00:04:15.540oh maybe go back so we can get a better hearing of that
00:04:20.980would you like me to i can do it it's not responding but it will
00:04:31.060could we please play this video this is twitter problems now let's see
00:04:39.460i think we can see the quote of what she said there if we yeah if we refresh it maybe then
00:04:43.380i think our reverence for the truth might become might have become a bit of a distraction that is
00:04:50.580preventing us from finding consensus and getting important things done exactly so reverence for the
00:04:56.980truth is preventing us from getting things done and from finding a consensus how does this sound
00:05:02.900this sounds like a completely foreign and alien perspective to me as far back as you can look the
00:05:07.940west has always had a sort of reverence for truth which has aided it well in the past and
00:05:13.060this is very modern thinking what do you think jess i don't know i don't think it is alien at least
00:05:19.700to me because for example i'm at university at the moment and i understand with like scientific
00:05:25.380debate in political science there are different claims and there are different you know facts
00:05:30.820there are different assumptions and so you have to be skeptical about that but it goes a bit further
00:05:35.700we're taught to question everything but there's no straight down facts and there's rarely any focus
00:05:40.340of facts but this does remind me of i think it must have been ages ago but i don't know if you remember
00:05:45.780aoc saying it's more important to be morally right and actually care about the facts like this has been
00:05:51.300going on for a while but now it's no longer just like a rabid leftist politician and now it's just
00:05:57.140anyone nowadays i mean this is the ceo of npr so is a rabid leftist saying such things but that's
00:06:02.980interesting as well that you consider that well that's the ceo of npr that's a news organization so
00:06:08.100what does that say about the veracity of news reported on npr are you going to trust it perhaps
00:06:12.740that there are disinformation experts perhaps but one thing to say about what you said jess is that
00:06:19.220it's really terrifying how people are dissociating moral rightness from facts what aoc said is
00:06:25.860absolutely terrifying and we always want consensus because society wouldn't function otherwise but the
00:06:33.620question is there are how are we going to discern between better and worse consent forms of consensus
00:06:42.820and without talking about facts we can't have a good consensus so um let's go to this fellow here
00:06:51.700thierry breton who is an unelected eu bureaucrat he sent a very interesting post to elon musk right before
00:07:02.180elon musk stage the interview with donald trump but before we talk about this analytically i want us
00:07:09.940to look at what he says in the very beginning with great audience comes greater responsibility because
00:07:16.100to me this seems exactly a very narcissistic way of going about things for the following reason first of
00:07:23.700all it is true it is a general principle that i think is true the greater audience gives people
00:07:32.020greater power and with great power comes great responsibility as a once great sage said but
00:07:38.020what is interesting is that he doesn't apply to himself has he applied it to himself has he applied
00:07:43.380it to mainstream media has he applied it that to the eu that is constantly promoting open border
00:07:49.540policies that no one wants it appears he has not so that's what seems to me absolutely narcissistic what
00:07:57.140do you think ladies first well i was just gonna say with great power of great an audience comes great
00:08:05.220responsibility again they do have their sets of moral values and they do have their moral standards and you can see this in the uk with the current protests and riots
00:08:13.140how you know they just seem to ignore the fact that three girls three young girls were murdered that seems to be brushed over that fact
00:08:23.140whereas they can discuss you know the so-called riots going on the anger that people feel that's dismissed
00:08:29.140and then you compare that to something like black lives matter i know this point is made a million times
00:08:33.140but it's important to reiterate how there is that double standard and again they just pick and choose facts
00:08:38.980and they think that someone like nigel farage for example is being irresponsible with his audience when
00:08:46.500or like elon musk for example raising awareness of freedom of speech whereas they're raising awareness of
00:08:52.100issues that are important to them i think free speech is a very important issue and the same when it comes to
00:08:58.340terrorist incidents or the effects of mass immigration i think these are important things to raise awareness
00:09:04.660of and so to say they're being irresponsible just shows how far away they can't visualize our morality
00:09:12.260they can't see our point of view but narcissists make it all about the responsibilities of the other
00:09:18.740side of the deal it's the other framework isn't it it's funny because you hear like um like humzy uses for
00:09:26.500example is gaslighting people um around like calling elon musk a race beta when hamzy use is calling
00:09:34.420people you know saying whiteness is a bad thing again he's hideously furious that scotland is a white
00:09:39.780country yeah with the principle of with great audience comes great responsibility i do actually
00:09:44.900think that there is some legitimacy to that but the fact is that the european commission the eu
00:09:49.140tiara breton all of these people are using their own power and response in an irresponsible way because
00:09:55.380elon musk has at least been trying to highlight acts of gross misconduct on the form of the two-tier
00:10:01.460policing system within the uk the way that the you british people are being mistreated by their own
00:10:07.300governments and the european commission and the eu are turning around and saying no no no no no no
00:10:12.260you don't get to talk about that you've got a big audience what you've got to do is tell our line
00:10:16.820you've got to promote our narrative whether or not it has any basis in truth exactly and you will see
00:10:23.380that he is also talking about public security never asking the question whether the open borders
00:10:29.860policies of the eu are promoting situations where europeans feel less safe it's not about his
00:10:37.780responsibility it's always about the responsibility of the people now um brussels has accused its
00:10:45.300internal market commissioner of going rogue by sending a letter to elon musk threatening punishment if
00:10:50.340content posted on social media was found to place eu citizens at risk of serious harm and they said
00:10:57.700that this is possibly election interference because he was directly talking about donald trump now we
00:11:04.420have here an interesting free speech uh union article that it says it may be true that the commissioner's
00:11:10.660decision to send the letter was made without wider consent within the commission but the argument still
