The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters - August 14, 2025


What Is Next For England? | Interview with Andy Ngo


Episode Stats


Length

18 minutes

Words per minute

149.78456

Word count

2,781

Sentence count

175


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode, I'm joined by Andy Ngo, host of Unmasked, an anti-fast-food restaurant and independent journalist, to discuss the UK government's attempts to censor online speech, including the controversial Online Safety Act.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
00:00:00.000 Hi folks, I'm joined by Andy Ngo, independent journalist and the host of Unmasked, an anti-fast study.
00:00:06.000 Andy, how have you found the new media conference?
00:00:09.000 So this is actually my first time speaking live in the UK since I've been here for several years now.
00:00:16.000 I'm very honoured to be here.
00:00:18.000 I am always encouraged at the spirit of debate that is within the norm a sort of British society.
00:00:28.000 This is in comparison to America.
00:00:31.000 There's, even though the people here would generally be probably supporters of people like you and I,
00:00:40.000 there's also quite a bit of disagreement that's played out already in some of these events.
00:00:44.000 I like that a lot.
00:00:46.000 It just reminds me part of what's great about British culture is that tradition of debate and speech
00:00:54.000 that unfortunately you're losing as your populations change.
00:01:00.000 And not just the population change either, since the government imposes ever more strict and tight rules.
00:01:06.000 What do you make of the speech rules that Keir Starmer has been employing, such as the Online Safety Act?
00:01:13.000 I actually have mixed thoughts on this, so I think it's a serious issue that it is so easy for children to be able to access explicit material online.
00:01:29.000 And I'm not of the view that there should be no restrictions on anybody being able to access that.
00:01:41.000 I think that, you know, minors and children, there needs to be some type of safeguards in place.
00:01:47.000 And clicking, I am over 18, is, in my opinion, not enough.
00:01:53.000 So, the backlash against the Online Safety Bill, I think, that has come from people who care about free speech,
00:02:01.000 I feel like they've kind of overlooked that particular part, which I believe was part of the intention of it.
00:02:06.000 I'm concerned that, however, the concerns that they do have, I understand that.
00:02:13.000 I've been impacted by it. I think on the first day that it went into effect, immediately on X, a whole bunch of content,
00:02:24.000 sometimes like a whole page of scrolling, it's not available to you.
00:02:28.000 And that's, I mean, that's moving in, that's now in the direction of where Australia has been,
00:02:36.000 where a whole swathes of content is just blocked based on your IP.
00:02:41.000 And for me as an American, like all this is very anathema to me.
00:02:44.000 I know that outside of the US, there's people who are more used to censorship and big government control.
00:02:52.000 That's like a big difference for me.
00:02:55.000 If it helps, as an Englishman, I feel this is horrific as well.
00:02:58.000 So, the thing about the Online Safety Act is, you are right that there is a genuine problem with children being able to access explicit material on the internet.
00:03:07.000 But if you actually look at the framing of the Online Safety Act, it does say children and adults.
00:03:14.000 And the content that it lists is also not only explicit content, but also quote-unquote hate speech and content related to illegal immigration.
00:03:25.000 So, actually, it is not just implicit in the Act, but explicit in the Act, that it's designed to censor adults from seeing political content.
00:03:37.000 I think the...
00:03:38.000 This passed under the Conservative government, right?
00:03:40.000 It was begun under the Conservative government and passed finally under Stalin.
00:03:44.000 Again, this is Conservatives letting down their side.
00:03:50.000 Yes.
00:03:51.000 Or maybe just doing what we should expect them to do.
00:03:54.000 I feel it's almost like you don't...
00:03:59.000 I don't know if the legal framework here doesn't exist for more protections of free speech.
00:04:05.000 But I feel, as this American immigrant here, like, not just myself helpless, but I look at the people around me.
00:04:15.000 It's kind of like all these laws that are just passed, one after the other, another related to a number of issues that you and I care about.
00:04:23.000 And it's like, there's nothing we can do.
