The Saad Truth with Dr. Saad - December 08, 2025


Senator Rand Paul - Ophthalmology, Economic Liberty, Taxation, & Immigration (The Saad Truth with Dr. Saad_932)


Episode Stats

Length

32 minutes

Words per Minute

185.26488

Word Count

6,113

Sentence Count

12

Misogynist Sentences

5

Hate Speech Sentences

15


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) joins Dr. Carl Gregg (D-VA) to discuss the dangers of settled science and the role of pioneers in shaping American exceptionalism. Dr. Gregg is an ophthalmologist by training and the author of the new book, "Suicidal Empathy." He is also the former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom and former U.S. Senator Rand Paul's guest on the podcast.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 I'm delighted to report that I have joined as a scholar the Declaration of Independence Center
00:00:06.120 for the Study of American Freedom at the University of Mississippi. The center offers
00:00:12.300 educational opportunities, speakers, internship, and reading groups for the University of Mississippi
00:00:18.340 community. It is named in honor of the United States founding document which constitutes the
00:00:25.340 nation as a political community and expresses fundamental principles of American freedom
00:00:31.060 including in the recognition of the importance of Judeo-Christian values in shaping American
00:00:37.300 exceptionalism. Dedicated to the academic and open-minded exploration of these principles
00:00:42.720 the center exists to encourage exploration into the many facets of freedom. It will sponsor a
00:00:50.640 speaker series and an interdisciplinary faculty research team. If you'd like to learn more
00:00:56.340 about the center please visit Ole Miss that's o-l-e-m-i-s-s dot e-d-u slash independence slash
00:01:05.240 Hi everybody a couple of weeks ago I had the former prime minister of Britain. Well that was a first
00:01:11.340 today I've got the first sitting U.S. senator. Senator Rand Paul how are you doing sir?
00:01:16.120 Very good yeah we heard it was the podcast to be on so you know everybody wants to be on it you
00:01:21.800 know so. There you go uh I want to for for the three people who may not know who you are let me
00:01:27.920 just read a very short intro you're an ophthalmologist by training by the way in my forthcoming book
00:01:34.200 Suicidal Empathy you'll appreciate that I have a small section on Sir Harold Ridley uh which you'd
00:01:42.560 appreciate because I'm at one point I'm talking about this idea of the this the silliness of
00:01:47.260 settled science and of course he faced a lot of pushback when he was trying to implement his ideas
00:01:54.040 you're a Kentucky senator since 2011 you're the chair of the senate homeland security committee
00:01:59.460 uh your books include government bullies taking a stand the case the case against socialism as if we
00:02:08.160 still need to have a book to explain why socialism doesn't work and your most recent book deception
00:02:13.740 the great covet cover-up anything else you want to add senator before we get going uh but before we
00:02:19.760 leave the Harold Ridley uh that I agree with you completely I've given the same speech about settled
00:02:25.040 science so Harold Ridley uh when they take the cataract out in the old days they'd take the lens out
00:02:31.360 that was cloudy but they wouldn't put anything in its place and so you could only see with these
00:02:35.600 really thick like almost a half inch inch thick glasses that had a great deal of positive power
00:02:41.480 but they were um not great vision so he had the idea to put a plastic lens in but he thought he was
00:02:47.340 crazy the whole university world said he was insane and it'll ruin the eye now all cataract surgery is
00:02:53.600 done that way but he had to resist things but it also happened when we went from taking the cataract out
00:02:59.680 we used to make a big incision and we would sort of burp out the whole lens as one piece
00:03:04.620 after a while we started going to a much tinier incision like two millimeters and we dissolve
00:03:10.320 the lens with an ultrasound and then we roll up the lens now in like the tip of a needle and very
00:03:17.060 gently screw it in and it unravels and rolls into the eye and it's an elegant surgery but everybody at
00:03:23.260 the university said oh who needs that little incision that's crazy that ultrasound will destroy the cornea
00:03:29.040 and lo and behold these innovations a lot of times came outside of the university many of these guys
