from
00:51:07.720
a fire hose of 96 and diamonds may even be more than that at current time of speaking and they're
00:51:11.960
also initiating proceedings against against marine le pen in france at the moment oh yes yes yeah they
00:51:17.260
are and there's some gen six guys that were kept in solitary for ages for almost nothing about i think
00:51:22.340
some of them might even still be you know anyway i'm not i'm actually not trying to be an apologist
00:51:27.020
here for putin no he does poison and murder journalists he doesn't like and political opponents he's like
00:51:33.100
he's he's an old fsb kgb badass i'm not apologizing for putin in any way i'm just saying probable cause
00:51:41.740
for why we need to be belligerent is kind of pot calling the cattle black a bit isn't i'm just saying
00:51:46.420
the idea that nato is um just a force for good in the world and the kremlin are the absolute implacable
00:51:55.300
evil baddies it's not it it's it's there's more nuance to it than that there's more shades of
00:52:02.260
is there a rumble rant oh yes the top one for one dollar from ramshackalotta okay ramshackalotta said
00:52:10.740
every time i've discussed the expansion of nato with normally friends they've never heard of the
00:52:15.240
warsaw pact for instance they simply see us as goodies and russians as baddies yeah yeah learn a bit
00:52:22.020
of history there's loads of youtube videos well you've got a little 10 minute youtube video
00:52:26.060
explaining it your your average street normie is going to be almost completely uh cut off from any
00:52:31.480
understanding of history yeah so it's like that like there's an iron curtain still you know from
00:52:38.460
sticking in the baltic yes in the adriatic an iron curtain has descended but when you talk about
00:52:47.620
nato being nothing but a force for good again i have to point out i recently did the segment
00:52:52.520
discussing the failed peace talks at the beginning of 2022 between ukraine and russia when the conflict
00:52:59.120
had only just started and how it was western nato allies particularly people like boris johnson
00:53:05.540
who came in said that they were going to put all the weight of their support behind ukraine
00:53:09.860
and scuppered it entirely even though because it seemed that russia didn't actually want to drag on a
00:53:16.160
conflict for longer than it was going to because they didn't steamroll ukraine as they thought that
00:53:20.540
they would russia actually had a quite was giving a lot of leeway for talks even about things like
00:53:26.440
crimea which you would never have expected from somebody like putin that he was willing to put
00:53:31.240
crimea on the table even to discuss but boris johnson and other blowhards like him decided to
00:53:38.080
come along and say no keep fighting keep fighting keep fighting keep fighting and what do we see
00:53:41.880
what was it actually what good has that done for ukraine it's just got a lot of their menfolk
00:53:47.400
killed hasn't it yeah and their cities some of their cities uh pounded to rubble um so i mean if i was
00:53:54.360
prime minister i would absolutely keep our nuclear deterrent i would increase our our own armed forces but i
00:54:00.900
would leave nato i'd be like no if russia does invade poland or something or lithuania then we'll talk
00:54:06.500
about we'll talk about it then and if america wants to do whatever it wants to do okay i'm not giving
00:54:12.200
loads of money and materiel and and men to nato anymore it's a cold war relic thing we don't need
00:54:20.520
it it's actually destabilizing things in the grandest sense if anything let me know in the
00:54:24.960
comments if you think that's a crazy wrong-headed take there you go so just finish up because i think
00:54:29.800
we're going over time a little bit or beginning to um there is this thing going on at the moment the
00:54:34.400
75th anniversary summit of nato and biden's there samson if you could just click through a few of
00:54:38.940
them we'll just look at the headlines really just click through there you go biden pledges uh even
00:54:43.220
more um uh defensive weapons for ukraine to shoot uh russian airplanes and missiles out which will
00:54:51.880
have to be made by american troops on ukrainian soil so that's great kia starmer's asking everyone
00:54:57.820
else to spend more of their money on it uh next one um yeah again same thing other people need to
00:55:06.040
spend a bit more money but we but we well i won't promise britain will though um okay uh cheeky a bit
00:55:15.280
we'll see he's sort of he keeps making weird uh pronouncements about how much he's going to spend
00:55:21.180
on defense whether he's going to increase it or not we'll see i suspect they'll make some sort of
00:55:25.420
decision on the policy in the next week or two i think they would have to but we'll see
00:55:29.940
if he increases increases uh defense spending in the uk or not i don't think keir starmer has made
00:55:36.020
a single announcement ever that he hasn't immediately contradicted in another interview the day after
00:55:41.620
well at least he hasn't said we're doing away with our nuclear deterrent um because that was a fear
00:55:47.440
any labor prime minister it's a little bit of a fear that they might do that i mean corbyn
00:55:51.100
sort of basically said he probably would or corbyn said um said he wouldn't use it he said he
00:55:56.140
wouldn't use it which is it makes it completely pointless tantamount the same thing um and yeah
00:56:01.820
and so coming out of the white house and the state department and the pentagon is still this line
00:56:06.280
that just as long as it takes whatever it takes for ukraine to to in air air quotes win i mean what
00:56:13.560
does it even look like i mean well it's almost like to the nuclear option and i'm saying that tongue
00:56:19.480
in cheek as a as a play on words if nato or the white house want to do a regime change in russia
00:56:26.920
just do it stop trying to drag the rest of the world into it stop stop um sacrificing english
00:56:33.320
ukrainian lives then if you're hell-bent nato on removing putin just do it but also and i'll try to
00:56:41.560
see how far you get but also don't do it yeah but also don't punch us into world war three please
00:56:46.840
but also don't get me and my family killed yeah i wouldn't appreciate it i'd rather not have a
00:56:51.440
nuclear winter if we if that's an option yeah uh but this last thing just say here's a is a
00:56:56.680
a twitter post from nato and sort of you know look how orwellian it is sorry is that a woman
00:57:02.900
yeah yeah okay oh so so we've got to the point where ukraine is going yes we will sacrifice our
00:57:08.560
women as well this is what a successful nation does in a war that they're winning is that they send
00:57:14.480
the women to the front line blonde-haired blue-eyed scandinavian and eastern ukraine
00:57:18.260
in fairness it is yeah that's a good point it is better than than in peacetime when they will sort
00:57:23.300
of flirt with the idea we need more ethnic minorities in the army we need more but once
00:57:27.820
things kick off all the adverts have like big white dudes that's true but also once this conflict is
00:57:32.800
over and ukraine's uh demographics and population have been depleted yeah where do you think that uh
00:57:39.440
nato and you aligns ukraine is going to be replenishing its population from i don't know
