ManoWhisper
Home
Shows
About
Search
The Saad Truth with Dr. Saad
- December 21, 2023
Harvard University and the Cultureā§øScience Wars of the 1970s (The Saad Truth with Dr. Saad_632)
Episode Stats
Length
14 minutes
Words per Minute
128.23825
Word Count
1,853
Sentence Count
119
Hate Speech Sentences
1
Summary
Summaries generated with
gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ
.
Transcript
Transcript generated with
Whisper
(
turbo
).
Hate speech classifications generated with
facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target
.
00:00:00.180
Hi everybody, this is Gatsad. I just got back last night from speaking at the AmericaFest
00:00:10.340
2023 event, which is organized by Turning Point USA. The organization and movement that
00:00:19.560
was founded by Charlie Kirk had a great time. I talked about prescriptions for a happy and
00:00:27.140
good life. I will be posting that talk in the next couple of days once I receive it. It
00:00:36.020
was truly an incredible event in that this might have been the largest crowd that I've
00:00:42.420
ever spoken in front of live. I think the previous one was in Mexico, maybe 5,000 people, and
00:00:51.500
this one I think had quite a bit more. It was really quite something. In any case, what
00:00:58.200
I thought I would do today, what primed me to do today's episode is the ongoing stuff that's
00:01:07.520
happening at Harvard University with the president of Harvard, Claudine Gay, and some of the craziness
00:01:15.020
that's taking place at Harvard. Some of you might remember that in a recent X Spaces session,
00:01:23.440
I discussed the ranking of 248 universities on free inquiry and free speech, and as conducted
00:01:37.340
by FIRE Foundation individual rights and expression, Harvard came out last 248 out of 248. Now, I don't
00:01:50.340
mean to just pilot on Harvard, but that made me think about a very famous set of debates, part of the
00:01:59.380
greater culture wars, and certainly the science wars that took place between two opposing camps at
00:02:08.300
Harvard beginning in the 1970s. And so this is really taking me back to my scientific work in evolutionary
00:02:17.780
psychology and sociobiology. And so I wanted to introduce you to just an absolutely unbelievable book,
00:02:25.080
book, So Defenders of the Truth, by Ulika Segestrale, whom I've communicated with, and I had been meaning
00:02:36.380
to invite her on the sad truth, and I never followed up. So I definitely need to correct that
00:02:48.000
mishap or that oversight on my part. So Defenders of the Truth by Segestrale is a book, I think if I
00:02:59.900
remember, I'm going on memory, it's from 2001. I read this book, I devoured it. It talks about the wars
00:03:06.900
that were, by the way, before I go on to tell you about what it talks about, here's another book by
00:03:13.600
Segestrale. This is actually the one that I was going to invite her to Nature's Oracle, the life and
00:03:22.740
work of Bill Hamilton. Bill Hamilton is the gentleman, many people have said that he is arguably the biggest
00:03:31.760
evolutionary biologist since none other than Darwin. He came up with the mechanisms of kin selection.
00:03:40.640
Incidentally, his doctoral dissertation at the time, I think it was at Harvard, was going to be
00:03:48.800
rejected. And then eventually, the paper that arose from that doctoral dissertation, which forms the
00:03:57.860
basis of kin selection, the idea that altruistic behavior can develop, can evolve between kin, and
00:04:06.600
there's an evolutionary mechanism by which these altruistic behavior can evolve between kin, is now
00:04:14.360
known as kin selection. And it is one of the four Darwinian modules that I use when I try to explain
00:04:20.700
a wide range of consumer behavior. The survival module, the mating module, the kin selection module,
00:04:28.920
and the reciprocal altruism module, which is from Robert Trivers, one of the other great evolutionary
00:04:35.300
biologists whom I tried to get on my show, but it didn't go too well. In any case, I won't get into that.