00:03:34.480 and women were private practitioners same with gallbladder surgery the universities resisted they
00:03:39.860 wanted the big incision and the small incision they said who needs that bad but you know every patient
00:03:46.060 in the world wants a small incision now because there's less pain in the recovery well i mean there
00:03:50.820 are many examples where you know a pioneer was first you know rejected by the orthodoxy but to stick
00:03:55.960 within the medical realm probably the biggest such example would be semelweiss right the the gentleman
00:04:02.020 who who said hey wait a minute maybe it's not a good idea to go do a child delivery right after we've
00:04:08.520 been working on cadavers and everybody said what kind of moron are you and now how many people have
00:04:13.400 been saved because of that insight from semelweiss who died a very tragic death senator but the great
00:04:19.600 story about semelweiss is also a story of how people are not stupid the enlightened uh philosopher
00:04:26.140 king should inform and control the public because people are stupid in that day and i think it was
00:04:31.820 in vienna right yeah so in vienna there were two hospitals there was the midwife hospital only about
00:04:36.880 one in a hundred women died after birth and at the doctor's hospital about one in five people were dying
00:04:42.580 and it had to do with the germ theory which they didn't understand they weren't washing their hands
00:04:46.680 but the midwives were never dealing with pus either and they weren't doing autopsies they were
00:04:51.300 doing only with uh with uh mothers coming into birth but the public understood this and so after a while
00:04:57.880 all the women all the moms had were choosing by the droves by popularity to go to the midwife hospital
00:05:04.980 because they heard the death rate was less yeah you currently practicing at all as an ophthalmologist or
00:05:11.400 or not at all i do some pro bono work and for years i've done some trips so i did a trip to guatemala
00:05:17.860 i did a trip to haiti i'm probably not going back to haiti six or seven years ago uh it was fairly
00:05:24.060 dangerous and one of the surgeons that went with us was a surgeon who was originally from haiti but was a
00:05:29.580 surgeon in chicago and i said will you be visiting your family and she said yes secretly at night and i said
00:05:36.520 well why do you have to visit them secretly at night because if anyone in the neighborhood heard
00:05:41.060 that i was a doctor in america and they knew my mom lived in this village they would chop her finger
00:05:46.140 off and send me her finger in the mail and say you can have your mom back for a hundred grand
00:05:50.420 uh so that was just the deplorable state of the lack of rule of law the other thing is is it was such
00:05:57.980 a depressing site they don't uh pick their trash up so some of that's a municipal function but really
00:06:03.740 who wants to live in a pigsty all of the trash was everywhere on people's front stoops all the rivers
00:06:10.140 all the lakes everything was just full of trash and uh but it was very sad so i do a little bit of
00:06:16.060 pro bono work but i've um i've done less since covid because you know i i somehow accepted that i had
00:06:22.600 natural immunity after i got sick i didn't really get sick after i had the disease and i know this is
00:06:27.860 heretical but i kind of think i didn't need a vaccine because i already got one from nature
00:06:32.280 how dare you disagree with science man himself fauci that's disgusting he is the science i don't know
00:06:39.500 what got into me that i would object to someone who thinks they are the science bad senator uh do
00:06:46.060 you miss it at all i mean do you ever sort of itch to go back into the surgery room or or this is sort
00:06:51.860 of behind you and you're now politicking all day no i do and it's it's obviously much more rewarding
00:06:57.940 uh cataract surgery is a relatively brief surgery but the rewards are enormous i mean almost
00:07:04.040 immeasurable to go from people who can't see to do what they want to do to getting mostly good vision
00:07:09.660 sometimes better vision than they've ever gotten because people who were extraordinarily nearsighted
00:07:14.840 because we take measurements to put the appropriate lens in we get rid of their nearsightedness
00:07:19.800 uh we had one gentleman that was just in in in the third world it's even more extraordinary because
00:07:26.900 their people are completely blind they come in blind and are able to see again in america and in most of