00:57:44.300
what you're suggesting now i hate to agree with guardianista types but you know even a stop clock
00:57:49.020
is right sometimes and i'm not a pacifist i think pacifism is sort of wrong-headed if someone attacks
00:57:55.840
you or someone invades your country you're morally obliged to fight back but just the orwellian nature
00:58:00.480
of this nato means uh means not being alone nato means protecting each other nato means living in
00:58:07.660
freedom does it nato means peace no it doesn't it doesn't it explicitly doesn't really uh and you
00:58:13.440
got people like this no nato means terror nato means destruction of families uprooting countries
00:58:18.600
death and genocide uh you know the guy i hate to agree with him but nato means world war three
00:58:24.020
loss of independence loss of sovereignty fascism is a bit far it's not actually oh yeah yeah because
00:58:31.580
in the mussolini style sense of fascism it isn't at all because because fascism was about
00:58:36.080
transitioning to multi-ethnic states for the 21st century that's what i think that was in
00:58:41.340
giovanni gentile wasn't it yeah yeah if you can mind quite that it's in the footnotes i think
00:58:46.020
yes no it's an unknown footnote okay so that's my take about nato and a little dig at nato and i'll
00:58:53.520
probably uh get some heat in the comments from pro nato people about that but there you go okay let's
00:58:58.780
move on to our third segment yeah well oh yes we've got one from cranky texan aimed for you bo
00:59:05.180
they say i almost fell off my chair yesterday when both failed to recognize the common enemy
00:59:10.740
of the communists and the islamists it's christians their culture and their entire civilization well i
00:59:16.520
did leave that unsaid but um it was sort of implied but no fair point and thank you for the thank you
00:59:21.660
for the 20 bucks they've sent in appreciate that thank you cranky texan yeah thank you shall we get
00:59:29.080
onto the conservative civil war the phony civil war it's the phony civil that's crucial um is peter
00:59:35.900
hitchens going to write a book about this one well probably not because he's always unpredictable at
00:59:40.280
these well it's sort of in the genes isn't it um the hitchens family i shouldn't have mentioned his
00:59:46.800
name i'm sorry you're getting you're getting some trouble from him at the moment uh no no no no i'm
00:59:51.840
not personally and i'm not i'm not looking forward to the at later on on twitter so let's just carry
00:59:56.940
right right uh you know apologies in advance for bringing up the conservative party and for
01:00:01.640
bringing up the election i don't know if people are bored of election talk um but but as everyone
01:00:06.080
knows there is now a tory rump of just 121 or so mps left you can see the the rough breakdown on the
01:00:13.760
map they're much depleted from their uh 2019 uh achievement under the political realignment
01:00:20.700
uh built by boris johnson and then immediately betrayed by boris johnson just about everyone who
01:00:27.060
who um had a hand in what's gone on in britain over the last five years uh but but in my view
01:00:32.200
so there's a there's a there's a there's a fight for the soul of the conservative party going on you'll
01:00:36.540
see all sorts of um tedious slightly platitudinous headlines to that effect in all of the national
01:00:42.600
newspapers um but in my view rumors of a civil war in the party have been greatly exaggerated
01:00:47.160
uh if there is one it's foregone conclusion i think will make it look exceedingly phony and
01:00:52.920
pointless in retrospect and uh the reason why i say that how how gay race communist is the tory
01:01:00.700
party going to be after this civil war as gay race communist as it is at the moment which is why it's
01:01:06.260
a phony civil war okay so it's nothing changed yeah it has a foregone yeah i think it has a foregone
01:01:10.240
conclusion baked into it because they could always go a little bit more oh they might intensify but
01:01:14.900
that's that's going to be the only question oh thank god i thought we were dealing with a
01:01:19.180
completely different party for a moment in many ways i think this makes things a lot easier but
01:01:22.560
what i'm saying is that and i it should become clear over the course of this segment why why i
01:01:27.220
think this but i think i think as people on the right who are very keen to see or even many people
01:01:33.160
who are not economically on the right but people who are sort of culturally and socially
01:01:36.100
on the right and who are sort of patriotic people who care about this country and its people
01:01:40.740
should um not get too invested in the conservative party civil war uh because i think there's very
01:01:47.020
little to be enjoyed from it as a spectacle and even less to be achieved from it as people
01:01:52.020
uh for people like us and this is because the vast majority from what from what i've been able
01:01:57.860
to garner on social media and through other mediums and particularly at cchq the higher ups the top
01:02:02.960
brass who who really run things i think i wish i'd included this in the segment steven edgington sent me a
01:02:09.100
text message that steven edgington of gb news friend of a friend of both uh the load seaters in
01:02:14.600
the new culture from sent me a text message the other day asking me to comment on a gb news piece
01:02:17.900
he was he was rustling up i don't actually know whether my comment made it into his piece but and i
01:02:22.280
didn't include it but apparently in the course of the election this was the day before the election
01:02:26.340
in cchq they had all of the you know the trans flag all of the progress flag all of that stuff was
01:02:32.640
the office was completely smothered in that so cchq is clearly captured and those are the higher ups
01:02:38.200
people who really dictate how things go on uh in the aftermath of this historic defeat but they
01:02:43.320
precisely so both cchq and and people in the sort of centrist dad punditry class seem intent on
01:02:49.740
learning all of the wrong lessons does look like that from the historic defeat and i'm so glad that
01:02:55.460
certain people decided to make a crusade to ensure that the party didn't get zero seats you okay you
01:03:01.800
want to make it you want to flesh out that comment that's no i think i'll leave it you don't want to
01:03:06.200
i'll leave that hanging i don't want the ads and stubbornly so drawing all the incorrect
01:03:12.680
conclusions and stubbornly ignoring all of the the correct ones and so they seemingly incapable of
01:03:18.480
sober self-reflection self-examination self-criticism the beginnings of wisdom um they have instead sort
01:03:24.600
of gone into full-blown huffy teenager mode and so if we can go to the next uh slide i'm not gifted
01:03:30.740
oh here we go okay it happened almost by magic do i just click next is it that simple yes okay very
01:03:38.920
good uh so tom jones uh whom i like uh very much and i i couldn't actually so i'll read it first
01:03:44.600
watching several sky news commentators joe johnson uh boris johnson's younger brother
01:03:49.220
but andy burnham assert the tory's problem is that they are reform light our net immigration figures
01:03:54.240
approaching one million the highest tax burden since world war ii and highest spending since the 70s