00:11:16.340seems like a weak excuse given that as internal market chief breton is fully empowered to oversee
00:11:22.660enforcement of the dsa this is the digital services act that he has overseen and can communicate with
00:11:28.900companies who fall subject to the new rules independently the commission spokesman also confirmed what
00:11:33.780breton said in the letter namely that the ongoing investigation against x into whether it violates the dsa
00:11:40.580relying too much free speech will take into account the restitution of donald trump's account
00:11:46.820suspended after january 6th so it's obvious what they're trying to do it's obvious that they are
00:11:53.300trying to prevent donald trump from winning the presidency it is interesting though there seems to
00:11:58.500be at least some disagreement within the eu regarding this seeing as they were very quick to disavow the
00:12:04.260original statement yes but the question is whether this disagreement is just a virtue signaling
00:12:09.300one and whether it is or and whether it's going to translate into action well well i wonder if the
00:12:15.540eu is beginning to consider that maybe it's not the best idea to pick a fight with the richest man in the
00:12:20.020world well he has a habit of picking a fight with elon musk and he has apparently a habit of sending
00:12:27.940weirdly sounding tweets this was from last may may 26th of 2023 he wrote twitter lives eu voluntary code of
00:12:36.980practice against disinformation but obligations remain you can run but you can't hide beyond voluntary
00:12:43.060commitments fighting disinformation will be legal obligation under dsa as of august 25 our teams will
00:12:49.940be ready for enforcement now this doesn't seem to me to be the kind of post or message that a
00:12:59.060politic political actor is supposed to send this seems to me to be personal who writes you can run
00:13:06.900but you can't hide yeah when has that been ever used by the good guy in a movie well again to me this
00:13:12.980all comes across as um all but no bite due to the fact that they have two problems when it comes to
00:13:19.940trying to persecute elon musk number one which is the more personal problem that all politicians of
00:13:25.300the west have which is that he owns twitter and if they want to ban twitter in their own countries or do
00:13:31.220things to smack twitter down they're all addicted to it so i don't think that they would like a world
00:13:37.220without twitter because they can't help but either try to grandstand to the crowd or more often more
00:13:43.940likely humiliate themselves because i'm almost certain that the uk the uk politicians at least
00:13:49.300have some kind of sick humiliation fetish and number two elon musk is highly highly integrated into
00:13:56.660the u.s governmental power structure with all of the government contracts that his own companies
00:14:02.260particularly space x have which are in the multi billions of dollars and so the u the eu being
00:14:08.980mainly made up of u.s vassal states might have trouble from the u.s side if they were to truly do
00:14:15.460anything against musk at the moment right let's switch continent now because it isn't just in europe
00:14:21.140it's also in brazil now i'm going to talk about allegations i'm not going to present these as facts but
00:14:26.420i'm going to talk about the allegations from both sides so you can see here a very interesting thread
00:14:31.620by mario nofal he's talking about the attempt in brazil allegations about brazilian authorities trying
00:14:40.260to crack down on free speech and twitter and asking elon musk to censor some posts and some accounts and
00:14:48.740also infiltrate also let's say change the algorithm in order to propagate their message and elon musk on
00:14:58.340the other side is saying that this platform is being asked to sense to censor content in brazil
00:15:03.860whether where the censorship demands requires to violate brazilian law that is not right so i don't
00:15:10.100know exactly what is going on but the same things that are happening in the eu and the same accusations and
00:15:16.500requests made from elon musk in the eu are really similar with those made in brazil they're not just
00:15:25.220in brazil here we have mark cuban who went on john stewart to complain about elon musk and x but ended up
00:15:31.780being an advertisement for why people should be on x now i'm not going to play it play it if you want we
00:15:37.300have the links on our website but they said some things that i think really require discussion so first
00:15:43.860of all they said that elon musk is irresponsible because he's calling for civil war i think that
00:15:50.100this is a very disingenuous claim to make this is actual disinformation this is the worst interpretation
00:15:58.100of a claim that people can make because they routinely do not distinguish between warnings and
00:16:05.140threats you could say for instance if you're promoting really unpopular policies you're censoring the
00:16:13.460population that is against these policies and you're creating a sectarian society where there is
00:16:20.340rising violence yeah that's not gonna end well when you say this it doesn't mean that you want this
00:16:25.940to happen it means that you don't want this to happen and you want people who promote these
00:16:30.180multiculturalist policies to stop promoting them so that was absolutely disingenuous but what is
00:16:35.780interesting is that they double down again on this narcissistic theme of constantly asking other
00:16:44.020people to be responsible without them being responsible they're saying he's the richest man in
00:16:48.260the world yes he probably is he has tremendous power due to twitter yes he does but they never ask
00:16:57.780the same about mainstream media and they say also that for instance it's roughly 20 percent of the people in
00:17:03.940in the u.s who has access into twitter eighty percent don't enter twitter they say but they are watching
00:17:12.980mainstream media so the question is if someone if alternative platforms are gaining power why not try
00:17:20.260to listen to the people so you solve the legitimacy issue and and let's say improve mainstream media so
00:17:28.260people are going to think that they are legitimate once again they're not they're not interested in
00:17:34.820assuming any kind of responsibility they're not interested into looking at into thinking that they
00:17:40.580owe uh obligations to the people they're supposed to represent they're always blaming the other side
00:17:47.860even when they have tremendous power themselves and i think we should show precisely how this happens in
00:17:55.140terms of legislation and we have here three hate speech laws no four hate speech laws which is the irish
00:18:03.300the scottish the canadian and the digital services act and i'm not going to bore you with details but
00:18:10.820i'm going to show you that especially in the irish one we see a lot of patterns replicated in all of them
00:18:18.740and there's a push towards subjectivity now the problem with subjectivity is that it gives it opens
00:18:25.780the door to arbitrary authority because whenever we're it's one thing to say obviously yeah incitement