00:04:43.180
So the reason why I'm going to talk about this is because these culture wars and science wars that
00:04:49.080
are talked about in this book, in the Defenders of the Truth, took place at Harvard. And so continuing the
00:04:58.960
long tradition of not being tolerant of opposing views, I'm going to discuss the story at Harvard.
00:05:07.020
But in any case, so also don't forget, this is the biography of Bill Hamilton, also written by
00:05:13.820
Segestrales. I would highly recommend you check it out. But let's come back to this book here.
00:05:19.200
Defenders of the Truth, it recounts the story of the battle that unfolded when E.O. Wilson,
00:05:27.640
this is the book Sociobiology. Sociobiology is the book that was written, a classic book,
00:05:34.480
the social basis basically of behavior, of which kin selection would be one such example.
00:05:41.300
It was a book that was published in 1975 by E.O. Wilson. For those of you who don't know E.O. Wilson,
00:05:47.260
I'm hitting you with a lot of books. Unbelievable. E.O. Wilson, this is called Naturalist, his autobiography.
00:05:55.920
E.O. Wilson was, of course, an entomologist at Harvard who studied social ants. He is also the one
00:06:03.080
who wrote one of my favorite books of all time. I keep mentioning it, Consilience, Unity of Knowledge.
00:06:10.400
Consilience is the idea that you can build bridges between, say, the humanities, the social sciences,
00:06:17.760
and the natural sciences, and hence create consilience between them. And it forms the basis.
00:06:23.400
So, for example, in my first academic book, The Evolutionary Basis of Consumption,
00:06:28.040
in the last chapter, I talk about how evolutionary psychology is the framework that can offer
00:06:34.380
consilience, not only to the behavioral sciences, but to consumer behavior specifically. In other words,
00:06:41.720
in order to have a unifying theory to explain human behavior, you need some meta framework that offers
00:06:51.000
you consilience, which you often have in the natural sciences, you have much less of in the
00:06:56.160
social sciences. And, of course, consilience can be achieved only through the application of
00:07:02.780
evolutionary psychology, evolutionary theory to understand human behavior. Okay? This is actually
00:07:09.120
very relevant to what happens here at Harvard back in the 1970s. And so, Consilience is a book that
00:07:16.000
you want to read by E.O. Wilson. Okay. So, let me move on. So, these are the five books that
00:07:21.120
I thought were relevant to the story. So, in Defenders of the Truth, E.O. Wilson is, after publishing
00:07:28.760
his book, Sociobiology, in 1975, the last chapter of that book takes the sociobiological approach,
00:07:39.320
which he used to explain the social behavior, the biological basis of social behavior across
00:07:47.140
countless species. And he said, oh, and here's how we could apply it to humans. This was in chapter
00:07:53.200
26, I think, the last chapter of the book. And then the world went crazy. What are you talking,
00:07:59.920
Wilson? How dare you say that biology explains human behavior? And this, as some of you who follow my
00:08:08.720
work know, became eventually known as the human reticence effect. So, that scientists, social
00:08:15.720
scientists certainly, but even natural scientists, are perfectly happy to accept that evolution explains
00:08:21.120
the behavior of every species except one species called human beings. And so, when E.O. Wilson
00:08:27.420
dared to apply the sociobiological principles to humans, that created great outrage. And many people
00:08:38.000
were irate, including, so now we come to Harvard, two of his illustrious Harvard colleagues,
00:08:45.000
there were others, but the two most famous ones were Stephen Jay Gould. Some of you may know him,
00:08:51.980
the paleontologist who wrote many best-selling books meant for the masses. He's known for his theory of
00:09:00.600
punctuated equilibria. But Stephen Jay Gould understood evolution, yet he wasn't willing to accept that it
00:09:12.100
applied to human behavior in the way that E.O. Wilson was purporting. And another one was Richard
00:09:20.920
Lewington, who was also a natural scientist, but who was a Marxist, who then thought, well, many of these
00:09:27.000
evolutionary explanations would be contrary to Marxist doctrines, and therefore, it must be defeated.
