The Saad Truth with Dr. Saad - October 25, 2025


Gad Saad vs the Woke People on Piers Morgan (The Saad Truth with Dr. Saad_904)


Episode Stats

Length

9 minutes

Words per Minute

178.47086

Word Count

1,669

Sentence Count

119

Misogynist Sentences

7

Hate Speech Sentences

5


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Gad Saad, evolutionary behaviour scientist, takes issue with the title of my new book 'Woke Is Dead' and argues that the ideology is dying out. We also discuss the Me Too movement and its impact on masculinity.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 To another issue now, Professor Gad Saad, the evolutionary behaviour scientist, who is not woke,
00:00:04.920 but was one of the first to take issue with the name of my new book.
00:00:07.860 Gad, welcome back to Uncensored.
00:00:09.460 What is wrong with woke is dead?
00:00:13.180 Well, thanks for having me back.
00:00:14.700 I haven't read it yet, but just from the title, it's a bit presumptuous to celebrate
00:00:20.360 that all of the parasitic ideas that constitute wokeism are now eviscerated.
00:00:27.220 Well, I don't say, to be clear, I don't say this. This is more an aspirational title.
00:00:31.580 I make it clear that woke is still there. It's dying out.
00:00:35.260 And the reason I say that is you're seeing screeching reversals now around the world
00:00:40.380 in things like corporate DEI policies, in the trans issue of trans athletes and women's sport.
00:00:46.640 You know, time and again, we're seeing the reaction to things like the Graham Linehan arrest
00:00:50.100 immediately reversed by, I think, huge public opinion against it.
00:00:53.660 What you're seeing is a response now from, I believe, the majority of people who have
00:00:59.640 a common sense valve saying, we're just not having this anymore. Sorry.
00:01:03.880 So that's what I mean by, I believe the ideology is dying out, but we have to make sure it is killed
00:01:10.420 off because I do believe, genuinely, it's been very damaging.
00:01:14.720 I mean, it's undoubtedly true that there has been a bit of an autocorrection.
00:01:18.980 I mean, just having Donald Trump win the presidency resulted in immediate executive orders
00:01:25.240 that reversed many of the nonsense.
00:01:27.320 But to draw an analogy from biology, there is something called viral latency in biology,
00:01:33.480 right, where a virus can lay dormant in you for years, if not decades, before it gets activated.
00:01:40.800 Take, for example, the shingles virus, which would be relevant to people that are roughly
00:01:44.900 our respective ages. It could be in you from childhood, and then it only hits you when you're
00:01:50.140 in your 50s and 60s. So these parasitic ideas that constitute wokeism took between 50 to 100 years
00:01:58.780 to first be spawned and then proliferate from the university ecosystem. So it'll take much longer
00:02:05.460 than what you're talking about, the reversal of the DEI stuff or Donald Trump. It's going to require
00:02:11.140 many, many years of eviscerating these dreadful ideas. But yes, I am hopeful just like you are.
00:02:19.220 That's actually an insane thing to say, though, because wokeism, or whatever you want to call it,
00:02:23.500 has existed since literally when Jesus was here. Jesus was woke. I mean, that's the whole point.
00:02:28.740 Love thy neighbour, have empathy for people. And he was literally killed for speaking truth
00:02:32.960 to power. So what you're talking about is not something that's only existed for the last
00:02:36.700 just to be clear. You're implying that people who reject the wokeism are somehow against kindness
00:02:43.300 or empathy or those things. I'm not. I want people to be kind and empathetic. It's the scolding,
00:02:48.740 the vilifying, the shaming, the cancelling, the destruction. That seems to be coming from the
00:02:53.080 right towards the left, especially in the case of your book. Well, no, it doesn't, actually. If you
00:02:57.460 read the book... Well, I've read some of the book. We haven't read it all. I haven't read some of the book.
00:03:00.640 As always, you come as a limiting amount of information on which you base your statements.
00:03:06.100 Am I wrong by saying that you say that the left have basically... The Me Too movement have
00:03:10.500 basically caused men to feel like they can't flirt with women? Isn't that what you're saying?
00:03:14.240 I said, if you read the book, I say that there are a lot of bad men who've done bad things,
00:03:18.540 but actually the over-demonisation of things like masculinity...
00:03:22.440 So you're blaming the left. I've just phrased it very deliberately.
00:03:26.320 There are bad men and there are bad women, right? But there's nothing wrong with femininity
00:03:30.420 or masculinity. These are things that should be treasured and prized in a civilised free
00:03:36.100 democratic society. Coming back to Gad, I want to play a clip. This is of Lily Gaddis,
00:03:40.880 who came on to try and defend, to me, the indefensible. Let's take a look.
00:03:45.780 Would you use the N-word out of interest? Yes. You would?
00:03:50.840 I do, quite frequently. You use the N-word quite frequently. Well, why?
00:03:54.940 Other than the fact you're a despicable racist. Are you?
00:03:57.400 I... Some would say I am. I guess, according to the ADL, I'm a white supremacist. I'm a neo-Nazi.
00:04:05.200 Yeah, well, if you use the N-word repeatedly, you are a racist, are you?
00:04:09.480 Sure, I'll embrace that. If that means forwarding, you know, helping white people achieve freedom
00:04:15.100 of speech, real freedom of speech, which, by the way, includes... I mean, Shiloh Hendricks is being