00:07:33.120 the modern world if you have a little bit of blurred of the vision where you're having a little trouble
00:07:36.900 reading or driving you'll usually have your cataracts removed but in the third world often they sit
00:07:42.340 there for years and years and i remember having one gentleman who basically was down on his knees
00:07:47.800 weeping you know just couldn't believe that he's got his vision back he you know he said he had lost
00:07:53.180 his wife lost his job he was living as a beggar and he was so excited to get his life back and all i
00:08:00.160 could say to him is what if your wife left you when you were blind maybe you choose a new wife
00:08:04.680 well now that you have your vision back happy when they get their vision back i hear you i i could keep
00:08:09.960 talking medical stuff all day but we have short limited time so i want to move to some other topics i know
00:08:15.340 that you are a big fan of the austrian school of economics i recently uh went on a deep dive i mean
00:08:21.840 i knew a lot about them already but i wanted to read the you know their biographies and so on i was
00:08:26.320 giving a talk at the university of chicago and there is a of course university of chicago school of
00:08:30.980 economics is right there milton friedman and so on and i bought you know hayek i bought the you know
00:08:36.660 the classic uh biography on von mises what was your entry point into getting to into all these guys
00:08:43.840 uh my dad you know my dad had been struck by uh the uh austrian school and his introduction was
00:08:51.660 probably uh through ayn rand ayn rand was uh personal friends with von mises personal friends
00:08:58.360 with henry uh haslett uh personal friends with murray rothbard and this group of people they all knew
00:09:04.440 each other well in new york and there are funny stories detailing their dinner parties and their
00:09:09.540 interactions but a lot of them uh became prominent after world war ii but the school really originated
00:09:17.360 in the 19th century and was a reaction to the labor theory of value and the labor theory of value said
00:09:23.680 basically that the table i'm sitting in front of is worth the labor that goes into it and so if a
00:09:29.920 capitalist comes along and sells me the table and makes 10 percent he's stolen 10 percent of that labor
00:09:35.900 from the people and this was the idea of labor exploitation this is what the the marx and ingalls
00:09:42.300 taught and lenin bought into that the workers were being ripped off based on an economic fallacy
00:09:47.980 and so then the the austrians combated that with this idea of the subjective theory of value
00:09:53.200 and uh because there are all kinds of things that didn't make sense you know why is a diamond uh worth
00:09:59.480 more than water you need water a lot more than you need a diamond and it really depends on the
00:10:04.660 circumstances if you're uh dying of thirst in the desert water is more valuable than a diamond
00:10:08.980 but it's really the marginal utility of that incremental uh additional unit but the the austrians
00:10:15.700 were big in this and i always say that the austrians should be and are famous for the refutation
00:10:20.780 of the basis of marxism and that's a pretty big deal and still should be important then there's
00:10:26.780 you know um more esoteric things but also they were very involved with the idea of uh what money
00:10:33.520 should be that money should have real backing such as gold or silver now uh i i mentioned in your in
00:10:40.040 the intro that you know it's it's disheartening to know that somebody has to write a book in 2019
00:10:44.380 on you know fighting against socialism the guys that we're mentioning had already we thought maybe
00:10:50.120 killed that that phoenix but it keeps rising now my my reasoning and you'll tell me you know if
00:10:56.720 if you agree my reasoning is that because there is sort of an infantile attraction to socialism so
00:11:04.640 that even if you kill the idea there is always going to be a new generation of imbeciles that are
00:11:10.920 going to say but wouldn't it be nice to live in a world where the elon musks don't exist like why do i
00:11:16.940 have to work so hard whereas he can make in one second more than my entire that that just seems
00:11:21.620 inherently unfair and it's easy it's almost part of our evolved emotional system to kind of repel
00:11:29.600 against that level of quote quote inequity is that why you need to write that book in 2019 and
00:11:38.340 there'll be the next guy who has to write it in 20 years and so on probably i think that uh you know