00:18:31.140to violence and and harm is to be prosecuted and understand violence and harm in a physical sense
00:18:40.420that's objective we understand what that is much better than if we talk about harm and violence in a
00:18:46.820psychological sense where everyone can say i'm offended therefore i have been psychologically
00:18:52.020harmed so what they're doing is they're trying to open through legislation the door to arbitrary
00:18:58.180authority they're trying to portray to introduce a psychological notion of harm and say that the
00:19:05.540government has the responsibility to tackle down psychological harm and psychological harm is whatever
00:19:13.300people want it to be and it's whatever people in power want it to be well they they take their new
00:19:21.300remit the government's new remit is almost exclusively dealing with psychological harm which is as you
00:19:27.620mentioned completely up in the air as to what that actually means does it mean that you're a little bit
00:19:31.940upset did it mean that you got a little bit offended does it mean that you have lifelong psychological
00:19:37.220trauma from now on and you won't be able to sleep the same and you'll be waking up in cold sweats
00:19:43.140they take that as a much more important duty than actually policing physical harm that comes across
00:19:48.500people unless as we saw over the riots over the past few weeks that right that that harm is being
00:19:54.740committed by particular kinds of people yes because the number one priority of the of the police or of
00:20:01.540the state as far as the police is concerned is to not be called racist well i mean if you in in the uk
00:20:07.780even in london a few years ago maybe back in 2017 i think there was an admission from the metropolitan
00:20:13.300police that they just didn't have enough officers and detectives to follow up on all of the murders
00:20:18.260that are going on in london and that's probably been worse been made worse since then um so it's much
00:20:24.340much much easier to get um the new spate of police officers tiny women uh who are naturally inclined to
00:20:31.460being busy bodies to spend all of their time trawling through people's twitter accounts and
00:20:35.700arresting them for that than it is to get them to go out and you know kick doors in and arrest hardened
00:20:41.060criminals and murderers no offense jess no absolutely i do wonder how much of the police are actually you
00:20:48.740know okay with this compared to how much of it is like the legislative measures and the executive
00:20:55.940and just governments in general like how many police officers are actually wanting to you know
00:21:01.940restore justice it can't be good for them it can't be good for people who you know when you sign up to
00:21:06.820the job i'm sure there are some means like you are to protect the community and i i don't want this
00:21:12.740narrative that all police officers are just like woke small women i don't think that's obviously true
00:21:18.900and so i bet that's so demoralizing for them as well to enforce that but again like what can they do
00:21:23.780well i saw a clip recently which was one of the classic ones a police officer speaking to a woman
00:21:28.740who was standing outside of an abortion center silently praying in her own head and he issued
00:21:33.460her some kind of um fine for causing disorder some public order offense for standing around there
00:21:40.580despite the fact that she said she'd already been arrested twice for it and was basically told that
00:21:44.980okay it is legal for you to do that i don't think it's a good situation where you should be
00:21:48.420allowed to silently pray in your own head but either way he did that which seems to be against
00:21:54.340the priors that have been set by the other arrests and i was sat there watching this video going is this
00:21:59.380what you signed up to the police for is this what you do you think that you are aiding the community
00:22:05.460in persecuting this one woman who's standing by an abortion center praying in her own head
00:22:11.220is that justice i think essentially what is happening here is that they're pushing not for a ministry
00:22:17.300of truth but a ministry of emotion it's going to be filled with bureaucrats who are going to decide
00:22:23.860for instance who has been offended and who has been psychologically harmed or not and this isn't they
00:22:30.340they don't care about facts they just care about a consensus and that means their multiculturalist
00:22:36.020consensus and here we can see in the irish hate speech law you can see here this is page 13 out
00:22:43.380of 40 in the document again we have all of the links there they say offense of preparing or possessing
00:22:49.620material likely to incite violence or hatred against persons on account of the protected characteristics
00:22:56.420which means you don't even have to disseminate something you mean you merely have to possess which
00:23:02.580also raises an interesting question how do they know if you possess something but haven't circulated
00:23:09.780it and be careful with your phone's meme folders be very very careful with the memes that you have
00:23:15.220saved i have to go and delete yeah and just look at what they're doing in order to make things even
00:23:20.420more arbitrary they're introducing another clause clause 11 there that says protection of freedom of
00:23:27.060expression for the purposes of this part any material or behavior is not taken to incite violence
00:23:32.420or hatred against a person or a group of persons on account of the protected characteristics
00:23:37.620or any of those characteristics solely on the basis that that material or behavior includes or involves
00:23:44.180discussion or criticism of matters relating to a protected characteristic as if anyone is going to
00:23:50.580take this seriously because it's not about who is going to say well i understand the criticism and not
00:23:58.100say that the criticism is hate speech that's exactly what they're doing so essentially what they're
00:24:02.900doing is they're basically gaslighting so yeah so if i criticize certain communities on the basis of
00:24:09.140crime statistics for instance is that going to be legitimate criticism or is that going to be hate
00:24:13.460speech well it depends upon the arbitrary whims of the bureaucrats who are members of the ministry of emotion
00:24:22.500here we have the same thing you can check also about the hate crime in scotland and then the monster
00:24:28.660the scottish monster initiative we also have bill c 63 in canada intruders canada that is very censorious
00:24:36.100and again it introduces clause all that are very subjective and here we have the dsa it's a it's a very long
00:24:44.900document here what you can do is you can go on the search bar type hate speech and it's going to show
00:24:50.500you the pages where it has hate speech again what the dsa does is it says that online platforms must
00:24:57.780conform to hate speech laws so for instance if you're in ireland dsa says that people and accounts
00:25:03.860in ireland must conform to the irish hate speech law so we have here the public feud over platform x comes
00:25:13.220at a time when disinformation and deep fakes have helped to fuel political discord and an outbreak of