01:03:58.620
part of reforms policy platform an obviously correct point by tom jones that i would also
01:04:03.740
i remember what i was watching sky news uh at the time as well because i was i happened to be in
01:04:08.240
poland uh during the election and we can't access the bbc so i um i was watching i was i was part of
01:04:14.580
a group of people who were watching it on sky news and i actually saw joe johnson's comments they
01:04:18.440
didn't make a huge amount of sense at all that's to be expected and i would and i and i would have um
01:04:23.380
i would have drawn up the clip but he's clearly not a huge huge draw sky news have not been
01:04:27.140
promoting it on their social media so i've just got tom jones's testimony there but i can i can
01:04:31.020
vouch for it that um this was precisely these were precisely the kind of claims that joe johnson and
01:04:36.580
other people in the conservative party have been making that a kind of imaginary lurch to the right
01:04:40.640
is responsible for the conservative defeat where i take this this isn't the welsh singer tom jones
01:04:46.820
no no no like you see people like rory stewart um um yeah and all the wet who voted what labor or
01:04:54.280
labor or lib dem i think he oh it was green i think he threatened to yeah i think it was green or labor
01:04:59.060
that he was going to vote for wasn't it yeah just like some weirdo puppet of some shadowy globalist
01:05:04.180
who knows what um yeah they're basically saying yeah the idea that the tories should go back to
01:05:10.540
actual conservativism with the small c is sort of crazy they need to be more wet if anything
01:05:17.060
precisely i mean yeah then they haven't learned anything then they're sort of kind of deliberately
01:05:21.860
refusing to learn any lessons totally then it seems totally and highly adjacent to rory stewart
01:05:27.720
um who will get more on him later actually rory stewart to remind everybody who has a podcast with
01:05:33.900
alistair campbell yes says everything you need to know right there doesn't it there you go well
01:05:37.480
that's the uni party in action my favorite thing about that is that i so i do sometimes tune into
01:05:42.220
that because i i i read the economist all the time so i'd like to get a i view it as a sort of um very
01:05:48.600
helpful and instructive portal into the centrist liberal dad midwit normie mind to to watch these
01:05:54.600
sorts of things and to read that sort of material and i always look at the comments as well and it's
01:05:58.160
so hilarious when you see people comment things like gosh it's so refreshing to see people who are so
01:06:03.120
politically at odds disagreeing with each other in a really really amiable way i'm
01:06:07.420
like oh my gosh there's a cigarette paper separating those two people yeah jesus christ
01:06:11.520
you know what do they think politics is they'll get gary lineker on as a guest exactly contentious
01:06:16.780
debate again what you're experiencing watching that podcast is the liberal establishment consensus
01:06:22.560
yes being to being fed to you that's what you're experiencing indeed a circle jerk yes sorry is
01:06:28.540
that a bit too no that's fine go for it david gork is making exactly the same point i think he's
01:06:34.220
now actually out of the party but he i guarantee you that he will be regarded as one of the god
01:06:39.660
one of one of the sensible figures on the right by precisely the kinds of people who are the top
01:06:43.920
brass in cchq and he now writes for the new statesman um the tories will keep losing if they
01:06:48.560
chase reform votes my new statesman piece on why a party that needs to recover a reputation for
01:06:53.460
competence and integrity can't win by making big undeliverable and populist promises and it's worth
01:06:59.160
saying here that uh low immigration levels which is obviously what he's referring to there and
01:07:03.440
sort of you know undeliverable promises were somehow possible in the 1990s and this is particularly
01:07:08.500
ironic because the 1990s are regarded by people like david gork as a kind of golden age the early
01:07:13.920
1990s of conservative governance led by sensible centrists like john major john major even wrote a
01:07:19.020
very very um warm what would be the word a very warm review of this book that um that uh david gork
01:07:26.740
rory stewart along with another bunch of wets have written called uh oh that's not it oh there we
01:07:32.320
go there we go called the case for the center right now if we can go down i don't know how to do that
01:07:37.180
you can look at all these tory figures who've made book chapter testimonials contributions to this book
01:07:43.280
and there they all are oh all of these people's um david gork uh key among them but but and john
01:07:50.100
major wrote a very sort of warm review of this book and it's hilarious because by the standards that
01:07:53.620
looking at a police lineup i wish by the standards that people like john major invoke today
01:07:59.980
and people who like john major as well their own sort of 90s paradise was some kind of forthright
01:08:05.740
hellhole in terms of immigration in terms of immigration rates because if you go back how do
01:08:09.680
i go back to the on the slides there we go oh yeah andrew neil versus no one more back oh okay just
01:08:15.560
back to here yeah just look at i mean i mean 1990s doesn't particularly stand out as an era of
01:08:20.100
mass immigration there and yet people like david gork will today say that returning to that is
01:08:24.580
undeliverable when it's the precisely the period that he that he deifies they seem to want the
01:08:29.420
stability and and culture of the early 1990s whilst keeping the insane immigration levels that we have
01:08:38.700
today not seemingly being willfully ignorant uh that the fact that the two are completely
01:08:45.220
incompatible you had michael heseltine on there the lord heseltine and john major as well um these guys
01:08:52.420
are sort of diehard pro-labor guys you think because they're sort of old school tories they're not
01:08:58.900
necessarily sort of bought into the european project but no they are like um kenneth clark as
01:09:05.580
well they're like diehard diehard like as much as blair or anyone pro euro and if they could have had it
01:09:12.500
you know probably open borders and things yeah um but what i think where this guy said you know using
01:09:17.420
populism the word populism as a pejorative is just uh just a dirty word populism i reject all of that
01:09:23.080
nonsense and i'm not having that uh because you can have left and right wing populism can't you can
01:09:27.580
have you can have sort of lefty populism so anyway the word in and of itself isn't isn't a dirty word yes
01:09:33.320
but i think what we're missing these days you know he described it as sort of undeliverable
01:09:37.580
where i was talking in the last segment about sort of geopolitics and sort of post-war and world war
01:09:43.700
ii stuff governments used to have guts they used to have balls they used to have like a vision where
01:09:50.840
we'll change we'll change the game we'll change the way politics is done we'll change the map
01:09:56.020
like we've got we fear nothing yes there's sort of nothing we can't do within reason obviously in the
01:10:03.820
laws of physics yes no we'll do this massive thing which changes the world it changes the course of
