The Saad Truth with Dr. Saad - February 10, 2026


Do We Have the Necessary Evidence Against Open Borders? (The Saad Truth with Dr. Saad_965)


Episode Stats

Length

5 minutes

Words per Minute

126.21197

Word Count

755

Sentence Count

29

Misogynist Sentences

1

Hate Speech Sentences

2


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode, Dr. Ghat Saad uses the Stopping threshold model of decision making to argue that open borders are a disaster, and Islamic immigration is a wonderful addition to the West. What would be the evidence you would need to see in order for you to agree?

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.280 Hi everybody, this is Ghat Saad. Some of you who follow my work might remember when I explained
00:00:07.180 my doctoral dissertation from way back in 1994. For those of you who may not remember,
00:00:14.860 my doctoral dissertation was in the area of psychology of decision making. Specifically,
00:00:20.120 it looked at how much information do you need to acquire between two competing alternatives
00:00:27.300 for you to stop acquiring additional information and commit to a choice. And so this is known as a
00:00:34.260 sequential binary choice model. And what you basically do, you have these stopping thresholds
00:00:42.820 where you accumulate evidence either in support of alternative A or alternative B until you reach
00:00:50.020 one of the two stopping thresholds. If you reach the stopping threshold of alternative A, you stop
00:00:55.520 acquiring additional information, you choose alternative A or the same thing for alternative
00:01:00.240 B. And I will put a link to an episode I had done where I had explained that work. And the power of
00:01:10.240 that doctoral dissertation, if I can speak of my own work, is that it really explains the cognitive
00:01:17.640 processes that exactly defines how people make decisions irrespective of the decisions that they
00:01:25.720 are making, whether it be choosing between prospective spouses to marry or apartments to rent or political
00:01:35.800 candidates to vote for. And I took this principle and I applied it in other contexts, in an epistemological
00:01:42.600 context, which I won't get into here. But what I wanted to do today is use that stopping threshold model
00:01:50.760 to explore how much evidence would you need to acquire before you stop and agree that the open border
00:02:02.120 policies of the West are terribly detrimental, suicidally, empathetically so, or no, they're wonderful. And so you can
00:02:11.720 acquire information, different sources of information until you either reach the threshold that tells
00:02:18.680 you open borders are a bad idea or open borders are a great idea. Now, I would posit to you that we have
00:02:27.480 certainly collected more than enough information in the order of orders of magnitude more than is needed
00:02:35.960 to suggest that the experiment has failed so much so that it has resulted in the possible death spiral of
00:02:44.520 many Western societies. But yet so many people continue to say, no, there is no such evidence or they can speak,
00:02:52.840 they, you know, they could talk away or rationalize away that evidence. So I would say to you,
00:02:58.440 you does, let's say, having hundreds of thousands of white British girls being raped in the most horrific ways
00:03:09.320 by predominantly Pakistani Muslim men in Britain, does that suggest something? Does it move you
00:03:19.160 towards one of the thresholds versus the other? The massive exponential increase in sexual assaults and
00:03:30.040 rapes throughout Western Europe stemming overwhelmingly from one group? They may come from many different
00:03:37.960 countries, but they share one thing in common. They're all co-religionist. Does that suggest that
00:03:44.920 we have some evidence? The fact that there is massive number of no-go zones in many Western cities? The fact that
00:03:55.400 civic society is slowly unraveling in countless ways, public prayers in position of certain food edicts that are
00:04:06.600 religious based on the rest of us, unique accommodations for one group, and on and on and on. The fact that I took a
00:04:19.400 two-year leave from my home university in Canada because it was becoming dangerous for me to be there. The fact
00:04:26.680 that there are now cities in the United States that are starting to exhibit the same kinds of tendencies that
00:04:34.520 you see everywhere else in Western Europe. The fact that there has been, you know, billions of dollars
00:04:41.800 stolen from Somali immigrants in the United States. They weren't Vietnamese, they weren't from Jamaica, they
00:04:49.800 weren't Nigerian, they weren't Orthodox Jews. They come from one particular mindset.
00:04:58.280 Now, I was going to actually take the time to sit and, you know, list all of the evidence that would suggest that we
00:05:09.960 crossed the stopping threshold of open borders being a disaster, a suicidal disaster. I could have done all
00:05:18.840 that, but I don't need to because rather I'd like to flip the question to you. If you are watching this clip
00:05:26.760 today and you're still someone who says, you know what, I think open borders are a fantastic idea. I think
00:05:34.920 more Islamic immigration is a wonderful addition to the West. Fair enough. What would be the evidence that you
00:05:44.280 would need to see in order for you to perhaps revisit your lovely, compassionate, and empathetic ethos.
00:05:57.960 Take care, everybody.