00:09:34.600
And so, of course, my entire academic career was nothing but a reflection of the fact that,
00:09:41.580
or a manifestation of the fact that many of my social scientist colleagues and people who are housed in
00:09:47.640
the business schools, you know, some economists, some organizational behavioral folks, some, you know,
00:09:53.920
consumer psychologists, some behavioral decision-making folks, all of the people in the business school
00:09:59.500
said, well, what are you talking about? You can't apply biology to study employers and employees and
00:10:04.180
consumers. You know, those folks exist outside of biology. And my entire academic career was really
00:10:11.760
fighting back against that. And it wasn't, it hasn't been easy to oftentimes publish scientific papers in
00:10:18.900
those journals, because the gatekeepers would have none of it. Well, E.O. Wilson was the OG of fighting
00:10:26.520
those battles at Harvard, where his close colleagues were completely rejecting the idea that you could
00:10:35.560
apply evolutionary thinking and sociobiology to explain human affairs. So even in the context of,
00:10:43.120
you know, scientists debating amongst themselves, he was being, you know, harassed and ostracized. And
00:10:51.200
this is, E.O. Wilson is one of the greatest scientists, you know, of the past hundred years. And yet,
00:10:59.140
his Harvard colleagues were causing him all sorts of trouble. There's a famous incident in 1978,
00:11:06.060
where he was about to speak. And some protester came and famously dumped ice water over his head
00:11:16.240
in protest of the fact that this, you know, Nazi was using biology to explain human affairs.
00:11:24.780
So again, now, of course, these dogmatic, intolerant academics are not restricted to Harvard. But this
00:11:33.640
shows you that even someone with the stellar, unblemished, extraordinary credentials and
00:11:43.520
stature of E.O. Wilson was hounded by fellow intolerant Harvard professors, all of whom, by the way,
00:11:53.620
have proven to be grotesquely wrong. They were parasitized. So the parasitic mind, which many of you
00:12:00.840
know, is a book that I wrote and published in 2020, really, the way that I was first exposed to
00:12:10.140
parasitic thinking was in the context of my academic career, where I would see these professors be
00:12:17.580
completely parasitized by these ideological pathogens that were so detrimental to logic, to reason, to
00:12:27.060
science. And so again, this is where you see it originally, where these natural scientists,
00:12:35.600
Stephen Jay Gould, Richard Lewington, and others at Harvard, were saying, no way, E.O. Wilson,
00:12:41.920
you can't use biology to explain human affairs. Leave these biological explanations for all other
00:12:49.280
species. But when it comes to anything above the neck, when it comes to explaining the human mind,
00:12:55.360
that certainly can't be due to evolution, you Nazi. So there you have it. Harvard continues its
00:13:02.500
wonderful tradition of being intolerant, even when it comes to someone as astoundingly prestigious as a
00:13:11.400
scientist as E.O. Wilson. Now imagine that Harvard has produced folks like E.O. Wilson, and now we have
00:13:21.720
President Claudine Gay, who it turns out not only has been accused now of, I think, something like 40
00:13:28.220
instances of unbelievable plagiarism. I haven't looked at the specific cases, but apparently it's
00:13:35.580
a recurring pattern of very, very grotesque plagiarism. But now it just came out a day or two
00:13:43.740
ago that even the acknowledgments, I think, in her dissertation are plagiarized. So there you have
00:13:51.440
it. You know, people think that a university's reputation is untouchable, right? Harvard is Harvard
00:14:01.240
and it can never be blemished in any way. Well, boy, are they doing a good job at proving that dictum
00:14:11.060
wrong? So there you have it, folks. Go check out, if you're interested in these incredible
00:14:16.920
scientific slash cultural war battles, this is an incredible book, Defenders of the Truth
00:14:23.240
by Seger Strale. Have a good day, everybody. Cheers.
Link copied!