01:10:09.580
history no do it they'll do it all the time nowadays nowadays or the idea of putting um using
01:10:15.600
the royal navy to secure the channel well it's not deliverable it's not possible we can't do it
01:10:19.600
exactly come on i like how you compare it to the laws of physics as well because
01:10:22.960
they it means it necessarily means that they if they're saying that uh mass mass immigration rates
01:10:29.100
like the 19 restoring mass immigration rates to levels comparable to the 1990s
01:10:33.620
is on a it's almost as if it's on a par with a kind of climactic weather event that you just
01:10:38.180
for politicians just have to react to this this is just the world we live in it's clearly it's
01:10:41.860
clearly not true these things are eminently controllable and they've been and and and our
01:10:45.700
political classes refuse to control them our politicians are just a completely different
01:10:49.160
class of person now the sort of people that were ruled by are the boring managerial types who
01:10:56.020
in any other life would have been completely unremarkable they're weak cowards they're cowards
01:11:03.740
they're afraid to have a big strong policy that the mainstream media might be angry about yes they're
01:11:10.120
afraid of it they're scared of it they really are so this this idea then that uh that um and again
01:11:15.680
an imaginary lurch of the right was responsible for the was going to be responsible for the conservative
01:11:21.460
party's complete implosion not as much as much of an implosion as some of us might have might have
01:11:25.240
liked it must be said but this was unconvincing even before the election i found this interesting
01:11:29.340
um rory stewart was on the back foot in the face of andrew neil's no nonsense uh questioning um on
01:11:37.320
precisely this point and this is bear in mind this is just before the election a couple of days before
01:11:41.140
and andrew neil asks i think the salient questions to rory stewart who so often gets away with just
01:11:46.000
you know signaling in a way which seems intelligent it doesn't it doesn't actually make detailed points
01:11:52.040
in what way have the tories been too right wing these past five years or so bar the trust interregnum
01:11:59.840
give you that one but that was only five days 45 days in what ways have the tories been too right
01:12:05.100
wing since 2019 i i think my major problem if you forget about uh liz truss is that boris johnson
01:12:13.160
broke what was most precious to me about the conservative party which was a sense of seriousness
01:12:18.260
a sense of integrity i think he was a ludicrous buffoon who was casual with the constitution
01:12:26.360
contemptuous of parliament and generally right wing that's that's that's boris johnson right but you
01:12:35.480
know i being a conservative for me is not just about economic policies it's about a way of viewing the
01:12:42.080
world the way of behaving in the world but i still i mean when i look at the record of that look
01:12:49.200
they're obviously uh in a bad way but this sort of mantra alistair campbell would go along with to
01:12:57.360
to your your partner that this is such a right-wing tory government that it needs to become have you
01:13:03.600
look at it we've already talked taxes at a revel record level that's not very right right wing record
01:13:10.800
public spending well it's not very right wing record immigration record regulation of businesses
01:13:17.140
and life some of that can be right some of that can be wrong it's not a it's not right wing red blue
01:13:25.720
and tooth and claw is it i agree i agree i mean one of the stupid things about this election
01:13:30.540
right there you go then he agrees he completely falls under scrutiny he's such an empty bag i know
01:13:35.520
he's a nothing thing it was all guff like just okay you don't like boris johnson i don't particularly
01:13:40.080
like him either i actually would agree with some of those criticisms about johnson being a cavalier
01:13:43.340
buffoon again for different reasons that he would he would invoke things like prorogation which is
01:13:48.040
actually a perfectly legitimate constitutional device maybe you cynically but it is legitimate
01:13:52.520
but in any case if he agrees then why is he contributing books to chapters titled the case for
01:13:57.280
the center right or as though the you know it makes no sense whatsoever so this was unconvincing
01:14:01.420
why didn't he do anything yeah why didn't he do anything but make the party more left-wing why is
01:14:07.260
he now saying oh we need to go back and make it even more left-wing because it was too right-wing
01:14:12.560
indeed indeed so this was unconvincing this again this is before the election and now it's even more
01:14:18.080
unconvincing now because guess what we actually have dispassionately put together data not just
01:14:23.240
vibes lacking any kind of detail and um i'm going to uh well let me preface this by saying that um
01:14:30.080
the the really unfortunate thing and why the reason why i think this is going to be a phony civil war is
01:14:34.660
that i think this argument made by the stewart types the david gawk types the joe johnson types
01:14:38.800
the penny mordaunt types the jeremy hunt types relics of the cameroon cameron era will have a per even
01:14:44.980
though they're wrong they will have a purchase in within the conservative party because it is no longer
01:14:49.340
duty bound even to pretend to care about the red wall voters they so monumentally betrayed
01:14:54.320
from 2019 onwards and so the red wall collapsed in the election we now have that evidence
01:14:58.600
and so according to a deep dive published recently by focal data i highly recommend that people click
01:15:03.580
on the link um i've been i've embedded it in the in the in the show notes but it should be available
01:15:09.060
afterwards as well uh which goes into all of the kind of demographic data on on what happened um on
01:15:15.940
the fourth of july a couple of weeks ago whenever it was six days ago um so quote quote from that
01:15:22.320
article labor rebuilt the red wall with a vote share of 41 percent despite climbing just three
01:15:28.320
percentage points on their 2019 achievement the party won 37 of the 38 red wall seats with ashfield
01:15:34.920
of course the anderson seat going to reform uk the conservatives lost all 28 red wall seats they won in
01:15:41.100
2019 dropping 24 percentage points in the process and there's the supporting graphic uh undergirding
01:15:46.380
all of that there so that's the red wall and that's now completely gone so the parliamentary voice
01:15:51.060
for people who have to impress and please those voters who are so crucial to the 29 victory
01:15:57.580
now no longer exist in the parliamentary conservative party which is of course very crucial when it comes
01:16:02.840
to deciding new leaders when it comes to deciding new direction of travel um so so that is obviously a
01:16:08.100
concern so this argument that the argument the kind of argument that we would make is not going to have
01:16:11.680
any purchase at all the kind of vague uh platitudes you know um um hoary platitudes wheeled out by david
01:16:19.580
gawk are going to be particularly salient and this is why because if we look turn out of the blue wall
01:16:25.220