00:11:44.100 when reagan said freedom's just one generation away from being extinct i think the same could be that
00:11:49.580 socialism just one generation from popping its head up again and having to be rebuked and having
00:11:55.100 to be repudiated utopian notion that we can all have an equal amount and we can just sit around and
00:12:02.020 you know they will be ruled by philosopher kings this you know these ideas that came from plato and
00:12:08.100 from others they always have to be they always have to be repudiated and the reason we have to only not
00:12:14.400 repudiate them we have to be more skillful than the supporters of socialism because their job is much
00:12:20.340 easier the if aoc were on your program which god forbid you have her on right after me but if you
00:12:26.540 have aoc on next week she will offer all of your listeners free cars yes free college uh free universal
00:12:34.880 basic income all these things will be free you can't really there is no such thing as something for
00:12:40.300 nothing there there has to be work involved and you have to have the incentives to do it and
00:12:45.040 capitalism creates this great wealth that leads to so much wealth that we can actually take care of the
00:12:50.260 poor and the disabled but what i'm offering is an abstraction and if i'm going to try to sell you an
00:12:56.180 abstraction and they're going to sell you a free car who do you think has the easier argument they
00:13:01.520 always have the free or better argument so we have to be more articulate more complete and more
00:13:06.540 thoughtful but getting back to will the will the people be smart enough to choose opportunity or
00:13:13.260 choose a specific outcome that a perfectly fair outcome for everyone people need to be you know
00:13:20.600 extolling the amazing uh opportunity the amazing history that has come from capitalism i'm a huge fan of
00:13:28.500 this whole movement uh human progress.org is a part of cato that talks about this that talks about
00:13:35.780 things that have occurred that are factual that are irrefutable that people have no idea have
00:13:42.100 occurred and this is what's happened since the industrial revolution and you say well what is the
00:13:46.660 industrial revolution it's just a manifestation of capitalism it doesn't happen without capitalism
00:13:50.780 but because of that we went from a time period in 1820 where 98 of the people lived on two dollars a
00:13:57.660 day or less abject poverty barely bear sustenance today less than 10 percent of the world lives on
00:14:05.680 two dollars a day constant dollars so it's been an extraordinary success we are rich beyond our
00:14:10.680 wildest dreams and i i i asked this question at university so i was at brown recently in dartmouth
00:14:16.760 and a couple of the university and i say is this the best of times or the worst of times and it's
00:14:22.380 amazing how many people think we live in the worst of times and that things are getting worse and i
00:14:27.200 say no no no it's not only materially the best of times there's less racism than there's ever been
00:14:32.580 there's there's there's more interfaith interaction there's ever been there's more interracial or
00:14:38.540 interethnic interaction than there's ever been there's never ever been a better time to be alive and
00:14:43.420 it's unequivocal it's it's unimpeachable and yet these young people are like oh gosh it's so terrible
00:14:49.720 nobody likes me and because i'm of this certain ethnicity i'll never succeed in life and i'm like
00:14:55.200 get up off your ass and go out and kick some butt the world is waiting for you to go out there and
00:15:01.400 make something and be optimistic and yet we still have a lot of woe is me victimology being taught out
00:15:07.920 there well don't i know it senator i've been a professor for 32 years but i mean i think part of
00:15:12.940 the reason for that angst and you know gloom and doom that you're seeing in those students
00:15:18.040 might be because so there's an unequivocal finding which i discussed in my previous book
00:15:23.700 on happiness looking at political orientation as relating to happiness and the research is
00:15:28.920 unequivocal conservatives usually score higher on happiness than you know leftists and progressives
00:15:35.420 and my argument and you let me know what you think if you're a conservative by definition you
00:15:40.820 wake up in the morning and you say yeah i may not live in a perfect society but there are values worth