00:25:18.900uk writing again again again there is this focus on the accounts and the rhetoric of a few people
00:25:29.540and there is zero focus on the policies that are introducing these these sectarianism
00:25:38.740into our societies it's like people who are saying well i don't want you to gasp for oxygen
00:25:44.740while they're depriving the room you are in of oxygen that's exactly what what they're doing
00:25:52.500and why why are they doing this because they want they are not interested in using mainstream media to
00:26:00.500do anything other but promote their multiculturalist narrative they don't think they're responsible they
00:26:07.700don't think they're accountable to the people they claim to represent but they do want to maintain
00:26:11.860the illusion that they represent these people here we have a collection of the negative headlines from
00:26:16.100the trump and elon spaces you see all of them are ultra biased as you would expect one of my favorite
00:26:22.100things about this if you look at this one in the top left here trump rambles slurs his way through
00:26:26.580elon musk interview it was an unmitigated disaster um the new tactic that has seemed to be affected by
00:26:34.420leftists both online and in the mainstream media seems to be that they're trying to pull a biden on
00:26:40.660trump and suggest that oh oh trump's looking really old oh he's slurring his way through
00:26:45.540oh do you think he's got dementia guys do you think he might be not fit for office
00:26:49.540as if it's going to work for anybody who actually listens to donald trump talk and compare it with
00:26:55.620joe biden only a few also question where is joe biden i know apparently he made an appearance
00:27:00.900a few days ago but this man is technically still in charge of the u.s right technically
00:27:06.980tech technically but i noticed this as well what's what's trending here hashtag harris waltz
00:27:13.540landslide 2024 now that's some wishful thinking going on yeah right there whoever whoever decided
00:27:19.540that was going to be a hashtag they've got dementia as well perhaps that's what biden's doing now he's in
00:27:24.100charge all the astroturf memes about kamala harris being like so brass and everything
00:27:28.580oh she didn't fall out of a coconut tree i know that he should give the ronald reagan response to
00:27:34.900walter mondale in the 1984 i'm not familiar where he said where everyone was asking in the first debate
00:27:42.580whether ronald reagan was uh fit enough to to be a president and he he said basically i'm not going to
00:27:51.460make age an issue of this campaign i'm not going to um what did he say i'm not going to take advantage
00:28:00.980of my opponent's youth and inexperience yeah so that's quite good he said it more eloquently than
00:28:06.340that i think you should give the william f bookley response that he gave to gore vidal yeah so last
00:28:12.740thing where all this is leading to this is leading to the ministry of emotion and to arbitrary governance
00:28:19.860to destroy the idea of citizenship to destroy and habituate the people into thinking that into
00:28:27.540not being citizens into thinking that anything that they do that may question the narrative is already
00:28:34.340being an extremist and they want to promote the ultra narcissistic way of thinking about things
00:28:41.220which is nina turner's thinking here black liberation and palestinian liberation are linked
00:28:47.300which is essentially them saying unless i get everything i want i get nothing if you disagree
00:28:54.180with this you're an extremist that's exactly their point and that's what where they want to end up they
00:28:59.300want absolute power they want to yield arbitrarily they want to to destroy the rule of law and they
00:29:07.700don't think that they are accountable to the people yet but they want to maintain the facade that they are
00:29:13.380do you think nina turner's ever read anything on the treatment of african slaves under the arabs
00:29:20.980and the eastern slave trade do you think she's ever read anything i don't think that she cares thomas
00:29:25.460thomas soul has a very interesting essay on it that maybe makes her think that
00:29:30.420they might not treat us so well i really don't think she cares no neither do i it's all under the
00:29:35.300nice big post-modern umbrella samson do we have access to the rumble rants like we have no we okay
00:29:45.300we've got a broken extension so we'll save those until the end in that case so in that case let's
00:29:50.980talk about the developments that have been going on with the ongoing cases that have been looking
00:29:55.460into what happened at nordstream 2 all the way back on in september of 2022 so it's been almost
00:30:02.340two years since the now famous explosions that ruptured nordstream 2 which was a pipeline
00:30:08.020going from russia to germany supplying natural gases at the time it seemed to be an act of
00:30:14.580sabotage and there was a lot of different fingers pointing in many different directions of course at the
00:30:20.340time the eu and other member states were talking about how it was a russian act of sabotage which was
00:30:27.700done to destabilize the west who would become increasingly dependent on russian natural gas
00:30:33.620for its own resources and as a way to basically put them into a crisis mode come winter of 2022 now
00:30:42.020there was quite a lot of contention as to whether this was the case but this is certainly something
00:30:46.420that we were fed at the time on the wikipedia page i noticed that it pointed out here and you can check the
00:30:52.340links uh on here to verify this information so in october of 2022 less than a month after this
00:31:00.580initially happened russia had confirmed the pipe b of the nordstream 2 pipeline had escaped destruction
00:31:05.940and offered to resume gas supply to europe now that was going to be on the basis of resuming
00:31:11.540payment because there'd been a number of disruptions to nordstream one since the middle of 2021 due to some
00:31:17.380issues with the pipeline and also due to concerns of non-payment of the rubles that were owed in
00:31:23.140return for the gas supplies uh but it was declined by berlin because of course they were all in on the
00:31:29.540ukraine effort and as far as i'm aware still are but for for a country that supposedly did it themselves
00:31:36.180this seemed to be strange behavior and there were a lot of questions asked over whether russia who would
00:31:42.180have had a great position of leverage over the west if it was in control of as it was in germany
00:31:48.580about 55 of its natural gas supplies come the winter why they would choose to sabotage their own
00:31:54.020infrastructure which they'd put billions and billions of dollars into as had the western states that had
00:32:00.260collaborated with them when instead they could have simply as they had done with the nordstream one
00:32:06.020pipeline turn it off and then the infrastructure is still there in the future for once peace time
00:32:12.100has resumed and you can carry this on or again you can use it as a point of leverage for the western