uh they and obviously the tories did badly everywhere on the map um they lost seats among the blue wall as
01:16:32.460
well but nowhere near as badly so these mps exactly the kind of people who are going to be more closely
01:16:36.940
aligned with wets from the cameron era like jeremy hunt will be heavily incentivized to make the
01:16:41.580
conservative party even more socially liberal even more um metropolitan and even more globalist at a
01:16:47.040
sort of policy prospectus level and at a kind of personnel level when it comes to just to selecting a
01:16:52.200
future leader and so they these are precisely the kind of people who are going to continue blaming
01:16:56.460
their overwhelming loss on this sort of imaginary lurch to the right i wonder at what point
01:17:02.760
the conservatives if ever um if they go down to you know almost nothing at what point they they will
01:17:10.780
spawn a a new robert peel a new thatcher at what point will they ever win their own heart and soul
01:17:20.120
back i sort of hope they don't um maybe that's just too spiteful but um i wonder if it'll ever happen
01:17:27.280
it's not going to happen in the next leadership race it's not so therefore it won't happen in the next
01:17:32.760
few years at the very very least and so that whatever the outcome of this phony civil war
01:17:37.200
that's underway then whatever the outcome is is not going to be that decisive because that person
01:17:41.540
is not going to to emerge and so who's on the other side of this phony civil war then so we've
01:17:48.240
seen the wets we'll get to it promise all right i mean so well a bravman obviously you've got these
01:17:53.520
people in this party who are who are maybe we have our certain views about how we can get to that in a
01:17:57.800
minute but there are people on the party who sort of code right wing and they are going to try and
01:18:01.900
benefit from this moment as well and whatever suspicions we might have about swella bravman's
01:18:05.740
own personal motive whether she was an effective home secretary or there are all these criticisms
01:18:08.940
which can still be made i grant readily grant that people like um robert jenrich is going to try and
01:18:13.820
make a kind of right-wing immigration restrictionist pitch as well i would suspect but the question is
01:18:17.960
is there any point in having this civil war in the first place i mean who because i think it's
01:18:22.020
foregone conclusion is so set in stone and it's partly because of data like this so i'll just read out
01:18:25.860
quickly because i think we're um sensitive on on time as well so again from from uh focal data again
01:18:33.520
well worth reading the liberal democrats won a majority of blue wall seats with the party picking
01:18:37.960
up 23 of these 43 seats that were won by the conservatives in 2019 labor's vote share 17
01:18:43.940
percent did not move one bit but the party gained nine seats again the story of the night labor is not
01:18:49.260
particularly popular they're benefiting from people staying at home people not voting tory voting reform
01:18:53.380
whatever it might be with the conservatives reduced to just 11 so there are still 11 conservative
01:18:57.420
mps which is you know 10 percent of 11 too many 11 way 11 too many who are going to be
01:19:02.980
wanting to impress these sorts of voters um and um yeah so i think the the the argument that people
01:19:10.860
like stewart and gawk and amber rudd and all these people make is going to have a particular purchase
01:19:15.960
not just because of those 11 mps but but certainly they're going to have more purchase than uh people
01:19:20.980
than um would be the case if there was a kind of huge red wall rump left over um there are some
01:19:26.480
people it must be said rather than just being relentlessly negative who who do seem to get it
01:19:30.680
again the point is it doesn't really matter that much miriam k lost her seats but she put out this
01:19:34.400
on on on x a perfectly shrewd remark the conservative party must be honest about what
01:19:39.220
happened our voters stayed at home or moved to reform that's clearly the lesson of the night
01:19:42.760
they didn't go to labor labor's vote share was not at all impressive the future for the party does
01:19:47.260
not lie in liberalism or progressivism we must be firmly conservative lean into the realignment of
01:19:51.300
2019 at a policy level not just at a personnel johnson loving level if we want to win back our
01:19:56.380
base we also had robert jenrich who i think who did um hold on to a seat and who i imagine is going to
01:20:01.400
try and be precisely that kind of peel figure i'm saying my point is that i don't think he will
01:20:05.840
succeed and i don't think he happens to be that person anyway no who said we have just suffered our
01:20:10.660
worst ever defeat we lost because we failed to deliver the strong economy nhs and border we promised
01:20:15.380
slightly slightly less um uh guns are blazing than than miriam kates to recover we must defend all
01:20:21.580
that we got right while confronting what we got wrong again it's quite corporate ceo type pros and
01:20:26.540
cons stuff but he but he but he does get um the fact that it was a failure to deliver rather than
01:20:32.640
making promises which are overwrought which is what david gawk's trying to say and then obviously
01:20:36.920
no surprise to see that eric kaufman one of the shrewdest observers in the business and a friend both to
01:20:42.340
this show and to the new culture forum perfectly grasped why the tories lost so monumentally he
01:20:46.220
actually um quotes data from this focal data page that i keep saying people should read and they
01:20:50.840
really should um the tories held their remain vote and lost much of their leave vote look at that
01:20:54.580
monumental difference between them holding the remain and a 42 point drop among uh leave voters
01:20:59.800
um astounding that there are still tory voices calling for the party to move to the cultural left
01:21:04.000
exclamation mark that speaks volumes doesn't it it really does it that is the betrayal that people
01:21:10.500
felt yeah just right there totally totally it's interesting leave voters seem to have gone over to
01:21:16.680
reform yes but also to labor yes and that remain voters uh weren't as enthusiastic about labor
01:21:22.380
according to those views that he was putting there as well indeed so there's labor are there for the
01:21:26.900
taking and that's what surprises me about people still seem to like people like suela breverman or
01:21:32.500
preety patel it's like no they were home secretaries and they flooded us with foreign fifth columnists
01:21:39.500
dooming us to a secretarian future well i always something maybe uh nightmarish that was done under
01:21:47.480
preety patel and suela breverman oh they tried it was it was the home office that wouldn't allow them
01:21:51.900
to i don't care no that was your job that was your remit to go to war with them then and you failed
01:21:57.500
well that's what that's the one that i always bring up though suela breverman she may have talked
01:22:02.660
tough when it came to him to actually wrangling all of the people in the home office to do the job
01:22:07.260
that they're paid without tax money for she couldn't do it rishi sunak's massive promise to stop the
01:22:12.980
small boats you didn't stop the small boats in any way shape or form so that's what you get