00:04:28.000 Have you got no faith in Nigel Farage and reform to fix this?
00:04:35.000 It's a long pause.
00:04:38.000 You need a huge shake-up in your political system, and I think you can do that.
00:04:44.000 However, without the existence of some equivalent of, like, the First Amendment in America, it just, it seems really tenuous what can be done, you know?
00:04:55.000 It's like, okay, a government maybe at best can roll back something, and then five, ten years down the line, a different government in power could easily implement those, you know, those type of restrictions again.
00:05:10.000 So it's just...
00:05:14.000 We've got a governmental system from a previous era, where we had a much more sort of socially joined-up country, and modernist, and a far greater level of not only social trust, but political dialogue.
00:05:29.000 Because, I mean, I kind of noticed that in America, you've got these two very powerful streams of content that come from the mainstream and the online media.
00:05:39.000 That is almost entirely segregated between the left and the right.
00:05:45.000 And for some reason, there is just very rarely any point at which they actually ever converge, and have a conversation with one another.
00:05:52.000 And that's always the most interesting thing in the world to see, actually, a devout right-winger and a devout left-winger actually talking about the same topic is a fascinating thing to watch.
00:06:01.000 And so we come from an era where you would always have both sides represented in the discussion.
00:06:08.000 But we've lost that completely, and now we have the domination of one side over the rest.
00:06:13.000 And so the sort of organic nature of the British Constitution was never such a problem, because there was always a kind of implicit understanding that actually this is for all of us, and we're just trying to do the right thing.
00:06:26.000 Now it's ideological, and it's one-sided, and I think that's the real problem.
00:06:31.000 And I think there's no real solution in a sort of First Amendment position, because, A, I don't think we can get stuck.
00:06:39.000 But it changes the nature of the political system entirely, rather than being an organic thing that we possess.
00:06:45.000 It becomes like the dead hand of a treaty on top of the civilization that imposes from long into the past, even if the thing doesn't fit the current moment.
00:06:55.000 It's my understanding that the British political tradition is that you don't actually have a ton of laws written down as laws.
00:07:04.000 Like things are just sort of inherited as sort of common law, right?
00:07:09.000 Yes.
00:07:10.000 You know, I'm going to present a question to you.
00:07:17.000 What do you think of the argument that the boat has sailed on Britain being a multicultural society?
00:07:28.000 It's like you have millions and millions of people who are here, who have been here now for a couple of generations,
00:07:34.000 talking about the immigrants going back to the 60s and 70s.
00:07:39.000 And then, of course, you have those who came in the 90s and more recently.
00:07:44.000 But they're here.
00:07:45.000 And the logistical and legal challenges of mass deportations is immensely challenging,
00:07:53.000 if not impossible, given your legal framework.
00:07:57.000 In a diverse place like Singapore, for example, they have some of the most restrictive laws on speech there.
00:08:09.000 You can be imprisoned for a very long time for offending religion, hurting people's feelings.
00:08:18.000 And it's been argued that that type of draconian reality for them is how they're able to maintain peace and order
00:08:31.000 amongst Buddhists, Christians, Muslims in a multiracial society.
00:08:37.000 Do you think the future of the UK and Europe is, well, it is moving in that direction of more and more restrictions on speech
00:08:45.000 to clamp down on dissent and conflict that happens as the populations become more diverse?
00:08:54.000 I think there's no other way for it to go, because if there's no common understanding between the groups of people,
00:09:00.000 and no common—I mean, I think it really does come down to Aristotle's conception of the polity.
00:09:06.000 It's based on friendship.
00:09:07.000 If you don't like the people around you, then you'll end up with conflict.
00:09:11.000 And if there is one hegemonic state that's decided this is the way that things are going to be,
00:09:17.000 then they have no choice but to become tyrannical.
00:09:19.000 They've got no choice to do a Lee Kuan Yew or anything like that.
00:09:23.000 Well, what are other options?
00:09:25.000 There is no option.
00:09:26.000 It has to go in this direction.