00:32:17.220states it seemed like a very strange conclusion to come to as far as i can tell if you think it
00:32:23.780through logically i mean okay i i am not speaking a lot about this work because i would rather it had
00:32:30.820never started no of course i think we're all in that same position and uh yeah i have said that i have
00:32:35.940friends that i haven't uh spoken to you in a while due to this but i will say this that i mean obviously
00:32:43.140whoever did it it's very unlikely that russia did it and that's not a justification for what russia is
00:32:51.220doing not at all but you just don't destroy your own means of exerting influence upon the state upon
00:33:01.380states like the eu states yes especially you just don't do this is yeah i mean some of the eu states
00:33:08.420had already been complaining for a long time about russia dependence on russian natural resources because
00:33:14.420of the fact that they saw russia as a potential aggressive state ever since 2014. yes but i mean
00:33:19.940germany was basing in its entire economy on cheap russian gas puts them in a pretty vulnerable position
00:33:28.260yes so i see no reason why russia would want to destroy that that pipeline especially because
00:33:35.460again they could have just not not used to turn it off but that's the question why would they not
00:33:43.380why would they turn it off because that the sanctions hadn't already taken place
00:33:49.700the sanctions i think if i'm not radically mistaken just tell me well by by september certainly the
00:33:56.500sanctions had already been i think the sanctions took place after the well right after the north
00:34:01.140nordstrom thing but maybe i'm totally north stream 2 itself had never been in a position to deliver any
00:34:06.980gas the infrastructure was complete but it hadn't been switched on it contained gas at the time of
00:34:11.700the explosion which is why it released uh so much methane at the time there was lots of videos going
00:34:17.140around of the surface of the water above it bubbling up which was the methane escaping but they'd never
00:34:22.420actually used it to deliver any gas because by the time the infrastructure was completed the war had
00:34:27.220begun and there was uh no that they they were not in a position to begin delivering that gas by the way
00:34:35.540as i mentioned at the time there was a lot of fingers being pointed ukraine immediately accused russia
00:34:41.620of causing leaks in two major gas pipelines which are described as a terrorist attack ukrainian
00:34:46.820presidential advisor michael podeluk i don't i'm not going to pronounce these names correctly that's
00:34:53.460a warning straight away i know how to pronounce putin and i know how to pronounce zelinski and that's
00:34:58.980all i need uh he said that the damage to nordstrom one and two was an act of aggression toward the eu
00:35:05.380he added that russia wanted to cause pre-war winter panic and urged the eu to increase military support
00:35:11.220for ukraine he also tweeted in english saying gas leak from the ns1 nordstrom one is nothing more
00:35:17.300than a terrorist attack planned by russia and an act of aggression toward the eu russia wants to
00:35:22.100destabilize the economic situation in europe and cause pre-winter panic and as i mentioned europe at
00:35:28.340the time and particular germany had become increasingly reliant on russian gas to meet its energy needs
00:35:34.740wholesale prices of gas in europe after the nordstrom attack had more than doubled and that was after
00:35:40.740also the time where um since the beginning of the war when the sanctions were enacted and since russia
00:35:45.780had switched off some of the gas and natural resource supplies um that price doubled gas prices in the
00:35:51.860uk if you all remember there was the worries at the end of 2022 whether grandma was going to
00:35:57.460freeze to death because she wouldn't be able to afford it even though it imports no gas from russia
00:36:02.660because the shortages has severely affected the international gas market that's why it affected us
00:36:07.460before russia invaded ukraine as i mentioned germany relied on russia for 55 of its gas that was back
00:36:14.660when this originally happened so what has been the developments since then well there have been quite
00:36:19.620a few this is one catching us up a little bit towards the beginning of the year back in february of
00:36:25.0602024 talking about what had gone on in the months and years since then and it says in here some us and
00:36:31.540european officials initially suggested that moscow had blown up its own pipelines and interpretation
00:36:36.500dismissed as idiotic by russian president vladimir putin instead putin blamed the anglo-saxons uh
00:36:42.740which is the us and the uk without providing evidence he also blamed ukraine all three countries
00:36:48.660deny any role the white house last year dismissed a blog post by a us investigative journalist alleging
00:36:54.100that washington was behind the explosions as utterly false and complete fiction the us opened a new
00:37:00.420tower um opens oh sorry uh the us and german media have reported that the yacht could have been sorry
00:37:07.460there was reports of a particular yacht that the german investigation into this which is at the time
00:37:12.420being right now still the only investigation that's ongoing all of the other international
00:37:17.700investigations have stopped and concluded by now germany is still going with it obviously because it was
00:37:24.100their resources that have been prevented from getting to them and it was part of their
00:37:29.300infrastructure project and to begin with uh they reported that they found a yacht that could have
00:37:34.260been used by a ukrainian or pro-ukrainian group citing leaked intelligence reports and people familiar
00:37:40.420with official investigations kiev has repeatedly denied any involvement with this and goes on to give some
00:37:46.580other information about the infrastructure project itself nordstrom 2 was fully owned by gazprom
00:37:52.100um which is a russian company but western companies british shell germany's winter shawl d and uniper
00:38:00.260and french enghi and austria's omv covered 50 of the pipeline's total construction costs of about 11
00:38:07.220billion dollars sorry i have to make a quick correction to what i said before the nord stream pipeline
00:38:13.860explosions occurred on september 26 2022 which was after several rounds of sanctions had been imposed on
00:38:20.820russia so apologies for what i said before no absolutely thank you for clearing that up for
00:38:25.220us uh there have been no plans announced since then to repair the damage in july of last year 2023
00:38:31.860germany told the u.n security council that it had found traces of subsea explosives in a sailing yacht
00:38:36.500that may have been used to transport the explosives this is the one that they've been investigating
00:38:40.260germany has confirmed its investigators raided a ship identified by german media as the 50-foot
00:38:45.620sailing yacht in january last year that may have been used to transport the explosives used to blow
00:38:50.660up the pipelines the boat leased in germany via a poland registered company contained traces of octagon