01:22:18.000
precisely this and and and and that and the the fact that the fact that those are the main reasons for
01:22:24.520
their defeat becomes so obvious when you look at the the map electorally and sort of tease out
01:22:28.720
certain trends so reform uk came second in almost 100 seats across the country it's extraordinary
01:22:33.900
great yeah brilliant roughly two-thirds of lost tory seats had a reform vote larger than the swing
01:22:38.600
away from the conservatives and then matt gudwin also draws out uh many key lessons including this
01:22:43.680
one in a in a in a sub stack post tories lost the working class i'm not going to read all of it
01:22:48.020
but um where was i going to read from i was going to read from but while boris johnson the tories
01:22:52.960
in 2019 won over more than half these voters this year they only won about one in four of them
01:22:56.840
with nigel farage and reform now making major inroads and winning nearly as many indeed across
01:23:01.000
europe blah blah blah the tories in other words are back to being a party that is most successful
01:23:05.280
here we go among the economically secure middle class having lost the earlier unique opening among
01:23:10.500
the working class this does not bode well for the party's future given labors and also the lib
01:23:15.100
dems and greens appeal to middle class graduate liberals and at the other end of the spectrum nigel
01:23:18.920
farage's strong appeal to the working class this competition for working class votes will be a
01:23:23.760
major point of debate among the looming battle for the future of the british right but as we've
01:23:26.820
discovered precisely the kind of people who are left over in that parliamentary rump have every reason
01:23:30.920
to chase those sort of labor voters those lib dem voters and those green voters and they're going to
01:23:35.960
sort of turn up their nose at farage voters and they're unlikely to to to um be willing to fight a
01:23:41.960
civil war on their behalf and within a party let's put it that way it's the net result of all of this
01:23:45.860
uh kimmy badenock yes she's so she is well i haven't i'm not i wasn't going to mention her here
01:23:52.960
because she sort of warrants uh special treatment because she's a very strange one because she's one
01:23:57.600
of those people along with suele braverman i would say who kind of codes right wing but should be
01:24:02.860
uh suspected i actually think she's more suspicious than braverman i think braverman is a little bit
01:24:06.840
more sincere though potentially ineffective and uh uh focusing on braverman for the sure so focusing on
01:24:13.720
braverman for the moment i'll just uh truncate this a bit so no doubt with her eyes on the tory
01:24:18.580
leadership contest suele braverman has now declared kind of an all-out war having won her
01:24:22.600
seat she is called on the tories to abandon quote unquote liberal conservatism and rustle up a quote
01:24:27.300
credible offer for the voters they lost to reform uk so she gets it at a kind of electoral level and
01:24:33.140
she even said in a recent natcon speech at which both uh carl benjamin and connor tomlinson of course
01:24:37.540
present at the moment we tory ministers nominally in charge of the system completely failed the progress
01:24:42.020
flag flew over our buildings as if they were occupied territory i wanted to scrap the unconscious bias
01:24:45.980
training which basically taught people how bad and racist britain was i was told that i was on the
01:24:49.340
wrong side of history by my senior civil servant i don't say this to boast or curry favor with you
01:24:52.900
as an audience but to start to confess my failure i couldn't even get the flag of a horrible political
01:24:56.420
campaign i disagree with taken down from the roof of the government department i was supposed to be in
01:25:00.280
charge of so she's all out declaring war and she's clearly eyeing up a kind of at the level of
01:25:06.260
rhetoric at least maybe at the level of substance as well sort of right wing takeover of the
01:25:10.660
conservative party but the point is i don't think this is going to happen that's a bit weak isn't
01:25:13.680
it yeah that's very weak it's disingenuous i couldn't yeah you could you could have fired
01:25:17.200
your top dick pass just because the guardian and probably the mail would say oh this is she's gone
01:25:22.600
too far and uh who they think they're they're a tyranny no she could have grabbed the home office by
01:25:28.300
the scruff of the neck and forced the government's policy through she didn't do it she didn't do it
01:25:33.360
and i don't think she'll get a second chance either and this is the point i love that the message
01:25:38.820
seems to be support me i failed yeah if you want strong leadership don't look for me because i'm
01:25:45.200
bad at this meanwhile of course and you know the reason why i think even if she were to have a
01:25:49.300
second chance well she's not even going to get a second chance at succeeding is that both as i'm
01:25:53.940
sure viewers will know karl benjamin and conor thompson have recently been suspended for the
01:25:58.040
conservative party so they seem intent seriously on learning all of the wrong lessons i don't think
01:26:02.060
suella braverman's bid whether we think it's sincere or not is going to have any kind of purchase so
01:26:06.960
i think that this stuff is a gift to any truly patriotic movement aiming to supplant the tories
01:26:11.380
over the next uh five years uh in my view though the conservative party is an irredeemable political
01:26:16.100
organism certainly not certainly not worth fighting a civil war for there's nothing to be salvaged
01:26:20.040
and once this phony civil war is over we should waste no time devoting our energy towards more
01:26:24.720
productive pursuits and indeed if necessary towards more productive infighting based wonderful i will just
01:26:30.900
point out regarding the carl and connor thing it's been pointed out by others but just have it on record on
01:26:35.380
here i think what might have really done it in for both of them carl especially was calling that
01:26:40.540
the party that they were members of get zero seats that might might have done connor fair to him
01:26:50.460
but calling for destruction of your own party might be why they might have worked a few people down at
01:26:58.460
cchq yeah and let's try and get through these video comments as quickly as possible then
01:27:03.760
pressure points to release the sinus headaches the congestion maybe eye strain take your power
01:27:25.480
fingers bring them to the inner corners of your eyebrows let your head hang off of them it might
01:27:32.940
feel sore once it's less sore keep moving your fingers along the inner bottom ridge until you are
01:27:41.160
at the outer corner where you drag your fingers down behind your ear down your neck and now see how you
01:27:48.760
feel so that was pressure points to relieve um headaches and so i think that was an excuse to
01:27:56.000
flip us off half a minute i actually have had sinusitis once which is a an infection of the sinus it was
01:28:02.520
my upper sinus which is a lot smaller and uh it was terrible so anything that can help with
01:28:07.540
relieving sinus pressure some people out there it was like someone was trying to burrow out of my
01:28:12.140