00:15:45.240 conserving and so that existentially i'm feeling good yes i can improve things but but hey i live
00:15:50.800 in the united states it's a beautiful beautiful place when i wake up as a progressive indoctrinated
00:15:57.680 at dartmouth and brown by the way i was a visiting professor at dartmouth so apologies if i'm criticizing
00:16:03.260 them uh i've been taught that just around the corner lies unicornia right this is where we if we can
00:16:10.940 only eradicate the current transphobic islamophobic sexist indigenous genocide and so on then we can
00:16:17.480 have the bliss that we're promised so i do wake up and i'm pissed off so the so your political
00:16:23.540 orientation ends up having an indelible mark on your existential happiness what do you think of that
00:16:28.820 well i think there obviously is a difference between optimism and pessimism with regard to your
00:16:33.940 your view of the world and you have to have an optimistic point of view if you think that
00:16:38.360 man women you know everybody included has the ability to achieve and attain happiness if you
00:16:45.920 think that though the world is preordained and that fate is this and and particularly if you think
00:16:51.760 because of who you are that the world doesn't like you and you'll never get ahead i i think it to me
00:16:58.180 it's um um it is optimism versus pessimism it's definitely chosen and i think it's it's it's worth
00:17:06.260 trying to point out what a great world we live in i mean these people who are so stern and drag we live
00:17:12.720 twice as long as we lived a hundred years ago we can buy 10 times as much food clothing costs one
00:17:19.840 one hundredth of what it used to cost when when when the automated loom came and the luddites were
00:17:25.860 smashing the loom with the with the hammers they were like this it'll never work all the weavers all
00:17:31.560 the hand weavers would be out of business in those days you had one set of clothing now we have 50
00:17:37.040 sets of clothing you know but so many clothes so they can't really anticipate this world but
00:17:41.880 that pessimism has always been wrong but i think to me it's important to acknowledge not only this
00:17:48.480 this progress this optimism is great wealth but where it came from this is why i'm forever saying
00:17:54.560 it isn't make america great again or even canada we can make canada great too if you want to talk
00:18:00.040 about canada but it's really what made us great in the first place and we were made great by capitalism
00:18:06.240 but we are also made made great by a portion of capitalism which is nothing different than
00:18:12.820 capitalism but is an integral part of capitalism and that is trade and the people who do not
00:18:18.100 understand that and think that we can banish international trade and somehow be rich
00:18:22.600 uh are really mistaking what capitalism is got you uh one specific question related to you know
00:18:30.600 finances then maybe one or two about sort of the existential existential threats facing the united
00:18:36.800 states and the west and then we'll wrap it up with maybe one or two uh quick personal questions
00:18:41.240 paris i call it parasitic taxation uh you may just call it heavy taxation now let me uh contextualize
00:18:50.320 you guys in the united states consider that you're heavily taxed if let's say you're in california
00:18:55.640 you haven't lived in quebec so in quebec it is by the way do you know off the top of your hand what if
00:19:02.120 you combine the two taxes federal and provincial what it would at the higher end what it would be at
00:19:06.520 do you know what it is no uh so at the highest level i think federal is 33 percent at the highest
00:19:14.080 provincial it's 25 percent so at the higher bracket yes it's a progressive tax you're you're getting
00:19:20.400 up to almost 60 percent but then what's left with you if you spend it your tax your double taxed sales
00:19:27.760 both provincial and federal so then you're getting killed another 15 percent if you add up all the other
00:19:34.240 taxes carbon tax and school tax and property tax so on you're probably left at around 30 cents to the
00:19:41.600 dollar so that let's put it another way from january till about end of august i am a full slave i i have
00:19:50.320 no personhood starting end of august i become a dignified individual now of course i always knew
00:19:58.080 about this but i particularly felt that senator when the parasitic mind my 2020 book became an international
00:20:04.880 bestseller the quebec and canadian government said hey you know we know that 99 of your book