00:09:28.000 And so it's inevitable that Keir Starmer's Labour Party, to maintain order and peace,
00:09:37.000 ends up tyrannising the majority native population.
00:09:41.000 But this is a horrific state of affairs, because nobody ever asked for this.
00:09:45.000 This wasn't ever voted for, and it's been voted against probably about half a dozen times, if not more.
00:09:51.000 And yet here we are with this problem.
00:09:54.000 But the advantage that Britain has over America is actually in the fact that we don't have a written constitution,
00:10:01.000 because the laws can be repealed at any point.
00:10:05.000 All it takes is 350 MPs with the will to do it, to repeal any law.
00:10:11.000 We can denaturalise anyone we like.
00:10:13.000 We can make anything to be true.
00:10:15.000 The parliament has supreme power.
00:10:18.000 And so things...
00:10:19.000 Not under the ECHR.
00:10:21.000 We can leave it.
00:10:22.000 The parliament has the power to leave it.
00:10:24.000 The parliament has the power to do whatever it likes, and set the legal regime of the entire country.
00:10:28.000 And this could happen tomorrow, if Kier Starmer wanted it to happen.
00:10:32.000 He just doesn't want it to happen.
00:10:34.000 So things are bleak.
00:10:37.000 But I think things in places like America and Germany, where you have a more formal constitution,
00:10:43.000 I think they're more permanent, actually.
00:10:47.000 So it's...
00:10:48.000 I don't know why I'm so optimistic about Britain's future, given the current statement.
00:10:54.000 Well, I mean, we can't just be blackpilled and depressed, right?
00:11:04.000 So...
00:11:05.000 James, in the subject, what's next for you?
00:11:08.000 I'm continuing my reporting.
00:11:13.000 I...
00:11:14.000 2025 has been a particularly violent year in the United States, with political violence.
00:11:22.000 As the Democrats and their allies on the left who are doing anything and everything they can
00:11:30.000 to try to sabotage American solventry in regards to immigration borders.
00:11:41.000 There's been immense attack on U.S. immigration officials.
00:11:47.000 Violent attacks, calls for them to be abolished.
00:11:52.000 And a lot of that incitement is coming from Democrats.
00:11:55.000 It's the same playbook they used five years ago against the first Trump administration.
00:12:04.000 And I wonder why...
00:12:09.000 One thing I realize is that for all liberals and Democrats talk about insurrection and how dangerous that is,
00:12:17.000 they are actively involved in that now.
00:12:19.000 They call for insurrection against the current government that they don't view as legitimate.
00:12:24.000 Attacking its institutions, attacking federal agents and federal law enforcement,
00:12:30.000 when it comes to anything related to immigration detaining suspects.
00:12:35.000 And...
00:12:37.000 So...
00:12:39.000 One thing that I've had my eyes open up to in the last year and a half, two years,
00:12:45.000 and I was probably a bit naive, is that I didn't realize how much of a threat to democracy comes from Democrats.
00:12:57.000 Even though I am a conservative, I don't view myself as particularly hyper-partisan in terms of party politics,
00:13:04.000 but with some of the, what Democrats have called for, I mean, imprisoning Donald Trump last year,
00:13:12.000 prosecution and all that, it...
00:13:16.000 Because Americans are saturated in that news reporting every day for four years now, five years,
00:13:21.000 I don't know if they realize how it comes across like how there is a breakdown in the rule of law in America.
00:13:32.000 It's not just the rule of law, it's the civic polity itself.
00:13:34.000 Yes.
00:13:35.000 Because it's genuinely, do we want to share a country with one another in America?
00:13:39.000 And the answer just seems to be no.
00:13:42.000 Neither side seems to want to share a country with the other.
00:13:45.000 And that's, I mean, I view America as undergoing a kind of cold civil war,
00:13:49.000 where it's, like, Donald Trump is basically going to try and clean out the institutions of left-wingers.
00:13:54.000 Well, okay, the next Democrat president, he's going to have to clean out the institutions of right-wingers.
00:13:58.000 And so you just have this continual changing of the guard until one culture is dominant over the other.
00:14:04.000 I mean, this is a bit worrying, isn't it?
00:14:09.000 I appreciate the clarity you speak when you say, like, civil war, how you say that a cold civil war,
00:14:15.000 because there are some commentators who say things like they think that imminent arms,
00:14:21.000 violence between different factions in the U.S. is likely. I don't think so.