00:38:56.740the same explosive that was found at the underwater blast sites germany told the un that it was possible
00:39:02.180for trained divers to attach explosives to the pipelines laying about 70 to 80 meters deep where the
00:39:07.700explosions occurred because of course when it first happened there was wonder there was concern that it
00:39:12.340might have just been a fault but then immediately after they found evidence that it was caused by
00:39:17.300controlled explosions under the water so this was the yacht that seemingly whoever conducted that
00:39:22.660operation had used to sail out to the waters to conduct it a day after the explosions on september 27
00:39:30.1002022 german magazine der seigl wrote that the cia had warned germany in summer of 2022 about possible
00:39:38.100attacks on baltic sea pipelines the washington post citing leaked information posted online wrote last
00:39:44.500june that the united states learned of a ukrainian plan to attack the nordstrom natural gas pipelines
00:39:50.340three months before they were damaged the intelligence report was based on information provided by a source
00:39:55.940in ukraine the post said according to the cia adding that the cia had shared it with germany and other
00:40:03.140european countries in june 2022 so judging by this information here if you were to believe the new um
00:40:09.700the post the washington post's information they point to it being actually a operation conducted by
00:40:16.820and with approval of ukraine which is quite a damning accusation but we'll carry on the dutch national
00:40:24.740broadcaster nos reported the same month the tip came from the dutch military intelligence agency mivd
00:40:31.540according to the post the cia relayed to zaluzny i think that's how you pronounce his name who was
00:40:37.620the ukrainian commander-in-chief general at the time for an intermediary that the united states
00:40:44.900opposed such an operation in november of last year the washington post reported that a man called roman
00:40:50.820chavinsky a former intelligence official who served in the ukrainian military special forces managed the
00:40:56.580six-person team but did not plan the attack he denied involvement the post said chavinsky
00:41:01.380took orders from senior ukrainian officials who ultimately reported to commander-in-chief general
00:41:06.100valerie zel terrible at these names zeluzny reuters was unable to verify the report independently
00:41:14.740and zeluzny had made no public comment germany's del spiegel and zdf have said that a group of six
00:41:21.700people five men and one woman boarded the uh yacht which was called andromeda in rostock germany on
00:41:27.940september 6th using forged passports and returned to rostock on september 23rd the yacht was spotted
00:41:33.860at a small danish island of cristiano near the explosion sites on september 16th to 18th and made
00:41:39.620a short stop at marina at a marina in kolobzreg poland on september 19th before returning to
00:41:47.060germany there was no evidence to suggest that poland was used to hope as a hub for the sabotage polish
00:41:51.940prosecutors said last year so that's a lot of information there's a lot of information there and a lot of it is
00:41:56.660coming from different sources and there is not any evidence really being presented to confirm any of it
00:42:03.060other than anonymous sources and hearsay but what's been going on since then since february is that this
00:42:10.260came out in the news as of yesterday wednesday the 14th of august 2024 germany has issued an arrest warrant
00:42:19.060for a diver over the nordstrom blasts according to reports this was issued back in june and it's being
00:42:25.540issued to a ukrainian man who was supposedly one of the team that planted explosives on pipelines
00:42:32.340september in 2022 supposedly he may have been the man who had been driving a van that got them to the
00:42:38.020yacht and there's information that he may have been snapshotted when speeding at 80 miles an hour in
00:42:42.900poland i think and that's where they got his face very interesting they were going to enrich the pipeline
00:42:48.340yes yes clearly do you have anything to add to all of this so far jess yeah i'm not a foreign policy
00:42:55.060expert so and it is a lot of information so i do have a question like so is the accusation that it's
00:43:00.260from the ukrainian government or is it just the ukrainian group that's um so far the the ukrainian
00:43:08.020government as they would has been completely denying all of the accusations but the next article that we'll
00:43:15.300look at in a moment from the wall street journal which came out today sorry yesterday but very late
00:43:20.820yesterday after this initial report came out is saying that there may have been involvement by the
00:43:26.180ukrainian government but that high-ups like zelinski were trying to prevent it from happening but that
00:43:32.180essentially things had been put in motion that could not be taken out of motion by the time that they
00:43:38.100were trying to halt the bombing now of course this is all again coming from anonymous sources the journal
00:43:43.940has been speaking to and there's some information which doesn't seem to add up as far as i can tell
00:43:49.380just giving a once and second look at the story as presented but we'll go through because this is in
00:43:56.660this is important if it has ramifications for the ukrainian war effort and ramifications for how
00:44:02.660trustworthy ukraine as an ally in the west is if they are willing and able to sabotage infrastructure that
00:44:09.620is necessary for the well-being of other countries even if yes you can say rightfully so it was foolish
00:44:15.700of germany and other european nations to be so reliant on russian natural resources yeah i don't think
00:44:22.580it's really any surprise that like ukraine is denying this because of course they're going to deny the bad
00:44:27.540thing but it just shows how even in something like the situation where germany and other european
00:44:34.100countries have been so hospitable in funding um for ukraine that's something like this can happen
00:44:42.580it's so eye-opening and the idea that you know we've been told that if we don't fund this war you
00:44:49.380know it will come back to bite us you know russia is going to take over the uk next if they do go after
00:44:55.540ukraine well this is already impacting us it's already impacting our our energy we do have to consider as
00:45:00.740well that western elites do seem to have a real bloodthirsty streak against russia for whatever
00:45:06.020reason i wouldn't speculate because there was the foreign affairs report from earlier this year as
00:45:11.620well that was talking about the initial peace talks that were going on between russia and ukraine where
00:45:16.980a lot seemed to be on the table that you wouldn't expect russia to put up there that seemed to have
00:45:21.540been sabotaged partially by involvement of western leaders like boris johnson going in and telling
00:45:28.420ukraine that no matter the circumstances the uk will fully support the war effort and also that