00:20:11.120 royalties were not garnered in canada but can you please give us 58 of your book royalties
00:20:17.600 the level of existential rape that i felt is unimaginable i probably walked for about a month
00:20:24.720 unclear what had just happened to me can we ever hope senator to get to your flat tax i think is it 14
00:20:32.000 or 15 or is this a pie in the sky dream and it's only going to get worse forevermore well that is an
00:20:39.040 important question is it inevitable that people will give up and just want other people's stuff
00:20:43.360 you know um but they you know as thatcher said ultimately socialism will run out of other people's
00:20:48.240 money but i will say there are examples of people being fed up with it in sweden they had a big wealth
00:20:54.160 tax and all of the rich people vjorn borg the founder of ikea all these people left sweden and they
00:21:01.120 finally reversed it and gave them incentives to come back and as much as sweden is extolled as a socialist
00:21:07.440 sort of paradise by bernie sanders and others it's a high tax welfare state but they actually made some
00:21:12.880 accommodations and interestingly in sweden it they taxed the heck out of the middle class but they're
00:21:18.480 actually less progressive than canada or the us we are very very progressive in our taxation in the us
00:21:24.480 and ours has become more because what we're doing is in order to get some rate cuts they let they leave
00:21:30.480 people off the bottom so really you may if you're a family of four in the united states uh mother
00:21:36.640 father and two kids uh up to fifty thousand dollars you pay no income tax so everybody under fifty
00:21:42.160 thousand dollars with two kids is no income tax so ours is really heavily graded and they all complain oh
00:21:48.160 the rich one percent is one percent that well the top one percent uh i think have like pay forty percent
00:21:55.280 of the income tax so it's always the opposite of what they tell you when bernie says the rich are
00:21:59.840 not paying their fair share just think the opposite the rich are paying more than their their fair share
00:22:06.400 um but it's a continual battle like anything else because envy is an easy emotion to sell uh like
00:22:13.360 nationalism or other things like that it's easy to sell that and we have to argue that there is a great
00:22:19.840 deal of mobility is one of the biggest arguments so when we you know um pickety and others put forward
00:22:26.480 that there's no income mobility and it slows down the economies all crash all of that's complete bunk
00:22:32.480 and the statistics have been refuted uh many of the cato scholars have talked about income distribution
00:22:38.320 one interesting fact would be the people make a million dollars this year as an income a million that's
00:22:43.760 a lot of money next year sixty percent of them won't make a million of the people in the top uh born into
00:22:49.520 the bottom 20 percent uh 20 of them make it to the top 20 so we really have more mobility and and
00:22:56.640 people have to understand if you if you move to cuba there's a top one percent but the top one percent
00:23:01.600 in cuba are the ones that are brother to the leader cousin to the leader or general for the leader it's
00:23:07.440 the same way in venezuela maduro a few generals and and north korea there are no fat people except for
00:23:14.880 kim jong-un he's the only fat person in north korea every soldier you see is like you know five nine and
00:23:21.360 one hundred and five pounds uh kim jong-un is four nine and 250 pounds and uh but there there's always
00:23:29.360 a top one percent and it's not perfect to the top one percent is some people inherit it some will be
00:23:35.120 lucky and be six foot eleven and a great basketball player and some will earn it because they had a
00:23:40.800 electrical company and worked hard or were a writer this and that but the bottom line is in a free
00:23:46.320 society it is more based on merit than any other society capitalism bases wealth and reward on work
00:23:54.560 and on merit better than any other system ever known to man amen uh i know that there's a million
00:24:01.840 different things that keep you up at night as a senator but if i asked you the singular greatest
00:24:07.840 existential threat that most keeps you up at night regarding the united states i've got my
00:24:14.720 my answer ready locked and loaded to be deployed but i'll first want to hear what yours is and then
00:24:19.840 i'll share mine what would it be i wouldn't say this keeps me awake at night but i think the biggest uh