head some of the worst pains i've ever had um so i actually appreciate any advice on that
01:28:16.700
oh there you go give that a try next time yeah let's go to cs hey this is a request to carl and
01:28:22.160
or connor when you get onto timcast irl can you make sure that he reads my super chat because i spent a
01:28:29.160
lot of money on super chats to that guy and he never bloody reads them and my meme must infect his show
01:28:36.100
come on guys don't be greedy and keep me all to yourselves
01:28:40.160
one personal note directly from me to mr cooper
01:28:45.020
is um i'm working on polishing one of my novels for him it will take weeks more yet but hey there
01:28:51.120
you go if you're watching you can be published by the end of the year
01:28:54.620
on cape breton island lies the village of lewisborg which in the 18th century held a large fort and
01:29:02.840
harbor from which the french raided new england shipping earning it the name the american dunkirk
01:29:07.900
lewisborg was captured by new england colonial forces during king george's war the american
01:29:13.060
theater of the war of austrian succession which was returned to france in the highly contentious
01:29:17.880
treaty of isla chapelle from madras in india souring british american relations and instigating ideas of
01:29:24.200
independence very interesting tidbit there if anyone's interested i do have an epochs episode all
01:29:29.820
about clive clive of india where that gets mentioned that exact thing gets mentioned that our
01:29:34.900
carnatic wars in india and we're trading off stuff with france uh very interesting if complicated bit
01:29:39.640
of history i went to a castle in wales last year i forget which one it is but it's got the full
01:29:44.160
display of everything that clive of india brought back with him oh right okay in wales yes in wales
01:29:49.660
is really interesting so i'd recommend if you look that up i can't remember the name of the castle but
01:29:54.660
it was a really good castle as well when i worked for the council i learned that the very tips of
01:30:00.400
wind turbine blades go supersonic which really messes with bats but they built them anyway when
01:30:06.780
we were buying a house we almost bought one with bats in the loft until we learned that we would
01:30:11.200
effectively be entering into a contract with the bats because they owned the loft in perpetuity if
01:30:17.100
there are bats there they own the place you're merely a tenant and you can't play loud music or turn
01:30:22.180
the light on up there without it being an actual crime bloody hell interesting but yeah there's all
01:30:28.340
sorts of laws in place about bats it's funny she said yeah it's absolutely true um if you find bats
01:30:33.840
if you're trying to buy a property and there's bats in it walk away look for something else it's just
01:30:38.400
going to be a pain in the arse too much trouble forever yeah you can't screw with bats in this country
01:30:43.440
i live in a town in ontario that has complained of having its pride crossing vandalized
01:30:50.220
in the build-up to june the local authorities took it upon themselves to repaint the crossing with the
01:30:55.120
progress pride markings not satisfied with that they also dug up and resurfaced the crossing only
01:31:01.200
before laying down the paint notably this is the only time i've known a roan to be closed and reopened
01:31:06.480
for work precisely on schedule well predictably within days it had been defaced and only a few days
01:31:12.320
into july and we're right back where we started however this is a notable climb down
01:31:20.960
well the pride flag okay there's the pride flag the rainbow flag okay right but then those other
01:31:27.940
chevron shaped colors aren't some of those about intergenerational love i.e pedophilia
01:31:34.180
like the light blue and the light pink i thought the light blue and the light pink i'm pretty certain
01:31:40.500
is the trans flag okay and some of the colors do represent though like intergenerational love is
01:31:46.240
love on that father there might be some variations but i know the the blue and the pink is trans and
01:31:53.100
the other colors have nothing to do with sexuality whatsoever it's just here's black and brown people
01:31:58.720
as well right for some for some reason just shoehorn anything you want in there now yeah pretty much
01:32:04.560
on the subject of labor not having a long lifespan because they don't have a popular mandate i have
01:32:12.760
to observe that the communists took over russia without a popular mandate either and maintain power
01:32:18.720
for 70 years simply through brute power politics labor could accomplish this pretty well just by you
01:32:26.000
know jailing all of their main opponents releasing all the actual criminals amnestying all the illegals and
01:32:31.940
importing another billion for good measure yeah it's actually remarkable when you look at what
01:32:37.680
lenin did after the the um october stroke november revolution it's i mean that is ballsy we talk about
01:32:44.680
governments having balls it's just kind of crazy it's just like yeah just send men to just take that
01:32:50.360
building and hold it and that one and that one now all comers see if you can take it off of us out of
01:32:57.180
our cold dead hands nobody could brutal that's it brutal three years of a war yeah
01:33:01.600
yeah i have a simple question do you guys think we will have a world war three and that question
01:33:09.220
comes from one place not from geopolitics because you could examine that all day and say yes or no
01:33:15.200
but from a psychological perspective to think that we almost expect there to be a world war three
01:33:21.320
is like a self-fulfilling prophecy that we will that we must and i don't like the idea that we must
01:33:28.080
but it seems to be the case a couple things i'll say one i think the cold war and the remnants of it
01:33:36.820
that we still deal with now is world war three in one sense there's not world war three as in
01:33:41.940
massed tank divisions and nuclear exchanges there's all different types of war and i think also another
01:33:47.540
thing to say another angle on that is that maybe in the next generation or now going into the next
01:33:52.560
generation the mass migrations we've seen into into the west particularly and america and australia
01:33:58.640
and something that will have some appalling fallout eventually and again not massed divisions of men
01:34:05.460
not massed tank columns or nuclear bombs or anything but there'll be a type of world war that will maybe
01:34:11.500
end in a some type of a world war three i don't think i don't think the big powers will nuke each other
01:34:17.680
or at least not in the in the near future anyway i can't really say all i can say is that i hope it
01:34:24.100
doesn't yeah fingers crossed our our leaders are frankly uh insane so i worry there was a time when
01:34:34.380
england faithfully obeyed the lord and we were put far above the nations with our glorious empire
01:34:38.760
now we do not obey the lord and well we labor in vain our food is fake and we don't know what a woman
01:34:45.400
is anymore so if we were putting together a 10 point manifesto for cultural change in this nation
01:34:50.780
then uh let's keep god at the middle of it otherwise the work is in vain
01:34:59.820
oh there we go uh we're a little over time samson what say he to a quick extension so we can read
01:35:09.100