00:45:34.500ukraine itself had been surprisingly successful in pushing back the initial russian attacks which gave
00:45:40.020it the confidence to believe that could continue the war effort with western support i have two things
00:45:44.740to add here so first of all it is very interesting that articles right like this one are being published
00:45:51.700right now because i don't think that something like this would have been published a year ago
00:45:57.620or no i agree so that's a good point it's really interesting that right now they are publishing
00:46:02.820articles like this now in this next article there's reports that germans investigative team
00:46:09.780were thinking that it might have been germany as early as november of 2022 i think this might have
00:46:15.380something to do with the fact that the war in the middle east there seems to be some heating up going
00:46:20.180on with iran so there might be some trying to pull back resources from ukraine and point them more in
00:46:26.180the direction of the middle it's like kanye with taylor swift would say you know it's you may have won
00:46:31.380an award but it's not your best award it's it's it's like you know it's not the best war that's the
00:46:37.700issue yeah that's the issue but what is interesting is that right now they are publishing articles like
00:46:42.580this and second i think that just you know my personal opinion we will never know because there's the
00:46:48.820old saying that you know in war fraud and deception of virtues the sad thing so even if a particular
00:46:56.100side has seemingly no reason to do something like sabotage that gives them an extra reason of doing
00:47:04.500it because they're gonna create wreak havoc and upon the the other side but no these are these are just
00:47:12.740the two sides i'm trying to think of no absolutely it's good to be just level-headed and look at both
00:47:18.020sides i really don't think we will ever know but is it is interesting that articles like this
00:47:24.340like these are being published because it seems to me that it is showing that people will
00:47:32.260and politicians will ask for a ceasefire and i think that it's going to be a balance antebellum as
00:47:39.700they say that it's it's going to stop wherever you know the russian borders are now and wherever
00:47:44.500ukrainian borders are now i think that's where it's going but as far as the nordstrom thing i
00:47:49.620don't think we'll ever know well still it's important to go over the information that we
00:47:53.860have available to us now and we'll be able to you at home will be able to make your own mind up as to
00:47:59.060how likely all of this does sound so going into this information the german authorities have issued an
00:48:05.780arrest warrant for a ukrainian man on suspicion of being part of the team the man a driving
00:48:10.820instructor identified only as and brace yourselves for this volodymyr zed i mean i'm sure i'm sure
00:48:21.460that's a very common name and set of initials but that's quite interesting although of course i don't
00:48:27.060i don't think zelinski is a driving instructor who was involved in all of this he was a comedian
00:48:32.500wasn't he he was a comedian he was playing a driving instructor ah it all makes sense now
00:48:37.060so he's last believed to have lived in poland and is alleged to have dived 80 meters to the seabed at
00:48:42.740night to plant explosive devices on the pipelines which ran from russia to germany in september 2022
00:48:48.420according to reports in two publications i'm not going to try to pronounce as well as the broadcaster
00:48:54.260ard germany first asked poland to arrest the man in june but he is thought to have gone underground
00:48:58.980according to security sources cited in the reports the german prosecutor general's office which has
00:49:04.020been investigating the case even after denmark and sweden dropped their respective inquiries has
00:49:09.140declined to comment polish authorities confirmed on wednesday that a european warrant for his arrest
00:49:14.260has been received the national public prosecutor's office said in an email to the news agency afp
00:49:20.580ultimately vladimir zed has not been detained as he left the territory of poland at the beginning of
00:49:25.860july this year crossing the polish ukrainian border so if this is to believe um be believed this man has
00:49:31.780returned to ukraine and ukraine does not extradite its own so there would be no chance of germany getting
00:49:37.620hold of him unless he decided to leave ukraine for some reason which would be unlikely the media outlets
00:49:43.780also identified another man and woman who are also ukrainian diving instructors as having allegedly
00:49:49.940been involved in the attack though no further arrest warrants have been issued for them i need to
00:49:54.900correct myself earlier vladimir zed was a diving instructor not driving instructor i misspoke
00:50:00.020apologies i misread that despite evidence that he may have had the backing of high-ranking military
00:50:04.660officials there's no suggestion that ukrainian president zelinski was aware of the attack or that
00:50:09.860it was state sanctioned now that in itself is contradicted by this enormous washington post
00:50:15.620article that purports to give the full story of what happened and says that it was funded by private
00:50:23.860businessmen at a cost of around three hundred thousand dollars and was overseen by a top general that
00:50:30.660would be general let me try and get his name right again zaluzny and president zelinski was actually aware of it
00:50:39.380but unsuccessfully tried to call it off there was also the suggestion in this article that the idea was
00:50:44.900come up with in may of 2022 and was the result of a excessive drinking session among senior ukrainian
00:50:54.580military officers where somebody suggested destroying nordstream in response to the remarkable success that
00:51:03.780ukraine had had at the time in halting the russian invasion this seems to be a very strange and unlikely
00:51:11.620circumstance to come up with such a an idea that then gets followed through as well so that's that's
00:51:19.860very strange to begin with so uh again it goes on to say it cost around three hundred thousand dollars
00:51:26.020it involves a small rented yacht that would be the andromeda with a six-member crew including
00:51:30.580trained civilian divers one was a woman whose presence helped to create the illusion that they
00:51:35.220were a group of friends on a pleasure cruise ukrainian president vladimir zelensky initially
00:51:39.940improved the plan according to one officer who participated and three people familiar with it
00:51:45.780because the journal say that they spoke to four senior ukrainian defense and security officials who
00:51:50.900either participated in or had direct knowledge of the plot all of them said the pipelines were a
00:51:55.620legitimate target in ukraine's war defense against russia i do not know why these people would have
00:52:01.460chosen to speak to the journal about it perhaps it's been playing on their conscience so much or perhaps
00:52:07.540they were at a excessive drinking session and decided to spill the beans on such an operation so