00:24:26.240 danger to the world is always nuclear war and i know we don't talk about that very much but uh you
00:24:32.880 know there's a new movie and it isn't the greatest movie of all but it goes through sort of this
00:24:37.520 countdown towards a missile launch and what happens and the idea that the decisions have to be made
00:24:43.040 within minutes and so one thing i've tried to do and you know people can have complaints about what
00:24:48.320 i've done or not done is that i've tried to make sure we have uh the cell phones of people in china
00:24:54.800 the cell phones of people in russia you have an icbm is headed from one continent to the other of 18 minutes
00:25:02.400 to try to figure out was this an accident is this a satellite gone awry is there something and one
00:25:09.280 of the choices is launching a thousand uh icbms at russia or at china and then they do the same thing
00:25:16.000 and the the whole world is destroyed in a nuclear war we've avoided that for so long that people like
00:25:21.600 yeah no big deal but that's why i still want conversations discussion of nuclear uh armaments uh
00:25:30.400 i think it's important that we have a lot of different phone numbers that we can call in that
00:25:35.280 18 minutes to try to make sure that there wasn't an accident that caused this and um that i think is
00:25:42.320 is pretty important so war i consider to be a very much a federal job and a job that my job is to try
00:25:48.560 to prevent us from being in war if possible can i offer another thing that should keep you up at night
00:25:54.080 if it doesn't oh i don't need to step a knife go ahead well uh so i are i agree that nuclear war
00:26:01.920 would be sort of a cataclysmic event that would result in a mass extinction event in in four seconds
00:26:09.040 but if you have a longer view or if i can use the the vision uh analogy of you know as long as you don't
00:26:15.840 have temporal myopia and you look over the long term demography is destiny right i'm not the first to say
00:26:22.160 this if you allow entry into the west of millions of people who literally couldn't be any more
00:26:31.600 antithetical to the foundational principles of the west in general and the united states in particular
00:26:38.160 you don't need a fancy professor sad evolutionary behavioral scientist to then tie the dots for you
00:26:44.720 that you're only going to end up having problems so what you see with the somalis and yes
00:26:49.120 there are infinitely many beautiful somalis and what you see with the afghan and so on
00:26:53.360 they do have something in common which is they they stem from a religion that while there may be
00:26:58.880 millions of people who practice it peacefully they practice it despite what the religion says right
00:27:06.240 so right now we have dearborn michigan dearborn michigan is a small manifestation of what would happen
00:27:13.200 if you continue along the same immigration patterns there will be two dearborn and then seven dearborn
00:27:19.280 and then 94 dearborn and then you will live the childhood that i lived where we had to wear really
00:27:24.640 good running shoes and run really fast so that the bad guys would not decapitate us do you share those
00:27:30.960 sentiments or are you more hey they can come to the us and they'll be assimilated and we have kumbaya
00:27:36.960 forevermore so i have uh opposed the special visa program um the somali program i think happened before
00:27:44.080 i was here but i would have opposed the special visas for somalis uh i have opposed and was here
00:27:50.000 during the afghan national program we've admitted over 200 000 and i gave a pointed speech on the floor
00:27:57.680 and my point was is that afghanistan needs their own thomas jefferson they need their own george washington
00:28:05.920 who is most likely to be the next george washington of afghanistan someone who knows western ways and
00:28:12.400 speaks english and has been knows of the world's culture we are decapitating a country the intellectual
00:28:20.240 potential of afghanistan the best of afghanistan and bringing them all here and you're right maybe
00:28:25.760 they don't assimilate here because of the religion but even more important to me is they needed to
00:28:30.800 remain to me it's equivalent to 1812 the british are back and it's a terrible place we lose 15 000
00:28:37.200 americans so the americans say oh can we have asylum in france you didn't hear of americans wanting to
00:28:42.880 leave for france no we start we we fought the british again we made them go to canada you know again