a few of the comments all right we can do a few so i'm going to say i'm going to read some of these
01:35:17.640
ones and we'll go three each for the segments so uh some of the general comments that have been left
01:35:23.580
have been a few people jamie lovey reese sim saying that they've received their islander magazine today
01:35:28.900
in the post and they're really liking it they're impressed with the aesthetics and the actual quality
01:35:33.220
of the articles so really glad to hear that those who've received it so far and enjoying it um
01:35:38.220
people saying that we've got a great lineup today i certainly agree with you i'll go on to my segment
01:35:43.700
nagubu nationalism chris damms don't forget that while women were winning the euros the media especially
01:35:49.560
the bbc were crying because there weren't any black players well that just goes to show the real
01:35:54.520
priorities doesn't it from an account strangely titled harry and josh are in a secret relationship
01:36:01.300
i didn't realize we were keeping it a secret a few black people are a good start but i don't see
01:36:06.480
any disabled representation on the english team exceedingly disappointing well we're going to
01:36:10.660
need to shape that up perhaps for the next euros no wheelchair users in the first team it's not on
01:36:15.660
really is it someone should be fired i know it's absolutely terrible and uh harry eating a kfc bargain
01:36:23.640
bucket all by himself i think that's bolsonaro pilled right there oh yeah saying so mass migration is
01:36:29.700
bringing us more goals more turkish barbers and more kebab shops that's a dino's dream right there
01:36:35.340
that's right we're living the dino dream dino maxi is the dino's world and we're just living it
01:36:42.080
the dino doesn't require those people to be citizens and on kebab shops you don't need to import the
01:36:46.000
people the recipes are available online this is this is true but the dino doesn't really understand
01:36:51.360
any of that he lives in blissful ignorance if explained to him as long as it's there as long as
01:36:55.800
it's there for him and he's happy uh would you like to read some of your comments if you wouldn't
01:37:01.160
mind go ahead well do you want to uh okay okay let's i've got it okay okay um cynthia paul says
01:37:11.580
completely agree with bow on the subject of nato oh all right i thought i'd get really bad pushback
01:37:15.580
maybe i still will in my view oh thanks for that in my view all nato and especially usa and uk seem to
01:37:22.220
have been done seem to have done in the past 30 to 40 years is to poke their noses into other
01:37:26.320
people's business and cause a lot of death and destruction by all the wars nato has perpetrated
01:37:30.940
there's definitely been a shift in the in the uh sorts of discussions been had about nato since
01:37:36.540
this conflict started so one or two things nato have done which are just sort of undeniably good
01:37:41.080
they have done some humanitarian things just flat out just straight up humanitarian things so you can't
01:37:47.700
blame them for that but still that sort of one percent goodness versus 99 and it's also nevertheless
01:37:52.720
proof of an expansion of their remit yeah yeah and still that quite right quite right uh jjwh says
01:37:58.980
nato has been uh largely demilitarized by giving their weapons to ukraine um they have very low stocks
01:38:05.940
of 155 millimeter shells for example given the lack of manufacturing capability it will take a very long
01:38:11.580
time to restock probably a decade also the quality of troops has markedly declined i have a friend who is
01:38:17.360
currently on a base in the m east oh right in the middle east as a contractor and he's appalled at
01:38:23.860
how far things have fallen well yeah quick thing to say about that a lot of people have said and i
01:38:27.400
probably agree that um lots of material we've given to ukraine was it was a deliberate thing it's
01:38:33.360
so that they can restock with new stuff it's so that they they have their budgets we we need to spend
01:38:39.500
loads more money on all new stuff because we've given away all our stuff it's a deliberate gambit so
01:38:43.960
they can keep their budgets higher and renew all their stuff they're basically giving ukraine all
01:38:49.340
the old crap sort of thing very deliberately um but that thing about shells yeah uh manufacturing
01:38:56.240
shells particularly how it's 145 millimeter ones yeah i've seen that in a number of places
01:39:00.440
that there's a dearth of shells we're not manufacturing enough shells but still we don't we're probably not
01:39:06.420
going to get into a total war where we need kind of an endless supply of artillery shells if we did we
01:39:14.620
might be in trouble but anyway um you and baker says ah nato 75 and this is very much riddled with
01:39:20.680
dementia and needs putting down yeah i mean that's sort of yeah if i was master of the world i would
01:39:26.460
just end nato i would end i would say to putin look we're not taking our eye off of you and we'll use
01:39:32.740
the u.s army or the british army or the german army or whatever if you if you get out of line
01:39:37.380
too badly but we don't need nato don't need it anyway should i read a couple yes absolutely um
01:39:43.380
i couldn't agree more with what based ape has to say uh internet blood sports need to become a
01:39:49.040
year-long module for politics students you can't graduate until you can tell me what ali da is proud
01:39:54.420
of and what is in voucher's tax folder now i must say i totally agree with
01:39:58.500
but i totally agree with that the youtube is much more radicalizing than the textbooks they
01:40:02.800
rustle up these days honestly i don't know what ali dawa is proud of can anybody fill me in i think
01:40:07.780
that's part of what's radicalizing oh because i can i can tell you what is in voucher's tax folder
01:40:12.400
because that was big news on twitter a few months ago californian refugees so to clarify the lesson
01:40:17.400
the tories took away from this election is that they lost because they were not left-wing enough yes
01:40:20.500
that is precisely the lesson the higher-ups seem to be making and it's the one that's going to inform
01:40:23.860
this phony civil war and is going to seal it for that side in my view can i ask you one thing real
01:40:28.800
quick is gove still the force to be reckoned with in the background is he sort of the kingmaker still
01:40:33.780
going to be in the future he certainly certainly likes to think of himself in that way and and
01:40:37.780
and kemi badenoch is his is his protege and uh yeah and she's doing quite well in terms of
01:40:43.660
odds makers of course um and finally a very poetic comment from thomas howe uh howe labor did not
01:40:51.380
rebuild the red wall they just walked over the remnants that's very true yes absolutely and
01:40:55.520
that's all the time that we've got thank you very much for sticking with us in this overtime so um
01:41:00.160
we'll see how england does in the semi-finals today fingers crossed yeah fingers crossed for
01:41:04.940
everybody because i don't want to spoil everybody's fun i just want to uh let everybody know that they
01:41:09.340
are propagandizing you but you already know that anyway we'll see you again tomorrow stick around
01:41:13.460
for tomlinson talks later take care and goodbye