00:08:37.440But being a human being with a moral compass, I would not celebrate were they to be killed
00:08:44.300Because I could immediately invoke my well-calibrated empathy and say, well, wait a minute, this hater that spends all his days hurling insults at me has a wife, has a daughter, has a son.
00:08:57.160Therefore, I'm able to put myself in the mind and in the shoes of the other and I understand their pain and I feel their pain.
00:09:05.340That's called a well-functioning, well-calibrated empathy module.
00:09:10.100The people on the left are unfortunately exhibiting, and let me very briefly here explain the difference between two ethical systems.
00:09:17.440Deontological ethics are absolute statements.
00:09:19.800So, for example, if I say it is never okay to lie, that would be a deontological statement.
00:09:25.720Consequentialism would say it's okay to lie if you're trying to spare someone's feelings.
00:09:31.220Well, when it comes to killing our political opponents, that should be a deontological no-no.
00:09:38.180Under no circumstances should it be okay for me to look to kill my opponent.
00:09:44.920The left, on the other hand, applies a consequentialist ethos.
00:09:49.460It's okay to get rid of Charlie Kirk because he was spreading such hatred in the world
00:09:54.800that it makes perfect sense for us to get rid of him.
00:09:58.180This kind of shifting from deontological principles to consequentialism is very, very dangerous.
00:10:04.480it seems to me there's just no and this might be ironic to say coming you know in in referring to
00:10:12.560a group that is all about modernist thinking and my truth is this truth but it feels like also at
00:10:18.760the same time you have this one leftist radical mind that says i have a truth you have a truth
00:10:26.240we all have different truths where there is no objective truth at the same time contradictorily
00:10:32.020perhaps they don't have this ability to have any middle ground there's other there's either they're
00:10:37.940extremely empathetic they don't want to kill a fly they're going to go vegan or they're out there
00:10:43.140killing people and it maybe those are just the ones that make the news but it seems to me from
00:10:49.300a from a psychological standpoint that defines this group it's one way to delineate them from
00:10:57.700the rest of the regular population. Right. I mean, you could apply what you just said to
00:11:02.500countless other examples of orgiastic cognitive inconsistencies. How could you be a radical
00:11:09.640feminist who spends your day complaining about the patriarchy, but then when it comes to six1.00
00:11:16.780foot four Linda, who yesterday was called Bubba and has a nine inch penis, you're supposed to let1.00
00:11:23.600her in with your daughter who is 13 years old. How could you from this side of your mouth be1.00
00:11:29.940so against the patriarchy and against, you know, all of the male violence, but on this side of0.96
00:11:35.640your mouth, once Bubba becomes Linda, it is perfectly okay for her to be in the shower with
00:11:41.800your 13-year-old daughter. So cognitive consistency is not a feature of those who have parasitized0.60
00:11:48.740minds. So diplomatically put. The other case that's just so shocking to the conscience for
00:11:57.800many of us is watching the women come out of the woodwork and defend Lindsay Clancy,
00:12:06.680Nurse Clancy, a woman who murdered her own children. Unthinkable to look at all the amazing
00:12:13.780cases of amazing mothers who sacrifice for their children. They don't get that kind of attention.0.55
00:12:19.580They don't get those GoFundMe pages. Lindsay Clancy gets a million two, million three0.99
00:12:24.700raised for her GoFundMe. What's going on there? Yeah, it's astounding. I mean, it's the same
00:12:32.080kind of general phenomenon as to why a serial killer gets hordes of women who are willing to
00:12:39.540marry him while he's in prison. Right. Again, it's the misfiring of the empathy module. But
00:12:46.800actually, it's it's it's great that you mentioned the Lindsay Clancy story, because just before I
00:12:51.540came on your show, I posted a clip on my channel where I actually wanted to focus on the psychological
00:12:59.520strength that the holdout juror must have had in order to be able to withstand all of them.
00:13:07.720right? So I gave two comparisons. Number one, there's a great movie, probably my favorite
00:13:13.640movie of all time from 1957 called 12 Angry Men, where you have 12 men that go, they're jurors,
00:13:20.160and 11 of the 12 want to convict this young man, and only one holdout guy stands his ground,
00:13:26.840and then eventually he's able to flip them. And the other example I gave is that my favorite
00:13:31.760experiment of all time is one by Solomon Ash, where he showed that you can get people to flip
00:13:37.700and go against their otherwise lying eyes for examples that clearly they should not be conforming
00:13:44.660to group pressure. And so this guy, I mean, rather than worrying about all the degenerate women who1.00
00:13:50.580are saying, go, go, Lindsay Clancy, this guy should be receiving the Presidential Medal of
00:13:55.860Freedom for having the cognitive strength to hold his ground. Moral strength. Dr. Gadsad,
00:14:05.360It's always too little time with you, and I so appreciate our conversations.