00:14:26.000 But this cold civil war is describing is more accurate, I think, much more accurate.
00:14:33.000 We, I mean, I'm from Portland, Oregon.
00:14:38.000 I see the hatred that the people have there for conservatives and Republicans.
00:14:43.000 Like, they don't, it's not that you don't want them as neighbors.
00:14:46.000 They view them as, like, a lot of them as subhuman, actually.
00:14:49.000 It's, now that I'm out of the U.S., away, I can look, I have a distance where I can look at it.
00:14:58.000 And it's, now that I feel black-pilled.
00:15:01.000 It's like, how do you solve these issues? I don't know.
00:15:05.000 You have the lying media, you have institutions that are captured, and you have, sort of like a corner dog,
00:15:12.000 referring to those on the left, and Democrats who are now lashing out violently, either directly or indirectly, or calling for violence.
00:15:22.000 And people, many liberals don't, don't see that as a problem.
00:15:30.000 I mean, we're developing sort of a, a culture of assassins, celebrating them.
00:15:35.000 You know, like, everybody knows about Luigi Mangione, who killed, allegedly murdered the United HealthShare CEO.
00:15:45.000 And there was another one the other day, wasn't there?
00:15:47.000 Recently, there was a random shooting, not random, there was a black shooter in Manhattan who wanted, allegedly, to go after people associated with the NFL.
00:15:57.000 But there was a CEO of a different company, corporation that was killed, a woman.
00:16:02.000 Yeah.
00:16:03.000 And just because she happened to be CEO, there was all the celebrations on social media from the left.
00:16:08.000 And that's this mainstreaming of, I mean, it's all, it's also linked to Antifa in the sense that the radicals on the left so believe that their cause is righteous,
00:16:20.000 that anything and everything that needs to be done, killing people, killing families, maiming people should be justified,
00:16:26.000 imprisoning political targets, killing political targets.
00:16:30.000 And that's, that's the America I live in, it's...
00:16:33.000 I don't, I hate to say it though, but I don't think it's confined only to the left.
00:16:38.000 The right, the right is not the right of 2016 anymore.
00:16:42.000 Their hearts have hardened.
00:16:44.000 And you can see it in the media, in just the kind of output that American media produces.
00:16:49.000 Well, you'll notice, you'll notice that everyone in America is fighting, right?
00:16:52.000 Like, Steven Crowder says, I'll fight for you.
00:16:54.000 The Young Turks say, I'll fight for you.
00:16:56.000 The Democrat politicians say, we're going to fight for this.
00:16:59.000 The Republican politicians, we're going to fight for whatever we want.
00:17:03.000 And you realize that, okay, this is just a brawl that everyone is engaged in.
00:17:08.000 And these are not people who have anything that they can concede to the other side.
00:17:15.000 Like, they, they can never at any point concede to the legitimacy of the point that the other side is making.
00:17:21.000 But I think that, yeah, corporations in America have run out of control.
00:17:25.000 I could concede that to the left, but so yeah.
00:17:27.000 I think the right, American right is much more in the political establishment willing to concede.
00:17:33.000 I agree.
00:17:34.000 I mean, they've been following the, the court orders, for example.
00:17:37.000 Yeah.
00:17:38.000 I think if it was the other way around.
00:17:40.000 They wouldn't at all.
00:17:41.000 But the, the right, it's clearly hardening.
00:17:43.000 Yes.
00:17:44.000 And it's, and I don't blame them either.
00:17:46.000 I actually think this is a normal response, an organic response to what they've been given from the left for years.
00:17:53.000 And you know, we've been on, we've both been on the receiving end.
00:17:56.000 But that, that seems to me an irreconcilable position.
00:17:59.000 So then what do you think's next for the US?
00:18:02.000 I don't want to get a civil war on you, but Tim Pool might have a point.
00:18:09.000 I don't know that.
00:18:10.000 And I'm not, you know, you can't, I think one of the main problems is generals always fight the last war.
00:18:15.000 And so I think that the internet and the general ideological nature of what's happening makes the future a bit less predictable than it was in the past.
00:18:23.000 And it could be something we just can't predict.
00:18:25.000 Anyway, thanks so much for joining me.
00:18:29.000 My pleasure.
00:18:30.000 Thank you, Carl.
00:18:31.000 Hopefully we'll get you back on the podcast.
00:18:33.000 Thank you.