00:52:13.140perhaps there's been some leaks from the inside um but either way according to this information the cia
00:52:19.460learned of it and asked the ukrainian president to pull the plug he ordered a halt these people said
00:52:25.700zelensky's commander-in-chief zeluzny was leading the effort and nonetheless forged ahead why he would
00:52:32.100choose to do that against direct orders i don't know the dutch military intelligence agency that was
00:52:37.140noted in the other articles mivd learned of the plot warned the cia not germany they went to the cia
00:52:43.380instead according to several people familiar with the dutch report and then the us informed
00:52:48.500germany which seems like a roundabout way of going about it when the us and the dutch are in
00:52:54.740allies with germany very strange portions of the account given to the journal were corroborated by
00:53:01.220an early two-year german police investigation into the attack now if we're going to believe
00:53:05.700any of the information that's been presented regarding this i would say that the two-year german
00:53:10.260police investigation is probably the most trustworthy one and not just a four random senior
00:53:17.860officials who decided to speak to the journal about such a thing especially given that the
00:53:22.740two-year german police investigation has in the end resulted in the issue of a warrant an arrest warrant
00:53:29.300for a man i don't know it's just it seems to me that it's all top down in this case and uh the fact
00:53:36.260that they are publishing it suggests that they want to push forward the narrative of ceasefire yeah it's a
00:53:42.020narrative shift uh especially if trump ends up getting in trump wants to pull us support away from
00:53:51.460the ukrainian effort he said as much he wants at least he says he says so uh but i do actually trust
00:53:58.100trump on such things more than i trust most of the politicians when they say certain things and also
00:54:04.500there's worries within the eu themselves where somebody like macron has been saying that they
00:54:10.740basically need to lessen their reliance on the us for military defense support and be able to build
00:54:16.180up their own army in case of russian aggression and they're not in a position to do that if this
00:54:21.460war carries on and they still have to continue ramping up support for ukraine so there's a few
00:54:26.420different avenues that you could say yes they want to wind this thing down but carrying on they say
00:54:32.340that the german investigators questioned dozens of potential witnesses scanned the bottom of the sea
00:54:36.620around the blast and sifted through masses of data including digital communication travel records and
00:54:41.240financial transactions they uh had one lucky break supposedly and rushing to leave germany the
00:54:46.920sabotage crew neglected to wash the andromeda which gave the german detectives traces of explosive
00:54:52.980fingerprints and dna samples from the crew which i assume has all been part of why they were able to
00:54:58.760issue this arrest warrant according to people familiar with the investigation of van driving
00:55:03.100the ukrainian sabotage team from poland into germany in 2022 was snapped by a german speed camera
00:55:07.840and the man the diving instructor was in the photo authorities in poland didn't act on the warrant and as we
00:55:14.800mentioned before he's ended up going into ukraine where they will not be able to extradite him
00:55:20.100regarding general zeluzny he's now ukraine's ambassador to the united kingdom supposedly zelensky
00:55:27.800chewed him out after this whole thing and demoted him and he took this position instead although this
00:55:34.300position as an ambassador means that he is uh he's got immunity on any charges so if anything did end
00:55:40.120up coming back to him according to these reports according to these arrest warrants he's bloody hell
00:55:45.000apologies he's not able to be charged for anything anyway because he's got immunity supposedly he was
00:55:51.820commanding the operation enlisted ukraine's top special operations officers and then which included
00:55:58.500roman chavinsky which is one of the names that was mentioned in the nordstream article and reported on by
00:56:03.580the washington post and when they tried to call it off um the things were already in motion so they
00:56:09.920couldn't call it off so chavinsky interestingly is currently on trial in ukraine for unrelated charges
00:56:15.920in july he was released on bail after over a year in detention he declined to comment on this case
00:56:21.960after people tried to get in touch with him about it but in a subsequent broadcast interview he said
00:56:26.640that the sabotage had two positive effects for ukraine helped loosen russia's grip on the european
00:56:31.700supporting kiev and left moscow with only one main avenue for channeling gas to europe pipelines
00:56:37.860traversing ukraine despite the war supposedly ukraine collects lucrative transit fees for russian oil
00:56:43.880and gas estimated to be worth hundreds of million dollars a year now that was not something i'm aware
00:56:48.640of you can verify that in the comments if you'd like earlier this year as it mentions zelinski ousted
00:56:55.100zeluzny from his military post and now he's the ambassador ukrainian officials according to this
00:57:00.080article who participated in or are familiar with the plot believe that it would be impossible to put any
00:57:04.720of the commanding officers on trial because no evidence exists beyond conversations among the top
00:57:09.560officials who were at least initially in this drunken session where they came up with the plan
00:57:14.460to commit mass sabotage against one of their own allies all in agreement about wanting to blow up the
00:57:19.440pipelines none of them will testify lest they incriminate themselves so i'm with you on this
00:57:24.920that this information is all uh very revealing but also slightly unverifiable and is in the in the
00:57:33.620interest of pushing the narrative in a particular direction changing course so to speak with the
00:57:39.580russia ukraine conflict as it stands right now especially convenient given that nobody involved
00:57:46.040with it is in any way touchable by western legal systems and being able to be brought to justice in
00:57:53.560front of a court where a lot more information would be brought out and we could truly verify how true any
00:57:58.920of this is also another thing it's fantastical to me that if any of this was true that the u.s would
00:58:07.020not be able to put a stop to it if they were really not in favor of this going ahead it's remarkable to
00:58:13.720the idea that the u.s would just say no don't do that and not do anything to put a stop to it if this
00:58:20.760really was an act of sabotage i wouldn't be surprised if the u.s was involved but again we don't know all of
00:58:27.820these reports have a lot of loose ends that can't be tied we don't know but if that's the case
00:58:33.140then they may publish our articles of the sort in order to make the ukrainians get all the blame
00:58:41.320so they can tell them we can we can end the war right now and you're not gonna have anything