00:04:19.260 attacked on all fronts. They're trying to bring legal charges against her. They're trying to get her
00:04:22.860 children taken away. So you were saying, Carmelo Anthony, it doesn't matter.
00:04:28.040 I mean, a pretty staggering thing to say on a show like this. I want to really quote Gad
00:04:33.020 from the book about this issue. I said, we're now seeing the first early murmurings of a new brand
00:04:37.700 of silliness from right-wing people who have spent years railing against all things woke.
00:04:42.700 They have very different opinions about the world, but use the woke tactical playbook to win
00:04:47.040 arguments and get what they want. You don't have to travel far on social media before you encounter
00:04:51.540 a furious, straight, white Christian man who's convinced the whole world is against him.
00:04:55.720 And I do believe that is becoming an increasing issue. In the same way that I found a lot of the
00:05:01.760 woke activists incredibly hypocritical, I also think it's very hypocritical of people on the right
00:05:06.900 to start behaving like the very people they've been criticizing for years for being hypocritical
00:05:11.960 wokies.
00:05:13.100 Right. So let me tie what you just asked with what the gentleman before mentioned about Jesus.
00:05:18.120 The idea that human minds can be parasitized has existed since time immemorial. So in that sense,
00:05:24.320 he's right. But wokeism involves a specific set of bad ideas. Two, 300 years ago, we used to think
00:05:32.160 that it was a good idea to throw a woman into a body of water. And if she swam, that meant that she
00:05:38.480 was a witch. So the capacity for human minds to be parasitized has always existed. The term
00:05:44.620 wokeism relates to specific parasitic ideas that are contemporary. Regarding your other point,
00:05:51.140 both people on the right and on the left could have parasitized minds. So for example,
00:05:56.720 when it comes to accepting evolution, it's people on the right that are against it. But when it comes
00:06:03.540 to applying evolution to the study of the human mind, it's people on the left that are against it.
00:06:08.820 So it's not a political orientation issue, although all of the parasitic ideas that constitute
00:06:16.240 wokeism do stem from the left, because all of those ideas come from the university ecosystem.
00:06:22.520 And it is largely professors on the left that inhabit the university ecosystem.
00:06:28.700 Do you believe it's dying, wokeism, as a concept, as an ideology?
00:06:32.540 Uh, not fully. So that's why I wouldn't throw the celebration parades yet. For example, in Canada,
00:06:39.540 we don't have an agent of change like Donald Trump. And so I recently had to appear in front of a
00:06:46.160 House of, you know, House of Commons committee, where I was trying to argue that it is wrong
00:06:52.880 to use DEI when judging scientific excellence. But for many of the people that serve in the Canadian
00:06:59.840 Parliament, that was, you know, blasphemous for me to say that, right? And so, yes, there is some
00:07:07.000 auto-correction taking place, but I wouldn't throw the party yet.
00:07:10.560 Donald Trump is an agent of change. What change?
00:07:13.900 Well, Donald Trump is clearly an agent of change. You may not like the change.
00:07:16.820 No, no, no. I'd like to know what the change is.
00:07:19.100 Can I offer one?
00:07:19.840 Yeah, offer again.
00:07:20.520 Not having 6'4 women with 9-inch penises that used to be called Bubba yesterday, but today
00:07:29.060 are called Linda, sharing the bathroom with my 13-year-old daughter would constitute a return
00:07:35.980 Now, can you answer the question in a non-silly way? Because I don't know anybody 6'9. Can you answer
00:07:45.040 the question in terms of what you mean?
00:07:46.800 Yeah, I've never seen a penis that long.
00:07:47.660 Yeah, and a penis that long. So can you answer it in terms of real-world things? What do you mean?
00:07:53.900 Having reversed the policy of having trans women, i.e. biological men, competing in women's sport,
00:08:04.260 until 15 minutes ago, the 117 billion people that had existed on Earth throughout human history
00:08:12.380 seemed to be able to navigate through the very difficult conundrum of what constitutes male
00:08:17.460 and female. But 15 minutes ago, we were no longer able to do that.
00:08:21.680 Well, actually, you're wrong, because there have been cultures in which they have made
00:08:27.120 definitions of what male and female are. And they're not majority cultures. They're not the
00:08:32.960 ones that we live in. But through human history, this has always been an issue. Always.
00:08:37.300 In those cultures that you're referring to, which I'm very familiar with the field of cultural
00:08:41.900 anthropology, when people decided to mate in those cultures, did they typically mate
00:08:47.960 by having two phenotypes called male and female get together?
00:08:52.380 Yeah, yes, yes. You're right. But I'm saying you're absolutely right.
00:08:55.500 So they knew what male and female was.
00:08:56.540 But you're absolutely right. But you do know as well that there were cultures in which those
00:09:02.440 two things flowed back and forth. When you're talking about procreation, of course, that's
00:09:06.560 true. But there are also definitions of male and female that went back and forth.
00:09:10.920 We're straying into actually a different area, which I want to discuss with another guest.
00:09:15.040 Gad, thank you very much indeed for joining me. I appreciate it very much. Good to have you back.
00:09:19.100 Thank you.