00:28:48.320 a an opponent of immigration but i think immigration should be based on merit and should be individualized
00:28:54.880 and i wouldn't prohibit people of a certain religion from coming but if there are countries like we
00:29:00.800 admitted all the somalis and then we admitted all of their relatives and it's like i don't know
00:29:04.800 there's several hundred thousand of them in minnesota now in one place and um you know the
00:29:10.320 other thing you can do to try to prevent them from becoming a reservation is uh we shouldn't allow
00:29:16.880 welfare so we have a rule in the united states you're not supposed to get welfare in the first five
00:29:21.360 years of immigration well except unless you're a refugee so all these special visa people were
00:29:27.920 refugees and they're immediately put on welfare well some of them are still on welfare 20 years
00:29:32.480 later and that's the big scandal they've just found in minnesota is people you know running these
00:29:37.680 fraudulent schemes to steal uh money from the government programs so i have less of a problem if
00:29:44.480 not if people are not on the dole and if it's based on merit and i would try to get away from bulk
00:29:49.360 immigration of uh huge populations all at once because i think there isn't an assimilation there
00:29:56.560 ends up being a uh sort of enclaves is there a critical mass of fellow senators that are you know
00:30:04.960 are falling in line with you in terms of what you're saying or are you sort of the lone wolf and
00:30:09.440 we're just going to keep it as is for the foreseeable future i would say donald trump agrees with me and
00:30:15.360 i think ran on that proposition the problem in the republican caucus is that there are many in the
00:30:20.480 republican caucus that are also really um more of the neoconservative variety more in favor of foreign
00:30:28.400 war they loved the iraq war and they loved the afghan war even more they loved being there they loved
00:30:34.800 you know spreading democracy and spreading freedom around the world and that they feel some sort of an
00:30:40.720 obligation to all these people but one there wasn't 200 000 freaking interpreters that's ridiculous
00:30:47.200 but they feel this obligation to those people i think it actually hurts afghanistan i don't think
00:30:52.560 it's good for our country to bring in 200 000 people at once from afghanistan but it also hurts them
00:30:57.840 they are probably uh some of the better people that could lead afghanistan once they're all gone who's
00:31:05.040 left the the people who want to chain up women or boys or whatever they do the the the the the war
00:31:12.400 mongers the drug dealers all the other people that ran afghanistan before if the good people leave so i
00:31:17.920 think it was always a big mistake and i argued it but there were many republicans uh who opposed me on
00:31:23.040 this last question because i want to be mindful of your time and then we could say quickly goodbye offline
00:31:29.360 in your career so far as a politician is there anything that has uniquely surprised you either
00:31:35.920 in the positive or negative about human nature probably in the negative is that one uh so much
00:31:44.080 of the decisions made are made by unelected bureaucrats the uh bureaucracy is so enormous that it dwarfs the
00:31:51.360 legislature part of that's because the legislature is wimpy weak and lacks ambition but uh the bureaucracy
00:31:58.480 sort of runs the place the other thing that's disappointed me is i see so many business groups
00:32:03.200 who come and they want to be regulated but they want to be regulated as rent control as uh you know if
00:32:09.920 you're uh a big bank in new york they love banking regulation they come and lobby for it why because joe's
00:32:17.040 bank in peoria uh uh doesn't have the ability to keep up with compliance so when joe's bank can't uh
00:32:24.320 uh absorb and and uh surpass the the cost of the regulations the big bank in new york buys the bank
00:32:32.240 of peoria so the fact that business likes regulation as an impediment to small business and the big
00:32:38.480 business and big banks get bigger because of regulations they support which is not capitalism
00:32:43.920 which is corporatism and cronyism uh that also is shocking and disappointing hey senator will you come
00:32:51.840 back when you have a bit more time so we can continue this conversation absolutely we'll do it again
00:32:56.400 thank you sir stay on the line so we could say goodbye